Feb 25, 2009 4:55pm

President Obama’s Health Care Reserve Fund

A White House official tells ABC News that in his budget tomorrow President Obama will introduce a $634 billion health care reserve fund dedicated towards health care reform (They acknowledge it will cost more than this, likely one trillion over the next decade, and they will seek additional funds from Congress).

Approximately half of the funding, the official says, will come from improved efficiencies in Medicare and Medicaid: 

  • expanding the Hospital Quality Improvement Program (saving, according to the Obama administration $12 billion over 10 years);
  • improving Medicare and Medicaid payment accuracy;
  • reducing drug prices by allowing more generic drugs on the market;
  • bringing down the drug costs of Medicaid by increasing the drug rebate for brand-name drugs from 15.1 percent to 22.1 percent of the average manufacturers price;
  • reducing Medicare overpayments to private insurers through competitive payments (saving $175 billion over 10 years); and
  • incentivizing better health care that reduces lowering readmission rates (saving $26 billion over 10 years).

The other half of the $634 billion, the official says, would come from reducing the itemized deduction rate for families with incomes over $250,000, limiting it to 28 percent. The administration anticipates raising $318 billion over 10 years from this step.

The administration is setting as its priorities for health care reform guaranteeing choice, making health cover affordable, protecting families’ financial health, investing in prevention and wellness, providing portability for coverage, improving patient safety and quality care, and maintaining long-term fiscal sustainability.

The administration says it will "aim" for universality.

– jpt

User Comments

Didn’t they just reduce the # of uninsured children by MILLIONS by putting in that new plan by which families earning $80,000 or less can get free health insurance or free health care for children?
So wouldn’t the 48 million number now be too high?
And does that number still include illegals?

Posted by: Peach | February 25, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

How do the numbers work out on this?
1 in 50 households make over $250,000/year
There are 111,162,259 households in the US
So (unless I’m mistaken) 2,223,045 households make over $250,000/year
The trust fund will be $634,000,000,000.
So the new burden on the households will average $285,194.41
or if it’s half, $142,597 additional tax burden per household
Is that right? Please tell me I’m wrong.

Posted by: MayBee | February 25, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Oh wait. Over 10 years.
So between $14,000 and $28,000 additional taxes per year per household.

Posted by: MayBee | February 25, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

So President O is not only going to let the Bush tax cuts expire, but further increase the burden on the upper 2% by limiting deductions.

Posted by: John F. | February 25, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

I would like to remind President Obama that all of his “salad days” stories – the bad car, the small condo, the struggling to pay student loans, the worry about college costs for their kids– he was making about $250,000 himself then.
He sure doesn’t talk like he felt so very flush then.
Tim Geithner avoided paying his taxes when he was making about that much.
Joe and Jill Biden made about that much and declared his net worth to be $100,000-$150,000.
How much does he think he can squeeze a few million people?

Posted by: MayBee | February 25, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Are we in some kind of bad dream here?
The Obama administration thinks 10 billion in pork is nothing–200 million for tatoo removal is nothing.
And Americans don’t care about wasteful spending anyway.
But oh that $13 a week taxpayers get is a lot of money. It will stimulate the economy–and will save us.
And to BO’s supporters all of this is fine and makes perfect sense.
Obama is America’s worst nightmare.

Posted by: harry | February 25, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Stocks Sink as Obama Address to Congress Fails to Wow Wall Street.
+++++++++
What a surprised! When was the last time Stocks did not sink as PB0 speaks?
Honestly, the best solution our Smartest Clueless Leader can offer to the country is simply shut the you-know-what up, and this is by no means intended to be disrespectful of the commie.

Posted by: kat | February 25, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

I don’t know why any ambitious young person would support Obama. He punishes those who aim high–taking almost 60% of their income.
His new generation of slacker supporters don’t worry about Obama’s pork spending.
They either don’t pay their taxes or aren’t required to pay.

Posted by: sammy | February 25, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

“I don’t know why any ambitious young person would support Obama. He punishes those who aim high–taking almost 60% of their income.”
Why do right wingers just make things up?
The top marginal tax rate isn’t within 20 pts of 60%.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

We have $30 million for Nancy Pelosi’s harvest mouse yet we still have to raise taxes?

Posted by: drjohn | February 25, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Peach, maybee- you’re asking pesky details-remember it is how he says it not what he means.
Perhaps he is planning on millions more of us making in excess of 250k (wink wink).

Posted by: david | February 25, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

The top marginal tax rate isn’t within 20 pts of 60%.
We’re getting close. Wait ’til next week when we get the “poor people need a Rolls Royce” tax.

Posted by: drjohn | February 25, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

What’s the difference between PB0 and a previous Prez?
B vs. M in dollars when it comes to spending. It’s just a factor of 3, in logarithmic scale, base 10.

Posted by: two cats | February 25, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

This is unbelieveable! With the way the economy is going how many people are really left making that much money and if you are on the cusp of making that kind of money it’s going to work out better for that individual to make less. You will be “richer” if you make slightly less than 250k than the one who makes the 250k.
WOW! Great incentive to excellence.

Posted by: Tim | February 25, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

You make this so easy.
House Republicans are challenging Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s claim that the massive stimulus spending bill contains no pet projects after uncovering in the bill more than $30 million for wetlands conservation in her San Francisco Bay area district, including work she previously championed to protect the salt marsh harvest mouse.
Wash Times, 2/11/09

Posted by: drjohn | February 25, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

It is nice to know that the majority of the comments here, so far, come from those with the minoritry of opinion. It gives me confidance in America again.
Thank God.

Posted by: Thinking | February 25, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Obama continues to prevaricate. If someone is retired, earning less than $250K in dividends and capital gains, do you believe their taxes are not going up?

Posted by: deanbob | February 25, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

great!!!! funy how republicans didnt bat an eyelash when bush added 5 trillion to national debt..and most of taht was war related,yet the gop is haveing a cow that we are gonna help commom people.

Posted by: T | February 25, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Dr john you think citing the Moonie Times equals proof?
ROFLMAO!
Politifact
“So Pelosi did not put an earmark in the bill to save the mice. In fact, there’s no money in the bill for mice. For this reason, we rate Pence’s remark False.”

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Some of you really need a reality check. My mother was born here, so were her parents and so on. She has worked hard, three jobs at times for most of her life. She is without healthcare, making below the poverty level and she is almost 60. She is literally choking to death because no doctor of hospital will see her without healthcare and she makes 100 dollars too much to receive any county assistance. wait until it’s you or someone you love who has never abused the system or used it for that matter and you have to watch them DIE right before you when there is care and medicine to help them. Tell me about fair then.

Posted by: without | February 25, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

“We’re getting close. Wait ’til next week when we get the “poor people need a Rolls Royce” tax.”
We’re getting close to 60% because Obama proposing returning the top rate to 39%.
Okey dokey.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

prevaricate… great word, and very true. We actually have been talking about me not working anymore and my husband cutting back on his hours. Why would we work for others who have been lazy or foolish. Did you know illegals here in this country will be able to benifit from the home bail out? Disgusting

Posted by: Mags | February 25, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

So everyone who is poor is “lazy” or “foolish” – get real! I bet your “maid” and your “gardener” love making the pittance you pay them because they are so expendable. The reality is that there are a lot of haves and they don’t give a dang about those who work hard and have none of the advantages they do.

Posted by: without | February 25, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

The reason I’m against government social programs, including health care is the money always go to the same people. People that never work themselves out of their situation. Then when someone in the middle class needs a temporary fix the door is slammed in their face.

Posted by: jon | February 25, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

WHERE IS ALL THIS MONEY COMING FROM?

Posted by: Why are we in this handbasket? | February 25, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Ryan C We already are Ryan depending on where you live, we live in a totally democrat run city of Baltimore and when you count in sales tax, property tax, state and city on top of Federal we are working over 7 months out of the year to pay our taxes. This is disgusting. We live in a city of entitlement and only 25% pay taxes and 75% consume taxes.

Posted by: Mags | February 25, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

As usual, a Democrat seeks to penalize people who have worked hard to achieve the American Dream. If it were you earning $250,000.00 a year, instead of whatever you earn now, would you happily wish to be penalized for your hard work? Most people who earn this amount of money have worked hard for it, gone to college and in many cases, have student loans to repay for their higher education. What is the incentive for people to excel in our country under Obama’s plan? The man continues to promote his socialist values even as we speak.

Posted by: Lisa Again | February 25, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

without- I agree we can do better in this country with regards to health care. It is expensive to buy insurance, and often too easy to lose.
you said: My mother was born here, so were her parents and so on. She has worked hard, three jobs at times for most of her life. She is without healthcare, making below the poverty level and she is almost 60.
=======
Have you considered paying for a health care insurance policy for your mother?

Posted by: MayBee | February 25, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

“The top marginal tax rate isn’t within 20 pts of 60%.”
With a top rate of 39.6%, plus 7.65% soc. sec. and medicare tax (for which Pres O has plans to lift the cap), plus up to 9% state income tax (see IA, RI, VT) you are up to 56%. Granted “he” doesn’t take all 56%, but the taxpayer still has to pay it.

Posted by: John F. | February 25, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Posted by: jon | Feb 25, 2009 6:06:02 PM
It has been proven that social programs create dependancy. Google this The Cloward-Piven Strategy, Part I,2,3 Manufactured Crisis

Posted by: Mags | February 25, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

This means less healthcare benefits to medicare patients. Obama wants another trillion dollars. He is spending money we don’t have. we will never recover from this fools administration.

Posted by: CW | February 25, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Considered paying for my mother’s insurance? Yes, I considered it. Except that I make not much more than she does. I live in a house that’s falling down and am terminally ill with less than a year to live.
Does that matter? No! Because no insurance will take her because she’s ill and 60! THey don’t have to cover her.

Posted by: without | February 25, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

I am a nurse and have worked since 1968. If this goverment wants to reform the healthcare, lets start by limiting the number of visits to the emergency room that so many medicaid patients abuse. If they need pain meds, they go to the local ER. Does anyone out there monitor that at all? I work in a clinic and see how they abuse the benefit of healthcare. Wake up and smell the roses Obama. And yet people who make less than $30,000 can’t even afford to pay for their own insurance, they can’t afford the rates. Give me a break, where is their free healthcare, endless visits and meds paid for?

Posted by: Mary | February 25, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Mags | Feb 25, 2009 6:03:35 PM…in addition to the illegal supports, Obama wants to send $900 M to Gaza.

Posted by: deanbob | February 25, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

agree you need to google this info
The Cloward-Piven Strategy, Part I,2,3 Manufactured Crisis

Posted by: Mags | February 25, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

This means less healthcare benefits to medicare patients. Obama wants another trillion dollars. He is spending money we don’t have. we will never recover from this fools administration.
Posted by: CW
___________________________________
I guess he doesn’t care that medicare patients have to pay 20% out of pocket for their medical bills WITH NO MAXIMUM OUT OF POCKET COST!
How much out of pocket costs do medicaid patients have? I guess that is why they call it the redistribution of wealth.
I guess it doesn’t matter that you have contributed a lifetime for these benefits.

Posted by: Tim | February 25, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

No, MayBee, don’t you see? We’re going to “print” our way out of the situation. When we fall short of the funds, Obama’s going to ring the Treasury and say “Print me out a few tril!” And then, inflation is going to go out the roof!

Posted by: danjapan77 | February 25, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Dr Levine has spoken often of Rules For Radicals. But I’m not familiar with The Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis. Thank you for the reference.

Posted by: deanbob | February 25, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

“The Cloward-Piven Strategy”
ROFLMAO!
Make sure you have two layers of copper in that tin foil hat mags!

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

: John F. You know John I think he will raise it above 39.6%. I am so sick of listening to him say we need to take from the wealthy which is far from wealthy were we live. He on the other hand is a multi millionaire, and his cabinet are all tax cheats

Posted by: Mags | February 25, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I fear for the future of our country. When the bills come due, who will have an incentive to work? Why would anyone risk their savings to start a new business that creates jobs if you will be penalized by our government for your successes. Our country has serious issues that are not getting better with the new administration, just costing more.

Posted by: jim 234 | February 25, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Time to start working less hours to get the income under $250K. Hey, with free health care, maybe I won’t work at all. One thing I know for sure – I’m not paying for this socialist cr*p while others sit on their fat b*tts and watch Jerry Springer.

Posted by: Samuel | February 25, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

“As usual, a Democrat seeks to penalize people who have worked hard to achieve the American Dream. If it were you earning $250,000.00 a year, instead of whatever you earn now, would you happily wish to be penalized for your hard work?”
Obama allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire on those making over 250K is not new and something he campaigned on heavily.
Obama won by 7% over McCain with individuals earning over 200k.
Obama won by 8% over McCain with individuals with the most college education.
Lisa Again, it is not a penalty, it’s a privilege to be able to be successful, live, work and be educated in the greatest country in the world.

Posted by: Paige | February 25, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Amen Samuel , that’s why socialism never works for very long

Posted by: Mags | February 25, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Time to start working less hours to get the income under $250K. Hey, with free health care, maybe I won’t work at all. One thing I know for sure – I’m not paying for this socialist cr*p while others sit on their fat b*tts and watch Jerry Springer.
Posted by: Samuel
______________________________________
But Samuel, Obama wants you to be “neighborly.”
This is going to be a nighmare.

Posted by: Tim | February 25, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

“Time to start working less hours to get the income under $250K.”
ROFLMAO!
You guys are hilarious that you think earning less than $250K will mean you bring home more than if you earned more than $250K.
It shows a lack of understanding on how taxes work.
And it makes it all the likelier that you aren’t making close to $250K.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Obama wants to “spread the wealth” at the rate he is going there isn’t going to be any wealth to spread.

Posted by: CW | February 25, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

“when Palin made a TRUE comment about being able to see Russia from her state the ripped her to shreads”
No, she claimed to be on the lookout for Putin’s incursions into US airspace when she had ZERO responsibility when it comes to national defense.
Though SNL summed her up nicely as the babbling idiot that can see Russia from her house.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Reagan: 81-86: Highest Margin Tax rate: 50%.
Obama: Proposed Highest Margin Tax rate: 39%.
I’m so tired of the GOP “complaining” about taxes when their messiah crushed the wealthy with a 50% burden.
LMAO!

Posted by: Jason | February 25, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

“I’m so tired of the GOP “complaining” about taxes when their messiah crushed the wealthy with a 50% burden.”
Nicely done Jason.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

This is nothing but socialism. You’ve all been had.

Posted by: Ryan | February 25, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Reagan reduced the top tax rate from 50% to 28%.

Posted by: MayBee | February 25, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

I hope that this plan accounts for things like inflation, population increases, imperfect execution of processes, and loss of productivity resulting from increased taxes and welfare.
They seem to think that just because there are no taxes, there isn’t a cost associated with spending money. When we have 5% annual inflation rates, cutting the cost of money in half each decade, you end up paying for it in the long run.
GDP is around 16 trillion. 700B for banks + 700B stimulus + 600B for healthcare totals at 2 trillion dollars. If you calculate inflation from just that, excluding the normal market multipliers, you get 12.5% inflation from those spending packages alone.
Inflation = (18 billion / 16 billion – 1) * 100% = 12.5%

Posted by: jol | February 25, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Ryan C | Feb 25, 2009 6:22:27 PM….did you even Google the subject (much less read it)?

Posted by: deanbob | February 25, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

“did you even Google the subject (much less read it)? ”
The secret marxist plot to takeover the US?
Make sure you get those tow layers of copper!
Can’t stop the mind control beams without the copper!

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Mags | Feb 25, 2009 6:42:23 What was the highest tax rate when Reagan took over from Carter? I think it was 70%?

Posted by: deanbob | February 25, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I think Americians should demand the kind of healthcare these government workers have. They are trying to shove something down our throats that will effect ALL of us. Do you like the Doctor you have now? Well, they might not be in business after this administration get through with them.

Posted by: T | February 25, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

They’re starting at nearly 634Billion and going up from there?? I don’t mind the people getting health care, but I sure don’t want our govt to control it.

Posted by: DJ | February 25, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

THE OB Spending Score board:
TARP = 700 B
Stimulas = 787 B
Next promised Stimulas = 1 trillion
Proposed Health care scam = 650+ B
Hillary is in China borrowing the 3 trillion as we speak. George Soro’s should be very happy. Watch GM go to China in debt exchange. The money saved by gutting the military, which is sure to happen, will not come close to paying off Chinese debt. Guess where it will come from? Killer tax increases
for the higher wage earners. He and George Soros are right on plan.

Posted by: ZZ | February 25, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

“I think Americians should demand the kind of healthcare these government workers have. They are trying to shove something down our throats that will effect ALL of us.”
I agree.
Which is why I hope Obama follow thru on his plan (which was also part of Clinton’s & Edwards’ plans) to open up the insurance plan enjoyed by Congressional members to everyone.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Per wkipedia: Fascism is a radical authoritarian nationalist ideology focused on solving economic, political, and social problems that its supporters see as causing national decline or decadence.

Posted by: deanbob | February 25, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

“Fascism is a radical authoritarian nationalist ideology focused on solving economic, political, and social problems that its supporters see as causing national decline or decadence.”
Thanks deanbob so I guess we now know where right wingers who blame minorities and liberals for ruining America are coming from.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Obama and that gaggle of lunatics he drug in with him are destroying the country. Keep the maintenance up on your lawnmowers because soon you’ll be eating grass.

Posted by: rplat | February 25, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Ok enough is enough. Obama is tying to make the US a Socialist heaven. In 2010 we can reverse all the damage he is doing.

Posted by: brian | February 25, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

“I think Americians should demand the kind of healthcare these government workers have. They are trying to shove something down our throats that will effect ALL of us.”
I agree.
Ryan C wrote: “Which is why I hope Obama follow thru on his plan (which was also part of Clinton’s & Edwards’ plans) to open up the insurance plan enjoyed by Congressional members to everyone.”
————————————–
Insurance plans for government employees are not free. Government employees pay monthly premiums that a lot people with lower incomes will still not be able to afford.

Posted by: Global Fraud!! | February 25, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

“Insurance plans for government employees are not free.”
No of course not.
“Government employees pay monthly premiums that a lot people with lower incomes will still not be able to afford.”
It is one of the public plan options Obama discussed during the campaign.
I have not seen it made part of this particular plan as of yet.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

China just told the US to stop spending so much….. or they will no longer buy our t-bills. Obama better be carefull, unless he’s planning to cause a depression??

Posted by: for sure | February 25, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I’m glad to see Obama beginning to deal with the health care problem. Health care costs underlie the whole economy. They are a large part of the government deficit, the struggles of employers, and the devastation happening to families.
Obama is right. We have avoided facing major problems like exponentially rising health care costs and the whole Medicare entitlement, and now the jig is up. We have to face the problems and solve them. I thank God for his vision and willingness to try to do very difficult things.

Posted by: JAB | February 25, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

I have to give the President Obama praise for that he is a good preacher. I guess Rev. Wright did teach something and now most are buying what he is preaching.

Posted by: T | February 25, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

i am tired of arguing with liberals who simply fail to realize we don t have this money even if you taxed people at a 100% rate. i want health care for everyone but you cant do bullet trains and windmils or acorn or housing. the man is a lawyer. i have more education than mr obama…dude you need some serious help.
mr obama said income tax will not go up unless you make over 250k. he failed to mention that in his own proposed tax bill social secuirty taxes will rise from a cap at 106k right now to 250k. the rate of tax is 15.3%. if you make 249,000 not 250k…your social security tax just went up 20,000.dont tell abpout his zero taxes.

Posted by: catman | February 25, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Isn’t it funny how even the liberal bloggers don’t say ‘raise taxes’, which is how B.O. will pay for PART of his national healthcare plan.

Posted by: SRose | February 25, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

So again, the Rich can afford it, the poor will be taken care of. What about us in the middle? Of course I do think I heard him say during his first term, as if he KNOWS he’s going to make it to a second? They can’t pick out a dog, but they sure can spend spend spend……I pray to God I am wrong….

Posted by: kab4usa | February 25, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

I think those who make $250,000 get double wacked, first, their top bracket will increased to 39%, next, their deductions will be further limited, what’s next? They will be rounded up and..

Posted by: scott | February 25, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Obama is going to cut the military to nothing, and we are going to get terror attacked repeatedly…and he is going to jack taxes on the entire working class.

Posted by: PresGov | February 25, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Socialist always lie about taxing the rich, but then they increase spending and tax the working class to death. It’s coming.

Posted by: PresGov | February 25, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

i would like to see a huge tax on republican Whine…. now that would solve all of our problems.

Posted by: MrSleepy | February 25, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I think Pres Obama is figuring a way of how he can put the country together. And the result is not tomorrow or next week. We need to give him time. As we have given him chance when he started his campaign for this job. Being patient always pays.

Posted by: Don Dom | February 25, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Oh..gosh,,,he asked for lots of money again and again..
I guess he gets use to it.
He got lots of money for his campaign.
Can he ask Oprah to donate again?

Posted by: cilla | February 25, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

It’s very nerve-wrecking to see all this knee jerking movements from Obama’s administration. It is very difficult to tell what truly is part of stimulus, recovery or pork. As a Democrat, it’s taken a lifetime to get to the point of making some decent earning. I’m baffled that we’ll be paying for Obama’s socialism.

Posted by: Stacy | February 25, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Jason Says
Reagan: 81-86: Highest Margin Tax rate: 50%.
Obama: Proposed Highest Margin Tax rate: 39%.
I’m so tired of the GOP “complaining” about taxes when their messiah crushed the wealthy with a 50% burden.
LMAO!
——-
Before you say something know the history of US.
It was 80% when Reagan tookover, He reduced it.

Posted by: adam | February 25, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Cilla made a great point about soliciting Oprah. For a person who raised 750,000,000 million campaign dollars, why can’t he raise the money for bailout without taking out anyone? Then again, he could solicit all his rich Hollywood friends and athletes. Let’s not forget Beyonce and her husband who make half a billion dollars a year.

Posted by: Stacy | February 25, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

This is unbelievable. Where is he going to get the money for this? There is no way to fund all of these programs, cut taxes and cut the deficit in half.
I do not want socialized medicine. And if people really knew what it entailed, they wouldn’t want it either. Do you want to wait 6-9 months to have a bad gall bladder taken out? Do you want your broken leg to not be set on a timely basis because you are 1) not a professional athlete or 2) you don’t stand on your feet all day at your job – it’s ok to walk with a cane the rest of your life, if you don’t meet criteria 1 or 2.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | February 25, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Obama is spending more money than any individual in the history of the earth. He has clearly disclosed his Socialist agenda. We must take congress back in 2010 and stop Obama from destroying the US. People were warned about Obama and now the nightmare is reality.

Posted by: brian | February 25, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Not only have we elected a nobody with no experience, he is seeking to spend this nation into so much debt, it looks hopeless for us to ever get out. God help us all.

Posted by: Gina | February 25, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Many people on this site heard Obama’s speech and didn’t bother to listen to it.

Posted by: Mike in Carolina | February 25, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

It is surprising how many people truly do not understand the issue and why healthcare quality and costs must be address now. Our country must gain productivity in healthcare to improve overall quality, lower costs, gain GDP productivity and by saving lives from needless errors.
These healthcare issues of quality, costs and saving lives through reduced errors is the responsibility of our government, medical establishment and patients.
Nearly 100,000 Americans die each year from errors or from adverse drug reactions and nearly half of Americans are non-compliant with their doctors instructions and prescriptions.
Recently the our government passed legislation to address this issues with e-prescribe (doctor prescribe electronically to the pharmacy) to reduce errors.
Research has proven Electronic Health Records improve healthcare quality, reduce costs and saves lives, again from needless errors.
Obviously Obama administration is doing the smart thing by investing in healthcare to gain productivity and improve quality, Why? When the entire baby boomer generation retires not only will it impact social security but medicare as well.
This investment in electronic healthcare by our government is not nationalism, its fiscal survival, improving healthcare quality to lower cost and saving lives.

Posted by: threeriverscrossing | February 25, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Time to start working less hours to get the income under $250K. Hey, with free health care, maybe I won’t work at all. One thing I know for sure – I’m not paying for this socialist cr*p while others sit on their fat b*tts and watch Jerry Springer.
Posted by: Samuel | Feb 25, 2009 6:28:43 PM
********************************
I will be shocked if you have more than $500 US in your account Samuel … The fact that you are here writing cr*p says it all, doesn’t it? $250,000 US my you-know-what!! LOL

Posted by: Democrat | February 25, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

AWESOME!!! Another speech and a guaranteed 3rd downturn in the market. “A little less talk and little more action.” Thanks Toby Keith, my thoughts exactly ☺

Posted by: SonicSedition | February 25, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

I get increasing concerned about how much Obama and this administration is spending. It seems to me that if his solutions work, then we will learn that all previous presidents could have pulled us out of debts and recessions by spending more. I always thought the way to get out of debt was to cut spending or to stop digging yourself more into a hole than you are in already. Oh well, time will tell if Obama’s approaches work.

Posted by: Acharka | February 25, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Enjoy your new communist state but study your history so that you’ll know your fate. With any luck this country might achieve the same level of success as Cuba. Keep the maintenance up on your lawnmowers because you’ll soon be eating grass.

Posted by: rplat | February 25, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Samuel 6:28 Who said anyting about “free health care”? So,if the facts aren’t negative enough, invent your own so that you’ll be sure to have something to complain or be critical about(Hannity/Limbaugh 101).

Posted by: Mike in Carolina | February 25, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

The Saudi Royals flew to the Mayo CLinic for their medical care for a reason–its a world class facility; the best. “Universality” is what our current Public Health Care system is already set up to achieve–you get what you pay for.

Posted by: Mia | February 25, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

I make about $350,000 a year. I do fine. However I work 60-80 hours a week. I will just cut back to 40 when Obama’s tax hikes come into play. That will not help the economy

Posted by: joe | February 25, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Jason–Reagan cut the highest tax rate of 70% to 35%.Reagan eliminated tax shelters the wealthy typically used to avoid paying taxes and forced them to invest in the free market AND pay taxes. The “misery index” that was used as a marker plummeted.

Posted by: DutchFan | February 25, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Give President Obama a chance!! You put up with Bush for 8 years and look what has happened!! At least he is working trying to get us straightened out!! I am so tired of you whinny, bully Republicans–complaining about everything–I don’t care what he would do, you would STILL be complaining!!

Posted by: lola | February 25, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

The military has socialized medicine. There are some fantastic doctors there, but we never saw the same one twice as a dependent. My dad could choose from 2 colors of glasses frames and everyone got Erthromycin no matter what ailed us. The limited choice and government making my family’s health care decisions isn’t anything I’m buying into.

Posted by: CmonNow | February 25, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Ted Kennedy didn’t travel outside of the US for his cancer care.
Nor did he choose the closest facility or even one in his state.

Posted by: mad | February 25, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Top Democrats brush off the president on earmarks
By Walter Alarkon
Posted: 02/25/09 08:23 PM [ET]
Leading Democrats on Wednesday appeared to brush aside President Obama’s suggestion that they sacrifice earmarks in the federal budget, arguing Congress knows better than “faceless bureaucrats” how to spend taxpayer money.

Posted by: jschmidt | February 25, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

What percentage of Americans are treated at the Mayo Clinic? Can someone post the cost of stay and treatment at a Mayo Clinic? I went to mayoclinic.org but no price or rate information is available that I can find.
Health statistics for the U.S. show health care to be worse then much of the world, even though it’s much more costly. About $2.2 trillion a year for healthcare in the U.S. That is about $17,000 per family per year. And it is projected to increase this year and next at about 3 or 4 times inflation.

Posted by: Paul | February 25, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

I say if you want health care GET A JOB!!(And I mean a REAL one you know the kind that actually expects you to work for 40hrs per week) If Demoncrats want health care for everyone then go right ahead…no one says you can’t give the Govt more of your money or adopt a non insured, welfare sucking crack addict to take care of. Just leave my hard earned money ALONE. I want to choose what charity I give MY HARD EARNED MONEY TOO. I don’t need the government to choose for me. I am a Republican and we have the brains to think for ourselves. We aren’t spineless, brainless Democrats who can’t seem to care for themselves and need govt to run things for them. I say GROW A PAIR and run your own life.

Posted by: liz hinoj | February 25, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Constitution Party!

Posted by: aarroozz | February 25, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Then Sen. Hillary Clinton would not have simply “Aimed” for Universal Health Care – she would have made it her administration’s top priority. Barack promised universal health care for nearly every American during his rediculously grovelling campaign. How that he’s made it the White House, he sings a totally different tune. Aside from some possible Medicare reform, its George W. all over again. The more I see Barack as President, the less I am impressed.

Posted by: PhillyPaul | February 25, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Yep you guess it we get to pay of all uninsured children legal or illegal that are in this country. Remember, ACLU made it illegal for a hospital to ask a patient to produce documents to show they are a legal citizen of the United States. That is one of the reasons that California is having a budget shortfall. I guess some of you have never talked to a veteran…that has gone to a VA hospital. All I can say is that it is an experience that I would never like to repeat. The best way to describe the experience is for you to go to your local county hospital….pretty much explains how a gov’t run health care system will be like. In fact go ask a Canadian how they like their nationalized health care system.

Posted by: camp50 | February 25, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

First: Olamba and Pigosi will let the Bush tax cuts expire (lot’s of guts there). Second: They’ll add additional taxes for social security via the so-called donut tax so that the first 105k is taxed, the next 145k is not taxed (for SS) and then the tax starts again at 250k. They’ll also make SS a welfare program with means testing so that your benefits will be reduced or eliminated if you made too much money in your career. Third: As we see in this article Olamba and Pigosi will limit itemized deductions to 28%. The result will be that payroll taxes and estimated taxes will skyrocket which will dramatically reduce discretionary spending hurting the economy even more. Most folks that make over 250k have the ability to defer their bonus income via wealth accumulation plans. This is what I plan to do if I still have a job after the Dems are done ruining the country. When is it enough?

Posted by: dan | February 25, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

The top margin tax rate under President Reagan was 50% for most of his two term. When it was reduced to 38.5% and later to 28%, GDP growth slowed and the country went into a recession.

Posted by: Paul | February 25, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Paul–where did you get that stat? Quebec’s high court ruled its own health care act outlawing private medical insurance violates their Human Rights charter–certainly you don’t believe the US fares lower than that? I’m betting my Iranian neighbor would argue with you too–a doctor doesn’t even come see you at the ER in her country until someone shows up w/the cash to pay for services.

Posted by: Mia | February 25, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

What needs to really happen to our health care system is the following.
1. Put a cap on all lawsuits against hospitals, doctors, nurses etc. 2. Any lawyer that accepts a client and files a frugal lawsuit and losses will have their lawyer license striped and they can’t practice law for one year. 3. Make insurance companies honor their policy 4. Allow hospitals, doctors ask patients for legal documents to show that they are legal citizens of the United States.

Posted by: camp50 | February 25, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

The other half of the $634 billion, the official says, would come from reducing the itemized deduction rate for families with incomes over $250,000, limiting it to 28 percent are you kidding the people are gonna see what happens when you play robin hood against the haves and giving to the have nots esp when the have nots did do any thing to earn it and the haves worked there fingers to the bone to live the american dream this is not socialism its communism this is not the america i know

Posted by: david reyes | February 25, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Mia…same thing in Mexico…show me the money or we won’t treat you. But hey the illegals mexicans come across the border and use our county hospitals free of charge…Which cost US over 10 billion dollars a year…Just wait for all the individuals trying to become doctors, I am sure they won’t let the door hit them on the way out to find another profession. What doctor wants to depend on the Fed’l Govt for their pay check. Heck the UAW worker makes more money than a doctor that takes medicare patients.

Posted by: camp50 | February 25, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

ACLU made it illegal for a hospital to ask a patient to produce documents to show they are a legal citizen of the United States.
==========================================
It is not the ACLU that made that illegal. It is the Declaration of Geneva – which supplanted the Hippocratic Oath – that has made it illegal. Or rather, it has always been illegal for phsycians to deny healthcare to anybody who asks for it. The relevant part of the Declaration reads: “I will not permit considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient”

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | February 25, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I got an idea from Emanuel, Obama’s chief of staff….Let’s all start our own NON PROFIT Organization, which owns the house that we live in, and pays us our salary. Of course as a non profit, the house that we live in is exempt from paying property taxes, we can make donations to our own non profit, and then pay our selves out of our non profit org. That is some creative accounting. I wonder if Emanuel could give us the name of his attorney and tax accountant…. I need help in setting up my own Non – profit organization – W.W.of the W.selosi

Posted by: camp50 | February 25, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

“that one not-so-little bit of liberal pork will go A LONG way to ensure that republicans dont rise above the rank of dogcatcher”
ROFLMAO!
Right wingers are ALREADY making excuses for 2010.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Camp50– Even if it costs the U.S. $10 billion a year to treat sick or injured illegal immigrants and their children that’s just 0.45%, less than half a percent, of the total the U.S. spends on healthcare.
The illegals are not the ones bankrupting American healthcare, the greedy healthcare executives are.
Unfortunately there is no way that greed will regulate itself. The government of the People needs to do its job.

Posted by: Paul | February 25, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Universal health care is one giant step down for America. It’s always less effort politically to step down. This massive social huddle towards universal health care is a counterfeit promise to the poorest of us. No personal requirments can be made with socialism that cannot be side-stepped by individuals. This is an evil Ponzi Scheme will add weight to the already back breaking fiscal burdens of Medicare and Social Security. A tidal wave of failure is on the horizon and this is our plan? Sooner now, rather than later, it must fail. Ask Bernie Madoff. Our leaders do understand what they’re doing, right? Then to history at least I’ll ask, is war against them justified? Our leaders are resigned to have us all sit on our and rationalize how we might have our cake and eat it too, but without making cake. (Fiat cake.) We WERE a great nation. If you are a Boomer, or older, you’ll probably agree with me on these things. The knowledge of the ‘majority’ is changing, or being changed, by the powers at large. I’m not at all against taking care of our own, but unless I personally see an effort being made by those applying for my help, I WILL CHOOSE not to help. What America did so well as we raised up as a productive nation, was to allow, or enforce, individualism through personal responsibility. We held that individual value high. Responsibility means personal choices can be made subject only to the rights of others. Socialism destroys responsibility on that choice level. Socialism is no more fit for America than homosexuality is to marriage. And so, universal health care will not raise us up to a higher level. America WAS a great nation but the sign posts of our compromises are mocking us. What should we do? This path weakens. If our individual compassions and sense of responsibility can be superceded by our central government, we will all be vulnerable to losing much more. A national heart exalted above the hearts of individuals? This reeks of evil. It demands to be shouldered EQUALLY by our whole nation, but not by choice. How many steps down until we’re finished?

Posted by: picomanning | February 25, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Paul said”The illegals are not the ones bankrupting American healthcare, the greedy healthcare executives are.”
According to a report published this month by the IRS (which is on the IRS website: IRS Non-profit Hospital Study), the average salary for a not-for-profit hospital CEO was $490,431 (2006). The median was $323,858. Add benefits to the salary & the median goes to $377,256. I wouldn’t say that hospital CEO’s are being too greedy. The problem all started with the creation of Medicare. I don’t have time to go into the whole thing right now as I have to go to work, but I promise, I will post this evening with what I saw happen in healthcare (I worked in healthcare finance for 20 years). I have posted it on this site in the past.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | February 26, 2009, 6:53 am 6:53 am

ellsbells930 – I believe Paul was not necessarily referring to hospital executives. I believe he was pointing out that health care insurance and drug company executives play a role in keep the cost of health care in this country high.

Posted by: The Graduate | February 26, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

hey i was in hospital needed two tylenol got bil they cost 7 dollars….my doctors just built a 3 million dollars house in our town of 18,000…. i see what is the problem…

Posted by: T | February 27, 2009, 7:42 am 7:42 am

President Obama is continuing to fuel the class wars in this latest effort. He has vilified anyone who makes over $250,000 a year as if this is some horrible thing they have done to the rest of the American people. I really get concerned about all that is going on lately in America. The president seems to want to make this and every other issue a war between the “haves” and “have nots.” He is taking advantage of our current economic chaos to put his own unique spin on the reality as he sees it.
Healthcare reform needs to involve some choices by those who wish to participate. It isn’t very democratic to make everyone pay and then limit their choices at the same time. You can surely bet that President Obama would not allow his wife or children to be denied medical care that he thought was essential, but that “the system” though was not. However he expects all of us to be part of this without question.
I voted for this man, and now severely regret it. In hindsight I think Hillary Clinton would have been a fairer and less egocentric president. Perhaps its time that the voters thought about this as the 2010 and 2012 elections come around. Hopefully this country will not be too broke or too divided to have elections by then.

Posted by: Jon F | May 11, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.