Feb 16, 2009 9:14am

President to Appoint Task Force on Autos

Despite previous plans, President Obama has decided not to appoint a "Car Czar," a senior administration official tells ABC News, opting instead to appoint Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and National Economic Council director Larry Summers as heads of a Presidential Task Force on Autos to oversee the restructuring of the auto industry.

In preparation for the automakers’ submissions of loan plans on Tuesday, Feb. 17th, a senior administration official tells ABC News, members of the Task Force will be drawn from relevant cabinet agencies and offices, including the Departments of Treasury, Labor, Transportation, Commerce, and Energy, the NEC, the White House Office of Energy and Environment, the Council of Economic Advisers and the EPA.

One key member of the Task Force will be Ron Bloom, a restructuring expert and a new a senior advisor at the Treasury Department. Bloom is a former vice president of Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, and a restructuring expert for the U.S. Steelworkers. You can read a 2003 Business Week Q&A with Bloom HERE.

The president has designated Geithner to oversee the loan agreements with the auto companies.

– jpt

User Comments

So are the automakers happy not to have a dictator overseeing their every move, or will Obama’s ‘task force” simply overwhelm them with rehab directives?

Posted by: matt | February 16, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am

(See Mickey Kaus’s thoughts on Ron Bloom elsewhere).
Every auto manufacturer operates within a structure of government-mandates (vehicle safety, emissions, environmental impact, fuel efficiency, taxes and tariffs, and, ahem, union agreements).
If we are to truly aid our manufacturing base, we should be “restructuring” our government’s approach to this industry, not the automakers themselves. Anything else is just an political play designed to prolong their misery.

Posted by: vinman | February 16, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

more socialism for corporations.
no different than the republicans

Posted by: verdinet | February 16, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

No doubt government intervention which means more regulation will kill any hope left for the auto industry unless the plan is to continually subsidize their losses with bailouts, in which case we’re just continuing to shoot ourselves in the foot. Every time the government makes a move the negative publicity brings this giant industry one step closer to its demise. Let them die with dignity.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | February 16, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Oh my God..TurboTAx Timmy in another position that he can screw up..America is DOOMED..You seen what his “plan” did last week… There is absolutely no leadership or judgement in this administration
And Yet another Democrat scandal is brewing in the Senate
Democrats “culture of corruption”

Posted by: DOH-bama Cabinet of Corruption | February 16, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

vinman:”If we are to truly aid our manufacturing base, we should be “restructuring” our government’s approach to this industry, not the automakers themselves.”
ALL automakers operate under the same governmental regulatory framework. Why is it only the big 3 can’t handle it? It seems stupid to say “the government is the problem” when so many manufacturers have no problem within the identical government environment. The companies are the problem, and they better accept the operational oversight that bringing on a white knight investor, public or private, always implies.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 16, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Is there one corporation in America that Democrats don’t hate? Seriously. They’ve demonized every corporation I can think of.
Dems are all about building their own power base in government and making people dependent on the government. We all know how government screws things up, and it won’t get better until we have term limits.

Posted by: Peach | February 16, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

It is about time the hypocrites republicans get out of the picture, especially the ones from south Carolina, Republican senator Graham said yesterday to nationalize banks. Govenor Sanford said the stimulus was a bad ideal and attacked it in his CNN column, meanwhile South Carolina is the biggest welfare state in the country. We need all the republican states against the bill not to take our money….But they won’t they can’t wait to lay their hands on it. Hypocrites..

Posted by: james | February 16, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

This is convient timing. I wonder how long it will take to get these people seated and settled into their offices. T
This buys a bunch of time for the auto makers to get their ducks in a row, which at present, they do not have.
I find it all rather dubious. Lets not forget the President Obama, as the President-elect, had a hand in crafting this bailout for the automakers. I find it alarming that he is changing courses at this late point in the game. Its a little too convient for his buddies @ the UAW.

Posted by: RH | February 16, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

@james,
Not sure why you talking about that here on the Auto Task Force board, but I would like to see where you got your data. Only thing I can find about SC on Welfare is they are Graded VERY LOW on WELFARE program and paying it out.
Post a link for you fact, please.

Posted by: ajax | February 16, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

The clueless leading the clueless.

Posted by: Sally J | February 16, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Might this task force be a bit crowded with administration heavy hitters? Will they actually accomplish anything? (Especially the shell-shocked Geithner…)

Posted by: matt | February 16, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

An auto task force sounds better suited for the task of retooling American car manufacturing than the singular Auto Czar. It’s an exciting prospect that the US will be competing on the global scale for automobile and fuel efficiency. Bring on the American ingenuity and innovation!

Posted by: kathy | February 16, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

More gov’t intervention (from those that are part of the problem), that will restrict the auto mfgr’s from making any profit, which will cause them to come back in a year to a year and a half for more money. This is about bailing out the unions and that’s all its for. Turbo timmy is in sooo far over his head that he can’t find his own ass with his own two hands.
Anything BHO is doing is designed to fail, so private industry will be depenent on gov’t. It’s called SOCIALISM.

Posted by: Dan L | February 16, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Sounds a lot like the Soviet Union. Ford was smart to refrain from taking federal money (although I’m sure the Motherland will impose regulations on it under the guise of regulating GM and Chrysler). If the Motherland doesn’t take Ford over, it will be interesting to see how it performs the two now nationalized car manufacturers.

Posted by: Comrade | February 16, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Ron Bloom is the only human being on this earth that can do this job.
If he doesn’t get the job America is headed for a catastrophe, from which we can never recover–right off of a cliff.
He has to have this job along with Geithner the only man brilliant enough to save the economy from disaster–the tax cheat.
Obama–the voice of reason.

Posted by: reed | February 16, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Sounds a lot like the Soviet Union
******************************************************
Oh, really? Retooling American car manufacturing to be competitive on the international front? How easily the buzzwords and buzzpoints are thrown around by some . . .

Posted by: kathy | February 16, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

It’s hard to listen to Geithner and take him seriously or give him any repect whatsoever.
He’s a tax cheat that Obama knowlingly kept in his cabinet even after BO said there shouldn’t be two sets of rules.
Neither Geithner or Obama have any credibility–and do not deserve America’s respect.

Posted by: bailey | February 16, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Obama’s handing out tax credits for cars that don’t exist. He cut off tax breaks for higher income people for buying cars- people who might actually buy the cars.
If you want people to buy cars, you incentivize that behavior.
Obama is not serious about it at all.

Posted by: drjohn | February 16, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

From being a crown colony we rose to becoming a republic which evolved into an oligarchy which has evolved into an idiocricy. The theory of evolution is alive and well but instead of improving as we evolve, American leadership regresses. We’ll soon be the subjects of some dictator if we continue down the path of government intervention. The Obama government is everyone’s Sugar Daddy. It’s time for another change already.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | February 16, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Kathy; What part of worldwide economic crisis evades your recognition? What good is having the ability to manufacture anything if there’s no one to buy the finished product? It’s not as if we are competing with other manufacturers. No auto manufacturer in the world is selling cars because no consumer feels secure in making an investment. Why do we keep pouring money into a bottomless pit?

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | February 16, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

As for those who see this as a negative thing, just remember why our auto makers need overseeing. They’ve consistently lost market share to foreign car companies, ignored the necessity for better fuel mileage as our dependence on foreign oil grew and built cars with a much shorter lifespan than some of their competitors.
So if our educational system needs a task force to fix its dismal performance will that be a bad idea, too?
Do these complainers want things to get better or not? Our car companies have shown they either don’t know how to or just won’t improve. Too many jobs are at stake for the government to not help.

Posted by: Lydia | February 16, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

We the workforce are the consumers. A government that shows no confidence in us receives no confidence from us. The vast majority of government spending is going to top end of the food chain. Didn’t our president campaign on the idea of a trickle up economy? Why has that idea been abandoned? What good is manufacturing capability if there’s no market for finished products? When the consumers have money to spend our economy will start a recovery. If something doesn’t change soon there will be no surviving manufacturers. The government can’t save them. Businesses need consumers. Only consumers can save businesses.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | February 16, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

They’ve consistently lost market share to foreign car companies, ignored the necessity for better fuel mileage as our dependence on foreign oil grew and built cars with a much shorter lifespan than some of their competitors.
=============
So what about their competitors, many of whom are excellent employers right here in the US? They figured out how to build these cars. Why should our government try to help someone compete against them now?
Remember, these car companies and their workers are paying the taxes that will go into this endeavor.
Do either Tim Geithner or Larry Summers know anything about running a business? What’s their experience in that area? Nothing.

Posted by: MayBee | February 16, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

“Obama’s handing out tax credits for cars that don’t exist.”
Like the Jeep I just bought and can write off the sales tax because of the stimulus plan? I can drive it so it sure seems to exist to me so does the $700.00 saved.

Posted by: seriously? | February 16, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Let the auto industry go bankrupt. Kill the union too! The unionized workers of America make too much money, have too much job security and rediculous work rules.
One day I saw a forklift driver come up with a load materials. He sat on the forklift while all the ladies in the work area unloaded the boxes. I thought this big guy could (should) help. I asked him why he didn’t help. I was told, “that wasn’t his job and he would have to talk to the shop steward to complain someone asked him to help unload his forklift!”
I bet the big guy was making $35+ an hour and couldn’t even help unload the boxes. I hope he loses his job and never finds a new job. That lazy ass union bastard doesn’t know how good he has it!

Posted by: AJ Jim | February 16, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

@jhw539 -
Of course, all automakers operate under the same governmental framework. But they obviously don’t all have the same challenges. What common denominator do the the Big Three have that their foreign competition does not? Bad management? People simply dismiss it as such, even though managing those corporations involves placating an obdurate ‘partner’ at every level of strategic planning. . . . A partner which has been contributing politically against the partnership for decades, as some type of insurance. Some symbiosis!
The government is keeping domestic automakers afloat for the sake of organized labor. And it’s using the opportunity to mold these corporations into instruments of the ‘common good.’ It’s payoff time when it should be time for Chapter 11.

Posted by: vinman | February 16, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

car CZAR..now what other country has a CZAR or had one? communist country uses that word.
how can anybody be comfortable with this word and all cheer Obama on?

Posted by: liberty | February 16, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

“[Obama opted] instead to appoint Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and National Economic Council director Larry Summers as heads of a Presidential Task Force on Autos to oversee the restructuring of the auto industry … designated Geithner to oversee the loan agreements with the auto companies.”
There really is a kind of slapstick quality to the “Obama” organization. A guy who can’t pay his own taxes or “restructure” a visa for a personal servant is gonna “restructure the auto industry” … along with ANOTHER guy who can’t even SPEAK properly?
Maybe everybody in the administration has to be such a creep as to make even the creepy Executive look plausible by comparison … but sheesh.
What these brain-dead poseurs OUGHT to do is let ALL these failed corporations BE failed … and prop up, instead, the people who actually ARE suffering.
With national health and a guaranteed income of some kind (favored by such “socialists” as Richard Nixon over the punitive and bureaucrat-intensive management of the poor), the country could ACTUALLY avoid the chaos to come under these idiots ..
How are people without income going to buy cars? With that 13 dollars? Duh.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

OH CZAR OBAMA!!!! TAKE CARE OF ME, FEED ME, GIVE ME MONEY, PAY FOR MY HEALTHCARE, TELL ME WHERE THE BREAD LINE IS, TELL ME WHO LIVES AND DIES. OH PRESIDENT OBAMA HOW I LOVE THEE. YOU ARE THE MESSIAH. GO TO CONGRESS AND GET THE KEY TO THE VAULT AND TAKE AS MUCH MONEY AS YOU WOULD EVER NEED. IT’S OKAY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL NOT MAKE A STAND. AFTER ALL NO AMERICAN CAN THINK FOR THEMSELVES ANY MORE, AND IT IS OKAY TO RAPE THE NATION WITH HIGHER TAXES. NO ONE WILL CARE BECAUSE EVERY ONE JUST WANTS A HAND OUT KNOW. NO ONE REMEMBERS WHAT AMERICA STANDS FOR ANY MORE. SO JUST GO TO PELOSI AND ASK FOR 900 TRILLION DOLLARS. WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR OBAMA? YOU WANT US TO WORSHIP YOU AND BE BRAINWASHED THEN JUST GO TO GONGRESS AND ASK THEM FOR EVERY LAST PENNY AMERICA HAS. WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR? JUST DO IT CZAR OBAMA.

Posted by: JEWELS | February 16, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

“JUST DO IT CZAR OBAMA.”
Well, He’s already glommed onto the contents of the Treasury for three generations or so into the future.
Usually in dictatorial Treasury grab, many thorny difficulties arise in getting the goodies past the lower tiers of the political class. As seems to be the case with the “Obama” organization, with its open hand to the corporations, its stupd thirteen bucks for the workers, and no-money-for-YOU blabla about “responsibility” for those ALREADY poor.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Maybee, while foreign companies assemble cars here, it is just a part of the cost of the vehicle. Where the parts are manufactured makes a huge difference in how many American jobs are created. 77% of the parts the big 3 uses are made domestically in the U.S. or Canada while the top foreign company that assembles here only uses 59%. That represents a lot of jobs.
And this is all about jobs, quality manufacturing jobs and building quality cars. Hopefully with oversight on the big 3 they can get their act together.

Posted by: Lydia | February 16, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

“while foreign companies assemble cars here”
About a 10- or twenty-year MORATORIUM of auto manufacture — while technology and the hahaha “economy” shake out — is what’s called for. PAY the workers’ mortgages, GIVE em the same health care the abominable Congress has provided its useless self.
Then pave the streets with GOLD, and you’ll still be ahead of The Obama Way … it’s not just that these twerps are fascists, but that they’re such CLUELESS, unimaginative fascists, still trying to recycle post-WWII rhetoric about “unions”, etc. Thirteen percent of US workers are in unions (including the not-really-a-union SEIU).
Maybe THAT’s where the $13 tax cut for workers, and the symbolically-suicidal Porkulus passing on … Friday the 13th … comes from?

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Isn’t Free Enterprise Refreshing?

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 16, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Maybee, while foreign companies assemble cars here, it is just a part of the cost of the vehicle. Where the parts are manufactured makes a huge difference in how many American jobs are created. 77% of the parts the big 3 uses are made domestically in the U.S. or Canada while the top foreign company that assembles here only uses 59%.
===
What’s Canada doing in the middle of that paragraph?
If the US automakers went away, do you think foreign companies manufacturing here would perhaps use more US-made parts in their products assembled here? Why or why not?
FWIW, I don’t want the US automakers to go away, but my reasons for that are almost entirely emotional. Their business structure is untenable, and their products have a hard time attracting buyers.
There are taxpayers inside the country who are competing with them, and they will be partially funding this restructuring.

Posted by: MayBee | February 16, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

They just came out with figures on how much this is costing the tax payers. If you are in the bracket from 25,000 to 35,000 get ready to pay an extra 14,000 a year. If you are in the next pay bracket it goes up from there. And next in line OBAMA IS ASKING FOR MONEY FOR TARP 3 AND THE BIG 3 ARE COMING BACK TO WASHINGTON FOR BILLIONS MORE. WHY IN THE HELL AM I GOING TO COLLEGE? I MIGHT AS WELL GET IN LINE WITH MY HAND OUT BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT TO GET A DEGREE ONLY TO HAVE TO PAY RIDICOLOUS TAXES.

Posted by: Jewels | February 16, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

“WHY IN THE HELL AM I GOING TO COLLEGE?”
Hopefully to study something medical OR directly food-producing.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Maybee, the only information I could access on the percentage of car parts made domestically or foreign, all included Canada as domestic. It is puzzling, maybe it has something to do with NAFTA making us strong trading partners? Your guess is as good as mine.
I find your assumption that U.S. car workers for Honda would look at saving fellow citizen’s jobs in Detroit as a bad use of their tax money a little short-sighted. If we continue to bleed jobs those Honda workers will be laid off if there are less Americans able to afford a new Honda. Think about it, the economy is summed up by the old quote, ‘no man is an island’. We are all relying on our country possessing enough good-paying jobs to provide enough consumers to buy whatever our company makes, so we don’t get laid off. I seriously doubt any Honda workers don’t understand that with the layoffs hitting them too.

Posted by: Lydia | February 16, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

“I MIGHT AS WELL GET IN LINE WITH MY HAND OUT BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT TO GET A DEGREE ONLY TO HAVE TO PAY RIDICOLOUS TAXES.”
Don’t look now, but many of the new poor have LOTS of degrees. On the plus side, no income means no taxes.
To medical and food pursuits (post below), you might wanna consider gunsmithing.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Look: first, arrest MOST of the political class. Then, lay off the top 90% of public employees (in California, 97%). Nationalize ALL the corporations that can’t take themselves private by April 1.
Freeze mortgages, start building PORTABLE, GREEN public housing pods. Institute a guaranteed income for those without assets, make most public facilities — including mass transit — which are fee-based free. Stop paying Social Security to anybody who has OTHER income, abolish HUD, and institute Single Payer Health equal to or better than HR 676.
Or … get ready to rrrrumble … and play police state … for YEARS …
His birthday suit notwithstanding, Obama is … a jive turkey. Live and learn: skin color really DOESN’T mean much.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Hahaha: David Axelrod, like Cheney before him, has taken to making snotty remarks about “chatter”. Won’t be long now …

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

It’s a little off-topic, but if someone could explain to me how the “Obama” machine can impose a trillion-dollar Porkulus on the country, without being able to summon the will to tax the RICH?
Most of the rich won’t mind. Good Lord, it’s the RICH who have the MONEY. Duh. It’s not complicated.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

I find your assumption that U.S. car workers for Honda would look at saving fellow citizen’s jobs in Detroit as a bad use of their tax money a little short-sighted.
============
In the current economic downturn, all jobs lost mean fewer people buying anything, including cars.
Yet their interest is definitely not in seeing their competitors *in particular* have their jobs and companies saved.
If the demand for cars picks up, surely the other companies would rejoice in having fewer competitors to help fill that demand. They could expand, and possibly even hire some of those out-of-work auto employees.
There’s a reason President Obama has resorted to rhetoric about that dastardly Japan not being allowed to be the first to develop the battery-operated car.

Posted by: MayBee | February 16, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

“There’s a reason President Obama has resorted to rhetoric about that dastardly Japan not being allowed to be the first to develop the battery-operated car.”
Hahaha. Remember when Khruschev said “We will bury you”?
What Khruschev DIDN’T mention is that the undertaker — whose pseudo-”academic” style pretty much IS that of a funeral director — would be a mob-friendly fraud in a birthday suit.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

GIVE ME ONE GOOD REASON WHY I SHOULD PAY FOR UNIONS, RETIREES, AND HEALTHCARE FOR A COMPANY WHEN THE UNION COULDN’T SETTLE, GOT GREEDY AND THE CEO WAS IRRESPONSIBLE. TELL ME WHY MY TAX DOLLARS SHOULD GO TO A COMPANY THAT NEEDS TO LAY PEOPLE OFF SINCE THE COMPANY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THERE ACTIONS?

Posted by: JEWELS | February 16, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Common sense has left the building…. and took our money with it.

Posted by: Lynn | February 16, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Maybe what Oprah MEANT to say wasn’t really “The One”, but “The One-der-Taker”?
She wouldn’t be the only person drowned out by premature cult-clamor from the “Obama” organization’s noisy peanut gallery of press people and hangers-on.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

It’s a little off-topic, but if someone could explain to me how the “Obama” machine can impose a trillion-dollar Porkulus on the country, without being able to summon the will to tax the RICH?
Most of the rich won’t mind. Good Lord, it’s the RICH who have the MONEY. Duh. It’s not complicated.
**********************
If you take all their money, nobody would bother to take all risks it takes to become rich. We benefit more from that risk taking in the long run, than we do a bunch of ineffective government programs.

Posted by: Lynn | February 16, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Maybe Oprah, as head of HHS, could pull off National Health equal to or better than HR 676 (government-paid health care similar to what the craven clothes-horses of the Congress have appropriated to their already-ludicrously-overcompensated selves).
We know that Oprah’s generous … SHE gave everybody a CAR, after all, on her own dime. Not like THESE crooks. (A “task force”? Give us a break: the only tasks of which these guys are remotely capable: lining their own Italian pockets and making crappy speeches.(
National Health would solve most of the “union” problems, and go a long way to helping citizens BEYOND the political class weather the collapse of corporate capitalism.
Not as many poor and elderly will die for lack of medical/dental care, of course. But if the “Obama” organization’s determined to kill off a bunch of people, let ‘em do it the Chicago Way — mass rub-outs would be quicker, cheaper, AND kinder … and might free up some sub-subsistence housing.
One is confident that the classy Dr. Dean — the more OBVIOUS head for HHS, and a New York uber-WASP in the FDR mold, but unbeloved by Darth Gibbs — wouldn’t mind working under Oprah.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

“nobody would bother to take all risks it takes to become rich.”
Yeah: being born into a ship-load of robber-baron boodle is EASILY as risky as letting somebody shoot an apple off your head with a bow and arrow.
Taxing the rich in NO way prohibits anybody from devising a “better mousetrap”, or the rodent-ridden from beating a way to their doorstep with money.
The counter example, of course, is Jonas Salk, who cured polio AND declined to take money for it. Money really ISN’T everything … and from time to time in history — when the main consideration is whether or not one has the “liquidity” with which to flee the political jurisdiction — it isn’t much of ANYthing.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

“nobody would bother to take all risks it takes to become rich.”
The only “risk” involved in falling into a tub of butter is that it may be JUST about to … come to a boil.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY:
“State governments have unfunded obligations worth $445 billion to subsidize health insurance for teachers, judges and other civil servants after they retire, according to a USA TODAY survey of state financial reports.”
So … how much of Porkulus’ supposed “aid to states” is going toward THIS wicked boondoggle? As long as public employees have to be DESPERATE to keep public jobs because of the health benefits, there’s no way they’re free to blow the whistle on irregularities in how public business is done.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

When the US automakers make better quality vehicles there will be no need to have any bailouts for them. They do need to get rid of the unions and the massive welfare state they created for the retired workers but the bottom line is quality! And to those autoworkers saying that not buying American is unpatriotic – how does buying an inferior product make you patriotic?

Posted by: raggmopp | February 16, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

When the US automakers make better quality vehicles there will be no need to have any bailouts for them. They do need to get rid of the unions and the massive welfare state they created for the retired workers but the bottom line is quality! And to those autoworkers saying that not buying American is unpatriotic – how does buying an inferior product make you patriotic?

Posted by: raggmopp | February 16, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

CZAR OBAMA, THANK YOU FOR BEING ELECTED. THANK YOU FOR TAKING FROM THE HARDWORKING AMERICANS TO GIVE TO THE POOR. THANK YOU FOR TAKING CARE OF ME. THANK YOU FOR SPENDING TRILLIONS UPON TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS. THANK YOU FOR MY HOUSE, CAR, HEALTHCARE AND THE FOOD. THANK YOU FOR NOT ALLOWING ME TO THINK. THANK YOU FOR NOT MAKING ME WORK FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE. JUST KEEP ON HANDING ME MONEY BECAUSE IT WOULD BE TO HARD TO HAVE TO GO TO SCHOOL OR TO WORK. I NEED SOMEONE TO PROVIDE TO ME AND YOU ARE THE MESSIAH. I WILL FOLLOW YOU UNTIL THE END OF TIME CZAR OBAMA. GO AHEAD AND STEP ALL OVER THE CONSTTUTION AND THANK YOU FOR RAPING FUTURE GENERATIONS OF AMERICANS. I BELIEVE EVERYTHING THAT YOU TELL ME AND I CAN NOT WAIT FOR MY HAND OUT.

Posted by: JEWELS | February 16, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Let’s hope Geithner handles this job better than reading the prompters last Tuesday…

Posted by: matt | February 16, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

“Let’s hope Geithner handles this job better than reading the prompters last Tuesday…”
Well, he’s probably DRIVEN a car … or at least ridden around in the back seat of one. How hard could it BE to … hahaha … “restructure” hahaha General Motors?
It’s like a Donald Duck comic, with revolving goofy nephews.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Kathy; What part of worldwide economic crisis evades your recognition? What good is having the ability to manufacture anything if there’s no one to buy the finished product?
******************************************************
Cheer up, mmonroeliveson. It’s going to get even worse according to the Mayan calendar.

Posted by: kathy | February 16, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

So Obama is still winging it! But it will take Chavez another 20 to 30 years to complete his transformation to socialism! :(
Obama continues to waver between the postmodern equivocator and the fantasy prone globalist image! :(

Posted by: aware2u | February 16, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Credits for purchasing autos were removed from the bill at last moment, replaced with the addition of $8 Billion for the hi speed train from Disneyland to Sin City..Instead of buying a new car, I am going to Vegas and roll the bones with my $13.00 stimulus bonus.

Posted by: Sigmonde | February 17, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY:
“State governments have unfunded obligations worth $445 billion to subsidize health insurance for teachers, judges and other civil servants after they retire, according to a USA TODAY survey of state financial reports.”
So … how much of Porkulus’ supposed “aid to states” is going toward THIS wicked boondoggle? As long as public employees have to be DESPERATE to keep public jobs because of the health benefits, there’s no way they’re free to blow the whistle on irregularities in how public business is done.
———————————
Human Intelligence,
Yep, Just take a really good look at the the Commonwealth of Taxachusetts!!!
The pensions for state workers, many of them corruptly inflated, are bankrupting that bastion of liberalism!
In Mass, you have Duval Patrick, playing Gilligan to Obama’s Skipper! Massachusetts, the state that just keeps on giving….Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, …. State politicians like Speakers of House Tom Finneran & Sal Dimasi , state senator Diane Wilkerson (bribe bra stuffer), Boston city councilman Chuck Turner

Posted by: Mike_C | February 17, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Credits for purchasing autos were removed from the bill at last moment,
++++++++++++++++++++++
Sec. 1008. Additional deduction for State sales tax and excise tax on the purchase of certain motor vehicles. It’s on pages 27, 28, 29 and 30 if facts interest you.

Posted by: Ranger | February 17, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.