Feb 10, 2009 8:08pm

Senate Republicans Grill Geithner for Greater Detail on Financial Plan

ABC News’ Matt Jaffe reports:

No sooner had Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner announced the Obama administration’s new financial stability plan then he headed across town to brief Congress on it, but some Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill wanted far more detail than Geithner was ready to provide today.

"We’ve been here for three hours and 23 minutes and have no discernible idea as to how we’re gonna solve this problem," said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn, at this afternoon’s Senate Banking Committee hearing.

"I don’t think…I wouldn’t want to encourage you in that view," replied Geithner.

"Well, we’ve been here for three hours and 23 minutes and I’ve been highly encouraged in that view, so I mean, we basically have some platitudes and again, I’m not being critical," said Corker.

"No, but you are, senator," Geithner argued.

"I’m not," said Corker. "I’m observing, in essence. Last night – I would be critical about this – I would think that the White House and you all communicate and last night the president said you would be very clear and there would be specific plans."

"And today we lost probably a trillion dollars in the market as people looked for those very clear and specific plans and instead heard guidelines and some platitudes. I mean, I haven’t heard today what your commitment is to solving the problem."

Corker’s criticisms came on the heels of similar comments from ranking member Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Alab., Sen. Jim DeMint, R-SC, and Sen. David Vitter, R-Lou..

"I think having a major announcement and a major committee hearing today with the complete lack of detail we have, quite frankly, was a big mistake and I think it’s another version of the American people hearing how cataclysmic the crisis is with no flushed out solutions," Vitter said.

"I’m here to testify today, the same day I laid out the broad objectives, principles and programs that we believe are the best path forward to help fix this financial crisis," responded Geithner. "And you’re absolutely right that we did not lay out today a level of detail to allow you to examine their efficacy and we are not claiming here today that we did that. And you’re absolutely right. And we’re gonna be careful in doing that so that when we provide you the details, they represent, again, the level of care and discipline that choices of this consequence require."

In all, Geithner found a much more unforgiving audience on the Hill than the one he addressed earlier at Treasury, when he read from a teleprompter and took no questions.

Some Senate Democrats did stand up for Geithner, including the man who introduced him at Treasury, chairman Chris Dodd, noting that Geithner had only been in office for two weeks.

But the new Treasury chief was given fair warning when Shelby stated towards the start of the hearing, "We should not, Mr. Secretary, bless your plan today unless we know it’s the right plan – and a lot of us are very, very skeptical."

The lack of detail in today’s plan was not all the only problem some lawmakers had with Geithner. Shelby noted that Geithner was head of the New York Federal Reserve as the current crisis was taking shape.

"I don’t want to put this all on you, but you were there in the driver’s seat," Shelby said.

"Everyone could have done more," acknowledged Geithner.

When Geithner wasn’t deflecting GOP criticism, he applauded Congress for passing the initial Troubled Asset Relief Program.

"That action made it possible for your government to take some very important steps to pull the system back from the edge of catastrophic failure," he said. "And that action has helped bring a better tone of stability and some improvement to our financial system. Without that action, we would be sitting here today with a dramatically worse crisis, dramatically harder to solve, costing dramatically more resources over time."

Although Geithner emphasized that Treasury was not seeking more money today, he did not rule out returning to Capitol Hill in the future to do so.

"I’m not standing here before you today to ask you to authorize more resources," he said. "I want to be candid, though, that I think this is going to be an expensive problem for the nation and it’s going to require substantial resources. But Congress has already authorized substantial resources. And I think our first obligation is to move to use those resources as carefully and as effectively as possible."

Geithner emphasized that he understood that the sums of money involved in the financial rescue might be eye-popping, but they are necessary.

"You’re absolutely right that the numbers involved are large," he told lawmakers. "But the basic lesson of the financial crises is that the actions we take have to be commensurate with the scale of the problems we face, and this is a very complicated, very challenging set of problems."

The Treasury Secretary stated that the prior administration erred in doing too little, too late to address the current crisis – that, he says, is a mistake that the current regime won’t make.

"The path our country has pursued to date was too limited in support," Geithner said. "It came late. It came with too little broad trust and confidence and too little direct support to the businesses and consumers and households that are most effected by the crisis; people who were careful and responsible in their actions but were damaged by the judgments of those who did not."

Going forward, Geithner vowed that the prudent approach was an aggressive one.

"I think the most conservative, the most careful, most prudent course is to be very aggressive with all the instruments of policy to try to reduce those risks," he said. "Because if we’re successful in eliminating the depth and duration of the recession, those losses ultimately will be lower over time."

After his busy day today – complete with a speech at Treasury, a handful of interviews, and a lengthy hearing – there is still no rest for the weary. Geithner is back on the Hill tomorrow morning to testify before the Senate Budget Committee.

– Matt Jaffe

User Comments

Obama has been hyping Geithner’s speech for a few days. At last night’s press conference, he said Geithner would provide “very clear and specific plans for how we are going to start loosening up credit once again.” That certainly didn’t happen.
There was no reason for Geithner to make an introductory speech today, except that his boss has scheduled it. It did more harm than good for now.

Posted by: MayBee | February 10, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Both Obama and Geithner are in no-win situations regarding the financial recovery plan. Too many details and they lose flexibility for the future. Too few details and, well, you get a market bomb and a host of angry obstructionists…I mean Republicans. Supposed you’d get the latter either way.

Posted by: matt | February 10, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

abc quotes Senator Corker:
“last night the president said you would be very clear and there would be specific plans.”
Oh, well, the tired old ideas of LAST night … maybe the Senate Budget Committee will scare this annoying turncoat out of government, despite his old-retainer status with Obama.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 10, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Oh, I am sure the Republicans wanted details — so they could start arguing against them, like they did with the Recovery Act. (Agreeing to vote against it before they really saw any detail, and then picking less than 1% of the bill to rant about all over cable news.) It would appear the new administration has learned an important lesson about how the GOP wants to play this game.

Posted by: Jo | February 10, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

matt…It’s the “angry obstructionists” of ANY political party that keep balance in our system (checks and balance) without it the problem would have been much worse..However, it looks like checks and balances are no longer with us. GOP House zero votes, GOP Senate 3 votes. The Dems bought this stimulus bill and now we get to pay for it. The sole responsibility for success or failure for this bill now rests with the Democrats who created it and voted for it.

Posted by: Parallax View | February 10, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

I read that with all the stimulus money they were going to want, they could have paid off 90% of all mortgage in the US….maybe they are gonna go for 100%.

Posted by: samhiguchi | February 10, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

It would appear the new administration has learned an important lesson about how the GOP wants to play this game
That’s just silly. The democrats don’t need any republican votes. And it’s not a game. Perhaps the clueless administration should stop campaigning and start working.

Posted by: Jane | February 10, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

I find it disturbing that Geithner has been allowed to keep his new position. His past record of not paying taxes is disturbing to me and I resent the fact that he is in charge of “money”.
Obama is right no one is perfect; however, when he makes a mistake, it is just a mistake. If it is the previous govt. they are nuts. You know I don’t remember the previous govt. crucifying the democrats with their mouth. Yet the democrats try and destroy the intelligence and character, of the Republicans by trying to belittle and discredit them anyway they can. I believe the democratic party has demonstrated immaturity, arrogance, and a Pharisee attitude in everything they do. I’m disappointed and disturbed. Furthermore, I believe this is their way of trying to manipulate the minds of the United States people by cutting another party down. I’m not impressed.

Posted by: Nancy | February 10, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Shelby, Corker, DeMint, Vitter, fresh from their defeat on H.R. 1 find solace in nipping at the heels of the Treasury Secy. He does need to spell out the details of his plan to those and other folks but my bet is that if he does, they will say they do not understand.

Posted by: Jeff | February 10, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

“Some Senate Democrats did stand up for Geithner, including the man who introduced him at Treasury, chairman Chris Dodd, noting that Geithner had only been in office for two weeks.”
Then what the #### makes them feel he’s qualified to stand up there and speak at all. Nothing but excuses from all of the crooks. They all exmplify the term “thick as theives”.

Posted by: Metiyo | February 10, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

More of the GOP looking fore guess what? Failure. Theyu like Wall street want the government to just hand over the money to those who need it least. That is not socialism mind you, but capitalism, just ask them.
Masters of the Negative is what the GOP is.
Theyu won me over; I am very negative about the GOP.

Posted by: Thinking | February 10, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

“Both Obama and Geithner are in no-win situations regarding the financial recovery plan. Too many details and they lose flexibility for the future. Too few details and, well, you get a market bomb and a host of angry obstructionists…I mean Republicans. Supposed you’d get the latter either way.”
I suppose that instead of “angry obstructionists”, you would rather have a demagogue and some sycophants? If you want that, you’ve already got Pelosi & the Congressional Democrats.

Posted by: I'm With Stupid | February 10, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Bush ruinned our country. He is living a fine life off taxpayer money while Americans are struggling. Cheney made millions off Haliburton. Have you noticed Haliburton is not laying off? Stop blaming Obama and blame the culprits: Bush and the mediocre Rethuglicans. They are all enjoying the perks of the Senate while the economy collapsed under their watch. They don’t give a damn about Americans or their struggling. McCain and his Republican cronies need to be fired.

Posted by: Sarah Pain | February 10, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Obama + Geithner = Dumb And Dumber….

Posted by: Lumberman_63 | February 10, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Obamacrat for Palin ..
*******************************************
Who do you think you are kidding?
First of all if somebody is inclined to support somebody of the caliber of Obama, the smartest person in the room, no matter what he does wrong, they would never change their support to the likes of Sarah Palin.
You may very well like her, but it isn’t due to any qualities that she could use to help get the country on sure footing before we all sink.

Posted by: Truth Matters | February 10, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Let’s all listen to the wise council of the GOP. They want to tell us all about fiscal responsibilty. That’s like getting investment advice from Bernie Madoff. Shelby,oh he’s so concerned about spending the tax payer’s money. Where was Mr. Shelby the last eight years. I’ll tell you where he was-blindly rubber stamping us into mountains of debt under the Bush Administration. The real issue here is that the Republican Party is so pathetic they actually want Geithner to fail. They want Obama to fail and our Country to fail because they don’t want to look even worst than they already do. Despite all the BS Americans are still solidly behind Barack Obama. If he turns this enormous mess left by the incompetent Bush Administration and the sheep that followed him the Republican Party will be fighting it out with the Libertarians and the Green Party for chump change.

Posted by: Mark S | February 10, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Kind of odd to run this story without any of the questions from the Democratic side, especially as it was Menendez who had the question that kind of put him off balance. This makes it sound like it was only the Republicans who were grilling him for details.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 10, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Obama is such a loser. He has ruined our country in less than a month. When can we Impeach him?

Posted by: sam | February 10, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Where are people going to realize that the two party system is just a mask of reality? We can’t win with either one. It’s the same story every time. Blame the prior administration. Do the same thing they did, act surprised that you get a different result. Wake up people!! For the most part, neither party cares about we the people, just their wallets and their powerful friends (and their wallets).
Want to solve the problem? Do away with 9/10s of the Federal government, repeal the Federal Income Tax, dissolve the Federal Reserve, and bring our troops home from the absurd amount of countries that we are occupying. Then things will start to look better.
Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result is insanity (by definition).

Posted by: CG | February 10, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

There will be no confidence in the financial arena until some action is taken to hold to account those who created this mess. Turbo Tim was there in NY on Wall Street watching his buds do the dirty deeds. So no action will ever be taken to prosecute. Just like always to many politicians in bed with the Wall Street crowd. All these toxic assets need to be marked to market and sold. Those institutions that don’t have the necessary assets to remain viable must fail and their good assets forfeited to solid institutions. that is more than just a stress test!

Posted by: dave | February 10, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Geithner can’t even figure out his taxes (ya right) and we are putting him in charge of the financial plan. Makes no sense.

Posted by: sam | February 10, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

I don’t know if anyone else noticed but those Southern Senators, (Dixiecrats) are all lining up against the stimulus to get even for their landslide defeat in November. I guess somethings never change.

Posted by: william | February 10, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Leaving the Past Behind Us
Blame…it’s passed around, we all know that. Too many foreclosures, too much bailout, too many lies, too much deception. Everyone deserves some blame for the housing mess we’re in, ok? Bankers, brokers, mortgage companies, appraisers, buyers, homebuilders, politicians….if you’ve been living under a rock for about 10 years, you may be blameless. I’ve probably left out a few groups, too. But when do we stop blaming and start looking for answers? Do we stew in our mud and pout forever? I say NO.
The Solution
This monster needs to be dealt with not using a butter knife, but a giant sword. Let’s get to the heart of it:
* Take a look at EVERY mortgage in the US.
* Government offers to payoff the ENTIRE mortgage, but takes a 35% stake in the property, only to be paid back if the home is sold
* Government offers to payoff HALF the mortgage, but takes a 25% stake in the property, only to be paid back if the home is sold.
* Government offers to payoff QUARTER of the mortgage, but takes a 15% stake in the property, only to be paid back if the home is sold.
Morally wrong? Perhaps…but how about the sub primes? That borders on ridiculous…and the stories that have come about. What does this solution accomplish? Many things:
* Takes bad/toxic mortgages off the market for good
* Banks get paid back their principal balances without any recourse from taxpayers, they can loan out again
* Foreclosures will stop or slow down significantly, and if the homeowner loses his/her job…won’t get thrown out of their home.
* Puts a floor under housing prices
* Income meant to pay mortgages can be used to spend in the economy, invest or save
If you’re into golf vernacular, this is called a ‘mulligan’….or a do-over. Yes, it seems wrong…but we’ll never get out of this crisis without some serious action….and until the powers that be are willing to put blame behind, then we’ll continue to be trapped in this web for as long as it takes.

Posted by: rip | February 10, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

He said the American people was for him = well no one that I know is. He is inexperienced and it shows. We might have been in a mess but we are in for a far greater one now. He doesn’t have a clue.

Posted by: Jane | February 10, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Obama is sooooooooo far over his head that it is downright scary. Turbo Tax Tim was/is the wrong choice and Obama should cut his loss as quick as possible and replace him with someone more qualified like Bernie Madoff.

Posted by: jack | February 10, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

dave says”There will be no confidence in the financial arena until some action is taken to hold to account those who created this mess. Turbo Tim was there in NY on Wall Street watching his buds do the dirty deeds.”
And this David couldn’t agree with you more, not only were his “buds” having a good time but I’ll bet you there were more than a few reps from the great northeast involved in this mess as well.

Posted by: david | February 10, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

We spend BILLIONS of dollars defending ourselves from individuals like Bin Laden for the Damage he has gone, but when much greater damage is done to our economy by CEO’s and Bank exec.’s we do not call them economic terrorist even though they have done more damage to the USA than Bin Laden could wish to do in his life time. How many people have lost Jobs and Homes, because of Bin Laden? Government needs to aggressively attack this kind of economic terrorist. If they do not we may fall pray to the terrorist from within.

Posted by: Richard | February 10, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

There is nothing as exciting as seeing a republican midget posture for the camera… no not that pug Liberman… I mean that little Senetor from Tennessee. He’s a jerk with a chip on his shoulder… venter, de mint and shelby are more of the southern white trash too.

Posted by: MrSleepy | February 10, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Those wascally wepublicans! Don’t they
realize that there isn’t a moment to lose in passing this wonderful Dem
package? Don’t they know how the people
will string them up for questioning
Obama and his slew of economic advisors?
They should stop trying to question
this tax cheat, Geithner, and pass
EVERYTHING Obama, Pelosi, and Reid
want. It’s called patriotism.

Posted by: grizzly bare | February 10, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Here we have Geithner who can’t figure his own taxes in charge of a monumental finiancial crisis?? Geithner was there when all this was coming down. Where was he? In bed with all his friends on Wall Street and Congress. When are we going to have them held accountable for the crooked deals they did?? I think Americans wouldn’t be half as angry as they are if we could at least see an attempt at procesecuting the properteriers of this mess. CEOs need to be fired and criminal charges need to be filed against them. What is happening? How come they are getting away with crime? How come we should give them more money to spend on themselves? What about Madoff? How come he is not in jail? He stole $50 billion dollars from innocent victims??? Put the CEOs in jail , let their companies fail as they should then we can talk about reconstruction.

Posted by: c horse | February 10, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

What part of the Republicans want our country to fail and all us common folk to suffer just so they can say I told you so don’t you understand? I will never vote Republican again!!!!

Posted by: JimM | February 10, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

He said the American people was for him = well no one that I know is. He is inexperienced and it shows. We might have been in a mess but we are in for a far greater one now. He doesn’t have a clue.
Posted by: Jane
*******************************************
Oh great G.I Jane and the Re-pubic-an followers.
It seems that every one of you have their own little worthless valued opinions and you have no idea
how big the problem is. Your experience on the Hill
shows that you were NEVER in control of this situation. Too bad you didn’t have this anal retentive stubbornness you are now showing when
you were were majority leaders. Maybe that is why
you lost seats in both houses for 2 consecutive
cycles! Right now you are showing only sour grapes. Isn’t it funny you are demanding details,
hmmmm hard to learn from mistakes, isn’t it. Don’t you wish you did the same with that $12 Billion you gave to Goldman Sacs, or the $85 Billion to G.I.A.
gee, I’m sure bush had it all set for you. Yeh, Right!
The long we procrastinate the worse it will get, unless this is what you want. Or maybe, this what you want…

Posted by: spacerook1 | February 10, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

c horse, You know what is really sick with this Madoff
fiasco. Martha Stewart spent time in prison (granted
it wasn’t hard time) but she had to get rid of her makeup which for a woman, would be as close to torture as you can get. This guy is in his $7 million
suite, having the pizza boy deliver empty boxes,
so he can fill them up with money, giving the boxes
back to be redelivered to his partners in crime.

Posted by: spacerook1 | February 10, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

It’s fair to say that one of the gang leaders from Dixie, Vitter, has a credibility problem of sorts, and isn’t really in any position to be be wielding any hookers, I mean, hooks into Geithner and his bailout plans. He (Vitter) needs to stop the can the Chicken LIttle, while Corker needs to put a cork in it. Hopefully, the GOP Dixie gang will go South in public opinion for their obstruction with the stimulus package, and calling for a ready made and complete bailout in two weeks. At least we know Geithner’s not going to pull a fast and careless one like Paulson.

Posted by: kathy | February 10, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

It’s fair to say that one of the gang leaders from Dixie, Vitter, has a credibility problem of sorts, and isn’t really in any position to be be wielding any hookers, I mean, hooks into Geithner and his bailout plans. He (Vitter) needs to stop the can the Chicken LIttle, while Corker needs to put a cork in it. Hopefully, the GOP Dixie gang will go South in public opinion for their obstruction with the stimulus package, and calling for a ready made and complete bailout in two weeks. At least we know Geithner’s not going to pull a fast and careless one like Paulson.

Posted by: kathy | February 10, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

He (Vitter) needs to stop the can the Chicken LIttle
**************************************************
I meant Vitter needs to can the Chicken Little. He needs to stop with the tricks. Sorry.

Posted by: kathy | February 10, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Not that I am a conspiracy theorist type person, but maybe the plan all along was to make sure Wall Street didn’t like Turbo Tim’s statements in order to send the Dow way down (which happened). Further showing B.O. followers the need for the almighty recovery act. Please, oh please can someone please tell me how nationalizing my healthcare (that I happen to be very happy with without B.O.’s interference) will help stimulate the economy?
The same people that screamed bloody murder over the patriot act (because private phone calls between terrorists were being tapped) are perfectly willing to let the government keep all of our medical information in a database. Had herpes, abortion, aids, or anything else you don’t want someone to find out?? Just you wait. Ask Joe the Plumber about having privacy invaded when you ask the wrong questions. Not that I am a Joe fan, but it didn’t take much to get a county employee to sing like a bird.
No to the spending plan, and no to nationalized healthcare. Government has no business telling me or you what care is best for us, and doctors will not consult you before treating you anymore, they will be forced to consult the government. Senior citizens WILL be the hardest hit. Congress and the admin will keep their first class healthcare, it’s you and me that will be stuck with the crappy care that we will no longer have a say in.

Posted by: Jessica | February 10, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

And any of you really expected answers from a criminal? Only difference between the recently appointed officials and criminal suspects is that the latter are suspects.

Posted by: No Compromise | February 10, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

All low-life, good for nothing trash.

Posted by: Flash | February 10, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

and, are we surprised by anything that the wicked witch of the west does for her own benefit? I mean, we are talking about the same woman (using that term loosely) that blasted automakers for flying corporate jets while practically boarding her taxpayer funded jet.

Posted by: Jessica | February 10, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

I’d like to know why republicans weren’t asking for accountability when
GWB was handing out 800 billion . And now the banks are not using that money the way it was intended to be used .

Posted by: Rick | February 10, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

I’m terribly disgusted with republican senators and house members. Seriously, rather than hurling insults and criticisms to the solutions that the Obama administration has offered thus far, why don’t you actually come up with solutions?? I AM SO FED UP WITH REPUBLICAN WING NUTS WHO KEEP ON CRITICIZING RATHER THAN ACTUALLY OFFERING SUGGESTIONS ON HOW TO SOLVE THIS ECONOMIC MESS. IT’S AN UNCONVENTIONAL PROBLEM THAT REQUIRES AN UNCONVENTIONAL SOLUTION. THAT MEANS TAKING RISKS IN FIGURING OUT WHAT WORKS!!

Posted by: FAI | February 10, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

The Republicans are a sad bunch. What they need to do is stand back and let intelligent people clean up the mess that their hero, George “WMD” Bush left behind.

Posted by: what667 | February 10, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

What I don’t get is all these people who think this problem is all the Republicans fault…it’s all Bush’s fault. It is the Congress’s responsibility to appropriate and spend $$$…and to regulate things. Who has been in charge of Congress for the last few years? Hmmm… Yes, in the long run, it is Bush’s fault…He was the President…that’s how things work. The President’s job is to provide leadership, but if Congress doesn’t want to do their jobs, the President can’t fire them…only we can. I have no use for Dems or Reps… they are all acting like 4 yr olds… “it’s their fault”…”is not”…”is too”. What a bunch of bunk!… C’mon people..quit playing their game! Make them do their jobs or get rid of them. Nuff Said!

Posted by: Roach | February 11, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am

All low-life, good for nothing trash.
*************************************************
Please, Flash, you really are too kind.

Posted by: kathy | February 11, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

WHAT I DON’T GET: Why does anyone with a brain believe this can be fixed without blunder, if the REPUBLICANS had been this cautious with BUSH, who inherited a SURPLUS then we wouldn’t be in this mess. As far as Senator Shelby, helly all he brings to Alabama is foreign car dealership, who too are laying off workers and so when has he been so for AMERICA. GET THESE PARTISAN CLOWNS OUT OF OFFICE!!!AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

Posted by: EYESURGERY | February 11, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

What a novice, has to go on another magical mystery tour to sell the stimulus that no one wants and then has this clown come out the next day and ask for 2 trillion more with no plan and no idea if any of it will work, just trust us. The Iraq War cost about 600 billion, so far Obama has made that look like chump change in three weeks.

Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | February 11, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

The Republicans have been put on notice. Come mid-term elections, the American people will again speak loud and clear the GOP is no longer of any use to the country.

Posted by: what667 | February 11, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am

I don’t think the Obama administration has a clue about what they are doing or they would provide the details. This is really scary how our government can rob us blind and not be accountable to anyone.

Posted by: ddd | February 11, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Stop looking back at Bush. Geithner today was very specific that there would be no specifics. He showed his hand today that is as weak or weaker than Paulson. Like Paulson he is a political pawn who must squirm and lie for his bosses. How sad that we qualify political nothingness rather than American citizens. Fire Geithner and the entire economic advisory committee.

Posted by: candlelightholder | February 11, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

The administration can’t give any details when they haven’t a clue as to what they’re going to do. No one in a stable financial situation and in their right mind would take on additional debt in this situation. And no lending institution is going to lend to the people who aren’t in a financial good situation because that started this meltdown. No matter how much money is pumped into the system credit isn’t going to loosen up and handing out money is the only card the new adminstration has to play.

Posted by: Publius | February 11, 2009, 1:44 am 1:44 am

I think I’m listening to Elmer Fudd?

Posted by: LongT | February 11, 2009, 1:46 am 1:46 am

That guy got an F-!

Posted by: LongT | February 11, 2009, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Another Chicago politician with no way forward.

Posted by: LongT | February 11, 2009, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Geithner. Another Chicago politician without a plan.

Posted by: LongT | February 11, 2009, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Eyesurgery, you seem to forget that it was the Republicans who had control of both Houses in Congress the last SIX years of President Clinton’s two terms.

Posted by: James Danley | February 11, 2009, 2:04 am 2:04 am

When will they realize that we can’t spend our way out of this situation, we have to produce our way out of it. It’s going to be my generation shouldering this massive debt that’s being shoved down our throats.

Posted by: WereScrewed | February 11, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Two weeks ago Geithner was the only man in America who could hit the ground running.
Today he needs more time to get up to speed.

Posted by: JM Hanes | February 11, 2009, 3:32 am 3:32 am

WereScrewed== Produce? produce what== for whom? Don’t you usually need a market into which your product can flow in order to make “production” a profitable enterprise?

Posted by: OMichael | February 11, 2009, 3:51 am 3:51 am

How many of you still refuse to see what is so plain to millions of other Americans?
Obama hates America and plans to bring her to her knees.
Please think about not helping him do that.

Posted by: tanarg | February 11, 2009, 4:06 am 4:06 am

Obama and Geithner….The doubletalk twins.
They rattle on ad nauseum without ever really answering anything.
As far as this call to arms of “too big to fail”…..Do ya think maybe we should prevent that in the future?
Lets just not allow companys to get this big….break them up into smaller companys, that we can afford to have fail…..
Seriously…I’m beyond worried about our country….I did’nt think Americans would let this bill pass…now I see they already have five more in the works….and when we all wake up to the damage…there is nothing we can do to hold them accountable…Oh we can vote them out…but they will not suffer financially like we will…we can’t prosecute them….They have nothing to lose…..
We’re finally getting to know Obama….All his talk about ethics and responsibilty, can be shed like a snakeskin….when it serves his purpose…
I doubt we will have to worry about any terrorist attacks…
The terrorists aim was to destroy our economy…and take our freedom.
They can now sit back and watch our prez do it.
I hope that was’nt the plan all along.

Posted by: J Moore | February 11, 2009, 4:22 am 4:22 am

tanarg, I believe it is Bush and Cheney who have done that.

Posted by: Mooseketeer | February 11, 2009, 4:23 am 4:23 am

From the article: “Corker’s criticisms came on the heels of similar comments from ranking member Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Alab., Sen. Jim DeMint, R-SC, and Sen. David Vitter, R-Lou.. ”
_______________________________________
that looks like the same laundry list of senators whom, for the past eight years, were yes men to what the previous administration requested. Where were these so-needed guidlines and specifics then? Where were the questions and challenges? Are we to take these guys seriously? I have news for them and their supporters… you were the people who got us in this mess and now you should sit back and keep your mouths shut and let someone else fix it!!!

Posted by: cork | February 11, 2009, 4:55 am 4:55 am

from the article: “”The path our country has pursued to date was too limited in support,” Geithner said. “It came late. It came with too little broad trust and confidence and too little direct support to the businesses and consumers and households that are most effected by the crisis; people who were careful and responsible in their actions but were damaged by the judgments of those who did not.”
_______________________________________
on the other side of the fence….. then why exactly is all I hear is helping those who wereb’t responsible? Why is it we should bail out those who purchased more home than they could afford? Why do we help those companies who leadership ran it into the ground? Why help a car company who was making muscle cars when gas was exploding to 4$ a gallon? Where is the help for those of us who live within our means but are being taxed out of homes by schools and states and counties? Where is our help? I hear nothing of taking care of or helping us… All we see is the govt handing money to crooks who have mega million dollar super bowl parties… etc etc etc
Obama and company are turning out to be almost as big a joke as the entire republican party has been for the past 2 administrations…..

Posted by: cork | February 11, 2009, 5:02 am 5:02 am

Geithner doesn’t deserve to be the Secretary Treasury. He can’t be trusting and he didn’t pay his taxes. Wall Street Market was down yesterday because of him.

Posted by: anonymous | February 11, 2009, 5:33 am 5:33 am

Geithner has to stall until the passage of the porkulus package, else TARP 2 save the economy before Obama can spend all the money buying votes.

Posted by: drjohn | February 11, 2009, 7:36 am 7:36 am

I see a lot of wisdom in this forum and a lot of stupidity too.
Hey, Obamabots: I thought your Messiah was all about Hope. And Change. And Unity. So why is it that all you can do is insult “white boys” and southerners and Republicans and Boooosh instead of defending Obama’s arguments? Could it be because they are indefensible?
Obama and Emanuel made a huge mistake in sticking with Geithner once they discovered his tax problems. The market and the people will never accept him as the titanic figure who will lead us out of this crisis and to can him now would make the markets go insane. So we’re stuck with another fraudulent, unprepared, Wizard of Oz dud who will never live up to the outrageous hype that spawned him. Just like our Dear Leader.

Posted by: CFB | February 11, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am

It isn’t just those pesky Republican Senators who are going after Geithner for his performance yesterday. I clearly remember when he was nominated for Treasury– we kept being assured that he was the most superior candidate ever, that we HAD to have him despite his tax issues because he was simply the only person who could do the job. We were reminded that, as head of the NY Fed, he had been intimately involved with wall street and the big banks during the growing crisis and that he had helped Paulson craft the rescue plans. We were told he could hit the ground running because of his unique skill set.
So now he’s in charge of Treasury and we were promised a big plan from him this week. His rollout of the plan was pushed back to Tuesday from Monday in order not to step on the story of the stimulus debate. On Monday night, Obama hyped the presentation to come. ANd then, on Tuesday, Geithner gave us a campaign speech or something rather than a plan. He had no details, and admitted as much. Fine, but then don’t go building up expectations for a plan that does not yet exist.
Most annoyingly, he told the Senators, “I have only been on the job for two weeks.” WHAT? That’s your excuse? Forget it. The transition was the smoothest in memory, as everyone on both sides kept saying. The Bush Treasury welcomed Obama people in to work along with them and to see what was going on. Geithner was at work in NYC. So after two weeks of actually holding the title but after much longer as the person whose main assignment was to take control of this situation, he is not yet ready for prime time.
The administration dropped the ball by leading us to believe a fleshed-out plan was coming this week. They are, after all, the ones with their hair on fire, shouting that time is of the essence and we haven’t a moment to spare to stave off Armageddon (sorry, catastrophe, let’s not exaggerate. *G*) So we can’t even pause to read an 800 page bill before we pass it, because time’s a wastin’. But we can roll out an outline and a pledge rather than a plan, and that’s okay because it’s only been a few weeks.
Give me strength.

Posted by: moderate | February 11, 2009, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Hey Cork. You’re wondering where “that “laundry list” of “yes men” were the last 8 years?
Answer: Trying to wrangle in Freddie and Fanny with opposition from Dodd and Frank.
Don’t blame republicans for this mess. As for Barry, he needs to stop with the over-the-top negative adjectives when it comes to the what Nancy, Harry, and Bill got us into. How can Americans have hope with that kind of rhetoric?

Posted by: RAT | February 11, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

cork…Fact: “What go us into this mess initially were banks taking exorbitant, wild risks with other people’s money (translation:sub-prime loans) based on shaky assets(translation:sub-prime loans.)” cited from Obama’s first prime time news conference.
Another Fact:In 1999 under pressure from the Clinton administration, Fannie Mae, the nation’s LARGEST home mortgage underwriter, RELAXED credit requirements on the loans it would purchase from other banks and lenders, hoping that easing these restrictions would result in increased loan availability for minority and low-income buyers. Translation: The Clinton administration looked to increase their sub-prime portfolios..Translation: Loaned money who could not afford to pay it back when interest rates began to go up thus mortgage foreclosures began banks began to fail..tax revenue took a dump, jobs began to go bye-bye…
Translation: The Dems responsibility is the beginning of this entire mess and the Repubs for ignoring the problem and the Dems ARE GOING TO DO IT ALL OVER AGAIN WITH THIS SO CALLED STIMULUS BILL…Mark this date and remember it in 2012…AS OBAMA SAID IN HIS FLORIDA TOWN HALL MEETING ” HEY, IF IT DOESN’T WORK, DON’T VOTE FOR ME IN 2012.” HE ACTUALLY SAID THAT!!!

Posted by: Parallax View | February 11, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.