By Nitya

Feb 13, 2009 2:41pm

Today’s Q for O’s WH — 2/13/2009

TAPPER: I just wanted to give you guys an opportunity to respond to two things from yesterday involving Caterpillar. One is the CEO of Caterpillar, after the president left the event, said that he did not think the stimulus package in and of itself would be able to enable him to rehire workers, certainly not in the short term. He put out a statement today saying that the stimulus package, "combined with other significant stimulus packages abroad, would help move the global economy towards recovery and, if these packages are enacted quickly, they could stimulate the need for our products, and that would likely over time provide capital and the opportunity to recall employees that have been laid off," certainly not exactly what President Obama said he had said. And I don’t know what he said to begin with. But if you could clarify that. And also…

GIBBS: Well, let me — let me — let me take a stab at that one. I think what the president said that the chairman and the CEO said, if the recovery plan is passed, the company would be able to rehire some of those employees. And as you just read, he said that, if these packages are enacted quickly, they could stimulate demand for our products that would likely over time provide Caterpillar the opportunity to recall employees that have been laid off during this downturn. I think the statement that you just read and the statement of the president are very consistent.

(PAUSE)

TAPPER: I don’t even know how to respond to that. It seems to me like the president — well, it just — I mean, the president was clearly giving the impression, before the stimulus package had passed, that the CEO of Caterpillar, who just announced layoffs in January, said that he would be able to rehire some of those workers if this stimulus package passed, the one stimulus package that the Senate was considering at the time. And what the CEO of Caterpillar said today — and, again, I don’t know what he said in private to anybody in your administration — what he said today was, this one, plus other ones worldwide, over a period of time, that could enable them to rehire some of those workers.

GIBBS: It would likely over time provide Caterpillar the opportunity to recall employees who have been laid off during this downturn.

TAPPER: All right. I’m not going to belabor it. The other thing is, Congressman Ed Schock yesterday, who President Obama urged Caterpillar employees…

GIBBS: Aaron Schock.

TAPPER: …Oh, I’m sorry, Aaron Schock. President Obama urged…Caterpillar employees to lobby him; he went to the floor of the House today and said that he had stayed around for half-an-hour and not one Caterpillar employee came to him and urged him to — to vote for the stimulus package and, in fact, over the course of time, 1,400 Caterpillar employees have urged him to oppose the stimulus package. And I was just wondering what you think that indicates, if the president comes to a factory, heralds what this bill will do for these employees, urges them to lobby a congressman, and, according to the congressman, not one of them does so?

GIBBS: Well, I haven’t — I haven’t seen what the congressman said. I think…

TAPPER: Exactly what I just said.

GIBBS: Right. I think — I think the president and the CEO have laid out the benefits of this bill, what it would do. I think it’s obvious an infrastructure investment that is greater than any infrastructure investment since the beginning of the Interstate Highway System in the ’50s is going to spur demand for construction equipment and put people back to work and will have a positive benefit in East Peoria, where we were, and throughout downstate Illinois, and throughout the country. I think, if the congressman goes back and evaluates the plan, lobbying or not, I think he’ll see that it saves or creates millions of jobs, puts people back to work, would put people — would put money directly into employees at Caterpillar’s pockets, as well as people throughout his district. It marks a landmark achievement, in terms of renewable energy, which, having spent time in Peoria and downstate Illinois is a big deal for them, will create and refurbish schools and create 21st- century classrooms. I think, if the congressman goes and looks at the bill through an economic lens, not just one — not just through a political one, I think he’ll see benefits not just for his district and his state, but for the entire country.

TAPPER: I’m not questioning that, but it seems to me like there’s some sort of disconnect between the president urging constituents to lobby their congressmen. This has been one of the problems that’s –

GIBBS: I can’t speak to — I can’t speak to what the — what the congressman said or saw from different employees, because I didn’t hang out with them yesterday. I can simply speak to the benefits that economists that aren’t affiliated with this White House say the bill will do. Maybe some of those guys should call him, too.

– jpt

User Comments

I know you’re just doing your job, but it seems that you are rare in your profession. Keep up the good work.

Posted by: Bryan | February 13, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

You go Jake!!

Posted by: lonniespears | February 13, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Go get ‘em, Jake. Hats off to you for asking the tough questions. Keep up the good work!

Posted by: Brent | February 13, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Watched this over lunch today. I don’t normally watch ABC but I have to give you kudo’s! You really pushed that – i could only wish you _had_ belabored the point, i sure got a kick out of listening to gibbs say “um.. um um..um”
Better get yourself some protection buddy their not going to like you much on the hill for a while :)

Posted by: Scott McDonald | February 13, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Jake thank you for showing some journalistic integrity.

Posted by: Ben Greenbaum | February 13, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Caterpillar CEO, JIM Owens, also said the stimulus BILL was light on heavy construction.

Posted by: mad | February 13, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Thank you for actually asking some tough questions that directly challenge the stimulus bill. It is just a shame that you could not get any honest direct answers.

Posted by: Eric | February 13, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

President Obama lies to the American people regularly. Just as candidate Obama did.
And our glorious “free and fair press” let him.

Posted by: Justamom | February 13, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Jake you are the man. Keep it up. You are the only legit reporter out there. Thanks a lot!

Posted by: Muu Dam | February 13, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

As General Powell could recall: he now remembers how he had lobbied the World to go to war to solve the Iraqi terrorist problem.
Our Greatest Smartest Leader is doing the Powell lobbying for our economy.

Posted by: Comrade Powell | February 13, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Great line of questions. Exposes how little understanding there is for how business and the economy works. Good job for asking the questions.

Posted by: Marc Yarlott | February 13, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Thank you, Jake, for being a watchdog rather than another lapdog.

Posted by: Gone Gulchin' | February 13, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Thank-you Jake for reporting the truth.
We the people will never hear from the MSM media that 1400 Caterpillar employees did not support Obama’s pork bill.
I did notice he did not get much applause.
But we only heard Obama’s version of how his bill will get people rehired.
Obama should be ashamed of the way he purposely misleads and manipulates us.

Posted by: sammy | February 13, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Jake,
way to go!!!!! Finally, someone asking REAL QUESTIONS!!!!!! Maybe I should start watching ABC ?

Posted by: tired of mainstream media | February 13, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Jake, thank you for being a real journalist.

Posted by: Michelle | February 13, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

While almost every other source in the media is asking Helen Thomas type “stupid” questions meant to make Obama look better it’s good to see someone stand up and do what the media should be doing…asking the tough questions. I heard Chris Matthews say he thought it was his job, now that Obama was elected, (something Matthews actively encouraged) to ensure he has a successful presidency. Which of course begs the question, why didn’t he feel the same way about Bush? Obviously my questions is rhetorical but gets to the heart of the problem regarding the media and Obama…most of them feel they can “help” Obama’s administration as they did during the election. This seems like erosion from journalism to activism, something I would think real journalists like Jake Tapper would detest. Keep up the good work!!

Posted by: DD | February 13, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Thank your for bringing back the Edward R Murrow form of journalism. Truth and honesty are important and most politicians today believe the concepts do not apply. I am telling friends about your refreshing approach.

Posted by: Neil | February 13, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

“Well, let me — let me — let me take a stab at that one.”
Yeah, take a shot at it.
The thing about this “save-r-create” jobs blabla is that as long as there ARE three or four million “jobs” LEFT, the Obama-stration can claim to have “saved” them.
Wonder how many NEW “jobs” will be for former-military riot police in California and wherever …

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 13, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Oh my goodness, a real live reporter!

Posted by: Looloo | February 13, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Jake -
Good job.
Please ask Gibbs if the Congress has exempted themselves from the healthcare guidelines they inserted into the stimulus bill.

Posted by: peach | February 13, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

I just googled you, Mr. Tapper. I’m an educated housewife who just happens to watch Robert Gibbs’ take on that great Byrds song every day (“Spin, Spin, Spin”). I also happen to be married to a man with a 20-year (so far) salaried career at Cat. I lived in the Peoria area for the majority of my adult life. Your questions and comments today were GOLDEN, nail-on-the-head perfect, and I just had to Google you to let you know. I actually am recording the news conference every day to see what you will say (bet you can guess what day last week prompted that!).
If I hadn’t switched parties when the Clinton debaucle began (thank you, Maxine Waters, during the impeachment proceedings), I’d sure be doing it now.
I have no clue if the “Buy American” provisions made it in the final bill, but I know that the Caterpillar salaried employees we know are NOT drinking the Obama Kool-Aid. (Such a shame that I am already so disillusioned – I really wanted him to be a great president, even though I didn’t vote for him. I just didn’t think I would feel this way so incredibly soon.)
Now to start TiVo-ing ABC News instead of just Fox. Tell your bosses to give you that raise, plus 20%. Keep up the great work.

Posted by: Cat Wife | February 13, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Bravo, Jake Tapper. My dad setup the AP office in Reno in the early 1930′s and was a member of the White House Correspondents Assoc. in the 1930′s and 40′s when in D.C. At last there is newspaperman/journalist he would be proud of and of the “old” style.
Keep up the good work.
P.S. Bravo to Caterpillar.

Posted by: Judy | February 13, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Jake, thanks for seeking the truth!
The truth will set us free! (2010?)

Posted by: Stormin Norman | February 13, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Jake, you probably will not ever read this, but I wonder how you are feeling. Rush has given the green light for his followers to come to this site.
How do you feel about that? I mean, what does that say for you?
I mean if I was a journalist and Madow or Matthews told people to come to my site, I would be worrying that I am not doing my job correctly..
Oh well, hope it works out for you.
Tell Matt I said hi tomorrow.

Posted by: Fox News Light | February 13, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Jake – You’re the best! Keep the questions coming. Keep up the good work!

Posted by: Dee | February 13, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

THANK YOU, for trying to get to the truth.Keep asking tough questions from BOTH parties. Maybe I’ll start watching the evening news again.

Posted by: Ski | February 13, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

C’mon Jake, it’s not fair asking Gibbs questions like that. It’s pretty clear that the Obama administration doesn’t think about their comments after they’ve been printed or uttered. They may not think about them beforehand, either.

Posted by: Lightduty | February 13, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

The other interesting Gibbs comment, I thought, was about the mortgage plan Obama is about to put out not being judged by 1 day’s performance of the stock market.
That, of course, is a reference to Geithner’s much-criticized plan, and the criticism didn’t come merely because it made stocks drop.
I hope they are taking criticism of Geithner’s plan/performance seriously.
I also hope that wasn’t a signal the mortgage plan isn’t going to be well developed either. I guess we’ll see.

Posted by: MayBee | February 13, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

That’s all I ever asked of any of the reporters ask the tough questions. I,ve watched Jake Tapper the last couple of weeks and I’m really impressed by him and his type of questions

Posted by: miami hurricane | February 13, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Nicely done, Jake.
Can I add a couple of other things from Obama’s website?
End the Practice of Writing Legislation Behind Closed Doors: As president, Barack Obama will restore the American people’s trust in their government by making government more open and transparent. Obama will work to reform congressional rules to require all legislative sessions, including committee mark-ups and conference committees, to be conducted in public. By making these practices public, the American people will be able to hold their leaders accountable for wasteful spending and lawmakers won’t be able to slip favors for lobbyists into bills at the last minute.
and
Sunlight Before Signing: Too often bills are rushed through Congress and to the president before the public has the opportunity to review them. As president, Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.
These are rather pertinent.
Does Obama intend to honor ANY of his campaign pledges?

Posted by: drjohn | February 13, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Why do you suppose the news stations have taken to cutting off the White House press briefings as soon as Gibbs makes a fool of himself?
This didn’t happen with Dana Perino, Tony Snow, Scott McClellan …

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 13, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Jake Tapper – The last honest journalist in America
Keep up the good work!

Posted by: Carol | February 13, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Kudos to Jake Tapper! I wish there were more journalists like you.

Posted by: Colleen | February 13, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

“As president, Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.”
Unless He’s aiming at a showboat signing on “Presidents Day”, or otherwise doesn’t feel like it …

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 13, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Jake,
I missed it. What was your line of questions and answers from congressman Schock with the evidence from his constituents?

Posted by: watching | February 13, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

keep on sticking it to ‘em…and perhaps you can ask when the president and co. will quit using the election results to justify doing whatever they want to do and believing whatever they want to believe, even when it means breaking all those promises made on the trail….

Posted by: kim | February 13, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

What evidence do we have that 1400 workers urged against the bill? I mean other than Jake telling us.

Posted by: irma | February 13, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

“Your reporting certainly hasn’t helped us better understand the Bill. ”
Jake Tapper is not your personal army.
***************************************
Never said he was. Just pointing out facts as they appear to me.

Posted by: Thinking | February 13, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

If I were Gibbs, I’d being reading this blog or having a staff member read it every day.
Jake actually “telegraphs” his question of the day hours ahead of time.
So why isn’t the Gibbster johnny on the spot with a real on-point comeback either factual or just a witticism instead of his confusion, tired WH propaganda lines and resentment of “odd” questions.

Posted by: robert b | February 13, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

jake if you dont quit asking him them questions a.b.c gonna get rid of you they want you to be like chris mathews

Posted by: jandj | February 13, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

You hold everyone’s puddies to the fire equally and ask the questions we all wish we could. You, sir, are a JOURNALIST and what a rare, wonderful thing in this day and age.
In honor of Valentine’s, I feel free to express myself thusly:
I ::heart:: Jake.

Posted by: tree hugging sister | February 13, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Gibbs is such a weazel!

Posted by: Cory | February 13, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

I’m sure he is one of the WHO CARES ABOUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE REPUBLICANS and that was a sabotage move..

Posted by: Lawrence | February 13, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Thinking, Tapper is a real journalist who asks questions that need to be asked. We don’t need to know what Tapper believes. He is supposed to look at issues without bias so he can ask questions and present them to the American people for their education. I for one saw the difference between the Presdent’s comments and the CAT CEO as an easy explain. Obama lied. Obama is a serial liar. He says he will be transparent and he hasn’t been. He said he wouldn’t have lobbyists in his administration. He kept that rule for 2 days before he had to sign a waiver of his own rule so he could have a former lobbyist in DOJ. I mean, why even have this rule if you can’t keep it. DUH! How many more lies will he tell before people will realize what a liar he is.

Posted by: Sandy | February 13, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

I’d be willing to bet that Gibbs hasn’t been hanging out with the “economists that aren’t affiliated with this White House” either. No speed bumps there!
If you’re ever at a loss for an article, you could just list all the things that Gibbs can’t speak to.

Posted by: JM Hanes | February 13, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

“The stimulus pkg. in and of itself.” Not being the sole solution says it all. A lot of other factors need to come into play here. That’s all. A jump start is better than giving the wealthy a tax break. Maybe we can try some more of the Republican “De-regualtion” techniques that helped to screw us over in regards to the Aero industry, power etc. Let’s complain about the real ideas–coming from the right wing that damaged our economy. Rather than playing catch 22 on what Obama said.

Posted by: irma | February 13, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Watch your back, Jake! Pretty soon you’ll get government agencies illegally crawling through your records… dare to ask tough questions and it’s only a matter of time before you get the Joe the Plumber treatment!
Meanwhile, Obama only allows preselected reporters to ask him preselected questions at his first big news conference. This administration so far is just like the campaign was–a highly choreographed charade.

Posted by: JHM | February 13, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Lets see that on world news tonight, I bet OLD Charlie and conflict of interest George would run from that question and answer LMAO

Posted by: DOH-bama Cabinet of Corruption | February 13, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

What a reporter should do. Ask the tough questions. If more reporters were like you, more people would know more about this stimulas and what it contains. Keep up the reporting.

Posted by: Greed | February 13, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I saw that presser and almost got whiplash on hearing Gibb’s answer. Does he think no one is watching? Are they all so immersed in the hopey changey Messiah stuff that they think no one will notice?
They may be right.

Posted by: Jane | February 13, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

“Your reporting certainly hasn’t helped us better understand the Bill.”
Well, it’s over 1000 pages that was finished up last night.
Yes, between then and now you could vote on it, but reading it or understanding it will take another few days of work at least. Then figuring out a summary, it’ll be mid-next week at the earliest before anyone can summarize what was passed through the house, maybe the week after before most of the details are known.
Fortunately reading and understanding isn’t necessary to vote on it and get it approved through the House.
Does anyone feel good that the House is willing to pass a bill that nobody has had time to read?

Posted by: Gekk | February 13, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Posted by: Cory | Feb 13, 2009 3:24:09 PM
Gibbs is such a weazel!
—————————————
Remember,someone could have or will say the same about you one day.

Posted by: fempharoh | February 13, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

non story….Rush Limbaugh orderd all the republicans to vote no from day one. which is the way it will be throughout Obamas presidency

Posted by: boring | February 13, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

BRAVO Mr. Tapper! My “hope” is that more journalists hold this administration accountable.
Thank you .

Posted by: oriana | February 13, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I can’t believe all this gushing over your reporting Jake! You didn’t even get the guys name right! What you complain about, is exactly what Obama said to begin with….So let’s do Nothing? All these complaints with no solutions. The Republicans had solutions that sunk us. I am looking at the NEW direction with a lot more optimism, geee I bet the Old Gipper is rolling in his grave with all this negativism from the right wing.

Posted by: irma | February 13, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Jake:
I find it intriguing that you are (by some, not by all) taken to task for pointing out and asking about inconsistent statements made by the newly minted (reference to the “mint” can be taken many ways, all intended) POTUS and/or his spokespeople. As if these events and occasions are your creation. As if you are the problem, if there is a problem.
I have a suggestion but maybe it’s too simple to be right, too obvious to have any validity but, to me, it sure makes sense.
If you don’t like Jake Tapper digging into inconsistent statements, stop making inconsistent statements.
How hard is that?
I know, seems harder than it should be.

Posted by: IndieDogg | February 13, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

It’s hilarious how many commenters in here are expressing hatred for Jake Tapper. How dare you ask tough questions, Tapper! You clearly have an agenda!
They’re so right… he should really just be asking “Obama, are you comfortable?” “Obama, is there anything we can do to make you more comfortable?”
How dare he question the most expensive bbill in the history of the US Congress!

Posted by: JHM | February 13, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

I’m curious as to why people don’t want this administration to answer hard questions. What is the rationale behind that?

Posted by: Jane | February 13, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Seems like Gibbs took you on a waltz. We realize that the truth sometimes hurt regardless of which team it comes from. We appreciate your work!

Posted by: david | February 13, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Will everyone get back to work at catepillar with the stimulus pkg? Will they or won’t they? That’s what O said….Give us the truth! Ed said no okay Aarron, whatever…OOOOOh so heavy….

Posted by: irma | February 13, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Thinking, Tapper is a real journalist who asks questions that need to be asked. We don’t need to know what Tapper believes. He is supposed to look at issues without bias so he can ask questions and present them to the American people for their education.
**************************************

Posted by: bdaman | February 13, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Jake – I’ve been impressed for some time with the quality and accuracy of your reporting. Thank you very much for doing your best to ask hard questions, research the issues, and hold the politicians accountable for what they say and promise. Your professionalism and integrity are commendable and very much appreciated!

Posted by: Donna | February 13, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Jake, You’re great. Keep it up.. It’s nice to see that there are still some reporters out there not afraid to ask the tough questions.

Posted by: ivory | February 13, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

It sounds like the majority of the posters here would rather go back to the Bush did things. I think I’ll give the new President a few months to dig out of the mess we are in. But really, if he is lying and taking our money–isn’t that what the last admin did?

Posted by: Tracy Young | February 13, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

I don’t know what he said to begin with. But if you could clarify that. And also…
and, again, I don’t know what he said in private to anybody in your administration
And I was just wondering what you think that indicates, if the president comes to a factory, heralds what this bill will do for these employees, urges them to lobby a congressman, and, according to the congressman, not one of them does so?
I’m not questioning that, but it seems to me like there’s some sort of disconnect between the president urging constituents to lobby their congressmen
****************************************
So the whole premis is that you do not know what was said, and it seems to you. You don’t even know if anyone lobbied the congressman or not. You take his word, but not the Presidents; why?
It SEEMS TO ME that you do not have the facts, are not privy to the conversation and are trying to make a name for yourself out of nothing.
It SEEMS TO ME that you also continue to write about the same thing every few hours, just in a different forum.

Posted by: Thinking | February 13, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

So this is where the right wing hangs now that they lost, well there’s FOX News. Good thing there are alternate worlds for some. This one is stuck in perpetual BORINGNESS! Bye!

Posted by: irma | February 13, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Tracy Young it’s not about going back, it’s about moving forward and the fact that Bush did us all a favor. He woke us up. Now we are trying to make sure we don’t get rooked again and The O is doin it. Not only is he doing it, he is endagering our security in the process.

Posted by: bdaman | February 13, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

irma | Feb 13, 2009 3:30:05 PM
It was the democrats that presided over the “regulation” enacted under Clinton concerning CLA and the “easy” mortgage debacle…that Dodd, B. Frank et al got sweetheart kickbacks on and in the case of Frank failed to monitor!Maybe we would like to de-rgulate a little and make it so bank do not HAVE TO loan to people who are clearly unqualified.

Posted by: Prchrmn2 | February 13, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Thinking; You are the most intelligent one on here. Obviously the most educated. I am glad you are on the same side. I have always been impressed with your comments. I have been able to tell when someone falsely tries to pass themselves off as you. I for one just can’t stand fighting the redundant lost, whether deliberate or due to ignorance arguments. Take care, I’ll be back on if things heat up, but ugggh….Keep fighting the good fight!

Posted by: irma | February 13, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Julio the Frycook for White House Press Secretary!

Posted by: Jim Treacher | February 13, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Keep up the great work Jake.

Posted by: VC | February 13, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Irma, Prchmn2 is correct and not making it up.

Posted by: Eagle Eye | February 13, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Thank for trying to keep the Obama administration honest, but don’t get frustrated, Jake. We are happy you are at least letting the White House know that they haven’t fooled everybody and that some people are paying attention to what they are saying and doing.
“Ooh, I love to dance a little sidestep, now they see me now they don’t-
I’ve come and gone and, ooh I love to sweep around the wide step,
cut a little swathe and lead the people on.
Ooh, I love to dance a little sidestep…”

Posted by: Roxie | February 13, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

NICE WORK JAKE! IS ANYONE ELSE WISHING THAT AMERICAN’S COULD HAVE SEEN THIS GROSSLY UNDER-QUALIFIED, FALSELY MARKETED OBAMA DURING THE PRIMARIES?
I DREAM OF HILLARY!

Posted by: MARKWEST DC | February 13, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Nice to know there is someone in the MSM doing the job of asking tough questions. Keep it up Jake.

Posted by: Ed | February 13, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

I’m not really sure what answers you were fishing for with those “questions.” They seemed more like the monolouges Congresscritters trot out when showboating on a blue ribbon panel.
What are you expecting Gibbs to say when a Republican House member makes an entirely unverifiable claim that Obama’s efforts to win support in a conservative town failed? Were you hoping to start some “partisan Republican” blame games, or giving him a chance to point Obama is willing to go out and speak to hostile crowds?

Posted by: jhw539 | February 13, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Jake, you probably will not ever read this, but I wonder how you are feeling. Rush has given the green light for his followers to come to this site.
How do you feel about that? I mean, what does that say for you?
I mean if I was a journalist and Madow or Matthews told people to come to my site, I would be worrying that I am not doing my job correctly..
Oh well, hope it works out for you.
Tell Matt I said hi tomorrow.

Posted by: JMart | February 13, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

“It sounds like the majority of the posters here would rather go back to the Bush did things.”
This is EXACTLY bow Bush did things — right down to the smirk, and the tiresome televised “thanks” to local pols when on junkets away.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 13, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Oh no. Tapper got the Congressman’s first name wrong. Yeah that invalidates everything else. Gotta love the liberal Obamatron logic on this one folks.
Nobody with even a rudimentary understanding of economics supports this bill. Only people that do support it are the Julios of the world who work at McDonald’s and think Obama’s bill will get him a raise.

Posted by: Chad | February 13, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Eagle Eye:”Prchmn2 is correct and not making it up.”
Not according to every reputable review of the situation. Claims that the government forced banks to loan money to people who could not afford it simply have no basis in fact and are absurd on their face. The government cannot even dictate a pay cap on CEOs, yet they have spent the last 10 years making the most fundamental decision – how to distribute loan capital – for banks?
Banning redlining and other proven discriminatory practices has nothing at all to do with loans made without due diligence towards asset and income verification. Nothing.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 13, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Nice work Jake!
Apparently there is still one person left who actually takes his job as a journalist seriously – whose loyalty and responsibility is to the American people and not our politicians in office.

Posted by: Anne Chai | February 13, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Chad:”Nobody with even a rudimentary understanding of economics supports this bill. ”
And the winner of last year’s Nobel Prize for economics, that “Julio of the world who work(s) at McDonald’s” I guess. (The winner of the 2001 Nobel for Economics thinks the stimulus is too heavily weighted towards the rich, but is better than nothing.)

Posted by: jhw539 | February 13, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

You can call me Mr. Tapper!
Hopefully Gibbs is getting a Three Day W/E!!

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 13, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Tough questions my foot this is a simple case of he said she said, passed on as journalism fit for the High School year book

Posted by: Thinking | February 13, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

This must be the change that Obama was speaking of in the campaign. These ppl dont seem to have a clue between right and wrong. Nice work, Jake.

Posted by: Mitch in NC | February 13, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

What Obama said about Caterpillar was not oversimplified, but was not that far from the truth.
As for the “question” about the Republican congressman, what was Gibbs supposed to say? How should he know what it indicates? Maybe Schock was lying.
His story is hard to swallow. Despite the media spin that support for the bill has eroded, support has actually increased to 59% in the Feb. 11 poll, up 7% after Obama started his tour of cities hit hard by the Bush quasi-depression.

Posted by: Media Skeptic | February 13, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

LOL …what a waste of time….what were the tough questions that he asked Gibbs?…… the CEO does not hire back and Obama said he would….that just shows the government does not run the company……1400 employees told the congressman not to support the stimulus after Obama asked for their support….Americans can have their own opinion. That is what is great about this country. Schrock voted against the package. All are happy….
Tough questions are what are we going to do to get off our dependence of oil? How are we going to rebuild our manufacturing base? How do we compete with China and India?
I am not disillusioned

Posted by: Lou | February 13, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Irma and Think sound like they believe only reporters and media outlets that gush over Obama and his policies are worth listening too. Actually Fox News
is very inpartial. They actually report NEWS and current events. Granted some of their personalities are not very pro-left but for the most part their “news anchors” are pretty fair. I guess if you don’t agree with Obama and his policies 100% of the time and you voice your disagreement you’re bias. What about all the msm that do nothing but gush over Obama? I guess that makes them true reporters.

Posted by: notafan | February 13, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Correction: I meant what President Obama said _was_ an oversimplification of the Caterpillar CEO’s position. But even Tapper inadvertently admits that the Caterpillar CEO thinks the stimulus bill will improve the economy.

Posted by: Media Skeptic | February 13, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

What an idiot, I am almost embarrassed for Trapper at reading this. Talk about been owned !!!

Posted by: Daivd | February 13, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

I guess if you don’t agree with Obama and his policies 100% of the time and you voice your disagreement you’re bias.
****************************************
I have never said that. My beef is this is a none issue that Jake doesn’t even know what was said by whom, when, and is trying to make hay out of.
You can’t make Gold out of lead and you can’t make journalism out of gossip.

Posted by: Thinking | February 13, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Jake – you always ask tough questions for both sides of the aisle. It’s a shame the wackos on either side don’t see that. They should go back to your posts during the election when you held everyone’s feet to the fire. What some don’t realize is that now that the Dems are in control of both houses of Congress and the Executive branch and are in the leadership positions, they are the one’s that will be given the most questions since they have the power.
No need to comment on Gibbs’ questions or the situation, the questions and answers speak for themselves. Thanks for trying to keep everyone honest.

Posted by: Aaron | February 13, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

“Actually Fox News is very impartial.”
Just this week one of the newsreaders was caught repeating Senate GOP talking points word for word including a typo.
During the February 10 edition of Fox News’ Happening Now, co-host Jon Scott claimed that “the Senate is expected to pass the $838 billion stimulus plan — its version of it, anyway. We thought we’d take a look back at the bill, how it was born, and how it grew, and grew, and grew.” In tracking how and when the bill purportedly “grew,” Scott referenced seven dates, as on-screen graphics cited various news sources from those time periods. However, all of the sources and cost figures Scott cited, as well as the accompanying on-screen text, were also contained in a February 10 press release issued by the Senate Republican Communications Center. One on-screen graphic during the segment even repeated a typo from the GOP document, further confirming that Scott was simply reading from a Republican press release.
Then we have McClellan
Matthews: “Did you see FOX television as a tool when you were in the White House? As a useful avenue to get your message out?”
McClellan: “I make a distinction between the journalists and the commentators. Certainly there were commentators and other, pundits at FOX News, that were useful to the White House.” [...] That was something we at the White House, yes, were doing, getting them talking points and making sure they knew where we were coming from.
Matthews: “So you were using these commentators as your spokespeople.”
McClellan: “Well, certainly.”

Posted by: Ryan C | February 13, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

“Matthews “So you were using these commentators as your spokespeople.”
McClellan “well, certainly”
and who excalty does Matthews work for? Also, whats the rest of McClellan’s comment? I guess anyone can put their own spin on something. Once again you prove my point, if it doesn’t come from an Obama loving sheep its not true. Seems to me obama uses the msm for his spokespeople.

Posted by: notafan | February 13, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Ryan, may I ask where you received this transcript? ABC, NBC, NEWSWEEK, MSNBC, The NY Times, LA Times, CNN? Please do tell

Posted by: Notafan | February 13, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

It must stink to be the White House press secretary. It’s not your fault that the president and the Caterpillar CEO screwed up, but you’re the one who has to pretend that they didn’t, even though nobody, not even you, believes it. How these people can go through this kind of charade every day is beyond me.

Posted by: Ralph | February 13, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

“Ryan, may I ask where you received this transcript? ABC, NBC, NEWSWEEK, MSNBC, The NY Times, LA Times, CNN? Please do tell”
The McClellean transcript was from when he appeared on Chris Matthews show last year.
The reading of the GOP Senate stimulus talking points thing complete with typo happened early this week.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 13, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

“It must stink to be the White House press secretary.”
It has to be the worst job you can get in the administration.
From George S to Ari to Gibbs today, these guys just get crushed everyday.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 13, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Go, Jake, go!

Posted by: Another Jake | February 13, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Ryan C “The reading of the GOP Senate stimulus talking points thing complete with typo happened early this week.”
————————————
And who’s asking “the tough questions” about that bit of collusion between Fox and the Republicans? Certainly not Tapper or anyone else at ABC. At least at ABC they do correct the typos before repeating Republican talking points.

Posted by: Media Skeptic | February 13, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

It reads in a very Palinisque, muddled kind of way. Besides that, it’s hair splitting, or in this case, obsessing on the many legs of a caterpillar.

Posted by: kathy | February 13, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Jake, I warned you about this yesterday. Stop reading into what people said and trying to make assumptions about what they meant. Take their word for what they said and dont try to read their mind anymore.
You seem to have convinced yourself that they said something they didn’t and no wonder you are flustered when Gibbs called you on it.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 13, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Thanks, Jake!!! In the past three weeks, you’ve earned a lot of respect from me.
Now……how about that ‘transparency’ thing and the 48 hour rule?
Keep up the good work……..and again, thanks.

Posted by: ed | February 13, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Jake,
You caught Obama in yet another bold faced out and out lie, and Gibbs trying in vain to cover for his boss. Too bad Gibbs couldn’t find his butt with both hands. It does make for some entertaining political theater. Keep up the good work Mr. Tapper. Your country needs you.

Posted by: EyeDoc | February 13, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Wow… there’s a journalist in The United States of America who’s actually asking the questions that the press IS SUPPOSED TO ASK!
Jake Tapper, stay the coarse and you sir be an American Hero.
Jake nobody with common sense would know how to respond to that… I refuse to even call it an answer.
Please for the love of God, don’t stop doing your job!

Posted by: Jason Bradley | February 13, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

…a journalist doing ‘journalism’? Who knew! Keep it up and people might start paying for news again.

Posted by: DJ | February 13, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Did Gibbs study under Erastus Corning? His answers were long and answered nothing.

Posted by: PA | February 13, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Jake, you’re one of the few MSM guys who are asking real questions. Thanks. Don’t be surprised if Gibbs yanks your WH credentials! Keep up the good work. God knows everyone else is in bed with the Messiah!

Posted by: Rich | February 13, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Jake,
Thanks for your professionalism, common sense, and guts in the face of this nonsense. You are the a voice crying in the wilderness I dare say.

Posted by: John in Seattle | February 13, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

“Human intelligence, you wrote the following remarkable accusation, “Why do you suppose the news stations have taken to cutting off the White House press briefings as soon as Gibbs makes a fool of himself? This didn’t happen with Dana Perino, Tony Snow, Scott McClellan …”
Ummm, do you watch a lot of cable news? Have you done so over the years? If so, you should know that coverage of the briefings is not a constant. Some days they cover it in toto, some days they show a bit of it, most days they do not cover it live at all. In the early days of an administration, it makes sense that they are covering the briefings more regularly than they probably will later on. And they covered Snow a lot when he first came on board, because he was part of the story, or so they thought– former journalist/commentator, popular with his fellow journalists even if his views were not, very personable and witty, cancer warrior.
In short, don’t be paranoid. They show Gibbs for a while to capture the flavor of the day, but usually do not stick around to the bitter end. Press briefings can get long and pretty inside baseball. It is similar to the coverage that was accorded to the plane crash press briefings today (and other similar tragedy press briefings). The three cable networks show the first fifteen minutes or so but when the questions get repetitive, detail-oriented, or just less interesting, they cut away. No sinister deeper meaning here, I dont’ think.

Posted by: moderate | February 13, 2009, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

The last real journalist in America.

Posted by: Bud Norton | February 13, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Well done, Tapper.

Posted by: therealist | February 13, 2009, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Finally, some sensibility appears in a sea of confusion. Thanks for keeping a level head as the political puppets bob back and forth to booming thud of the panic drum. It must have been tough for Gibbs to answer straight with, at-best, crooked information on hand.

Posted by: Byron | February 13, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Keep the Press Secretary honest Jake…you’re the only one out there other than Major Garrett) that can see through the fog that Obama and his associates are putting up…

Posted by: CK | February 14, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Don’t people think it’s passing strange that George Stephanopolous of ABC admits to talking every day to Rahm Emanual in Obama’s administration?

Posted by: Elk | February 14, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Thank You!!! Mr. Tapper, for showing what a fraud that politician is! He can’t just pull numbers out of thin air and expect journalists to repeat them without question!
I am talking about Schock, of course.

Posted by: Christopher Fahry | February 14, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am

i live in central illinois, i know ppl who work at that plant, Obama is lucky they didn’t take him outback and beat the crap out of him, not every union guy is an obamatron

Posted by: shoey | February 14, 2009, 3:36 am 3:36 am

and let me clue you in on the reason why no one approached Rep. Schock, they were afraid of losing their jobs! when you work at a union shop you don’t voice any opinion but the Union’s opinion, that’s why they went home and e-mailed or called or wrote, but card-check will put an end to that nonsense now won’t it?

Posted by: shoey | February 14, 2009, 4:03 am 4:03 am

All I can say is I’m glad there is SOMEONE in the White House press corps who considers him/herself a journalist…whose job it is to be a check on our elected officials (regardless of party).
I remember during the Sarah Palin media onslaught I wrote a couple comments here criticizing Tapper for being unfair to Palin because she was a Republican.
I was dead wrong…if a member of the media can be equally critical of Republicans and Democrats than Kudos to them. That is all that Republicans/Conservatives ask from the media…nothing more.
Thanks for the tough questions Jake…wish there were more like you.

Posted by: joe | February 14, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

I appreciate the questioning; but, I am more outraged at the fact that we are continually being told that “no one had a chance to read the stimulus bill”. Isn’t that more of a priority than the CEO and the Congressman? So, the next time you have a press conference with the President or even Mr. Gibbs ask him how is it “that you can sign a bill that you haven’t read thoroughly?” I would like to emphasize the word “thoroughly”.

Posted by: Jeremey LeBlanc | February 14, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

I’d like to join my voice with the others who have noticed a light in the ‘journalistic darkness’. Thank you Mr.Tapper.

Posted by: Gary | February 14, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Geez, Jake, you might just singlehandedly save journalism.
:-)

Posted by: drjohn | February 14, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

I may just have to start watching ABC again :)

Posted by: Pavel | February 14, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

What are you doing, Jake? You are not allowed to question our betters! Just take what the Obama administration says as law and submit.
Gee, aren’t Barack and Michelle a gorgeous couple? They are so in love! I adore them.

Posted by: Log cabin | February 14, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

You are the last honest journalist in the US.
KEEP ASKING QUESTIONS!

Posted by: Reggie | February 14, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Thank you!!!!!!!!please help save our republic…I have a new respect for ABC News. I wont forget your journalistic integrity!!

Posted by: joseph | February 16, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

CNN will be doing a new more accurate special called “From Marx to Obama”.

Posted by: Meatball Wedge | February 16, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Nail his scuzzy but to the fence.

Posted by: Woody | February 17, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

We need to hold these people in the WH accountable for what they say as they turn this country into a socialist mess…

Posted by: Ken | February 18, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.