<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Qs for O&#8217;s WH &#8212; 2/5/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bdaman</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626680</link>
		<dc:creator>Bdaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626680</guid>
		<description>Jake, I see most of the comments here are complimenting you on a fine job. I also would like to say fine job, however I find it very hard to believe when it comes to transperency this administration has zero,nada,zilch. Lets see how long it takes you to get what you ask for. With over 40 lawsuits that have made it to the federal level and five cases conferenced at SCOTUS. With retired Military Officers now filing suit all to get the president to have Hawaii release THE ORIGINAL VAULT BIRTH CERTIFICATE maybe you&#039;ll have better luck with your request. If not get in line and file your own suit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake, I see most of the comments here are complimenting you on a fine job. I also would like to say fine job, however I find it very hard to believe when it comes to transperency this administration has zero,nada,zilch. Lets see how long it takes you to get what you ask for. With over 40 lawsuits that have made it to the federal level and five cases conferenced at SCOTUS. With retired Military Officers now filing suit all to get the president to have Hawaii release THE ORIGINAL VAULT BIRTH CERTIFICATE maybe you&#8217;ll have better luck with your request. If not get in line and file your own suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandi</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626679</link>
		<dc:creator>sandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626679</guid>
		<description>I was so thrilled that somebody finally took on that pompous Gibbs....WTG Jake - don&#039;t stop! There is no transparency in this administration!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was so thrilled that somebody finally took on that pompous Gibbs&#8230;.WTG Jake &#8211; don&#8217;t stop! There is no transparency in this administration!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626678</link>
		<dc:creator>SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626678</guid>
		<description>WTG Jake Tapper!
You are one of a few journalists that still have ethics attached to your profession. Keep it up and we may find out just how &quot;transparent&quot; this administration really is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTG Jake Tapper!<br />
You are one of a few journalists that still have ethics attached to your profession. Keep it up and we may find out just how &#8220;transparent&#8221; this administration really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathy</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626675</link>
		<dc:creator>kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626675</guid>
		<description>After yesterday&#039;s interview, I&#039;m not interested in today&#039;s.  I doubt that&#039;s an uncommon sentiment among readers or the viewers, even though contention gets hits and sales in the media.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After yesterday&#8217;s interview, I&#8217;m not interested in today&#8217;s.  I doubt that&#8217;s an uncommon sentiment among readers or the viewers, even though contention gets hits and sales in the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlouchingtowardBoulder</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626673</link>
		<dc:creator>SlouchingtowardBoulder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626673</guid>
		<description>FINALLY somebody in the media takes on the great messiah Obama.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FINALLY somebody in the media takes on the great messiah Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626670</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626670</guid>
		<description>Wow, since when do we use polls of American people to actually gauge whether policy is correct or not? We didn&#039;t use it for our entry into the Iraq War so it&#039;s a little disingenuous, Jake, for you to use that data for the stimulus package esp. when  recent USA Today/Gallup Poll found that most Americans overwhelmingly want Congress to pass the stimulus bill.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, since when do we use polls of American people to actually gauge whether policy is correct or not? We didn&#8217;t use it for our entry into the Iraq War so it&#8217;s a little disingenuous, Jake, for you to use that data for the stimulus package esp. when  recent USA Today/Gallup Poll found that most Americans overwhelmingly want Congress to pass the stimulus bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teresa</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626668</link>
		<dc:creator>teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626668</guid>
		<description>Obama is transparent about how transparent he is.
It is kind of like &quot;no lobbyists will work in my administration... except those that do&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is transparent about how transparent he is.<br />
It is kind of like &#8220;no lobbyists will work in my administration&#8230; except those that do&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626666</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626666</guid>
		<description>Jake Tapper FINALLY grows a ####when it&#039;s a Democrat in office, yet was meek for 8 years under Bush. How surprising.
He already told you he would check and then you say &quot;Just based on listening to the president&#039;s rhetoric, I&#039;m sure it&#039;s something he&#039;d want to do.&quot; After which you lecture him to death to create drama. Must be a slow news day, right Jake?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake Tapper FINALLY grows a ####when it&#8217;s a Democrat in office, yet was meek for 8 years under Bush. How surprising.<br />
He already told you he would check and then you say &#8220;Just based on listening to the president&#8217;s rhetoric, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s something he&#8217;d want to do.&#8221; After which you lecture him to death to create drama. Must be a slow news day, right Jake?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maureen</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626664</link>
		<dc:creator>maureen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626664</guid>
		<description>Thank you,  Jake Tapper!  For asking the question, for persisting, for giving us some hope that journalism is not prostitution with a college degree.  Making public servants comfortable is not journalism in the public&#039;s interest:  the more uncomfortable they are the better.  When they have nothing to feel ashamed about, maybe they&#039;ll be able to answer a question straightforwardly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you,  Jake Tapper!  For asking the question, for persisting, for giving us some hope that journalism is not prostitution with a college degree.  Making public servants comfortable is not journalism in the public&#8217;s interest:  the more uncomfortable they are the better.  When they have nothing to feel ashamed about, maybe they&#8217;ll be able to answer a question straightforwardly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caligirl</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626662</link>
		<dc:creator>Caligirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/02/todays-qs-for-1-4/#comment-626662</guid>
		<description>&quot;why is this blog deleting all comments critical of Tapper? Where is your transparency?
Posted by: Sean &#124; Feb 6, 2009 1:37:06 AM&quot;
Well, let&#039;s put this into perspective.
There are more critical comments on Jake&#039;s blog than Obama will see his entire term.  ;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;why is this blog deleting all comments critical of Tapper? Where is your transparency?<br />
Posted by: Sean | Feb 6, 2009 1:37:06 AM&#8221;<br />
Well, let&#8217;s put this into perspective.<br />
There are more critical comments on Jake&#8217;s blog than Obama will see his entire term.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>