Feb 5, 2009 1:13pm

With Campaign-Like Rhetoric, President Obama Assails Stimulus Plan’s Critics as Pushing ‘Old Arguments’ and ‘Worn-Out Ideas’

Using language he used against his Republican opponent in the general election campaign, a fired-up President Obama came to the Department of Energy Thursday to assail critics of his stimulus package as pushing "worn out ideas" that not only lead to "bickering" at a time of economic peril but are the very ideas that helped cause the recession to begin with.

The strong words recalled a campaign event in tone and tenor, and came the same day that Democrats expressed concern that the president had lost control of the messaging about his stimulus package as public support for the jobs bill slipped in several recent polls. A Gallup poll from over the weekend indicated most Americans now think the bill should either be defeated or changed significantly.

The president called for members of Congress "to rise to the occasion" and pass his jobs bill, which in the Senate has grown to more than $900 billion.

"We can’t keep on having the same old arguments over and over that lead us to the same old spot," he said. "We end up bickering at a time when the economy urgently needs action."

"This isn’t some abstract debate," the president said in the lobby of the Department of Energy building, after being introduced by Nobel Prize-winning Energy Secretary Steven Chu. Last week, the president said, many of America’s largest corporations announced layoffs; today came the news that the number of new unemployment claims jumped to 626,000 — the highest level since 1982.

Tomorrow "another dismal jobs report" is expected, the president said.

Debate and scrutiny of the legislation is crucial to a democracy, the president then said, but "the time for action is now. .. We can’t delay and we cant return to the same worn-out ideas that got us here in the first place," he said, echoing some of the same language he and allies used to draw attention to the age of his general election opponent, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, who is 72 years young.

Saying his opponents support "tax cuts alone" as a panacea, not to mention "half measures," the president said "those ideas have been tested and they have failed. They have taken us from surpluses to an annual deficit of over a trillion dollars."

The president did not mention that the bill he is proposing would double that deficit.

"The American people have rendered their judgment," the president said, adding, "let’s put Americans to work doing the work that needs to be done."

For the Energy Department crowd, the president noted that the bill would push energy efficiency, and an electric grid that powers computers "and even BlackBerries," that would reduce consumption from 2-4 percent.

Obama said with a touch of indignance that he "read the other day that critics of this plan ridiculed our notion that we should use part of the money to modernize the entire fleet of federal vehicles to take advantage of state of the art fuel efficiency. This is what they call pork. You know the truth. It will not only save the government significant money over time, it will not only create manufacturing jobs for folks who are making these cars, it will set a standard for private industry to match. And so when you hear these attacks deriding something of such obvious importance as this, you have to ask yourself — are these folks serious? Is it any wonder that we haven’t had a real energy policy in this country?"

To cheers,the president said, "Washington may not be ready to get serious about energy independence but I am, and so are you, and so are the American people."

But the energy-related content of his speech was surprisingly short, considering where he was. Clearly the president was there to push passage of the stimulus bill.

"I’m calling on all the members of Congress, Democrats and Republicans, from the House and Senate, to rise to the occasion," he said.

"No plan’s perfect," he acknowledged, saying he’d love to see improvements to this one, "but the scale and scope of this plan are the right one."

– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

Hmm, in the morning he agrees with Senators in the afternoon that the bill needs to be paired down. In the afternoon he rails against critics of the bill, and in the meantime the Senate swells the bill to over 900 Billion adding over 100 Billion.
Our government if officially out of control.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

“Saying his opponents support “tax cuts alone” as a panacea, not to mention “half measures,” the president said “those ideas have been tested and they have failed.”
Thats why the last tax cut doubled GDP and increased federal tax revenue.
And Tapper is right to bust him on this criterion of increasing the deficit. By that standard he is blowing out the stops.
It would be nice if he could stop using the politics of fear- now he threatens that we will *never* come out of the recession if we dont accede to his demands.

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

jpt quotes The Puppet:
“We can’t delay and we cant return to the same worn-out ideas that got us here in the first place,”
The elite-right Trojan Horse who wants Senator Gregg for Commerce DARES to say that?? He says that and nobody throws shoes? Amazing.
When that birthday-suit thing wears off, which should be any day, people WILL throw shoes.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 5, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Obama is winging it!
Winning an election doesn’t mean you can govern, and bowing to political expediency/savvy doesn’t mean you can lead wisely! :(
Obama’s arrogance and lack of wisdom in his fear mongering attempt at mind manipulation confirm his tendency to over-reach!
Many brilliant world, so called leaders, have taken people down harmful paths!

Posted by: aware2u | February 5, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

PBO does not need to blame anyone, but his O experience in governing. If he has 10% of the skills of our old Bill Clinton, he would need no republicans to pass the PBO stimulation with pork fats,
58-41.
Clinton passed his real economic stimulus by a vote of 51-49, without a single support from the republicans. He raised taxes and created an environment that those who paid more taxes made even more money. That is called economic stimulus.
Money giveaway is socialist pandering. PBO, for your information, the election is over. You need to think and understanding governing.

Posted by: two cats | February 5, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Good to hear. I say the time is now to kick some a–.
It was nice that Obama started out by trying to sit around with the GOPers and hear their ideas and incorporate them. But when it became clear that these fools just aren’t serious about solving anything or doing anything productive, it is time that they got the back of the hand. These are the same fools that drove the global economy into the ground. They deserve to be put in the basement with Ross Perot’s crazy aunt, because you have to be nuts to buy their malarky.

Posted by: Bud | February 5, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

It is a little amateur to go back to campaign rhetoric trying to save his bill. It probably doesn’t even need saving. The bill will probably pass the Senate at a whopping 900 Billion even with most of America against that much spending in the Bill. That is a failure of our government. Why did people get excited about this?

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Im amazed,given the depth of this economic crises, that there is still so much bickering. It is true that no plan is perfect & these are problems noone has experienced before. Sitting on their butts will not solve the problem them. So let the man you elected as President get on with the job! Enough griping and partisanship. The voters elected Obama because they trusted him to turn the economy around…
Im astounded by the negativity. The rest of the world has high praise for your Presdient & how very much he has acomplished in just 17 days. Yet, the American media & the nay sayers seem hell bent on tearing him apart…shame on you folks!!

Posted by: Dee | February 5, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Concerned in OH, where have you been? Everyone acknowledges that it is not a short term fix to “drill here drill now”. The first drop would not come out of the ground for 7-10 years. By that time, hopefully, we would be on to other sources. Get with the times…

Posted by: Craig | February 5, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

“Obama’s arrogance and lack of wisdom in his fear mongering attempt at mind manipulation confirm his tendency to over-reach!”
Meanwhile, the “Obama” organization’s private online army of disciples is sending out “stimulus” fluff which does not, in fact, seem to be all that well received.
Only His birthday suit stands between The Puppet and angry mobs at the White House gates. And THAT is fading, fading, like the Cheshire Cat, leaving nothing behind but the grin.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 5, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Go Obama!!!!….that’s the change we’re talking about.
sure, keep encouraging Jake T’s agenda. He has to date not challenged one thing the republican opposition has espounded

Posted by: watching | February 5, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

“The voters elected Obama because they trusted him to turn the economy around…”
True he won the election, however the country is still split. The other side doesn’t magically disappear, and some of them bring up some good points. Lets not forget 11 Democrats in the house voted against the bill as well.
“Im astounded by the negativity. The rest of the world has high praise for your Presdient & how very much he has acomplished in just 17 days.”
I’m guessing you mean GITMO here, which the closing from executive order may not even be legal. But closing it would be a good idea, even if it is just a smoke and mirrors tactic to get the rest of the world to shut up about it.
I guess SCHIP is progress too, unless it turns out (as some predict) to be another bloated, debt building Government program like Social Security and Medicare. Time will tell on that.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

It is no surprise that Republicans continue to play their broken record. These aren’t the brightest bulbs around. The things that they have called for are a joke.
Republicans talk and act like tax cuts have no fiscal impact. These fools are the ones who added $5 trillion to the national debt over the last 8 years, by borrowing money so that tax cuts could be enjoyed by the top 5%.
So now they want to borrow more money and give it back to the same people? And where will people put that money? A lot of it wont go anywhere productive – buying gold, investing in overseas markets and currencies, sitting in their bank accounts, etc. Nothing to create and maintain the national job base.
Which means it makes a whole lot more sense (as all lucid economists have noted ad nauseum) to spend money on infrastructure, alternative energy projects, updating the medical records system, etc, etc. that will all go to more jobs, more consumer spending (which makes up the largest part of GDP) and also put the country on a more productive foundation for future economic growth.

Posted by: Bud | February 5, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

“The first drop would not come out of the ground for 7-10 years. By that time, hopefully, we would be on to other sources. Get with the times…”
Actually that is not entirely accurate. Much of those delays is because of other bureaucratic requirements for drilling. It’s not just a moratorium on drilling offshore and poof, you can start drilling. There are a gambit of federal permits, state regulations and permits, EPA permits, all of which have nothing to do with oil companies getting assets into place to drill. They can do that quickly.
Search “Shell Shale Oil 8 year lease” and you’ll find that, in order to test their process to extract shell oil, they had 7 years of bureaucratic paperwork, on an 8 year lease.
Also on alternate energy, the first big push for alternate energy sources started in the late 1970′s. Billions have been poured into it for almost 40 years with little to show. The problems of alternate energy, I PROMISE, won’t be solved in the next 7-10 years. It’s an efficiency problem. No amount of money or politics is going to fix that. Oil is the most cost effective form of energy on the plant and that’s not changing anytime soon.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Once again The republicans Dont want to get in the 21ST Century, Get up with times, The world is changing, Everyone is Changing But not the Republicans still stuck in the Past GO PRESIDENT OBAMA!

Posted by: Angie | February 5, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

1. This is not a “stimulus” bill, it is a SPENDING BILL
2. As stated previously, Obama doesn’t need overwhelming Republican support (He won!), he just needs to keep Democratic caucus and 1-2 Republican “moderates”
3. Obama is seeking “bi-partisan” support in an effort to seek political cover when the “stimulus” does not materialize as expected.
4. Obama has now resorted to blatant fear-mongering (which was thought previously to be a uniquely Republican trait) stating “we may never recover if we do not pass this bill quickly” which, in the event the bill does not pass, he can point to when defending why economy has not bounced back (“if y’all had passed my bill, we’d be through these bad times by now”).
This bill is a clunker and I am encouraging my Senators not to vote for it unless MASSIVELY reworked to remove all spending which is not targeted to immediate and sustainable job creation and which has a sunset provision for discontinuation of spending upon end of recession.
Obama has proven to be a great campaigner and outstanding speaker, but he is a lousy leader. It’s amateur hour at 1600 Penn. Ave.

Posted by: tjp612 | February 5, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

I’m so tired of this guy and his cohorts telling us we have to do this “now, or else!” Sorry Mr. Obama, while you may be able to walk on water, feed the poor w/ a wave or your hand, etc., we the people still get to have our say, and have our voices heard on such huge decisions before they are made. This is a big deal, Mr. President, you don’t just do it in a matter of days, trying to ram it through …. and then make it sound like we have to agree w/ you, and if we don’t, we are practically enemies of the state! Get real Mr. President …. 46 million of us voted against you. And while you won, you still represent those of us who didn’t vote for you, and you better start listening!!

Posted by: Franklin DelanObama | February 5, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

where is the democratic majority in the house and senate??? they’re in danger of losing seats in 2010 unless they stop the in-fighting. everyone in america is watching. just recall what happened to Clinton and the party majority several years back when they didn’t produce. The last few years of the clinton presidency ended up with clinton fighting a republican majority and losing. This is what the republicans what to see happen (an ineffective/indecisvie democratic majority)

Posted by: johnnwuch | February 5, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

This is like watching a little league game. You want the other team to lose. And who cares who gets benched. It’s about the win, not the game. We’re tired, cold, hungry and scared as he**. We don’t care who is spewing the rhetoric. Get out of the city and take a drive through rural America and see what’s left of the middle class. You have to spend money to make money. It’s as simple as that. The deficit is so astronomical as it is, does another billion really matter, if it means help for millions of people? Isn’t a prosperous and working America more secure than one that’s falling apart? Is it really that important to “win” for the sake of winning, when so many have everything to lose?

Posted by: Bea | February 5, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

@ KR
What I also fail to understand is that development of oil fields are a great source of job creation!
These are not just make work jobs – Oil companies provide jobs for a wide spectrum of our society: Engineers & laborers, accountants & geologists, skilled & unskilled. Furthermore, jobs are created by businesses that support the oil industries, namely manufacturers, professional services, and small business. It’s a no-brainer (unless you are a hard-core environmentalist).
I don’t get it…

Posted by: tjp612 | February 5, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Echoing some others here, I think people are getting tired of the “same old rhetoric” coming out of Obama’s mouth. As the poll numbers show, he has failed miserably to convince most of the American people that this bill is a good one.

Posted by: Aaron | February 5, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

If the Republicans have their way, this is what their “Plan” would do:
- the unemployed will see unemployment benefits cut back – compounding home foreclosures and the drop in consumer spending;
- states will be forced to lay off tens, if not hundreds, of thousands (instead of the few thousand of state/city workers that are losing jobs) further compounding unemployment (AND foreclosures);
- AND most Americans either wont see a dime in tax cuts or barely get chump change, while the top 1% gets the most tax benefits (with the bill for such tax cuts passed to future generations);
- Meanwhile, our deficit goes up by exactly the same dollar amounts as the currently proposed stimulus plan, with continued increasing deficits, thanks to decreased tax revenues in future years (see the Bush tax cuts and their $5 trillion contribution to extra national debt);
- AND, the tax cuts will have dramatically fewer benefits in spurring economic growth as people save money (instead of spending it) as a hedge against a continued economic decline;
- Leaving the economy in a prolonged state of being FUBAR.
Have we not learned enough not to listen to a word these GOPer fools have to say?
Or are most Americans as stupid as the GOP thinks they are?

Posted by: Bud | February 5, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

KR,
You are the expert. So how much should we spend on a stimulus plan? Maybe we should spend 0 and maybe we should spend $2 trillion – it depends on what economist you talk to.
The one thing we do know is that to give more tax breaks to the richest %5 of americans did NOTHING FOR US OVER THE LAST 8 YEARS. That is why we are in this mess. Obama sent up a DETAILED plan that of course can be picked apart. Remember when Bush sent his plan to congressional leaders – 3 pages to ask for $700 billion from the Chinese (they will be buying this debt). At least this administration has a PLAN. He won – lets see what he’s got.

Posted by: sickened | February 5, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

The kind of arguments posted here is the very reason why George Bush was elected twice. People are so easily manipulated by Repbublican spin because it appeals to their lowest instincts – greed.
The stimulus needs to be at least 1T and rushed through Congress because it’s actually a year and a half too late and needs to start flowing enough cash through the system to make a difference. If you wanted wanted a smaller bill, you should have pushed for one last year; even after receiving token cheques that Bush agreed to last year.

Posted by: Eve | February 5, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Are these “fiscal conservatives” forgetting just how open they were to the Dems ideas – even when W was elected by a much closer margin. Tell you what – lets see the difference in progress after BO’s first term. W’s first term progress was to totally go through the surplus built up by the Dems previously.

Posted by: Mary E | February 5, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

If the backwards thinking Rebublicans are in revolt,
Forward thinking must be in progress.
Good job POTUS. hahaha… look at all the hair on fire.
hilarious
YES WE DID!!!!

Posted by: Omentum | February 5, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Have we not learned enough not to listen to a word these GOPer fools have to say?
Or are most Americans as stupid as the GOP thinks they are?
Posted by: Bud | Feb 5, 2009 2:18:28 PM
————————————
With all due respect, the policies Obama wants brought us the Jimmy Carter era. The policies we on the right want brought us the Reagan era. In the Carter era, unemployment was very high, interest rates and inflation were sky high, and everyone was depressed. By 1984, Reagan had reversed that and then some.
We on the right choose to actually pick a path that has worked in history. Obama? He wants us to go back to the Carter years …. maybe worse? No thanks!

Posted by: Franklin DelanObama | February 5, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

First Trips:
Clinton: held a town hall with average Americans
Bush: visited soldiers
Obama: going to luxury resort with spa and golf course.

Posted by: Michelle | February 5, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

This is not a stimulus plan, rather it is a liberal Democrat social agenda plan that uses fear mongering and threats of doom to push through their pet pork-filled projects.
Why the rush to get it done?
Because the more people learn about it the less they want it or see the need for it.

Posted by: Sally J. | February 5, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

franklin deleno,
Remember something – you LOST.
We put up with a Bush for 8 years. He and his cohorts have brought this country to his knees.
We who voted for obama are willing to give him more than TWO WEEKS before we decide to let the MINORITY PARTY again decide what is good for Rich America.
YOU LOSE.

Posted by: sickened | February 5, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

“What I also fail to understand is that development of oil fields are a great source of job creation!”
Your absolutely right. My brother worked in the oil fields in the summer back in the early 80′s during the oil boom. He was making about 3 times minimum wage while in high school. Another friend of mine worked on off shore rigs, working 2 weeks on, 1 week off making 50k a year, and it was manual labor, skills learned on the job. It was tough work, but damn good pay.
It not only creates jobs, it creates good paying jobs.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

“look at all the hair on fire.”
Especially among the poor — the displaced, dispossessed, INVISIBLE to the policy-pushers poor — who enormously eclipse Gibbs’ smiley-face remarks about unemployment compensation and the like.
Achieving “energy independence” by having the power turned off for non-payment will lead to a LOT of “hair on fire” which may well spread to er other areas.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 5, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

I thought the campaign was over. All the ranting, raving and rhetoric does not change what you are trying to foist on the taxpayers. Your “stimulus” plan was exposed as a politics as usual, pork-filled political payback scheme.
Where is the transparency you promised? Give people the line-by-line details. President Obama:
Perhaps it’s time you owned up to another ‘screw-up’ and start over.

Posted by: WTNY | February 5, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

“brought this country to his knees.”
I keep hearing this but it wasn’t economic policies that brought this about, it was irresponsible lending practices and variable rate loans. This falls largely on poor banking practices first, congress/administration are down the chain a bit, but are definitely involved. But it also spans several administrations, going back to Bush Sr. and Clinton.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

“The Sky is falling! The sky is falling!
You must do what the Democrats say or the world will come to an end!” says the panicky Obama as he runs from TV camera to TV camera.
Obama is just spewing grade school silliness and talking out both sides of his mouth.

Posted by: Helmut Unger | February 5, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Dear Sickened!
Yes, we may have lost, but we still count. We still live here! And note – most real conservatives were no big fan of Bush’s spending BTW so that argument doesn’t hold water w/ us.
We’ve seen this kind of spending ruin other countries and drive them into spiraling socialism … and the problem w/ socialism is, eventually, you run out of people to take money from! It does not work.
That’s why we are dead set against this. When you are in economic dire straights, you cut spending ASAP. You don’t borrow more!

Posted by: Franklin DelanObama | February 5, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

“We put up with a Bush for 8 years. He and his cohorts have brought this country to his knees.”
The Democrats — including Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Kerry et al. — were right there to enable the neo-cons. They’re there RIGHT now enabling the NEO-neo-cons whose Puppet Obama is.
Comments from another place:
“Change you can deceive in.”
“CHANGE … it’s the new SAME.”

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 5, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Franklindelena
Cut spending on what???? I own 3 retail stores and let me tell you buddy people have cut spending. I PRODUCE JOBS, I AM SMALL BUSINESS. I WILL BE CLOSING SOON IF ANY MORE SPENDING IS CUT.
Let’s rely on the people that actually won to make the decisions.
I always hear how dissatified people were with Bush – Who actually voted for him? Its hard to find anyone who admits to it now. How about admitting to voting for him and give us an apology.
The debates were over election nite. Its time for the Democrats to put new policies into place.
If you want to run the country you better rebuild your party and start appealing to middle america.

Posted by: sickened | February 5, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

The other side which didnt vote for him are not going to support him anyhow.
This group has to listen to what he says.
Dems did not vote for Bush either, but they listened to him for the long 8 years.
After all Republicans win in 2000 and 2004 was not a straight forward win in Florida and Ohio!

Posted by: RST | February 5, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Jake,
Wells Fargo canceled their Las Vegas trip. Are the Dem’s going to cancel their golf and spa outing?

Posted by: jas | February 5, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Jake- I appreciate your tough reporting. Thank you.
Gibbs seemed to not be so appreciative today, though.

Posted by: MayBee | February 5, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Human Intelligence:
your acrinam is a contridiction to your statement.

Posted by: sickened | February 5, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

In 1986, GDP was down over 6%. In the last quarter GDP was down 3.8%.
Did the Government of 1986 panic and try to put us in debt for $1 trillion?
Nope, they solved it with two words:
TAX CUTS.
In 1981, the top marginal tax ratewas 70%. When Ronald Reagan left office in 1989, the top marginal tax rate was 28%.
Recession long gone.

Posted by: Sally J. | February 5, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Mirror image of the first 14 days of Bill Clinton.

Posted by: Lizzie | February 5, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Human Irrelevance,
Come on now. Take pointers from our Present Commander in Chief.
He admitted he screwed up and he will take his lumps. No doubt the minority party was going to fire away regardless on how he reveives the shots.
But now the moment of truth for you and your pathetic party.
The republicans screwed up. They lost touch with the American people and were fired (started in 2006 btw).
Now admit it and take your lumps…..
Question??? If you had a contractor come in and totally screw up your house. Would you receive advice from him/her after you fired him. Let me assist you… NO not only no but heck NO.
That’s where we are now. Same old contractor who screw up the house now comes back on the scene to give recommendation on how to fix it.

Posted by: Omentum | February 5, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Sally,
Didn’t we just go for 8 years of tax cuts and out of control spending on an illegal war?
why don’t we just all decide not to pay taxes at all? Lets just all go it on our own.
Do you not think that there should be some debate as to what the tax policy should be or is bush’s policy just fine with you?
Lets not try to compare era’s, thats way to simplistic. The way the economy is run today is just a little more complicated then it was in 1984 wouldn’t you agree?

Posted by: sickened | February 5, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Obama’s rhetoric has fooled many but it just is not going to cut it going forward. He has to start doing something except talking and giving speeches.

Posted by: brian | February 5, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

“The Sky is falling! The sky is falling!
You must do what the Democrats say or the world will come to an end!” says the panicky Obama as he runs from TV camera to TV camera.
Obama is just spewing grade school silliness and talking out both sides of his mouth.
Posted by: Helmut Unger | Feb 5, 2009 2:29:21 PM
==========================
hmmmmm
reminds me of when the neocons told us that we would see a nuclear mushrooms all over America if we didn’t sign on to this war.
hmmmmmm
we shall never know????? makes you wonder
ust thinking out loud.

Posted by: Omentum | February 5, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

If we’re having this much fun with the stim bill, can’t wait for next years budget. That’s going to be fun.
“I PRODUCE JOBS, I AM SMALL BUSINESS. I WILL BE CLOSING SOON IF ANY MORE SPENDING IS CUT.”
Coming from a business family, this doesn’t make much sense. Will you be closing your least productive store if you cut spending? Or you talking about closing all of the stores?
Have you calculated how much you spend in taxes? (payroll, workers comp, corporate tax, property tax, etc)?
My father owns 3 businesses too and he paid 250,000 in taxes last quarter. Thats in a QUARTER. That’s a hard check to write.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

sickened- Bush had nothing to do with today’s problems but living on borrowed money did. Credit cards, house payments, car payments, and people overspent money they did not have. No politician has control over people except to change banking laws and require Federal banks to maintain a much larger cash reserve and tighten credit. Obama is not doing any of this, but is going to make the problem worse. How is borrowing and spending ” change” from the past? It isn’t so wise up.

Posted by: brian | February 5, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Franklindelena
Cut spending on what???? I own 3 retail stores and let me tell you buddy people have cut spending. I PRODUCE JOBS, I AM SMALL BUSINESS. I WILL BE CLOSING SOON IF ANY MORE SPENDING IS CUT.
Let’s rely on the people that actually won to make the decisions.
I always hear how dissatified people were with Bush – Who actually voted for him? Its hard to find anyone who admits to it now. How about admitting to voting for him and give us an apology.
The debates were over election nite. Its time for the Democrats to put new policies into place.
If you want to run the country you better rebuild your party and start appealing to middle america.
Posted by: sickened | Feb 5, 2009 2:39:15 PM
————————————
First off, I’m part of middle America, just like you. Secondly, I STRONGLY support and encourage tax breaks in a big way for small businesses like yours. As for Bush, didn’t vote for him in ’00. Voted against Kerry in ’04. Sorry, I guess.
I’m for tax cuts for everyone (everyone who actually pays them that is). Big corporations like the one I work for, the one that supplied me my job. Tax breaks for small businesses, like yours, that supply most of the jobs in this country. And tax cuts for people like me – if not through my actual income, then through things that promote spending, such as on new cars, home improvements, and also things like interest on legit loans such as college, home, etc. …. and day care too.
And I don’t have to listen or fall in line w/ anyone. That’s not how America was founded!! Sorry! And if any Dems fell in line w/ Bush, then that’s their problem …. not that I noticed too many doing so for eight years.

Posted by: Franklin DelanObama | February 5, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

I sense the Change here:
- Obama is for the Stimulus
- Obama tells Blue dogs not to vote for it
- Obama is for the stimulus again
- then all of the Senators are working together to fix the Nancy Pelosi bill
- then Obama is back to HR1 has to be passed immediately
The Washington Times has a report saying that the CBO has done estimates and the Obama stimuls may be worse than doing nothing:
“CBO, the official scorekeepers for legislation, said the House and Senate bills will help in the short term but result in so much government debt that within a few years they would crowd out private investment, actually leading to a lower Gross Domestic Product over the next 10 years than if the government had done nothing.
CBO estimates that by 2019 the Senate legislation would reduce GDP by 0.1 percent to 0.3 percent on net. [The House bill] would have similar long-run effects, CBO said in a letter to Sen. Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican, who was tapped by Mr. Obama on Tuesday to be Commerce Secretary. “

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Seems we are stuck in politics as usual. Now here is an idea–the Pork Stimulus bill is indeed more of the same. Let’s support our new president by passing a much less expensive “stimulus only” bill and let local governments decide how to spend it in their communities. The amount each community receives will be based on a percentage of their unemployment and states asking for bailouts will have to get their money form their share of the stimulus package. Advantages: States know what the need most and a good chance for communities to get involved. Once a state makes its decisions they can be reviewed by congress. In the meantime Congress can generate taxes by passing legislation that discourages government tax cheats, simplify tax laws, and investigate taxes filed by all federal employees. Before we spend trillions of taxpayer dollars, we need “transparancy” achieved through discussion and thought. President Obama was elected because the American people wanted change. In 17 days, it is still business as usual.

Posted by: Jo Beckstead | February 5, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

“I guess SCHIP is progress too, unless it turns out (as some predict) to be another bloated, debt building Government program like Social Security and Medicare. Time will tell on that.
Posted by: KR | Feb 5, 2009 1:54:44 PM”
The majority of uninsured people already qualified for SCHIP or Medicaid but didn’t register.
The SCHIP changes were about getting more people on the government health care roles.
If they really wanted to cover the uninsured people instead of merely making a stepping stone to national healthcare they could do it much cheaper with informing people who qualify. But cheaper = smaller government = less power.

Posted by: Cryos | February 5, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

“Didn’t we just go for 8 years of tax cuts and out of control spending on an illegal war?”
The entire defense budget, war in Iraq and Afghanistan is 60 Billion a month out of 1 trillion in spending. The Iraq war funding is roughly 6 Billion a month.
If your electricity bill for the month was 100 bucks, you’d save 60 cents.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

The issue is real pork, not some lame argument by the other side about fuel efficient government cars. What’s real pork? Oh, say 245 million dollars to the American film industry. For what? Oh yeah, reward for all that Hollywood support during the campaign. More pork? Sure, 150 million to US bee keepers. Want more? Certainly. How about 2 – 3 million for wooden arrow makers in Oregon. And the list goes on and on. The average American is not against the bill, we’re against the pork that the bill contains; pork, pork, pork and more pork. Did I mention pork? This isn’t rocket science, Mr. O. Take control of your party and declare the stimulus bill a No Pork Zone. The Republicans will get in line because now you really have changed the rules of the game and they’ll want to save face. And, you’ll get the average American’s support for your bill. The bill gets passed and everyone is happy.

Posted by: Parrotheadnh | February 5, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

I will be watching “moderate” republicans like the below. “Republicans” who allow passage of bills like this better prepare for a lot of money to be sent to their competitors in their next primary elections as well as money to the general election democrat if they win the primary.
Enough RINOs and neo-cons.
“Mr. Obama personally intervened to wrangle support among Republicans, courting key centrist such as Sens. Susan Collins and Olypia J. Snowe, both of Maine. “

Posted by: Cryos | February 5, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Mr. President,
Instead of whining like the little boy who has been told to stand in the corner, grow # ### & LEAD!
YOU tried to push nominees through the confirmation process who failed your OWN sniff test….YUO SCREWED UP…..
YOU allowed Pelosi & Frank Inc to bloat the house bill…..YOU SCREWED UP….
YOU set an impossible schedule for a bill of this magnitude to be debated & allow the american people the “Transparency” that YOU promised…. YOU SCREWED UP…..
YOU are now resorting to the same old politics YOU promised to fix….YOU SCREWED UP……
YOU must now sit back and allow the legislative process to work.

Posted by: Mike_C | February 5, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Hey Barry, guess what? This is NOT a campaign! We don’t need rhetoric, we need leadership. We need you to realize this piece of pork will doom us for decades.
And ABC — we need editorial leadership to stand up to Barry and TELL him so.

Posted by: Beth | February 5, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

“YOU set an impossible schedule for a bill of this magnitude to be debated & allow the american people the “Transparency” that YOU promised”
This actually a good point. This bill I think was biting off a bit more than all of us could chew. He could have gotten a 1 year stim plan passed rather quickly.
Reference 1993 Clinton Administration stimulus bill, a whopping 16 Billion.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I love how everyone is blaming SOMEONE ELSE….When in reality it’s the individual American that insisted in living beyond their means, thinking they would ‘somehow’ never have to pay the piper.
We were ripe to be set up by Obama AND THE MEDIA….with promises that he would save your cookies, and make everything allright again….
NO ONE IS GOING TO SAVE YOU!!!!
Unless we all get really smart really soon, and start looking out for ourselves….then we deserve the screwing we’re gonna get from Obama and his compadres…
This is gonna be painful…face it!
The free ride you’re expecting from Obama is’nt going to happen.
It’s OUR fault the media got away with their shamless promotion of Obama…We did’nt stand up and say enough.
All you have to do is look at what Obama spent on his campaign to see he threw money around shamelessly…and why not? it was’nt his money…football stadiums, rock concerts, buying tv time..He bought the election…somewhere I read it cost $8.00 per vote he got.
And NOW you think he is going to suddenly spend our money conservatably…Have another glass of kool-aid….
And start taking responsibity yourselves..And face the fact this is gonna be painful for awhile.

Posted by: J Moore | February 5, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

HILDA SOLIS
Today a Senate committee is going to vote on the nomination of Obama’s labor secretary, California Democrat Rep. Hilda Solis. As of right now, her nomination is being blocked in the Senate.
The Nominee Who Lobbied Herself
Hilda Solis’s breach of House ethics rules may disqualify her from serving.

Posted by: here we go again | February 5, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm


“Didn’t we just go for 8 years of tax cuts and out of control spending on an illegal war?”
The entire defense budget, war in Iraq and Afghanistan is 60 Billion a month out of 1 trillion in spending. The Iraq war funding is roughly 6 Billion a month.
If your electricity bill for the month was 100 bucks, you’d save 60 cents.

Well its even worse than that.
If any old porky spending stimulates the economy, then havent we just had years of stimulus spending?
If the spending needs to be targeted to be helpful then people should be examining the spending in the Bill.
For instance what is the P&L on this $600M in foreign hybrids he wants to buy government employees? It sounds like for this to make economic sense you’d have to be driving 60,000 miles per year. Is that right? No one knows because it hasnt be examined.

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

J Moore | Feb 5, 2009 3:25:16 PM
Your take on reality is flawed.
The crooks in charge are the culprits not the people of America. GET A GRIP!

Posted by: 8yearsofbad nowitisworse | February 5, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

And I refuse to let that happen. We can’t delay and we can’t go back to the same worn-out ideas that led us here in the first place. In the last few days, we’ve seen proposals arise from some in Congress that you may not have read but you’d be very familiar with because you’ve been hearing them for the last 10 years, maybe longer. They’re rooted in the idea that tax cuts alone can solve all our problems; that government doesn’t have a role to play; that half-measures and tinkering are somehow enough; that we can afford to ignore our most fundamental economic challenges — the crushing cost of health care, the inadequate state of so many of our schools, our dangerous dependence on foreign oil.
***********************************************
This passage should be referred to since it comes prior to the editorializing made on “doubling” the deficit. It’s not arguable that the plan will increase the deficit – but for each dollar spent on infrastructure, a stimulus of at least 1.90 is added to the economy. And what’s there to show for the deficits of the Bush administration and their tax cut panaceas?

Posted by: kathy | February 5, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

I am glad that Obama has gone into “Campaign Obama”.
President Obama needs to be on OFFENSE every single day while he is president. He should NEVER allow the Republicans to try and roll over him.

Posted by: Cameron | February 5, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I am glad that Obama has gone into “Campaign Obama”.
President Obama needs to be on OFFENSE every single day while he is president. He should NEVER allow the Republicans to try and roll over him.
Posted by: Cameron | Feb 5, 2009 3:41:12 PM
————————
The democrats are going to roll over him and spit him out! IMPEACH!

Posted by: OLOGO MUST GO | February 5, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Well Well Well, the media is finally questioning the messiah. Too bad they didn’t do this during the election, as Obama might be more prepared for the REAL TRIALS and tribulations of the job. I guess running the country is a little more difficult than running a campaign of rhedoric with a slobbering complicit media. Oh let’s be honest, if it hadn’t been for the slobbering media… he would have never won, would he? Ha.

Posted by: Why are we in this handbasket? | February 5, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Support for Stimulus Package Falls to 37%
Two weeks ago, 45% supported the plan. Last week, 42% supported it.
Opposition has grown from 34% two weeks ago to 39% last week and 43% today.
Sixty-four percent (64%) of Democrats still support the plan. That figure is down from 74% a week ago. Just 13% of Republicans and 27% of those not affiliated with either major party agree.
Seventy-two percent (72%) of Republicans oppose the plan along with 50% of unaffiliated voters and 16% of Democrats.
Related survey data shows that half the nation’s voters say the plan that finally emerges from Congress may end up doing more harm than good.

Posted by: unaffiliated | February 5, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

“that is the budget for the military even if we were not at war.”
Current defense budget is 571 Billion. Roughly 80 Billion for the war in Iraq each year, another roughly 10 Billion (last I checked) for Afghanistan.
Added together 660.
Divided by 12 = 55 Billion a month (I rounded up for my old numbers of Afghanistan)
Monthly spending budget of US Govt = 1,000 Billion
Monthly spending on War 80 \ 12 = 6.6 Billion

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

“BertieW … The entire defense budget, war in Iraq and Afghanistan is 60 Billion a month out of 1 trillion in spending.
that is the budget for the military even if we were not at war.

Yes, but with all this extra GWOT spending why arent things going gangbusters?
Either- the type of spending matters
or
We arent spending enough on GWOT!e

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

“Yes, but with all this extra GWOT spending why arent things going gangbusters?”
They are, maybe you aren’t looking in the right place. AQ has been devastated, terror groups in Indonesia and Southern Philippines are on the run, and funding streams have been severely restricted.
But you’d have to be interested in finding that information. It won’t find you.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

“”Do we have the votes? We believe we do. We believe we can find two Republicans of good will” to back the plan and override a Republican filibuster, Reid said.”
Classic. He doesn’t have all the Democrats on board, but clearly focuses on Republicans as the halt. Lets wait for the vote and see.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

“ITS INEVITABLE. Move aside nay sayers.”
nay sayers = people who actually have to pay for this thing

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Obama’s advisers want to be certain tax dollars sent to the faith-based social service groups are used for secular purposes, such as feeding the hungry or housing the homeless, and not for religious evangelism. The administration doesn’t want to be perceived as managing the groups yet does want transparency and accountability.
Transparency and accountability? From the Obama Administration? Like the same transparency and accountability over here?
But the Obama team also made its own mistakes. The president’s troubled cabinet nominees added to the cacophony that at times drowned out the White House economic messages in the past two weeks. And it seems more apparent each day that the nascent Obama Administration isn’t fully prepared for the task at hand.
You mean, like, you hafta have, like, experience to do the job of president-ing?
The president’s decision to push through a massive stimulus bill, while perhaps unavoidable, is forcing the much-vaunted Chicago crowd to adapt at lightning speed to its more skillful adversaries on Capitol Hill, while at the same time taking a crash course on harnessing the full power of bully pulpit.
Poor widdle babies. Tsk, Tsk. Here’s my suggestion to President Obama:
RESIGN. You made history as the first African-American president and you’re making history again by outdoing Jimmy Carter, George W. Bush, hell, even Warren Harding in the incompetence department. Let your Secretary of State assume the charge you are so ill-prepared to execute.
Since what you’re really good at is talking empty platitudes from a podium and making lots of misguided people give you money, why don’t you start your own church? Hey, it worked Reverend Moon!

Posted by: tsk tsk | February 5, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

“”Do we have the votes? We believe we do. We believe we can find two Republicans of good will” to back the plan and override a Republican filibuster, Reid said.”
Susan Collins already said that he could have her vote if he removed a $100B of pork. How hard is that?
I wonder how many votes he really has seeing as Count Frankenberry hasnt been seated and he kicked Liberman out of the party. And he apparently lost Webb.

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

“The war in Iraq and Afghanistan has not cost the Military one cent over standard military cost. Inflation included.”
You have to love the ridiculous lies told by the right wing.
The Iraq & Afghanistan wars are funded by supplemental bills to the defense budget.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Er, yes, indeed. The Democrats won. They control the House, the Senate and the White House. So would someone here tell me exactly HOW Republicans are stopping this train wreck? Seems to me it’s public opinion. Republicans are talking, and last I heard their speech is as protected by the Constitution as the Democrat’s speech was under Bush.

Posted by: Portia | February 5, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

“The Iraq & Afghanistan wars are funded by supplemental bills to the defense budget.”
You are correct.
Iraq and Afghanistan together equal about 7 or 8 Billion a month.
But compared to total US government spending per month of 1,000 Billion.
Total perspective is everything

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

“Honeymoon = Over
Obamamania appears to be fading a bit in recent polls and special elections. Pollster Scott Rasmussen reports that support for the White House’s stimulus package has now fallen to 37% among voters, down from 45% two weeks ago. At the same time Mr. Rasmussen’s surveys show the Democratic advantage in a generic ballot test with Republicans has fallen to just four points, down from seven.”
———
Short honeymoon……cause he can’t perform.
Pass the Kool-aid!

Posted by: whitewash needed | February 5, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

“But compared to total US government spending per month of 1,000 Billion.
Total perspective is everything”
This from the same person who freaked out over tobacco taxes eventually not being able to cover children’s insurance and the need to find another revenue stream.
When the original program cost $40B over ten years.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

“Pollster Scott Rasmussen reports that support for the White House’s stimulus package has now fallen to 37% among voters, down from 45% two weeks ago. At the same time Mr. Rasmussen’s surveys show the Democratic advantage in a generic ballot test with Republicans has fallen to just four points, down from seven.”
Yes Republimussen who is the middle of the pack in election poll accuracy but always has a conservative lean when it comes to social issues or approval ratings.
He’s FoxNews and Rush Limbaugh;s favorite pollster.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

“Obamamania appears to be fading a bit in recent polls and special elections.”
ROFLMAO.
His job approval is between 62 and 65 and his favorables are in the mid 70′s.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Gallup reports porkulus support now at 38% — Pushing a fraud isn’t working as well as it did when PRAVDA was running the blocking.

Posted by: bill-tb | February 5, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Obama and the Washington PIGS have no clue as to the plight of the average American. They’re on a RETREAT using our money while we’re trying to survive! Lets’s take away the perks of the politicians and see how many would go to Washington. Obama comes out with a cap on CEO’s. How about a CAP on politicians! Please remember all of this in the next local and state elections.It’s time for the people to UNITE and get these PIGS out of Washington!

Posted by: Julie | February 5, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

“Yes Republimussen who is the middle of the pack in election poll accuracy but always has a conservative lean when it comes to social issues or approval ratings.
He’s FoxNews and Rush Limbaugh;s favorite pollster. ”
Yeah, we went over this yesterday.
If you want to count people who says they want “major changes” as being in favor of HR1 then go ahead. No one is fooled.
Then when you see only 37% support to you that obviously means 70% support it.
And when support keeps going down every poll, that means its still gaining acceptance.

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Sorry Republicans, the American people aren’t buying it any more. You are about thirty years behind in your idiology. Only truth, clarity, and being forthright will save you. But the question is, can you DO that?

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Why doesn’t President Obama understand that the American people want a bill that helps stimulate jobs now, this year, but doesn’t include all the pork and pet projects thrown in.
I thought candidate Obama said that as president he would take out all the pork, line by line. This bill is a BLT sandwich minus the L and the T.

Posted by: Roxie | February 5, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Wow, all of a sudden people on this board, who are probably in debt to their eye balls, are calling for fiscal responsibility even though they licked the boots of an administration that doubled the deficit with tax cuts for the wealthy and an illegal war?
Go home and clip coupons. No better yet, take 50% of your monthly income and buy guns and ammo for 7 years straight!!!!!

Posted by: JV | February 5, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Obama can get as indignant as he pleases, I’m still opposed to this pork laden package that Pelosi et al are trying to stuff down our throats. Obama is too afraid of the left wing zealots to carve out an authentic stimulus package and leave the pork where it belongs- on the floor of the House and Senate chambers.
Obama’s not an effective leader. He should have realized this package was in trouble when 1. Pelosi and Reid smugly intoned “We won” – (in other words, we don’t care what the republicans want.) and, 2. when Rahm Emanuel said it would be a shame to waste a ‘good’ crisis.
We need a president who will govern from the center. When will Obama realize this?

Posted by: s. valenti | February 5, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Pork = projects that put people to work. I know what you mean when you question when Obama said he was going to use a scalpel to go thru the budget line by line, and I think he will. But people need jobs now, so we can’t worry about every little thing that the right throws in. But don’t be fooled, they call it pork because they don’t want it in the bill. Probably not benefiting them in some way. This is the same smear and confuse tactics that came from the right during the election. Just make it all too confusing so nobody can understand. Well, it will all be onine for anyone to see. And Obama will ask for our opinions 5 days before he signs or vetos a bill. HOW COOL IS THAT? Have you read this article? It explains things perty well:

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Golly, give the guy a chance. He’s doing more in his first month than most have done in their first year. How easily we critisize. Give these folks a chance first before you go throwing them out and calling them Pigs. We just THREW the real pigs out of office. Where were you when they were doing their damage? Year in year out? I can’t believe we all let them get away with it.

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

“Wow, all of a sudden people on this board, who are probably in debt to their eye balls”
I am not up to by eyeballs in debt- is it ok with you if I comment?
- CBO Study says Stimulus will lower GDP over time.
- Popular Mechanics. Shovel-Ready will make the infrastructure worse. “Why Shovel-Ready Infrastructure is Wrong (Right Now)”
-And there isnt much infrastructure in the current bill. Maybe $90B.

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

you WISH Obamamania was fading. You HOPE if you say it enough that we’ll all believe it. Oh, excuse me, I have a tasty little Obama press conference to watch right now….YIPPEEE! :)

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

The right is trying to whittle down the infrastructure spending, cuz they think spending is a bad word. How else to put people back to work AND fix our broken infrastructure at the same time? I’m sorry, but SPENDING is not a bad word, and PORK is used to scare you. We can’t mess around any more. The republicans can’t really say, exactly what they do want. All they want is tax cuts for all the rich folks who benefited from Bush. Are you gonna let them get away with that? Isn’t it enough that they wouldn’t confirm Holder till he promised he wouldn’t come after them for war crimes. Isn’t that extortion? And then the Iraq war, and now they want to pull this? Republicans GET OUT OF OUR BILL. IT IS THE PEOPLE’s BILL! And btw, we don’t have to work with you. No good deed goes unpunished! Pass the kool aid.

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

from “In the Stimulus Bill: An Earmark by Any Other Name”, by Michael Grabell and Christopher Weaver, ProPublica (quoted on Another Network’s website which presumably is read by bazillions of citizens):
“The package includes an insurance exemption — but only for companies that work on recreational boats longer than 65 feet. Another provision would lift a Medicare regulation affecting only three long-term care hospitals in the country.”
No wonder the “Obama” organization players are looking bad and snapping at people.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 5, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Mr President:
Stop the political posturing and pass
this non-stimulative, wasteful spending
bill of yours!
You have the votes in both houses to
pass it! Stop Whining!
Don’t expect Republicans to sign on to
this Titanic(as in disaster)bill.
You will get no cover. It’s your baby!
You sink or swim with it.

Posted by: reaganfan | February 5, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Give me a crack at that bill, I’ll cut all that stuff out! He’s got to get into the nitty gritty of the bill instead of trusting his fellow democrats not to put “their” stuff in there. Remember, we don’t do that anymore Democrats. Make it clean or Obama, you got to read and red line stuff in there. I know you don’t have time for all the details, but lavish excess and allowances for this and that derails your message and your mission.
P.S. I love you :)

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

“I can’t believe we all let them get away with it.”
Um.. I think this is what we are trying to do, prevent more of the same? How can people complain about the enormous debt rung up by the previous administration then be so oblivious to one of the biggest spending bills outside the budget in our lifetime?
I think what’s ticking Obama supporters off is that the bill is stinky, the American people realize it, and that’s not a good thing coming out the gate. So just bury your head.
I don’t think so. Give us a less stinky bill and I’ll be writing Republicans to support it. But not this bill, not this much.
And I have not heard 1 single Obama supporter refute making this a 1 year bill instead of a 4 year bill? Why 800 Billion over 4 years? Why not 200 Billion this year and fight over that. He’s asking too much of the American people, and his supporters.

Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Does anybody know what EXACTLY the insurance-related “yacht workers exemption” for those having to do with “recreational boats longer than 65 feet” — that’s a BIG boat, even by rich-people standards — IS, in the “stimulus”??
Who-all is stimulated by it?
We all understand that “our” representatives don’t actually read the stuff they advocate for and against so vociferously, but don’t they have people who DO read it?
For enough $, I’d read it myself.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 5, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

“The right is trying to whittle down the infrastructure spending, cuz they think spending is a bad word. How else to put people back to work AND fix our broken infrastructure at the same time? ”
So how much infrastructure spending do you think is in the bill?

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Maybe The Puppet could just SINK all “recreational boats over 65 feet long”.
That’d stimulate a bunch of boat-builders and sail-makers and upholsterers and er gimbel manufacturers, anyway.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 5, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Dear Human Intelligence, I haven’t read the bill but as i understand it there is not enough infrastructure spending because the Republicans whined to get it taken out. We need that infrastructure spending. Email whitehouse.gov and tell them we need to fix out outdated infrastructure. Aren’t you tired of them side streaming money for these worthy project to their pet projects.

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

“Dear Human Intelligence, I haven’t read the bill but as i understand it there is not enough infrastructure spending because the Republicans whined to get it taken out.”
LOL- its all yours baby. The Republicans were not allowed to consult on it at all.
They had 4 days to comment on the Pelosi/Frank bill before they had to vote. Next to nothing got removed.
Are you surprised now to find that there is very little infrastructure spending in a bill that people keep trying to sell you as a infrastructure bill?
Thats why it has to be rushed through.

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

BertieW,
The only pork I know that was approved by the majority of so called fiscal conservatives is known as IRAQ! And it cost over $2 trillion. Where were you then? Bin L. is laughing at YOU!
If you want to call it infrastructure spending in the Middle East then that’s your call.

Posted by: JV | February 5, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

” And it cost over $2 trillion. Where were you then? Bin L. is laughing at YOU!”
Sorry, but by Obama’s logic that must be an enormous stimulus. Think of all the jobs created or saved!
I want to know why the EU can tell Obama to take out the Buy American provisions and he does, but actual American tax payers arent permitted to comment on his pork pie spending

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

But Bertie Bertie Bertie, you are commenting now, and you will always be allowed to comment. I think, however, that you need to look back at what your party went wrong instead of just going for the knee jerk “attack the dems no matter what” mentatlity. I saw PALENTY of consulting of Republicans going on. TOO MUCH, in my opinion. I mean WE WON.

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

How can barry call this a stimulus package when it does next to nothing to stimulate our economy?
It is simply a means for barry to pay back all of the far left fringe groups who helped raise his 700Billion campaign $$ in the first place.

Posted by: dave | February 5, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

BertieW,
Under Bush, the trade deficit doubled so don’t go there. Also, are you stating that we need another war to provide jobs?
As well, you cannot pass legislation with monikers like “Buy American” because it violates world trade agreements already in place.
The US Chamber of Commerce (not exactly a liberal enclave) says that it will spark trade retaliation.
Remember, 95% percent of the worlds’ consumers live outside the US. If we refuse to buy foreign made goods, then our trading partners will refuse to buy from us. We are the largest exporter in the world so does that make sense?

Posted by: JV | February 5, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

If you don’t have a copy of the stimulus bill (last House of Rep revision) on your desktop then don’t comment on it.

Posted by: JV | February 5, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

“I think, however, that you need to look back at what your party went wrong instead of just going for the knee jerk “attack the dems no matter what” mentatlity”
That’s why the “attack the dems no matter what” strategy is the only thing they have going. What else are they going to do? -List examples of all the great policies and accomplishments of the last 8 years?

Posted by: Skip | February 5, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

“Email whitehouse.gov and tell them we need to fix out outdated infrastructure.”
That’ll be a cool day in the Bad Place.
Were we EVER to email that address, it’d be an ignored demand to investigate long-standing HUD and Social Security corruption in the California First Congressional District, presided over by Ms. Pelosi’s booze-biz associate Mr. Thompson (the Blue Dog who was, may be still, on the “Obama” organization’s list for Commerce).

Posted by: Le Petit Prince | February 5, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Skip said “That’s why the “attack the dems no matter what” strategy is the only thing they have going. What else are they going to do? -List examples of all the great policies and accomplishments of the last 8 years?”
Thanks for chiming in with some logic! :) I whole heartedly agree.

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Terrilyn,
Thanks for the props. Ever notice when the Rush followers come one here they always result to name calling or play on words like Obama bin Biden? As if their juxtaposing of letters will reveal the truth like some Ouija board game.
Sickening.

Posted by: JV | February 5, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

JV and Skip are my new best friends. WE ARE NOT ALONE AND oh yes WE DID! :) LOL

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Terrilyn,
Whoa. I’m on your side. My comment was aimed at the people who are claiming the wasteful spending within after hearing it on Rush O’Hannity’s show. They need to do a little research first. Ya know, don’t judge a book by its cover.

Posted by: JV | February 5, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Hey JV, yeah those Limannity’s can’t produce truth or fact. I’m just gonna keep asking for it, because I want to know about valid arguments, but they can’t just say it and expect us to believe it anymore. Talk about fear tactics. I also love the fact that Obama’s middle name is now a source of pride for us. Look what WE did! :) Ha!

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Oh, sorry JV, I was referring to La Petit Prince’s comments below. And someone else said, don’t comment if you don’t have the bill on your desk, so I was just taking them to school. LOL! :)

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Any estimates of how much taxes will go up to pay for this? I don’t have a government job with its associated great benefits and pension, and now my 401(k) is essentially gone, so I want to know how I’m going to afford my life after paying for everyone else’s. How much will this cost me?

Posted by: abcnewsvisitor | February 5, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

well, you are gonna get a tax break if you make less than $250,000 a year, and I’m guessing that’s the case. They are debating whether to give the breaks thru payroll taxes or stimulus checks. Personally, I vote for lower payroll taxes. This would be about $12/week extra in your check. As to how much this will cost you personally? That’s hard to say. Our taxes won’t go up if Obama keeps his promises, and so far as I see, if he said it, he meant it. But if you have children, you may want to nickname one of them “recovery plan” or “bailout baby” cuz our children’s taxes will be paying this back years to come. Nothing’s coming out of your pocket right now. If you ask me, if Congress would just pay their taxes, maybe we won’t get our raised. :) I don’t know about local taxes though, that depends on each Governor, I would guess, and how much they get from the stimulus. I hope I didn’t make things more confusing. I’m confused too.

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

“If you don’t have a copy of the stimulus bill (last House of Rep revision) on your desktop then don’t comment on it.”
Darn right. It’s only as long as the Patriot Act, so make it a substantial desk … thousands, maybe millions of trees would die for the PAPER to print it over and over as reporters sniff out earmarks and special-interest underwriting.
OO! ooo! Jughead’s about to speak at the House Dems’ stimulating zillion-dollar “retreat”. Aux teevee!

Posted by: Le Petit Prince | February 5, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

BTW, two years ago when Ralph’s (Kroger) closed all of their No. Cal stores, it put my new organic coffee bar out of business. I lost everything, 401k, IRA, equity, good credit. So, I went thru this then when it was just starting, I’m here to tell you IT’s NOT WORTH ENDING YOUR LIFE. I almost did, and I’m glad I didn’t, because then I wouldn’t be here to witness this great age we are in. But don’t worry, your taxes won’t go up, and the sun will shine again.

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

gee, it sure got quiet in here when we started demanding facts….it’s been fun. Signing off. :)

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

CBO Study says Stimulus will lower GDP over time.
- Popular Mechanics. Shovel-Ready will make the infrastructure worse. “Why Shovel-Ready Infrastructure is Wrong (Right Now)”
-And there isnt much infrastructure in the current bill. Maybe $90B.
Posted by: BertieW | Feb 5, 2009 5:28:03
********************************************
You guys are too funny. That Bogus CBO report was debunked a couple of weeks ago, but many of you don’t seem to want to let facts get in the way of a good story!
Boy, why didn’t I think of going to Popular Mechanics for information on the economy of the nation.

Posted by: Truth Matters | February 5, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

” … if Obama keeps his promises, and so far as I see, if he said it, he meant it.”
Except on lobbyists, and “change”, and all that. To the House Dems’ retreat: “thank you for giving me a reason to use Air Force One”, then he RE-does the unfunny joke about Rahm Emanuel teaching bad language to underprivileged children and LAUGHS AT HIS OWN (non-)JOKE.
It’s on news teevee now. It’s one of the weirdest exercises in empty words that I’ve ever heard (and that’s plenty).

Posted by: Le Petit Prince | February 5, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Obama is going to do the same thing Bush did spend money we don’t have and not worry about the consequences.
That doesn’t work in our personal life and it won’t work here. These clowns are the ones who created this mess now there telling us they know how to fix it. SURE. Where did the 350 billion go that Hank paulson took from the treasury gee they don’t know and now they want more sure go ahead we trust you. We don’t have our best and brighest running things do we.

Posted by: James Villa | February 5, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

SOUTH CAROLINA please vote Senator Graham out, move on out of the 18th century.

Posted by: EYESURGERY | February 5, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

SOUTH CAROLINA has the 3rd unemployment rate in the our country, what is he thinking, stop this partisan politics crap or get voted out.

Posted by: EYESURGERY | February 5, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

James Villa, I’m glad you brought that up. Why hasn’t Paulsen been trotted out in front of a congressional panel to find out WHERE THAT MONEY WENT. Now THAT was a feeding frenzy on American tax dollars, and we should DEMAND to know where that money went and WHEN it will be paid back. Hello? AUDIT!!!!!

Posted by: Terrilynn | February 5, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

“You guys are too funny. That Bogus CBO report was debunked a couple of weeks ago, but many of you don’t seem to want to let facts get in the way of a good story!
Boy, why didn’t I think of going to Popular Mechanics for information on the economy of the nation.”
How is the CBO bogus? They are the Congressional Budget Office. If you dont believe them, why do you believe Barney Frank?
And you need to down load new talking points.
The CBO report is brand new.

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

“Why don’t you move to another country if you don’t like it?”
Which one do you suggest?

Posted by: Le Petit Politics | February 5, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

This is not a Economic stimulis package its a wasteful government spending bill,and will do nothing to boost our economy.Whats the RUSH we rushed 350 billion and no one can tell you where it went?All Americans need to look at the spending projects in this bill,and see its nothing more than a government growth bill.and has no oversight on the 200 billion given to the states,and they have already overspent on Social programs for illegals,there is no provision to stop them from continuing this wasteful spending.

Posted by: stormerF | February 5, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

The Internal Revenue Service is trying to collect billions of dollars in unpaid taxes from nearly half a million federal employees. According to IRS records, 171,549 current federal workers did not voluntarily pay their federal income taxes in 2007. The same is true for 37,752 active duty military and nearly 200,000 retired civilian and military personnel. All for a total of $3,586,784,725 in taxes owed.
While Bush was in office, his office the Executive Office of the President, which includes the White House, had 58 employees who did not pay $319,978 in taxes for year 2007!!

Posted by: JV | February 5, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

BertieW:
CBO analysis referenced by you only looked at so-called discretionary spending, not the entire $825 billion stimulus package proposed by House leaders. Among the spending not analyzed is a proposed $275 billion in tax cuts and nearly $200 billion for jobless benefits — both of which are expected by some to jump-start the economy more quickly than infrastructure projects.
Second, the CBO data is based on an already outdated version of the proposed stimulus package.
Last, and perhaps most important, the three-page CBO data sheet makes absolutely no qualitative conclusions about whether infrastructure spending will stimulate the economy, or whether it will or won’t help the economy to grow. It projects when the money would be spent, period.

Posted by: JV | February 5, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Terrilyn – Hope you’re right about my federal taxes not going up, but I don’t believe it for a minute. I know my state taxes are going up — I live in Massachusetts, so there’s the Big Dig to still pay for. Did any of you catch the story in Forbes about under funded government pensions? It’s scary.

Posted by: abcnewsvisitor | February 5, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

This whole business is discouraging. I thought that the way the system works is that the President and his staff draft the Bill. His staff takes the bill to Congress and the debating starts from there. In this case, Obama went to Congress and said “come up with a passable Bill.” He hadnded out some general guidelines but did not put pen to paper past that. He claims that the world’s best economist’s guided this bill – they didn’t.
Let’s scrap this Bill and start over. The President needs to sit down with his staff and write a bill. They need to define what we are trying to achieve with each provision. If he is going to spend X dollars then it needs to produce Y jobs. Such and such a spending initiative produces this or that result. If you can’t draw a straight line to the immediate benefit then that provision needs to go away.
Its not easy but it is straightforward. The President needs to do this himself – not rely on Congress to come up with something that is passable. He need to come up with something that will actually stimulate this economy.

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | February 5, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Obama is a flaming idiot with less backbone than earthworm. If this bailout passes I certainly hope it’s 100% partisan. The results will be next to worthless and this Yo-Yo will be looking for someone else to blame. What’s next? Bailing out Mexico.

Posted by: AmericanPie | February 5, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

The saga of the POST TURTLE……a farmer was driving down the country roads near his farm and he spied a TURTLE on top of a fence post along the side of the road………….the poor turtle was flailing its legs as it sat straddled on top of the fence post…..soon a good samaritan drove by and saw the turtle’s plight….he admonished the farmer that the turtle needed help. The wise farmer told the good samaritan that this was just a “POST TURTLE” and he had seen them before…the good samaritan asked “What is a POST TURTLE”???
The farmer said a “Post turtle” is one who was placed on top of the fence post………….he did not get there by himself….someone had to put him there…..and when he gets there, he has no clue as to what to do….or how to get down.

Posted by: socialism101 | February 5, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Here is the report available off the CBO home page:
“Estimated Macroeconomic Effects of the Inouye-Baucus Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 1″
Essentially they are saying that after spending trillions we will end up slightly worse off. Why? If the spending is just pet project pork then there is no lasting benefit to the economy so it is a net negative. Hover Dam was a net positive for many decades. Building a dog park is not.
“Most of the budgetary effects of the Senate legislation would occur over the next few years. Even if the fiscal stimulus persisted, however, the short-run effects on output that operate by increasing demand for goods and services would eventually fade away. In the long run, the economy produces close to its potential output on average, and that potential level is determined by the stock of productive capital, the supply of labor, and productivity. Short-run stimulative policies can affect long-run output by influencing those three factors, although such effects would generally be smaller than the short-run impact of those policies on demand.
In contrast to its positive near-term macroeconomic effects, the Senate legislation would reduce output slightly in the long run, CBO estimates, as would other similar proposals. The principal channel for this effect is that the legislation would result in an increase in government debt. To the extent that people hold their wealth in the form of government bonds rather than in a form that can be used to finance private investment, the increased government debt would tend to “crowd out” private investment—thus reducing the stock of private capital and the long-term potential output of the economy.
The negative effect of crowding out could be offset somewhat by a positive long-term effect on the economy of some provsions—such as funding for infrastructure spending, education programs, and investment incentives, which might increase economic output in the long run. CBO estimated that such provisions account for roughly one-quarter of the legislation’s budgetary cost. Including the effects of both crowding out of private investment (which would reduce output in the long run) and possibly productive government investment (which could increase output), CBO estimates that by 2019 the Senate legislation would reduce GDP by 0.1 percent to 0.3 percent on net.”

Posted by: BertieW | February 5, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

The answer to bad debt is not more bad debt. CUT SPENDING, get our fiscal house in order. If Obama wants to blame somebody, this started with the subprime mess cause by democrat legislation, regulation, and policy. (Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and company) Obama had his fingers in the pie also. (lots of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac) The stimulus package is a bad Idea and a waste of money.

Posted by: Philip V. | February 6, 2009, 3:47 am 3:47 am

Campaign style rhetoric >>>>
This is the old style politics in action. And talk about old ideas, his ideas of stimulus is going back to the Johnson/Carter administration. Those are old ideas. Where are the government cuts in spending or ways to pay for all this? Its almost a Trillion dollars without interest.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | February 6, 2009, 7:16 am 7:16 am

So, why is Obama in such a hurry to create jobs in Europe and China ? Me spidey sense is tingling ! As the French say, ‘plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose’ (The more things change, the more they stay the same).

Posted by: Gregg&Brian | February 6, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Look, the head of the RNC stated “bipartisanship is over-rated”. With their childish attitude of my way or no way how can bipartisanship be expected. Meanwhile, folks continue to lose jobs. Do folks forget it was Republicans in charge that led to the mess we’re in? So, the hell with Republicans….they are not interested in bi-partisanship. They are only interested in mindless demagoguery. That’s my opinion as an Independent voter. Pass the damn stimulus now!

Posted by: indy_voter | February 6, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

More spending cuts? More tax cuts? More Republican demagoguery. Seems to me what is needed is investment in this country which is what is provided in the package. Republicans should stop acting like children insisting on their way or no way. If not, Democrats should simply pass without Republicans. Republicans can blame Democrats if it doesn’t work. That is a role that they are most comfortable with anyway…

Posted by: indy_voter | February 6, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Man, this guy is like some psycho girlfriend who keeps you guessing one day to the next. One day I think he “gets it,” the next he seems clueless as a teenager.
So today he talks like We the People are just itching for him to add nearly a trillion dollars to our debt when everyone knows that is not true. Most Americans are against this stimulus package because it is laden with unnecessary pork and, more importantly, we don’t think it’ll work.
I mean, what did the $700 billion from last October do for us????

Posted by: Ken | February 6, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Is the community organizer from Chicago inexperience beginning to show? Did he loose his scalpel? I thought he won the election but from his speech yesterday you would think he was still campaigning for President.

Posted by: HankHill | February 6, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

I am disgusted by how Congress, mostly the Republican members of Congress, don’t get it. They LOST the election! And incredibly they continue to play the same old game that has crippled this country. Does the Republican Party really want to be responsible for causing the Great Depression of 2009, because believe me they will be! Do we need to have Hoovervilles in Central Park again, before they get it? Are they so out of touch with the American peoples’ plight that they play games and don’t expect the consequences to be felt in homes across America?
I cannot believe how some Americans continue to embrace oil as the only way! What is wrong with you folks…don’t you realize that we are funding our own demise…I say the bill doesn’t go far enough…I say let’s fund a “Project” bringing together the best minds in our country to develop energy alternatives ab alternative to oil.
I think President Obama has been extremely patient with these hacks and I applaud his tenor and his words and I say Right On PResient OBAMA!

Posted by: MRD in Massachusetts | February 6, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

If you republicans can call Obama an idiot,what do you call BUSH,remember him? the guy who bombed iraq,spent lots of money there for nothing,the guy who is called worse abroad…wake up guys.Obama is the POTUS and will take this country out of this mess.

Posted by: pam | February 6, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

“The president did not mention that the bill he is proposing would double that deficit.”
The deficit that Bush left us with was spent on a needless war and on making the rich even richer. The deficit that Obama will get us into will be spent on things that we will need not just to jump start our economy (by stimulating short-term demand and investment) but also to lay the foundation for the next and more sustainable period of economic growth (by investing in alternative energies, infrastructure, health care, etc.). If everything is done right and folks in DC start getting serious about doing the right thing, the next period of economic growth will generate more than enough to cover Obama’s (and hopefully also Bush’s) deficits. Bill Clinton inherited the first Bush’s huge deficit and managed to turn it into a decent surplus. I’d put more trust in a Democratic President’s ideas.

Posted by: teddymaniac | February 6, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Where do any of you idiots think the money is coming from- some bank in the sky? We had some idot stand up and ask the president why if he used to make 3000.00 a month but can only make 1100.00 per month, was there something he could do to make it 3000.00 a month-
WELL LETS SEE IF YOU GIVE SOMEONE THE SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR NOT WORKING AS UYOU DO FOR WORKING, HOW MANY WOULD ACUTALLY WORK- It doesnt take a genius to figure this one out…. But again that is what the Dems want, for all of us to depend on the government so they can control each and everything you do,
Regardless of who or what party is in office, more government programs is not hthe answere,wait till all the wealthy people stop spending there money here in USA and start spending it in other countries, guess what where do you think the jobs come from in the first place- OH yea I forgot, all of you Dems think we should all just work for the
GOVERMENT- the people that want this stimulas the way it is, are only those that dont want to work for a living, those that thinking working part time at McDONALDS SHOULD MAKE 25.00 AN HOUR, GIVE ME A BREAK-

Posted by: susan gonzalez | February 11, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

I think its ironic that there is stimulas money for Hollywood- It seems to me the Dems think its bad to be a buisness man and make money, but if you are a politician, an actor or actress, a sports star, or rap artist or in the entertainment buisness that its ok to make millions of dollars, but you cant do so if you own a buisness- DO YOU KNOW THAT PALOSIE-(How ever you spell the speakers name) is worth 60 million dollars- so why isnt she giving up some of her fortune- politicans as a whole on both sides make more money than they should- and it seems that a lot of them dont pay their taxes- ( the person over the IRS now, just overlooked the taxes he didnt pay- yea right and I am a bannana -

Posted by: susan | February 11, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

I believe that BUSH AND OBOMA ARE IDOTS- The only thing u Dems can say is: Well if Bush did it then its ok for Oboma to do it- Thats like saying because my next door neighbor killed his spouse that its ok for me to do the same- Its getting old hearing that old sound bite-Not all of us agreed with Bush either-
IT DOESNT SEEM TO MATTER TO YOU THAT CHINA IS BASICALLY GOING TO OWN US….and that is what it comes down to – the bank in the sky just happens to be CHINA

Posted by: susan | February 11, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.