By Caitlin Taylor

Feb 6, 2009 8:59am

Worst Job Loss Numbers Since 1974

Dan Arnall of the ABC News Business Unit tells us the bad news: the Bureau of Labor Statistics says the nation’s employers cut 598,000 workers from their payrolls during January, with significant downward revision to previous months. This is the worst month of jobs loss since December 1974 (-602K).

Since the jobs loss started in January 2008, the nation has seen more than 3.2 million jobs vanish into the black hole that is the current recession. The number is significantly worse than the best guess of economists (-524K) and marks the thirteenth consecutive month of negative jobs growth.

The national unemployment rate – calculated in a separate and simultaneously released survey – rose significantly to at 7.6%. It’s the highest unemployment number since September 1992.

Do you know anyone who has lost their job in recent months? Have you? Share your story below.

- jpt

User Comments

People lose jobs while the Senate dithers….Republicans need to get out of the way so the stimulus can be passed. The miserable ideas are what got this country in the state it is right now….

Posted by: indy_voter | February 6, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

With Obama’s partisan speech to Dems last night, his post-partisan campaign rhetoric has now been revealed as BOGUS!
Now is NOT the time for Obama to rev up his base to dig in their heels – when a majority of the public agrees with Repubs on the stimulus bill that contains too much non-stimulus pork.
But Obama can’t bring himself to say “no” to Pelosi and Reid because they brought him to the dance and own him.
What a mess!

Posted by: joseyj | February 6, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

While Republicans are Grandstanding and Listening to the Likes of Rush Limbaugh More and More Jobs are slipping away,And Republicans want to give people Tax cuts. Well the last I checked If you dont have a Job you dont Pay Taxes, So what good are the Tax cuts? Most Businesses are in the RED, So giving them huge tax cuts does not Mean that they will stop laying off or hire new people They will take that money and Pay off Debt and rebuild their Businesses.

Posted by: Angie | February 6, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

This is awful that jobs are lost, but please – tell me how a bill that pays back Democratic fundraisers (that’s what about 80% of this bill is, don’t fool yourself – ACORN (LOL)) is supposed to create jobs?

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 6, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Nobody is laughing at Ron Paul now.

Posted by: Dan | February 6, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

indy_voter:
I fully agree with you! Republicans did not have good ideas the last 8 years, they do not have any now either! We voted for CHANGE and we are eager to see it happen.

Posted by: RST | February 6, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

“Dan Arnall of the ABC News Business Unit tells us the bad news: the Bureau of Labor Statistics says the nation’s employers cut 598,000 workers from their payrolls during January, with significant downward revision to previous months. ”
If this is a January number, then it isnt a “downward revision”.
You have to have a number before it can be revised.

Posted by: BertieW | February 6, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

This stimulus is so full of favors and fluff that it will do next to nothing to “save” or “create” jobs or the economy. We will be throwing good money after bad.
Everything run in seasons and cycles. This is just a drought before the rains come again.
Sometimes, doing nothing is better than doing something just to appease people. The government has a very poor track record of interfering and making things worse.
My brother-in-law lost his job at… surprise, a automotive engine manufacturing plant. He may have found a job in an aviation plant. We are waiting and hoping.
On the other hand, our small company had the best year ever last year and we hired an additional employee, so we are running counter to the national trends.
Has anyone called Pelosi on her statement of losing 500 million jobs a month? Talk about fear mongering and crazy making…

Posted by: WaitItOut | February 6, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Seems like the “miserable ideas” that got us here came from the congress and corporations that are getting saved.
More of the same will not solve the problem

Posted by: smith | February 6, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Ron Paul in the debates: “We have lived beyond our means, now we must live beneath our means.”
Everyone in the crowd and across America: “Ha, ha, ha, you are so kooki! The economy is sound.”

Posted by: Dan | February 6, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Ron Paul for President, 2012. REAL Change we can believe in!!

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | February 6, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Obama, the second comin
Agreed, but he would be 77 years old. If wisdom does come with age, I am so there.

Posted by: Dan | February 6, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Indy_voter “People lose jobs while the Senate dithers….Republicans need to get out of the way so the stimulus can be passed. The miserable ideas are what got this country in the state it is right now….”
The Republicans cannot stop the stimulus. The problem is the Democrats know it will fail and so they do not want to pass it without some Republican support so they don’t get the sole blame for that failure. It shows a lack of confidence and leadership on the part of Democrats and Obama.
I agree with the Republicans. This is a bad bill and should be changed significantly before they offer their support.

Posted by: James | February 6, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Nothing is bad than taking a hand of a blind person. You will never reach at the anticipated destination.
Am sorry to say am not ready to take an hand of those who got us lost!!!

Posted by: Rosie | February 6, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Some of us lived “beneath our means” all along. Ron Paul was right, saving for rainy days (which always come) is the only way to prosper.
There is no magic potion, no economic elixir. No “Poof!” jobs created. The market will correct and the economy will recover on its own, in its own time.
What we are doing now, with the “stimulus” bill, is digging ourselves into deeper economic holes. The way to get out of a hole is not more digging… The best way to get out of a hole is to stop digging.

Posted by: YupYup | February 6, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Economics is 90% psychology.
I think the previous administration, as well as Congress and the Obama administration are all guilty of fearmongering.
The result of their dire predictions has become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The economy will turn around only once the people (consumers and business managers) are convinced they can spend again.

Posted by: Born in the USA | February 6, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

James,
The bill cannot pass without at least tacit Republican support: Republicans have enough votes to fillibuster and keep the bill from ever coming up for a vote.

Posted by: Born in the USA | February 6, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am

I agree with those who say that the media, and BOTH parties in Congress drumming this “do what we say or the sky will fall” fear is adding fuel to the fire. I agree with the guy that said that 90% of the ecnomy is confidence. There is no confidence, which has resulted in hiring freezes, pulled back business and consumer spending, which only exasperates the whole problem. Many companies are sound and making money, and if they would just concentrate on their PRODUCTS, and not the stock price.. we might be okay. We’ve got to get back to basics, back to producing things people want to buy.. which creates jobs, small businesses, and industry. No abitrary government spending will be a substitue for real organic growth.

Posted by: a reader in ga | February 6, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

To stick with the topic, no I don’t know anyone who has lost their job. My hubs company is set to release 8000 from theirs, thankfully he won’t be one. I truly feel for anyone who loses their job, it is going to be tough for a while, but it will level out in the end.

Posted by: samhiguchi | February 6, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

The porkulus bill is not the answer, no matter how many tantrums Obama throws.

Posted by: Michelle | February 6, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

“Economics is 90% psychology.
I think the previous administration, as well as Congress and the Obama administration are all guilty of fearmongering.”
So you think in light of the numbers printed in the article above that we will inspire trust and confidence by telling people everything is going great and they should invest as if it were so? It sounds like more baloney from the Bush days to me.

Posted by: Skip | February 6, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

And Jake, you might mention that half of those job losses came in the past 3 months – meaning that the economy is accelarating downward. Companies are cutting production, and dropping employees because of that, since no one is buying anything.
So, obviously, a plan of 100% tax cuts, like the one from economic whiz John McCain is the only answer.
Only that really makes complete sense – that is, if you are completely ignorant and insane.

Posted by: Bud | February 6, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Yes, to the question I do know several who have lost or about to lose their jobs
We had to interview 3 prospective candidates, within the company, for a office assistant position that became available. All three had been given their lay-off notices prior to these interviews. All qualified. Only one would go home with an offer, two would go home knowing they would be without jobs in two weeks, one of which had a house up for short sell and another whose spouse has been without employment for 2 years….Needless to say it turned out to a JACK DANIELS NIGHT…
Point: The current economic climate is not only hard on those unemployed but those employed that are asked to make tough decisions…
And NO, I do not believe this so called stimulus bill is going to be worth the volumes of paper it is printed on..Going to take time and memory to correct this one…….

Posted by: Parallax View | February 6, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

“So, obviously, a plan of 100% tax cuts, like the one from economic whiz John McCain is the only answer.
Only that really makes complete sense – that is, if you are completely ignorant and insane.”
So we need to differentiate “tax cuts” and what they mean.
“Tax cuts” could be one shot rebates, to people that paid taxes. Or they could be to everyone, regardless.
Or “Tax Cuts” could be reductions to the tax rates of individuals, or additional deductions that encourage certain kinds of consumer spending.
Or “tax cut” could be reductions to business tax rates or additional deduction allowance to encourage behavior. Or the could be one-time deductions that go away.
Each one of the “tax cuts” will have a different effect. No one is going to change their strategic behavior for a one-time rebate. As Mitt Rommney said today in an article on CNN:
” Third, sending out rebate checks to citizens and businesses is not a tax cut. The media bought this line so far, but they’ve got it wrong. Checks in the mail are refunds, not tax cuts. We tried rebate checks in 2008 and they did virtually nothing to jump-start the economy. Disposable income went up, but consumption hardly moved.
Businesses aren’t stupid. They’re not going to invest in equipment and new hires for a one-time, short-term blip. What’s needed are permanent rate cuts on individuals and businesses.”
The current First Time homebuyer credit is probably worthwhile. On the other hand dont expect first time buyers to spur new home starts and construction jobs.
Most of the Obama “tax cut” is Making Work Pay which is $500/yr/person and phased out at $75,000 (because those people are evil).
Now giving money to working poor might be a worthwhile thing to do, especially now to buffer their personal conditions, but it in no way will stimulate the economy. If they spend the $500 on cheap dollar store junk out of each $1, probably $.07 stays with the company, $10 goes to the landlord and utilities , $.05 to the worker, $.10 to containerized shipping and transport. 60% of the stimulus would go to Chinese manufacturing.
In short one shot rebates to the poor will stimulate next to nothing.
Obama has no tax action that would in his plan that would cause a business to reinvest
Obama has no action in his plan that would cause a investor to put more money out.
The total amount of infrastructure projects is only $90B. The rest are dubious wishlist project that will have a questionable economic effect.

Posted by: BertieW | February 6, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Economics is 90% psychology.
*****************************************************
Interesting. Sounds like mind over matter. Hmmm.

Posted by: kathy | February 6, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Republicans have been chanting the mantra of tax cuts since Nixon at least, but every time they leave office they leave a bigger mess behind. It just doesn’t work. -And I hope we will be spared further quotes by Mitt Romney. That fool doesn’t even have the common sense not to tie his dog to the roof of his car and go on a trip.

Posted by: Skip | February 6, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

” That fool doesn’t even have the common sense not to tie his dog to the roof of his car and go on a trip.”
There we go again with the politics of personal destruction. Cant you ‘progressives’ ever stop your hate? Probably half the country did that in the ’60 and ’70′s.

Posted by: BertieW | February 6, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

I don’t hate Mitt Romney, I just don’t like him. -And funny you should mention ol’ Mitt(American job killer)Romney on an article about job losses. He is probably as personally responsible for, and profited by, packing up as many American companies and shipping them overseas as anyone. When it comes to job loss he is kind of an expert.

Posted by: Skip | February 6, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

The bill cannot pass without at least tacit Republican support: Republicans have enough votes to fillibuster and keep the bill from ever coming up for a vote.
==================================
Do Republicans really want to viewed as obstructionists? I say give the weekend for the moderates to compromise then bring the bill the floor and let the chips fall. If the votes aren’t there then let Republicans filibuster. They will pay a political price because delays will only cause the economy to worsen.

Posted by: indy_voter | February 6, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.