Yet Another Journalist Joins Obama Team
Chicago Tribune correspondent Jill Zuckman announced yesterday that she will join the Obama administration as assistant to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and director of public affairs.
"I’m excited about going to a department in the administration that’s going to play a huge role in hopefully putting people back to work," Zuckman told the newspaper.
Zuckman becomes at least the fourth reporter to join the Obama administration. Others include former TIME Washington bureau chief Jay Carney who is now Vice President Biden’s communications director, former Los Angeles Times reporter Peter Gosselin who is now a speechwriter for Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, and former Washington Post deputy editor Warren Bass who is an adviser to United Nations Ambassador Dr. Susan Rice.
Former ABC News congressional correspondent Linda Douglass became a senior strategist for the Obama campaign, while other campaign officials included former CNN producer Kate Albright-Hanna and former CNN correspondent Aneesh Raman.
There is also talk, of course, of CNN chief medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta becoming surgeon general.
Former ABC News correspondent Geoff Morrell is Pentagon spokesman, having taken the job during the Bush administration and staying on with Defense Secretary Gates.
– jpt

Email
Rick Santorum Encircled in Prayer
Boehner Slams Obama on Contraception Controversy
I reckon about 90% of journalists are already unpaid members of his team.
Posted by: Brad Brzezinski | February 16, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
There seems to be a group of very sour folks here who never have anything positive to say and certainly don’t seem to tolerate any opinion not their own.
Posted by: MIguy | February 16, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
McCain has lost his ‘base’, it seems …
LOSER REPUBS!!!
HOWZ THE WILDERNESS TREATING YA?
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Posted by: R Mutt | February 16, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Maybe he owed these people something?
Posted by: JULIE | February 16, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
jpt writes:
“former Los Angeles Times reporter Peter Gosselin who is now a speechwriter for Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner,”
Hahaha: so HE’s the one! Who’dda thunk a speech so stupid was constructed ON PURPOSE …
Note: anybody who missed Andy Rooney Sunday night take on Geithner’s speech missed a really good piece. Look for it on video at Another Network.
As for Zuckman’s pointless burble, public employees at ALL levels should be barred, on pain of death, from EVER saying “I’m excited about … ” ANYthing having to do with his/her paid “work”.
Tapper’s left out Lynn Sweet of the Sun-Times, who’s morphed into a hastily-rearranged talking head on behalf of Da Organization.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
I don’t understand why this is surprising…every form of print media is shedding jobs right now…at least a gov’t paycheck is steady.
Posted by: dakota65 | February 16, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
jpt quotes the burbling Zuckman:
“the administration that’s going to play a huge role in hopefully putting people back to work,”
Ah: “HOPEfully” … maybe her next excited utterance on behalf of one the Obama organization’s remaining recycled Republicans — “LaHood” haahaha — will deal with ‘change’.
Under the flim-flam Gibbs/Obama “save-r-create jobs” doctrine, as long as there are still three or four million people who HAVE “jobs”, Porkulus is working.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
It cuts both ways. Look at George Stephanopoulos, former Clinton hack, now employed by ABC News. He’s also now involved in regular briefings with Obama’s Chief-of-Staff Rahm Emanuel even as he “reports” or “analyzes” the news at ABC. What else is new.
Posted by: Eric | February 16, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
“every form of print media is shedding jobs right now…”
And yet you can still read about David Axelrod’s “research” non-profit (headliner “news” celebrity du jour: Tom Brokaw) in Parade Magazine. Amazing.
Literacy’s sooo yesterday.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Who wouldn’t want to work for Obama after slaving away for years for their corporate media tycoons?
Posted by: Flash Override | February 16, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
“Who wouldn’t want to work for Obama after slaving away for years for their corporate media tycoons?”
Anybody who didn’t actually want to further smiley-face fascism, maybe?
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
It cuts both ways.
***************************************************
Sure. Look at the former White House Dough Boy over at Fox. I’m referring to the pudgy, fat one who kneads and rolls the news — the none other than Karl Rove.
Posted by: kathy | February 16, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Transportation? Is Zuckman even qualified for this?
Just more ammo for the Hannity’s of the world and their crusade against the MSM and Obama…
Posted by: matt | February 16, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Anyone who doesnt think that Hannity represents the MSM is a fool.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 16, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Now maybe we can get some fresh blood in, some reporters who wont be afraid to report on George Bush’s rape rooms at Guantanamo and elsewhere. Especially now since we have Brandon Neely confirming what the detainees have been saying for years.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 16, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Imagine being Geithner’s speech writer.
Posted by: mad | February 16, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Hannity Is no Journalist he is a Right wing Rag, The Man is so Biased its Pathetic Garbage what a waste of Good Air time
Posted by: Angie | February 16, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
How many of these Chicago journalists held back on digging up information of Obama because they were lobbying for a new job?
How many had some bombshell news on Obama and friends prior to the election, but held it back on the promise from Obama for a new job?
Posted by: Sally J | February 16, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
The late Tony Snow of FOX was a strong advocate for invading Iraq who became White House Press Secretary under GW Bush.
But then relatively fewer people seriously consider FOX objective.
I bet there’s many more examples of journalists becoming political pr people (and vice versa).
Posted by: Danny | February 16, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
“journalist” — “right wing rag”
Whats the difference?
Posted by: Flash Override | February 16, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
There’s no end to the people Obama owes.
He’ll need a second pork bill to pay them all back–with our money, our children and grandchildren’s money.
What a great guy…
Posted by: sammy | February 16, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
well, because Obama owes so much to media..why not pay them back by hiring them.
Posted by: frieda | February 16, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
They got him elected. They won’t skip a beat.
Posted by: drjohn | February 16, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
“journalist” — “right wing rag”
Whats the difference?
****************************************************
No comment on that one.
Posted by: kathy | February 16, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
FRIEDA
Typical Republican BS,Why when Republicans lose they blame the Media?
Posted by: Angie | February 16, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
I’d only like to see Gupta appointed so we can watch Michael Moore tear him apart again.
The people want national health care, the media doesn’t
The people dont want trade agreements with countries that kill union leaders, the media does
The people want social security left alone, the media want to tear it apart
The people want jobs programs, the media wants tax breaks
The people want investigations into Bush administration lawbreaking, the media doesn’t
Tell me again, whats the difference between a right wing loudmouth and a MSM journalist?
Posted by: Flash Override | February 16, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Flash Override, Yeah Fox News is the MSM and ABC,NBC,CBS,CNN, and all the rest are the Obama Media.
Posted by: not agreeing | February 16, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
I feel for people who watch Fox News!
Posted by: Angie | February 16, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Since journalists are frequently experts in politics, have amassed great knowledge and education to get their posts, possess critical verbal, writing and social skills, it doesn’t surprise me that Obama would find worthy people among the journalist profession.
It sure is different than giving the job of head guy at FEMA to a horse show director! We all know how that swell decision worked out for Katrina victims.
Posted by: Lydia | February 16, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
The contention that the media won the election for Obama is unfair in light of McCain running an extremely poor campaign, and losing every debate with Obama.
McCain chose a running mate about whom he knew virtually nothing, someone who alienated the majority of independents, who was incapable of doing a press conference, and who repeatedly made a fool of herself on nationally televised interviews.
Secondly, doing transparent publicity stunts like “suspending” his campaign and then accomplishing nothing significant during the “suspension” made McCain look foolish.
So did McCain’s loudly proclaiming the “fundamentals of the economy are sound” as the nation sank into the worst downturn since the Great Depression.
And the majority of the American public saw Obama as the winner of every single debate he had with McCain, and they saw Biden as the winner over Palin. The Republicans went 0 for 4 in the debates.
In my opinion the media bias was in the opposite direction–in favor of McCain.
Posted by: Danny | February 16, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
In my opinion the media bias was in the opposite direction–in favor of McCain.
**************************************************
Absolutely. Of course, Obama would have never gotten away with the foibles of McCain. They would have been assigned an amplified, 24/7 coverage like the blueberry picked Wright videos.
Posted by: kathy | February 16, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Everyone in the PR industry knows this is how you get inside the media industry, hire journalists. Obama’s played a very PR controlled campaign, unlike McCain and Bush. He had the money to burn before the election but now he doesn’t have the campaign funds. Easy answer – hire them into the WH, because it’s working well with the personal lawyers he’s hired to the WH too. These days, campaigns are won on PR manipulation and marketing. A socialist agenda running on capitalist tactics. Change you can believe in!
Posted by: Der Kempt | February 16, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
“The people want national health care, the media doesn’t [etc.]”
There’s a class-obedience thing in play here: it’s the corporate elite, not the mere hirelings of “the media”, who REALLY call the tune.
The daily interplay of coercion by which “the media” is played, and through the media, “the people”, is about as close to untrammeled evil as you’d want to get.
As for McCain’s “campaign”, there wasn’t any. It was a two-party fix from the elite right: few “Republicans” OR “Democrats” have any party principles left, after rolling over for fascism under the Bush regime. To roll over for fascism NOW, under a celebrity figurehead, isn’t much of a stretch for the political class.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 16, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Three little words:
Quid pro quo.
Posted by: RolandBurris | February 16, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Hey, if you did enough good for our Smartest PB0 to get him selected, he will help you out as well, as long as you do not ask his COS for a dollar amount while you are being listened.
Posted by: two cats | February 16, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
The contention that the media won the election for Obama is unfair in light of McCain running an extremely poor campaign, and losing every debate with Obama.
Posted by: Danny | Feb 16, 2009 1:05:23 PM
—-
A dog could have run McCain over in the general election.
It is this bunch of people, or media, who ultimately selected a completely inexperienced, clueless person on the economy to be the democratic nominee.
Had the media been fair, and HRC got her fair share, the economy would have not tanked as it is today. The mortgage and banking problems would have been at least treated as the number one economic problem two years ago.
What? PB0′s next task is to figure out the mortgage loans? Where was he 2 years ago when he promoted the first money giveaway?
Posted by: Voodoo | February 16, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
wow,i am laughing and just really amazed at how many people actually believed the media had nothing todo with Obama winning, and was in fact very much in favor in having him win. anyone catch Brian williams “so how are you feeling tonight?you must be thinking about your parents” meanwhile the economy is tanking and brian williams is concerned that Obama is not happy! whenever he messed up, the media was quick to fix and quick to blame the republicans for it. during the primaries the media attacked Hillary and gave Obama numerous of passes. i mean everyone became afraid to actually challenge Obama on his very thin resume and experience for fear of the media attack on them (we all saw Joe the plumber didnt we). how ironic,the media says Joe is a fraud cuz he had a 2k tax lien yet Hilda Solis hubby has a tax lien for 16 years and far more than Joe had and the media looked the other way.
the media elected Obama and now they have to do their part to make sure that his policies are passed. their teasers “how dare the republicans obstruct Obama’s stimulus!!!” how about the media actually reporting “well Obama promised transparency and so far we are not seeing it! people urge congress to hold off on signing the bill until the president reviews it with us like he promised!” there was none of that! in fact, i think the fairness doctrine ought to be applied to them!
Posted by: liberty | February 16, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
The contention that the media won the election for Obama is unfair in light of McCain running an extremely poor campaign, and losing every debate with Obama.
Posted by: Danny | Feb 16, 2009 1:05:23 PM
—-
Danny, If you recall, HRC won every single debate over 0bama, and scared the you-know-what out of him that he could not even dare to have another debate with her on the same stage. Did it make any difference to the media propaganda?
Posted by: Voodoo | February 16, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
heres a little example from this morning MSM rounds on burris situation. another example of Media bias/favorism towards Democrats. watch when they have to report on a corrupt government offical, if it is a democrat they skip that, but if it’s a republcian they blare it and then they go on and on and on the full hour discussing it.
Monday morning show coverage of allegations that Illinois Senator Roland Burris may have perjured himself with respect to connections to impeached Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich minimized calls for investigation or Burris’s resignation. On the CBS Early Show, correspondent Thailia Assuras explained: “State Republican lawmakers are calling for Senator Roland Burris to resign and be investigated for perjury…The U.S. Senate could move to expel Burris, but analysts say that’s unlikely to happen. It’s not the kind of distraction Senate Democrats need as they try to move forward the president’s agenda.”
On NBC’s Today, correspondent Lee Cowan had a similar take: “…some Republican lawmakers here are now calling for Senator Burris to resign. At the very least, some want to see a criminal investigation launched to see whether or not he perjured himself. As for his colleagues in the U.S. Senate, so far they’re reserving judgment.” ABC’s Good Morning America barely mentioned the controversy, only offering one 15-second news brief on the story. In addition to downplaying the issue, none of the three morning shows mentioned that Burris was a Democrat. Only the Early Show featured an on-screen graphic with ‘Illinois (D)’ next to Burris’s name while playing a clip of the Senator.
Early Show coverage almost portrayed Burris as a victim of Republican opponents as fill-in co-host Chris Wragge declared: “Political opponents of Senator Roland Burris, appointed to Barack Obama’s seat, are already calling for Burris to resign.” Thalia Assuras later described how those Republicans: “…allege he lied in January before the Illinois House Impeachment Committee investigating charges that Governor Rod Blagojevich tried to sell the Obama seat for campaign contributions or high-profile jobs.”
Posted by: biasedmedia | February 16, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
another example from MSM softball questions. boy poor Clinton, he really got grilled there!!
NBC’s Ann Curry traveled down to Texas to speak with former President Bill Clinton, on Monday’s “Today” show to talk to him about his Global Initiative but never asked Clinton about all the troubles his Initiative, and his foreign ties, caused and could potentially still cause his wife in her role as Secretary of State.
Posted by: biasedmedia | February 16, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
I’ll give you a big example of media bias from these very pages. Jake has claimed that Obama’s recovery act is the most costly piece of legislation ever. Yet, it only contains about $480 billion of spending, much less than the $612 billion for the military last October. The modest recovery act only barely qualifies as as among the ‘most costly’ if you include the $280 billion of tax cuts in it. Yet, if you are going to count tax cuts as costs, the bill pales in comparison to the $1.35 trillion tax cut in 2001.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 16, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Voodoo- Yeah, the media was kinder to Obama. It was probably a gender thing, and perhaps his agenda was less threatening than hers. His campaign may have had signs waving about change, but the stronger impetus for it was Hillary Clinton all along. Like her proposal to impose a windfall tax on oil companies for green tech in contrast to Obama’s tax payer stimulus plan. Or her resolve to diss the failed No Child Left Behind Act, which will now be “improved” by a Secretary of Education, who possesses no educational background. Pardon my nostalgia.
Posted by: kathy | February 16, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Danny, I agree with you that the media didn’t win the election for Obama. McCain made too many mistakes.
I really admire the mix of people Obama is choosing. He isn’t only picking yes men, so he will get a variety of opinions.
And to Voodoo, I don’t know where you get your information but I don’t recall any main news polls showing Hillary winning all the debates over Obama. Watching Fox doesn’t give very accurate information on certain topics. And Fox sure did want the election to be between Hillary and McCain, figuring dredging up Bill’s past would guarantee a victory for the Repubs.
I can’t imagine why with all the problems we are facing as a nation, that so many people commenting here are either focused on the past or knocking everything Obama does.
Posted by: Lydia | February 16, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Wow…I’ve been secretly in Love with Jill since I first saw her on TV….
She is very easy on the eyes…
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 16, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Begala: Stimulus foes shouldn’t take the money
——
Are you kidding me?
In as much as we love ya guys, and as much as dislike the socialist agendas of PB0, we certainly will not refuse PB0′s money giveaway (actually probably will get 0 like last time). It’s our money any way; we contributed more than those who get more, but contributing not a penny in taxes.
Posted by: two cats | February 16, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Brad: “…90% of journalists are already unpaid members of his team.”
So, true. Many in the tingly, giggly and activist press were falling all over themselves to get Obama elected. It’s a shame because many questions that should have been asked during the campaign, weren’t. The press needs to be independent to do its job correctly and it no longer is.
The Fourth Estate died in 2008 and Obama’s campaign picked up thousands upon thousands of unpaid but highly influencial and conspicuous campaign workers.
Posted by: Murrow | February 16, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
To Flash Override: Have you read your Constitution lately? Do you know the difference between an annual federal budget and a supplemental spending bill? Military spending is part of the annual budget, and in fact is one of the few items that we as taxpayers are constitutionally obligated to provide. We must provide for a common defense and the infrastructure of government ( salaries for Reps, Senator, Judges, buildings, etc.) All other spending is at the discretion of our elected officials so far as we will stand for it. This bill is by far the largest supplemental spending bill ever passed by any government. We will be mortgaging our childrens’ future on a hunch. Are you OK with that?
Posted by: Woody | February 16, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Woody, that was only the $612 billion appropriation bill. If you want to talk about all military spending, you are talking about twice that amount for this year.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 16, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Most of the media went to work for Obama over a year ago.
Posted by: Tina | February 16, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Who in their right mind considers the military budget necessary for “the common defense”?
Posted by: Flash Override | February 16, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
The media did NOT get Obama elected. John McCain and his inept campaign did. Unlike many on the right who are so blinded by their morally bankrupt ideology that they can’t see straight, the MAJORITY of the American voters were tired of incompetence in the White House and voted for someone most likely to make us respect the Presidency once again. Here is an analysis of the media coverage of the 2008 election from the Pew Research Center for those of you who want the truth and not spin.
Posted by: Hellbound-Liberal | February 16, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
No, I’m pretty sure the media got Obama elected. He made them tingly.
Posted by: HeavenBound | February 16, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Jake:
You are hands down the best reporter in washington. You know it, we know it….I’m just sad that Barry will likely not include you in any of the reindeer games.
He picks his reporters carefully. This is all a big staged show. Barack thinks we are stupid enough to swallow all of this. Time will tell, I suppose.
Keep up the truth. Just the truth…We desperately need it Jake.
Posted by: mary | February 16, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Woody: Your children don’t have a future without this bill…get your priorities straight..don’t just repeat what you hear from politicians-it will make you go blind….
Posted by: cowgirl | February 16, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Boy you all give the people who write stories for papers a looooot of credit…i personally don’t pay any attention to most of them…i am beginning to think republicans are the only one hanging on their every word…just hoping they will side with them…republican approval rating sank after the stimulus bill-thats all the information i need to know
Posted by: cowgirl | February 16, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
18 plus Americans voted for President Obama. Not the media for sure. If then candidate had said a third of what came out of the mouths of hypocrite McBush and Palin he would not have lasted as long as those idiots did. McBush has always been cozy with the media. Watch him….Johnny come lately along with his cronies are hoping that the American economy will fail, so he’ll get back his “media darling status” Wish.
Posted by: sngeorgia | February 16, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
That’s 18 MILLION PLUS VOTERS, sorry for the error
Posted by: sngeorgia | February 16, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
I guess that’s in addition to
President Obama’s stealth journalists
in the news media like Chris Matthews,
Bill Press, and George Stephanopoulos to
name a few! You’ll neither hear nor
read any discouraging words here.
Everything is “peachy keen” in
Obamaland. Obama is responsible for
all that is good and those bad
republicans are to blame for anything
that goes wrong! Yeah Right!
The American People are too smart to
fall for the pablum thrown out by
the Obama Cheerleaders!
Jimmy Carter, the sequel has begun.
Posted by: reaganfan | February 16, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
The longer President Obama is in office the more I wish for a re-do on the election. A journalism major in the Cabinet. Three years, 11 months and counting. I do believe Mr. Tapper is in the tank for President Obama…or he is incapable of doing investigative/informative reporting.
Posted by: Deborah | February 16, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
The media got him elected with their coverage…he owes em
Posted by: nuts for obama | February 16, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Yesterday, the new U.S. President played basketball and then watched the NBA all-star game with a friend. He’s been enjoying a vacation in Chicago, seemingly unconcerned that we are in the midst of a financial crisis the like of which we haven’t seen since the 1930s.
As always today Hillary Clinton is not vacationing, nor taking time off. Hillary is hard at work Saving The World.
When the world needs help, when the world sends a call for help like a mythical Batsignal in the night, that S.O.S. morse code message is answered by S.O.S. herself – Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: greenfun | February 16, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Pretty amazing that they join a campaign and an administration and still bear the title “journalist”. I thought journalists were supposed to be objective? They always claim to be. Maybe in their heads they are.
Unfortunate that media outlets have become extensions of political arms of our government through their own personal politics. The end result is that the American public gets the losing end of full perspective and information.
When asking a “journalist” about why they left out important facts from a story, the “journalist” replied, “I didn’t feel those facts were important to the story, and only would have lengthened the limited space I have”.
Professional journalism at its finest.
Posted by: KR | February 17, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
the obamedia getting payed their hush-money with taxpayer dollars.
well that certainly is transparency.
Posted by: joe | February 17, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
The media followed the only decent story during the primary and general elections – President Obama!!
If you want to blame (or thank) anyone for the slam dunk election — look to team McCain’s triple double screw up — with Palin leading the league in assists.
I would never vote for Obama/Biden (especially Biden) But I Do Understand and cannot fault anyone who voted against the Dorky Duo (McCain/Palin).
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 17, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
I hear Fox News is liberal media now.
Posted by: John | April 7, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
*sigh*
Jake, please keep your integrity as you continue in your very important career. You are a beacon in the darkness.
thanks,
we are counting on you.
MJ
Posted by: mjishernameo | September 26, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm