A.I.G. = Allowing Irreversible Greed?
"There are a lot of terrible things that have happened in the last 18 months, but what’s happened at AIG is the most outrageous," Larry Summers, chairman of the National Economic Council, told George Stephanopoulos this morning.
Summers was responding to news that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told AIG CEO Edward Liddy that it was unacceptable for the company to dole out $121 million in bonuses for senior executives after the company took more than $170 billion in taxpayer dollars. Geithner suggested to Liddy that $9.6 million in bonuses going to the top 50 executives should be cut in half, with other bonuses tied to performance.
"Secretary Geithner has been in Europe," reported White House economic adviser Austan Goolsbee on Fox News Sunday. "He was really upset…by the news. He stepped in and berated them, got them to reduce the bonuses following every legal means he has to do this. I don’t know why they would follow a policy that’s really not sensible, is obviously going to ignite the ire of millions of people, and we’ve done exactly what we can do to prevent this kind of thing from happening again."
Liddy, brought on to run AIG in September by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, later said that the conversation was a "difficult one" for him.
As reported by ABC News’ Matt Jaffe, CEO Liddy wrote to Geithner on Saturday explaining that his predecessors "took significant retention steps at AIG Financial Products," the company’s most notorious division. "These arrangements were designed at a time when AIG Financial Products was expected to have a significant, ongoing role at AIG, and guaranteed a minimum level of pay for both 2008 and 2009. (Due to losses at AIG Financial Products, a senior manager will receive about 43% of his 2007 expected level for 2008.)"
Liddy wrote that some of "these payments are coming due on March 15, and, quite frankly, AIG’s hands are tied. Outside counsel has advised that these are legal, binding obligations of AIG, and there are serious legal, as well as business, consequences for not paying. Given the trillion-dollar portfolio at AIG
Financial Products, retaining key traders and risk managers is critical to our goal of repayment."
The CEO said that "in the current circumstances, I do not like these arrangements and find it distasteful and difficult to recommend to you that we must proceed with them. …Honoring contractual commitments is at the heart of what we do in the insurance business. I cannot have our clients lose faith in our desire and ability to do just that."
Focusing on AIG Financial Products, the most notorious of the company’s divisions, Liddy responded that the 25 highest-paid active contract employees at AIG Financial Products "have agreed to reduce their remaining 2009 salary to $1….The remaining 2009 salary of all other officers – that is, anyone with a title of associate vice president or higher – will be reduced by 10% (subject to local law requirements)." In addition, members of the AIG Leadership Group including Liddy will receive no 2008 year-end bonus.
But Liddy said he was worried about these steps, saying the company "cannot attract and retain the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses – which are now being operated principally on behalf of the American taxpayers – if employees believe that their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury."
"We are a country of law," Summers told Stephanopoulos today. "There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts. Every legal step possible to limit those bonuses is being taken by Secretary Geithner and by the Federal Reserve system…What the Obama administration has done, based on the advice of attorneys, is done everything that it can to, within the law and within the tradition of upholding law that we have in this country, to limit these bonuses. And they have as a result of Secretary Geithner’s efforts been scaled back."
House Financial Services Committee Chair Barney Frank, D-Mass., told Fox News Sunday, "we need to find out whether these bonuses are legally recoverable."
It seems to me that these $121 million in bonuses — combined with AIG’s continued refusal to share the names of the companies such as Goldman Sachs receiving $50 billion or so of its bailout funds — could represent a tipping point of sorts, with the public more inclined to let these companies go under than to agree to further bills in bailout funds.
The administration clearly seems concerned by this. Goolsbee this morning, asked if he feared the AIG bonuses would trigger a backlash impacting future financial steps, said "Yes, you worry about that backlash, but you’re also angry…that this would happen…at an institution that, you know, has been so troubled and you’re trying to save. So I think that’s perfectly fair."
What do you think?
– jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
I want to work for AIG, a place where when I do a terrible job that sends my company into the toilet, I still get paid outrageous bonuses. Let the company fail. Where is a new revolution taking place? It is time for the US citizens to rise up and throw out all politicians. I the can manage my share of huge amounts of money this country has given the rich.
Posted by: Diana | March 15, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Where were the Republican union/ contract busters at when AIG had their hands out?
Posted by: danboylerealtor | March 15, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Obama Administration Lie of the Day:
Summers, just now with George “I create Dem strategy every morning with Rahm/Carville/Begala” Stephanopolis, said that Obama inherited a trillion dollar deficit as created by a Republican President and a Republican Congress….
Apparently Larry didnt notice the Dems winning Congress in 2006.
Sickening lie, repeated enough, will become truth in the public’s mind.
Now George is attacking McConnell with vigor, right after kissing Summers’ ring for 20 minutes and failing to rebut Summers’ LIE that the GOP controlled CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENCY IN 2008. If George can’t bring himself to correct outright factual lies by Obama’s advisors on his show, he should be removed.
Sickening to allow George to create talking points for Obama with Rahm and then cross examine the GOP about those talking points.
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 15, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Is it legal to demand that AIG return our generous bailout funds?
Posted by: Disgusted in Ohio | March 15, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Obama just gave AIG 30 more billion. You voted for this.
We could have sold off AIG’s vital assets and let the rest of it go into bankruptcy.
But the demographics of this country from illegal immigration mean we have a permanent leftist monopology government in this country.
McCain would have stopped the paymetns to AIG and sold off their key assets.
But no the demographics mean we have ATM Obama in charge where the only question is how fast can we print out the money.
Posted by: Sean | March 15, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
What a fallacious argument that the bonuses are needed to retain the “brightest and best.” If these gentlemen allowed the company to get into the shape it is, then the “brightest and best” must have a new meaning. I guess I could qualify now…except my checkbook balances.
Posted by: Duke | March 15, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
We need to make these comments DIRECTLY on the AIG website. AIG’s bailout is something like 25% the size of the entire national bailout!!!
We have to comment DIRECTLY to them, let them know how ridiculous this is….
Posted by: sang | March 15, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
So, how about we let them go under, and see how many contracts they can honor. Bonuses are supposed to be compenstation for a job well done. They allow the company to share its “earnings” with executives and employees alike, I find it hard to justify giving any compensation when the company had a loss. We need to just let capitalism work…
Posted by: James | March 15, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
The greddy incompetents at AIG would be the first to say that the unions are braking the back of the country and ask for contract concessions from people making $60K a year. This is very wrong and we need to find a way to stop it.
Posted by: kathy | March 15, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
AIG Are they not the keepers of congressional and senatorial pensions?
This should then come as no surprise. They are just keeping their faith hence he rewards. Hey wouldn’t you be grateful if someone had looked out after your pension? Come on now!
Posted by: Jay | March 15, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
AIG should have been allowed to go bankrupt. I think it’s time some people were incarcerated.
Posted by: B. Greenslade | March 15, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Edward Liddy says that “Honoring contractual commitments is at the heart of what we do in the insurance business. I cannot have our clients lose faith in our desire and ability to do just that.” I’m having difficulty seeing how paying bonuses for running the company into the ground is an act that builds faith. Larry Summers says that “We are a country of law. There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts.” Yes we can, Mr. Summers. We’ve done it once and we’ll do it again. “When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth…”
Posted by: Mike Edwards | March 15, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
They should have been allowed to go bankrupt. Our government is screwing the taxpayers to keep rich people rich.
Posted by: Nelson | March 15, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Blood will follow blood
Dying time is here
Damage Incorporated
AIG = Damage Incorporated
Posted by: Huh | March 15, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Let them fail. They can’t pay bonuses if they don’t make a profit, period. If we have to bail them out, then, as in a bankruptcy proceeding, we get to renegotiate contracts and payouts. Talent? Ha, that’s the most laughable line. It’s that great talent that got them into this mess.
Posted by: Carl C | March 15, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Are americans and our press just stupid in general?
Almost all major corporations do retention bonuses to keep what they view as key employees from leaving. Many of them are 2-3 year payouts, and only stipulation in contract is the employee stay on as an employee, thus the team retention -and these are not tied to performance of the company….so duh, they have to pay it out or the employee will sue and win. Pretty much any lawyer will take that case as it is a guaranteed win.
Posted by: dp | March 15, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
This is outrageous. AIG should be taken over by the FDIC, wind down its affairs like any other bank that has failed, and sell off its pieces. When a bank/insurance/financial products company is too big to fail, then its too big.
Posted by: Chuck | March 15, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
What has happened to America and the American people ? Greed has replaced pride in our country with fear and lack of control of our lives.
Posted by: judgerembert | March 15, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
All compensatory obligations should be based on where AIG would be without taxpayer dollars. Without OUR money, they would be in the unemployment line with the rest of us! When are we going to revolt!! We are to busy trying to make ends meet, while our gov’t is stealing from us at a faster pace!!! REVOLUTION!!!!
Posted by: ken | March 15, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
It is an urban legend that you need these people in order to saty competitive.
AIG is not competitive and with thousands of fiance guys looking for work you can find replacemenst. Every employement contract has a provision for people acting out of bounds so use that not to pay bonuses. Short of that just don’t pay them and let the courts decide.Don’t let the AIUG management decide for they are too cowardly and out of the same skin.
Ford still has its head above water because they brought in a top guy who wasn’t from the car industry to connect Ford to the real world.
Posted by: john freivalds | March 15, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
AIG = Always Invest-in Garbage
- Arunabh Das
Posted by: Arunabh Das | March 15, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
dp – Key employees indeed. The same ones that made AIG insolvent. Time to let engineers and scientists run the show….you know the people that can add numbers as they were intended to be added.
Posted by: Huh | March 15, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Socialism for the Rich, and Capitalism for everyone else :-(
Posted by: pezibaer | March 15, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Give me back my tax dollars now. You greedy losers deserve absolutely nothing, and if we, the poorer American taxpayers saved your company only to hand out hefty bonuses to the people who obviously did a terrible job, then the taxpayers MUST demand the return of “our” money and AIG, you figure out how to pay these fools yourself. What disgusting greed. Oh and please publish their names!
Posted by: Karen | March 15, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Matthew – You state the fallacy: Government intervention led to this compliments of the Federal Reserve and their low interest rates over the last several decades combined with the fact that our fiat dollar was massively inflated. Have you not been listening to Ron Paul? Don’t blame the free market. You can blame greed, but also blame government intervention.
Posted by: Huh | March 15, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Give them a million plus dollars and reduce their pay to a dollar. The Final Insult. We believe you when you say that you will work for $1.00. We know you are already looking for another job. Gullible is not quite the word when swindle people. They are called victims, and you, gentlemen, are the Perpetrators of Fraud, aka Criminals.
Posted by: John mitch | March 15, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
No,no, no, no, no. Post the recipients’ pictures so we can see them! List how much they get in bonuses. Tell what they do at the company to “earn” such wondrous monies while others are losing their jobs!! I’m for transparency, for sure!
Posted by: nell post | March 15, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Talk about being outragious, the very people that run it down and put all the taxpayers in the hole are the ones benifiting. Is this one of the schems like the buffet table where you eat all the principle and spend all the profit on yourself and family. Smells like it and our govt. people are in there helping. Guess we have change afterall!!
Posted by: Hal | March 15, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Even if the government throws billions more at AIG they made me angry enough that I won’t be doing any buisness with them ever again. I imagine neither will millions of other people.
Posted by: selvatico | March 15, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I too am very upset at the outrageous salaries and bonuses these executives get. Yes indeed, they are very greedy. These same greedy executives have also taken strong legal steps to make sure their bonuses have no bearing upon whether company makes a profit. The audacity of AIG top executives to say they are legally bound brings even more audacity to their statements. Fact is they wrote these contracts!!!!! If there is agreement by all of the executive, and supplemental agreements signed, then bonuses could be reduced. AIG is just being indignant. What he is saying. We are not going to change. Give us the money, but stay out of our business. Outrageous!!! Their company is in bankruptcy stage!!
Posted by: Sharon | March 15, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Hummm, layoff’s in “Right to work” states. No reason for layoff’s of hundreds of thousands of Americans but these guy’s are “NEEDED” so we must keep them happy. We are a “nation of laws”? Whay about morality, common justice. Cowards hid behind “the law”, crooks twist “the law”. Do domething Sheepeople! If we are a nation “of laws” CHANGE THEM. Call, write, do something even if you just don’t do any business with these companies do something. The sad thing is if you don’t do anything then you take the rest of us with you.
Look up who said….
“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them”
Posted by: Doc Fury | March 15, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Your country has long been a subservient puppet to the Zionist movement.
Posted by: haha | March 15, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
I agree with Ralph.
Why should the tax $ go to pay for a company that supports international country interest…see GIA contributions.
Where did the undistributed dividens go? Not bonuses. How much of the american people tax $ go to banks that AIG is a front for…BoA…Citti…Gold Sucks…???
Posted by: moe | March 15, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
AIG has already failed. The US Government should force AIG into Chapter 11 bankruptcy and that should eliminate the bonuses to the incompetent operators. Let the lawyers discuss the issues forever, and force the government and other creditors to take over the company. If this is called nationalization, so what? The bailout should have had strings attached that would allow for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and if it didn’t the government officials responsible for the mistake are incompetent and should be replaced.
Posted by: Phil | March 15, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
We should’ve just let these guy’s go under when we had the chance; yes, it would’ve been bad for the system, but what kind of system did/do we have anyway? In the absence of the American people this company would’ve been gone, and their-executives who caused the mess-contracts likely wouldn’t have survived bankruptcy. I suppose this is the price we pay for propping up foolish companies. When will people learn that the beauty of capitalism is that when you “let” these types fail you will get a smarter replacement in their wake? Enough of the entrenched corporate giants who can lobby their way to survival!
Posted by: chuckb | March 15, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Oh and who cares if they sue. Let them grovel in the gutter for any pennies that are left in AIG – minus our tax contributions. I heard that they are all worried that these senior(s) will leave the country – GOOD RIDDANCE. Maybe we can attract some honest hard-working people to fill future financial market positions. People who can add to the country, not subtract all for themselves. I agree, let us revolt on this one. Shame on you all
Posted by: Karen | March 15, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Ron Paul for president now!
Posted by: Ben | March 15, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
AIG insures the Congressional pension fund. The Congress will happily bankrupt our country and destroy our economy to protect their lifelong place at the public trough.
Posted by: jobseeker | March 15, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Do we know what the terms of the bonuses are? There must be clause in the bonus contract stating that it is based on something: performance, a review, target numbers, etc. Without the bail-out dollars, its hard to imagine any executive hitting their goals to earn a bonus.
Posted by: falconium | March 15, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
It is easier to start new than to clean out a rats nest such as AIG. This is true for some of the big banks as well. Let them fail and there will be plenty of qualified people willing to set up new enterprises, that will make lots of money, playing by the rules. Naturally a set of regulations need to be in place so as to keep this debacle from repeating itself.
Posted by: Willy | March 15, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
We should bring back George and Dickie just to handle AIG..they made swiss cheese of the constitution and they could do the same to AIG.
Posted by: Harvey Cooper | March 15, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
To retain the best and the brightest, isn’t that what I read. Didn’t their best and brightest get them in this mess. I understand contractual agreements, and we (taxpayers) may lose this round, but going forward? Pay these people off and get younger, and more motivated staff members. I guarantee the 8.50/hr mail room clerk behind in his mortgage won’t see a dime.
Posted by: Tony | March 15, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
This may trigger the refusal for future bailout funds for AIG. It’s very difficult to believe that the FED’s weren’t aware of these payouts. If the Treasury Dept. didn’t know about these payouts then our people on Capitol Hill need to look at the Treasury, not AIG. By all means let AIG go down.
Posted by: Elle G | March 15, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
the cemetary is full of indispensible men.
fire these guys and let them sue for their bonuses. tie them up in court and put check payable to them in their coffins and a note as to what is owed to them on their tombstones….
Posted by: harvey kane | March 15, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Elle G – We know very little about what the Fed knows and is doing. Support Dr. Ron Paul’s HR 1207 IH: Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009. We might then get some answers.
Posted by: Huh | March 15, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Whenever Barney (we don’t need any more oversight at Fannie Mae) Franks opens his mouth, the subject loses all credibility. Those who blame Bush are revisionists who want to forget the actions of Franks and Chuckie (never saw a camera he didn’t like) Schumer who fought regulation of the financial services companies tooth and nail.
Posted by: Robert | March 15, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
I didn’t get a bonus this year. Why? Because the company is not doing well. Do I expect a bonus? No. Would I LIKE a bonus anyway? Of course. but my company was not bailed out and most of the employees working at my company lost their jobs and no one is helping them. AIG has the audacity to pay the losers that drove the company into bankruptcy with OUR MONEY!!!! How dare you. Wake up and smell the economy, it has soured to the point of decay and you greedy high paid out of touch executives want to steal the taxpayer dollars that you are riping us off with anyway with the high insurance premiums. I would rather see AIG go under than give another penny to you greedy losers. Good luck on the unemployment line.
Posted by: jim | March 15, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Hasn’t AIG figured out yet that the people it is seeking to “retain” are obviously NOT the “best and brightest”? The company is a miserable failure that has a significant role in taking down the world economy, the people it is trying to “retain” are behind those failures, and it should not be rewarding OR retaining those people. “Retention bonuses” are tied to a person staying at a company – so if AIG fires those people, they will accomplish two things: they won’t have to pay “retention bonuses” AND they will get rid of the people who are perpetuating this massive failure. Apparently, AIG has not gotten the message that it’s time to clean house. The corruption at AIG must end.
Posted by: Alex | March 15, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
The government should simply nationalize AIG: cancel all outstanding contracts, replace management, sell off the international operations and convert the domestic life insurance company into a government owned entity.
Posted by: rpahk | March 15, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
The government SHOULD outlow credit default swaps as being against public policy, since over 80% are speculative. That would shut down the financial products division quite quickly.
If it doesn’t want to do that, it can pass a special law taxing bonuses to companies that have received TARP funds…maybe as high as 100%.
Posted by: Jane A, | March 15, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
“Liddy wrote that some of “these payments are coming due on March 15, and, quite frankly, AIG’s hands are tied. Outside counsel has advised that these are legal, binding obligations of AIG, and there are serious legal, as well as business, consequences for not paying.”
Let them sue!!
What jury is going to side with a company who behaved so stupidly and irresponsibly?
Posted by: drjohn | March 15, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
One thing people need to do is wake up and realize neither political party is “on your side”, they both serve the rich.
Don’t fight among yourselves peons, direct you energy at the source, the entire congress.
Posted by: Bum | March 15, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Just remember, half of the great college graduates, graduated at the bottom of their class… It’s a shame those are the one’s who Obama chose to surround him in his cabinet and advisory positions…The auto companies made concessions with their (UAW) employees, what makes AIG any different now that the Government owns 60% of the company with our taxpayer dollars, we should decide who gets such ridiculous bonuses.
Posted by: Wally | March 15, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
What bonus? The way I see it the company went under the second they took billions of our money. AIG is not a solvent company and has no money except ours. As an investor I say no to the bonus program, let the execs go find another job. I’ll be happy to take thier place for a mere 500k, plus stock options, private jet, company credit card, gold golf club memberships around the world, assistants to pay my personal bills from the company account, and assistants to keep everyone away from me. Just don’t ask me what I’m doing or going to do. Talk to my legal team about that! Enron, Worldcom and all the others, no lessons learned there.
Posted by: Doc Fury | March 15, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Don’t pay the bonuses and let the “top” executives sue and quit if they don’t get the bonus they think they are intitled to. It’s immoral for AIG executives to accept the bonus given they’re working for a FAILED company whose business decisions were made by them!
Posted by: NShearer | March 15, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Don’t know if it’s already been suggested, but I would take out a full page ad in whatever large city newspapers are left with the names and email addresses of all employees of AIG receiving these bonuses. Maybe shame is the only thing left to recover these outrageous,excessive, and guaranteed fees. No more! In spite of what compensation “experts” have been spouting all these years, no one individual ANYWHERE is worth these rewards.
Posted by: Phil | March 15, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
How come these contracts aren’t being treated the same way any union contract is right now — that is, the company and the public aren’t strongarming these folks to either get with the plan and give up some of what they’ve contractually won or lose. it. all. I mean seriously. I might have more sympathy if any company were acting as though the commitments they made to the unions and former employees were to be respected. AND DON’T MAKE ME LAUGH — insurance companies have to have the public know they will pay out what they promise? OH GIVE ME A BREAK! This stinks from every direction
Posted by: Carlyle | March 15, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
All those trillions of inflationary dollars, now being spent on saving non-viable, failed megacorporations, could have been spent on healthcare and education, thus saving millions of lives in the long run and building a strong foundation for future greatness of this country. Unfortunately, the opposite direction has been chosen.
Posted by: Walter Small | March 15, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
change where my back is broken from all the free loaders come on
Posted by: d peyton | March 15, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
what a beautiful “system of retention”, wasn’t this group of smart *** that have a role in having AIG ran aground? It is time to fire all of them and hire new people!!!
Posted by: Eddie | March 15, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Let them pay bonus and go bankrupt. WHat they mean by ‘to retain people ?’ Are these people having other options at this moment ? All banks / insurance companies are at same position right now.
Posted by: mandar | March 15, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
AIG could avoid all the bad publicity and just call the excessive, poorly timed payments “Earmarks”.
Posted by: mike | March 15, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
If these are the best and brightest talent, and we have to pay ransom to keep them, then the guy who thinks this should be fired immediately for incompetent management. His reasoning is ludicrous and his comment confirms it.
Posted by: C H Eck | March 15, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Since when does any company reward an employee if said company’s bottom line is so far in the red they need government assistance. These employees cannot be considered “good” employees if they caused the company to loose money. Duh!!
Posted by: gloria | March 15, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
No bonuses. Let them go. Let them find another job!!!!!!!!!
TALENT = RUNNING THE COMPANY INTO THE GROUND.
Posted by: furious_american | March 15, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
“Honoring contractual commitments is at the heart of what we do in the insurance business.”
No — looking out for No. 1 and screwing everyone else to the fullest extent possible is what insurance companies are known for doing, and this dosn’t in any way change that perception.
Posted by: Tenley | March 15, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
I think we should apply “Survival of the fittest” theory in economics too. Those who struggle and survive let them grow. Those who are greedy and would like to die let them die. I don’t think that tax payers money should be given to them for partying and partying. If some financial institutions are able to survive in this bad economy, they will grow in the future. This situation is due to greed of rich executives. So, one should be very careful whether or not to fulfill their greedy demand(s).
Posted by: DCG | March 15, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Why would anyone work for AIG or any of these banks that have taken TARP $. If these $ were guaranteed they have to be paid that is the law. would you work for a company if you were not getting the money owed to you? I think not!
If these were auto union employees not getting their guaranteed $ every democrat in congrss would be sreaming but they are vilified bankers so lets pile on.
These terrible banksers are the people who pay the bulk taxes to NYC and NY state. That idiot Cuomo is going to bankrupt NY by driving bankers out of the US.
Where is the outrage over auto union employees being paid not to work and driving the auto companies into the ground. Where is the outrage that our 401k’s are worthess but government employees will get 100% of their pensions guaranteed raising taxes for all.
We have loaned $ to the banks, they have to run their businesses. If the idiots had not let Lehman fail we would all be in better shape.
Where is the blame for the democrats? Chris Dodd head of the banking committee was getting sweetheart loans from countrywide but no one gives a damn. If he was a republican he would be in jail.
Posted by: only fair | March 15, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Since the 1980s, the nation’s country club elite has been stealing what little middle class America still owns, and the United States no longer has enough of a constitutional democracy to stop, much less reverse, this daily daylight robbery.
America is devolving into political and economic feudalism where an economic nobility owns everything and the rest of us are mere serfs. Welcome to the 12th century.
Posted by: Ken Bley | March 15, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Let’s see…send Madoff to gaol, but not these AIG criminals? Let AIG FAIL, get rid of bad garbage! Prosecute the perps at AIG AND ANYONE WHO AIDED AND ABETTED THEM, lock’em up, get an investigative commitee to see if there is anyone else out there that needs to be locked up, AND IMMEDIATELY TAKE BACK ANY TAPAYER PROVIDED FUNDS THAT ARE LEFT!!!
Posted by: feddup | March 15, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Let them go under.
Outlaw and ANNUL all the financial shenanigans that you can’t explain in 60 seconds.
Posted by: GLH | March 15, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Did the government have a signed contract with AIG stipulating how to spend this money ? If there is such a contract what is the problem ? If there is none (why in the hell wasn’t there) then it is none of the government’s damn business what AIG does with the money. What is wrong with this stupid government ? Doesn’t matter a bit who did what. The milk is already spilled. Who gives money to a child then tells the child they can only buy certain kinds of candy ? This is a contractual nation. I would not let a gardener in my yard without a signed contract. CYA for both of us. What was Pelosi and company (been in charge for 3 years, right ?) doing while all this money was flying around ? I hear congress is above padding their own pockets. If you put lip stick on a piece of pork then it is no longer pork, is it ?
Posted by: El Coyote | March 15, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
These guys could create some goodwill by returning their bonuses to the Treasury, or pooling their bonuses to create a fund for the unemployed, or for students wishing to go to college who can’t pay for it now.
Posted by: MayBee | March 15, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
This company should have been let go to bankruptcy. Now government cannot recover anything out of them, with them continuing to live a lavish life and taking $121 M in bonuses. Do they have any morals at all? How can they stomach that money when the country is paying their tomfoolery? This has got to stop right away. Government should take back the $121 M. If they get any bonuses, it should be for their performance for 2009. 2008 is history and a worst one to that.
Posted by: Karthik Srinivasan | March 15, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
AIG contracts with their senior staff was with AIG money not donated tax payer funds. There should be no binding legal requirements on the donated funds. If our donated money was provided with no strings attached then who ever did that should be out of a job. Those funds should be for running the business not paying salaries, forget bonus. Is this evidence of the good old boy’s club still in place between government and business? Retract the funds now.
Posted by: Concerned doner | March 15, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Why are they not in jail?
Posted by: J. Collins | March 15, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
As a member of the public, and one who has to work longer because my retirement is gone, let them go under! It’s time for everyone, even the big execs to work for the greater good, the good of America as a whole, not their own greedy pockets. If I, the little worker has to do it, so doesn’t the big fellow. And I am not an unskilled worker, I have more than 8 1/2 years of college. But I have a strong desire to move our country forward, not myself, but the country, the world; into a new age for my children. If this organization cannot realize what a dire financial situation we are all in, if the organization is still only thinking of themselves, let them go under. The excuse that the company cannot attract qualified people because they will not pay enough is only that, an excuse. If money is the only thing tying these people to an AIG job, well we don’t need that type of people. It’s a new age out there, one of selflessness and concern for the greater good. those are the folks that desire to survive. let the money greedy ones, try to find a job in this day and age. The greedy people should be happy they have a job. I believe the money should go to the companies that will help the country, the world.
Posted by: Sandra Gelber | March 15, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Stop helping out the big giants and letting the little ones fail!!!! If they cannot operate their business then they do not need to be in business! My company has already made necessary cut backs, taken out safety programs, suspended manager raises and bonuses, and laid off people, and has not asked the government for a hand out! We are pulling together and making it work. Everyone just has to step up to the plate right now!
Posted by: Stephanie | March 15, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Treasury should immediately seize all funds identified for “bonuses” from all companies under government assistance. The U.S. government could always conveniently break treats with Native American nations, why not the banker tribe? Let these wonderful manages sue; I think we have enough government lawyers to handle that. Better yet, let them quit. Does anyone think there aren’t enough unemployed bankers to fill their positions? If they stick around long enough to successfully unwind the mess they helped create, then and only then, should tnhey receive any bobuses.
Posted by: FadingFast | March 15, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Banks have hijacked the country. Our new, hopeful president keeps doling out wads of cash to them. He is their puppet, and we voted him in thinking he was on our side. We’ve all been skillfully duped, again (myself included).
Posted by: rckstrdave | March 15, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Here’s a solution for those “legally biding contracts” — fire these executives and directors whose massive greed and even larger incompetence has brought us to this. Can them all; there’s the bonus they deserve. In fact, I would suggest we explore criminal prosecution of these thieves for fraud, extortion, conspiracy, you name it they’ve got a bunch of wrongs — that would certainly abrogate any binding contracts with these greedy, too smug to be ashamed creeps.
Posted by: cl | March 15, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
send them to china for expedited judicial processing
Posted by: sunshine | March 15, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Fire the “Top Talent” and hire the “Bottom Talent”
Fact is if your “Top Talent” drives your company into the ditch, and can only be saved by billions in tax payer money, Thats not “Top Talent”
And since AIG now works for me (Tax payer handing over said billions)
This “Top Talent” is FIRED.
Posted by: Stephen | March 15, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
“Almost all major corporations do retention bonuses to keep what they view as key employees from leaving”
So what… guess what? The game has changed and ownership of AIG has changed.
New owners… are us… we the American taxpayer don’t have to abide by your stupid employment contracts.
Posted by: Patrick | March 15, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Morally: Once AIG has taken public funds to prop its corporation up, then the executives “should” stepped up and volunteered to have their bonuses nullified.
Legally: Theyre protected by the laws and contracts they had tailor made to suit their positions.
Overall: Its all part of the corporate scandal’s that have been bilking the people for decades. Would you give up your bonuses if you didnt have to ? Most likley not. Its wrong, very wrong, but theres no one in power with enough backbone to call them ALL on this.
I’ll gladly take their job for $100,000 a year, ramp up my knowledge base to equal theirs, and make us all in a much better position, but lets be real people that wont happen. They have it made, why should they not recieve the spoils of their profession. They need feul costs for their toys
Posted by: ed | March 15, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
There is no way any company should be allowed to pay bonus for company failure from taxpayers money. Let AIG go kaput.
Posted by: AJ | March 15, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Under normal circumstances they would have to pay these fools, but normal circumstances do not include times when the citizens paid to keep the company afloat. BANKRUPTCY, NOW! Dam.n the consequences, we don’t need these types sticking around.
Posted by: chuckb | March 15, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Beyond denying the bonuses, the federal government should claw back the bonuses that were given during the period where AIG engaged in their irresponsible speculative use of credit default swaps. The government should also seek clawbacks from those Wall Street firms and banks that made bets with our (i.e. investors’) money.
Posted by: Tom | March 15, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
These people are criminals who belong in jail or death row.
Posted by: Poorer Taxpayer | March 15, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
I don’t understand why all contracts like these were not neutralized as soon as taxpayers took 80% stake in the company.
Also, if this administration philosophy of holding contracts sacred is so important, why have they allowed judges to re-write mortgage contracts.
Something needs to burn for these decision makers to understand the taxpayers have had enough.
Posted by: On Fire | March 15, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
What a farce we have a for a govt… I say take then into chapter 11 and while were at it fire Barney Frank and Chuck Schumer and Connie Watts, G5- Nancy and Billion dollar train man Reid….
Posted by: Bill W | March 15, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
This is an obvious attempt to cover up or prepare for a french style revolution, you know, nepoleon dictatorship. You helped vote for it TARP…congress vote for it, although people were protesting it, across the country…Who is benefiting???
Which countries benefited???
Which group of people have seen the most hardship from this financial collaps, and who are the ones justifing their own invovelemnt by creating fronts… madoff is an example…
Posted by: hank | March 15, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
The article first states that Geithner was in Europe as though he couldn’t have known about the bonuses. Then states that Liddy had been working with counsel for some time. When did who know what?
Posted by: SalllyBrown | March 15, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
” Dems winning Congress in 2006.”
Apparently you didn’t notice that republicans still held the presidency and congress for a dozen years before that.
Got it?
Posted by: Patrick | March 15, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
FINDING A LEGAL WAY TO DO THIS IS THEIR PROBLEM.====OR NO NEW MONEY
Posted by: JOSEPH MCALOON | March 15, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
I think your picture says a lot more about your ego than you think it does.
Posted by: The Phantom | March 15, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Pay them their “bonuses” in pennies. That will teach them.
Posted by: clyde | March 15, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Ed, they only reason they even have a chance to pay these bonuses is that WE gave them money to stay afloat. Some argument could be made that we don’t owe the bonuses, and a whole lot better argument could’ve been made if we didn’t just give the treasury free rein to hand out and instead attached strong conditions to the funds (e.g. no bonuses to execs or no money).
Posted by: chuckb | March 15, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Since when has the US Government ever stopped by a contract? If I remember correctly, the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (PATCO) had contracts when Ronald Reagan summarily fired them in the 1980s. If these AIG executives have contracts “requiring” AIG management to loot the treasury to pay them, then the government should renegotiate the contract. If the goal is to rebuild trust in our financial system, this is a giant step backward.
Posted by: D. Newman | March 15, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
LET THEM GO UNDER. FIRE THEM ALL.
Posted by: AIG OWNER | March 15, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
It doesn’t specify how many Sr. Execs there are or what they’re receiving. I think we’ve gone overboard in the salary/bonus bashing. Yes, I agree the CEO’s should not be getting $30 million, or whatever when their company is faltering, but don’t deny the underlings their bonuses because there’s a goof up by the CEO. Some of these guys work 90-100 hours a week. They give up a lot, have worked for, and earned advanced degrees, and deserve to be compensated for it. If you pay them the same as the guy that asks, “Would you like fries with that?”, I guarantee you, no one would do some of these jobs. And while we’re at it, these positions are very selective, especially in the Investment Banking area, not everyone has the talent and brains to do it. And trust me, they’re not all crooks, and not all bad!
Posted by: IB's Mom | March 15, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Bonus my %s^.
Put them in jail!!
Posted by: disgusted | March 15, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
“to get the best and the brightest…” I think AIG has shown that money can’t buy intelligence or aptitude or the ability to lead a big company. The best and the brightest have driven the company into the ground and US taxpayers should demand that those who led this company be fired and not given any sort of bonus for stupidity.
Posted by: David Qualey | March 15, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Ah – but Congress is due for a raise and Speaker Pelosi sees no problem with dodging the issue whenever it’s raised. Maybe AIG is following her lead?
What part of this whole thing don’t Democrats get? Eventually, the thieves they elected are going to run out of pockets to steal from. What then? Try complaining — they’ll get the same condescending attitude and icy cold stare that Obama gives to lowly reporters who question with him. (ooo – isn’t that what reporters are supposed to do?)
Newspapers — if any of you “journalists” are reading this — this is your one, only and last chance to save your skins: tell the truth about this Administration and liberal Democrats. You remember how to tell the truth, don’t you? Clue: the “marketing” put out by the Obama Administration is always a lie. Start there.
Some Change.
Posted by: Levon Tostig | March 15, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
If ever there was an apt time for the phrase “The chickens have come home to roost”, this is it.
Capitalism is based on the willingness to risk.
I took the easy road, and worked as a drone in aerospace for over 30 years. There was a time that I made a great living, with perfect medical insurance, vacation time, the works.
Then “trickle down economics” reared its greedy head.
Suddenly, my work associates and I were being paid too much, and if we wanted to keep our jobs, we would have to make sacrifices. Raises disappeared, cost of living allowances disappeared, medical insurance was whittled down to nothing, and um, wait a second … executive salaries skyrocketed.
The reason? “We have to pay high salaries to attract the best and the brightest”.
Meanwhile, those of us who actually PRODUCED the bombs, missiles and satellites were treated as utterly replaceable beings, with no credit for our own talents or intellect.
So back to the chickens …
Dear Execs:
You are no longer needed. Please empty out your desks, as there is a very long line of highly qualified people, each of whom is applying for your job.
Thank you for your service. (not)
Posted by: Jerry Ulibarri | March 15, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
This is one company that needs permanent waterboarding.
Posted by: AIG needs waterboarding | March 15, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
The government should let the ones that should fail fail. The bank that holds my mortgage has never had a loan that resulted in foreclosure. Are they getting bailout money? No! They don’t bundle their mortgages and sell them off, either. Greed should be rewarded with failure. AIG, et al, should fail so other, more-worthy entities can rise. GM? Gone with the Corvair and Chevette. Ford? Gone with the Pinto. Chrysler? Gone with the K-cars. They all had their chance. Now it’s others turns. Think fair.
Posted by: laissez-faire | March 15, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
I hope the Democrats who voted for Big O are happy.
Posted by: Fire Obama, AIG, BoA, Goldman Sachs | March 15, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
AIG EXECS – MADOFF/GORDON GECKO REDUX (Greed is good’ What’s in it for me-today?”)
* If these execs are so key to AIG’s recovery-& the country’s (supposedly why we’re supporting AIG)- AIG Execs should VOLUNTARILY TAKE A 50% PAY CUT-or greater – and stay on for the privelige of helping their country and their children’s – recover.
* Only a 10 percent cut for the Exec. VP’s at AIG – otherwise they’ll leave?
* America’s top biz elite have neither EITHICS nor LOVE-OF-COUNTRY at their core.
Posted by: Iris in Arlington | March 15, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
STOP THE BAILOUTS! Let AIG, GM, Chrysler and all the banks, brokerage houses and mortgage lenders that are failing go under. They are what brought us to this crisis. They need to pay the consequences for their actions. In fact, they should all go to prison.
Posted by: Ed | March 15, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
If AIG had gone bankrupt, the payout would have been zero…..
Posted by: Disgusted in Atlanta | March 15, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
NO company is big enough to fail. BIG companies failed all the time.
Posted by: GKH | March 15, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
I just finished reading the article on AIG and the bonus distribution to it’s top employees. Aig is worried that it will not attract a top financial team if it would eliminate the bonus program. If these people are so good, then why is AIG in trouble. Shouldn’t people be rewarded when they do a good job, like making the company successful and not for making it almost bankrupt?
Posted by: Alice A. Utkus | March 15, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Go straight to jail, do not pass ‘go’, and do not collect a penny.
Posted by: do not collect | March 15, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Without the bailout there would be no AIG or Bonuses.
So lets cancel the bailout money. Let them sink.
Is there a contract for that?????
Posted by: Jim | March 15, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Publish online – and continually update – the names, addresses, telephone numbers, cell phone numbers and email addresses of these greedy financiers who have exploited public funds, and the amounts of their annual compensation.
Do not allow these scondrels to avoid very public confrontation by Congress (go to it, Barney Frank) and any taxpayer who wishes to point out their destructive egocentricity.
Such consistent confrontation techniques, from which there is no escape,have proven effective in family treatment of drug abusers, alcoholics and others who inflict suffering on those around them.
Posted by: Thelma V. Mueller | March 15, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
The bonuses MUST NOT be paid… if they are, in deed, legally binding contracts, let the people who “think” they deserve them fight for them in court. What AIG is trying to puul off is obscene and MORALLY wrong…. no matter if it was a CONTRACT or NOT!
Posted by: Florian Sever | March 15, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Whoever heard of bonus money for operating in the red? Bonus to retain the best? Are you kidding me? Turn on the TV, where are they going to go? Who’s hiring, I need an application!
Posted by: Steve | March 15, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Look at this statement carefully, “But Liddy said he was worried about these steps, saying the company “cannot attract and retain the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses – which are now being operated principally on behalf of the American taxpayers.” Ah..I see! Those so-called best and brightest talents had successfully taken taxpayers money and put them in their own pocket.
Posted by: Larry | March 15, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
“Every generation needs a new revolution.” – Thomas Jefferson
When my small business pays more taxes that 50 of the top 100 firms in the U.S., you know we have lost control. Why do you think that when Steve Forbes wanted a 20% flat tax (They should be paying 40% as tax codes are now) for companies they went wild… because they don’t really pay their tax amount. Time for the middle class to rise up and end this… it is not what our forefathers planned when they founded this country.
Posted by: Kevin | March 15, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
People don’t get it! The Federal Reserve Bank in NOT voted by the people of the US and is privately owned with ABSOLUTELY no TRANSPARENCY. Do your homework everyone and see why our forefather’s hated this idea; especially Lincoln.
Run and own the money system of any government and you will control the citizens of that country.
Ron Puaul Senator has a bill before congress asking for transparency of the Fed. Write a email/letter to every friggin congressman telling them to support that bill.
Wait till the heat of the summer comes and watch what happens to this country.Remember Watts? it will look like a camp fire. Be prepared or do something with your pen/pc!!!!!!!
Posted by: kevin duff | March 15, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
“best and the brightest” what? your huge bonuses and rediculous salaries have attracted the best and the brightest greedy theives
Posted by: webrockk | March 15, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
I say email the AIG website. I’ve left several choices messages with my cell phone number included. These guys are crooks and deserve to be flogged in public. As a taxpayer, I’m tired of being raped by the corporate criminals that ran this company into the ground.
Posted by: MSG | March 15, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
The people who use or recieve taxpayer money to pay outrageous bonuses for failure are thiefs and criminals and should be put in Jail.
Unfortunately in America white collar criminals are treated with kid gloves.
If this was China, they would all be hung in public
Posted by: Bob | March 15, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
It’s OUR money! They have no right to use the “contract” excuse. If THEY had the money to pay the big bonuses then THEY are obligated – no US. If THEY insist on paying out bonuses for bad performance, then WE have the right not to give them any TAX money. Let them all go bankrupt. That is the capitalist way, isn’t it? If you do good, you are rewarded – if you do bad you go out of business.
Posted by: lorax | March 15, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
List all the divisions of AIG that contributed to the losses. List all the AIG divisions that had nothing to do with the meltdown.
Determine the percentage of these bonuses that go to the loosers.
It is a giant international company. Do not throw out the baby with the bath water.
Posted by: Gary L. | March 15, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
So when is the government going to cut their paychecks in half? Failed government program after failed government program, these life politicians and buraucrats keep pointing the finger outside instead of in…keeps the day job. When are Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Nancy Pelosi, Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez going to be held accountable for their misuse of the peoples money and unaccountablity, such as no enforcement of existing laws against illegial aliens and non-existent tort reform.
Posted by: mark | March 15, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
How come when I read something like this that old Beatles tune, REVOLUTION, comes to my mind???
Contact Congress and tell them how happy you are about this!!!
Posted by: GrimReaper | March 15, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Plain & simple. OBAMA is a LIAR. I voted for him and am ashamed. He is ALL TALK and RHETORIC and when it comes to DOING the right thing he abrogates all resposnsibility and blames, Bush, Congress, this, than and the other thing. The ONLY CHANGE he brought was bringing in tax-cheats to run the IRS> US deserves better than a phony like Obama. The media is just STUPID in continuing to give him a free pass.
Posted by: Joey West | March 15, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
The government did not know about those AIG bonuses before giving bailout money?
This argument about retaining the best people does not hold water. In 1981 the air traffic control system underwent a extreme turnover. The same argument was used in the form of “The can’t fire us all.” Losing the quality and experience was a prediction of doom. Yet, the system quickly recovered. Remember we were talking about hundreds and thousands of lives not just money.
You will be surprised how quickly quality increases when jobs are on the line and how quickly anyone will step up to the challenge obtaining a higher paying job. I’ll take the job and be doing as good within months.
Posted by: Tim Novak | March 15, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
here is the quote….
The CEO said that “…Honoring contractual commitments is at the heart of what we do in the insurance business. I cannot have our clients lose faith in our desire and ability to do just that.”
yeah….we wouldn’t want us to “lose faith” in them would we!!!…LOSER!!!
Posted by: td | March 15, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
You people have no clue how the free enterprise system works.
AIG is in the risk management business. It is my responsibility to ensure there is zero risk to AIG’s paychecks.
Posted by: Important Senior Executive, AIG | March 15, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
If these “bonus contracts” are so sacrosanct, let Barney Frank call them all up individually before Congress to plead their case…… on C-SPAN.
Let the public know who they are, and how to let them know, personally, how the public feels about their greed.
These gluttons have almost killed our nation!
Posted by: Florian Sever | March 15, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Senortorial and Congress’s pension’s seem to be the front runner here. How would they survive? American Citizens have been dropped on their heads, forced to eat whatever is put in front of us and just say “em, that is good” Fire every person who feels they are deserving of a bonus.. They have their bonus, a job,
We need to clean house, fire all and start over.. Create companies that have a lid. When the top is achieved open a new company, create good benifits for alot, not bonuses for a few.
Keep companies alive for over a hundred years, not fly by night, change your name and carry on.
Posted by: PattyS | March 15, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
He says that bonuses are necessary to “…attract and retain the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses…” What the heck? It was these guys that got them into the mess in the first place. Maybe, just maybe, they are NOT the best and the brightest and they should quit and go somewhere else.
And that’s another thing, where are they gonna go? They’ll stay right there at that cushy AIG job. This is all BS, we should have just let them go under.
The big question that needs to be asked is since when to people get rewarded for doing a bad job?
Posted by: jdg | March 15, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Privatize profits, public losses. Who would argue with that, I want the same deal!
Posted by: Doc Fury | March 15, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Imagine how inspiring it would be to see an AIG executive choose to give back his/her bonus and encourage others to do the same. That would be big news.
Posted by: Kathy Madison | March 15, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I find it remarkable how many people are venting about the greed of AIG on this blog. When are people in the Western countries going to get it through their thick skulls that this crisis is ultimately caused by the unprecendented greed of entire countries living at levels far above what their economies can truly support? These financial companies have done a brilliant job at manipulating every facet of the financial system to keep generating more and more fake “wealth and prosperity” to let us continue to feed our fat faces. We whine about AIG and bonuses and then Obama turns round and implies that we are being responsible by trying to cut the deficit in half in five years. HALF….he needs to cut it to zero as soon as this crisis is over and start to pay down the outrageous levels of debt that we have instead of paying ourselves this outrageous bonus every year from money we just don’t have. I wonder what that would do his poll ratings. I agree we should be angry at AIG, but lets try applying some of that righteous anger to ourselves.
Posted by: David | March 15, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Write your congressman over this one!
Contracts with a company are only upheld if a company is alive and functioning.
If a business went bankrupt, obviously nobody expects to receive bonusus from them–and bankruptcy is exactly what happened with AIG. They cannot operate as though they were still propped up by their own two feet, and claim “laws” require them to pay out. If they have no money and are bankrupt, how can they expect to pay?
Posted by: paul | March 15, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
The AIG should go under if neccessary.
The money they received from tho treasury is not AIG’S money it is ours.
If they AIG had earned the money then I could not say anything but they did not.Let AIG sink.
Posted by: George | March 15, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Tim Geithner should have said simply to Liddy: “OK, NO bonuses…we’ll see them in court.”
Posted by: Florian Sever | March 15, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
I think there are plenty of “the best and brightest talent” out there on the streets who would love the opportunity to lead AIG to recovery. This is bull.
Posted by: johnk860 | March 15, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
I thought bonuses were paid for a job well done, for working hard to make the company a success. A company that has to be supported by our tax dollars is not a sucess. The persons running the company are not a success. What inspiration do these so called executives have to do a good job if they know they are going to be paid millions of dollars anyway? There must be something in their contract that states terms for these bonusus and that number one term should be a successful, profitable company, or something is wrong.
Our government sould have put these billions of dollars into the american economy. The people that pay in these tax dollars are loosing their jobs, homes and retirement. Who is really going to foot the bill then or is our genious in the white house and congress still going to be using that credit card. One day that credit card will have to be repaid,
Posted by: jerusalemoak | March 15, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
“My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.”
Carl Schurz (March 2, 1829 – May 14, 1906)
Even it these bonuses are legal they are morally wrong and should not be accepted by the AIG executives. What a positive message it would be to the country if they refused the money. A simple display of sacrifice and humility could help set it right….
Posted by: Jimmy | March 15, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
One has to laugh at the notion that these are the “best and brightest” in the industry and that millions upon millions of dollars are needed to attract the right talent to these jobs. At one time these people may have been rising stars but obviously they have been resting on their laurels for quite some time now. These salaries are beyond exorbitant and this type of executive greed simply is one more example of the decline of any sense of ethics or moral responsibility in our country.
Posted by: Barry in West Virginia | March 15, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Where is the contract that says the government has to give AIG any money?
Posted by: Taxpayer, AIG owner | March 15, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Diana says
I want to work for AIG, a place where when I do a terrible job that sends my company into the toilet, I still get paid outrageous bonuses. Let the company fail. Where is a new revolution taking place? It is time for the US citizens to rise up and throw out all politicians. I the can manage my share of huge amounts of money this country has given the rich.
It is very easy to paint everyone at AIG as the ones that sank the ship and are costing taxpayers billions but it is not so. There is only a handful of individuals that sank this ship and they are mostly gone. The rest of the employees work hard, pay their taxes, and are solid citizens of the community. I know because I know some of them. So back off when categorizing everyone at AIG. Because the majority of them are hard working and have to pay bills the same as everyone else.
Posted by: harryinLA | March 15, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Recall the words of Bush II: “We have to violate market principles to save the market.” Like any politician, he flip-flopped. In turn, America has begun the project of nationalizing private banks and businesses. BHO, following the lead of Bush II, has continued this nationalization, supposedly out of necessity. Please also recall, however, the example of Washington Mutual Bank, the largest savings and loan institution in America. It went bankrupt. Investors and shareholders lost. JP Morgan Chase promptly bought this bank. Market principles worked here. Hardly anybody remembers. Let the bad banks go. Other banks, with smarter business models, will replace these bad banks.
Posted by: anotherview | March 15, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
If it is a contractual agreement it is between AIG and there contractors or employees not between them and the taxpayers of this nation.
Take the $121m back. If AIG can’t afford the bonuses after that, so be it. Let them fall like all the other small businesses that had to claim bankruptcy because of mishandling of funds by the larger corporations such as AIG.
Posted by: Ken | March 15, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
When will the people of this country get mad enough to say: Enough!!
The bonuses to executives have been outrageous and obscene for a long time—gathering their initial steam under Ronald Reagan and snow-balling– getting larger and larger– until we are where we are today. Is anyone saying out loud: One of the reasons we are experiencing this economic meltdown is because of these excessive bonuses?? I am stunned that these companies feel they can continue to roll over the American people–even blaming “irresponsible home buyers” for the mortgage melt-down—how about irresponsible executives that have been amassing wealth that cannot be defended with any rationalization? The big companies —with the support of the Republicans (who now cry foul ironically)—told us: You too can be rich! Invest in the stock market, take risks, buy a new home, watch TV programs that show luxury and wealth as THE most important definition of being an American. Go for it! Reach for the heights!
Now they tell us—as they bank their enormous bonuses—”Oh my, you were irresponsible to buy a home and go into debt—tsk, tisk.”
When will we get fed up enough to say NO MORE!!!!
Posted by: RMG | March 15, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Why are they paying retention bonuses to people that put them in this mess?
Posted by: B.A. | March 15, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
I think that in the end the Democrats will blame it on Bush, then try to get even more taxpayer money to finance Obama’s follies.
Posted by: Will Stanton | March 15, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
“paul”:
You are right, bu there is ONE real big difference. We ARE being punished ….we’re going to pay the bill for AIG!
Posted by: Florian Sever | March 15, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I love all these comments about invalidating employee contracts. Come on people we do not live in the old communist Russia!
If we do this for Banks that took Govt $ shouldn’t we also be able to invalidate Auto Union contracts for Auto makers that take Govt $. Should we also be able to invalidate government union contracts for states that take Govt Bailout $. If it is good for the banks it is good for all that take bailout $.
Not every person who works for a bank gets a million $ bonus.
There are accountants, secretaries, clerks and others who work there.
This democrat created class warfare has to stop. The media is a willing partner in this.
Every NBC, MSNBC and CNBC on air employee should have to announce and then reduce their income because their parent company GE is involved in Government relief programs. HA! never happen.
Posted by: Take Backs | March 15, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Obama throws a 133 million dollar party during one of the worst economic stints this country has ever seen. Then does everything in his power to take 122 million dollars of incentives which are under contract. Maybe instead of having the party he could have donated that money to AIG’s bonus fund so they could keep the best and brightest workforce and hope to find a way out of this mess. In my opinion they are all greedy idiots. They have their foots firmly placed on the necks of the American tax payer and are slowly choking us to death.
Posted by: Justin Schneider | March 15, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
if the government doesn’t give me ten million dollars, i’ll quit. last offer.
Posted by: best and brightest insurance rep | March 15, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
We are a country of law,” Summers told Stephanopoulos today. “There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts.”
Well, let’s see – if the government hadn’t handed over hundreds of billions of dollars to AIG, AIG would have gone completely under – kaput – under their contracts. Would those “best and brightest” folks at AIG gotten any bonuses then? And having run AIG into the ground, where are these folks going to run off to if they don’t get their bonuses? Who would employ them in this economy?
They should thank their lucky stars for not managing the same disaster in China where they execute corporate executives for their malfeasance rather than giving them bonuses.
Posted by: Greg | March 15, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I don’t understand what the problem is here. Contracts can be re-negotiated. If the employee refuses to go along with a decrease in his bonus similar to those already agreed to by senior management, then he should be fired. I cannot accept the arrogance that anyone has expertise that is unique. There are hundreds of highly qualified and currently unemployed persons walking on Wall Street who could do these jobs. This sort of inflated ego worship is what got us into this mess in the first place.
Posted by: downtowndoc | March 15, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
@IB’s Mom
“but don’t deny the underlings their bonuses because there’s a goof up by the CEO. Some of these guys work 90-100 hours a week. They give up a lot, have worked for, and earned advanced degrees, and deserve to be compensated for it. If you pay them the same as the guy that asks, “Would you like fries with that?”, I guarantee you, no one would do some of these jobs. ”
Totally agree. But I doubt we’ll be moving towards a more meritocratic society any time soon.
Despite all the supposed outrage, I bet most would still opt for an easy get-rich quick lifestyle. Who’d want “waste their time” building something, inventing something, creating something, when you could just, you know.. hire someone else to do it for you and make even more money?
Posted by: justme | March 15, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I am a Reagan Republican who could not stand the last administration…. guys like I said it is time for a REVOLUTION. STOP PAYING TAXES, IF YOU WORK FOR A MAJOR COMPANY THAT ABUSES THE SYSTEM THEN STRIKE, 0
We have too much government and too little return. Even at a local level the people who work at a town or county level think we are here to create jobs for them… it is time to end all of this crap.
We have the ability to control this but we don’t because they have us all afraid. We are more concerned with our kids soccer game this weekend then the country we are going to leave them. This is disgusting. Time to stand up…. the country belongs to us…not them.
Posted by: Kevin | March 15, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Legally binding contracts? Would the bonuses have been paid if the US Taxpayers allowed AIG to go bankrupt?
Posted by: Carl | March 15, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
In my home town of Roanoke, VA there is a national insurance company founded in 1914, Shenandoah Life. It has been a sterling corporate citizen for nearly a century. Early last year their management tried to reduce risk by buying Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac preferred stock. Big mistake! They lost $50 from their liquidity, which led last month to the state taking over the company. Right now it’s doubtful that this insurance company will survive. Our local congressman was unable to get any federal money to stabilize their balance sheet. I guess AIG had swallowed all the “extra” cash. Nobody at Shenandoah Life is getting any bonuses. They’ll probably end up with pink slips for trying to be honest businessmen. But then, who cares about a mere $2 billion company?
Posted by: Clark M. Thomas | March 15, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
PUT THEM IN JAIL
Posted by: TT | March 15, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
A.I.G as not behaved and is in trouble. We could have allowed its trouble to bankrupt and cave it in. We could have allowed it to crash and burn. A.I.G has been playing with matches, attempting to burn the town around down. It ran out of matches before it could ignite the town. But A.I.G loves to play irresponsibly, so it is going to pay its executives EXTRA MONEY for coming SO CLOSE to burning down the town.
Posted by: Terryeo | March 15, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
My 13 year old grandson announced yesterday, that since he found out that AIG was now a penny stock, he was going to invest $50 from his birthday cash in stock — with Daddy’s help. This behavior of the top (installed by Paulson — remember?) and middle investment executives at AIG (whose impossible greed led the company to failure)indicates that they believe it will be “business as usual” as soon as the low-attention-span public forgets how this all started. Their denial and arrogance can’t bode well for future trust in AIG’s core business model, so I’ll pass your blog on to my grandson and suggest he think twice about buying AIG — he’s probably better off putting it in his mattress!
Posted by: Broken in NY | March 15, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
I say stop the bailout and let this company go under
where’s my bailout?
Posted by: KK | March 15, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
David, you are wrong that this is caused by people living above the level that our country will support. Rather, we have paper pyramid wealth schemes that have been draining the wealth from the people; this is the result of our bearing the burden of parasites. It is entirely the fat cat oligarchs ruling and ruining who are at fault. AIG should be put into bankrupcy and liquidated
Posted by: Ralph Siegler | March 15, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
As with other welfare, is there no accountability, no right of rules, not a overriding contract of “buy in”. Are we are not investing public money in these companies as a loan. Where is the collateral and obligation??
Posted by: Doug | March 15, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Shenandoah Life lost $50 million, not $50 as typed in the preceding email. To AIG that’s peanuts; but to a middle-sized insurance company with legal liquidity requirements, that’s a killer amount.
Posted by: Clark M. Thomas | March 15, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
These people are thieves and the worst kind of scum.
Posted by: usn | March 15, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Easy to see that Geithner was one of the Wall Street crowd…AIG execs get restrained by being allowed to walk away with $4 million in bonuses?
This guy is proving to be Obama’s worst cabinet choice and deserves to get the boot. Where is the FBI and where in hell is Chairman Dodd?
These AIG bums should be hiring defense lawyers.
Posted by: Matt Thomas | March 15, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
AIG as it was before taxpayer bailout doesn’t exist. They need to do the same as done in bankruptcy courts. Wipe out all “unfavorable” previous contracts. Then fire these employees for gross mistakes. Then JAIL THEM. And make sure that they don’t get a penny. And then post these jobs to millions of Americans. There are many more talented people who will apply for and get these jobs. These criminal employees are not indispensable (no one is!).
Posted by: Jail Them | March 15, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
This 121 million is spread over several people. What in the hell is wrong with the public ? Why is it O.K. for some famous movie star to make more than this on one movie ? I don’t hear any pissing and moaning about this . Or certain big sports figures to make a hell of a lot more than this, and some have trouble writing their own name
after graduation from college. And that is perfectly O.K. America is sick. I think she is in her death throws.
Posted by: El Coyote | March 15, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
How is it that the government did not know about AIG’s “legally” binding committments to payout these bonuses. Should they not have investigated everything before committing taxpayer money to bail them out?
During an audit all contracts are reveiwed; how could this have been missed or overlooked?
Posted by: Tricia | March 15, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
All universities who produced these people should be forced to have their professors correct the problem.
If the American people rise collectively, we can take these people, we out number them possibly 10,000 to 1 if not more. Stop the heard- mentality; start thinking on a higher more intelligent level.
I will be there for you lets do it!!!!
Posted by: 10-5-23...its them | March 15, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Just let AIG drop dead!
Posted by: Richard | March 15, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Just because it is legal to honor the contracts, the contractee does not have to ACCEPT the bonus. Therein is the problem.
Besides, the “best and brightest” are the ones that ruined, yes RUINED, the company. The government CAN and SHOULD abrogate the contracts because the money given is not buisness income; the government should DEMAND all the money back – now. No exceptions. AIG has enough assets to sell to cover their existing debt. If AIG goes not comply, slash and burn them to the ground.
EOM.
Posted by: Markv | March 15, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
AIG has been refusing to pay many of the medical/dental bills for my daughter. -Fine print-not covering expenses in the first year of coverage -Does that apply to Root Canal? This is not something one can plan ahead for. Now they “HAVE” to pay big bonuses. Do they get a bonus based on how they hurt us? There may be riots if this isn’t fixed. I am really mad.
Posted by: Carol | March 15, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
U.S. Treasury = Property of AIG
Posted by: Mad | March 15, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
i give up.
Posted by: mike bewley | March 15, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
A.I.G would have gone under and no one would have gotten bonuses! We live a capitalistic society and you have to let companies fail no matter how large they are. Yes, it hurts. GREED always hurts but it is the only system of reconciliation to this type of scandal.
Posted by: Dan | March 15, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Incredible , or is it ? Makes one wonder who really is controlling this “game of chess”
Posted by: Tim | March 15, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Fire the people who want bonuses and hire new people who haven’t been proved incompetent. It’s that easy.
If Summers wanted to do about it, he would. He and Geitner (we the people) are now the largest shareholders.
Posted by: omg! | March 15, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
You people have no clue how the free enterprise system works.
AIG is in the risk management business. It is my responsibility to ensure there is zero risk to AIG’s paychecks.
response:
Paychecks I can understand but a bonus is given when a job is well done, if goals are met and the company is doing better than expected. AIG company had to get a loan from Congress to stay afoat now to me it sounds like to Exec’s there, did not do their job well and should have been fired instead of given a bonus.
Posted by: Concerned in AZ | March 15, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
To My Sons and Daughter, and my Grandchildren:
I’m so sorry my generation has done this to you. In my day we would have just let the chip fall were they may. You do not deserve this; you have done nothing wrong but yet We (I) will punish you for the next 100 years to pay off this and other government bailout scams.
Love, Your greedy Father’s and Mother’s generation
Posted by: Peter | March 15, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Justme…. These so called educated people who put in so many hours are responsible for these loses.
I worked on Wall Street and I can tell you many of your assumptions are all wrong. None of these people are compensated for the long term health of their company… they are compensated for short term profits… this type of thinking has caused many executives to make poor decisions.
Go hang out by the corner of Gold and John Street on a Thursday or Friday evening and you will see the Limo’s with the high class call girls waiting to pick up these same executives after they done drinking at “Harry’s”.
You are not getting the best and brightest…. usually you are getting “legacy’s” just like GW Bush getting into Yale or the Kennedy’s into Harvard.
Ninety Percent of the people on Wall Street should not be allowed to run a cash register at Burger King, Half of them would be too stupid to open it and the other half would steal from you.
Posted by: Kevin | March 15, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
What is a bonus anyway? My company has put them on hold.
Posted by: crazy | March 15, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I think what’s really ‘funny’ is managements comment that, ‘we wouldn’t be able to compete for the ‘top talent’ if we weren’t allowed to give bonuses. The fact is that a ‘mob of lemmings’ would have done a better job than these idiots. It is my considered opinion that not only should they NOT receive bonuses; but, in addition, they should all be fired and all the MBA programs in this country be shuttered. They may have PhDs, but they don’t know enough to come in out of the rain. When are WE going to indict Hank Greenberg for running the ‘biggest ponzi scheme ever imagined by mankind?
Posted by: Robert Card | March 15, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Once again the government did a lousy job. When handing over billions in the form of a loan, all critical issues and fine print should have been resolved before handing over the money. But then, what do they care…the money is just free…from us, the taxpayers.
Posted by: Bob | March 15, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
It’s simple. Blacklist every name on AIG’s bonus list that accepts a bonus from AIG this year from any contact with the federal government or any candidate or PAC or lobbies. Ban any PAC or lobby that knowingly attends any function or has any contact with them.
Publish a shun list on the web and make sure that social-security and medicare and all federal judges can weigh that info when judging the veracity of their claims.
Posted by: jack | March 15, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
After the Communists took over in China, I was appalled by what they did to rich landlords and business owners. Now I’m not so sure.
Posted by: NotSoConservativeAnymore | March 15, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
To El Coyote:
The big difference between movie stars making more, and these folks making more, is that we choose to pay the salaries of stars by watching films…in this case *we* are forced to pay for AIG, and AIG is taking advantage of that. Imagine if your tax dollars were being used to pay for lavish lifestyles of movie stars (morover ones that weren’t actually working)–that would be an outrage.
Posted by: paul | March 15, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
These people are criminals and should be in jail or worse.
Posted by: No bailout, no bonuses, nada | March 15, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Do we have any comments? You are so right that millions of people will be outraged – and that is because we are spending our hard-earned money so that ‘the best and the brightest’ can get a bonus for ruining their company to the point where the federal government had to bail them out to the tune of $170 billion and counting.
Sorry, folks, but the outrage is DESERVED! Our future and our children’s future and the future of our country is on the line, and the people who brought AIG to this point are being rewarded? What does that say for the social contract? How do you explain this behavior to someone who is barely able to feed their children or can’t afford needed medical care? Sorry, we are taking your tax money so we don’t lose employees who all went along with the biggest Ponzi scheme of all?
According to the article, AIG “has” to pay these bonuses because of their contractual obligations – where was their concern for contracts when they were having a heyday trading default swaps with nothing behind them? It was nothing but a giant Ponzi scheme, and if we can’t throw them in jail, then either pull the company charter or, do the following:
Divide AIG into two parts: the insurance division that has been run responsibly, is making money, and should continue, and the financial section which should undergo an orderly bankruptcy. If we, the people of the United States own 80% of the company, then we can shut it down. Sorry, we can’t pay bonuses for a division that doesn’t exist anymore. End of story. In my view, the officers of AIG are lucky to stay out out of jail – they completely failed in their fiduciary duties. If you are selling people any form of insurance (such as credit default swaps), then you have to have some substantial money backing up the insurance, otherwise you are a crook.
Why is this so difficult for the federal government to understand? The main problem is that the swaps were so ‘sophisticated’ that no one could understand or regulate them. Its not all that sophisticated, folks – if you issue insurance, then you have reserves backing it up.
No company, no bonus. Plain and simple. Or, if we have to issue the bonuses, then we will prosecute these crooks as they deserve.
Posted by: Laurie A. | March 15, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
AIG has a lot of heathy insuranc subsidiaries that are trying to break free and become indepentant profit producing companies. If they loose talented staff in these companies the tax payer will loose all that it has put into AIG. Oh and don’t forget that the employees of these companies are tax payers too. So when they become unemployed, you the taxpayer with a job will still be paying for them. Wouldn’t it be better to wait a few months for the economy to turn so that these subsidiaries could be sold or have an IPO and pay the back the Government. To tank the company now is to loose everything the Gov. has already put into AIG. EVERYTHING!!! Think about it.
Posted by: N Bove | March 15, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
The specious logic used to attempt to justify what cannot be justified needs to be displayed in all its flawed wonder.
If there had been no bailout by us (the taxpayers), AIG would have imploded and not one cent in bonuses would have been paid to anyone. Those sacrosanct contracts would have become unenforceable. How can tax dollars used to keep the company afloat be diverted to “top performers” pockets?
Claw back those payments and let them sue…if they dare. Unless there are twelve AIG executives on the jury, they won’t have a chance.
These people have no ethics. Why should they even be allowed to remain as leaders in what is obviously a morally bankrupt organization.
As my friends from the Bronx would have said, “throw the bums out!”
Posted by: Luis A. Morales | March 15, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
After reading this article this morning I am feeling a fierce mistrust for the bail out of these unfeeling , greedy giants that could care less about the vast numbers of our population that have joined the growing ranks of the unemployed due to their misdeeds. (Those of us that are on unimprovement trying to survive and save our homes)We can certainly tell by the decision to pay these large bonuses that there is not a shread of team work in AIG. Liddy makes the statement that he is concerned that the sharpest of those that caused the downfall of AIG will go to work for someone else, leaving AIG without those sharp minds. Please Mr. Liddy, give us the tax payers a break. There is no I in team. Let’s do the math. AIG has been given 171 Billion to date. If we were to divide that by $30,000.00 we would se that would be 5,700,000. Let’s see now, that would give 5,700,000 families and small businesses $30,000.00 each to help save their homes and businesses for the upcoming year. What a novel idea. Let’s help out those people that are suffering as a result of what the financial Giants, with their sharp minds have created, out of greed. No, NO, let’s not punish them. let’s give them horendous bonuses & sit back & let them do it again. Why not, we are telling them that there are no consequences for their actions. Oh wait, there are consequences. They still get paid Millions in bonuses. Right, that’s the way to do it. Let’s all clap our hands for AIG. If there was one shread of decency in that company, all those bonuses would be waived, and everyone in that company would roll up their sleeves and make things right without any bonuses. Do we really want to support a company that is not willing to do that? I say NO!!
Remember, we did not cause this situation, the TRUST is gone. This company and others like them have fleeced the American Public out of Billions of dollars & here we are , paying the price.
Posted by: Rotten Al | March 15, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
What the government needs to do is to shut down the CDS market. What a lot of people don’t understand is that there are $60 trillion of CDS backing $10 trillion of bonds. That is like allowing a lot of people to own life insurance on your life. Sooner or later, someone will try to do you in. In this case, AIG sold all these guarantees on other bonds, which in fact have not defaulted, but the risk rose and AIG was forced to put up additional collateral which is where the government stepped in. But if the government can assure that other bonds won’t default (which they can), AIG will suddenly seem quite solvent as all that collateral that the government put up will come back. That is the root of the problem now. The cause of the problem indeed was the financial products group who bet multiple times more than they should have. Senior management was asleep at the wheel in not understanding the level of leverage and risk that was going on. Indeed, the previous senior management and heads at the financial products group have already rolled. To unfairly punish those that remain at this once great company is not the solution. There is tremendous value at the company and if the problem gets fixed versus trying to blame those that have not been any part of the problem, the government, taxpayers, shareholders and bondholders ought to see some significant returns from current levels.
Someone else that should have been blamed is Elliot Spitzer for forcing out Hank Greenberg. Hank knew very well the levels of risk that were being taken and only Hank would have been able to have shut down the risk levels at financial products before it got out of hand.
Unfortunately the dumb, liberal media and political demagogues are only interested in stirring up the lynch mobs, selling papers, advertising and winning votes.
What is scary at this point is that we are marching down the road on a path to a government of socialism and collective dictatorship. Government cannot fix all the problems and they never could. But if they were to just focus on assuring solvency and liquidity, reducing risk-taking and leverage, empowering and motivating the able, then we can return to the path of prosperity and responsibility. Otherwise, we are clearly entering the path of lifelong indebtedness, insolvency, dependency, and despair.
Posted by: Seekerofthetruth | March 15, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
We shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater – there are thousands of dedicated, HONEST employees at AIG, most of whom are NOT executives, who work long hours to support their families, and they deserve a modest bonus for doing their jobs well.
Case in point: the people running their website (who have nothing to do with credit default swaps or poor risk management) have prevented it from crashing under the weight of everyone submitting their negative comments!
Posted by: Stop the Mob Mentality | March 15, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
NBove, not so fast. I believe that bailout funds make the government a sort of secured creditor. Thus, if the company goes bankrupt, the government will get some of its assets. So, we don’t lose anything more then we have already lost. (I think this is the way the bailout was structured, although I am not 100%)
Posted by: chuckb | March 15, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
I say let’s all get in our private jets, fly to Washington, D.C., and demand bailout money…or we won’t pay our taxes!
Posted by: Ed | March 15, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
We’re a country of law. What law says the taxpayers have to give them a red penny? Do a reset and nationalize them.
Posted by: lawyer | March 15, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
How many people in the USA are going to bed hungry, without heating, without health care? And how many Americans have read George Orwell’s “Animal Farm?” I guess very few. However, there is a statement in the book that goes like this: “All pigs are equal, but some pigs are more equal than others.” The people at AIG are not normal people. They are not like the typical American. They are at the top of the totem pole in this wonderful society. We the humble, struggling ones allowed them to reach up there. It’s time to chop down the pole. It time that we be all equal again. It’s time to stop the rip-off. No more bailouts or bonuses for AIG. They messed up. Why should we have to fix their problems? If I am the jackass that that gave the clarion call to revolt in “Animal Farm,” well so be it. I urge each and every American to shut off the television and read the book to their children.
Posted by: JCee | March 15, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
They use tax money to pay the bonus. They should go to jail. They are talent on greedy.
Posted by: Chris | March 15, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Throw their ***** in jail, and throw away the keys.
Posted by: $2 off | March 15, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
I’m astounded that Liddy is worried that the company “cannot attract and retain the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses.” What Libby calls “the best and brightest talent” are the same no-talent clowns who knowingly and intentionally drove the massive AIG truck off the cliff. Let that “best and brightest” group leave empty-handed. Being the 80% (?) shareholder of AIG, the American taxpayer should demand that the entire lot of
“officers – that is, anyone with a title of associate vice president or higher” be terminated for breach of contract and cause. No corporation-regardless of how large it is, should ever be considered “too big to fail.” The notion of a corporation being “too big to fail” is counter to the underlying principles of the free market system we tout. Break up AIG just like Ma Bell was broken up years ago…
Posted by: Ed | March 15, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Nothing will happen to these executives and nothing will change. This country is being run into the ground by greed, plain and simple. It is going to take a massive and coordinated revolution of regular people to rise up and demand change. The Gov has people scared and that should NEVER happen here in the USA. We need our collective voices to be heard and to end the nonsense that we all have had to endure since this ‘crisis’ began.
Posted by: Mike | March 15, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Its your representatives and senators who have allowed this.. Do not vote a single incumbent back to office in the next 6 years.. Please!!!
Posted by: roger | March 15, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
does Barney Franks always talk like that or does he have canker sores in his mouth.
Posted by: Trudy | March 15, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Mob mentality? Seriously? I understand that the net admins didn’t cause any of this, but so what? The company was poorly run and it should fail. Compassion you say! What about compassion for all those on the streets that were harmed by the company’s actions, all those that have suffered because of Wall Street’s greed, all those who lost their job because of the meltdown that they had nothing to do with? What about those people? I definitely feel for the AIG net admin who had nothing to do with this mess, but what about those who were not even a part of AIG? AIG should pay, and that means the entire company. Yes, it sucks for those who didn’t do anything wrong. But, if it is between dumping an AIG job or handing out more fake money, I choose the former. A new company will take its place any you trusty admins can get a job their.
Posted by: chuckb | March 15, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
My business is down 43% and I’m a little behind in my payments to suppliers. How about a bailout for me? Not asking for bonuses or anything extra, just a regular bailout.
Posted by: Small Business Owner | March 15, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Posted by: El Coyote | Mar 15, 2009 1:10:59 PM
This 121 million is spread over several people. What in the hell is wrong with the public ? Why is it O.K. for some famous movie star to make more than this on one movie ? I don’t hear any pissing and moaning about this . Or certain big sports figures to make a hell of a lot more than this, and some have trouble writing their own name
after graduation from college. And that is perfectly O.K. America is sick. I think she is in her death throws.
El Coyote, you need to wake up. I agree movie stars and athletes are paid more than they are worth but that has nothing to do with taxpayer money bailing out a company that for years has been using there assets to swing the stock market in their favor. AIG has now lost the game due to the economic crises; the government wants to bail them out…..who is going to bail me out after losing more than have of my retirement investments due to companies like AIG manipulating the stock market.
Posted by: Ken | March 15, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
The problem with this country is that we have become soft. Instead of standing up and demanding the resignations of the top AIG executives, we coyly ask that they reconsider and not take their bonuses. Obviously they are not going to do that and just as obviously they are going to cry foul and demand to talk to their attorney. How many times have you been threatened by a child saying you can’t do this or that … my dad will sue. Go cry to your parents (executives)… they raised a bunch of losers… see if they care. As for the rest of the country I’m tired of paying for it.
As to the comment that they are legally owed these bonuses. What obligation did they have to perform? Let the whole damn company go belly up and let’s start over again. They can sue a rock for blood if they want, it doesn’t mean they will get it.
Posted by: disgusted | March 15, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Anyone remember that the taxpayer dollars given to AIG were a loan, not a bailout? AIG were obligated to repay the initial loan in 2 years. It was only because AIG couldn’t afford the Fed’s usury that it required the last round of money and an updated repayment schedule of 5 years.
No one seems to be complaining that BoA, Citi, and the automakers got a HANDOUT. Any responsible taxpayer might be a little more hopeful that AIG survives long enough to repay those borrowed dollars to the national coffers. But given the tone here, I doubt anyone will be posting a “thank you” or even an virtual nod when AIG satisfies its obligation.
Posted by: Anyone remember this fact? | March 15, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Why are they still free?
Posted by: Best And Brightest THIEVES | March 15, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Remorseful and apologetic AIG top executives? Are u kidding me? Put a bunch of foxes in charge of a chicken farm and expect the foxes to feed and take care of the chicks. They wont. The foxes will eat the chicken. That is what happened and will keep happening at AIG until the whole top echelon is dismissed.What I see now is more chicken farms being given to the AIG foxes 2 raise. The public approves by its silence and inaction.
Posted by: SingoStar | March 15, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Shut them down and let them fail.
Posted by: Obama is a worthless wimp | March 15, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Liquidate AIG and fire them all.
Posted by: vburns | March 15, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
I hope they pull the plug. I want them to go under and fail. I am so sick of bailouts. What the H E doulbe hocky sticks. If it mean the country suffers for it fine by me AIG is the devil. I have to agree with all of you who say if you do bad you should go under if you do well you are prosper. What is so wrong with that.
Posted by: Gary | March 15, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
AIG may be legally bound to give the bonuses — but no one is legally bound to ACCEPT the bonuses. All executives should do take the only honorable course here: give the bonus money back!!
Atone for AIG’s sins. Say no to unearned bonus money.
Posted by: Ginny | March 15, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
If you don’t literally want riots in the streets- its time to FIRE these morons. And don’t even THINK of telling us “you can’t.” We can smell the BS a thousand miles away, at this point.
The top 3 tiers of executives at these companies need to be totally removed. 100% of them. MAYBE the younger execs haven’t been totally corrupted yet.
Posted by: Greenpa | March 15, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
I don’t think people here are being very fair to the AIG executives. Let’s face it, they’re better and smarter than the rest of us. otherwise they wouldn’t be holding major positions in a company like this — even if it did ultimately fail.
I’m sure that most people here, if they’re honest, would admit to themselves that they don’t have the talent their top bosses do. Most of us are followers because we don’t know as much as they do. So, just like with Mom and Dad when we were little kids, it’s important to listen to them.
These people have a lavish lifestyle because they deserve it, jealous as we may be about that. So it isn’t fair to expect them to give it all up and live in a house in the suburbs like the rest of us, just because they didn’t make all the right moves. They’re used to a higher standard; let’s give it to them, because they’ll still be thinking up ways to employ the rest of us in the future.
Posted by: susana | March 15, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Although you’ve used language that’s pretty over the top, I think Suzana has hit it about right on the head. We could all stand to back off a little in our judgment. The people at AIG are the kind of people who make America great. They take the chances that the rest of us don’t have the stomach for. It’s all about independence and a pioneering spirit. Read the writing of the great Ayn Rand, one of whose closest disciples was Alan Greenspan. These are the people that make the markets and the whole society work. Truly a class apart.
Posted by: jimay | March 15, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
…attract the brightest?
the individuals who got AIG in this hole can not be so bright, they are the total opposite: pathetically incompetent. I will not use the word CORRUPT so as not to be accused of being unnecessarily moralistic when the sheer numbers suffice to prove the point. They should return all the salaries and bonuses they have been given since they did not earn them. These vermin in the guise of respectable citizens should dig ditches and work- with no salary- to help rebuild the nations infrastructure which could have been done with the billions they mismanaged from their powerful positions.
The Obama administration must recognize the overwhelming majority of citizens, across all ideological boundaries, who support the idea of letting all the failed banks and financial institutions disappear for good in the bottomless pits that through THEIR OWN INCOMPETENCE AND MISMANAGEMENT they created themselves. It is not acceptable and most unconscionable to use the hard earned money contributed by the taxpayers to rescue them now so that they live to ABUSE THE TAXPAYERS AGAIN and COLLAPSE MORE PAINFULLY SOME OTHER DAY.
But not all that is coming can be that bad. Out of this big mess will certainly emerge a different class of businesspeople and entrepreneurs; one that will have learned that the stability, benefits and future of their individual works and projects is intimately linked to that of the the communities the societies and, at large,
of the countries they are in.
As a nation let’s not allow this nightmare to go without leaving us any profit (so to speak.) Let’s learn the lesson of this dark experience and no doubt we will emerge from a cloud of dust, but wiser, creative as ever, and stronger in our unity to march on and lead the world to a future of great progress and achievements.
Posted by: Pantonar | March 15, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
We did let “capitalisim” run its course. Human nature always finds ways to cheat any “promising” system: Godless Communism, Fascism, and Godless Capitalism. What difference does it make? Global faith in human “solutions” has proven a failure, and false distortions of “Christianity” have discredited the real stuff. Lots of self-deception and hypocrisy: Christian, Muslim, Hindu (now they, too, murder Christians, forget Ahimsa,) etc. The solution is not political; the wars are religious, not political. It’s not money or oil; it’s spiritual war in our own souls.
Posted by: tony | March 15, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
jimay wrote: “Read the writing of the great Ayn Rand, one of whose closest disciples was Alan Greenspan. These are the people that make the markets and the whole society work.” The problem with this way of thinking is that the markets and the whole society upon which they are built have clearly demonstrated that they don’t work. Bush himself admitted to this when he said last December that he had “abandoned free market principles to save the free market system.”
Posted by: Mike Edwards | March 15, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
If AIG is so much as 1 day late in their repayments they should be charged heavy fees and put at-risk for a government take-over. Perhaps its the taxpayers who should appoint someone to oversee the company. Someone who duly represents the taxpayers that is.
Posted by: Candice | March 15, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
AIG is supposedly bound by contract to pay bonuses!! If the american taxpayer didn’t bail out the company just how relevant would contracts be?? Those same executives would be unemployed. How can the White House let them get away with this?? They are taking money which was intended to support the company. AIG and the White House have diminished themselves.
Posted by: Flcreeker | March 15, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Where is the federal investigation? There are tons of activities that need to be dealt with.
Posted by: Jessica | March 15, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
AIG should have been allowed to fail!!
We are supposedly as citizens in a capitalist democratic republic. We did not vote men into office to revile socialism in public, then practice it for only private business. When the poor starve they must raise themselves by their bootstraps, when the rich fall the poor must support them? I contend this is neither Capitalism nor Socialism, it’s Feudalism. And in Feudalism their are nobles and serfs, which benefit from the bailout? And which are you?
Posted by: Publius | March 15, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“We are a country of law,” Summers told Stephanopoulos today. “There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts.
—————————————-
Unless it’s a mortgage contract, then all bets are off.
Posted by: mad | March 15, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
We all need to call or e-mail the president and our representatives and tell them this is not acceptable. I don’t what to hear the president saying IN THE FUTURE this will not happen on his watch. I want him to stop it NOW.
Posted by: Tina | March 15, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
“…attract and retain the best and brightest talent…” should be carved with an AIG logo on some monolith surrounded by apes.
These AIG Financial Products staffers who expect and demand these obscene bonuses makes me wonder if Jeffrey Skilling has a bunch of brothers and sisters working there?
Posted by: Steve | March 16, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am
So where are the videos showing the rotten fruit being thrown at any and all of these crooks? Most other countries manage to fill executive positions for DRAMATICALLY less, and when gross errors are discovered, they get shuffled off with dispatch. Sure, they may be brighter and more decisive than the rest of us, but so what–they aren’t gods and I’ll not worship at the church of unbridled capitalism that captivates so many media sychophants.
Posted by: homebuilding | March 16, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Generational Wealth and the Capitalist GREED that Spawns GREED…
Is Inevitable & Cyclical.
Until, True and Sincere Voices stand up and hold their Representatives in Local, State and Federal Governments Accountable and that they will not Accept Generational GREED and Generational DEBT…
This Capitalist System of GREED will CONTINUE..
It will.. CONTINUE.
Until the People and those supposedly representing them, Hold Capitalist..
ACCOUNTABLE !!!
Posted by: O. | March 16, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Excellent title. How can we allow this behavior? Rewarding poor performance with taxpayer dollars cannot be tolorated.
Posted by: Bulldog | March 16, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
It’s funny to hear some people sympathetic to these executives. The same people who are disgruntled about healthcare for the poor and the welfare system are now spouting that because these execs are used to a certain lifestyle of luxury and astronomic income, we can’t really expect them to change. How many annual salaries for the “regular” worker would just one executive salary pay for? Something like 218 according to some reports on CEO vs the average workers pay. Yes, they supposedly have these jobs because they are better trained/educated/suited to them. My entire family has worked in the auto industry and are better suited to that than unemployment checks, but I guess what we have here is a double standard.
Posted by: Jessica | March 16, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
I’m sickened by the way the exiting Bush administration ensured the AIG bailout before the Obama administration could come in with their say.
Our current administration should cease and desist all payments being made to AIG – or demand repayment NOW!
Our governemnt should issue an investigation into this catastrophe starting at the top! I’m sure you’ll find mostly republicans responsible for this mess!
AIG should be turned over to the government, since we own them anyhow. We can vote on who stays and who goes!
Posted by: terri | March 16, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
AIG, HOW DARE YOU. I CAN’T IMAGINE THAT YOUR HEARTS HAVE BECOME SO HARDENED AND CALLOUSED TO DO THIS. GREED IS THE NAME OF THE GAME ANYMORE,FORGETTING THE WORKING CLASS, WHO IS THE BACKBONE OF AMERICA. I HOPE IT IS NOT TOO LATE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS. MARY
Posted by: Mary Benton | March 17, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
When I am late to pay my monthly credit card bill, Citibank or BoA through its credit card companies charge me 30% late payment fee!When either of them go red, I am forced to come to their aid with our bail out tax money.Furthermore,when one of them, AIG, fails my tax money is used to reward their top executives.Should I make it a habit of paying my credit card bills late, I am charged exhobitant interest rate fees, yet I am still paying, late or not.In otherwords, I am there to help the lazy rich while their only purpose in life is to milk me dry of any income. The truth is when the rich fail, the working middle class and poor come to their rescue but when the ordinary working people are in trouble, the rich send them to the courts and jail to straghten and reducate them.
Posted by: SingoStar | March 22, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am