Caught My Eye: TARP Watchdog: ‘We Do Not Seem To Be A Priority For The Treasury’
The watchdog for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the government’s financial rescue plan, said today that the Treasury Department has not been cooperating with oversight efforts up to this point.
"We do not seem to be a priority for the Treasury Department," the Congressional Oversight Panel’s Elizabeth Warren told a Senate Finance Committee hearing today.
"We have sent letters. We have requested that there be someone named so that we can get technical information. And so far, we have not been a first priority," Warren said. "We use what you give us, and we will exercise the leverage given to us by Congress. In part, that’s why I’m here today. I’m here to talk to you about what’s happened so far, what we have discovered so far, the inquiries that we have in mid-stream and for which we continue to await responses."
Warren, visibly frustrated with a lack of cooperation from the administration, emphasized, "This problem starts with Treasury."
Neil Barofsky, Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, voiced similar concerns.
He noted that his office just conducted a survey of all 364 TARP recipients on their use of government funds, something they had requested Treasury do, only for the Department to decline to do so except in the cases of Citigroup and Bank of America.
"One thing is clear: complaints that it was impractical, impossible, or a waste of time to require banks to detail how they used TARP funds were unfounded," Barofsky said.
"The survey strongly supports my earlier recommendation to Treasury," he emphasized. "Banks can and should be required to report on their use of taxpayer money to provide maximum transparency and not simply be asked to report on the possible impact of the funds, such as giving only lending activity."
Ranking member Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said the administration needs to start living up to its promise to increase the program’s transparency.
"Unfortunately, despite saying all the right things about open government, the new administration has not made any major changes aimed at making TARP more transparent," he said. "Moreover, I have heard about potential problems with access to information from all three of the oversight bodies testifying."
At this morning’s hearing, such problems were emphasized time and time again by Warren. Her Congressional Oversight Panel will release their fifth report on TARP next week.
"As I see it, you really have two options here: either you get Treasury to get some religion on this point — and put their own standards in place, or Congress is forced to step in," Warren said. "We will do everything we can on your behalf, as your congressional oversight panel, but what we can best do for you now is to identify and pinpoint that this is precisely where the problem starts. And then the problem has roll down effects all the way through the system of lack of accountability, complexity that no one can figure out what’s going on, so that we never identify the place where we need to start the solution."
ABC News has asked the Treasury Department for a response and will update when and if they get back.
–ABC’s Matt Jaffe
UPDATE 6:27pm:
Treasury spokesman Andrew Williams just sent along three letters between Treasury and GAO, as well as the following statement:
"Transparency and accountability are central to ensuring that taxpayer
funds are spent wisely. Treasury is actively engaged with our four
oversight bodies and has made significant progress in implementing
every GAO recommendation, including the following important measures:
Treasury hired more staff across the Office of Financial Stability,
strengthened its internal controls framework to ensure program
objectives are met, improved procedures to oversee contractor
performance, and published and expanded its survey on the lending and
intermediation activities of banks.
Over the last month, Treasury has rolled out five core components of
our Financial Stability Plan, and we will continue communicating to the
oversight bodies, the Congress, and the American people as we implement
these programs, open up lending for consumers and businesses, and
achieve economic recovery."
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Transparency? This government shoved a “stimulus” package thru congress without allowing time for anyone to read it, citing catastrophe or crises every other word, and the went on vacation. This goverment passed AIG bonuses they knew where in there, and then reneged on the deal with phoney outrage. This government is trying to shove thru a pork laden budget, without advertizing the last 5 years of huge deficit spending, by changing the rules for passage. This administration has done nothing but lie before, during and after the election. This government is not to be trusted on anything.
Posted by: betsy | March 31, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Duh? Did they really think they would tell the public what is going on and where all that money is going? Naaaa
Posted by: Carol in Alabama | March 31, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Obama looting the country for his banker buddies on Wall St. and the media or congress being allowed to make it public? HAHAHAHAHA!!! No chance in HELL!!! Gotta love the fake indignation though… Priceless, give that woman a medal!
Posted by: hmn... | March 31, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
George,
How are you doing with those morning talking points from the White House? Still lying about it and trying to hide it?
Posted by: Richton Holmes | March 31, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Look like the stinky stuff of Obama administration is going to hit the fan soon.. This will be ugly.
Posted by: Swiftlearner | March 31, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
I am saddened, but not surprised, that the members of Congress seem so stupid. Take Wells Fargo as an example. They have assets of $1.4 Trillion. They received $25 Billion in TARP funds. Since receiving those funds they have lent or committed to loans exceeding $100 Million and have paid salaries, utilities, rent, insurance, interest on deposits and many other expenses. How can they possibly tell us accurately where the $25 Billion was spent? What a waste of time and effort and expense to try to find out.
Posted by: GrampaB67 | March 31, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
What is going wrong in this country ??
Bush got blame and hammered with the war in Iraq and this guy has destroyed us in less than a 100 days got us a deficit of nearly a trillion dollars and Obama almost triple that amount with borrowed money!!! and all he says is that is not his fault, he inhereted, BS!! wake up stupid and ignorant people !! This country is going down like the Titanic and you all fools, who voted him into office are the ones to blame !!
Posted by: Frank | March 31, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
“ABC News has asked the Treasury Department for a response and will update when and if they get back.”
So if they just ignore it, story over?
Posted by: ultranaut | March 31, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
The problem is that there is only one person at Treasury and it is Geithner.
Geithner needs help. He is understaffed.
Posted by: Sara | March 31, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
George: I find this very troublesome, and reeks of obfuscation on the part of the Treasury. A criminal investigation should ensue if they refuse to provide the information or “slow play.” This is the stuff I’d expect from the likes of, say, Jimmy Hoffa, and not my Government. National Security I will refuse as a reason for such delay and would signal “insider trading” within the Banking Complex. Transparency is the only way to root out corruption on these economic issues.
Posted by: Spartan Phoenix777 | March 31, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
You mean that everything that Obama critics claimed he was going to do during the election IS ACTUALLY happening? Hmm, go figure??
I blame those who campaigned for this man knowing full well what he was going to do to our country. It’s yours – you own it.
Posted by: Kim | March 31, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Ms Warren is chipping away at a Treasury stonewall, with a teaspoon, to get the transparency that the American public deserves. I’m no politico, but do I hear a whistle? Who runs the 362 other companies that recieved TARP funding? And why are they being protected from public scorn?! If Elizabeth Warren and her congressional oversite panel were given priority, they might catch the criminals who have been robbing the American public since I was born. And no, I am not a really articulate 5th grader.
Posted by: Dianne Yvette | March 31, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Check out the meeting notes for the Financial Stability Oversight board: http://www.financialstability.gov/about/oversight.html
Their last meeting was in January. They were created to meet monthly, to oversee TARP. I guess Obama and Geithner have been to busy to meet, even 1 time, on how that $700 Bn is being spent.
Posted by: WSLS-Webguy | March 31, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Get out of the way! Where’s that checkbook!
Posted by: LongT | March 31, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
yep. no doubt there IS an “explosion of government” under obama. it falls far short of socialism however because all of these explosions of government spending do NOTHING TO HELP THE MIDDLE CLASS!
sorry — not yelling at you, just talking loudly.
the massive looting of the treasury is COSTING the middle class, NOT benefiting us. In a socialist economy government spends big bucks on systems that HELP us, like:
universal health coverage
free (or almost free) university tuition
long-term and real unemployment benefits
good quality public schools
widespread public safety and low crime
free museums and parks
excellent mass transit and train systems
paid leave for parents
tax deductions and subsidies for day care for working mothers
mandatory vacation, sick leave, disability
pensions and retirement accounts
People can be opposed to that sort of public spending — in fact most Americans probably are (not me — I’d LOVE to see the $40,000 we spend in taxes every year going to most of those programs) but that is NOT AND NEVER WILL BE what obama and his minions want to see.
the massive taxpayer spending going on under obama is flowing directly to:
1. campaign donors
2. very very rich people
3. democratic party machines in cities and states in order to get votes for 2010 and 2012
Shucks, i WISH the looting of our treasury was at least being used on the middle and working classes. nope — it’s going to the very very rich so that they’ll underwrite obama’s next election, and to the politicians and the poor people they scam so that they’ll vote for him and the dems in the next elections.
it’s a banana republic with an oligarchy running banana headquarters in DC, aka the major branch office of Wall Street.
Posted by: The fix is in! | March 31, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Madam Watchdog. Now, you know what the AMERICAN PEOPLE knew from the very beginning – bailouts would be a disaster – throwing money into an abyss. WASHINGTON and WALL STREET are too interconnected to allow transparency. Money flows between the two like blood in an UMBILICAL CORD. By the way. If you are going to be a watchdog, you better show some TEETH. You look more like a watch kitten. No wonder you were chosen for the job.
Posted by: Carol | March 31, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
george s is a propagandist, he helped fool the public into voting for a socialist (obama)
Posted by: stan | March 31, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
All a bank has to do is run a configured financial report on their computer and they can have the information the investigators want. Financial institutions have many, many report models they run every day. They know exactly where every dollar goes. There is no excuses. So the real question is: is the Treasury Department lazy, corrupt, or under-staffed? Inquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: Wayne | March 31, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Obama is good
Obama is great
We surrender our will
As of this date.
Posted by: zom | March 31, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
I’m not sure what is going on. This is a mess. But I have a problem with a “oversight” committee complaining that the Treasury (or anyone else) is not responsive because THEY will not “over see” TARP money. Isn’t that what the committee is for?
I know that a lot of money is going to be wasted. Old and new administrations failed on this point. This is not a Democratic or GOP problem. Both parties are responsible.
Posted by: MG | March 31, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
“yep. no doubt there IS an “explosion of government” under obama. it falls far short of socialism however because all of these explosions of government spending do NOTHING TO HELP THE MIDDLE CLASS!”
————————-
LOL, and you think socialism will ?????
Posted by: Mike_C | March 31, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
I know she is flustrated but Geitner is the only one working at the treasury so far. Obama has not had time to appoint anyone else because he is working on his new world order and all. If she will just leave Tim a message he will get back with her in a few years.
Posted by: billy bob | March 31, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Carol: Your point is hilarious and so true. She has no teeth, because Congress doesn’t want her to have teeth. I have to re-post your comments —– “Madam Watchdog. Now, you know what the AMERICAN PEOPLE knew from the very beginning – bailouts would be a disaster – throwing money into an abyss. WASHINGTON and WALL STREET are too interconnected to allow transparency. Money flows between the two like blood in an UMBILICAL CORD. By the way. If you are going to be a watchdog, you better show some TEETH. You look more like a watch kitten. No wonder you were chosen for the job.” —- Perfect!
Posted by: Karen | March 31, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
I can tell you where the lion’s share of the TARP funds have gone… the funds went in the front door of these financial institutions and was shoveled out the back door to hedge funds just as quickly.
Posted by: ItDoesnotTakeEconorFinance | March 31, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Obama is good
Obama is great
We surrender our will
As of this date.
===========================
zom,
Actually…..
You are not of the Body.
You will be absorbed!
It is the will of Landru (Obama).
Posted by: Mike_C | March 31, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Wayne, the Treasurey Dept is at the very least lazy and corrupt. Since it is a beurocracy, I seriously doubt it is understaffed. This does not surprise me…people blindly thought that the banks would bend over and take one in the backside so the American Public will know where the funds go…the funds went in the managements’ pockets which is why they don’t want the transparancy. God forbid they suffer any loss of income.
Posted by: JustMyOpinion | March 31, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
You cannot bankrupt the country through transparency.
That is why TARP was pushed through with such gloom and doom zealous.
Everything else is just smoke and mirrors.
Wake up America! You Gov’t is not here to serve YOU! They are only interested in a means to an end. YOUR end.
Posted by: Bruce | March 31, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
GrampaB67: I’m not trying to be a smart-alec, but yes, with the accurate and correct accounting and auditing procedures (which any bank should have in place), they could very easily, and should be able to very easily, trace every last penny of the money the government gave them. With the technology today, it should be a matter of pulling up a few screens and telling the computer which report to run, how you want it run, and in what kind of format.
Posted by: JustMyOpinion | March 31, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
I think Wayne is right and Grandpa is wrong– financial institutions, just like any other corporations, must keep books and prepare reports that track the money that flows in and out of their company. Whether the money came from the government or not does not change the fact that it does not just disappear down a rat hole. I am sadly not surprised to learn that yet another oversight group is being ignored by the administration that pledged to be hypertransparent. This is getting ridiculous. And we are supposed to trust these folks to run even more programs as they continue to expand the government to unprecedented levels? No thanks.
Posted by: moderate | March 31, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
One baby among group starts crying everybody cries. She thinks it is her turn to get the attention. So much noises these days…………
Posted by: Holly 65 | March 31, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
the massive taxpayer spending going on under obama is flowing directly to:
1. campaign donors
2. very very rich people
3. democratic party machines in cities and states in order to get votes for 2010 and 2012
Shucks, i WISH the looting of our treasury was at least being used on the middle and working classes. nope — it’s going to the very very rich so that they’ll underwrite obama’s next election, and to the politicians and the poor people they scam so that they’ll vote for him and the dems in the next elections.
it’s a banana republic with an oligarchy running banana headquarters in DC, aka the major branch office of Wall Street.
Posted by: this is bad very bad | March 31, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
The treasury department answering to no one? Yeah that sounds about right.
Posted by: keredte | March 31, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Once again President Obama- Please begin to follow through on what you promised.
Where are the Congressional leaders ( if we actually have any)- Pelosi, Reid, etc?
If these banks dont want to answer the questions thats fine- pay the TARP money back today- then you can do what you want – private jets, junkets, all with no questions asked.
Posted by: Angela | March 31, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
For crying out loud. Geithner has NEVER minded the store:
Google: Timothy Geithner: Obama’s Teflon Treasury Secretary
“Mr. Geithner, the job of the New York Fed is to — now I am quoting its own web site — ‘supervise and regulate financial institutions in the Second District [Wall Street]. Its primary objective is to maintain safe and competitive U.S. and global banking systems.’ You have been in your current post since 2003 and during that time the U.S. financial system has come close to complete disintegration. Why do you deserve a promotion?”
Posted by: MacGhil | March 31, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Okay…just one question folks…when did any of you ANTICIPATE that a politician would actually hold true to campaign promises? You there with you hand up..yea, you in the back….how was the ride in on the turnip truck last night?
Posted by: JustMyOpinion | March 31, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
How dare her question Obama!
Posted by: chick.jones | March 31, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
All this bail out money and all I get is higher and higher credit card rates!!! THIS IS UNREAL!!! WHEN IS THE AVERAGE AMERICAN GOING TO GET HELP FROM ALL OF OUR MONEY BEING SPENT!!!!
Posted by: Kevin | March 31, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
You mean the fox does not want scrutiny when it is allowed to raid the henhouse?!! How surprising!
Posted by: Ford Fairlane | March 31, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Gee, you don’t think that any of our money could end up in the hands of Liberal Supporters and groups like ACORN, DO YOU? Obama is a crook.
Posted by: mark | March 31, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
MacGhil — Yes. Tim has been around the block many, many times. He is intimately familiar with Wall Street. Of course, it gets lost in most reporting.
Posted by: Nancy | March 31, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
She won’t be around too long.
Posted by: Jimmie | March 31, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
This administration has been a complete disaster, but how surprising is that?
Posted by: Steve from Wisconsin | March 31, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
She served her purpose when she said that Paulson had overpaid for bank assets. She got big coverage from the lib/media for that since it was a shot at Bush.
Now, they are done with her.
Posted by: rk | March 31, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Yes, Treasury does have a lot on its plate today,tomorrow and for the foreseeable future.
Frankly, NOTHING is more important than tracking where the money is going and what EXACTLY we are getting for it, NOTHING boys.
If they want any kind of credibility at all they will work this out and right now. we have all had it with the polices of recent history, responsibility lays on every side of the aisle.
I will say it again,
NOTHING is more important than tracking where the money is going and what EXACTLY we are getting for it, NOTHING boys.
Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | March 31, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Transperancy !!! what a freaking joke Obi-Wan talks about it a lot and will dole out little tidbits when it is advantageous to him and his agenda but his talk and actions to date with regards to tranperancy are two different things entirely.
Posted by: formerdem | March 31, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
The idea isn’t to see where the money goes, it’s to spend the money. Then taxes can be raised, more money spent and the cycle continues. Conservative capitalism tried to make everyone rich but that didn’t work so liberal socialists will make everyone poor. I guarantee they will succeed.
Posted by: Mississippi Mike | March 31, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
I would say that it should be of utmost urgency that these problems be resolved by treasury for this watchdog group — I would offer that no other money go out the door to banks until this information is divulged.
I hope Sarkozy can influence Obama on stiff regulations for the U.S. Banking System to follow.
Posted by: paulet | March 31, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Cut their fingers off.
Posted by: Windbreaker | March 31, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
The Obama administration should never had promised to follow every dollar and ensure the proper spending of money. Honestly, how can any group do that and yet be flexible and quick enough handle a crisis in the financial system. It would take a very LARGE and efficient team to perform the duties as a watchdog. Same goes with the stimulus money. Does anyone really believe you can monitor all of that money and hope to revive the economy fast enough? You would likely have to spend as much money on tracking the stimulus as the cost of the stimulus bill itself. Its easy for some commentators to say that banks have a way of tracking their money. That may be true to an extent, but I doubt they are going to track what percentage went where,and for how long, from the bailout packages.
Posted by: Dale | March 31, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
TRANSPARENCY???!!!
This is government by decree and forced by demagogues…
America is dead dead dead… we may not survive this one!
We have to stop spending more and producing more real goods and stop outsourcing!!!!
Posted by: Anthony | March 31, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Kevin you asked,
All this bail out money and all I get is higher and higher credit card rates!!! THIS IS UNREAL!!! WHEN IS THE AVERAGE AMERICAN GOING TO GET HELP FROM ALL OF OUR MONEY BEING SPENT!!!!
My O my… gee…
ANSWER…… ARE YOU READY???
NEVER, SPELLED n.e.v.e.r…. that never… (smile) he fooled ya and everyone else… never will the average American get help until we are fully under socialism, then, we’ll still get little to nothing, because the commisars will need their caviar!
Posted by: Anthony | March 31, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Is any of this really surprising anyone???? Our government at its finest. Time to wake up America.
Posted by: Freedom Isn't Free | April 1, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am
Our government has been put through a Bush. Your joking if you think it can be fixed in 2 months.
The crazy part is that it can be fixed.
The stock market’s a joke though. I would rather buy property in China than watch Wall street diddle with my money.
Posted by: Jew | April 1, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am
I would like to see socialism in America – because what we have now is disgusting. Banks are being funneled money indiscriminately and the money has no strings attached. Banks are not committed to tell TARP where the money has gone – and when asked Banks WERE asked about that, they refused to answer — and got away with refusing — what’s wrong with this picture ?
When the working class taxpayer applies for a loan from a bank there is plenty of paperwork that has to be filled out – the borrower has to expose his entire life to the bank and after the bank decides he is a good or bad risk, the taxpayer can win or lose on the whim of the bank. Our government just hands billion to banks with no background check nor any strings — this is wrong.
I’d rather see that money going into programs that help people and socialism here in America would do more for Americans than is done now – we would finally have equal treatment for all people which is much overdue.
We need an oversight committee watching over Obama – if we supposedly have a transparent government, I’d like to see a lot more than what I’ve seen so far.
Posted by: Elle | April 1, 2009, 3:02 am 3:02 am
First of all…who sends “letters” still? What’s the point? Is our gov’t this wacked? I get the feeling this is still how they communicate. Send an email or pick up the phone!
Posted by: TL | April 1, 2009, 3:46 am 3:46 am
TARP is probably helps to ensure liquidity and functioning of free markets – however , it cannot create demand ( which is a good reason for GM to re-structure ), hopefully by improving consumer confidence and bank lending rates , the demand will pick up. Changing the culture takes time and this time we are committed to make the change and lead our way into a brighter future.
Posted by: Rick | April 1, 2009, 7:24 am 7:24 am
I betsy agree this adminsitration is full of smoke screens and misdirections plays and the STUPID Press still wets itself in excitement whenever they see this man.
Transparency? This government shoved a “stimulus” package thru congress without allowing time for anyone to read it, citing catastrophe or crises every other word, and the went on vacation. This goverment passed AIG bonuses they knew where in there, and then reneged on the deal with phoney outrage. This government is trying to shove thru a pork laden budget, without advertizing the last 5 years of huge deficit spending, by changing the rules for passage. This administration has done nothing but lie before, during and after the election. This government is not to be trusted on anything.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | April 1, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am
We need to put these politicians in a uniform and send them to Iraq or Afghanistan. Their tour of duty ends when they are KIA.
Posted by: ray sparks | April 1, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
What do you people expect from a “Community Organizer”…..Organiztion perhaps…. LOL !!!!!
Not A Chance!
Posted by: Mike_C | April 1, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Stall; delay; redirect! Transparancy? What’s that? It is Washington, the same old Washington that cares only for itself.
Posted by: deanbob | April 1, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Well I wanted to give the govt. the benefit of the doubt when they asked for TARP. Now it seems that the whole excercise was a way to try to protect the wall street investors (including those in Congress and others in govt). I still think that if we put money into maintaining infrastructure and setting up universal health care, we would be doing something very important as well as injecting needed cash into a shrinking economy. No more money for TARP. Take back whatever is left.
Posted by: Barbara | April 1, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Nearly every comment on this story blames the Obama administration for the current financial mess.
What are you people smoking?
This mess we are in is the result of twenty years of rampant financial irresponsibility on the part of the entire developed world.
Financial firms created ever-more-complicated financial “products” which were, in many cases, so complex that even the people who invented them were unaware of the inherent risks. Rating agencies gave AAA ratings to pure garbage, and “sophisticated” institutional investors gobbled them up like cotton candy. Regulators generally failed to recognize the risks. In some cases (like AIG) there were no regulators.
American citizens became “consumers”, who learned that they could borrow their way to “prosperity” – for a while. “Smart” “consumers” were encouraged by banks and the financial media to “tap the equity in (your) home” to buy pretty much whatever you wanted to buy. “Creative financing” lead to sub-prime mortgages that let anyone with a job buy their “dream” home.
American corporations were encouraged by “Wall Street” analysts to “grow” by borrowing more and more money. About eight years ago, Ford paid out a “special” dividend to get rid of the excess cash on their balance sheet. “Wall Street” told them it was foolish to carry that “useless” cash on their balance sheet. (Think Ford might like to have that money back?) Microsoft paid a special dividend four years ago for the same reason.
A year ago, this was all George Bush’s fault. Now, “Obama owns it”.
Give me a break!
These problems are not the result of “Liberal” policies, any more than they are the fault of “conservatives”. They are OUR FAULT. Collectively, our society is responsible, and it is “society’s” responsibility to find solutions.
Last year, the Bush administration faced a monumental crisis which threatened the very survival of our financial system. They threw every conventional monetary and fiscal tool at the problem, and conditions continued to worsen. Since September, when the Lehman failure literally “froze” the financial markets, the Treasury and the Fed have taken dramatic, unprecedented steps to keep the system intact. First Bush, and now Obama, have taken heat for borrowing and printing trillions of dollars in a frantic effort to stabilize the economy. Critics claim that all this money was wasted, since the system is still in near paralysis. Come on!
Imagine the world today with the following institutions bankrupt: AIG, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, BankAmerica, General Electric, and all the rest of the financial institutions in the world.
Don’t believe me? Ask yourself where these institutions would have gotten financing over the last six months without government guarantees of money market funds, FDIC backing on bonds, Fed and treasury purchase of commercial paper, TARP, TALF, and the expanded Discount Window.
Am I the only one out here who goes to sleep every night grateful that our leaders have pulled out all the stops to support the system? Have they done everything perfectly? No. Have they saved the system? So far, the obvious answer is YES.
Posted by: Mike | April 2, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am
The URL above links to a hot topc which people are beginning to address. “Local Law Enforcement: Are They Above the Law?” This article comments on local police violating minor traffic laws without blue lights or siren notification which drivers break and given citations.
This is a topic I would like to see addressed.
http://www.socyberty.com/Law/Local-Law-Enforcement-Above-the-Law.626063
Posted by: G. Nichols | April 6, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am
The CORRECT way to dispense Bail-out Funds should include following prerequisits:
1) First Guiding Principle is that The Treasury Department has the Fiduciary OBligaiton to protect Taxpayers’ Funds from Fraudulent use by any private enterprise, eg. Hedge Funds
@) That Bail-Out Funds should be the LAST RESORT, to minimuze government spending.
PROCEDURES PRIOR TO APPROVAL FOR BAIL-OUT:
1. Inspection & Approval of Foreclosed Assets By The County Appraiser, – to detemine the existence of such assets & to valuate these assets based on current market value. Changes in value shoould be reflected pro-rata.
2)Since Bail-Out funds are Taxpayers
The GAO must first Audit the Applicant-Bail-Out to determine Corresponding Accounts eg. Mortgage Documents, Loan Documents to CONFIRM & VERIFY if all Outstanding or Unpaid Loan Amount -or BAIL-Amount Per Unit is correct & well documented = and should CORRESPOND to APPAISED VALUE.
if all other remedies have already been exhausted by the Subject-Applicant eg:
-Auction Sale of all foreclosed assets
-Asset Management – ie the use of a Property Management Firm to maintain the properties,
- to LEASE OUT these properties WITH AN OPTION TO BUY.
2) Applicant should show sample batch of REO’s with corresponding List of Approved Buyers.
2) These Buyers – must be verified – to determine if such Buyers DO EXIST.
3) Projected Chasflor Statement & corresponding Demographics to prove that repayment of Bail-Out is feasible.
PROCEDURES UPON APPROVAL
1) Bail-Out should be first APPROVED by at least five Signatories – which represents existing regulatory bodies, eg. GAO, County Appraiser, FDIC & other appropriate agencies.
2) LETTER AGREEMENT -that should stipulate all requirements & approvals necessary for fund releases.
DISPBERSEMENTS of BAIL OUT FUNDS:
Funds should be lodged in A TRUST or ESCROW ACCOUNT – in Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, where PROGRESS RELEASES of Bail-Out Funds are have undergone scrutiny & APPROVAL.
These are measures to insure that PUBLIC FUNDS are not to be used by FRAUDULENT ENTERPRISES.
Posted by: tERRY B | April 20, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm