Mar 20, 2009 6:16pm

Democratic Senators Tepid on Geithner Support

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports:  With President Obama pronouncing his “complete confidence” in Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s leadership, we thought it might be interesting to ask members of the Senate Democratic caucus whether they agree. The answer? When their offices were contacted by ABC News, fewer than half of Senate Democrats were willing to echo the president. Of the 58 senators in the caucus — 56 Democrats and two independents — 21 answered “yes” when we asked their offices whether they have “complete confidence” in Geithner. Only one of the senators — independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont — answered “no.” Sanders voted against Geithner’s confirmation, and said through a spokesman that he sees the secretary as “part of the problem.” As for the remaining senators, quite a few didn’t respond, or a press representative said they couldn’t reach the senator to get a response. (We first made contact with all Senate offices Thursday afternoon, and gave them until Friday afternoon to respond.) Some, like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, said they never respond to surveys like this. Nonetheless, a Reid spokesman said it’s fair to characterize Reid’s support for Geithner as “complete confidence.” Then there’s another group that’s firmly on the fence on Geithner — at least publicly. The office of Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., responded by saying: “Our President has stated his support for Secretary Geithner.” The office of Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., wouldn’t answer "yes" or "no," but pointed out: “Senator Byrd did not support Mr. Geithner as Treasury Secretary.” The 21 senators who answered “yes” to our query: Baucus, Bennet, Bingaman, Boxer, Burris, Cardin, Carper, Dodd, Durbin, Gillibrand, Kerry, Klobuchar, Landrieu, Lautenberg, McCaskill, Menendez, Leahy, Reed, Schumer, Shaheen, and Warner. Even in the group expressing "complete confidence," we got some responses indicating that may not always be the case. Said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La.: “While he exercised extremely poor judgment about the AIG bonuses and must lead the effort to recoup those bonuses, I remain supportive of the Secretary for now.” Said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn.: “He has the President’s support and backing, and he has mine at this point.” Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.: "I have total confidence in President Obama and I will support the team he puts together as long as he has confidence in them." Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.: "Obviously there are lots of questions, including about the handling of the AIG bonuses, but the president’s Treasury secretary should be given a chance to do his job." This is all very unscientific. Then again, these are Democratic senators being asked whether they have full faith in a Democratic president’s Cabinet secretary, just two months into an administration. The president has gone out repeatedly in recent days to voice his full support for Geithner. It does seem to underscore the extreme scrutiny being applied to the president’s Treasury secretary in the wake of this week’s revelations surrounding AIG bonuses. Few lawmakers in either party are calling for his head, but his support on Capitol Hill is clearly not as strong as it is in the White House. ABC News’ Sara Just, Jonathan Greenberger, Jennifer Parker, Courtney Cohen, Mary Bruce, Ferdous Al-Faruque, Lindsey Ellerson, Teddy Davis, Caitlin Taylor, and Huma Khan contributed to this report.

User Comments

Nice shot Obama, don’t forget about your other foot… More incompetence just like the last guy. This is real chump “Change”.

Posted by: hmn... | March 20, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

I can’t wait for 2011, the left will say: come on… he has only been in office three years, give him a chance.

Posted by: stickman | March 20, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Tim Geithner looks like a deer caught in the headlights. I don’t need “cable chatterers” or politicians to tell me he’s in over his head. The look on his face tells me that.

Posted by: Janet | March 20, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

The President is an abject liar.
Who rammed the stimulus bill through(which contained the provisions exempting the AIG bonuses)?
Who made personal addresses to the nation demanding the stimulus bill be rammed through?
Who mocked Republicans for standing in the way of the stimulus bill?
Who appointed Geitner over the objections of many that he was a tax cheat?
Who has steadfastly defended Geitner?
The President’s frilly words mean nothing.

Posted by: Constantine XIII | March 20, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

How ridiculous. Who saw the Charlie Rose interview? Who watched his responses at the Congressional hearing? Thank God we finally have a team in place with brains in their skulls. I’ll agree that his first press conference was not a good presentation but the man is brilliant just like everyone said when the speculation swirled as to who would get the Treasury Secretary nomination. Our economy is like the bus that has skidded off the bridge and now hangs teetering over the abyss. By moving one way you potentially cause the whole thing to fall so you have to have a calculated plan to extricate yourself. The new administration inherited ALL of this and has been in office for about 8 weeks. Geithner has had his position for even less time. Get real.

Posted by: TSnow27604 | March 20, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Hey tsnow, Read my first post. When does this guy become responsible for anything? I can see it now…. the dems take office in 2032 and say “we still need to fix the failed policies of the Bush administration” Have a little back bone.

Posted by: stickman | March 20, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

The man should have been fired 3 days ago….. He is a lier and a tax cheat…. Obama is in way over his head… The man is a fool…!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Lumberman_63 | March 20, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

As things get worse and worse in America, I see Geihtner as being the fall guy for Obama and the Dem Leadership.

Posted by: Fall Guy | March 20, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Herein lies the major problem with these self-serving, narcissistic politicos . . . they’ll watch the Republic crumble before they’ll take an unpopular position. Honor and courage are simply not found in these dolts.

Posted by: rplat | March 20, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Today, unlike the other 364 days of the year, repubs are pitchfork waving populists, and 100% PC birkenstock wearing ultralibs concerning Obama’s special olympics comment.
You folks fool no one.

Posted by: Tom | March 20, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

What’s the point in constantly looking for the negative? You can’t flip a switch and everything is all hunky dory… and they said there would be mistakes and false starts and working towards solutions. Give them a chance to function, no one expected bush to leave the country in the toilet, let alone pull the handle as he walked out the door. At least this team has a brain pool, not a cess pool to pick from.

Posted by: Jo Minneapolis | March 20, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

I approve of him. So long as my 401k isn’t filled back up with speculation. I prefer real money that doesn’t disappear like flatulence in the wind

Posted by: rightbehind | March 20, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn.: “He has the President’s support and backing, and he has mine at this point.”
>>>>>> Like a cockroach with the lights off. When the light goes on he will be saying I knew he wasnt qualified.
These guys are so incompetent.

Posted by: ChicagBob | March 20, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

stickman – I think if the democrats don’t have the economy under control by middle of next 2010 they are going to lose a lot of seats to republicans. Not that that will be any better. Both politicans of both parties put themselves and their party before the needs of the average hard working American. And they are both in bed with the rich and powerful.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | March 20, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Can you just imagine the flack if Bush had appointed this guy? Note that as the media and the administration discuss the higher than projected deficit over the next four years they fail to reveal that sleeping giant the NATIONAL DEBT which every deficit increases and no president to date seems to have discussed much less tried to do anything about. We will probably be beyond any hope of recovery ever by the end of Obama’s spending. Ask your senators and congressman what they see as our future.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | March 20, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Geez folks, ease up.
It’s not like he lied about a war and got thousands of our servicemen killed or anything.

Posted by: LarryE | March 20, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Geez, I wish folks would ease up on Geithner.
It’s not like he lied about a war and caused thousand of our servicemen to unnecessarily be killed or anything.

Posted by: LarryE | March 20, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Harry Reid doesn’t care anyway as long as he gets Obama to further his agenda. Same with Pelosi. Both of the same ilk. I recall back just before the election’s how Pelosi went on a ranting about how Bush got us into this mess. But reality is Bush and his Secretary of the Treasury warned way bak in 2001 and 2003 what might become of the future bedlam on the horizon looming. But no leader of the Dems wanted to listen, especially Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. Now Dodd has backpedaled, and blames Geithner. Soap continues tomorrow.

Posted by: Steve | March 20, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Tim Geithner (and Larry Summers) know exactly what they’re doing. I think Obama insists on his entire cabinet working within the bounds of the LAW. If denying the bonuses would not have survived legal challenge, then he made the correct decision. It may not be politically popular, but its the right decision and I applaud him for having the courage to make it.
Congress should have the courage to follow his lead. Instead, they pass a bill to tax bonus payments that they know is unconstitutional and will never become law. Why did they do it? Not because it was the right thing to do but because it’s politically popular, at the moment, with their constituents. Why did 87 Republicans agree to this tax increase? Something they are philosophically opposed to? For the same reason, because it’s politically popular at the moment. Pathetic.

Posted by: AnAmericanPerson | March 20, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Allow republicans a chance to run the country and they’ll produce wealth that disappears like flatulence in the wind.

Posted by: rightbehind | March 20, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Why don’t you news people back off of the Secretary, he is just trying to do his job, back off!!

Posted by: Michael Cifala | March 20, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Why don’t you news people back off of the Secretary, he is just trying to do his job, back off!!

Posted by: Michael Cifala | March 20, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Why don’t you news people back off of the Secretary, he is just trying to do his job, back off!!

Posted by: Michael Cifala | March 20, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

He should be fired. He has no sense of what to do. He is spending our money, good money, and putting it towards bad money. What a fool. Step down Tim. You are a loser and a cheat.

Posted by: curt | March 20, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

The last thing the media needs to do is give this bunch a free ride.

Posted by: Boxcar | March 20, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Mr. President need to focus more on the problems we are facing and find solutions. This is not the time to go to some funny late night shows and crack foolish jokes.
This is like “The KIng playing violin while Rom was burning”.
I just cant digest this attitude. Be more serious Mr. President!!!!The man of Change

Posted by: shivaglal | March 20, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Tim Geithner is now in white house intensive care unit and more importantly Larry summers also their time is over and their days are numbered, they are product of the same wall street that we are talking about.

Posted by: bignkeng | March 20, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Michael Cifala It was obama that stood on his little soap box before the election and said that him and his administration should be held to a higher standard. True?

Posted by: Boxcar | March 20, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Let’s make it crystal clear. Mr. Geithner lied and cheated on his taxes, Mr. Geithner lied about knowing about the AIG bonuses along with Mr. Dodd who added them to the Pork Bill after hours. Anyone see a pattern here. Mr. President, it’s time for this guy to go back to the private sector.

Posted by: BA in KC | March 20, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

To inject a little good news, the Dow has gone up about 10% in the last 10 days. That doesn’t guarantee anything, but it has been quite a while since we have seen that. Sure, it is a very small jump compared to the cliff diving that the Dow did this past year. But it is still good news.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | March 20, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

And one other thing Mr. President, when did you know about the AIG bonuses? I mean “THE FIRST TIME”.

Posted by: BA in KC | March 20, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Geez folks, ease up.
It’s not like he lied about a war and got thousands of our servicemen killed or anything.
This administration has that scheduled for next year

Posted by: lopezf11 | March 20, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

We need an investigation about when Obama knew about the bonuses. Dodd, after denying any role in the laws language, not only fessed up on himself, he said that the administration requested the language allowing the bonuses.

Posted by: t hill | March 20, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Hello, this is like the mushrooms you see after the thunderstorm

Posted by: shivaglal | March 20, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

If not Geithner than who? Is he better than Paulson who began with the bail out mess? Is there any original thinker who can provide an economic recovery without dumping trillions in government spending? I think that there is very little courage within Government to make the hard decisions of spending cuts and slicing the deficit in half and trimming the government and so in my opinion Geithner alone cannot change the economic trends and cannot take the blame for the bail outs that have been a big waste. It is time for capitalism to take its course under strict regulation, Which means no company big or small should be allowed to stay on infinite government life support like AIG and Citi has. Someone has to say let the chips fall where they may and that decision has to come from the top because that will require real courage and dynamism and will be a high risk decision but one that may trim the incompetence and restore faith in government and begin the recovery process. If this decision was taken to let AIG go if it did not receive a bail out was taken in last September, we may have been sitting in a recovery now without the confidence in government and wall street lost. This is not Monday morning quarter backing because I said so in September 2008 and so did a majority of Americans.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | March 20, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

The “laissez faire” of our polical establishments in dealing with this mole-hill turned mountain is why we find ourselves in this quagmire. It is incredibly dangerous for our country to turn this VERY IMPORTANT issue into a political “foot ball.” The end result could become even more detrimental to our national security than the Treaty of Versailles was to the world — should it become so….

Posted by: Spartan Phoenix777 | March 20, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

“All the President’s Tax cheating Men” Just because they cheat and don’t pay taxes, doesn’t meant they aren’t honest and without integrity. NOT!

Posted by: Craig | March 20, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

I do not trust the government to “run” our economy regardless of who is in charge.

Posted by: Diana Clary | March 21, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am

I have been contemplating Geithner’s astonishing sole suvival among the tax dodging nominees who -quite rightly- got the shove. I repeat: He’s a tax dodging crook, yet he got the Revenue collecting, allocating and disbursing job. It’s unbelievable. A common poacher given the head game keeper’s job. I note that he is jewish. I hate to ask this question but would he, by chance, be the best bet for those who want to continue the US Treasury’s often illegal financial support for Israeli -again often illegal- military acquisitions?. And would this intervention on behalf of AIG bonuses have anything to do with Security Services’ -in this case the Israeli Security Services’- traditional way of creaming off private company funds to pay for their covert Intelligence activities? It would certainly provide a full explanation for his otherwise extraordinary and apparently counter-productive actions since taking office and his astonishing approval in the first place and survival up till now. Methinks it may well be Rahm Emanuel who has a lot to answer for. Sereving two masters is always a dodgy business.

Posted by: gerardmulholland | March 21, 2009, 3:13 am 3:13 am

If the President has faith in Geithner, then I have faith in Geithner….
With the economy in chaos…Geithner makes for an easy bunching boy and imo, we get the chance to see who exactly the bullies are and who are willing to roll their sleeves up and get to work to help clean up this mess.
People tend to want to put the blame on Geithner… I don’t get it…
AS a Mom who has had to clean up my fair share of messes…
And, As anybody can attest to that has ever had to clean up the mess left by others…
At first, the clean up can look really ugly and appear to actually be getting worse, but with a bit tenacity and intelligent vision, chaos can be given structure and order to become something more constructive.
Secretary Geithner has a very large mess to clean up and very often those gifted with much vision and intelligence are those same individuals that also may lack for popular appeal…
It would appear that many of our Representatives in Congress lack for both…
The Key with Geithner, the Economy and Obama and his administration is one of vision and long term…

Posted by: theafalcon200 | March 21, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am

What Obama’s administration is doing with the tax payer’s money is incredibly wrong. In fact, they are not just stopping with the current taxpayers but also will be using the taxpayers for the next few generations to pay for their spending blitz.
For those who say this mess was inherited, every president inherits from his predecessor. Bush cleaned up a recession after Clinton. The difference is he didn’t have the democrats in Congress listening to him back in 2004 when he predicted we needed more regulation for our lending institutions. Also, since Obama was part of the Congress at that point he inherited his own mess.
This collapse was brought about because the American people are spending beyond their means. How does it help the problem when the US government continues the same practice? The US government needs to scale back and stop frivolously wasting the taxpayers’ money. They also need to put money back into the citizens’ pocket with a tax credit. Once the taxpayers have a little more cash flow, then they will begin spending.

Posted by: mccollegemom | March 21, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Those Rush Limbaugh loving right-wing Neocon Democrats are at it again. Give it up. You LOST. Stop questioning Obama and his people.

Posted by: Professor | March 21, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

And only three months ago how many of our “esteemed” leaders supported him? If I recall correctly a number of politicians, economists, and corporate executives were saying that Geithner was the best option for this position. We all expect miracles but the truth is that this mess cannot be fixed in two months much less two weeks. No wonder the President can´t find anyone to accept the pending appointments in Treasury. Who in their right mind would want to become another punching bag?

Posted by: BachisBest | March 21, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Hussein Obama is a JOKE. This guy is such a phony and opportunistic politician.

Posted by: Jeff Leishing | March 21, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

The American People BEGGED Washington – Congress, the Treasury, the FED (where Geithner is from), and the Presdident – not to embark on Bailout Economics. Washington refused to listen. The result is a FISCAL DISASTER.

Posted by: blister | March 21, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

It is important to know that although the bonuses to AIG are distasteful they were no surprise to anyone least of all the the Obama administration. Geithner and Congress have be in negotiation with AIG concerning Exec compensation since Nov. Geithner is on tape discussing the bonuses in NOV, JAN, and early March. So for them to pretend to be angry and shocked is insulting to the AMERICAN PEOPLE. Dodd was asked to make the amendment by the Treasury department (Geithner) and he did it but then lied about it! But the scariest thing of all is the fact that the Federal Budget committee has issued a report which states that if they pass Obamas budget it will BANKRUPT our nation in just a few years. Yet Obama states that he is Undetered! What can we think; is he undetered to Bankrupt the Nation???

Posted by: dburger | March 21, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Give Geithner a break. America is in a gigantic financial crisis. Geithner inherited this. Why do you think it has been difficult to get him some help. Geithner has only been on job for 8 weeks. He is reportedly a brilliant hardworking man. Well respected. Give him a chance to do his job before crucifying him.
What about Bush Administration giving the ok for giving these bonuses last fall? All these arrangement were made then. Liddy was brought in/appointed by Bush administration. Present Obama administration loses credibility negating prior government agreement already agreed to.
Everyone is also blaming Dodd for the changes. But legally it would be difficult to now take away money when Bush administration approved these last fall. Publicly Bush said there would be no big bonus payouts. Behind the scenes
negotiations were going on to do just that. Present Treasury was receiving strong legal advice any laws regarding retroactive action against these bonuses would lose in court. That is why clause was inserted limiting forward contract payments after February 9, 2009. Corporations were given some leniency by paying in stocks until taxpayer money paid back. This was real good incentive for executive to make sure company thrived. Executive could not just receive these payouts/salary with no regard to profits of company. Salary was also limited until company returned to profit and taxpayer money returned. Limits were quite fair to taxpayers and corporations. I feel those restriction
in second stimulus bill were excellent considering what Bush Adminstration and his Treasury did then.
None of this excuses the corporation involved for not pursuing re-negotiation of these contracts though. These corporations are ones to blame. These corporation are quite defensive of any interference with their business. These corporation knew taxpayer that are bailing them out were getting quite angry about these payments. But they took no action. Why? Contracts are re-negotiated all the time. These corporations that are on brink of bankruptcy should have voluntarily done something. They had to have realized repercussions would explode. Salaries/retention pay/bonuses should have been changed. Such poor business decisions made considering they are losing lots of money each and every quarter.
The Tax Bill that passed through Congress is still a questionable legally. I am not sure it will eventually become law. Legislators are just scrambling frantically to the tune of outraged taxpayers.
These corporations saying they will lose executive is the “old” belief stance. All has changed. They are almost bankrupt.
Obama is not making any real commitments or taking strong stance. He says he is angry. Good for him. The legal verdict is still out on this Tax Bill. He came aboard midstream taking on inherited worst disaster in years. Prior government agreements regarding prior bailouts had already been agreed to. And there was no limit on these payments. Republicans did not want limits imposed. Democrats tried back then, but they could not get the votes at that time if limits set in huge original bailout, even among their own party. Do recall the all the “hoopla” last fall. Original bill had difficulty even passing.
Midstream it is difficult to change prior agreements legally. I feel Obama administration and legislators felt they were doing what they could do legally. Place restriction going forward. This was a just legal stance/solution.
Now we just wait to see what happens to Tax Bill. Am I angry, yes. But I am attempting to evaluate the real progression of facts. I would like to see all the legislators stop the political attacks and game playing – both sides.

Posted by: Sharon | March 21, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

For those saying we should stop questioning our government, are you for real? It is our responsibility to think for ourselves and make sure the government works for us! I will not be told what to think by Limbaugh (who I do not listen to) or Obama ( who I don’t listen to much either). Our country is still a democracy and as long as we exercise our beliefs in the correct fashion we are still able to speak up. The freedom of speech is a right given to us by the constitution as long as it continues to stand!!!

Posted by: mccollegemom | March 21, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

“All the President’s Tax cheating Men” Just because they cheat and don’t pay taxes, doesn’t meant they aren’t honest and without integrity. NOT!”.. …..I literally laughed out loud when I read this. Best post of the day!! Loved it!

Posted by: Jill | March 21, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

“”If the President has faith in Geithner, then I have faith in Geithner….”"………….I have seen many a herd mentality on these blogs, but this one takes the cake. BO only has ‘faith’ in Geithner because to remove him at this point merely reinforces the man’s inability to make quality choices to begin with. I wonder if the people in Germany said, “If Hitler has confidence in his final solution then I have faith in it too.”
Such a herd mentality cannot be tolerated by free thinking peoples.

Posted by: Jill I Am | March 21, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

The time to have been tepid over Geithner was when it was proven that he was a tax cheater. THAT was the moment the man should have stepped down and BO should have had the B***s to ask him to. Arrogance. It is alive and well in the WH and will be for 4 more years. Just because the man elected to Pres is black does NOT give him a get out of jail free card and collect however much you can.

Posted by: Jill | March 21, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Comment on headlines only: does it matter what anyone else thinks of Geithner? From what I’ve interpreted so far is, control, majority, and what ever the big Gov. wants, they get and then some.

Posted by: teaparty4.15 | March 21, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

I had to fork over a check to the IRS for around $3K because I had the ‘audacity’ to pull from my IRA to pay my kid’s tuition….I can’t imagine how much trouble I’d be in if they caught me not paying that. Yet Geitner gets away with literally thousands in unpaid taxes, so much for the ‘Audacity of Hope’.

Posted by: Bill | March 21, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Since GM is getting bail-outs too, then that means the UAW contract as well should be null/void as of TODAY, right?

Posted by: Bill | March 21, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

If it’s not too much trouble, do you think we can screen the folks lining up for jobs in Obama’s cabinet to weed out the more egregious liars, criminals and tax cheats? Heck, I’d settle for the same level of scrutiny you’d get applying to work in Mcdonalds. But inept as he is, Geithner is not the problem, any more than is Obama. They are symptoms of the disease, not the caue. The root of this disaster is the private, for profit banking cartel that likes to pretend it’s part of the federal government–I’m referring to the Federal Reserve. Please, lend your support to bill HR1207, A Bill to Audit the Federal Reserve. Cut off the head of the snake before it devours us all.

Posted by: h5mind | March 22, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Geithner and Paulson declared AIG “too big to fail” as a reason to create a bail-out. Now, we have Obama saying Geithner would still have his job, even if he wanted to quit. Obama might as well have declared Geithner’s job as “too big to fail”. Still, I don’t expect Democratic leadership to hypo-vehiculate (throw under bus) Geithner, at least, not when he has yet to unveil his plan.

Posted by: T961585 | March 22, 2009, 7:10 am 7:10 am

posted by Jill I AM..I have seen many a herd mentality on these blogs, but this one takes the cake.
Hey Jill,,,Speaking or “herd mentality” Yeah, I saw it a lot over the last 8 yrs before Obama and even after… With some people claiming Bush was the best President ever. And I see it with those whom think that Rush’s huffing & puffing is the gospel…So do you mean free thinking people according to whom??? Rush???
I also find it humorous that your type of “mentality” link my comment to any part of Hitler. Because I am betting that you voted for Palin/McCain, and from this view, Palin is a freak and would have fit beautifully into your type of mentality… yeah… what a job she would be doing now… Obama made a gaffe on Leno… Palin is a gaffe. Were you a part of that herd…?
If I had commented as you have, I would be seen as unpatriotic but, since I stated my comment because finally I see a President that I can believe and have faith in…a first in my lifetime… that makes me having herd mentality than so be it… This will be a first for me hmmm….feels fine to me…
I voted for Obama on the issues, and as President, I think he is doing a fantastic job… certainly better than the last 8yrs…
From one herd mentality to another…
Hope you have a great day!

Posted by: theafalcon200 | March 22, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am

Larry E… “lied about a war and got thousands killed” Are you referring to LBJ and the Gulf of Tonkin incident (that never happened) which he used to pull us into Viet Nam ?

Posted by: Tom Beebe | March 22, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Thea, had a fabulous day. Many thanks for your concern. As for your incorrect assumptions about whom I voted for, I can only deduce that you incorrectly assume that anyone who speaks out against BO and his entourage must be part of “the others.” I’m simply an American who knows when poor choices have been made, just like many poor choices have been made not only in the past 8 yrs but in the 200 plus years we have been a country. Once again, in as kind of tone as possible, simply because BO has faith in Geithner does not mean that ALL should have faith. I stand by my comment because Geithner IS a tax cheat. I stand by my comment because Geithner is in WAY over his head and even the dems who supported him are now “tepid” in their response. Why? Because they and every other politician are concerned about fallout -if they see the writing on the wall, they will “bailout” faster than you can say AIG. Those are not unpatriotic words thea, simply statements. So, I say to you, have a great day from one American to ……the herd.

Posted by: Jill | March 22, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Professor- It is contrite to use Lumbaugh every time President Obama’s leadership comes into question. I don’t listen to Rush and even there are millions of people who hang on his every word, he does not speak for ALL REPUBLICANS, INDEPENDENTS, OR EVEN DISGRUNTLED DEMOCRATS. He just has the loudest bully pulpit….Michael Steele is in charge of Republicans and he is articulate, calm with resolve. Glenn Beck probably is gaining momentum because he is talking issues and basics and he is not a Republican. There are many people out there who are not Republicans who oppose Obama’s rhetoric. Sean Hannity is another. We need another party…..because it is just to cozy with the Republicans and Democrats. We need a real vote that will keep the good old boys honest. Any ideas?

Posted by: Deborah | March 22, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Betcha Geithner pays his taxes THIS
year. Betcha Rangel doesn’t.

Posted by: Trajan | March 22, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Fellow Republicans , I heard that the FBI and CIA were sending covert agents to all of the tea parties to gather information/names .
Patriotic Republicans , be warned !!

Posted by: loki | March 22, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Geez, I wish folks would ease up on Geithner.
It’s not like he lied about a war and caused thousand of our servicemen to unnecessarily be killed or anything.
Posted by: LarryE | Mar 20, 2009 8:42:04 PM
————————————-
cmon larry ,get with the program (idiocy/stupidity/denial of facts)
be a real republican ,obfuscate man obfuscate!

Posted by: loki | March 22, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Hey Jill,,,Thanks I did have a pretty productive weekend…And thanks for your concern…as well
So…did you even vote in the last election…You don’t sound like you voted for Obama…You claim not to have voted for Palin/McCain… so did you throw your vote away to someone else who had no shot of winning…if so, I have to admire that,,,(sarcasm)
As far as Geithner being a tax cheat… perhaps the truth of the matter is that he simply had a poor tax preparer…If he was indeed a tax cheat and it was intentional, he would be on his way to jail…don’t you think…? Just as if you have someone who prepares your taxes, if audited, you have a chance to redeem yourself…much in the same way as Geithner had. Or would you prefer to be sent right to jail as it seems you would prefer that for Sec. Geithner. Tax evasion is different than making a mistake in your taxes…which is quite easily done since taxes are not the simplest of things to understand.
And although the Democrats may be tepid in their support of Geithner… If you pay attention, you will note that it is Republicans, although they quickly point out that he is a “tax cheat”… they are also well aware that he is the best man for the job and they really don’t want anybody else in that Geithner’s position because they honestly have another person they think could do better.
I think perhaps you and many others here (part of that herd mentality) really don’t seem to understand all that Geithner has on his plate…all that he is expected to do with the economy in chaos… that’s to be expected from a certain type of mentality…i guess.
I support this President he seems confident in Geithner and that is good enough for this American, part of a herd or not…

Posted by: theafalcon200 | March 23, 2009, 7:11 am 7:11 am

Isn’t strange the that the media demanded to know every detail of President Bush’s past, his college records, his military records, his health records, now are willing to give President Obama a pass on something as simple as a birth certificate? Why won’t the President release a copy of his original birth certificate instead of the recently generated abstract? It’s only a birth certificate, what could he be hiding?

Posted by: Terry | March 24, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.