By Lindsey Ellerson

Mar 11, 2009 5:37pm

Did Obama Blink In Earmark Battle?

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: President Obama ran for office by promising to take on Washington’s ways. But, in seeking a middle ground on earmark reform, he is delaying a major clash with Congress — and signaling a willingness to work with lawmakers in an area many hold sacred. While the president flashed more strong language in his vow to tackle earmarks, critics immediately charged that he fell short of the spirit of his campaign promises, if not the substance. Where he once promised to comb the budget “line by line to make sure we’re not spending money unwisely,” today he quietly signed a $410 billion measure with some 8,500 earmarks in it — a bill he admitted is “imperfect.” And in outlining reforms to the earmark process moving forward, he collaborated with Democratic leaders who continue to defend their right to direct pockets of money as they see fit. “The president blinked,” said Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a government watchdog group that seeks to eliminate wasteful spending. “The president missed an opportunity. He could have set a high bar. He could have fulfilled his promise to the American people to do something about spending.” “This is dithering around the edges,” Ellis added. The earmark reforms the president unveiled Wednesday were produced with the close cooperation of legislative leaders. It repackaged some provisions — including those surrounding transparency — that had already been in place. Skeptics — including Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis. — predicted that the new rules would have little real impact on how special projects are awarded to lawmakers. “Unfortunately, it looks like we’ll have to wait for more indictments and convictions before we get meaningful earmark reform,” said Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz. “The American people, even those of us who didn’t support him, expected change and expected him to do what he said he would do,” Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., said on ABC NewsNOW’s “Politics Live.” “He promised, and you know, most of us think that when another person promises something, he or she will deliver. He has not delivered.” Still, by pronouncing a continued commitment to reforming the earmarking system, the president is laying down a marker for future spending battles with Congress. The new provision giving executive agencies review power over earmarks could spark confrontations the next time lawmakers come to appropriators with lists of projects they want funded. Steve Elmendorf, a veteran Democratic strategist, said the president’s commitment to fiscal discipline and earmark reform will provoke a clash with senior Democrats and Republicans. “There are a lot of people in Congress, in both parities, who feel very seriously about the prerogatives of Congress to help write the budget,” Elmendorf said. “Next year’s budget, they’re going to be under enormous pressure.” Earmarks weren’t a top-tier issue for Obama during the campaign trail, certainly not like they were for McCain. But the issues surrounding special projects are too high-profile for the president to ignore, Elmendorf said. “It fits in his overall message frame, in changing things and how they work,” he said. More on this topic, with me and ABC’s David Muir, on today’s “World News Webcast.”

User Comments

The omibus bill was “done” before President Obama’s took office….HELLO..THIS WAS GEORGE W. BUDGET TO 10/09 that wasn’t signed before he left office. This omibus bill was done 18 months ago…..President Obama’s budget for 2011 has not been written and debated yet. The Republicans know this….They are still reaching for “straws”. That’s why I would never, ever return to this party again. They are so…..yesterday with their dishonesty.

Posted by: sngeorgia | March 11, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

He didn’t blink. HE CLOSED HIS EYES!

Posted by: Geo | March 11, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

George Bush Budget… Who Cares!! Barack Obama said “He would not sign any bill that came across his desk that had earmarks..” He did not say unless it came from the George bush era… We got change alright – earmarks for the Dems vs earmarks from the Repubs. Change from one hand to the other and either way, the American people get the shaft. Thanks Mr. President for the flip flop again. I guess you can’t take on your own party can you?

Posted by: obiwon | March 11, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

It is quite funny that to this date President Obama acts like he is candidate Obama. Let’s keep blaming the other and give us the half truth every politician gives and hopes that we will forget their promises. I do not believe that he should had signed this bill and the others to date without at least trying to get his “reforms” and “new ways” into Washington. Unfortunately, he is a politician, so he would do whatever it takes to get elected then see where he realy stands on any of his issues.

Posted by: Juan | March 11, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Beginning to sound like the broken promises made to the American Indians.

Posted by: William | March 11, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Here are some earmarks
#2 Shelby – 64 individual earmarks total $114,484,250
#3 Bond – 54 individual earmarks total $95,691,491
#5 Cochran – 65 individual earmarks total $75,908,475
#6 Murkowski – 71 individual earmarks total $74,000,750
#8 Inhofe – 34 individual earmarks total $53,133,500
#9 McConnell – 36 individual earmarks total $51,133,500

Posted by: clm | March 11, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

He lies like a rug. Either that or he is Dumber Than Dirt!

Posted by: jaki30 | March 11, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Way to go Obama! This administration sounds like all the others. LIES! LIES! LIES! Say anything to get into office and then DO WHATEVER THE HECK YOU WANT! So this is the CHANGE we got! Pathetic. The budget may have been crafted under Bush’s reign, but you said you wouldn’t sign a budget that had earmarks! What a LIAR! I’m thoroughly disgusted! More business as usual!

Posted by: Colin | March 11, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Obama didn’t have the GUTS to stand up against earmarks like he promised. This guy says one thing and does another. Disgusting !!!

Posted by: CW | March 11, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

He had the chance to veto the bloody thing but wimped out big time. We are all aware that the omnibus bill was concocted before obama took over but guess what he is in charge now. He signed it. He did not have to. What happened to his “line by line” promise??

Posted by: pesiri | March 11, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

We will go through our federal budget – page by page, LINE by LINE – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way.”
That’s what he said during the campaign.
Now, what happened was the “N” was deleted. I guess he doesnt like the “N” letter, so the federal budget went LIE by LIE.
So where is the change? You got bamboozled i think.

Posted by: Danny | March 11, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Did Obama Blink In Earmark Battle?
=======
Are you accusing our Greatest Smartest Clueless Leader something?

Posted by: kat | March 11, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

The omibus bill was “done” before President Obama’s took office….HELLO..THIS WAS GEORGE W. BUDGET TO 10/09 that wasn’t signed before he left office. This omibus bill was done 18 months ago…..President Obama’s budget for 2011 has not been written and debated yet. The Republicans know this….They are still reaching for “straws”. That’s why I would never, ever return to this party again. They are so…..yesterday with their dishonesty.
Posted by: sngeorgia
————————————-
Done 18 months ago? Really. So did they know in June of 2007 that in the spring of 2009 that congress would need this.

Posted by: DJ | March 11, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

sngeorgia said “The omibus bill was “done” before President Obama’s took office….HELLO..THIS WAS GEORGE W. BUDGET TO 10/09 that wasn’t signed before he left office. ” And all Obama would have to have done was say he wasn’t going to sign it until all the earmarks were out of it. It doesn’t matter when it was written. This is why the President (no matter who is in office) needs the line-item veto.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | March 11, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

In my opinion, the whole “last year’s bill” justification is a giant cop-out. Fact is, it’s this year’s bill spending this year’s money, and that’s why the President has veto power. He could do the right thing (like he promised during the campaign) but just doesn’t feel like it.

Posted by: Open-Mind | March 11, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Um, sngeorgia, I don’t think that’s Bush’s signature on the bill. He could have sent it back but he chose to sign it. It’s his budget.

Posted by: Oh Please | March 11, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

He had the chance to veto the bloody thing but wimped out big time. We are all aware that the omnibus bill was concocted before obama took over but guess what he is in charge now. He signed it. He did not have to. What happened to his “line by line” promise??
Posted by: pesiri | Mar 11, 2009 6:10:35 PM
=====
That’s the prices point, pesiri. He has the chance, he has the chance to correct the “wrong” done by Bush (actually more by his supporters in this bill), as he has been doing.
Well, there is payback time. If someone supported him to get into office, he will reward them by raising campaign contributions, campaigning for them on Air Force one, keeping their earmarks for their districts so that they will be re-elected. This is typical, in Chicago, Blago style. The only difference is that poor bloody Blago got caught.

Posted by: two cats | March 11, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Give Obama the chance to settle down in the white house and get the economy back on track and you fellows will be talking differently. I have confidence in Obama to do the right thing for the American people. Give him a little time. Right now, he is busy cleaning up the mess left over by—you know who.

Posted by: what667 | March 11, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

This bill could have been amended any way Obama saw fit. He was happy to sign it with the 8% spending increase and the pork. Just admit it, you guys believed every word he said. You would probably still believe him if he said “there’s no earmarks in this bill”. If Obama said it, it must be true. LOL.

Posted by: Don | March 11, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Obama should have been far firmer/tougher with Congress on earmarks. Congress is like a little child. If you aren’t firm at the start when the child misbehaves, they’ll continue the misbehavior and then start pushing to see what else, or how much, misbehavior they can get away with. Obama is simply setting himself up for a lot more grief down the road by being lax now.

Posted by: Terrence O'Day | March 11, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Can someone take that teleprompter out of the podium?
Best of all, up load a wrong speech. It will be cool to see what our Smartest Clueless Leader will read. Betya he will give the speech on the teleprompter.

Posted by: kat | March 11, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

what667 I would say he blew one of his best opportunties to clean up a mess by signing this porker. I see no change here.

Posted by: boxcar | March 11, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

One more thing to add … it would be one thing to just break a campaign promise … that’s “typical politician” stuff. But completely unacceptable is President Obama’s deliberately irresponsible levels of spending during what he calls an econmic “crisis” and “catastrophe”. His spending is several times more than what Bush spent while the economy seemed healthy.
If the US dollar collapses due to a US bankruptcy, history will not blame that on President Bush.

Posted by: Open-Mind | March 11, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

According to Jake tapper on Political Punch this is what Obama had to say about earmarks:
But he pledged to work with Congress to reform the earmark process:
* requiring Members of Congress to post earmark requests on their websites and subject them to hearings;
* subjecting earmarks for for-profit companies to a competitive bidding process; and
* pledging to remove future earmarks without any legitimate public purpose.
No this doesn’t sound like No Earmarks to me, and has he really had a chance to work with Congress?

Posted by: Thinking | March 11, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Let be realistic to the effort that President Obama is trying to achieve for the America People.
Of course you know that both sides are still playing politics as usual. But make “NO” mistake that as the days and months go by this type of rhetoric from both side will have to stop.
We as the America people have more at stake in the process than we exercise and have in the pass.
So before we begin to play the blame game, let’s remember what type of
government we have.
One of the people, by the people and for the people, So the question is where are the People!!!
So stop all this blame game and let start going back to the “basics”.
The only way that Washington is going to change their attitude is WE THE PEOPLE begin to raise our voices with a cry that this land and this generation will begin to mark and remember.
That, this is the generation of CHANGE and this is a time for CHANGE.

Posted by: Concern | March 11, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

I cannot believe the incredible lack of comprehension and in many comments, the extreme disrespect for our President. At the risk of having the “race card” thrown in my face, I do have to wonder if the same level of disrespect would be served up if Mr. Obama was white.
To those of you who are quick to call him a liar, or say that he is “dumb as dirt”, you might want to brush up on the legislative process before crucifying President Obama for signing the Omnibus bill drafted under the watch of GWB.
Anyone who knows anything about how our democracy operates certainly knows that the Congress is infinitely more powerful than any President could ever hope to be. While a president can push reform, its passage is subject to the will and whim of powerful Congressional leaders who often get elected under the guise that they will serve their home territories well by being in Washington. Sure, the President can veto a particular part of the budget, but it is the members of Congress who can override these vetoes.
The President is a figurehead who can guide legislation and enact executive orders, but the real power-base is deep in the halls of Congress. Many Senators and Republicans have served for decades and it is the longstanding privilege of their office(s) which place them in a position of near absolute authority.

Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Of the top ten Senators requesting highest # of earmarks 5 of them are Republicans,
#1 Specter – 134 individual earmarks = $25,320,000
#2 Murkowski – 71 individual earmarks = $74,000,750
#3 Chochran – 65 individual earmarks = $75,908,475
#4 Shelby – 64 individual earmarks = $114,484,250
#8 Bond – 54 individual earmarks = $85,691,491

Posted by: clc | March 11, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Do you really this these Senators are going to be “bipartisan” if it means giving up this kind of money?

Posted by: clm | March 11, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

How long are Dems gonna blame Bush? I mean really. Let us know right now Dems so that when that date is up we can start…lol. 4 years from now you
Dems will still be blaming Bush…it’s a sickness.

Posted by: Mike | March 11, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

It is interesting that Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., would say “He promised, and you know, most of us think that when another person promises something, he or she will deliver. He has not delivered.”
Obama is making good on all his promises much to the consternation of the Republican’s they do not know what to do when they meet someone who says what they do and then does what they said. They are use to saying lies to get elected and then doing what they please. If the president tries to reform health care and create a REAL energy policy he is doing too much and he needs to concentrate on the economy, if he decides to put off a fight on the line items in the budget he is not doing enough. By the way if any of you people care to read the budget you would see that there are MORE REPUBLICAN EARMARKS per REPUBLICANS THAN Democratic earmarks relative to the representation. (I guess it is asking too much for people to read the bill themselves) What is true is that REPUBLICANS were in charge for 12 YEARS, remember they took over congress the second year of the first Clinton administration and they are SOLELY responsible for the mess we are in. They had absolute power and it corrupted absolutely. So for all you ditto heads that have not even read the bill and did not even see who put the EARMARKS in the bill because you just repeat what you are told, try thinking for your self and give up repeating what your messiah Rush has told you.

Posted by: American Patriot | March 11, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

What’s the deal, Mr. President? Why no media showcase trip to Denver to tout this bill? You could have sent it back and even Rush would have had to give you a bit of respect. But no…you signed that bloated piece of legislation and now you have to sneak it around like some fat cougar you picked up at last call. Good luck with that.

Posted by: Ed | March 11, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Well, I’d like to take a moment to personally thank ABC and the rest of the MSM for your treasonous support of candidate Obama, your constantly glowing reviews of him and his completely empty background, your unwillingness to even do basic vetting on this charlatan (you know, he really is a socialist, even belonged to the young socialists – yet you folks in the MSM chose not to report it at all or gloss over it). All of you went into a hyperventilating fever to jump on Palin’s lack of experience – but ignored the fact that she had far more executive experience than he did – BUT SHE WASN’T RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, HE WAS! You waxed on and on about his being a community activist, but ignored the fact that he was a COMPLETELY FAILED COMMUNITY ACITIVIST – and then tried desperately to seperate him from ACORN. You made the point time and again about how educated his supporters were (of course, most intelligent people know being ‘educated’ and being ‘intelligent’ are vastly different – I wonder if his educated supporters were the same ones you showed on inauguration night, jumping for joy that Obama was going to pay for their house, their gas, give them a job and make white people pay for what ‘they did’… yes, very educated and intelligent supporters he’s got there).
You claimed he rarley brought up race, yet the man spent the entire campaign race baiting then trying to blame it on someone else (HELLO – remember what he did to HRC when she correctly *gasp* pointed at the Johnson and the Congress passed civil rights legislation?)
This empty suited loser should have never made it out of the primaries, but you in the MSM proved your bias with every broadcast, with every issue, with every newspaper – you chose ideology over your so called ‘journalitic integrity’ and this scumbag received unwarranted acclaim and praise and it’s likely that got him elected.
You made light of his margin of electoral victory, but failed to mention that he only rec’d votes from 35% of registered voters… some mandate he’s got when he represents 35% of the voting public, huh?
Even now, when you take what amounts to a glancing blow, you rein in your criticsm – oh, it’s not his fault. He showed huge character and decision making flaws, you ignored it, and he appointed what amounts to the worst, most corrupt cabinet one could imagine. His failures are glaring and constant and we, the people are paying for it dearly – let’s hope, for your sakes, when the American people finally have had enough that you folks in the media are ready because as far as many of us are concerned you commited treason and should be tried and executed for it!

Posted by: DJH | March 11, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Rob “I cannot believe the incredible lack of comprehension and in many comments, the extreme disrespect for our President. At the risk of having the “race card” thrown in my face, I do have to wonder if the same level of disrespect would be served up if Mr. Obama was white.”
Oh – you mean like the level of respect that was shown President Bush? Or President Clinton? No one is treating Obama any different. As for my opinion, I wouldn’t care if he was purple with orange polka dots…. I’m against everything this man stands for. I believe in small government, personal responsibility and low taxes.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | March 11, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

@Open-Mind; that’s an interesting username – doesn’t seem to fit with your statement about Obama. “…But completely unacceptable is President Obama’s deliberately irresponsible levels of spending …”
Take a moment to see what Bush spent billions of dollars on…. War, bulking up the military and tax cuts for the super-wealthy. What is Obama spending money on? Fixing the TARP legislation, rescuing the economy, reinvesting in America, securing affordable healthcare and addressing the funding inequalities in our schools, libraries and various public systems.
Under Bush, some $350 billion was spent with little or no understanding of where it went or how it was used. V.P. Cheney had close ties to Haliburton who only now has agreed to repay the American people for some level of wrongdoing.
Surely no administration is perfect, but history will almost always tell us that Democrats spend to help those in need while Republicans spend to help themselves and the hell with the rest of us.

Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Most of the Republican Pork….
Shelby (AL) $114,484,250
Bond (MO) $85,691,491
Cochran (MS) $75,908,475
Murkowski (AK) $74,000,750
Inhofe (OK) $53,133,500
McConnell (KY) $51,186,000
Specter (PA) $25,320,000
Martinez (FL) $18,758,000
Voinovich (OH) $13,501,000
Brownback (KS) $12,020,048
Gregg (NH) $10,028,000
Hutchison (TX) $9,851,000
Graham (SC) $9,545,000
Alexander (TN) $5,402,000
Kyl (AZ) $4,950,000
Wicker (MS) $4,324,000
Thune (SD) $4,275,000
Chambliss (GA) $4,253,000
Sessions (AL) $4,250,500
Vitter (LA) $4,034,000
Barrasso (WY) $2,713,000
Cornyn (TX) $2,518,000
Roberts (KS) $2,202,000
Enzi (WY) $1,725,000
Isakson (GA) $1,425,000
Burr (NC) $1,284,000

Posted by: clc | March 11, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

For those who say people who criticize Obama are racist did you really hear all the criticism of President George Bush. BTW, he is a white man!!! Why can’t people express negative opinions about Obama without being called racist? I disagree with Obama over his spending, taxation, abortion, education, bail-outs, and now the lack of leadership on earmarks. It is in our freedom of speech to be able to express our opinion, at least for now.

Posted by: mccollegemom | March 11, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

@ellsbells930 -it sure is nice to dream.

Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Now we know!
Obama is not man of authenticity or integrity. He is a coward and an obfuscating (lying), salesman with an Obama/Pelosi agenda that uses “the people” as pawns! :(
If Obama had an ounce of intestinal fortitude, he would have vetoed this bill!
The democrats controlled congress last year. Bush threatened to veto this bill. So the dems waited for the wimp to get to the White House.
History will give Bush high marks for success in Iraq and protecting the USA.
Obama will be a one term obfuscating, pseudo intellectual POTUS who reads a teleprompter and has no idea what he is doing!
And, I am no far-left or far-right wing-nut!

Posted by: aware2u | March 11, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

@mccollegemom – I never called anyone racist. I merely speculated how it might be different if Obama weren’t black. But that issue aside – you are entitled to your opinions and disagreements.

Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

For those blaming the Republicans for the earmarks, you may want to recheck your math. While they are in no way blameless, 60% of the earmarked money is going to the democrats’ special interests while the rest will be going to Republicans’ interests. This could all have been stopped if Obama had done what he promised on the campaign trail. I think you guys are trying to rationalize another broken campaign promise away.

Posted by: mccollegemom | March 11, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Why do these arguments always become a distraction due to one person’ s definition of what they think pork is versus another’s definition of stimulus to save or create a job(s)? Shouldn’t we all be able to understand how bad unemployment and the economy is and look at the bigger picture of how we need the next four to five years to go and work together to make that happen? I know my 401(k) would appreciate that.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 11, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Bush threatened to veto this budget but the wimp passed it!
Obama has not done anything to fix the economy but read his teleprompter with its obfuscating rhetoric!
He is an arrogant, incompetent “fairy tale” and a losing “roll of the dice” just like President Clinton said!

Posted by: aware2u | March 11, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

I think the point is there are Republican and Democrat Senators and Congressmen that feel they are entitled to all of this money. Barack Obama can’t make them change. We as Americans can.

Posted by: clm | March 11, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

What is all this nonsense with the teleprompter? Fact*: Presidents have been using teleprompters for more than half a century, but none relied on them as extensively as Obama has so far. I’d rather hear a speech by Obama which holds true to its original words, than listen to a lackluster diatribe like what GWB offered up to us for the last 8 years. *Source: International Herald Tribune.

Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Democrats give tidbits to “the people” with one hand and take it and more back with the other hand so they can amass power and gain control!
This does not elevate “the People!” It degrades and dehumanizes them! :(

Posted by: aware2u | March 11, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Obama’s teleprompter speeches demonstrate a total lack of active listening.
He preaches with the tactics of a cult leader or a used car salesman! He is an abominable, obfuscating, communicator and a total bore!
But even worse – he is all talk – no walk! :(

Posted by: aware2u | March 11, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Rob said “@ellsbells930 -it sure is nice to dream.” It shouldn’t be a dream. It is how our country was created to be.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | March 11, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Earmarks will never go away – and most American don’t want them to or simply don;t care. This is a bipartisan “problem” that has gone on as long as Congress has existed. Everyone wants a project – or twenty – to tout to their eager constituents.
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | March 11, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

clm obama said in his campaign speeches that they would have to change under his watch. I see no change

Posted by: boxcar | March 11, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Robotic Obama behaves and speaks mechanically and emotionlessly. He is arrogantly cool/cold and appears to care only about appearances :(
This media created idol is just a fantasy!

Posted by: aware2u | March 11, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

BLINK?? Its like someone gouged his eyeballs out.

Posted by: joe | March 11, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

For a while I thought he was using teleprompters but now I realize he’s been shaking his head “no” while he addresses us, meaning whatever I’m saying just ain’t so.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | March 11, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Mr. President, You lied,I don’t care if the earmarks were for the Repub. or Dems, how about the American people who believed you when you said, “no bill will be signed with earmarks”. Why would you lie to the American people Mr. President?

Posted by: BA in KC | March 11, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Mr. President, You lied,I don’t care if the earmarks were for the Repub. or Dems, how about the American people who believed you when you said, “no bill will be signed with earmarks”. Why would you lie to the American people Mr. President?
Posted by: BA in KC
______________
your a lying peice of trash. Do you have any proff.

Posted by: hat gorl | March 11, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

For a while I thought he was using teleprompters but now I realize he’s been shaking his head “no” while he addresses us, meaning whatever I’m saying just ain’t so.
Posted by: mmonroeliveson
_______________________
did someone cave your skull in or do you naturally think like an ape

Posted by: hat gorl | March 11, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Pelosi owns him while the Dems have the audacity to talk about Cheney running the country.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | March 11, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

hat gorl; Anything to say beyond insults? My sympathies to you. The truth is really hard to swallow after so much HOPE for CHANGE.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | March 11, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

“your a lying peice of trash. Do you have any proff.” What is this supposed to be? ‘your’…. shouldn’t that be ‘you’re’? ‘peice’….shouldn’t that be ‘piece’? ‘proff’… shouldn’t that be ‘proof’? I think ‘hat gorl’ needs to realize that the insults he/she is slinging are grounds for a lawsuit. To call someone a “lying piece of trash”, without proof that the person is lying or piece of trash is grounds for a libel suit.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | March 11, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Rob,
Your defense of 0-bama is disgraceful at best.
The fool is incompetent, as you show yourself to be with every one of your statements.
No earmarks means no earmarks. Its called a veto, idiot. Who controls Congress if you are so worried about an override?
You are a socialist Marxist 0-bama fool probably on welfare in a big house you lied on your mortgage application to get and now you will get bailed out.
You are a pathetic Liberal. You clowns got some circus going :)

Posted by: Sam Adams | March 11, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Oh dear, 0-bama is dividing the country with his recklessness and utter shameful used-car salesman tactics.

Posted by: Little Old Lady | March 11, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

The man flat out lied. Time and time again. When does stupid American public figure it out. Or is everybody on some kind of government assistance?
That’s what Obama wants. He suckered you fools who voted for him and YOU KNOW IT NOW!!!

Posted by: John Hancock | March 11, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Obama lies and lies and lies
Obama spends and spends and spends
Kool-Aid drinkers — How do you guys seriously live with yourselves?

Posted by: Change You Got | March 11, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

I am sorry I voted for Obama. He is out of his league for sure. He lied for sure. I believed him and I am angry.
Line by line. I will never believe Obama again. Or another Democrat. Tax cheats, all of them.

Posted by: John | March 11, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Wow. Obama has guts. He must not like the White House too much.
Are you proud of America now everybody?
When does this spending madness STOP?
I voted for Obama. I lost my faith a while ago…

Posted by: Paul from New York | March 11, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Obama knew it was a lost cause… it was almost a veto proof spending bill and congress would have just added more pork to get the 5 extra Senate votes. This would have been a perfect storm if he would have vetoed the bill. The first show down and he would have lost in a crushing defeat. The president is not going to say ‘no’ to spending… and congress has no reason to say ‘no’…

Posted by: None of the Above | March 11, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

You people are all racist.
You don’t hate Obama because he is a community organizer who has no idea how to govern or responsibly spend money as in any normal household.
You hate Obama because he is a socialist Marxist wealth re-distributionist bent on destroying America as YOU know it.
King God Obama reigns. Get used to it!

Posted by: Liberal Defender of Garbage | March 11, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

0-BAMA IS A LOST CAUSE
Yes we can. Spend ourselves to death.

Posted by: american | March 11, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Bloody fool Obama is a bad show, mate
Don’t care, don’t live here :)

Posted by: punk rock band | March 11, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Yes, President Obama blinked. The horrible realization that he is a party figurehead instead of the most powerful man in the world was so absolutely shocking to him he must have blinked several times. From this point on the President is a paper tiger and everyone in Washington knows it. I’m sure that everyone in the Senate and House are getting a good laugh at his harsh words (which are ONLY words).

Posted by: Publius | March 12, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

“Words….just words” B. Obama-campaign
2008. Trouble is…..he needs a tele-
prompter to ask the press to be seated.

Posted by: Trajan | March 12, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

None of the Above said “Obama knew it was a lost cause… it was almost a veto proof spending bill and congress would have just added more pork to get the 5 extra Senate votes.” So what? He would have made a stand and showed that he meant business. This shouldn’t be about “winning” and “losing”, it should be about standing by you promises and doing what is right. Even though I didn’t vote for him & I disagree with virtually every policy of his, I thought he was sincere in his pledge of “not business as usual”.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | March 12, 2009, 6:32 am 6:32 am

So Obama gets a free ride on signing this bill because Pelosi is to blame for writing it. He says congress loaded it up and I don’t like it so it’s not my fault. Like they didn’t have it planned. Pelosi doesn’t care about finger pointing, knows it’s just part of politics. So now that he’s signed a second stimulus package with pork he says he’ll change the way business is done in Washington. Meanwhile we’re out of another 410 billion. When will ABC start to call it what it is? We’re being fleeced.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | March 12, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am

ellsbells930 – … “I thought he was sincere in his pledge of ‘not business as usual’.” HAHAHAH, ROTFLOL!!! That’s funny… hahahaha! You gotta know when to hold ‘em and know when to fold ‘em. Obama knows it’s time to hold ‘em and there’s no loss in for signing. It’s your money he’s spending, what does he care? You didn’t vote for him and you have expectations? HAHAHAH!

Posted by: None of the Above | March 12, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Mr. Obama is adding $3.2 trillion to the national debt in his first 20 months in office, surpassing the $2.9 trillion added during the Bush presidency’s entire eight years.
Obama is a liar and a politician. For the third straight election… this country blew it. When all is said and done…George W. Bush and Barack H. Obama will have destroyed this country.
UnF’nBelievable….!

Posted by: Michael | March 13, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am

None of the Above – It is possible to not agree with a person’s politics & still like the person.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | March 13, 2009, 6:46 am 6:46 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.