Economic Boat’s Not Taking on Water, But Not Pumped Out Yet, Hoyer Says
ABC News’ Matt Jaffe reports: After Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner addressed the House Democratic Caucus this evening, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said the closed-door session was "not contentious," but Democrats did express concerns about the use of taxpayer funds as the Obama administration tries to lift the country out of its recession.
"The members of the caucus clearly raised the great concerns that the American people have about the amounts of money involved and about the effectiveness of that money," Hoyer said. "Secretary Geithner said that the administration shared that concern with the American public, but believed that not to have taken the action we’ve taken would have — in the short term, not so much in the very long term — caused an even greater loss to the economy, a greater loss of jobs, as severe as the loss of jobs has been."
However, the Maryland Democrat cautioned that Geithner’s attempts to convince Congressional Democrats that the administration’s actions are working is another challenge altogether.
"Secretary Geithner indicated that he believes that what we are doing is working, but the problem with working, of course, is that that means it’s not getting worse," he said. "Obviously the first effort was and had to be to stop the deterioration in the stability of the economy. It’s very difficult to show any of us progress when all you’re doing is stopping — the boat’s not taking on more water, but you haven’t yet pumped it out.
"I think Secretary Geithner is obviously trying to do and is doing the best job he can, given the circumstances that he inherited. This administration, I think, has done more than any administration, perhaps in history, including the [Franklin D.] Roosevelt administration, in a month, a little over a month, to beat a crisis that confronted it both here economically and abroad militarily in foreign policy. There’s still an ongoing desire to work with and to support this administration and Secretary Geithner in meeting this crisis."
With so much taxpayer money at stake, Hoyer emphasized that Congress will be focusing on strict oversight of how funds are spent.
"It is not acceptable for taxpayers to be asked to invest substantial sums of money in getting credit moving and stabilizing the housing market and not having that happen," he said.
Hoyer noted that the possibility of the administration seeking more money to address the financial crisis did not come up in the meeting.
"Secretary Geithner believes that it is working," Hoyer said. "This is not going to happen overnight and we need to stay the course."
Also after tonight’s meeting, with the Treasury Department under criticism for being short-staffed, a Democratic source told ABC News that Geithner told members of Congress that he will unveil his domestic team this week.
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
If Congress is worried so much about needlessly spending taxpayer money how about giving the axe to that omnibus bill now before them that is loaded down with thousands of earmarks and includes an 8 % spending hike. What’s going on here? To pass this oinker calling it last year’s business is an outrage.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 10, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Just remember what President Obama inherited it isn’t a pretty picture. I don’t care how much it takes to get this country on it’s feet again, I am just tired of sending my money to Iraq. Earmarks be dammed if they get people working again> Just like pork what is pork in one state is a necessity in another state they may not need air conditioning in Maine but they do in Death Valley. It is about time we have a president concentrating on the USA Lets give the man a break and help not complain, if you see litter on the ground pick it up and put it where is belongs, don’t just complain about it.
Posted by: Rose Szymanski | March 10, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Now that the snow along the highways have melted has anyone seen all the trash laying where the snow was, now that would give a few people jobs may be temp jobs but it is a job to clean it up, I even saw a boot and hubcaps.
Posted by: Rose Szymanski | March 10, 2009, 7:44 am 7:44 am
To the Victors go the spoils–straight out of your wallet! Here’s some “emergency stimulus” spending for you.
BOSTON – More than one out of every five dollars of the $126 million Massachusetts is receiving in earmarks from a $410 billion federal spending package is going to help PRESERVE THE LEGACY OF THE KENNEDYS.
The bill includes $5.8 million for the planning and design of a building to house a new Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the Senate. The funding may also help support an endowment for the institute.
The bill also includes $22 million to expand facilities at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library & Museum and $5 million more for a new gateway to the Boston Harbor Islands on the Rose Kennedy Greenway, a park system in downtown Boston named after Kennedy’s mother and built on land opened up by the Big Dig highway project.
Posted by: Pork Out on Spending?? YES WE CAN! | March 12, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am
1. Reduce dependency on foreign oil. The oft discussed, never implemented option of increased drilling in our own fields is shut off again. That 10 years from approval to refining is just like tomorrow – it NEVER comes. 2. Unambiguous campaign promises to end pork & earmarks. at the very first opportunity to “walk the talk”, our leadership has let us down again. The excuse of “last year’s business” just won’t fly. Dealing w/ congress is like raising kids. Every time you say no & then turn a blind eye, you open the door to more of the same. 3. “We won;t allow lobbyists to work for the government in the area where they lobbied” (paraphrased). Less than 60 days into the administration, there have already been waivers issued for 2 of these people. What should we expect from leadership that got its start in the Chicago political system – complete with all the inferences that entails. PS. Watch for the Employee Free Choice Act – an opportunity for jobsite elections to be monitored by a private entity in lieu of an impartial agency & to do so while eliminating the secret ballot – a mainstay of our system.
Posted by: Steve from Illinois | March 13, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm