Emblems to Stamp Projects Funded by the Stimulus Package
ABC News’ Sunlen Miller reports: Put a stamp on it — that’s what the White House says. President Obama announced today that his administration will begin stamping an emblem on projects funded by the economic stimulus package so that people can easily recognize the effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. All projects will be stamped with the ARRA logo (short for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and lists the recovery.gov website on the emblem. In remarks at the Department of Transportation this morning, Mr. Obama referenced the new emblems. “We’re also making it easier for Americans to see what projects are being funded with their money as part of our recovery. So in the weeks to come, the signs denoting these projects are going to bear the new emblem of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act,” Obama said. “These emblems are symbols of our commitment to you, the American people — a commitment to investing your tax dollars wisely, to put Americans to work doing the work that needs to be done. So when you see them on projects that your tax dollars made possible, let it be a reminder that our government — your government — is doing its part to put the economy back on the road of recovery.” Obama, who was at the Transportation Department to highlight the 150,000 specific jobs that would be saved or created under highway spending from the recovery act, also said that transportation specific projects would don a second emblem – bearing the word TIGER (short for Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery). — Sunlen Miller

Email
Chrysler Super Bowl Ad Pro-Obama?
President Obama Tops Mitt Romney in New Poll
I say this really in jest, but it’s really not necessary. I thought recovery gov was going to provide that info?
Posted by: KR | March 3, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
It’s an O.
The recovery emblem is an O.
Posted by: MayBee | March 3, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Again, we have cheap marketing tricks in lieu of actual, substantive benefit. It’s become a hallmark of this administration already.
But then again, what is a cult of personality without iconography and meaningless sloganeering?
Posted by: Flyover Country | March 3, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Rush Limbaugh wants our President to fail. Do republicans in Congress agree with him?
Posted by: Mark | March 3, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
======Rush Limbaugh wants our President to fail.=====
I agree with what Rush said. However, I do not agree with what Mark said Rush said.
Posted by: Sue | March 3, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
How is the identification of a stimulus project that we’ve paid for amount to iconography and meaningless sloganeering? Perhaps you’re confusing your rhetoric with accountability to tax payers.
Posted by: kat the real one | March 3, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Don’t all these symbols from the Obama administration make you feel kind of creeped out?
Posted by: Sue | March 3, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
The funniest part is Biden is the sheriff, according to Obama. I want to see him wearing a tin star.
Posted by: Sue | March 3, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
kat thro-How is the identification of a stimulus project that we’ve paid for amount to iconography and meaningless sloganeering
=======================
Because it is in the shape of his initial and signature campaign logo.
Posted by: MayBee | March 3, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Flyover,
Obama is actually taking steps to undo the mess that he inherited. You can either get on board with the program, or continue to sit there in flyover country and whine. Your choice….
Posted by: gizmo | March 3, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Hey Jake – if I see more mexican illegals working on the side of the road, should I feel better about my country?
Posted by: heavenislikethis | March 3, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
I’d be more accurate to put the $ amount placed on that lamp post the ARRA will build.
“This lamp post will cost your children $500,000″
“This home loan will cost your children $600,000, too bad they’ll never live there.”
Thanks, 52! Ya’ll rock.
Posted by: lorien1973 | March 3, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
MayBee:”Because it is in the shape of his initial and signature campaign logo.”
Always good for a laugh. Now anything ’round’ is Obama’s personal icon! If he wanted a personal logo, I would have expected the inner divisions to be rotated 90 deg to imply a B too.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 3, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Rush Limbaugh, exact quote:
“I would be honored if the Drive-By Media headlined me all day long: “Limbaugh: I Hope Obama Fails.” Somebody’s gotta say it.”
Posted by: jhw539 | March 3, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
“How is the identification of a stimulus project that we’ve paid for amount to iconography and meaningless sloganeering? Perhaps you’re confusing your rhetoric with accountability to tax payers.”
Actually, this administration has ZERO accountability to taxpayers. It’s why trillions of dollars in spending has been rushed through in the last 6 weeks. It’s never been about a “stimulus”…it’s about exacerbating a nation’s growing reliance on the government dole. The logos and lip-service to accountability are nothing more than smoke and mirrors to obscure the fact that President Obama has mortgaged this country’s future on programs designed to permanently increase the size of government.
President Bush was fiscally irresponsible in many ways. President Obama is a profligate, dangerous spender with zero knowledge of economics.
Posted by: Flyover Country | March 3, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Great Idea–Bully Pulpit at work everwhere. What with the talking heads talking down the economy, this is the only way to be heard over the crowd of ney-sayers. You would think that the media would do its share to give people hope in this endeavor, they have failed. What a shame.
Posted by: Sims | March 3, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
You rightwingers just can’t stand to see a Democratic president who’s in control of his message. It’s hilarious to watch you squirm.
Bush was a master of empty stagecraft, and you supported him every step of the way, so don’t pretend for a minute that you have any principled stand against this kind of messaging.
As for the fact that this particular emblem is in the shape of an “O,” and that somehow this is meant to enhance the Obama cult of personality, give me a break. If it were a triangle, you’d be accusing Obama of sucking up to Wisconsin Cheddar lobbyists. You people are shameless.
Posted by: Spine | March 3, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Always good for a laugh. Now anything ’round’ is Obama’s personal icon! If he wanted a personal logo, I would have expected the inner divisions to be rotated 90 deg to imply a B too.
==========
His campaign symbol was an O, an O precisely this round. There has never been a B implied in the interior.
This emblem was designed by the administration, and the O was chosen for good reason.
Posted by: MayBee | March 3, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
This is like the “WPA” I see carved into so many public works projects and structures in this area. Every time I see that “WPA” logo on public structures, I am reminded of how great FDR was and how he pulled America up by its bootstraps. I hope that “ARRA” will have the same significance for future generations.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 3, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Because it is in the shape of his initial and signature campaign logo.
************************************************
So anything round qualifies as Obama iconography? Gee, then a rectangle should have used instead to identify the stimulus projects for us taxpayers.
Posted by: kat the real one | March 3, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
MayBee:”His campaign symbol was an O, an O precisely this round. ”
It’s a CIRCLE. Circles are round – they are precisely, mathematically that round. All of them.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 3, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Remembr the 50′s cartoons with the Russian party member wearing a giant “Hero” medal? Is that next?
Posted by: smith | March 3, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Q: How do we subtly show off our socialist pride?
A: Keep the red, but replace the hammer and sickle with gears! that’s the ticket!”
Posted by: Be Afraid | March 3, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Is there no end to the tacky hokum of the “Obama” organization? Here we see what we HOPE is the FULL flowering of the impulse that introduced the phony “presidential” seal.
TIGERS? Those who are reminded of rivers of butter can, we hope, be forgiven. Better He should get back to possums … the rat-like nocturnal animal with the great big teeth, easily blinded by any flash of illumination. Or, of course, vultures.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | March 3, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
OMG – Anything “round” is now an Obama logo?.?
okay right winger women – throw out your bras – you need square cups now.
oops – that means Limbaugh’s face is an Obama logo!!!
Posted by: Absurd | March 3, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Typical Obama ARRAgance.
Posted by: Jim Treacher | March 3, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
good god, more logos!! I think this cheapens government!!
Posted by: morninmist | March 3, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
“This article was not meant for Rush Limbaugh dido-heads. Go back to looking at the pictures in your porn magazines.”
Classy, Sims. DITTO has two T’s and one D, by the way. Love that taxpayer-funded education.
So, will President Obama pull us out of a recession with vastly inefficient spending programs, government-run health care and an pathological desire to attack his ideological enemies? Dare I say it…Yes He Can.
Posted by: Flyover Country | March 3, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
What a waste of time and money. In Illinois we just spent thousands upon thousands of dollars taking down all the Blago signs on the tollways, which cost thousands upon thousands to put up just a year or two ago.
Posted by: Doh! | March 3, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
It’s a CIRCLE. Circles are round – they are precisely, mathematically that round. All of them.
============
The letter O is not generally written as a circle, but it was written as as one for Obama’s campaign icon.
Now the same shape- out of all shapes- is being used as an emblem for his Administration’s signature act.
Are you dismissing out of hand that is was designed by the Obama administration to evoke candidate Obama?
Posted by: MayBee | March 3, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Why do you think the three republicans voted for the stimulus, they all sit on the appropriations commitee and looking to benefit themselves because of democrats control.Then we have that Senator from NY, Schumer who believes the American people love pork, if thats the case let send him some….Starting adding all the bills that get passed and how much porks in there, its not a small percent its added to a big percent…American seem to be gullable and not look at the big picture.
Posted by: Russell Fox | March 3, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
“Welcome to Socialism 3.0 — Obamanomics! Resource allocation for Round 1:
25% Farming
25% Industrial
50% Bureaucracy
Ready?? Begin!”
Posted by: Be Very Affraid | March 3, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
I love it.
I know of a few projects in my community that would be a perfect fit for the Recovery Act. I hope that when more and more people see how the funds are being used, we can regain some of the confidence of our great country.
Posted by: glass | March 3, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
I’m just glad that Dwight D. Eisenhower’s name isn’t plastered all over the interstate system.
Oh.
Posted by: luther blissett | March 3, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
MayBee:”Now the same shape- out of all shapes- is being used as an emblem for his Administration’s signature act.”
The same shape is used for all governmental seals. How many other shapes are used for government seals – it’s circle or square. And even accepting your nefarious conspiracy theory, rather than being pleased that he may personally be associated with a stimulus bill you heartily mock and insist will destroy the country, you’re annoyed? Your hatred is making an utter hash of any logic you may have had behind it.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 3, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Say what you will, but I love the idea! I can’t wait to see it on the high speed rail system between Baton Rouge and New Orleans — you know, the kind Jindal trashed on national tv while his state transportation department was applying for stimulus money to fund it!
Posted by: hang | March 3, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
This is socialism. I don’t know what it means because I’ve never seen a textbook, but I like to throw it around when I disagree with something.
My neighbor is a socialist because his dog pooped on my lawn.
Posted by: reason | March 3, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Could it be a circle because mass production of round logos use less materials and thus less expensive?
Posted by: Midwest Liberrian | March 3, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
His ego knows no bounds. I have just two words: grow up.
Posted by: beebop | March 3, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
The same shape is used for all governmental seals. How many other shapes are used for government seals – it’s circle or square. And even accepting your nefarious conspiracy theory
==========
Well, let’s see. The word “TIGER” being used as the new emblem for the transportation department. That seems to defy the “circle or square” rule you describe.
The emblem for the White House hanging behind Robert Gibbs (on my tv as I speak!) is a sideways oval. The National Parks service is an arrowhead. The GAO is the Capitol Dome.
The US Airforce has flight wings. The Printing office is kind of filled-in U.
The USDA is just the initials.
Hmmm.
btw. I don’t say it is a nefarious conspiracy theory. I say it is blatantly evocative of Obama’s signature icon.
Posted by: MayBee | March 3, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
What’s next, a photo of Obama required in the homes of every American? This guy’s ego knows no bounds. Can we add this emblem to the diving stockmarket he’s now responsible for too?
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | March 3, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
maybee: what you have described are LOGOS. They are decidedly different than an official emblem. I just looked up disparate federal agencies, and they all had round official emblems.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | March 3, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Most tyrants use dear leader’s face …
But at least with this labeling, I will know what to avoid
Posted by: tarpon | March 3, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
But at least with this labeling, I will know what to avoid
***************************************************
It’ll be time consuming avoiding major thoroughfares and bridges. Good luck on your journeys.
Posted by: kat the real one | March 3, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Your hatred is making an utter hash of any logic you may have had behind it.
—————————————
I don’t recall any of Maybee’s comments as hateful. He/she doesn’t call other commenters liars, or question their intelligence, or resort to labels.
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
I guess it’s only a matter of time before Nike and Coke start stamping their labels on a bridge. It’s their taxes too yes?
The more I think about it, the sillier it sounds. A certain country in WWII emblazoned a certain emblem on state funded projects as well. I can’t say cause it will get deleted to point out a historic fact, somehow its “hate”.
Posted by: KR | March 3, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
I keep hearing this “saved or created” jobs line. What does that mean, exactly? Why does no one question it? Saved means “not lost” – to me that means ZERO jobs created. Why does the administration insist on using the “saved” label? Are they hedging their bets? Are they lowering expectations? What about the hope? Saying “saved” doesn’t mean hope, it means retrenchment. If there’s a slight uptick in job creation, it’s a success, since it beat the “saved” label. It’s BS, and they know it.
Posted by: Jeff Weimer | March 3, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
William J. LePetomane – I don’t know what you looked up. The IRS alone defies the idea that all official emblems of government agencies are circles.
However, this is not an official emblem of a government agency. It is a design emblem being stamped on the jobs/products being funded by the stimulus package.
As you can see, the emblem being used in the same way by the transportation department says “TIGER”. Obviously, not a circle.
Posted by: MayBee | March 3, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
“The more I think about it, the sillier it sounds. A certain country in WWII emblazoned a certain emblem on state funded projects as well. I can’t say cause it will get deleted to point out a historic fact, somehow its “hate”.”
Okey dokey then.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
One wonders how much all these logo’s are going to cost…..
Posted by: Son of Liberty | March 3, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
“You can either get on board with the program, or continue to sit there in flyover country and whine.”
Those who live in flyover country have a right to whine since most of us won’t see one cent of the recovery money (no large cities [read: Obama supporters] here.) But hey, at least we won’t have to look at those stupid signs.
Posted by: Polly A | March 3, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
I love how the Obamabots defend their new overlord and his miserable retread, New Deal spending boondoggles…. He is failing on all counts and unfortunately you and I are paying for it.
2012 can’t come soon enough
Posted by: Son of Liberty | March 3, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Jake,
I double dog dare you to ask Baghdad Gibbs if they are going to stamp these emblems on the front door of every single deadbeat homeowner I have to bail out. Enquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: c17wife | March 3, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
One wonders how much all these logo’s are going to cost…..
————————————–
Indeed
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Well played c17wife
Posted by: Son of Liberty | March 3, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
oh my! this is going to lead to interesting developments.
Posted by: eggs | March 3, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
“I keep hearing this “saved or created” jobs line. What does that mean, exactly? Why does no one question it? Saved means “not lost” – to me that means ZERO jobs created. Why does the administration insist on using the “saved” label? Are they hedging their bets? Are they lowering expectations? What about the hope? Saying “saved” doesn’t mean hope, it means retrenchment. If there’s a slight uptick in job creation, it’s a success, since it beat the “saved” label. It’s BS, and they know it.”
—————————————
Jeff Weimer,
The ONLY possible way to actually know if a job is “saved”, is to know for sure that it was going to be “lost” in the first place!
The ONLY way to know if a job was on the cutting board is for every business in the country to openly announce upcoming layoffs by job! Then if they receive “stimulator” money directly or in directly and then do not have to lay off those workers, those jobs can be offically counted as “saved”.
ANY other mechanism that does not follow this model closely, results in “magic” numbers for so-called saved jobs!
Anyone with at least a few brain cells left can understand the reasons why NO businesses would ever go along with this kind of scheme!
Posted by: Mike_C | March 3, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Between Obama’s obsession with Rush Limbaugh and his coming up with symbols like this and his own personal seal, our economic problems are sure to end!
I can hardly wait for Obama’s version of the “WIN” button. (With his “O” logo, of course)
Posted by: Karen Schell | March 3, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Re- “saved or created”… this is simple.
Let’s say a State (North Dakota) for instance was going to “cut” 1,000 jobs due to budget shortfalls (teachers, firemen, police) without any additional funds.
Due to the Recovery Package, that state now receives funds to replace that deficit.
Thus, the ARRA “saves” 1,000 jobs.
This is a NET POSITIVE for the economy of North Dakota and to the lives of those who would have lost their jobs.
Posted by: Tom | March 3, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
This new logo is similar to the efforts used by FDR during the Great Depression and his New Deal.
Works Progress Administration
Look it up in Wikipedia. Pretty straight forward. Just as every state puts a logo, or a sign, that says “your tax dollars at work”.
What’s the uproar?
Posted by: Tom | March 3, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Ever notice how fans of government control are in love with logos? G
This reminds me of FDR’s Blue Eagle, which was the sign that a store was observing his mandated price controls. Some business owners went to prison for NOT CHARGING ENOUGH. That’s what happens when government starts making the rules.
On the whole “want the President to fail” thing. Let’s see. Our Prez wants to increase the size of government, reduce individual liberties, kill the youngest and oldest in our society, silence opposition, offend our allies, and meet with our enemies.
Yes, I’d like very much for those plans to fail. Now, if Obama was to have a “road to Damascus” moment, then I’d happily support his new raft policies.
Posted by: Lightduty | March 3, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Tom,
Your example is TOO simple! Where are you going to see companies annoucing in advance that they are going to layoff people, just so Obama has a way to count “saved” jobs!
Yes, there are times when companies announce plans to lay off workers, but most of the time, there is no advance notice that the company is going to lay off people. I have been through it 4 times in my career. Not once was it publically announced that the company would be eliminating 20 or 200 or 2000 jobs!
Usually when a company pre-announces it, it hopes the market will react in a positive fashion to its “tightening up the belt” as it were.
Posted by: Mike_C | March 3, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
It’ll be time consuming avoiding major thoroughfares and bridges. Good luck on your journeys.
Posted by: kat the real one
——————————
Not that time consuming. Most of the money didn’t go to roads and bridges. Boston.com puts it at 5% for “infrastructure”. Forbes said it was $27 bn is going to states for roads, which is more like 3%.
Posted by: Lightduty | March 3, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Obama Playbook:
When the going gets tough, select from following options:
a.) Read a book to 2nd graders
b.) Make a speech
c.) Introduce marketing gimmick
d.) Introduce a new policy to detract from latest fiasco
e.) Entertain at the WH
Note: Multiple combinations of options can be utilized
Posted by: tjp612 | March 3, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
What happened to the $250 Billion highway Bill passed in 2005? That bill dwarfs this one for infrastructure.
Posted by: JohnnyL | March 3, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Geartrains generally work better when the teeth of the gears actually mesh.
I’m just sayin…
Posted by: Parabellum | March 3, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
I can’t believe how divided our country has become, listen to what you all have written, the bitterness between the parties is just plain discouraging, i wish we could all get behind someone whom we could all trust, that we know, i mean KNOW who will lead our country to what we all hope for our children.
what is wrong with the form of government that set the forum for individual liberty and mans ingenuity and brought us everything from cars, to computers, sent man to the moon, and has the capacity to make a nuclear device. the greatest men to ever walk this earth, by devine province, fashioned this country on moral fiber and hard work, and the blood that they were so willing to shed for the sake of those freedoms, who are the men and women of congress today, to think that they may omit the very things those founding fathers were willing to die for. is this really the change that so many mandated? i dare say NOT! what about transparency? what about lobbiests? term limits? business as usual in congress and now still the white house, shame to all politicians who are no lonmger looking for the best interests of this nation, and the individual states therein.
Posted by: Gary | March 3, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
From Food Stamps to Fools Stamps ?
Posted by: Stephane MOT | March 3, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
What a great idea. Government accountability. A concept Bush/Cheney thwarted at every turn. No wonder rightwingers are so upset.
Posted by: Anthony | March 3, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
All of this PR ticks me off. PR stunts do not display the servant leadership he says HE wants American citizens to display. This is completely self-serving. Barf. It’s bad enough we have the humiliation of government intervention everywhere we turn, rammed down our throats by fear mongering communist wannabes – now Obama will rub it in our faces. What an egotist. Instead of a foreigner throwing a shoe at him, he will have Americans spitting on him before this is all over.
Posted by: NPage | March 3, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
I suppose only folks with a vested interest or high political motivation bother to comment on these blogs. But, the nastiness of some the comments reminds us that old order really can’t stand that the majority of Americans are behind this President. Enjoy your daily dose of Limbaugh red meat. The rest of us have turned the page and are very grateful leave the fear mongering Bush years behind. At least Obama is willing to invest in the middle class, instead of greedy Wall Street con artists. Government of, by, and for the people is making a come back. Keep up the good work, Pres!
Posted by: Jeff E | March 3, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Holy cow! Is this guy obsessed with logos or what?
Weird.
Posted by: RR GOP | March 3, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
How the heck much did THAT cost? And notice it’s in the shape of an “O?”
The campaign for ’12 has already started…
Posted by: Liz | March 3, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
JohnnyL:
“Obama Playbook:
When the going gets tough, select from following options:
a.) Read a book to 2nd graders
b.) Make a speech
c.) Introduce marketing gimmick
d.) Introduce a new policy to detract from latest fiasco
e.) Entertain at the WH”
Sounds an awful lot like Dubya’s playbook. Especially the part about reading to grade-schoolers, which is what he was doing and continued to do while NYC fell.
Posted by: D2k | March 3, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
It takes a bold visionary to stare crisis in the face, and calmly design an emblem to lead us forward.
Tapper – “C17Wife” posted an excellent question that I, and many others, would absolutely love to see you ask the Obama Administration. Please consider it.
Posted by: AoS.reason | March 3, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
I think some folks are overlooking the value of this. Design has played a very signifant role in our history, especially during difficult times. World War II-era posters encouraged everyone to do their part and came to define the american spirit through hardship.
Posted by: ed | March 3, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Wow. All the anger over a simple logo.
I’m a graphic designer, and I think this is a fantastic idea. Firstly, to all of you worried about cost, a logo doesn’t have to cost much at all, but it is a very effective & efficient form of communication. This mark is a great affront to those who believe gov’t can do no good whatsoever, and that corporations are the sole purveyors of goodness. You should all be upset, instead, over the saturation of for-profit marketing we’re deluged with on a daily basis. It’s mind-numbing.
Anyway, it’s just information. It also happens to be a very intelligent political concept, and is harmful to no one.
Posted by: Db8it | March 3, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
“Now, the Star-Bellied Sneetches had bellies with stars.
The Plain-Belly Sneetches had none upon thars.
Those stars weren’t so big. They were really so small.
You might think such a thing wouldn’t matter at all.”
Posted by: dolly | March 3, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
A brilliant writer already stated this and I just feel the need to repeat her words: “The mark of the Beast.”
Posted by: vinny | March 3, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
“A brilliant writer already stated this and I just feel the need to repeat her words: “The mark of the Beast.” ”
LOL…oh yeah. You just stay home and wait for the rapture, Vinny. And what brilliant writer was that? OMG…
Posted by: D2k | March 3, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
The second TIGER designation seems like a bad idea. It will only cause confustion. The main ARRA logo is a great idea though. It should counter the fact that most of the money is going to relatively small, but necessary, projects rather than mega-projects like the Hoover Dam.
Posted by: Kathryn | March 3, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
I don’t think this logo would create as much controversy if “O” had not run his campaign (and for that matter, his presidency) with heavy doses of marketing. At almost every turn there is some banner behind him (or members of his administration) or message in front of the podium (e.g., “Responsibility”, “Ready to Lead”, etc.). As Americans are now finding out, the substance product does not meet the expectations the set by the packaging. Buyers remorse is setting in. Fast.
Posted by: tjp612 | March 3, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
It’s all about restoring confidence.
People want to see that somebody “is doing something about the problem”. They want to be able to point to something that’s concrete evidence of progress on solving the economic mess.
That makes them more confident…they are more likely to spend money…that creates jobs…which leads to more people spending money…which leads to prosperity…
The economic problems are by no means “just psychological”. But psychology plays a big role in making things better.
Posted by: Gary | March 3, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Couldn’t they keep it to red, white and blue? That green is groovy in bathrooms and diningrooms in the fifties.
Posted by: dukas | March 3, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
My opinion on the logo: I don’t care much for the rounded corners, and the images bleeding off into white just looks strange for the stars and throws everything off balance, too much space on the upper right. Definitely not as refined as his campaign logo, done by a totally different team of designers.
Posted by: matt | March 3, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Good grief! Does this mean all those new Chevys and Cadillacs will have this logo stamped on the trunk lid?
Posted by: Sigmonde | March 3, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Wow, its pretty sad reading what some of you guys and girls write over things as innucuous as this. Now you hate emblems, news to me.
I guess Roosevelt’s national WPA infrastructure initiative was a terrible thing because it had its own logo, too? Give me a break.
Posted by: James | March 3, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Why not just make the $700 billion available in the form of no red tape Small Business Loans? Entrepreneurs and small business create the jobs, not the government.
Posted by: Sigmonde | March 3, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Jake, any thoughts on why the president hasn’t taken a shine to you?
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
This mark is a great affront to those who believe gov’t can do no good whatsoever, and that corporations are the sole purveyors of goodness.
======
Let’s put an ARRA emblem on your strawman.
Posted by: MayBee | March 3, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
OMG THESE PEOPLE ARE DESPERATE! The wheels are coming off the bus and CORPORATE WELFARE by the BILLIONS is tanking the stock market. As today’s WSJ said, they are rapidly running out of people to blame.
Are you Obama voters figuring out that Obama is bailing out the WEALTHY OF WALL STREET and sending the bill to the small business sector, the ONLY private sector who’s still creating jobs?
CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN? Just wait until the small business jobs evaporate.
Then he’ll come for the middle class…and on down.
You people just elected the biggest snake oil scam artist in history. He makes Bernie Madoff look like an amateur.
And you who elected him, will share the ‘sacrifice’ for his grand ‘vision’.
Posted by: genie | March 3, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
cute and easily identifiable use of taxpayer money. thanks!
Posted by: tam | March 3, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
America’s government never uses logos in this manner. I’ve seen signs on the highway that say “prisoners at work”. This is the beginning of socialism in portraits. God Help Us. Even if you don’t believe in God, you have to know deep down this is just WRONG. A branding from the Obama WH.
Posted by: SC | March 3, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Gear – Hammer
Plant – Sickle
Our country is in great danger, Obama is nothing but a front for the real power players that want to gain total control over our us.
Posted by: Longshanks | March 4, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am
To Mike_C:
Yes, it’s a little more difficult to pinpoint jobs “saved” in the corporate sector.
It is not difficult to do so for state and local governments. Thos budget shortfalls (and the proposed layoffs) are there for the eye to see.
In almost every city/state in this country, there are teachers, cops, firefighters, and city/state workers who will now be able to keep their jobs.
And yes, those roles are “jobs”, not “work”.
Posted by: Tom | March 4, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am
There are 3 leaves on the plant and 8 stars. The little plus sign in the gear means you add: 3+8=11. And how many letters are in Barack Obama? I think it is pretty clear what is going on here!
Posted by: dude | March 4, 2009, 2:04 am 2:04 am
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Elaina
Posted by: Elaina | March 4, 2009, 4:16 am 4:16 am
“I guess Roosevelt’s national WPA infrastructure initiative was a terrible thing because it had its own logo, too? Give me a break.”
“This is like the “WPA” I see carved into so many public works projects and structures in this area. Every time I see that “WPA” logo on public structures, I am reminded of how great FDR was and how he pulled America up by its bootstraps. I hope that “ARRA” will have the same significance for future generations.”
REALLY?????? Have you researched that time? Have you researched what the government did to business then if people didn’t participate? Keynesian economics, or supply-side economics.. it’s more of a argument of these two sides. I don’t think in the Dali-Bama’s mind that he’s setting out to destroy the nation on purpose. I do think he is a socialist, and I would have more respect for the people in charge if they would just say – this is what we want to do.
In the meantime – small business is going down the tubes. We see the reflection in the market *daily* The personal assault on capitalism continues! Thank you, Mr. President!
Posted by: ACinTN | March 4, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am
And the money for these stamps comes from where?
If jobs are created the American people can, and will, see them. We don’t need to spend more money we don’t have to point out to us what we can already see under our noses. Children we are not, Mr. President.
Posted by: cindy | March 4, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Okay, the sad part of this is the company that will make the stamps has gone out of business. Yes, this down turn caught them by surprise and they are gone. Now the stamps have to be made in China, in a plant powered by non-clean burning coal. It will take 9 weeks after manufacture for the stamps to arrive in DC for distribution. Meanwhile, the CO2 from the smokestack in that factory will have circled the world three times. Joe Biden is an idiot. But his “health” (foot in mouth disease) will cause his removal in 14 more months.
Posted by: tim | March 4, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I think it’s missing something in that upper-right quadrant. Oh, yes: It needs a black quadrant with a red flame surrounding a $, symbolizing all of the money that’s gone up in smoke!
Posted by: Clyde | March 4, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Before you know it, Obama’s face will be projected on the outside of buildings and we will expected to bow down when we see it. Good luck with that, I will go to jail first. The evil is creeping in, inch by inch. We must be aware of this and stop it.
Posted by: irishrose | March 4, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
This most downheartening. The ramifications of the actions being taken now will impact everyone for the next 30 years. Obama needs to understand that; yet he can’t.
The United States of America is NOT a YMCA in South Chicago; Obama needs to understand that; yet he can’t.
Obama was put in office by voters who could not look passed the flowery prose and charasmatic appeal. Obama says so much without actually saying anything. Obama needs some fundamental training… in order to lead the United States of America, one needs to understand the United States of America. In order to understand her, one needs to love the United States of America (with ALL it’s flaws) and embrace the principals of its founding; yet he can’t.
Obama needs to understand that, as President, he is a human starting pistol – the immediate and consequential results of his statements; yet he can’t.
Support Obama – Nope – I can’t.
To say that one supports the President, but not his policies…? What? That’s as moronic as supporting our troops, but opposing their actions in defense of this country – at the direction of the President, as approved by CONGRESS. Just as moronic as spending billions of dollars on “special projects” while calling it stimulus.
Stand by – if not stopped, this will indeed become an Obamanation.
Simple fix? Fire all 535 and replace them with working mothers and fathers; laid off employees who know how to budget their income. Americans who know the difference between a want and a need, and have actually held positions in that “small business” who argued the point. Americans who live their daily lives outside the “golden parachute” of the DC Beltway in the real economy, buying real gas, real food, real clothes.
These same Americans are just as (if not more) educated then Obama. They bring a diversity of thought and proven concept of practice.
The United States of America is not easy. It’s advanced citizenship. It’s as plain as the nose on your face, and as elusive and mysterious as the Blue Whale. You have to want this IDEA to succeed, not simply point out all it’s faults and place blame.
Obama needs to understand that to be a true leader, he needs to embrace the idea of America, understand America, listen to her people, and act accordingly; yet he can’t.
Posted by: Gary | March 4, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
What’s wrong with the emblems/logos is that they have a decided Communist Propaganda feel. Let him have his signs, but do they have to represent all things Communist? This is America. Let’s have some creativity!
Posted by: Michelle | March 4, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
How much did we pay for this out of tax payers money. Is it necessary?
Posted by: Rita | March 4, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Ohh yes FDR had a logo too.
Read up on the Blue Eagle logo for his NRA abomination.
Henry Ford and small businesses did not use them it and see where it got them.
Posted by: kevin | March 4, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Slightly better than the pepsi logo; only slightly.
Posted by: mediazerm | March 4, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
How will they put this stamp on the part of the “stimulus” that has 1.7 million tax payer dollars going to “Pig Odor Research” in Iowa? Will they just stamp it right on the pigs, or will the workers wear uniforms bearing the socialist agenda stamp.
Posted by: Daniel | March 4, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
when did graphic design become “communist?”
i like it.
Posted by: Tgee | March 5, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
I guess they thought the Swastika, or the Hammer and Sickle, where too brazen. What a communist. And to Kat the real one, their accountability to taxpayers is to, “NOT WASTE THEIR TAXES!!”
Posted by: KSN | March 5, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
All this talk about money being spent frivolously. How about the boatloads of money dished out during the Iraq escapade the last couple of years. Its about time we spend some money here sustaining life.
Posted by: Mr. Greenbacks | March 5, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Yeah it is you are correct, only paying to research pig odor, and the other 9,000 examples in the 1100 page bill, do not stimulate the economy, and the ysure as hell dont sustain life. Youre an idiot.
Posted by: Daniel | March 6, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
The process of establishing economic recovery is the bus being driven by the President. He is the only driver we have, yet some would rather be dropped off in the ditch of economic disaster. Well they can do that if they choose to, but what is objectionable are those hanging on the bus drivers neck, while the bus is racing down the mountain road. What is worse those were the same folks that set us on this terrible path. And now we are trying to safely get to the bottom, and all they can do is cry and distract the driver, making the bad situation worse. Thanks alot.
Posted by: Rich | March 23, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm