By Lindsey Ellerson

Mar 16, 2009 4:14pm

FireDogLake’s Jane Hamsher: Obama Administration ‘Lighting Money on Fire’

ABC News’ Rick Klein and Jonathan Karl report: For a window into some of the liberal angst out there over bank bailouts and the AIG news, we chatted today with Jane Hamsher, founder of the liberal blog FireDogLake, about her online petition drive to press Congress to block further funds for big banks.

On “Politics Live” today, Hamsher spoke to a populist anger that crosses party lines — and that represents a real leadership challenge to President Obama.

Said Hamsher: “My concern is that the lack of political will has to do with the fact that people have no confidence in what’s happening right now. People on the right and the left are looking at all this money being shoveled to banks [by] friends of Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers . . .  and they’re not seeing any accountability. They don’t know where the money’s going, they don’t know how much is gone, and it’s all non-transparent and extremely suspicious.”

“You know, the AIG executive bonuses that were just given out are just one example. There’s been no attempt to try and keep those bonuses from happening in the first place,” she continued. “So, you know, there is no public confidence in the process, and until you can restore that confidence, I think you’re just lighting money on fire.”

In this context, what are the chances of Congress approving more money for banks?

“I don’t think there’s any question right now that until they restore some confidence in the system, no one’s gonna give them that money, and I don’t think that’s a Democratic or a Republican consideration. I think that everybody feels that way this morning. The reason that this money went through to the executives yesterday — $165 million — is because that’s the deal that Timothy Geithner cut. . . . Timothy Geithner let these people get these bonuses. This was OK with him, so the fact that this morning we’re suddenly hearing the administration has problems is because the American people have problems, and nobody’s gonna want to face that.”

For many liberal voices, the sequence of events is confirming suspicions they’ve long had about Geithner. Hamsher said she wants to know when Obama himself found out about the bonuses that are set to go out to AIG executives.

“Since this deal went through because Timothy Geithner negotiated it, did Obama know about it and would he have stopped it before hand? Somebody needs to ask him, ‘was this deal OK with you or did Geithner do it without telling you, and was this something that you’re unhappy with?’ Yes, we’ve heard they all think it’s a bad deal, but they put it through anyway, so it’s a good question.”

User Comments

Obama is in a real bind with the bailouts.
Can’t let them fail without the obvious catastrophic consequences and market meltdown.
Can’t bail them out without cries of horror from the Left and incessant sniping from the GOP. Tough position…
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | March 16, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

As for so-called liberal angst out there, Jane Hamsher doesn’t speak for “liberals” anymore than I do. And as far as I know, Jane Hamsher is one of the wimps who doesn’t call herself a liberal, but rather that oh-so-better-sounding “progressive”. Maybe Rick and Jonathan would be better off and better informed if they went out and talked to ordinary, average Democratic liberals across the country like myself, instead of relying on the know-it-all bloggers like Hamsher.

Posted by: Linda Tinjum | March 16, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

The bonus payout excesses at AIG are just the tip of the iceberg of what is happening with the other Wall Street bailouts including Bank of America. Working productive Americans are bailing out the same crooks that destroyed our economy along with 45% of the wealth in the world and now the American taxpayers and our children will be forced to live a far lower standard of living with reduced prosperity and opportunities due to this but only we pay the price.
Washington has bailed out the banks, Wall Street & their Washington special interests and much of the cost is added to the national debt to by paid by this and future generations while real estate and investments continue to fall. Find out what a growing repudiate the debt movement could mean for treasuries, the dollar, gold and the stock market and how this is a better alternative than Washington’s plans to monetize the debt in future years and tax and destroy our remaining wealth by depreciating the dollar.
The Campaign to Cancel the Washington National Debt By 12/21/2012 Constitutional Amendment is starting now in the U.S. See: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=67594690498&ref=ts

Posted by: Ron | March 16, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

AIG = Allowing Irreversible Greed.
AIG = All in Greed.
AIG = Arn’t I Greedy.
AIG = A$#holes, in general.
This is sick. Why in the world are we helping these companies that keep sending millions to people who do not know how to run a company? They cry yet get paid millions on the “average joes” taxes. Furthermore, I fear this is just the tip of the iceberg. Look what Enterprise rent-a-car did to get bailout funds:
http://www.butasforme.com/2009/02/25/alert-enterprise-rent-a-car-may-have-fired-employees-as-fake-evidence-when-lobbing-for-bailout-money/
Not to make excuses for these people, but the bailouts are making crooks out of everyone that touches the money.

Posted by: Jax | March 16, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.