Geithner $ Comments Cause Market Stir
ABC News’ Matt Jaffe reports: Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner caused a stir in the markets today when he said he was "open" to Chinese calls for a new global reserve currency. But is he?
Nope.
During a Q & A session today at the Council on Foreign Relations, here’s what he said:
QUESTION: One, the Chinese government proposal about a… about a global currency, and about the IMF regulations that would… the new IMF idea about, you know, the general agreements to borrow and having a faster ability to disburse to emerging markets.
GEITHNER: On the, on the first question, I haven’t read the governor’s proposal. He’s a, a remarkable, a very thoughtful, very careful distinguished central banker. Generally find him sensible on every issue. But as I understand this proposal, it’s a proposal designed to increase the use of the IMF’s special drawing rates. And we’re actually quite open to that suggestion.
The dollar fell on Geithner’s comments, but rose again when, at the end of his appearance in New York, Geithner clarified his remarks:
MODERATOR: I’d like to ask one final question, in effect on behalf of the market. It might be useful if you tried to clarify your earlier comment on the reaction to the central bank governor of China’s idea, and… so let me ask the question this way. Do you see any change over the foreseeable future in the basic role of the dollar as the world’s key reserve currency or the reserve currency?
GEITHNER: I do not. I think the dollar remains the world’s dominant reserve currency. I think that’s likely to continue for a long period of time. And as a country, we will do what’s necessary to make sure we’re sustaining confidence in our financial markets and in — and in the productive capacity of this economy and our long-term fundamentals.
And in an interview with CNBC later in the day, Geithner again reiterated the importance of a strong dollar:
GEITHNER: I want to say this very clearly: a strong dollar is in America’s interest. We’re going to make sure we’re pursuing policies that improve the long-term fundamentals of the U.S. economy.
In case there was any doubt about Geithner’s stance, at yesterday’s AIG hearing the Treasury chief replied "yes" when asked if he would "categorically renounce" China’s suggestion:
[REP. MICHELLE] BACHMANN: Would you categorically renounce the United States moving away from the dollar and going to a global currency as suggested this morning by China and also by Russia, Mr. Secretary?
GEITHNER: I would, yes.
- Matt Jaffe

Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
If we want the dollar to remain the reserve currency WE have to keep our economy in good shape. There’s no reason for other countries to hold a reserve currency that is not stable. It kind of defeats the point. On the surface, the idea of a reserve built on a basket of currencies from economically advanced nations is a good one for any country from the point of view of stability.
Posted by: Michael | March 25, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
The way you have a strong currency is with slow money growth and a responsible fiscal policy. How, pray tell, can you claim to be pursuing a strong dollar policy when you have pegged interest rates at zero, you’re letting the money supply explode, and you’re simultaneously spending like a drunken sailor? How dumb do you think the Chinese are? Geithner is full of it. It is amazing the markets listen to such fairy tales.
Posted by: Ron | March 25, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Sounds lie this is a non-issue, what with Geithner’s multitude of denials on ditching the dollar.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | March 25, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
The way to make the new and so-called improved dollar markets defend their positions is to force the dollar value down. It is still the reRushlican thinking at work. There’s no rule that both the dollar and gold can rise simultaneously is there?! Currency really doesn’t matter all that much as long as what is deemed ‘valuable’ is global. The value of homes of the ‘prosperous’ (U.S. real estate) cannot be valued at zero. Even the homeless man living in a box can sell the box, yes? Any rule a rule to value assets at zero simply doesn’t make any sense! Banks must take the ability to use a common sense value to assets, period!
Posted by: Common Sense | March 25, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Wow! Geithner has A LOT of power!
Posted by: Sara | March 25, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Would you want communism to fail?
Jay Leno Blasts Obama
Even Jay Leno is comparing Obama’s policies to communism. I want that to fail. Watch Leno blast Mr. O’s policies:
http://tinyurl.com/c4vkpq
Posted by: jonas | March 26, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Oxycodone.
Hydrocodone versus oxycodone. Buy oxycodone without prescription. Oxycodone extraction iv. Buy oxycodone. Oxycodone.
Posted by: Oxycodone. | August 31, 2009, 5:55 am 5:55 am
Keflex.
Keflex.
Posted by: Keflex. | September 2, 2009, 3:10 am 3:10 am