Geithner on TARP Money: ‘We Have Roughly $135 Billion Left’
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told me this morning on "This Week" that his department has roughly $135 billion in uncommitted money left over in the TARP plan.
"George, we have roughly $135 billion left of uncommitted resources," Geithner said on "This Week" — in his first public accounting of TARP funds.
According to estimates, there was only about $32 billion dollars left of in the TARP money, the government’s financial rescue plan.
So, I asked Secretary Geithner, "Where did you come up with that extra $100 billion dollars?"
"Less is out the door, but in terms of, if you look at what’s not committed yet, it’s roughly in the $130-135 billion range," he said.
"Now that, that estimate includes a judgment, a very conservative judgment, about how much money is likely to come back from banks that are strong enough not to need this capital now to get through a recession. But that’s a reasonably conservative estimate. And it gives us, and this is very important, substantial resources to move ahead with this broad based sweep of initiatives to help get the financial system back in the business of providing credit," Geithner said.
However the Treasury Secretary wouldn’t shut the door on another round of TARP spending.
"Can you get through the rest of this year with the money you have?" I asked Geithner.
"We have substantial resources and we’re going to use them quickly, as quickly as we can, to make sure they’re devoted to things that are going to get credit flowing again," Geithner said. "And we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it in terms of whether we need additional resources. And of course if we come to that point, we’ll go to the Congress and give them the strongest case possible and help them understand why this’ll be cheaper over the long run to move aggressively."
–George Stephanopoulos
Email
White House Blinks Amid Catholic Church Anger?
Navy SEAL Commander Advised: Get the Hell Out of the Media
Good questions – good answers – good approach to economic situation.
Posted by: BobM | March 29, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Good! No more bailouts and no more robbing the taxpayers.
Posted by: t hill | March 29, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
What a coached performance. Everytime George brought up a point, Geithner went into a coached type positive diatribe of how they are taking the right path and have to act quickly. Balony balony balony. He never delt with one concern and that’s because he can’t. We have to America. Don’t let government take over your life. Let the banks close. Let the consequences roll because the result won’t be big government telling us how to live. Get off your butts and educate yourselve. Don’t let a smooth speach roll you over.
PJ
Posted by: PJ | March 29, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Good morning everyone.
Republicans come up with a VALID plan with NUMBERS yet ?!?!?!?!?
Posted by: JimmyTwoTimes | March 29, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Look. Geithner, Obama, and Congress have proved that they don’t give a flying flip about us either. Where’s a decent third party that we can join? We need one.
Signed
A disgusted democrat
Posted by: jan | March 29, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Every one of these Wall Street crooks are related in one way or another. Then the POTHUS places these crooks in charge of the agencies they are supposed to look over. Biggest bunch of crooks the world had ever seen, they pass laws to make stealing legal. You want to bet Madoff is really staying at a hotel or at home and no one knows it. Lets get a live web cam of his cell so we can see that crook in the poky.
Posted by: greg | March 29, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Jimmy,
The Republicans don’t have to come up with a plan. Since they don’t have the numbers to stop anything all they have to do is do what the Democrats did for the past 6 years, criticize everything.
Posted by: t hill | March 29, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
may godd help us if this plan doesn’t work or we get hit by some disaster,cause were totally broke now.Obama blew all our grand kids cash like drunkin sailor…..Were F–ked now Better learn to speak chinese….
Posted by: dean | March 29, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Republicans come up with a VALID plan with NUMBERS yet ?!?!?!?!? Right after the democrats do. ROFL..
Posted by: ChicagBob | March 29, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Just a quick comment.
I work as Project / Program Manager for a major Fortune 500 company. My team and I manage several projects at any given time including the financials. At any time in the project execution, we should be able to provide our project sponsors, where we are on the project expenditure (how much we have spent, where the money went, and how much we are left with), etc.
I am so amassed that the executive team members in Obama’s administration, when asked specific questions (in the congressional hearings as well as by news media) about how much money is spent, how much money needed for TARP and other programs going forward, the answer they give very vague. Imagine if I were to do the same for my projects at work, my project sponsors will let me out of the door by the end of the day.
One can extrapolate this to the way the treasury department is handling people’s money. We need transparency and honest answers to straight-forward questions. Obama administration in this regard is much better. Hank Paulson and his team were a bunch of idiots not knowing where they were when the crisis happened in Fall 2008 and what to do.
Posted by: Nash Nari | March 29, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Tried many times yesterday to post a question for the Secretary- never was able to get the link on the abcnews.com site to work- Would like to know what the Secretary thinks about ” too big to fail.” Doesn’t that really mean these so called too big to fail companies should be broken up so that they don’t jeopardize the entire country by taking many risks and getting us all in this terrible position?
Posted by: Angela | March 29, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Tried many times yesterday to post a question for the Secretary- never was able to get the link on the abcnews.com site to work- Would like to know what the Secretary thinks about ” too big to fail.” Doesn’t that really mean these so called too big to fail companies should be broken up so that they don’t jeopardize the entire country by taking many risks and getting us all in this terrible position?
Posted by: Angela | March 29, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Good morning everyone.
Republicans come up with a VALID plan with NUMBERS yet ?!?!?!?!?
Posted by: JimmyTwoTimes
=========================
Come on Jimmy. The GOP has been relegated to insignificance now. Nobody listens to those bozos.
Posted by: Kevin | March 29, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Kevin,
It’s probably best that nobody listens to the GOP anymore because when Obama and the rest of the Democrats blow our children’s future Obama and the Democrats can take all the credit.
Posted by: t hill | March 29, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Good! No more bailouts and no more robbing the taxpayers.
Posted by: t hill | Mar 29, 2009 9:28:54 AM
I agree with you, but unfortunately Obama/Geithner won’t commit to no more bailouts. And why should they? Most taxpayers still seem content to let those two bailout whoever they want.
Posted by: Duncan | March 29, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
my gawd, does anyone believe geithner is anything but howdy doody without the red hair?
Posted by: realityville | March 29, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Well, what’s Limbaugh & Hannity to do now. Appears the plans of President Obama and Tim Geithner are well on the way to actually working even though a few such as Paul Krugman have stated it may not be enough. What is interesting in this rhetoric of the war between the plans, of which Republicans have yet to present one, is the fact that while publicly denouncing the administrations plans, many Congressmen & women, and Senators, continue to accept campaign donations from the very institutions who has been bailed out from Tarp funds. Including Republican whip, Eric Cantor, who has been more than vocally opposed to Obama administration plans. He has accepted $2,500 from Citigroup; $5,000 from Bank of America; $1,000 from Chrysler; Republican John Boehner, House Minority Leader, who has acepted $5,000 from Bank of America; $5,000 from American Express; $1,500 from U.S. Bancorp Employee PAC. Other’s, including democrats, are on the dole as well. The reality, of course, is that these contributions, individually, aren’t a lot of money. But many members of Congress (including Speaker Pelosi and Financial Services Chair Barney Frank) have decided against taking any of the money. The optics of this for both the banks and for the members of Congress is bad, and only feeds the credibility problems both entities have with the American public. Appears to me to be rather hypocritical in the case of Cantor and Boehner who have been so openly opposed to the administration plans, spouting Limbaugh/Hannity like vile rhetoric almost on a daily basis, all while standing with a hand out behind their back being filled with taxpayer capital from the very plans they are opposing.
Posted by: devilkev | March 29, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am
I’ve been critical of Mr. “Too big to fail” Geithner but now that he’s unveiled his plan for the toxic assets, I can see some sense that he’s trying to preserve America’s capitalistic system and free market approach to problem solving. He could have done what Paul Krugmen recommended and nationalized all the troubled banks for auditing. Then we would be working out every asset on a case by case basis which would take much longer. There are some real gems worth buying among the toxic assets and letting a market work them out rather than assigning auditors to each bank seems like an interesting idea.
Posted by: T961585 | March 29, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
George and his wife are good friends with Obummer and his wife.
Posted by: mouse | March 29, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Kevin, I totally agree with you. Calling the President a socialist, complaining about the First Lady’s arms, and how much fuel he uses in Air Force One, is all the GOP has. They have absolutely no solutions to any problems facing this country. None. Just look at the comments left by their supporters. Ask any of them for complaints about Obama, and you’ll get a six page reply, but ask them for their solutions and you won’t get one sentence.
Posted by: Diane in TX | March 29, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
It was disingenuous of Treasury Secretary Geithner to simply state that the government had no legal authority to alter the terms of the agreements (credit-default-swaps) between AIG and Goldman Sachs, Merrill, etc. resulting in all of those entities receiving 100 cents on the dollar.
Geithner’s response is simply not credible. Contracts are broken and renegotiated every day; just read the sports pages!
Posted by: Willi W S | March 29, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
We can’t trust anything that Geithner says. I have ZERO confidence in the man and wouldn’t trust him to run a lemonade stand on a hot day, much less trust him with the country finances. He needs to go! And his isn’t any better. Our oaf of a president just named a member of AIG’s Board of Directors to his “tax reform” task force! The AIG Board FAILED MISERABLY in its fiduciary duty, and Obama wants to use one of them to help come up with tax reform for the country?? What an idiot!
Posted by: Kim | March 29, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Good Show George, for once I will agree with George Will that American’s do not care about deficeits as long as there is prosperity, so now we face the day of reckoning.
We do have to control our deficeit spending and this will be crucial to our recovery in the long run. Americans have to decide do they really want the Government to provide them everything? Personally I would like to pay down this massive deficeit.
We are a people of short memories and we are still trying to learn lessons of the great depression. Kudo’s to Mr. Will he nailed it right. We have a lot of work to do in this country. From bailouts to bonuses to our banking system. So let’s try and get this one right for our future generations.
Posted by: Keith | March 29, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Het Tim, can you send about three billion of that to Arizona? That will just about cover the deficit that Napalitano left us with.
Posted by: BikernAz12 | March 29, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Good session! I would have liked the segment with Stephanopoulos and Geithner to continue another hour, with Krugman also at the table for the continuation.
Posted by: YouMayBeSmartBut | March 29, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
This is a joke right? It says right in the article that this estimate is based on a judgement “about how much money is likely to come back from banks”. What does that mean? This is not money that hasn’t been spent yet. How can you put this in the $135 billion left?
‘
Posted by: nomomoney | March 29, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
This is a joke right? It says right in the article that this estimate is based on a judgement “about how much money is likely to come back from banks”. What does that mean? This is not money that hasn’t been spent yet. How can you put this in the $135 billion left?
‘
Posted by: nomomoney | March 29, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Ever notice how Tiny Tim acts like a spoiled little kid who has always gotten his ways. Tiny Tim has a problem with the truth, Although, I hardly can expect George Step…..to actually ask a difficult penetrating question. Poor George is such a freaking lacky for Obama……What a waste of oxygen
Posted by: TruthnMichigan | March 29, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
George needs to wipe that brown stain off his nose.
Posted by: Boxcar | March 29, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
JimmyTwoTimes…Republicans come up with a VALID plan with NUMBERS yet ?!?!?!?!?:you wrote..they have it’s called cut spending, send some of the money to small businesses, not more welfare and food stamp programs and Pig Smell research. But mainstream media won’t report it and Nancy Pelosi has shut them out of any bipartisan talks, transparency…..Your socialist government owns this, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank should be in jail
Posted by: payupmidclass | March 29, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9607
Americans Largely Silent as Their Nation is Systematically Destroyed
By JB Williams Tuesday, March 24, 2009
After trillions in taxpayer debt has been foolishly poured into the
bottomless black hole of leftist wealth redistribution programs, under
the guise of economic *stimulus* or *stabilization* legislation,
the new *ONE World* government running Washington DC announces;
Geithner, Bernanke Call for New Wind-Down Powers After AIG* and the
people still sit silent as they watch Obamanation grow in unbridled
power.
Geithner Asks Congress for even Broader Power to Seize private Firms as
the average American stumbles through their daily routine as if nothing
is happening. Canada Free Press managing editor Judi McLeod writes No
cheerleader for propping up greenback at G20 summit asking, *Is the
table being set for One World Government rather than speeding the
recovery of the worldwide recession at next week*s G20 London
summit?*
Obamanation has taken the nation from a trillion in debt to over $4
trillion in debt in the first sixty days, with even more federal
spending promised, which could put the nation $10 trillion in debt
before the 2010 mid-term election cycle. Amnesty for illegals and ACORN
led redistricting will make 2010 and beyond a moot point.
Still, beyond the movement to mail tea bags to members of congress or
file another legal demand for proof of Obama*s constitutional
eligibility for the office he holds, both of which are like whistling in
the breeze, the people remain largely silent.
Threatened with a Soup Line Existence
The American people would never trade personal freedom for the false
promise of federally redistributed free-stuff under some ill-fated
socialist experiment, unless they were first threatened with a soup line
existence.
And so it shall be*
50% of their life savings and 30% of their home values have already
evaporated into thin air. National unemployment is driving towards
double digits as home foreclosures continue to mound.
With their backs against the wall, confused by a daily diet of media
manipulated headlines aimed at scaring the public into submission,
convinced that our nation*s complex woes demand a solution far too
complicated for the average peasant to comprehend, the people find
themselves in a state of terminal paralysis.
Incompetent Evil in Charge
The same people responsible for the many disasters now surrounding
every American household, were elected in 2006 and 2008 to fix what they
broke. Instead of reversing course and placing their faith in the
principles of freedom, they are installing more of the same failed
entitlement policies that created the problem and they are doing so at a
fever pace.
The folks currently in charge of the nation don*t like anything at
all about the nation that once was. They have a very different vision
for America, one based on redistribution of free-stuff, not equal access
to freedom.
At the foundation of personal freedom is the right to make your own
decisions, invest and risk your own capital, own your own property and
keep that which you are willing to work and sacrifice to earn. It*s
called economic freedom, aka capitalism.
But capitalism is public enemy #1 in America today, thanks to decades
of class warfare and the art of division via social envy, all for
purpose of political gain.
Life, Liberty and the right to individually define and pursue Happiness
has been replaced with the right of some to take from others against
their will, in the name of a greater common good, better defined as the
entitlement mentality.
The Change Agents New World Dictionary
Old concepts have been redefined. Capitalism is now referred to as
Fascism. Personal ambition is now called greed. Those who seek access to
other people*s rightful earnings are called charitable, and those who
demand a right to only that, which they earn, are called greedy.
It isn*t just the words that have new definitions. The concepts have
new meaning as a result.
Words like socialism and communism no longer have a negative
connotation attached to them. Most Americans have no idea what they are
anymore, or why they don*t want to find out the hard way.
The concept of liberal interpretations limits the meaning of words only
to one*s individual imagination. The Constitution means only what
someone imagines it to mean. If the shoe doesn*t quite fit, a new
definition will solve the problem.
What are Americans Waiting For?
I don*t know what it will take to wake up the average American, but
whatever it is, it hasn*t happened yet*
The people currently stocking up on food, water, guns and ammo in
record numbers, causing shortages in all the above at the retail level,
are clearly awake and anticipating something, but what? Meet the
*extremists…*
The people still trying to get a court somewhere in America to hear the
arguments concerning the most secretive corrupt president in US history,
have been awake for a long time. Meet the *birthers…* But they
continue to have trouble waking anyone else up, including in the
so-called halls of justice.
Is it a bankrupt dollar and a new international currency that will get
their attention? – A North American Union? – An ACORN Army on their
doorstep? What will be the final straw that breaks the proverbial
camel*s back?
I don*t have the answer* Frankly, I expected the people to revolt
long before now. Clearly, I had underestimated the depth of apathy and
tolerance for anti-American nonsense in the average modern American. But
then, so did our nation*s founders, whom I*m certain are rolling
over in their graves in disgust by now.
The Silent Consent Continues
Nobody knows for how long or at what expense, but so far, the people
remain silent and Washington continues to profitably interpret that
silence as broad-based consent.
Here*s to the average American waking up in time! – Good luck!
Posted by: payupmidclass | March 29, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Let’s let Obama try to turn this disaster around. He was elected to do that and so far, I am very pleased with this administration. The Republicans got together and decided en masse to pan everything Obama is doing. They have no credibility…zero, none, nada!!!
Posted by: sosupernova | March 29, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
It was a sure thing that propping-up these Wall Street giants would create a fiscal and economic catastrophe. The American people knew it. They called their legislators. They emailed Congress and the President and the FED. But, Washington and Wall Street keep each other in power – bailouts flow to Wall Street and campaign contributions flow to Washington. It is a system that is destroying our country.
Posted by: Claire | March 29, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
If the Obama and his Congress just has to spend every dime they can get their hands on, why not spend it on things we need like infrastructure, border security and education? Why yell later that we can’t do those things because we don’t have the money? Do it now while you’re spending the money anyway! Those are things that will put people to work and put businesses in the black again. … Or you can give out more unearned multimillion dollar bonuses.
Posted by: Oonogil | March 29, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
I thought it was a good show. Geithner surprised me, I guess that I have been hearing too much that he is a “behind the scenes” kind of guy, so my expectations may have been low for his first Sunday appearance. Question on my 1 billion dollar plan went unanswered; put $3million check in the hands of every one of our 305 million Americans and let them pay off their mortgages, buy a new car, get health insurance, and pay for college. Wouldn’t that stimulate the economy enough? Not a cent needed for public works programs, nor for AIG and a fraction of the cost of what everyone else is proposing. No more toxic assets…Not even worth a try? With the numbers everyone is talking, and $3million checks not being mailed to everyone, I wonder who is profiting from this huge bailout?
Posted by: Bill58M | March 29, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
like it how they blame the 700 billion on Bush. true he was still a lame duck with a month left, but it was the democratic Congress that passed this tarp bill against GOP efforts to trim it. and why call it $700 billion. when they didn’t get the votes the first time, they went and added 150 billion more in earmarks/pork to get the extra votes needed. (for rum, producers/dist. ,race tracks , and toy wooden arrows. this money is just going to pay off the insiders who bet the bad home loans(pushed by Dems to get their poor constituents in a home)would not be paid. if the banks went under it just means they wouldn’t be able to pay those gamblers who bet on loans going bad. so what? like we care if they don’t get paid? we could start over with a new bank with gov. funds chartered to loan to who we think need it ,to get economy going. run by ceos from credit unions who have shown good sense, and are still profitable, today
Posted by: al hall | March 29, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I work as Project / Program Manager for a major Fortune 500 company. My team and I manage several projects at any given time including the financials. At any time in the project execution, we should be able to provide our project sponsors, where we are on the project expenditure (how much we have spent, where the money went, and how much we are left with), etc.
I am so amassed that the executive team members in Obama’s administration, when asked specific questions (in the congressional hearings as well as by news media) about how much money is spent, how much money needed for TARP and other programs going forward, the answer they give very vague. Imagine if I were to do the same for my projects at work, my project sponsors will let me out of the door by the end of the day.
One can extrapolate this to the way the treasury department is handling people’s money. We need transparency and honest answers to straight-forward questions. Obama administration in this regard is much better. Hank Paulson and his team were a bunch of idiots not knowing where they were when the crisis happened in Fall 2008 and what to do.
—————————-
Great post…..
I sincerely hope that the Congress does not authorize any more outlays until an evaluation process as to what good the outlays have done thus far has been done and made public.
Expenditures have either (1) been a waste of money, or (2) partially successful and partially a waste, or (3) completely successful and we do not need to spend any more TARP funds. We must not spend TARP funds simply because the money is there.
As to the Republicans, please lead, follow or get the hell out of the way (meaning be silent). Nothing can be done about Fox & Friends, Rush, Hannity and the rest of that lunatic right wing gang but to ignore them.
Posted by: beto | March 29, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Anyone depending on the Republicans to contribute has only to read the budget they came up with Friday to much fanfare. It was a complete joke. Nothing in it but the same old bitching, whining and moaning. Even Laura Ingraham, a hardcore right winger, was embrassassed by it.
Posted by: beto | March 29, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
sosupernova ….what he is doing to this country and to YOUR kids future is something we don’t want he to have the chance to get, is that hard to understand, do a little study on where we will be when the operating cost of our government is 60% of the GDP. Russia is 80% getting and idea. Obama’s policy will fail at our expense, YOUR kids expense, we can’t afford for this to happen
Posted by: payupmidclass | March 29, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
sosupernova …. check this sight out http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9607
Posted by: payupmidclass | March 29, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Every time I see Geithner’s sneering face- I want to slap him.
Wall Street and the bankers have taken over this goverment.
It’s not about Dem/Repub- it’s US against THEM~!
Wake up, America.
dprogram.net
The Obama Deception
Posted by: coolpillow | March 29, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Claire: your note above says “It was a sure thing that propping-up these Wall Street giants would create a fiscal and economic catastrophe. The American people knew it. They called their legislators. They emailed Congress and the President and the FED. But, Washington and Wall Street keep each other in power – bailouts flow to Wall Street and campaign contributions flow to Washington. It is a system that is destroying our country.” Most people who are not blinded by political parties agree with you. But, like the ill conceived wars of the past several decades, this Bailout Blitz, is another PR campaign that never had the support of the American people. The people in power just cannot bring themselves to trust the wisdom of the American People.
Posted by: sarah | March 29, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Geithner proposal for bigger, swifter government intervention and acknowledgment that it will lead to larger deficits in the short term – coupled with Krugman’s point that US is capable of maintaining its credit ratings despite higher debt/GDP ratio – is very reassuring.
I also agree and respect his and Obama’s opinion that we can’t just let the auto industry die out, given the role automotives play in America esp., with the horrible state of the public transportation system.
But one thing keeps bothering me a lot about what Geithner, Summers and other Obama officials say about the Wall St bonuses — that they were based on pre-existing contracts. Anybody who has written contracts knows 2 things (1) they can be renegotiated by the involved parties depending on the change of leverage — and at this point, the AIG execs don’t seem to have much, and (2) contracts have clauses per which, a “Change of Ownership” can trigger the entire contract open to termination or renegotiation — which has occured with the government intervention with AIG.
So why keep repeating that contracts cannot be changed on Wall St, while simultaneously asking the US auto industry unions to renegotiate their contract terms??? Are ONLY Wall St contracts unmodifiable? Is it because these guys put millions of dollars into Gov officials pockets?
Posted by: Vishram | March 29, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
If AIG knew they were going to pay the bailout money to Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank, Societe Generale etc., then why didn’t the Bush administration know where the AIG bailout money was going? and why didn’t the Obama administration know for 8 weeks where it went?
Was AIG refusing to share this information? or did the government not ask?? For crying out loud, when my dad gave me money for Christmas, he used to ask me what I was planning to do with it :-)
Posted by: Vishram | March 29, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
IT’S ABOUT TIME WE HAD A PRESIDENT WITH SOME CLASS !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Bilbo Baggins | March 29, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Where is ABC’s coverage of the Ashley Biden cocaine controversy?
Funny how ABC couldnt wait to smear Bristol Palin, and family on her teen pregnancy.
Here we have who is alledged to be the Vice Presidents daughter whiffing lines on video, and no story? Hilarious.
Come on ABC, youre liberal democrat bias is disgustingly on full display once again.How you guys can look at yourselves in the mirror is beyond me.
Posted by: Badger | March 29, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
$135 Billion left. Now all they have to do is find where best to spend it? I wonder who’s owed political payback?
Posted by: LongT | March 29, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
I don’t like the guy. He talks too fast in what seems like canned responses.
Posted by: LongT | March 29, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
This latest “Bank Rescue Plan” is just a delaying action while Obama tries to get his spending plans through congress.
The Europeans know what he is doing and they do not want any part of it.
They want the US to bite the bullet and fix the Banking Problem.
Obama wants to pass massive spending on Global Warming and Massive Spending on Health Care before the true impact of the banking crisis becomes common knowledge.
Obama is willing to live with continued economic decline while he drags this out.
Posted by: Reality Check | March 29, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
This latest “Bank Rescue Plan” is just a delaying action while Obama tries to get his spending plans through congress.
The Europeans know what he is doing and they do not want any part of it.
They want the US to bite the bullet and fix the Banking Problem.
Obama wants to pass massive spending on Global Warming and Massive Spending on Health Care before the true impact of the banking crisis becomes common knowledge.
Obama is willing to live with continued economic decline while he drags this out.
Posted by: Reality Check | March 29, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
OBAMA HAS CLASS.. NOW THAT’S PRICELESS.. OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST.. AND YOU CALL THAT CLASS…. GEORGE AND BEGALA,AND CARVILLE , HAVE CONFERENCE CALLS WITH RAHM EVERY MORNING.. SO DO YOU REALLY THINK YOU WILL BE GETTING THE TRUTH , OUT OF ANY OF THEM… YOU LIBERALS BOUGHT OBAMA’S CRAP HOOK, LINE AND SINKER…..AND THE REST OF US WILL PAY FOR THAT MISTAKE….. OBAMA STANDS FOR ONE BIG ASS MISTAKE AMERICA….AND OBAMA IS THE BIGGEST MISTAKE IN THE WHITE HOUSE… JUST DISGRACEFUL… THIS MAN HAS SPENT MORE MONEY THAN ALL THE PRESIDENTS COMBINED , SINCE GEORGE WASHINGTON.. AND HE’S NOT DONE… MAY GOD BLESS OUR COUNTRY.. WE SURE NEED IT NOW
Posted by: linda | March 29, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Maybe Obama is a trojan horse sent to bankrupt the country from within? Naww!
Posted by: LongT | March 29, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
There goes the second amendment. This is for real folks! http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
Posted by: LongT | March 29, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Class? Like a hollywood actor perhaps.
Posted by: LongT | March 29, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
All those people buying guns, ammo and canned goods are the smart ones. The people who voted for and still support Obama…they’ve got a real lesson in store for them. If they survive, which many of them won’t, I suspect they’ll be permanently inoculated against “hope and change” rhetoric coming from a poseur elected only because of good timing and skin color.
Posted by: mac | March 29, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
The Obama town hall meeting where Obama prepicked the questioners and knew the questions before hand. That is real transparency. LOL If the Pres. can’t be open about anything neither can Geightner. Come on…the Pres can’t take questions without knowing them before hand? Just kinda proves he doesn’t know much and isn’t ready for that office. Kinda scares the hell out of me.
Posted by: Ob | March 29, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
i am small trucking company doing import and export container work needing asistance to stay in business where does a small guy like me get tarp assistance
Posted by: werner | March 29, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
small import and export trucking company in need to stay alive how do i get tarp help for the little guy
Posted by: werner | March 29, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Only $135B left? Exactly where did you spend the rest??
Support HR 1207 … the Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009
Show us the money!
Posted by: Evil Banker | March 29, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Amazing how many people do not see through the daily/weekly dog and pony
show! The same people probably don’t/
didn’t understand how folks in Germany
once were sucked into following evil people. Good luck when you folks wake
up from your slumber.
Posted by: Dog and pony | March 29, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
tHERE IS NO MONITORING OF THIS HUGE AMOUNT OF MONEY. gEORGE sOROS MAY HAVE IT, ACORN MAY HAVE IT. There is no record of how the money has been spent. Obama is the biggest con man in history. And he is laughing himself silly every day. You know… the gallows humor. Just imagine the jokes BO and this Geithner tell each other. For the administration that promised clarity and openess, it is the most secretive. BO is a criminal genius.
Posted by: Scott K | March 29, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
THANK GOODNESS I can sleep soundly every night knowing that intelligent people are finally in charge again after 8 long painful years of stupidity. I am glad that the VAST majority in this country did voted correctly last November and did not let the morons that I see hanging out on this discussion board steal the election again.
Reading the absolutely ridiculous, useless, and vile comments above just proves how much we need education reform!!!
Good thing the G(reat) O(bstructionist) P(arty) is on its way out!
Posted by: ObamaSupporter | March 29, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
As misguided as he is, I used to believe Obama at least thought he was doing good things for our country. Now I am beginning to wonder.
Posted by: wrd | March 29, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Private profits / public losses, is a perversion.
Posted by: trkycharlie | March 30, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Lets all listen to the tax cheat, who pretended he did not know about the bonuses in the last bailout. Can I pretend not to pay taxes. I have not received anything from any bailout. I look forward toward this government to steal or tax me to death. Our country will never be able to pay back a ga-zillion in spending. Tax the working people for the non working people.
Posted by: jim | March 30, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
You want real change that you can believe in … how about a balanced budget! That would impress me … Obama’s crazy spend, spend, spend budget is just plain stupid.
I’m work for the government, and I manage a budget for my office, and I know at all times what my balance is – to the penny. That Geithner didn’t know exactly how many BILLIONS he has left is terrifying.
Posted by: Scott | March 30, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Scott K -
53% is NOT a vast majority, it’s just slightly better than a simple majority.
And you’re right, we need education reform; it’s just another government-run program that fails to accomplish what it’s goals. Maybe we can spend hundreds of billions of dollars on a government-run health-care system, and run that into the ground too!
Sleep well, and don’t forget to pick up your welfare check in the morning.
Posted by: Scott | March 30, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Scott! Wake up!!! Obama received more votes than ANY OTHER President EVER! Go, take some history lessons. And he definitely got more than our previous disaster managed to steal!
Thanks for the good wishes, btw. I shall sleep very well as I do every night, and unlike you I am educated enough not to be needing a welfare check.
Posted by: ObamaSupporter | March 30, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am
Many experts have been questioning President Obama’s understanding of economics in the wake of his bailout packages and, more recently, his proposed budget – which the Congressional Budget Office has estimated would add $9.3 trillion (with a “t”) to the national debt over 10 years. These experts question whether or not the president understands the economic consequences of his executive actions, many coming to the conclusion that he is either unaware or overly optimistic when it comes to the desired results.
These “experts” are wrong on both assertions: President Obama and his advisers know exactly what they are doing.
During this time of crisis where the nation is gripped by fear, the current administration (following the words of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel) is not going to let this opportunity pass. Obama has surrounded himself with globalist thinkers who believe America’s sovereignty is an outdated notion and that her place is not at the head of the world community as an independent nation but rather an equal part of it, on par with human rights violators such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, et al. In direct concert with this globalist mentality is the need for a global currency; the dollar should no longer be regarded as the currency of choice but relegated to a place that sees all nations holding an equal piece of legal tender. With a strong dollar, America’s citizenry would reject the move to a global currency. However, with just the right amount of fear and uncertainty, America’s citizens have proven time and time again that we will do just about anything to alleviate the pain.
Up until now the current economic crisis has helped grease the wheels in getting Americans to think that we are not invincible, that economies are susceptible to frightening times. This awareness has programmed the brains of Americans to understand the feeling of financial fear and to know they never want to experience this fear again – whatever the cost. It is this psychological conditioning that has already opened one door and will soon open two more.
What we saw behind door No. 1 was the acceptance by the American public of extremely excessive bailouts and stimulus packages disguised as a “fix” of the recession with little or no oversight. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been essentially stolen from the taxpayers on both Bush’s watch and Obama’s, yet we allow it because we don’t want to feel any more pain. Now, several spending bills later, we are staring at a multi-trillion dollar budget proposal that will force the Treasury to either print even more money or subsidize its own debt.
After trillions of new dollars have been (and continue to be) printed or government subsidized, door No. 2 will swing open, and hyperinflation will punch us squarely in the mouth! Hyperinflation occurs when you have a massive increase in the money supply that is not proportionally backed by the production of goods and services, resulting in a substantial decrease in purchasing power. Currently, we have the U.S. Treasury printing trillions of new dollars at a time when America’s GDP (the universal measure of a nations output of goods and services) is either stagnant or shrinking. The potential onset of hyperinflation is a phenomenon that will make our current economic crisis pale in comparison; again triggering America’s psyche, still fresh with the fear of financial instability, into a mad rush to once again “heal the pain.”
Bloodied by the hyperinflation punch, America’s public will stumble toward the third door, eager to bandage their wounds, and open what will be disguised as a cure-all to their ills … a one-world, global currency. Now, the onset of a truly “one-world” global currency may prove to be a few steps into this last door, but once this door is cracked, it will be nearly impossible to slam shut. First you will see a merging of the North America’s systems into one continental currency (Google amero). Most of Europe has already established the euro, and the countries comprising Africa are discussing an African Union which would recognize one continental currency. Eventually, these geographical (no longer national) currencies would likely merge at the behest of the IMF, World Bank and few geographical elites. The result: a consolidation of economic power into fewer and fewer hands causing an ever-expanding lower class and a shrinking middle class. Those not fortunate enough to be a member of the elite will find themselves financially enslaved by them.
Don’t be fooled by the purported good intentions or supposed ignorance of any administration, as the current economic policies being shoved down our throats are neither well-intended nor ignorant; rather they are coldly calculated.
Posted by: malfax | March 30, 2009, 2:41 am 2:41 am
There has doubtlessly been great anxiety about the economy, but I think even greater anxiety exists over what President Barack Obama is doing and planning to do to this country. We’ve always had economic downturns, and we’ve always recovered, but we’ve never deliberately planned to spend ourselves into bankruptcy, from which we may not be able to recover.
True, our smorgasbord of entitlements has threatened our long-term solvency for some time, and reckless politicians have been negligent in refusing to reform them and, instead, have just created more. But Obama takes profligate spending to entirely new levels while pretending to be a fiscal hawk.
With all due respect to Mr. Obama, I don’t recall ever seeing another president whine so much about the mess his predecessor left him, disgracing the motto of former Democratic President Harry Truman that “the buck stops here.” Though childish and unpresidential, the worst part about it is that he’s using it as a bogus justification to do much worse.
Seriously, how many times are we going to have to hear him say, “Republicans have a short memory, because as I recall, I’m inheriting a $1.3 trillion annual deficit from them”?
Stop right there. This is grossly misleading on many levels. In the first place, President Bush’s budget deficits were declining nicely each year before the sub-prime crisis hit in 2008 (fiscal year 2004: $412.7 billion; FY 2005: $318.3 billion; FY 2006: $248.2 billion; FY 2007: $160.7 billion; and FY 2008: $454.8 billion). Second, Democrats took control of Congress in 2006 and thus share blame. Third, the 2009 budget, upward of $1.3 trillion, contained the extraordinary bailout and rescue expenditures, which Obama voted for. Fourth, eight months of this FY 2009 budget that Obama is blaming on President Bush will occur on Obama’s watch (Jan. 20 through Oct. 1, 2009). Fifth, but most important, Obama is seeking to establish this atypical, artificially bloated FY 2009 as the new baseline from which his budgets should be compared, falsely implying that President Bush incrementally increased the deficit each year until it reached the annual figure of $1.3 trillion (the above numbers show the opposite) and that it will remain that high unless he – Obama – brings it down. Apparently smiling at our collective stupidity, he thus plans to disguise his increases in annual spending as decreases and take credit for cutting the budget in half by the end of his term.
When we cut through the smoke and mirrors, we see that Obama’s plan is to ratchet up annualized spending to rates greatly exceeding President Bush’s budgets. The Heritage Foundation reports that President Bush ran budget deficits that averaged $300 billion annually, while Obama’s are projected to average more than $600 billion, “even after the economy recovers and the troops return home from Iraq.”
Obama also doesn’t mention, and then dissembles when asked about it, that after his first term – in the so-called out years – his deficit numbers start rising even more precipitously, to some $1.2 trillion – almost the level of FY 2009. All one really needs to do to understand Obama’s unconscionable plan to bankrupt America is to look at a simple chart comparing his deficits with those of President Bush, prepared by The Heritage Foundation.
Obama should look at this egregious $1.3 trillion figure (some say it’s substantially more than that) with horror, instantly promise never to allow it to happen again, and have extreme confidence he could fulfill that promise merely by cutting out the extraordinary items. But he’s doing just the opposite, with fraud in the inducement and malice aforethought.
His ideology compels him to grow government exponentially, national deficits and debt be damned. Oh, sure, he tells us he has to spend these enormous amounts to stimulate the economy, but he knows the vast majority of his expenditures aren’t even designed to stimulate the economy, and he’s also aware that the economy will turn around anyway in due course, without government intermeddling on the spending side.
Adding insult to injury, he’s claiming he’s saving $2 trillion in spending, when the truth is that a great portion of these “savings” will result from withdrawing our troops from Iraq, which was also going to happen anyway. Another portion involves trillions of dollars in tax increases, which have never before been considered “savings.” By the time he’s done – if he serves two terms – he will have almost doubled the national debt, according to conservative estimates by the Congressional Budget Office, and we’re supposed to thank him for impoverishing and enslaving our children. This is what Obama calls “A New Era of Responsibility.”
Posted by: malfax | March 30, 2009, 2:53 am 2:53 am
Some words of wisdom from Thomas Jefferson: “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”
Posted by: malfax | March 30, 2009, 4:30 am 4:30 am
<>
You know how they can look in the mirror… They are using the mirror for the same thing, whiffing up those lines.
Posted by: twinstick | March 30, 2009, 6:20 am 6:20 am
Wouldn’t it be nice if the government returned these unused fund to the American people. That’s an accountable solution to me.
Posted by: Patrice Lee | March 30, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am
MY FRAKKING GODS
Let them FAIL
America. if you want recovery, then cut off these dead limbs. If your arm was shattered with gangrine, you would have it removed. These businesses and Banks are DEAD LIMBS. REPLACE them WITH the new laws. All saving the old ones do is say “Its OK that your a stupid idiot that cant add or subtract, we will bail you out.”
This attitude ENCOURAGES these types of situations.
Take your stimulas and STICK IT.
And the reason you dont get specific answers is because THEY HAVE NO IDEA. They threw money at the problem hopeing that it would go away. You feed a stray cat, does it go away? Or does it come back EVERY DAY looking for hand outs?
The goverment has failed. FAILED. AND WE DO NOTHING!!!????
WE HAVE FAILED, AND WE DESERVE WHATS COMMING.
WE NEED TO ACCEPT OUR FATES, AND PUNISH THOSE THAT BROUGHT US TO THIS BRINK.
WE need to LEARN from this, and NOT let it happen again.
WE NEED TO GET UP OFF OUR a$$ES AND DO SOMETHING.
OR
We can sit back and watch our beloved country turn into a 3rd world nation with Nukes. Soon they will be putting santions on US!
Buy the MADE IN USA tag. Fix ourselves, set an example for the world to follow.
We beat this kind of thing before, but that was mostly our parents. Lets see what kind of kids they raised
Star
Posted by: fallingstar | March 30, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Little Timmy the tax cheat has proven time and again that a) he knows nothing and b) he is a mere puppet of the fascist dictator, der Fuehrer (aka Big O)!
Posted by: ricardo maxwell | March 30, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Btw, how can Timmy the tax cheat say we have $135 million left when we really don’t have anything at all unless we print it out of thin air?
Posted by: ricardo maxwell | March 30, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
So much for B.Hussein’s promise of “absolute transparency”… who got the money? how much? Hey- isn’t that our money their giving away? taxation with fraudulent representation? Who is John Galt?
Posted by: Maxwell Smart | March 30, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
If the TAX PAYERS are going into debt to bail out the banks, why shouldn’t the bailout money go towards paying off the principle debt that caused the ‘financial crisis’ in the first place?
Isn’t it the bad principle debt supposedly the cause of the ‘crisis’?
Why should ‘we the people’ be stuck with twice the debt while the Bankers get bailed out?
ANSWER: ‘we the people’ are not represented by our government unless we have lobbyists and untraceable diamond currency to bribe them.
Posted by: Adam L Tucker | March 30, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Tiny Tim at Treasury and Aunt B running homeland security this administration is a joke.
Posted by: Tom | March 30, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
It’s okay, George. You’ve got yours.
Posted by: Mary Jo | March 30, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
I am lobbying for the government to get into the business of credit cards..interest rates at 5%, compete with these banks raping americans on credit..the government uses the profits to pay off the national debt…we get a reasonable rate..will kill the credit industry with good old capitalism..or they will have to lower their rates..get banks back to a time when they just made loans and took deposits..a way to pay off government debt without taxing the american people twice…anybody on board????
Posted by: cowgirl | March 30, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Obama spent much more time vetting the choice of his dog than he did the likes of Tim.
Shows.
Posted by: paul | March 30, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
wow this makes me want to poop all over
Posted by: M.A.N. | March 30, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
George needs to put a disclaimer on the show. He advises Obama on image. His show therefore is not objective. Too bad George I use to love your show all the way back to Brinkley days. George your a fraud.
Posted by: devoid | March 31, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am
This being the 31st of March 2009 you would think that banks would be doing their part on the economic recovery, and I am sure that “some” are, but it seems that CHASE hasn’t gotten the message. At least that is what is reflected by the most recent letter I received from them concerning REDUCING my credit line by one-half of what it was previously. To me that seems to be going in the wrong direction based on the recovery plan “freeing up” credit for the banks. They said in their letter dtd March 22, 2009 that this decision was in no way based on any credit reports or credit preformance, but that they are reducing “ALL” lines of credit, for business reason, where the available credit is greater than $500. huh!!!!!
Posted by: Jerry H. | March 31, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
So if there is all that money left over, do the American Tax payer get a chunk of it, since it is our money anyway. If not, then please tell me how do I stimulate the economy with $7.50 a week, cause that is what single tax payers get, it’s $13 a week for married people. How can I go on a vacation, or buy a car, house, or clothes, much less food, and the basic necessities. And please tell me how giving all this money to the greedy people who cannot help me help stimulate the economy. How is giving my tax payer money to these people help me with my finances. Can I get an answer please. Seems these reporters are dancing around questions like this. Can a reporter finally ask the hard questions like this one, instead of those questions that do not help anyone get a real correct answer. Do your job to get down to the real answer and quit wimping out on asking the issue questions that will help the tax payer get some of our money back. Ask the question of when we will get a fat stimulus check worth more than $600 so we can stimulate the economy. Or are you scared you might lose your job.
Posted by: cdd | April 1, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
No more TARP money. It doesnt appear to have any positive impact on the economy. Let the banks fail, let GM go into bankrupcy. Propping up failing institutions is not what our country needs.
Posted by: Barbara | April 1, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Good morning everyone.
Republicans come up with a VALID plan with NUMBERS yet ?!?!?!?!?
Posted by: JimmyTwoTimes | Mar 29, 2009 9:33:52 AM
========================================
Even though I’m posting to a 2009 post, the answer to that is no. They are still doing their fear mongering tactics of: “democrats want to over tax you”. And pick up on any story that would slightly or greatly wound the Democrats, and over do it just to get back into seats.
Posted by: Rosli | July 26, 2010, 3:22 am 3:22 am