Mar 16, 2009 3:16pm

Gibbs: Not Taking Cheney’s Advice ‘Could Be The Best Possible Outcome of Yesterday’s Interview’

Asked for reaction to former Vice President Dick Cheney’s criticism of the Obama administration on CNN Sunday, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said: "I guess Rush Limbaugh was busy so they trotted out the next most popular member of the Republican cabal."

Gibbs went on to say that terrorists will be brought to justice, unlike under Bush, and "not taking economic advice from Dick Cheney could be the best possible outcome of yesterday’s interview."

On Sunday, Cheney said Obama’s national security choices are making the country less safe. In an interview with CNN’s John King, the former vice president defended the Bush administration’s war record and economic policies.

"I don’t think you can blame the Bush administration for the creation of those [economic] circumstances," he said.

Criticizing Obama’s economic agenda, Cheney added: "But the key, I think, is the extent to which they fix the problem with the financial institutions in the society. That is a federal government responsibility. … And my own belief is that the way we grow the economy, create jobs, create wealth is in the private sector. The government doesn’t do that. If you’re really seriously interested in improving the performance the economy, I think tax policy is more important."

– jpt

User Comments

Great statement Gibbs.
Some people should just get “no cred” stamped on their foreheads. Cheney would be first in line for that.
loser

Posted by: Omentum | March 16, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Agree 100 percent with Gibbs!

Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | March 16, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Gibbs sounds a bit scared.
Who could blame him?

Posted by: Plumber | March 16, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Just saw Gibbs on CNN (or was it Fox? I was flipping back and forth) and when he made his statement about Cheney, I had to just shake my head. This press spokesman is such a tool.
Let me be clear– I am not and never have been a Cheney fan. Not every Republican or even every Bush fan is a Cheney fan, believe me. Having said that, there was no reason for Gibbs to be so sophomoric, rushing to get in another Limbaugh shot and to refer to a Republican “cabal.” This is NOT supposed to be a partisan position. He is there to represent the president and to speak on behalf of the White House. It is beneath the dignity of the office to keep making these cheap shots.
Someone needs to remind Mr. Gibbs that the election is over. The White House is supposed to be in governing mode. And sometimes in that mode you take the high road when someone gives you a clear shot at the load road as that reporter did by asking about his reaction to the Cheney interview. Trust Mr. Gibbs never to pass up an opportunity to be petty.

Posted by: moderate | March 16, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

OH, and I hope Mr. Tapper provides more info from the press briefing later, including his usual feature giving a transcript of his own question and Gibbs’ response. I didn’t see that when I was watching, but Gibbs was getting pretty flummoxed dealing with another reporter and I wanted to know what the overall feel of the room was and how things are going with the daily briefing.

Posted by: moderate | March 16, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

“WASHINGTON — A new poll by the independent Pew Research Center for the People & the Press has found that President Barack Obama’s popular support is eroding, with his approval rating dropping below 60 percent.
“‘President Barack Obama’s approval rating has slipped, as a growing number of Americans see him listening more to his party’s liberals than to its moderates, and many voice opposition to some of his key economic proposals,’ the Pew Center concluded.”
A nation begins to inquire, “what in God’s name have we done?”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 16, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Here’s a piece of advice for Gibbs to help him deal with his boss.
Children who are constantly praised turn into narcissist who cannot handle criticism.
Describes BO perfectly and the way his adolescent staff deal with critics.

Posted by: sammy | March 16, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

The Democrats are nothing but friends to our enemies and cowards Cheney was a awsome Vice-President and Thank You for keeping us safe. Onl

Posted by: AIMEE | March 16, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

There’s a piece by Paul Begala on cnn.com about Cheney. It’s excellent, you should read it.
And, for those above who are worried about Obama being surrounded by sycophants – don’t be so alarmed, you’ve got Michelle.

Posted by: Steve From NH | March 16, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

“And my own belief is that the way we grow the economy, create jobs, create wealth is in the private sector.”
Is that how Cheney’s Haliburton was able to get no bid contracts?
Is that Cheney’s idea of private sector wealth creation?
BTW, did he ever fully divest himself of Haliburton stock as he stated he would?

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Add another to the enemy list. Rush, Jim Cramer, Rick Santelli,Cheney … Propaganda Minister “Baghdad Bob” Gibs cannot get enough bashing dissenters from the pulpit of White House Spokesman. What ever happened to free speach in this administration? Next thing you know the John Stewarts et all will be sent on the attack.

Posted by: Vince C | March 16, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

“Cheney was a awsome Vice-President and Thank You for keeping us safe”
Except for Harry Whittington.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

The defenders of Darth Cheney are all Lush Limbaugh fans no doubt. That says it all! What a bunch of Rightwing idiots! What’s Cheneys’ approval rating 1%? Cheney belongs in prison with all his other criminal associates! It will take decades to undue all the misdeeds the Bush administration did to America! The evil puppet master Cheney is the man MOST responsible for all the evil wrought on our country!

Posted by: AJ | March 16, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Better not to listen to the rants of a man who nearly destroyed our country. These chicken hawks never served in the military but were over eager in sending our men and women to a war for profit. They lied us into a preemptive war. Men have gone to jail for far lesser violations of the law.

Posted by: worldsam | March 16, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Gibbs has no class at all, he undermines the office of the President by acting like street rabble in his comments. I thought Obama was going to work past partisanship and unify the country? Instead, it looks like they are having so many failures that they’ve resorted to scapegoating and undignified behavior.
I hope that Cheney runs for President, he seems to be wonderfully on top of the political and economic situation, and I know that I would fully support him in his attempt.

Posted by: Gillian Smith | March 16, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Really?
Anyone who still apologizes for the past administration has a screw loose. By any measure, they were a complete failure. The fact that we were not hit after 9/11 (on Bush’s watch – 9 months into his administration) is not that impressive to me. If that makes a successful president, I guess Jimmy Carter was even more successful than Dubya.

Posted by: billy smith | March 16, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Hello Cheney! The private sector is generating no wealth and is laying off 600,000 people a month. How can you say that when you know the opposite is true?

Posted by: Bob | March 16, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

moderate: It is beneath the dignity of the office to keep making these cheap shots.
============
yes.
I’m surprised how free they feel to say these kinds of things.

Posted by: MayBee | March 16, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Cheney – there is virtually no private sector left to generate wealth. Don’t blame this on Obama. It started with your idiot buddy in the White House and his awful administration who fell asleep and allowed greedy Wall St types to run roughshod over the middle class and destroy $11 trillion in wealth by screwing around with complex financial instruments (read: smoke and mirrors)

Posted by: Bob | March 16, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

moderate:”This is NOT supposed to be a partisan position. He is there to represent the president and to speak on behalf of the White House.”
What? This most certainly IS a partisan position and has been used as such by every administration in my memory. Don’t you remember Ari railing against the NY Times and warning Americans “need to watch what they say, watch what they do.”
As long as he isn’t lying or swearing, it’s pretty much fair game and in line with precedent.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

worldsam: “Boy, I say boy, now that’s a chicken hawk!”

Posted by: Bob | March 16, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Obama’s doing a great job. He’s been putting the brakes on this out of control freight train like he should be. Next up is Medicare which is just about to bankrupt the government and immediately after that is social security. Think that people in this county still to this day don’t seem to get the mess we’re in and what we’re facing here. The days of sticking our heads in the sand and praying rich CEO’s can solve problems are gone, it’s time to actually tackle and fix problems. Doing nothing would be far far worse. Even if stock market rallies back to where it was it is not going to solve anything.

Posted by: Scotti | March 16, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Cheney was a awsome Vice-President and Thank You for keeping us safe” Except for Harry Whittington.
————
And the 3000 who died on 9/11.

Posted by: hang | March 16, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Cheney has never met a war that he didn’t like.

Posted by: Mack | March 16, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Gillian Smith:”Instead, it looks like they are having so many failures that they’ve resorted to scapegoating and undignified behavior.”
Telling the truth and consistently pointing out actual facts is hardly scapegoating. As much as Republicans want everyone to forget what happened when they had the reins and implemented the exact policies they are still pushing as the cure for everything, Americans aren’t quite that stupid.
“I hope that Cheney runs for President, he seems to be wonderfully on top of the political and economic situation, and I know that I would fully support him in his attempt.”
Wow, it’s one of the 15 percenters who like Cheney. Even my dad, who voted the Bush/Cheney ticket because he trusted Cheney, now mutters and shakes his head whenever his name comes up.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

The Bush-Cheney cabal are losers. If they were any good, the RepubliCONS would still be running our government. They weren’t and they aren’t so why do you Cheney supporters still think the way you do? You’ve been listening too much to Limbaugh , haven’t you?

Posted by: leftyintexas | March 16, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Still with the Limbaugh thing, huh? Totally unprofessional behavior from a a White House spokesman.

Posted by: W. Axl Rose | March 16, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

O-dumb-AH.. friend of the terrorist
giving millions of american taxpayers dollars to rebuild terrorist stronghol in Gaza
O-dumb-ah. I never met a terrorist i wouldn’t let go

Posted by: Obama-LIVE FROM THE WAFFLE HOUSE | March 16, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

what planet is thank god the ex ex president on? please someone from aig.. who is another enron… give me the “in the know” mindset?

Posted by: jeff horn | March 16, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

I wouldn’t underestimate Cheney if I were in Gibbs place. Leave the judgemnt of Cheney to the history buffs, judicial system and the people.
Just acknowledge he has a right to his opinions and move on to the next question!

Posted by: jksmithinga | March 16, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Mack…said Cheney never met a war he didn’t like. Cheney DID meet one war he didn’t like…The Viet Nam War. He got 5 deferments to keep himself out of it…the COWARD!

Posted by: leftyintexas | March 16, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

O-dumb-ah to the wives of the terrorist victims of 911…SO WHAT!!!

Posted by: Obama-LIVE FROM THE WAFFLE HOUSE | March 16, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

GIBBS NEEDS TO KEEP SOME COMMENTS TO HIMSELF OR BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!!

Posted by: Denisea213 | March 16, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

“there is virtually no private sector left to generate wealth.”?
Gosh!
I think this poster might want to stop watching TV. The US has a $13T GDP this year, that’s more than triple the GDP of China. It’s more than China, Japan, Germany, France and the UK put together.
It’s ten times the economic output of all of Africa, South America, and Australia put together.
Unfortunately, the amount of yearly taxes in the USA, $6T, is greater than the yearly economic output of China.
Imagine what the level of prosperity would be in this country without the taxes!

Posted by: Gillian Smith | March 16, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

“moderate:”This is NOT supposed to be a partisan position. He is there to represent the president and to speak on behalf of the White House.”
This convenient amnesia experienced by conservatives is amusing.
Going back to at least Reagan, the Press Sec has been a partisan position though the partisanship usually is to the President vs party or ideology.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

What is with all this talking? ..and I mean both sides too! Yesterday, I am shocked by Mr. Cheney and his devisive rhetoric and then I see Mr Clinton, rather Mr. Hollywood, speaking about Mr. Obama’s policies. What gives here? I don’t recall Mr. Reagan speaking during Mr. G H Bush’s term, nor Mr. Bush speaking upon Mr. Clinton’s term. Heck! I don’t recall Mr. Clinton speaking during W’s term! The only one I recalled who spoke a lot (but no one listened) was Mr. Carter! Former administrations SPEAK to the White House directly!!!! Don’t play your opinions out in the press!

Posted by: FS | March 16, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Gibbs cute. But you know you are sending more and more people Rush’s way. Let Rush go.

Posted by: Geo | March 16, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

W. Axl Rose:” Totally unprofessional behavior from a a White House spokesman.”
I guess pointing out the truth is now unprofessional. At least he’s not slandering him as unpatriotic through ‘anonymous sources.’ It’s refreshing to get back to an administration taking full ownership of their political strategy, and historically a far more professional approach to politics.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Cheney via jpt:”1)But the key, I think, is the extent to which they fix the problem with the financial institutions in the society. 2)That is a federal government responsibility. … 3)And my own belief is that the way we grow the economy, create jobs, create wealth is in the private sector. 4)The government doesn’t do that. 5)If you’re really seriously interested in improving the performance the economy, I think tax policy is more important.”
=========
By my count, Obama has stated agreement with 4 of the above 5 statements.
Obama also finds tax policy very very important, as he is working hard to change it.

Posted by: MayBee | March 16, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

No attack after 9/11? Remember the anthrax terrorist attacks? Remember on whom?? And such a satisfactory conclusion to that attack as well.

Posted by: rodyl | March 16, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

The Obama administration: Picking fights with private citizens and continuing to blame the Bush administration in an attempt to cover up its own appalling lack of action and decisiveness.
We don’t have a president, we have a playground child.
The Chicago thug machine and all his years organizing ACORN have served him well.

Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | March 16, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

AJ – You must be quite happy with Obama’s war now, and his lack of withdrawal from Iraq or Afghanistan or Gitmo. Oh wait, it’s not his fault. He’s only President and his party owns Congress!

Posted by: Gillian Smith | March 16, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

O-dumb-ah…I am open to taxing your health benefits now.. of course i lied about that during the campaign

Posted by: Obama-LIVE FROM THE WAFFLE HOUSE | March 16, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Let’s see, WHO was vice president when the WTC was used for aerial target practice?…….
Thought so.
‘Nuff said.

Posted by: CSD | March 16, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Bob Gibbs, I really like your press briefings. It’s great to see someone tell the truth for a change (Get the message Ari?). Keep up the great work you’re doing Bob!

Posted by: leftyintexas | March 16, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

moderate: “Someone needs to remind Mr. Gibbs that the election is over.”
Well, actually, it looks to me like someone needs to remind the former vice president that the election is over.
By the way, is he still in his wheel chair or was that episode over and done with as soon as Obama was sworn in and Cheney knew he wouldn’t have to stand up for a black man?

Posted by: Elliot Ness | March 16, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

“Mack…said Cheney never met a war he didn’t like. Cheney DID meet one war he didn’t like…The Viet Nam War. He got 5 deferments to keep himself out of it…the COWARD!”
ZING!

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

O-dumb-ah.. so what i appoint tax cheats and liars to my cabinet?

Posted by: Obama-LIVE FROM THE WAFFLE HOUSE | March 16, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Gillian Smith:”Imagine what the level of prosperity would be in this country without the taxes!”
Yes, look at the economic powerhouse Somalia has become through the abolishment of taxes! All the US does is waste tax money on boondoggles like funding the invention, implementation and incubation of the Internet – a pure pork project that will never pay back I’m sure.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

“Plumber” says Gibbs looks “scared” and “who could blame him?”.
Do you think he’s afraid he might be assasainated if he says the wrong thing?
“moderate” may have a point in that Gibbs shouldn’t lower himself by making cheap shots. Let’s just remember that the Cheney/Bush admin was the worst in modern history and it’s laughable to hear them desperately trying to salvage their tattered legacy by blaming Bam for their incompetance and the current state of the union. It’s sad really.

Posted by: Robert Carver | March 16, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

I think Gibbs is reaching for something beyond his scope..just answer the questions..leave the dramatic flair to the more capable actors. I’ll just say that people at a low level need to stick to the script..and if you’re getting this stuff in your script..you need to replace the writers.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 16, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Obama, Rush Limbaugh isn’t even listened to buy grassroots conservatives!!! Stop obsessing about Rush like Bush did with bin Laden… Neither one has ANY significance or effect whatsover on ANYTHING!!!

Posted by: hmn... | March 16, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

“Let’s see, WHO was vice president when the WTC was used for aerial target practice?…….”
And who was vice president when it was bombed from underground?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 16, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Cheney…when will this nation finally see the back of that man for good?

Posted by: libertyjustice33 | March 16, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

With all the problems we are facing why does this administration keep attacking private citizens that disagree with them…Cheney and Limbaugh don’t run anything accept their mouths… we are getting a little tired of the energy being put into this sophmoric stuff… critism comes with the presidency ask Clinton and Bush… develop some thicker skin Mr. President

Posted by: phillysmart | March 16, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Being a college drop out that he is, Rush manages to get ignorant conservatives useless talking points that are quickly refuted.
========
You know, I don’t think an ABC news website is the place you want to use this as an attack.
The late, great Peter Jennings was himself a high school dropout.

Posted by: MayBee | March 16, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Cheney = Loser
Why are we listening to him?
look where he brought us?

Posted by: mike | March 16, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

“Smiles, we won you lost. Change you scared to believe in. ”
No, so far it is “No Change” that we can’t afford. All Obama has done is be critical of the past while doing the samethings just on an order of magnitude greater!

Posted by: Mike_C | March 16, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

hmn…”Obama, Rush Limbaugh isn’t even listened to buy grassroots conservatives!”
Then why, exactly, have so many high profile Republican party members been forced to show deference to Rush? Doesn’t matter if you’re a Congressman or the chair of the RNC, you are not allowed to criticize even tangentially Rush. THIS is why he is viewed as a legitimate spokesman for the Republican party – they have publicly given him that mantel. It is disingenuous to whine that the Whitehouse is daring to publicize the Republican’s own choice. Steele’s comments gave them a chance to make a break, and they resoundingly chose to keep Rush as their top spokesman.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

I keep getting a message that I am some kind of threat to this posting what’s up? All I said is time will tell if this Prsedent does better than the last one! Is Cheney monitoring little old ladies now?

Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | March 16, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

What a joke? The Democrats bringing criminals to justice. Treating a 1993 attack as a criminal offense. When attacked it is best to fight a war. This new administration will be remembered as the weakest in history.

Posted by: Goprightwinger | March 16, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Under Cheney – Bush we had the worst terrorist act on American soil in history. And he is saying that their administration kept us safe? What is he smoking?

Posted by: Mike | March 16, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

You know what I’m sick and tire of the Obama team. What substance do they have? Ever sense Obama ran his campaign until now all I’m hearing is bashing Bush. Get it over with for crying out loud. I didn’t hear Bush complains how bad Clinton was when 911 happened as soon as he took office. Bush took it head on, win or losed it was his responsibility for this country.

Posted by: vegas | March 16, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

phillysmart:”With all the problems we are facing why does this administration keep attacking private citizens that disagree with them.”
Yes, how dare the press secretary answer a question from the press. And all Obama EVER talks about is Cheney. Why just… err… has Obama every mentioned Cheney since becoming president?
The reason the press secretary exists is so the president doesn’t have to waste time with this. But I guess you think Gibbs should be personally creeping through the scrub of Afghanistan looking for Bin Laden or something.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Cheney’s trying to stay relevent. He lost his little marinette in Bush. Can’t pull the strings anymore. More of the same scare tactics. The boy who cried wolf.

Posted by: Jim Bob | March 16, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

What an absolute Bozo! Is he totally clueless. A pathetic human being. The guy is a borderline war criminal and he wants to criticize the new administration’s foreign policy and national security policy. IDIOT. Will someone please shut him up!!! He along with Bush and Paulson oversaw the destruction of Trillions in investor wealth and the greatest raping of shareholder wealth known to man kind and this guy gets a national audience? Please CNN stop this nonsense. You have no business giving this Stalinist moron a national forum any longer. Good riddance.

Posted by: Jay Sharp | March 16, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Vegas:”What substance do they have? Ever sense Obama ran his campaign until now all I’m hearing is bashing Bush. ”
Did you miss the reinstatement of FOIA priorities? Stem cell research? The moves to close Gitmo? The new budget outline? The final push on the stimulus bill?
You know, how Obama is moving so rapidly on implementing the agenda he was elected on that people (used to a president who couldn’t multitask) are complaining it’s too fast?

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Cheney is apparently still in charge of the past administration. I’ll bet bush still shines his shoes each day.

Posted by: libertyrulz | March 16, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

I can see from the blogs that the Obama stephord children are out in full force… anytime somebody criticizes the annointed one they work overtimw on attack mode.. we found something they do well… now if they would turn their attention to leading we would be alright

Posted by: phillysmart | March 16, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Has anyone noticed that the Chinese and the Russians are testing the waters (the S. China Sea incident and bomber bases in Hugoland)? What you should be concerned about is what they’re testing for? Because of O’Binden administration, there will be nuclear based bombers in Hugoland shortly. That’s my guess. Who knows what the Red Chinese will do…Taiwan? Japan?

Posted by: LT | March 16, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

“I didn’t hear Bush complains how bad Clinton was when 911 happened as soon as he took office. Bush took it head on, win or losed it was his responsibility for this country.”
9/11 happened 8 1/2 months into Bush’s Presidency.
And he, his admin and the the right wing media have blamed it on Clinton ever since.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

jhw539 the Moron said:
“It’s refreshing to get back to an administration taking full ownership of their political strategy, and historically a far more professional approach to politics.”
LOL! Attacking a private citizen is a “professional approach to politics?” Maybe in Chicago!

Posted by: W. Axl Rose | March 16, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

jhw539… he was baited even you must see that… we expect our president and his staff to avoid polarizing the nation even further… but without that polarization to talk about all the angry ones don’t have a clue

Posted by: phillysmart | March 16, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Rush and Cheney……what a combination…

Posted by: t | March 16, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

I think I’ll check out what this Rush guy is saying. He must be exposing something worng in the Obama administartion, otherwise they would not be so worried. And just how stable is this Gibbs fellow. Seems a bit off the deep end over nothing more than a radio show.

Posted by: mojo | March 16, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

“Has anyone noticed that the Chinese and the Russians are testing the waters (the S. China Sea incident and bomber bases in Hugoland)?”
Isn’t it great that we became involved in a coup of Venezeula allowing Hugo to play strong man and kick start his military relationship with the Russians?
I am so glad that the Bush admin had the foresight to tell Hugo to stuff it when it came to spare parts for his F-16s because he called Bush names at the UN.
Hugo then promptly replaced the F-16s with Russian fighters which has brought us to the situation we now face.
Though I certainly agree that China is testing us like they did during the spy plane incident early in Bush’s 1st term (June I think).

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

I left the CNN boards because of the kids. I guess they found ABCNEWS too.

Posted by: Shannon | March 16, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

“LOL! Attacking a private citizen is a “professional approach to politics?”
Like Bill Maher?
Or Joe Wilson?
Or the many other attacks on people who were against the War in Iraq?

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

AJ.. do you care about the country…or simply hate people who are not like you…did you get beat up by republicans when you were young…. or are you working for the Obama nation …

Posted by: phillysmart | March 16, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Who cares what that EVIL MAN CHENEY has to say! As far I’m concerned he should be in jail with his pal Scooter Libby!
Heck and throw Karl Rove in with ‘em!!!
These Republicans have made themselves irrelevant.

Posted by: SarainDallas | March 16, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Gibbs sounds as pathetic as cheney. obama is a tool by the way. just like bush was a tool. america is going down because of these 2 fools. bush was to stubborn n arrogant while obama is too much of a metrosexual. doomed we are. smoke up now and enjoy before your smoking/inhaling nuke fumes from russia via cuba/venezuela

Posted by: ddmcd1974 | March 16, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

LT: “Has anyone noticed that the Chinese and the Russians are testing the waters”
Like when they forced down one of our surveillance planes in international airspace and held the crew for 11 days on Hainan Island? That happened in April of 2001. Bush did get the crew back, but the Chinese had fun taking apart the plane and suffered no reprecussions. So far, Obama – and the US – is handling the China hazing better than Bush. Not sure they respect him more or if they are just so tangled up economically they’re scared to push too much.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

I think this administration better concentrate on their
own performance

Posted by: jane | March 16, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

phillysmart:”we expect our president and his staff to avoid polarizing the nation even further.”
Telling the truth may increase polarization in the short term, but is the only way to get back to a healthy discourse. Rush clearly sets policy in the Republican party and has the respect and deference of Republican lawmakers and party leaders. It is appropriate that the Whitehouse points this out so the public can honestly evaluate the actual Republican platform and allocate their support on the reality of it and not the bumperstickers.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Cheney is a big fat liar who lost all credibility with lie after lie after lie during eight years of republican corruption that he always approved of. As vice president he was able to cause some of the most evil and wicked harm to our country and others. He has nothing but contempt for America’s laws and constitution and deserves nothing but comtempt by America’s people.

Posted by: Vicki | March 16, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

jhw539… the truth seems to be relative to you… Obama speaks it and everybody else should just listen… think about how ridiculous that is

Posted by: phillysmart | March 16, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

phillysmart :”the truth seems to be relative to you”
No. The truth is fact. This is why I cite actual, documented facts in my replies. Could you please provide ANY actual facts – that is documented reality – to back up your radical opinions?

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Gibbs is right. Rush must’ve been busy because evil stubborn cheney came to the stubborn arrogant rescue as usual and boy was he wrong as always. Bush and Cheney And limbaugh is the reason our country is in the mess to begin with. Its pretty bad for the republican part when they have to raise the party with a radio commentator/host. i mean how low can you get??? Please tell me there’s someone in the republican party with a political seat who can challenge the democrats instead of a RADIO HOST? I guess not. Thats why they lost. The republicans spent 50 trillion dollars to help IRAqis but when our current president wants to help OUR country the hypocrits speak out that we’re spending too much eventhough he’s helping his own people instead of IRAQ’s. enough said.

Posted by: Bob | March 16, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Ryan C oh yeah, the right wing did jumped on Clinton it’s ok for the right wingers to do that to inform people because the news medias are not for that but I mean the Bush’s administration didn’t go out there and making fools out of themselves like the Obama is doing now.

Posted by: vegas | March 16, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

I’ll try this again. I wonder how many people posting here actually saw the interview yesterday. I did and if I did not despise our former VP so much I might have felt sorry for him. His responses were just as pathetic as the past administrations performance. Thankfully that chapter in our history is closed. My hope is that we can all survive the aftershocks from their misguided reign.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 16, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Why is anyone even talking to these 2 loosers. Does Cheney think he can scare the americans into believing there will be another terriost attack so we will put him back in office so her can inflate fuel prices again for his profit? Face it Cheney you are not in office! GET LOST OLD MAN! You and Busch did enough damage to this country!

Posted by: Pat | March 16, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Why is anyone even talking to these 2 loosers. Does Cheney think he can scare the americans into believing there will be another terriost attack so we will put him back in office so her can inflate fuel prices again for his profit? Face it Cheney you are not in office! GET LOST OLD MAN! You and Busch did enough damage to this country!

Posted by: Pat | March 16, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

phillysmart:”you are definately working for the Obama people because you hit all the talking points”
No, I am not working for Obama people although obviously I am a supporter. Do you HAVE ANY FACTUAL BASIS FOR YOUR COMMENT? I have stated a number of verifiable facts (like elected Republicans publicly showing deference to Rush, or the Hainan incident, or Ari Fleischer attacking Bill Maher) to support my personal opinions. What do you base your rationale on? All I can find is juvenile insults.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

I guess Gibbs would be funny here if the stakes were not so high. He and Obama will look like the biggest fools to walk the earth if we get hit by a terrorist attack due to their neglegence and arrogance.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

“Cabal”?
Wow.

Posted by: Gromit | March 16, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

jhw:And that’s why—there was an earlier question about has the President said anything to people in his own party—they’re reminders to all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do. This is not a time for remarks like that; there never is
=============
The “earlier question” mentioned in this quote was a very inflammatory remark regarding Sikhs and muslims, made by a Republican congressman.
Fleisher was not attacking Bill Maher. He was saying emotions were running high in the country, and it was not a good time to make inflammatory remarks.

Posted by: MayBee | March 16, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

I haven’t seen a fact on jhw539 posts yet… at least I don’t get paid for my beliefs

Posted by: phillysmart | March 16, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Rush Limbaugh has no official position with the republican party… thats a fact

Posted by: phillysmart | March 16, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Cheney will go to jail. Just wait.

Posted by: John Kovacs | March 16, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

ryan & jhw: just because some on the right (as with the left) can’t articulate their points as well as you do not make you right. The bill maher thing was not the same, this bob guy actas like a 4 year old when he speaks. if you guys actually believe that this administration is doing a good job i feel for you. not that bush was any better but to sit here and push for these policies you have to be closed minded. as a matter of fact they just plain scare me.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Limbaugh is the de facto Republican leader. Republicans should be proud of him.

Posted by: John Kovacs | March 16, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

A class act, Gibbs is not.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

“ryan & jhw: just because some on the right (as with the left) can’t articulate their points as well as you do not make you right.”
Articulation is overrated.
I would settle for people understanding their own posts vs just parroting what they heard or read elsewhere.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Obama’s a uniter! Just ask him.

Posted by: Justin | March 16, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

folks on the left…. you do understand that 20 million people listen to rush every week. now, if you were to take the IQ of those and match it against the hip hop side of the radio what do you think you would find? just listen to the advertising on am vs fm and i think you will find the answer. people who listen to talk radio are a good portion of what fuels our country that you want to overhaul. be careful what you ask for… the grass is not always greener, as we are finding out at a rapid pace.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

phillysmart wrote: “Rush Limbaugh has no official position with the republican party… thats a fact”
Absolutely right. He’s an entertainer (supposedly) who just signed a $400 million dollar radio deal for the next 8 years. And he is STILL the de-facto voice and leader of the GOP. How pathetic for them…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | March 16, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

billy bobbilly bob – you mean like how Bush and Cheney looked after it was revealed that they refused to look at briefings that specifically warned them that Bin Laden was “determined” to attack the U.S. and likely to use hijacked airplanes?
Posted by: kimbers | Mar 16, 2009 5:02:31 PM
You can go on back to the Clinton years and look how he had Osama in his sights and did not pull the trigger. Big Deal, it is Obama’s turn and this is post 911 and there are no more excuses. End of story.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Gibbs is just another one of Obama’s clowns. All they need is a few performing animals and they could start their own circus. Obama can be the magician (all smoke and mirrors).

Posted by: Gary | March 16, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

phillysmart:”I haven’t seen a fact on jhw539 posts yet… at least I don’t get paid for my beliefs”
Then you have not been reading my posts. Although as a professional engineer, technically I do get paid for ‘my beliefs’ (those are also based on facts I might add).
“Rush Limbaugh has no official position with the republican party”
This is true. My counter to it is the deference shown to him by Republicans. Newt is the only one who has voiced criticism and not been forced to apologize.
“My intent was not to go after Rush – I have enormous respect for Rush Limbaugh… I was maybe a little bit inarticulate. … There was no attempt on my part to diminish his voice or his leadership.” Michael Steele, RNC Chairman
“I regret and apologize for the fact that my comments have offended and upset my fellow conservatives—that was not my intent…And on so many of these things, I see eye-to-eye with Rush Limbaugh.” Gingrey (R-GA)
Governor Mark Sanford (R-SC):
“Anybody who wants [President Obama] to fail is an idiot, because it means we’re all in trouble…”
Followed quickly by his clarification that he wasn’t daring to insult Rush (via his Communications Director): “the governor was not referring to anyone (in particular).”

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

king of men: i guess the difference to me is that ari did not talk about bill maher EVERY SINGLE DAY. this guy has to avoid tough questions somehow so he deflects to rush. its like he is on the freshman debate team.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

So the President of the United States (through his spokesman) thinks the Republican Party is a cabal – implying a sinister intent.
A cabal is a number of people united in some close design, usually to promote their private views and interests in a church, state, or other community, often by intrigue. Cabals are sometimes secret societies composed of a few designing persons.
Obama and company are more bizaare than we thought.
The President is supposed to represent the people of the United States – not the Democratic party.

Posted by: Sally J | March 16, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

I wonder how long Obama’s administration is going to continue beating this one. Think they’ve ever thought it might back fire. Say like people are comparing Keith Olberman to being the head of the democratic party. Every election comes down to independents. Some like Rush,some don’t,some take him with a grain of salt. Whichever way, this is getting very old. Let it go. Find a new bashing tool. Keep the great divide. Keep the change a coming!

Posted by: Move On | March 16, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

billy bob:”You can go on back to the Clinton years and look how he had Osama in his sights and did not pull the trigger. ”
Clinton did pull the trigger. Barely missed him by some accounts. Of course, Republicans took to the floor of Congress to denounce President Clinton’s attempts to kill Bin Laden, hammering him for a couple weeks to make sure he never tried such a thing again. So glad they put scoring a good partisan talking point about “Monica missiles” over our nation’s security. Thanks Republican party!

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Why doesn’t Cheney just crawl back into his hole like a good little weasel, and remember that HIS TIME IS UP??? When Bush was in office, Cheney constantly acted like he thought HE was President – and now that Bush is out of office, Cheney STILL acts like he is somehow in charge. I wish his Secret Service guards would just tell him to SHUT UP!

Posted by: Jordan | March 16, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

A real NEWS interviewer would have asked Cheney how much Haliburton’s stock went up during the war? Yes, I know, Cheney put his stock in holding, but it does not mean he did not benefit from Haliburton’s profit once he left the vice-presidency.

Posted by: Kenneth Pennington | March 16, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

“i guess the difference to me is that ari did not talk about bill maher EVERY SINGLE DAY”
Since Maher was summarily fired by ABC, the need to discuss him disappeared.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Cheney: “I don’t think you can blame the Bush administration for the creation of those [economic] circumstances” … Oh, then who would YOU blame, Mr. Chaney? THE TOOTH FAIRY??? Truth is, Cheney deserves the Madoff treatment!

Posted by: Jordan | March 16, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

billy bob:”You can go on back to the Clinton years and look how he had Osama in his sights and did not pull the trigger. ”
Clinton did pull the trigger. Barely missed him by some accounts. Of course, Republicans took to the floor of Congress to denounce President Clinton’s attempts to kill Bin Laden, hammering him for a couple weeks to make sure he never tried such a thing again. So glad they put scoring a good partisan talking point about “Monica missiles” over our nation’s security. Thanks Republican party!
Posted by: jhw539 | Mar 16, 2009 5:14:54 PM
You guys just dont get it, this is not a football game you are rooting for, this is for keeps and the stakes are real cities and real lives. We cannot afford to make ONE mistake period. If Obama does not get information from someone because it might violate a terrorist rights and that person is involved in nuking a major city, Obama and Gibbs and the rest of the liberals will look like fools. I just hope it never comes to that.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

see king of men…. you just sit there and continue to call people names. I don’t think my comparison is very bizarre at all… (as a matter of fact which all of you guys seem so interested in) go ahead and google (am radio advertising demographics) third link down…. what makes it so funny is that these stats are from NPR. but you just keep on keepin on king… go get em

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

“you do understand that 20 million people listen to rush every week. now, if you were to take the IQ of those and match it against the hip hop side of the radio what do you think you would find?”
Geee I wonder what you are trying to say here.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

stickman:”king of men: i guess the difference to me is that ari did not talk about bill maher EVERY SINGLE DAY. ”
Could you cite where Gibbs has talked about Rush every day? Or even every press conference for that matter? I see no mention of Rush in the 3/10, 3/11, 3/12, or 3/13 press conferences. I didn’t bother to search transcripts back further. By “EVERY SINGLE DAY” did actually mean something like “a few times in the last three months?”

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Why is Cheney’s opinion relevant? He was an out-to-lunch VP and VP is not a very important job anyway. The guy is a war mongering profiteer, nothing more.

Posted by: Zinglesloff | March 16, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Does anyone actually listen to Cheney anymore? Or for that fact the Republican party. Well except for the few states in the South that are lost in some cultural time warp. My plan would be to have a reverse LA purchase and sell, lets say Mississippi and Alabama. That way we could pay down some debt and get rid of the United States versions of the Detroit Lions 0-16.
Keep up the good work Gibbs!

Posted by: stuart3368 | March 16, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

billy bob:”You guys just dont get it, this is not a football game you are rooting for, this is for keeps and the stakes are real cities and real lives. We cannot afford to make ONE mistake period.”
Why was torture rejected as a useless strategy when dealing with Nazi prisoners in the depths of WWII? There are legitimate opinions that the harsh approach causes greater harm to our fight against an asymmetric enemy. Bin Laden does not need us throwing up a smokescreen of torture rationalizations and Abu Grahib to help him recruit for his evil ’cause.’

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

We don’t need Cheany’s advise on the economy, war, security, interpreting the constitution, giving Iraqi contracts to friends, hunting, or anything else. Thanks for playing a big hand in destroying our country…now just go away.

Posted by: DSchles33 | March 16, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

I hate Cheney and Limbaugh but get rid of Gibbs please. His glibness and continuing to comment on idiots like Rush gives them alot more press and power then they merit. I’d like to see a press secretary that sticks to the issues at hand and bypasses the Cramers and Limbaughs.

Posted by: alpaig52 | March 16, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

billy bob:”You can go on back to the Clinton years and look how he had Osama in his sights and did not pull the trigger. ”
Clinton did pull the trigger. Barely missed him by some accounts. Of course, Republicans took to the floor of Congress to denounce President Clinton’s attempts to kill Bin Laden, hammering him for a couple weeks to make sure he never tried such a thing again. So glad they put scoring a good partisan talking point about “Monica missiles” over our nation’s security. Thanks Republican party!
Posted by: jhw539 | Mar 16, 2009 5:14:54 PM
Ignorance is bliss. I live in one of those states and our main industry is putting people in space. Do you even know where that is???

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Wow, I really struck a nerve with you guys today. analogies are a way to compare. sorry thats too deep for you king, and as for ryan, go ahead, tell me what i was trying to say. and jhw, come on its obvious bob has mentioned rush more than a few times or we wouldn’t be having this conversation. i am at work, barely have time to respond much less look up different press conferences.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Cheney…and Bush, please go away…and take Jindal, Steele, Rush, Rove, Falin and all the rest of these loosers with you! You’ve done enough damage.

Posted by: ByeDick | March 16, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

According Cheney, tax policy is the answer. Didn’t we try that for 8 years, give the rich a tax deduction? My god, when does the greed stop?

Posted by: mtfern | March 16, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Cheney is one of the least respected, least liked people in America. but what is the Obama adminstration hiding by defusing the talks with humor.
I disliked the Bush team and the GOP led government, but seeing the new Adminstration and congress behave like Bush, Frist and Hastert is doing more to undermine my confidence in our government. maybe those who are buying gold, guns and stockpiles of food know something that I do not know.

Posted by: scott jeffries | March 16, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

billy bob:”Ignorance is bliss. I live in one of those states and our main industry is putting people in space. Do you even know where that is???”
What? I think you may have pasted in the wrong quote – I didn’t say anything about a particular state. I was referring to the cruise missile attacks that targeted Al Quaida camps in Afghanistan launched by President Clinton in August of 1998. I have no idea what you’re talking about.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Gibbs is great. I like that he can jab Cheney and the rest of the right wing losers, and that he does it with a sense of humor. Cheney is history, and if justice prevails, will be behind bars someday.

Posted by: earth_not_flat | March 16, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

I like how people are saying if Bush and the republicans were good thet would still be in office . well if that is the case than why didn’t gore and the democrats win in a big land slide if Clinton was so great. I feel the $4.00 gas stuff drove the heating and automobile expenses to high. I sold cars than and it sure stop it in a hurry.Pres. Obama said the deregulation was a a cause well it was Clinton and his party that did that. They always switch parties when thing are bad at election time.

Posted by: rayco96 | March 16, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

“Wow, I really struck a nerve with you guys today”
Or perhaps it is us that have struck the nerve with you since all you offer are insults.
” i am at work, barely have time to respond much less look up different press conferences. ”
But that doesn’t seem to stop you from speaking with certainty.
Perhaps you should actually verify before you parrot.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Idiot he is.

Posted by: Fargon | March 16, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

jhw539 Like thta was ever a reason for 911 or anything that bin laden did. He hates you for the way you think and for our part in creating Israel. He has plenty of propaganda for recruiting. The Abu grahib issue was a creation of our press as was the so called torture of prisoners in Gitmo. Use some common senmse and quit believing everything the press tells you.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

stickman:” and jhw, come on its obvious bob has mentioned rush more than a few times or we wouldn’t be having this conversation.”
You implied he mentioned Rush “EVERY SINGLE DAY.” I was pointing out that this was not a fact. If I had more time, I would count up how many days the Whitehouse has actually mentioned Rush, but I am willing to bet it’s around 10 in the last 12 weeks.
Your initial distortion of the facts makes reasonable argument impossible. The truth is every mention of Rush gets multiple headlines, sometimes for several days. But Rush is hardly a common topic and clearly is not a major issue for this Whitehouse, as much as the press loves to hype it.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

“and as for ryan, go ahead, tell me what i was trying to say”
No you tell us.
Either you were a coward trying to make a racist statement but too afraid to say it outright or you simply parroted it unaware of what it meant.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

The GOP mantra: “Tax breaks and the end-all of economic recovery”——-truth: Tax breaks and trickle down economic policies have FAILED.

Posted by: GOP is a dying breed | March 16, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Rush has 20 Million people tune in a week? That’s 20 million dived 7 days. That’s 2.8 million listeners. 1/2 are believed to be liberals wondering what dumb thing he’ll say next. That leaves the Republican Leader with just over 1 million people tuning in to hear Rush tell them how to destroy America.
I do however think that Gibbs need to stop trying to pick a fight with every Republican! The Election is OVER!!!

Posted by: Kevin | March 16, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

jhw539 sorry I was trying to copy and paste this
Does anyone actually listen to Cheney anymore? Or for that fact the Republican party. Well except for the few states in the South that are lost in some cultural time warp. My plan would be to have a reverse LA purchase and sell, lets say Mississippi and Alabama. That way we could pay down some debt and get rid of the United States versions of the Detroit Lions 0-16.
Keep up the good work Gibbs!
Posted by: stuart3368 | Mar 16, 2009 5:27:19 PM
Ignorance is bliss

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

First of all,
I LOVE Gibbs. He says it like it is. Limbaugh is a fat, indulgent, opiate-addicted, right-winged sociopath and Cheney is right there with him.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

“The Abu grahib issue was a creation of our press as was the so called torture of prisoners in Gitmo”
Does it sicken anyone else that right wingers vacillate from torture is ok to torture never happened to accusations of torture are the press’s fault?

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

there are individuals who emerge as devisive types. cheney and rush certainly are found in this category. they are loved and hated. my take on it, i suspect that cheney/rush had unresolved and painful relationships with their respective fathers. they are lonely deep down, despite how well known and famous they are. in spite of all the many people around them. it’s unfortunate that they take out their disfuntion on the rest of us, and that they weild so much power.

Posted by: too many people | March 16, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Gibbs your an idiot.

Posted by: ChicagBob | March 16, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

seriously ryan, we hear about bob talking smack ALMOST every day, and rahm threw in his two cents too, so get off it. the fact is you guys are so far left you can’t even think for yourselves. i personnaly don’t like cheney, or w, i did not vote for them, not that kerry would have been any better(dodged a bullet there). I just don’t like barry and his policies. he is just the same as bush but spends ten times as much. i probably agree with you on a number of things but you want to have a hissy fit and not a real discussion. don’t get angry with me, find a right wing nut to yell at.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

And my own belief is that the way we grow the economy, create jobs, >>>> We are loosing 630,000 jobs a month. What is the Obama solution as we are headed to 10% unemployment? Gibbs nice try to hide failure with humor but I am not buying it. You think job loss is a joke?

Posted by: ChicagBob | March 16, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

billy bob:”The Abu grahib issue was a creation of our press as was the so called torture of prisoners in Gitmo. ”
Rumsfeld offered to resign because he is a professional who knew exactly how much Abu grahib hurt us. That you prefer blind faith to your team makes it pointless to debate you. I welcome those with other opinions, but it’s not worth wasting time if you are living in a fantasy land with your own facts. The Taguba report was a ‘creation’ of the US Army Criminal Investigation Command. I suggest you read the Article 15-6 report summarizing the documented abuses. They are not appropriate for posting here.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Isnt Gibbs the same man who said the economy is in Crisis last week and now is saying the economy isnt that bad? I think Gibbs needs a lie detector tied to him.

Posted by: ChicagBob | March 16, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

CHENEY 2012 !!!!
You won’t hear Cheney sugarcoating anything, talking “hope and change.” Cheney is right on just about every issue.

Posted by: nightspy | March 16, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

as you wish ryan, what i was trying to say was that (most) of the people who tune into talk radio are well educated, make over 75k a year, and own their residence. that means they are more likely to vote and have an educated opinion on the issues. i know you want me to be a crazy neo con racist 80 year old white guy… but i am not. do you always look for the worst in people?

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

stickman:”we hear about bob talking smack ALMOST every day, ”
If you listen only to Rush, that may be true. I don’t hear about it very often and an investigation of the documented press briefings record does not support your assertion, no matter how loudly or often you repeat it.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 16, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Chicagbob: Oh really, tell me, how is Gibbs an “idiot” when Cheney has tried to pass the buck on the past 8 YEARS???????
What you and your simple-minded brethern of conservative neocons fail to see is that the tax policies of the Bush administration did NOTHING to promote economic vitality. For some bizarre reason, their philosophy is stuck in the dark ages, where feudal lords, or in our case, the top 5% earners of today get all the tax breaks and the middle class ends up paying more/$ income. Since the vast majority of small business owners and Americans do not fall into that category (greater than $250K/yr), it would make sense that our policies should target the people that need it.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

a little water never hurt anybody

Posted by: nightspy | March 16, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

“The Abu grahib issue was a creation of our press as was the so called torture of prisoners in Gitmo”
Does it sicken anyone else that right wingers vacillate from torture is ok to torture never happened to accusations of torture are the press’s fault?
Posted by: Ryan C | Mar 16, 2009 5:43:25 PM
It depends what one considers torture. Comparativly speaking the U.S. is not even close to other countries do. Waterboarding is not inflicting pain, so exactly why do you call this torture? I call this enhanced interrogation techniques.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

stickman: Fact: More college educated people vote Democrat now than Republican. Fact: Educated people believe in evolution, most GOPers don’t. Fact: The economic crisis started during Bush years.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Should anyone point out to Cheney that the worst terrorist attacks in our nations history (The bombing of the Marine Barracks in Lebannon and the attacks of 9/11) have all occurred on the Republican watch….mmmmmmmmm

Posted by: mbm | March 16, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

“seriously ryan, we hear about bob talking smack ALMOST every day, and rahm threw in his two cents too, so get off it.”
Almost everyday?
Well we heard it today.
There were comments during 3 consecutive days after Rush was called the head of the party but that was in the beginning of the month.
So why adopt the right wing line that Obama has been doing nothing but talk about Rush?
” i probably agree with you on a number of things but you want to have a hissy fit and not a real discussion. don’t get angry with me, find a right wing nut to yell at.”
Real discussion?
This is your first post to the thread.
ryan & jhw: just because some on the right (as with the left) can’t articulate their points as well as you do not make you right. The bill maher thing was not the same, this bob guy actas like a 4 year old when he speaks. if you guys actually believe that this administration is doing a good job i feel for you. not that bush was any better but to sit here and push for these policies you have to be closed minded. as a matter of fact they just plain scare me.
Don’t whine when you come looking for a fight and one finds you.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

jhw539 I am not trying to say what our soldiers did at abu grahib was right, but is was blown way out of proportion by the press. During the same time we were being called the villians for abu gragib by our own press, our soldiers and contractors were being hung from bridges and having their heads cut off, remember?

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Look guys, the real discussion here is about economic policy and security. Cheney and Bush failed miserably on both fronts.
Obama is left to clean up the mess in Afganistan and wall street.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

terrorist attacks under democrat:
Clinton:
1993
Feb. 26, New York City: bomb exploded in basement garage of World Trade Center, killing 6 and injuring at least 1,040 others. In 1995, militant Islamist Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and 9 others were convicted of conspiracy charges, and in 1998, Ramzi Yousef, believed to have been the mastermind, was convicted of the bombing. Al-Qaeda involvement is suspected.
1995
April 19, Oklahoma City: car bomb exploded outside federal office building, collapsing wall and floors. 168 people were killed, including 19 children and 1 person who died in rescue effort. Over 220 buildings sustained damage. Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols later convicted in the antigovernment plot to avenge the Branch Davidian standoff in Waco, Tex., exactly 2 years earlier. (See Miscellaneous Disasters.)
Nov. 13, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: car bomb exploded at U.S. military headquarters, killing 5 U.S. military servicemen.
1996
June 25, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: truck bomb exploded outside Khobar Towers military complex, killing 19 American servicemen and injuring hundreds of others. 13 Saudis and a Lebanese, all alleged members of Islamic militant group Hezbollah, were indicted on charges relating to the attack in June 2001.
1998
Aug. 7, Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: truck bombs exploded almost simultaneously near 2 U.S. embassies, killing 224 (213 in Kenya and 11 in Tanzania) and injuring about 4,500. 4 men connected with al-Qaeda 2 of whom had received training at al-Qaeda camps inside Afghanistan, were convicted of the killings in May 2001 and later sentenced to life in prison. A federal grand jury had indicted 22 men in connection with the attacks, including Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden, who remained at large.
2000
Oct. 12, Aden, Yemen: U.S. Navy destroyer USS Cole heavily damaged when a small boat loaded with explosives blew up alongside it. 17 sailors killed. Linked to Osama bin Laden, or members of al-Qaeda terrorist network.

Posted by: nightspy | March 16, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Have any of the leftists in here actually watched a gibbs press conference? He comes up with a one-liner or two and stumbles through the rest. Of course the incredibly biased media only talks about the one-liners. Sound familiar? You all are sheep.

Posted by: Ryan | March 16, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

“It depends what one considers torture. Comparativly speaking the U.S. is not even close to other countries do.”
So our Consitution and ideals on human liberty should be guided by what the despots of the world are currently doing?
“Waterboarding is not inflicting pain, so exactly why do you call this torture? I call this enhanced interrogation techniques.”
I love how a right winger parrots the admin line attempting to legalize torture as their own thought out reasoning.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

kimbers What is torture? define it. I hate to breake it to you but i do not care for Bush.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Billy bob: I think the whole purpose of the detention prisoner debate is this: These people are not given the legal rights that a US citizen has. So what ARE we fighting for? If it’s not liberty, then what?

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

billy bob- our contrators? blackwater was working for the u.s.a.?

Posted by: too many people | March 16, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Ryan C, What is torture Ryan? Where would you draw the line if your family’s life depended on it?? Be truthfull.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

truthwillsetyoufree:
OK, people like you really, really irritate me because you cannot back anything up with facts. Tell me, how was McCain planning on fixing our economy? Tax-break only policy? How did that work out for us during the Bush years huh?

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

GOP alternative to the stimulous plan: TAX BREAK ONLY POLICY IN THE TUNE OF $500+ BILLION

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Shame shame shame….Cheney??the worst American politician,what does he know about good governance?he should be told to shut up and watch the genius do his job.

Posted by: Pam | March 16, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

I have got to go but where would all of you draw the line if the life of a loved one depended on it. Be truthful.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

truthwillsetyoufree: I’m not done with you buddy. Explain how trickle-down, supply side economic theory works and how that has NOT failed us.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

FACT: Jimmy “Print Money” Carter introduced the CRA (community reinvestment act) during his abysmal administration. Bill “Oops, did I get any on you?” Clinton resurrected the CRA because he thought 70% of Americans should be homeowners. His administration told FNMA and GNMA to open their doors to that 20% of Americans labeled as SUBPRIME BORROWERS. So what really happened is Bush inherited yet ANOTHER democratic demagogue’s warped vision of utopia….AND HERE WE ARE.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Gibbs and Obama – boys in a man’s game

Posted by: Ind-Dem | March 16, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Yup, I say these are worse:
Under Ronald Reagan and Goerge W. Bush
The Beirut barracks bombing was a major incident on October 23, 1983, during the Lebanese Civil War. Two truck bombs struck separate buildings in Beirut that housed United States and French military forces—members of the Multinational Force in Lebanon—killing almost 300 servicemen, most of whom were U.S. Marines. The blasts led to the withdrawal of the international peacekeeping force from Lebanon, where they had been stationed since the Israeli 1982 invasion of Lebanon. The organization Islamic Jihad took responsibility for the bombing, but that organization is thought to have been a nom de guerre for Hezbollah —- or a group that would later become part of Hezbollah[1] —- receiving help from the Islamic Republic of Iran.[2]
The September 11 attacks (often referred to as nine-eleven, written 9/11) were a series of coordinated suicide attacks by al-Qaeda upon the United States on September 11, 2001. On that morning, 19 Islamist terrorists affiliated with al-Qaeda hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners.[1][2] The hijackers intentionally crashed two of the airliners into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, killing everyone on board and many others working in the buildings. Both buildings collapsed within two hours, destroying at least two nearby buildings and damaging others. The hijackers crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon. The fourth plane crashed into a field near Shanksville in rural Somerset County, Pennsylvania, after some of its passengers and flight crew attempted to retake control of the plane, which the hijackers had redirected toward Washington, D.C. There are no survivors from any of the flights.
Excluding the 19 hijackers, 2,974 people died in the attacks.[3][4] The overwhelming majority of casualties were civilians, including nationals of over 90 different countries. In addition, the death of at least one person from lung disease was ruled by a medical examiner to be a result of exposure to dust from the World Trade Center’s collapse.[5]

Posted by: mbm | March 16, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

“Ryan C, What is torture Ryan? Where would you draw the line if your family’s life depended on it?? Be truthfull.”
We are a nation of laws.
If we decide to disregard the laws as circumstances dictate then what is the point of the rule of law.
If my family’s life depended upon it, I would do everything in my power to protect them regardless of consequences to myself.
Thankfully the US government does not operate as though its family is in mortal danger.
BTW stop watching 24 for your torture fetish rationalizations.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

No one is listening to the Republican Party anymore because there isn’t much party left. Also the arrogant, out-of-touch attitude voiced by Limburg & Cheney is doing a wonderful job of destroying what little remains. And after the mid-term elections there will be even less.

Posted by: Stan Still | March 16, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

“Bill “Oops, did I get any on you?” Clinton resurrected the CRA because he thought 70% of Americans should be homeowners.”
In a bid to boost minority homeownership, President Bush will ask Congress for authority to eliminate the down-payment requirement for Federal Housing Administration loans.
In announcing the plan Monday at a home builders show in Las Vegas, Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher called the proposal the “most significant FHA initiative in more than a decade.” It would lead to 150,000 first-time owners annually, he said.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Any of you that actually understand economics would see that the Republican party uses 2 tools in their efforts to fix the economy. Both have failed.
1. Depending completely on the treasury to lower interest rates to stimulate lending. FAILED. Rates are now less than 1% to banks.
2. Tax cuts for the wealthy. FAILED. (see last 8 years for information)
Democrat approach (Keynesian)
1. Since the public does not have the purse strings to spend, govt steps in to spend, thus creating jobs and injecting pure capital into all levels of the economy.
2. Tax cuts for the middle class (the vast spenders) to stimulate THEIR pocket books
3. Invest in infrastructure for long term stability

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

sciencerules – the correct term is “Tinkle-Down”: the rich get tax breaks and everybody else gets whizz.

Posted by: Jordan | March 16, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Great now the Republicans can go after the “powerful Al Franken!” PLEEASE!!!

Posted by: hmn... | March 16, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

The strategy of Obama and his tax cheat cabinet = Reward failure, punish the real hardworking Americans and advance every immoral liberal agenda he possibly can. This will prove to be his undoing in Nov 2010 when the chicken come home to roost and the conservatives take back over congress!

Posted by: Ind-Dem | March 16, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

So I go off to do my work and come back to see this thread has really exploded. CUrious, I come in and read the thread and notice a pattern. The folks who lean left are jumping all over stickman and billy bob, and some comments are sensible and some are nitpicky. Come on, jhw, you know full well that stickman did not LITERALLY mean “every single day” but his point, which is correct, is that recently Gibbs took frequent potshots at Limbaugh as part of an overall strategy by not only Gibbs but other Democrats to try to paint the Republicans in general in a negative light.
I notice, however, that these same people do not engage with the more measured statements of Sally J, who rightly took issue with Gibbs’ language. Yes, tarring the Republican party as a “cabal” is not nice, but never fear, sally, Gibbs probably had no clue what the word meant anyway. As Sally says, the president is supposed to represent all the people, not the Democratic party. And this particular president made quite a point of how he was going to change the tone in Washington and to insist that people “put away childish things” and act like grownups. Gibbs’ comments do not reflect the high-flown promises of his boss.
As this is getting long, I’ll respond to my own critics in the next post.

Posted by: moderate | March 16, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

stan still…….. who is Limburg? DAMN !!

Posted by: nightspy | March 16, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

—————————
So, you are saying that EVERYONE LAID OFF OR UNEMPLOYED RIGHT NOW IS “LAZY”??? I’m sure that comment will fare well with the large middle class population on unemployment right now.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

“This will prove to be his undoing in Nov 2010 when the chicken come home to roost and the conservatives take back over congress!”
1st Q fundraising figures will be in soon.
I do not think the GOP is going to be pleased.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

okay jhw, you made me waste some time, even though you know you could have done it, march 2nd, march 9th, and today, throw in rahm on march 2nd, and i am sure i couldn’t find them all. looks like you got a white house stuck on rush. ryan c, i have read your posts here before and normally you are very civil and friendly. today you are not. I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

First, what does Cheney care about the economy anyway? He lives way better than any of us! Second, you all gotta know that Cheney doesn’t give a rat’s butt about any of us. Why are you giving him so much air time? He should take the hint like Bushie did and GO AWAY!

Posted by: js45601 | March 16, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Everybody blames Bush for the past 8 years. Guess who had control of the congress – demos! And before that weakling repubos! It is time we got real Americans to represent us. Not a bunch of tax cheaters who try to make a career out of it.

Posted by: Ind-Dem | March 16, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

who do I think supplies the jobs right now?
1. Government
2. Small Businesses
3. Large corporations
What’s your point?
1. Infrastucture spending=govt jobs
2. Small business loans and healthcare reform=small business jobs
3. Large corporations TARP funds=gee, wonder who that’s going to help.
Look, if you are going to throw out statements, you’d better back them up buddy

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Except for Harry Whittington.
—————————————
Last time I checked, Harry was still alive. On the otherhand, Mary Jo…..

Posted by: mad | March 16, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

stickman Sorry junior. This is Bush’s mess. Nice try though.

Posted by: Stickyman | March 16, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Time to take to the streets folks. This inexpereinced community organizer is going to give the farm away…..just print more money and “bail” the losers out….

Posted by: Ind-Dem | March 16, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Maybe time to replace gibbs with rev wright…let him sing song the news conferences will sis botox pelosi shouts amen!

Posted by: Ind-Dem | March 16, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

If my family’s life depended upon it, I would do everything in my power to protect them regardless of consequences to myself.
Thankfully the US government does not operate as though its family is in mortal danger.
BTW stop watching 24 for your torture fetish rationalizations.
Posted by: Ryan C | Mar 16, 2009 6:04:04 PM
I would assume that would include torture to protect your family??? Than that means you are not above torture, thanl you for being honest. The second part I will say this, Our goverment use to operate as we were under mortal danger. Finally I have seen 24 twice and did not care for it.

Posted by: billy bob | March 16, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Ind-Dem: Your statement isn’t really true.
1. Most of the damage to the economy started pre-2006-07. Dems didn’t have a veto-proof majority and Bush vetoed more legisilation 06-08 than all the other years combined.
2. Republicans had full control of Congress for 12 YEARS. During that time, they passed deregulation after degregulation of the financial markets.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

BlofeldBuildings: Your name still fits you true intentions and you have yet been able to back up a single accusation or speculation with real facts or information from a reliable unbiased sources. If you can’t back it up than don’t say it. Get an education than you can play with the big boys.

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Well we all see how the Wall Street rich trickle down economics have helped everybody. Go AIG…Glad to see you all got your bonus this year. Alright Bernie, Tax Break well spent….
Old Money is Stale Money…The United States most ensure that money moves freely throughout all of society so new ideas and business ventures will get started.
Trickle Down economics is for cowards who are afraid of change and progress. America gives all people equal chance to succeed if they have courage and strength to push forward. Trickle Down economics ensures that the old wealthy can keep their money without evolving

Posted by: mbm | March 16, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

“…strategy of Obama [...] = Reward failure, punish the real hardworking Americans and advance every immoral liberal agenda he possibly can” : You mean like reward a bunch of corporate-exec FAILURES by letting them take home huge bonuses for doing THE WRONG THINGS? Or do you mean punish “hard working” Bernie Madoff and advance such “immoral agendas” as that if you steal taxpayer money, YOU GO TO JAIL???
Clearly, the demi-GOP prefers the Bush/Cheney “moral, conservative” agendas of giving no-bid contracts to your own company (Halliburton) and if anybody dares object, water-board them on the spot!

Posted by: Jordan | March 16, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Ind-Dem blah blah blah. LOL

Posted by: Jimmy | March 16, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

sciencedroolsovergop Bush/Chaney failed security? Ummmm let’s re-cap the National Security concerns since Obama/Biden have been in office 50 days…China increasing military spending 15%, Iran demands an apology from America before talks not too mention their increased nuclear ambitions and their drones flying over Iraq, my personal favorite, talk of Russian bombers in Cuba and Venezuela, North Korea threatens to launch a long range missile with promise of war if we shoot it down…..and yet the Obama White House has little to say…Yea, I feel safe alrighty with Obama at the helm…

Posted by: Parallax View | March 16, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Ron Paul is the guy who had the right plan!

Posted by: Ind-Dem | March 16, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

The one person who is as obnoxious as
Cheney is that little slimeball Gibbs.
That guy is a snake with legs.

Posted by: wis134 | March 16, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Stickman: Remind me again: How is Keynesian theory “communist” vs Freidman? Both require money. One thinks it will work by injecting it directly into tangible projects. The other believes that the money will “trickle” down through tax cuts that effect the uber rich.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

destra, you almost have it… whether its carters cra, or gramms glass-steagall, the problem is not demo or repub. that’s why it is very frustrating having open dialogue on these sites. everyone is on one team or the other. i believe we both are on the right track, they all have to go.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Jake, the punch line has been great reading today. Enjoy u and George on twitter.
It may not have been good decorum for Gibbs to comment on Cheney but it sure was satisfying.
By the way, is it standard practice for journalist to quote from the weekly Human Events and ask the question: “Is the president of the United States trying to brazenly deceive the American people?” According to his employer, this journalist is suppose to be the best political journalist of his generation. Who knew?
Keep up the good work.

Posted by: tw | March 16, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

hey manny do you pay taxes? If so congrats – most of obamas cabinet members didn’t

Posted by: Ind-Dem | March 16, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Stickman: The pure essance of Bush policy has failed. YOU FAIL TO SEE THIS. The treasury has no more tools under it’s belt other than lending directly to banks. Interest rates basically cannot be cut anymore than they already are. The tax breaks you saw during Bush did little to spur investment and growth. It only made our deficit HUGE. Where were the benefits? Show me proof.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

carter, clinton and obama would make nice lawn boys at the limbaugh estate!

Posted by: Ind-Dem | March 16, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

sorry science guy you got me fired up, it is socialism not communism. socialism is where the goverment takes our money and puts it to work where it feels necessary with the illusion that you can still do as well as an individual as capitalism. and what happened? you didn’t like my payroll tax idea? that would help the little guy (ME) and business right away. you guys constantly complain that we never come up with any ideas, well there you go. what are your thoughts?

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Gotta go work but rest assured we will not roll over and die!

Posted by: Ind-Dem | March 16, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

billy bob and those who support a Torture policy: Be careful what you wish for, you might get and it may be your son or daughter or grandchild being tortured in a foreign land because the U.S. can torture than why can’t we? Be very, very careful where that line has to be drawn. Torture, when allowed on non-citizens can eventually be allow on our own citizens. Again, be very, very careful. Did you child take that sucker from the store? To what degree will you allow torture to be used? Or “enhanced interrogation techniques” as some of you like to white-wash it with. Be VERY CAREFULL. How fast were you speeding in that car? You will tell us!

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

It’s interesting to see Obama and his cronies throw out jabs to radio personalities who do not tow their line. I’m sure glad Bush didn’t give any credability to Randi Rhoades or Al Franken.

Posted by: Chuck | March 16, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

It seems that the arm chair economists are at it again, bashing anyone’s plans that are at least trying to do something for the American people. Do these armchair economists have a plan to change things or just looking for a forum to jack their mouths on? If all plans are so bad, what is so good about yours?

Posted by: taxpayingvoter | March 16, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Stickman: I wouldn’t be opposed to the rollback of payroll taxes for SMALL BUSINESS. I know those taxes kill alot of small guys trying to make it. Makes it hard for me to rationalize cutting them for large corporations though, when executives get millions in compensation. Plus, you have to understand, that anytime you cut a major tax, there won’t be that money there anymore to fix the roads, schools, hire more policemen, fund the millitary, etc. So there are drawbacks to every scenario. Which is why Obama wants to cut middle class taxes and use govt. money to subsidize infrastructure and the items I mentioned above.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Republicans should be forced to refer to “trickle down economics” by its original name — “horse and sparrow” the horse (the rich) eats the oats (tax cuts) and the sparrows (us regular folks) eat whats left of the oats in the poo the horse plops out
Try selling that to the American people these days

Posted by: snooch | March 16, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

i have to go to work so for the last time BUSH STINKS! we get it. so the next time you stub your toe or burn the chili, blame yourself not bush. just because bush stunk sooooooo bad does not give barry the right to come in and spend 10 times as much and screw up even worse. get it? some of us did not approve of bush, and now we are just flat out scared. and science guy, i meant the amount you recive in your check, i may have used the wrong term. 13 bucks a week (the middle class tax cut you mentioned) is going to do nothing and i mean nothin. cut the fed tax on my check and i will spend it, trust me. i will continue to read your posts guys but i have to go to work while i still have a job!

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

“I would assume that would include torture to protect your family??? Than that means you are not above torture, thanl you for being honest.”
I could not torture.
That involves at the very least a tolerance for sadism that I cannot really think about.
I could see myself killing to protect my family.
But again that’s why individual emotion and priority is removed from our system of government, indeed our society.
Do you support rampant vigilantism?
“The second part I will say this, Our goverment use to operate as we were under mortal danger.”
Unfortunately, we have far too many times in our history disregarded our ideals in favor of expediency. From some of the first acts of Congress to slavery to civil rights today.
“Finally I have seen 24 twice and did not care for it.”
So you’re not even aware of the basis for the talking point you parrot?
How sad.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Stickman and Science: A compromise I believe would be to understand Socialism, and capitalism can BOTH be abusive to the needs of mankind if you let either of them run rampant upon the real needs of society. Checks and balances are required to protect the abuses of either. They both are needed in ALL society and cannot exist by themselves.

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

“you didn’t like my payroll tax idea? that would help the little guy (ME) and business right away”
Payroll taxes fund unemployment insurance, Social Security and Medicare.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

As promised, my response. It was pointed out to me various times that the press spokesman IS a partisan position. Ryan_C wrote, “Going back to at least Reagan, the Press Sec has been a partisan position though the partisanship usually is to the President vs party or ideology.” But that is not the same, dear Ryan. Of course the press secretary is supposed to defend the positions of his boss and to be partisan, that is, taking sides passionately, in dealing with issues related to president. So Gibbs should defend the president’s version of the stimulus bill from those who want another sort of stimulus, for example. And in doing that, he would be taking on republican politicians in congress who are opposed to that bill. But to knock Rush Limbaugh with alarming frequency (but not every day, right, jhw?) and to gratuitously joke about Limbaugh and a Republican cabal when asked about Cheney, rather than simply deflecting the question with a polite but firm statement is not being partisan to the White House or to his boss but being partisan to the Democratic party and, I would argue, childishly so. He could easily have turned aside the question with something along the lines of “Former Vice PResident Cheney’s views are his own and not of any particular interest to those of us currently in the White House working hard to keep America safe and to rebuild our economy.” See, a dismissal of Cheney as irrelevant and a reminder that there’s a new sheriff in town that is not so childish in tone and substance. There’s no need to score zingers to make your point.
Jhw oddly tries to use the example of Ari Fleischer to “prove” that “the republicans did it first, so it’s okay.” Not a new tactic by our pal Jhw, who loves to claim his/her statements are facts while everyone else’s are opinions. Let’s provide context,JHW, for your example. It only took a few minutes of research on the web to track down the incident to which you referred. No, I had not remembered it, to be honest. And it’s not surprising to see that this is one of those perennial left-wing memes that has taken on a life of its own, just like those “right wing talking points” of which we who disagree with jhw are so often accused of following.
So, after Maher made his unfortunate comment about cowards, a comment that got him, as Ryan pointed out, cancelled, Ari was asked in a press briefing on September 26, 2001, about what Maher had said. HEre’s what Ari said in response to a question about whether or not the president was outraged by the comment: “I’m aware of the press reports about what he said. I have not seen the actual transcript of the show itself. But assuming the press reports are right, it’s a terrible thing to say, and it unfortunate. And that’s why—there was an earlier question about has the President said anything to people in his own party—they’re reminders to all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do. This is not a time for remarks like that; there never is.”
First of all, for less than a month after 9/11, I think that Ari’s response was pretty measured– there was no sarcasm and little in way of personalizing. Second, you will notice the reference to an earlier question about saying things to people of the president’s own party– that’s a reference to a tasteless remark made by a congressman about people who stand out because of their dress (the congressman seemed to confuse Sikh’s religious headdress for Muslim gear and should not have been profiling anyone, a point that Ari made). Mr. Fleischer puts the two incidents together (the congressman and the comedian) and says that in the charged atmosphere in the near-term aftermath of 9/11, people needed to watch their words and actions carefully so as not to inflame the situation.
This seems to me to be a completely nonpartisan statement. I do not see Mr. Fleischer singling out Democrats or implying that Democrats are the ones who need to be on their guard. And I do not recall Mr. Fleischer gratuitously lashing out against Michael Moore or any other Democrat who was not the subject of a question in order to score some sort of Republican point.
Sorry, I see a big difference between what Gibbs is doing here and what press secretaries in the past have done. As so often happens, it seems to come down to who’s ox is being gored (not you, Al).

Posted by: moderate | March 16, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Good one Gibbs, I wish I had though of that.
I often wonder why we hear from people like Cheney saying anything other than their plea at their war crimes trial.

Posted by: JR | March 16, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

“Be careful what you wish for, you might get and it may be your son or daughter or grandchild being tortured in a foreign land because the U.S. can torture than why can’t we?”
diboggan what box have you been hiding under for the past few years whilst our people have been beheaded for the pleasure of the Muslim viewing population. But you probably don’t call that torture as they are killed not injured or hurt and left with scars and mental images.
But you really don’t know if we tortured anyone. All you have is the “word” of avowed terrorists who are allowed and required to lie to infidels and can kill his own people if it will do harm to an infidel.
Waterboarding was deemed legal to use and so was other methods. But now that we have the wimps in office it isn’t.

Posted by: BarsandStars | March 16, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

dlboggen: Which is exactly why I don’t understand what has the GOP in such a pickle. Obama is giving tax cuts, just to a different segment of our population (middle class instead of uber wealthy). He is using government to subsidize those cuts in funding to schools, infrastructure, R&D, banks and small businesses. So what is all the hooplaugh about? What people fail to see is that both tax cuts and direct goverment spending all cost money. Both take money out of the public fund, but are used in completely different ways. Tax cuts by themselves have been shown to fail. Cutting interest rates isn’t working. So what’s left? DIRECT INVESTMENT THROUGH GOVT. Bottom line.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

coyote blue: VERY GOOD QUESTION Mr. Blue. You need to move to the front of the class. Why was Bush and Cheney not investigated for their offences against the constitutional and the illegal war in Iraq? There are a number of offences that do need answered to. An investigation is a GREAT idea. Good question Mr. Blue, Very good question. Thanks for bringing it up.

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

i caught my own mistake ryan c… but thanks. we all make mistakes right?

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

The Cheney administration did the worst job ever of protecting Americans from terrorist actions. Any advice from Cheney should be filed appropriately.
Nice one, Mr. Gibbs!

Posted by: Cthulhu | March 16, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

can’t help myself, i really must go but i have to ask….. so science guy…. how are you going to spend your big tax break? where is your $13 going? i can’t wait to read this.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

“Waterboarding was deemed legal to use and so was other methods. But now that we have the wimps in office it isn’t.”
Strength to right wingers is authorizing someone else to do the torturing than denying torturing ever occurred.
To the rest of the world that is cowardice.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Well put Mr. Science, I agree completely. Trickle down has not worked and the removal of so many checks and balances on the capitalist side destroyed the balance that allowed the middle class to prosper and buy the products made in the U.S. and earned by U.S. workers hired by corporations in the U.S. that is not only wanting a good bottom line but understands the economics of patriotism. The system feeds itself if the balance is maintained. Capitalism or Socialism can either be termed a parasite of society if either grows too large. You might call it a symbiotic relationship that works best for both when balance is achieved.

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

“The nitwit posting in my name can cease and desist immediately.”
Agreed.
Impersonating is the lowest form of trolling.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Oh, and to those bashing Gibbs, I know Dana Perino said some pretty messed up things too (she also didn’t know what the cuban missle crisis was). I think Gibbs is an intelligent press secratary and good for him for callling out Cheney and Limbaugh for the fanatical neocons they are.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Is ad hominem attack all that Gibbs is going to offer?
What a dirtbag.
Obama has brought Chicago to the entire country.

Posted by: drjohn | March 16, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

“moderate” – connecting Cheney with Limbaugh is wholly appropriate behavior for Obama’s press secretary. Both Cheney and Limbaugh have repeatedly demonstrated that they are arrogant men who think their own ideas and opinions are the only ones that count. Both seem to believe that they are the rightful people to be “in charge” even when someone else has been properly placed in that position. Both, in fact, have the same arrogant self-regard as did Benedict Arnold!
To compare Cheney to Limbaugh is a very good way of pointing out that Cheney is properly IRRELEVANT.

Posted by: Jordan | March 16, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

stickman: ????? What are you referring to with your $13 comment?

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | Mar 16, 2009 6:56:27 PM
Perino never engaged in ad hominem attacks.
Gibbs is slime.

Posted by: drjohn | March 16, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I like this Gibbs guy. He’s smarter than what we’re used to in a White House spokesman, and he knows when to be serious (most of the time) and when it’s appropriate to be a bit witty.
Responding to some irrelevant comments made by disgruntled ex-VP Cheney — that’s a fine time to lighten things up a little and give everyone a laugh. Cheney’s remarks weren’t anything important.

Posted by: Jack | March 16, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

dlboggen: Well said. Any Obama bashers here would be wise to look at the GOP proposed alternative to the stimulous plan before they post comments.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Posted by: Ryan C | Mar 16, 2009 6:54:50 PM
A few years ago Eric Holder refused to call waterboarding “torture.”
Now he has courage to call us all cowards.

Posted by: drjohn | March 16, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

OK, I’ve got my own impersonator here. Good times.

Posted by: sciencerulesoverGOP | March 16, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

stickman: The game is not over yet Mr. Stick, the game is only slightly over 50 days since Obama has been in office. It took Bush and Cheney 8 years to help this county be where it is right now and it will take a lot of effort on “everyone’s” part to be solution oriented and constructive instead of being cynical and destructive. i.e. be part of the solution and get involved if you don’t like what you see. Work locally and work your way up. If your ideas make sense and can produce real results than you can be part of the solution. I would encourage you to do so. I challenge you to do so. Good luck!

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

“to gratuitously joke about Limbaugh and a Republican cabal when asked about Cheney, rather than simply deflecting the question with a polite but firm statement is not being partisan to the White House or to his boss but being partisan to the Democratic party and, I would argue, childishly so”
He was defending the President against comments by Cheney.
He tied in Rush’s hope for failure with Cheney’s lack of responsibility.
I thought it was a nice piece of politics though I am sure those on the receiving end don’t like it very much.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

thats what the middle class gets, 13 bucks. unless you get something i am not aware of. thats the only break i have heard of. and infrastructure? great just what we need, more unions. see how well that worked in MI. i am sorry but i can not help but to be a little cynical.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Perino?
Perino once said, “Both the president and the vice president have long believed, and it’s a part of what has made them the leaders that they are, which is not to chase popularity polls but to hold themselves to a standard that requires people not to like them.”
Guess they got their wish!

Posted by: Jordan | March 16, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

dlboggan, such a good post except the tired over and over and over (the failed policies of the last 8 years) blah blah blah. dems and repubs are to blame! all of us! be honest now, are you really a fan of dodd, barney, pelosi, reid, rangel, waters etc? when i ask this question i get crickets

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

“Perino never engaged in ad hominem attacks.”
Really?
Helen, I find it really unfortunate that you use your front row position, bestowed upon you by your colleagues, to make such statements. This is a — it is an honor and a privilege to be in the briefing room, and to suggest that we, at the United States, are killing innocent people is just absurd and very offensive.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

my goodness, how what a quick whit. But then the republicans aresuch easy targets for fodder.

Posted by: matt | March 16, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Failed ex-VP Cheney hopes to get his cred back by waiting, chewing his bitter cud until maybe, just maybe, another terrorist attack occurs here and he can blame it on the guys who have to spend the next generation cleaning up the mess he and his sock puppet left behind.
What a miserable excuse for a human being. Gibbs was being kind to him.

Posted by: Cthulhu | March 16, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

“A few years ago Eric Holder refused to call waterboarding “torture.”
Now he has courage to call us all cowards.”
Well we all know what a coward you are dr john.
But you seem to be confusing Mukaskey and Blair with Holder.
And their respective definitions with Holder’s speaking of national cowardice when it comes to discussions on race.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

You guys noticed how with the previous administration their “enemies” were radical Islamists, al Qaeda, Hamas, North Korea, etc. And the new administration, their “enemies” consist of American citizens? No matter if you like who Team BHO attacks or not, that should tell you guys something.
Now, back to your Kool Aid!

Posted by: TxBoB | March 16, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

whoa! ifyouwatch it it’s even more funny! Not only did he get the ‘I think not taking financial advice…” shpeel, but he got “the hand” ..the “tell it to the hand” LOL! How true. here they are in the very thick of this mess, today Obama combing over the details of the Bush AIG bailout and trying to find some loophole he can use to stop financing bonus’ and cheney is giving advice! LOL!! too funny.

Posted by: funny is as funny does | March 16, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Mr. BarsandStars: I am assuming that you may likely be a warrior of sorts and have been in the war in one sort or another. I can honor that. But, I will not let your fanatical hawkish attitude destroy the very fabric of what this nation has fought so hard for over it’s short several hundred year history. We have all lost loved ones and friends because of our “hard blood stained fight” to establish and uphold that which is considered decent and humane for the betterment of our nation and those nations that may follow us. I appose the very nature of your establishment that torture can be justified for ANY reason at ANY time. I will defend that stand to my very death and under the very TORTURE that your kind would find necessary to apply towards any other being on this planet we call home. I will oppose you Mr. BarsandStars. I will oppose your kind.

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Does anyone remember Clinton making interviews when Bush took over critiquing him??? Did Gore ever go on national TV and throw mudat Bush???? no. Never. Republicans ARE the party of rude ignorant stupid people.

Posted by: just keeps gett'n better | March 16, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

“You guys noticed how with the previous administration their “enemies” were radical Islamists, al Qaeda, Hamas, North Korea, etc. And the new administration, their “enemies” consist of American citizens?”
You forgot about the part where critics of the Bush admin became lovers and/or supporters of terrorism.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

how come when we finally get to the nitty gritty i don’t get any answers from you folks? well do you? do you like nancy? how about rangel? chris dodd anyone? my fav barney? i could go on. do any of you like these leaders? what about your 13 bucks? what are you going to do with it? tell me please. if you support this garbage so much tell me why.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

“The divisions, the stereotypes, the scapegoating, the ease with which we blame the plight of ourselves on others, all of that distracts us from the common challenges we face: war and poverty; inequality and injustice,” Obama said. “We can no longer afford to build ourselves up by tearing each other down. We can no longer afford to traffic in lies or fear or hate. It is the poison that we must purge from our politics; the wall that we must tear down before the hour grows too late.”
- Barack Obama, speaking at Martin Luther King Jr.’s Ebenezer Baptist Church, January 21, 2008

Posted by: Jenn | March 16, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

“and to suggest that we, at the United States, are killing innocent people is just absurd and very offensive.
“…yes, because we are thefirst country in the history of all peoples to go to war and not kill any civilians. Call the Guinessbook of world records! it’s a miracle! When you go to war, you KNOW you WILL kill innocent people. That’s why the reason to GO to war must be clear, and indefence. Much like storming into someone’s house and killing a whole family because one guy bugs you. YOu better show you were in imminent danger of being killed yourself or you’re going to jail for murder. I’m of a mind, you go into a foreign country, guns ablaze, shock and awe, bombing the crap out a city, you KNOW you are killing innocent people, and we sure did = next question. Why? What was our purpose? D ont tell me we killed them to free them. I’m surehat doesn’t wash with the relatives of those killed.

Posted by: no you didn't | March 16, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

stickman: If that is your answer to the challenge to be part of the solution than sit on the sidelines and listen to your crickets. Just get out of the way. You cynicism will not help you.

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Change, huh?
Same old immature behavior attempting to counteract criticism.
Not much different than Bush admin, so far.
Just a distraction to keep you stupid masses busy fighting, while the politicians ship your tax dollars to AIG for bonuses and to pay off counterparties like Goldman Sachs, foreign banks, sovereign wealth funds and California (just to name a few).
Such ignorant suckers you are! You and your children will be paying for years. Well, those 50% of you who actually pay federal taxes.
Oh, nevermind, go back to your political sniping. Fools. Suckers. Sheep. You reap what you sow.

Posted by: AV | March 16, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Cheney said tax policy is the way out of this mess? Well, that decides it, Cheney isn’t just a lying crook. He’s criminally insane! Why didn’t I see this before. The nerve of some people. Wow, to stick with your B.S. right to the end. Mind boggling indeed.

Posted by: Demsrgreat | March 16, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Cheney said tax policy is the way out of this mess? Well, that decides it, Cheney isn’t just a lying crook. He’s criminally insane! Why didn’t I see this before. The nerve of some people. Wow, to stick with your B.S. right to the end. Mind boggling indeed.

Posted by: Demsrgreat | March 16, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

mr boggan, with all do respect i do not think you know what i do in my community, i do what i can when i can. i don’t think my history would allow me to run for anything. i do commend you for encouraging people to get up and actually do something instead of sitting here with only rhetoric.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Agree with Jack’s comment below. I don’t think Cheney’s comments are valuable in the least and an ‘ad hominem’ response – to consider the source – is perfectly valid.
Most of us couldn’t care less what Cheney or Limbaugh blathers about.

Posted by: MIguy | March 16, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

i have to go (Really this time) but my answers to these problems take real sacrifice, not the kind barry is talking about. 1st, let these companies fail. yes i know that will cause the world to end but we need a solid foundation, not chasing bad money with good, these are failed business models. 2nd, CUT spending, you don’t fix your debt by adding more, i thought that was common sense. 3rd, cut taxes for the middle class, not 13 a week, i mean real tax cuts, 4th, don’t take away the incentives for people to buy homes, ie taking away the interest deduction, 5th get out of the way, let the economy do its thing. these are just a few but i am short on time. makes alot more sense than trillion dollar bridges and welfare right?

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

stickman: About the only thing you cannot run for in this land is federal government posts and that are many many ways to get involved with whatevery party or organization you choose. Just get involved and make you voice heard. Speak well, write well, do well and you can and will be heard. I urge everyone here to do just that, includin myself. So, formost above all, get involved with real productive, positive solutions for ALL of our sakes. You for me and I for you and whomever is lucky enough or unfortunate enough to lead this country from whatever state is may be in at that time. Go forth and “make it so”.

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

stickman: You stay in there stickman. Together we can all win. Nice sparring with you.

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

to you left wing Socialists, Cheney has more brains in his little finger than you do in the entire cabinet. Everybody is starting to understand Obama is an empty suit.

Posted by: brian | March 16, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

good deal boggan, had to wait for your response, see ya later.

Posted by: stickman | March 16, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

I am ashamed of Obama and his tax cheat cabinet

Posted by: aj | March 16, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Gibbs is a blabbering idiot and is probably the worst WH press secretary I have ever heard.

Posted by: vet | March 16, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

I can’t believe I voted for this guy.

Posted by: ohiodemocrat | March 16, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

So much for change. Gibbs keeps taking the bait and responding like a child on the playground.

Posted by: thomas | March 16, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

The Republican party has a chance to become a great country first party again if they would just get their you know what together. Every time Cheney or Rush, or big mouths Hennidy or Savage open their mouths they take a step back, not forward. For years they have lost touch and now focus on the hope Obama fails. They listen to Rush and Hannidy which are the very examples of what is wrong with the “Grand Ole Party.” Just look at its recent campaine and past. The Republican Party shamelessly abandoned its values. Not only did Republicans disavow their leader (George W. Bush), they pressured presidential candidate John McCain into supporting far-right positions he had previously opposed, thereby destroying his political integrity. Meanwhile, the win-at-all-costs mentality of Republican strategists led to the adoption of an overridingly negative and cynical campaign strategy—one that attempted to demonize Barack Obama by portraying him as a terrorist and someone without a U.S. birth certificate. Even more shameful is that McCain and his campaign (with a handful of exceptions) tacitly endorsed calls for violence against Obama by failing to discourage rally goers who shouted “off with his head” and the like. However, the most irresponsible decision of the year was McCain’s choice of running mate, Sarah Palin, who was painfully unqualified and neither the reformer nor maverick she purported to be. From her very first public appearance it was clear the self-proclaimed “hockey mom” was in over her head, and although handlers bent over backwards to hide her intellectual shortcomings from the American people, she was ultimately exposed as being totally unprepared to be vice-president. Before pointing your fingers at Obama,Gibbs or anyone else, try looking at yourself and what you need to do.

Posted by: CAW | March 16, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

thomas – so true! I’ll take my ball and go home!!!

Posted by: ohiodemocrat | March 16, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

hey ohio – we are thinking of getting together a protest maybe march on DC. You might think about joining. We will hava a new website up and running in a few days to organize it.

Posted by: thomas | March 16, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

“…yes, because we are thefirst country in the history of all peoples to go to war and not kill any civilians…” …
WHAAAAT? Lessee: the Chinese Embassy? The civilian shelter during the First Gulf War? All the civilian casualties during “Shock and Awe” in 2003? The various homes, mosques, etc. that we bombed “by mistake”? The whole family killed by our troops to cover up their rape of the 14-yo daughter?
You GOP apologists truly AMAZE me with your ability to deny truth even AFTER it has hit you square in the face and drawn blood! “War is peace; freedom is slavery; ignorance is strength!” And money can buy ANYTHING.

Posted by: Jordan | March 16, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

ABC News, “you’re trusted source.”
I’d like to see the Jon Stewart treatment on that one.
Though, he’d never do it. He only targets his enemies, and I doubt a “friendly” like ABC News would ever make that list.
See how subjective things are? Most everyone comes with a bias. Yet, those with a bias bash those they deem bash worthy.

Posted by: AV | March 16, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Hey, since when did the PC guy from the Apple commercials take the white house flack job?

Posted by: Jack O. | March 16, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Thomas and Ohio: Gibbs got your attention, didn’t he. Did it upset you. Make you think about it. I’ll bet a lot of Americans got it. Cheney is a fool and a man without a soul, unpatriotic and unAmerican. Rush and Cheney will make a fine couple together and should go hunting together.

Posted by: dlboggan | March 16, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

DON’T THEY LOOK LIKE TWIN RUSH AND CHENEY?

Posted by: CROOKS AT THEIR BEST | March 16, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

“Rush and Cheney [...] should go hunting together.”
YES!!!
Deep in the Amazon rain forest, alone, with only poison-frog darts and blow guns. In fact, forget the frogs: they both have enough venomous spittle and PLENTY of hot air!

Posted by: Jordan | March 16, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Jordan posted>>>To compare Cheney to Limbaugh is a very good way of pointing out that Cheney is properly IRRELEVANT.
Plus,,, pointing out that both Cheney and Limbaugh live to serve their own egos… very valid point…
I thought it was funny…;)

Posted by: theafalcon200 | March 16, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

dlboggan…posted>>> The system feeds itself if the balance is maintained. Capitalism or Socialism can either be termed a parasite of society if either grows too large. You might call it a symbiotic relationship that works best for both when balance is achieved.
————————————
I thought this is a very intelligent statement… Balance is key… either way… Nice…

Posted by: theafalcon200 | March 16, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

“Not much different than Bush admin, so far.”
…except for the competence, the intelligence, the priorities, and the respect for law.

Posted by: Cthulhu | March 16, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Ha, Gibbs is such a fool. Everytime someone brings up an Issue he doesn’t like he hurls personal attacks instead of dealing with the issue.
The Messiah’s telaprompter has no answers, all they can do is campaign and blame Bush. I hope we survive the next four years as a country. This is what happens when you elect a rockie for all the wrong reasons with no resume.

Posted by: jon | March 16, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Obama can sure pick losers! Anybody look into this guy’s taxes?

Posted by: nuts for obama | March 16, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Hey Gibbs…you’re no Tony Snow. Class has left the White House.

Posted by: nuts for obama | March 16, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

“Not much different than Bush admin, so far.”
…except for the competence, the intelligence, the priorities, and the respect for law.
_______________________________
Yeah, but maybe the Obama admin will acquire some of these over time.

Posted by: GetMedieval | March 16, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Mr Cheney and Mr limbaugh do look alike. I wonder if their related?

Posted by: dan kolich | March 16, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

The Libs trying to attach Limbaugh to the republican party is getting so lame.
The republicans should start asking Gibbs to dennounce Olberman or Mathews, or the whole PMSNBC network for that matter. This arguement is nothing but a distraction from the fact that Obama has been focusing on everything but the banks and has been passing laws that (weather you agree with the morality of the situation or not) make us less safe.
You can’t argue that taking methods away from the gov that gets intell weather its threw torture or spying will make the country more open for attack.
This whole Blame Bush, and the right is the Limbaugh party is just a distraction from the real story that is Obamaj’s telaprompter is killing the economy with his agenda

Posted by: jon | March 16, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Mr Cheney and Mr limbaugh do look alike. I wonder if their related?
Posted by: dan kolich | Mar 16, 2009
Actually Obama is related to Cheny. They are like 6th cousins or something.
I think Obama looks Osama
Gibs looks like Chenny
and the whole Dem party follows the lead of Olberman and PMSNBC.

Posted by: jon | March 16, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

This is the kinder, gentler administration that Obama promised sniping at private citizens and still trying to make monsters of the Bush administration. It’s no longer the Bush administration; it’s the Obama administration and they are responsible now. Nobody in the White House appears to know what is going on with the economy; all they want to do is use the crisis to get their socialist programs passed. God help America.

Posted by: Richard Bulgarelli | March 16, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

sciencerulesoverGOP Fact it was pointed headed folks that led to this economic melt down. These ivy league elitists are the captains of industry trained in the finest universities that basically destroyed wealth by high risk gambling. Their back room payoffs are legendary. Dod Franks and republicans as well. And when has the government been any good at running anything except the military? Gibbs is a joke the job losses are terrible and the Obama is a travesty.

Posted by: ChicagBob | March 16, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

This is the kinder, gentler administration that Obama promised sniping at private citizens and still trying to make monsters of the Bush administration. >>>>> YEAH here is Obama and his HIT SQUAD out in full campaign mode attacking everyone they can. Thats change you can believe in. LOL.. The Obama administration is trash talking again.

Posted by: ChicagBob | March 16, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Well done Gibbs.Now on dont shut your mouth on all liberal translations aimed at you and the president.

Posted by: dotherightthing | March 17, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am

I can’t wait for this smart ass to go! I am so sick of hearing him detract from the real issues by criticizing the past administration and a radio talk show host. Get a life dude! You are not a stand up comedian, you are the White House Press Secretary! Start acting like it bozo!

Posted by: Stef | March 17, 2009, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Mr. Gibbs is Mr. Obama’s worse spokeman in this history. I agree with former VP Cheney. He is right!

Posted by: anonymous | March 17, 2009, 4:12 am 4:12 am

Everyone knows Cheney is right. You can’t even argue that point. If you take away tatics to get info (regardless of the moral arguement) you will be less safe. Just like if you take away the wire tap program. Its not about weather its right or wrong, thats not what Cheney said. What he said was we are less safe and that is deff true. If we get hit again, people will be asking what Obama’s telaprompter could have said or done differently.
GIBBS is a big baby. Anytime anyone challenges Obama’s telapromter Gibbs goes into a personal name calling attack instead of dealing with the issue.
He has absolutly no class. Where is Tony Snow when you need him. This admin is a joke. Hope we don’t get hit again because of this moron

Posted by: jon | March 17, 2009, 5:51 am 5:51 am

Gibbs is a pig.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | March 17, 2009, 6:38 am 6:38 am

Gibbs you slob front for Obama. Stop blaming everyone for Obama the goofball.

Posted by: Thinking | March 17, 2009, 6:54 am 6:54 am

Did Obama vet this ja-ck as- Gibbs.

Posted by: scon | March 17, 2009, 6:55 am 6:55 am

Say what you will about Cheney but the Dems claim they are for the poor but it is only if they use taxpayer money.Cheney gave 77 percent of his income to charity while Biden gave .15 percent. Yes point 15 not 15.

Posted by: Cindy | March 17, 2009, 7:40 am 7:40 am

Good for you, Robert. Who is this liar to finally to out of the “hole”. If Cheney was so honorable, why is he critizing the President. Afterall, this jerk is a vice-president that left office 53 days ago, and find the need to “slam” our new President. This is unpresedented, and it isn’t proper. Honorable men doesn’t do this Cheney! But I quess trying to save this worthless party of yours. Good for Gibbs. No one have to take anything from Cheney anymore. He’s a liar.

Posted by: sngeorgia | March 17, 2009, 7:40 am 7:40 am

Do you Mountain Dew drinkers truly think that a Vice- President, whether he left honorable or not should be giving these interviews in 56 days after leaving office?????? Whatever his preception is he should keep it to himself. This has never happened in the history of the U.S.. An ex-vice-president is out of line. Good for Gibbs.

Posted by: sngeorgia | March 17, 2009, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Obama the telepromter president….empty suites..empty words….

Posted by: connerstone77 | March 17, 2009, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Good for you, Robert. Who is this liar to finally to out of the “hole”. If Cheney was so honorable, why is he critizing the President. Afterall, this jerk is a vice-president that left office 53 days ago, and find the need to “slam” our new President. This is unpresedented, and it isn’t proper. Honorable men doesn’t do this Cheney! But I quess trying to save this worthless party of yours. Good for Gibbs. No one have to take anything from Cheney anymore. He’s a liar.
Posted by: sngeorgia | Mar 17, 2009 7:40:45 A
Cheney is talking policy. He cares about the safety of the country. Gibbs has no answer except to hurl personal jabs at Cheney. I have never seen a pres secretary act so petty and childish.
Grow up GIBBS, you need to get some new talking points from The Messiah’s telaprompter. The Limbaugh line is getting old. Your acting more like Keith Olberman, instead of speaking for Obama’s tela prompter

Posted by: jon | March 17, 2009, 8:00 am 8:00 am

Typical dem reaction to anything they do not want to talk about. Attack, throw mud and redirected it toward other places rather than have a dialog. Sounds like a spoiled 12 year old. He knows that what Cheney said was true. The question is still WHY not call them what they are. I’ll say it then. TERRORISTS! Maybe gibbs will come after another private citizen like he has several times. Why doesn’t he just make Pakistan a glass source they he can brag that obama got Osama.

Posted by: jr | March 17, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Cheney is a lieing, ruthless cut-throat. Why would anyone listen to anything he has to say at this point?

Posted by: Howard Beale | March 17, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Gibbs talking for the Capone administration. I mean Obama, who knows how to grease the wheels with bribes and payola.

Posted by: ChicagBob | March 17, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

I’m starting to get annoyed with Robert Gibbs. What’s with all the catty comments from this guy?

Posted by: Y | March 17, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Finally, some class in the White House!
After years of lies from Ari, Tony, and Dana, I’m so glad that Robert Gibbs called VP Cheney on his outrageous comments.
Why is Cheney attacking the POTUS? Cheney needs to go back to his bunker.

Posted by: LiberalRepublican | March 17, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Never in the history of the changing of the government has an ex-President or vice president has been so critical of the new president. Someone need to call this thief out….this is not Appropriate for Cheney to do this. GOOD FOR GIBBS. HE CALLED IT RIGHT. WHO DIE AND LEFT CHENEY THE EXPERT ON ANYTHING.

Posted by: sngeorgia | March 17, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

“Why is Cheney attacking the POTUS?”
Because like the the fictional Henry Potter from that Jimmy Stewart film (whom he actually resembles very closely) Cheney is a scheming, insecure, warped and emotionally crippled little man who needs to put others down so that he can feel himself to be big and strong.

Posted by: Jordan | March 17, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Based on what Gibbs reads in the NEWSPAPERS? He doesn’t talk to the bozos in the WH?

Posted by: tanarg | March 17, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

How ridiculous that the Obama administration is targeting private systems and making fun of them and their ideas. Remember Joe the Plumber that was the great ones work also, how much longer is it going to take for American citizens to wake up to what this administration is doing!!!!

Posted by: NT | March 18, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Maybe it’s time for Gibbs to return to Auburn, sit in the stands at Jordan Hare Stadium, and keep screaming “War Eagle.”

Posted by: Percy | March 18, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

This administration is a circus. They are acting like 5 yr olds. For 8 years we had all the Democratic president critcizing Bush nonstop and Bush never reacted. The animals are runninng the zoo!!!

Posted by: Terry | March 18, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

If 9/11 never happened the Republicans would have had no agenda except tax cuts for the rich. The only thing they ever accomplished waas shooting down every proposal the dmes made and limiting the middle class! They took away the deductions for donated cars,
made it harder for individuals to declare bankruptcy, (not corporations)
unless you are a corporate pig you are a sub prime idiot to be republican

Posted by: knowledgable | March 19, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Why is anyone giving this paranoid sociopath a forum? In his pathetic attempt to reject blame for the economic meltdown by saying “nobody could see it coming”, he merely proves that the Bush administration was incompetent and out-of-touch; not caring whatsoever about this nation and its people. This man should be in prison.

Posted by: DaveM | March 19, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

When the dust settles and people finally talk about this administration, Dick Cheney will be revealed as an amoral, paranoid sociopath who operated a criminal shadow government and disregarded the Constitution as a list of “suggestions.” With that administration, this country came closer to a dictatorship than ever before in our history. “I don’t think you can blame the Bush administration for the creation of those [economic] circumstances,” he said.” Pathetic! Where does he think the buck should stop?

Posted by: DaveM | March 19, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

When the dust settles and people finally talk about this administration, Dick Cheney will be revealed as an amoral, paranoid sociopath who operated a criminal shadow government and disregarded the Constitution as a list of “suggestions.” With that administration, this country came closer to a dictatorship than ever before in our history. “I don’t think you can blame the Bush administration for the creation of those [economic] circumstances,” he said.” Pathetic! Where does he think the buck should stop?

Posted by: DaveM | March 19, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Gibb’s had acting in the most unprofessional manner for in the position he holds and who he represents. Most of you who agree to this have never held an upper management position nor could handle yourselves professional in front of a congressional hearing as most professionals are called to do. Ya’ll just show your ignorance just as Gibb did. for He just played into Rush’s hands, how stupid on his part.

Posted by: Roben | March 20, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.