Gibbs Weighs In on Steele’s Apology to Rush
What does it say about the state of the Republican Party that RNC chairman Michael Steele apologized to conservative talk radio giant Rush Limbaugh, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs was asked today by the irrepressible J-Mart of Politico.
“I was a little surprised at the speed in which Mr. Steele, the head of the RNC, apologized to the head of the Republican Party," Gibbs said.
Gibbs repeated again –- as he did yesterday –- that members of the press should ask Republicans whether they agree with Mr. Limbaugh’s comments that he hopes President Obama fails.
– jpt

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Why is Gibbs so snarky? Does Obama approve of Gibbs’ behavior?
Posted by: Doh! | March 3, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
I am a Republican and I agree with Rush in hoping that Obama fails to enact the massive growth and leftward shift of government toward a nanny state. I want Obama to succeed in restoring growth, prosperity and personal responsibility, but I do not believe the plans he has laid out will take us there.
Posted by: John F. | March 3, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Because the divisions between the Republicans is so much more important than the stock market tanking.
Posted by: Robin | March 3, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Wow, I wish Gibbs could be as clear and concise when questioned about the Obama administration’s policies.
I’m not a big Rush fan, but the liberals have twisted what he said to suit themselves. He wants Obama’s socialist policies to fail. That isn’t the same as saying that he wants America to fail.
Posted by: marylou | March 3, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Limbaugh is now an enemy, like banks and bankers, CEOs and corporate executives, Insurance companies, Oil companies, lobbiests, special interests, etc.
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
“I was a little surprised at the speed in which Mr. Steele, the head of the RNC, apologized to the head of the Republican Party,” Gibbs said.
Gibbs has had a rough going his 1st month as press sec but this is a shining moment.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
So let me get this straight. Instead of fixing Americas problems, Obama got himself elected to take on… Rush Limbaugh!!! Um okay Barack, whlie your so busy with sideshows, how’s about you put the Wall St. criminal bankers in jail, get our troops OUT of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, (the unmanned, undefended US border maybe?)stop printing money and running up record inflation and deficits so China decides to by property in the US to cover our debts, and stop hamstringing the states with even more unfunded mandates that keep them in a black hole where they have no choice but to sell of assets and cut services across the board. Naw, you CAN’T be constructive and attempt to FIX problems, let alone live up to your own promises you made in the campaign. Enjoy that 1st term, because if this keeps up you won’t get another. (Just like Jimmy Carter)
Posted by: hmn... | March 3, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Gibbs is trying to generate anger and further divide our great nation. He needs to shut his trap and stay in the white house. He is about the dumbest thing talking! I do believe the white house is afaid of Rush, if not, why all the attention? All this talk is probably bosting Rush’s ratings and the more people that tune into his show the more people he gets to listen to his point of view and then he’ll get them thinking, even if they don’t agree with him and hate him at least he’ll get them thinking which is something Obama doesn’t want people to do.
Posted by: notafan | March 3, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Add me to the list of Republicans who hope Obama’s plans to hope Obama fails to continue the disastrous policies of the Pelosi-Reid Congress. Like John F, I’ll applaud anything Obama does that I think will help the economy. For instance, I’m glad he’s raised so much money for the Treasury by convincing recalcitrant Democrats to pay back taxes as part of his retroactive vetting of appointees.
Posted by: bgates | March 3, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
In case you haven’t realized, if Obama fails,so does the country and Rush poses as a true American…how can he wish that the policies or the President fails? I am disappointed in Mr. Steele. Apparently his courage does not match his name. One rebuke from Rush and he backs down. Does not say much for the party leader or the party.
Posted by: talmag | March 3, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
“I do believe the white house is afaid of Rush, if not, why all the attention”
Afraid?
If they were afraid they would not be attempting to make him the public face of the Republican party.
The Obama admin is taking advantage of American’s dislike of Rush who is still popular within the party itself. This has created a condition where the party leaders could cast Rush aside or kiss his ring. That Steele did both and looks weaker for it was a bonus.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Headline you’ll never see:
Obama Promises to Meet Limbaugh Without Preconditions
Posted by: Jim Treacher | March 3, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
The press asks the press secretary a question in hopes of creating controversy, the press secretary gives a flip answer not unlike the kinds of answers previous press secretaries have given in similar circumstances year after year after year, and all you folk explode with commentary that sounds like barking chihuahuas. It’s a non-issue, ladies and gents. Park your barkers until there is something worth a snarl.
Posted by: Mary | March 3, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Speaking of enemies, The Telepraph:
It is bizarre that Mr Obama is less willing to answer questions than Mr Bush. It reflects very poorly on his tendency towards control freakery, which has been in evidence since his campaign.
- It’s discourteous to Mr Brown, who was desperate for his big moment with the podiums. On his two set piece trips to see Bush there were proper pressers at Camp David and then in the Rose Garden. Why gratify him with the first European trip and then snub his big PR moment? There will be no private relaxation time for Mr Brown with Mr Obama, a given on previous prime ministerial trips. I know he’s busy but it shows that he is not really that interested, as my sources were telling me last week.
—————————————
Change….
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Bgates, if you think they’re aren’t any repubs that haven’t paid all of their taxes, you’re living in the land of Oz. They just haven’t gotten caught…yet.
Posted by: trae | March 3, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
‘“I was a little surprised at the speed in which Mr. Steele, the head of the RNC, apologized to the head of the Republican Party,” Gibbs said.”
========================
When you have a press secretary making childish statements like this it says a lot about the administration.
Imagine the reverse coverage if republicans said the same thing about George Soros.
The SNL skit knocking on the democratic party slated to run before the election got pulled including jokes about “George Soros: Owner Democratic Party.”
So apparently democrats idea of free speech is to snowball comedy acts that make them look bad yet promote childish “rush = republican leader” garbage.
I suppose though considering the mental age of democratic constituents this sort of thing is right on target.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Rush Limbaugh is just as dangerous to our country as Bin Laden the only difference is Bin Laden is not on Oxycontin.
Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | March 3, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
“Bgates, if you think they’re aren’t any repubs that haven’t paid all of their taxes, you’re living in the land of Oz. They just haven’t gotten caught…yet.
Posted by: trae | Mar 3, 2009 5:33:52 PM”
I would think this would have come out during the democratic witch hunts of 2007-2008. You know that timeframe where giving Roger Clemens the gavel was more important than the economy.
Funny how Bush is being given the blame for this yet you don’t see the democratic congress called out for doing nothing but political games since 2007 instead of you know; passing laws and regulations.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
The holier than thou Repubs can’t get enough of themselves. 100% of the Wall Street crooks who have stolen BILLIONS of dollars from pension funds, non profits and retierment funds are Republicans. So yeah lets get the government off out backs so they can STEAL whatever is left.
Go Obama! This crowd needs to be put in its place. By the way, two countries that are not falling into the economic black hole cultured by the years of Republican deregulatory Rule are Sweden and Canada. Wanna guess why?
Posted by: pgo | March 3, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Socialist? Hardly. We’re practically fascist compared to most of Europe and we’d have to make a lot more changes than Obama’s proposing to get there. And europe isn’t much more than a light shade of socialist, even the dreaded Sweden (which, I might add, ranks much higher on measures from education, to health, to happiness almost every time polls are run).
And the term nanny state just amuses me. As if somehow having a social safety net for those, like almost 1 in 10 Americans now, who have fallen on hard times is going to reduce us all to pansies who can’t take care of themselves.
I am confused as to why we are so terrified to stray even an inch toward another nation’s ideas, even when they apparently work. What the heck are we so afraid of. We always pick the worst case scenarios and march around shouting the ‘sky is falling’ when someone suggests we try a different way to fix a crisis. Instead they advocate we sit on our hands and let our nation rot from the inside because we don’t want to be like those people over there.
As for the socialist thing, pick up a book on Marx. You could even go to some of the villains out there like Stalin or Mao. Actually read what they have to say and determine for yourself what socialism is. I guarantee you it looks nothing like the Obama administration. Frankly, the only socialist thing we’ve really done so far is partially nationalize citibank, a move pushed by economists both conservative and liberal alike.
Posted by: Aremis | March 3, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
“Rush Limbaugh is just as dangerous to our country as Bin Laden the only difference is Bin Laden is not on Oxycontin.
Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | Mar 3, 2009 5:34:44 PM”
========================
More intelligent liberal critical thinking.
Conservatives don’t even have to point out things like this for liberals. Sane people can see the ridiculous analogies that liberals use and tell they’re dealing with a nutjob.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
“Socialist? Hardly. We’re practically fascist compared to most of Europe and we’d have to make a lot more changes than Obama’s proposing to get there. And europe isn’t much more than a light shade of socialist, even the dreaded Sweden (which, I might add, ranks much higher on measures from education, to health, to happiness almost every time polls are run).”
==================
I suppose the former USSR and current China are far to the right of socialism too? LOL.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
It’s embarrassing to have a President who runs the office on this level of thug-like behavior.
Posted by: Morris | March 3, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Just like all other great nations throughout history, America will be torn apart from within. Such a shame.
Oh, and by the way….. I really don’t believe someone like Rush Limbaugh is the best person to look to for salvation.
Posted by: Bill | March 3, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Lanny: I aagree with you…he is a dangerous manic person. Self interested and likes the sound of his own voice. I regret Mr. Steele backed down as that only feeds his ego. He is a rabble rouser and he just might incite the crazies of the world to do something harmful. If enough people stand up to him, it will weaken his cause and it should not be President Obama as it will only give him some ligitimacy.It is unbelievable that a pill popping talk show host can get this far. I blame the audience he attracts.
Posted by: talmag | March 3, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
====In case you haven’t realized, if Obama fails,so does the country====
You know, I’ll just bet you were one of the first in line to tell the left that if Bush fails, so does the country.
Posted by: Sue | March 3, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
But Rush the IMO terrorist did not say he hoped the policies would fail now did he?and I have ti say Gibbs was right it did not take long for the token to kiss Rush butt.Maybe some of you should remember how Jim Jones led his supporters down the path to destruction the same way Limburg is doing
Posted by: joyce | March 3, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
He is not scary it is those who listen to him, and those that listen to those who listen to him, like the GOP.
I find it hard to believe that there could be that many nut cases out there.
Posted by: Thinking | March 3, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
There is cowering, and then there is the gut wrenching fear that is reminiscent of the McCarthy Era. I recall the few brave Americans who risked everything to take a riteous stand; clearly none of the current crowd of centrist republicans is made of that sterner stuff. I suppose we each must decide whether we will assert our convictions and risk the blacklist or continue the pathetic lives of quiet self serving equivocation
Posted by: jym | March 3, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
“Bgates, if you think they’re aren’t any repubs that haven’t paid all of their taxes, you’re living in the land of Oz. They just haven’t gotten caught…yet.
Posted by: trae | Mar 3, 2009 5:33:52 PM”
I would think this would have come out during the democratic witch hunts of 2007-2008. You know that timeframe where giving Roger Clemens the gavel was more important than the economy.
Funny how Bush is being given the blame for this yet you don’t see the democratic congress called out for doing nothing but political games since 2007 instead of you know; passing laws and regulations.
_____________________________________
Not necessarily, cyros. I’m sure you don’t believe the repubs are all on the up and up. As far as political games, BOTH parties are guilty of that, so don’t even go there, my friend.
Posted by: trae | March 3, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Rush is a terrorist? And the GOP is palling around with him? Or something like that? Dear Gawd, it is worse than I thought.
Posted by: Sue | March 3, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Bottom line is, folks, whether or not you want to admit it, the Republican party *is* run by Limbaugh. Steele has kissed the Godfather’s ring. How pathetic. The Democrats would be fools to not handle this exactly the way they’re handling it. This whole thing is hysterical. Anyway, I’d love to see that bloated, drug-addled gasbag Limbaugh actually debate ANYONE in any situation where he doesn’t have this finger on a delay or dump button. But it ain’t gonna happen. The leader of the Republican party is some fat guy with a radio show. How proud you all must be. =)
Posted by: Ted | March 3, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
You know, I’ll just bet you were one of the first in line to tell the left that if Bush fails, so does the country.
****************************************
We did and look what happened the GOP supported his failed policies, and look at the mess we are in.
Posted by: Thinking | March 3, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
“…making childish statements like this it says a lot about the administration…” Cryos
Wrong. Says much more about the flailing GOP. Still clueless… after 2 straight national drubbings.
Rush is the best thing ever to come along for democrats. Please, keep him babbling along.
Posted by: Honest_Abe | March 3, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Funny that for a fat loudmouth drug addict the president has taken such a personal interest in everything he says and does.
Backbone, free speech, values and truth is the enemy of the Marxist.
Posted by: RR GOP | March 3, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
More from the UK press:
But there was no family gettogether, nor did the President offer Mr Brown and his wife Sarah a starstudded White House dinner.
And instead of the traditional joint press conference, the Prime Minister was instead given an impromptu media briefing in the Oval Office.
Within minutes of landing in a snowbound Washington on Monday night, Mr Brown’s aides had been made aware that their high expectations for the trip were in danger of exceeding the low-key welcome the Obama administration was prepared to offer.
Suggestions that the new President’s crowded diary made it impossible to give more time to Mr Brown rang hollow after it emerged that his other engagements included a routine speech to the Department for Interior and a meeting with the Boy Scouts of America.
—————————————
Change…
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
TO CYROS
I think you twisted that around, did you mean to say Barack Heussein Obama is as dangerous as Osama Bin Laden?
TO: Mary | Mar 3, 2009 5:30:26 PM
Don’t think Rush Limbaugh would talk with Obama, he would not waste his time.
Posted by: jeanette | March 3, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
I love Rush L., Joe the P., Sara P., Ann C., and the other conservative leaders. Watching and listening to them is like watching cartoons only more amusing. The brilliant political tactic of the Obama administration has more and more painted the picture of a Republican party that is led by comedians and showman who are even attacking one another. This approach allows the American people to see the joke that people who call themselves conservative have become. The enormous egoity and lust for attention and money fuels these people who are the Republican and conservative leaders. It is so much fun to watch. Keep it up!
Posted by: Jimdandy | March 3, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
It’s very thoughtful of the Obama administration to show such concern for the state of the Republican party.
Posted by: MayBee | March 3, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Divert and Conquer. Discredit the enemy. This is how saul alsinky tells you to get socialism in. Looks like the administration is doing a fine job of following The socialist doctrine.
This is the only way Obama knows to work. It’s how he got elected each time. He has no qualifications, never ran anything. He’s just a lawyer with many part time jobs. No business accomplishments on his resume.
Fool the people. He’s counting on the fact that most of them are too dumb to look any further than the TV screen in front of them.
Posted by: citizen4honor | March 3, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Gibbs repeated again –- as he did yesterday –- that members of the press should ask Republicans whether they agree with Mr. Limbaugh’s comments that he hopes President Obama fails.
*************************************
Will they respond? No. No guts.
Posted by: Thinking | March 3, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Should I go back to 2001 or 2005 and find all the posts where left leaning pundits openly called for Bush to fail? Was it any different when Keith Olberman and Randi Rhodes openly hoped the Bush would fail? What about all those times that Rhodes called for Bush to be impeached?
The left is so incredibly transparent it nauseates me.
Posted by: Keith | March 3, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
The minute the Republicans came out of their very first meeting with President Obama, quoting him as saying, “I won,” and also that DC won’t get anything done until the GOP stops listening to Rush, I knew the GOP had stepped into “it.”
RNC Chairman Michael Steele publicly groveling to radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh is what President Obama won with that “toss off” line.
And it’s only going to get better when the new Senator from MN takes the 59th Democratic Senate seat in a few weeks.
It looks like the fat, greedy white men are going to lose again in 2010.
Cheers!
Posted by: Jan | March 3, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
“_____________________________________
Not necessarily, cyros. I’m sure you don’t believe the repubs are all on the up and up. As far as political games, BOTH parties are guilty of that, so don’t even go there, my friend.
Posted by: trae | Mar 3, 2009 5:49:54 PM”
====================
of course both parties are full of corruption.
i can go there all I want. When the day comes republicans are interviewing baseball stars while the economy goes into shambles I would hope you would be mad about it.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
So who do you think is more afraid: The Obama administration, of a radio-show loudmouth who less than 1/3 of Americans view favorably; or the Republicans, of admitting that he is the only thing they have left?
Posted by: Skip | March 3, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
“Should I go back to 2001 or 2005 and find all the posts where left leaning pundits openly called for Bush to fail? Was it any different when Keith Olberman and Randi Rhodes openly hoped the Bush would fail? ”
By all means do so.
I suspect you will be looking for a very long time.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Please… can’t we all just get along…
As my husband’s grandmother always said “COnider the source.”
I hope Obama succeeds, and Limagh finds his oxycotin… I’m tired of his lambasting divisional tactics….
Posted by: Gigi | March 3, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Gibbs repeated again –- as he did yesterday –- that members of the press should ask Republicans whether they agree with Mr. Limbaugh’s comments that he hopes President Obama fails.
*************************************
Will they respond? No. No guts.
*************************************
We will be seeing the out of text comments by Rush who said he hopes them (his policies fail) on TV ads soon to mislead the America people.
Obama is really we will see ads within a week with the misquote out of context statement by Rush Limbaugh. What’s sad is this guy is the leader of the free world? Playing childish games like this.
And what he was out again this weekend partying. Man does Obama have a great job.
Posted by: citizen4honor | March 3, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
“But Rush the IMO terrorist did not say he hoped the policies would fail now did he?and I have ti say Gibbs was right it did not take long for the token to kiss Rush butt.Maybe some of you should remember how Jim Jones led his supporters down the path to destruction the same way Limburg is doing
Posted by: joyce | Mar 3, 2009 5:47:12 PM”
Liberal racism at its finest. I love how openly racist democrats are and how people don’t get offended.
Liberal thought process: Even though there are big philosophical differences between the 2 parties having NOTHING to do with race, all blacks and minorities must vote democrat or they are “tokens” or “sellouts.”
Wow so in liberals’ minds black people must all think a certain way and want handouts or they are a sellout? That concept in itself is pretty disturbing. So I guess that minorities are all the same and vote only their self interests?
I must be clueless. I’ve always been under the impression that the individual > something as simple as race. I guess I’m not “progressive” enough.
Simple fact is democrats exploit racism for political gain making relations worse since the worst thing for democrats is good racial relations.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Limbaugh is just a talk show guy with a high school education. He just happens to be good at what he does..talk. He could do a 180 tomorrow and shill for the Dems. and be good at that too. He’s never gone any further than radio. He couldn’t hold elective office because he’s not smart enough. He’s never on any discussion shows because he’s too shallow and most of what he says isn’t true. It’s his audience you have to worry about. These are people who only have am radios. His 20 million listeners deal is bs also. That’s the high end of an estimated range.
Posted by: doug | March 3, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
The Republicans just aren’t learning from their defeat in November.
There are a lot of people who would be Republicans rather than independents or Democrats if it the GOP didn’t alienate the center. Many of the people who voted for Obama were voting against the Republican party rather than voting for the Democrats.
This turn of events simply shows that the right wing — exemplified by Limbaugh — remains firmly in charge. Unfortunately, unless the GOP can distance itself from Limbaugh and his ilk, the party will almost certainly suffer further losses in 2010 and 2012.
If I were a Democrat, I’d be very happy indeed.
Posted by: Martina | March 3, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Headlines ….
Steele hurts spine doing Limbaugh-Rock, going real low as he goes …
Posted by: Y M | March 3, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
So who do you think is more afraid: The Obama administration, of a radio-show loudmouth who less than 1/3 of Americans view favorably; or the Republicans, of admitting that he is the only thing they have left?
*******************************
I can’t believe how stupid these comments are that DEMS would actually believe this made up story. We are really in big trouble if people are so gullable. Rush the leader of GOP? Most rep don’t even turn he show on. LOL. He’s an entertainer…..
Posted by: citizen4honor | March 3, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
“It looks like the fat, greedy white men are going to lose again in 2010.
Cheers!
Posted by: Jan | Mar 3, 2009 6:00:49 PM”
More pathetic liberal race divide and conquer tactics. Juice up the hatred against whites and then use that hatred to control votes and turn the populace into government slaves.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Should I go back to 2001 or 2005 and find all the posts where left leaning pundits openly called for Bush to fail?
***************************************
See what we mean? Is Rush the President of the US in a time of great economic stress? No. Rush is the leader of a weak and ineffective political party, the GOP.
The whole point is to show that GOP supports this nut case.
Posted by: Thinking | March 3, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
“Divert and Conquer. Discredit the enemy. This is how saul alsinky tells you to get socialism in.”
Do right wingers realize how dumb(and of course) hypocritical they are when they assign such basic political tactics as the creation of Saul Alinsky?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
mad -
Per the BBC
Downing Street dismissed suggestions that Mr Brown’s visit had been downgraded by Mr Obama after it emerged there would not be a formal joint press conference.
The prime minister’s wife Sarah also met First Lady Michelle Obama away from the media cameras.
In addition, Brown is addressing a joint session of Congress tomorrow.
Looks like, yet another, of you tabloid sensational stories you are spreading is bunk…
Posted by: Ranger | March 3, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
It looks like the fat, greedy white men are going to lose again in 2010.
****************************************************
They’re apparently the ones in the driver seat for the GOP. Looks like the ending scene of Thelma and Louise is coming up, but with the fat, greedy white men in their place. RIP, GOP.
Posted by: kat the real one | March 3, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Liberals won’t be happy until they own the media 100%. Rush is so “dangerous” because he represents one of the few voices dissenting to the mindless drivel coming from the lackey media.
If democrats’ policies were actually so strong they could debate them on their merit. The fact they can’t factually debate Rush on many topics speaks volumes.
i don’t even like Rush but find funny how much liberals hate freedom of speech and multiple viewpoints.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
It doesn’t take much to provoke the townsfolk into picking up their pitchforks and torches.
Gibbs and Obama are playing a very dangerous game in trying to demonize a specific American citizen.
Posted by: WikiWiki | March 3, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
So who do you think is more afraid: The Obama administration, of a radio-show loudmouth who less than 1/3 of Americans view favorably; or the Republicans, of admitting that he is the only thing they have left?
*******************************
I can’t believe how stupid these comments are that DEMS would actually believe this made up story. We are really in big trouble if people are so gullable. Rush the leader of GOP? Most rep don’t even turn he show on. LOL. He’s an entertainer…..
So you chose ‘B’.
Posted by: Skip | March 3, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
“Liberals won’t be happy until they own the media 100%.”
Do liberals run News Corp?
How about Time Warner or Vivendi?
“Rush is so “dangerous” because he represents one of the few voices dissenting to the mindless drivel coming from the lackey media.”
Rush isn’t dangerous unless he again inspires a Timothy McVeigh.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
“i don’t even like Rush but find funny how much liberals hate freedom of speech and multiple viewpoints.”
ROFLMAO!
Not even his most dogged defenders will admit liking the man!
I still can’t believe Steele handed us the gift of bowing down to this guy!
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Hey Republicans,
I do believe these lefties are so afraid of Limbaugh and us 20 million republicans that they have to go on and on and on. Now apparently so is President. He has not a clue of what to heck is going on. I think we just knocked him off His game. Wow! !!!we are GOOD!!!! Go ahead lefties concentrate on us. that way you won’t know that your Pres. is falling apart…
Posted by: jeanette | March 3, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Cyros- The truth-that your party is self-destructing, hurts, doesn’t it? Get a grip on it, dear.
Posted by: kat the real one | March 3, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Jeanette:
Which are you? Conservative or Republican?
Posted by: JV | March 3, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
“i don’t even like Rush but find funny how much liberals hate freedom of speech and multiple viewpoints.”
*******************************************
“Liberals and most sane Americans hate “hate” and Rush Limbaugh is the poster child for hate. The fact he is such a predominant figure/leader in the Republican party right now simply ties the Republicans to the politics of hate.
Limbaugh calling for riots in Denver at the DNC convention; calls women “feminazis”; says women should not be allowed on juries where the accused is a stud; making fun of Michael J. Fox’s Parkinson’s disease accusing him of over-shaking for effect; saying james Earl Ray (MLK’s assassin) deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor; his comments on Terri Schiavo were despicable and the list goes on and on and is so disgusting -
Any decent human being would not have anything to do with him – which is why it is so unbelievable the Republicans are allowing him to have so much power over them!
Posted by: Ranger | March 3, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
“The fact they can’t factually debate Rush on many topics speaks volumes.”
Rush factually debates….anyone?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Do you ever notice how when some posters reply to those who disagree with their Republican views, they start by calling them lefties or liberals. It’s as if they live in a black and white world. Strange. They can’t break out of their thought box. Probably wear the same clothes, drive the same car, eat the same foods, never veer off course for fear of having an open mind.
Posted by: JV | March 3, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
The correct response for Mr. Steele would have been to appreciate Mr Limbaugh, say he is an entertainer, and quip that Mr Steele is glad Rush is on the right side instead of the other side. A little finesse could have saved all of this rancor. Mr Steele needs to act like a leader if he is to truly be one.
Mr Limbaugh is not the leader of the Republican Party. He is a voice.
Posted by: NPage | March 3, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
“Liberals and most sane Americans hate “hate” and Rush Limbaugh is the poster child for hate. The fact he is such a predominant figure/leader in the Republican party right now simply ties the Republicans to the politics of hate.
Posted by: Ranger | Mar 3, 2009 6:29:04 PM
===============
Look at all the racist liberal posts on this thread and ask yourself who is the party of hate.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Does Obama approve of Gibbs’ attacking a radio host?
Posted by: Hmmm... | March 3, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
They can’t break out of their thought box. Probably wear the same clothes, drive the same car, eat the same foods, never veer off course for fear of having an open mind.
Posted by: JV | Mar 3, 2009 6:32:11 PM
=====================
Don’t worry soon the liberals for freedom will have GPS in your car tracking your movement so they will protect you from veering offcourse. They will even maybe program the car to go to their approved government doctor?
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Limbaugh represents the worst of mankind; Stelle should not apologize; he should be standing up to him and telling Limbaugh that his comments and attitudes are unacceptable for any American.
How the GOP responds is indicative of the party’s attitude…. meanspirited, selfish, and UNChristian.
Posted by: abby0802 | March 3, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
I support Rush Limbaugh, and I know that my family and friends were thrilled by his speech this weekend. He is the lone voice speaking for me, not Mr Steele.
I do think that the Republican party has been split into two factions: the tiny elitist wing, led by the McCains and Steeles; and the conservative wing. Rush is an eloquent spokesman for the conservative wing and I will certainly do my best to defend someone who speaks for me.
Posted by: Morris | March 3, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Mr Limbaugh is not the leader of the Republican Party. He is a voice.
***************************************
So far the only voice
Posted by: Thinking | March 3, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Morris – Your post says a lot about you…..
Did you feel the same way Rush did about women who supported Clinton during the primaries? He is soo “eloquent”…….
“”You have to understand the mindset of a lot of these feminists and women…These women have paid their dues. They’ve been married two or three times; they’ve had two or three abortions; they’ve done everything that feminism asked them to do. They have cut men out of their lives; they have devoted themselves to causes and careers. And this — the candidacy of Hillary Clinton — is the culmination of all of these women’s efforts.”
Posted by: Ranger | March 3, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
I would suggest you read up on the stimulus and state’s proposals that Obama had to nationally address.
Democrats choosing treatments is a FACT; doctors are likely soon to come. In the stimulus bill it lists using personal medical records to ensure doctors are giving “approved treatments.” Do yourself a favor and look up how controlled medical care is under most nationally run health care.
Several democratic governors and legislators have proposed taxing gas by mileage rather than per gallon. This would require installation of GPS and a clock in EVERY car and they would monitor when and where you drive. This was brought up by Obama’s own cabinet but Obama said he wouldn’t look at doing it at this time.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
“Posted by: Ranger | Mar 3, 2009 6:29:04 PM”
=====================
I assume you are even more upset at Franken being a senator-elect (still under dispute).
Surely if you find a radio host appalling you can’t think that rape jokes are appropriate for someone running for senator.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
“Democrats choosing treatments is a FACT”
Nope, that was made up by a shill for Big Pharma.
“Several democratic governors and legislators have proposed taxing gas by mileage rather than per gallon. This would require installation of GPS and a clock in EVERY car and they would monitor when and where you drive. This was brought up by Obama’s own cabinet but Obama said he wouldn’t look at doing it at this time.”
Would that be Republican Ray Lahood that proposed that?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
“”Democrats choosing treatments is a FACT”
Nope, that was made up by a shill for Big Pharma.
“Several democratic governors and legislators have proposed taxing gas by mileage rather than per gallon. This would require installation of GPS and a clock in EVERY car and they would monitor when and where you drive. This was brought up by Obama’s own cabinet but Obama said he wouldn’t look at doing it at this time.”
Would that be Republican Ray Lahood that proposed that?
Posted by: Ryan C | Mar 3, 2009 7:02:38 PM”
========================
Ray Lahood is a member of Obama’s cabinet is he not? And so far as the states go it is DEMOCRATS proposing the idea.
The wording in the stimulus is there. Surely you know that since Obama posted it days in advance to allow you to read it before voting on it.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
“Surely if you find a radio host appalling you can’t think that rape jokes are appropriate for someone running for senator.”
In the 1995 New York magazine profile of “Saturday Night Live,” Franken is described among a group of show writers sounding out a spoof of Andy Rooney centered on a sedative pill bottle found in the “60 Minutes” essayist’s desk. Franken and fellow writers Norm MacDonald and Jim Downey kick around fictional Rooney responses to the discovery of the bottle.
The article quotes Franken putting an edgy twist on the discussion: “And ‘I give the pills to Lesley Stahl. Then when Lesley’s passed out, I take her to the closet and rape her.’ Or `That’s why you never see Lesley until February.’ Or, `When she passes out I put her in various positions and take pictures of her.”
Tasteless and yet never aired.
Rush on the other hand enjoys airing his tastelessness.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Cryos – Why would I be “more upset” about Franken?
I am not a fan of Franken, but Rush can beat him in a hate throw-down any day. In addition, Franken was not the keynote speaker at the Netroots Convention nor does he speak for the Democratic Party, nor do the Democratic leaders cow to him.
Republican Senator Bunning is also quite a character and I don’t think he’s even into radio.
Posted by: Ranger | March 3, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
‘Cryos – Why would I be “more upset” about Franken?
I am not a fan of Franken, but Rush can beat him in a hate throw-down any day. In addition, Franken was not the keynote speaker at the Netroots Convention nor does he speak for the Democratic Party, nor do the Democratic leaders cow to him.
Republican Senator Bunning is also quite a character and I don’t think he’s even into radio.
Posted by: Ranger | Mar 3, 2009 7:09:07 PM”================
=================
Nice try to justify double standards. Yay another hypocrite shows their colors. congrats.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Ranger – I think your post says a lot about you too…
Are you saying that Hillary did not have vocal support from ardent feminists? Having been a former public official from the Democrat party in the San Francisco area, I can certainly verify this by first-hand evidence.
Perhaps you should get out more often.
Too much computers can hurt your eyes.
Posted by: Morris | March 3, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
I am ashamed to be an American after Obama was elected
Posted by: pester | March 3, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Ray Lahood is a member of Obama’s cabinet is he not? And so far as the states go it is DEMOCRATS proposing the idea.”
You claimed Democrats were proposing it then cited an Obama cabinet member.
Can you name the other Democrats proposing it or is it only Republican Ray LaHood?
“The wording in the stimulus is there.”
Name the page. Because the pages cited by the shill for Big Pharm said nothing like what she claimed they did.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
I love seeing two different irrelevant defenses to the same empty double standard.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“Nice try to justify double standards. Yay another hypocrite shows their colors. congrats.”
You should look up the word hypocrisy.
Also the word projection.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
mad – I don’t need an observation and interpretation by a Politico reporter to tell me what I read from the actual British reporters at the event.
Posted by: Ranger | March 3, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Any more right wing talking points for the day cryos?
I am disappointed we had no warning of imminent reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
‘Any more right wing talking points for the day cryos?
I am disappointed we had no warning of imminent reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine.
Posted by: Ryan C | Mar 3, 2009 7:15:41 PM”
=====================
I have to give Obama credit he shut that one down for now. However that didn’t prevent democrats from inserting similar but less straightforward language into recent bills.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
I’d like to mention a big difference between Al Franken and Rush: Al Franken has actually gone over to Iraq to entertain our troops, and they really appreciated it.
Posted by: Skip | March 3, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
When the BBC asked Obama about perceptions that “unlike his predecessors” he has no particular affinity for England, the president soothingly used the words “special” and “relationship” in concert no fewer than three times.
—————————————
I guess this BBC reporter was just repeating gossip in asking such a question.
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Divert and Conquer. Obama’s key to victory. So why everyone’s in this stupid chat no one is paying attention to:
1. Tim Geithner saying a few mins ago that what got us here was gov’t overspending.
2. That Obama’s budget is larger than ALL OF THE PREVIOUS BUDGETS COMBINED IN OUR ENTIRE HISTORY. In our entire 300 years of existence. His budget is larger than all of them combined. And you think just taxing upper 2% of Americans can pay for all of it?
Divert and Conquer – steer them away from the facts. And Obama also knows most Americans are just not smart enough to look up the facts.
Divert and Conquer.
Posted by: citizen4honor | March 3, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Ryan C – Have you no shame at all? You should instead engage in the pros and cons of an idea by explaining your support or opposition.
Are you going on the record as opposing the tax-by-mile? Perhaps we could tax-by-mile on bikes as well, as the carbon dioxide emitted by exhaling also contributes to your global warming? As does jogging or running? Or do you think that the people should allow Big Biking and Big Walking organizations to be subsidized in the upcoming cap and trade days?
Posted by: KansasGuy | March 3, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
“I guess I just need to have 100% faith in the government when they don’t say how they will use the information. ”
So you debunked your own bs and added a new talking point.
“Regular citizens like Joe the Plumber sure didn’t have government information used against them.”
Why not cite CREEP is you’re going to talk about improper access to medical records?
Read up on HIPPA.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
“Ryan C – Have you no shame at all? You should instead engage in the pros and cons of an idea by explaining your support or opposition.”
Shame?
You’re the same guy who has done nothing but post right wing talking points even debunking one yourself.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
“I have to give Obama credit he shut that one down for now. However that didn’t prevent democrats from inserting similar but less straightforward language into recent bills.”
Which bills and which democrats?
You’ve already made stuff up or simply parroted debunked talking points.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
party-line 57-41 vote. Durbin’s bill.
“To encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public airwaves are used in the public interest.”"
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
“”I guess I just need to have 100% faith in the government when they don’t say how they will use the information. ”
So you debunked your own bs and added a new talking point.
“Regular citizens like Joe the Plumber sure didn’t have government information used against them.”
Why not cite CREEP is you’re going to talk about improper access to medical records?
Read up on HIPPA.
Posted by: Ryan C | Mar 3, 2009 7:25:09 PM:====================
=========================
I debunked nothing. Government approved/not approved treatments are a logical next step for “fiscal responsibility.” You are naive enough to think that not spelling it out means it won’t be used this way? And this was just backdoored into a “stimulus bill.”
nice strawman though.
I deal with HIPPA so I don’t need to read up on it. The government has the rights to use those records. Oh and what happened in Ohio was “illegal” also.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
I admitted I was wrong about tax by the mile being solely a democratic idea; its bipartisan.
However I don’t expect you to admit you’re wrong about S.160.
Posted by: Cryos | March 3, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Steele and Limbaugh bickering is like an imbecile arguing with an idiot at a Moron’s Convention!
Posted by: zjd99 | March 3, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
“To encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public airwaves are used in the public interest.”
Media ownership diversity is not the fairness doctrine.
I don’t see the problem with limiting how many media outlets 1 entity can own in a single region. While having different owners does not guarantee diversity in opinion, its at least possible vs the handful of companies we now have that control nearly all media outlets.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“I admitted I was wrong about tax by the mile being solely a democratic idea; its bipartisan.”
You didn’t admit you were wrong and you have yet to name a single Democrat that was on board with the idea.
“However I don’t expect you to admit you’re wrong about S.160.”
You have a problem with “provide the District of Columbia a voting seat and the State of Utah an additional seat in the House of Representative” as proposed by Joe-mentum?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
“I debunked nothing.”
You stated the stim bill had language it did not. You even demonstrated what language the stim bill actually contained.
“Government approved/not approved treatments are a logical next step for “fiscal responsibility.”
Ahhh the slippery slope logical fallacy.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
“I deal with HIPPA so I don’t need to read up on it. The government has the rights to use those records.”
Could you show where in HIPPA, it allows the government the right to use those records?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 3, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
“Are you saying that Hillary did not have vocal support from ardent feminists? Having been a former public official from the Democrat party in the San Francisco area, I can certainly verify this by first-hand evidence.”
So you are saying Limbaugh is correct and also agree with him all these women also had two or three abortions?
Despicable.
Posted by: Ranger | March 3, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
If Obama’s goal is to move the U.S. towards a socialist-style government and society, then I hope Obama fails.
If Obama’s goal is to make the U.S. less safe, then I hope Obama fails.
Posted by: Will Stanton | March 3, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
If Mr. Gibbs reads this blog, I want him to know: make no mistake about it, I WANT PRESIDENT OBAMA TO FAIL.
Why?
Because I want America to survive and succeed.
Remember when dissent was patriotic?
Posted by: concerned american | March 3, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
“Remember when dissent was patriotic?”
I don’t remember it being patriotic when we were getting scammed into the war in Iraq.
Posted by: Skip | March 3, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Hey Jake, if you have any stones, why don’t you ask Gibbs if he wanted G.W. Bush to succeed?
Posted by: RBR | March 3, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Steele wasn’t the only apologist to Limbaugh – there were a couple of other Republican senators who recanted after speaking out against his hoping Obama would fail. It looks like the more reasonable figures in the GOP were directed to eat dirt. Rahm was right about Limabaugh maintaining a leadership position in the party. So long maladaptive GOP and good night! Better and better mornings are coming.
Posted by: kat the real one | March 3, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Memo to GOP: Allowing Rush to hijack your entire party is not the way to rebuild and rejuvenate a struggling movement.
Posted by: wickedlittledoll | March 3, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
I prefer the WH focus on economic and security issues rather than individual US citizens who disagree with policy decisions.
Posted by: mad | March 4, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am
The controversy about Michael Steele and Rush Limbaugh (who I don’t really particularly listen to anymore) is more than about Rush. When the liberal talk show host said that CPAC looked like a bunch of Nazis Michael Steele nodded in agreement.
Some said his nodding wasn’t in agreement with that statement but still at the very least he was quiet and did not speak out against that outrageous statement.
This is more than about Rush the person. This was about the speech he gave and if you listened to the speech and agree with it then it is not only Rush but you, and all other grassroots conservatives that Michael Steele has rebuked in the harshest of terms.
Well, if that is the way the “leader” of the GOP feels about me then I say no, no, no, not God Bless the GOP, GOD DAMN the GOP. It isn’t the party I thought I knew!
Posted by: Greg | March 4, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Is George Stephanopolous and his daily phone friends a part of Obama’s campaign to discredit Rush?!?!
Posted by: Jon Scar | March 4, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
I’m loving the idea that Obama is trying to manipulate the ‘Rush’ thing…
This will be another ‘self induced’ wound….Until now…the country has only heard sound bites that out of context seem wacko…those of us who have actually listened to Rush…know better….but the public has to make an effort to ‘find’ Rush on the radio….How wonderful O’dummy is giving him a national platform….I’m jumping for joy here…..
We want the Republicans in congress to ‘man up’ and ‘out’ Obama whenever possible….but I understand the fine line they must walk while a lot of the country is still in “loovvve” with this con man……
Obama is encouraging this as a way to distract the country from paying attention to what he’s doing to the country….HA! this will sooooo blow up in his face……Rush will put him under a microscope…and show the country who the ‘real’ Obama is.
We want our congressmen and women to realize….they are our ‘soldiers’…their mission is to ‘protect’ America from this kind of radical reforming of our American values….It just so happens their hands are tied now….they are outnumbered…
We so need a ‘voice’ to educate Americans right now….it’s going to take public opinion to turn this around.
If you are so stupid as too fall for the spin that Rush ”is the head of the Republican Party” then you will have to accept ‘The View’ is the head of the Democratic Party…..Their venomous attacts..using their national platform every dang day…shouting over Lizabeth completly denying an opposing VIEW…lol [pun intended]..
Let the Games begin!
Posted by: J Moore | March 4, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
It says that Republicans do not have the balls to stand up to a divisive force within their party. It also says they are leaderless right now and have no message. Until they stand up to Limbaugh in a decisive way their support will continue to deteriorate amongst Indepenents (like myself) and moderates..
Posted by: indy_voter | March 4, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
“I’ll give you a bit of insight, we support Rush more than any of the GOP leadership.”
And that speaks to the lunacy of the right wing more than anything.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 4, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Rush Limbaugh for President !!
&
Sean Hannity for Vice President !!
They are the Voice and Face of the Republican Party, are they Not ?
The are Fully Vetted, Honorable, Trustful, Truthful, Moral, Honorable Tax Payers, Devoted Family Men, Morally Straight, They own One Home, like Most Americans…
They pay their Taxes and Operate Honorable Businesses, Honest, Law Abiding Citizens and Devoted Husbands…
Yep, These Two Men, should be the Republican Ticket, for 2012 !!
Now if You think I’m serious, about any of the Baloney I just Pecked above…
Note: I also Own a Large Oil Field and Oil Refinery in Texas and I’m a Near and Dear Friend of George W. Bush !!
Posted by: O. | March 4, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Rush is becoming a sort of a Mt.Rushmore for the Democratic Party Elite.Rush is so powerful according to them that they have to enlist, our President, the Chief of Staff, the Press Secretary,the propaganda voice- boxes of the well oil democratic machinery ,the Liberal Press.Pretty soon they will call the Arm forces too.What a ridiculus predicament when we all are suffering in this land of ours. Maybe they will remember their own slogan Is the Economy Stupid11111
Posted by: MFB | March 4, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm