How Congress Protected AIG’s Bonuses
ABC News’ Jonathan Karl reports: During late-night, closed-door talks last month, negotiators for the House, Senate and White House stripped out a measure to the stimulus bill that could have restricted the AIG bonuses. Here’s the story: Last month, the Senate unanimously approved an amendment to the stimulus bill aimed at restricting bonuses over $100,000 at any company receiving federal bailout funds. The measure, which was drafted by Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., applied these restrictions retroactively to bonuses received or promised in 2008 and onward. But then… The provision was stripped out during the closed-door conference negotiations involving House and Senate leaders and the White House. A measure by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., to limit executive compensation replaced it. But Dodd’s measure explicitly exempted bonuses agreed to prior to the passage of the stimulus bill. Here’s the exact language from Dodd’s measure in the stimulus: "The prohibition required under clause (i) shall not be construed to prohibit any bonus payment required to be paid pursuant to a written employment contract executed on or before February 11, 2009…"

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Outrageous. I hope Chris Dodd does not get re-elected.
Posted by: Fran | March 17, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Didn’t Dodd specifically get really big campaign contributions from AIG? Might that be the reason for his concern and his changing the language?
God this administration is awful…
Posted by: beth | March 17, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Absolutely insane when average Americans are losing their jobs, benefits and retirement plans.
Posted by: Magical Mischef Maker | March 17, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Way to go Chris…Polls in CT already show you getting your ass kicked…I’m sure this will help…LOL!
Posted by: Nubtail | March 17, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Disgraceful.
Posted by: Mack | March 17, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
The questions need to be answered: What did the White House know, and when did they know it?
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | March 17, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
This is the same Chris Dodd that restricted any inquiries into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Have we had enough of Change yet people? Where’s the “change” to protect us??
Posted by: Gina | March 17, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Say goodnight, Chris Dodd.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | March 17, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Why does this surprise ANYONE?? Fromt he same administration that promised no bill would be voted on for 5 days then voted the giest “stimulus” spending bill in US history only hours after it was reconciled. The same administration who promised no lobbyists in the cabinet then nominated several. Who called for transparency and gave none, who signaled the end of corruption, then filled 4 cabinet posts with people who failed to pay their taxes. The administration who promised tax cuts to 95% of america (even though only 60% pay taxes) then vowed to let current tax cuts expire and has already passed sweeping “sin taxes” on things like tobacco products and usage taxes on fuel (to raise your gas prices)…
But I guess these don’t count…
Posted by: arkie vet | March 17, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
A fair number of those Wall Street robber barons live in Connecticut.
Posted by: Mack | March 17, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Looks like Mr. Dodd owns this one.
And he better be able to come up with some REAL GOOD COVER, or hope that the brain surgeons @ AIG held back a little of there pay because Dodd will need it.
Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | March 17, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
How many of you know that the man in charge of monitoring the mortgage industry (D Barney Frank) received $400,000 in lobby funds from Fannie and Freddie (all while being involved romantically with a top exec at Fannie)
Or that (D)Chris Dodd and (D)Maxine Waters while sitting on the same senate committee also took 10 of thousands from lobbyists. That Obama’s CIA Chief (Penetta) has a daughter who works for a company whose main customer is the CIA.. or that Panetta himself received lobby money from this company before taking over as the CIA head..
this administration is a joke.. and we will ultimatley pay the price..
Posted by: arkie vet | March 17, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Maybe before the AIG bonuses were actually paid, Sen. Dodd still believed that “No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed” actually meant that no bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed. But that was then, and this is now. Now, we need an ex post facto bill of attainder to get that money back. We’ll call it a “tax,” though to pretend it’s not one of those nasty things the Constitution says we can’t do. Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Posted by: Lawrence J. Kramer | March 17, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Lawrence J. Kramer:”We’ll call it a “tax,” though to pretend it’s not one of those nasty things the Constitution says we can’t do.”
A tax would be perfectly constitutional. There are always retroactive tax laws – the rules for taxes on the income you’re earning right now are not yet completely written.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 17, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
We keep asking where was Congress when it was supposed to have been protecting us?? Who owns/paid for/’donated’/bought our Congress? Why isn’t Congress honest and honorable and transparent? What nastiness are they hiding this time? Who can trust them? When? This is BOTH parties GUILTY AGAIN!! This is more than one administration’s guilty! Where were members ‘troughing’ instead of really doing their jobs “to protect and defend” our USA. Bet they have another sneaky pay raise for themselves planned to sneak dishonestly into next ‘last bill of the session’. Watch for that gross grab into our national wallet yet again. Each and every member and his/her staff should be transparent. They certainly do not seem to be responsive nor looking FOR OUR NATIONAL GOOD – just their own greed. SHAME AGAIN AND AGAIN!! am so disappointed …
Posted by: nina | March 17, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
DARRYL –”And he better be able to come up with some REAL GOOD COVER”– why would he need to do that? do you really think the “in the tank for Obama” media is going to make a big deal out of this?? this story will be buried within 2 days.. just like the “investigation” that Pelosci launched to “get to the bottom of the mortgage crisis.. and hold the responsible parties accountable”.. When she couldn’t hang it on a republican, the “investigation” died on the vine..
Posted by: arkie vet | March 17, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
This and the Community investment act that created the housing/credit crunch… DODD MUST GO!!! Peter Schiff would be a good place to start.
Posted by: hmn... | March 17, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
jhw539 -”A tax would be perfectly constitutional. There are always retroactive tax laws – the rules for taxes on the income you’re earning right now are not yet completely written.”– maybe so, but a “targeted” tax intended to strip private citizens out of legally earned money IS NOT constitutional.
Posted by: arkie vet | March 17, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Guess who got the largest AIG contributions for 2008???? Dodd and Obama. Scoundrels!! We should throw these rascals out!! What crap. Then they have the chops to pretend how terrible it is for AIG to give bonus money out. They just do not get it that we know what liars and cheats they all are down there.
Posted by: pesiri | March 17, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
arkie vet – while I tend to understand the anger and frustration by posters on this topic, and accusations flying left and right, please be advised that Leon Panetta does not have a daughter. Go to factcheck.org before you just post the rumors you hear. I also agree that if Chris Dodd is responsible for this AIG bonus debacle, he should go now, not at election time, but now!! This is just too much to take.
Posted by: geecee | March 17, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
whilst we’re asking the Doddster a few hard questions, perhaps we can ask (again) for him to release the docs from his sweetheart mortgage deal with Countrywide
Posted by: dk14 | March 17, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
arkie vet:”maybe so, but a “targeted” tax intended to strip private citizens out of legally earned money IS NOT constitutional. ”
Not sure what interpretation you’re using to determine that. The Sixteenth amendment is pretty clear on this point.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 17, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
pesiri:”Guess who got the largest AIG contributions for 2008???? Dodd and Obama.”
This is a lie. Dodd received the highest donations by a good margin, but Schumer (R) was in second place. McCain actually took more money from AIG than Obama did.
We get it – you hate Obama and everything he’s trying to do. That’s fine, you have some respectable company. But it’s hard to take your opinions seriously when you keep making up lies to try to justify them. It reduces the credibility of the (few I fear) intelligent conservative voices.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 17, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
If Dodd, gets re elected, then Acorn will have its hand in this mess. Acorn wants socialist dems in charge with the savior. Acorn will twist arms, with their leftist coalition, and even wants to go against moderate dems who question Obama’s trillions in spending. Acorn will play better dirty tricks with the elections and fund lefti$t dem$.
Posted by: Jose53 | March 17, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Jose53:”Acorn will twist arms, with their leftist coalition, ”
Well, as a fallback straw man I suppose it is less silly than the old “blame Clinton” lines.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 17, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
So, this is the “change” we hoped for? Seems like the same Dems being Dems with just bigger negative consequences for honest folks- or is that fools?
Posted by: 4merCMS | March 17, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Way to stand up for the American People, Senator Dodd! Hey, by the way, Senator, I’m thinking of doing a refi… can you hook me up with any good lenders?
Posted by: I'm With Stupid | March 17, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
If this is indeed true, its shameful. This is what was posted on his website:
March 16, 2009
Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban affairs, released the following statement today in response to AIG’s decision to pay out $165 million dollars in bonuses for its executives.
“This is another outrageous example of executives – including those whose decisions were responsible for the problems that caused AIG’s collapse – enriching themselves at the expense of taxpayers. A car mechanic or teacher in Connecticut shouldn’t have to subsidize the bad decisions of these executives. Executives at other companies receiving TARP funds have voluntarily foregone bonuses – there’s no reason why those at AIG shouldn’t do the same.”
Posted by: ajc | March 17, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
JHW539 -
Retroactive 100% taxes? Not hardly. Congress can’t make a confiscation into a “tax” by calling it one.
Maybe we should find all the AIG execs and throw bricks through their windows. That’ll show ‘em how we feel about their kind. Then we’ll take their homes because they obviously don’t care enough to maintain them. We’ll call it the “broken glass tax.” That’ll make it ok. I mean, it’s a tax, right?
Posted by: Lawrence J. Kramer | March 17, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
This administration is the biggest cluster f….. I have ever seen in my entire life. It makes the Bush Admin seem like the ‘good ole days’.
Posted by: Fedup | March 17, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Here’s the exact language from Dodd’s measure in the stimulus: “The prohibition required under clause (i) shall not be construed to prohibit any bonus payment required to be paid pursuant to a written employment contract executed on or before February 11, 2009…”
————————
Is this the same Senator Dodd that is not screaming to high heavan about these bonuses and is advocating a high tax on them?
Only thing I can think of that he is one santimonious hypocrite.
Posted by: beto | March 17, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
I hope the voters in CT remember Dodd’s deeds at reelection time. Where is that change that Obama promised- this is DC at its best and norm! If President Obama truly wants change he must stop this kind of nonsense – yes, really stop it not just say how bad it is and then do it anyway- oh… thats what he did on earmarks – against them but signs a bill with over 8,000 earmarks included anyway and then says the next one we will implement that rule!!! Its also so pathetic to watch all of Congress be so outraged by this and yet they do nothing… such a fake performance!! Just the usual DC dog and pony show- look and appear outraged, but keep on with business as usual.
Posted by: Angela | March 17, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
I doubt the voters of CT will do anything about at all. Those voters will reward him with another term. Remember when ole’ Barney got nailed with his complicity in the Freddiemac and Fannymae mess….well what did Massachusetts do? Reelected him to 6 more years. What a bunch of knotheads.
Posted by: Fedup | March 17, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Dodd id just taking his cue from his President:
First:
“…we cannot afford to govern out of anger, or yield to the politics of the moment…”
and, then:
“How do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?…. [I have asked Sec. Geithner] to pursue every legal avenue to block these bonuses and make the American taxpayer whole.”
So what, exactly, would someone governing out of anger do? Send mobs out to throw bricks through the offenders’ windows?
Posted by: Lawrence J. Kramer | March 17, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Fran – I’m with you but let’s go further – don’t re-elect any democrats and a few republicans too!
And let’s not remember to signed the bill – that would be Obama.
Posted by: ravenhair49 | March 17, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Dodd was the largest recipient of AIG campaign contributions last year — over $100k.
Obama was the second largest recipient of AIG campaign contributions.
Pretty good return on your investment!
Posted by: Ponder | March 17, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Well arkie vet, i respectfully disagree.
The “outrage” is just a little (sarcastic) deeper on this. And I do believe the Obama is a man of his word.
With respect to accountability, both in Congress as well as the previous administration, he will require it.
He has stated that his focus is (as it should be) moving forward and shaping/changing the future for the betterment of ALL Americans and by extension a better world.
just like an angry word spoken or the bullet from a gun, once there out they don’t come back and impossible to change.
Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | March 17, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
FALLOUT GROWS: Those who voted for the stimulus supported the clause to protect the AIG’s bonuses. Obama’s Own Stimulus Bill Protects the AIG Bonuses He Now Condemns —
http://www.butasforme.com/2009/03/17/obamas-stimulus-bill-explicitly-grants-aig-the-legal-right-to-hand-out-bonuses/
Looks like Obama sides with AIG, as well as Chris Dodd.
Posted by: Jax | March 17, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Isn’t all this debate in congress a kick in the head. All the Senator type crooks dising the business type crooks.
I don’t see how anyone in congress can possibly call anyone else bad managers. Our national debt is at an all time high. The economy is ion the toilet & congress has the nerve to blame in on anyone else! And then ask why the business guys should be able to keep their jobs! They (congress) need to look in the mirror.
Posted by: ben solrterbeck | March 17, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
If what Chris Dodd did is as bad as some of you enjoy postulating… then the citizens of CT should take him to task. He does NOT represent the entire US — you have taken a civics class, heh?
He is also not a product of “this administration”.. He has been in office since Reagan’s time.
No, I am not blaming Reagan, that would be ridiculous… as ridiculous as blaming the current president for what Dodd may or may not have intended.
Sheesh…
Some of you actually drool over any tidbit you can toss out to place blame on Obama.
Take the log out, then go for the speck.
Posted by: dassis | March 17, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Ponder,
Your statement has already been soundly invalidated.
Both Schumer (R) and McCain(R) took more money from AIG than Obama did in the last election cycle.
You can’t just say it… facts have to be backed up!
Posted by: dassis | March 17, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Ponder,
Your statement has already been soundly invalidated.
Both Schumer (R) and McCain(R) took more money from AIG than Obama did in the last election cycle.
You can’t just say it… facts have to be backed up!
Posted by: dassis | March 17, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Well, everybody wanted a name!! You got one, a BIG ONE!!
What are you going to do about it???
Are you going to sit around and complain till his next election or are you going to try to get him out NOW???
Posted by: Ted Johnson | March 17, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Daddis,
Thank goodness you cleared that up for me. I feel much better knowing that AIG gave more $$$ to Schumer and McCain than Obama.
Have any of these Honorable Men given those contributions back? Given that those contributions were taxpayer dollars, they should simply refund the amounts to the U.S. Treasury.
Posted by: Ponder | March 17, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Thanks for posting the exact text. Verified the content in the enacted version HR 1.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?c111:./temp/~c111gzG5ep
P.S. have to agree with “arkie vet” @ Mar 17, 2009 4:50:45 PM… as much as I would like to believe Dodd will be held accountable, he got of scott free on sub-prime…
Posted by: Black Mesa | March 17, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
here we go,,
Obama said he was going to change;;;
1st of all you have all the same players but a different president…
I will never vote for Dodd or Joe Liberman…
Posted by: tc | March 17, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
One more thing Daddis,
How long has Schumer been a Republican?
Can you check this fact?
Posted by: Ponder | March 17, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Before you neo-cons gripe about the 1. something trillion that Obama is spending on things mainly to help America get back on its feet..why don’t you take time to stop and gripe about the 9 trillion that Bush and the Republicans threw down the rathole with no accountability. Before your Criminal Party (GOP) points its finger it better look in the mirror at who the really big hypocrites and crooks are. The biggest crooks are the first to point the finger at someone else’s relatively small potatoes offenses if helping the American public is such an offense to you…and look at the money WASTED down the r@tholes of Iraq, Tax Cuts for the PIg-Rich, Katrina boondoggle, sweetheart contracts with Halliburton and oil companies….lets’ look at the whole picture here..don’t just try to hobby-horse Obama. That is DISHONEST.
Posted by: JL | March 18, 2009, 7:02 am 7:02 am
This whole executive pay flap is a stupid distraction. I know it is the principle of the bonuses (technically ‘retention fees’) that gall people and rightly so, but to focus on the bonuses (retaining incompetent CEO’s so they won’t go to work for some other company, as if some other company would want them)…to focus on these bonuses is straining at a gnat while having swallowed the camel of the Bush years of olly olly oxenfree for Wall Street. Granted, Dodds’ stripping out the restrictions on executive pay bonuses is irritating and it makes the Democrats look like hypocrites precisely at a time when they need popular good will to carry out Obama’s rescue packages. I hope Obama and the key Democrats won’t fall into the same trap that Bushies did of kissing Wall Street’s @$$ while giving the finger to Main Street. It is starting to look like both partys just can’t say ‘no’ to the fat cat bankers and hedge fund pirates.
Posted by: JL | March 18, 2009, 7:09 am 7:09 am
This is an obvious attempt to deflect the anger of the People away from the administration and Washington Politicians and dump it on the Government Run AIG.
Gotta love their Obama’s of “Hold Me Accountable”…Unless he tells you it’s someone else’s fault….then his robots swarm the internet and Defend him…usually trying to Blame Bush for something….Kind of like the Republicans Blamed Clinton.
Silly really….It feels like Kindergarden…..
Posted by: Patch W Adams | March 18, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am
When are we going to pass a law eliminating excessive political contributions from corporations? AIG is a poster child for how money corrupts our government.
Posted by: enough | March 18, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Pres. Obama can preach change all he wants, but he has to convince a Congress of 100+ members to also change their ways. and that is hard… He’s going to have to make a lot of concessions..
Now, Dodd is full of it. AIG is full of it. All the banks double dipping in the TARP and AIG collateral paybacks are full of it. Can they just not legislate in an honest manner.
Posted by: nfiniti | March 18, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Actually, Chris Dodd did not write in the retroactive exemption from bonus caps–the Treasury Department (Geithner, Summers) insisted on it. His original intent was to block bonuses regardless of when the contract was issued. I’m no fan of his, but blaming this on him is just incorrect.
Posted by: Julie | March 18, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
JL,
People must distinguish between Conservatives and Republicans. Conservatives have no love for Bush and Company. Bush and the Republican Porkers in Congress have set the Country on a course towards economic ruin. Conservatives opposed all bailouts. Conservatives supported immediate tax cuts to put more money into peoples’ pockets to jump start the economy.
Unfortunately, this Administration believes that only the Government can spend money to jump start the economy. This Congress and this Administration has spent more since January than Bush spent in 8 years. For the amount of money that has been spent in the past couple of months, the Federal Government could have declared no taxes due for 2008. Does anyone dispute that relieving the entire country of its 2008 tax burden would have done more to stimulate our economy than the massive PORK-O-THON that was enacted??????
Posted by: Ponder | March 18, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
The democrats and republicans are owned by the same corporations. Does anybody with a thinking brain not see this?(ie- follow the money) Change is not coming except for finding out that commercial real estate has not collapsed yet and it will this summer. Who will need other bailouts then? I was told you cannot recall senators and congresspeople, can anyone refute this? please let me know!!
Posted by: Dangel | March 18, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
“Not sure what interpretation you’re using to determine that. The Sixteenth amendment is pretty clear on this point. ”
Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution (rf. the part dealing with “bills of attainder” and “expost facto laws”.) jhw539, here’s a link that explains it.
http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossary/legal/attainder.htm
Posted by: Keyser_Soze | March 18, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
This item contains a very serious misstatement of fact. The amendment as Dodd wrote it did not contain the provision you attribute to it. Please issue a correction at the soonest possible opportunity.
Posted by: Flash Override | March 18, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Do not reelect Dodd.
Posted by: ctla567 | March 18, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Ah, the knives are out.
Dodd had inserted a similar amendment as Wyden and Snowe: he was forced by Treasury officials to dilute his amendment because Treasury was afraid the financial institutions who were in trouble would not try to seek Fed. Assistence. That would have jeopardized their bonusses.
Dodd isn’t the one we should be faulting, people inside the Treasury. I’m afraid Geithner and Larry Summers have had a big deal in strong arming Dodd in this
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | March 19, 2009, 7:29 am 7:29 am
Get a grip people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac both paid bonuses, some as high as $640,000.00 this year too.
Look how up in arms you all are over a few hundred million while this administration has been spending trillions of your dollars and billions of those trillions are EARMARK pork garbage but you’re not angry about any of that.
Congress caused this mess, not AIG. Look to your President and his involvement with ACORN and groups that put pressure on lending institutions to give loans to people who couldn’t afford them and a willing congress that passed laws covering those loans.
It’s all smoke and mirrors. If congress can get you focused in on anything BUT them they’ll do it and it’s working almost flawlessly!
Posted by: Alan | March 19, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Julie hate to burst your Bubble..but Dodd just admitted on CNN that it was his Idea.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090318/pl_politico/30833
Keyser Soze..Have we met before?
Posted by: Patch W Adams | March 19, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Sorry Julie…CNN is now saying it was Obama’s Idea….
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/18/aig.bonuses.congress/index.html
But that doesn’t mean anything to the Kool-Aid Drinkers…does it?
Posted by: Patch W Adams | March 19, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Ann
http://externallaptop.net
Posted by: Ann | March 20, 2009, 2:50 am 2:50 am
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Miriam
http://www.craigslistposter.info
Posted by: Miriam | March 24, 2009, 3:48 am 3:48 am
Great post, but its a bit long and most people like short and sweet posts!
Posted by: ForexTeacher | March 28, 2009, 6:57 am 6:57 am
Thanks for the information. Any other posts or blogs you can recommend read?
Posted by: TraderForex | March 29, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am