More Back Tax Issues for an Obama Nominee
This time it’s United State Trade Representative nominee Ron Kirk who owes back taxes, joining the ranks of other tax-addled Cabinet nominees such as Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, former Health and Human Services Secretary designate Tom Daschle, and former chief performance officer nominee Nancy Killifer.
Kirk owes $9,975 in back taxes, most of that from speaking engagement honoraria. Kirk had told organizations to give speaking fees directly to his alma mater, Austin College. In all, $37,750 of honoraria were not reported as income for tax years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Senate Finance Committee reported, saying that Kirk should have accepted the money directly, made the donations himself, and then claimed the cash as charitable donations.
By not doing so, Kirk avoided approximately $6,000 in taxes, the committee said.
In addition, Kirk had declared as an entertainment expense more than $17,000 in tickets to Mavericks’ games.
The committee told Kirk to go back and look at his records, and to pay personal income taxes on any game when he couldn’t recall the name of the person whom he took to the game and the business they accomplished at the game. Kirk subsequently substantiated $9,900 of the total $17,382 as qualifying entertainment expenses, meaning he will pay an additional $2,600 in taxes.
"We are confident that Mayor Kirk will be confirmed," said White House spokesman Ben LaBolt. "The president nominated Mayor Kirk because of his proven ability at the negotiating table — building consensus between opposing stakeholders in Dallas and crafting deals to create opportunities for U.S. businesses overseas. The mayor is working with the Finance Committee on a few minor issues mostly relating to a scholarship fund he set up at his alma mater — Austin College. The nomination is on track — the Committee has scheduled a hearing for next Monday."
The issues were raised after Kirk’s nomination team informed Finance Committee staff that in October 2008, he’d paid $2,188 in additional taxes plus $139 in interest for tax year 2006. The IRS had told Kirk that he’d failed to include a speaking honorarium of $5,000 and dividend income of $819.
On Feb. 6, 2009, the Finance Committee asked Kirk to clarify his practice of assigning honoraria to Austin College.
Kirk responded on Feb. 17 and met with Finance Committee staff on Feb. 19. He submitted additional information to Committee staff on Feb. 24, 2009 and Feb. 28, 2009.
Kirk’s nomination does not appear to be imperiled.
– jpt

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Kirk’s tax problems don’t seem to be in the same league as the others. Sounds like he was pretty generous to be giving entire speaking fees to his alma mater. Why does this rate a story?
Posted by: Lydia | March 2, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
This is the group of clowns that will enact massive tax increases beyond allowing some to expire.
They have no problem not paying taxes themselves but want us to pay more.
Maybe if democrats actually paid taxes we could balance the budget.
It is outrageous to have Charlie Rangle, multiple issue tax cheat, and getting away with it, lecture us that we need to get over the idea of tax increases.
This would never get a pass in a republican. They would be lynched, jailed and everything they owned confiscated.
Dems are so corrupt and it just keeps coming and coming while their fellow dems just shrug.
Posted by: Sick of BO BS | March 2, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
and the pay-for-play corruption his “urban czar” got busted with today.
***************************************
Go back and read the post!
Kirk had told organizations to give speaking fees directly to his alma mater, Austin College. In all, $37,750 of honoraria were not reported as income for tax years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Senate Finance Committee reported, saying that Kirk should have accepted the money directly, made the donations himself, and then claimed the cash as charitable donations.
He never even saw this money.
Posted by: Thinking | March 2, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
I think it’s a job requirement in the Obama administration that you MUST be a crook. Chicago politics at its finest.
Posted by: Plumber | March 2, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
“The president nominated Mayor Kirk because of his proven ability at the negotiating table — building consensus between opposing stakeholders in Dallas and crafting deals to create opportunities for U.S. businesses overseas.
——-
Truly skillful and proven ability at the games in devising schemes to cheat Uncle Sam on taxes.
Our Greatest Smartest Clueless Leader is so talented and smart in helping the country to identify cheaters and to recover its lost revenues. Viva 0bama!
Posted by: two cats | March 2, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Well, B. Hussein Obama has brought about two changes.
You no longer have to have experience, qualifications or intelligence to be elected President.
and
Committing a crime is now a “minor issue” for high level cabinet members.
PS.
And no, I am not an idiot, I realize that if this was a Republican that the MSM would be raving holy h*ll with 24 news shows highlighting the culture of sleaze.
Posted by: LogicalSC | March 2, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
I once was given an extra penny for change. Surely this is newsworthy! Gawd you people are petty. Guess that’s why most people don’t like you.
Posted by: Common Sense | March 2, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
He never even saw this money.
Posted by: Thinking | Mar 2, 2009 5:36:31 PM
=========
That’s where his ability and skills lie. He does not even see the money to cheat the IRS. Had he seen “this money”, he would have to pay $9000 more taxes on the money that he earned.
If he was not audited by the congressional committees because he was nominated by PB0, he would still be cheating your good ‘ol Uncle Sam.
Posted by: two cats | March 2, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Its getting to be a long list of cheats
Posted by: boxcar | March 2, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Thinking,
If you think he did not know he should pay taxes on what he earned, do you really want such a duh to run your urban affairs, unless you want to join his crowd of tax cheating schemes.
Keep Thinking. It’s good for you.
Posted by: two cats | March 2, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
NoSense sd:
“Gawd you people are petty”
Really, how many lobbyist and tax cheats are you expecting in Barry’s cabinet and at what level of crime should people grow concerned?
Change we can believe in..Aahahhahaaaaaaaaaaaahahaaaaaaaaaaa!!
Look you better go scrub that tramp stamp Obama sticker off your Prius because in a few months people are going to be laughing their arses off at anybody stupid enough to admit the voted for the “mistake”
Posted by: LogicalUS | March 2, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Secret anti-terror Bush memos made public by Obama
The Associated Press – WASHINGTON (AP)
The Justice Department on Monday released a long-secret legal document from 2001 in which the Bush administration claimed the military could search and seize terror suspects in the United States without warrants.
Posted by: Common Sense | March 2, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
DALLAS, March 2 (Reuters) – A U.S. court heard on Monday that the health of [Republican] Allen Stanford’s financial empire was worse than feared while Antigua and Barbuda’s government moved to seize an island owned by the Texas billionaire accused of an $8 billion fraud.
The estate’s final assets might only amount to hundreds of millions of dollars, not billions, said the lawyer appointed to run the Stanford Group Co and two other firms controlled by the businessman, who has a penchant for cricket and publicity.
Posted by: Common Sense | March 2, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Another cabinet guy with tax problems?
Posted by: Huh | March 2, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Of course if it were one of US, we’d be in prison right now. But all these guys get is a little bit of public embarrassment. Where’s the justice in that?
Posted by: Angela | March 2, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
It’s just been announced that this year’s spending only under Obama, not George Bush’s spending, is creating debt that will cost us $1B – 1 billion – per day to pay back!
And that’s at today’s extremely low interest rate. And Obama’s own debt repayment figures are actually higher.
$1 billion per day to pay back Obama’s debt. And he’s not done yet.
Posted by: Peach | March 2, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
NoSense your Daily Kos idiocy is’t funny around grown-ups so if you don’t like be called out for stupidity don’t come to discussions with the grownups
In addition, I am not part of Obama’s Welfare Nation which looks to others to pay for their life. I would never steal the earnings of my children and grandchildren to pay for my mistakes or my “healthcare” but shamefully your “messiah” doesn’t feel any such qualms and apparently neither do his supporters.
Obama’s Welfare Nation speaks!
Posted by: LogicalUS | March 2, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Just one more tax cheat in a sea of Obama appointed tax cheats. Why should we expect any Democrat to actually pay their taxes? Democrats love taxes because they never pay them personally. That honor is left to us working stiffs.
Posted by: James | March 2, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Give it a rest. No doubt he had CPAs and lawyers go over his taxes. These things happen. I am willing to be that that there isn’t a person in his position that could withstand a tax audit by a Congressional comittee. Including the members themselves.
Posted by: Thinking | March 2, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Thinking, the nominees of other administrations went through the same scrutiny but we never had this many cheats, not even in the Clinton white house.
Obama has surrounded himself with crooked, arrogant idiots. As the saying goes, the fish rots from the head down. This is indicative of Obama’s character.
Posted by: James | March 2, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
1 billion per day to pay back Obama’s debt. And he’s not done yet.
****************************************
Really? What the heck does that mean? for how many days? Your little facts, as allways, mean nothing.
Posted by: Thinking | March 2, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
notthinking, being blind to corruption is not a positive trait. These people that Obama nominated are cheats. They knew they owed tax on their income but because they are Democrats they decided that the rules don’t apply to them.
sickening…
Posted by: Alicia | March 2, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I would never steal the earnings of my children and grandchildren to pay for my mistakes or my “healthcare”
*************************************
Really? Will you let your children go without health care, food on the table, roof over their heads should you be laid off?
This talk is nonsense they are going to pay if we don’t fix this.
Posted by: Thinking | March 2, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Let me get this straight, a guy says to those offering him speaking fees to send it to his alama mater and we’re putting him down as a tax cheat?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 2, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Politico asked the offices of all 99 sitting senators to say who prepares their taxes, whether they or the Internal Revenue Service has ever discovered an error on returns they’ve filed, and whether they’ve ever had to pay back taxes. (Read all the surveys here.)
Of the 56 senators who have responded to the survey, eight said that mistakes have been made on their tax returns, and six said they have paid back taxes. Thirty senators said that no mistakes have been discovered on their returns and that they’ve never paid back taxes – at least to the best of their recollection.
The offices of two senators – Jim Webb (D-Va.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) – told Politico that they would not answer the survey questions. The offices of Kyl and 42 other senators – 17 Republicans, 24 Democrats and Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) – failed to respond at all.
Posted by: Thinking | March 2, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
I would never steal the earnings of my children and grandchildren to pay for my mistakes or my “healthcare”
****************************************
Again Really? The GDP was aprox 13 trillion. the debt carried by the American public? 13 trillion. When was the other time in us history has this happened? 1929.
Sorry we have already mortgaged them out.
Posted by: Thinking | March 2, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Reduce the deficit — Make Obama’s cabinet pay their TAXES!!!!!!
Posted by: freedom_is_good | March 2, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
“Reduce the deficit — Make Obama’s cabinet pay their TAXES!!!!!!”
Special Thanks to Palin and Joe the Plumber for paying up their back taxes. Every bit helps… Now, are they “tax cheats” too or was that just an honest mistake since they are Republicans?
Posted by: Paige | March 2, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
But Obama wouldn’t want everyone to think he has two sets of rules or anything.
Even though BO didn’t have the guts or integrity to ask Daschle to step down.
He will let this tax cheat slide too.
Posted by: sammy | March 2, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Obama must think he is back in Chicago being surrounded by all this corruption.
He must feel right at home.
What a fraud.
Posted by: tyler | March 2, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
These things happen.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ahhhhh the motto of the Messiah!
Posted by: Plumber | March 2, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Jake:
I wish you could clarify something. Every article I’ve read says he didn’t report the income from speaking fees because they were donated directly to the scholarship fund.
BUT. Did he claim the charitable deductions (without reporting the income)? I haven’t seen that addressed anywhere?
Posted by: jeanne | March 2, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
being blind to corruption is not a positive trait.
***************************************
Hmmmm. Do you belong to the same GOP that put it’s head in the sand whuile Bush rode above the law?
Posted by: Thinking | March 2, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
BUT. Did he claim the charitable deductions (without reporting the income)? I haven’t seen that addressed anywhere?
***************************************
NO.
Posted by: Thinking | March 2, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Sorry guys, this one doesn’t read like corruption. Unless you count telling somebody to donate a fee to a school vs. paying it to you corruption. I would not have realized I had to count this as income either if it had not passed thru my hands in the process. The guy made a great gesture. Obviously this one is about difficult tax rules. But you just can’t help put put him up there with the other cheaters?
Posted by: FedUp | March 2, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Thinking:
Where did you find that info? I haven’t been able to get an answer from the articles I’ve seen.
Posted by: jeanne | March 2, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Don’t these well-paid “pubic servants” have CPAs do their taxes? There is NO excuse for this. They are tax cheats and know exactly what they’re doing. These are not “mistakes” but calculated attempts to circumvent the law. DISGUSTING.
Posted by: They make the laws but don't follow them | March 2, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Sounds like he was pretty generous to be giving entire speaking fees to his alma mater. Why does this rate a story?
***********************************************
I don’t know. Maybe for the title than can be attached to it.
Posted by: kat the real one | March 2, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Obama is a total disgrace. He has failed this country. I’m ashamed that I voted for him.
Posted by: Jeffrey | March 2, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Huh? So he is now obliged to pay taxes over income he did not receive? The speaking fees went to his Alma Mater, he can only pay those taxes now with money earned elsewhere, and not from his speaking fees?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | March 2, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
so then, under the new rules proposed by the administration, when your income is over the 250K threshold (proposed) for a tax increase and you donate say 100K you will pay about $39,000 in tax because of the donation.
Or stated in another way, if your income is 349K and you donate 100k to get under the cap for the new tax increase you will still have to pay the 39k or so of taxes…smoothe
Kirk is just being made to live by the new rules
Posted by: smith | March 2, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
At some point we will figure out that too many cannot pass a Senate review of our taxes.
That points to a different problem than not paying and not collecting. That points to a flawed and unmanageable system
Posted by: smith | March 2, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
I am not part of Obama’s Welfare Nation which looks to others to pay for their life. I would never steal the earnings of my children and grandchildren to pay for my mistakes or my “healthcare” but shamefully your “messiah” doesn’t feel any such qualms and apparently neither do his supporters.
Obama’s Welfare Nation speaks!
Posted by: LogicalUS | March 2, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
William wrote: [[Huh? So he is now obliged to pay taxes over income he did not receive? The speaking fees went to his Alma Mater, he can only pay those taxes now with money earned elsewhere, and not from his speaking fees?]]
William — he may have donated the money, but he still earned it. That makes it income. Then he donated, from his income, some money. He still has to claim the money as income — because that’s what it was. And he gets to claim his donations, too, because that’s what they were.
And let’s simplify the tax code! Because I think we can all see how this mistake got made.
Posted by: Liz | March 2, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Obama….”most ethical administration EVER”
Posted by: Jack | March 2, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Technically, he should have claimed both the income and the offsetting charitable deduction. Of course, under Obama’s “down payment on health care” revenue raising scheme, those charitable deductions are going bye bye. Too bad, so sad, Ron Kirk.
Posted by: Bridget | March 2, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Or perhaps more accurately, too bad, so sad, Austin College.
Posted by: Bridget | March 2, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Yeah O! I say he should nominate EVERY ONE of his supporters / voters and our economy would be stimulated by all back-taxes. Let’s start w/ Pelosi, Dodd, Frank & Reed…Go O!
Posted by: Perferct | March 3, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am
The reason this gets flagged as news is because, as Tapper writes, by donating the speaking fees directly to his alma mater instead of making it income AND THEN donating it, he avoided paying about $6000 in taxes. That’s a no-no, according to you folks who believe in taxing the rich.
Posted by: Robin | March 3, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Common Sense,
Maybe they’re playing down this story since loads of Democrats accepted contributions from Stamford AND VP Biden’s family has more than a few connections through brother’s and son’s investment firm.
Posted by: Robin | March 3, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Bono and U-2 make use of Netherland tax shelters to reduce their tax liabilities — taxes that could be used to fund Bono’s charitable causes.
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Oh, and considering tickets to a professional sport a tax write off is pretty audacious. $17K a year? If this were a Republican, you guys would be tearing his eyes out. Seriously, he knew this was a push, to declare the entire season’s cost a write-off.
Can you just own up to the fact that Democrats don’t like to pay taxes either?
Just be honest about it – the people who want to raise taxes on the rich don’t really want to pay more in taxes personally. That’s why this is an issue, more than anything else.
Posted by: Robin | March 3, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am
Kirk’s nomination does not appear to be imperiled.
—————————————-
Of course not. The head of the IRS is a tax cheat. Kirk fits right in with this administration.
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am
ANOTHER tax cheat in the Obama administration. I’m just stunned.
Posted by: Peach | March 3, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Uh oh. Another Obama lie.
White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel has inserted 16 earmarks worth $8.5 million into the bill the Senate is to begin debating today. The earmarks include money for a Chicago planetarium and a Chicago suburb.
Posted by: Peach | March 3, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Kirk is a lobbiest — but only on the state level.
Kirk is a tax cheat — but only in the amount of $10,000.
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Speaking as a CPA this is being blown way out of proportion. This is the bad side of politics. Kirk was not cheating on his taxes. However,he may have taken an agressive approach, but so has millions of others. Speaking as someone who has been preparing taxes for 35 years for all ranges of income Kirk was not out of line. He did not recieve any money for the services in question and if he should be allowed to take a charitable deduction if he is forced to claim the related items as income. End of story except for those who want to whine about it for political purposes.
Posted by: unshrub | March 3, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Kirk was not cheating on his taxes.
————————————
So he doesn’t really owe the $10,000?
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Robin:Can you just own up to the fact that Democrats don’t like to pay taxes either?
Just be honest about it – the people who want to raise taxes on the rich don’t really want to pay more in taxes personally. That’s why this is an issue, more than anything else.
==================
Exactly.
Posted by: MayBee | March 3, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
It’s a good day when someone from NYTimes bails on O…love it! David Brooks has awakened. There is hope out there for us! Keep spreading the truth.
Posted by: Hope | March 3, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
I agree w/ the CPA, maybe this is an oversight. The problem I have is w/ the too much deductions on personal things like the b-ball tix. They’re talking about taking away so many of our deductions. This is infuriating because it just keeps adding to these tax/ spend liberals who do it on others dime but are cheat the system…even O did it w/ his deal w/ Rezko..it’s what makes me trust less and less.
Posted by: Hope | March 3, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Really? Will you let your children go without health care, food on the table, roof over their heads should you be laid off?
This talk is nonsense they are going to pay if we don’t fix this.
Posted by: Thinking | Mar 2, 2009 6:37:38 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Thinking: Not to worry…your onionted one will take care of you just like it has been done for the last 40 years only on a larger scale. I or my family won’t be eligible because of the ….. .. … ….
The answer to tax fraud is a FLAT TAX, if you buy anything you pay tax.
Posted by: Roland | March 3, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Raise taxes on the rich???? How much money do you think these yahoos in Washington make? Aren’t they raising their own taxes? Oh, they can cheat and get away with it, it is the small businesses and 250K earners that pay…yeah, right. If you think for one minute that those folks think about us out here, I have beach front property in Arizona for sale. They only think of what can I do for ME and oblabla is leading the pack. Wake up America.
Posted by: Mildred | March 3, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
“The president nominated Mayor Kirk because of his proven ability at the negotiating table — ”
His proven ability at $17,000 worth of Mavericks’ games, more likely.
The “Obama” organization sooo sucks.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | March 3, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
“The president nominated Mayor Kirk because of his proven ability at the negotiating table — ”
—————————————
What are his basketball creds? (other than season tickets)
Posted by: mad | March 3, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
I believe the problem is far more deeper in government than anyone wants to admit. What about the poor guy who makes mistakes and keeps getting fines and penalties added. Now unemployed, we lose our returns and stimulus checks and yet, the bill gets bigger and bigger. Must be nice to have the money and say….here, now that I got caught. Don’t try and write the IRS, they have no sympathy for the little man.
Posted by: fairisfair | March 24, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Popularity is the key to a damned government. What’s worse is that we are also responsible for it.
Posted by: glendalemission | October 19, 2010, 3:53 am 3:53 am
Obama now loses more jobs. Opportunities is getting tighter. I can’t Imagine how far this one can go.
Posted by: the energy egg | December 19, 2011, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
It’s just been announced that this year’s spending only under Obama, not George Bush’s spending, is creating debt that will cost us $1B – 1 billion – per day to pay back! Isn’t that a embarressment for the USA?
Posted by: persoonlijke lening | December 24, 2011, 9:27 am 9:27 am