Mar 5, 2009 7:54am

Obama Hosts Bipartisan ‘Timeout’ Dinner at White House

From Sunlen Miller Declaring it a "timeout" before they "dive back into the game" President Obama hosted a bipartisan group of congressional leaders to the White House for dinner last night. "The country is going though an extraordinarily difficult time, and we are going to have some monumental debates taking place over the next several months and years," The President said in the East Room before dinner. "We’re not always going to agree on everything. But given how hard so many of you are working on both sides of the aisle day in and day out, I thought it was important for us to be able to step back for a moment, and remind ourselves that we have things in common family, friends, laughter." The administration has followed a pattern recently, opening up the White House on Wednesday nights for social events – a Stevie Wonder concert last Wednesday, and cocktail parties with various groups in weeks past. "This is a pretty big house so we get lonely," Obama joked to his guests, "It’s hard for me to move around out there some times so I got to bring the world to me." About 180 guests – House and Senate committee chairs, ranking members, members of Obama’s cabinet, senior staff, legislative staff – and all their spouses – sat at elegant tables with white roses, white peonies and green apple centerpieces on a light blue tablecloth. The dinner that followed – served on gold rimmed china – included Celery Soup, Wild Mushroom Crisps, Steelhead Salmon with Citrus sauce, Crispy Spinach, Toasted Saffron Couscous Pearls, Baby Iceberg lettuce with Maytag Bleu Cheese and Yogurt ranch dressing and for dessert, Milk Chocolate velvet cake. Before the President’s entrance into the room, Vice President Joe Biden worked the room. "You know Pete Orszag," Biden said jokingly introducing the OMB Director to Congressman Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) who just yesterday told Orszag while he was testifying in front of the House Budget Committee that the facts surrounding the budget are "disturbing." Both men laughed off their less combative introduction this evening. Other antics in the room pre-the president’s arrival: Treasury Secretary Geithner -possibly not too happy the White House could not spell his name correctly on his name card at the table (it was misspelled as Timothy Geitner – without the "h") bucked the system and rearranged the assigned seating at his table, mixing up the name cards. White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel also took a role in the seating rearrangement. As the president and First Lady walked into the room they passed two women who potentially could have become First Lady: Teresa Heinz Kerry and Cindy McCain. Mr. Obama gave Mrs. McCain a kiss on the cheek. Among those seated at the President’s table were Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC), and Senator Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. – Sunlen Miller

User Comments

No $100 steaks? I thought that is your favorite party favor Obama. Or is that only reserved for your “friends” and your parties for them.

Posted by: Krissy | March 5, 2009, 7:57 am 7:57 am

I wish I had enough of the taxpayers’ money to have a party every Wednesday with such great food. Heck, I’d settle for just one Wednesday out of the year.

Posted by: jennifert7 | March 5, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Did Obama pay for this out of his own pocket? Did Stevie Wonder donate his time and talent? How about the cocktail partys? Tax payer money or more of O’s personal? I could understand one or two famlies a week but 180 guests! Is this going to happen every Wednesday for 4 years? At what cost to us, the people. I think these are fair questions so don’t start ragging on me. I’m just askin!

Posted by: notafan | March 5, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am

The WH staff has been forbidden to release all & exact dinners of menu because of the redicule it created when they ordered the $100 a serving steak…So much for transparency. The more he faces resistance and redicule, the less transparent everything will be…oh well,big sigh

Posted by: Hope | March 5, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

We’re losing jobs,
and they’re eating cake?
We’re eating from brown bags,
And they make us pay for their parties?

Posted by: taxpayer | March 5, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Does the president get a budget for White House expenses? This is going to cost oodles if he does this kind of stuff every week. Since he’s politicking, it should come out of his campaign funds! (And yes, I know I’m dreaming.)

Posted by: Liz | March 5, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Don’t be so hard on our president. He is only trying to do his best. What does it hurt to include people from both sides of the isle in a dinner party. I notice that alot of Republicans are enjoying eating there.

Posted by: Hazel | March 5, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

It warms my heart to see the parasite class enjoying themselves on the taxpayer dime. The poor dears work so hard. /s

Posted by: MaryD | March 5, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Oh, sure. I really miss paying all that money to that stupid Bush guy who spent all his time playing country squire in Texas when he wasn’t robbing our country blind or getting us into completely senseless wars. Or riffling through our mail or searching our phone records or pooping on our Constitution.
This was a WORKING dinner, people: Pres Obama greasing the wheels, trying to get these folks together in a congenial atmosphere to break their resistance to cooperating for the good of the country. Money well spent IMO.

Posted by: Sue P | March 5, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

He saved billions on Marine One … and that was personal sacrifice as Marine One’s sole purpose is to protect the president …. so I think a few coctail parties won’t hurt.

Posted by: Kevin | March 5, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Sunlen Miller – I’m sure covering White House dinner parties is a part of your “watchdog” duties. But next time, since so many Americans are out of work, why don’t you tally up an estimate on how much this is costing the American people, that’s news. I could care less of the antics of those attending, at least you didn’t try to guess what designer labels were represented.

Posted by: Chris | March 5, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Obama is not a pretentious man. These dinners are not designed to impress, or to curry favor.
As The President said, it is his wish for all parties involved in cleaning up after Bush to maintain civility, to remember the reasons for working together.
I much prefer that my money be spent on the furtherance of political cooperation, than say, on irrational and unjustified wars?
Have at it, Mr. President. You’re doing exactly what needs to be done, and I revel vicariously over your sincere overtures toward reconciliation.
The White House is BACK … the nation will soon follow.

Posted by: Jerry Ulibarri | March 5, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

I think that Obama tries to use these dinners as a chance to look bi-partisan
when in fact he uses Pelosi to do all the liberal budget work so that it can look like he is some what moderate.
Which we know is not the case. She will take the hit from the liberals while he tries to hold on to the Blue dogs.

Posted by: karen | March 5, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am

But most importantly, was Michelle wearing a sleeve-less dress so they could all admire her toned arms???

Posted by: Sally J | March 5, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Obama fiddles while Rome burns…

Posted by: Richard F. | March 5, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

That’s like inviting your in laws over for dinner. The knives come out when they’ve gone home.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 5, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

This is the kind of CHANGE you can believe in. You voted for it. A politician from Chicago and America didn’t see it coming ? Wake up. You deserve it.

Posted by: El Coyote | March 5, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

The food was probably good – but I’ll bet not good enough to have to sit through the condescending lecture first.

Posted by: marylou | March 5, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Obama has given new depth and meaning to the term partisanship. It has never been this bad before. The faux stimulus bill being the most glaring example.
These mini events of bipartisanship involving food and wine are nothing but dog and pony shows for the Obama media to drool and exclaim over
Keep the food and drink. It would be best to show bipartisanship in legislation and cooperative efforts running this government.
Obama is destructive and corrupt. Yet he is reveling in lording over us all. $100/pound Kobe beef while we the little people watch our retirement funds disappear.
This disingenuous excess is disgusting.
The Peron’s (you know Evita) had nothing on the Obama’s.

Posted by: BO Needs to Go | March 5, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Are the White House staff people who had their salaries frozen allowed to moonlight as waitstaff at these parties?
Or maybe they can moonlight as belt-tighteners for all the guests who are leading us through these near-catastrophic economic times.

Posted by: MayBee | March 5, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Tell me if I am wrong. The President had a party for the powerful people in Washington, while at the same time he did not have time for a formal dinner with the Prime Minister of England? Does he dislike England that much? Why?

Posted by: B. Leathen | March 5, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Republicans are giving new meaning to sore losers. It has been six weeks. The rant overlooks the facts and is without substance, suggestions, alternatives or merit.
In truth, the new administration has taken more action in six weeks, then the previous administration did in six years.

Posted by: Jim | March 5, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

This is a great American tradition — breaking bread together.
I applaud President and Mrs. Obama and their attempts at bipartisanship. Also, I love that the spouses are included, and that the White House is being highlighted again as the beautiful place that it is.
The Obama family displays so much dignity. He is truly a statesman and diplomat.

Posted by: Jan | March 5, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

B. Leathen: The President had a party for the powerful people in Washington, while at the same time he did not have time for a formal dinner with the Prime Minister of England?
===========
He and Michelle didn’t even have time for a nice lunch with the Browns.
Although, to be fair, he treated the Prime Minister of our other close ally, Japan’s Aso, pretty much the same shabby way.

Posted by: MayBee | March 5, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

What is he doing worrying about healthcare when NO ONE is going to be working if he doesn’t start caring about his agenda bringing the market down?
There will be no industry left in this country if he gets his agenda thru.
Healthcare will be the least of our worries.

Posted by: Citizen4honor | March 5, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

He’s entertaining again while I’ve lost my kids college money and our retirement.
Unreal.

Posted by: Citizen4honor | March 5, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Go Obama!

Posted by: Michael | March 5, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I believe this to be a fabulous tactic. It is quite easy to hate the facelss “other.” Perhaps our pols can get back to the days Tip O’Neil and Baker/Dole.

Posted by: Ken | March 5, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Look in the dictionary under “pompous” and you will find Obama’s picture.

Posted by: BubbaRight | March 5, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

“Let them eat cake”…

Posted by: tjp612 | March 5, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Sue P. Get a life and shut up about Bush. He is no longer President that other man (whoever it is) is. You know the arrogant one with the wife that is ashamed to be an American.

Posted by: Jane | March 5, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Jan, Yeah he sure is some diplomat. Love how he treated the Brown’s. NOT! Read how Mrs. Brown really put thought into the presents she brought for the Obama’s girls and Mrs. O just had someone run to the White House gift store and pick up a model. Yeah, those Obamas, they have such class NOT

Posted by: notafan | March 5, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Wednesday night is a big party night at the White House. Another big tax payer expense…spending $$ we don’t have and wasting time and energy. They all should be ashamed. No one in Congress should ever point a finger at Corporate “big wigs” for their getaways…Politicians are all a bunch of hypocrits starting at the top of the food chain…the President.

Posted by: Deborah Byrd | March 5, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

I always like to break bread before grappling with my opponents…it shows a high degree civilized behavior.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 5, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Seriously, in the grand scheme of things, what it costs to run the White House in general, how many donors have stayed and been wined and dined there, etc., etc., etc., what difference does it make? Do you REALLY think Stevie Wonder is charging the American people? It is an honor to perform for the President of the United States, always has been, always will be. A few cocktails and a more collegial atmosphere in Washington is hardly a problem we need to worry about.
I wonder . . . does anyone know anything about the schedule and costs of Bush’s “entertaining”? And I further wonder why you all would ponder about what Pres. Obama does and not Pres. Bush . . . yet, I am glad we are keeping an eye on our guy; however, I think we’re being a bit unfair to him and uninformed about the details of what we’re questioning.
Now, if the Obamas start renovating the White House, I’m going to be VERY interested in those costs at a time like this. A few cocktail parties to get people to work together seems like money well spent to me.
I guess it’s a good thing that people in general are, for once, interested in spending and budget proposals and so on. I bet 99% of you couldn’t tell me a thing about what Bush was up to during his presidency.
I think it’s important to try to get past the spin coming from both sides these days, and the infotainment slant the media is taking. The media is constantly trying to manufacture conflict, to get us to keep tuning in to the reality show we all loved so during the election. I just wish they’d REPORT more and gossip less.

Posted by: Teri B. | March 5, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Concerned in OH,
You have your facts wrong. Bush enlarged our national debt from 4.7 trillion to 10 trillion in his 8 years,that is an increase of 5.3 trillion. (and that’s not counting the continued expense of the Iraq War he started, the rebuilding still to do there, the amount of help our injured returning vets will need for life, etc.)
Obama’s $800 billion stimulus bill was not made on a whim but a necessary reaction to the terrible economic mess that Bush allowed to fester.
*please not the difference between trillion and billion. It is a big difference. Bush has been a really big spender.

Posted by: Lydia | March 5, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

These dinners are a good idea. I like the whole attitude of we’re more alike than different that pervades Obama’s style of politics. Appealing to our better selves is a good idea.
(And that gold-edged china they used, was that what Laura Bush picked out right before leaving?)

Posted by: Lydia | March 5, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

as a former social worker obama want the people to find their common interests.

Posted by: maz hess | March 6, 2009, 4:16 am 4:16 am

Ya know, I’m glad we’re holding our guy’s feet to the fire. It’s a nice change of pace from the Bush years when NO ONE held him accountable till it was too late, isn’t it?
I just feel like the guy’s getting slammed from all directions over tiny and petty things, yet the breadth and scope of the things he’s gotten done in such an amazingly short amount of time is ASTONISHING, particularly considering he’s doing his very best to keep his campaign promises, which you rarely see a president do at all, much less within the first 100 days.
Can’t someone cut the guy a little slack on something? The pressure he must be under! His hair is turning white right before our eyes! It’s shocking really. He’s working himself to death, trying as hard as I’ve ever seen anyone, being incredibly smart and ernest about it all the way along, and still he’s got food being thrown at him from every direction, and a lot of the time, these don’t seem like fights that are worth picking. Like everyone jumping up and down on his head over less that 2% of the Stimulus.
I want us to hold him accountable. I really, really do, I just want us to have reasonable expectations and reasoned, informed criticisms.

Posted by: Teri B. | March 6, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

informed educated people now exactly what Bush has been up to. Fighting terrorism that Clinton ran from and aloowed to fester and grow, trying to bring to light the failed Clinton policy of Fanny & Freddie loaning money to people that didn’t deserve loans based on their credit history and income, and yes having it come to a head “which he warned congress it would” during the end of his tenure. Open your damn eyes America and do your homework if you’re going to post statements or send emails

Posted by: disgusted | March 7, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Teri B., actually, I think most folks who follow the government and politics at all closely can tell you in detail about Bush’s socializing in the white house– there was very little. He did not like large dinner parties, threw few state dinners, did not drink alcohol and turned in early. Pretty boring, and there were complaints in Washington about the lack of a social energy to the White House. I was actually rather surprised and disappointed that there were not more state dinners under his watch and that Laura did not get more opportunities to entertain.
It is not that we were not watching during the Bush years. It is that there was not much to watch. Which is a shame.

Posted by: moderate | March 7, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Wow! Most of you all a little bitter and jealous in your posts. Obama can’t please everyone..but some of you like being mean and hateful, so why does he even need to try to please anyone. Just do the job the best that he can and move on.

Posted by: Sheila | March 8, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.