By Lindsey Ellerson

Mar 13, 2009 6:43pm

Palin v. Political Punch

A very irate aide to Gov. Sarah Palin contacted ABC News today to explain why his boss’s 31 requests for earmarks in the fiscal year 2009 budget, totaling $197 million, represent a victory for fiscally conservative values.

"I am disturbed by this item," wrote Bill McAllister, director of communications for Gov. Palin, referencing a blog entry from last night in which we referred to an article in the liberal magazine Mother Jones noting that Palin — after what seemed like a campaign against earmark abuse — was back at the proverbial trough.

"The headline doesn’t seem very dignified for a major news organization," said the spokesman for the governor who repeatedly referred to then-Senator, now-President Obama as "palling around with terrorists." He also quibbled with our referencing Mother Jones. (We also reference conservative publications here. But anyway.)

"Let’s start with the overwhelming mischaracterization of Gov. Palin’s stance on earmarks that has been repeated and repeated since Aug. 29," McAllister wrote. "The governor never said that earmarks should be abolished or that the State of Alaska wouldn’t seek or accept any. Didn’t happen. What she said well before she was a national candidate (going back at least to October of 2007) was that earmark reform was necessary and the state would need to rely less on federal money than it had been."

McAllister then pointed out that Palin made 51 earmark requests for the FY 2008 budget, totaling $256 million; and 31 requests totaling $197 million, for the FY 2009 budget.

McAllister said that for next year’s budget, Gov. Palin will only make eight requests, totaling $69 million, which will include "six ongoing federal appropriations and just two new projects: an upgrade at the Kodiak Missile Defense Facility, which is relevant to national security, and a bridge replacement critical to construction of the pending Alaska natural gas pipeline, also in the national interest."

"Governor Palin is a fiscal conservative," he wrote. "Literally moments ago, the Alaska State House of Representatives passed a budget that differed little from what she proposed, that spends less in the next fiscal year than this one. She has spoken out on reform of the federal process, and it is a disservice to her that her position was so egregiously mis-reported last year and that those same false stories are now being used to make her look like a hypocrite — adding insult to injury, quite literally."

Alarmed, I asked McAllister how Palin was "literally" injured. Was she okay? Was she infirm?

"I didn’t say physically injured," he wrote back. "Certainly her reputation was injured by the erroneous reporting."

Ah.

In any case, the point is, Gov. Palin as a vice presidential candidate claimed that she "championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending of Congress."

And yet, she has asked for and is still asking for — and receiving — tens of millions of dollars in earmarks — pork barrel spending that does not go through the normal appropriations process.

Including, you might be interested to know, moneys for alcohol bootlegging interdiction and North Pacific fisheries programs.

Her former running mate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., requests no earmarks.

That’s a fiscally conservative position.

We’ve never hesitated to point out political mixed messages, on earmarks or other subjects, whether they come from Democrats such as President Obama (read HERE or watch HERE) or Republicans such as Gov. Palin.

We will continue to do so.

Have a great weekend, everybody.

- jpt

User Comments

Republicans are only against the earmarks that they aren’t personally benefitting from, or if they have been requested by a member of the Democratic party.

Posted by: truth matters | March 13, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

If only McCain and Palin were in the White House right now.
We would have America back.
Let’s take it back in 2010 and 2012!!!

Posted by: reese | March 13, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

John McCain’s opposition to earmarks only hurts the people of Arizona. He does not have a similar position on tax breaks for the wealthiest 1 per cent.

Posted by: RapidRobert | March 13, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Jake, are you saying that Palin and Obama are the same in regard to earmarks?

Posted by: mad | March 13, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

So are all the right wing hacks that screamed about suppression of dissent because Gibbs enjoyed the Cramer smackdown now gonna come to bat for dear old Jake?
Or will the love for Caribou Barbie conquer all?

Posted by: Ryan C | March 13, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

you people are SCARED of Gov. Palin. She IS the real deal. When the GOP refused to eat their own, as you dems do (Hillary Clinton- check & mate), you decided to try to eat her for the GOP.
I’m still waiting for one of you “independent thinkers” to actually THINK for a change. That is the change I am looking for from the Obama administration.

Posted by: shutupstupid | March 13, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

William Ayers isn’t a terrorist, and he’s not pals with Obama. Got it.

Posted by: Jim Treacher | March 13, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Nicely done, Jake. I am enjoying your reporting more and more.
-NPage

Posted by: NPage | March 13, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

“When the GOP refused to eat their own, as you dems do (Hillary Clinton- check & mate), you decided to try to eat her for the GOP.
I’m still waiting for one of you “independent thinkers” to actually THINK for a change.”
I always enjoy these little prepared quips and how completely unaware the writer seems of the contradictions

Posted by: Ryan C | March 13, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

great work as usual, Jake. glad to know that the gov has someone reading on her behalf.

Posted by: tw | March 13, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Gov.Palin is a fiscal conservative get over your high mantinence —.Only one person is hell bent on earmarks and that John OLD MAN MCCAIN.Leave the beautiful governor alone.

Posted by: catina | March 13, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

If I were Palin, I’d replace the communications director.

Posted by: mad | March 13, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

In our dreams reese. The Dems have it until atleast 2032, and beyond. Get use to it.

Posted by: Gg51 | March 13, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

palin is a disgrace to women

Posted by: onemorethought | March 13, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

“If I were Palin, I’d replace the communications director.”
I just looked him up and apparently he has done this sort of personal chastising of reporters before
Today I wrote a post about Sarah Palin’s hiring practices and the fact that minorities need not apply. Well I heard from her communication director, Bill McAllister who is a black man. He also said that Palin signed the Juneteeth proclamation this year. So today I stand corrected and I thought the correction was worthy of its own post. Here is his comment:
That was some no named blogger.
In regards to Troopergate
An email he sent out
For those who might not have read the depositions, below is my memo to one reporter who claimed to have read them and found nothing remarkable. It seems that only one side of the story is being told. As professionals, I’d think you’d hate to see that.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 13, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

BTW – the link on the photo and caption on the ABC News homepage leads to a “Trip to Greece”
Might want to have someone fix that

Posted by: Greyson | March 13, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Good post tho. Need to know if politicians words are being backed up their actions.

Posted by: Greyson | March 13, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Freedom of speech is great isn’t it. Too bad so much of it is useless crap.

Posted by: Ben | March 13, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Oh, it’s on, Jake Tapper.
Imagine if in the White House we had Biden and Palin. The word “literally” would never recover.

Posted by: MayBee | March 13, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

“Imagine if in the White House we had Biden and Palin. The word “literally” would never recover.”
Now THAT…was funny.

Posted by: Ryan C | March 13, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Palin requests funding for 31 projects and she is made out to be an abuser of earmarks but Obama signs a spending bill with over 9,000 earmarks after promising to end earmark abuse and he is given a free ride?
Hopefully we can move the governor into the white house in 2012. She has managed to balance her states budget and was wise enough to put money into a rainy day fund that is now helping the people of her state during this difficult economic period. If only Obama was as forward looking and strategic in his decision making process.

Posted by: Jim | March 13, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Governor Palin is an inspiration to me. The left and their willing partners in the media continue to attack her but she proves time and time again that she is wiser, and more capable than they will ever be. Her leadership continues to inspire hope that there will be a leader who can pick up the pieces of our broken economy when Obama leaves office in four years.

Posted by: Jenny | March 13, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

I just looked him up and apparently he has done this sort of personal chastising of reporters before.
—————————————
Yuck, another thing Palin and Obama have in common.

Posted by: mad | March 13, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Jake, you said “We’ve never hesitated to point out political mixed messages”
Well, how about Obama promising to end earmark abuse but still signing the 410 billion dollar spending bill that contained over 9000 earmarks? Does that not rise to your “mixed message” threshold? When can we expect your column on Obama’s hypocricy?
God bless governor Palin and her family. They have withstood attacks that would have permanently scarred anyone else. Yet, she remains positive, enrgetic, down to earth, and successful.

Posted by: Curt | March 13, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

I think mother jones is gonna be jealous you are receiving all the attention

Posted by: o | March 13, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

She said thanks but said no thanks after the bill passed.
You leave her alone Tapper.
For the sake of humanity.
We need her to become the Republican nominee for 2012.
hahahahah

Posted by: funkycoldmedina | March 13, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Do Governors request earmarks??? I thought State Reps wrote the bills. This is news to me.

Posted by: Gary | March 13, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Gov. Palin’s “championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending of Congress.” The question is, were her requests abuses of earmark spending, or were they appropriate requests? The word “abuses” is key to the issue. I don’t know the answer to the question, but it should be approached fairly. But I am glad that she is still governer (and can deal with the issues at that level,) and not vice president.

Posted by: Don Rush | March 13, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

palin isn’t a hypocrite?… say it ain’t so

Posted by: earth_not_flat | March 13, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

These are Republican earmarks – as opposed to Democrat tax-and-spend Liberal earmarks – and there is a difference. Remember, Palin can see Russia from her kitchen window! That gives her PERSPECTIVE! (Pllllllt!)
Why on EARTH does anyone even take this woman SERIOUSLY anymore? The campaign is OVER. She is likely a one-term governor, also. Except for still being a chiseler, Palin is irrelevant!

Posted by: Jordan | March 13, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Mrs. Palin would have been great for the people – she understands that government is fool of flakes – She is right and has been right all along.
I have only one word to Mrs. Palin (Sorry) you deserved better from our country and McCain.
The media is bias and wrong on most everything – the major anchors should all be fired – losers all – what they say no longer matters for they can not to be trusted.
It is sad to see our country being hi-jack by these mean no nothing fools who READ the news put in front of them -

Posted by: A citizen | March 13, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Jake Tapper,
Thank you for the article! I imagine it is not easy walking in the middle as far as coverage goes, and you can’t please everybody. I appreciate your getting all of the facts, using your professionalism, wit and sense of humor, and providing unbiased information. You are one of the best.
Have a great weekend!
Independent viewer/reader

Posted by: dz | March 13, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

So a story bashing Sarah Palin? From ABC news? No way! Well it would have been nice if somewhere we could find at least one story that ABC news did about the current president breaking his promise about earmarks. Remember he told the American people when he was running for president that earmarks were evil and he would put an end to them. He would use a scalpel… Remember? But then he got elected and broke his promise. See, now that would have been a story. But ABC news would never do a news story about a subject so relevant and serious as president Obama breaking his word!

Posted by: Radio Active News | March 13, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

a citizen, I agree, Governor Palin would have been great for America. She was the only one in this years election that would have actually worked to change the sewer that is the federal government. She has been consistently treated unfairly, as all women who enter national politics are.
Governor Palin, we look forward to your continued leadership. Don’t let the haters get you down.

Posted by: Kim | March 13, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Wat to stick up for yourself against frontier hypocrisy, Jake.
Palin campaigned as the mortal enemy of earmarks, She is continuing to utilize them in bunches. That’s a big story.

Posted by: matt | March 13, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Jake, I’m disappointed in you. And I read Political Punch often. You are being unfair and biased. All states accept earmarks. Palin never said she won’t accept earmarks, she said she wants to see Alaska gradually become less dependent on them and that the whole system needs reform.
She is not in a position to reform the Washington earmark system — she has to play by the rules put in place by Washington. If she was flat out refusing all earmarks, she would be doubly criticized for that!
Here’s an idea, why not write an article comparing how Palin has handled Alaska’s budget compared to say, the governor of Kansas, Illinois, Arizona or California. Take all things into account — earmarks, spending, revenue base, planning, tax rates, refund returns, etc.

Posted by: do-wop | March 13, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

There is confusion about the earmark process. There is nothing wrong with earmarks if they are made through a proper vetting process. The problem is, there is no vetting process. This is what needs to be reformed. Otherwise, politicians simply load up a bill with them because there is no way to monitor them unless the entire bill is voted against. Criticism should go to congressional leaders who let the rules, if there are any, to be ignored.
Glad to see you gave Palin her say, which was only fair becaus eof the one sided report yesterday.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 13, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

This last election takes it all. I have never seen so many whimpy sore lossers in my life. So many of you are all so bitter and negative. Go get a life.

Posted by: patpardis | March 13, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Jake, you say you will point out “mixed messages” on both sides. I have a few stories that will point out some of that hypocracy.
1) Obama promising to bring an era of responsibility on the day he signed the 800 billion dollar, pork laden, stimulus plan.
2) Obama promising not to hire lobbyist but then ignoring that self imposed rule to hire four lobbyist so far.
3) Obama saying he would take a scalpal to any earmarks he finds
4) Obama promising to start a new era of bipartisanship and then dismissing the other party with his “I won” one-liner.
5) Obama saying that determining when life began was “above my pay grade” but then deciding that allowing the purposeful creation and then destruction of human embyos is perfectly fine.
The list could go on and on.

Posted by: Mark | March 13, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

“So many of you are all so bitter and negative. Go get a life. ”
Why don’t you try offering some critical thinking about the subject instead of offering platitudes?

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 13, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Jim Bob, You need to understand that not all earmarks are bad. She stated that she will do her best to stop the abuses of wasteful earmarks. Why do you have to cast her off as a beauty queen? Do you feel insecure about your own appearance?
McAllister said that for next year’s budget, Gov. Palin will only make eight requests, totaling $69 million, which will include “six ongoing federal appropriations and just two new projects: an upgrade at the Kodiak Missile Defense Facility, which is relevant to national security, and a bridge replacement critical to construction of the pending Alaska natural gas pipeline, also in the national interest.”

Posted by: Tom | March 13, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

“This last election takes it all. I have never seen so many whimpy sore lossers in my life. So many of you are all so bitter and negative. Go get a life.”
Posted by: patpardis |
Patpardis, no body on here is talking about the last election. We’re talking about a spending plan written and passed by Congress and signed by president Obama. The plan contains earmarks for all states (after all, this is tax-payer money, it should be returned to the states and used for projects that benefit the people), including Alaska, but only Palin is being criticized for accepting them because she said the system needs to be reformed.

Posted by: Sak Pase | March 13, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Gosh Jack don’t you remember? Palin only disputes earmarks when it is publically appealing for her to do so. So please don’t expect her to be “consisten” on this issue. When she was busy bashing Obama she was all about dogging him about taking earmarks for his state! so what is her malfunction? She just needs to shut her trapola and just take the money just like she knows she lobbied for! I wish we were all that stupid, but we’re not!

Posted by: lucy | March 13, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

We’ve never hesitated to point out political mixed messages, on earmarks or other subjects, whether they come from Democrats such as President Obama (read HERE or watch HERE) or Republicans such as Gov. Palin.
We will continue to do so.
—————————————-
President Obama is in favor of higher taxes on the rich, he thinks it is neighborly to spread the wealth around. Please ask Gibbs in what years The President sent extra tax money to the US Treasury.

Posted by: mad | March 13, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

We’ve never hesitated to point out political mixed messages, on earmarks or other subjects, whether they come from Democrats such as President Obama (read HERE or watch HERE) or Republicans such as Gov. Palin.
We will continue to do so.
—————————–
Jake, how about an article on Obama’s claim to put every spending bill on the Internet five days before they are voted on. Of course, that somehow did not include the stimulus plan, which has added 800 billion dollars to our debt. Does that not meet the “mixed message” examples that you have committed yourself to exposing?

Posted by: Mark | March 13, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

“Polling data show that Mr. Obama’s approval rating is dropping and is below where George W. Bush was in an analogous period in 2001.”
The public is getting that gnawing feeling that this guy isn’t equipped for the job.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 13, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

We’ve never hesitated to point out political mixed messages, on earmarks or other subjects, whether they come from Democrats such as President Obama (read HERE or watch HERE) or Republicans such as Gov. Palin.
We will continue to do so.
****************************************
Well I am waiting for the continue to do so. Lets start with those who entered earmarks and are using it as a political football, saying Obama should Veto the bill, or voting against the Bill, knowing full well that it would pass. It is all Political BS
To be honest I do not care about earmarks they have there place in our political process. I think that people really are not against them just against those in other districts.

Posted by: Thinking | March 13, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Did Palin ever give back the $300,000 worth of expensive clothes she stole from the Neocon Party .. LMAO

Posted by: ZakD | March 13, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

GetOffMyLawns! — she never said she was against earmarks!! She said she is against the abuses in the earmark system. Earmarks are taxpayer money being returned to the states to benefit the people. I, as a taxpayer, want some of those federal dollars to flow to all the states. I just want it to be done in a fair and equitable manner — that’s the position Palin takes on earmarks. She never said the system should be done away with, she said it should be fixed. Washington needs to fix it, and Palin isn’t in Washington!
I don’t understand why people like you feel the need to distort the facts in an effort to prove a point?

Posted by: Y | March 13, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Palin is a nitwit.
Everybody knows that.

Posted by: Julie | March 13, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

We’ve never hesitated to point out political mixed messages, on earmarks or other subjects, whether they come from Democrats such as President Obama (read HERE or watch HERE) or Republicans such as Gov. Palin.
We will continue to do so.
—————————–
Joe Biden said that paying your taxes if you are rich is a “patriotic duty”. Yet, Obama has allowed Timmy into his cabinet even though he obviously was not as patriotic as he should have been.
Does that not meet the “mixed message” examples that you have committed yourself to exposing?

Posted by: Mark | March 13, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Julie is a nitwit. Everyone knows that because the amount of intelligence she has limits her to one sentence per post.

Posted by: Tom | March 13, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Tom, Tom Tom, Did you read the article? “51 earmark requests for the FY 2008 budget, totaling $256 million; and 31 requests totaling $197 million, for the FY 2009 budget” All of a sudden she got religion with the earmarks with 6. That’s rich. Oink … Oink.

Posted by: Jim Bob | March 13, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

all this fuss over earmarks seems overblown to me. Earmarks are okay unless they are stupid earmarks. It really is part of a politician’s job to try to bring home some money for their own districts and it isn’t always a bad thing.
What is ridiculous is how the Republicans voted lock step against the stimulus bill because of earmarks etc. and as soon as it was passed they are first in the line asking for them. Some hypocrisy there (big surprise!)

Posted by: Livvy | March 13, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Here are the top 10 earmarks in the omnibus spending bill..
1. Thad Cochran, R-Miss.: $474 million
2. Roger Wicker, R-Miss.: $391 million
3. Mary Landrieu, D-La.: $332 million
4. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa: $292 million
5. David Vitter, R-La.: $249 million
6. Christopher Bond, R-Mo.: $248 million
7. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.: $235 million
8. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii: $225 million
9. Richard Shelby, R-Ala.: $219 million
10. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa: $199 million
6 out of the 10 including the top 2 are from republicans and at least 3 of these people voted against the bill knowing full well that it would pass anyway.

Posted by: fiscalnut | March 13, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

“Tapper got called out on his crap reporting and he proved them wrong”
now the neo-cons are bitter
awwwwwwwwwww

Posted by: JR | March 13, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

I find Obama’s approach to governance to be devoid of anything that champions the values of hard work, persistence, or self motivated responsibility. No government will survive much less thrive if it has its basis in class envy, the culture of need, the culture of expecting something for nothing, and the culture of transferring responsibility for success to a governmental agency.
Governor Palin understands this. In spite of the attempt by Jake and other so called journalist to denigrate her, Governor Palin will make a great contrast to the failures Obama creates over the next four years when she runs in 2012.

Posted by: James | March 13, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Republicans have never been against earmarks as long as they’re for themselves, they only object to Democrat earmarks, how very hypocritical of them but then they are neo-cons.

Posted by: JR | March 13, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Jake, you missed the point on this. Palin has been consistent on the issue in her rhetoric and her actions. I respect your reporting, and I think that you’re usually fair to both sides. But on this issue, I think that you’re wrong and that you’ve refused to see it.
Hope you have a great weekend.

Posted by: mel | March 13, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

During the presidential campaign Sarah Palin did say she was against earmarks. But when I researched I found Alaska actually got more dollars per resident than any other state.
Jake, Mother Jones will love this publicity.
Sarah Palin’s communication director is attacking and attempting to lie, yes lie. This is same approach Sarah Palin took through the Presidential campaign. That is another major reason I did not like her. She also revealed she is a dangerous politician. I saw her time and time again revel in her ability to entice crowd rage and hate. I congratulate her for her mesmerizing crowd rally speeches, but found speeches quite dangerous. FBI was called in and wouldn’t even let news media near any of spectators. Crowds were attacking the media, all with her blessing. the shouts from crowd were like “mob madness.”
Tell Sarah Palin everyone knows what she said during campaign, I had researched her whole political history. She is an earmark queen. Through Ted Stevens her mentor, she got several for Wasilla as Mayor. What Sarah does, and what Sarah says are two different things. According to Sarah, Sarah is always right.
Dear old earmarks complaints. Democrats and Republicans vote for earmarks. Republican say they are against all earmarks. But I see they have a fair share themselves and gladly accept. Stimulus bill brought more of the same complaints from Republicans. But most are now taking the money. It’s called same ol’ political games. Earmarks can be good or bad. Legislators just need to be more responsible when allocating money out. Lobbying and political maneuvers to get a bill passed get in way of good bills being passed. They need to cut way back.
This Republican sure did not vote for McCain-Palin. Tried to, but researching them just could not do. Was first time I crossed over.

Posted by: Sharon | March 13, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Jake, I think you could do all Americans a favor by fairly comparing the successes or failures that both Obama and Governor Palin have over the next four years. I suspect that Governor Palin’s success in Alaska will far outweigh the results that Obama produces.

Posted by: Nikky | March 13, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Jake, do you get to sit in on the conference calls that George Stephanopolis has with Rahm Emanuel every morning? Do you get the same marching orders from the messiah?

Posted by: alfredo | March 13, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Palin said she was against abuse of earmarks. Has she abused earmarks? Impossible to know from Tapper’s story.
How does she compare to other governors, or to previous Alaska governors? Also impossible to know, Tapper and his buddies at Mother Jones can’t be bothered to do the reporting.

Posted by: VidOmnia | March 13, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Y — I’ll rephrase and shorten:
“Earmarks are bad, unless their mine.”
Sorry for wasting your time with articles and facts, they do get in the way when the good Governor tries to prove she is something she is not.
Truth is she was all for it with everyone else until about 2007 or so. Now, I never said they weren’t useful or not for good projects but she’s still saying one thing and doing another.

Posted by: GetOffMyLawns! | March 13, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Witless from Wasilla just won’t quit. No surprise. The media spotlight can be truly addictive. Once, Sen. McCain ran over me because I was standing between he and a t.v. camera.

Posted by: B. Bear | March 13, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

The Emperor with no clothing Two Face Fraud
No earmarks in the budget
9000 earmarks in the budget
Yes We Can
NO lobbyists in my administration
Several lobbyists in my administration
Yes We Can
None of those evil presidential signing statements.
Presidential Signing statements in the budget?
Yes We Can
Plenty More.., stay tune.

Posted by: Tom | March 13, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Bear, Please explain to me this. Who started this blog entry? Was it Governor Palin to gather attention?
No.

Posted by: Tom | March 13, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

It is funny to me that you find it necessary to defend your reporting on Palin as not attacking a conservative Republican. I have not seen that kind of wording when you’ve hit on Obama or other Democrats. Tells me how far the pendulum has swung and that right wing attacks of bias have good, solid, mainstream reporters spooked.

Posted by: TJ | March 13, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

I think, technically, it is an “earmark” if some member of Congress specifies that certain funds go to a specific project.
I do not believe that when governors of the various states make budget requests of the federal government that those requests have anything to do with what we think of as “earmarks.
You can read the definition of “earmarks” as explained by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) at: http://earmarks.omb.gov/earmarks_definition.html

Posted by: dream | March 13, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

So jake, let me see if I understand you. Yourself, as an ABC reporter can take on a condescending tone in your reports when you are dealing with the office of a White female Governor of what is the largest land mass state in the country. Yet you treat with kid gloves, a black president who shouted how the stimulus had no Earmarks repeatedly but then went and hid to sign the Omnibus with Earmarks because they are “important” to the business of legislation. Gee, I guess the Governors office did not say things the way you wanted to hear them, nice and pretty, dressed up with some lace maybe. Grow up Jake!

Posted by: Bill | March 13, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

Gov Palin is a hypocrite with a capital H on many issues. Did you see her sarahpac letter where she says shevis doing “bold” things for gov reform and personal freedom? It is a joke! She is not for personal freedom when it comes to womens choice. And what bold things has she done? For a great perspective on the REAL Sarah palin do a search for the Mudflats blog.

Posted by: Lorna | March 13, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

“Did Palin ever give back the $300,000 worth of expensive clothes she stole from the Neocon Party .. LMAO”
The republican election committee dressed her..what’s your point?
Did Pelosi pay for her family’s travel expenses incurred by the U.S. Military? No, because they said she’s 3rd in command and it’s ok. Palin’s first in command in Alaska, and the State said it’s ok for her to travel with family, but the GOVT. said she had to pay it back!
Democrats don’t have to pay their taxes, but you do. Is there a double standard out there. Oh, you betcha!

Posted by: Sheila | March 13, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

To the Palin supporters:
Does the truth matter at all to any of you? Is there nothing you can learn about Palin which will change your mind?
Apparently not. I’m a conservative mom, but I ain’t buying what she’s selling.
She’s Obama with better legs and a little lipstick.

Posted by: Eyes Wide Open | March 13, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Me and every other Democrat I know just pray that this women with the intelligence of pocket lint, runs in 2012. She’s a political gold mine for the Democratic party.
I think fatboy rush should be her running mate. With these two on the ticket, the GOP won’t gave a chance to get back into the WH again until Malia and Sasha are running for office.

Posted by: John McNugget | March 13, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

I wish the media’s payroll was funded by the people and not politicians. Then the reporting might be fair, even handed and maybe even truthful.Find something newsworthy to report; this sure isn’t it.

Posted by: tired of the lies | March 13, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

As a Governor she has to do what she can for the state she governs,

Posted by: spock | March 13, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

I’m an Alaskan and I see this sort of crap everyday. Palin sticks her hoof in her mouth then blames everyone else. I can’t figure out which is worse-the fact she’s run our state into the ground or the ignorance of the Republican party that carries her around on a pedistal. The truth is she’s nothing more than a hillbilly governor who hasn’t a clue about anything she is supposed to know.

Posted by: Dave | March 13, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

ABC, it’s obvious that half of these posts are conservative..why is it your belief that we want you to present news in your slanted liberal vein? And let’s not even talk about your prime time programming..nooooooo..let’s not go there..then I get really irate!
And Lorna..you can find 1000′s of liberal, anti Palin posts..and 1000′s for her. What was your point again? Oh, yeah, you’re upset that she’s against a woman’s “choice”. You mean abortion? She believes a fertilized egg..embyo..is a life. You consider that stupid, ignorant or backward? Scientifically, she is correct.
So, the real subject here was the affrontery of one of Palin’s employees in objecting to the constant barrage against Palin because she had the nerve to say negative things about our new Pres? Before he WAS Pres! No one cared if anyone said terrible things about the old Pres. No one on the left, anyway!

Posted by: sheila | March 13, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Jake..you are a sexist jerk!
“”Earmarks are bad, unless their mine.”
is that Obama they are speaking of?
Grow a spine and actually make a trip to Alaska if you really want to do a story of the Palins. But that would require true journalism skills.

Posted by: S. Morgan | March 13, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Good job Jake. Keep ‘em honest. It would be nice to see you pop the ballon of a few Ron Paul supporters. He never votes yes on bills he puts earmark into… He is giving his district a refund you see. And Pauls’ principles are intact and unasailable… Oh the irony that , John McCain, a guy that picks and chooses what parts of conservatism he likes or dislikes based on media coverage can be so consistent on earmarks floors me. Yet Ron Paul can have dedicated legions that simply do not care that he requests earmarks. Sigh

Posted by: Rodney | March 13, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

There was a report the other day of communities still paying $ 6.00 per gallon for gas in Alaska, who still shop groceries by mail and are completely crushed by the economic downturn. But the Gov would rather cling to being fiscally conservative with so much suffering?
Sounds like criminal negligence from her and everyone else including the Fed Gov

Posted by: Mill | March 13, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Come on Jake. Do your homework. The amount of earmarks requested by Alaska has gone down steadily since Palin became Governor. She would really like Alaska to be independent of federal dollars but it’s the federal government which doesn’t allow them to tap into their own resources. As for Obama palling around with terrorists–how do you explain the SF police union wanting the FBI to proceed with a full criminal investigation into Ayers and Dohrn?

Posted by: Becky | March 13, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

This woman is a nut case.NO she stil has the clothes as of now.Her daughter was a thing to use during the election just like all her other kids. If the press backs off maybe she would go away /….

Posted by: NHvoter | March 13, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

“the Queen of the Turkey Killers started this.”
Oops! That did it. Two thirds of this country hunts. Turkey season..it’s turkey! Get over it! Every time I hear the View’s Joy going on and on about the Turkey, I get crazy! I’m from the midwest..we hunt turkey. Mississippi..hunts turkey..Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Arkinsas, Louisiana, all the western states hunt turkey..when you all try bashing Palin for hunting turkey, you’re bashing 2/3 of the country! Oh, and hillbilly’s hunt turkey too!

Posted by: Barbie | March 13, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

“Grow a spine and actually make a trip to Alaska if you really want to do a story of the Palins. But that would require true journalism skills.”
I sounds like you’ve never seen a Sarah Palin interview. I’m sure Jake has no fears.

Posted by: Skip | March 13, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

how do you explain the SF police union wanting the FBI to proceed with a full criminal investigation into Ayers and Dohrn?……..Posted by: Becky | Mar 13, 2009 10:18:01 PM…. I can explain for you, it’s a complete non-issue and nothing will become of it, much to your dis-satisfaction. HA! HA! HA!

Posted by: bob | March 13, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

“..when you all try bashing Palin for hunting turkey..”
It doesn’t have much to do with HUNTING turkeys, it has to do with having a television interview with someone strangling them in the background.

Posted by: Skip | March 13, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

An official of a state government asking their federal government representative to get money for the state is a very different thing than the federal representative inserting a line item in a budget. The state official can ask for money every day of the week, only the federal representative can do it.

Posted by: david | March 13, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Jake,
It was a cheap shot. You know it, you did it anyway. Get over it, bashing Palin is so…..last year. Ever looked at Barack Obama’s hypocrisies?
What you say? ABC would fire you if you did that? Well now we know why no one watches them !

Posted by: patriot | March 13, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

“Remember, Palin can see Russia from her kitchen window!”
Hmm. Did Palin say that?
Or (hint) did Tina Fey say that?
Anyway, I found this a disappointing article. Little analysis of the content of the earmarks, e.g., whether they’re “abuse.” Two examples are listed, as though it’s self-evident that they’re bad earmarks, though it wasn’t. The defensive tone throughout is indicative that jpt knows his position is weak and that better reporting is needed.

Posted by: PD | March 13, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

“It doesn’t have much to do with HUNTING turkeys, it has to do with having a television interview with someone strangling them in the background.”
Yes, imagine. At a turkey-processing plant, they actually kill turkeys. Oh, the scandal.
Do there exist people who think the turkey on their table at Thanksgiving got there without being killed?

Posted by: PD | March 13, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

If you want to write about Hypocrisy, this is Hypocrisy:
If they gave out Olympic medals for fiscal irresponsibility, President Bush would take the gold, silver and bronze.
– North Dakota Sen. Kent Conrad, July 2008, commenting on a projected 2009 deficit of $482 billion.
I would describe it as a good beginning.
– Sen. Conrad, February 2009, commenting on President Barack Obama’s 2010 budget.Projected deficit: $1.75 trillion.
Taking some earmarks for the state of Alaska, requested by 3 legislators that don’t even LIKE Sarah Palin, and attributing them to her, is hypocrisy of the media. But your kind of missing the forest for the trees aren’t you when you ignore Dorgan’s hypocrisy and continue this invention of Palin hypocrisy.

Posted by: ndgirl | March 13, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

The simple fact is, earmarks is the way The Congress does business.
Until this mythical reformation of the earmarks system happens, that is the way it will be.
Talking about change is not change.
I thought maybe this blog was the klone bright light.
My error, I’ll take you off the list.

Posted by: Larry Sheldon | March 13, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Jake is another stupid reporter that looked at the two earmark bills and zoom in on Alaska. Obama promised no ear marks and signed both bills without batting an eye. Now that is the story. Did Jake write about that? He wrote about the Governor of Alaska. Did he do any research? You betcha not! It is so easy to make up your own pathetic story to please your left wing pie brain. Can it have anything to dod with the fact that Obama has been looking clueless lately? All the other governors are chiming in about the two bills but Jake picks the one governor that has went back to running her state. You people are so pathetic. Why do these people continue to distort the governor’s record? If you want to write about the governor that is fine but tell the truth. It has been nearly five months since Palin went back to Alaska and the only way these kooks can get some attention is by the Palin name. Who is the President? Write about how Obama is way in over his head and his advisors are idiots. But you don’t dare do that because you know the thug machine will come after you.

Posted by: John | March 13, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Cheap shot, plain and simple, by someone who hadgenerated some trust with the right

Posted by: roger rainey | March 13, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

What the hell is wrong with earmark? It brings money back home by those most able congresspersons and senators. The more they are able and capable to make earmarks, to build parks, roads, homeless shelters, bridges, pig order investigations, the better for your home town. These are the kind of people you should definitely keep for your district and for your state.
Those who complains about earmarks are purely political boneheads, like our Greatest Smartest Clueless Leader PB0. The clueless senator from Minnesota, whom no one even can remember her name, is completely useless. She should be voted out next time.
As to the up coming comedian Franken, whome this cat voted for, unless he brings earmark money back to Minnesota, his days will also be numbered as Coleman did.

Posted by: two cats | March 13, 2009, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

“Yes, imagine. At a turkey-processing plant, they actually kill turkeys. Oh, the scandal.”
I don’t think anyone implied that it was scandalous, and I think you know that. It’s just extremely inept and out of touch. If you interview millions and millions of Americans I’m sure they would enthusiastically tell you that the last thing that they and their families want to see right before Thanksgiving is graphic images of turkeys being slaughtered. But hey -maybe in Alaska it would be considered a good appetizer.

Posted by: Skip | March 13, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

“I don’t think anyone implied that it was scandalous, and I think you know that.”
If you check the news coverage of the event, you’ll find that indeed there were Palin-bashing stories focusing on the horrors!, the HORRORS! that turkeys are killed at Thanksgiving. The NYT was particularly ridiculous and ninny-like.

Posted by: PD | March 13, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Two cats,
The problem with earmarks for Palin is that she spend months campaigning against them. Another episode of a Republican talking out of both sides of their mouths.

Posted by: Lori | March 13, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

“As to the up coming comedian Franken, whome this cat voted for, unless he brings earmark money back to Minnesota, his days will also be numbered as Coleman did.”
You’re willing to openly confess that you voted for that comic devil Al Franken?
I’m extremely impressed. -and that’s no joke.

Posted by: Skip | March 13, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Funny how the Obama team will continue reporting every move that Gov. Palin makes. Oh, you say, this is just an ABC reporter reporting on Gov. Palin….exactly….you will hear so many reports on Gov. Palin from now on until election day because the Obama team is quite notably scared to death of her.

Posted by: destined | March 13, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

John, You are not the only one that hopes Gov. Palin runs in 2012. She is also a political gold mine for the Republican party.
The money she raised as VP was unheard of and as the President nominee it will be endless.
This country will be mess in 2012 and conservatives will take back everything.
Why to you think so many governors are running their mouths. Obama will do for Palin what Bush did for Obama. And its looking more and more like Obama is not as bright as the corrupt MSM made him out to be without that teleprompter.

Posted by: Sal | March 13, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Gee-Willikers, another lying, left-wing media hack.
Every Obama appointee is a crook and he has time to make up lies about Sarah Palin. HIS SNARKY RESPONSE ALONE belies his credibility.

Posted by: Danielle. | March 13, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

I’m surprised at the number of comments here that seem to imply that jpt is completely in the tank for Obama, merely because he write an article critical of Palin and/or her staffer.
jpt has been one of the few journalists willing to pose difficult questions to the Obama team.

Posted by: PD | March 13, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Jake Tapper is looking for his 2 minutes of fame. You are so transparent.
Who the hell are Bill Ayers and Beranrdine Dohrn? Terrorist friends that palled around with ObeTheTeleprompter in Chicago. Imagine what goodies you would have found, if you had dropped 200 investigators into Chicago.
Now we are all paying for the teleprompter in the WH.
“McAllister then pointed out that Palin made 51 earmark requests for the FY 2008 budget, totaling $256 million; and 31 requests totaling $197 million, for the FY 2009 budget.
McAllister said that for next year’s budget, Gov. Palin will only make eight requests, totaling $69 million.”
JakeTrappertheKissObeTheTelepromper, Are you comparing these peanuts with the other states. There was 700 billion dollar budget that went out to the states and you write a story about peanuts going to Alaska. Are you really Joe Biden?
Why don’t you write about ObeTheTeleprompter approval ratings dropping to 56%?
Why don’t you write about the how the clowns in California have bankrupted that state and Arnold is running around pleading for ever penny he can get? The LIBERAL KOOKS have bankrupt that state and you are worrying about peanuts going to Alaska.
Wait a minute, wait a minute, your phone is ringing, and it is the kooks from MSNBC.
Your better hurry and get that tinkle up your leg.

Posted by: Jan | March 13, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

I didn’t know governors could ask for earmarks to be inserted into the federal budget.

Posted by: Axey | March 14, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Jake!
How hypocritical are you not to include the millions of pork with Obama and Rahm’s name on them. Or Biden. Or the fact that Obama broke his word about pork by signing – hidden away from the citizens of the USA – the bill instead of sending it back – as Bush had promised to do – to be reduced. You need to change your position to Obama press agent since you are not fair and balanced. Are you trying out for Gibb’s job? Lack of integrity is not a plus for “reporters.”

Posted by: Linda Mae | March 14, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Sarah Palin is a moron.

Posted by: Lilly | March 14, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Where did you write this story at a bar?
This story makes you look like a whiner looking for attention.
Try writing about how Obama stood before the American people and look them right in the eyes and said: I am proud to say there are no earmarks in this bill.
This will come back to haunt him.

Posted by: June | March 14, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Jake, What is up with this comment?
“for the governor who repeatedly referred to then-Senator, now-President Obama as “palling around with terrorists.”
You lost all creditability with that line. Once I read the terrorist bit I knew the rest of the story would be BS. Did you write that with a straight face? 58+ million people knew Obama palled around with domestic terrorists. If you clowns had reported the truth then lots more would have known, but the truth has a way of finding its way to the people. We have 2 to 3 years to spread the truth.

Posted by: Jake | March 14, 2009, 1:50 am 1:50 am

That MJ article was just silly. What a nitpicking, uninformed piece.
What a bunch of poor fluffy journalism all around.
Look into those projects. Liberals should be interested in environmental projects like protecting the King Crab, which is also an economic issue for Alaska, and not solely controlled by th eir state. It’s a natural resource like Salmon. It’s not inappropriate to request federal money for an Indian Cultural center, American Indians are funded federally.
Palin packed away a lot of money for her state in the previous budget, some of it by taxing big oil, and by avoiding spending (Despite criticism from her legislators to spend it while they had it) during that period in order to save for leaner times, like now. Seems like a smart thing for a governor to do.
If you call yourself a journalist, then research your stories. If you can’t do that, stop asking to be paid for this, and blog instead.

Posted by: j in canada | March 14, 2009, 2:01 am 2:01 am

With each passing day, it is becoming evident to anyone with half a brain who can get one eye open, that out of the final four top candidates in the 2008 presidential election, only John McCain and Sarah Palin had the experience, the know-how, the integrity and the guts to assume the office of the presidency.
Obama proves by the day how jaw-droppingly inexperienced he is to be in the top position: Putin and Medvedev told him off publicly…. Ahmadinejad is laughing at his offer to talk, as he screws the warhead onto his missile…. North Korea is ready to release missiles… Hugo Chavez wants Obama to join him in Socialism…. Obama wants to open up trade and travel with Cuba, even though 10 presidents before him have shunned this Communist regime that murders its own people…..China is chiding Obama for spending at a time when we owe them trillions of dollars…. Obama has mistreated and insulted Gordon Brown, our staunchest ally and closest friend… Obama couldn’t get Canada to deploy more of their troops to Afghanistan, even when he had NAFTA to use as a bargaining chip…. Do I need to go into the “stimulus” package, the earmarks in the latest pork bill that he signed off on in private, the tax cheater he insisted we MUST have as Treasury secretary, his abominable picks for his cabinet, and his closing down of Gitmo, with NO PLAN for where these hardened terrorists are going to go? The gaffe with Pakistan? The cap and trade rule which will only serve to drive away or kill business and jobs? The sinking stock market? How about 3 months from now, when unemployment is higher, we’re deeper in debt and closer to an attack by one of our increasing number of enemies?
NOW how good does a McCain/Palin administration sound?
Yet ABC continues this tired, yawn-inducing attack on Sarah Palin, trying to discredit her in any way possible, in a lame attempt to try to distract the public from the powder keg in the room that is Obama and his minions.
Get a SPINE, ABC. Why don’t you be different for once, and break from the herd of all the other elitist, liberal media clones and start reporting some REAL news, like the denigration of our country at the hands of a completely inept BUFFOON? Why are you wasting your time going after every little thing the governor of Alaska says and does, when Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Geithner and the rest of the crooks are running this country into oblivion? Are you SO AFRAID of the public’s favorable response to Sarah Palin that you have to run stories about her which try to harm her reputation? Does she scare you that much, ABC and Jake Tapper? Do you REALLY think she’s that big of a threat to Obama’s re-election chances in 2012? You must, or you wouldn’t be running these stories about her. It’s kind of like Obama picking on Rush Limbaugh. Why would the president of the United States fear a radio talk show host? WHY?….
Why would a flailing, journalistically bankrupt media outlet that’s hemmorhaging money waste it’s time and resources with the governor of Alaska? WHY?….

Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | March 14, 2009, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Hmmmm…..Gov. Palin got money for ‘North Pacific Fisheries???’
Ummm…Of course you must not realize how much Alaska depends on this “BUSINESS” for their economy….
I bet this ‘earmark’ will do double duty and “create and save jobs” in Alaska…..But I’m sure no one wants to hear about “sucessful governing”
And King crab research??….prolly the same deal…..
You’d rather watch Obama frenetically running around in ever smaller circles….Talking about ‘someday’
Did you miss the modus operendi in the last bill…all like it would ‘save or create’ 3 1/2 million jobs….and then….after the bill passed….suddenly it was announced 3 1/2 million ‘might’ be too optomistic…prolly should be 2 1/2 million instead?
Just what new info did they get in a week?….could Obama have just been blowin smoke up your skirt to get the bill passed?
OK Jake…I’m starting to ‘get’ it….Your bosses at ABC have ‘instructed’ you to stop the independant fair reporting that you have been showing so much promise in….and get back on the bias bus….
Or…worse than that….Obama has bought you…..
Time will tell….I’ll hang around and watch for awhile……everyone gets it wrong sometimes….not fair to judge yet….

Posted by: J Moore | March 14, 2009, 3:26 am 3:26 am

As for comparing McCain to Palin on earmarks….McCain does’nt have the responsibility of running the biggest state in the country…
Sarah would be remiss if she did’nt look out for the best interests of her state…
She’s the only one in the entire bunch that actually has ‘executive experience’

Posted by: J Moore | March 14, 2009, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Lets See……….Bill McAllister…Directer of Communications……
Wonder if that job decription means It’s his job to make sure you have the facts straight….and not spreading misinformation….

Posted by: J Moore | March 14, 2009, 3:52 am 3:52 am

God I hope George Stepsonofobama has’nt been conferance calling you….
Has he invited you to the weekly bashes at the White House?
It ain’t worth it Jake….you have a long career ahead of you….in four years it will be over…don’t get yourself stained for a short time in history

Posted by: J Moore | March 14, 2009, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Aug. 29,” McAllister wrote. “The Governor never said that Earmarks should be Abolished or that the State of Alaska wouldn’t Seek or Accept any.
Didn’t happen.
What she said well before she was a National Candidate (going back at least to October of 2007) was that Earmark Reform was necessary and the state would need to RELY LESS on FEDERAL MONEY than it had been.”
——————-
That’s Borderline Bull-Spit !!
If You are Independent, Self Reliant and a Self Sufficient State, don’t Accept any Ear Marks, Period.
—————
Sarah Palin: “Big Government, Needs to get out of the Way”
Palin won’t Allow “Big Government, To get out of the Way”
Because, Palin has Never stopped Requesting…..
[[Ear Marks]]
—————
Note: Alaska is Heavily Dependent upon Oil-Gas and Federal Ear Mark Millions, it’s their, Life’s Blood !!
—————
That’s exactly why, Sarah Palin, Loved Ted Stevens, because Ted Brought the Bacon, Hogs and Pork Products Home to Alaska and Now Lisa Murkowski and others are bringing the Bacon Home and Sarah Palin, will not Reject the Pigs and Hogs coming to the Yukons, No Sir.

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 5:49 am 5:49 am

McAllister then pointed out that Palin made [[51 Earmark Requests]] for the FY 2008 budget, totaling $256 million; and [[31 Requests]] totaling $197 million, for the FY 2009 budget.
——————-
Palin Depends on [[FEDERAL MILLIONS]]
The Federal Government, is Giving Tax Payers money, from the so called “Lower 48″ Giving Their Taxed Millions, to these Yukon Hill Billies !!
Plain and Simple, It’s..
[[Welfare]]
—————-
Sarah Palin and Lisa Murkowski, Simply Love, Pork Barrell Millions and Always will….
—————–
Note: Alaskans Per Capita Garner More per Dollar, than any State in the Union..Fact 504.34 Per Person, whereas People in the Lower 48, Per Person, are Very Lucky Indeed, to take Home 8-18.00 Per Capita.
—————-
Alaska makes Money from the Earmarked Millions Brought Home by their Representatives in Congress and their State’s Governor Gladly Recieves and Distributes to her Alaskan Residents, at our Nation’s Tax Payers…EXPENSE.
—————–
Alaska is a [[Welfare State]] and their Windfall Profit Tax is…
[[Socialism]]

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 6:00 am 6:00 am

McAllister said that for next year’s budget, Gov. Palin will only make 8 Requests, totaling [[$69 Million]], which will include “six ongoing federal appropriations and just two new projects: an upgrade at the Kodiak Missile Defense Facility, which is relevant to National Security, and a Bridge Replacement critical to construction of the…
Note: Pending Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline, also in the National Interest.”
———————-
Gas Pipeline, National Security ..Hmm
National Interest No…
Big Oil Interest, Yes !!
—————
Big Note: Sarah Palin’s Oil Gas Line, will Rely on More Ear Marked Pork Billions, but it will Not Happen.
————
At any Rate, Big Oil has already begun its Own Gas and Oil Pipeline, with Pipes already being laid, while Palin’s So called Gas Pipeline Quest has Not even Gotten Underway…
Regarding Sarah Palin’s Gas Pipeline Project, Not One, Single Solitary Pipe has been laid and the Canadian gas Company is not compelled to do ANYTHING, until More Money, I mean, MILLIONS has CHANGED HANDS !!
———–
There is also a Native Canadian Indian land Dispute and Legal hurdle, that will take YEARS to ever RESOLVE, that would Permanently put Palin’s Gas Pipeline Quest on ICE !!
————-
Big Note: Not to mention, the Alaskan State House has put Palin’s Plans on ICE as well, because she Submitted them Too Late…
Palin is Slack in so Many Ways
Good morning America…
Wake up, this Woman is a Big Oil Tool.
An Not a Very Bright one at that !!!

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 6:12 am 6:12 am

Some flack calls on behalf of Palin to “set the record straight.” You’re telling us this because it’s unusual or because it involves Palin?

Posted by: crclark | March 14, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am

You’d think shovel ready infrastructure projects for clean energy=jobs would have pleased the Dems. She’s asking for less than $200 million while other states are getting billions. What’s the problem? Not enough Dem. votes in Alaska? Alaska is part of the U.S. Where’s the beef?

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | March 14, 2009, 7:37 am 7:37 am

If each of the 50 states asked for funding for 31 projects within their states there would be only 1550 projects total. The omnibus funded over 8000 earmarks. She’s very conservative compared to the present federalies.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | March 14, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am

It is the Republicans are the only against the earmarks so as I. Sarah Palin is favored with the earmarks- if she does decide to run for President in 2012 she will not get the nominee. It because of blamed Democrats and the mainstream news media.

Posted by: anonymous | March 14, 2009, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Someone wrote: “As for comparing McCain to Palin on earmarks….McCain does’nt have the responsibility of running the biggest state in the country…
Sarah would be remiss if she did’nt look out for the best interests of her state…”
LOL, good one! She presides over the biggest state – WITH THE SMALLEST POPULATION! Her state has fewer people than well over a hundred CITIES in the ‘lower 48′. Yet the earmarks in the bill total the highest dollars per person of ANY state. And if she would be ‘remiss’ by not looking out for ‘the best interests of the state’, then are you saying earmarks are good? And Mccain is wrong to NOT ask for them?

Posted by: SearamblerOne | March 14, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Someone wrote: “If each of the 50 states asked for funding for 31 projects within their states there would be only 1550 projects total. The omnibus funded over 8000 earmarks. She’s very conservative compared to the present federalies.”
Translation: earmarks are OK as long as they are requested by a conservative. Otherwise, they are pork, and bad…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | March 14, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Its OK; Obama didn’t veto the bill. It is Obama’s fault. Next we will hear from the GOP Governors that the federal Government made them take the money. I am really surprised at the reaction by the Palin supporters, pretending that Political Punch hasn’t run post after post about Obama not vetoing the bill.
Isn’t it time we all admit that this whole Earmark thing is fabricated talking point?

Posted by: Thinking | March 14, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Alaska: Population Of 650,000
Oil Rich
Ear Mark Rich
Politically Corrupt….
Because those Klondike-Yukon Politicians, Palin Included are Detached from the USA, they could Do Anything, until Sarah Palin was Introduced to Us, we could care LESS about what goes on in the Great Oil State of Alaska.
But since this [Hollow Floating Bubble] Sarah Palin, was Introduced to the USA…
The Flash Light is Shining Brightly on this Corrupt State and it’s Windfalls Profit Checks, Ear Marked Billions and it’s Governor [Sarah Palin] not Paying Her Taxes…
It’s Official, Sarah Palin is this Nation’s…
“Ear Marks Queen”
————-
An Alaska is a [[WelFare State]]

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am

“As for comparing McCain to Palin on earmarks….McCain does’nt have the responsibility of running the biggest state in the country…”
Yes, all those thousands of square miles of tundra need extensive management.

Posted by: Skip | March 14, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

John McCain
He speaks Against Ear Marks, because it makes him Appear and Feel like he’s a Crusader, when Ear Marks are Only 1-3% of most State’s Budgets…
Pot & Kettle Mentality: McCain Lives Off his Filthy Rich Wife’s Millions, so I find his Stance Against Ear Marks..
Hollow
McCain, Flies around in his Private Plane, all Financed by Cindy Lou McCain.
Arizona is a State in need of as Many Ear Marks as they can get !!

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Hmmmm….”BIG OIL” is evil and bad? Does anyone know where I can fill my tank with gasoline or diesel made by Little Oil? To think that I’ve been filling up with fuel from “Big Oil” all these years just scares me to death. Not to mention all the flights I’ve taken for vacations. Do the airlines use fuel from “Big Oil” or Little Oil? My gosh, this is a terrible problem.

Posted by: Charles | March 14, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Alaska was just voted by researchers at University of Buffalo, Tx.State, & Geor. Mason U..as the best State with:
The researchers say their work “presents the first-ever comprehensive ranking of the American states on their public policies affecting individual freedoms in the economic, social, and personal spheres.”
Over a quarter of the state’s workforce is employed by state or local government, and that figure does not include federal employees. Alaska has the third highest debt ratio in the country and the second highest state and local government spending ratio. However, Alaska does extremely well on personal freedom, scoring first on our ranking,” the profile states.
NY is the worst.

Posted by: bobc | March 14, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

That is why I don’t get my turkeys from a farm that kills them. I only buy turkeys that come from a sealed plastic wrapper and reputable grocery store. Eat turkeys killed on a farm? Gross! This is the 21st century for gosh sake! Use a grocery store!

Posted by: Charles | March 14, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

There are more than 8,000 earmarks in the budget bill Obama just signed.
Yet, Obama had campaigned AGAINST earmarks.
Oh, the irony of it.
In signing the bill and APPROVING the more than 8,000 earmarks, Obama said the bill was “old business” and not his fault.
Nothing is ever Obama’s fault, and if Obama breaks promise … after promise … after promise … as he does, that’s not Obama’s fault either!

Posted by: dream | March 14, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Alaska is a Welfare State, an its Generated by our Federal Taxes and there’s not a damn Thing, we can do about it.
……….
Its a well known fact, that Washington is Very Generous to Alaska…
Alaska has an Abundance Of [[CASH]]
Alaska’s Oil Wells function without Levying an Income Tax.
And the Interest from a [[$34 Billion]] “Permanent Fund”…
All Past Oil Receipts are Stashed, that gives every Alaskan Man, Woman and Child an [[Annual Handout]], Expected to be about…
$1,000 This Year and Climbing !!

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Shell report says next Prudhoe is offshore
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — At a time when Alaska and the nation are suffering job losses, a report released Monday detailed what could be a future boom.
The study claims the development would bring an average annual employment over 50 years of 35,000 jobs. Good paying jobs not your stupuid a## 10 green jobs maybe. Oil and natural gas is our future.
If you let Alaska develop their resources they won’t need a penny from the federal government.
Let Alaska develop their GOD given resources!

Posted by: Sally | March 14, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Jake, it’s fine that you try to call out hypocrisy from Pres. Obama, Palin and anyone else with regards to earmarks, but maybe you should do some research yourself.
1) While McCain claims that he will veto ALL earmarks, as was reported during the campaign, he said that he would NOT eliminate “earmarks” that come in the form of aid to foreign countries such as Israel, Egypt and Jordan. Now, if he were President, maybe he would veto the whole omnibus bill that had these earmarks in it, but it is highly doubtful and he certainly couldn’t eliminate some and not others (as Obama can’t do) because he wouldn’t have the authority of the line item veto.
2) During the campaign, he also said that he would refuse to eliminate “earmarks” that were set aside for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that would go to construction projects such as housing for military families.
3) And he has in fact requested earmarks just a few years ago in 2006 when he signed up with the other Senator from Arizona to request $10 million to name an academic center after Justice Rehnquist
So, while McCain may have never requested as many earmarks as other Senators to say that he is a fiscal conservative on this basis by totally rejecting earmarks is not true. He has requested earmarks before, and as a candidate he said that he wouldn’t touch certain earmarks that came in the form of foreign aid, and money for military construction projects.
In your zeal to call out hypocrites, you might want to look more closely at the people yelling the loudest on their soap box.

Posted by: TRW | March 14, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Big Oil is Big Oil…
Big Oil Stopped being “Little Oil”
A Very Long Time Ago…Duh
Big Oil is “Big Oil”….
Because it is …”Big Oil”
Big Profits and Big States like ..
Texas, California, Florida and Lousiana…
What do you know….
Republican Governors: Rick Perry, PiYush “Bobby” Jindal and Sarah Palin all have their EYES on running for President Of The United States Of America in [[2012]]
Maybe Republican Governor, Charlie Crist too ?
All Big Oil States…
“Big Oil” Rules the Nation…
There is No “Little Oil”
“Drill Baby, Drill”
Hahahahaha !!!

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

How dare that EVIL Governor Palin defend herself against Tapper’s micharacterizations? Tappergate!!!!
Oh, and the reason McCain can get away without requesting any earmarks is that he gets Kyl, the junior Arizona Senator, to request them all. Unlike Governor Palin, Senator McCain has no responsibility for making any management decisions.

Posted by: VidOmnia | March 14, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

I want all the morons to raise their hands. Do any of you people do any research.
Some info on the Permanent Fund.
In 1976, Governor Jay Hammond championed an amendment to the Alaska Constitution that established the Alaska Permanent Fund. It is important to point out that this is in the Alaska Constitution and not just in state law
The Alaska Permanent Fund itself is managed by a non-governmental agency consisting of a number of governor-appointed individuals (mostly bankers, investors, financial experts)
The famous Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend is issued to every man, woman and child who has resided in Alaska for a period of one year or more.
It is commonly joked that military personnel newly stationed in Alaska will go down to the Division of Motor Vehicles to get their Alaska Driver’s License in order to begin their residency as soon as they can. There are some other requirements, however, such as you need to reside in Alaska for a certain number of days each year to qualify — though invariably there are exceptions to the rule (e.g., military serving overseas can still get it, so can congressional members living in D.C.).
It is stated in the Alaskan Constitution that the resources in the ground belong to the Alaskan people.
The state has been in debt for years and years.
Just like the country is carrying a 12 trillion dollar debt and growing under the Obama clowns. Every state has a state wide debt that you know nothing about.
Sarah Palin has been governor of Alaska for TWO YEARS you bunch of clowns .
The federal government will not let Alaska develop their resources so they have to pay them off with earmarks and federal dollars.
LET ALASKA DEVELOP THEIR RESOURCES AND THEY WILL BE THE RICHES STATE IN THE UNION.

Posted by: Jake | March 14, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Sarah Palin is an easy target for Taper and the rest. The Republican Party lost because of who they ran for President not V P. Electing the Democrats will be the biggest mistake of the century, we know already in this very short time. We are sitting ducks for the enemy, we want everything handed to us, the Congress is a complete mess and a disaster. I just hope the people with common sense will rise up, find a way to bankrupt the Soros of the world who are working against our principals and realize if they don’t we are done for as the country we knew growing up. We are in a crisis of monumental proportions. MSNBC and NBC are leading the pact and the liberals are following.

Posted by: Rita | March 14, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Sarah Palin does not “Manage” she has people in her Administration, “Manage” for her.
She just Dates & Signs what’s thrown in front of her.
Sarah Palin is not a Thinker.
The Town of Wasilla had No Major Debts, if Any, but Sarah Palin put that Sage Brush Town, Not a City, but a Town in [[Millions]] of Dollars worth of [[Debt]]
Sarah Palin was Elected based on her..
[[Face On The Label Appeal]]
Alaska being the Product and the Label being [[Sarah Palin]] and Palin would’ve been Fine, as long as she stayed where she was…
In Alaska, Now the Cats Out of the Bag…
She’s a “Hollow Floating Bubble”
An 4 Years, Brushing Up, Will Not [Change] that…
Sorry
She’ll be Very Lucky, to Win a 2nd Term, as Governor of Alaska.
The State House, has put her Agenda on the back Burner, because she Turned her paper Work, in LATE.
2010: Is an Re-Election Year for Palin.
Coincidence, I don’t Think So.

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

The Alaska Permanent Fund is from revenues made off the resources in the land (oil, gas,).
The federal government owns the land but not the resources that can be tapped.
Big government is the problem not the solution.
Wake up!

Posted by: Tad | March 14, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Obama does not “Manage” he has people in her Administration, “Manage” for him.
He just Dates & Signs what’s thrown in front of her.
Obama is not a Thinker.
Obama was elected based on the corrupt MSM and an economic meltdown.
You are the cat that was let out of the bag.
I can not believe you wrote this stuff.
The only cat out of the bag

Posted by: Pat | March 14, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Rita wrote: “Sarah Palin is an easy target for Taper and the rest. The Republican Party lost because of who they ran for President not V.P.”
Correct: she IS an easy target. Incorrect: the GOP lost for a whole lot of reasons – failed policy, failed ideology, failed leadership. Had Mccain chosen someone with a brain, the election would have been a lot closer (although he would have ultimately lost anyway, just by a smaller margin). Turn off Rush and Hannity for a while, it will do you some good…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | March 14, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Jake,
I am still waiting on those mismatches. Can see anyhere. Try again with Biden or a democrat.

Posted by: Sam | March 14, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Daily Kos: Simply put, Alaska has made a habit of Transferring its Operating COSTS to the [Federal Government].
The state pulls out nearly two times as much money as it pitches in to the Treasury, a drain that looks especially bad in light of the state’s fiscal reality.
Today, Alaska enjoys a healthy budget surplus, and it sits on a Permanent Fund of more than $39 billion. It also refuses to levy sales or income taxes on its citizens.
Since the federal payments are not made to individuals, many Alaskans have deluded themselves into thinking they are [[Not Welfare Recipients]].
Even when the Alaska state government sends Oil payments Collected from [Windfall Profits Taxes], among other things directly to each individual, it still doesn’t occur to Alaska’s residents that they are…
[[Welfare Recipients]]

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Pat: Too Much Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Oxycontin.
—————
Obama is a Columbia and Harvard Grad with Honors. The Man’s a Respected Attorney.
1st Man of Color Voted President of the Harvard Law Revue, in it’s long History.
The last time I checked Harvard and Columbia were Ivy League Universities and Majority Rule White in Population.
State Senator
Author of 2 Books
2 time Grammy Awarded for [[Spoken Words]]
Obama Won the Popular and Electoral College, to Win the Presidency.
Popular Vote: Over 60 Million
Electoral Vote: 360
McCain-Palin: Could Not garner 200 Electoral Votes more over the needed 270 Votes, to win the Presidency and they would have to get there 1st and they got No Where near the Magic Number of [[270]]
—————-
Sarah Palin Bounced around several States and Jr. Colleges to eventually Garner a Degree in Journalism…
Ha !!
Bring Palin on in 2012…
She better be Concerned with Winning her Re-Election.
————
I would Love to see Palin Author a Book !!

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Alex Campbell……
You repubs don’t want to have a “real debate”, you want to spend all day talking about Obama riding in Air Force One or the cost of his suits.
I can understand that a lot of people have a problem with all of this spending, but I have YET to hear a clear, precise, VALID alternative solution from the GOP. All we ever hear from you people is “tax cuts”.
So here’s your chance, oh great debater. Let’s hear YOUR solution to this economic MESS !!!!!!!

Posted by: John McNugget | March 14, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

wow..Tapper isn’t biased afterall, just a reporter doing his job.
If anyone can anger Obama supporters in one blog, and then get the Rushites mad in the next, well, they are doing their job.

Posted by: Fox News Light | March 14, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

1. Alaska receives nearly twice as much federal dollars than they contribute to federal income, making it one of the largest beneficiary states. They receive the highest per capita federal dollars and 3rd highest total fed dollars.
Alaska taxpayers receive more federal funding per dollar of federal taxes paid compared to the average state.
Per dollar of Federal tax collected in 2005, Alaska citizens received approximately $1.84 in the way of federal spending.
This ranks the state 3rd highest nationally and represents a large rise from 1995 when Alaska received $1.21 per dollar of taxes in federal spending (then ranked at 17th highest nationally).
2. Alaska receives $13,950 per capital in federal dollars, the #1 state in the country in per capita fed spending dollars received.
3. Alaskans pay no state taxes.
4. Alaska has consistently had one of the lowest rates of state/local taxes Estimated now at 6.4% of income, Alaska’s state/local tax burden is well below the national average of 9.7%. Alaskans pay $2,871 per capita in state and local taxes. They are ranked 50th–the lowest state/local tax burden in the country. Wouldn’t want to burden local residents with investing in local infrastructure, right?
4. BIG OIL and the Alaska government pay off its residents to love them. Are you aware of the Alaska Permanent Fund? This $40 billion fund from oil revenues had an individual payout in 2007 of $1654. That is $1654 for residents to keep their love of oil flowing. No wonder Palin wants to drill, drill, drill.
5. Palin’s own Wasilla received $27 million in earmarks under Palin to pay for things like a community center and sewer system repairs that, in a state like mine at least, is paid for locally with….Taxes.
As is often said, “Taxes are what we pay for civilized society”

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Alex….
WHERE’S THIS BIG ECONOMIC PLAN YOU HAVE TO SOLVE ALL THESE PROBLEMS ?!?!?!
…jeopardy theme song playing…

Posted by: John McNugget | March 14, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Obama says no Earmarks and signs a bill that has the most ever. No lobbyists and he hires 10 of them. We must pay taxes to be a patriot and he appoints several tax cheats. No torture except renditions. And he appoints the lawyer that represented the “American Taliban” to his justice apartment and he is our Commander and Chief. Hypocrisy almost treason.
Get over it Palin lost you won, you don’t ever have to worry about her again. Why don’t you hold the man you voted in office accountable for his actions, not the actions of a women you claim is weak and ignorant.
And Bush was the most educated president we had and look at were that got us. He had a MBA from Harvard. Facts are facts.

Posted by: John Munoz | March 14, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

John Munoz…
2 Months is Not 2 Years or 4 Years.
Obama Never said, he was “Banning All Earmarks”
President Obama did Win and this process has Good and Bad Uses.
Earmark Reform will be Handled Appropriately, but Not Gotten Rid Of…
Get Real
—————
Sarah Palin Vs. Politcal Punch is the Title. It was Sarah Palin, the Ear Marks Queen, Campaigning with McCain’s Anti-Ear Mark Rhetoric.
An all Semi-Senile McCain said…
“When I become President, I’ll make their Names Known and You will Know them”
Well, we know thier Names and they still got the pork and McCain made their names known…
That’s all McCain would’ve done as President.
“Make their Names, Known” and Passed the Damn Omnibus Bill, with his Signature, had he been Elected President.

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Obama says no Earmarks
****************************************
Obama never said no Earmarks. This is a total fabrication. He critisied McCain for being so obsessive about earmarks. All of this is on You tube. Give me a quote where he said he would end earmarks.
Your putting McCain’s words in Obama’s mouth.
What he said is he would go line by line to reduce wastfull spending, Not earmarks he called some earmarks as good.
But lets be real he doesn’t have line item veto powers top begin with.

Posted by: Thinking | March 14, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

When you subtract federal defence spending on Alaska’s large defence installations, the net federal funding per capita is much lower. Also, when you control for relative population densities, the per capita comparisons become meaningless.

Posted by: Emerson Car | March 14, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Right he is not banning all earmarks, and she didn’t say that we should ban all earmarks,she like Obama said we needed “reform”, and that is the fact. So I guess that we put that to bed. “bi-partisan” like.
So now we can all talk about the real issues.
-Several lobbyists,lobbyists were banned.
-The American Taliban lawyer in our Department of Justice.
-The keeping of renditions.
-More debt now than any other administration before it.
-Appointment of “non-patriotic” tax dodgers that seem unqualified.
-The funding of international abortions, even as we bankrupt ourselves.
-The popping off of Communist nations.
-The snubbing of political allies.
-The the reports of Obama being overloaded, while he is spending time fighting radio hosts.
-And the most important, raging corruption in Congress.

Posted by: John Munoz | March 14, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Governor Palin has been an advocate for earmark reform. She has said since 2006 that Alaska needs to be less reliant on federal dollars. Her stance has not changed; her requests for 8 projects were appropriate. Has anyone looked at Illinois? Over 1,100 projects receiving federal dollars. The treatment of Governor Palin by the mainstream media is shameful.

Posted by: Jane | March 14, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

A couple of questions for Jake regarding straight-talkin’ John McCain:
Was McCain’s appointment of Palin as his running mate a fiscally conservative position?
How about McCain saying on ABC that Palin never requested earmarks as governor?
Sounds like he was lovin’ himself some b o l o g n a!

Posted by: Danny | March 14, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

For anyone interested in crooked politicians like Palin keeping their word, not double talking and being held accountable for their hypocrisy.

Posted by: John Munoz | March 14, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Sarah Palin is an “Ear Marks Queen”
Always has been an Ear Marks Queen and will Continue to be an “Ear Marks Queen”
Lets Begin Weeding ourselves of Corruption.
Capitalism: Breeds Corruption…
Ending Corruption in Politics starts at the Local Level…
State, City and County, the bad Thing is…
These People are More corrupt than the Federal Level, just watch your Local News.
Every President Multi-Task…
Every President has an Abundance of Responsibility.
Most Presidents Desire the Challenge.
Only Time will tell in any case.
But 2 Months and a 1 Week, is hardly a Measuring Stick for the New President Of the USA.
All Things in Time.

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

George Stephanpolis asked John McCain a Direct Question…
Would he [John McCain] Endorse Governor Sarah Palin for President in [2012]
McCain Responded by saying….
“Its Too Early, My Corpse is still Warm”
This is a Woman, that Ran with him, as his VP and he Avoids Endorsing her.
McCain Selected this “Hollow Floating Bubble” and since he Lossed the Election, McCain Refuses to Endorse Palin….
McCain chose Palin for one purpose, Garnering the Largest Voing Power in America…
The White Female Vote.
It Failed because Palin was Never going to Win Over this Large Demographic..Period
The More she Talked, the Less the American Female Audience like her.
McCain could’ve Chosen….
1. Former Secr. of State: Condoleeza Rice
2. Republican Moderate: Sen. Lisa Murkowski
3. Republican Moderate: Congress-Woman Kay B. Hutchison
But he Chose this “Hollow Floating Bubble” Sarah Palin.

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Alaskan Republican Senator…
1. Lisa Murkowski, Experienced, Intelligent and could hold her own in a Debate with any Man in the Political Arena.
Texas Congress Woman…
2. Kay Bailey Hutchison, also Experienced, Intelligent and stand Toe to Toe with any Man, in the Political Arena.
Former Secretary Of State…
3. The International Community Respects Rice, Standford Professor, who speaks Russian, German, French, Italian and Spanish Fluently and Good Negoiator.
Condoleeza Rice, Of all the Females Listed here, is the Most Qualified to be President or Vice President of the USA.
Of course Rice would Never Consider running for the Highest Offices in the Land.
But Sarah Palin is a Label with Nothing Underneath …
Nothing
Sarah Palin is a “Hollow Floating Bubble”….
Note: Sarah Palin is a Pillow Case Stuffed with Peacock Feathers.
Wait a Minute, that’s an Insult to the Peacock Feathers, when the Peacock Feathers themselves, have a Higher IQ.

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

There is a difference between a senator requesting an earmark and a governor accepting one. A good analogy is selling teens alcohol; the businesses get nailed, not the kids. And, of course, if only Congress had the maturity of 17 year-old boys.

Posted by: Nexialist | March 14, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Nexialist: You Need to Read.
Sarah Palin Did Request totaling [69 Million $] of Government Ear Marks and it was not just her State’s Senators and Congressmen..
You need to Read.

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

All in All – Alaska is probably the best territory that the U.S. has ever stolen.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 14, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Nexialist: You Need to Read.
Sarah Palin Did Request [69 Million $] of Government Ear Marks and it was not just her State’s Senators and Congressmen..
You need to Read.
—————
The Governor’s Spokes Person: McAllister then pointed out that Palin made 51 earmark requests for the FY 2008 budget, totaling $256 million; and 31 requests totaling $197 million, for the FY 2009 budget.
McAllister said that for next year’s budget, Gov. Palin will only make eight requests, totaling $69 million,

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Earmarks happen. I’m coming to terms with it. I think people have major problems with earmarks geared towards things like museums and pig odor. Earmarks towards defense and infrastructure is hard to argue against. I just see this story as another distraction away from a president that has been a hypocrite for his campiagn and his presidency thus far. People whine and complain about the Republicans but do nothing to confront their own candidates.
I mean this is the guy who said that he wouldn’t have any lobbyists and then hired some, plus multiple tax cheats. He said he would champion earmark reform and instead of sending the dang bills back to congress to strip out many of the unneeded earmarks he chose to sign them anyway. Then had the nreve to get on tv saying that “next time” it’ll be different. Really?
At least with Palin I’m seeing some signs of reform- each year her requests keep dropping. She’s actually trying.
What I find most funny is that the likes of ABC and MSNBC have the nerve to try and scream hypocrite when the guy they all wanted is doing EXACTLY that. Maybe they could try holding their own candidates to their high standards before beating up on those who they won’t vote for anyway.

Posted by: xax | March 14, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

I don’t understand the PROPOSE of this article.
Why is the writer of this article comparing a Governor to a President.?
OB AMA SIGNS TWO BILLS LOADED WITH EARMARKS AND THE WRITER ATTACKS SARAH PALIN. I thought Sarah Palin was back in Alaska.
Obama signs the bills LOADED WITH EARMARKS and Sarah Palin takes the heat. I am confused, is Sarah Palin whispering in Obama’s ear and telling him to sign 2 bills loaded with EARMARKS?
Why should Sarah Palin be judged for what Obama does?
Obama and McCain both campaign on NO earmarks. Obama was elected POTUS. Obama has signed two bills loaded with earmarks.
I mean the man stood in front of the American people and said with a smile: There are no earmarks in this bill. The man stood there and looked the American people right in the eyes and lied right to their faces. Now that is something to be worried about.
I am confused, is Sarah Palin the POTUS? If Sarah Palin had signed those two bills now we would have something to complain about. As Governor of Alaska she campaigned on reducing the need for so many earmarks and that she has dont. She never campaign as Governor of Alaska to eliminate them. Alaska pays federal taxes and they deserve earmarks just like all the other states.
Sarah Palin is not the only one responsibility for requesting earmarks for her State.
Tell me again the purpose of this article? Is it to reflect blame off of Obama who lied to the American people and put the blame on Palin who is back home in Alaska governing her state.
The person that wrote this article is stupid and clueless but then what is new with the MSM. I have never seen so many stupid people gathered in one field.
I MEAN THE MSM IS NOW COMPARING OBAMA TO THE VP ON THE LOSING TICKET. How crazy is that.
I KNOW, THIS ARTICLE was meant as AN EARLY APRIL FOOLS JOKE.
WINK-WINK-WINK

Posted by: Frank | March 14, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

The GOP would have to be complete morons to put this woman on the ticket in ’12. She’s getting ripped apart and she isn’t even on the ticket yet. What do you think will happen to her if she runs in ’12? Palin supporters can scream all day long about the “biased media”, that will make absolutely no difference. Fair or unfair, that is the way it is. PERIOD !!!!

Posted by: Core | March 14, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

This is such double standard I don’t see Jake Tapper critiquing Obama for signing a bill (in secret as he is ashamed) that is so full of earmarks. I personally don’t like Sarah Palin but I think this media is so biased that that just can’t accept Obama is wrong Jake is making sacrastic comments of Palin and earmarks for Alaska what about the earmarks that Obama got for Illinois and then campaigned to say he was getting rid of them. Jake if you can’t be impartial then don’t be a reporter

Posted by: Nichole | March 14, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

McAllister said that for next year’s budget, Gov. Palin will only make 8 Requests, totaling [[$69 Million]], which will include “six ongoing federal appropriations and
Note: Just 2 New Projects: An upgrade at the Kodiak Missile Defense Facility, which is Relevant to National Security, and a Bridge Replacement critical to Construction of the…
[Pending] the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline, also in the National Interest.”
———————-
Gas Pipeline, National Security ..Hmm
National Interest No…
Big Oil Interest, Yes !!
The President Obama and the Federal Government Handles the Missile Sites, Not Palin. She has No Authority over Federal Issues.
Palin, is Only mentioning the Missile Site, because it tries to add some Weight, to her Slim Resume.
Its a Very Sad and Pathetic Attempt, to give her some Weight.
—————
Big Note: Sarah Palin’s Oil Gas Line, will Rely on More Ear Marked Pork Billions, but it will Not Happen.
————
At any Rate, Big Oil has already begun its Own Gas and Oil Pipeline, with Pipes already being laid, while Palin’s So called Gas Pipeline Quest has Not even Gotten Underway…
Regarding Sarah Palin’s Gas Pipeline Project…
Not One, Single Solitary Pipe has been laid and the Canadian Gas Company is not compelled to do ANYTHING, until More Money, I mean, MILLIONS has CHANGED HANDS !!
———–
There is also a Native Canadian Indian land Dispute and Legal hurdle, that will take YEARS to ever RESOLVE, that would Permanently put Palin’s Gas Pipeline Quest on ICE !!
————-
Big Note: Not to mention, the Alaskan State House has put Palin’s Plans on ICE as well, because she Submitted them Too Late…
Palin is Slack in so Many Ways
America
Wake up, this Woman is a Big Oil Tool.
An Not a Very Bright one at that !!!

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

The missing context tells much…
This story criticized Sarah Palin for accepting a few million in earmarks, yet does not give earmark totals of other states (aside from McCain’s).
My guess is, that if you looked at the earmarks other states requested, it would make Palin look very fiscally conservative.
Since such relevant, key information is left out, intelligent readers will conclude that the information does not support the underlying purpose of this story, and that is to kick around Sarah Palin.
C’mon, Tapper…let’s see how much other Governors are requesting…or would that mean you doing your job?

Posted by: ynot4tony2 | March 14, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Imagine Palin on Stage Debating with….
Tex Governor, Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Charlie Crist, Lisa Murkowski, Kay B. Hutchison and Tim Pawlenty….
You Thought Last Year’s Saturday Night Live Skits were Funny…
It would be Hysterical !!!
Palin is a “Hollow Floating Bubble”

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Hey “O” (is that an abbreviation for “goatse”?)…
Your constant attacks on Sarah Palin tell me that you fear her greatly.
Don’t deny it. You’re too transparent to lie.

Posted by: ynot4tony2 | March 14, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I Fear Sarah Palin like…
Oprah Winfrey Fears…
Rush Limbaugh !!
No Fear At All.
HaHa HaHa HaHa !!!
PS: Sarah Palin Fears …
Lisa Murkowski, Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich, Kay B. Hutchison, Tim Pawlenty and Charlie Crist…
Those are the Names she’ll Face in the Republican Race for the White House.
———–
Sara Palin, is a …
“Hollow, Floating Bubble”
Period

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Will stupid little Sarah just please go away? PLEAAASSEE?????

Posted by: Jwench | March 14, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Frank Murkowski Alaska-Canadian Gas Pipeline
————–
In March 2007, Palin presented the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) as the new legal vehicle for building a natural gas pipeline from the state’s North Slope.
Note: Former Alaskan Governor, [Frank Murkowski] Orchestrated and Formed this Pipeline Deal, Not Palin, but because of he Lossed to Palin, the Deal went Forward, with New Governor [Palin].
————
Only one legislator, Representative Ralph Samuels, voted against the measure, and in June, Palin signed it into law. On January 5, 2008, Palin announced that a Canadian company, TransCanada Corporation, was the sole AGIA-compliant applicant.
In August 2008, Palin signed a bill into law giving the state of Alaska authority to award TransCanada Pipelines [$500 MILLION] in [Seed Money] and a License to Build and operate the [$26-BILLION Pipeline] to transport Natural Gas from the North Slope to the Lower 48 through Canada.
————–
TransCanada projects the pipeline to be Operational by late [[2018]]…
Note: Barring Unforeseen Obstacles ?
There’s already an Obstacle, the Native Canadian Indians, Don’t want their Land to be Used, to Facilitate a Gas Pipeline.

Posted by: O. | March 14, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Re: ynot4tony2
“My guess is, that if you looked at the earmarks other states requested, it would make Palin look very fiscally conservative.”
Your guess would be perfectly wrong Tony.
Alaska was the # 1 piggie per capita, $210 for every man woman and child. Plus, thanks to Alaska’s taxing the bejeebus out of the oil companies, they didn’t need it as much as some far poorer states.
Had you read the (linked) article that the Governor’s aide was responding to you wouldn’t have needed to guess at all. But then, what fun are facts to ditto-heads?

Posted by: Kelly | March 14, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

The GOP are such hypocrites they put earmarks in the stimulus packages and voted against it knowing that it will pass. That want it to look like the dems are putting all the pork when are just as guilty.

Posted by: Tonya | March 14, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Hmmmm. “North Pacific fisheries programs”? Isn’t Mr. Palin a commercial fisherman?

Posted by: eddie | March 14, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

First: Good of you to report this, Jake.
Second: John McCain doesn’t request earmarks because he goes directly to the agencies involved and gets them to put the money for projects he wants into their budgets instead of into the national budget. He just strong-arms people for it, in other words.
Besides amounting to a miniscule part of the budget, earmarks are useful and usefully done because they are out there for everyone to see, whereas McCain’s method is hushed up – it’s pure hypocrisy for him to complain about earmarks when he gets the money under the table with no accountability.
The other thing about earmarks is that they are not extra, added expenditures, they are simply directions that generalized appropriations, say $xx out of the total budget of $xxxmillion for education, be spent specifically for some particular project, e.g., $xx of the education budget for xyz educational program at abc state university. They are not extra money, they are simply special instructions for how broadly budgeted money is to be spent. If it doesn’t go to those “earmarked” programs, it’s not like the money will be saved, it will just go somewhere else.
A final note: SP is no doubt cutting back on her state’s expenditures and her earmark requests at the expense of her poorest and most needy constituents, and/or has taken a lesson from McCain in finding less transparent ways of getting the same cash.

Posted by: propitiousmoment | March 14, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Bill! Bill!
We liked you SO much better on KTUU news hour. Sigh!

Posted by: cat | March 14, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

PattiB you need to check yourself. President did not say he would end earmarks that would be your man and woman McCain and Palin.
President Obama said he would reform the earmark process.
Get your facts straight.

Posted by: Yurdelite | March 14, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

To all those Palin supporters complaining that the article didnt list other governors earmarks, the point is that during the campaign Palin said she was against earmarks and agreed with McCains call to cut all earmarks. As far as saying that Obama said he was against all earmarks, he never said that. Obama said he would reform the earmark process and reduce wasteful earmarks during the campaign.

Posted by: Kevin | March 14, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Thank you for pointing out the incorrect use of “literally.” We need to hold politicians accountable — including the way they use our language.

Posted by: Andy | March 14, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

–”Alarmed, I asked McAllister how Palin was “literally” injured. Was she okay? Was she infirm?–
That is literally the funniest thing I have read all day!

Posted by: ebruns | March 14, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Boy oh boy!!! I’m from Alaska and all we see Palin do is blame everyone else! She will not be elected AGAIN as governor and has no place on the national scene. Her party isn’t even calling on her!!! Everyone needs to check her out more thoroughly as to her tenure as mayor in Wasilla and her two years as governor. She is unethical!! It amazes me – every time she or her family stick their heads out they get them bashed!!! She has one tough ego that is for sure!

Posted by: Jodie | March 14, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

I was really hoping we had heard the last the female representation of the last President. Her prior legislative history, regionally and then with the state indicated her intent to say one thing and turn right around and do that she had just condemned. Man what group does that sound like?

Posted by: Tom Blackmon | March 14, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

I HATE Palin… but… YOU blew it. You quoted her stance – and YOUR “point” – that she wanted to “champion reform to end the ABUSES of earmark spending in Congress.” ABUSES! Not earmarks completely. That one word means they have a solid leg to stand on and you’ve done a sloppy job.
Like I said, I HATE HATE HATE Palin. But you’ve done a disservice to us all by letting them LEGITIMATELY get away with bashing the media. They’re right on this one and you’re wrong… and you’ve let Palin – a confirmed liar – get the upper hand in this arguement. And that’s bad. Worse… you can’t see that fact.

Posted by: Sam | March 14, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

I don’t care for Sarah Palin and am grateful that she is not “a heartbeat away” from the presidency right now. But you’ve given her the same bad rap that the corporate media has been giving President Obama, who also has been accused of breaking his word on a promise to end earmarks that he never made. This is equally unfair to both of these people. Why is it that it’s so difficult for news people to get their facts straight? Isn’t it their job?

Posted by: Len | March 14, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

I recall the campaign and she made her bed saying how she turned down federal money. And then it turns out she didn’t. Now again she rants about earmarks while still taking the money that can benefit her state. It’s doublespeak. It’s Orwellian.

Posted by: Robert Rundbaken | March 14, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

you just quoted her saying earmark ABUSES, but yet you stand by your reporting… I can’t believe how sloppy journalism has become. Gosh.

Posted by: Marcus | March 14, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

PP: You are right on about the Palin and earmarks. As an Alaskan I can say that Gov Winky is feeling a lot of heat for any number of botched Palinisms.
One notable exception: please don’t knock money for research and managing our fisheries. The seafood industry is the #1 employer in AK and generates revenues second only to Big Oil.
Thanks for keeping your eye on GINO (gov in name only).

Posted by: EatWildFish | March 14, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Sarah couldn’t have been too grievously injured by the blog post, she didn’t turn loose her attack ferret Meg Stapelton.

Posted by: Barry from Alaska | March 14, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Palin says she’s pro-Life and she just appointed a pro-Choice judge in Alaska this week. She says she’s against earmarks and yet she takes millions. Doesn’t anyone in the GOP care about ideological consistency? Can’t you see that Palin is playing you all?

Posted by: Lulu | March 14, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Your article is typical of drive by media who unethically attempt to down Sarah Palin and distract from the real news worthy issues. For example let’s look at Saranomics, While Obama is spending trillions and our economy is worsening, Sarah showed maturity and economic leadership with the funds of the largest State Budget in the USA. When oil was selling at $140.00 plus a barrel she created a budget based on $64. Democrats in Alaska were outraged and demanded she spend all the money. Liberal media talk radio condemned her. Not to buckle under to liberal bashing and misinformation, She instead held it in reserve explaining that oil would not stay in that price range. Oil now selling at $30-$40 a barrel; Sarah’s far sightedness and fiscal frugality paid off. Alaska currently has billions in reserve and Alaska’s state coffers can ride out the recession for up to three years with out budget cuts or taxes(the lowest in the nation) being raised.
Additionally, she is currently working on Alaska’s own stimulus plan to help people with heating and other costs during this recession. However, do the media cover this good stuff? No! They only attempt to dig up the dirt. However it seems one truth is emerging in media circles. It seems that Sarah is emerging as a Teflon politician, and the media cannot hurt her and her popularity is growing world wide! Perhaps that is what is scaring the extremist media to death. Every story you throw out gains her more support! 2012 is looking good for republicans every day! And as Paul Harvey would say, “now you know the rest of the story”

Posted by: Roger Batson | March 14, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Sorry Marcus, one is either for earmarks or not. One politician’s useful earmarking is another’s pork. That’s why I credit McCain for his integrity (requesting ZERO earmarks), nonsensical as that may seem. Fact is, Palin is a HYPOCRITE.
McCain is the king of GIMMICKS. His crusade against ANY Earmarking whatsoever,and his claim during the campaign to combat the National Debt by vetoing EVERY earmark and imposing a Spending Freeze are just as nonsensical as the great idea of Joe the NON-plumber.

Posted by: Pro America Parts | March 14, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Jake Tapper – finally a reporter that actually reports the facts and doesn’t back down or apologize for those facts. Memo to Palin – can you see America from your house?

Posted by: Greytdog Δ | March 14, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

The issue of earmarks has been completely overblown by the media, including ABC news, thanks in large part to my state’s senator John McCain. As everyone should know by now, some earmarks are good, some are bad, but all told they represent less than 2% of the federal budget. There are many bigger fish to fry including multi-billion dollar weapon systems that were designed for the Cold War and now are just welfare projects for defense contractors.
It’s not often that I agree with Gov. Palin, but she is right in that the earmark process needs reform, but there is nothing inherently wrong with earmarks themselves. They are, after all, merely a process of directing spending to specific projects that has been allocated in the budget bill. Some of this spending is mis-directed to wasteful programs that would be better allocated by the responsible federal agencies. In other cases, probably the vast majority, the specific allocations are completelu appropriate.

Posted by: Mike M | March 14, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

The Congress is also a part of Government and they are elected to work for their constituents. Earmarking is a process that empowers them to achieve direct, specific results for their constituents.
Should the process be reformed? YOU BETCHA! But is every piece of earmark an abuse. Hell no! That’s why the POTUS ran on REFORMING the process and on reducing the total amount. McCain & Palin, on the other hand, ran on vetoing EVERY SINGLE BILL that contains ANY earmark. That was cheap nonsensical talk. Now, Palin finds herself in a dilemma when it comes to walking the talk. As for McCain, I can only say: “Poor Arizona!”

Posted by: Pro America Parts | March 14, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

The Federal budget is supposed to help individual states with certain things such as infrastructure.
If any of you all don’t believe that, then I guess you avoid driving on Federally-funded highways.
If a Democratic governor wanted millions for something like bridge repair, building new schools and hospitals, etc. I would have no problem with that. But one would hope that the individual states would look to ways of financing such things themselves first.
None of these earmarks of Palin’s sound unreasonable. However, I do believe that appropriations should be done with oversight and not just thrown in with other spending bills…thus I am fundamentally against earmarks.

Posted by: RR GOP | March 14, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

should “not” be done without oversight

Posted by: RR GOP | March 14, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Why is attention given to this woman. Leave her to a fringe subset of the GOP, and watch her disappear from the national stage.

Posted by: mallam | March 14, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

What Sarah says and what sarah does are two entirely different things…like the bridge to nowhere (thanks for the money, no thanks to the bridge) and the palin’s “do as we say, not as we do” family values. Why is anyone surprised by the earmark issue?

Posted by: karen | March 14, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Wow. Jake Tapper is taking on a Republican. Never thought I’d see the day. Jake, your fans don’t seem too happy. Best you go back to Obama and Dem bashing. You’re so much better at that.

Posted by: Jymn | March 14, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Karen, you are absolutely right!

Posted by: Pro America Parts | March 14, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

I suppose that your muckraking now excuses ABC’s “Path to 9/11″ before.
I’m not buying any of it until you expose the elephant in the room: corporate bribery, sanctioned as “campaign contributions,” “bundled money” and the rest of the legal gibberish that buys influence and votes against the public interest. Nonsense parsing of these silly distractions. Utter pap.
MEAT, Jake…get to the meat of the public interest issue and stop the nonsense.

Posted by: John Ullmann | March 14, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Methinks she doth protest too much. What a hypocrite.
Excellent job, Tapper.
On another note though, this whole earmark thing is totally overblown. It’s all just a fevered peeve of grampa McCain’s. I say we should send Alaska all of the earmarks they request, and more. Lord knows they need it. That place is great to visit but can be HELLISH to live in – why do you think they’re cooking so much meth, getting teenagers knocked up, and drinking sterno?
Earmarks are not inherently bad, and Obama never said he’d abolish them. As Ron Paul says, we should be doing MORE earmarking and not less. Done right, there’s accountability.
For example, we were able to get worked up about that Alaskan bridge because of the specifics of the project. Hundreds of times more money has been wasted in Iraq on things we will never know about.

Posted by: Tungsten | March 14, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I find it interesting that on the few occasions the main stream media actually does its job and points out the hypocrisy of the right wing in this country, they are attacked as the “liberal media.” Facts are liberal ideas I guess.
Mr. Tapper, along with most of the Washington press corp, went along to get along during the last administration. It wasn’t until the last few years of the Bush debacle that Tapper began to ask questions. By then, it was too late. As usual, now that the Democrats have retaken the congress and White House, the press corp has started the gotcha game with Obama. Unlike most Republicans, I actually want the press to do their jobs and point out the inadequacies of the Democrats who are in power–when called for. However, I am so tired of watching the press line up to prove that they’re not liberal by attacking Obama for anything and everything.
Thus, when I read something like Tapper’s take on Palin, I’m not impressed. He’s spent the last month finding all the different ways Obama has not lived up to his campaign promises–i.e., gotcha journalism–even when the examples have been ridiculous. Tapper is as afraid as everyone else in the Washington media to point out the absolute hypocrisy of McCain and the other Republicans remaining in congress because he doesn’t want to antagonize them and lose “access.” Palin’s in Alaska, so she’s an easy way for him to then say see…I am objective…yeah right.

Posted by: Miz in Portland | March 14, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Welcome back real news reporting, I missed you..Good article..

Posted by: bay | March 14, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Chuck TX:
Obama never vowed to end earmarks. That’s just another right wing talking point. That is to say, a lie.
In fact, during the campaign he justly chided McCain for his obsession with earmarks, in this case around 1% of the budget. But of course, we can’t expect honesty from the right wingers.

Posted by: Tungsten | March 14, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Kudos, Tapper.
Nice touch on the “literally,” too!

Posted by: shelleydee | March 14, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Funny how Palin dispensed an aid to do her dirty work. She’s a crook. End of discussion. D.

Posted by: David G. | March 14, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

“Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., requests no earmarks.”
That’s right. He has a cute little trick for that. He lets the other conservative Republican senator from Arizona, Mr. Kyl, fill Arizona’s goodie bag for him, to the tune of about $200 million.

Posted by: wcf | March 14, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

“That’s right. He has a cute little trick for that. He lets the other conservative Republican senator from Arizona, Mr. Kyl, fill Arizona’s goodie bag for him, to the tune of about $200 million.”
That’s great! So it seems everyone has their hand in the forbidden cookie jar one way or another.

Posted by: Skip | March 14, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Open up the dictionary….turn to the word “hypocrite”….see Sarah Palin’s photo……

Posted by: Jeff | March 14, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

“I told them thanks, but no thanks, for that bridge to nowhere . . . .”
Poooor Sarah, yes she did make a big deal out of it.

Posted by: FedUp | March 14, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Governor Palin has become an expert in excuses, responsible for nothing and misquoted or a victim of the press for everything else.
Anyone who considers her a person of substance is delusional or cannot tell the difference between beer and champaign.
The notion that a governor from the 47th least populated state, with no budget based on its own tax base or experience dealing with all of those issues is qualified to govern is naive.
She is a light weight except in the looks department where she is highly attractive.

Posted by: geek | March 14, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

The republicans isn’t slick, they are trying to knock Palin out of the running for 2012 because she is the one that their base wants and they know they will lose with Palin because everyone else don’t like her and they need more then the base to win 2012.

Posted by: Tabbyj | March 14, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Palin is the very definition of “hypocrite” in many areas, both personal and public.

Posted by: Karen Hudson | March 14, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

smells like the dimwit palin’s been makin’ bacon again.

Posted by: oink | March 14, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Governor Palin: You are a cheap political hack, dressed up in $300,000 worth of clothes that you stole from GOP donors. You pal around with drug dealers who are related to your future son-in-law, and pregnant unmarried teenagers. On top of all that, you are married to a mullet-head. You lied about the Bridge to Nowhere, you lie about earmnarks. But we love you anyway because you are the leader of the Republican Party. Next to you every other Republican politician looks like a rabid chipmunk on crank. God bless you.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | March 14, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

sarah palin does a wonderful job of screwing herself into the ground every time she opens that dumb mouth of hers.
she’s been exposed over the past year, and it just eats her up.

Posted by: yabetcha | March 14, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Palin = HYPOCRITE
Palin = HYPOCRITE
Palin = HYPOCRITE
Palin = HYPOCRITE
Palin = HYPOCRITE
Palin = HYPOCRITE
Palin = HYPOCRITE

Posted by: jen | March 14, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

the republicans thinks that palin is a “breath of fresh air” for the republican party.
i think her “air” is about as fresh as a house full of 12 people on chili night.

Posted by: P.U. | March 14, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Sarah who?
Reaganismus is dead.

Posted by: Jerry | March 15, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Why is she still news? Or for that matter, why do we still have to hear way too much about McCain. Their election party is over and it looks like their political party is too.

Posted by: bhciapol | March 15, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

You are all getting a lot of milage out of this Sarah Palin thing. Someone on here mentioned that Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski may be running for President in 2012. Well, if you think Sarah Palin is a lightweight and great sport to go after, wait ’til you get a lode of Lisa Murkowski. Remember, that bridge-to-nowhere Sarah said “No Thanks” to? It’s planned to provide access to Murkowski’s family property. So far, over $65 million has been spent on that project, and what’s more? it continues to this day.

Posted by: ccairnes | March 15, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

We want the NEWS not politics so thanks. These guys are not “above the truth” so keep it coming.

Posted by: ashabot | March 15, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

As I predicted, Obama is stuck with what he can get out of Congress.

Posted by: BlueAmberol | March 15, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Don’t back down one bit Jake. You keep ‘em honest. The more they cry the more you know your on to the truth.

Posted by: Jason | March 15, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

If only McCain and Palin were in the White House right now.
We would have America back.
Let’s take it back in 2010 and 2012!!!
lolololololololololololololololololol
Dumb and Dumber…

Posted by: Realist | March 15, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

“The headline doesn’t seem very dignified for a major news organization,” said the spokesman for the governor.
We’re talking about “You Betcha” Palin here. God forbid anyone should write an undignified headline about her.
PALIN FOR PREZ . . . or something

Posted by: Musk | March 15, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

It boggles my mind that any sane person could possible think that Sarah Palin has what it takes to be President of the United States. But, then again, I thought the same thing about Dubya.
Mr. Tapper, a hat tip to you Sir.

Posted by: Realist | March 15, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Good Lord. When will Repubs just give up and stop claiming to be things that they aren’t? Palin, a fiscal conservative? Please. Nice to know, though, that she’s still after the “gotcha media”–it let’s us all know that her propensity towards censorship is still alive and well.
Well done, Jake.

Posted by: Jade | March 15, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Is it possible that Senator McCain has forgotten that ending all earmarks was his campaign obsession, and not a campaign promise from then candidate Obama?
Apparently, Senator McCain’s memory acuity problems have infected the rest of the Republican leadership as well.
Of course, they’ve already forgotten that this deep recession was a Republican gift to the country along with out-of-control spending on everything but the American people.

Posted by: Wally Hayman | March 15, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Pwned.

Posted by: IH | March 15, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Republicans are not against earmarks per say. Some like Ron Paul believes there should be more earmarks and the stimulus package should all be earmarked so that everyone knows where the money is being spent.
If I lived in Alaska I would want Palin to get every earmark she could for Alaska. As the Governor it is her job to get those earmarks. Kudos to her for serving the people of Alaska.
As part President I would want to stop the spending allocated for those earmarks but not for earmarks themselves per say. But then again she is not President is she. She is however the Governor of Alaska and should act for the people of Alaska.
Now, this is a lot of noise for something that is dwarfed by the stimulus package, such that the earmarks are irrelevant. There are earmarks coming for the next 50 years that will not touch even one of the stimulus packages.
If someone wants to point out how Palin decided to go against the voice of the American people and tacitly supported the Bush bailouts. Hey that is fair game and I would love to see that.
But this earmark thing is silly.

Posted by: sms | March 15, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am

A recent poll shows that 61% of Republicans and 100% of Democrats hope Sarah Palin runs for President in 2012.

Posted by: Evan | March 15, 2009, 2:05 am 2:05 am

It’s amusing to watch Republicans who should have been humbled in the previous two elections lash out at the media as if the masses are still behind them. Sarah Palin is a joke as is her staff’s defense of her utter hypocrisy in the above article.

Posted by: Steve O | March 15, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am

When is this woman going to learn that she cant just scream about crap and not get called on it.
Shes Single A baseball player trying to handle a Major League Pitcher.

Posted by: hdtv information | March 15, 2009, 2:37 am 2:37 am

“A recent poll shows that 61% of Republicans and 100% of Democrats hope Sarah Palin runs for President in 2012.”
HAHAHAH Agreed. Let her try to play ball with Barack.
A debate between those two would be comic gold.
“Um like you tried to do like socialism and you know terrorists so how can you know about saving the middle class america, as such”

Posted by: hdtv information | March 15, 2009, 2:41 am 2:41 am

With each passing day, it is becoming evident to anyone with half a brain who can get one eye open, that out of the final four top candidates in the 2008 presidential election (Obama, Biden, McCain, Palin), only Sarah Palin had the experience, the know-how, the integrity and the guts to assume the office of the presidency.
Obama proves by the day how jaw-droppingly inexperienced he is to be in the top position. Our enemies have already sensed this weakness, and are closing in:
Putin and Medvedev told him off publicly….
We’ve lost our military base in Azherbaijan….
Cuba and Venezuela have invited Russia to set up bases in their countries….
Ahmadinejad is laughing at his offer to “talk”, as he screws the warhead onto his missile….
North Korea is ready to fire off missiles…
Hugo Chavez wants Obama to join him in Socialism….
Obama wants to open up trade and travel with Cuba, never mind that 10 presidents before him have had the good sense to shun this Communist regime that murders its own people…..
China is chiding Obama for spending at a time when we owe them trillions of dollars….
China is harassing our naval ships in the South China Sea, even though they are in International waters…..
Obama has mistreated and insulted Gordon Brown, our staunchest ally and closest friend…..
Obama couldn’t get our friend and neighbor Canada to deploy more of their troops to Afghanistan, even when he had NAFTA to use as a bargaining chip (which he didn’t bother to use)….
Do I need to go into the “stimulus” package, which won’t stimulate a thing?….
The earmarks in the latest pork bill that he lied about and signed off on in private?….
The tax cheater he insisted we MUST have as Treasury secretary, and has since proven to be an inept fool?….
His abominable picks for his cabinet, some of whom had to back out due to “tax issues”?…..
The lobbyists he hired, after he told us he wouldn’t?….
His closing down of Gitmo, with NO PLAN for where these hardened terrorists are going to go?…..
The gaffe with Pakistan?….
The cap and trade rule which will only serve to drive away or kill business and jobs?…..
The sinking stock market, due to his continued lack of confidence and lack of coherent economic plans?….
How about 3 months from now, when unemployment is higher, we’re deeper in debt and closer to an attack by one of our increasing number of enemies?
NOW how good does a Palin administration sound?
Yet ABC continues this tired, yawn-inducing attack on Sarah Palin, trying to discredit her in any way possible, in a lame attempt to try to distract the public from the powder keg in the room that is Obama and his minions.
Get a SPINE, ABC. Why don’t you be different for once, and break from the herd of all the other elitist, liberal media clones and start reporting some REAL news, like the denigration of our country at the hands of a completely inept BUFFOON?
Why are you wasting your time going after every little thing the governor of Alaska says and does, when Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Geithner and the rest of the crooks are running this country into oblivion?
Are you SO AFRAID of the public’s favorable response to Sarah Palin that you have to run stories about her which try to harm her reputation?
Does she scare you that much, ABC and Jake Tapper?
Do you REALLY think she’s that big of a threat to Obama’s re-election chances in 2012? You must, or you wouldn’t be running these stories about her.
It’s kind of like Obama picking on Rush Limbaugh. Why would the president of the United States fear a radio talk show host? WHY?….
Why would a flailing, journalistically bankrupt media outlet that’s hemmorhaging money waste it’s time and resources with the governor of Alaska? WHY?….

Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | March 15, 2009, 2:52 am 2:52 am

What bothers me more than any thing about Palin is the fact she she holds a degree in JOURNALISM, of all things, yet she can’t seem to form a coherent sentence. Her interviews and WELL rehearsed “debate” were pure comedy. Whatever college she attended, should have their accreditation revoked.

Posted by: Jamie from SC | March 15, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

“Her former running mate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., requests no earmarks.
That’s a fiscally conservative position.”
Is it? Is it fiscally responsible to avoid all earmarks, or is it just irrational? I suppose that’s what conservative and liberal are, though, smokescreens of irrationality.
I think the problem between Palin and ABC here is that they’re quibbling over a phantom – the definition of conservative, particularly “fiscal” conservative.

Posted by: Justin Ayers | March 15, 2009, 3:16 am 3:16 am

John McCain and his partner in crime Kyl have a lovely little scam running in AZ.
McCain requests no earmarks and rails against them as if they mean the end of western civilization and the crucifixion of Jesus Christ all rolled up in a thermonuclear bomb.
His fellow Senator from Kyl requests all of AZ’s earmarks.
Then they both vote against the spending bill, go home and campaign against the horrible corrupt broken system in Washington while celebrating the goodies Kyl brought home to AZ.
Hypocrites.

Posted by: Allan | March 15, 2009, 3:26 am 3:26 am

It’s funny that any politician is singled out and condemned for hypocrisy and self-contradiction. You become a politician, those merge with your DNA. Honestly expecting to see politics without those? How about I interest you in a bridge, in Alaska? Or investing in subprime mortgages, maybe?

Posted by: mek | March 15, 2009, 3:57 am 3:57 am

I personally think earmarks have long been “stimulus” packages– they offer jobs to millions of workers in construction, science, universities, field workers, farmers, etcc.. I am an Alaskan and not a Sarah supporter, yet when ever people from one locality or mindset challenge another’s “earmarks” it is such a simple one-liner for headlines: case in point: the pig manure issues are a huge problem in SE and midwest states were huge factory pork farms produce huge, unhealthy manure lagoons. They go into small towns, sell the town on their factories, and then make the town virtually uninhabitable. Likewise, the North Pacific Fishery in Alaska is the largest by tonnage in the world, yet there are ominous problems happening with the fish and crab populations. You can’t have your fishwich, Mr. ABC New Yorker, without them. Bootlegging into “dry” native villages is huge problem- the villages have massive problems (way over any state’s averages except maybe indian reservation).. suicides, rapes, and murders in towns that your viewers woudl think are in a 3rd world country and are only intermintently accessible to law enforcement by air..

Posted by: AKRBT | March 15, 2009, 4:00 am 4:00 am

Go, Jake, Go!

Posted by: SouthEnder | March 15, 2009, 5:12 am 5:12 am

Why a state governor has input on a missle defense facility mystifys me.

Posted by: gevan | March 15, 2009, 5:48 am 5:48 am

Eh… I am as liberal as they come and absolutely NOT a fan of Palin’s, but it seems to me that reason – this time at least – is on her side. If she never said earmarks needed to be abolished or that she wouldn’t accept any – only that they needed to be reduced, well, it sounds like that’s what she’s doing. This isn’t reporting, Tapper, it’s snarking.
“Alarmed, I asked McAllister how Palin was “literally” injured. Was she okay? Was she infirm?”
C’mon… how childish can you get?

Posted by: Karenlee | March 15, 2009, 5:51 am 5:51 am

Memo to Mr. McAllister: Can you say, “tapdance.”

Posted by: William H | March 15, 2009, 6:26 am 6:26 am

Ear marks? Is that as in pig ear marks? I thought the term was pork barrel, which sounds more truthful than ear marks.

Posted by: BRYANT BETSILL | March 15, 2009, 6:28 am 6:28 am

The media, TV and the talk show host handled the financial melt down the same as they handled Bush’s run up to the Iraq war, they bought into the lies “hook line and sinker” and it is taking a comedian to bring the issues to the fore front. This is what happens when we allow a few individuals and corporations to own the majority to the media facilities.

Posted by: George Bell | March 15, 2009, 6:51 am 6:51 am

TO JAMIE FROM SOUTH CAROLINA PUT DOWN THE KOOL-AID AS FAR AS SARA PALIN IS CONCERNED STOP THINKING WITH THAT 3RD LEG ITS NOT WORKING GO BACK TO BED RIGHT NOW

Posted by: RENO | March 15, 2009, 7:03 am 7:03 am

McCain can not request earmarks because of his dealings with the Keating 5.

Posted by: Dave | March 15, 2009, 7:32 am 7:32 am

“Republicans are only against the earmarks that they aren’t personally benefitting from, or if they have been requested by a member of the Democratic party.”
Truth Matters, you hit the nail on the head. I could not of said it any better then you just did.

Posted by: jRa | March 15, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Governor Palin IS a hypocrite.
Her most famous statement on earmarks was that she refused the “Bridge to Nowhere,” when of course, it was reported far and wide, she went on to keep all the money, till this little hypocrisy was brought to light.
The speed of her spokesman’s reaction just shows how devoted she is to running again, and how much she misses the adulation of the fascist no-nothings on the right.

Posted by: Richard Green | March 15, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am

can someone please explain to me who in the entire state is supposed to request funding to boost job, infrastructure and so on to benefit us the tax payers? Not members of congress and not governors?

Posted by: michelle | March 15, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am

One state received more earmarks $$’s per person than any other state. Care to guess which one? Yup, Alaska.
Palin is still the joke that she was last year.

Posted by: Jeannie | March 15, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Earmarks or pork whatever you want to call it helps their states. I have no problem with them getting it. I do have a problem with people lying about it. Its no shame to bring the bacon home to your states. But I do hate it when a congressman says I want pork for my district yet when they come to vote on it than say no. Knowing full well they are going to get the pork they want yet can say I didn’t vote for it. That is what I hate. Just be honest about it. The party of no had 22 of 28 that voted no yet all requested pork and are getting it. I say if you want the pork for your state don’t be ashamed to ask for it. One’s states pork is another states waste. No one is happy. They are all phonies no matter congress or governors of states. Don’t blame the messenger.

Posted by: southern yankee | March 15, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

How can we miss this bimbo if she WON’T GO AWAY…..!!!!

Posted by: SearamblerOne | March 15, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

I love Republicans.
It is never their fault for anything, their wrong doings will be on Video Recordings and they will stand in front of the whole World and say well I said it or did it but you know,it was the Liberals fault, it was the Liberal Media’s fault, it was the Liberal Voters’ fault and for that matter it was my Liberal Mother’s fault.
Check it out, every Republican reads from the same Playbook, which says blame everybody else for your incompetence.
Way to go guys, great Conservative Roll Models you are.

Posted by: kandlefly | March 15, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I love all the “gotcha” comments that our Conservative friends produce. Reliably replicating the talking points that Rush and Bill give them, they stream to the big, bad liberal media like lemmings to the cliff. Here we have to read their nonsense, empty words between regurgitated catch phrases. “Your gotcha comments are hurting America”! Here, in the online forum, they are safe, they can escape confrontation and intellectual exchange like they escape the real world. I just want to pet them on the head, our foxy friends…

Posted by: Friese | March 15, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Poor, poor, pitiful Sarah.

Posted by: ericmiami | March 15, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Palin rocks!
at least she doesnt go out and make a grand stand speech about “no lobbyist will work for my administration, i will veto all earmarks that cross my desk”, yep that’s Obammy.

Posted by: jaj | March 15, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

HEY REPUBS….
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEEEASE PUT THIS WOMAN ON THE TICKET IN 2012. EVERY DEMOCRAT I KNOW WANTS THIS MORON TO BE THE “FUTURE” OF THE GOP !!!!!
…..”you betcha”….”ya know”…….”gosh darnit”…

Posted by: John McNugget | March 15, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Palin rocks!
at least she doesnt go out and make a grand stand speech about “no lobbyist will work for my administration, i will veto all earmarks that cross my desk”, yep that’s Obammy.
Posted by: jaj
=========================
no she just goes to a farm to pardon a turkey while another one is being SLAUGHTERED right behind her.
this woman is an idiot.

Posted by: rudy | March 15, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Elly Mae Palin’s recent brain flatulant is
to build a road to NOME. Take a look at a
map… there’s NOTHING in NOME. No industry, no pop. to speak of. Building a
road in that extreme environment would be
costly, and require constant expensive maintenance. And this is in a state where we have recently had two charities
from the lower 48 deliver food to some of our villages.
Her political career in AK is over. We’re wild and crazy up here… but not
stooopid.

Posted by: lkh in AK | March 15, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Palin is a complete fraud, just like every other Republican!

Posted by: Thomas Mc | March 15, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Tell McAllister to go back home. Sarah Palin has lied and lied, again and again. Her whole political public service history reveal a lady that says one thing, then changes mind, and then says she was never for. Never admits she is ever wrong. Just claims publicly all who correct what she said initially are wrong and are attacking her. She then usually claims attacks on these individuals or organizations. She has left so many dead bodies all across Alaska as she has risen to political stardom. I was so excited when she was chosen. As I intensely researched her activities/record, Alaska government, etc. became quite alarmed. She and her husband carry huge underground vendettas against people in Alaska who oppose them. I found lots of information prior to John McCain group entering Alaska to clean house. After McCain group arrived total shutdown occurred. Lots of games are being played up there.
Wow, Alaska is really state full of corrupt politicians. FBI has been there since 2004. FBI is agency that should be given the credit for cleaning house, not Sarah Palin. FBI was acting alone. Alaska government was actual body being investigated, and were left out of any involvement. Sarah Palin deserves no credit for cleaning up Alaska. Just another statement lie. Can all be argued down quite easily with real facts. Facts are it was FBI. All in the records!!!
I am Republican and what I found out was outrageous. Poor people of Alaska need to be more informed and involved. How can a state of 267,000 have at least 10 politicians indicted. All were Republicans except for one. Oil Company executives indicted as well.
Please stop reporting on Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Sharon | March 15, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

We really need to stop giving so much credit to washed up policy debaters who are all about winning a verbal argument regaurdless of real worl impacts.

Posted by: jes | March 15, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

AGAIN, “The governor never said that earmarks should be abolished or that the State of Alaska wouldn’t seek or accept any. Didn’t happen. What she said well before she was a national candidate (going back at least to October of 2007) was that earmark reform was necessary and the state would need to rely less on federal money than it had been.” as quosted by her communication director, Bill McAllister.

Posted by: DAVY D HOBSON | March 15, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Sarah Palin is a….
“Hollow, Floating Bubble”

Posted by: O. | March 15, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Now just Imagine Palin on Stage Debating with….
Tex Governor, Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Charlie Crist, Lisa Murkowski, Kay B. Hutchison and Tim Pawlenty….
You Thought Last Year’s Saturday Night Live Skits were Funny…
It would be Hysterical !!!
Palin is a “Hollow Floating Bubble”

Posted by: O. | March 15, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

1. Sarah Palin would’ve Never Pursued an FBI Investigation of Alaskan Senator Ted Stevens. So we know Palin had Absolutely Nothing to do with…
“Getting Rid Of the Corrupt Policies and Politicians in Alaska”
2. Sarah Palin would’ve Pardoned Ted Stevens of the Federal Crimes he’s Convicted of, had she not been Running for Vice President of the USA.
3. Sarah Palin could STILL Pardon Ted Stevens, if she Loses her 2010 Re-Election for a 2nd Term as Alaska’s Governor…
Keep that in mind
4. Sarah Palin has a BIG CONNECTION to Ted Stevens, that is why she Remains Silent on the Ted Stevens Conviction or Harshly Criticizing Stevens as a Corrupt and Evil Alaskan Politician.
5. She had Better not Speak Ill of Ted Stevens.
Who Knows…
Maybe the FBI, who Convicted Stevens, has Major information on Palin’s Dealings, through Ted Stevens, Steven’s Family Members or his Associates ?
Stay Tuned….
Todd Palin is the …
[[Silent Governor]]
The
[[Shadow Governor]]

Posted by: O. | March 15, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Palin v. Political Punch
Jake be careful with Sarah Palin remember she sees herself as a pit bull with lipstick. I don’t want you to get hurt.

Posted by: Save Tapper from Palin | March 15, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Sarah Palin just bit Jake Trapper?
Jake we need you in the White House as a reporter. Next time Sarah attempts to bit you throw a rock at her from a distance pit bulls with lipstick will hesitate giving you time to escape.
A favorite quote for Jake – He Who Hesitate Is Lost
Tapper don’t let Sarah bite you again!!!

Posted by: John John | March 15, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

The Alaskan Governorship Consist of the Following…
1. The Packaged & Labeled Governor [Sarah Palin]
2. The Shadow Governor [Todd Palin]
3. The Silent Governor [[BP Oil]]
Note: Todd Palin’s Employer is BP Oil…
The “1st Dude” Todd Palin, Frequents the Governor’s Office, Control’s and Influences Alaska’s Oil Policies, via Sarah Palin.
Keep in mind, Sarah Palin did a Ton of Work form her [[HOME]] not the Governor’s Mansion.
Keep that in mind.

Posted by: O. | March 15, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Don’t praise John Mccain not getting ear marks to quickly. As he rely’s on his other sources in Arizona to bring home the bacon. That way he can keep his hands clean, while others draw in the pork for the state. They need some of what they call pork for the states,but it needs to be a worthy cause/program and not just PORK!

Posted by: jupitor | March 15, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Why are you still giving this woman free publicity? She is like a dry sponge…she waits for any news org to write about her and then she, or her minions, pounce..Ignore her and she goes away. She has been outed as a liar, a spin artist, and I truly hope the Repubs run her for potus in 2012. She will be annihilated along with Bobby Jindal the elevator operator.

Posted by: The Cp29 | March 15, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

@ Bill
I don’t know how often you read Political Punch, but Jake Tapper never treats President Obama with kid gloves in any of his articles. Jake Tapper asks tough questions (mostly fair questions) and has comments(sometimes a little sarcastic) about almost everything President Obama does or says. I have questioned a few times if President Obama has done something personally to Jake Tapper after reading a few of his articles. But, for the most part, Jake is very professional and unbiased. I think he is one of the best out there.
independent viewer/reader

Posted by: dz | March 15, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Jake: RUN OUT AND GET YOUR RABIES SHOT – THAT PITBULL IN LIPSTICK IS ARMED AND DANGEROUS!
She’s addicted to the spotlight – this has nothing to do with you.

Posted by: Xango_Xango | March 15, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

I love Gov. Palin! I cannot imagine how much better our country would be today if we had McCain/Palin at the helm instead of…what we have. President Teleprompter and Vice President Oops. America is going to be a Saturday Night Live bad dream for the next long, drawn out 4 years. No reruns, please.

Posted by: djn | March 15, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

The Godliness/Goodness of Sarah Palin reflects to those godless people who despise and viciously attack her. And that’s normal; Jesus was murdered because of His goodness. There is always struggle between the Good and evil and Good always prevail.

Posted by: Ramon L. Sagrado | March 15, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Palin’s comet, still barely visible but fading away rapidly.

Posted by: BMCC | March 15, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Why don’t you do a report on Jack Murtha and all of his Earmarks and PMA? We should have term limits and then people like him wouldn’t exist.

Posted by: katy winters | March 15, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

It’s time for the FBI to step into Alaska and deal with the Palin Gates building around the state. (Before any more starry eyed southerners are encouraged to donate any more money into the SarahPAC bridge to nowhere.) This is a free country, however, so keep on fushing that money away. Sad, Sad Day for Alaskans to see robbery in broad daylight.

Posted by: PalinGate | March 15, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

DJN: Oh Yeah…
Yu want Peace on Earth….
Go to Alaska and let Sarah Palin Lead You.
Its a Government Dolling State and You would Love it…
Go SEE first hand, how Sarah Palin will Govern You.
Go to Heaven On Earth…Alaska

Posted by: O. | March 15, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Sarah Palin is the ….
Peggy Hill of the Klondike !!
Todd Palin is the…
Hank Hill Of the Great Yukon..
Thank God, Fate was kind to America in [2008]]

Posted by: O. | March 15, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

It’s time for the FBI to step into Alaska and deal with the Palins

Posted by: Rhonda Davis | March 16, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Palin is not smart and a hypocrite.

Posted by: jeremy | March 16, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Better get Tina Fey on this right away. Let her have her way with Sarah, she can destroy Palin once and for all with huge ratings on SNL. Just turn the whole dilemna over to Tina and let her make short work of Palin.

Posted by: Gloria | March 16, 2009, 2:13 am 2:13 am

if you dont keep bringing up sarah palin people might start paying attention to what obama is doing.he and pelosi are spending our strong capitalistic country into a socialistic welfare state.palin isnt the one destroying our country.

Posted by: jane gutowski | March 16, 2009, 8:13 am 8:13 am

The worst, fiscal conservative bar none – extreme right wing Republican Gov Sanford of SC. This man is single handedly destroying the economy of South Carolina.

Posted by: Bob | March 16, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Nowadays, I’ve deeply regreted that I supported for Obama. If I knew that 3.55 trillions dollars would be spendthrift by Obama economic team and DNC until 2010, I could not embrace for him at all. So many Americans are trembling the fact that $2.85 of the 3.55 trillions will be printed bills.
Sarah Palin and Gov. Palin’s plan is
right. I can’t await your economic plans in 2012. GO SARAH/2012

Posted by: Sharon-NY | March 16, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Caribou Barbie and her political hack press secretary McAllister are a joke. ABC has it right. She likes to claim she is a fiscal conservative but Alaska gets a free ride off oil wealth. Thank God her and McCain are not in the white house now. What a disaster that would be. McCain would be spending his day planning air strikes on Iran with Israel and Palin would be giving anti abortion speeches, meanwhile the US economy would go down the drain.

Posted by: Paul | March 16, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Why can’t this woman just keep quiet for just a little while, even better just disapear from news coverage? Amazing she is still seeking our attention–like a cry baby or delusional prima donna! One problem with people like Palin is the inability to make correct self-analysis,recognize their own deficincies and their level of intellectual depth. During the last Presidential campaign, judging from all appearances, she must have presumed that she could win simply by a charm offensive in an increasing knowledge-based world. She could not see how inadequate she was for the task ahead in the face of challenge. She couldn’t even recall basic and widely known facts, let alone analyze geopolitical situations. Yet she felt able to picture her self on the world stage discussing and making sense with world leaders on difficult issues in our much more complex world. For ideological Republicans like herself, the problems of the world are much illogically simplified to fit into their trunketted worldvie and they always try to speak to us in the superlatives: their opponents are definitely wrong and they are surely right. We just so the damage such backward thinking can do in the Presidency of George W. Bush. Ironically, Bush failure has not stopped them from still promoting the same solution–e.g., tax cut as the solution to all tax problems; stunch support for expoitative corporatocracy even at the risk of unnecessary foreign wars; attempt to impose personal religious goals upon all as law and public policy. Higher ambition should be made of higher brain matter and intellectual curiosity.

Posted by: Dr. Sam | March 16, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

CORRECTIONS, PLEASE!
Why can’t this woman just keep quiet for just a little while, even better just disapear from news coverage? Amazing she is still seeking our attention–like a cry baby or delusional prima donna! One problem with people like Palin is the inability to make correct self-analysis,recognize their own deficincies and their level of intellectual depth. During the last Presidential campaign, judging from all appearances, she must have presumed that she could win simply by a charm offensive in an increasing knowledge-based world. She could not see how inadequate she was for the task ahead in the face of challenge. She couldn’t even recall basic and widely known facts, let alone analyze geopolitical situations. Yet she felt able to picture her self on the world stage discussing and making sense with world leaders on difficult issues in our much more complex world. For ideological Republicans like herself, the problems of the world are much illogically simplified to fit into their trunketted worldview. They always try to speak to us in the superlatives: their opponents are definitely wrong and they are surely right. We are now painfully reminded in the Presidency of George W. Bush what heavy damage such backward thinking can do to us all here and globally. Ironically, Bush failure has not stopped Republican ideologues from still promoting the same old tried and tested solution–e.g., tax cut as the solution to all tax problems; stunch support for expoitative corporatocracy even at the risk of unnecessary foreign wars; attempt to impose personal religious goals upon all as law and public policy. Higher ambition should be made of higher brain matter and intellectual curiosity.

Posted by: Dr. Sam | March 16, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Palin is a joke and a true lame brain. I never want to hear about her again. Let her stay on FOX and disappear there.

Posted by: Sing | March 9, 2010, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.