POTUS Sends Special Video New Years Greeting to Iranians
President Obama sends videotaped message for the Persian New Year, Nowruz, to Iranians. The message included a subtitled Farsi translation.
"I would like to speak directly to the people and leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran," the president says in the video.
Even in this, there is significance, says Trita Parsi at the National Iranian American Council.
"By using the term "Islamic Republic," Obama is also signaling America’s acceptance of Iran’s revolution," Parsi says. "This does not mean that America will not welcome democratization in Iran, but it does signal that the policy of regime change has been cast aside."
Nowruz celebrates the arrival of Spring and the beginning of a new year, beginning with the vernal equinox. An Obama administration source says that while traditionally, the President and Secretary of State have have released paper statements for Nowruz, President Obama wanted to address the Iranian people and government more directly.
"In this season of new beginnings I would like to speak clearly to Iran’s leaders," the president says. "We have serious differences that have grown over time. My administration is now committed to diplomacy that addresses the full range of issues before us, and to pursuing constructive ties among the United States, Iran and the international community. This process will not be advanced by threats. We seek instead engagement that is honest and grounded in mutual respect."
The United States, the president asserts, "wants the Islamic Republic of Iran to take its rightful place in the community of nations. You have that right — but it comes with real responsibilities, and that place cannot be reached through terror or arms but rather through peaceful actions that demonstrate the true greatness of the Iranian people and civilization."
Parsi says that "Obama is focusing on behavioral change, not regime change," which "is a significant break with the Bush Administration policies."
Through this speech, President Obama expresses "tremendous respect and recognition of the Iranian nation and civilization," Parsi says. "He shows an important understanding of the uniqueness of the Iranian civilization, a point that likely won’t be lost on the Iranians."
Mr. Obama even invokes the poet Saadi, saying, "The children of Adam are limbs to each other, having been created of one essence."
- jpt
UPDATE: Speaking with Reuters, Aliakbar Javanfekr, an aide to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said the Iranian government "welcome(s) the interest of the American government to settle differences. The American government should realize its previous mistakes and make an effort to amend them in order to put aside differences. The Obama administration so far has just talked. By words and talking the … problems between Iran and America can not be solved."
Ingraining the message of Nowruz in his politics as well, Javanfekr said the holiday "is a sign of fundamental development in nature and Obama should learn from this to make fundamental changes in his policy towards Iran. Supporting Israel is not a friendly gesture and the new year is an opportunity for the United States to change this policy."
"By fundamentally changing its behaviour America can offer us a friendly hand," Javanfekr said. "So far what we have received have been unfriendly fists. Unlimited sanctions which still continue and have been renewed by the United States are wrong and need to be reviewed."
In addition, Iran’s energy minister, Parviz Fattah, was quoted in the London Telegraph saying that Iran said that the country would "finish and operate the Bushehr nuclear plant by the end of this year. … Exactly 20 days from now we will have another celebration for celebrating the achievements we have gained for peaceful nuclear energy. You will hear about the news."
Fattah called President Obama’s message "positive … although it might also have negative points in itself as well. The Iranian leaders will precisely assess this message. We believe that we need that in addition to messages we need positive action from Mr Obama as well as from his government. So in addition to talk, we need actions."
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
This is a joke, right?
I have to stop being informed. It’s like a nightmare. This man is an idiot.
Posted by: mjishernameo | March 20, 2009, 8:03 am 8:03 am
POTUS? Oh, you mean TOTUS: “Teleprompter of the United States”. Let’s all hope that Obama had his trusty teleprompter, while fawning to the terrorists who make up Iran’s government. And, let’s all hope that the State Dept. flunkies found a neuron to use in order to check what they scripted for TOTUS. We don’t need any more screw ups from this bunch of clueless Ivy Leaguers. No “reset button” gaffes, or “Special Olympics” gaffes. O and crowd have already done enough damage with their collossal stupidity.
Posted by: JD | March 20, 2009, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Now that is Change.
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Shouldn’t the economy be The One’s number one focus? Not bowing to the Ayatollah or legitimizing Ahmadinejad?
Posted by: BigGator5 | March 20, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am
So much for low level contact first…IDK, I think I’m going to have to stop reading the news until they throw the idiots out of DC…hmmm that would mean I may never read the news again….
Posted by: samhiguchi | March 20, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am
This is a joke, right?
I have to stop being informed. It’s like a nightmare. This man is an idiot.
****************************************
Hmmm……. The right wing of the American Government and the Right Wing of the Iranian Government Thumping each others chest has gone a long way. Real progress has taken place with outstanding results over the last several years. I Just do not understand the need for something different.
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Shouldn’t the economy be The One’s number one focus?
****************************************
Yea let’s ignore the fact that we live in a big world. Let’s just focus please on one issue like war in Iraq or something. That way we can ignore the econonmy. Oh yea we tried that.
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am
word, words, words. All I hear is words. If not him (Mr. Obama), then from you (reporters). Show…. me….! From “My Fair Lady”.
Posted by: Edna Antonian | March 20, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am
Obama is just a front man for Gibbs and Company. I’ll bet that little unscripted bowling gaffe got him in hot water with Gibbs.
Posted by: Gotterdammerung | March 20, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am
To the people calling Obama an idot: Oh right, because he is reaching out and trying diplomacy, he is an idiot? Extending an olive branch is just smart. Bush couldn’t do it because it didn’t fit his narrow redneck cowboy image. If he had they wouldn’t have taken him seriously anyway. Obama is the President and as such has to multitask, something Bush was incapable of. Bush would have already been on vacation. Obama won and is popular, get over it. As for not reading the news anymore, just tune into FOX News, it is the same thing. Obviously looking at all sides of an issue isn’t your idea of smart. If your types were in office during the Cuban missle crisis, we would have nuked Russia and had full blown global thermonuclear war. Critical thinking skills by the Kennedy brothers saved us from that fate. Bush surely would have listened to the military advisors and launched. Buh bye Bush…good riddance.
Posted by: wirey | March 20, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Let’s face it, we are going to be attacked because of this doofus. Someone should tell him that all the world’s not the Oprah Show.
Posted by: dazey | March 20, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am
just more appeasement of our enemy”s. All the while the Iranian pres sits there and says, “obama is weak” and he is right. Didn’t we try appeasement before 9/11? yep, and it always fails.
Posted by: chad | March 20, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am
“Sincerely,
The American Public”
COH – You do NOT speak for “The American Public”, thankfully.
Posted by: Gigi | March 20, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am
This is not the 0bama I thought I knew.
Posted by: TOTUS | March 20, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am
President Obama be careful Iran will twist and use your every word. Thses people have proven they can NOT be trusted. They will take that olive branch make a bomb of it and give it back to you.
Posted by: hkdakota | March 20, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am
This will provide a nice opportunity to determine who’s sufficiently aware to realize that a ‘nation’ is not a single monolithic structure but actually has more than one component. Bypassing leaders and taking your case straight to the people can certainly be regarded as a good move. The people who fail to understand this will be revealing their own ignorance.
Posted by: Paul Dirks | March 20, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Searambler, thats an old tune play something new form the liberal playlist!
Posted by: hkdakota | March 20, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am
He has already basically turned his back on Israel regarding the Palestinian threat and the re-funding of Hamas… as has Billary…
He brings many woes to this nation !!!
Posted by: theregoesthecountry | March 20, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Man you neo-cons are tiresome. We finally have a president smart enough and energetic enough to handle numerous fronts, and you bash him. Nixon and Kissinger courted relations with China. Reagan with the USSR. Now you want to bash Obama for trying to open dialouge with Iran. You are drowing in your stupidity. The GOP is breaking apart, in Washington with zero leadership, and with a dwindling base of negative naysayers like many of you on this site. The world is changing rapidly and instantly, get on board or get out of the way, your ideas and concepts are tired and failing.
Posted by: justlookin09 | March 20, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Diplomacy? Yeah, right. This from the same D’Ohbama who gave British Prime Minister Gordon Brown a “gift” of 25 old DVD’s, in exchange for Brown’s profoundly thoughtful gift of (among other things) a hand carved wood pen made from the timbers of a ship called “The President” which played a role in US/UK relations.
The DVD “gift” is seen as an insult by both the British press, and people. Brown is being gracious about it, but today there are news reports that D’Ohbama gave Brown DVD’s that were regionized to the USA only, and when Brown attempted to play one in Britain the words “Wrong Region” flashed on and were all he got.
So if D’Oh and mob are that stupid with our closest ally, the UK; Lord help us all when this president-on-training-wheels attempts diplomacy with a terrorist nation who WANTS TO KILL US.
Posted by: JD | March 20, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am
Mr Vaughn…. God cannot possibly bless one who tries to force Israel to give away that which was given to them by God himself… as a matter of fact they bring judgement and curses on themself…
Posted by: theregoesthecountry | March 20, 2009, 9:02 am 9:02 am
theregoesthecountry Poisted:
Obama doesn’t even understand who he’s talking to… (…or does he?) Unlike the shallow-faithed Americans these fanatics will stop at nothing to dominate the world with their faith… maybe Mr. sleeper Prez. is showing his true traitor-tinged colors…
***************************************
theregoesthecountry posted:
Mr Vaughn…. God cannot possibly bless one who tries to force Israel to give away that which was given to them by God himself… as a matter of fact they bring judgement and curses on themself…
***************************************
Hmmm……….
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Being Mr. Nice Guy and patronizing the Iranians will not stop them from getting nukes and missiles to deliver them.
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Hugo Chavez ragged on him before he even set foot in the White House. The Russians openly mocked his naiveté. Now he’s off to appease the Iranians. If this is a contest to see how many world leaders he can get to blow him off within his first 100 days, I’d say he’s right on track.
Posted by: Ed | March 20, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am
DIPLOMACY? Why in the hell would we do that? What would our great wartime leader, Geo. W. Bush do? He’d bomb Iran! He wanted a regime CHANGE in Iran, not lame-ass diplomacy. Wake up, America. Time to bomb, bomb, bomb Iran, just like John McCain said. Hee-Hee.
Posted by: Howard Beale | March 20, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am
This man Obama need to stop embracing our enemies and discarding friends and he need to do that today. For those that support this nonsense from Obama let me be clear because I think he and his message is complete nonsense coming from a complete idiot. Have you gotten already what Iran did to our service men, they dragged their bodies thru the streets.
Posted by: Pepper | March 20, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am
after 9-11 attacks Iran let the USA use its territory to find missing servicemen They helped us until the dumb cowboy included them in the axis of evil
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am
“that which you do to the least of my brother’s – you do unto me’ Jesus Christ
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am
It’s interesting reading all those who believe “diplomacy” and “reason” will result in a positive outcome when the adversary executes homosexuals, jails citizens who speak out, call for extermination of an entire race and look to a greater sphere of influence. Sound familiar? Probably not because our education system doesn’t teach history – only diversity. Iran is not any different from all the other fascist regimes we thought we could reason with, like Baathist Iraq, Nazi Germany, or Stalinist Soviet Union.
Another bit of history…30 years ago Iran committed an act of war against the US while a weakling was in the White House powerless to act. 25 years ago, Iran’s surrogates in Lebanon bombed a US installation killing scores of Marines. 20 years ago another US president tried to reestablish back channel communications to “moderates” in Iran. For the last 20 years, Iran has waged a proxy war against the US via hostilities with Israel and its support od terrorism. Now, this Cook County state senator will forgive all that unilaterally and expect Iran to be an honorable partner in negotiations. We will be humiliated again as we were with Carter. “Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it.”
Posted by: tunacantj | March 20, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Isn’t it Great to have a guy with a Head on his shoulders leading this country. After 8 years of bush/cheney, it’s like going from the tee-ball league to the Majors. From the worst of all time to the Best in the Future.
Posted by: pt | March 20, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am
I have just as much confidence in Obama being sucessful negotiating with Iran as I have in the stock market going above 10,000 next week.
Posted by: billy bob | March 20, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Hugo Chavez ragged on him before he even set foot in the White House. The Russians openly mocked his naiveté. Now he’s off to appease the Iranians.
****************************************
Now why would they do that?
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
“I still think that NoBraina would’ve negotiated with Hitler…”
If it was in the best interest of U.S. and world at large? Why not?
You all are seriously all about cutting off your noses to spite your faces. Look at the big picture, kids.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
He gave the right message, the ancient message of peace. Let narrow-minded people ridicule it, let evil ones twist it. Real people got the message and real people want peace. War just benefits the deep pockets of the gun-makers and some evil, greedy politicians on both sides! Real families’ share will be tears. Hail to peace in the world and God bless you, Mr Obama!
Posted by: won't say | March 20, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
pt said: “Isn’t it Great to have a guy with a Head on his shoulders leading this country. After 8 years of bush/cheney, it’s like going from the tee-ball league to the Majors. From the worst of all time to the Best in the Future.”
==============================================================
Hogwash.
A cowardly, naive appeaser is more appropriate.
Posted by: rplat | March 20, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Obama is so infantile and naive. He think that Iranian islamic zealots think like an auto worker in Detroit. His ability to give a speech will have no effect on them. The Iranians will take this as a sign of weakness to be exploited immediately. Having lived and worked in the Middle East, Obama’s behavior will have them planning how to take complete advantage of him because he has now lost all standing as a leader. Obama is just a fool.
Posted by: brian | March 20, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Another bit of history…30 years ago Iran committed an act of war against the US while a weakling was in the White House powerless to act.
****************************************
Tell us why that happened. It wasn’t because the US was supporting a puppet regime in Iran now was it? It wasn’t because the Public, yes that is right the Public IE the People of Iran revolted. Not a Government, but a people revolted against US rule.
Easy to talk big, but how would it have looked if the US took action against a people not a government. Sure we could have deystroyed them, but that is not the point is it?
Yea I can slap around a lot of people to get my way, but I don’t, guess I am just weak.
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
whats more serios World War 3 – which Krauthamer is calling for – or joking about a speech impediment ? So sensitive
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
guy: you might want to look up the following in the dictionary: facetious, hyperbole, sarcasm
Posted by: Howard Beale | March 20, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Newsflash: The cable news channels are reporting that Iran’s government issued a statement telling the world that no one will stop them from developing their nuclear program. Furthermore, the press asked an Iranian government spokesman if they saw the Obama video ‘greeting’. The spokesman said they didn’t pay any attention to it.
This is serious. Search Neville Chaimberlain. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Posted by: JD | March 20, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
brian: the Voice of American routinely broadcasts all kinds of messages to other parts of the globe, including repressive regimes. It is not unusual at all for many of those messages to come from the president. Now all of a sudden in your mind because it is Obama this time, and not every president before him, he is a fool?
Posted by: Howard Beale | March 20, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Iran’s Leadership Ignores Obama Outreach, Says World Powers Cannot Block Nuclear Program. So Much for Obama video
Posted by: Pepper | March 20, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
“McCain is not for you” they said.
Posted by: Mike | March 20, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Reality time. Yes, there is evil in the world.
Posted by: Mike | March 20, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am
This is one of the things that I agree with Obama on.
Posted by: Huh | March 20, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Obama is a serial person that can’t handle two events simultaneously. He has the fiscal condition of this country so screwed up that he simply doesn’t have the time or aptitude to effectively deal with our enemies . . . ergo, pacify and pander to them. Furthermore, his only real objective is to completely transform this once great Republic into a Marxist utopia. Meanwhile his alter ego Pelosi is busy trashing the Constitution on his behalf. Unfortunately, those staunch defenders of the Constitution, the Republicans, are mimicking the three monkeys that see no evil; hear no evil; and speak no evil. In the common vernacular . . . we’re screwed.
Posted by: rplat | March 20, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Amazing, absolutely amazing, that all the experts here would condemn an attempt at diplomacy! And the alternative?
Posted by: EdDoc80 | March 20, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Iran’s Leadership Ignores Obama Outreach, Says World Powers Cannot Block Nuclear Program. So Much for Obama video
****************************************
MY. MY did you really think one video would do the trick?
One day as President, one video, oh my what a failure.
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
See? rplat just made my point for me. LOL
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | March 20, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Los Angeles has a very high percentage of Persian Jewish people- I think maybe the highest number of Persian Jews in the world.
It would have been a great idea while he was in LA to meet with some of them to talk to these Persian Americans before he sent a message to Iran.
Posted by: MayBee | March 20, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
to paraphrase General Norman Schwarzkoff – war is hell and must be a LAST RESORT Try diplomacy first…..then the Europeans etc cant say we didnt try to reason with Imalittlejerk
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
To the knee-jerk reactionists who offer simple “Neville Chamberlin” rants should try to grasp the complexity of Iran and the world before you start typing your 5th-esque sentences. Iranians are set to go to the polls later this year, and this message will help push them towards the reformist candidates that advocate engagement. The benefits of Obama’s outreach will be longterm, as the Iranian people are ready to become part of the world community and engage with the west. Iran is not Na-zi Germany
Posted by: Eric | March 20, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
The video was to the Iranian people as much as it was for Ahmadinejad. Seriously, you all have much to learn about diplomacy. The ignorance some of you display is horrifying.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
The reason we can dismiss the big talk from the right-wing keyboard warriors in regards to more saber-rattling toward Iran is that we know from the conspicuous lack of long lines of them at the Army recruitment centers during the war they ‘supported’ in Iraq that if there is a war with Iran that they aren’t going to be the ones to go fight it.
Posted by: Skip | March 20, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
concerned Sorry to mske fun of his condition it isnt nice I wont do it again He pisses me off by being a war hawk without thinking of the consequences
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Oh no, another Jimmy Carter!
Posted by: OOhhh nooooo! | March 20, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
The video was to the Iranian people as much as it was for Ahmadinejad. Seriously, you all have much to learn about diplomacy. The ignorance some of you display is horrifying.
Posted by: silky | Mar 20, 2009 9:59:30 AM
_______________________________________
I must have missed the video Ahmadinejad sent us saying “Merry Christmas.”
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | March 20, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Awwww…poor baby…all the Iranian leaders ignored his pretty little video…he’s just going to have to try harder next time
Posted by: samhiguchi | March 20, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
“I must have missed the video Ahmadinejad sent us saying “Merry Christmas.”"
I don’t think he sent one. What’s your point?
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Oh, yeah yeah, go head and make fun of the disabled! I have several friends went to special olympic and they scored quiet well in bowling. It’s a shame that obama thinks he is bad as they are. Actually they are as good as the professionals. Yes, that is an insult!
Posted by: Special | March 20, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
“Awwww…poor baby…all the Iranian leaders ignored his pretty little video…he’s just going to have to try harder next time”
Actually, Obama being an intelligent man and knowing the whole field, knew exactly how he was going to respond. Again, the message was for the people of Iran, more so than for Ahmadinejad. It’s really not that tough to get your head around.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
I GUESS AMERICA LIKES WAR…. AND WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A WARMONGER LIKE BUSH AS PRESIDENT.
Posted by: frenchie 11 | March 20, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Thinking -I remeber wht happened 30 years ago. The theocratic thuggocracy – supported by the Iranian people – took over the US embassy, overwhelmed the consulate staff and held them hostage for 449 days while the peanut farmer did NOTHING! If you truly believe this regime is better than the Shah’s, freer, more open to ideas and discourse, then you are a lost soul. America created this problem to the extent that Carter allowed this to happen. That is history. We are witnessing a renewal of “peace, love and understanding” with the this naive and inexperienced president. Review your history and learn from the mistakes of Munich, Carter, et al. Peace is not given, it is earned from the power to enforce it.
Posted by: tunacantj | March 20, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
What an idiot, The sitting president of Iran has threatened repeatedly to wipe our ally Israel off the face of the earth AND is one of the terrorists involved in the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis. These people dont’ want dialog and our president simply looks weak for offering it. Now they think we are afraid of them. What a STUPID STUPID move. I guess the change is that we all will be converting to Islam.
Posted by: Bob | March 20, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
anyone worried about an unstable Pakistan – who have the nukes already?
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Was that Ahmadinejad that started the roit against american hostage at Jimmy Carter time? Ahmadinejad won that time. Obama is now acting like jimmy carter and Ahmadinejad is winning again.
Posted by: 2nd jimmy carter | March 20, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
“The video was to the Iranian people as much as it was for Ahmadinejad.”
State controlled press. We can’t be sure they ever got the message. Hopefully they did cause the message is fine.
“conspicuous lack of long lines of them at the Army recruitment centers during the war they ‘supported’ in Iraq that if there is a war with Iran that they aren’t going to be the ones to go fight it.”
12 years military here, served overseas in OEF-P. Polls consistantly show 70% of the military are consertative in their voting. Iraq also had one of the highest retention rates of any war since WW2. Not sure what your trying to convey with your statement given those facts.
“how dos Iran threaten the USA ? Crickets.”
Iran is a shia state. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, and Syria are all Sunni states. If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, it will incite an arms race in the middle east. The Sunni’s are more against nukes in Iran than we are. The last thing they want is dominate Shia state in the middle east. Discounting the obvious power shift in diplomacy that would occur, a nuclear armed and trigger happy middle east would vastly increse instability in the region which would have a profound effect on our energy imports, not to mention the rest of the worlds imports. Such instability would lower the bar on intervention in the middle east from the US, Europe, Russia, and more importantly China. The prospects of what could become of that are pretty horrifying. Not to mention the straights of Hormuz where a huge percentage of the worlds energy transits, of which we protect, could be dominated by Iran.
Iran with nukes is very very bad ju ju.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
The reason we can dismiss the big talk from the right-wing keyboard warriors in regards to more saber-rattling toward Iran is that we know from the conspicuous lack of long lines of them at the Army recruitment centers during the war they ‘supported’ in Iraq that if there is a war with Iran that they aren’t going to be the ones to go fight it.
Posted by: Skip
————————————-
So negotiating is the answer, right Skip? Is it possible to negotiate with the Pope to make him worship Satan? Let’s see how much success we’d have if we were to try to negotiate with YOU to get you to become a conservative! The chances of Obama succeeding in negotiating with Al Qeada is about one fifth of that.
Obama does not use his head, Skip, and neither do you.
Posted by: marco | March 20, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
“We are witnessing a renewal of “peace, love and understanding” with the this naive and inexperienced president.”
Not at all. But hitting the reset button isn’t such a bad idea considering what was going on before wasn’t working.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Clearly this page verifies the psychographics of a range of abcnews audiences. But!
To all the Right Wingers. Yes, Obama is reaching out but it is also an indirect attempt at make the “Iranian people” (not the government) change their politics internally. Notice that the video makes a parallel between Iran’s ancient past and it’s bleak outlook in the present. Obama understands that in order to change Iranian mindsets he has to reach out to their pride. He praises the past and Iranian people around the world eat that stuff up. Why do you think Iranians call themselves Persian? Because “Persian,” has positive connotations. Most people don’t like being associated with the current regime.
To all the culturally ignorant people who are writing comments on this site! Nowruz is a Zorastrian tradition, therefore not Islamic. Doesn’t that tell you anything? Iran may be an Islamic nation now but its heritage and Zorastrian ideals are still embedded in the present culture. The table decorations for this event are based on Zorastrian ideals which also included a wine bottle, now taken out. The oldest wine jar in the world is called the Hajji Firuz, located, you guessed it, in Iran. The Iranian culture is always in constant flux between past ideals and the present. All it needs are “words” to tilt it in one direction.
Obama is just trying to get “the people” to feel invigorated. Obama’s message is actually a very cleaver attempt at seeding another revolution. Don’t think this video makes the Iranian government feel fuzzy. It actually makes them nervous.
So yeah you could call this diplomacy!
Posted by: charles watts | March 20, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
“how dos Iran threaten the USA ? Crickets.”
Oh and Iran exports arms to groups such as Hamas and Hezbolah, the possibilty of nukes entering that fracas increase significantly. Israel would not be happy.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Sooo if you rearrange the letters in BHO do you get Neville Chamberlain.
Posted by: fred | March 20, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
marco: so your solution would be what, exactly?
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | March 20, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
tunacantj – Nice to see your memory goes back to the late 70′s, better than most conservatives. Now, can it go back even further and explain why the Islamic Revolution happened and why they took over the US Embassy? Answer. The Iranians had a democratically elected gov under Mossadeq which decided to nationalize Iranian oil. USA did not like this because it hurt Standard Oil, so we arranged a coup to bring a dictator (Shah of Iran) to power. Over the next few decades the Shah brutally put down dissent, especially from the religious establishment. This drove the suffering Iranian people closer to the Mullahs and gave them power as the voice of decent against a harsh dictator. So when the bubble finally burst on the Shah’s regime, it was the clerics leading the charge. So how about we as Americans learn about our role in creating the Islamic Republic with our CIA covert actions and support for dictators.
Posted by: Eric | March 20, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
let’s not be stupid people….they are trying to build a nuclear bomb covertly and use it…probably on Israel, but who knows and we cannot allow that to occur. So all you fools that think we are going to kiss and make up better wake up and smell the coffee!
Posted by: Tom, Long Beach, California | March 20, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Obama has taken a step in the right direction and if he has to go an extra mile to establish diplomatic relations that would certainly get things on the right track. That extra mile could be lifting of sanctions and that will be fine along with exchange between the people of Iran and the USA. I think the USA should also start normalizing relations with Cuba. These steps could be a spring board to a new era of American foreign relations and diffusing tensions and resolving conflicts. I am not suggesting being complacent or being off guard but negotiating from strength and higher moral ground. It is time to demonstrate being better human beings by acting with compassion and sensitivity.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | March 20, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
“Funny!”
Right wingers get in trouble when they attempt to employ the funny. Best to stick with what you do best, procreating without mercy and trumpeting ignorance.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Marco, you are confused. This thread is about negotiating with Iran, not al-Queda
Posted by: Eric | March 20, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
The alternative is let Israel fly over and destroy every silo, every corner. Are we going to allow these people to develop the weapon and then use it as bargaining tool to press radical Islam upon weaker neighbors. BOMB THEM BOMB THEM NOW !!
Posted by: Frank | March 20, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
The alternative is let Israel fly over and destroy every silo, every corner. Are we going to allow these people to develop the weapon and then use it as bargaining tool to press radical Islam upon weaker neighbors. BOMB THEM BOMB THEM NOW !!
Posted by: Frank | March 20, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
To come anywhere close to making fun of the Special Olympics as a President is unblievable. The Lib Media will try to clean this up for Obama.
Posted by: Mike | March 20, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Tom Who are you, Nostradamus? The amazing Kreskin can see the future
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
“let’s not be stupid people….they are trying to build a nuclear bomb covertly and use it…probably on Israel, but who knows and we cannot allow that to occur. So all you fools that think we are going to kiss and make up better wake up and smell the coffee!”
All you fools who think that’s what Obama thinks is going on need to splash some cold water on your face. Or go back to school. Something.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
“Polls consistantly show 70% of the military are consertative in their voting. Iraq also had one of the highest retention rates of any war since WW2. Not sure what your trying to convey with your statement given those facts.”
You can’t tell me that only 30% of military personnel who voted, voted for Obama.
I’m trying to convey that right-wingers don’t have the guts to put their money where their mouth is. The military is scraping the bottom of the barrel for soldiers and has been for some time now and you know it. They’re sending 35 year old mothers who did a stint in the national guard 12 years ago over there. Are you trying to tell me that all the eligible military age Republicans that support the war are already over there fighting?
Posted by: Skip | March 20, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Obama is a fool….
Posted by: Lumberman_63 | March 20, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am
I guess there is evil in the world.
Posted by: Too Tall | March 20, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
“To come anywhere close to making fun of the Special Olympics as a President is unblievable. The Lib Media will try to clean this up for Obama.”
Actually, the American people will simply wave at it as it goes by. The media are irrelevant. It’s already been reported. We don’t care. It was a foot in the mouth moment on a live (live to tape, anyway) comedy show. Nobody with a grip on reality cares.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
let’s not be stupid people….they are trying to build a nuclear bomb covertly and use it…probably on Israel, but who knows and we cannot allow that to occur. So all you fools that think we are going to kiss and make up better wake up and smell the coffee!”
****************************************
What is your solution?
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
“I guess there is evil in the world.”
A little late to the party, bud.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Guy, showing your ignorance in writing….now that’s predictive……just use history my friend and recognize the most successful state/nation was the Roman Empire(over 600 years) and they were brought down by a little cancer like Iran.
Silky, well that says enough, but you will wake up from your dream soon and deal with reality just loke Obama must soon
Posted by: Tom, Long Beach, California | March 20, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
force their compliance to International law or suffer the consequences….they are no different than North Korea or Syria….
Posted by: Tom, Long Beach, California | March 20, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
force their compliance to International law or suffer the consequences….they are no different than North Korea or Syria….
Posted by: Tom, Long Beach, California | March 20, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
“The military is scraping the bottom of the barrel for soldiers and has been for some time now and you know it. They’re sending 35 year old mothers who did a stint in the national guard 12 years ago over there. Are you trying to tell me that all the eligible military age Republicans that support the war are already over there fighting?”
Not sure where youre getting this. For the first time in history, the US Navy has let go of Academy grads before their committments are met due to a glut of officers. If you failed out of the pilot program, you were sent home. The air force has been going through reduction for the last 5 years, offering incentives to leave the Air Force.
The military can only have so many people. Its a number mandated by congress. Every billet in the military is a set billet. The reason national guard/reserves were called up was because we simply do not have enough total active duty billets to maintain the war in Iraq. That’s pretty sad when you think about it. Has nothing to do with poor recruiting, its problem with the total size of our active duty force. Even Obama has said he needs to increase the cap on active duty to ease the burden on reserves. Problem is it has to get through congress. Doing that and cutting the budget will be near impossible however since the active duty payroll is the largest cost in the defense budget.
And its impossible to have ALL military age republicans in the miltary, but active duty military is dominated by republican voters. You can look it up anywhere. Obama actually did better than most democrats, last poll I saw had that he got about 36% of the military vote, most are lucky to get 30.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Why would our enemies be intimidated by Obama?
He won’t even say the word terrorist and wants to charge our own soldiers for health care.
America is in trouble.
Posted by: sammy | March 20, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
“The Obama administration so far has just talked. By words and talking the ..problems between Iran and America can not be solved.” …What Iran wants is the destruction of Israel.
Posted by: Hey Man | March 20, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
The reason we can dismiss the big talk from the right-wing keyboard warriors in regards to more saber-rattling toward Iran is that we know from the conspicuous lack of long lines of them at the Army recruitment centers during the war they ‘supported’ in Iraq that if there is a war with Iran that they aren’t going to be the ones to go fight it.
Posted by: Skip
—————————————-
Lack of long lines? Your head buried in the sand? Recruitment was up during the Iraq war for all branches of the military as well as retention. And if you do not think it will be the right-wingers fighting, who will it be? Left-wingers? Maybe, but only after the draft is reinstated and they are forced to serve. And even then, half of them (if not more) will do their best to get out of serving anyway they can!
Posted by: Global Fraud! | March 20, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
All this is likely moot anyway. Israel has much more at stake with a nuclear Iran. The Israelis will likely launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran if Iran proceeds to develop a nuke.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | March 20, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
force their compliance to International law or suffer the consequences….they are no different than North Korea or Syria….
****************************************
And what are the consequences of ignoring International Law?
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am
What do any of you think Obama can do or say to stop Iran from having nuclear weapons? At what point do you think Obama should use military force – after they have the weapons or before they have the weapons?
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Hey Skip, in regards to Iran I don’t think anyone, left or right, say that diplomacy shouldn’t be the first, and most vigorous first step. However, if the Iranians do not beleive that you will use force, they will never take anything you say seriously. The world or UN has no spine when it comes to Iran. What is missing is the Iranians believing that there will be any serious downside to pursuing nuke weapons. Right now, nothing is showing them that the world will do anything serious to stop them, so why stop? If we all hang our hat on diplomacy, they will simply use that to stall, stiff arm, and dodge if never beleive you’ll use the stick over their head. That’s not diplomacy, that’s just wasting time.
So everyone should support the diplomatic approach, but the message also has to be sent that we will use force if Iran does not comply with the resolutions, otherwise what good is it?
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
All ex-presidents have sent New Year messages to Iranian people what the difference here was Obama called the “leaders” of Iran and did not mention the word “regime”.
Iranian so called leaders are not elected leaders but selected.
Does Obama cares that yesterday the Iranian blogger Omid Reza Mirsyafi who was sentenced to two and a half years in prison for insulting authorities died in Evin prison.
Not once he mentioned the human rights issue. This is an insult for people in Iran who have been fighting this regime.
Obama forget that Clinton went further and apologized to Iranian government for America’s past mistakes and nothing changes.
Posted by: Omid | March 20, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
And by admitting our mistakes and making amends does he mean “send us money!” Hasn’t anyone told him, we’re just about bankrupt! He’ll need to ask our new govenment for his allowance – can he speak Chinese?
Posted by: PLH | March 20, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Obama just showed how weak his administration is to the world. These people over there will thrive on this stuff. Thanks Obama for destroying all we gained. Go back to hollywood and appear in dancing with the stars this time.
Posted by: Jim Rod | March 20, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
I don’t know what fantasy world some people are living in, in which there are plenty of new recruits volunteering and people getting turned away, but my 35 year old brother in law who is a career Navy man was just ordered to 8 months duty on land, in Iraq, because they don’t have enough army guys to send. He isn’t even trained for what he is doing, and has already spent several tours in the Persian Gulf. Must be a Republican fantasy, telling yourself we have plenty of brave young Republicans just itching to go over and fight this pointless and expensive fight. And President Obama sent exactly the right message to Iran; whether and how soon they start to listen is up to them, but our president represents the dignity of what our country believes, hopes and strives for, not theirs. There are people all over the world who welcome this message of a desire for peace and inclusion, including in Iran and Iraq, even if their politicians and other paid rabble-rousers didn’t react positively.
Posted by: iamwomaninMI | March 20, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
WHAT DO YOU WANT AMERICA……….PEACE OF WAR.
Posted by: frenchie 11 | March 20, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Global Fraud!” Recruitment was up during the Iraq war for all branches of the military as well as retention.”
Really? Why were the stop loss policies required? Why did the Army and National Guard not make their recruitment goals in 2004 (the only year I bothered looking up)? Why are you lying?
Posted by: jhw539 | March 20, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
These people who live in a fantasy world. The Iranians now understand Obama is weak and a person to be taken advantage of. Obama demonstrated he knows nothing the Middle East cultures. What an amateur, the problem is he is endangering lives each time he makes these naive mistakes.
Posted by: brian | March 20, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
“At what point do you think Obama should use military force – after they have the weapons or before they have the weapons?”
First step to a weapon is enrichment. In the past, both Bush and Putin offered Iran LIGHT water nuke power plants which do not use weapons grade uranium. Iran turned down the offer and have continued to enrich uranium for a heavy water nuke power plant. Heavy water plants use weapons grade plutonium, which can easily be consolidated and used for a weapon.
So enrichment is the key here. Every day they enrich, is a day they get closer to a nuke weapon. So the focus should be on stopping the enrichment, in which they have put their finger in the air to the world and said they would continue. So there is an impasse. A threat do destory the centrifuges, or at least they think there is a threat, may be the next step. Getting the Iranians to think the west is serious is a critical step, cause they currently have no concern that the UN (or US) will do anything serious.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Jim Rod:”Thanks Obama for destroying all we gained.”
Interesting fantasy world you live in – all Bush gained for us? A nuclear North Korea, a resurgent Iran with blossoming power in Iraq, a driftless Palestinian policy that has seen Israel failing around with useless wars, a massively expensive Iraq war and drawn out nation building, Bin Laden free…
We can only hope Obama destroys all the Republicans “gained” for us these last 8 years.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 20, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Hey Eric
Impressive recollection of events even if it is twisted to show mean old America. Let’s ask a question. Would you be willing to give up your way of life, your cars, food, nice home to make amends? The cold hard facts are that Iran’s thuggocracy would only be satisfied if the USA gave up all of that. If this way of life is not worth defending to you – as it has been to all those citizens who fought for this country – then you are no more than a parasite living off those who would defend us, CIA, US Army, Marines whatever.
Posted by: tunacantj | March 20, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
KR:”A threat do destory the centrifuges, or at least they think there is a threat, may be the next step. ”
Israel already has VERY clearly made that threat, and it was VERY credible under the Bush administration (and still is actually). What is the next “next step” seeing as how a credible threat has clearly failed?
Posted by: jhw539 | March 20, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Marco: You said Obama doesn’t use his head? That is extremely funny coming from a guy who no doubt supported Bush, the biggest idiot to ever sit in the Oval Office. I love your double standard. Too funny.
Posted by: wirey | March 20, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Obama should be very appealing to Iran.
He’s soft on terrorist and is willing to send our tax money to Gaza.
Now Obama needs to denounce Israel and apologize like Ahmadinejad wants.
Bet they love how he snubbed Gordon Brown.
I see how Obama wants to change America’s image.
Posted by: tyler | March 20, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
tunacantj:”Would you be willing to give up your way of life, your cars, food, nice home to make amends? The cold hard facts are that Iran’s thuggocracy would only be satisfied if the USA gave up all of that.”
Oh please, Iran is NOT al quaida. If the US threw Israel into the sea, they’d be our best friends for life. Still wholly unacceptable, but it’s dangerous to be as completely ignorant of adversaries motivations as you appear to be. Not all our enemies are identical you know.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 20, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Of course Iran snubbed Obama. Obama’s actions in the Middle east culture demonstrate a weak leader who now must be challenged and put in his place. Obama had no idea what he was doing because he knows nothing of the culture. He thinks the Iranians are all from Chicago.
Posted by: brian | March 20, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Global Fraud!” Recruitment was up during the Iraq war for all branches of the military as well as retention.”
Really? Why were the stop loss policies required? Why did the Army and National Guard not make their recruitment goals in 2004 (the only year I bothered looking up)?
Posted by: jhw539
—————————————-
US Military Meets, Exceeds Recruiting Goals for February 2009
Posted by: Global Fraud! | March 20, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
brian: “Obama demonstrated he knows nothing the Middle East cultures. ”
Coming from the party that thought Iraq was one big happy family that would greet us with roses and payback the small cost of the war out of their oil revenues, this is hilarious.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 20, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
” but my 35 year old brother in law who is a career Navy man was just ordered to 8 months duty on land, in Iraq, because they don’t have enough army guys to send. He isn’t even trained for what he is doing, and has already spent several tours in the Persian Gulf. Must be a Republican fantasy”
Navy reservist doing what they call an “IA” or individual augmentee tour. This has more to do with the lack of sufficient active duty BILLETS, not a sign of poor recruiting.
Those who have no served in the military have to understand something. Not all jobs in the military are the same. Some rates or specific jobs have trouble filling their ranks, while others have a glut. Certain specialties, mostly those that require more training, are hard pressed to fill, while others that require a low amount of training have plenty of people. The army who have some with specialty experience or advanced training are being used in their field, where as in peacetime they would fill more administrative roles at an HQ. Since they are being used to take advantage of their training and/or experience, reserve augmentee’s or active duty augmentees are going to Iraq and Afghanistan to fill the adminsitrative roles, many of which don’t require tons of training to do.
So before you start touting that its a recruiting issue, you should probably serve and understand it.
Thats not to say we are having trouble recruiting in certain areas. There isn’t enough special ops guys out there because the training eliminates 70-80% of those that apply and there is huge demand for those guys. There aren’t enough FAE30′s in the Army cause the schoolhouse is so small, so the Army calls on other services to fill the gaps. Its far more complicated than “they can’t recruit” balony. But people will beleive simplistic explanations of complex things without question sometimes.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
US Military Meets, Exceeds Recruiting Goals for February 2009
****************************************
For Feb 2009! Oh what a surprise. One of the worst recession in history, and you brag about Army recruitment? It is the only work they can get.
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Global fraud!:”Really? Why were the stop loss policies required? Why did the Army and National Guard not make their recruitment goals in 2004 (the only year I bothered looking up)?
Posted by: jhw539
—————————————-
US Military Meets, Exceeds Recruiting Goals for February 2009 ”
So you counter my pointing to a full year’s data during the height of the Iraq war by pointing to ONE MONTH of data from under the Obama administration when the war is finally wearing down?
Do you even realize how embarrassingly weak that makes your “argument” seem? You said: ” Recruitment was up during the Iraq war for all branches of the military as well as retention.”
Fact: The Army and National Guard missed their recruiting targets in 2004. Conclusion: You were lying about recruitment being up.
Fact: Stop loss, the INVOLUNTARY extension of military service was used widely during the war. Conclusion: You were probably lying about retention being up.
Fact: Your best response to the above is a single month of recruiting information taken under the Obama administration after a pull out date has been set.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 20, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Excellent! The haters and doomsdayers will be in an uproar, because their mindset is violence and war and a basic evil view of humanity, but those of us who actually have hope for humanity are thrilled with Obama.
Posted by: earth_not_flat | March 20, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Phew! Lot of ignorance on display here…
Some of the posters scare me quite frankly. According to their theory, let’s bomb them to oblivion and then ask questions. That would go perfectly in line with the treatment of Natives a couple of centuries ago, with the enslaving of 15 million Africans, and starting 23 wars in our short history of a country! Why should we bomb them back to the Middle Ages? BECAUSE WE CAN!
It made us the darling of the world, so why not continue that path?
And for all of you who think that Iran will launch a nuclear attack against Israel or another country, please THINK first before you post. Should Iran decide to build a bomb and use it, the consequences would be the end of Iran as a country. It would be levelled beyond recognition.
President Obama is the best thing that could have happened to America! What a contrast to the trigger happy morons before him! So keep whining you war mongers, you are a dying breed!
Posted by: Peter | March 20, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
“What is the next “next step” seeing as how a credible threat has clearly failed?”
Move 3 carriers into the gulf and publically move stealth bombers to the area and threaten a strike. Show a ramp up. Just talking it while not showing any type of movement isn’t threatening.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
VIVA OBAMA -
AND THANK YOU FOR
SEEING THIS WORLD HUMANLY -NOT US AGAINST THEM KIND OF ALL FORMS OF EXTREMISTS.EXTRMISM IS THE CANCER TO HUMAN KINDS WHETHER ITS MUSLIM ,CHRISTIAN JEWS OR HINDU–WE’ ALL ARE HUMANS AND THIS PLANET BELONGS FOR ALL OF US TO ENJOY
Posted by: Julio | March 20, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Gee : Poster by: Some of Ya’all is Real Dumb
I wonder what you would be saying if it was Sarah Palin that made the remark
Posted by: Andy | March 20, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
He’s soft on terrorist and is willing to send our tax money to Gaza.
****************************************
Hmmm….. All those people in Gaza are to blame now are they? It’s not not like they have passports and are free to go now is it? Why they can just walk across the boarder into Israel, or Jordan, or Egypt, or hop a plane to the US.
Absurd!
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
“Should Iran decide to build a bomb and use it, the consequences would be the end of Iran as a country.”
Thats really not the issue. I certainly do not think they would use it. There is an increased probability that it could get to Hamas or Hezbolah, but that’s still unlikely.
The other ramifications are not as serious, but just as frightening. As I explained earlier, Iran is a Shia state, Jordan, Egypt, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are Sunni states. None of them will stand idle while Iran has nukes. They too will want nukes. Iran, with nukes, can threaten a huge percentage of the worlds energy that passes through the straights of hormuz, something we currently protect with our navy. The dynamic will change drastically, just as it has with North Korea. A dynamic that hurts America, and the worlds interest. You may be fine with that, but it creates a far more dangerous middle east since they are known to be a little trigger happy. Lets not forget, they had no problem using biological weapons in the 80′s.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Would you not all be embarrassed if OBAMA succeeds in achieving peace in the Middle East and getting what Israel wants without killing thousands of Iranians? Why not give his approach a chance? Or, killing Iranians is what you writers want and are fearful OBAMA’s approach might avoid this outcome.
Posted by: joseph | March 20, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
“Would you not all be embarrassed if OBAMA succeeds in achieving peace in the Middle East and getting what Israel wants without killing thousands of Iranians?”
Would be more than embarrassed, I’d be floored. He could achieve something that would undo 3,000 years of fighting between Jews and Palestinians. It is however, a complete pipe dream. It’s going to take generations for it to end, not administrations, and it has to come from them, not us. We get so arrogant in what we think we can achieve, it works against us more time than not.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
He is a joke. The whole world thinks he’s a joke and now thinks we’re a joke as a country not only because of him but because of all the dirty laundry we continue to air out from 10 years ago till today. The only upside is that maybe now terrorists won’t even bother sneaking a nuke in ’cause China would be a more amazing target.
Posted by: dum | March 20, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
“We get so arrogant in what we think we can achieve, it works against us more time than not.”
With some of our leaders, yes. But it doesn’t mean we stop trying. This message and it’s response is positive. As in, not negative. That is good. Is it a substantial stride? Probably not, but it’s a baby step.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Is it better to let the Iranians have nuke weapons and not take military action or should military action be taken to prevent them from having nuclear weapons?
What are the benefits of Iran having nuclear weapons?
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
“He is a joke. The whole world thinks he’s a joke and now thinks we’re a joke as a country not only because of him but because of all the dirty laundry we continue to air out from 10 years ago till today. The only upside is that maybe now terrorists won’t even bother sneaking a nuke in ’cause China would be a more amazing target.”
Actually, if you bothered to read or view any international news, you would know that the international community unanimously applauded his election and continue to applaud his actions as POTUS. But by all means, continue inventing your own reality. It’s what you guys do best.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
ignoring International Law would result in sanctions and eventually attack…..so sorry, but those are the rules
Posted by: Tom, Long Beach, California | March 20, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Next President Obama should welcome the Iranian President to White House and have face to face talk so we can see what other racist hatred people are going to say about this.
Posted by: Advicer | March 20, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
KR wrote: ” He could achieve something that would undo 3,000 years of fighting between Jews and Palestinians. It is however, a complete pipe dream. It’s going to take generations for it to end, not administrations, and it has to come from them, not us. We get so arrogant in what we think we can achieve, it works against us more time than not.”
Am I safe in my assumption that you said the same thing when we invaded Iraq?
Posted by: SearamblerOne | March 20, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Our enemies aren’t stupid; they see the rot and deterioration that is descending upon this country. They’ve noticed the disregard for and the trashing of our Constitution including the mob rule of the House of Representatives. They see that we are totally and irrevocably divided and that our will is all but gone. Now tell me, why should they be cooperative when we are about to give them what they couldn’t win in battle? Wake up people it’s almost too late.
Posted by: rplat | March 20, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
“Am I safe in my assumption that you said the same thing when we invaded Iraq?”
Actually I said the same thing about Iraq adopting our forms of laws and Democracy. Their forms of laws will inherently fit their culture, which is far more brutal than ours. So yes, I did the say the same thing, but not about the Iraqi’s wanting freedom from Saddam, they did want that. Where we were arrogant is that they would want our interpretation of that freedom. It cannot be generalized like you put it.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
This shows that Obama is a strong leader. Any idiot can make threats when he has the strongest military in the world backing him. Bush proved that. What Obama is doing is saying to the Iranians – look, we can blow you back to the stone age, but there is no need for that if you are willing to coexist peacefully with the rest of the world. This is exactly what everyone (with the exception of the hateful, murderous, warmongering repubs) wants. Obama is telling the Iranians we can live in peace or we can blow you to hell. Take your pick. And this time, unlike with bush, if the Iranians choose not to play nice, the whole world will see it and know it, and the world won’t have any problem when America does what it has to do. This is exactly what happened when we went into Afghanistan. The whole world was behind us because we told the Taliban to turn over the 911 terrorists and they refused. Obama is an absolutely brilliant leader.
Posted by: libertyrulz | March 20, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Some 30 years ago while attending the Univ of San Diego, religion in other languages. I was inspired to write a paper regarding the real preceive reason why people fight each other. “God” Every religious group believes that they have and know the right and only god yet all of the gods that I had to research (except a few minor ones) for that paper seemed to be loving entities. We are the physical hands of these entities on earth and I couldn’t find any reason why (we the people of earth)there has to be a decision made as to which god is the best god. All gods are best when they are praised in love by the people who praise theirs own. If we all would get to know the other gods you just might find what I did. They are all for love and mercy in the region of the planet that the people who praise them live.
I have met the enemy in my time and before I did, I said a prayer to “my” almighty god who did save me but i know some of my enemy did the same and were not saved. For the sake of their god and our god, may we find a leader in this country who can act as a leader of his/her people and let gods be private to all who wish to serve him/them. Lets praise each other for a change, maybe we will have another one of those 2 centuries of peace in the world. In closing, may your god richly bless you!
Posted by: James Felder | March 20, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
After exhausting diplomacy, we try hard sanctions, and military action is a real LAST RESORT. None of this pre-emptive strike bs
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
“So everyone should support the diplomatic approach, but the message also has to be sent that we will use force if Iran does not comply with the resolutions, otherwise what good is it?”
You and I have had this debate before KR so we don’t need to put everyone through it again. We end up agreeing on these two points. What I don’t agree with you about is that everyone else does. Too many people posting here today for example want to portray Obama’s approach as weakness or even cowardice. I disagree. I think it takes great strength to make the first moves toward peace when you know you’re going to get a lot of critcism for it.
Posted by: Skip | March 20, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
“Why not give his approach a chance?”
When his approach fails, what should he do? Should he let Iran have nukes or should he employ military force?
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
ignoring International Law would result in sanctions and eventually attack…..so sorry, but those are the rules
****************************************
Sanctions are in place, so who is going to attack?
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
“Too many people posting here today for example want to portray Obama’s approach as weakness or even cowardice. I disagree. I think it takes great strength to make the first moves toward peace when you know you’re going to get a lot of critcism for it.”
We definately found where we agree. I do not think it is cowardice what he has done, he has done the correct first step. Where we may disagree is what he does from here out. I personally believe he will take this path out far too long, delay with more diplomacy in the UN. It’s academic at this point, the future holds the real key to how he handles it. I’m a little concerned that this will be his only approach as he has not let out any type of gesture that he is willing to employ all elements of national power towards the prevention of nuke weapons in Iran. I may be wrong, he may do it, but as long as his base screams diplomacy, I seriously doubt he’ll go beyond that.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
KR I never understand war-mongers like you. We invaded and killed Iraqi’s for no good reason My hatred is unjust war , our dead soldiers, limbless and blind veterans who got hurt for NO GOOD REASON. PS We supported Saddam and gave him his chemical weapons PSS Our CIA trained Osama bin Loser in the 80′s great job Neo-cons
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
“I never understand war-mongers like you.”
War is a part of human nature. Because I accept that and choose that our country be prepared for it doesn’t make me a “war monger”. The need for the Iraq war can be debated, but you cannot deny the end result, an ally against terror in the middle east is infinately valuable in a strategic sense. You can choose to ignore that all you want, but it is a truth. It was however, poorly handled on many levels. It did give us set backs in some areas, but it also helped devastate AQ in the middle east. Like I said, you can choose to ignore all of this if you want and it can be debated about how we got in there till your blue in the face. The end result doesn’t change.
“We invaded and killed Iraqi’s for no good reason My hatred is unjust war , our dead soldiers, limbless and blind veterans who got hurt for NO GOOD REASON.”
Every war can be considered unjust. There were those who said WW2 was unjust, doesn’t mean they were correct in that assessment. I would argue there were very good reasons for going, but I’m not going to bother telling them to you because your going to believe what you want so its futile.
“PS We supported Saddam and gave him his chemical weapons”
We did, and Russia was supporting Iran. The real fight was between us and Russia in that conflict, Iraq and Iran were cold war pawns at the time. Of course you may choose to ignore that perspective.
“Our CIA trained Osama bin Loser in the 80′s great job Neo-cons”
Again, your lack of knowledge on how that came to be is either you never learned it or you choose to ignore it. Osama was training fighters to fight the Russians in Afghanistan so yes, he certainly had our support. He turned on us when the cold war ended, as he Russia was gone but we were still there.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Too many people posting here today for example want to portray Obama’s approach as weakness or even cowardice. I disagree. I think it takes great strength to make the first moves toward peace when you know you’re going to get a lot of critcism for it.
_______________________________________
To the writer of this post and others like it, it is not that we want war w/ Iran. I’d like nothing better than for us to have World peace. It’s that we know you can’t trust these people. These are the same people that deny the Hollocaust! How can that be? You are not dealing w/ a rationale regime here, yet you are trying to look at this rationally. The only thing that Iran understands is strength. And what Obama is doing – no matter what good intentions he may have – is showing weakness. I’m not saying we have to threaten Iran at every opportunity, but you can’t effectively bend over and expect your enemy to respect you! Weakness – real or perceived – on our part will be exploited by the Iranians. The Russians thought JFK was weak, and it lead to them parking nukes 90 miles off our coast. Thankfully, JFK really wasn’t weak, but his example still shows what weakness – real or perceived (and in his case, initially perceived) – leads to. Obama looks weak on this, and so now we do as a country! Expect Iran to treat us as if we are weak!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | March 20, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
tunacantj – There is no twisting, its the unfortunate truth that has led us to this point, and a truth that is at the forefront of the Iranian perspective on our relationship. Unless we understand the history we don’t understand the present face off. I say this not to make my beloved country a “bad guy”, but just to state the truth, that no nation is perfect and no nation should conduct themselves as if they are, especially Iran.
I would certainly defend my life against any aggressor, but that is not Iran. Iran’s “thuggocracy”, which I think is an appropriate and clever nickname, only cares about retaining power, not depriving Americans of their cars and lives. The idea that the Iranian people and government’s goal is to change our lifestyle is as arrogant and uninformed as it is laughable. The people of Iran have a thirst for respect (as descendants of an ancient and powerful civilization) and to become a member of the world community. The only way to drive a wedge between the moderate Iranian people and the thug mullahs that run their country is to deprive the mullahs of evidence of a belligerent USA. Sabre rattling over the past 8 years has only led to a more entrenched Islamic Government, increased Iranian power, and much progress on their nuclear program. Is this your big solution, more of the same?
Posted by: Eric | March 20, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
JOSEPH BRINGS OUT A GOOD POINT!, Posted by: joseph | Mar 20, 2009 11:35:40 AM
But just as frightening. , Iran is a Shia state, Jordan, Egypt, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are Sunni states.
None of them will stand idle while Iran has nukes.
>>> They too will want nukes. <<>> VERY <<< SOON!!!!!!!!
LOL……
C.E.
Posted by: CE | March 20, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
“With some of our leaders, yes. But it doesn’t mean we stop trying. This message and it’s response is positive. As in, not negative.”
Oh absolutely, we should always try, and we do. Most people in the US don’t have the visibility on the things DOS does, or USAID, or all the great things the US does around the world. In the end, 2 things give us our leverage in the world, our money and our military might. The only reason anyone in the world gives us more than 2 seconds of attention is because of those 2 things. They honestly could care less about our words, they want our money or they don’t want to be at the wrong end of our military. This goes for adversaries and allies alike. If we acknowledge that as a people, we’ll all come to a better understand of what our real leverage in diplomacy is. To quote Obama, “Just words, just speeches” is exactly whatthe world thinks of our diplomacy if its missing those two elements.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
KR – If you think Iraq is now an “ally” in the war on terror against Iran you are terribly misinformed. The Shia majority government in Iraq is subordinate to Iran and Iran has much more infuence in Iraq than we do, even with our troops still there.
Posted by: Eric | March 20, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
It’s just like when Obama told the Russians that we’d kill off our missile defense system in E. Europe if they help us out w/ Iran. What did Russia do w/ this friendly overture? They told Obama to go pound sand!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | March 20, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
KR You or your sons or nephews or uncles gonna join the Army ? Going to fight Iran ? Step up to the plate – talk is cheap You want war so badly You go fight it – I am SICK of war personally
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
I’m an Iranian, not living there because it is ruled by evil self-serving mullahs. Educate your self on teh fabrications of shia sect of islam and you will see what a joke it is. They have one prophet hiding in a bottom of a well. People in 2009 believe that!
Let us not forget that islam was forced on Iran at the point of the sword. No one embraced it unless they were ignorant or made money from it.
The Saudi man hiding in an Afghani cave knows that very well and so do his counterparts that rule Iran today. The Obama administration knows this very well, but for once we have true diplomats at bat.
I have the utmost respect for President Obama and his administration. I partly support what he did today, even at the point of feeling sick in my stomach to hear islamic republic in the same sentence as Iran. The American leader has a job to do and he is doing it well, that keeps me from throwing up.
Having spent time in the region and keeping in regular contact with Iranians, I’m told that 95% of the people in Iran are against the mullah regime, you can guess who the other 5% are and how many homes they own in Dubai. For that I thank teh British government for their design of the middle east.
Find out for yourself how many mullahs are in the UK and where their actual orders come from. Google the “great game” and see for yourself. My American brothers had enough gumption to part from the British and be free for real.
God bless America and Iran and may humanity see teh end of the irrational instrument of oppression: islam.
I fear teh day that we have a Jewish, Christian, Hindu or islamic republic of America. Keep religion out of government and send islam back to where it came from. We now have 1 billion apologists for the ignorance, that’s nothing to be proud of. Thank you for reading.
Posted by: SB | March 20, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Bush and his supporters are running around the country attempting to rehab Bush/Cheney image the last few weeks.
Obama is rehabbing the USA image after 8 years of Bush/Cheney nightmare.
Go Obama!
Posted by: Phil | March 20, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Here’s Iran’s response so far:
“Obama has talked of change but has taken no practical measures to address America’s past mistakes in Iran. If Mr. Obama takes concrete actions and makes fundamental changes in U.S. foreign policy toward other nations including Iran, the Iranian government and people will not turn their back on him.”
What are they saying here? The U.S. is at fault, and the U.S. needs to change its ways for everything to work out. Nothing here about concessions from Iran! It’s all “it’s your fault, you apologize and we’ll play nice.”
This is what weak leadership brings us! Iran is nowhere near the moral plane we are on! They have no business lecturing us! They think the Holocaust is a fairy tale! What does that tell you about them!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | March 20, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
It is dangerous for him to send the message to the Iranians. It is a mistake. He should focus on the economy and fix the problem. He has ‘lack’ of experience and leadership.
Posted by: anonymous | March 20, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
“You or your sons or nephews or uncles gonna join the Army ? Going to fight Iran ? Step up to the plate – talk is cheap You want war so badly You go fight it – I am SICK of war personally”
Your a very hard individual to talk to. I am in the military if you actually read some of my posts. I served overseas. If I was called to Iran I would go, so I’m not sure what your trying to pin me to. It pretty freakin childish I’ll say that, so this will be my last post to you.
“Osama was trained by the CIA in Afghanistan – known fact”
And what was going on in Afghanistan at the time smart guy? Lets get your known facts out on the table. What year was it and what was happening in Afghanistan?
“Hitler tried to take over the world – and I am so proud my uncle’s shed their blood in Normandy fighting the Nazi’s. A JUST WAR.”
If you bothered researching, you would find that there were Americans in WW2 who called it an unjust war. I brought it up as a point that anyone can talk about war as an unjust war, and my point was that it didn’t mean their assessment was correct. Goodbye guy, I’m done talking with you.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
To the writer of this post and others like it, it is not that we want war w/ Iran. I’d like nothing better than for us to have World peace. It’s that we know you can’t trust these people
****************************************
Maybe we can Maybe we can’t./ Does it matter? From what I read here some people think this is the only thing that Obama is doing.
Is it absurd to try an talk? Do really think that the US is not prepared to do what is necessary should it come to that?
‘
It sounds more like many of you are hoping that talk fails and we can just go off to war again, and again, and agian. Why not it is so simple. We just blow the hell out of hundreds of thousands, and send thousands of our kids to their death, but you know what I am safe.
Grow up; someone always pays the price, we are doing so now, we did after every war we were in; Emotionally, Politically, and Economically.
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
“This is what weak leadership brings us! Iran is nowhere near the moral plane we are on! They have no business lecturing us! They think the Holocaust is a fairy tale! What does that tell you about them!”
For like the 8th time…he was talking to the citizens of Iran, not the leadership. And the response has been positive. Stop playing the fool.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
“I have the utmost respect for President Obama and his administration. I partly support what he did today, even at the point of feeling sick in my stomach to hear islamic republic in the same sentence as Iran.”
Enjoyed your post SB, and agree with most of what you said. Unfortunately, by Obama calling it the Islamic Republic of Iran, did he give credence to the regime? Would the Iranians see it as recognizing the regime? I’m indifferent on the issue, but it does give a hint of conforming to the Iranian regime’s description of itself.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
YESTERDAYS NEWS Bush adm official admits many held in Cuba (Guantanamo Bay) prison are innocent Interesting
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Hey KR Did you know most Iranian people like Americans Wear Levi’s listen to hip-hop music Why should we kill them, please tell me how they threaten you or your family?please
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
How’d those Freedom Fries work out for ya ? We were wrong. Just admit it. We had no right to invade Iraq (or Iran)
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Bush is a Rhode Scholar A mind like that cant be wrong Lets nuke every other country we dont like for no real reason. His economic and foreign policies worked so very well. What a safer world we live in thanks to georgie Porgie
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
How incredibly refreshing!! Mr. Obama, you are a truly compassionate and gracious person and I am proud to have you as my President! [I'm sure the Republicans are fuming over Obama's sense of fairness and hope.]
Posted by: moosedog66 | March 20, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Hey guy, did you know that on every friday for the past 20 years the Iranian people take to the streets and chant “death to America” and burn our flag in the streets. In all the videos I have seen of this not one person was wearing Levi’s or playing rap crap.
Posted by: mogo | March 20, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
This is what weak leadership brings us! Iran is nowhere near the moral plane we are on!
***************************************
Yep. We are weak if we don’t, we have the moral authority, and the “chicken little” obligation, to do so.
Posted by: Thinking | March 20, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
For like the 8th time…he was talking to the citizens of Iran, not the leadership. And the response has been positive. Stop playing the fool.
Posted by: silky | Mar 20, 2009 12:52:13 PM
________________________________________
The people of Iran aren’t running the country. A bunch of religious zealots are! What they think matters. You need to stop playing the naive fool!
Posted by: Obama, the second coming | March 20, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
I know…. to prove to Iran just how much we want to be friends… maybe we should just give them one of our Nukes to let them know how much we trust them… or shoot… let’s just give them all of our launch codes…
Posted by: theregoesthecountry | March 20, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
. “Lets nuke every other country we dont like for no real reason.”
Bush may not be a Rhodes Scholar, but apparently, after reading your comments, he’s a lot smarter than you. BTW, what countries did Bush threaten to nuke, as you imply?
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
“For like the 8th time…he was talking to the citizens of Iran, not the leadership. And the response has been positive. Stop playing the fool.
——-
The people of Iran aren’t running the country. A bunch of religious zealots are! What they think matters. You need to stop playing the naive fool!”
Both of you are talking in absolutes, when the truth is a bit inbetween. However, the ultimate power in the nation is still within the Mullahs. The people could all love America, but they are still under the control of the regime. The regime chooses who can run for office and who cannot. They have an effective and brutal paramilitary intellgence force, not unlike the Gestapo and SS of WW2 Germany. It does make it difficult for the people of Iran to truely effect change in their nation. However, Iran does still fear a massive uprising in the nation. I would imagine they do much like any other militaristic regime and they target and imprison/execute any truly reformist leaders. At least they have in the past.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
What is the difference between the Ayatollah that runs Iran and Saddam Hussein?
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Eric
Moderate Iranians? a wedge? The part of the populace that would listen to diplomacy is powerless to change Iran. What others are you referring to? Khatami? He is an anti Semite who also wants a nuclear Iran with greater hegemony in the region. The lessons to be learned from the past – specific to Iran – are that they are not looking for a constructive relationship. Remember Reagan’s mistake with Iran reaching out to the moderates? They look to restore a Greater Persia and would do so at our expense. Carter should have been enough for us to learn this hard lesson. Trash Bush if you want, but you do not negotiate with terrorists and only do so with dictatorships from a position of strength. We have lost that with this weak attempt today.
Posted by: tunacantj | March 20, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
“For like the 8th time…he was talking to the citizens of Iran, not the leadership. And the response has been positive. Stop playing the fool.
Posted by: silky | Mar 20, 2009 12:52:13 PM________________________________________
The people of Iran aren’t running the country. A bunch of religious zealots are! What they think matters. You need to stop playing the naive fool!”
You’re missing the point. He is working at building good will with the people of Iran. That is a good thing. He already knows where the leadership stands.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
“We have lost that with this weak attempt today.”
Please explain how this statement is “negotiating with terrorists.”
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
silky
Do you believe that the leaders and enforcers in Iran are not terrorists? They executed a prisoner for insulting their leader today. They stone women as adulterers. They execute homosexuals. Their surrogates have killed our forces in Iraq and Lebanon. They bombed embassies in South America and cafes in Berlin. What do you believe the definition of a terrorist should be?
Posted by: tunacantj | March 20, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
“Do you believe that the leaders and enforcers in Iran are not terrorists? They executed a prisoner for insulting their leader today. They stone women as adulterers. They execute homosexuals. Their surrogates have killed our forces in Iraq and Lebanon. They bombed embassies in South America and cafes in Berlin. What do you believe the definition of a terrorist should be?”
His statement today was not “negotiating with terrorists”, any way you frame it.
As for talking to Ahmadinejad. There are exceptions for the no negotiating with terrorists rule. One of them being, if it is in the best interest of US and world security to do so, meaning that it also won’t encourage further terrorist behavior.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
tunacantj – I think that you have a mis perception of Iran. It is a fairly modern country, and the folks who hold economic power in that country are moderate and favor engagement with the world. The religious establishment is not popular with the educated classes and only survived the last decade because the previous administration neutered the educated Iranian moderates and moderate politicians when he countered their offer of a post 9-11 constructive relationship with a place in the “Axis of Evil”. The direct result of which was the nutjob Achmadinejad. Surely their desire for a greater Persia does not include the USA. Greater Persia would actually be the “stans” which are under the influence of their ally Russia. One thing is for certain, Iranians are not out to get us, and if you look at recent history any objective observer would conclude the opposite.
Posted by: Eric | March 20, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Silky
As for talking to Ahmadinejad. There are exceptions for the no negotiating with terrorists rule. One of them being, if it is in the best interest of US and world security to do so, meaning that it also won’t encourage further terrorist behavior.
———————
First, a negotiation requires two parties. This “message” was not that. He gambled and lost. He believed that a unilateral declaration of his intentions would bring about a negotiation and they rejected him, again. This was a reckless act by a naive and inexperienced leader. The only difference between his attempt and Chamberlain’s in 1939 was that Neville had a face to face with der Fuhrer whom he trusted to keep his word. He too was reckless and naive and millions paid for it. Obama didn’t even wait to have a face-to-face. He just caved in to Iran with this weal attempt at Realpolitik.
Can you demonstrate how this in any way advances world security or is in the interests of the United States?
Posted by: tunacantj | March 20, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
“Can you demonstrate how this in any way advances world security or is in the interests of the United States?”
Tangibly, right now, no. But the sentiment reaching the people of Iran is only going to be positive. That regime needs to go, whether from internal or external forces. In the meantime, what is the harm in reseting things from a diplomatic standpoint?
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
“His statement today was not “negotiating with terrorists”, any way you frame it.”
His statement implies he is willing to negotiate with terrorists.
FYI, Iran is recognized as a state sponsor of terrorism.
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
No comment by Obama about the American journalist currently being held in Iran against her will, though.
But really, who cares what happens to her? It’s not like Obama has a duty to defend the citizens of the United States.
Posted by: WSLS-Webguy | March 20, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Mogo Did you know that folowing the Sept 11th attacks candlelight vigils were held by students in Iran? Did you know soccer stadiums in Iran with 60,000 Iranians had a moment of silence for the dead. Did you know that after 9-11 Iran allowed us to use their country to search for lost servicemen?
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
“His statement implies he is willing to negotiate with terrorists.”
Not the same thing.
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Bush may not have nuked Iraq, but his policies of pre-emptive strikes for no reason could very well lead to atomic war and a nuclear holocaust Wake up
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
“But really, who cares what happens to her? It’s not like Obama has a duty to defend the citizens of the United States.”
What do you know about his efforts to get this person freed?
Posted by: silky | March 20, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Silky
If we exhaust all diplomacy and sanctions Then we may have no choice but to go to war But then it would actually be justified.
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
“If we exhaust all diplomacy and sanctions”
At what point is “exhaust all diplomacy”. Just asking as this has been going on for 4 years now. Another 4 years?
What if we get intel that they are a few months away from a nuke, do we take military action prior to that point or wait until it’s detonated underground?
In diplomacy, you can choose to play in the arena of knowns, or you can choose to play in the arena of “what ifs”.
We know they do not have a nuke, but they want one. We know that they have threatened other nations. We know that our intel was wrong on the number of operating centrifuges in Iran, estimated 2500 and learned it was closer to 15000.
So with that, how long is long enough? Give us your best guess.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Who has been saying that Iran was a state sponser of terror, oh yeah that was the Bush Administration and they were well known for being truthful. Who are we as Americans to dictate how other countries act or behave. How would you like it if we got speeding tickets before we were caught speeding, or I proclaim I will speed on the way home later this week so I get a ticket today. Iran will do what Iran will do. Iran will suffer the consequences of their choices WHEN THEY MAKE THEM. It is not America’s role to Police the world or to make sure all countries are doing what we want them to do. We should of reached out long time ago to these people. Do we not have freedom of choice and freedom of religion let these people make their own choices. If they want nukes, we have nukes, Isreal has nukes, china has nukes, India, pakistan, so what. If they screw it up we will be there. But our motto here in America is you are innocent until proven guilty, you have freedom of speech. By sanctioning this country to death we make the Iranian Public out enemies.
We should aplaud Mr Obama he aparently has more guts and common sense than many who have posted here. He is making the hard descions that our leaders have failed to do for 30 years, and though times our hard for alot us now, we need to have the courage that we will not defer our childrens future for them to fix, we will make the hard choices that the generation before us did not have the courage to do. Tha America that you have known for the past 25 years is not only gone for good but never really exsited with 40% of the wealth made was ficticious and nothing more than paper wealth. Those days are gone so we must take it upon ourselves to bring our country from the brink of this republican manufactured crisis and take our country back form the rightwingers who have had us under their boot for way to long.
Posted by: greg | March 20, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
“Who has been saying that Iran was a state sponser of terror, oh yeah that was the Bush Administration and they were well known for being truthful.”
Iran has been shipping weapons to Hamas and Hezbolah, known terrorist organizations, for decades. They also funded and operated insurgents in Iraq, a violation of the laws of war and would be an act of war in everyones book except ours, well maybe France as well. Is that criteria not good enough?
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
“Bush may not have nuked Iraq, but his policies of pre-emptive strikes for no reason could very well lead to atomic war and a nuclear holocaust ”
Has Obama reversed this policy? No?
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
“Who has been saying that Iran was a state sponser of terror, oh yeah that was the Bush Administration and they were well known for being truthful.”
Iran has been on the State Sponsor of Terrorism since 1984. Still are even today under Obama.
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
“Iran will suffer the consequences of their choices WHEN THEY MAKE THEM.”
You’re analogy is bad. Lets try this one. A man says he’s going to shoot his neighbor and everyone knows he has been trying to build a gun in his garage. Every night, flickering lights are seen in his garage. He has been getting shipments from a guy accross town containing metals and other parts that could be used construct a gun.
Ok stop, now the neigborhood got together and said, hey this guy needs to stop constructing a gun. So lets limit how much gets shipped to his house (Sanctions). But the guy hasn’t changed his toon, in fact he has said that the sanctions only renews his resolve. So lets offer him some new light bulbs, more energy efficient ones and he’ll save money. He refuses. He’s seen how his buddy accross town, after he got a gun, everyone backed off of him (North Korea) so he’s determined.
So your the police chief, you have two options.
1) Go into his garage and break up anything that has to do with the creating of the gun. You can do it in the dead of night and before he even knows what happens, it will be over.
2) Wait until you here a shot fired in his garage when he tests it, and then try and take the gun away from him, but you run the danger of him running to the window and shooting at his neighbor before you can get to him, or he may shoot at the police at the door.
3) Do nothing. But now, because all of his neighbors don’t like or trust him, they all start constructing guns in their garage (Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, Jordan). Soon, there will be guns pointing out of all the windows in the neighborhood and this neighborhood has been known to get into fights frequently.
What option do you choose.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
yeah we’ve exhausted all diplomacy by threatening Iran for 4 years and not talking to them great stategy -its worked so far
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Has Obama reversed this policy? No? well, he’s certainly trying by talking to people. What a concept. Last time I checked -Obama hasnt illegally invaded another country who never threatened us.. If you have your way – he will
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“yeah we’ve exhausted all diplomacy by threatening Iran for 4 years and not talking to them great stategy -its worked so far”
So far they have never been threatened with strikes, as much as you’d like to believe that. Lets look at what Bush has done to Iran. I believe in 2006 (or 2005), an economic package was offered by the US and Russia to build things such as LIGHT water nuke power plants, refineries to refine their own oil, as well as a number of other economic incentives to give up enrichment. They refused. Not too long after, the UN authorized stronger sanctions on Iran. That brings us to today. Still looking for that big bad threatening “we’ll invade you har har har” you characterize Bush with.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
“Has Obama reversed this policy? No? well, he’s certainly trying by talking to people.”
The president makes the policy. Why do you think he has to talk to somebody to change it.? Does he need someone’s permission?
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
kr great story. more choices though.
4. get a mandate for a search in his garage.
5. if you randomly take him out, the whole neighborhood will use that to get at your family.
6. engage the neighborhood to understand that you’re not enemy. (virtually everyone, except one uses that to do unjust things like abusing their daughters, sons and wives without taking responsibility.)
Posted by: lupercal | March 20, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Did you know that folowing the Sept 11th attacks candlelight vigils were held by students in Iran? Did you know soccer stadiums in Iran with 60,000 Iranians had a moment of silence for the dead. Did you know that after 9-11 Iran allowed us to use their country to search for lost servicemen?
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
How does Iran threaten me and my family? just like Iraq didnt? Tell me why these human beings deserve to die? Please explain
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Iranians are not Arabs They speak Farsi Have a long historic culture Most like Americans, wear Levi’s and listen to rap or hip-hop. How have they threatened you?
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
sigmund freud – its common sense to talk to people Ignoring or shunning them has done NOTHING ZERO ZILCH NADA to help America
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
kr fact of the matter is you dont one bad apple. virtually all of then have their own problems. if you’re the self-anointed police chief (or appointed by others so they don’t have to do the policing themselves), you gotta make sure that you’re not public enemy #1. so u gotta talk. If you took out this dude in that neighborhood, the whole neighborhood would cheer and breathe a sight of relief. you take out iran. and tell me the reaction.
Posted by: lupercal | March 20, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Hey I never said you don’t talk. In my posts below, I point out Diplomacy has been going on for 4 years. Not directly from the President, but from US representatives, or through intermediaries as is common in diplomacy (like Jordan or Russia).
Look, I’m with you guys, if you can talk him out of this, go for it. Those who have closely studied this regime will most likely tell you that your playing into their hands as they need time and need to stall us. Just like North Korea dazzled us with diplomacy and talks right up until they detonated a bomb underground, diplomacy can serve to work against us. If we are all aware of that, we won’t be so shocked if the day comes you read in the paper that Iran detonated a bomb, soon to be followed by one in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, and Egypt. If we are all fine with that, then lets get on the big koombayah wagon and smoke some hash and kick the horse.
Lets just realize a couple of things. There will be nukes all over the middle east. 70% of the worlds energy flows through the straights in which Iran has laid claim to. They have on multiple times in the past attempted to close the straights launching silkworm missiles at our Navy. When they are a nuke power, they will be able to do that and our Navy will be powerless to do anything about it, effectively bringing the world to its knees.
As long as we accept that risk, diplomacy till your hearts content. You won’t get any argument from me. However, I do not think many on here are aware of the termoil a nuke Iran will cause.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
“its common sense to talk to people Ignoring or shunning them has done NOTHING ZERO ZILCH NADA to help America”
Then why doesn’t Obama just pick up the phone and make an appointment with Ahmadinejad? What’s holding him back?
Posted by: Sigmond | March 20, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
kr great story. more choices though.
love this analogy. Let’s continue.
So you take the option to go into the garage and find out exactly what he is doing, is he making a gun? Well it turns out he was making a box car for his son. Let’s call this man Iraq.
Posted by: greg | March 20, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
kr great story. more choices though.
love this analogy. Let’s continue.
So you take the option to go into the garage and find out exactly what he is doing, is he making a gun? Well it turns out he was making a box car for his son. Let’s call this man Iraq.
Posted by: greg | March 20, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
“So you take the option to go into the garage and find out exactly what he is doing, is he making a gun? Well it turns out he was making a box car for his son. Let’s call this man Iraq.”
I knew that would come up. Let me turn that around on you.
So you take the option to talk to the guy and he stalls, stringing you along and suddenly, BOOM, theres a shot in the garage. Oh thats North Korea.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
And just a little food for thought for all those Ballistic Missile Defense nay sayers out there. North Korea, run by a dillusional self serving lunatic, can reach the West coast of the US with a nuke. Enjoy your dinner.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Now I agree that Iran sending money and weapons to Hezbolah and Hammas does not help the intrest of America. But we have done the samething supporting locals of diffrent nations to support our own intrests, Congo, Columbia, Iraq, Afgahnistan. I think the pharse is War by Proxy. So under that definition we would be terrorists, but since we deem our Proxy Wars just in the name of Liberty. Forcing people to adapt or form their beliefs to what we want them to do is just as wrong. Though our enemies claim that they are just defending their homes and way of life from Western influence. Who is right here? Which side is on the side of rightousness? Is it American arrogance that we believe we can change other governments when we don’t like. One thing is true, the only time true and lasting change to take place you have to have an uprising from within. Our own country did this. France did not even get involved with our independence until it was clear the colonies were going to win.
Posted by: greg | March 20, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
KR
the persumtion of innocence is one of our greastest attributes as Americans. If you see boogiemen in every shadow, innocent people will suffer.
Posted by: greg | March 20, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
“the persumtion of innocence is one of our greastest attributes as Americans. If you see boogiemen in every shadow, innocent people will suffer.”
You have no idea how many boogiemen are running around out there. Fortunately you live a nice sheltered life here in the states. When you go outside these borders, and you’re job is to understand the threats posed to this nation, its allies, and it’s interests, you start to realize that the boogieman is real and he has no love for you. He will tell you what you want to hear to get what he wants, and he’ll stab you in the back if you turn your back to him. It’s real folks, this is a dangerous, screwed up world. I’ve spent the last 5 years in strategic studies and there is no peace pipe out there to smoke.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
This is the way I see it: Obama is snubbing Israel, Obama is extending an olive branch to Iran. Iran is preparing to nuke Israel and BO wants to be on the winning side. For Israel to retaliate or defend themselves, they have to pass Iraq air space, which WE control. This is the really scary part….how does he plan on responding to this? Will he order the military to step back? Or will he block any aggression by Israel.
This is a very, very dangerous time. If I were a Jew, I would be marching in the streets about the disrespect America has demonstrated toward Israel, who has been a loyal ally to us in the Mid-East.
Thats my take. Obama has no loyalty or character, no spine, and ANYONE can be thrown under his bus. Look at his history.
Posted by: mjishernameo | March 20, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
“But we have done the samething supporting locals of diffrent nations to support our own intrests, Congo, Columbia, Iraq, Afgahnistan. I think the pharse is War by Proxy.”
Certainly was a staple of the Cold War diet by both us and the Russians. It is innevitable that our nation will support groups that support us. Those that don’t support us, or threaten our allies, we work to undermine.
Certainly Iran is doing the same with Hamas etc. Doesn’t mean we go “Oh ok, go ahead, we understand”. You counter it, you try to stop it because it affects one of our allies. That’s the game of the world bud. There’s black, theres white, and theres grey and we’re in all of em.
But our nation does stand for liberty and freedom. We lost our way in the Cold War because of necessity to protect interests abroad. We have a chance after the Cold War to finally be principled in that, but we pooh pooh it for the sake of non-existant peace.
This country hasn’t done everything right, and hasn’t done everything wrong, but we should always stand on liberty and freedom. Just like Hamas was elected, we have to learn to accept what we get. We have to strive to be a principled nation on democracy, freedom and liberty even if we didn’t do well at it in the past, we can’t use the past to justify stopping that pursuit. It is in the best interest of the world that people experience freedom and liberty if we ever truely want to see peace in the world. Accepting and containing status quo will never achieve the peace in the world we all say we want. We disagree on how to get there.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
At the least, Obama’s overtures put pressure on hard-liners to justify their anti-American stance to Iranians, said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran expert at the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Previously, the hard-liners have been able to blame the impasse on Bush, who was widely unpopular in Iran.
“Rather than tip the scales in favor of (hard-line) radicals, as the Bush administration did, I think Obama’s efforts at diplomacy will undermine them and puncture their narrative of a hostile U.S. government bent on oppressing Iran,” Sadjadpour said.
Posted by: guy | March 20, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
“Previously, the hard-liners have been able to blame the impasse on Bush, who was widely unpopular in Iran.”
Give them time. They’ll create an impasse with Obama. They did with Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr. I’d be surprised if they choose a different tactic now. They will find something Obama will not budge on and when they do, they’ll have their excuse.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
I still wish him luck. His message, by enlarge, was good. Questionable statements…
Calling them by their proclaimed title, Islamic Republic of Iran. This surely ticked off the Sunni nations. Maybe we’ll hear about it, maybe we won’t. There is an ongoing fight among the Sunnis and Shia on who has legitimate Iyatolahs (sp? too lazy on a friday to look it up). So might spark a tizzy, maybe won’t.
And praising their building and creativity. They are trying to build and create weapons grade uranium. It stepped into a double meaning that might have been best to find different words of priase for their history. Nothing huge, but could have used a different choice of words there.
Posted by: KR | March 20, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Guy
I completley agree with that last post. The point I was trying to make is that we are playing the same game that has failed. A new opportunity arises now that we as the United States may take a some what diffrent aproach. That we might brake the cycle. I like his approach is diffrent tha what we have tried to do before, so I think the Pres deserves a little credit instead of the harsh critism from our republican leaders.
Posted by: greg | March 20, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Iran was a good friend of us. It’s about time the Obama Administration and our intelligence agencies stop believing Israel’s false “intellince” to ingratiate itself with the USA.
It is best to constructively engage one’s real or purported adversaries.
Posted by: R B Quinn | March 20, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
The Queen send a new year message to the World every year. But I think this Obama new year message to Iran is not the same. Gengis Khan also send his message and ambassador to Iran at the time it was Persia, and they send back his head in a basket.
Posted by: Joe | March 20, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Well, it worked for Carter.
Brilliant!
Posted by: RR GOP | March 20, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Very satisfying to see the President show respect for an ancient culture regardless of how paranoid their junior leader is about Israel. I so admire and love Mr. Obama and Mrs. Obama and their little sprouts. The garden is a great idea, I’m going to plant a bunch of my seed packets from last year, now that I’ve heard that they last three years. It was not inspired by the White House garden, but by a plot of ground behind our garage that could be a wonderful place to plant.
Or I could get one of those expensive round contraptions that does all the work for you within your home, for a couple of hundred dollars. Hardly Making Do…
I loved the quotation that the President selected. I only know The Prophet and “Speak to me now of children” and back when I was campaigning for Barack Obama, I made up a poster for him with those words on it. Too long for a poster, but I raised my kids by it and they turned out well.
I enjoy reading your postings. I’m new to this world but I’m learning to scan faster and faster.
At some point I hang it up and go lay down, but unfortunately that point is midnight to 2 a.m. and I wake up at 6, exhausted, to begin again.
I’m on dialysis M-W-F for 4 hrs. each so there’s a lot of time hooked up to a machine to watch political tv and read books and magazines. One patient even brings her computer down and I’m going to do that. My computer is a notebook that’s about 5 years old, and she just came in with a little thing about 6 ” x 8″. I’m insanely jealous, but a new little baby computer is not on my want list for right now. I’m busy making Dymo labels for my million file folders (for the stuff I don’t want to store in Bookmarks).
Have a great night.
Posted by: stefbovt | March 20, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
If Obama is going to put his hand out towards Iran, He just might want to make sure there is a gun in it. I don’t trust them, never have, never will.
Posted by: BikernAz12 | March 21, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Iran is our new BFF!
Posted by: Desdamonajoe | March 21, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
As a true truce, we demand nuclear secrets and the technology from you. Share what you know and prove your faithfulness towards friendship. Otherwise we will reguard you as being weak and a tool.
Posted by: Habiab | March 21, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Hey Folks,
President Obama created a personal message to the president of Iran and shared it with the world. The open dialog has started and Mr. Obama is using the full power of the Internet to help solve some of our world problems. I commend them both for wanting to work toward solving the problems between our two countries.
Both sides have valid issues but the past is the past. Time now to look toward the future. This is a game played on a world level.
President Obama could stun the world by bringing Israel to the stage. He should send another message asking Israel to stop playing the game of letting the world wonder if they possess nuclear weapons. To stop the deception by refusing to confirm or deny. Oh yes, it would upset Israel and some members of our government, but Mr. Obama would show courage and the American people would see this and know the real President Obama. Mr. Obama is working for the greater good of the American people and the people of the world, not for the members of Congress. With the support of the American people he can accomplish great things. That is where his real power lies.
ISRAEL, please tell the world the truth. Your scientists know and the nuclear scientists of the world know. If we want to stop the proliferation of WMD’s it needs to include the ENTIRE nuclear club and the countries that wish to become a club member. If Israel disarmed voluntarily, that would give Iran incentives to drop their quest for building a bomb and show the world that the United States is committed to bringing peace to the world. Current members of the club include:
United States
Russia
Ukraine
China
United Kingdom
France
India
Pakistan
Israel
It is known that Syria and Argentina both wish to become members. How many other nations desire this kind of power?
Every nation that builds these weapons increases the risk for catastrophy.
Support President Obama’s efforts. His job is difficult and he’s trying to do the right thing.
Thanks for reading…
Posted by: RandallG | March 23, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am