By Dschabner

Mar 18, 2009 10:46pm

President Obama Compares Big Banks, AIG, to Suicide Bombers

At his town hall meeting in Costa Mesa, Calif., Wednesday evening, President Obama compared embattled insurer AIG and other large failing banks to a suicide bomber.

"A lot of people say, ‘Well, why not just let the banks fail?’" the president said. "’Why don’t we just let them fail, let them go bankrupt, what’s the problem?’"

The president said that if the local community bank, Fullerton Community Bank, failed, "We’ve got something called the FDIC, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, that would take it over, it would guarantee all the deposits so you don’t have to worry about your deposits.  They are not at risk.  And it would be able to kind of sort things out and then resell the bank fairly quickly and it doesn’t threaten the system as a whole."

Bigger banks, however, "Citicorp or Bank of America or, you know, Wells Fargo that controls 70 percent of the banking system, and all of them are weakening, you can’t afford to have all those banks all at once start going under.  Even though the deposits might be guaranteed, you’ve got the entire economy resting on that credit."

The president said, "It was the right thing to do, even though it’s infuriating, even though it makes you angry because you’re thinking, ‘I was responsible and these folks are irresponsible and somehow I’m paying for them.’ The same is true with AIG.  It was the right thing to do to step in."

"Here’s the problem," Mr. Obama said, "It’s almost like they’ve got — they’ve got a bomb strapped to them and they’ve got their hand on the trigger.  You don’t want them to blow up.  But you’ve got to kind of talk them, ease that finger off the trigger."

- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

I thought we were supposed to catch suicide bombers before the act, hold onto them for a few years and then release them into the American populous. I guess that’s his plan on banks. He’s caught them before they exploded, now we’re going to hang onto them for a few years (not change the policies that got us here or anything), and then unleash them back into the American economy so it can all happen again, but the next time with more BANG!

Posted by: NPage | March 18, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Obama’s policy on neither one makes much sense to me.

Posted by: NPage | March 18, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

We really did not what we were doing, but we have tried our best. That got to worth something, right? You mean I signed off, and pushed my buddy Dodd to put the language in the Stimulus Bill to ensure awarding AIG bonuses? But, but, but I am telling you I am outraged.
Although the notion that we are clues is true, we are still trying to steer the economy into my deep O – the deep hole on the tail of my Lobby Force One.
- PB0 at his townhall meeting that he was afraid of when there was someone debating him.

Posted by: kat | March 18, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

30 seconds until waterboarding is worked into the discussion.

Posted by: vinman | March 18, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Speaking of bombs…every time President Obama isn’t comforted by his friend the “prompter”, he lays a…….BOMB

Posted by: ralph | March 18, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Obama has lost all credibility.

Posted by: Michelle | March 18, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Funny how he went from President Obama to Mr. Obama, lol!

Posted by: Stef | March 18, 2009, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

I think there are three things to consider in this AIG mess.
(1) The AIG bailout organized by the NY Fed happened in a weekend. Understandably, compensation wasn’t high on the list of priorites.
(2) AIG failing is not an option. It would take the global financial sector down with it and we’d be in a depression right now.
(3) This Bailout rage masks the real issue: we need to put Justice on the case and bring grand juries against not only AIG but Citi and all the major financial institutions.
This administration has been fighting to keep the world financial house in order and deal with this crisis; things have fallen through the cracks. But this off with their heads mentality isn’t helping. Call them out and then fix the mess: that means criminal complaints on AIG IMO. This crisis isn’t over and distracting Treasury isn’t going to help and it won’t help attract folks to the post: three have walked away already rather than deal with this political mess as well as the financial mess. That’s a shame and a danger for the country. WE should be rallying around Treasury like we did the military IMO. The fate of life as we know it hangs in the balance IMO. Tent cities are ALREADY appearing; despite all we’ve done right. The only thing holding us up has been the stimulus and FDR’s legacy as well as Chairman Bernanke and Hank Paulson’s forceful action. I know Paulson is a pariah; but history will say he stepped up and fought hard when the chips were down.
That’s my take anyway.
Our financial system was hijacked and the people who did it are obviously looting and threatening to blow the world up if they don’t get paid: see Citi CEO and his 11 million. But we still gotta save them to save ourselves. Who know Wall Street would be twice the headache Iran is? Go figure.

Posted by: Rhoda | March 18, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

hope! change! bombs strapped to banks!
lolol

Posted by: al | March 18, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

next up… the fannie/freddie exec bonuses due to be paid under obama’s watch. how ya gonna spin this??

Posted by: bhudda flii | March 18, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Quote Obama on his presidential campaign trail “That’s Washington Double Speak!”

Posted by: from Ohio | March 18, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

The President is UNBELIEVABLE!! President Obama wants us to think he’s a standup kinda guy. He feigns outrage over AIG and the bonuses, but it turns out he (his Administration) cajoled Sen Dodd into making certain a provision to protect the bonuses was inserted into the Stimulus Plan. The “outrage” frenzie that the President, and his stoogie Capitol Hill Democrats have worked up is not only hypocritical, but it is endangering the lives of AIG employees and their families.
A friend of mine told me the Latin phrase to describe the President and Sen Dodd’s two-faced hypocracy: they’re lying sacks of sheet!

Posted by: Voter2Be | March 18, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

I HAVE TO WONDER IF OBAMA IS LIKE THE WIZARD IN THE WIZARD OF OZ THE TELEPROMPTER BEING THE FIRE BREATHING SPEAKER AND HIM BEING THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN, POLOSI BEING THE WICKED WITH AND BARNEY FRANK AND CONGRESS BEING THE MUNSKINS

Posted by: david reyes | March 18, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

I’ve told these people time and time again the entire economy could come crashing down on us, water could turn to blood, children might starve and dogs and cats might start living together but they still aren’t completely distracted from the incompetence of my administration or my over-reaching power grab. Hmmm…I know, I know! I’ll drop in the phrase “suicide bomber”! ——-Honestly, has this guy acted presidential one time since his inaugaration? Pathetic. And now he goes on Leno?! The first sitting president in history to hit the late-night talk show circuit?! My God!

Posted by: Dan | March 18, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

He would know all about suicide bombers…

Posted by: screwed | March 18, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Banks that are too big to fail are too big. Teddy Roosevelt busted up the trusts for a reason. A free market requires that those who do well be allowed to succeed. It also requires that those who screw up be allowed to fail. The phrase “too big to fail” is an indictment of the current state of American capitalism.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 18, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Rhoda – you make too much sense.

Posted by: As I See It | March 18, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Extremely politically tone deaf comment by Obama.
“Here’s the problem,” Mr. Obama said, “It’s almost like they’ve got — they’ve got a bomb strapped to them and they’ve got their hand on the trigger. You don’t want them to blow up. But you’ve got to kind of talk them, ease that finger off the trigger.”
I’m sorry, this is just wrong. The President must not stoop to this level of Orwell.1984 type rhetoric oomparing bank executives to suicide bombers. This is just wrong.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 19, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Concerned in OH posted “I’m guessing him saying something that stupid, that he wasn’t reading from the real president, the teleprompter.” Now let’s hear from a president who didn’t use a teleprompter :: G.W.Bush who said “I’m telling you there’s an enemy that would like to attack America, Americans, again. There just is. That’s the reality of the world. And I wish him all the very best.” and “I’ve abandoned free market principles to save the free market system.” The funniest part is that to YOU Bush was a brilliant orator. Ha!

Posted by: SamTyler1973 | March 19, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

simple easy. Europe funded a side in the feuding between the two sides of what divided the united states during the civil war. they aided the confederate,
now since that time and before a back door entry was created. In the fraternaties of our universities and places of education. Skull and bones for example.
gives these priveleged class of students a great unrecorded amount of funding from a european connected grant. they are and have been known to have entered into a royal
chivalry covenant, of which they are well cared for. Selected and only by selection. They are knighted before our faces and their loyalties are no longer to our country.
Obama was is the fall guy. He’s smart, but it’s far too well structured to have been done alone. it was done by many. look for the employer of the mathmaticians that could have
created such a complex formula. it’s all tied. washington and wall street. for a purpose only to expand the fact that the common wealth in which the district of columbia reside in are
and have been that of managed common wealth of the royal monarchial cartel that have like an octupus with is enforcing analysts to regulate the resources of our world and the barters that
come with those transactions.
“Orional 13th amendment” will automatically remove a corrupt official. Just get a officer and print the law of the land. need 38 states to get wall street, washington, cheney, bush, and due to the
fact that democrates and republicans also have that corrupt stentch on them it’s hard to enfore unless you help. dems and repubs are in-charge of this vote. and its you telling them that your IN-CHARGE! ! !

Posted by: origional 13th amendment | March 19, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Rhona – cogent analysis — a few comments:
1 and 2 contradict with 3 in your points. Instigating grand juries for AIG and Citi (and BOA, Fannie, Freddie, etc.) would cause the same crash 1 and 2 discuss.
I agree the best solution is to rally around the Treasury and Obama – but only if Obama backs off his hard leftist initiatives which are at least perceived as anti-business. Card Check, Carbon Tax, business and personal tax hikes, unrestrained spending to double the debt in 4-5 years – all of which Obama needs to put aside to focus on the financial crisis, now, and be more of a centrist.
If he doesn’t, rallying to Treasury and Obama will only ensure he gets more of the above agenda through now, hastening the crash of the economy you bemoan in numbers 1 and 2.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 19, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Some times the President actually speaks the truth:
“Here’s the problem,” Mr. Obama said.

Posted by: Voter2Be | March 19, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

I will bet that by the end of this year he’s going to announce that Michelle ‘Muscle Arms’ Obama is pregnant just to get a distraction and have the MSM go on 24 hr. ooohhh—ahhhh cycle! Geithner, I give him till the end of the month..writing’s on the wall! That’s his MO—support than throw them under the bus!

Posted by: Hope | March 19, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

I quess Obama needs to get out his ole’ scalpel and seperate the bomb from the banks, instead of throwing the hatchet at it.

Posted by: Mad Dog | March 19, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

The president said, “It was the right thing to do, >>>>>
That’s a false assumption there are several other alternatives to handing out a blank checks to high stack gamblers.
1) Change the mark to market for a time allowing for 5 year averages. This would end the liquidity issue because its just a paper/accounting issue.
2) BUST up the banks, GM and AIG into small enough pieces so they can be purchased by GOOD banks like Fullerton Community Bank. I am sure MANY banks that size are not in trouble and could always use another branch and this would spread the toxic assets out tween all those small banks.
Addition to the above ideas to bring back some confidence..
PUT the people in the slammer that rated these derivatives AAA.
They should never have such a high rating. Look for fraud in the case of Wall Street, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Create a new law that will stop further derivatives trading.
Take back the 13dollar a week tax credit and use the 300BILLION dollars to buy/guarantee the toxic assets.
Put Chris Dodd in front of a Grand Jury on payola charges.
There is SO much that could be DONE Mr President besides handing out BLANK checks. That practice leads to nothing but more anger.
LOCK down our borders so we dont loose more jobs that the US people need so badly and get card check so we can make sure he people here working are legal -vs- being slaves.
Reward companies that hire 95% American
as well as contract only with companies like that by giving them a 50% tax cut.
Increase Taxes companies that dont have a 95% American force by 50%.
CUT the HIB visa by 80%.
Reduce capitol gains so family farms and homes can stay in the family.
Its a shame that the government forces family farmers to sell their land because of taxes. That has to stop.
There is so MUCH you could do instead of just witting out blank checks to fat cats who are playing us all for Fools.
Hire me.. I need a job ;-)

Posted by: ChicagBob | March 19, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

The media is the voice of the state they have forgotten to remember the individual. We the people have to understand our philosophy behind our principle conservatives. We conservative stand for liberty the other side does not and that is why people like Barnabus Frank want to take a private citizens property, you have a leader of the senate who publicaly goes after a private citizen…. Harry Reid vs the Elrushbo, and a President that would be happy to punish those who are succesful and take everything you earn to fortify his power. I here the left constantly rippimg down our country trashing hard working people such as those at AIG. AIG entered into these contracutal arrangements and need to be treated with respect. Congress is no more than a frenzied mob. Congress has targeted private citizens and this sounds to me like congress is acting like a totaliarian regime. Yhey make me sick to my stomach. Congress caused this whole mess and it goes deep and the very people who caused this whole mess are those that are creating new policy. What a bunch of hacks.

Posted by: sav | March 19, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

To origional 13th amendment:
I couldn’t have said it better myself.

Posted by: Voter2Be | March 19, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Sam Tyler wrote: “The funniest part is that to YOU Bush was a brilliant orator. Ha!”………Nice set of quotes. Of course it is nothing more than a red herring. The fact that a previous president made asinine statements has no bearing whatsoever with criticism of similar comments from the sitting president. Another problem. You are the only one to mention Bush and thus have presented, in addition to the red herring, a strawman argument. But hey, if it makes you feel better who cares about the facts?

Posted by: Dan | March 19, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Demagogy (also demagoguery) (Ancient Greek δημαγωγία, from δῆμος dēmos “people” and ἄγειν agein “to lead”) refers to a political strategy for gaining political power by appealing to the popular prejudices, emotions, fears and expectations of the public — typically via impassioned rhetoric and propaganda, and often using nationalist or populist themes.
citation,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demagogy
Read it all, there are historical examples friends…astounding and quite current?
CHANGE in 2010 and 2012

Posted by: Anthiny | March 19, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Dan: So your point is that I COULD have said it better?

Posted by: Voter2Be | March 19, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Thanks for the wiki Anthiny…Keep spreading the word! Meantime, why can’t moderates & conservatives battle the ACORN w/ a group just like them? Oh right, Holder! Did you hear they’re going to wrk for the census! Time for a Revolution people and time to let the MSM media FAIL!!!

Posted by: Hope | March 19, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Obama and the Dems are SAVING their
fat cats on Wall Street with the black hole of AIG swallowing the buckets of
taxpayers money. This ensures buckets
of dough coming back to the left at
election time. This is the street
game of find the queen after I maneuver
the three cards. The idiots screaming
and applauding at the “town hall” today
will NEVER guess where the queen hides.
The “queen” is Barney Frank, Dodd, et. al. Acorn will re-census America into
a Dem fortress. CBS,NBC,ABC,NYT cheer
the effort. Obama reverts to B-S mode,
and all is well.

Posted by: Trajan | March 19, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

“So your point is that I COULD have said it better?”…..I would certainly hope so.

Posted by: Dan | March 19, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

AIG gave Obama only slightly less than
Dodd in the last election cycle.
Move on, folks…………….NOTHING
to see here…………………….

Posted by: Trajan | March 19, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Is it true that after the President compared AIG and big banks to suicide bombers that the crowd broke out chanting: “O Bomb a”, “O Bomb a”,”O Bomb a”?

Posted by: Voter2Be | March 19, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Comparing AIG and the other banks to suicide bombers shows just how inept the President is at representing a situation and/or how little respect he has for the intelligence of the public. If the end-all and be-all of these organizations is gain then deliberately setting out to destroy themselves and the system around them is the last thing they would want to do. He could have compared the situation to an infection or disease that threatens the health of the entire system, but by trying to link this economic situation to one of national security is just pathetic.

Posted by: Publius | March 19, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Where’s the transparency?

Posted by: lm | March 19, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Mr. Liddy, the CEO of AIG who took this job in 2008 on the behest of the Bush Admn. and the “outraged” politicians, testified today that although he felt these bonuses were horrible he also felt that in order to repay taxpayers quickly and control further systemic risk to our economy, it was prudent to pay out these bonuses.
This person is being paid a meager salary of $1.00 per year without a bonus or stock options in lieu of services. Neither is he a politician.
If YOU were on the hook for $165 billion dollars to AIG and the guy runnning the company told you that these bonuses should be paid in order to pay you back, what would you do? You know what, don’t answer because we all know what we would do and its exactly what Geithner did and he did so upon the recommendation from the guy working in the trenches, not the politicians in Washington.
If they returned the money, would we be talking about this now? The fact that these people keep the bonuses is OUTRAGEOUS!!

Posted by: a tired hampster | March 19, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Actually there is a difference. Most suicide bombers kill themselves to strike fear and death to those that they see as unjust in causing harm to those the suicide bombers identify with. The bankers just want to get rich at the expense of the nation and the taxpayers with the knowledge that we will bail them out and let them keep their jobs. Thus the bankers are worse than the suicide bombers.

Posted by: Huh | March 19, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

What gives? I didn’t see the AIG bonuses on that comprehensive graph on recovery

Posted by: Pioneer | March 19, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

The only salaries I want to see given back are from Congress who have failed us far more than AIG has.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 19, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

So why the heck dont we let them blow themselves up? Sorry, but I disagree with Obama. Let them flush themselves into the toilet.

Posted by: paul | March 19, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am

2 wrongs don’t make a right.
The banks have behaved like blood sucking idiots but our Senators and Government officials have behaved equally disgustingly offering blame blame blame and now it comes out that OBAMA no less signed off on letting the Banks go ahead and give the bonus’s.
Solution, let the banks fail and maybe we need to try what works in the rest of the world SNAP ELECTIONS in 90 days!

Posted by: CC | March 19, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

I think Obama’s comparison was very accurate.
AIG knows that if they go down the world economy goes down.
Another one to look at is Goldman Sachs. paulsons former employer that made him a multi-millionaire
They were the first to get TARp money, plus Goldman received several billion from AIG to cover their gambling losses.

Posted by: Jim | March 19, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Oh, so that’s how it’s done? I’m a Soldier and have been fighting suicide bombers for a few years now. If only I knew that I just need to talk to them sooner! I could have saved a few terrorist lives!

Posted by: CJ | March 19, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am

What did Wells Fargo do that was so bad?
Keep Wachovia from failing.
He really needs to learn that as President of the United States, he has a big megaphone. Name-checking companies (and countries) must be done with caution.

Posted by: MayBee | March 19, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Well, I tell ya what Jake, i’ve done a little research.
If the Administration is so ready to admit they’ve been the Administration for 60 days (anyone who reads the papers knows the White House watered down the Dodd amendment at the time of the “stimulus” legislation), how about talking about campaign contributions after the AIG collapse and first bailout occurred via Paulson, Bush, Geitner and Bernanke?
Proving that Obama received campaign contributions from AIG employees after the bailout isn’t difficult at all. Just do an advanced search on fec.gov for contributions made on or after September 16, 2008.
After a quick search and calculations (subject to double checking of my math), Obama for America, Obama’s main campaign fund, directly received at least $8,600 post-bailout contributions from employees who listed AIG as their employer. This doesn’t take into account employees who listed their employer American International Group or a subsidiary name that doesn’t include AIG.
Obama’s joint fundraising fund, the Obama Victory Fund, received at least $15,521 in post-bailout “bonuses” from AIG employees. I’m not 100% sure of how the reporting works, but it appears that the bulk of the bonuses paid to the joint fund, at least $12,171, went into Obama’s main campaign fund. And it also appears that at least $2,550 of those “bonuses” came from two employees of the much-demagogued AIG Financial Products subsidiary.
That’s a total of over 24,000.00 in cash to Obama from AIG employees, after AIG collapsed in September 2008, that Obama has not returned or even discussed publically. Obama refused to answer a question on the AIG contributions today.
Well that may be a real story. Proven donations to Obama from AIG execs after the bailout announcement to AIG in the early fall, that could be a real story.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 19, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am

Obama says he can Walk and Chew Gum at the Same Time. He also said he would go Line by Line & Veto Pork Too! You Can take Obama out of Chigaco, but you can’t take Chigaco out of Obama. No Obama 2012.

Posted by: from Ohio | March 19, 2009, 1:35 am 1:35 am

NO OBAMA 2012!

Posted by: Not Fooled | March 19, 2009, 1:43 am 1:43 am

I support Obama but poor choice of words on this one. Let’s see proactive leadership, not necessary to pile on with negativity, there are always plenty to carry that banner, the President has to always, always, always rise above the pack.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 19, 2009, 1:44 am 1:44 am

you republicans are funny ,after 8 years of obama you are going to get 8 more of hillary.
SO REPUBLICANS,JUST GET USED TO THE IDEA …
YOU = DONE ,G/BYE

Posted by: Tim | March 19, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am

That’s right Obama. Keep the anger on the banks and not the fact your policies are directly responsible for helping them out.

Posted by: Jordan | March 19, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Also, FYI, ABC News itself reports that the Obama campaign received a $23,000 post-bailout “bonus” from AIG’s employees, so my numbers aren’t too far off. Maybe they screwed up on the search and my numbers of about 24,000.00 are right. Either way, its a fact, buddy, that Obama received a post bailout cash injection from AIG employees.
ABC News:
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign finance reports, more than $120,000 of that money was donated after AIG received its first $85 billion in federal bailout funds in September. The company has since received a total of $170 billion in taxpayer cash to prevent its collapse.
Their generosity included more than $23,000 to Obama’s campaign.
Both Obama and Republican presidential candidate John McCain raked in much larger sums from AIG earlier in the year. Obama collected a total of $130,000 from AIG in 2008, while McCain accepted a total of $59,499.
Also, a Connecticut newspaper reports that Senator Dodd will return any “tainted” contributions from AIG employees – whatever Dodd deems “tainted” to mean, I suppose. Dodd has received many contributions from employees of the Connecticut-based AIG Financial Products unit over the years – and AIG’s employee PAC.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 19, 2009, 2:27 am 2:27 am

99% LIES!! THATS THE REPUBLICAN WAY ,IF THEIR LIPS ARE MOVING THERE IS A LIE COMING SOON FOR SURE.
Posted by: Brian Wilson | Mar 19, 2009 2:21:37 AM
99.9% Lies!! (fixed that for you!)

Posted by: Jeffy | March 19, 2009, 2:44 am 2:44 am

Tim said:
scores of executives at aig are apparently getting 10s of millions in “bailout bonuses” and obama gets that monster 25k, oh yeah he was all in on everything ,getting the big kickbacks ,oh yeah…DO YOU KNOW HOW STUPID THAT MAKES YOU AND YOUR “RESEARCH “LOOK?
Response:
My point is not to compare Obama’s take of about 25K to the take of the others in the equation. My point is that Obama is up there screaming about outrage — if that was genuine, why would any contributions post bailout in Sept 08 to Obama continue to be held by Obama and not donated to charity or back to the federal government?
Simply put, false outrage, proven again by the 25K post bailout AIG cash to OBama.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 19, 2009, 2:45 am 2:45 am

OK. So, when AIG funnels money overseas, is that like an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile? Put your money where you can find it.

Posted by: cal | March 19, 2009, 2:47 am 2:47 am

The difference is Obama campaigned and continues to preach he’s Mr. New Way Post Partisan reasonable man above the fray no lobbyists or influence guy.
So held to that self imposed standard, Obama must answer for the 23K plus post AIG bailout contributions to him from AIG execs.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 19, 2009, 2:51 am 2:51 am

obama has said TWICE now that he doesn’t care about being re-elected…
“if this bailout doesn’t work i’ll be a one term president…”
“i’d rather be a one term president that got a lot done that a two term mediocre president.”
BE AFRAID. BE VERY AFRAID.

Posted by: bhuddaf | March 19, 2009, 2:53 am 2:53 am

Response:
(spin spin spin spin etc…)
Spin…that’s all you have. The NEW president(i love saying that ) may ,or may not even be aware of these contributions , they just occurred very lately you act like it happened 2 or 3 years ago.
And whoever said he wasnt going to give those contributions to charity or whatever? you are searching for something that just isnt there ,admit it.
When/if you and the other troglodyte “thinkers” that presently make up the brain trust of the republican party get some real heavyweight FACTS as ammunition, then perhaps the republicans as a whole will have a chance to regain some respectability. until then ,keep spouting insignificance and we adults will keep ignoring you.

Posted by: Tim W | March 19, 2009, 2:59 am 2:59 am

Hey , Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter don’t forget about the fake birth certificate and also that Obamno is a Muslim and hates all whites ,and is also plotting (along with pelosi and reid) to let terrorists invade the usa and is going to set up liberal run concentration camps for anti obama citizens (its already happening ,use goggle) and for americans who wont become muslims.
its all facts…
Make sure you get all the republican facts out there so we can win next election!

Posted by: Tim w | March 19, 2009, 3:08 am 3:08 am

BAILOUTS
ARE
DA
BOMB!
AWE YEEEEAAA!

Posted by: cal | March 19, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am

Obama is the worse President in this history since former Pres. Carter.

Posted by: anonymous | March 19, 2009, 4:59 am 4:59 am

To Sandy: Because your ashamed of being white is why Obama was elected. For years and years the race card has been played over and over again as if any white person alive today had anything to do with slavery. What no one wants to say is the black community has to take responsibility for its actions, like crime rates, births out of wedlock, missing fathers, etc., etc……

Posted by: atlanta3430 | March 19, 2009, 5:42 am 5:42 am

Why color important? Go back one step and look at the whole situation. The important thing is how the gov is working and what the president is doing, not the skin colors

Posted by: gentleman | March 19, 2009, 6:24 am 6:24 am

We should encourage and be together.

Posted by: gentleman | March 19, 2009, 6:26 am 6:26 am

Oh wait…I’m sorry. I owe an apology to Tim W. I misunderstood what you said. It was someone else you were quoting. I’ve made a fool of myself. I apologize.

Posted by: JL | March 19, 2009, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Very poor choice of words. I voted the last ape out because I got so sick of the fear mongering and the word terrorist. That being said? There’s nothing like a cup of former Bush supporters on some thread like this all smug and crowing first thing in the morning. A little reminder guys – under whose watch did it all come crashing down? I don’t think I’d get all full of myself considering it was because of many ills prior to Obama taking office that we now sit in this mess.

Posted by: FedUp | March 19, 2009, 6:27 am 6:27 am

“Here’s the problem,” Mr. Obama said, “It’s almost like they’ve got — they’ve got a bomb strapped to them and they’ve got their hand on the trigger. You don’t want them to blow up. But you’ve got to kind of talk them, ease that finger off the trigger.”
Interesting analogy… does that mean that once he’s gotten them to “ease that finger off the trigger” he’s going to have a sniper take the shot? Or is he going to say, “Thank you for not blowing us all up! Here, have these sacks of money! We hope we’ll see you back here at work bright and early at 10:30AM!”

Posted by: I'm With Stupid | March 19, 2009, 6:29 am 6:29 am

If AIG and the other banks are suicide bombers that make the Obama administration
Iran, acting like their hands are clean all the while providing support to those bombers.

Posted by: hkdakota | March 19, 2009, 6:33 am 6:33 am

We in Europe esp. in The Netherlands are still applauding President BAM cleaning the mess of 8 years of Republicans garbage politics!Americans,for crying out loud,give the President BAM the time to clean the mess!!!he inherited,AIG were already giving bonuses during Bush’s government and why all these commotion’s now that Pres.Bam is really giving all his best to clean messy Uncle Sam.I love America to the core here from Europe.

Posted by: Miss caroline bautista | March 19, 2009, 6:40 am 6:40 am

Get ready for huge bonuses to be coming soon to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Wonder how much money they gave to the campaigns of the sleazebags in Washington? And the beat goes on.

Posted by: Steve | March 19, 2009, 6:41 am 6:41 am

Guess he didn’t have a teleprompter. Outrageous remark.

Posted by: CW | March 19, 2009, 6:45 am 6:45 am

Senator Grassley of Iowa uttered the words first, not Obama. Just another slip by an incompetent President who needs a teleprompter to let him know what to say. I want to see him in a press conference without that teleprompter, and let’s see what he really has on his mind.

Posted by: Steve | March 19, 2009, 6:47 am 6:47 am

What is this article doing here? It doesn’t have anything to do with Barry’s basketball picks. Shame on you ABC! You should concentrate on fluff and leave the hard reporting to Fox.

Posted by: Stilicho2008 | March 19, 2009, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Obama is the most anti-business, anti-capitalist President this nation has ever had.
Next he will be wanting to put bankers and other private businesses owners in Guantanomo Bay.
Plus Obama’s intelligence is highly overrated. This guy’s intelligence comes from the telepromtper.

Posted by: Sally J | March 19, 2009, 7:29 am 7:29 am

What were people thinking putting this guy in the Oval office? Explaining and restating the obvious, by the oblivious, is his trademark. Supporting a dude simply because of his ‘ethnic background’ is now proving to be beyond absurd. It has gone all the way to ‘oh, oh, we done messed up, but we’ll never admit it’.

Posted by: therockofages | March 19, 2009, 7:38 am 7:38 am

OK – now lets get it straight – Dodd first said he didn’t know and then admitted he did know and actually wrote the amendment for the bonuses. Obama didn’t know, but signed the bill with amendment into law. So, Dodd lied and the WH did not vene read the bill they signed into law?

Posted by: jamescbuilder | March 19, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am

This is all a distraction. The democrats are one million times more wealthy and corrupt than the AIG executives. This is all a manufactured distraction to get people to not pay attention to the outrageous abuse of spending of tax payer dollars without any oversight. 4.2 billion dolars to ACORN in the stimulus bill, and the media as well as the Obamabots, mentioned nothing.

Posted by: mm | March 19, 2009, 7:45 am 7:45 am

Is this guy for real? Who in hell got this bozo elected? Oh, we did. Well, at least the ones that voted for him did. Thanks, guys, for electing a green horn. Wait, greener than a green horn. Yepper, our country sent yet another idiot to the White House. Damn!

Posted by: Mike | March 19, 2009, 7:46 am 7:46 am

I don’t think Obama really meant for that to come out the way it did. The teleprompter told him to say it, and it slipped before Barry knew what happened.
Now, aren’t we all curious as to what the teleprompter will make him say today? Maybe he’ll thank himself again, just like he did on St. Patty’s Day when the teleprompter gave him the wrong speech! lolololol

Posted by: TxBoB | March 19, 2009, 7:46 am 7:46 am

We are stuck with this fraud for 3+ years. The only way to stop the damage he is doing to the country, is elect a COngress that doesn’t send him bills which further his Socialist agenda. This means, in 18 months, we have to send him a message. Sen. Reid should be the first to go.

Posted by: brian | March 19, 2009, 7:47 am 7:47 am

Just because AIG EMPLOYEES(!) donated money to Obama’s campaign doesn’t mean it is AIG money – that is wrong to imply. If AIG employees wanted to support Obama’s campaign back in Sep ’08, (at the height of a close campaign) so be it.

Posted by: NonAIG | March 19, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am

Obama has to be stopped by taking control of congress in the next election. We have to limit the damage he can do and block his Socialist agenda.

Posted by: brian | March 19, 2009, 7:56 am 7:56 am

Brian, I agree.. I also say to the voters in San Francisco California, send someone else back to congress in 2010. Pelosi is yet another idiot that needs to go. Hell, all of Congress should be recalled. The Democratic and Republican party have proven to the American people that they are no longer viable. Both now have a credibility problem that is beyond repair. Just look at Sen. Chris Dodd. That sack of potatoes lies to the American people that he knew nothing about the clause in the stimulus bill protecting company bonuses. He now admits he slipped that clause in the stimulus bill. Makes you wonder how many lies he’s told, eh? Oh, and I’m sure he’s not the only one that’s lied. There’s that other idiot, Barnie Frank.

Posted by: Mike | March 19, 2009, 8:00 am 8:00 am

FACTS – Obama received over 125k from AIG. He also knew the bonus provision was in the stimulus bill. His administration told Dodd to put it in there. Dodd did so and then lied about it. He got caught and now he is telling reporters about what happened. Obama and his admin are dirty. Plain and simple and if you can’t see that there is no hope for you. Obama lied, Dodd lied and they got caught. What change hey???????

Posted by: chad | March 19, 2009, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Get over the bonuses already. Get over the Dodd amendment. Get over it. Congress has NO constitutional authority to abrogate private contracts to which the federal government is not a party. None. Former President Bush insisted that TARP 1 must not contain any limits on executive compensation, because of his view that the government should not be setting compensation rates for private business even if it is a majority shareholder. So TARP 1 funds were paid even though AIG had these contracts. That may have been a mistake, but it wasn’t a mistake that entitles the federal government to invalidate private contracts. The ball was in AIG’s court to demonstrate good faith by doing everything possible to rescind or renegotiate its agreements. AIG didn’t until yesterday. The rest of the Dodd amendment, by the way, imposes major restrictions on compensation to future TARP recipients. The right way to do this is to impose the limitations as a condition of receiving money. This Administration is willing to do that. I am glad that so far, it is not willing to engage in an unlawful exercise of federal power by invalidating the bonus agreements. Geez, conservatives, I thought you’d be with Dodd on this one!

Posted by: Hil | March 19, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Um…wouldn’t a more apt analogy have been paying for the emergency room care for a cardiac patient who had lived on doughnuts and cheeseburgers for his entire life?

Posted by: Principal Chair | March 19, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Obama HIMSELF knew about the bonuses on March 12th, BEFORE they were paid. “AFTER the funds were disbursed, the president ordered his economic and legal teams to determine if there was a way to recoup the money, according to the aide.”
On the 17th, however, his paunchy press secretary answered questions about what “the administration” knew and WHEN it knew it with: “Gibbs said Monday, “Based on what I read in the newspaper,” the administration learned about the bonuses last week. He declined to offer a timeline on Tuesday.” (Click through ‘posted by’ for link.)
Why are we picking on the comically inept Geithner, the ethically inept Dodd and the law-abiding Liddy when Obama HIMSELF could have brought it to a screeching halt before one dime went anywhere? (And actually acted like the crusading hero he campaigned as?)

Posted by: tree hugging sister | March 19, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Dodd did Obama’s dirty work for him and now Obama is throwing Dodd under the bus. I hope Dodd takes some others with him!

Posted by: ctmom | March 19, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

obamma’s a genius bailout AIG so the company will have money to make more
multimillion dollar political donations to reelect the crooked politicians who got them the money
then make sure the employees who destroyed the company get those big fat bonuses so they can continue donating millions of dollars to again support crooked politicians who made sure they got those bonuses
another words the American tax payer gets to donate money to reelect crooked politicians who got AIG the billions and billions dollars

Posted by: greg coldewey | March 19, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Just more proof that without that teleprompter Obama has got nothing.

Posted by: sammy | March 19, 2009, 8:31 am 8:31 am

This shows Obama’s contempt and loathing of the U.S. financial and capitalist system.
He believes that the banks are holding the US hostage and that they will blow themselves up and take the hostages with them unless Obama pays the ransom.
How did this guy become President of the United States?

Posted by: Will Stanton | March 19, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

So Dodd fessed up last night. He suddenly now remembers adding the provision to the bill that allowed this to happen. Even CNN is calling him a liar… amazing how easily you can expose these clowns with some blatant acts of journalism.
So… if Dodd did it and Geithner made him do it, either:
A. Geithner’s incompetent for not telling his boss that he was signing a bill that had language in it that was guaranteed to deliver huge political backlash
or…
B. Obama WAS informed by Turbo Tax Tim and his manufactured outrage yesterday was as phoney as his Hope and Change message has proved to be thus far.

Posted by: whoisjohngalt? | March 19, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am

How does this help Obama’s Final Four picks?

Posted by: Marie | March 19, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

You just have to wonder what the President has on Dodd to make him take the rap.

Posted by: Plumber | March 19, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Hey Dodd, obama, get ahead of things. Give back 5 years of AIG bribes/donations and 5 years of Fannie/Freddie donations. Same for the rest of all Congressmen – both parties.
At least the Democrats read the stimulus package before voting for it, so they knew about the Dodd amendment. Oh wait, that’s right, they didn’t read and still voted for it. but it’s not their fault.

Posted by: Joe | March 19, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

How can Dodd “confess” to adding the amendment? His doing so is a matter of public record. There’s this thing called the Congressional Record. It’s widely available from a number of different sources, and it documents the entire legislative process in the House and Senate. Unless Congress holds closed sessions, every amendment, every remark, every committee report is in there. I knew about this amendment back in February. People, transparency doesn’t mean that your favorite news source reports on it. It doesn’t mean someone comes to your house and tells you. If it’s part of the public record, it isn’t a secret.

Posted by: Hil | March 19, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am

So, Obama is simply paying the American lip service pretending he knew nothing about the provisions in the stimulus package. What a rat! And Dodd now is the fall guy. Obama, you’ve bamboozled the American people. That dog and pony show you’ve put where you show outrage over the distribution of these bonuses is simply a show. Who in hell do you think you’re kidding? Unfortunately, the people who got you elected can’t see you doing no evil. What a shame! What a travesty!

Posted by: Mike | March 19, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am

we’ve elected a sick arrogant inexpeirenced unpologetic man

Posted by: Tim | March 19, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

“Just because AIG EMPLOYEES(!) donated money to Obama’s campaign doesn’t mean it is AIG money – that is wrong to imply. If AIG employees wanted to support Obama’s campaign back in Sep ’08, (at the height of a close campaign) so be it.”
That’s exactly right. Corporations are prohibited by federal election law from contribution to political campaigns. It’s not like the AIG board voted to give $100K to Obama. These contributions – and those to other politicians (Dodd who was #1, McCain who was #3) – all came from individuals employed by AIG. These were legal contributions and almost all of them were made before AIG blew up last fall. There’s a lot of noise about Obama and Dodd (somehow, McCain is left out) returning this money. How does that help. The money would go to the accounts of the individuals who contributed, not AIG. Many of those individuals might not want the money back. And some of those individuals may not even work for AIG any longer.
People, understand campaign finance law before you go around peddling your feigned outrage.

Posted by: OGLiberal | March 19, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Slept on it, and this morning I am still seriously disturbed by the president’s choice of metaphor. Tempers are running far too high already, as was illlustrated by the exchange between Barney Frank and Mr. Libby, who read emails threatening AIG employees to justify his reluctance to have the bonus takers’ names made public. Libby wanted assurances that any names turned over to the committee would be handled responsibly and would not be made public, but good old Barney refused to make any such assurance. Now we have the president using terrorist imagery to talk about AIG– so what happens when some loon decides s/he is justified in taking out said terrorists for the country’s good? AIG workers do not have the Secret Service protection the president does.
The president should be trying to calm fears and explain things in ways that tamp down the flames, not throw gas on them. I am disappointed.

Posted by: moderate | March 19, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Bailouts build strong muscles.

Posted by: blister | March 19, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Republians….remember these banks were in jeopardy during your administration. Aig was in trouble during your administration…these contracts were in place during your administration….why didn’t you check them out first? Why didn’t you oversee the part about the bonuses? Now,it easier to blame the new administration…however, we all remember when it started…not on Jan 20, 2009…long before it. We need to remember this….all of us.

Posted by: talmag | March 19, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

It is evident that current AIG management has no clue and they are taking decision that are not in interest of taxpayer.
Voters on the other hand is expecting silver bullet or Obama to be a King Lear who can fix their problems in a days.
Bank are too big and should not be allowed to failed is not an excuse.
Classic Management one liners.
a. “How do you eat an elephant?” – One bite at a time
b. “Divide and Conquer”
If AIG or other banks are giants then create baby AIG or other banks as they created Baby Bells for AT&T.

Posted by: Tim | March 19, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

“why didn’t you check them out first? Why didn’t you oversee the part about the bonuses?”
I don’t remember the Bush administration (don’t know if they did or not honestly) stirring the public into rage over the bonuses. I do remember both candidates doing it, Bush may have, I don’t know. If he did not, maybe he knew they were contracted and legal and if you made it a cornerstone of your platform to say that those giving out bonuses won’t get bailout money, then you wouldn’t be able to bailout anyone? Just a hunch, no idea.

Posted by: KR | March 19, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

How could those teleprompters be so so insensitive?
Shame on them…

Posted by: sammy | March 19, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Google this article. Pretty good read from feb 1 2007.
“Bush targets extravagant CEO salaries”

Posted by: KR | March 19, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Also, FYI, ABC News itself reports that the Obama campaign received a $23,000 post-bailout “bonus” from AIG’s employees, so my numbers aren’t too far off. Maybe they screwed up on the search and my numbers of about 24,000.00 are right. Either way, its a fact, buddy, that Obama received a post bailout cash injection from AIG employees.
ABC News:
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign finance reports, more than $120,000 of that money was donated after AIG received its first $85 billion in federal bailout funds in September. The company has since received a total of $170 billion in taxpayer cash to prevent its collapse.
Their generosity included more than $23,000 to Obama’s campaign.
Both Obama and Republican presidential candidate John McCain raked in much larger sums from AIG earlier in the year. Obama collected a total of $130,000 from AIG in 2008, while McCain accepted a total of $59,499.
Also, a Connecticut newspaper reports that Senator Dodd will return any “tainted” contributions from AIG employees – whatever Dodd deems “tainted” to mean, I suppose. Dodd has received many contributions from employees of the Connecticut-based AIG Financial Products unit over the years – and AIG’s employee PAC.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 19, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Hopefully this is AIG debacle is the straw that broke the camels back to help bring our country back together. “The buck stops here Obamma” and both sides of Congress are truely at a fork in the road. Will We The People be lead to “It’s a Wonderful Life” or down the other path to Pottersville, and the Ununited States of America.There was a time in America, when this movie was released, that America, along with it’s people were united and careing while looking out for each others needs. There is plenty enough of Capatilism for all of us to be fair and balanced without having to go down the path of socialism

Posted by: Kap10 Ahab | March 19, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

There are over 500 Trillion $ (yes Trillion $ with a T) of BS backed derivatives out there , to make them “good” planets entire GDP is not enough let alone Americas. AIG insuring hedge funds etc… Bite the bullet and trash them and start a fresh system, it will be one time hit or else it will be a never ending misery.

Posted by: fyi | March 19, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Who care if AIG insured BS backed derivatives and has a contract, so tax payers must make good on these contracts . I am sick of these talking heads talking as if contract is a word of god. It is not . Bankrupcy court breaks contracts all the time . Who on earth will buy insurance from AIG anyway that they cannot be put into bankrupcy? I say burn such CONTRACTS to the ground or they will burn us to the ground.

Posted by: btw | March 19, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

SO. Obama and Congressional Democrats (like Dodd!) solicit and take HUGE campaign donations from evil suicide bombers?

Posted by: Gerry | March 19, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

So Obama is caving in to blackmail?
That’s the obvious conclusion to his ridiculous metaphor.
If anyone else would have said such a truly ridiculous thing as Obama just now did, it would be the lead story for 7 days straight in a scorched Earth smear campaign against whomever said it (see Clinton, Hillary; Palin, Sarah; McCain, John).

Posted by: OxyCon | March 19, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Banks and AIG as suicide bombers??! Was there a glitch in the teleprompter or did he really want to make that analogy?

Posted by: Kyda Sylvester | March 19, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Did someone hijack the teleprompter or did boy genuis come up with this himself? If GWB had ever said anything near this he’d have been crucified but since it is Obummer it will be overlooked. What a buffoon! “Hope” that “change” to unemployment is working for you and “hope” you like the “change” left in your pockets!

Posted by: cccc | March 19, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Another day in United States Of Ponzi

Posted by: lol | March 19, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

How’s this for outrage? The Stimulus bonus exclusion also ensured all of these BOA bonuses to Merryl Lynch execs who sank their company got paid:
Bank Of America (BOA) having rcvd $45 Billion in TARP money is second only to Citigroup as the biggest TARP recipient.
Yesterday a NY judge ordered BOA to dislcose the bonuses.
These bonuses are NOT TOUCHED by HR1586.
According to the New York Attorney General’s analysis of the bonus data:
-the top four bonus recipients received a combined $121 million;
- the next four bonus recipients received a combined $62 million;
- the next six bonus recipients received a combined $66 million;
- Fourteen individuals received bonuses of $1 0 million or more and combined they received more than $250 million;
- 20 individuals received bonuses of $8 million or more;
- 53 individuals received bonuses of $5 million or more;
- 149 individuals received bonuses of $3 million or more;
- Overall, the top 149 bonus recipients received a combined $858 million;
- 696 individuals received bonuses of $1 million or more. ”
“Congressional Democrats took aim at the Obama administration Wednesday, blaming the president’s economic team for creating a loophole that allowed AIG to pay its employees millions of dollars in bonuses and then not doing enough to stop the bonuses when it could. “

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 19, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

This president is dangerous. Is his description of banks intended to start a run on the banks or can he really be that clueless?

Posted by: Karen Otravez | March 19, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Here’s the correct analogy;the bomb is strapped to us an Obama is holding the button.Got Change?

Posted by: Butch.F | March 19, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

It was in such incredibly poor taste to compare multi-millionaire AIG executives to terrorist suicide bombers.

Posted by: leannabelle | March 19, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

In other words, the banks and AIG are being allowed to force the rest of us to cover their losses for them. They are no better than a suicide bomber.
If a bank or company is “too big to fail” then it won’t fail.
If a bank or company is too big to LET FAIL then it’s too big and needs to be broken up.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Posted by: pmk | March 19, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

“In other words, the banks and AIG are being allowed to force the rest of us to cover their losses for them. They are no better than a suicide bomber.’
It is Congress and Obama, not AIG nor the banks, that have forced these losses on taxpayers.

Posted by: Sigmond | March 19, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

That is the best analogy I have heard so far, well done President Obama.

Posted by: Martin | March 19, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

The analogy is only flawed in identifying the bankers with the bank, and in the idea that they have a bomb strapped to themselves. The bomb, instead is just strapped to the bank. If the banks go down, then the credit system collapses and we are indeed screwed.
But the bank going down does not mean the bankers go down because of the lack of accountability in this whole fiasco.
The only pseudo-plausible argument for giving bonuses to the AIG execs is that if they are the only ones who can solve the problem they leave, we’re screwed. And they will leave if they don’t get their bonuses.
Really it’s like certain bankers have accidentally set up a bomb in the financial system and they won’t defuse it unless we give them more money. If we don’t give them money, well they’ll walk away out of a job but probably not to badly off; and the rest of the economy burns.

Posted by: sean | March 20, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

So if you see a suicide bomber and he’s looking all suicidal and you’re wielding a .357 and he’s standing literally five steps away, you want to drop the gun and ask him out for a cup of tea?

Posted by: jjay | March 20, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

He’s sick, sick, sick. I ‘any’ Joe Sixpack mentioned ‘bomb’ and ‘trigger’ in the same paragraph, Home Security, FBI, ATF, USMS, USBP, and Obama’s Momma’d be crashing your party faster than Charlie Rangel can invent a new tax dodge!

Posted by: steve | March 20, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

This snake oil fast talker is sick!

Posted by: steve | March 20, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

The insanity of Obama knows no bounds!!
The Audacity Of Insanity should be his next book!

Posted by: Scrap5000 | March 20, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

At least Bush haters had good reasons, as history has and will continue to prove. This insane hatred shown to our new president and his family can only be explained by fear and ignorance of a sad, uneducated and vocal minority of so-called Americans.

Posted by: Bob | March 21, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

So when will President Barack Obama be returning all of the money he accepted from AIG and the other companies that accepted federal bailout funds?

Posted by: JBASAP | March 22, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

You get what you vote for HE HE !!!

Posted by: Terry | March 22, 2009, 3:56 am 3:56 am

“The most effectual means of preventing [the perversion of power into tyranny are] to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts which history exhibits,….”
Thomas Jefferson
Got change? Yeah I think we did.
Now let’s read some books and get some edjumacation.

Posted by: this is a name | July 24, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

OK ! Bank bailouts where bailout because of defaut mortgages – right.. So if they really wanted to save the economy. Hows about giving all the bailout money – now mortgage money to those that were defauting. The banks still would have gotten the $$$$ and the people would be able to keep those homes… Now this make more sense… A friend and I did divide the $$$ given to those big fat cats and those bonuses between the population of the country and each person would get about 100,000 or so… Some would not need it and other would. So if that money went to the people who were really in trouble because of the crisis. Of course – making sure t money went through the people first before the banks. The banks still would have gotten the $$$$ needed so they wouldn’t have collapsed. Well – it doesn’t take much to see how the economy would have been stimulated. As it goes now – the banks get bailed out and now they are stealing those house back and selling them. The American people are suffering and the banks are getting richer… It is all a big rip off of the USA citizens and our great grandchildren will be paying for this way into the future – - not only US… Does this make sense to anyone else. Sorry Obama – - it could have been done another way… one that benifited the american people not the ones who cause this mess…

Posted by: DAVID D.... | February 22, 2010, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.