By Lee Speigel

Mar 4, 2009 9:32pm

President Obama’s Health Care Reform Push

“The cost of health care now causes a bankruptcy in America every thirty seconds," President Obama will say tomorrow at the White House forum on health care reform, a summit of 150 Democrats, Republicans, and advocates for doctors, nurses, patients, labor unions, and business groups. "By the end of the year, it could cause 1.5 million Americans to lose their homes.”

“If we want to create jobs and rebuild our economy, then we must address the crushing cost of health care this year, in this Administration," the President will say, according to excerpts provided by the White House. "Making investments in reform now, investments that will dramatically lower costs, won’t add to our budget deficits in the long-term – rather, it is one of the best ways to reduce them.” 

White House officials say this urgent language is serious — the president wants to see health care reform enacted and signed into law by the end of 2009. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Montana, the chair of the one of the key congressional committees that the president is entrusting to draft the legislation, says his goal is for the Senate Finance Committee to begin drafting the legislation at the beginning of the Summer, with a bill hitting the floor of the Senate for a vote before the August recess.

So why would this effort work while previous efforts have failed?

The administration feels there are two reasons: first, health care costs have skyrocketed since the 1990s, to the degree that "every one now knows the current path is unsustainable," a White House official tells ABC News.

The other reason? Call it the un-Hillary approach to health care.

That’s a reference not only to the fact that the administration is outlining principles but letting Congress work it’s will — as opposed to just handing over a big binder and saying, "Here, pass this," a senior administration official says. Tomorrow in additional to Republican congressional leaders, a senior administration official says, "you’ll see some people who opposed health reform in the 90s."

That’s a reference to Charles "Chip" N Kahn III, president of the Federation of American Hospitals, and Karen M. Ignagni, president of America’s Health Insurance Plans, a successor group to the Health Insurance Association of America, which launched the "Harry and Louise" TV ads that helped sink the health care proposal drafted by President Bill Clinton’s White House, led by then-First Lady Hillary Clinton.

"I respect that Sen. Clinton and President Clinton tried to get health care fixed in 1993," then-Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill, said in Henderson, Nevada, in January 2008. "But they went about it the wrong way. They went behind closed doors and tried to do it themselves. Here’s what I’m going to do. We’re going to have a big table. We’re going to have doctors, nurses, big drug companies, insurers … I’ll sit at the table. I’ll have the biggest chair because I’ll be the president. I’ll put my plan at the center of the table. We’re going to do it on C-SPAN, so everybody will be able to see just who’s saying what."

C-SPAN, in fact, will be there tomorrow. President Obama will make opening remarks after which attendees will divide into five discussion groups. One of those groups will be broadcast on C-SPAN, the others will be webcast, assuming technology cooperates. The groups will be moderated by administration officials such as Domestic Policy Chair Melody Barnes, OMB director Peter Orszag, NEC Chair Larry Summers, and newly-named White House health care czar Nancy-Ann DeParle.

Following the seminars, the president will lead a discussion with attendees in the East Room of the White House.

The White House has refrained from discussing what specifically should be in the health care plan; officials say everything is on the table. But President Obama will enumerate his eight health care reform principles tomorrow:

• Guaranteeing choice of health plans and physicians;
• Making health coverage affordable;
• Protecting families’ financial health;
• Investing in prevention and wellness;
• Providing portability of coverage;
• Aiming for universality;
• Improving patient safety and quality care; and
• Maintaining long-term fiscal sustainability.

White House officials say this will be just the beginning of this process; they’ve also discussed community discussions to be held. Health and Human Services  Secretary-designate Kathleen Sebelius will not be in attendance; White House aides say she’s still transitioning from the Kansas governor’s office, and point out she has yet to be confirmed.

- jpt

User Comments

Will this be just as “bipartisan” as the stimulus bill negotiations were? Bipartisan, meaning that Pelosi and Friends write the bill and shut every Republican and Blue Dog Democrat out of the drafting process?

Posted by: Dave | March 4, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Well Mr. Obama…we can start by not thinking we have to give medical care to every illegal immigrant the crosses the border. We can start by declaring that at least one parent has to be a US citizen before their child is considered a US citizen…just being born here doesn’t cut it.

Posted by: Bill | March 4, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

So who will be paying for this one? Since we have tons of money just sitting around…..
oh thats right….we don’t. We are close to 2 TRILLION dollars more into debt b/c of Obama and the spend happy Dems.

Posted by: John | March 4, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Healthcare has some unique attributes. There is no way to set a limit on the value of more resources. Every case is is natural, being complex and unique, so unique that the best decision maker on the efficient distribution of resources is the physician. How on earth will you control the limits on those very simple facts?

Posted by: Mark | March 4, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Socialized government run/paid for health care is a FAILURE everywhere in the world. It rations what you can/can’t get and is even denounced in England by one of the major proponants who got it started (their solution to it’s failure in Britian is to…privatize parts of the health care coverage!)
Why in GOD’S name do Liberals think that the US of A is going to accomplish what the rest of the SOCIALIST world hasn’t been able to is beyond me…oh WAIT! It’s all about SOCIALISM and the control of all our pathetic lives by LIBERALS/SOCIALISTS/COMMUNISTS!
Never mind. Socialized Medicine in the USA…one giant leap for destructive socialist liberals who want to run your lives…one giant LEAP backwards for freedom from Government tyranny.
Wake up people.

Posted by: Riteaidbob | March 4, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

My God……..this man every day has another “crisis” to blabber about! Just pick something and actually work on it! I see a laundry list of “wants” …we aren’t Santa Claus! I have yet to see a plan to implement anything.

Posted by: ConservativeGal | March 4, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

What a country illegal immigrants get free health care and I have none.

Posted by: Ken | March 4, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

With this President I need anti- depressants. I can’t take it anymore.

Posted by: American Mom | March 4, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Bill said “Well Mr. Obama…we can start by not thinking we have to give medical care to every illegal immigrant the crosses the border. ” News flash, if an illegal can’t pay, we pay one way or another. I hope Obama does something about securing our boarders and getting rid of the illegals. Getting rid of the policy of anchor babies is a good start.

Posted by: SamTyler1973 | March 4, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

I second “Bill”….no more taxpayer money should fund anything whatsoever (healthcare related or not) for illegal aliens..not one penny. and the law about simply being born here to gain citizenship has let things spiral out of control. i understand that you can’t be inhumane and turn human beings away at ERs but at some point enough is enough. Why on earth has this not been brought up more. Oh that’s right..because we have to be politically correct and we can’t hurt anyone’s feelings…ugh.

Posted by: southerngumdrops | March 4, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Obama’s plan will not lower the cost of health insurance for those of us who pay for it. This is an absolute joke! What the government pays doctors, hospitals and pharmacies for Medicare and Medicaid patients is an absolute joke. If we get rid of private health insurance for universal coverage our taxes will skyrocket and the the quality of care will be worse because every non-working person will be in line at the doctors office. Believe me in Philly they don’t believe in appointments. They got there before you so if you get seen before them they start a riot. A good portion of the population of Philly is either on Medicare and Medicaid. Because Medicaid doesn’t pay enough to cover the cost of a normal child birth a dozen maternity wards have closed the past decade and the ones left are having trouble handling the increased workload.

Posted by: Matt | March 4, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

I can’t believe anyone on here would actually whine about this? What exactly is wrong with trying to fix healthcare?
Perhaps the Bush apologists amongst you just don’t remember that government should actually be able to solve problems and get something done that doesn’t involve starting wars or taking away our freedoms.

Posted by: MIguy | March 4, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

I have a perfectly good high deductible HSA plan that costs me $6 a week. I use it as a tax shelter and haven’t been to a doctor since 2001 since I have a $3000 deductible. My wife actually has an interesting plan that also has a $3000 out-of-pocket deductible but it pays out on the first $500 you use every year so you don’t avoid checkups. Seems reasonable.

Posted by: Skeptic | March 4, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

it seems to me the comments are from young healthy republicans who have never been to europe. health care cost are the biggest tax are americans. drug companies and health insurance companies are making billions while the average joe can’t even make the payments. if the gov can lower cost of insurance it would be a tax cut for everyone. also the cost of medicare and medicaid will only go up and continue to take up more and more of the budget. by lowering cost medicare and medicaid will take up less of the budget. what is rush’s plan?

Posted by: william | March 4, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Why can’t this administration first have a debate and engage experts outsite the Washington lobbyist circuit to find a way to structure healthcare that doesn’t rely on the failing models we see in socialist countries? This is America where new ideas come from. Why can’t we have some new ideas? Why can’t government be innovative? What about a tax deduction for health care insurance? What about a requirement to put money aside into a health savings account through a health care bank/service. If everyone is required to have insurance or a health savings account(CA requires every driver to have car insurance) the cost of insurance goes way down and the competitive market for this service will explode with innovation and tailored, low cost plans. Why is it that the only solutions the O administration considers involve taxing people and taking away their freedom to choose what’s best for themselves?

Posted by: California Serfer | March 4, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

How much more in debt is Obama going to put Americans? His spending has to be stopped!

Posted by: Irishrose | March 4, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

ConservativeGal:” I have yet to see a plan to implement anything.”
Did you miss the stimulus passage? Or the headlines about the mortgage plan details being release today? Or his submission of a budget outline following his campaign promises right down the line?
You honestly haven’t see ANY of these plans? He’s going right down the list of what he was elected on.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 4, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

I suspect Obama is headed for a Swiss style health care system which is consumer oriented and mandates everyone has an insurance policy. There are some good features and negatives, one being the Swiss system has government price controls.
Google swiss health care.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 4, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Despite the naysayers healthcare reform will happen and Republicans are in the room form the very beginning to address conservative concerns. We already spend more per capita on healthcare than any other country and still have tens of millions uninsured. Knee jerk conservatives will lose this battle for the same reasons they lost the last election. They are simply wrong on this issue.

Posted by: Elliot in Texas | March 4, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

health care in the US has become big business….I pay $19000. for my family coverage and two of my kids are 19 and 21 students and are no longer covered…I have A $500 deductable per person..so Blue cross never covers anything unless its major…The dr’s have not seen a raise in years..yet Blue cross employees get raises each year…the middle men up to top men get bonuses…1/3 of early $ that is spent stays inhouse…why is this being allowed in the US??? If I had to offer each one of my employees coverage at this cost..we would have to close down…The US is one of the only countries in the world were the company is responsible to cover health Ins and retirement..with the taxes that we pay…we shoud not have to worry about these things…NY State pays more for their Medicaid system than canada pays for the whole country…and in New york the working poor and middle class are forced to pay for medicaid to give coverage to the non working…coverage that they themselves don’t have for their own families..even though they go to work each and everday and pay for it..What a screwed up system….wake up America..we all deserve to be covered..Health care should not be a profit business….let the people that your elect know how you feel…you have the power to make changes….

Posted by: LisaMarie | March 4, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

I’ll say this… The man is bringing these issues to open talks. People are getting involved. I would rather watch politics than the wold series on T.V., this is a big step in changing the Nation. Liberal, Democrat Republican, drop the act no man can be put in a box. This country needs everyone to contribute, EVERYONE. So get off your pedstools and get your hands in the dirt. I’m no english major but I never met one who could fix his own plumbing.

Posted by: Joshua Sylvia | March 4, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

MIguy, nothing is wrong with trying to fix health care. The problem is President Obama and the Liberals talk a great game, but there goal is to actually have the federal government control health care and then implementing preventative health care. Through a government controlled preventative health care program the federal government will be able to dictate what we can or cannot eat and drink; what products we can (i.e., only “green” products) or cannot buy (i.e., SUVs) by denying health care to those individuals who do not adhere to the government mandated “guide lines.”

Posted by: James Danley | March 4, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

I have worked very hard for my entire life just to provide the bare essentials in order to survive in life – - and I was wounded and therefore unable to work until I healed,…. In the mean time, the bills piled up, and now I have nothing. I am ruined before I even started. Like I woke up one day and decided to wound myself for no reason and thereby destroy myself and my future.

Posted by: Spartan Phoenix777 | March 4, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Obama better also deal with the SEVERE shortage of primary care providers in every state in this country. Not only are their shortages due to physicians, nurses, dentists etc growing older, but due to more professionals going into specialities, or going into other professions.
If you are reading this and haven’t felt the shortage you are lucky… check around there are small towns and hospitals without providers!!
Realize Obama that there is more to this problem than just insurance. We don’t even want to talk about the cost of prescriptions that skyrocketed afer advertising was allowed on TV.
This mess is bigger than he realizes

Posted by: Sue (a health professional!) | March 4, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

It is exhausting. Many families are one car crash or medical calamity away from financial ruin. So even if people’s cars aren’t working properly, or they are seriously ill, they are discouraged to get help due to the increased insurance costs, deductibles, and the lack of coverage.
I had an asthma attack and had to be hospitalized. You would think that I would be covered considering that our family is paying over $10,000/year on coverage. WRONG! We end up paying a $2500 bill for going to the emergency room, waiting there for two hours while my condition deteriorated, and eventually recieved medicine which took only 1/2 hour, then sent home. We pay $10k/year and the insurance would barely even cover 1/4 of the total $3000 bill.
Its not just the insurance companies that nickel and dime you, but the hospitals as well. Even the smallest and simplest of procedures can cost several hundreds or even thousands of dollars. This has to change.

Posted by: Andrew | March 4, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

“I suspect Obama is headed for a Swiss style health care system which is consumer oriented and mandates everyone has an insurance policy. There are some good features and negatives, one being the Swiss system has government price controls.”
I believe that representatives from the health insurance industry already informed the Obama administration that they could cover all Americans if they mandated just that: Everyone would have to have insurance. They don’t want people to get insurance once they are already ill (etc) without having paid into the system.
This will give opponents of the plan a line of critical attack by claiming that forcing everyone to be covered will infringe on personal freedom.

Posted by: Skip | March 4, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Hey, I just thought of the solution to the previously stated problem…Set a portion of net taxable income to be paid directly to a physician of your choice. Let them get together and fund hospitals and buy equipment and pay for medicines. That way, the physician you choose will be the one that will have to look you in the eye and say, “sorry, but we just can’t afford it.” It will save all of us working triple time to pay for the bureaucratic inefficiencies. Oh, wait, that would likely circumvent the intent.

Posted by: Mark | March 4, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

“I can’t believe anyone on here would actually whine about this? What exactly is wrong with trying to fix healthcare?”
It’s how you fix health care that matters.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 4, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

“This will give opponents of the plan a line of critical attack by claiming that forcing everyone to be covered will infringe on personal freedom.”….In addition, the Swiss system relies on government price controls. An inescapable economic law states that if you control prices the supply will be restricted.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 4, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

There will be even LESS Primary Care Providers after his reform. It is actually health care “rationing”. Deciding who gets treatment and who does not. That is not what Doctors do. Nor government.

Posted by: bpower | March 4, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

The fact is, there is no free health care even with the Euro systems. Someone has to pay. In Switzerland, everyone pays the same amount monthly, depending on your age category like 1-10, 11-18, >25.
Whether you are rich or poor, you pay the same amount for your monthly premium. Those unable to work are subsidized by the government.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 4, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

“The cost of health care now causes a bankruptcy in America every thirty seconds,” President Obama will say tomorrow……
————————————–
The study the president keeps quoting was debunked years ago. The study called a bankruptcy “healthcare cost related” if gambling, alcholism, drug addiction and a death in the family were a part of the family profile regardless of other circumstances.

Posted by: mad | March 4, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Hey, I’ve got an idea, why don’t we all work on Monday to pay our utilities, Tuesday and Wednesday to pay for our house and car, Thursday to pay for our kids, Friday to pay for ourselves, Saturday to pay for others, and then Sunday we can work for Sigmund and his friends!

Posted by: Mark | March 4, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Oh, pardon me, Sigmonde.

Posted by: Mark | March 4, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

bpower:” It is actually health care “rationing”. Deciding who gets treatment and who does not. That is not what Doctors do. Nor government.”
That is EXACTLY what insurance company and HMO bureaucrats do; it is rationing, and it is currently done to maximize their profits. I take it you are young and healthy if you have no personal experience with this.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 4, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

The Swiss model, which we will no doubt hear more about from Obamans, has some negatives. Taxes are high in supporting large defense budgets as we do. Still, it is typical for a family to pay $1000 or more a month for insurance. The big problem is the government setting price controls which limits supply of services. There is no easy answer or a perfect model. And there is no free health care for most.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 4, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

“Hey, I’ve got an idea, why don’t we all work on Monday to pay our utilities, Tuesday and Wednesday to pay for our house and car, Thursday to pay for our kids, Friday to pay for ourselves, Saturday to pay for others, and then Sunday we can work for Sigmund and his friends!”
Sounds like you think everything should be free in life. Everyone has to work, including me, to pay for a house, car, insurance, etc. Everyone in the world who can work, has to work. Except you, maybe.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 4, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Someone mentioned “Obama better also deal with the SEVERE shortage of primary care providers in every state in this country.” It should be noted that part of this shortage is artificially induced, a product of the wish by professional doctor associations to limit the number of doctors. Not to mention, these groups are almost always opposing other types of clinics and health care that don’t involve doctors, which could go a long way in relieving the pressure. But too many doctors don’t want anyone eating into their pie.

Posted by: D.B. | March 4, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

bring on socialism its about time. the free market has failed, and if some changes dont happen so will america

Posted by: palmal5 | March 4, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

“It should be noted that part of this shortage is artificially induced, a product of the wish by professional doctor associations to limit the number of doctors.”
This is a ridiculous statement. Show us a source for that statement.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 4, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

“the free market has failed, and if some changes dont happen so will america”
America hasn’t failed. You have.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 4, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

I don’t have to work if I’m rich, but if I was poor I would still like to be valued as a worthy human being.

Posted by: zorra | March 4, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

NEWS UPDATE!!!
WHITE HOUSE JUST REVERSED ITSELF THIS EVENING re inviting Single Payer advocates to the summit to discuss on Thursday! Yes we can and yes we will – pass HR676.
PNHP (Physicians for a National Health Program) and Sen. Conyers (HR676) NOW invited after thousands and thousands of emails, calls, faxes, et al flooded the White House saying “LET US IN”.
Thousands of us are absolutely fed up with corporate bailouts and allowing the private insurance industry to get another bailout/handout by literally handing over to them the nation’s health care has now crossed the line with the electorate.
Last words, and the press and media will no longer so easily be able to bypass us as they have been doing for the last several years. You don’t have to like it but you may have to accept it. Change is coming re health care especially.

Posted by: LjR | March 4, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Sigmonde- WE haven’t been working. We’ve been living off of crude. Now that the sands are being mined, the next resource to be mined will be you and me. It’s the cold hold truth. Do you think it really takes a lifetime to earn back the value of a house that took a month to build, and will have two or three lifetimes in it? Sunrise to sundown will, eventually, be the order of the day. Maybe 50 years, maybe 100.

Posted by: Mark | March 4, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

“0bama is going to lower the price to the lucky 50% of Americans that get a free ride…”
Are you really suggesting that over 100 million Americans ‘get a free ride’ or are you just whining again?

Posted by: Skip | March 4, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Rationing of health care – People, we already have rationing. Can’t go to out of network providers, limitations on how many PT sessions entitled to post-surgery, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.
WAKE UP AMERICA! And yes, your taxes will go towards health care for all but hello, it already is going to pay for public hospitals’ emergency wards where the uninsured get treated. The idea here is some sort of system which brings DOWN that cost by actually covering everybody. If we can get all of these people OUT of the emergency wards for their flus and what not (by giving them basic good quality health care), we can bring down the costs.
People, go and do some actual research here.
Personally, the selfishness and self-centeredness of the last decade of free market buy giant houses and crap has brought us here. Hence all of you people p’d that you might not be able to continue to horde your $$$ to buy another useless piece of s jet ski or something… get over yourself and grow up.

Posted by: LjR | March 4, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

“Sigmonde- WE haven’t been working. We’ve been living off of crude.” What do you mean – WE?
Right now is no where near the economic mess Carter put us into. Maybe you don’t know about that period. Mortgage rates at 18%, inflation at 14%, unemployment at high levels and foreclosures everywhere and home values dropped like a rock. The economy will get better. Quit complaining.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 4, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Better to live in reality than in denial. Things are tough now, but we’ll be stronger in long haul. Have faith, don’t let fear ruin your life. It’s not a crime to be poor anyway. Unemployment benefits actually benefit gov. They are the spenders and taxes are paid to gov. better than companies lay off’s. Obama is smart man. Our population will be dramatically reduced in several years as unfortunatly most boomers by then will be in heaven. Sad thought, but a fact. That’s almost 80 million folks. We need to focus on healthwe’ll have their jobs, plus more in healthcare, values will go up for states where boomers flock to, and our future looks bright. For those without work, take classes, get a head start on a different career or plan to be business owner. I would invest in anything to do with stem cell research, beauty products, skin care or anything to do with aging. We just need to redirect as our population and world affairs change.

Posted by: zorra | March 4, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

What people don’t realize is the fastest growing demographic for the uninsured is those who can afford it and chose not to have it. You want to fix healthcare, fix it by mandating everyone have it…period! There is all this talk about universal health care and that will never work in the US because #1: the US is in the top 3 when it comes to obesity. The US doesn’t care about personal health anymore. Here is an idea, pose a tax break for those who are w/in a certain BMI, don’t smoke, and are ovarall active individuals. The primary care physician can submit a form through the new electronic records to certify this #2: people would take advantage of the system. As anyone can testify to, when something is free people take advantage. Patients would go to the doctor for everything further increasing costs and not helping the system at all. #3 in a capitalistic society it is not a just system. What would end up happening is those who are in the upper tax brackets would continue to see their taxes increase to pay for others in a lower tax bracket and pay less. Studies have shown there to be a large difference in personal health when comparing lower economic status to those of higher. So by making those who studies show are already healthier and make them pay more in taxes for those who are less healthy you will eventually exhaust the source of income driving the program and will bankrupt the system. Instead why not make physical activity a bigger part of the K-12 education?
Just some thoughts I had.

Posted by: mmm1145 | March 4, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

santyler1793, Obama is for open borders. He is for giving illegals drivers licenses and health care and welfare and free college tuitions. Americans no longer have rights in their own country. Witness, the ICE raid a week ago of a manufacturing plant that employed illegals. Ice arrested the employers and illegal workers who had stolen SSN numbers. Obama’s Homeland Security chief, Janet Napolitano was angry that ICE had arrested the illegals. She said she was going to have ICE agents investigated for arresting the illegals. This is Obama. Ain’t he grand?

Posted by: Sandy | March 4, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

“Sigmonde” wrote: “This is a ridiculous statement. Show us a source for that statement.”
It’s common knowledge that AMA was for years predicting oversupply of doctors and advocating accordingly. Only a few years ago, former AMA President John Nelson was stating that he did not know for sure if there was a shortage of physicians. Smart guy;) And the Association of American Medical Colleges has finally also agreed that it was in error in predictions. These and other groups had, and still have, vested interest in keeping supply and demand on their side, although now we know they erred in a big way. Doctors are not gods. Understand human nature before you are the one who looks ridiculous.

Posted by: D.B. | March 5, 2009, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Sigmonde- Carter’s mess was a temporary increase in the cost of crude supply. That shocked the system. We are now in a long-term increase of the cost of crude supply. Interest rates will no longer distribute our resources fairly, and for some reason so many of you think that politicians will?

Posted by: Mark | March 5, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Well, those from other countries seeking top health care won’t have to journey here anymore (e.g. Lech Walesa coming to TX for his heart surgery), because our health care system will be just as junky as everyone else’s in the world. . . God help us, this man is on a rampage.

Posted by: Interested08 | March 5, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Sigmund
Did you go to collage. If you did then you would know that all unv. do that. I know I have been to four unv. and three collages. They limate the # of people by getting you to quit or unfairly down grading your performance there is lots of tactics they use to get your money. life isn’t fair no matter what you think.Sorry to burst your Bubble just ask the head of any dept If they give you an honest answer. one gave me a honest answer. They can only put so many people out in Field with out causing a problem for people in that field. And in the medical field their is so much more hasels Frivalas law suits and such. Good luck trying to suie the Gov. Ha ha the laughs going to be on all those who want this abomination. I just thought of that of course thats not all it will cost too much is not sustanibal and we will all be living like russians in a while. It would be funny if it wasn’t so friken sad

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

“Instead why not make physical activity a bigger part of the K-12 education? ”
That’s a good idea but then you’ll have lawsuits from parents whose chunkier kids can’t cope and are treated “unfairly”.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 5, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

America has the highest infant mortality rate of all highly industrialized nations. Also, ours is the only one without a national health plan. Please put your ideology aside and think about that for a minute.

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | March 5, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

maybe i missed something but an election was won here and a mandate to CHANGE things as well. The Greedy Old Party screwed up bringing in a half wit the last 8 years and now it time to mop up.

Posted by: bob samms | March 5, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

“It’s common knowledge that AMA was for years predicting oversupply of doctors and advocating accordingly.”….
There is no mechanism that limits how many people can become doctors other than maximum capacity of medical schools. Nor is there a limit of medical licenses that can be issued. You don’t know what you are talking about.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 5, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

“one gave me a honest answer. They can only put so many people out in Field with out causing a problem for people in that field.”
della- that’s nonsense. Get a lawyer and sue the school that told you that.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 5, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

mark from atlanta why dont you look at statistics about fetal mortality rates and diabetes (type 1, 2, and gestational) then compare diabetes statistics in the US to those other “socialized medicine” nations. You might notice a trend…it is not the type of healthcare that is the problem, it is the lack of personal accountability that is

Posted by: mmm1145 | March 5, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Zorro
OB is giving these co money and they are still laying people off. his answer is no where near the solution every Pres that has tried this has failed. This is not new Change. hope what ever platatudes he gives. He is a empty shirt and he is using scare tactics so congress can do what they want. Im still waiting to see some change. Not the old enslaving people to the gov.Welfare destroys people it dosn’t help people at all. Letting people keep more of their money to start business or exband business employs people. Gov creats nothing People do. That means you and I. Regimes which opress their own people will collapes of their own immorality. Welfare keeps people oppressed.

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

jhw539 states: “That is EXACTLY what insurance company and HMO bureaucrats do; it is rationing,…”……I’m not sure what you’re referring to with “rationing” here, but it’s NOT the same thing as what is done under gov’t run health care systems. In those systems, there are boards who determine who will receive treatment and who won’t. i.e., not everyone will get the dialysis they need to continue living. THAT is rationing. I don’t think anyone in this country is ready for that – but by the time they realize what it means, it will be too late – Obama’s on a roll and he wants everything done, right now. . . those with wealth will still have good health care – they’ll go somewhere and pay private for it. Not uncommon even in countries with the most liberal health care system.

Posted by: Interested08 | March 5, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Sigmund they can just deny it. What proof is their. well I guess you can find proof But I bet its pretty difficult. Unv. are a business they tell you what you want to hear to get you in. Most people never even ? it. But Im long out of school. But they have Quota in and out. But they make the money But I hear their having a tough time and I amagine the gov will start looking into what they do with the money.

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Good thing only some of us have health care so then we can have a good argument, cause if we all had health care we wouldnt be here now, phew.

Posted by: palmal5 | March 5, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

“Well, those from other countries seeking top health care won’t have to journey here anymore (e.g. Lech Walesa coming to TX for his heart surgery), because our health care system will be just as junky as everyone else’s in the world. . .”
Statistically it is likely that a certain average value of something in a large sample will be similar to the same average value in a small sample but the extreme values will not be similar. The larger sample will be much more likely to have more extreme values.
So a country like France will probably have about the same quality medical care as a larger country like the US, but at the extreme the very best medical care in general will be in the larger country (US). That’s why people come here.

Posted by: Skip | March 5, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

“those with wealth will still have good health care – they’ll go somewhere and pay private for it. Not uncommon even in countries with the most liberal health care system.”
Its not about whether or not they will still have good health care, the issue is the fact up to 60% of they net yearly income will be taken to support others. And those who think 60% is an exaggeration it isn’t. In Canada it is roughly 65%

Posted by: mmm1145 | March 5, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Interested08:”..I’m not sure what you’re referring to with “rationing” here, but it’s NOT the same thing as what is done under gov’t run health care systems. In those systems, there are boards who determine who will receive treatment and who won’t.”
Currently insurance companies and HMOs have boards who determine who will receive treatment and who will not, what medications are covered and what are not, etc. What are you going to do if the board rejects your doctor’s request for a specific cancer treatment – dump your HMO and get insured (with pre-existing condition) elsewhere?
It’s not like the governement will be the end of some sort of utopia with infinite healthcare resources. Currently our rationing is done first by personal wealth then by mostly private, for profit companies whose primary motivation is to minimize their expenditures to fulfill the bare minimum of their contractual obligations.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 5, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

A lot of these comments are clearly coming from people with absolutely no real knowledge about healthcare in other industrialized nations.
The Republicans have built a zombie base who know nothing but can repeat talking points verbatim. Luckily, they’re about 20% of our population.
Meanwhile, real people must deal with real problems — how to pay for health insurance prime among them.
Since the Republicans don’t offer any alternative solutions, all they can do is keep yelling “Socialist!” over and over again.

Posted by: Naveen | March 5, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

No sigmund it is not a law or a rule it is more covert then that it is economics.

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

della…are you sure you went to college? because you’re writing “collage”, which is a composition of materials laid out on a flat surface in artistic form. i’m not disagreeing with your point necessarily, but rather stating that it would hold more weight if there weren’t so many spelling errors which makes it look like you’ve never even seen a “college” campus much less set foot on one.
p.s. i’m against socialized medicine and am not trying to start anything…just making a point that a reduction in spelling errors would make your point more valid

Posted by: southerngumdrops | March 5, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Naveen have you ever lived in another country?

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Obama is pushing ahead with healthcare.
Questions: Our healthcare is so expensive because Lawsuits (like the Wyeth one just won) + gov’t forced coding. Until that is fixed – there will never be affordable healtcare.
So why are we doing this now? Fix the system – then standardize it.
2. Are we ready for people to die because the treatment was deemed too costly by the 15 board review panel? this will happen
3. Why are we doing this? – First fix the economy coz they way I see it, no one will be working to pay for it if we keep losing jobs at this rate.

Posted by: citizen4honor | March 5, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

those of you that argue that private insurance companies have boards that decide what is and what is not covered need to realize that they base this off of medicare. the difference between private coverange and medicare is that reimbursements to the physician are actually what they should be on an patient to patient basis with private coverage where medicare decides to pay the physician a flat fee say $600 regardless of the extent of the patient’s injuries. these flat rates are what are driving the increase in healthcare costs b/c to compensate for this physicians and hospitals have to make more from someone else so they charge more on the private side which in return drives up premiums. Take government out of the equation and you fix the issue.

Posted by: mmm1145 | March 5, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

KnowItAll “Sigmone” wrote again: “You don’t know what you are talking about.”
I am afraid it is you who is lacking in knowledge on the subject. Unlike some other professions, the marketplace doesn’t strictly determine number of doctors in a given country. Political decision is involved, heavily influenced by doctors. One example is how Congress controls supply of doctors by amount of fed funding provided to medical residencies. Not to mention Medicare shifting caps on reimbursing hospitals for costs of training residents. And these and other decisions are political, influenced by advisory boards staffed with the parties who may benefit. Like I said, you have poor knowledge of human nature. Doctors are same as any other persons wanting to get and keep their share of the pie. As I recommended to you, start to learn more about human motivations, and you will gain better well rounded knowledge of the various pieces to the puzzle.

Posted by: D.B. | March 5, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Obama’s plan includes lowering the prices paid to doctors and hospitals. Now do ya think that’s going to give us quality care?
Half the doctors in this country can’t speak English now, all good doctors will go into private groups.
In England, there is a shortage of gov’t dentists. The gov’t programs require dentists to only treat superficially massive amounts of patients in an assembly line fashion. As a result, many dentists just go into private practice and people have to pay for their own treatments. Many pharmacies carry fillings, crowns and pliers for people to do their own dental work.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/3353121/Dentist-crisis-4.7-million-opt-for-private-care.html

Posted by: citizen4honor | March 5, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Yes and I do that . Im surprised you didn’t pic up on my lack of punctuation
as well.
Im not trying to be sarcastic but I do not understand what that has to do with any thing My key board has a sticking problem and I think faster then I can type. Sorry if this offends.

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

I don’t have health care. I have a job, but that can’t pay for it.
I kinda just resigned to be screwed if I get sick… that’s the way American’s do it. Bankruptcy is better than death, right Republicans? Duh.

Posted by: Sean | March 5, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Why don’t we just solve the problem?
Why don’t people have healthcare?
Because they can’t afford it.
So let’s reduce lawsuit awards and remove gov’t coding requirments and regulations.
Let’s get the economy on track again so people can get back to work.
This is insane to even be dicussing – American is broke. We have no money for it -no matter how noble the cause.
No socialized healthcare is as good as ours.

Posted by: citizen4honor | March 5, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

mm11145 Thats very intersting. I always wonder were there # came from

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Sean,
I don’t have health care. I have a job, but that can’t pay for it.
I kinda just resigned to be screwed if I get sick… that’s the way American’s do it. Bankruptcy is better than death, right Republicans? Duh.
—-
No guarantee with Obama’s plan you’d be alive. If you happen to get one of the diseases his team has deemed too expensive to treat…. you’re a gonner anyway.

Posted by: citizen4honor | March 5, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Sean when you took that job maybe you should have weighed the benefits of taking a job that lacked healthcare coverage. I’m a full time student w/ $200,000 in medical school loans yet I am still able to live comfortably and pay for my family to have health insurance. I realize that health insurance is more important than a home theater system, the best computer, ipods, etc. and budget to protect my family. Your employer doesn’t have to supply insurance coverage for you; you can purchase it yourself

Posted by: mmm1145 | March 5, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

citizen4honor:” Are we ready for people to die because the treatment was deemed too costly by the 15 board review panel? this will happen”
This already happens. Seriously, what planet do you live on? How do you think the 83 million uninsured people are going to fare if they get ANY major illness? What’s that you say – they won’t be left to die of appendicitis even if they don’t have any health insurance or money? Sounds a lot like we already have (very expensive and inefficient) health care then…

Posted by: jhw539 | March 5, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I’ll say it again, Americans are the last to know, we have been duped by our own government/the insurance industry–even if you can’t stand Michael Moore and are a die-hard Republican, go see the movie “Sicko.”

Posted by: Sallie | March 5, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

mmm1145:”Your employer doesn’t have to supply insurance coverage for you; you can purchase it yourself”
Said with the blithe confidence of someone with no pre-existing conditions.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 5, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

They are left to die if they don’t have health insurance. In Oregon last year, something like at least 1200 people died because they had no medical insurance, and could not get treatment to save them.

Posted by: Sallie | March 5, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

“it is not the type of healthcare that is the problem, it is the lack of personal accountability that is” Hold on there – either I am misreading your comment or you are implying the reason why the U.S. has higher infant mortality rates and diabetes rates than the countries with socialized medicine is because Americans are less responsible? If that is the case perhaps there is a correlation between socialism and and personal responsibility. Perhaps being willing to “share the wealth” is another incident of being responsible?

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | March 5, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

citizen4honor:”No guarantee with Obama’s plan you’d be alive. If you happen to get one of the diseases his team has deemed too expensive to treat”
Did you read the article at all? There is NO plan out there yet and the proposal is to have a plan hashed out in full view of the public with all stakeholders at the table. Obama’s plan doesn’t exist except apparently in your fearful head.

Posted by: jhw539 | March 5, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Well that is what Ive been saying all along if Gov would jst get out of our way we the people could solve all the problems but every time Gov gets involed were their not sa pose too. They produce nothing we do. We invented the car not gov we invented electricity hey didn’t i could go on and on. Gov just takes our money and gives it to who ever is going to vote for them or wh ever financed them or a pet project. Oh I know their are some who do represent some but its maining about them keeping their job.Like global warming what a scam it snowed in south carolina for heavens sake. Oh I heard they call it global cooling today I wonder if gore will give us our money back

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am

pre-existing conditions goes back to my earlier statement about the lack of self accountability in this nation when it comes to personal health. Those who stay active, eat healthy, and avoid obesity would have no problem with coverage. Yes there are the few exceptions, which my wife has (she has genes BRCA1 and BRCA2) look those up if you dont know what they are. Im pretty sure that preexisting condition trumps any one that is preventing you from being covered and we still were approved.

Posted by: mmm1145 | March 5, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am

“The cost of health care now causes a bankruptcy in America every thirty seconds
======
From where does President Obama pull this statistic?
He has used it several times, never with a citation.

Posted by: MayBee | March 5, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am

On the sharing the wealth deal I beleive the people being us have no objections on share the wealth But we would just like to the ones to choose who we want to give it to instead of the gov deciding who to give it to. But we the people need to speak up about it and demand it ( What we want) Gov is not the answer and never will be. every time they get involved they do not look at the ramifications of their actions.

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Well said Della. Increasing taxes like Obama has chosen to do, even though it is only to the those who make more than $250,000 for now, will result in nonprofit organizations really hurting. I have no problem with spreding the wealth, or what I like to call giving, but I don’t like having my money taken from me and distributed to whom the government seems fit

Posted by: mmm1145 | March 5, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Maybee
I know exactly what you mean all this stuff they throw around. The #s change all the time too.

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

I eagerly await the proposals to actually lower health care costs, rather than just lower the cost of insurance for some individuals.
President Obama discusses the cost of medical care to the government, but Medicare and MedicAid are already managed cared subsidized by other taxpayers.
I am really, really hoping we will get an actual discussion out of this- the things people will get and the things people will give up. I fear it will be left for Congress to write up whatever they think they can get away with. I’m certain they are trying to pass it (and the costs that will come along with it) before taxpayers feel the bite from other spending.
I don’t want to see Stimulus II:The Healthcare Plan.

Posted by: MayBee | March 5, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

most people that are in a bubble and are driven like the president and the first lady have to have their treadmill or whatever because they get bored without it… most regular people have access to excercize stuff and can excercize but dont have as much time on their hands as the leader of the free world does its always different for elected officials normal people barely have time to breathe

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Thanks mmm1145
Maybee I bet you can find the statistics on the net some where.
Has any one red the stemulas bill yet any of it?

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Della
I would gladly do a copay for health insurance out of my paycheck but my employer says its too expensive so they wont offer it even before the president was president or even a state senator he could afford it and thats not a fair deal to say do as I say not as I do when its free for him

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Della
nobody has read the stimulus bill not even members of congress because they used to write legislation now the congressional staff does

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Congress will try to dictate the stimulus talk about the president but the truth is the president needs to be tough with both democrats and republicans…. what pelosi is doing is telling the president that its all very nice but they are doing it her way!

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am

The cap and traid is just another way to introduce a tax hike in energy cost and anything that produses green house gases is a sneeky way to in crease taxes on us ordinary people as ob puts it. Of course he going to give us something to help us out with that so end the end it will not offset it because it will affect everything that transpotation touches manufactures touch it just dose no make any sence to do this at this time.Yall have a much better out look on life. Yall have hope I just don’t see it. I do not have insurance and I have a small business and Im just trying to keep my people employed.

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 1:35 am 1:35 am

I just fell in love with our corrupt politicians. They have caused the implosion of the British strategy to enslave us through finance, and soon enough they will bring collapse to any effort to enslave us through socialism. Given the tyranny of the elite, the tyranny of one, the tyranny of the appetites, or the tyranny of earmarks, I’ll take earmarks.

Posted by: Mark | March 5, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Every day I become more and more impressed with Obama. I was almost going to vote McCain, but I’m now more happy that I didn’t. I think McCain was a pretty good candidate, but he wouldn’t have been able to handle this mess.

Posted by: Julie | March 5, 2009, 1:41 am 1:41 am

I read some of it . That was my job at one time reading regs. And they gave a bunch of money for a four wheeler trail for some state. It just amazes me. I wonder if it is polosi and read that are really the head of the gov. They sure have the purse strings. That would be like when clinton was pres after he got into trouble. The fiscal purse strings were cut. for threat from the dems for him to siding with the rep for fiscal responsability man its been a long time sence we have had any of that (fiscal responsability)

Posted by: Della Creighton | March 5, 2009, 1:46 am 1:46 am

della creighton
yea IM all for the energy improvements but it sounds expensive to me and there is no way we can just switch over to a “smart grid” that knows which kind of energy is being produced overnight… and I work for a small business and their personal taxes are going up so thats not going to help me any

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am

mark
then what was that with the Brittsh PM trying to get the US to foot the bill on a worldwide stimulus.. sounds liek enslavement to me!

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 1:56 am 1:56 am

julie
this mess isnt handled yet! THe White house is being immature about who is talking about whom when there needs to be transparency in what is donr to help the economy

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 1:58 am 1:58 am

della creighton
yep… in the 90s Clinton had a fight over closing down the govt with the republicans over the operating budgets of each dept….thats what its goignto come to… but I fear the president isnt even in the conversation

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 2:01 am 2:01 am

general sec
the stimulus plan was emegency spending but now we are dealing with the budget it should be harder to pass

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Comrade General Secratary: Wanted to drop by real fast, Can’t stay long, but I wanted to encourage you to keep fighting the good fight.

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 2:11 am 2:11 am

The only emergency in the stimulus JG was to fund the Obama Brown Shirts that round up the votes; from the Greens to the ACORNs, all he was doing was paying bills, THAT was what he meant by INFASTRUCTURE. We’ve peeled off some dims who are up for election next year, but the others may keep marching in lock step behind him.

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 2:19 am 2:19 am

newsrook
yeah.. taking seriously a national crisis with Chinas money since the money … even with the tax increases on wealthy is goingt o be put on the government CC and the money we get from our payroll taxes is still owed the government it means we will pay it back after 2011 applaud we will be trying to and doing it is different

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Oh, and BTW, the evil drug company gave it to her for free. Damn those capitalist swine for undermining the omnipotent and all knowing state.

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 2:33 am 2:33 am

wuddinyalik2know
yea I can prove that ACORN etc was on the ground in the primaries tryingto run up the score in North Carolina … I overheard meetings in Dem HQs where I worked… I know they used church busses to take african americans in the polls in NC in the praimary may 5th and the election its how HJohn Edwards ever became a politician because he won in heavily black eastern NC using church buses for political things is illegal by the way but since it was a primary who was watching eh?

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Ditto Linden, Couldn’t of said it better myself.

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 2:34 am 2:34 am

If you become ill in your late teens in this country, you can never own your own business. You can only work for companies which offer health insurance, and if you happen to lose your job, or cannot become employed sufficiently quickly to avoid a major hospitalization, you are in debt for the rest of your natural life, with no hope of escape. Or worse, you are dead.
That is slavery, and is not expected out of the citizens of any other civilized country than this one. Obama is our one, slim hope at emancipation.
I’m very lucky. Somebody in my family has always been employed with benefits, so I still live. However, my life should depend more on hard work and intellect, and less on luck.

Posted by: mellers | March 5, 2009, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Thank you so much!! I can’t think of any issue that is more urgent. It is a sin that there are people that work 2 or 3 part-time jobs and are unable to receive medical care for themselves or their family. No other industrialized country has this problem. Why would we even debate it? The insurance companies are incredibly greedy and money is what elects politicians.

Posted by: afranio8 | March 5, 2009, 2:36 am 2:36 am

wuddinyalik2know
yea it was Nancy pelosis symbolism to have PM Brown address congress and ask for US help for a world stimulus.. presumably because the markets are here… we arent that dumb

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 2:36 am 2:36 am

afranio8
thats all well and good but I would work 3 jobs if I could and there arent that many employers here its the primary employers that should do the right thing but obama doesnt make them

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 2:38 am 2:38 am

They bussed people from Chitown into IN for the dem primary, that’s probably how the state went blue in November. Lake county, or gary, is known for it’s rampant corruption. In MO, they supposedly rounded up the ACORN types, but with a Dem Sec of State, who knows what they pulled in KC and STL. They could have done likewise in Ohio, where a judge ruled a week beforw E day that you could vote from a park bench. You telling me the Obuma people could turn that down? If the dude won, it was barely. Voter Fraud is NEVER pursued in most states, especially blue ones.

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Bad thing is, NC has trended blue for some time. At least in MO we have a Red Legislature. In NC, you’ve got the whole blue package.

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am

general secretary
yep, separation of church and state! they used the fact that the DNC is “not subject to the constitution” argument and Hillary was only 300 delegates behind if there were full votes for MI and FL in the primaries.. guess who wouldve won by 300 delegates…Clinton and she had to ceremoniously release her delegates tt he convention so that Obama wouldnt be embarrassed and not get the minimum on the first ballot… I can hear Chief of staff immanuel laughign histarically all the way from washington

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 2:43 am 2:43 am

general secretary
IM not agreeing with you on policy per se I think that it was a bad thing with the whole operation chaos which really happened now you have a gift if a president you can kick aroudn and with Clinton it wouldnt have been any fun

Posted by: jg | March 5, 2009, 2:47 am 2:47 am

afranio08, Any Govt that has the power to give you everything you want has the power to take it away too. Just because they put your name on a list that doesn’t mean they are giving you healthcare. THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH, DID EVERYBODY FORGET THAT?

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 2:49 am 2:49 am

wuddinyalik2know
yea well there were rumors of bill clinton doing that in 92 which obama himelf helped with and he merely wanted the favor returned.. its not democratic .. this is a repulic that shouldnt necessarily have all republican ideas but not what we have now either!

Posted by: JG | March 5, 2009, 2:49 am 2:49 am

At least Hillary Rotten couldn’t call me a racist in typical Stalinist fashion. They both loved Alinsky, but she would have been easier to go after than the post partisan partisan.

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 2:53 am 2:53 am

What’s scary is tha everything the libs accused Bush of Obuma has done with interest after 5 weeks. Yet they don’t care. Fascism with a smiley face, everybody.

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 3:00 am 3:00 am

Had my share of fun with this. Comrades, we shall prevail against the bougeois running dogs of capitalism. Sweet dreams.

Posted by: wuddinyalik2no | March 5, 2009, 3:02 am 3:02 am

There is a prediction that within the next 2 years our Health Care system is going to take the route of AIG,Wells Fargo, Lehman Bros and the rest of the defunct corporate entities. Imagine a bankrupt health care system. Sounds like a very realistic future to me.
People touting socialism when it is the Friggin Repubs that got us here with their greed and corruption. Now they spew words of socialism when they are the very ones who initiated it. Their propaganda is worse than the Nazis. They need to go crawl back under their rocks after the shambles they left this country in. Hypocrites and Nazis.

Posted by: Newsrook | March 5, 2009, 3:06 am 3:06 am

What did the article say? Health Care bankrupts someone every 30 seconds? Obama wants to bankrupt an entire nation with the same BS that has failed in every SOCIALIST country on the planet. Hope? Change? How about ignorance…stupidity…power hungry…facist…socialist. Shear and utter fool hardy madness.
WTG DEMS!

Posted by: Riteaidbob | March 5, 2009, 4:18 am 4:18 am

I am 66 years old, America has been at war as long as I have remember, actually I was born in the middle of WWII, 1942. Our goverment has always found money in HUGE AMOUNTS to fight Germans, Japanese, Koreans,Chinese, Russians (cold war), Vietnamese, Iraquis,etc., etc. Then how come we can not find money for a decent universal health insurance?

Posted by: Emilio R. C. | March 5, 2009, 5:21 am 5:21 am

Obama is merely mimicking what Hillary said during the primary. But at least he stole a good idea. Good luck to him with this – and even better luck to the American people that it indeed turns out to be a blessing and not a curse.

Posted by: marylou | March 5, 2009, 5:21 am 5:21 am

You go Mr. President! Stop the 10 thousand dollar a day ICU’s and 75 thousand dollar prosthetic limbs. We pay more than any other nation on the planet for healthcare and it’s rated 37th! It’s time we got what’s best for the patient instead of what’s best for the stockholders!

Posted by: rightbehind | March 5, 2009, 6:10 am 6:10 am

Not another speech!!!! I am sick of listening to this guys BS. He is so busy preparing speeches that he doesn’t have time to actually learn what is going on.
How much is he spending today? Another trillion? LOL

Posted by: CW | March 5, 2009, 6:21 am 6:21 am

If healthcare bankrupts someone every 30 seconds how do hospitals, nurses and doctors get paid? I recently had surgery
the hospital charged $12000K the insurance paid them $1,200 the hospital had to write off the difference. The cost of high medical care is also due to the high number of people who NEVER pay for it.

Posted by: CW | March 5, 2009, 6:31 am 6:31 am

Obama need to be admitted to a mental institution. He has completely lost it. Or is he another Hitler and we have lost it?

Posted by: barefootboy | March 5, 2009, 6:42 am 6:42 am

Go Barack. Only fools can say that health care in the US isn’t broken. One shouldn’t have to chose between losing everything they own and staying alive. One shouldn’t have to die because they aren’t insured. People with insurance plan A shouldn’t get better health care than those with plan B.

Posted by: Eric | March 5, 2009, 6:48 am 6:48 am

MIguy said “I can’t believe anyone on here would actually whine about this? What exactly is wrong with trying to fix healthcare?”
The problem is that the government shouldn’t be trying to fix it, since it is the government’s fault it’s a mess. The creation of Medicare is the reason our system is such a mess now. You can trace the deterioration of the system directly from that. It all started with how the government paid providers for Medicare patients. It was a mess (with incomprehensible regs) that paid providers for certain expenses & capital items – but yet, still didn’t cover the costs of Medicare patients. The Medicare Cost Report was worse than any tax forms the IRS creates. That in turn created cost shifting to commercial insurance plans. Several insurance companies went to similar payment systems (paying a % of charges & then settling with a cost report at the end of the fiscal year). HHS then created the prospective payment system (PPS) – (DRG’s, base rates, weights, outliers and days stay that they’d pay for). The commercial insurers followed suit & jumped on the HMO bandwagon (even though HMO’s had been in existence in California for years). And it has just gotten worse every year since.
**Every horrible thing the insurance companies have come up with, has its roots in the Medicare system.**
The sad thing is that the people who are anxious for universal healthcare are probably the people who will be denied care because their cost/benefit ratio will be too high – the chance of a good outcome will be too low for the cost of the treatment. They will be in no better shape than they are now.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | March 5, 2009, 6:48 am 6:48 am

I think they should fix one piece at a time, when things get all bundled together many items get diluted and comprimised.
Here are a few areas to save in:
1. Limit awards for lawsuits, It should be limited to damages. I hate to say this but mistakes do happen, no one is perfect. This would greatly reduce the cost of insurance.
2. Do not Pass Free Choice Act, this will have a significant cost to many Hospitals and Nursing Homes throughout the US. Many studies have shown, the extra costs do not support the care. Also patient care suffers when strikes occur at Hospitals and Nursing homes.

Posted by: phil | March 5, 2009, 6:56 am 6:56 am

Illegal immigrants come to this country to have their babies at no cost. Those babies automatically become US citizens and qualify for free healthcare, free meds. and a check every month. THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS !!!

Posted by: CW | March 5, 2009, 7:03 am 7:03 am

nothing is standard or so it seems. two people with the same hmo but who work for different companies pay unequal copay for care, one say $25 per visit while the other $5. doctors, nurses, surgeons, hospital staff have so finitely a division of labor that there are several people doing what less could be doing. one wonders how other nation’s like canada, england, japan manage health care. is the usa the only nation with high priced health care and why?

Posted by: Lawrence | March 5, 2009, 7:03 am 7:03 am

“Crushing cost”? “The economy won’t recover until we deal with health care”?Can we have a helpful conversation on health care without Obama using fear mongering and bully tactics to force his radical plans that will ultimately kill quality and availability of health care in the U.S.? We already have a severe shortage of doctors.

Posted by: Julie Ohio | March 5, 2009, 7:04 am 7:04 am

I think this is a great idea. This is a multi-faceted problem that needs to be faced in front of everyone. One previous comment said take 1 problem at a time, but this country needs to address everything, with the commitee approach. I’m sure there will be special interest groups cutting this down, but the losers need to learn to be part of the solution, instead of part of the problem.

Posted by: Gary, Parma Hts, Oh | March 5, 2009, 7:09 am 7:09 am

Part of the problem is that Americans go to the doctor to much compared to the rest of the world. Obesity, also causes a wide range of problems such as diabetes. Drug companies charge way to much for the same medications that can be bought in Canada for half the price. Malpractice lawsuits need to have limits.

Posted by: CW | March 5, 2009, 7:19 am 7:19 am

Every 30 seconds, the government goes bankrupt again due to inane spending policies and free giveaways.

Posted by: jol | March 5, 2009, 7:33 am 7:33 am

Fear mongering is all this clown has left.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
So much for change.

Posted by: Kim | March 5, 2009, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Well said CW,
I also think insurance needs to go back to what it was originally intended to be, non-profit. That would solve a lot of issues, if they weren’t so worried about their profit margins they wouldn’t deny everyone. The overall costs needs to be looked at, I mean why is it $5 for an advil, I can buy a bottle for that price. I once spent the night in a hospital, they took xrays, did a CT scan, and I had stitches, most of the time was laying around doing nothing and it cost me $10000!!! (If I had insurance it would have cost them $20000, probably)..
The system is broke and needs fixed, however I am against a nationalized health care system, because then the government can use that as an excuse to control our lives, in what we eat, etc..

Posted by: dc70 | March 5, 2009, 7:37 am 7:37 am

ABC where is the story about Obama’s expensive wednesday dinners for the elite?

Posted by: CW | March 5, 2009, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Nothing about limiting the amount you can sue for in malpractice suits. Disgusting.
How about making the doctors insurance less? Nothing there either.
Real costs that have to be paid for by us. Because some lazy sob feels she was touched wrong and sues the pants off of the hospital and doctor driving up costs for all of us.
Obama doesn’t really care about taking on the real costs with doctors, does he.

Posted by: Mark | March 5, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Obama’s like a pup on the loose – he’s gotta run around and mark everything in sight, just to leave his mark….. running around and marking EVERYTHING to do with this country, in a big frenzy.

Posted by: Interested08 | March 5, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am

No wonder the market is going biserk and there is no consumer confidence. Obama is off to awful partisan start. He is in a total state of denial. Let’s punishing the working folks to cover the irresponsible ones. In the name of “bailout”, he is trying to push his bigger political agenda.

Posted by: Stacy | March 5, 2009, 7:46 am 7:46 am

CW @ 6:21: Good post! We’re getting a speech every other day….this guy sure misses the campaign trail, doesn’t he?…… I’ve never heard anyone – even a politician – give as many ‘I’m A Gonna’ speeches as this fella…..problem is, it’s all “I’m A Gonna Use YOUR money and it’s money you don’t even HAVE yet!”

Posted by: Interested08 | March 5, 2009, 7:47 am 7:47 am

WE DON’T WANT to be FRANCE Number TWO. Understand this you Washington pinheads, YOU ARE SINKING America even farther than the liberal moron GWBUSH did. We are going to fail as a nation because of all the tens of millions of people that Obama is adding to the government payroll. There is no way on Earth or Mars(Where Obama, Pelosi and co. really reside) to pay for all this. We will be a third world nation and ultimately fall apart into many smaller nations because you are breaking the spirit of the entrepreneur do to your give-a-way programs that steal the future of our children!!!!

Posted by: rockychance | March 5, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am

That is right! Check out the $100.00 per meat selection that Obama dined on with his guest Wednesday. It is disgusting that he spends that kind of money while blasting crooked CEO’s. In other words, Obama is lying his behind off when he says he is for a change in Washington. He is more of the same only ten times worse.

Posted by: rockychance | March 5, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am

another Socialist Obamination from Obama. Health care was affordable before the lawyers and government got involved. Want to fix healthcare? Cap the malpractice awards to actual damage only, and get the government out of it completely. The Obama proposal will raise costs and make the system more inefficient. You notice that Obama doesn’t mention the massive malpractice insurance costs because he is a lawyer.

Posted by: brian | March 5, 2009, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Pres Obama used to be a community worker. This man works for Joe Mainstreet NOT Joe Wall street. Finally we have a president that knows what the average American needs. He is the first president who started to work even days before his inauguration. This man is a workaholic…How many presidents u know, make the congress and Senate work on week-ends? This man is a workaholic. Finally we have someone who works for the average countryman NOT the wealthy fat pigs. Give him a chance! Let me tell you something, I worked for a rich pig who gave money to charities because he would be tax deducted NOT because of goodwill and he insisted that I put it on his tax form. No more greedy pigs running the white house, no more please…..

Posted by: Roy Nelson | March 5, 2009, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Obviously, we need change. However, when a boat is sinking we need to first figure how to stay afloat instead of trying to focusing on how to build a bigger boat. Obama needs to defer the bigger agenda until the economy is more stable.

Posted by: Stacy | March 5, 2009, 8:00 am 8:00 am

This isssue is critical – Facts on healthcare:
We have the best healthcare technology in the world
however
We pay twice as much for half the access to top healthcare
We have a child mortality rate worse than Spain and Cyprus
Our life expectancy is 5 years less than all the other industrialized nations
Over 50% of bankruptcy is related to medical bills
Everyone of us, who is not independently wealthy, are one catostrophic illness away from bankruptcy (even if insured)
Our companies are at a cost and competitive disdvantage due to the cost of health care coverage and costs…
I can alos attest to the quality of national healthcare given my direct experience when my son was born in the London…(and he was in intensive care for 4 weeks), I can personally attest to the fantastic care he recieved, and the best thing, was not having to fight the insurance companies, allowing us to completely focus on him…which saved his life…
So folks, our system is broken, we need to drop the blind ideology and fix this now…it is a national discgrace, and unchristian to leave people without access.

Posted by: indithinker | March 5, 2009, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Yup just another program designed to help everyone who is irresponsible. I am sure this will do nothing to help those of us who are paying our bills. WHY BOTHER OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Again, you won’t get my vote again.!!! I have seen NOTHING that impresses me and all I see is him handing out to welfare trash.

Posted by: Tired of Games | March 5, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Obama, you just lost support from someone who voted for you.
tick tick tick…your approval rating is coming down down down.
Your spending and proposed spending in a time like this when we trusted you….I am outraged!

Posted by: Kay from Mn | March 5, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am

For all those screaming that only those who can afford it get the best care – get your facts [and stats] straight. There’s too many other variables in health care to just shout about income and care results….
CASE IN POINT: The state of Massachusetts noticed a higher rate of low birth rate & C-section babies among lower income women. The risk factor was identified as being little or no prenatal care (i.e., a lot of the womens’ first health care encounter while pregnant was at time of delivery). So a program was implemented which identified lower income, pregnant women and made every effort to ensure that they received a full range of prenatal care……many of these women already qualified for state health care benefits, but they weren’t showing up for the care. ….So transportation to and from their appointments was provided. GUESS WHAT? After several years of this – THE STATS FOR LOW BIRTH WEIGHT DID NOT CHANGE……why? Turns out it wasn’t the lack of health care, it was the behaviors of the women (drugs, smoking, alcohol), while pregnant, that was the issue. So before people scream for more Health Care Money – get your stats and facts straight. It’s not all about the money, folks. Stop being so naive!

Posted by: Interested08 | March 5, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Well, I’m glad bho is gonna give all of us healthcare. I’ve quit my job and I’m jumping on the obamabot bandwagon. I’m gonna let big daddy government take care of me now. I’ve worked for 30 years paying taxes and taking care of others, but hey, if you can’t bet em’ then join em’.

Posted by: bo | March 5, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am

“Turns out it wasn’t the lack of health care, it was the behaviors of the women (drugs, smoking, alcohol), while pregnant, that was the issue.”
Except if you have healthcare you are much more likely to get treatment for drugs, smoking, and alcohol.

Posted by: Skip | March 5, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am

“Illegal immigrants come to this country to have their babies at no cost. Those babies automatically become US citizens and qualify for free healthcare, free meds. and a check every month. THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS !!!Posted by: CW | Mar 5, 2009 7:03:00 AM”…That’s not the worst of it CW. He wants to give amnesty to 20 million illegals even we can’t even pay for the people we have. What is this man thinking? MORE VOTERS for his voter farm. Obama is a disater that the democrat snuck in with the help of the media. They want a total power, and I fear since we are already living socialism(my husband works 7 months a year just to pay our taxes before we see a dime)communisum is what BO has planned for us. Read The Slobering Love Affair by Bernard Goldberg. Obama’s past is so corrupt and was totally hidden during his campaign by the MSM

Posted by: Mags | March 5, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Indiethinker @ 8:03 states: “We have a child mortality rate worse than Spain and Cyprus”…..for the BILLIONTH TIME – infant mortality in the U.S. is NOT ABOUT LACK OF HEALTH CARE MONEY. It’s more about behaviors of a large number of pregnant women – even those who have access to quality health care throughout, and after, pregnancy, and ironically a stat as a result of our excellent pre-term birth infant care…..You can throw all the money you want into “health care for the poor” but how is the federal gov’t going to control the alcohol and drug abuse, smoking, young age of the moms, etc. etc. that plague an entire population of pregnant women in this country? ………….
ANOTHER factor in infant mortality is that more and more babies are viable at lower gestational age birth – i.e., babies who used to be born w/out hope are now able to receive care. *Many* of these babies thrive and do well, however many succumb to their early birth, despite all the best medical care available. So those stats are actually not a sign of lack of care, or inadequate care, but of extensive care reaching to babies who previously would not have even lived long enough to be an infant mortality stat…….[it's like saying that the oncology floor of a hospital has a higher mortality rate than the orthopedic floor. Well, of course it would. But due to the nature of the illness, not the lack of care]……….
Sorry for the rant but I’m getting sick and tired of junk stats being thrown around designed to misinform and trash our health care system…..look at the CA OctoMom – are her babies being NOT cared for by the hospital because she can’t afford it? No – they’re being cared for in every way possible, right along with those babies whose parents are insured. STOP THROWING OUT JUNK STATS TO JUSTIFY SOCIALISM!!!!!! And yes, I’m yelling.

Posted by: Interested08 | March 5, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am

Well, it’s about time somebody come to the realization that it’s healthcare that causes the collapse of so many families. It caused bankruptcy for my family during the last recession 20+ years ago and it costs me $40K a year, now. You can’t live with the cost and you can’t live without it.

Posted by: Leah | March 5, 2009, 8:34 am 8:34 am

“Except if you have healthcare you are much more likely to get treatment for drugs, smoking, and alcohol.”Posted by: Skip | Mar 5, 2009 8:24……Skip, you didn’t read the results of the study, did you? You just picked out what you wanted, to advance your ideas, and ignored the facts. You can treat people all you want for addiction and health care them to every expense, but that doesn’t mean they’ll stop the addiction and eliminate the negative results……you’re intent on lying with stats, to advance your cause.

Posted by: Interested08 | March 5, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am

interested08…where did I say “infant mortality rates?” – I said “child mortality rates”…
totally different…this is children age 2- 5 years old….check the OECD stats..internationally accepted facts and figures…
care to quibble with any other facts?

Posted by: indithinker | March 5, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Conservatives are starting to seem increasingly goofy. Before it was just angry but now the comments are downright goofy. Their world view is Tim McVeigh, David Duke and Rush Limbaugh all melted together. I for one accept that a blog posting won’t change a single mind. They seem to think they can change policy or the minds of Democrats by calliny everyone a Socialist and letting them die in the streets. Really weird. But hey, people are entitled to their own opinion. Just not their own facts.

Posted by: Elliot in Texas | March 5, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

“STOP THROWING OUT JUNK STATS TO JUSTIFY SOCIALISM!!!!!! ”
Spoken like a true right-winger with an anti-socialism agenda. And yet you say it isn’t about money. So we’re supposed to disregard the numbers and just follow your ideological opinions?

Posted by: Skip | March 5, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am

and btw interested08…it is ok to yell and scream….all people who are frightened by something they do not understand get a bit cranky….go ahead yell and scream…it will make you feel better…
But I would suggest getting a passport and go see “socialized medicine” before you judge it…might remove some of your fear.

Posted by: indithinker | March 5, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

I realize this may be extreme, but a may help solve a lot of issues.
Encorage Mandatory Birth Control for those who don’t have insurance and/or can not afford to raise children.
I would rather support someone who is responsible than someone who is not.

Posted by: phil | March 5, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am

you know Phil, I hope you are never one of those that gets a catastrophic illness and realizes that his/her insurance company are all totally shysters and you get to see what it feels like to have to scratch and claw to get them to pay for your bills…only to discover you end up broke….this is what the healthcare fix is about…you just dont get it do you?

Posted by: indithinker | March 5, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

interested08 – indeed not, I do not have all the answers and I am not a proponent of “socialized medicine”…and if you take it as an insult and presumption – I apologize – was not intended…
Clearly you had a bad experience in your interactions with “national health” in your travels…I had a good one and am letting people know…there is nothing to be frightened of.
As far as facts, I go on the OECD statistics which are accepted by the US govt and the AMA and the UN …as accurate…so it isreasonable use these stats….IMHO.

Posted by: indithinker | March 5, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am

interested08…would like to hear your experience of “nationalized healthcare” that you allude to outside the US…given you seem to have had a bad experience…please share it with us, and add to the debate…

Posted by: indithinker | March 5, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Indithinker: If you break down the categories of CHILD mortality stats in the U.S, and you can “quibble” about those (you can’t seem to comment w/out being trite and judgmental, can you?), you’ll see where the CHILD mortality rates arise from. Child mortality rates in the U.S. are for different reasons than in other parts of the world. Many of the % are from congenital diseases which sadly, the child would never have survived no matter what amount of health care they receive. The U.S. also has, which is devastating, a high rate of child deaths due to accident and abuse….in terms of accidents, the number one cause of death for children (which is up to ages 18) is vehicle accident, taking about 6K teens a year. Add in those younger than teen age and there’s a whopping stat…..now, those deaths are included in CHILD mortality, but are vehicle related and not related to treatment of a disease or preventive medical care. If mortality due to vehicle accident is removed, life expectancy in the U.S. rises considerably, as does life expectancy for children. This needs to be taken into account when comparing stats to other parts of the world, if the reason to address the stats is for purposes of crafting a health cares system.

Posted by: Interested08 | March 5, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

interested08….guess we can agree to disagree on the stats…but can you quibble with any other points that I draw out below – for instance on bankruptcies, or the fact that our companies are at a cost disadvantge…or that we are all one catastrophic illness away from financial distress….?
Also still waiting to hear your experiences in using “nationlized healthcare” – or am I being too judgmental by calling you out on it?

Posted by: indithinker | March 5, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

I find it odd when people are discussing health care reform no one ever brings up the savings that would be created by a)ensuring that a valuable employee doesn’t lose that employee because they needed surgery and couldn’t get it. That is a hidden expense. I used to be an upper middle class worker. 7 yrs ago a drunk hit me while I was at a light and changed my life for the worst.
As it turned out my wife had recently been let go from work not too long after breast cancer surgery and treatment. When she lost her job and our health insurance with it, I was temporarily uninsured, naturally when the accident occurred.
Because I had no insurance I could not get the necessary spine surgery I needed and my herniated disc pressed against my root nerves that come off the spine.
Anyway, it took three years to finally get the surgery and by that time, the nerve damage was irreversible. So now I cannot work, am typing from my wheelchair and can no longer earn my good paychecks and pay taxes on them.
The drunk who hit me had minimum liability as it turns out, and there was not enough to even cover my surgery ($123,000) not even close. Something has to be done to fix our disastrous state of health care.
I think it would be a good idea to ensure what happened to me doesn’t happen to someone else because of an untimely lapse in coverage.

Posted by: Larry | March 5, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Elliot in Texas, excellent points. Republicans have no alternative solution to health care at all, except allowing people to go uninsured in the name of the “free market”. Next, they’ll say Bernie Madoff and Rick Santelli should be running HHS.
To Della Creighton: Have I lived overseas? Yes. And so have many members of my family. And many have them have also practiced medicine in other countries, as well as the U.S.
Don’t use scare tactics about “socialized medicine” until you’ve at least studied the numerous different models of universal healthcare. But like most Republicans, you don’t actually use facts, just read talking points distributed by the RNC or Rush.

Posted by: Naveen | March 5, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

“But like most Republicans, you don’t actually use facts, ”
What country, in your opinion, has the best health care system and why do you think so?

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 5, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Indithinker: Great experience in fact, with health care in Great Britain – injury treated in the ER at of course, no expense. However – is the qualification for something simply “a good experience”? Lots of people have a “good experience” using heroin – should it then become supported? …….aside from the good ER experience, GB’s health care system does take into account “need”. Obviously a tax supported system can’t provide all care, to everyone, all the time. So there’s waiting list which then present a dilemma. For e.g., if a woman finds a lump in her breast, she can wait to have her mammogram (six weeks, maybe longer) or she can pay private (very expensive) and have one the next day. What should she do? Wait and save the money, or pay more for a privately done Mamm and have the results immediately? It’s easy to see then how such a system gives an advantage to those who can pay for the private testing. Such choices are part of the system, and need to be part of the discussion…….and it’s not “quibbling” to point out the realities of mortality stats, if those stats are being used to tout one system or another.

Posted by: dhlyjak | March 5, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Indithinker: Great experience in fact, with health care in Great Britain – injury treated in the ER at of course, no expense. However – is the qualification for something simply “a good experience”? Lots of people have a “good experience” using heroin – should it then become supported? …….aside from the good ER experience, GB’s health care system does take into account “need”. Obviously a tax supported system can’t provide all care, to everyone, all the time. So there’s waiting list which then present a dilemma. For e.g., if a woman finds a lump in her breast, she can wait to have her mammogram (six weeks, maybe longer) or she can pay private (very expensive) and have one the next day. What should she do? Wait and save the money, or pay more for a privately done Mamm and have the results immediately? It’s easy to see then how such a system gives an advantage to those who can pay for the private testing. Such choices are part of the system, and need to be part of the discussion…….and it’s not “quibbling” to point out the realities of mortality stats, if those stats are being used to tout one system or another.

Posted by: Interested08 | March 5, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

JG- You seem to think the British come here as beggars. Take the contrary case, then, and imagine what you would think if we went to Britain to warn them on the dangers of removing us from every level of domestic and foreign policy planning days before the passing of sweeping changes to make their system more like our? Buehler?…Truly our cultural divide is so great that they make war on us right under our noses.

Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | March 5, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

If there is to be any mandate, it should be that a fraction of net income goes DIRECTLY to a physician of our choice. Eliminate government oversight and let the local group of chosen physicians manage the health of the community. Counties or cities could even determine the portion of mandated net income for that community. Their pay will then be directly related to productivity and expense/health benefit, the management of that health going to those best able to manage it, in combination with business agents that they interview and select. What better way to help rebuild the health of America? A small federal spending could balance any neglected communities at times. On the other hand, we could all just start working for British/European bureaucrats through a huge federal program and watch the quality of care disappear.

Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | March 5, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Sure just put it on the taxpayers tab…just that easy huh Obama? For the Obama Zombies out there please view the documentary titled “The Obama Deception”
…its no wonder why the little puppet wants to expand government!

Posted by: jeremy | April 7, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Health care reform is a bad idea if everyone has to take it. I have great Insurance right now and only pay $55 a week and I don’t see a bill for anything. So why should I lose that and be charged to where my family can’t afford to live. This is just another stupid idea by the democrats to try and tell everyone in this country what to do. I’m thinking of going to the republican party. My spouse works in Insurance and she could lose her job if this goes thru. Thanks Obama, Pelosi and all the idiots in Washington that what this.

Posted by: Dave | April 30, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Hmmm…
Health Care for All Uninsured Americans is Simple!
1) Merge Medicare with Medicade into a single “Income Based” system.
2) Allow insurance companies to offer “Medigap” coverage to all participants.
As for Funding…
1) Changing from an “Emergency Treatment” to a “Preventative Care”
system will save local communities billions, maybe even trillions of
taypayer dollars!
2) Small business will be able to compete globally and hire additional
taxpaying employees!
3) Wealthy seniors will pay their fair share!
4) The tremendous burden on future generations will be greatly reduced!

Posted by: jpinsatx | May 14, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

I am a self employed Realtor who has paid through the nose for years for health insurance. I never filed claims until the last few years, when aging caught up to me. I was on my husbands Aetna policy for the last 4 years. He lost his job in Dec 2007 and our 18 month Cobra ($900/mo) expires at the end of this month. I have been diligently shopping for health insurance for the last few months and have been TURNED DOWN due to pre-existing conditions – which by the way are under control with very reasonably priced medications I purchase each month with my prescription card – NOW – Tell me why the government mandates that employers cover their employees regardless of pre-existing conditions – but when it comes to the Self-Employed people in this country – we can’t even obtain a reasonably priced policy (80/20 PPO w/$1000 deductible) we are willing to pay for!!! When I was turned down – I was directed to apply with the State of Wisconsin (HIRSP – Health Insurance Risk Sharing Plan) for the cost of $1600 /month (no wonder the system doesn’t work!) PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE – WHEN PASSING HEALTH CARE REFORM – DON’T FORGET ABOUT THE SELF-EMPLOYED – WHICH SEEMS TO ALWAYS BE THE CASE!! MANDATE A REASONABLY PRICED POLICY TO BECOME AVAILABLE TO US AS WELL, REGARDLESS OF PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS. FIX THIS MESS NOW! DON’T FORGET ABOUT THE 45-65 YEAR OLD AGE GROUP IN THIS COUNTRY! FOR ONCE – TAKE CARE OF US!

Posted by: Linda Z | June 7, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

look…for the people that don’t want health reform just cause they want to stay with their insurance plan….THAT’S WHAT THE HEALTH REFORM IS FOR! YOU STILL HAVE THE CHOICE TO STAY WITH YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN! If only you can see that America is going more into debt just for insurance executives to have their their excessive money to live in luxury! how selfish! And no one is going to lose their jobs, more than anything people would have more opportunities to more available jobs. And by reforming the health care, they would be more efficient ways to care for any patients. We just need to look at all perspectives in how we can fix our health care system. WE JUST NEED TO WORK TOGETHER AS AMERICANS. :)

Posted by: D13 | November 12, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I was burned in a gasoline fire and lost fifty one percent of my lungs, i have Diabetis, and I don’t need handouts from the government because I’m willing to work for a living. Handouts from the government cost everybody, and if you think it is free and fair you do your homework. Taxes on Juunk food, higher payroll taxes, higher income and business tax, and there are other tax increases coming down the pike, including a proposal for a gas tax. Duh people go back to school and take a math class. Just wait till you get your free Obama care. Like my sister-inlaws family in Spain said “my dad had to wait for 7 years to get his surgery that he was in desparate need of, he almost died several times. That was in Barcelona people. Good luck with your communist style socialist party. Oh thats right, he’s not a communist, just all of his advisors are. Walk like a duck????? DO YOUR HOMEWORK!! And if you would like to call me right wing go ahead, At least I know how to work,
balance a check book, and serve people without having to lie and cheat. By the way the goverment will govern your health care, read the 2,500 page document, it is online

Posted by: Chris | March 20, 2010, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.