President Takes Responsibility for AIG (Not Really)
COSTA MESA, Calif. — "Washington is all in a tizzy," President Obama said at a town hall meeting here this evening. "It’s their fault, it’s the Democrats’ fault, it’s the Republicans’ fault. — Listen, I’ll take responsibility. I’m the president."
In the next breath, the president said, "We didn’t grant these contracts, we’ve got a lot on our plate. But it is appropriate when you’re in charge to make sure stuff doesn’t happen like this."
But the president said, the point isn’t to assign blame but to solve the larger issue.
"For for everyone in D.C. scrambling how to blame someone else, just go ahead and talk to me," the president said, deviating from his prepared remarks, "because it’s my job to make sure we fix these messes, even if I don’t make ‘em."
Mr. Obama tied the controversy over $165 million in retention bonuses for officials of the AIG Financial Products unit to an economy built on recklessness and greed — and one that he said he would change.
"These bonuses are a symptom of a much larger problem," the president said, attacking "the system and culture that made this possible."
But, he said, "what’s just as important is that we make sure that we don’t find ourselves in this situation again where taxpayers are on the hook for losses and bad times," the president said. "We don’t need these house of cards, these Ponzi schemes, even when they’re legal."
Citing local projects the stimulus bill is funding — new cops in Inglewood, a new highway lane in Orange County — the president said he would "create or save" 396,000 jobs in California over the next two years.
He then started taking questions.
– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
So, he’s the President..ok..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 18, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
My ears hurt….
By the way, what brave reporter asked him about the contribution AIG made to his campaign? Of course, Obama ignored the question completely.
But at least the questions are starting to come out…Keep up the good work !
Tapper, as always….keep on it! We’re listening.
Posted by: mjishernameo | March 18, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
When you are dealt a bad hand, you do the best you can with it, and try to make changes as you proceed. Only way to go!! As for the repubs who are screeching like Coulter for Geithner’s resignation – where were you and your indignation when your president GW was in power for the last eight years, allowing these shenanigans to go on, deregulating everything that allowed the CEO’s of these companies to run the rest of us in the ground. You the repubs SHOULD be the ones to be fired!!!
Posted by: Karen | March 18, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
So, is he taking responsibility or not? It is getting very tiresome listening to him blame others and feel sorry for himself (“we inherited this mess”, etc., etc.).
“it’s my job to make sure we fix these messes, even if I don’t make ‘em.”
(even though he signed Stimulus Bill containing the “Dodd Provision” allowing execs to claim bonuses announced prior to 2/1//09)(BTW, Dodd is the #1 recepient of donations from AIG at well over $100k and The Community Organizer isn’t far behind)
“For for everyone in D.C. scrambling how to blame someone else, just go ahead and talk to me,” the president said, deviating from his prepared remarks,…”
What? He spoke without the teleprompter? What gives?
Posted by: tjp612 | March 18, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
mjishernameo,
Good catch. He totally blew past the question – I was hoping for follow-up question as well, no luck.
I agree with you…the media is coming around…not all MSM, but enough to start putting squeeze on this circus.
Posted by: tjp612 | March 18, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
So…is the “legal” ponzi scheme the stock market?
He always seems to indicate the stock market high was fake and built on greed, people’s current losses are fake, but he will build up some sort of true wealth that won’t go bust.
Posted by: MayBee | March 18, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Karen,
Please. Same old strawman talking points. Do you have any specifics to back up your claims?
Posted by: tjp612 | March 18, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Somebody please do the math on the AIG bonuses. The bonuses amoount to about .1% of the money Congress gave to AIG. How does that complare to the pork that Congress added to the Federal budget. It amounts to about .23% fo the budget and Congress is not complaining.
Posted by: David R Timpe | March 18, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
News:
CNN – “I’m responsible for bonus loophole”, Dodd says
On Tuesday, Dodd denied to CNN that he had anything to do with the adding of that provision.
Posted by: Sigmond | March 18, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I don’t like huge bonuses for overly paid exec’s who take unreasonable risks and place the whole country is dire straits. It is infuriating that there were so few regulations in place that it could happen at all. I do not blame the president… and am not sure whether Geithner is culpable. I am not going to call for his ouster at this point. The Republicans have pounced on everything this administration has proposed. This makes me very suspicious that their motives are more political than substantive. They are trying to embroil this country in a witch hunt…a game they are famous for.
Posted by: sosupernova | March 18, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
But, he said, “what’s just as important is that we make sure that we don’t find ourselves in this situation again where taxpayers are on the hook for losses and bad times,”
===========
California had a budget crisis well before the economy fell.
How in the world do we not put the taxpayers on the hook when the bad times are caused by outrageous government overspending, like we’ve had here?
Posted by: MayBee | March 18, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
BTW – Does anyone have any idea what Jimmy Carter was doing at the White House today? With all the turmoil surrounding the WH these days, it isn’t exactly comforting that he is seen there for what I assume is to provide counsel…
Posted by: tjp612 | March 18, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
tjp612:”BTW – Does anyone have any idea what Jimmy Carter was doing at the White House today?”
He met with General Jim Jones, the White House National Security Adviser. Most speculation is that he wanted to talk about policy towards Israel, with the snarkier noting that Obama gave him the cold shoulder with just a quick handoff to his staff.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 18, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Sorry Karen. Blaming Bush for bills passed in February that specifically permitted this makes no sense. Obama and Congress own this one completely!
Posted by: Gillian Smith | March 18, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Gillian Smith:” Blaming Bush for bills passed in February that specifically permitted this makes no sense. Obama and Congress own this one completely!”
The bill passed budgeting this money under Bush ALSO specifically permitted this – to the same, exact degree. In fact, the bill under Bush had no limitations on future executive pay like the one passed in February does.
Why are you OK with Bush’s bill that specifically allowed these bonuses and permitted even bigger ones to be given in the future, but attacking the bill passed under Obama that did not attack existing contracts but forbid future bonus excess?
Posted by: jhw539 | March 18, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Concerned in OH:”He did make this mess. Dodd added the bonus protection language in, 0bama signed it into law.”
When Obama signed that bill, he legally forbid any future bonuses like this until the US taxpayer was fully paid back. Should he have vetoed that too?
Posted by: tjp612 | March 18, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Jake Tapper Reports What Obama Said (Not Really)
[from the transcript, all caps mine]
“We didn’t draft these contracts. We’ve got a lot on our plate. BUT IT IS APPROPRIATE WHEN YOU’RE IN CHARGE TO MAKE SURE THAT STUFF DOESN’T HAPPEN LIKE THIS, so we’re going to do everything we can to fix it.”
Now it would be fine to analyze and criticize that clause I put in all caps, but to completely omit it undermines the credibility of this report, and the journalist making it.
I am losing a lot of trust in the quality of Jake’s work.
Posted by: Danny | March 18, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
A President that actually comes out and says “I’ll take responsibility for it”
This guy makes that clown bush, and the rest of those P.U.N.K.S in Washington look like childish idiots.
Bravo President Obama !!!!
Posted by: Jason | March 18, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Obama always has to have it both ways.
“Blame me, even though it isn’t my fault”.
Posted by: OxyCon | March 18, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
I love how Republicans pretend they can govern everytime they are out of power.
Posted by: jim | March 18, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Dodd: “I’m responsible for putting in the bonus language, but I did it only because the Obama administration insisted.”
Obama: “I’ll take responsibility for the bonuses, even though it’s not my fault.”
Who were the two biggest recipients of AIG campaign cash: Obama and Dodd.
Connect the dots people. This is like when two murderers try to confuse the jury by each saying the other guy did it and they were just there.
Obama and Dodd are both guilty as sin. Vote the bums out!
Posted by: DJK | March 18, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Oh, and why is Obama filling out brackets and campaigning in Orange County when he needs to be in the Oval Office coming up with a reasonable bank rescue plan.
Posted by: DJK | March 18, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Jake give it a break. The Republicans, the party of non-compete contracts in Iraq, Enron, Blackwater. etcetera crying false outrage at the AIG bonuses.
Posted by: Kathleen | March 18, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
WOw President Obama’s teleprompter almost assumed responsibility for something.
I’m impressed.
Posted by: Plumber | March 18, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Danny – it’s there. Second paragraph.
========
And it may well be his job to make sure stuff like this doesn’t happen.
That means he has to be proactive, not reactive.
Posted by: MayBee | March 18, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Thanks Maybee. I blew it on that one!! Sorry Jake.
Posted by: Danny | March 18, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Unless Jake added that without an official update?
Well, either way, I’m glad it’s in there!
Posted by: Danny | March 18, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
He’s EVERYBODY PRESIDENT whether you like him/not or agree/disagree with him!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | March 18, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
“Oh, and why is Obama filling out brackets and campaigning in Orange County when he needs to be in the Oval Office coming up with a reasonable bank rescue plan.”
=======
Maybe he’s scouting the CA budget brain trust for Treasury appointments.
Posted by: MayBee | March 18, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
“Please name the deregulation that Bush signed into law that created this mess.”
Apparently the SEC didn’t think they needed a law to deregulate the banks because they went ahead and did it regardless. Bush and the rest of the Republicans didn’t voice much protest about it anyway.
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
End of honeymoon.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | March 18, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
This is all a diversion created to keep our attention off the real AIG issue which is how AIG has been used to launder money going to institutions here and abroad. The press seems to be starting to have flashbacks of their previous role in a democracy, and may even get to the bottom of this. Why does a blogger have to uncover the retention bonuses at Fannie and Freddie? Go get them Jake!!
Posted by: ralph | March 18, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
“…massive wealth redistribution…”
The middle class seems very dissatisfied with the product that Karl Rove sold them -they want their money back!
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
“The Security and Exchange Commission deregulated the banks on their own? And George Bush is at fault because he didn’t protest? And this is what caused the financial mess we’re in?”
Like I was trying to say:
The Republican controlled congressional banking committees never even held any oversight meetings on some of the biggest changes.
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
List of folks who opposed regulating AIG’s bonuses and salaries (but are now pretending like they never did):
1. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
2. Senate Banking Commitee ranking member Richard Shelby (R-AL)
3. Rep. Peter King (R-NY)
4. Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO)
5. Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK)
Hypocrites.
Posted by: StopFakingUHypocrites | March 18, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
“For for everyone in D.C. scrambling how to blame someone else, just go ahead and talk to me,” the president said, deviating from his prepared remarks, “because it’s my job to make sure we fix these messes, even if I don’t make ‘em.”
What a joke. I take responsibility but i didnt make the mess? Huh?
You are the President now Obama, stop crying about the past. If you didnt want those bonuses going out, you could have negotiated to get rid of them before the march 2 2009 deal to give AIG 30 billion more. Or are you too incompetent to know what is going on at AIG before handing out 30 billion more on 3.2.09?
Which is it, Obama supporters?
Did Obama intentionally avoid the bonus issue when granting AIG 30 billion more on 3.2.09, or is he so incompetent that he didnt know about the bonuses before handing out 30 billion to AIG on 3.2.09?
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 18, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Obama’s Own Stimulus Bill Protects the AIG Bonuses He Now Condemns
(Fannie plans bonuses of $1M for 4 execs)
Name / Office / Total AIG ‘Bonuses’ in the form of Contributions
Dodd, Chris (D-CT) Senate $103,100
Obama, Barack (D-IL)Senate $101,332
Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) Senate $35,965
Baucus, Max (D-MT) Senate $24,750
Biden, Joseph R Jr (D-DE) Senate $19,975
OBAMA & CONGRESS HAVE KNOWN for MONTHS ABOUT the AIG BONUSES
Posted by: upCHUCK | March 18, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
“What changes? When did they happen? What effect did they have?”
Like in 2004 when they waived the leveraging rules for Bear Stearns, Lehman Bros, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Any of these names ring a bell?
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Yep its a crime. That they gave money to AIG then AIG gave bonuses not only to managers but to politicians like Obama and Clinton
Posted by: toasty | March 18, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
The bonuses are just shut up money.
There seems to be quite a scandal brewing around AIGFP.
If these people don’t get their bonuses, they’ll give up evidence, and then we’ll get to hear about the real outrages going on there.
Posted by: Flash Override | March 18, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
“For for everyone in D.C. scrambling how to blame someone else, just go ahead and talk to me,” the president said, deviating from his prepared remarks, “because it’s my job to make sure we fix these messes, even if I don’t make ‘em.”
You signed it cupcake, you own it.
Posted by: drjohn | March 18, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Christopher Dodd is a damned liar.
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.
Posted by: drjohn | March 18, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
It started with Bush. Obama expanded it.
…I don’t see any good guys in this mess.
Posted by: jan | March 18, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
“Christopher Dodd is a damned liar.
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.”
OMG that’s hilarious! -I’m not trying to be condescending or sarcastic at all. You got to admire conviction.
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Definition.
Instant amnesia – see republican hardliners.
Posted by: jan | March 18, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
While all the Republicans in congress feign outrage at the AIG bonuses, the GOP’s true leader, Rush Limbaugh, is all for them.
Know what that means, don’t we? The Republican party will soon push for even bigger bonuses!!!
Posted by: RushIsYourLeader | March 18, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Know what that means, don’t we? The Republican party will soon push for even bigger bonuses!!!
Posted by: RushIsYourLeader
————————
Yes AIG gave your tax bonuses to politicians such as Obama in form such a campaign contributions. Obama should also be forced to pay this back from his own pocket.
Posted by: True BLUE | March 18, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
How does one (or The One) say how whether or not jobs were created OR saved?
If 20,000 more illegal immigrants come into the U.S. next year, will that mean that 20,000 jobs were created?
If 5000 Americans die at the work place does that mean 5000 jobs were saved seeing as how they weren’t fired, laid off or quit?
How does this work exactly?
Posted by: RR GOP | March 18, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I’m confused! If Obama knew that the bonuses were grandfathered in why was he so outraged? Hmm, it makes me wonder! Really wonder!
Posted by: UTW | March 18, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Come on now. The doctors want the bail out money now.
Posted by: randal | March 18, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
I know of two layoffs that needs to take place in Washington DC very soon. Their initials are Dodd and Geithner. We’ll save impeachment for Obama.
Posted by: jim | March 18, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
“Explain to me the nefariousness of allowing these companies to increase their debt to capital ratios? And if this was the root cause of the economic crisis, why didn’t those banks fail in 1996 prior to the rule being enacted?”
Because they got really carried away and started to leverage to very dangerous levels. Of course there will be those who will argue otherwise, but it seems to be no coincidence that these same firms were the ones to start collapsing first, and they were big enough players that the rest of Wall Street, particularly AIG, and the entire economy was badly damaged. . As for why they didn’t fail back when, I don’t know.
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
This discussion is entering a level of complexity that I openly admit I don’t enter into because I don’t claim to be an economist. There were many reasons why the housing bubble was created and why it burst. Certainly the Federal Reserve wasn’t watching the banks that were selling the toxic mortgages either, that were then repackaged and sold as securities.
I don’t blame Bush and the Republicans for knowingly creating the conditions that led to the crisis but their political philosophies of government nonintervention hamstrung them at a time when action was needed to avoid a crash.
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
I get bloggers who don;’t see the big picture but Tapper and the other small minded reporters should help keep our eye on the BIG picture
Market over 7500 today – stabilizing
Housing numbers published yesterday – better then expected
Inflation in Feb up .04% on track for a “normal” year
Are we determined to not let this country recover?
Are we not in agreement that the bubble is the result of lack of oversight and vitually no regulation?
Yeah there are some bad guys and
Yeah there are some people who are getting money they don’t deserve
But if it costs $165, which is less than 1% of the AIG loan money to clean up the company and get the taxpayers back their money down the road – isn’t that more important than this insane witch hunt the press is diverting attention to?
This $165M is a big number – but it was reduced from $450m which is a bugger number –
People who understand the complications of these businesses have to wind them down
Posted by: alison | March 18, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Jake,
The President is responsible for the economy, which includes AIG.
The President has taken more responsibility for the things happening in his Administration in 50 days that the Bush Administration did in 8 years.
Why are you always so snarky?
Not really too becoming on the White House beat . . . makes you seem kind of childish.
Posted by: Nashville_fan | March 18, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Amen Nashville.
Posted by: Mike | March 18, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
“Yet, you apparently, assign no blame to the social engineering and obvious corruption that was going on with “affordable housing” by Democrats in Congress or at the Federal Reserve.”
I’m going to skip the ‘obvious corruption’ part since that could be a whole night in itself, but as for the social engineering -Hey, I’m a Democrat.
I don’t think there is anything wrong with structuring mortgages so that lower income people can afford to own a home. No one has proven that it can’t be profitable either. But you can’t apply these same standards to everybody. If the Democrats are guilty of anything its being foolish enough not to know that a good intentioned plan can be ruined by people who find ways to abuse it. And in this case did it get abused! Everyone was buying houses that they knew they would never be able to afford under other circumstances. The housing bubble certainly wasn’t composed of mortgages to lower income people. So Democrats are going to have to be much more careful in the future.
Posted by: Skip | March 19, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am
I didn’t see Jake ask these questions of Pres. Bush. It is clear to me that Tapper hates Obama and wishes to see him fail, no doubt. And I am sure Obama knows that too from Tapper’s reporting on the campaign trail. Tapper never gives Obama a break. But that is ok – we are watching you, Tapper and so is God Almighty. God will look after Obama and protect him from evil men like you. Tapper is a jealous and envious fool who has a dark heart. May God Bless Obama and keep him safe and protect him from men like Tapper!!
Posted by: SW | March 19, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
economy built on recklessness and greed — and one that he said he would change.
HOW?
How Mr. Obama?…How are you going to do that?
Answer: Socialism… Yes, SOCIALISM, the only solution to recklessness and greedy capitalism…Yes our HOPE…the CHANGE ‘big brother” will bring to save us… long live BIG brother!
Faint…swooon… 1984 took a little longer to get to America, or, will that be the USSA?
Historical references as to how this has always failed.
Doesn’t sound like he has the solution to anything but the enslavement of the Am,erican people to a third world status…
Posted by: Anthiny | March 19, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am
“So in a nutshell, you really believe, deep down, that noble Democrat ideals are being ruined by evil Republican principles & philosophies?”
I would modify that to say that in this particular case noble Democratic ideas were ruined by greedy people of all denominations. The fault of the Republicans was that their principles and philosophies prevented them from stopping it. I think it’s interesting to consider that if the Republicans were in control all along the housing plan wouldn’t have been implemented so the whole bubble wouldn’t have happened and if the Democrats were in control all along they would have implemented the plan and then once they saw it was getting abused they would have done something about it and the bubble wouldn’t have happened so it seems to come down to an effect of the changeover of power in 2000 exacerbating the weaknesses of both parties.
Posted by: Skip | March 19, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am
As for the mortgage crisis which kicked all of this off, Fareed Zakaria, GPS on CNN had a discussion about the mortgage crisis either last week sunday or the prior sunday. Also, News Hour with Jim Lehrer spoke about the economic crisis and how it may have started. You can catch these at their websites.
One of the shows, lays the claim that it was the Federal Reserve that started the bubble when they lowered mortgage rates for too long. AIG took it upon themselves to take such risks but, they had no idea what they were backing because they were relying on banks and the increase in housing prices to sustain their bets. Banks were relying on housing prices as well as AIG to cover themselves from risk. I can’t recall what it said about Fanny & Freddie but, I would hedge a guess that they fall in the same category as banks.
It didn’t say anything about the community reinvestment act but, as a banker myself there are many ways around this. Your only required to offer these loans to people who qualify as stated in your bank’s lending policies. So, blaming the CRA doesn’t seem logical.
Posted by: Stranded | March 19, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am
In the end it all comes down to philosophy. We’re never going to agree on some of these things so if we’re going to avoid disasters like this one we have to learn to compromise. I remember when I was a kid my aunt used to say: “now, now kids -fight nice!”
Posted by: Skip | March 19, 2009, 1:15 am 1:15 am
“It didn’t say anything about the community reinvestment act but, as a banker myself there are many ways around this. Your only required to offer these loans to people who qualify as stated in your bank’s lending policies. So, blaming the CRA doesn’t seem logical.”
I’m not following you exactly because I’m not a banker but it was my understanding that the banks were radically changing their lending policies and the Federal Reserve wasn’t supervising them. No?
Posted by: Skip | March 19, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am
You are the President now Obama, stop crying about the past. If you didnt want those bonuses going out, you could have negotiated to get rid of them before the march 2 2009 deal to give AIG 30 billion more. Or are you too incompetent to know what is going on at AIG before handing out 30 billion more on 3.2.09?
Which is it, Obama supporters?
Did Obama intentionally avoid the bonus issue when granting AIG 30 billion more on 3.2.09, or is he so incompetent that he didnt know about the bonuses before handing out 30 billion to AIG on 3.2.09?
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | Mar 18, 2009 9:35:12 PM
It’s comments like this that drive a person to become partisan. It isn’t whether he knew or didn’t know, it’s the fact that he wasn’t upfront about WHY it was being paid. As a logical person, I’m smart enough to understand WHY it was paid, it’s that HE didn’t think so that pisses me off. However, I will say that comments like the one above just validates his theory doesn’t it.
Posted by: Shannon | March 19, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am
I’m not following you exactly because I’m not a banker but it was my understanding that the banks were radically changing their lending policies and the Federal Reserve wasn’t supervising them. No?
Posted by: Skip | Mar 19, 2009 1:32:27 AM
*****************
As I stated, Banks were required to lend according by CRA or the community reinvestment act standards only if these applicants fell within their lending guidelines. As for federal regulations, yes they didn’t supervise these companies effectively but, these banks had a choice didn’t they? They were looking at these peoples credit, debt to income ratio, and work history and making a judgement for themselves based on the info and the amount of risk they were willing to take but, it wasn’t the CRA or Community reinvestment act that forced these banks to lend to risky buyers. Also, keep in mind that it didn’t help that these contracts were being chopped up and sold on the stock market with AIG footing the bill if they defaulted.
Posted by: shannon | March 19, 2009, 1:42 am 1:42 am
Well, I tell ya what Jake, Obama should be taking responsibility, as AIG paid him 100K in the 2008 cycle….and even 24K after the Sept 08 AIG collapse…i’ve done a little research.
If the Administration is so ready to admit they’ve been the Administration for 60 days (anyone who reads the papers knows the White House watered down the Dodd amendment at the time of the “stimulus” legislation), how about talking about campaign contributions after the AIG collapse and first bailout occurred via Paulson, Bush, Geitner and Bernanke?
Proving that Obama received campaign contributions from AIG employees after the bailout isn’t difficult at all. Just do an advanced search on fec.gov for contributions made on or after September 16, 2008.
After a quick search and calculations (subject to double checking of my math), Obama for America, Obama’s main campaign fund, directly received at least $8,600 post-bailout contributions from employees who listed AIG as their employer. This doesn’t take into account employees who listed their employer American International Group or a subsidiary name that doesn’t include AIG.
Obama’s joint fundraising fund, the Obama Victory Fund, received at least $15,521 in post-bailout “bonuses” from AIG employees. I’m not 100% sure of how the reporting works, but it appears that the bulk of the bonuses paid to the joint fund, at least $12,171, went into Obama’s main campaign fund. And it also appears that at least $2,550 of those “bonuses” came from two employees of the much-demagogued AIG Financial Products subsidiary.
That’s a total of over 24,000.00 in cash to Obama from AIG employees, after AIG collapsed in September 2008, that Obama has not returned or even discussed publically. Obama refused to answer a question on the AIG contributions today.
Well that may be a real story. Proven donations to Obama from AIG execs after the bailout announcement to AIG in the early fall, that could be a real story.
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 19, 2009, 2:22 am 2:22 am
Excuuuuuse me Mr President…..You damn sure did grant these bonuses….You signed the bill….that made it law to pay them……Who you trying to kid?
Perhaps you don’t read what you sign….but you now know you did indeed sign off on them……
Then you duck and dive any responsibility…..unbelievable….
You must think the rest of America are too stupid to live…..
Fix your telepromptor….its giving you misinformation….
The LEAST we expect in a president…is to care about America and Americans….To at least not insult our intelligence….
I got news for you….You don’t own this country yet!!!
As for impeachment….I’d love that…except…..that would move Biden up as President….and if he could’nt serve his entire term……Pelosi’s next in line…..
Our only hope is to use the remedies provided in our constitution…put checks and balances back in the mix….lean on congress and the Senate to tie his hands…..we can do that now…..or replace those that are ignoring us in the next election…..
Posted by: J moore | March 19, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am
Obama is only as intelligent sounding as his teleprompter. Without the teleprompter Obama is almost incoherent in his ramblings.
Posted by: Sally J | March 19, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am
Mr. President. Man up and take responsibility for steering this ship. Stop your whiny explicit and implicit blaming of Bush…yeah…we got it…now get on with it!
Posted by: Principal Chair | March 19, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am
While he’s assuming responsibility he should just go ahead and admit that Pelosi is the real president.
He’s just there make history, read off of the prompter and convince taxpayers that it’s OK to waste their money.
Posted by: bailey | March 19, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am
I’m sure he took some real tough questions from those nitwits with stars in their eyes.
What better place for Obama to puff up his deflated ego than California?
Posted by: sammy | March 19, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Someone ask him about the AIG contributions to his campaign !
Reporters listen up: You are our eyes, ears and mouth….please hold him to the fire! He was never vetted properly by the MSM…We have been screaming at our television sets for 2 years about this guy.
We (heart) you tapper. Keep it up.
Posted by: mjishernameo | March 19, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am
“The Federal Reserve in Boston stated that using things like credit history, and employment verification was disproportionately excluding minorities from qualifying for mortgages, and deemed such practices as racist.”
So do you disagree with their analysis or do you think it’s just OK that it should be harder for minorities to get a mortgage -free market and all that.
Posted by: Skip | March 19, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
i love all of you people who scream about the msm finally “waking up” and asking questions and holding obama accountable, blah blah blah. (55 days in to his administration, he’s more accountable than bush EVER was) where the hell were you all for the past 8 years, when they sat on their fat wallets and didn’t ask one hard question, for fear of being shut out of the press pool?
think maybe if they had been doing their jobs, we might not be in this mess? think maybe if they asked hard questions before the war in iraq, all of that money wouldn’t be gone? think maybe, if they had investigated the companies behind the housing and mortgage crisis, that maybe there wouldn’t be a need for bailouts??
so now, we have another democrat in the white house, and the press corp is allowed to ask questions again. good. i welcome it. obama actually answers the questions. frightening, i know.
Posted by: cathcatz | March 19, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am
“For for everyone in D.C. scrambling how to blame someone else, just go ahead and talk to me,” the president said, deviating from his prepared remarks, “because it’s my job to make sure we fix these messes, even if I don’t make ‘em.”
It’s kind of like “Catch Me if You Can” though isn’t it? He sure won’t be at his desk.
Posted by: Bob | March 19, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
I don’t get it!!! Why all of a sudden everybody is expecting the President to create a miracle out of the economic mess?? Why all of a sudden everybody expect the President to make dishonest people honest??? SERIOUSLY who knew AIG was going to paid out bonuses with bailout money…WHO…AIG…not the President. From the outside looking in (like EVERYBODY else) the President expects people to do the right thing with the monies given. Unfortunately…Americans are greedy!!! And now it seems like Americans are not willing to work together to get to the solution under the current President. I wonder how different things would be if McCain was in office. But apparently there aren’t enough McCain supporters out there. I JUST DON’T GET WHY THERE ARE SOOOOOOOO MANY PEOPLE AGAINST WORKING TOGETHER!!!!
Posted by: American | March 19, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Tell me…how is it that some of the rich got billions of dollars richer in 2008 while the rest of us (working hard to get by) struggle to even get to work (gas)!….GREED…that is the downfall and roof of the American economic crisis!!!
Posted by: Confused | March 19, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Gimme a break, dude. There’s a difference between saying I am now responsible for this and saying that I did not get us into this mess.
He owned up to it, but will not take credit for the problem.
Seems reasonable to me. But MAN does Jake Loooove these gotcha moments!
Posted by: mk3872 | March 19, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
What is wrong with everyone? Obama did not create this mess. These contracts were in effect before this administration took over. Why didn’t the previous administration question the part about the bonus’? I would rather have a president who stands up in front of the people and takes responsibility and questions than one who does behind the door deceptions like before. We need to get behind him and stop bashing him before we see what his plans actually achieve. He never had the luxury that other presidents have had from day one. The republicans esp. (Boexner) had bashed him from day one. Some even tried to say he did not take the oath properly, and some even are still bringing up the birth certificate nonesense til today. We need to get behind this president as he is facing far worse than any other previous president has and we need to give him the chance he deserves.
Posted by: talmag | March 19, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Seems everyone is still blaming Bush. Anybody realize that in the agreement that was signed it had in it that all AIG’s executives which had a employment contract before Feb 11 would still get their bonuses yet our idiot politicians still signed it including Obama, so let’s put the blame were it belongs on this one. Amazing our politicians are grilling Libby when they are the ones that signed the bill. Hello people, yes it’[s greed but remember who signs these bills in next election and get the bumbs out.
Posted by: danny | March 19, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Hopefully this is AIG debacle is the straw that broke the camels back to help bring our country back together. “The buck stops here Obamma” and both sides of Congress are truely at a fork in the road. Will We The People be lead to “It’s a Wonderful Life” or down the other path to Pottersville, and the Ununited States of America.There was a time in America, when this movie was released, that America, along with it’s people were united and careing while looking out for each others needs. There is plenty enough of Capatilism for all of us to be fair and balanced without having to go down the path of socialism
Posted by: Kap10 Ahab | March 19, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Do you think Obama has time to look over million contracts between aig and its employees before he help Bush to sign 10000 pages bill? Use your common sense.
Posted by: thetpower | March 19, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
I understand you are probably one of the lowest guys in the White House Press Corps, but enough with the “gotcha” stories. They don’t read well, you don’t deliver them well, and nobody really cares in the end. There’s a problem and reporting the story as if Bush were still the President doesn’t work anymore. This isn’t a story, this is you trying to be relevant.
Posted by: Come on Jake | March 19, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Obama is right; the bonuses are a symptom of a system and a culture. But you don’t effectuate business reform by having the government grab the reigns and take it over the operations of a company. A much more effective way: LET AIG FAIL!!!
Consider this: we know about the AIG bonuses. What else is under the carpet??? We’re supposed to trust Geitner to reform AIG on an operational level??? Bad bad policy.
Posted by: cordelia525 | March 19, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
let them fail, let the system reset itself, will I get a bailout for poor investments?
Posted by: Cameron | March 19, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
To Come On Jake,
I’m very glad that a handful in the media are holding the president accountable for his actions. Obama is crashing and burning…just what the conservatives thought would happen. If you don’t have the stomach for the destruction, I suggest you stop reading the news. I’m finding it hard to watch myself. It’s only unfortunate the media didn’t hold the candidate accountable.
Posted by: Stephanie Lynn | March 19, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm