Mar 11, 2009 10:21am

President to Downgrade Drug Czar Position from Cabinet Rank — A Move Biden Criticized in 1989

When Vice President Biden later today formally announces the nomination of Seattle Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske as the new Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, he will also be in a way formally downgrading the office from Cabinet-level status to non-Cabinet level status.

Interestingly, Biden himself criticized a similar move by then-President George HW Bush in 1989.

The position of "Drug Czar" was created in 1988; after taking office in 2001 President George W. Bush elevated the "Drug Czar" to Cabinet-level status, a rank afforded other positions not officially in the Cabinet, such as director of the Office of Management and Budget, and U.S. Trade Representative.

But when his father, President George HW Bush appointed the nation’s first Drug Czar in 1989, director William Bennett learned that Bush Sr. had decided not to give the position Cabinet-level status only after hearing about a Cabinet meeting to which he wasn’t invited.

Biden, then the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, criticized the elder Bush’s position, telling the Washington Post in 1989 that it would lower the profile of the drug war.

"The priority of drugs in the executive branch will actually decrease," Biden said at the time.

Today’s presence in the Cabinet of Biden — credited with having coined the term "drug czar" in 1982 — is the reason the White House today says Kerlikowske does not need Cabinet rank.

The Obama administration "is fortunate to have a vice president with an unrivaled breadth of knowledge about federal drug policy," says an administration official. "Never before has there been someone with this level of knowledge who is as close to the president as Vice President Biden. The vice president will work closely with the director-designate to oversee both the international and domestic anti-drug efforts."

In 1989, Rep. Glenn English, D-Okla — one of the authors of the bill that created the Drug Czar position — said Bush Sr.’s move would "weaken the drug czar in his relationship with other members of the Cabinet … It does trouble me."

"Whether a position is Cabinet-level or not is less important than whether the director will have a seat at the table when important decisions are being made," an Obama administration official says, adding that Kerlikowske "will have full access and a direct line to the president and the vice president."

In his remarks today, Kerlikowske will address that he knows first hand the problems that drugs can cause in families — and will reference his son, Jeffrey’s problem with drugs. 

President Obama is the first president to have admitted having used, in his youth, marijuana and cocaine — "admitted" being the key word in this sentence.

– jpt

User Comments

I HOPE After the Deadly Shooting In AL Yesterday, And The shooting In IL Sunday. President Obama and Congress CHANGE The Gun Laws so Guns dont end up in the Hands of Maniacs And Innocent people Keep Dying! time to CHANGE THE GUN LAWS!

Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | March 11, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

You want to fix the economy? Legalize marijuana and slap a tax on it.

Posted by: Deep Release | March 11, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Without a teleprompter Obama has nothing.
He can’t think on his feet, can barely complete a sentence without stuttering, which makes him sound incompetent and deceptive.
He’s a complete fraud set out to bring America down.

Posted by: tyler | March 11, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Tyler
I think you have Him Confused With Bush Bush was A deer in Headlights When It came to Questions, and The Man couldnt even put a Sentence together That Made Sense!

Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | March 11, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Why do we need all these drug czars? What have they ever accomplished? Biden might know drug policy but what has he ever done to stop drugs other than come up with the handle “drug czar”?

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 11, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

It’s already illegal for people to use guns in the commission of other crimes, did that stop the Maniacs on IL and AL?
Maybe they should have put up a ‘Gun Free Zone’ sign.. that would have surely made those maniacs think twice, right?

Posted by: PAFOA | March 11, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Angie In PA Wrote: The Man couldnt even put a Sentence together That Made Sense”!
He couldn’t stand straight, was always draped over the podium. Makes you wonder if he didn’t take a shot or two of liquid courage before those ramblings that served as speeches.

Posted by: Josh | March 11, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

It’s nice to see Obama selecting someone with a genuine clue for this position. This country has been imprisoning it’s non-violent citizens for too long.
There are more people in jail in California for marijuana than rape and murder combined. It’s the reason there is so much violence in Mexico. You don’t see Mexican gangs shooting up towns over cigarettes or alcohol, do you?
Prohibition created the black market, which is the lifeblood of these criminal gangs. If properly regulated and taxed, it would completely starve them of funds and a reason to exist.
Remember how we got Al Capone.

Posted by: doug | March 11, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Is this supposed to be a gotcha? Ask yourself if anything may have changed in the drug wars over the last 20 years. Is it possible we have different priorities now? Have any other issues – say terrorism – arisen that make the Drug Czar position less of a focus?

Posted by: Merle | March 11, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

“..Kerlikowske will address that he knows first hand the problems that drugs can cause in families — and will reference his son, Jeffrey’s problem with drugs.”
I thought poor or lack of parenting was a major cause of drug problems with children. Let’s see where Kerlikowski puts the blame.

Posted by: Sigmonde | March 11, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

PAFAO
All I am saying is Everyday Citizens Should Not have AK-47 There should be better Gun Laws to Protect Innocent Citizens!

Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | March 11, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

If innocent citizens want to protect themselves from violent criminals, they should take some personal responsibility for their own safety. That means learning how to use a firearm, perhaps in the military.
Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither – Ben Franklin.

Posted by: Heston | March 11, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

They should arrest and prosecute the gun… Right? Because that’s what was responsible evidently.
Put the weapon on trial and outlaw sharp objects while we are at it.

Posted by: Boxy_Brown | March 11, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

In states and cities that allow CCW
there is very little gun crime!!
Question is…
Were the firearms used his?
Had he ever been diagnosed with mental
illness? etc…etc…
Those calling for gun control please look at our Nations Capital!!
(That’s Washington D. C.) for those of you under the age of 30!!
//

Posted by: Sheepdog | March 11, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

ANGIE IN PA. I’m glad I own 3 AK-47s an M-16, 4 shotguns, and 10 pistols. If this country is ever attacked or taken over by a coup, no matter how farfetched, don’t ask me to help you! It might not happen in our lifetime, so I’m making sure my sons will have them, just in case. The only way I’m giving up my guns, is when you pry them from my cold dead fingers.

Posted by: manson | March 11, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

angie in pa…gun laws only protect criminals….do you think gun laws will stop a criminal from getting a gun? get real. with this government we have the second amendment is more important than ever.the only thing that will protect innocent citzens are themselves….police are after the fact. the deed has been done.protect yourself.so if we change gun laws only nuts and cops will have guns…no thanks i prefer to take care of myself.

Posted by: ctaman | March 11, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Doug what about those of you that uses the stuff just stop Then there would be no demand for it Laws are made to protect people YES even from themselves I might not want wear by seat blt but I know if I don’t I’ll could be fined if I don’t What about going back to the days that we do what right Take a walk around SF and see the zombies

Posted by: David | March 11, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Once again, the administration rationalizes its hypocrisy.

Posted by: jjsmith | March 11, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

The problem is there shouldn’t even be a “Drug Czar”. Drug use is a health issue, not criminal by default. Ask “Cops Say Legalize Drugs” at leap and Norml. Getting ACTUAL facts and information, is the key. Biden doesn’t have the “unrivaled breadth of knowledge about federal drug policy” the Obama administration claims. His policies are originate from early 20th century propaganda lies based on racism and big business.

Posted by: Monty | March 11, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

wow, the first post is a tangent about gun laws, and over half the thread followed the tangent. Why do you people mix all the issues together? anyway,having a drug czar is stupid.

Posted by: Ozarkess | March 11, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Monty-get rid of your propaganda-Drugs are not only a health issue. Drugs are a criminal issue. Drugs come into this country via the open borders and are grown in this country by the anti-criminalizing drug crowd. Drugs that are grown and manufactured for health reasons are different animals all together. Drugs that are sold to addicts illegally prolifigate crimes all around, from the social destruction of families through addiction to the crimes on lawful citizens through theft(for drug money)and violent crimes(for drug money)(gangs)including murder. This is the point where it no longer becomes a “health issue” but a death issue and that is a crime! Never ever decriminalize and tax drugs-it has been tried and failed in other countries miserably.
Yes this does expose the endless whirlpool of hypocrisy from the left. We the people are sick of it all!

Posted by: ctay | March 11, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Ctay,
As you say, the “social” implications are not to be underestimated. The illicit black market is what directly funds these criminal gangs and groups. Have you no knowledge of the prohibition of alcohol? Unsafe, unregulated, untaxed, and on top of all that, we get murder, death, etc. from the Mafia. It’s no different now. And as for other countries? Watch “The Union” documentary and tell me Canada and Amsterdam, are “failing”. Both places have higher cannabis use than the USA. Not to mention the multi-BILLION dollar industries that cannabis and hemp cultivation could provide, in these dire economic times.

Posted by: Monty | March 11, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Never ever decriminalize and tax drugs-it has been tried and failed in other countries miserably. Posted by: ctay>>>>WOULD YOU PLEASE SHARE THE NAMES OF THOSE COUNTRIES WITH THE REST OF US? I’ve never heard of them or is it a lie?

Posted by: rich | March 11, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Have you ever thought if drugs were legal that crime would go down(no need to get if from mexican drug lords if you grow it here right in america) and tax revenues would rise? Mabye if you people on the right pratice what you preach, and let the invidual be responsible for the choice to use drugs are not, then we wouldnt have this problem and quit telling people how to live there lives.

Posted by: ProfessionalChristian | March 11, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

You mean like in Holland which has a far, far, lower rate of addicts than the US even though drugs are decriminalized. Your right almost no drug crime and very few addicts does mean decriminalization was a miserable miserable failure.

Posted by: Rawr | March 11, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

“Yes this does expose the endless whirlpool of hypocrisy from the left. We the people are sick of it all!”
Do some research and you will find that “you and your people” are a very small majority anymore moron. More people are in jail due to marijuana convictions than anything else. This is a waste of taxpayers money and IS A HEALTH ISSUE!!

Posted by: Hologram5 | March 11, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

ANGIE IN PA SAID:HOPE After the Deadly Shooting In AL Yesterday, And The shooting In IL Sunday. President Obama and Congress CHANGE The Gun Laws so Guns dont end up in the Hands of Maniacs And Innocent people Keep Dying! time to CHANGE THE GUN LAWS!
Angie you are so right-I truly hope and pray that our government loosens the gun regulations so much that every lawful citizen can own 2 or 3 each so they can defend themselves against the millions of criminals who illegally own guns-its the only way to fight them. Glad you agree. Criminals are criminals. A criminal does not obey the laws. A criminal will have a gun whether there are antigun regulations or not. Mexico has a gun ban-see how well that works there? We in this country have the right to bear arms as per our constitution. Not for hunting, not for show, but specifically for protection from criminals and a tyrant government. We are willing to allow our government that we hire to work for us to regulate guns minimally for the lawful gun owner in order to ensure that the government knows we are lawful-the criminals are not using registered weapons and they are definitely not going to obey gun regulation laws-hence the only way to fight criminals owning guns is a well armed populace. Just ask the J.Hudson from Chicago-where firearms are banned when her ENTIRE FAMILY WAS KILLED-do you think the guy who killed them obeyed the antigun laws? No only the dead family obeyed them.

Posted by: ctay | March 11, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

ctay, you and “angie” need to realize that this is the most heavily armed continent on the planet and THAT IS WHY WE ENJOY FREEDOM. Look at all the other countries, they don’t have the freedoms that we enjoy, besides, stick to the story at hand…

Posted by: hologram5 | March 11, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

i am a coservative and drugs should be decriminalized and treated as a health issues if abused as is alchohol and prescription drugs. crime will go down as it it did in the 20s and a whole group of folks will have to find new jobs, those groups are gang members, cops and prison employees.

Posted by: catman | March 11, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Drug interdiction and relief for those addicted should be on the top of our list! This is a national catastrophe, worse than Katrina, worse than Irag.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 11, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Kerlikowske should follow Robert Wakefield’s (Michael Douglas) lead in “Traffic,” and refrain from accepting this position.
After all “If there is a war on drugs, then many of our family members are the enemy. And I don’t know how you wage war on your own family.

Posted by: yourwrongyourwrongyourwrong | March 11, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

It seems like these clowns in the government can do whatever they want; downgrade/upgrade positions??? What a joke! The entire leadership of this country has become one big joke, and the American citizen is paying the price. What went wrong with America? Its become what they want to do with whoever and whatever they want. There are no boundaries or set standards anymore! God help us all!!!

Posted by: brannigonforall | March 11, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Clay, you clearly have NO understanding of your own history. And as to what you are “sick of”, I am sick of people telling me that I am a criminal for having a few hits of cannabis for my depression while they smoke their cigarettes and drink their scotch.
It’s time that yo ugrow up and learn something: Prohibition has NEVER worked, anywhere it’s been tried. All it’s ever done is to grow a new criminal class and increase violence.
I propose that we treat people as adults and let them do with their own bodies what they want. If they screw up and beat up someone or rob a store, then bust them for THAT, not for having a joint in their pocket. It’s called RESPONSIBILITY. Rather than screw with the 830,000 of us we do every year for weed, let’s deal withthose who hurt someone ELSE. You can hurt yourself if you want (even though cannabis has NEVER kileed anyone in over 10,000 years of known use), but as soon as there is a victim involved, it’s an actual crime. How about that? It’s whaqt yo urighties actually scream about, why won’t you actually allow it?
If we can deal with alcohol, which kille 150,000 Americans every year, or cigarettes, which kill 450,000 of us every year, or prescription drugs, which kill 200,000 of us every year, then I don’t see why we can’t deal with something that kills NO ONE.
Learn some history, and back up your statements with fact, or keep it to yourself. I have facts and can list my sources every day of the year, you have lies and can’t back up a thing.

Posted by: WJM | March 11, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

“There are no boundaries or set standards anymore!”
Of course there are. They just aren’t where they used to be.

Posted by: Hope | March 11, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Remember how we got Al Capone.
—————————————
Times really change, don’t they. Now we put them in the President’s cabinet and in charge of the IRS.

Posted by: mad | March 11, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Drugs are bad! Don’t do it! The best way to beat a drug problem is not to try it, in the first place. Stay away from it. If friends offer you drugs, say “NO!” If someone tells you, “here, take a hit,” Say, “No, thank you!” Once you fall into that temptation of taking the first hit, you will want another hit, and another, and another— you will be hooked, and it will be a long destructive journey of your life. You will lose it all—your health, family, career, and friends. In the end, drugs will destroy you. I have seen it happen to other people. I am sure you too have seen other people suffer because of drug addiction. PEACE!

Posted by: what667 | March 11, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

we need to change the gun laws and other laws to protect ourselves from violence. Possibly we should legalize drugs, especially drugs like marijuana, heroin, mushrooms, lsd, valium, oxycotin, and rohypnol that tend to make people lazier than normal. Still make drugs like speed, cocaine, crack, pcp illegal cause they tend to make people more crazy. We also need to eliminate all these movies, tv, and video games about killing, raping, etc. We are raising children on a diet of perversion and violence then wonder why people go nuts. We also need to outlaw violent rap and heavy metal music that encourages violence, misogny, and dark motifs. We also need to censor the internet since there is a lot of dangerous ideas out there. We need protection Obama! Make some laws to protect us!

Posted by: Albert | March 11, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Did Joe Biden have a stroke or is this Alzheimers?

Posted by: Mike | March 11, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Yes drugs are bad. Drug laws are so far beyond bad that you can’t say drugs are bad in the same sentence as drug laws. One BIG problem in this country is that there is no justice, only laws. So there is no relation between the severity of a crime and the amount of punishment. You can hurt no one but yourself and go to jail for years and you can ruin hundreds of peoples lives and go to jail for months then get out and do it again. sick

Posted by: joe | March 11, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

As a resident of Seattle, I can’t say that Gil Kerlikowske is a bad choice. He hasn’t been that bad of a police chief here in Seattle, compared to some of the bastards that run police departments in other cities. As a pot smoker, I can’t say that the man has ever hassled me much. They don’t act like you’re smoking crack here if you smoke pot and they don’t play that delusional ‘gateway drug’ trip with Marijuana either. It’ll be nice not to have a jingoistic piece of crap in this position for a change, and it should have never been a cabinet level position to begin with. All you partisans here making unrelated comments are the shame of our nation with your divisive war drum beating. You’ll never get your way, America is here for good.

Posted by: Sir Luthor | March 11, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

“Drug Zcar” used to be the name for big time drug pushers, and now they’re ‘leadership’ in governement? What stupidity! Thats not even funny!!! This nation has lost its mind!!!

Posted by: brannigonforall | March 11, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Please correct your story.
George W. Bush admitted to using marijuana and it’s on tape. He said “I wouldn’t answer the marijuana questions. You know why? Because I don’t want some little kid doing what I tried”.
You can look it up. and remember it was on tv-ABC I think?

Posted by: E.A. | March 11, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

hmmmmmmmmm get rid of the drug czar but keeps the porn czar change change change :change of fools: change change change change of fools sing it everyone

Posted by: david reyes | March 11, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

“time to CHANGE THE GUN LAWS!”
Here’s a thought: How about “Time to Lock Up the Wackos and the Criminal Fringe and Throw Away the Key”?
It’s not guns that are the problem. CRIMINALS are. But the Libs want to confiscate the guns and let the criminals go free.
How does that make sense again?

Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | March 11, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

“Today’s presence in the Cabinet of Biden — credited with having coined the term “drug czar” in 1982 — is the reason the White House today says Kerlikowske does not need Cabinet rank.
The Obama administration “is fortunate to have a vice president with an unrivaled breadth of knowledge about federal drug policy,” says an administration official. “Never before has there been someone with this level of knowledge who is as close to the president as Vice President Biden. The vice president will work closely with the director-designate to oversee both the international and domestic anti-drug efforts.”
LOL, well, well, well…
Who knew Joe Biden was one step under Superman! He is the head of the Middle Calss task Force, In charge of the “stimulator”, & now The nation’s pseudo “Drug Czar” !

Posted by: Mike_C | March 11, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

I was hoping Obama’s line by line examination of federal progams would have led to him realizing the DEA and “Drug Czar” are complete failures. DEA implemented by Nixon now receives roughly $25 billion a year in funding yet drug are now more potent and cheaper. Good Work DEA. Also, the money that is made goes to druglords who murder and other countries. If we cut the DEA and legalized and taxed drugs we could solve our economy in one move. But why do that it makes too much sense?

Posted by: DSchles33 | March 11, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Decriminalze. Spend money on REHAB, and you will get productive taxpayers back into society. Criminalize and you STILL will have addicts, and drug sex orgies on every college campus, and there will STILL be addicts, except they will be on drugs and STILL using drugs surprisingly (sarcasm!) in PRISON, on the taxpayer dime! The states NEED the money, the addicts NEED to get off the junk; What, does this make too much sense! Yup! Politicans like to get big money from the military, prison, pharmaecutical drug complex, and moralists who use and abuse alcohol and cigarettes and prescription drugs that are more toxic and deadly (and proven so in clinical trials yet STILL approved by the Ahem, FDA) than the “illegal drugs” they proclaim to detest, will continue to enforce and advocate the dreadful and harmful status quo on the “War on Drugs.”

Posted by: hmn... | March 11, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

The problem in this nation is not that we have a political system with two parties that are fundamentally opposed to each other. The problem is that we don’t have a viable third party that would force the creation of a coalition, which would bring partisanship to its knees. I would say that there are as many (or more) moderate independent voters as there are liberal democrats or conservative republicans. But where is the third party that represents them?

Posted by: Brian Levine | March 11, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

“let the criminals go free”
Been to SF lately??????

Posted by: Mike_C | March 11, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Somebody has to pay the bill sooner or later.

Posted by: Silver | March 11, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Time to wake up Mr. President!!! Drug Policy causes considerably more harm than drugs. We voted for CHANGE not another stupid Czar. If you want to fix the drug problem you have to take the Profit Motive Out of It. Can anyone think of a Czar who did anything of value. I hate the whole Czar concept.

Posted by: MD | March 11, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Legalize pot and tax it. It would save the economy and put corporate America down. Read THE EMPEROR WEARS NO CLOTHES by Jack Herer.
That was the original idea kind of…. It was taxed but illegal to possess so it involved a sort of self- incrimination to get the tax stamps, which was a violation of the 5th amendment. Thanks to Timothy Leary for arguing that in front of the supreme court, and winning. It paved the way for the DEA. Thanks once again Mr. Leary.

Posted by: Josephus | March 11, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Talk about ruining families, the DEA has put more people in jail for one marijuana cigarette than for murder. Since people are desperate they turn to whatever they can to make money so the repubs can play games and hope that America fails.
Did none of you people read what happened when we had alcohol prohibition?? More criminals, more money for private prisons.
Beside, Budwiser can’t stand any competetion since they don’t want you growing a weed for free in your own yard. Booze and cigarettes kill many, many more people than drugs. Drug Czar, wasted lives and wasted money.
BTW, crazy people with guns kill people and most people with guns are crazy.

Posted by: Xrepublican | March 11, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Angie in PA, actually Obama is always well prepped. There are clips of him giving a speech when his teleprompters shorted out and he was pacing stuttering, & repeating like a crazy person. Anyways, the war on drugs will never be over. People who deal in drugs don’t pay taxes on them so f them! Make more stringent drug laws to make more money off of them. Try not to send them to jail tho cuz that just costs us more money. Hope that they shoot eachother or go broke and change careers. Leave the gun laws alone, Crime is statistically lower in areas with high gun ownership cuz it makes a dum criminal think twice. As far as someone goin postal and slaying their family that’s not something that can be eliminated with any laws.

Posted by: huh? | March 11, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

BTW, street drugs will never ever be legalized because the majority of growing areas are in nations run by military dictators that we dispise. It’s mostly about the macroeconomics, not just addiction.

Posted by: huh? | March 11, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

I’m with Joe!

Posted by: pitbullstew | March 11, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

You folks have serious teleprompter issues, and our country is reeling from multiple problems…now do you understand why you are no longer in charge??you can’t identify the problems..ergo…you can’t fix them…

Posted by: cowgirl | March 11, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

It’s not guns that are the problem.
CRIMINALS are. But the Libs want to
confiscate the guns and let the criminals
go free.How does that make sense again?
Posted by: BlofeldBuildings
*****************************************
Interesting, since we are on the subject of drugs
and guns, I’m going to paraphrase your statement:
“It’s not drugs that are the problem.
ABUSERS are. But the Rupublicans want to
confiscate the drugs and let the Highly Financed
CEO’s, Political Cronies, Lawyers, Radio Talk Show
Hosts etc,etc… go free.How does that make sense
AGAIN?”

Posted by: spacerook1 | March 11, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Legalize, tax and regulate all “illegal” drugs. First, the legal drugs like Oxycontin, Percocet, etc are much more dangerous and provide actual gateways to heroin use. Anyone who grows up seeing heroin addicts will probably not choose to use it. (I know it stopped me). However, cannabis does not belong in the same class as it is less harmful than alcohol. Hell, it would be one of the few things we could manufacture in the U.S. since all industry and jobs for the middle class are being outsourced.

Posted by: Uberliberal | March 11, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

E.A., while you are correct about the Bush quote about marijuana, I think Mr. Tapper is guilty of slightly sloppy writing. He said only Obama has admitted to using marijuana and coke as a teen, and I think he intended the emphasis to be on the cocaine part of that sentence. As you say, Bush’s answer could be interpreted as a confession and Bill Clinton’s hilarious “I didn’t inhale” is even better known. So I think Tapper intended to imply that only Obama has admitted to cocaine use, which is true as far as I can tell, because I cannot imagine ANY other presidential candidate who could possibly have gotten elected having made a similar confession. And of course, Tapper can imply that Obama admitted it, but is perhaps not the only one who did it.

Posted by: moderate | March 11, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

The war on drugs is a grand failure. The drug czar was dreamed up inder the fantasy worl of Ronald Reagan. Too many innocent people have been falsely convicted of bogus drug charges, even with no evidence. Backed by pathatic judges, sloppy lawyers, bad cops, arrogant politicians, lamebrain public defenders, idiot probation departments. THis post should be eliminated. Nothing but a cover for shady behaviour.

Posted by: Alltryth | March 11, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Josephus
/—–
Legalize pot and tax it. It would save the economy and put corporate America down.
—–/
Yes, indeed! It would help stem the escalating need for more jails and help some poor countries stabilize their own economies with a new export — legitimate export.

Posted by: Common Sense | March 12, 2009, 7:19 am 7:19 am

don’t know if this was national but there was a big news story here in Atlanta the other day about a guy who spent two months in jail for a “suspicious white powder” on the upholstery of his car that turned out to be deodorant – your tax $ at work…

Posted by: jakesdad | March 12, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

We have armed invasions by drug cartels on our southern border and Obama demotes the drug czar? Way to go Barry. Be sure to have some pre-written text cued up on the token-prompter

Posted by: kwills11 | March 12, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Yeah man, let’s throw more weed smokers in jail. That will solve the problem.

Posted by: Jailbreak | March 12, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Every day when I wake up I wonder, what will Obama screw up today? Some days it is more than a few things. Today he decided to downgrade the drug enforcement program and he proposed to give 100 billion to the International Money fund. A few days back he really screwed up when he tried to entertain the British Prime Minister. Gave him a bunch of DVD’s that will only work on an American based player. He also was a complete idiot regarding proper protocol required for a visit by a foreign head of state. Obama is a useless empty suit and is in effect no more than a puppet in the hands of stupid puppeteers!

Posted by: Craig Cannon | March 12, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

My…my…my: yet another thing for the Republicans to feel threatened over: listen to them whine!
I am afraid the best thing we could do for the “war on drugs” would be to remove the laws that prohibit “drugs” that can grow by themselves in your garden – and then attack all the others with everything we can afford to muster.
If somebody wants to grow a plant and smoke it or eat it, let them… as long as they do not drive or operate machinery at the same time! (Christians take special note of Genesis 1:29.) But make all imported, manufactured and processed drugs so expensive that nobody will go to the trouble and bother. For those already addicted, provid transitional controlled supplies under medical supervision along with counseling, detox and whatever tools are needed to get off the stuff.
In other words, DESTROY THE MARKET.
That should help stem the tide of drug profits flowing out-of-country, and leave the cartels here and there running into bankruptcy. Poetic justice in very truth! Mexico might actually become a safe place to visit again!

Posted by: Jordan | March 12, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Get rid of the whole drug war by legalizing all drugs and placing limits on use like we have for tobacco and alcohol.

Posted by: Dion | March 12, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

The last three presidents admitted smoking marijuana. Bush did it secretly in his interview with Tim Wead, which went public and then mostly disappeared (try finding an audio clip of the tape on line…I can’t), and Clinton “didn’t inhale,” which doesn’t absolve him.
Hypocrisy on the part of all three…they can do it. The rest of America goes to jail for it. That simply doesn’t wash. “Do as I say, not as I did….”

Posted by: Steve Scott | March 28, 2009, 8:06 am 8:06 am

I also hate the whole Czar concept. Why do we even have that title in a democratic country? I’ll tell you, it’s because we have very little freedom left. If you have ever come up against the legal system you will see what I mean. Cops, lawyers, DA’s and judges can ruin your life. If you are poor, you are going to lose. The drug war is a war against all of us. I hate cocaine and meth too but dont see the big deal about weed. However, the system has failed.

Posted by: Concerned | May 20, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.