Stimulus Goal Downsized
ABC News’ Jonathan Karl Reports: A group of economists including Mark Zandi of Moody’s who has advised Democrats and Republicans just presented House Democrats with a report that says the recently enacted $787 billion stimulus package will fall far short of the goal of saving or creating 3.5 million to 4 million jobs.
In the group’s briefing, two of the four economists said only 2.5 million jobs will be saved or created in the next two years. Zandi told House Democrats that a second stimulus is needed as well as more money for banking stabilization and housing. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi did not disagree with the assessment. She says it is going to take time to recover from the "Bush economy."
In addition to setting expectations that more money will be needed, House Democrats championed all the work they have done with the president on the economy (stimulus, housing, banks) in his first 50 days.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
I think everyone understood the initial estimates to be a tad optimistic.
And remember that many other job creating projects were taken out of the final bill to appease moderates and the GOP.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | March 10, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
hmmmm, the next examination of the “stimulus” package will report that the estimate was to high and the growth will only be the 25 jobs that the ohio police department reported…..so much for the “stimulus” .
Posted by: plainolcitizen | March 10, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Thats because The stimulis was Not Big enough
Posted by: Angie in PA | March 10, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Alot Of spending That was Focused on Jobs was Took out of the Bill and Replaced with TAX CUTS For the Republicans!
Posted by: Angie in PA | March 10, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
oh and BTW thank you for your tax money..sorry its not helping you
S-U-C-K-E-R-S
I is your president and i gots yor money
Posted by: Obama-cabinet of corruption | March 10, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
plainoldcitizen; But they’re good union jobs with benefits. They’re long overdue. The best part is they represent votes for the labor union party. sic
Posted by: mmonroeliveson | March 10, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Monroe..The government represents big business interests, and the unions represent workers interests..you don’t think that is fair???or maybe only one side should be entitled to a lawyer in a court??? answer…each side should have equal representation
Posted by: cowgirl | March 10, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
The majority of concern today is about our failing economy and those in charge of dealing with the problem not being up to the task. It’s time for the American taxpayers to step up and join protest groups now forming all over the country. Enough words, we are just spinning in circles talking about the mess our own federal government has created. Protest marches, tax revolts, national one day strikes, are coming to the forefront. If we want the madness to stop, we need to clean up the mess in Washington. Congress is full of democrats and republicans that have divided our people into two hate groups and that needs to stop. Congress has clearly told the American taxpayers to go to hell with the 8000+ pork and earmarks attached to legislation that was supposed to help us out of the mess we are in. Any good a recovery package would have done was destroyed by our own senators and congressman. All these people need to go. Term limits must be imposed on congress and no more full pay for life retirement and full, free medical insurance for life for these bozo’s for serving only one 4 year term. These things should make your blood boil.
Posted by: Bob Retired | March 10, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
The Republicans must be smiling right now…. they are so bent on destroying the USA that they actually love the fact that less people will be employed than originally anticipated. I wonder if they are happy to know how many fellow repubs will lose their mobile homes and pickup trucks due to their greed and hatred? That’s OK, they can go to church on Sunday and be forgiven for everything they do, say, and think – despite the hatred they preach.
Posted by: Cheetah | March 10, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Get ready, another “stimulus” is in the works. Disgusting !!! What did we get from the first one? 25 jobs.
Posted by: CW | March 10, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
IMPEACH THIS MONSTER OBAMA ALREADY!
Posted by: sandy | March 10, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Pelosi needs to understand that it will take time to recover from the Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush years. The bubble is 35 years in the making. She is a partisan nut.
Posted by: Huh | March 10, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Our leaders lying to us: Change???
Posted by: Eli | March 10, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
If the stimulus went to the individual taxpayers only, there would be a domino effect to the top and help all. The way it is only helps the big have bigger bonuses and parties.
Posted by: Missouri Voter | March 10, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Cheetah: do the math if you are able. The economy was doing just fine until the democraps took control and decided to kill the country to envoke socialism. Many red flags were raised and ignored by Franks, Dodd and the other misfits sitting on powerful boards. They are only spending tax money, not their own since they are above paying taxes and giving to charity.
Posted by: nookly23 | March 10, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
obama kind of penned himself in the other day when he said the stimulus will create 3.5 AMERICAN jobs. This reminds me of Bush 41, read my lips
Posted by: DJ | March 10, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
The cost of foolishness stands at $787 billion and counting. The “jobs” will largely be low productivity government and/or union jobs and they will not number 2.5 million. Each job will cost far more than it should and will return far less in taxes than jobs in the private sector.
Posted by: N'erdowell | March 10, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
The stimulus bill was not a stimulus bill at all. Thats why its not producing the number of jobs estimated. It was nothing more than a democrat wish list to pay back the base for voting for Obama and to solidify the base well into the future. The tax and spend Democrats are now in charge. Elections have consequences and now we get to reap the ‘benefits’ of said consequences.
Posted by: Dave fett | March 10, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
its funy they keep mentioning Bush, didn’t the dems win? maybe they need to stop whining and do something! Pelosi has made her political career from talking about Bush policies. We will be paying for the next 100-200 years for BHO’s programs, that makes Bush’s 8 years look like an economic boom. All I have seen from the dems is a lot of finger pointing, maybe they should start doing this in front of a mirror. LOL
Posted by: USdoomed | March 10, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Tax the rich and speread the wealth.
Posted by: A. Smith | March 10, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
The 4M estimate was just to get the “THING” passed as quickly as possible thru Congress.
Posted by: Bobby | March 10, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
The “stimulous” was not about stimulous, but a way for government to determine what will be best for us all.
Posted by: troy | March 10, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Of course, you know that these economists were probably capitalist pigs…
Posted by: Gina | March 10, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
No surprise there – just an effort to “prepare” us so Obama and the Democrates can steal more of our money -oh and by the way, did you read that 300,000 illegals will be eligible for the jobs that were supposed to go to Americans.
Who were the idiots that voted these people into office??
Posted by: ravenhair49 | March 10, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
cheetah, I thought republicans drove hummers and lived in mansions. I thought we were all beyond rich because we don’t share our money. So what is it, are repubs rich or dirt poor living in trailors? you can’t have it both ways.
Posted by: notafan | March 10, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
It will be 3 years from now and Pelosi and the Dems will still be blaming anything bad that happens in the world on Bush!! Is the stock market crash since the inauguration Bush’s fault? I don’t think so….more of the market’s reaction to the ridiculous amount of drunken sailor spending Obama wants to do.
Posted by: Steve Grabinski | March 10, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
ravenhair49, where can I read this? of course all of us with working brains, able to think for ourselves, who didn’t vote for Obama knew this was going to happen. He is all for destroying america and her people.
Posted by: notafan | March 10, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
The “War-on-Wealth” policies of the marxist drug addict and his hopelessly hopeless loony-left liberal d-crat sycophants are the biggest threat to America’s future.
The hussein bear market is being driven by fear of the consequences of the irresponsible pork-a-palooza and social welfare boondoggle he, and the loony-left d-crats, are pursuing. This “generational theft” will curtail economic growth and hobble the economy for decades. Welcome to the new and improved great depression. As the economy burns, hussein wastefully spends the earnings of future generations.
But, if your have NO INTEGRITY, NO ETHICS, NO CONSCIENCE and NO BRAINS and are a loony-left liberal d-crat (i.e. a TAX CHEAT), you don’t have to worry about this since you can just “geithner” your taxes and all this waste won’t cost you a penny.
Posted by: ALEX H | March 10, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
A. Smith – don’t you mean steal from the rich and give it to a bunch of deadbeats who think the government owes them a living? We would never reward someone for getting an education, working hard, and providing for their family – no, people like you think they should be punished and their hard earned money taken away to give to people who spend their life working the system.
Posted by: ravenhair49 | March 10, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
2.5 million jobs SAVED or created. A congressman, I forget who, said it allows Obama and his team not to fail. If 1 million jobs are lost, they can say it would have been 3.5 million without the “stimulus.”
Posted by: GK_1970 | March 10, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
notafan: Here you go:
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/stimulus_illegals_jobs/2009/03/09/190028.html?s=al&promo_code=7BCE-1
Posted by: ravenhair49 | March 10, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
You mean that they didn’t actually consult any economists when they made the plan??? And now that it’s passed, they’re just now finally figuring this out?
Posted by: jol | March 10, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Welcome to the “Shuck and Jive Minstrel Show”, a puppet show extraordinaire!
You’ll laugh! You’ll cry! You’ll run for the exits in terror! This show has something for everyone, and nothing for ANYone!
Our puppeteer’s name is George Soros. And the star dummy with the strings attached is Barack Obama. And there are supporting puppets, too: Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, David Axelrod and Rahm Emmanuel.
It’s coming to a dilapidated theater in YOUR home town. Don’t miss the stunning musical number, entitled the “Yes We Can-Can!” The price of a ticket is your retirement savings, your home’s value, your job and your freedom. But as the show’s tagline reads, this is “CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN!”, so everything is going to be alright. We’re all in GOOD HANDS.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Thanks Voters! Thanks Media! Thanks for electing this idiot into the White House, who has proceeded to turn everything good about this country upside-down. We’re all living the Poseidon Adventure, and we have a clueless, inexperienced man-boy with deluded fantasies of Socialism at the helm.
See you all at the bottom, if there is one…..
Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | March 10, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Seriously now. Won’t anyone listen to reason?
The best cure for a recession is a recession. It is natural. Throwing money at this will only make it worse for future generations. The Republicrats are determined to destroy this country!
Posted by: Reason | March 10, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Thanks again to our illustrious politicians who rushed yet another bloated stimulus plan through. At least it got a box checked off Obamas list of compaign promises to try and uphold. This sucks. Next time vote independent, things will not get better until we clean house and start over.
Posted by: NoSpin1600 | March 10, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Well, at least BoBo talked about education today. Every time he opens his mouth about the economy the market tanks.
BoBo! Just shut up! We all know that you are a moron. Let Nancy make a few headlines and I promise the economy will get better WITHOUT you!
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | March 10, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
The Democrats have been in charge of Congress (both houses) since 2006. They blocked every attempt at correcting the Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae subprime morgage mess. Now they are trying to convert it to socialism. All this spending that they are shoving down our throat will mean much higher taxes for all of us….
Posted by: Danny | March 10, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
to all of you who buy this stimulus crap,
would you think it smart to bury your family deeper into debt as a way to financial solvency? Obviously not. We need to focus on the fundamentals. there is a ton of money all over the world afraid to invest in businesses for fear of government taking more and more. We need less government and more adherence to the constitution.
Posted by: antiDave | March 10, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
it will seem better while we re spending our new borrowed money, until that bill comes due too.
1/3 of the entire federal budget is interst on the debt we already have, we can not add more and think it won’t hurt us.
Posted by: antiDave | March 10, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I am thanking God every day I didn’t vote for the current president. What an idiot!! I am looking forward to the failure of this current administration so we can finally get the change we all need so badly. And it isn’t change we need so much as we need to bring jobs and industry back to the USA and quit out-sourcing, as well as stop throwing money we don’t have on this economy, that isn’t stimulous, it’s just ignorant.
Posted by: Kat Zmyth | March 10, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi need to shut here trap for a change. It is more like the Clinton Policy that got us here
Posted by: Joe | March 10, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Bob Retired…you are spot on! 100% retirement after just 4 years in Congress?! Insane!! Not to mention the 100% special medical plan they have. Put them on Medicare with the rest of the retirees. I doubt they will let it fail then. Two-term limits for both houses. We need to go back to citizen politicians and have them focus on doing what’s right instead of the next election.
Posted by: Independent63 | March 10, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
The whole use of the word “saving” was remarkable to me.
I really noticed when Obama snuck that in during a speech.
In the beginning, there was only talk of creating not saving.
I see already where this is going. Things will get bad and the Obama people will be singing “Blame Bush” at every turn….
Posted by: opedanderson | March 10, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
And just how could this have been a surprise? Anyone with an ounce of common sense should have been able to ascertain that this was BS back when he was campaigning (oops sorry…he is still campaigning!) Best guess will be everyone gets to go back to their “old” jobs and he will take the credit for putting America back to work with our own tax dollars. People…he is not King…will someone please tell him that?
Posted by: Conservative Gal | March 10, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Monroe..The government represents big business interests, and the unions represent workers interests..you don’t think that is fair???or maybe only one side should be entitled to a lawyer in a court??? answer…each side should have equal representation
Posted by: cowgirl |
—————————————
Despite popular belief, unions do not represent the interest of workers. Its true that the unions will fight for pay increases for the worker. However, this is only because every time workers get pay increases, then the union gets more money by way of increased membership dues.
Posted by: Global Fraud! | March 10, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
We’re doomed
On another abc blog, ‘Tanya’ posted that she needs a bailout. She is upset that her credit card is charging her high interest rates.
She bought a car with her credit card.
Of course she supports Obama. She is the perfect sheeple. She can’t make lifes decisions on her own and needs the government to think and act for her. So she wants a bailout at my expense.
Posted by: Stupid get rewarded | March 10, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Predictions can fail and continue to do so as there are just too many factors governing jobs. I suspect the stock markets are cheering citigroup because they reduced their operating costs which means jobs and so if companies streamline their operations there may not be too many net jobs to gain.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | March 10, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Jobs Created? More like Jobs bought with tax dollars…..
Posted by: Mike Jones | March 10, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Nancy Pelosi is just as much to blame as George W Bush. She’s the one, along with Clinton, that wanted lending criteria relaxed so everyone could own a home. That started the housing bubble. When people started defaulting then banks tightened credit, hence the credit crisis. The credit crisis forced businesses to lay off people because they couldn’t get the money they needed. People stopped spending because they have no income. There’s your recession. For her to point the finger solely at Bush is unconscionable. CALIFORNIA WAKE UP! Vote her out. The rest of America do the same…VOTE OUT EVERY INCUMBENT!! How can you expect change when you just keep electing the same people to Congress who got us into this mess. WISE UP!
Posted by: Independent63 | March 10, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
How many zeros in a billion?
This is too true to be funny…..
The next time you hear a politician use the
word ‘billion’ in a casual manner, think about
whether you want the ‘politicians’ spending
YOUR tax money.
A billion is a difficult number to comprehend,
but one advertising agency did a good job of
putting that figure into some perspective in
one of its releases.
A.A billion seconds ago it was 1959.
B.A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.
C.A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age.
D.A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth.
E. A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes, at the rate our government is spending it.
While this thought is still fresh in our brain…
let’s take a look at New Orleans ….
It’s amazing what you can learn with some simple division.
Louisiana Senator,
Mary Landrieu (D)
is presently asking Congress for
250 BILLION DOLLARS
to rebuild New O rleans Interesting number…
what does it mean?
A.
Well… if you are one of the 484,674 residents of New Orleans
(every man, woman, and child)
you each get $516,528.
B.
Or… if you have one of the 188,251 homes in
New Orleans , your home gets $1,329,787.
C.
Or… if you are a family of four…
your family gets
$2,066,012.
Washington , D. C
….HELLO!….
Are all your calculators broken??
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL License Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax)
IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Tax
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service charge taxes
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax (Truckers)
Sales Taxes
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemploy ment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
0ATelephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Tax
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Tax
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not ONE of these taxes existed 100 years ago…
and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt..
We had the largest middle class in the world…
and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.
What happened?
What the heck happened? ????
Can you spell, “P-O-L-I-T-I-C-I-A-N-S”?
Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | March 10, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Good God! I am so sick and tired of hearing “inherit” “transparency” “stimulus” and “Bush” from all of these demo-craps! It could be 10 years from now and they will keep saying Bush and using the same termanology. This is getting old!
Posted by: pro-American anti Obama | March 10, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
We have record deficits, record military and non military spending, uncontrolled, insecure borders, troops in 130 countries (instead of the US border) record unemployment, matched with inflation, and an unfunded mandate crisis that is bankrupting the states, that Obama wants to add further with nationalized mandatory health care and psychological screenings for you and your children as well… Does THIS sound lke a country that will be able to exist? Forget the unfunded mandate crisis, and the military budget “black hole”, HOW are we going to survive with a declining tax base, to pay for social programs from the retirees and the illegal immmigrants??? Does Obama have a plan for THIS! Who is he going to raise taxes on with record unemployment and corporations that have offshored and outsourced jobs and tax base workers overseas. Wealthy millionaires and corporations and individuals DONT pay taxes! And are NEVER even penalized! WHERE is Obama going to get the money? How many of our ports can he sell to China? How many national resources (like parks) can he lease to the United Nations? This has a finite amount he can do before it becomes unsupportable! Doesn’t ANYBODY out there recognize this!?!
Posted by: hmn... | March 10, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
This teacher of economics believes what our economy needs just now, right along with increased government spending and a middle class tax cut, which is coming by the way, is a sense of unity and confidence. We’ll get through this — eventually. But progress will be slowed by negativism. Criticize if you must, but let’s be fair; this new guy’s only been President for 50 days.
To read my response to a recent viral disinformation email, an analogy comparing our economy to a swimming pool and calling government efforts to kick start recovery wasteful, unproductive spending, go to
http://kgarry.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/the-swimming-pool-analogy-more-viral-disinformation/
Posted by: Kent | March 10, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Jobs schmobs. Who cares when the Citi CEO has bailed-out Wall Street gurus celebrating today. Maybe we should just buy bailed-out Citi stock and we’ll never have to work another day in our lives?
Posted by: Geo | March 10, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Obama is desperately trying to carve out his place in history; he wants to be famous for rescuing the country. He’ll have his place in history, all right, but it won’t be for anything good.
He perpetuates the “victim” mentality by daily reminding the people that he “inherited” this problem, so he can’t be held responsible.
Posted by: Richard | March 10, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
If you read The Economist Magazine, the one complain they had over and over was that the Stimulus was too small, given the enormity of the problem, and since then, we have found out banks are far LESS stable than they first reported. We are in a train steaming for the cliff. how many jobs did Bush create???? None. So if this creates 2.5 million, well, that’s 2.5 million MORE than bush. Bush created job LOSS! Let’s all remember that, shall we?
Posted by: frank | March 10, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
The republicans failed, but that’s not what this story is about. This story is about the democrat’s recent stimulus plan. Republicans (foxnews actually) only got the most embarrassing pork pulled from the bill. This 800B clausal pile of DNC pork is not doing a dam thing for the economy. Nothing! It felt good, all the fairies cheesed for the photo opt, love and harmony was in the air. Obama is new, and educated enough to help us, but this congress failed us. On his own, Obama would have line itemed the pork from this bill. You guys are correct to support Obama, but this congress (both sides of it) are guilty of allowing this crisis to happen. If they are not held accountable in the 2010 PRIMARIES, then we’re done for. Please pick someone else from your party; there are qualified people out there like Obama. (Think about that, why was a new comer allowed to rise to the most coveted position in American politics?) It’s because no one in this congress or senate was qualified. Please give us a new congress, party control won’t change hands; however, at the rate we’re going, the swing voters will vote against these incumbent reps in the general election.
Posted by: Ozarkess | March 10, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Cowgirl, Unions don’t give a flying crap about their workers, they care about union officials keeping the huge salaries, conventions in Vegas and Bahama resort retreats. They have not gave a crap about the rank & file since Hoffa disappeared.
Posted by: hkdakota | March 10, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
I will bet the people whose comments are the same people who voted for George W. The same people who do not have the character to admit what they did. Why don’t you piles of human trash check out Section 60 in Arlington see what you voted for. go to hell.
Posted by: Louise | March 10, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
When did economists predict Bush’s policies would create a single job? I dont recall. And obviously Bush’s economic policy resulted in a Recession/Depression. We’ve had no growth for over 8 y ears. What Bush called growth was actually folks taking equity out of their homes to spend. I’d say any growth due to government legislatoin is a huge leap forward and something we haven’t had for nearly a decade so I’d say it’s a great start. 50 days in and he already did something productive. Heck, 8 years and can you point to a single thing Bush did that created something productive????? Anything??? one thing???? I can’t. This is a step up.
Posted by: R U kidding me | March 10, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
A good leader is one who willing takes on a problem, knowing it is a problem and gives it his/her all to fix it. A good leader doesn’t use words such as “inherit” You wanted it, you got it, own it! A good leader looks forward to the future, not always looking back and blaming someone else. Obama is NOT a good leader!
Posted by: pro-American anti Obama | March 10, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Yeah….Ozarkess….one question
If Obama is so great and congress so bad. What did he do when he was there the last two years?
Posted by: Rafter | March 10, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Biofeldbuildings, GREAT POST!
Posted by: hkdakota | March 10, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
“If Obama is so great and congress so bad. What did he do when he was there the last two years?”
Ran for President.
Posted by: silky | March 10, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Maybe if you become Pig Sniffers you can get a job..or maybe if it wasn’t for the Democrats attempt to Socialize the Country it would actually contain more job creation that just spending to increase their voter base (Low income minorities) If it was changed to the GOP’s liking then WHY DID IT ONLY GET 3 GOP VOTES!!!! The GOP stated again and again that it was NOT going to create jobs but you silly liberals kept your heads up your arse and praised the bill.
Posted by: GetalifeMatt | March 10, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
We could save or create another 1.5 million jobs by getting rid of Nancy Pelosi. She has done more damage to the economy than any one person in history!
Posted by: jack | March 10, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
The only way to make this country workis to be personally responsible. Pay for what you buy, don’t live outside your means, and if you have a credit card, use it responsibly, and quit giving all our government money away to those that don’t need it. If the stimulus package is based on jobs, we should not have any problem by clearing the welfare programs and putting them to work, and where they can pay their fair share and we won’t have to reditribute the wealth, because they will have their own to spend
Posted by: Stickman | March 10, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Hey, at least he’s predicted to create jobs!!! Haven’t seen that for a long time! And frankly, with t he state of the interstate highways and bridges and our antiquated grid, I’m glad. We let our country fall apart too long.Bush put this whole country, it’s economy, it’s infrastructure, it’s research efforst, all on the back burner. Nice to see Obama putting the country and our economy first. However million jobs, we’ll take em!!!! Better than handing out trillions to folks so they can invest in china!
Posted by: oh yeah | March 10, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
I know people who are loving unemployment. My mother was recently laid off and she’s now on a 14-day cruise and looking forward to having the summer off financed in part through her severance package and unemployment. When that runs out (in 6 months), one of a number of stimulus programs will be in place to help. Don’t tell her that the country is in the midst of an economic crisis.
Posted by: do-wop | March 10, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
someone please punch Pelosi in the mouth. BO is a total deek too.
Posted by: Mad as Hell | March 10, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Here is the kicker….
The Obama/Pelosi/Reid 3headed beast has NOT yet extended the f-22 raptor program which would SAVE 95,000 AMERICAN jobs!!!!!
WHY ??????????????
Your all so concerned about union jobs, maybe you should get your collective heads out of the UAW’s @ss and realize there are miliions of workers who ARE NOT UAW members!!!!
Why are you Mr Pres. running off to a foolish photo op for 25 “saved” jobs, when you have not lifted a finger to save 95,000 jobs for a paultry few billion dollars!!!!!
Your throwing around trillions in hope that it MIGHT work. This one is a no brainer, and your still screwing it up!
Hey Pelosi… Push the F-22 instead of the dopey crap you keep writing into these bills. This is about American jobs!!!! Remember the American Worker?
Posted by: Mike_C | March 10, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Let sjust give money out to any industry that is failing…we have the ability to jsut keep printing money so who cares….right? ;)
Posted by: jmw1824 | March 10, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
“someone please punch Pelosi in the mouth. BO is a total deek too.”
George…is that you? How’s the weather down there? You sound like maybe you’ve been hitting the sauce a little too hard…is Laura out of town again?
Posted by: silky | March 10, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Less than a 100 days in and already economists are saying that his efforts will have results. Hey, not bad. Yeah, we’d all like it to be more,but it’s pretty amazing to hear economist come forward and say “this is going to work” at all, to any degree. Clearly Bush was on the “how big can a fail” plan for America. Bush was not the least bit successful in anything he did. NOTHING. So it’s nice to see the first time out the gate, Obama will have some measured success.
Posted by: whateva | March 10, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Rafter, he was a junior member, there wasn’t much he could do. Not like the members of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, and the House Financial Services Committee.
ALL OF THEM FAILED US! And should be replaced, just like you and I if we fail at our job.
Posted by: Ozarkess | March 10, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“(Think about that, why was a newcomer allowed to rise to the most coveted position in American politics?) It’s because no one in this congress or senate was qualified.”
Uhh…. I hate to break it to you, Ozark, but Obammy was a member of the Senate. A junior member, but a member, no less. So by your logic, Obammy isn’t qualified. And I would have to agree with you whole-heartedly.
What is needed is a TRUE outsider, one who actually has a list of accomplishments, understands business, economic and energy concepts, is not beholden to Beltway politics and is a breath of optimistic, can-do fresh air.
OBAMA ’08 – - “Change We Can Believe In”
PALIN ’12 – - “Change You’ll Be Begging For”
Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | March 10, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Not much different than “mission accomplished” or “they have weapons of mass distruction.” Politicians will say anything to get things passed through congress. Democrats? Republicans? What’s the difference?
Posted by: BonnieInTexas | March 10, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Why did anyone think that spending would create savings?
Posted by: Tara | March 10, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Yeah, but do we need more F-22s? I’m thinking no.
Posted by: silky | March 10, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
“PALIN ’12″
Ha! If Palin even makes it on to the top half of the Republican ticket, I’ll eat Dave’s shoe.
Posted by: silky | March 10, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Pelosi says it will take time to get us out of the Bush economy. BS. It has been the Pelosi, Frank, Dodd, and Reid economy as well. Nancy – you make me want to puke.
Posted by: motney | March 10, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
“What is needed is a TRUE outsider, one who actually has a list of accomplishments”
You mean like taking 4 schools to graduate in 6 years with a journalism degree, be mayor of a town of 12, and then the governor of a state where people expect nothing of their government? Impressive list there.
Posted by: silky | March 10, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
4M jobs is probably way too optimistic.
Posted by: Tyrone | March 10, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
R U kidding me .. Are you kidding me ??
You must living out of welfare and find this massive spending good.For those who say that the republicans want Obama to fail I must say he does not need any help, his mistress Pelosi will take care of that. The democrats including Hussein Obama wanted us to loose the war in Iraq. Can you remember or your memory is selective ????
Posted by: Frank | March 10, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
This president inherited a mess. Republicans have been busy eroding the US economy for more than 24 years. It will not be repaired overnight.
Posted by: rightbehind | March 10, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Those said that the stimulis was not big enough would repeat the same excuse again and again to cover their continuous failure. Just like AIG claims that the any bailout is never enough.
Posted by: gpfgp49 | March 10, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
This is the Democrats’ baby – don’t blame Republicans anymore.
Posted by: Joe | March 10, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
whateva–”Less than a 100 days in and already economists are saying that his efforts will have results. Hey, not bad.”– What economists are you listening to? Bill Mahr? less than 100 days in and the stock market has dropped 50%.. the unemployment rate went up another 1/2 percentage point this month. The economy continues to retract and Obama now wants to spend MORE…
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
out of curiosity
when are most of you going to stop positng on message boards, get off your fat lazy ameircan asses and actually DO something about the things you complan about.
I see complaints and hatred bounced back and forth, but yet nobody is willing to put it all on the line and DEMAND the change they spend hours on message boards complaining about.
all of you are the problem. none of our politicians fears the people because your not willing to do whatever it takes
Posted by: Obama is doing a great job | March 10, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Our problems really began long ago. The American government (both congress and the president) approved the exportation of American business and jobs through NAFTA. Politicians in Washington represent those that pay them the most money (lobbyists representing big business). It’s really comical, when politicians run for office, they say, “vote for me and I’ll go to Washington and fight for you”. Ha ha, what a big joke. The initial spark that started the exportation of American jobs was the desire by big corporations to expand by making and selling their products in huge, new, untapped overseas markets. Using Coca Cola as an example, fifty years ago every street corner, business , store, and gas station in America sold Coke. They couldn’t expand any more, but making and selling Coke in Europe, Russia and China caused executives to salivate. The plans were set in motion to change American laws, and establish new trade agreements with other countries. The concept was a new global economy. Big business carefully and skillfully maneuvered new laws and treaties needed to accomplish their goals. After many years of behind the scenes preparation, NAFTA was introduced to Congress. Most of the preliminary work to get the needed votes for approval was done well before hand. American workers, unions, and the public were kept very much in the dark until it was too late to fight it. NAFTA sailed through congress. That’s why so many say our government is broken because senators and congressman sold out the American workers and the American people when they approved NAFTA. It became clear our government no longer represented the voters or taxpayers in this country. This is the reason why I chose not to vote the last election. The government is broken and they all need to be thrown out of office, both democrats and republicans alike. I will give my life to fight for and defend our nation, but I wouldn’t lift a finger to defend this pathetic US Government, or what the government calls “American interests” overseas. American interests over seas are nothing but big business interests. Term limits are needed now, lobbyists need to be outlawed in Washington, and full pay pensions and free life time health care for congressman & senators after serving only one 4 year term must be stopped.
Posted by: Bob Retired | March 10, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Frank sorry you need to stop listen to Rush. No one wanted us to lose the war in Iraq. That is BULL and you know it.
Posted by: Tonya | March 10, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
“What economists are you listening to? Bill Mahr? less than 100 days in and the stock market has dropped 50%.. the unemployment rate went up another 1/2 percentage point this month. The economy continues to retract and Obama now wants to spend MORE…”
You know better than this.
Posted by: silky | March 10, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
I really think it is bad manners to blame someone else on a mess you took on to fix. It appears that the Dems are more focused on bashing the previous adminstration than getting to work to make this country better. I haven’t had a job yet that would let me get away with this childish behavior. We don’t care what you think about the past, just get on with the future. Also, stop spending MY money on useless crap.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
rightbehind–”This president inherited a mess. Republicans have been busy eroding the US economy for more than 24 years. It will not be repaired overnight.”– back that up with something if you don’t mind.. How have republicans been eroding the economy?…
Reagan took us from carter’s 12% unemployment and 155 inflation to 6%.. Bush 2 took us from Clinton’s 6.7% (yes it was that high at the end of his administration) back down to 5.1% (not quite as good as Clinton’s best years, but it did stop a recession in 03). then the dems created this entire mortgage mess by letting fannie and freddie control THEM.. and now we have another dem who is letting it all snowball to the next great depression..whiel he and the puppet masters are running roughshod over all of us to make sure that when all is said and done, we will not longer control our gfovernment, but will be dependent on it…
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
silky: Did you know that 84% of all statistics are made up on the spot. I have seen a wide range on the stats you quoted and they vary depending on who you listen to. You don’t need useless overblown stats to notice that Obama only inspires hope in the people that have nothing. The people that can invest have no confidence in him otherwise there would be a huge bull market and the economy would be pretty much fixed.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
CitiGroup (Bank) said it made first profit since 2007. Give me $100 billion and I will make a profit too. What happens when the federal funds trough is depleted and there is no more? One can only guess. If the economy fails to improve, the opportunity for more federal funding is extremely risky, given the escalating National Debt and the enormous interest cost of that debt.
Posted by: benvictor | March 10, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Silky–” Are you not paying attention.. Stock market is now below 6,700 prior to the mortgage meltdown it was over 13,000. Here are the unemployment rates for the last 4 months (bush’s last two and Obama’s first two sequencially) 6.7%, 7.2%, 7.6%, and 8.1% (this is from the department of labor and statistics).. Projections are that unemployment will reach 9% by April and be over 10% by June… that stimulus is sure working isn’t it Silky…..
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Pelosi is the biggest idiot I have ever seen in Congress. Just think she is two heartbeats away from the presidency. Saying the “bush economy” is an idiotic statement. Pelosi has led the Demoncrats in the house for two years. She is part of the reason we are in this mess. This is the “demoncrat economy”
Posted by: TEXAN | March 10, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
The market has fallen 21% during Obama’s first 50 days in office, and 32% since election day, making it the worst performance ever for a new president. This is how the financial markets work. They don’t care about hope. They don’t care about change. They don’t care about charm. They want results. They want economic growth. They want governments that can pay their debts. And if they think policies of high taxes or runaway spending means slow growth or default, they will brutally punish this country’s stocks. After seeing his pork stimulus and pork budget it’s become very obvious. . . . .the market hates Obama.
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
How long has Nancy and the Dems been running Congress? None of this mess belongs to her and Harry Reid? What a joke.
Posted by: Kevin | March 10, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Pelosi is an idiot. She’s Great at passing the blame without accepting any herself. If Bush is to blame, then so is she. She’s been leader of the House for how long now? Oh yea, and what is that special jet of hers costing us again?
Posted by: Phil | March 10, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Is this Nancy Pelosi’s first term? I guess the incumbents had nothing to do with the state of the economy.
Posted by: whoareyoukidding | March 10, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
‘Hope is always tomorrow.’ Suckers.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | March 10, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
“When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion — when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see money flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors – when you see that men get richer by graft and pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – you may know that your society is doomed.”
–Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged (1957)
Posted by: evan thomas | March 10, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
DUH! Say it aint so, say the messiah did not lie to us, please say it aint so.
Posted by: billy bob | March 10, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Tonya–”Frank sorry you need to stop listen to Rush. No one wanted us to lose the war in Iraq. That is BULL and you know it.”– Actually you are wrong– what do YOU call it when Harry reid publically states “This war is lost” as he tried to pressure the president to withdraw unconditionally…face it.. had we lost, it would have been a great “crisis” for the dems to get elected on.. since that didn’t work out, they blamed the republicans for the mortgage mess THEY caused and are still blaming them for their own failures to fix it… Wasn’t it Rahm Emanuel who said no good crisis should be wasted?
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Spread That Wealth – if you seriously think that Obama is personally responsible for the stock market, then you have no friggin clue how the market works. Grow up, silly goose!
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
As a followup to the above about NAFTA. Now that America is in a precarious employment situation, it is important to realize that as a result of NAFTA it is estimated almost 25 million blue collar, middle class, manufacturing, assembly line and associated support jobs have been shipped overseas. Now, when these jobs are desperately needed for a recovery, they are gone. Than you US Congress, and Mr. President (Bill Clinton) for destroying our economic engine we need now more than ever. All those foreign countries will be far ahead of the good ole USA now that they have our manufacturing plants, assembly lines, and related support jobs. We, in America are now proud owners of the “service” economy. You wash my windows, I’ll cut your lawn, and you know Bill down the street, the electrical engineer, is flipping burgers at MacDonald’s. A good job in America nowadays is working for Walmart. Go ahead, keep arguing over democrat versus republican stuff, you only hurt the American people more by not focusing on that evil bunch in Washington, DC, both the congress and the president that have done more damage to our country than any war ever has.
Posted by: Bob Retired | March 10, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
arkie vet , you are asking a dem to think way to deep, are you trying to give them a headach?
Posted by: billy bob | March 10, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Silky–”You know better than this.”– Gee silky..yesterday you wesponded to one of my posts with “this is completely wrong”– I have noticed lately that you don’t seem to be able to really apply any logical responses to differing opinions.. Is that becasue even you are seeing through all the garbage and realizing that this president is going to destroy the economy?
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
billy bob: One of Obamas first bills he signed into law showed him to be less than truthful. The SCHIP bill included a huge cigarette tax increase. He claimed he wouldn’t raise taxes. I guess he can pick and choose who he wants tax. Watch out you’re next on the runaway tax hikes yet to come.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Republicans are such a bunch of whiny crybabys – do they seriously think that Obama is going to wave a magic wand and fix all of Bush and the GOP’s messes overnight? It took a long time for the Republicans to create this economic meltdown, and it will take the rest of us a long time to fix it.
Meanwhile, GOP whiners and obstructions offer no help or solutions – they’re like a bunch of overgrown, mentally handicapped babies who love to wallow in their own feces and then cry when an adult tries to come in and clean up their fouled playpen.
Republicans are worthless people. Nobody responsible will ever listen to them again.
Posted by: Mingus Fingus | March 10, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Angie–” if you seriously think that Obama is personally responsible for the stock market, then you have no friggin clue how the market works. Grow up, silly goose!”– your the one who needs to grow up.. the stock market works on anticipated up or downturns (speculation in most cases). Usually market trends indicate what brokers feel is appropriate for 3 to 6 months down the road. that being said, our brokers currently have a very bleak picture of what Obama is doing…
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Obama is Pelosi’s little pet!
Posted by: dd22 | March 10, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Danny – incorrect. The Dems have not been in charge of the House since 2006. They won the House back in November of 2006, but didn’t take control until they were seated in January of 2007. If you dumb Republican whiners can’t even get your basic facts straightt, why should any of us listen to your partisn complaints about anything? You are very stupid and hypocritical people. Please be quiet.
Posted by: Fernet | March 10, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
“….only 2.5 million jobs will be saved or created in the next two years.” Well, what about the last EIGHT years? According to the WSJ, the Bush administration only created about 3 million jobs (net) over its EIGHT years, a fraction of the 23 million jobs created under President Clinton. The country now has almost 12 million unemployed. And according to the 2007 Census, 37.3 million Americans are living below the poverty level. Of course it’s going to take time to create more jobs and level the playing field.
Posted by: idahogirl | March 10, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
boulderhippy2 The real tax he wants to pass is the energy tax “CAP AND TRADE TAX” comming to a fuel source near you. The remarkable wisdom behind tis tax is to force the country into using alternative fuels by taxing fossile fuels to the point they cannot compete. Sounds great if you do not mind paying more for gas, electricity, ect and if you do not want to compete internationally.
Posted by: billy bob | March 10, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Mingus fingus–”Republicans are such a bunch of whiny crybabys – do they seriously think that Obama is going to wave a magic wand and fix all of Bush and the GOP’s messes overnight? It took a long time for the Republicans to create this economic meltdown, and it will take the rest of us a long time to fix it.”– Umm you menaq all of Frank’s and Pelosci’s mess don’t you.. this was NOT a republican crated problem.. it was created and propigated by democrats.. now the same social democracy idealogy is what they are using to try to fix it with increasingly worse and worse results.. at what point will you see the real problem? when unemployment is 10%, 15%, 20%? When inflation is 8%, 12%, 25%? When will you say enough?? after it is too late?
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Where were these economists when Bush kept saying that we weren’t in a recession???? Must have had their heads up their butts like the rest of the republicans.
Posted by: Kris | March 10, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Republicans are such a bunch of whiny crybabys – do they seriously think that Obama is going to wave a magic wand and fix all of Bush and the GOP’s messes overnight? It took a long time for the Republicans to create this economic meltdown, and it will take the rest of us a long time to fix it.
Meanwhile, GOP whiners and obstructions offer no help or solutions – they’re like a bunch of overgrown, mentally handicapped babies who love to wallow in their own feces and then cry when an adult tries to come in and clean up their fouled playpen.
Republicans are worthless people. Nobody responsible will ever listen to them again.
Posted by: Mingus Fingus | Mar 10, 2009 3:43:49 PM
This post serves no purpose, just taking up cyber space.
Posted by: billy bob | March 10, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
30 years of laissez-faire, “every man for himself!”, “I’ve got mine; screw you!” Reaganomics has brought us to this point. I don’t agree with Obama’s continuing of Bush’s corporate welfare policy by throwing trillions of good dollars into the hands of Wall St. crooks. But the fact remains: Republican-nomics, in collusion with a few key corporate Democrats, have led us to the precipice.
Posted by: Henry Blankett | March 10, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
notafan – actually that sounds about right to me: Rich Republican party bosses like Rush Limbutt drive around in Hummers and live in crapulent mcmansions, while the dumb arse rank and file live in trailer parks and smoke crystal meth and rant about black helicopters and whatnot. The Republican party is all about a two-tiered society where the rich dominate the poor and middle class no longer exists.
Posted by: Fernet | March 10, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
notafan – actually that sounds about right to me: Rich Republican party bosses like Rush Limbutt drive around in Hummers and live in crapulent mcmansions, while the dumb arse rank and file live in trailer parks and smoke crystal meth and rant about black helicopters and whatnot. The Republican party is all about a two-tiered society where the rich dominate the poor and middle class no longer exists.
Posted by: Fernet | Mar 10, 2009 3:52:18 PM
Maby Rush can get a jet like Pelosie has someday????
Posted by: billy bob | March 10, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Mingus Fingus: Way to be open minded. When did you become one of the Democratic collective? Can you have an original thought? Can you hear things you disagree with and civilly take other viewpoints into consideration? Offering total disrespect to people that have opposing views is no way to influence people. Is the democratic thought process one that demeans people that disagree with them so their followers can no longer consider independent thought? Keep your blind devotion and keep the welfare checks coming.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
arkie vet – oh please, the market responds to many, many more stimuli than just the President and his policies. To hold any President personally responsible for the vagaries of the market is patently ridiculous. Grow up – it’s clear from reading your accumulated posts that you’re just a dyed-in-the-wool partisan hater looking for any excuse to trash the man. It’s obvious that there’s nothing that Obama could ever do that would please you, so why should anyone take your partisan whining seriously? The rest of us sensible folks are at least giving the President a chance – go crawl back under your rock. Nobody needs your crap right now.
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
The rest of us sensible folks are at least giving the President a chance – go crawl back under your rock. Nobody needs your crap right now.
Posted by: Angie | Mar 10, 2009 3:57:24 PM
The key word here is “sensible”. OK
Posted by: billy bob | March 10, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
“So if this creates 2.5 million, well, that’s 2.5 million MORE than bush.” The point in hiring Obama is for him to bring results and accomplishments, not for you lame people to be underachievers and point out that you didn’t screw up as badly as the last person. Be proactive, bring results that actually saves American jobs and the economy instead of your useless whining that you didn’t screw up as badly as the last person in the job. Be an AmeriCAN, not an AmeriCAN’T!
Posted by: Jim | March 10, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
idahogirl–”only 2.5 million jobs will be saved or created in the next two years.” Well, what about the last EIGHT years? According to the WSJ, the Bush administration only created about 3 million jobs (net) over its EIGHT years, a fraction of the 23 million jobs created under President Clinton.” –sorry to burst your bubble too, but that is all wrong..first, Bush netted 3 million jobs over the eight year period. Which means that his created jobs were offset by jobs lost in his first year (between the end of the clinton administration and 9/11) His actaully job creation was almost 10 million but offset by the 6.8 million lost at the end of the Clinton whitehouse. Using the same measuring stick, Clinton actaully did not create ANY new jobs since the unemployment rate was relatively the same when he left as it was when he started.. the 23 million is a complete fabrication by the Clinton whitehouse ( it has been stated at 28 million on several occassions) this number was arrived at by adding all created jobs during his 8 years without subtracting any lost jobs from the total. Want proof — when clinton took office, the unemployment rate was 5.6% 280 million americans times 5.6% means that about 15.5 million were unemployed. When he left the rate was 4.5% which means that 12.5 million were still unemployed that means his net was 3 million not 23 million.. Now if you credit the 6.8 million lost before bush ever drew up his first budget, or passed his first tax cut, to Clintons economy, then the total for Clinton was -3.8 million jobs…
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
boulderhippy2 – stop whining, you big hypocrite. All you Obama-hating obstructions do is trash Obama for having opposing views all damn day long and now you have the gall to complain about other people telling you the truth about yourselves?
Did I hurt your widdle feewlings? Cry me a river you big baby.
You dumb cons are too ridiculous to take seriously. Maybe if you knew how to voice your opinions without being such an obnoxious and hateful bunch of whining, partisan, obstuctionist jerkoffs, the rest of the country wouldn’t completely hate your damn guts right now?
DUH!
Posted by: Mingus Fingus | March 10, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Henry – go back to your weed and let the adults handle this. Reaganomics worked. Nobamanomics fails.
Posted by: TEXAN | March 10, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Jim–”So if this creates 2.5 million, well, that’s 2.5 million MORE than bush.” The point in hiring Obama is for him to bring results and accomplishments, not for you lame people to be underachievers and point out that you didn’t screw up as badly as the last person. Be proactive, bring results that actually saves American jobs and the economy instead of your useless whining that you didn’t screw up as badly as the last person”– First see my earlietr post on job creation by bush , and second.. What should we do if we think that Obama’s plan will be detrimental and destructive to the economy and America.. Your saying we should just be quiet.. Maybe bein an AmeriCAN mean opposing those things that will hurt us.. ever think of that?
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Angie…..I have several friends who are floor traders and also floor brokers on Wall street. I speak with them regularly and let me tell you, not one of them or anyone else on that floor has any faith in Obama’s policies. This is why the market is tanking.
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
arkie vet – yeah, too bad most of the jobs that Bush created vanished before he left office, along with the rest of his supposed “benefits” to the economy. Sorry, dude, but the Bush/Republican economy was a mess based on an illusion.
Posted by: CamLok | March 10, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Mingus–interesting post.. you used 17 separate slurrs and defamatory adjectives against conservatives – all in order to tell us NOT to be obnoxious so people would take us seriously..wow am I the only one who finds this hilarious?
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
CamLock. . .were you just describing Clinton’s dot-com bubble?
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Mingus Fingus: We had to listen to the dems over the last 8 years. After only 2 months you are tired of us? Get used to it. And by the way, there are a lot of people that love America and want the best for it. That typically means slowing down the government because when they work too fast only bad things happen. Now go worship at your Obama alter and cash your govt. check.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
What good are the jobs if they are going to illegal aliens? That won’t help the out of work US taxpayers or the tax system.
Posted by: Joe | March 10, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Spread The Wealth – I’m sure you do… but like I said – anyone who holds the President directly and personally responsible for Wall Street is an idiot – and that includes your friends. Seriously, grow up already!
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Camlock — go to the US department of statistics and review the record on employment figures for –oh say the last thirty years– look at the presentages AFTER tax cuts by people like Bush and Reagan and even Kennedy (who also believed that tax cuts were the best medicine for growth). You will find that every tax cut is followed by 4 to 6 years of low stable unemployment while every tax hike has the opposite affect. Couple thos hikes with high spending like we have now and you get an added affect hyper inflation.. Carter’s presidency is a great sample of what Obama’s policies will accomplish..
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
boulderhipppy – So it’s not about good policy for you, it’s all about partisanship? Thanks for clarifying your position. It was just as the rest of us suspected, and now we know there is absolutely no reason to take your whining seriously. LOL
Posted by: Mingus Fingus | March 10, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Angie. . .Grow up?? What’s that got to do with anything? It’s not about maturity. The fact is you can attribute 50% of this slide to the market’s disapproval of Obama. If you spoke to anyone on Wall street they would agree with that statement.
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Texan: Reaganomics “worked” at doing what – burying the nation under a graveyard of debt? Shipping the nation’s manufacturing jobs (the only real wealth generator the nation had) overseas to China and India and down to Mexico? Replacing solid pension plans with a 401k house of cards?
FYI, I also blame Bill Clinton and gang of Wall St. cronies for their free trade and financial industry deregulation policies for destroying our economy. Both Bushes, especially the latter, provided the coup de grace.
(And sorry to burst your bubble, but I’m a tee-totaller).
Posted by: Henry Blankett | March 10, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
arkie vet – I just did as you said and the stats do not corroborate your claims. Frankly, the notion that tax cuts always benefit the economy was debunked a long time ago. Please try again. Thanks!
Posted by: CamLok | March 10, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Sorry Arkie vet, I’m going with the numbers published in the Journal based on Labor Department payroll numbers, not “fabrication”. The counts are based on total payrolls between the start of the month the president took office (using the final payroll count for the end of the prior December) and his final December in office.
Because the size of the economy and labor force varies, the WSJ also calculated in percentage terms how much the total payroll count expanded under each president. After taking account how long Bush had been in office, he showed the WORST track record for job creation since the government began keeping records in 1939.
Posted by: idahogirl | March 10, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Spread The Wealth – really? 50%? Do you always make up statistics to back up your silly arguments? Seriously, grow up already – you’re just making yourself look more ridiculous and hysterical.
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Angie –”Spread The Wealth – I’m sure you do… but like I said – anyone who holds the President directly and personally responsible for Wall Street is an idiot -”– Anybody who can not recognize that the action of the president and congress DIRECTLY affect the market is an even bigger idiot.. Obama said earlier this week when asked about the continued fall of the market that the market”was like a tracking poll, it goes up and it goes down and it doesn’t really mean anything” — He was half right.. it is like a tracking poll, but it has great meaning.. it is a reflection on how the economy feels about government policy.. and right now.. theya are all feeling a little sick to their stomach about his.. You know i don’t think i have ever seen the liberals go from optimism to denial as fast as they have this election cycle.. Maybe you guys should just face facts.. You were sold a vison that has no value…and now you are seeing a plan self destruct…
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Mingus Fingus – ha! Nice takedown of boulderhippy! You pretty much hit the nail on the head with this guy – and most of the rest of the Obama-haters, too – they’re not complaining because of any real principles or ideology, they’re just complaining because they lost and don’t know what else to do.
The GOP has nothing constructive left to offer, so all they’re doing is whining and trying to blame all their messes on the guy who was elected to clean them up.
Classic!
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
More of the failed democratic Donkeynomics.
Posted by: dan | March 10, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Angie. . .my friends, including my own brother, aren’t some office jockeys at Merrill Lynch. They’re on the Wall street floor trading millions of dollars every minute. They have the exact pulse of the market every minute of every day and I trust what they tell me, but don’t let me stop you from getting your data from a message board.
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
arkie vet – oh please, just admit that your real agenda has NOTHING to do with Wall St. and everything to do with undermining the President out of sheer partisanship.
Stop pretending to be reasonable and responsible and just admit that you hate Dems and will do or say anything to destroy a Democratic President.
Because anything else you say is pretty much crap. LOL
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
How long will it be? How long? How long will it be till the Obama supporters start to come back down to earth and realize that the “Bamster” has ruined the country. 6 month, maybe a year? It will happen for sure. He is a dismal failure!! The only group he can lead ….. ACORN! Rush is correct. His policies must fail. They are unamerican!!
Posted by: JimOnTheRight | March 10, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
“The democrats ….wanted us to loose the war in Iraq”…really? name ONE person who said “I want the US To fail in Iraq” Or “I want bush to fail”. Name one. Go ahead. Show me proof. NOBODY WANTED bush to fail, they were ANGRY Bush was failing. They were ANGRY at failure. Hence the “my God he’s so incompetent! Can he do nothing right????” Folks EXPECTED bush to do something right. He didn’t. He screwed up everything he touched. This IS the bush economy. All those fannie mae mortages combined do not amount to a fraction of the losses banks are posting. Banks aren’t failing en masse due ot fannie and freddie! How infantile. Even your boy Fox news moron bill Oreilly admits that. This IS A result of bush’s economic policy. And NOBODY WANTED bush to fail.l NOBODY. Only republicans wish for hte fall of their country in hopes of their own political gain.
Posted by: R U kidding me | March 10, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Spread That Wealth – that’s nice, but your friends and own brother sound like the kind of herd-mentality idiots that got the market into this mess in the first place. Sorry, but I am not impressed. I’ve met plenty of floor traders and they are far from the sharpest knives in any drawer… Like I said, if they’re blaming Obama personally for their failures, then they’re a bunch of idiots… and probably aren’t very qualified for their jobs, either. LOL
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Mingus Fingus: It is totally about policy. The current adminstration is turning our people into dependents of the govt. They take our money and give it to someone else. I disagreed with Bush’s bank bailout too. I disagree with a great society concept. The govt cannot create jobs. They can only create a job creation environment. As far as slowing down govt. I mean the wreckles spending. Govt spends money and when they say it is an investment they are actually taking our money and spending it.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
R U kidding me. . . How about Harry Reid’s famous “The Iraq War Is Lost”. . . . . . and Angie, . . . they aren’t failing, they make money every day, you dont’t need the market to rise to make money, you just need movement, and believe me, when Obama speaks, there’s plenty of movement. Those have been some of their most profitable days.
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
boulderhippy – wrong. That’s not “policy” you’re talking about, that’s ideology. And you’re not actually talking facts, but opinions based on your own rightwing free market economic ideology.
Well guess what, genius – the free market failed to regulate itself like all the Friedmanites claimed it would, and now all the capitalists are lining up to take government handouts. Times have changed and your ideology just couldn’t keep up. Now it’s time to give some new thinking a try. You need to sit down, shut up, stop peddling the same old failed mantras and truisms of the GOP and give our President a chance to actually make his policies work. Nobody wants to hear your whining, obstructionist crap. You guys were WRONG about the market’s ability to regulate itself – why should any of us believe that your fearmongering about Obama’s policies are right now?
Sorry, but you guys need a time out to think about what you’ve done. Deal with it.
Posted by: Mingus Fingus | March 10, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
JimOnTheRight: Even if his policies fail they are going to be around for a long time. Look at the Democrats law making marjuana illegal. That arcane law has been around since 1937. What Obama doesn’t realize is that a law is hard to get off the books once it is enacted. He hasn’t had the experience to know what is a good or a bad law.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Spread The Wealth – if they aren’t failing then why are they complaining so much? What a bunch of whiners… They need to shut up and give the stimulus a chance before they start talking their pessimistic nonsense.
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
idahogirl–”I’m going with the numbers published in the Journal based on Labor Department payroll numbers, not “fabrication”. The counts are based on total payrolls between the start of the month the president took office (using the final payroll count for the end of the prior December) and his final December in office.”– Your saying that my numbers from the dapartmant of labor and statistics iare fabrications?? First, since bugets lag one year , then its wrong to go from December to december.. to do so means that the 1.5% increase in unemployment since december of last yeAZr is Obama’s responsibility.. even I wouldn’t go that far.. but let’s use your criteria okay:
From the the labor statistics websight reagan started at 6.3% and ended at 5.3% which means about 2.5 million new jobs under Reagan. Bush 1 started at 5.3% and ended at 7.4% – a loss of 5.5 million jobs.. but remember why bush one was NOT reelected — he said read my lips, no new taxes then reaised taxes.. humm, then more taxes = more unemploymment. Clinton 7.3% to 4.0% or 9 million jobs created. Bush 2 4.0% to 4.9% equals 2.5 million lost. Now factor in a couple of things.. Reagan saw the results of Carter’s economy erode the rates from 6.3% to 10.8% percent in his first year.. he was still able through tax cuts to recapture that AND add 2.5 million jobs…Bush 2 saw the collapse of the dot.com (which accounted for a lot of Clintons’s job growth) and 9/11 in his first year erode the rates from 4.9% to 6.0%.. If you go from his high of 6.0% to his finish of 4.9% he actually created 3 million jobs. Further , if you apply the rate at the begining of Clinotns second year ( his first budget and tax plan to the end of the first year of the Bush (2) administration the numbers are…6.5% to 5.7% which means that clinotn only actaully “netted” 3.3 million jobs while Bush 2 actually “netted” – 2.2 million.
Go to the bureau of labor statistics websight and use their data base tables to see for yourself..
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
idaho girl- “he showed the WORST track record for job creation since the government began keeping records in 1939.”– we started keeping records long before 39, in fact if you look at Roosevelt’s “track record” it was FAR worse using your method than anyone else..
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
boulderhippy2 – wow. You really hate Democrats, don’t you? You partisan Republicans crack me up – do you really think your bias isn’t totally obvious? It makes me wonder if all your bloviating is really about the good of the country or the good of your party. I’m an independent voter, and I sure find it hard to trust the GOP when it seems like all of their complaints these days are more motivated by sour grapes than any honest effort to solve our economic problems. Seems to me Republicans are actively trying to make things worse just so they can blame it on President Obama. Your agenda is pretty transparent – do you really think the rest of us are going to forget this in 2010? Shame on you!
Posted by: Nando | March 10, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Again, name me ONE democrat who said “I WANT (Notice the word WANT) I WANT Bush to fail” NO ONE said that!! NOT ONE DEMOCRAT WANTED Bush to fail!!! In their opinion he WAS failing and for that thye were ANGRY!!!!! That is the EXACT OPPOSITE of republicans. REGARDLESS of not agreeing with his policy especially on Iraq they w ere ANGRY they saw the war as a failure!!!! ONLY republicans WANT AMerica to fail!! ! And just WATCH where that gets you in midterms!!! Just you watch!
Posted by: R U Kidding me | March 10, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Mingus Fingus: I guess the capilalists need to think about making this country the greatest society in history. Most of the comforts in this country could not have been achieved under Socialist rule. The main policy problem I see with Obama is making certain segments of society outcasts so he can tax them disproportionally. He said no tax increases during the campaign the signed the SCHIP into law. To refresh your memory it increases the TAX on cigarettes. That is a tax increase on a small portion of people so it is o.k. Just wait you are next (that is unless you are a welfare leach like I think you are).
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
arkie vet – that is pure nonsense – do you know how many millions of jobs were created under Roosevlet during WWII that simply didn’t exist before? Why do you keep making up/ purposely misreading statistics? Do you think the rest of us are idiots? Please!
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Did I ever say they were complaining?? No!! I said they’ve told me you can attribute half of this slide to the market’s disapproval of Obama. They aren’t playing politics, they’re playing the market and regarding that, they couldn’t care less if George Bush or George Soros were president. They have a neutral opinion regarding politics. They’re only interested in market movement, up or down.
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
idaho girl, –oh and by the way when you offset one year (as you should) for Reagan to take out Carter’s last year of economic “control and move to the first year of Bush 1.. then you get job growth of 10.8% to 5.4% or a Job growth of 12 million for Reagan’s 8 years.. which dwarfed the numbers of both Bush and Clinton.
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
What is needed is a TRUE outsider, one who actually has a list of accomplishments”
You mean like taking 4 schools to graduate in 6 years with a journalism degree, be mayor of a town of 12, and then the governor of a state where people expect nothing of their government? Impressive list there.
——————————–
silky,
And exactly what was Obama’s resume again? Lets see… I can give a telepropter speech better than anyone on the planet.
Other than that, I have no bleepin idea how to form a government. (see failed nominations) I went out on a limb for MY MAN Timmy Geithner, but it looks like that was about as successfu as giving ARod over 200 million!!!!
Oh Yes…I WAS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER!
and dont forget, I am a professor too!
Posted by: Mike_C | March 10, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
R U Kidding Me. . . .who do you think Harry Reid was doing when he said “The Iraq war is lost”
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
boulderhippy2 – now you’re just ranting a bunch of gibberish. Stop trying to frame the argument in terms of “capitalism” and “socialism” – that’s just stupid and historically/ economically ignorant. Neither party has any interest in “socialism” – you clearly don’t even know what the term means. Once again you’re letting your crackpot ideology get the better of you.
Now what the adults are talking about is something called “social democracy” – which is distinctly different from Socialism’s command economy and wholesale confiscation of private property.
Social Democracy is practiced is just about every industrialised nation in the world today – including our own (Social Security, Medicare, etc.) – and it is wholly compatible with capitalism and the free market. What the deabte now is about is the expansion of Social Democracy programs in the face of rising economic inequality in order to SAVE the free market by equipping workers with the means to keep solvent.
All the rest of the nonsense you’re spewing is just paranoid hot air.
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
do you know how many millions of jobs were created under Roosevlet during WWII that simply didn’t exist before? Why do you keep making up/ purposely misreading statistics? Do you think the rest of us are idiots? Please!
————————————-
Angie,
Roosevelt did not “create” those jobs! The WAR did! FDR’s policies were a mess, WWII is what truly pulled America out of the end of the Depression Era.
Posted by: Mike_C | March 10, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
since we are talking about the military & job creation, you still are avoiding the querstion I have posed about the F22 and Obama fiddling instead of saving 95,000 American Jobs!!!!
Posted by: Mike_C | March 10, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Spread That Wealth – are they the same geniuses who gave you that bogus 50% statistic you tried to pass off earlier? I seriously do not give a crap what a bunch of Wall St. whiners with their herd mentality have to say about Obama – Floor Traders are a notoriously fickle lot, about as bright as a pack of lemmings if you ask most people. LOL
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Angie–”arkie vet – that is pure nonsense – do you know how many millions of jobs were created under Roosevlet during WWII that simply didn’t exist before? Why do you keep making up/ purposely misreading statistics? Do you think the rest of us are idiots? Please!”– i don’t think you are idiots, i think you are misinformed.. Okay go to the webcite for the US bureau of the census. (Historical statistic of the United states) and review the Depression era unemployment statistics.. an easier reference is from a rerint off Oregon coast Magazine online (http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1528.html) — It shows that unemployment PRIOR to the crash of the stock market in Nov 1929 was 3.14%, by 1930 it was 8.67% and by 31 it was 15.82% throughout the new deal era of Roosevelt it continued to CLIMB reaching 24.75% in 1933 and in 1938 (after all the new deal infrastructure spending – including the TVA and CCC programs) were in place, the rate was still 18.91%.. When the economy started ramping up for WW2 (free market growth) then and only then did it begin to decline.. In 8 years under Roosevelt it went from 15.82% to 17.05% with a high of almost 25%.. in two years of free market capital growth spurred by the start of WW2, it went from 17.05% down to 9.66%.. Bottom line GOVERNMENT SPENDING NEVER WORKS (ie: Obama’s plan) while Free market growth ALWAYS DOES (ie: cutting capital gains taxes to jump start business growth). Don’t belive me.. look at the record.. its rather telltale…
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Nando: No, I do not hate democrats. I however do not agree with the way they feel about government needing to be a charity. I do not agree with the spending on frivolous things (both parties are guilty of this one). I don’t think we should cater to either the rich or poor. I believe the excessive govt taxes, fees, surcharges and excise fees should be simplified for everyone. I believe our Representitives should be more like statesmen than fund raisers. We are all American and should look at both sides of an issue without blindly following. It seems like you can’t criticize the other side without being called nasty things. I might be guilty of doing that but I shall try in the future to be dragged back into that cesspool of disrespect.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Who’s whining Angie. . .seriously. . .you keep saying whining, but you’re the only one whining! Once again, for the 3rd time Read And Comprehend, they’ve made more money since Obama’s been elected than they have in the last 2 years. They aren’t complaining, Obama moves the market, they short the market, everybody’s happy, Capice? These four fickle dummy friends of mine probably traded 50 million dollars worth of stock today.
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Arkie,
You have to remember. Liberals a re like zoo animals. They need that sign, PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE LIBERALS ANY REAL FACTS!
Posted by: Mike_C | March 10, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Mike_C – that’s a common myth among conservatives that “the war fixed the economy”. But the facts show that we were well on our way out of the depression by 1940, and didn’t actually go to war until 1941. You do the math.
It’s pretty clear to most serious historians that Roosevelt’s policies built the capacity and the economic infrastructure that would bring us out of the Depression – the advent of the war simply accelerated the process.
Also, I never said that Roosevelt created those jobs, I said that they were created under Roosevelt. Please don’t misquoute me. Thanks!
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
boulderhippy2 – oh please. Stop lying. You are clearly a partisan headcase. Do me a favor and make a list of 10 things that you like about Obama and the Democrats, okay?
Posted by: Nando | March 10, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Angie–” You are on track about the current practice being social democracy rather than pure socialism.. but if you look at it by definition, (say from the encyclopaedia Brittanica) the only real difference between socialism and social democracy is the path chosen to get there. Both attempt to create a governmentally dependent economy and economic class, the difference is that socialism is often achieved spontaneously through revolutionary means while social democracy is more of a transition through incremental governmental change.. Interesting that the Brittanica states that, for that reason, social democracy is more akin to communism than to socialism..
Either way, i do draw exception to your comment that it is practiced in just about every industralized nation today. That may be true but it is NOT tandamount to equating the system with success.. none of those countries enjoy the equivelent standard of living that we do .. and they still suffer from almost equal levels of poverty. You can’t use the number of social democracies as evidence taht it is better.. there are more dictatorships than social democracies.. does that make dictatorships an even better choice???
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Spread That Wealth – so then why are you and your friends whining about Obama’s policies?
BTW – did you see that the market closed up today? By your logic that must mean that Obama’s fiscal policies are working!
Posted by: Nando | March 10, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
arkie vet – you don’t travel much, do you? Your claim about the standard of living is downright laughable. Do you seriously believe that? If so, when was the last time you travelled in western Europe or East Asia?
Also, it’s “tantamount” – don’t try to impress us by using words you can’t even spell. It just makes you look silly.
LOL
Posted by: Mike Greene | March 10, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Nando – good observation! The market closed up today – according to the Obama-hating partisan obstructionists that must mean that Obama’s economic policies are working, since he is clearly the only force that ever impacts the stock market. LOL
Posted by: Mike Greene | March 10, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Nando. . . NO ONE IS WHINING!!!! They have simply explained to me that the markets dislike of Obama’s policies is attributed to a large percentage of this slide. These friends of mine don’t care where the market goes as long as it goes somewhere. . . . and to answer you with the same sarcasm, YES!!! his policies were suddenly a great success today!!
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Angie–”But the facts show that we were well on our way out of the depression by 1940, and didn’t actually go to war until 1941. You do the math. “– actually the facts (and figures) show that we were completly stagnant at about 18% unemployment and it was NOT improving. UCLA released a study last year that provided a detailed breakdown of the depression as Roosevelt’s policies .. now UCLA is a pretty liberal university, but their conclusion was that the depression would have corrected in 4 to 6 years were it not for Roosevelt’s new deal policies..those policies caused the depression to EXTEND for over 8 years and were it not for WW2, the study concluded that the depression may have continued for another decade.. This is from a 2 year study out of a very liberal university… kind of makes you wonder don’t it?
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
I didn’t say I liked any particular democrat. I have some good friends that are Dems. I said I didn’t hate them I don’t necessarily have to like certain ones. That is the difference between anecdotal and emperical evidence. Most dems and journalists have a difficult time with this concept.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
arkie vet – wow. That is pure malarkey. Seriously. Social democracy isn’t akin to communism – it’s still compatible with the free market and private property. After all, as Angie correctly pointed out, we are ALREADY a social democracy. What the current debate is about is whether we want to expand our social safety net or continue on the same path that created this economic mess. As for your silly claims about a class of people that’s dependent on the government for support – I suppose you want to abolish our professional military, too?
Get a clue.
Posted by: Mike Greene | March 10, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Spread The Wealth – sorry dude, you were definitely whining. I just looked in the dictionary under “whining” and it had your picture. Good luck with that. LOL
Posted by: Truth Squad | March 10, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
arkie vet – incorrect. Try again.
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Mike green– thank you for correcting me on my mis type.. i am traveled.. lived three and a half years in portugal. I am fairly familiar with the EEC. Western Europe spends over half their income in taxes, eastern asia (depending on where) ranges from affluent (with huge inflationary rates) to deplorable.. North Korea has a 40% malnurishment rate,a nd half the country has no electricity, in China, the average FAMILY dwelling is 400 sq feet. Britain has national healthcare but pays over 70% in taxes. Sweden has nationalized nursing care, but the waiting list is 2 years long and you have to live until age 90 for the government to take care of you.. 28 million Canadians cross into the US annually to receive healthcare that isw either not available or has too long a waiting list in their own country..
And what do we have here.. people living below the “poverty” level with beer guts, a smoke in their mouth, a color TV set to watch, and in many cases an SUV in the yard….
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
boulderhippy – whatever, man. you have some serious anger issues regarding Dems that you need to resolve. I didn’t ask you to list 10 Dems you liked, I asked you to list 10 things that you liked about Democrats – anything, dude. Nice hair, nice teeth, kind to kitties and puppies, whatever – and you couldn’t even do that? Very sad Your partisanship is completely out of control. And when you tell me that “some of my friends are Democrats” you sound like an old time racist saying “but some of my best friends are black” – and nobody ever believed their crap either. Seek help, man. Seek help.
Posted by: Nando | March 10, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
mike–”As for your silly claims about a class of people that’s dependent on the government for support – I suppose you want to abolish our professional military, too?”– i have a clue, and i was a member of the military.. which is constitutionally required, unlike all your “safety nets”
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
I don’t think that the accommodations to the GOP were warranted and thus caused a shortfall — that and the fact that the news has been quick and harsh. I am thoroughly under the impression that Bush did nothing because he didn’t look for answers and prayed that things would fall apart more in the January time-frame — and that the GOP has been no help — the only answer they have is NO — I hope Americans remember this when it comes to voting in 2010 and give them their answer right back.
We may just have a third party grow out of all this ridiculous obstruction.
Posted by: paulet | March 10, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
arkie vet – that’s a good question that Mike asked you: do you travel outside the country much these days? Do you get a lot of first hand information about the state of European and Asian social democracies for yourself, or do you form your opinions of them based on what others tell you?
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Reading comprehension apparently isn’t this board’s stong suit. I’ll leave you jokers with this, upon my “stupid and fickle, herd mentality, floor trader” friends advice, I’ve probably been riding a short sale on most of the stocks in your plummeting 401K since election day and before every time Barry speaks, I up the ante. Thank you Barry, and have a good day!!
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | March 10, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
gee folks… I quote the bureau of census, the bureau of labor statistics, the encyclopaedia, and still I get “wrong again”. Angie — READ what i referenced..try arguing with that..I am sure you can.. Mike– same for you.. don’t believe me then pull the book out and read for your self.. it specifically DOES compare social democracy to communism..R U KIDDING ME — your posts are not even attempting to bring any facts just slams and slurs.. at least i give Mike and Angie credit for a spirited debate on issues even if i do think they need to recheck their facts… gotta go folks.. God bless America…
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Angie –see my post 5:41:44
Peace
Posted by: arkie vet | March 10, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
arkie vet – nice try, but if you don’t want a class of people that’s “dependent on the government,” then you would agree that we ought to abolish our professional officer class, right? I mean there’s nothing in the Constitution that stipulates that, just “the appointment of officers” in Article 1, section 8. Also, there’s nothing in the Constitution about having an air force, either. Maybe we should abolish that, too? LOL
Posted by: Nando | March 10, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
How long ago did you live in Portugal? The EEC hasn’t existed since 1993. Ever heard of the EU? Also, I wouldn’t base my view of European social democracies on Portugal, which is historically one of the poorest countries in Europe. Have you been to Germany or Northern Europe much? They do just fine with their system and their standard of living often meets or even exceeds our own.
I suspect that your worldview is long out of date – as are most of your statistics. Frankly, I don’t have time to check all of your statistical claims, but I suspect most of them are extremely dubious and bogus.
Posted by: Mike Greene | March 10, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
arkie vet – I don’t care where you get your statistics from, darlin’ – but it’s pretty clear that you’re manipulating them for your own ends. I mean your earlier misreading of data to suggest that FDR presided over a net job loss is utterly absurd given the millions of jobs created under his Presidency during WWII. Fact is, like Mike Green, I don’t have the time to chase down all your whoppers – who does? – so I’m just going to assume that your credibility is suspect and that all your stats are complete crap.
Thanks!
Posted by: Angie | March 10, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Nando: As for my friends, I live and work in Boulder CO. One of the most liberal communities in the U.S. I don’t choose to live in a vacuum so I socialize with a lot of dems. I have seen what it does to a community. They buy open space land instead of fixing the streets. They tell you where and what you can build on your own property. They hang pensises in a public library and call it art. They put a tax or fee on everything possible. They spend so much money on studies that they can finish a project only 200% over budget. They built a massive homeless shelter that is nicer than the CU dorms. A business man bought a nice property that was historically an RV park. The former owner removed all of the RVs when he decided to sell. When he went for an RV park permit he was told that since they were gone he couldn’t get a permit. Yes I have anger issues because I am tired of working hard, making my mortgage, paying my taxes and never seeing any real benefit to my massive tax load.
Posted by: boulderhippy2 | March 10, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Blofeldbuildings…so go find another country to live in..I am willing to pay another tax: deport the WHINERS tax. make a contribution to this country …or get out..thats my last offer
Posted by: cowgirl | March 10, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Arkie vet – I also was going to ask you where you dredge up your info, but thank goodness you were able to explain: “Oregon Coast Magazine”. Yah, I’ll take that data any day over the Wall Street Journal. And as far as your position on the Great Depression – most Americans are willing to take advice from Ben Bernanke (who was appointed Fed Chair by President Bush). While you may not agree with his “Financial Accelerator” theory, it’s a worthwhile google. He believes the Great Depression provided a takeaway lesson: “government bears the important responsibility of trying to stabilize the economy and the financial system, as well as of assisting people affected by economic downturns.”
Posted by: idahogirl | March 10, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Let’s see… The CEO of GM flys to DC in a private plane and get ripped over it. Obama flys in Air Force one to Ohio to tout 25 – count ‘em – 25 jobs and that’s just prefectly fine. Go figure.
Posted by: garand911 | March 11, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am
For those of you who think the stimulus bill was too small, I have a news flash. It is not a matter of Obama and the Democratic Congress not spending enough money; it is a matter of them not spending the money they did efficiently.
Suppose the government were to directly hire workers at $10/hr for full-time work. Each worker would receive $20,800 per year in compensation and the employer (the government) would have to contribute an additional $1,289.60 in FICA and $301.60 in Medicare Taxes. For 5 million workers, that would be a grand total of just under $112 billion per year. – about 1/8th of what the Democratic Congress spent in their “stimulus” bill.
Now, the government directly hiring workers probably wouldn’t be in our nation’s interest. So, instead, let’s have the government offer to pay half the wages of any such new positions created by Private Enterprises. There isn’t a company around who wouldn’t jump at the opportunity to expand operations with the government picking up half the price. More importantly, this would create not a mere 5 million jobs at the pricepoint I gave earlier, but 10 million.
Now, let’s look at the direct effects of this proposal.
There are currently about 4 million people drawing unemployment – most of whom would be absorbed intp these new job positions. An additional 6 million people who are currently living on mere scraps or drawing welfare would fill in the rest of these positions. That means that the government no longer has to pay any of those unemployment, welfare, or food stamp benefits – which would recoup over half of the cost of the proposal I made.
Moreover, each of these workers now have a taxable income – which would allow boost tax revenues at federal, styate, and local levels. This serves to reduce the net cost of this program further (at the federal level),provide states with the revenue stream they are needing, and boost the amount of money available in the local communities to pay for police, fire, emergency, and school services to the public.
Additionally, the proposal I have made here would diminish the number of people actively seeking jobs, directly driving the wages of new jobs up as businesses are forced to compete to obtain the workers they need.
And all of these people earning more money would be spedning that at the stores and businesses throughout this country – driving up consumer confidence and demand, providing businesses with the revenuesd they have lost through this recession, and spurring further business expansion and development.
As a further note, the banks would find more people demanding banking accounts – providing the financial sector with the revenue necessary to revitalize the credit market in this nation.
Bottomline: a simple proposal costing far less than 1/8th of what Obama proposed per year could create far more jobs than he has promised us, move people from welfare and unemployment to productive work, boost consumer spending, revitalize the business and stock market, aid the financial sector in making a full recovery, and boost state and local revenues to provide the services our society needs (and boost some like education to where they need to be).
So, why aren’t the people in DC taking such an action? Maybe you should ask them for an answer to that. What I can tell you is that their current “stimulus” plan is a perfect example of inefficiencyt and lousy planning.
Posted by: Kenneth Durham | March 11, 2009, 2:23 am 2:23 am
CowGirl: I hope you make BIG bucks…since you willing to pay more taxes. Watch out very soon you will pay everything to taxes.
Not enough jobs…how true!! Now they want another stimulusProbably figured that all of this will come out right before the 2010 election and right now the Dem’s are in line for a BIG change.
Speaking of big change, if I didn’t pay sso much in taxes I would move to California so I could VOTE PELOSI OUT!!!
Posted by: Sue | March 11, 2009, 8:06 am 8:06 am
The Bush Economy? Oh, yeah, the Good Old Days.
========================
Posted by: kim | March 11, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
who to trust? i just don’t know anymore. Everyone blames Bush, everyone blames Obama. There are two parties Rep and Dem. They are knocking each other down. It is like two parents fighting and the kids(THE US CITIZENS) are becoming depressed, disappointed, and dysfunctional. And when the stimulus goes out to the big companies, are we the citizens going to see it? Will I have to learn a new skill in construction, so that I could help build the new eco-friendly high schools that house underpaid pissed teacher? And since we the tax payers are bailing out the banks, can the banks please lower our interest rates? Or give the citizen’s a break. No interest for 5 years until we pay off our debt. The banks and big corps were forgiven for their mistakes and overspending. Can we the people be forgiven too? Give us a break too. I am only paying interest every month on my education loan. Not to mention I am still in college trying to finish my degree in Teaching. And from the future outlook, I may have a worthless degree. More time and money wasted. I am scared!!!!
Posted by: lisa bernardini | March 12, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am