By Jennifer Parker

Mar 15, 2009 9:13am

Summers: AIG Bonus Bombshell ‘Outrageous’

President Barack Obama’s top economics adviser, Lawrence Summers, said that insurance giant American International Group’s plan to award senior executives hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses and retention pay is "outrageous."

"There are a lot of terrible things that have happened in the last 18 months, but what’s happened at AIG is the most outrageous," said Summers, chairman of the White House National Economic Council, during an appearance on "This Week" Sunday.

"What that company did, the way it was not regulated, the way no one was watching, what’s proved necessary, it is outrageous," Summers said.

In a phone call Wednesday to AIG CEO Edward Liddy, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said it was unacceptable for the company to give out tens of millions of dollars in bonuses for senior executives after the government committed $170 billion to keep the struggling company afloat — far more government bailout money than has been awarded to any other firm.

In a letter to Geithner Saturday, AIG’s chairman and CEO agreed to restructure some of the payments. But Liddy wrote, "quite frankly, AIG’s hands are tied," arguing the firm would risk a lawsuit if it scrapped the bonuses.

Liddy also wrote the government’s demands could affect AIG’s ability to retain "the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses" if "employees believe that their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury."

Summers argued today that the Obama administration has sought to limit the AIG bonuses.

"We are a country of law. There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts. Every legal step possible to limit those bonuses is being taken by Secretary Geithner and by the Federal Reserve system," Summers said.

"What the Obama administration has done, based on the advice of attorneys, is done everything that it can to, within the law and within the tradition of upholding law that we have in this country, to limit these bonuses. And they have as a result of Secretary Geithner’s efforts been scaled back," he said.

–George Stephanopoulos

UPDATE: When I asked Larry Summers today why taxpayers didn’t have a right to know which AIG "counterparties" were getting their bailout money, he pressed the companies to disclose. This afternoon, they did.

User Comments

As far as I’m concerned, they need to demand money already given to AIG returned to the government and let AIG go down. Forget negotiating. This is totally unacceptable.

Posted by: jan | March 15, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Take the bonuses away and let the “best and brightest” who drove AIG into the gutter, walk to their next job. What a joke!!! Afraid of getting sued?? Are you friggin kidding me? Are you telling me that AIG wrote employment contracts to executives that GUARANTEES bonuses in a time of the worst performance in history by any company anywhere? No wonder they are where they are. And that type of corporate behavior is from the “best and brightest”?

Posted by: JRS | March 15, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

I’ll go further than that. The only reason you would want AIG’s idea of “best and brightest” to stay with AIG would be to keep them from going elsewhere and bankrupting yet another company. In case they haven’t noticed, we have a problem with high unemployment. They should have been content to keep the company open and functioning sans bonuses. If AIG cannot adjust their attitude and drop the bonus issue, then we need to get money already given back and give it to someone more willing to please and more deserving.

Posted by: jan | March 15, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

I want everyone on the internet to remember this whole AIG story the next time the government tries to sell us a GLOBAL WARMING, Green World… Absolute BS!!

Posted by: Jim | March 15, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

This just an open announcement that one American can legally f*uck the other American under the current set of law .

Posted by: Swiftlearner | March 15, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

All insurance is just a legalized, force-fed, giant scam on the populace. Insurance of any kind should be OUTLAWED. We’re being turned into indentured servants to the Corporations and Government by our own government.

Posted by: Teresa | March 15, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t AIG basically an insurance company? Why are we bending over backwards for an insurance company? Something does not smell right about this. I have a feeling the sky will not fall if they go under. Why wouldn’t all the other legit insurance companies in the world take their business if they go under. I say let’m go!

Posted by: stevieb | March 15, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

I voted Democrat, but agree with Republicans abou AIG. These bonuses should not be going forward. This should have been in the agreement when AIG got their first money. There are many smart people who would give their eye-teeth to have these jobs for less pay. We all die, so the world and AiG can do without someone. So please rewrite or tell those people if they are not willing to lower their sights, they have to go. This has happened to many people in my community-told they had to go with no recouse.

Posted by: DOROTHY JOHNS | March 15, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Unless you understand how the “New World Order” and Gilderberg group fit into this, you will never understand what is really happening within our government.
The information is out there on the net but, do you really want to know?

Posted by: vnvet69 | March 15, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Return the money AIG you just give out as a bonus!
Corporations like AIG don’t believe in shared American sacrifice but in quarterly profits. Yes the bonus AIG is giving out like candy is from the Tax payers but AIG knows it will take a hit for a week from the media and then the story will fade from the media.
Perhaps the bonus money AIG is giving out should be returned to Government and put to better use in fixing the economy.

Posted by: Paul | March 15, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

i think the government is doing right by trying to stop these bonuses. all monies that we have given them should come back then see if they have money to give them

Posted by: brenda | March 15, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

If those are the “best and brightest” then AIG is doomed to fail. You do not deserve any kind of bonus if you are a part of the team that drove your company to point of needing billions of tax dollars in bailout money. Period. You deserve to be fired. It is just that simple.
No more bailout money for AIG. Let the “best and brightest” earn their bonuses by digging themselves out of the mess they got themselves into.

Posted by: Susan | March 15, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

AIG Bonuses
If we as a nation are so crazy as to forgo bonuses for AIG employees whoever can we possibly get with the requisite expertise to take their place now that Bernard Madoff is going to jail? Maybe he could get a work release. (Alas.)

Posted by: Thingumbob | March 15, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

This is a catch 22 situation—letting AIG fail would have a greater affect on our financial system than the Lehman failure , which the govt now realizeS was a huge mistake .At least this administration is learning from the previous mIstakes and has a tIgar by the tail that they are trying to TAME. BE PATIENT

Posted by: char;ene | March 15, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

tennessee governor has worked three years without any pay – free – using his own money. he don’t ask for a bonsus- he is just wanting to help the state – now this is a true and honorable example that the “best” should follow if they care about our country.

Posted by: brenda | March 15, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

It’s all vile, full of corruption and rewards irresponsible financial decisions from reckless corporations to reckless individuals now to be ‘saved’ by a reckless government and all on the backs of responsible, productive people.

Posted by: bct | March 15, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

The writing’s on the wall, capitalism as we’ve known it needs to die, and die now! The excutives of these corporations need to be forced to understand that when they get to that level, they are PUBLIC SERVANTS just like elected officials are. SCREW the law if it protects these greedy bastards. They need to have every single bit of wealth taken from them and forced to live like the rest of us.

Posted by: Noah - North Carolina | March 15, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Liddy also wrote the government’s demands could affect AIG’s ability to retain “the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses”
I don’t buy that argument by Liddy. They failed and now they are being given a bonus?

Posted by: Chuck | March 15, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

If indeed the staff of AIG is “QUOTE”
AIG’s ability to retain “the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses” Than why the H*** are they goung down the tube and taking the AMERICAN PUBLIC WITH THEM

Posted by: Constantly Confused | March 15, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Contrcts? You mean our Smartest Clueless Leader had no clue there are contrcts inbusiness even a commie like himself could not just tear it off if he does not come out of closet.
What is his promise to limit the executive pay to 250 grand? Is this another empty word done in the deep O?

Posted by: kat | March 15, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Summers, please! Your continuous flood of money to AIG and the rest of the giants is disgusting. The system is BANKRUPT by BAILOUT ECONOMICS!

Posted by: Geo | March 15, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

I believe AIG said it needed the bailout money because the consequences of failure would cause serious damage to the economy, and also to help save jobs for all their thousands of employees, suppliers and the like. Well, I’m sure the average secretary at AIG supporting her children has had her hours cut, benefits rolled back, and counted herself blessed because her job wasn’t eliminated completely. What about all the small business suppliers to the AIG giant who undoubtably were pressured to take less for their goods and services (more likely told, “we’re in trouble, we’ve got to tighten our belts– so this is what we’re paying you.”). How do all these folks feel, who were probably told “we’re all in this together, this is what we have to do to keep the company going” when they see a few of the people who led them into this mess in the first place rewarded? Apparently, once one is considered a “master of the universe,” (thank you Tom Wolfe)one is entitled to lifelong entitlement– a constant nod to their superiority. When help is extended to less self exalted people it’s derided as welfare or (gasp!) socialism.
The irony is, AIG asked for/demanded that money for the good of the many (hm, so now socialism is ok?) and once received, an enormous part of it went straight to the few. When would you expect those bonuses will “trickle down” to the laid-off secretary?

Posted by: Carla | March 15, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Just want to give some thought to all of the “STIMULUS” bull.
First of all, if you want the banks to get back into good shape, the people who owe them money are the ones that need help! Not the bank, THE PEOPLE!! If the y could pay their mortgage, credit cards, car payments, the banks would be right back to where they were before all of this “stuff” started! Obviously, the banks that just want to be able to help themselves and their investments, not the people! They never have been interested in the people, just the people’s money!
Nobody needs to be able to borrow more money, they need to be able to pay for what they already have!
If people go into foreclosure, what is the credit rating? Can you borrow money with a bad credit rating? NO!!!! No bank will ever loan you money for anything if you have a bad credit rating! Who is going to be able to borrow money from a bank that receives this “STIMULUS MONEY” if they have a bad credit rating? Yep, no body!
MONEY DOES NOT FLOW DOWNHILL ANYMORE! Just look at what AIG and others are doing. That money is going up to management people. It is not going into the caufers for loans to people! it is not going to help stop foreclosures! THE GOVERNMENT MUST GIVE STIMULUS TO THE WORKING FAMILY. They are the ones who make the economy work!
How about taxing the “heck” out of companies who have and continue to move good paying jobs to CHINA? The US now owes China money! What the hoot is this? Bring our jobs back here, put people back to work in those jobs, and bring our economy back with what we already had. By taxing the hoot out of these companies, they won’t have the economic incentive to move these jobs out of this country! Protectionism??? Well what is this all about anyway? TRYING TO PROTECT our economy!!! SO DO IT! Make it more financially responsible to keep people in this country working than to pad the executive’s pockets with more bonus money in one year than most working people make in their LIFETIME! DUH!
PEOPLE ARE WHAT IS IMPORTANT! Not executive’s bonuses!!!!!!!!!!
Think about what really moves this country. Is it the executives or the worker who makes it possible for the companies the executives run, make a profit!?

Posted by: B Bonjour | March 15, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

My God George, you are letting this man get away with lying. Follow up on your questions. He say’s they can’t undo contracts okay, so why is the administration rewriting mortgage contracts and wanting to get principles reduced. No question about those contracts. Good Lord, do we need comedians to do the work of ALL media??

Posted by: TruthSeeker | March 15, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Does Mr. Liddy think that if we just let AIG go bankrupt that will ‘affect AIG’s ability to retain “the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses’? How about they give back the money they took from the American taxpayers and Mr. Liddy can dole out bonuses from the money they DON’T have?
And another thing, if these people at AIG are the “best and the brightest talent”, why the heck did AIG need $170 billion to stay in business?
http://moronmeter.com

Posted by: I'm With Stupid | March 15, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Let AIG fail! Let’s see who these best and brightest are. Companies will avoid them like dog doo. Call your representative and stop this. Start prosecutions to find out where the money went. Let them fail!

Posted by: rightbehind | March 15, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Government simply must stop giving money to private business. This is a direct attack on capitalism. Our current elected officials cannot prevent themselves from stupid stunts like this and must be replaced.

Posted by: peacefulrevoltnow | March 15, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Brightest? Most talented? What are these idiots talking about? If they were the brightest and most talented, their company would not be where it is now.

Posted by: John Kovacs | March 15, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Hey, Summers… If the gov’t cannot legally abrogate a contract, how is it the gov’t can abrogate a union agreement and allow the little guy to lose his job, wage scale, benefits, etc.? You are a lying politician like all the others.

Posted by: Mel | March 15, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

I can see the same old politics talking a good game but not doing anything about it. It is time the goverment step in and force these greedy people out of their jobs or make the companys pay back every dime that they have gotten.

Posted by: ghostrider | March 15, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

I can see the same old politics talking a good game but not doing anything about it. It is time the goverment step in and force these greedy people out of their jobs or make the companys pay back every dime that they have gotten.

Posted by: ghostrider | March 15, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

The idiots in there overseas location wrote up a bunch of Credit Default Swaps for trillions of dollars, bascially saying if the counterparties started amounting losses on their packaged crap they brought…then A.I.G would pay out on the SWAP, guess what? the crappy mortgage derivites went bad…so they have to pay the counterparites or the counterparties go down too…a never ending black hole, because guess what? the packaged crap continues to lose because the economy is so bad. More money coming to AIG. Bet on it.

Posted by: Natalie | March 15, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

they problem isnt contracts, it’s that they dont DESERVE the bonuses. a bonus is a reward for outstanding service, something they obviously lacked. let them sink.

Posted by: lisa | March 15, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

What in the world…why in God’s good name do these things continue to happen…what happened to our standing up for what is right? AIG claims that they would lose the people the bonus’s are going to…then let them go…if they are that good they will find another job…but if these are the very people who have put AIG in the financial dire straits that they are in, who would touch them? I am incensed over this one and I hope George that you hold AIG’s feet to the fire on this one…AIG had the audacity to raise my car insurance 32% when nothing changed for underwriting and when asked why the two people I talked to couldn’t give me a credible answer. AIG, an acronym for ALL IN GREED.

Posted by: HUH? | March 15, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am

I think Summers is off base talking about laws protecting contracts. GM, Ford & Chrysler had contracts with the UAW but the government made tem change to gr=et money. Delfi filed for dankrupcy and some judge said that the health care could be ended for all those retires that woked for years with a pension and health care as a promised reward. When Kmart reorganized the government cancelled all the old stock and issued new stock so the old stock holders were screwed. The laws/rules are used/adjusted/modified/change to fit the results wanted b those who have the influance/power.

Posted by: DNK | March 15, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

It is absurd that every municipality in the country is re-negotiating employee contracts for police, fireman, etc. but we give 170 billion dollars to this private company that ‘is too big to fail’ to have them have a retreat for executives at a five star luxuary resort within weeks of this bail out. And now, not six months later they are giving out bonuse to their executives that exceed the yearly salaries of the 3 million+ ‘peons’ that have been laid off during the past year. We have a socialist country, it’s in place to rescue the upper class. They don’t have to sell their yacht, trade in the mercedes or porsche, and lay-off the maid.

Posted by: diane631 | March 15, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

SO WE HAVE ANOTHER FREE PASS & “NEXT TIME” WE’LL DO BETTER??? THROWING MORE & MORE BILLIONS–WASTED!!!AND THIS IS ONLY ONE “INSTALLMENT” OF THE BONUS!! I DON’T THINK THE BONUS WILL BE SPENT IN THE ECONOMY OR COMPANY STOCK!OH, BUT LET’S CALL THEM & LET THEM KNOW IT’S NOT ACCEPTABLE!! THAT’LL TEACH THEM NOT TO DO IT AGAIN!! STOP PASSING ROUGH DRAFTS & GET IT RIGHT ON BINDING LEGALITY TO AMERICA’S FUTURE!! TG & BO CAN’T GET THIS RIGHT & THE WORLD IS SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE HOW POWERFUL WE ARE & FOLLOW OUR LEAD??

Posted by: Denisea213 | March 15, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

AIG CEO Liddy is lying. Derivatives expert Tavakoli has the goods on him:
http://tinyurl.com/avp3zj

Posted by: Toaster | March 15, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Giving bonuses for “good job” to the very people who bankrupted the company? Retain them? Why? And where would they go, it’s not like anyone is hiring right now.
They have been poor stewards of their investor’s money so why would anyone want to continue to do business with AIG? The company is doomed, let it go. Just make them pay back our money first

Posted by: Susan | March 15, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

summers the ugly idiot said on thursday that obama’s stimulus has stablized consumer spending.
the lying shitola

Posted by: realityville | March 15, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Safe bet is on Summers taking over for Geithner at Treasury before the end of the year…
http://twitter.com/politicalbuzz

Posted by: matt | March 15, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

The best and brightest? You must be kidding. Yeah the best and brightest for banrupting a major business. Do they really need these kind of people? Especially when there are many more “best and brightest” out there looking for jobs, who might actually do a GOOD job. In these contracts for the bonuses is there any kind of clause for job performance? If so they could deny at least some money on that.
Also if those best and brightest had any shred of decency, morality, integrity or conscience they would forgo the big bucks to help the company they serve. I guess that’s not how business is run any more.

Posted by: joanie | March 15, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

This is fraud and corruption at its worst. This is one of the reasons why socialized bailouts are immoral. Follow Ron Paul’s lead for the proper path forward. You know the guy that flies coach and packs a sack lunch.

Posted by: Huh | March 15, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

The executives of AIG are going to get millions of government subsidized bonuses and Obama is going to claim he did all he could do to prevent it… As time goes on this story will die out and AIG will start cutting jobs and those job cuts will be decided by those who have collected millions off the taxpayers.

Posted by: jdcitizen | March 15, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Jim wrote: “I want everyone on the internet to remember this whole AIG story the next time the government tries to sell us a GLOBAL WARMING, Green World… Absolute BS!!”
Please elaborate. How is the AIG financial fiasco related to global warming?

Posted by: SearamblerOne | March 15, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

The bailout and stimulus handouts can be(and could have been) written with PENALTIES and LIMITS.
But no, we have Lawrence Summers and his drivel.
All the talking heads and political hacks think that the American public is so stupid that we will invest in anything when all our hard-earned dollars get sucked out the legal loopholes into the pockets of the well-connected and self-proclaimed “best and brightest.” Baloney!
I’m tired of all the “Ooops” government and journalism.

Posted by: Morisot | March 15, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

AIG has an option; pay no bonuses and let the AIG managers sue AIG. This will get the plaintiffs in court, their names on public record, and provides them a public forum to explain why their bonuses are justified by the financial disaster they actively facilitated. If they are as smart as we are told, they will understand this is their time, their opportunity to demonstrate that financial brains and patriotism can go hand in hand.
Clark Moeller

Posted by: Clark Moeller | March 15, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

There is no point in talking silly with these blood suckers and crooks at AIG or any other financial institution. They have no morals and no scruples. Let them die by their own sword. Before the taxpayers’ money is given, even if it is just one dollar, the government must demand full and unrestricted veto power on any actions on these jokers. Let there be one representative of government sit on the boards of these companies who are empowered with such veto powers.

Posted by: narumanchi | March 15, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

George had a chance to “hold their feet to the fire ” but he blew it. Why did he allow Summers to dismiss it so easily saying the gov’t can’t abrogate contracts”??? What bull, George …..either grow some or get off the air.

Posted by: Mel | March 15, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

What’s good for the UAW is good for AIG. Contracts are Contracts, with the unemployment rate at what it is and what it is gonna be, retention should not be an issue. Where are these poor souls going to work, if not for AIG. No bonuses or retention pay for the greedy.

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 15, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

I guess at AIG, “bonuses” are guaranteed. Interesting just how convoluted and high flying the financial industries are.
Where’s the competition and capitalism in that?

Posted by: perk235 | March 15, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

This is just another head fake from Washington. They want to get everyone upset about a couple of undred million dollars in corporate bonuses while they waste tens of trillions of dollars through ignorance and bad policy. Nothing ever changes in Washington, they always see failure every place else but never in their own actions.

Posted by: Nikky | March 15, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Let there be one representative of government sit on the boards of these companies who are empowered with such veto powers.
Posted by narumanchi.
This is an excellent idea. The percentage of $bailout propping them up, the percentage of government representation on the board.

Posted by: perk235 | March 15, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

The goverment should let AIG take its own medicine : AIG can afford giving out huge bonuses to the so-called ” best and brightest” that means they do not need our tax dollars from the original bail-out and the second one. A failure business entity should not reward those who run their own corporation down the ground. It is irrational and not logical way of doing business at the tax payers’ expense.

Posted by: mtr2311 | March 15, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Pay them with what they created. Credit default swaps. If it is such a great deal for taxpayers why not the ones who thought these things up? Hopefully the thunder growing louder in the background will bring some recognition to our leaders that a major storm is a brewing in our country.

Posted by: balesgirl | March 15, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

If the bonuses are based on + performance that should be reason enough to negate the contracts. Running a corporation into the ground isn’t a + performance. This is totally obserd. Anyone working for AIG that gets that bonus should be ashamed!

Posted by: Joan | March 15, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Obama should demand that those “genius” AIG “executives” who made such extremely bad decisions in 2006 and 2007 – thus causing the AIG debacle – give back their bonuses for those years, since they obviously didn’t earn them!!!

Posted by: AlChemist | March 15, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Stop and think a minute. If AIG were to cancel bonuses, what executive would want to expose themselves to the critisum of filing a law suit against a company they worked for and caused to lose billions of dollars. Don’t pay the idiots and see what they do. For the CEO to say his hands are tied is just his way of passing the buck. If he was a real leader he would tell them to eat cake until the company is profitable and has paid the tax payer back.

Posted by: michael benton | March 15, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

The “fear” of lawsuits if AIG does not pay its executive bonuses if invalid. I’ve designed executive comp programs for years! The funding mechanism that delivers cash to the bonus pool would not be based on taxpayer money. Therefore, since we had to bail them out because they had no money, then it means the bonus pool is empty. The payout mechanisms that allocate the bonuses most likely are based on some performance metric. Since AIG hasn’t performed, it is highly unlikely anyone achieved the performance goals. Unless the pay plan design is faulty, AIG executives are not entitled to anything – let them use up time by suing for their bonuses. By the way, if the pay plan design is faulty, common practice dictates a clause be put in all pay program designs that enables the company to get out of the obligation of paying based on a windfall/shortfall or other unforeseen circumstance. An incentive pay plan is designed for pay for performance and/or retention of key talent. Pay for performance means when the company does poorly, the participants of the plan are paid poorly. From a retention standpoint, I’m at a loss to determine who is a key talent that AIG needs to retain? It appears the lunatics are running the asylum at AIG. We need to step in as taxpayers and say ENOUGH – WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!

Posted by: MEB | March 15, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Liddy also wrote the government’s demands could affect AIG’s ability to retain “the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses”
========================================
That is a bunch of crock! First off, it was the “the best and brightest talent” that got AIG and the rest of the banking business into this fiasco. Secondly, this is a fundamental problem in business today….CEO’s are not interested in the challenge of building companies rather they are enticed by the what is it for them (i.e, enormous salary and protection from losses). It is no wonder many CEO’s have played fast and lose. The best CEO’s (I believe) are those who have come up through the ranks of the company and have a sincere desire to see the company succeed. The worst CEO’s are those motivated by salary and jump from company to company..Justifying bonuses as ways lure the “the best and brightest talent” is incredibly self-serving and egotistical. I think the government should demand AIG repay to us any amount of money AIG pays for bonuses. In fact, it should be at least triple the amount.

Posted by: indy_voter | March 15, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Where were the union contract busting Republicans at, when they gave all the money to AIG. They didn’t have a problem forcing broken contracts when the auto companies wanted a loan? Are white collar contracts an exception to the rule?

Posted by: dan | March 15, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Anyone who takes this bonus should also get free room and board next to Bernie M, the whole lot should be fired for incompetence and sent to prison.

Posted by: Want2Racer | March 15, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

WALL STREET is the center of the universe. AIG is GOD. And WASHINGTON is its faithful SERVANT. Disgusting!!!! “In Debt We Trust.”

Posted by: Geo | March 15, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

The “best and the brightest” are the ones who made the decisions that got AIG into a position where it had to ask for 180 BILLION dollars in aid, as if it were a third world nation whose leaders had stolen money and cached it in a Swiss bank. Let the “best and the brightest” get other jobs somewhere else. AIG is not going to survive as an entity — it’s going to sell off its “books of business” that are profitable, and those will be renamed to avoid any taint of AIG, and AIG will be a shell full of ill-advised loans, and a by-word for stupidity. Let the “best and the brightest” sue! There’ll be nothing there to recover. Give the “best and the brightest” the bad debts resulting from the bad deals that they themselves made as a “bonus”. But don’t pay them bonuses for doing bad work!

Posted by: Marcus Bales | March 15, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

How about this…Let AIG go down and legally, nobody gets a BONUS. Idiots.

Posted by: cjcanu01 | March 15, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

It IS LEGAL to let AIG go under, and dole out their customers to other companies who have acted responsibly. If the CEO thinks these people will quit and get into the unemployment lines without bonuses, he is just delusional. I SAY YANK THE SILVER SPOON FROM THE MOUTHS OF THIS COMPANY. It’s time to BREAK UP THIS MONOPOLY!!

Posted by: Lifesajourney | March 15, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

scaled back? scaled back? scaled back?
whoever believes that, leave the room.

Posted by: linda | March 15, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

The only answer for “We The Middle Class” is to send them all to THE Guillotine !!!

Posted by: Dave | March 15, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

AIG has aleady proven it only has retained the best and brightest crooks, not insurance execuatives. The Feds should kick Edward Liddy out, and ask Warren Buffet, who really knows the insurance business, to pick new management for AIG.

Posted by: Tyrone | March 15, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Please write these same comments to President Obama and copy you senator and representative. If people cannot collect all their donation into a single BIG donation to impact their representatives may be writing to them can give them an idea of our, the people’s stand.

Posted by: juanbuda | March 15, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

TYRONE: LOVE YOUR COMMENT ABOUT GETTING RID OF THE CURRENT CEO AND INSTALLING WARREN BUFFET!!!! Great Idea!!!

Posted by: Lifesajourney | March 15, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

I heard that most Democrats are lawyers and most Republicans are businessmen. Didn’t even ONE of those lawyers know this BEFORE they decided to give AIG the money? I can’t believe this people are running our government and are able to throw our money away like this.

Posted by: Fiveftfury | March 15, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Out incompetent Congress has low approval ratings, yet continues to vote themselves pay raises.
How about our crappy representatives give some of their pay back to us taxpayers!
p.s. How’s that stimulus doing for the ecomony?

Posted by: JoeHanson | March 15, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

I can tell from reading most of the comments many of you just don’t get what went on with AIG. It wasn’t like the banks. You don’t get how these people were told if they hit a target they would get a certain amount of pay. So yeah, they will get sued. It will cost more. You don’t get how the taxpayer owns the company now so we really can’t let it fail now. Too late. Interesting. The banks have used TARP money (billions) for deals in Dubai, etc. and nobody yells. But let’s “off with the heads” of American workers?

Posted by: FedUp | March 15, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I think it is up to the american people not to do business with a company that obviously does not care about us.

Posted by: Paul | March 15, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

George, why donn’t you quit it with the bunk! You and your lying guest Mr. Summers know what is really going on, so why don’t you tell the public the truth?
FACT:
were driving a Mercedes, spent $40,000 on a new kitchen with granite countertops and stainless steel appliances, sent their kids to private school, had a second home at the shore, and took exotic vacations all over the world. Now their house is in foreclosure and you are paying to bail them out. The anger and outrage in the country is at the highest level since the Vietnam War. The American public is being misled by government officials, politicians, and the Federal Reserve regarding the causes of this crisis and the solutions needed to solve our economic tribulations.
The average American does not know much about the Federal Reserve. The government and the Federal Reserve prefer to operate in the shadows. If the American public understood what their policies have done to their lives, they would be rioting in the streets. Henry Ford had a similar opinion:
“It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”
Most Americans believe that the Federal Reserve is part of the government. They are wrong. It is a privately held corporation owned by stockholders. The Federal Reserve System is owned by the largest banks in the United States. There are Class A,B, and C shareholders. The owner banks and their shares in the Federal Reserve are a secret. Why is this a secret? It is likely that the biggest banks in the country are the major shareholders. Does this explain why Citicorp, Bank of America and JP Morgan, despite being insolvent, are being propped up by Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner?
The history of National Banks in the United States has been controversial since the Founding Fathers signed the Declaration of Independence. The Constitution of the United States unequivocally states that only Congress has the authority to coin money, not an independent bank owned by unknown bankers.
The Congress shall have Power to coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures
Article 1, Section 8 – US Constitution
Our most recent horrifying experience with an all powerful central bank has led to the current worldwide financial crisis. In less than one century the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States has destroyed our currency and has allowed bankers to gain unwarranted power over the country. They had the ability and opportunity to bring down the worldwide financial system.
When the average American is told that the dollar has lost 95% of its purchasing power since the inception of the Federal Reserve in 1913, they look at you with a blank stare and start wondering whether American Idol is on TV tonight. The systematic inflation purposely created by the Federal Reserve silently robs the average American of their standard of living. The CPI figures published by the US government tell the story.
The government began keeping official track of inflation in 1913, the year the Federal Reserve was created. The CPI on January 1, 1914 was 10.0. The CPI on January 1, 2009 was 211.1. This means that a man’s suit that cost $10 in 1913 would cost $211 today, a 2,111% increase in 96 years. This is a 95% loss in purchasing power of the dollar. For some further perspective here are the prices of some other common items in 1913 per the Morristown Daily Record:
Boy’s shoes for school, .98/pair Women’s shoes, 2.00-8.00/pair
Bread, .10/3 loaves Butter, fancy, .30/lb
Cereal, Kellogg’s Corn Flakes, .09/box Eggs, Fresh Western, .27/dozen
Peanut butter, .09/jar Toilet paper, .26/6 rolls
Daily Record [Morristown NJ], .01/daily paper
Notable on the CPI chart is that in the years following the creation of the Federal Reserve, inflation ran at double digit rates to finance Woodrow Wilson’s foreign intervention into World War I. The other notable period was in the years following President Nixon’s closing of the gold window in 1971. This led to rampant inflation that wasn’t tamed until the early 1980′s by Paul Volcker, the only independent courageous Federal Reserve Chairman in its history. The figures so far in the 21st Century seem modest. This is due partly to the methodical downward manipulation of the calculation by government bureaucrats. The period from 2010 to 2020 will show a dramatic jump caused by all of the money printing and reckless spending that is occurring today. Book it Dano.
The average American might just conclude that prices always go up, so what’s the big deal about inflation. This is where the Federal Reserve and politicians have pulled the wool over your eyes. The CPI was 30.9 in 1964. Today, it is 211.1. This means that prices have risen 683% since 1964. The only problem is that your wages have not risen at the same rate, even using the government manipulated CPI. Using a true CPI figure, average weekly earnings are 64% below what they were in 1964. This explains why a family of five could live well with one parent working in 1964, but even with both parents working and using debt in prodigious amounts, the average family does not live as well today.
The First Bank of the United States was created in 1791. Alexander Hamilton, the 1st Secretary of the Treasury, proposed this bank and convinced a hesitant President Washington to agree. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were against the concept. It favored the moneyed classes of the North versus the agrarian South. The bank was given a 20 year charter and President James Madison let it expire in 1811. He then renewed the charter in 1816. The wise men who took unprecedented risks in declaring independence from England’s tyranny, feared the tyranny of bankers equally:
“All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America rise, not from defects in the Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation.”
John Adams, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, 1787
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a moneyed aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.”
Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President -1802
[The] Bank of the United States… is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution… An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries. What an obstruction could not this bank of the United States, with all its branch banks, be in time of war! It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw its aids. Ought we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile?
Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President -1803
“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance”.
James Madison, U.S. President
President Andrew Jackson was the first and only President in the history to pay off the National Debt. He worked tirelessly to rescind the charter of the Second Bank of the United States. His reasons for abolishing the bank were:
It concentrated the nation’s financial strength in a single institution.
It exposed the government to control by foreign interests.
It served mainly to make the rich richer.
It exercised too much control over members of Congress.
It favored northeastern states over southern and western states.
President Jackson believed that only Congress should be responsible for the issuance and control of the currency. Delegating that duty to powerful New York bankers was distasteful to him.
“If Congress has the right to issue paper money, it was given to them to be used … and not to be delegated to individuals or corporations”
President Andrew Jackson, Vetoed Bank Bill of 1836
President Jackson, shown here “driving out the devils and money changers”
with his order to withdraw public money from the central bank
-Edward Clay lithograph, published 1833
President Jackson’s honesty and anger at the bankers should resonate today, as bankers have again brought our country to its knees.
“Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the grace of the Eternal God, will rout you out.”
A President with Jackson’s strength of character would put the blame where it belongs today. He would rout out these criminal bankers, rather than give them more taxpayer money to squander. A President with a moral backbone would put an end to the disastrous 96 year experiment of the Federal Reserve. Instead our last two spineless Presidents have put Goldman Sachs bankers in charge of our national Treasury. An examination of inflation throughout the history of the United States proves that from the beginning of our nation through wars and the Industrial Revolution, the country experienced virtually no inflation as our currency was backed by gold. The creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 and the closing of the gold window in 1971 unleashed a tsunami of inflation that continues today.
Karl Marx published his Communist Manifesto in 1848. It included 10 planks. Two of the ten planks were as follows:
A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Centralization of credit in the hands of the State by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
The dates February 3, 1913 and December 24, 1913 framed a year which placed our country on a downward fiscal spiral. The United States had tinkered with an income tax during the Civil War and the 1890′s, but the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional. Until 1913, the U.S. government was restrained from overspending because it was completely reliant on tariffs and duties to generate revenue. The Sixteenth Amendment changed the game forever.
“The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”
When you give a Congressman a dollar, he’ll take a hundred billion. The initial tax rates of 1% to 7% were rather modest. That did not last long. The top tax rate reached 92% during the 1950s and today rates are still 500% to 1,000% higher than they were in 1913. The government is addicted to tax revenue. In 2007, they absconded $1.2 trillion in taxes from American individuals. Does anyone think that the bloated government bureaucracy spent these funds more efficiently or for a more beneficial purpose than its citizens could have?
Without $1.2 trillion in individual tax revenue, Congressmen would not be able to add 9,200 earmarks to the current $400 billion Federal spending bill every year. This is how they waste your money:
$1.8 million to research “swine odor and manure management” in Ames, Iowa.
$41.5 million to upgrade presidential libraries of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Lyndon B. Johnson, and John F. Kennedy, according to the Heritage Foundation.
$2.9 million to study how to breed and raise shrimp on “shrimp farms.” Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) reports that since 1985 the federal government has allocated $71 million to the study of shrimp science.
$209,000 to improve blueberry production in Georgia, according to CAGW.
$200,000 for a tattoo removal program in Mission Hills, Calif.
$5.8 million for the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the Senate in Boston, according to the Heritage Foundation.
$6.6 million for Formosan subterranean termites, also according to Heritage.
Rothschild, J.P. Morgan & the Federal Reserve
“Those few who can understand the system (check book money and credit) will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on it favors, that there will be little opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear it burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.”
Rothschild’s Bros. of London
The House of Rothschild had been the dominant banking family in Europe for two centuries. They were known for making fortunes during Panics and War. Some claimed that they would cause Panics in order to take advantage of those who panicked. The Panic of 1907 was the used as the reason for creating the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis attributed the causes of the Panic of 1907 to financial manipulation from the existing banking establishment.
“If Knickerbocker Trust would falter, then Congress and the public would lose faith in all trust companies and banks would stand to gain, the bankers reasoned.”
1906, Frank Vanderlip Vice President of the Rockefeller owned National City Bank convinced many of New York’s banking establishment that they needed a banker-controlled central bank that could serve the nation’s financial system. Up to that time, the House of Morgan had filled that role. JP Morgan had initiated previous panics in order to initiate stronger control over the banking system. (Picture slimy Mr. Potter offering the members of the Bailey Building & Loan, 50 cents on the dollar for their shares during a bank panic in the classic movie Its A Wonderful Life). Morgan initiated the Panic of 1907 by circulating rumors that the Knickerbocker Bank and Trust Co. of America was going broke, there was a run on the banks creating a financial crisis which began to solidify support for a central banking system. During this panic Paul Warburg, a Rothschild associate, wrote an essay called “A Plan for a Modified Central Bank” which called for a Central Bank in which 50% would be owned by the government and 50% by the nation’s banks.
In November 1910 a secret conference took place on Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia. Those in attendance were: JP Morgan, Paul Warburg, John D. Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, Senator Nelson Aldrich, Colonel House, Frank Vanderlip, Benjamin Strong, Charles Norton, Jacob Schiff, and Henry Davison. Out of this meeting of the most powerful bankers and politicians in the country came the plan for a Central Bank. This conference was unknown until 1933. In 1935, Frank Vanderlip wrote in the Saturday Evening Post: “I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System.”
Behind the scenes these powerful men were formulating the plan for a Federal Reserve System. There was no outcry from the public to implement this plan. The public knew nothing of this. The Aldrich Plan was renamed the Federal Reserve Act and pushed forward by Paul Warburg and Colonel House. Warburg essentially wrote the Act and pressured Congressmen to see his way or lose the next election. Colonel House, who had socialist leanings, was the top advisor to President Wilson.
The Glass Bill (the House version of the final Federal Reserve Act) had passed the House on September 18, 1913 by 287 to 85. On December 19, 1913, the Senate passed their version by a vote of 54-34. More than forty important differences in the House and Senate versions remained to be settled, and the opponents of the bill in both houses of Congress were led to believe that many weeks would elapse before the Conference bill would be taken up. The Congressmen prepared to leave Washington for the annual Christmas recess, assured that the Conference bill would not be brought up until the following year. The creators of the bill then pulled the ultimate scam on the American public. In a single day, they ironed out all forty of the disputed passages in the bill and quickly brought it to a vote. On Monday, December 22, 1913, the bill was passed by the House 282-60 and the Senate 43-23. This meant that the single most important piece of legislation ever passed by the Senate was missing the votes of 26 Senators because it was passed during the Christmas recess. President Wilson, at the urging of Bernard Baruch, signed the bill on December 23, 1913. A few years later, President Wilson had second thoughts:
“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world–no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men.”
There were some brave Americans who did oppose this legislation and foresaw the devastation that it would lead to.
“Throughout my public life I have supported all measures designed to take the Government out of the banking business. This bill puts the Government into the banking business as never before in our history. The powers vested in the Federal Reserve Board seen to me highly dangerous especially where there is political control of the Board. I should be sorry to hold stock in a bank subject to such dominations. The bill as it stands seems to me to open the way to a vast inflation of the currency. I had hoped to support this bill, but I cannot vote for it cause it seems to me to contain features and to rest upon principles in the highest degree menacing to our prosperity, to stability in business, and to the general welfare of the people of the United States.”
Senator Henry Cabot Lodge – Dec 17, 1913
“From now on, depressions will be scientifically created.”
Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. – 1913
John Maynard Keynes, the current hero of the Obama administration and Paul Krugman, had this to say about the Federal Reserve in 1920.
“Should government refrain from regulation (taxation), the worthlessness of the money become apparent and the fraud can no longer be concealed. By this means government may secretly and unobserved, confiscate the wealth of the people and not one man in a million will detect the theft.”
Mandate from Hell
According to the Federal Reserve’s own website, their duties fall into four general areas:
Conducting the nation’s monetary policy by influencing the monetary and credit conditions in the economy in pursuit of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.
Supervising and regulating banking institutions to ensure the safety and soundness of the nation’s banking and financial system and to protect the credit rights of consumers
Maintaining the stability of the financial system and containing systemic risk that may arise in financial markets
Providing financial services to depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign official institutions, including playing a major role in operating the nation’s payments system
The American public was told that the Federal Reserve would eliminate any future bank panics. From 1913 through 1920, inflation increased at more than 10% per year as Wilson spent vast sums during World War I and its aftermath. From the early 1920s to 1929, the monetary supply expanded at a rapid pace and the nation experienced tremendous economic growth. Benjamin Strong, one of the participants at the secret conference on Jekyll Island, was the Federal Reserve head. By the end of the 1920s, speculation and loose money had propelled asset and equity prices to unsustainable levels. The stock market crashed in 1929, and as the banks struggled with liquidity problems, the Federal Reserve cut the money supply. This was the greatest financial panic and economic collapse in American history so far – and it never could have happened without the Fed’s intervention. The Fed caused the bubble with loose monetary policy. The Depression did not become Great until the Smoot Hawley Act in 1930 destroyed world trade and the raising of the top income tax rates from 25% to 63% in 1932 destroyed the incentive to earn money. Over 9,000 banks failed and a few of the old robber barons’ banks managed to swoop in and grab up thousands of competitors for pennies on the dollar.
The Federal Reserve’s primary mandates were maximum employment, stable prices and moderate long-term interest rates. Their other chief function was to supervise and regulate banks to ensure the banking system is safe. Lets assess their success regarding their mandates:
Unemployment reached 25% during the Great Depression; attained levels above 10% in 1982; and will breach 10% in the next year. Grade: Failure
Based on the chart above and the CPI data since the Federal Reserve’s inception, the dollar has lost 95% of its purchasing power. Grade: Failure
Based on the chart below interest rates have been anything but moderate since the inception of the Federal Reserve. They have consistently caused booms and busts by setting rates too low or too high. Grade: Failure
The Federal Reserve was supposed to supervise the activities of banks. Instead, under Alan Greenspan, they stepped aside and let banks take preposterous risks while giving an unspoken assurance that the Fed would clean up any messes that they caused. This total dereliction of duty gross negligence has led the greatest financial collapse in history. Grade: Failure
The Chairman of the House banking & Currency Committee Louis T. McFadden fought a lonely battle against the Federal Reserve in the early 1930s. He was swept out of office when his opponent in the next election received thousands of dollars in campaign contributions.
“Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation’s debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed have cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.”
Louis T. McFadden – Representative from PA 1934
Mr. McFadden has a soul mate in Representative Ron Paul from Texas. Mr. Paul has been on a one man mission to abolish the Federal Reserve for over a decade. He seems to be the only person in Congress with the courage, fortitude and intellect to understand the damage that has been caused by the Federal Reserve and call for its abolition. The entrenched political class, despise Mr. Paul because his call to abolish the Federal Reserve would destroy their ill begotten wealth and power.
Since the creation of the Federal Reserve, middle and working-class Americans have been victimized by a boom-and-bust monetary policy. In addition, most Americans have suffered a steadily eroding purchasing power because of the Federal Reserve’s inflationary policies. This represents a real, if hidden, tax imposed on the American people.
From the Great Depression, to the stagflation of the seventies, to the burst of the dotcom bubble last year, every economic downturn suffered by the country over the last 80 years can be traced to Federal Reserve policy. The Fed has followed a consistent policy of flooding the economy with easy money, leading to a misallocation of resources and an artificial “boom” followed by a recession or depression when the Fed-created bubble bursts. In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to stand up for working Americans by putting an end to the manipulation of the money supply which erodes Americans’ standard of living, enlarges big government, and enriches well-connected elites, by cosponsoring my legislation to abolish the Federal Reserve.
Ron Paul – Sept 10, 2002
Representative Paul sized up his colleagues in Congress and the Federal Reserve perfectly in 2006 when they were oblivious to the impending disaster that was about to befall the nation. He was belittled by the mainstream press and fellow Congressmen.
The coming dollar crisis is not likely to be “fixed” by politicians who are unwilling to make hard choices, admit mistakes, and spend less money. Demographic trends will place even greater demands on Congress to maintain benefits for millions of older Americans who are dependent on the federal government.
Faced with uncomfortable financial realities, Congress will seek to avoid the day of reckoning by the most expedient means available – and the Federal Reserve undoubtedly will accommodate Washington by printing more dollars to pay the bills. The Fed is the enabler for the spending addicts in Congress, who would rather spend new fiat money than face the political consequences of raising taxes or borrowing more abroad.
The irony is that many of the Fed’s biggest cheerleaders are the same supposed capitalists who denounced centralized economic planning when practiced by the former Soviet Union. Large banks and Wall Street firms love the Fed’s easy money policy, because they profit at the front end from the resulting loan boom and artificially high equity prices. It’s the little guy who loses when the inflated dollars finally trickle down to him and erode his buying power. Someday Americans will understand that Federal Reserve bankers have no magic ability – and certainly no legal or moral right – to decide how much money should exist and what the cost of borrowing money should be.
Ron Paul – July 11, 2006
Before he became a tool of the political ruling elite and the bankers who truly control the country, Alan Greenspan actually understood and supported a currency backed by gold which couldn’t be manipulated by corrupt politicians. The confiscation of middle class wealth through the insidious use of inflation has proceeded unchecked for 96 years.
In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good, and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim on goods. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.
Alan Greenspan – 1966
Howard Beale, the news anchor in the movie Network, could have spoken the same lines today that he was speaking in 1976. He describes our current financial crisis to a tee.
I don’t have to tell you things are bad. Everybody knows things are bad. It’s a depression. Everybody’s out of work or scared of losing their job. The dollar buys a nickel’s worth; banks are going bust; shopkeepers keep a gun under the counter; punks are running wild in the street, and there’s nobody anywhere who seems to know what to do, and there’s no end to it.
I want you to get mad!
I don’t want you to protest. I don’t want you to riot. I don’t want you to write to your Congressman, because I wouldn’t know what to tell you to write. I don’t know what to do about the depression and the inflation and the Russians and the crime in the street.
All I know is that first, you’ve got to get mad.
You’ve gotta say, “I’m a human being! My life has value!”
So, I want you to get up now. I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window, open it, and stick your head out and yell,
“I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!!”
Anyone who is not mad as hell at this point is not paying attention. Your tax and spend corrupted politician leaders and your banker controlled Federal Reserve have borrowed and spent your tax dollars, your children’s tax dollars, and their children’s tax dollars desperately attempting to prop up this bankrupt system. The unleashing of a never ending tsunami of printed dollars by the Federal Reserve makes every dollar worth less. They have systematically created inflation that has slowly but surely reduced your standard of living. Politicians in the pocket of lobbyists, corporate interests, and bankers have used their power to tax in order to spend trillions on worthless projects in their districts to insure re-election. The combination of taxing and printing has led to a National Debt of $11 trillion.
Bankers love debt. The more debt, the more interest they collect. Issuing credit cards and collecting 21% interest and billions in late fees seemed like a can’t miss proposition. It was until people couldn’t pay the debt back. Now the unwinding of the greatest debt bubble in history has created a 2nd Great Depression. Instead of learning from the past, the Federal Reserve has chosen to do exactly what led to the crisis. They have lowered rates to 0% and have printed money at prodigious rates. The Fed has doubled their balance sheet in the last 12 months.
They have loaned billions to the bankrupt banks that inhabit our financial system while accepting worthless pieces of paper as collateral. They have hailed back to Jekyll Island and the cloak of secrecy. They will not reveal to the public the banks they have loaned money to or the collateral that backs up those loans. The arrogance of Ben Bernanke proves that the Federal Reserve answers to bankers, and not to the American public. The books and records of the Federal Reserve are not open to scrutiny by the General Accounting Office. Ron Paul has introduced the Federal Reserve Transparency Act which would open their books to the public. No organization with as much power as the Federal Reserve should be permitted to operate in the shadows.
A recent article by David Galand from Casey Research pointed out the insidious methods by which the government extracts our money for their self serving schemes:
Accounts Receivable Tax Building Permit Tax
CDL License Tax Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax Dog License Tax
Excise Tax Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax IRS Interest /IRS Penalties
Liquor Tax Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax Property Tax
Real Estate Tax Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax Road Usage Tax
Sales Tax Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA) Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Utility Taxes Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax Well Permit Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Vehicle License Registration Tax Workers Compensation Tax.
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax
After digesting this disgusting list, do you feel under taxed?
them cap and trade fees. The Federal Reserve will pull out all stops to create inflation. When you owe the rest of the world $11 trillion, inflation makes the debt less burdensome. The dollar will decline versus gold. With the enormous amount of currency creation and spending by the government, the economy will eventually pull out of this depression. The acceleration will take the Federal Reserve by surprise. They will be hesitant to raise interest rates. The inflation genie will get out of the bottle and will not go back. The hyperinflation that takes hold will lead to social unrest, rioting, and a drastic reduction in the American standard of living.
There is no solution that will not be painful to everyone in the United States. The only solution that would put America back on a path of sustainable prosperity would be a gold/precious metals backed currency that would force government and its citizens to live within its means. Congress would need to vote for something that would take away its power. With our current political system, this is impossible. Money is power. This leads to only one conclusion. The existing Ponzi scheme will have to collapse before we can adopt a rational financial system for America. It may take decades, or it may happen in 2010. No one knows. If the country can be convinced to follow the wisdom of Ron Paul, we still have a chance to avoid this fate.
When the Federal government spends more each year than it collects in tax revenues, it has three choices: It can raise taxes, print money, or borrow money. While these actions may benefit politicians, all three options are bad for average Americans.

Posted by: malfax | March 15, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

The sad thing is we will continue to bailout these big companies. I would love to see statistics on who accepted the money and who didn’t and the number of companies that gave bonues including the layoff percentage since they got the money. Our government seems to be afraid to hold them accountable.

Posted by: Steve | March 15, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Bonuses whould be given out to people who do a good job. The fact that AIG needs so much bail out money obviously shows that the “best and brightest” working for them didn’t do a good job. They’re afraid that they might get sued by these people? They shouldn’t be because these people did a lousy job running their company and are not entitled to bonuses.

Posted by: APW | March 15, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

This is just outrageous. The Obama administration has to step in and hold these people accountable for miss using the funds that the American people have paid in keeping their business going. Obama should put into law that no bonuses and extra spending are paid out especially when it is the American people who are losing their jobs left and right are bailing these companies out. Where there are smart leaders there will be more. Let them walk out of the job if they’re not happy because they didn’t get their million dollar bonuses. Greed has run rampant and this country is crumbling underneath it. Enough is enough. Come one Obama – let’s get this right.

Posted by: J | March 15, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Fine let them have there bonuses they earned it (like a crook anyway), but take back the $180 billion the fed have “loaned” them and let them sink a a ship with 180 billion holes in it. Take the $180 billion give it to the taxpayers to spend, it is a lot better than the avg of $13 worthless we will get back on our paycheck, what a joke let AIG sink. and what a joke the bailouts are, everyday people file for BK, everyday people come out of it stronger.

Posted by: David | March 15, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

There are contracts and there are contracts and contracts CAN be legally broken FOR CAUSE. AIG has betrayed the public trust — it’s taken taxpayers’ money and used it fraudulently to feather the nests of its top executives — the same executives who brought it to the brink of total failure. Given the state of our economy today, the so-called “best and brightest” are a drug on the market. Who in their right mind would want to hire engineers of failure?

Posted by: nanameow | March 15, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Is there a word that can express more outrage than outrageous?
I try very hard to be positive and try to find the good in everything.
That said, these ARE the very people that (in part) ARE RESPONSIBLE for the “economic conditions” the global economic meltdown, that w ALL are facing and that we all are trying to dig out from under.
Put aside for a moment that they are now using taxpayer funds for these bonuses, the culpable parties & individuals that are responsible for there direct involvement HAVE to be held ACCOUNTABLE.

Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | March 15, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

This is tyranny!

Posted by: jimmie | March 15, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

This is tyranny!

Posted by: jimmie | March 15, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

So mr. average American, with a family of four, making $60,000 year. I need the money that is withheld from your paycheck, and paid to the government, so i can pay a bonus to my employees. Employees that pushed my company into a state of insolvency. Oh,and by the way, brought the financial system to its knees which in turn will probably force your employer to fire you. Sorry, but my employees, which are government employees now that you own us, really need this money to supplement their $1,000,000 salary. Have a great day!

Posted by: Tcorenevsky | March 15, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Let them sue. Those who sued would have a Scarlet Letter worse than the original hung around their necks for the rest of their lives. Their pictures would be plastered across every major network and they would be pariahs. And enough with the “we don’t want them to leave.” Where are they going to go? I’d love to hear their next interview. “So Mr. Aig Employee, tell us about the things you accomplished in your last job.” “You created the biggest economic disaster of the past 70 years?” “Wow, that’s quite an accomplishment, who wouldn’t want to hire you?”

Posted by: Reality Check | March 15, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Intersting…having the same thoughts at the same time.

Posted by: jimmie | March 15, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Worry about keeping the brightest talent in AIG? Gee! They should be worrying about losing their jobs. Let them leave. See who is going to hire them. They will beg to have a job instead having a bonus. The CEO of AIG should be fired.

Posted by: bbyyaa | March 15, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Instead of currently wanting to off the heads of people promised a certain salary if they hit a target? (They are legally entitled and they would sue.) Well, a better question is “have we learned our lesson on how some companies are allowed to get too big and it’s dangerous?” Have we learned that our government has allowed these types of companies to not have enough capital in the bank themselves in case of an emergency? In other words – as the government demonizes companies? Well, THEY are also a HUGE part of the problem here, and they’re mostly demonizing to take the focus off of what they messed up???

Posted by: FedUp | March 15, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

AIG said they need to give the bonuses to retain the brightest and the best in the industry. Obviously they have no idea what the brightest and best are, they are satisfied to keep the ones who will continue to screw the American public.

Posted by: Terri | March 15, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am

What a joke……….”the best and the brightest”. If this is truly the best and the brightest, then we are in deep s%@&. Bonus money is for a job “well done”, not for being the source of this economic breakdown. Liddy is giving this money to the very same dept. and people who screwed up in the first place and caused this fiasco. If they want to walk, then let them….and don’t let the door hit you on the a$$ as you leave. They have NO PLACE TO GO, and certainly no one wants to hire these idiots.

Posted by: enough already | March 15, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Folks, I love this country, and I’m sick of the lies we are being spoon-fed by the main stream media hacks, who are in cahoots with the criminals manipulating our economy/money on purpose to destroy this nation. They are lying to us all. PLEASE watch this video for some insight before they delete this post. They don’t want you to know the truth. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8484911570371055528&ei=5CO9SaNvp7ioA82gib4B&q=the+creature+from+jecjyl+island&hl=en

Posted by: malfax | March 15, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

I don’t agree at all with the way the bonus thing is shaping up nor how much money has been given to AIG. However their stock is now selling at about 50 cents a share and knowing the government will not let these guys fail (ever) I suspect within a reasonable time frame the stock will be worth 30 to 40 times what it is today. We may not like it but there is an opportunity here for a average person to make a very small investment today and reap some reward in a few years.

Posted by: atlanta3430 | March 15, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Then have the US attorney file suit against these executives for malfeasance.

Posted by: drjohn | March 15, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

As far as I’m concerned, they need to demand money already given to AIG returned to the government and let AIG go down. Forget negotiating. This is totally unacceptable.
Posted by: jan | Mar 15, 2009
—————————————
I agree, they should be allowed to fail. However, AIG insures the pensions of the nations politicians, so I wouldn’t count very much on the government letting them go down. On a ligther side, I have seen where the President is considering taxing health benefits, something he said he would not do during the campaign.

Posted by: Global Fraud! | March 15, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

What does Edward Liddy, CEO of AIG, not get? No loan, no business, no jobs, no contracts, no bonuses. It’s simple. This is not rocket science.

Posted by: Mel King | March 15, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

AIG has no problem in finding ways to get out of paying insurance claims with hidden clauses and unscrupulous practices and for them to say that they have to make these payments with our money for to these despicable Execs. is
sheer lunacy.

Posted by: Ralph Spencer | March 15, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

George, you are a liar and an Obama sychophant.
DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS TAPPER.
Obama Administration Lie of the Day:
Summers, just now with George “I create Dem strategy every morning with Rahm/Carville/Begala” Stephanopolis, said that Obama inherited a trillion dollar deficit as created by a Republican President and a Republican Congress….
Apparently Larry didnt notice the Dems winning Congress in 2006.
Sickening lie, repeated enough, will become truth in the public’s mind.
Now George is attacking McConnell with vigor, right after kissing Summers’ ring for 20 minutes and failing to rebut Summers’ LIE that the GOP controlled CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENCY IN 2008. If George can’t bring himself to correct outright factual lies by Obama’s advisors on his show, he should be removed.
Sickening to allow George to create talking points for Obama with Rahm and then cross examine the GOP about those talking points.
Here is the quote and Georgie boy’s failure to correct Summers LIE:
SUMMERS: We’d love to see Senator McConnell’s concrete
alternatives that gets closer to a balanced budget. The situation the
president inherited of nearly $1 trillion deficits, before he did
anything, came at a time — came at a time when it was a Republican
president and a Republican Congress that were making the decisions.
……..
STEPHANOPOULOS: OK, Larry Summers, thanks very much for your
time this morning.
SUMMERS: Thank you.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 15, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

“arguing the firm would risk a lawsuit if it scrapped the bonuses.”
LET THEM SUE!!!
What’s their argument going to be? We DESERVE those bonuses???
What jury would side with those cretins?

Posted by: drjohn | March 15, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

As in every other business failure, a few people made bad decisions that sank the company. The large majority made money for the bank, or protected them from more substantial losses. They did their jobs, and bonuses are in many cases, more than 50% of their pay. And yes, if the best and brightest leave, the feds will lose even more billions. Lastly, ALL of the fed money is as an investment in stock, and the terms are so tough AIG is in worse shape than they should be. The rating agencies and the bank’s risk managers completely underestimated the risks on securitized debt obligations, and that’s a problem because huge numbers of people are not paying their mortgages per the contracts they signed. When the majority turned into deadbeats, nobody’s money is safe anymore.

Posted by: Dave C | March 15, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

“SUMMERS: We’d love to see Senator McConnell’s concrete
alternatives that gets closer to a balanced budget. The situation the
president inherited of nearly $1 trillion deficits, before he did
anything, came at a time — came at a time when it was a Republican
president and a Republican Congress that were making the decisions.”
George, if this is true, you’re guilty of journalistic malpractice.

Posted by: drjohn | March 15, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

“What that company did, the way it was not regulated, the way no one was watching, what’s proved necessary, it is outrageous,”
To say there weren’t regulations is just crazy, every one of these companies had the best regulation of all until the govt. stepped in and that is, if you do stupid things, you fail.
This is just one more example of the slippery slope that goes along with these bailouts and what happens when in the end they will fail anyway because the same stupid people are in charge.
You might as well take this TAXPAYER money and light a match to it.

Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | March 15, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

I don’t think this is a Republican thing or a Democrat thing. It seems both sides see these bonuses as being rip-offs. Now is the time for the two parties to unite and take care of the crooks at AIG.

Posted by: dramaguy | March 15, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

I was always under the impression that a bonus was a “pay for performance” perk when a company was profitable. These bonuses certainly can’t be “pay for performance” since these clowns drove the company into the ground. Also if you call these bonuses “retention payments” it still doesn’t work- these losers should NOT be retained!

Posted by: chuck | March 15, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

What an arrogance by the CEO to tell that AIG will loose the “Best and Brightest”. If they were that smart, they wouldn’t have run AIG into the ditch and let it beg money from the tax payers to survive.
I’m not a legal expert, but the contracts are null and void as it was signed by a privately owned entity. Since, the last 6 months the ownership has changed and the new owner (The Govt.) calls the shots. Taking shelter under contracts is garbage and the CEO is protecting his employees under this pretext.
Attorney General Holder should send a directive saying that the contracts are null and void and asking AIG to write new ones without any bonuses for senior executives. If they need bonuses let them go…they should be glad that they have a tax payer funded job when everyone else is hurting…

Posted by: Yogi Sharma | March 15, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

We’re going to become a nation of martial law if Bamy gives AIG the money. Mar my words. There will be rioting in the streets and martial law will be imposed. Go ahead, Bamy. Give your supporters our great great grand kids money. I dare you.

Posted by: WhatChange? | March 15, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Take the Money Back! LET THEM FAIL!
then who are they goin to sue?

Posted by: Swpnclr | March 15, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

So these AIG employees broke the law falsifying documents on insuring risking mortgages and now want the law to protect them on their bonus contract? How convenient. Let’s bring on these threats of lawsuits and we will see how they can defend their actions in a court room.

Posted by: Don | March 15, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Im sooooooo tired of all this corruption
Bonuses, Baiouts, and lobbyist BS
America wake up

Posted by: capt norm | March 15, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

I say stop the bonuses and let them sue! If we are going to spend billions of dollars to rescue AIG from itself, then I think it’s worth investing millions of dollars to fight the bonuses, which total hundreds of millions of dollars. I guarantee that in this environment, a settlement would be reached, and the millions of dollars spent on fighting the bonuses would lead to 10x or more in savings on these bonuses.

Posted by: bob | March 15, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

HOW CROOKED IS WASHINGTON???? They are all crooked thugs and all AMERICA now knows it. AIG big shots are milking the AMERICAN people and we are letting our pathetic leaders get away with this crime of stealing from the US taxpayers. Do not people care when they are getting raped? Apparently, people are too stupid to have leaders and man it really shows. How in the world are we to survive with such CROOKED leaders in WASHINGTON and dumb people voting for them(repubs and dems alike)but now it is maily democrats who are in charge. HOW SICK are we as a people!!!

Posted by: rockychance | March 15, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Simply Outrageous!! These Wall Streets gang bang us through President Obama and Treasury Tim. There is nothing we can do about.
Stop all the bailouts. Spend money where we need the mosts.

Posted by: Carlos | March 15, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

AIG’s insurance companies seek out every loop hole they can to deny a claim, yet management feels they need to uphold the bonus contracts for their incompetent employees??
Send Liddy back to Allstate and find someone who has some balls.

Posted by: bahia | March 15, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Virtually moments before he moved into the White House, Obama stunningly nominated 3 tax cheats in a row. Daschle and another withdrew their nomination. Timothy Geithner got pushed through. It was Obama total slap in the face to the millions who voted for strict ethics, but Obama got his man in power. Obama had argued that Geithner was SOOOOO unique and important to the “recovery.” Basically a fear tactic. When Geithber met with Congress, though, THEY were stunned that he presented them with virtually no ideas and no plan after having a month to prepare for the meeting. AIG will get their way. It was INSANE for Obama & Company to dish out ANY of OUR money without strict, strict legal stipulations. That has continued and the results will probably be catastrophic. Cognitively, what is happening is that huge, huge resources are being dished out in lax fashion. After all, what’s a few million or tens of millions when you have a questionable trillion dollar “stimulus” program. Pretty insane that Obama often chides the executives AFTER forking over cash to keep them alive and eating….

Posted by: marat | March 15, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Well, it appears ABC NEWS is deleting any reference to the quote from Summers as soon as it is posted. Typical sychophantic response to being caught in a lie. You think it okay to trick the American people into believing that the Dems had nothing to do with the deficits of 07, 08 and 09 when indeed they were in charge of Congress, as the Obama Administration’s point man wants to trick the public into believing?
That’s change we can believe in? Straight lies via propaganda delivered by ABC News to millions?
Seriously?
Here is the quote and Georgie boy’s failure to correct Summers LIE:
SUMMERS: We’d love to see Senator McConnell’s concrete
alternatives that gets closer to a balanced budget. The situation the
president inherited of nearly $1 trillion deficits, before he did
anything, came at a time — came at a time when it was a Republican
president and a Republican Congress that were making the decisions.
……..
STEPHANOPOULOS: OK, Larry Summers, thanks very much for your
time this morning.
SUMMERS: Thank you.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 15, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

We’re going to become a nation of martial law if Bamy gives AIG the money. Mar my words. There will be rioting in the streets and martial law will be imposed. Go ahead, Bamy. Give your supporters our great great grand kids money. I dare you.
……I already spoke of the martial law subject…..Google “topix end of world begins oct 2008″ and see for yourself

Posted by: Herbert Wetherby | March 15, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Let them sue. Call their bluff. Wanna bet not a single one of them will sue? The last thing they want is their picture plastered across EVERY SINGLE newspaper and nightly newscast. NOT A SINGLE PERSON would sue.

Posted by: Reality Check | March 15, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

let the bums fail…why are we helping these people???
no more money for aig,,,EVER…

Posted by: carlos ortiz | March 15, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

This the most pathetic story I’ve read since they started giving away taxpayer money last year. I’m what you could described as very angry. Maybe discusted is more like it. I hope these vipers eventually lose as much as we have in our retirement accounts, not to mention the tax money they are stealing. Totally unacceptable!

Posted by: LongT | March 15, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

So apparently bonuses are not tied to any performance criteria. Wonderful! What a bunch of snakes!

Posted by: LongT | March 15, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

I never take the time to fill in any of these comment forms, but this action is beyond the pale. As a laid off worker, i am totally disgusted that the govt still makes me pay taxes and then turns around and takes those dollars i really can’t ford and gives it to a company of f***-ups in the form of bonuses. Lawsuits? Fine, Stop the bonuses, fire the “worst and the stupidest” for total incompetence. If they take them to court, AIG can use some of the money for legal fees. It is either this or the govt should put a halt to all future bail-out dollars and let this company go down the tubes where it belongs. absolutely sickening.

Posted by: Michael Piacentini | March 15, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Hey this is true capitalism at its best. This is what the republicans have pushed for all these years. The republicans have always supported a lack of regulations, and a “Free” market…where execs are free to do whatever they want.

Posted by: Paul | March 15, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

This is precisely why AIG, GM, and everyone else should NEVER have received bailout money in the FIRST place! Why the heck are we as taxpayers being forced to subsidize bad judgement? The excuse that “oh my God, jobs will be lost” is BS. By the time this is over, instead of a few big companies going down, it will be ten times that number of the little guys, who supply 90% of the jobs in this country and never get a dollar in bonuses to do their job right. Any more bailouts and I will close my doors out of principle……….

Posted by: Paul Mennick | March 15, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Go ahead and sue! I’ll bet the legal prosecution fees would be less than the tax money we gave them. I’m hopping mad! Bums!!!

Posted by: LongT | March 15, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Obama is a liar. Summers said the government can’t do anything about AIG paying bonuses to top executives. The government can demand AIG return the $170 billion dollars they gave them. And then they should not give them any more money. AIG is bankrupt and their CEO has the gall to say they need to give bonuses to keep the best and brightest working there. What a joke. For putting AIG into bankruptcy they all deserve to be fired not given a bonus.

Posted by: Sandy | March 15, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I still have my Obama sign up in my yard, but I must say, I am very disheartened that Tim Geitner is so incredibly TONE DEAF! If you can manipulate contracts when it comes to mortgage cram downs, or the auto labor contracts, YOU CAN FIND A WAY LEGALLY TO TELL THESE EXECS TO GO FLY A KITE! And I want to see some names – who are these people who are putting THEIR pocketbooks ahead of America’s at this critical juncture? We need a HALL OF SHAME where Americans can see who the culprits are who are getting away with their hard earned money in the form of government bail out bonuses.

Posted by: Deborah from NC | March 15, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

George — that’s a good one, AIG’s CEO Edward Liddy stating: “the government’s demands could affect AIG’s ability to retain ‘the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses.’” Are not they the ones who created their company’s problems in the first place? Perhaps, “the best and brightest thieves,” but no more than that. Golden Parachutes and Job Security? I don’t think so….

Posted by: Spartan Phoenix777 | March 15, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Ladies of the night always get the money up front. When Obama’s team gave AIG the money, a legally binding contract forbiding large bonuses should have been included. I voted for obama, but this is his fault. He gave away money without the appropriate strings attached. President Obama, you are about to distribute a lot more money, please think ahead.

Posted by: Kenneth Pennington | March 15, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Say it 3 times – Wall Street Greed, Wall Street Greed, Wall Street Greed. AIG, I will never do business with you again. There are other insurance companies and believe me I will take time to find them the next time I need one!!!

Posted by: JimM | March 15, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I am so tired of this issue of “the sanctity of the contract.” What BS! If we don’t have the laws now to vacate destructive contracts, then let’s suspend any payments under existing contracts and move to implement a new law ASAP. Are our political leaders completely devoid of creativity? This repeated story of “There’s nothing we can do about it now, but we’ll fix it in the future.” is absolute hogwash.

Posted by: CitizenPat | March 15, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

So, Obama doesn’t like it, but there’s absolutely nothing he can do about it? It’s a matter or contracts? Bull S#it! Take the money back, then let AIG try to live up to those “contracts”.

Posted by: Gotterdammerung | March 15, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

President Obama, the American people demand thatyou require AIG to return the money, immediately!!!!
Enough is Enough!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | March 15, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

OUR COUNTRY DID NOT GET THIS GREAT BY LETTING THE VULTURES DICTATE TO US. MR PRESIDENT, DON’T LET THIS HAPPEN. WE BELIEVED YOU WHEN YOU PROMISED THAT THE GREED ETC, WOULD END. I AM ONE OF YOUR SUPPORTERS
GOD BLESS

Posted by: JOSEPH MCALOON | March 15, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

The CONTRACTS would have been null and void had AIG not received a bailout and allowed to fail. AIG, under the circumstances, should not honor the and let the lawsuits begin. 1) The contracts being so one sided would allow AIG to argue against them, 2) If the greedy and abusive CEOS and execs are that ignorant to suit after they have already been overpaid – let them – see how far they get, 3) If suit is brought – AIG can countersuit the execs and CEOS for corporate sabotage and neglect. The CEOS and execs (already overpaid to such an excessive degree) lack all integrity and human decency to even accept any bonuses at this point.

Posted by: speterson | March 15, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

SKULL & BONES people. Hey Bush said to Obama give him the Money Congress, so he can fix this mess. WHAT MESS? it’s all make-believe joy-ride fraud Crises. Nothing is real everything is a dream. What we have is outright Robbery of the American Financial System by a bunch of Harvard graduate smart-asses.

Posted by: JImtheDickFck | March 15, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

President Obama, we the American people are mad as h-e-l-l about this and your point man says there nothing you can do. Sir, you are the leader of the free world!! Your integrity is at stake!!! Sir, you had better do something!!!!

Posted by: JimM | March 15, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

This is sick. Why in the world are we helping these companies that keep sending millions to people who do not know how to run a company? They cry yet get paid millions on the “average joes” taxes. Furthermore, I fear this is just the tip of the iceberg. Look what Enterprise rent-a-car did to get bailout funds:
http://www.butasforme.com/2009/02/25/alert-enterprise-rent-a-car-may-have-fired-employees-as-fake-evidence-when-lobbing-for-bailout-money/

Posted by: jax | March 15, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Secondly, Do we honestly believe either the Dem’s or Repuke’s will save us from Themselves? DO You? If you do you are sorely mistaken. These MEN are thieves. This government let’s white collar college educated Ccksuckers who belong to their little group sex parties. Rule us? The commmon American man and woman. This is nothing short of King of England, Tax Tax Tax, bend over the people and brake their Backs Slavery for EVERY American. Folks we need a REVOLUTION and we need to go up there to congress and senate with Guns and do something about this SH!T !!!!!!!!

Posted by: Cockjthe DogWagger | March 15, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

If this company AIG is in trouble due to a problem in Great Britain then let the British Government Bail them out.
The U.S. Government must be fair and must begin to let business run on level playing field. This is one of the problems of U.S., businesses do not compete on level playing field.
AIG is now on big advantage over any other insurance company since they have unearned free moeny to play with. Not $50.00 but Billions. This is unfair, if they go out of business, other companies will pick up the slack. This is not the 1st time a company will go out of business in the U.S. and it will not be the last. LET THEM BE ON THEIR OWN. The great talent will not have any money for bonus. If they are that great, then let them prove themselves.

Posted by: Victor | March 15, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

You people on here make me lauph seriously. You scream and yell yet nothing will happen and you will do nothing about it. They will get there bonuses and you will pay for it. Your representitives are in the pockets of these rich CEOs how do you think they got your money in the first place? Instead of biching you should do something about it. Take back your government before its too late. But you are all to lazy to do it. If we all stood together we might get something done but tht wont happen. Take control call these scum bag congressmen and your president and tell them in no uncertain terms that if they allow this to happen they will be out of a job in the next election.

Posted by: Mike | March 15, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

“Administration Is Open to Taxing Health Benefits”
McCain got crucified for this becasue that POS Biden continually mispresented the proposal. The idea was to remove the exclusion, which is a World War II anachronism, and to provide a corresponding tax credit that would help to finance families’ purchase of individual, portable policies. I think it would have created some genuine competition to drive down costs of insurance, and it would have certainly improved the problem of portability.
It appears that Obama looks to tax without the corresponding credit.
We’re screwed.

Posted by: Tim | March 15, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

ou people on here make me lauph seriously.
What? Are you serious? You think we dont know this? Then you’re as lame as congress moron. WE DID CALL on a little telephone and tell our congressional azzholes NOT to vote for the Bailout and They Did. Like I said. What they ONLY UNDERSTAND is violence. Nothing short fo CIVIL WAR will ever, get it EVER Fix this kind of bullsh!t going on today. They know it and laugh at you and us for crabbing about it on dialogue billboards such as this. CIVIL WAR People. That’s the only way. Ok, don’t believe me. This will go on for 8 more years. Fine

Posted by: HeyStupidJackasses | March 15, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

They need the bonuses “to retain the best and brightest”!?? Their “best and brightest” ran AIG into the ground requiring a massive government bailout. How arrogant and delusional. I strongly agree with the line of thinking that no business in America should be able to get so big that if it collapsed it would threaten collapse of the entire system. There should be no bailouts and companies should be restricted to a size where we can let them fail. To reward with bonuses outright failure is so twisted. It’s not capitalism, it’s not socialism, it’s just plain sick.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 15, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

I just have to say this because it’s the best thing I’ve heard from government official yet and that was Ron Paul. With this Stimulus package & what they should do with it…”Instead of bailing out all these corporations, SEND A CHECK OUT TO EVERY AMERICAN PERSON.” He says that WILL get the ECONOMY going again and let the Banks & AIG fail. Which I think when push comes to shove, those businesses would seem to able to pull a few million out of thin air or from their safe’s behind the big painting on the wall in their offices and/or corporate jets.

Posted by: Barbi47 | March 15, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

If it is in the contract and they “have to” pay them it is not called “bonus” any more. Bonus is not guaranteed and is paid upon reaching certain goal, not upon destroying the company.
I lost my job and half my IRA because of their decision and my tax money is rewarding them. God bless the USA.

Posted by: MJA | March 15, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Recall the bailout money and begin prosecution of these best and brightest The smart money at this point would be on the whistle blowers!! They in some cases collect a portion of the money recovered. Any of you know where to point the fingers and help the US find these, “most desired, best, and brightest employees”.. You should be contacting your local Democratic Representatives.

Posted by: rightbehind | March 15, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

I have worked for AIG for years. It is not the auto insurance division this is involved in this crap. It is the finacial division. I also agree that none of the executives or managers should recieve bonuses. The “REGULAR” employees were told at the beginning of 2009 that there will be no raises for 2009. If we cannot get a raise after years of service, NO ONE should get a bonus for running our company into the toilet!

Posted by: Lady | March 15, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Send subpoenas instead. Let these best and brightest have their day in court. Most likely sitting in the jury will be someone who has lost or knows a family member that has suffered as a result of the economic theories of these, “best and brightest”. They’ll get what they deserve then

Posted by: rifghtbehind | March 15, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Shut them down. We have no need to subsidize insurance companies. As we saw in the aftermath of Katrina big insurance treats us like human garbage. As far as I am concerned big insurance company executives are slumdog millionaires.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 15, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

I think it’s safe to say we are all mad as hell and we are not going to take it any more.
We have the power. Write and call your Congressmen and Senators. NO MONEY FOR AIG. We can also choose to take our business from them or any company they own and give it to someone else.
If the government is going to continue to pump OUR MONEY into this beast, we have the power to take down their business by not patronizing them. TAKE YOUR BUSINESS ELSEWHERE AMERICA! RAISE YOUR VOICES!! NO BUSINESS DEALINGS WITH AIG STARTING TODAY!!!

Posted by: anobid | March 15, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

All bow before the Great Speculus the Speculator. He uses his mighty Hedge to make derivatives out of all who are insolent to his free market system. He rewardeth those that make him wealthy. Woe! be unto all that should question his economics. His republican disciple’s come before him to lay waste to all Great Nations near and far that they all might become one under his prospectus.

Posted by: rightbehind | March 15, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Let’s keep it simple. If you do business with AIG, stop. Move your business to a competing firm. Customer attrition is the only thing that will make AIG pay attention. We will not stand for this.

Posted by: Boston | March 15, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Our politicians are surprised at the millions in bonuses? It all an act on their part. These bonuses have been an ongoing practice for years and Congress certainly had to know that the practice would continue. Further, Congress had to approve of the practice or they would have required AIG to eliminate bonuses as a condition of the bailout.
Nope – our corrupt Congress knew exactly what would happen, and the bungling oaf of the Treasury Secretary did too. It’s high time that Geithner resigned, and every member of Congress who voted for the bailout to be voted out of office at the next election.
We need a new American Revolution to replace our Congress and the newly crowned King Obama….

Posted by: KW | March 15, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

I’m a facts loving fool; so I found malfax’s long treatise interesting. A study of the economics of the Holy Roman Empire would prove a case of daja-vu for us. And the battles between the Patricians and the Plebeians continue….

Posted by: Spartan Phoenix777 | March 15, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

the total amount to be paid on the bonus is probably minor compared with the total amount of bailout money already promised to be paid by Fed to AIG, which is about 170 billion dollars, a truly outrageous number !

Posted by: austin | March 15, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

AIG states: the government’s demands could affect AIG’s ability to retain “the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses” if “employees believe that their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury.”
I say: You don’t have the best and brightest talent or you wouldn’t be in the mess you’re in right now.
Fire them all and get some honest, decent workers.

Posted by: Lynn | March 15, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

There is a movement…it’s starting to undulate, it’s creating itself, being felt by all Americans…those who have been cheated, left bereft, thrown out of their homes, plundered of their hard earned efforts over the last 30 years…there is a movement, and it’s coming and it has your name on it, and you will join it…you will join it because you all will know someone, a friend, a family member, all ages, all races useful, decent, living on the streets, living in garages, shacking up in tents and shacks, living in their cars, and overflowing in the parks…good, decent, law abiding, rule following Americans…when they swarm, you will join it…when they cry, you will hear it and come…when they scream, you will join them and then something this way comes…you will do something then…then our police will enforce those swarms, but then the swarms will overcome the police…and the government will collapse. And a new time and place will come…and we will swear that we will learn from this, the past. Until then…do what you can…

Posted by: Movement | March 15, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Are we being unfair to AIG? It seems AIG is spreading the bailout money around. It is reported the lobbyists in Washington went wild! We now have all the missing Billions of Dollars in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. with all the Billions of Dollars of bail out money, becoming Trillions of Dollars, that is also missing! Is it true from the reports in Europe that the Swiss Banks are having trouble putting all the new U.S. 100 dollar currency into secure vaults? If they run out of room will they have to take some of the gold bars with the Swastika imprint on them and put them somewhere else? A lot of American, Jewish, Russian, European, Chinese and others blood paid for those gold bars. Now, again a lot of blood from people around the world, is paying for all those new crisp 100 hundred dollar bills (currency) being hidden in these vaults. Do you think the Swiss Banks as reported last week will really give out the information of all the deposits of everyone using their banking system? Do you think if they did some our economic problems in the United States would be solved? – With Blessings to all.

Posted by: JR Johnson | March 15, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Can’t abrogate existing contracts? Fine, create a “deck of cards” of all the most egregious executives who gorged at the trough of bailout funds…put their faces out there on every billboard, newspaper, TV station, and internet site in the country….let’s ensure they live in complete shame for the rest of their days. These cloistered scumbags are giving the American people the middle finger and they ought not get to do so behind the gilded gates.

Posted by: cameotoo | March 15, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Outrageous is putting it mildly. AIG can fail as far as I am concerned – once they are forced to return all the money they have already gotten. Then, I couldn’t care less if they all rot. If they can’t see the trees for the forest, get out and leave the rest of us in peace.

Posted by: durrs | March 15, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

“Retain the best and brightest talent”? He means the jackasses who orchestrated the situation AIG is in I assume? Of course yes I do realize that the only true jackasses are the poor stupid taxpayers! “Duh, lookey! I’m watching the elected royalty who helped start the meltdown shovel my money to the criminals who ran it! You know, the best and brightest”!

Posted by: Asannidsay Yupper | March 15, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

I’M MAD AS HELL, AND I’M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!!!

Posted by: Aaron | March 15, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Well, it appears ABC NEWS is deleting any reference to the quote from Summers as soon as it is posted. Typical sychophantic response to being caught in a lie. You think it okay to trick the American people into believing that the Dems had nothing to do with the deficits of 07, 08 and 09 when indeed they were in charge of Congress, as the Obama Administration’s point man wants to trick the public into believing?
That’s change we can believe in? Straight lies via propaganda delivered by ABC News to millions?
Seriously?
Here is the quote and Georgie boy’s failure to correct Summers LIE:
SUMMERS: We’d love to see Senator McConnell’s concrete
alternatives that gets closer to a balanced budget. The situation the
president inherited of nearly $1 trillion deficits, before he did
anything, came at a time — came at a time when it was a Republican
president and a Republican Congress that were making the decisions.
……..
STEPHANOPOULOS: OK, Larry Summers, thanks very much for your
time this morning.
SUMMERS: Thank you.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 15, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Well, it appears ABC NEWS is deleting any reference to the quote from Summers as soon as it is posted. Typical sychophantic response to being caught in a lie. You think it okay to trick the American people into believing that the Dems had nothing to do with the deficits of 07, 08 and 09 when indeed they were in charge of Congress, as the Obama Administration’s point man wants to trick the public into believing?
That’s change we can believe in? Straight lies via propaganda delivered by ABC News to millions?
Seriously?
Here is the quote and Georgie boy’s failure to correct Summers LIE:
SUMMERS: We’d love to see Senator McConnell’s concrete
alternatives that gets closer to a balanced budget. The situation the
president inherited of nearly $1 trillion deficits, before he did
anything, came at a time — came at a time when it was a Republican
president and a Republican Congress that were making the decisions.
……..
STEPHANOPOULOS: OK, Larry Summers, thanks very much for your
time this morning.
SUMMERS: Thank you.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 15, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

As I understand it, the payment structure for AIG employees (and others in the field) consist of a base salary with a certain variable incentive ‘bonus’ each year based upon individual performance.
This arrangement is not unlike that of an auto salesman whose pay is partly commission on each car sold, or even that of the average waitress whose hourly base pay is minimal because both she and the restaurant owner know she’ll be getting tips as well.
I’m not an employee of AIG, so I’m not singing for my supper here. I just think too many people might be having a violently negative, visceral reaction to the single word “bonus” without considering that a lot of people in our economy get paid for performance in the same way and whose families rely on that money to pay the monthly bills.

Posted by: H.M. | March 15, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Well, it appears ABC NEWS is deleting any reference to the quote from Summers as soon as it is posted. Typical sychophantic response to being caught in a lie. You think it okay to trick the American people into believing that the Dems had nothing to do with the deficits of 07, 08 and 09 when indeed they were in charge of Congress, as the Obama Administration’s point man wants to trick the public into believing?
That’s change we can believe in? Straight lies via propaganda delivered by ABC News to millions?
Seriously?
Here is the quote and Georgie boy’s failure to correct Summers LIE:
SUMMERS: We’d love to see Senator McConnell’s concrete
alternatives that gets closer to a balanced budget. The situation the
president inherited of nearly $1 trillion deficits, before he did
anything, came at a time — came at a time when it was a Republican
president and a Republican Congress that were making the decisions.
……..
STEPHANOPOULOS: OK, Larry Summers, thanks very much for your
time this morning.
SUMMERS: Thank you.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | March 15, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

t’s very odd that all of these elected officals are expressing such anger at the private sector over paying out bonus money. Did you know that all of our elected congressmen voted about 15 years ago to give themselves periodic raises, which they have an opportunity every time it comes up to vote “yay” or “nay” on actually receiving that raise? And for 2009, the year when so many Americans are losing their homes, their jobs, their savings, . . . our dear congressmen voted “Sure, we’ll take that raise”. I know it’s not the same in dollar figures as this AIG thing, but it is exactly the same in principle. Oh, I forgot, congressmen do not have principles.

Posted by: Andrew in the Desert | March 15, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Take the money back and try the people who took unfair advantage of the situation for fraud. Leave it to AIG to continue the fine capitalistic practices that sunk their company and devalued the national currency. But that’s the inevitable end game of capitalism isn’t it? Consume, deplete, move on to the next profitable target.

Posted by: foxisms | March 15, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Unfornately, AIG knew the US government will not let them fail. Banks and investors from all over the world have been financing the American dream by buying up mortgage-backed securities. AIG was the guy who received insurance payments to guarantee continued payments from those mortgage. Well…people stop making mortgage payments and foreclosed on their house…now AIG doesn’t have enough capital to pay the insured. Let AIG fail? Not exactly the right way to win back the confidence of investors. People need to understand where the money is coming from when they go to the bank and apply for a loan. If AIG fails, we will see double digits mortgage rate in no time. AIG executives know that the US government won’t let them fail, and they are dragging around Bernake and Geitner by their balls. When AIG fails, that means the end of Wall Streets. Like Bernake said at a hearing, he was angry at AIG but he had no choice.
Perhaps the US government should bypass AIG and the banking system, socialize health care, loan money directly to people, and take money from the rich and give them to the poor so everyone becomes middle class…wouldn’t that be great? Oh wait a second…then we would become a socialist society, wouldn’t we?

Posted by: Dr George | March 15, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Mr. Libby, you stated that you are obligated under contract to pay these bonus. I know a little about bonus and these type of bonus are based on results. Looking at your financial statements for the last year, none of these contract will stand up in court unless you have lied in your financial statements. Mr. Geithner, to keep faith with the American people, you must force them to cut the bonus, they can’t be justified and Mr. Libby knows it, its his lawyer talking.

Posted by: Dana | March 15, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

OK—-Well let’s see if the Obama administration can deliver—– and control the outrageous misue of taxpayers’ money—— or do we simply have an empty suit running the show !!!
All talk and no substance!!!!

Posted by: roscoe | March 15, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Then perhaps the real answer is to see how many of those demanding bonuses should be brought up on charges and proceed to break AIG and all the other “too large to fail” corporations into smaller more manageable companies with a strict prohibition on buying and selling themselves and each other.

Posted by: jan | March 15, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Where is all the outrage from the American citizens?
The UAW members are expected to break their contracts for benefits already earned with the auto companies but the fat cats on Wall Street are not. Give Me A Break!
vnvet69 | Mar 15, 2009 9:53:56 AM is right. You people better get your head out of the sand and pay attention to what is going on in the WORLD. Take the time to Google-the Bilderbergers, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, CIA and yes even the Vatican. Good reading material is a book by Jim Marrs, Rule by Secrecy.
Pay Attention Everybody

Posted by: gimmeabreak | March 15, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Let them sue. NOT A SINGLE ONE of these clowns would have the stones to sue. Their names would be plastered all over the evening news, every website in America, and every newspaper in this country. They would be pariahs. They would be spit on when walking down the street. Their children would be mercilessly bullied at school. There’s not a single person among them that would want to put themselves or their families through the public ridicule they would have to endure. If they deserved the money, that’s one thing.

Posted by: Call Their Bluff | March 15, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Americans are verbalizing their outrage against the fat cats. They receive mega pay scales while laying off thousands who were not at the helm of the company but merely doing their jobs according to poorly designed administrative policies set forth by upper level management and executives. The innocent had suffer the consequences and all the while top management is still making millions, and have retained their positions. When Thain had refurbished his office at Merrill, while the company was failing, for one million dollars,…could of saved 12 jobs with that money. These practices continue, we’ll experience some tea parties across the nation, also, around the world…consider this, scientists and researchers make less money(the base of our innovators) than these paper pushers and and ironically for which we scramble like ants for their crumbs.

Posted by: Phallon | March 15, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Am wondering if ABC forwards these remarks to their guests of the day… Any guesses?

Posted by: K.M. | March 15, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Just publish a list of names and addresses of those accepting the bonuses. If these employees are going to be bole enough take my money, it should be public record who the thieves are and where they can be found.

Posted by: lr3921 | March 15, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Contact the White House. Tell them these flimsy excuses of 1) there are contracts and 2) these people will walk if they don’t get their bonuses are both ridiculous. Let the scammers sue. Let them be pariahs for the rest of their lives. The only way we stop this is to flood the politicians with our outrage:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

Posted by: Take Action | March 15, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Congress and the administration have only themselves to blame. Each time the government sticks its nose to business, it screws it up. AIG made no commitment to the government, no rules were established; just a rush to hand out tax payer’s money. Either let the free market decide which companies should survive or standby to watch money wasted. This same Congress, in its hypocritical method, attaches over 8000 earmarks to a bill we tax payer’s must now be burdened. Congress deserves it poor rating and the president conveniently chose NOT to display leadership to clean this mess up; no integrity to be found anywhere, in either party. Tea party time.

Posted by: fedup_11 | March 15, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

If these were the “best and brightest” why is AIG in such trouble. Also, who is hiring now? No one can afford to hire during this down turn. Let the “best and brightest” go!

Posted by: W.R.P | March 15, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

If these were the “best and brightest” why is AIG in such trouble. Also, who is hiring now? No one can afford to hire during this down turn. Let the “best and brightest” go!

Posted by: W.R.P | March 15, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

lr3921 is exactly right. AT A MINIMUM, if we pay these bonuses, the names of those bold enough to say they deserve these bonuses should be plastered across the Internet and be listed on the nightly news on every major channel.

Posted by: Sunshine The Best Disinfectant | March 15, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

The Senate was going to attach real limits on executive compensation to the Stimulus Bill.
Then Timothy Geithner convinced them not to.
The Stimulus Bill just contains meaningless limits on executive compensation.
==========================
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/business/economy/10bailout.html
Mr. Geithner, who will announce the broad outlines of the plan on Tuesday, successfully fought against more severe limits on executive pay for companies receiving government aid.
======================================
Without Timothy Geithner’s interference, the contracts for the bonuses at AIG may have been null-and-void.

Posted by: Eric Jaffa | March 15, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

This is just a tiny fraction of the problems you get when you let government interfere with business. AIG should have gone bankrupt and solved its own issues. Instead, the government puts in money, and they tried to impose some populist nonsense on AIG which probably isn’t legal but sounds good. The government is always the problem and it is never the solution. Obama is a complete loser in over his head and obviously not up to the job. A 1 termer for sure.

Posted by: brian | March 15, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

THE RICH GET RICHER AND POOR GET POORER!

Posted by: EmptyWallet | March 15, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I want my tax money back or I am going to sue. What’s that? Right, I am a measly Amreican pleebe with no right to have my tax money returned from the best and brightest at AIG!

Posted by: jl | March 15, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Just pass a law taxing all corporate bonuses at 95%. Let them get paid out, keeping the contracts in place, but tax the #*(#*! out of them!

Posted by: Tom | March 15, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

I just watched the George Stephanopoulos “Round Table” clip that included a segment on the John Stewart vs. Jim Cramer battle last week. It was interesting to see the networks (including ABC) distancing themselves from Cramer as if he is a totally different entity. Cramer is a buffoon and may give the message differently than the rest of the so called financial journalists but his message was the same as all the others.

Posted by: dan | March 15, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

This is almost as good as the “Were afraid to tell who get the bonuses crap that just came out of these brain surgeons. These ARE the people that (in large part) ARE responsible for the mess we are ALL in. They need to be fired and where even remotely possible, criminally charged. That they collectively have the balls to say that this was, or is not, in there ability to stop continues to perpetuate the arrogance that got us here in the first place. ENOUGH ALREADY.
Fire the “executive management” as well as the so call “Board of Directors” as well as the “compensation committee” nonsense and replace them all. People, they are literally stealing OUR money AND our futures.

Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | March 15, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

This is almost as good as the “Were afraid to tell who get the bonuses crap that just came out of these brain surgeons. These ARE the people that (in large part) ARE responsible for the mess we are ALL in. They need to be fired and where even remotely possible, criminally charged. That they collectively have the balls to say that this was, or is not, in there ability to stop continues to perpetuate the arrogance that got us here in the first place. ENOUGH ALREADY.
Fire the “executive management” as well as the so call “Board of Directors” as well as the “compensation committee” nonsense and replace them all. People, they are literally stealing OUR money AND our futures.

Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | March 15, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

While AIG should have failed in the first place, we cannot forget who gave them the money in the first place: our own government. They are much to blame for this fiasco. There were many people who opposed the bailout of AIG and our own representatives still allowed it to happen. We need to get our money back from AIG since it’s our tax money at stake. Let AIG fail, we still have many choices to choose an insurance provider. Do not vote for any incumbent senators or representatives. We need fresh blood in Washington and in our own state and local governments
We can still make a difference!!!

Posted by: Ernest | March 15, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Call the Bluff: I too have anger, however, not to that extent…never take it out on children and need not be physical with anyone…violence begets violence…however, we should demand their positions should actually go to the brightest and best…plenty of intelligent people out there who would do their jobs for less money, also, many of those laid off at the lower end had gotten the pink slip due to circumstance of poor administrative policies set forth by the top tier…can’t comprehend the logic of why top level execs were retained…it was their poor policies and leadership that caused the giant to go into the red and innocent people had suffer the consequence. I guess this was scapegoating and besides easier to lay off those who were actually the brightest so as not to have any threats of them receiving the pink slip.

Posted by: Phallon | March 15, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Well I guess the Obama admin needs to step and do something about this. It is our money and AIG has ruined our economy and their people who did this get millions in bonuses. NO! Obama needs to stop this.

Posted by: Kris | March 15, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

If GM, Ford, and Chrysler were made to renegotiate their contracts with the UAW, I think AIG could renegotiate their contracts. With unemployment at an all time high, I think they could hire someone that is willing to accept less money. Manufacturing companies fire people and hire someone else for a lot less pay every day. AIG should think about doing just that.

Posted by: Holland Girl | March 15, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

When a company goes bankrupt, which is what technically happened to AIG, save for the government’s 80% purchase of AIG via the bailout, all promises for bonues ceased. Like Enron, the pension ain’t there, Enronites. It’s been wiped out by higher ups who weren’t scrupulous. This is a no brainer. The government calls in its bailout to AIG and takes it over 100% and those who don’t get their bonuses to live on the rest of their lives since their AIG work will keep them unemployed the rest of their lives can simply retrain to work as greeters at Walmart. You own this Obama. Step up to the plate and be a leader, or plan to greet customers at Walmart in 2013. You’re not going to hang anymore of this on Bush, Cheney or the Republicans. You’re the President now. Act like one.

Posted by: Rob | March 15, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Don’t Give Me Great Executives. Give Me Lucky Executives. AIG executives should be paying us for being such losers and still having a paycheck. Many better workers are now unemployed. Who said these fat greedy slobs are “good”?

Posted by: geneonlbk | March 15, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

If AIG thinks the people they have at the top are the “best and brightest” talent, and that they need to keep these people, they are in worse shape than we thought!!! Imagine how bad this would be if they had lower paid “bad executives” at the top!!!!! These “best and brightest” have run the company into the ground and now want bonuses !!! I am very certain that for a mere, oh say, $5M, I could have run that company into the ground just as good, if not better, than these morons have – an amazing cost savings !!! My application goes into tomorrow !!!

Posted by: Norm | March 15, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

I thought the Democraps were going to stop all this Republican driven garbage.
Looks like the only thing that changed was the people in DC who are shafting us.
Hey, Obombma, can you say ‘one termer’?

Posted by: jaki30 | March 15, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

AIG Posted The Largest Corporate Quarterly Loss In U.S. History Of $61,700,000,000. Yet They Are Giving Away $165,000,000 To Retain Their Best People. YOU DON’T HAVE BEST PEOPLE!!!!
Give Greed An Inch It Will Steal Everything It Can. We The Taxpayers, The Real Americans Suffer.

Posted by: A.C. | March 15, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Boys, boys, boys – you guys are pretty stupid. We give billions of dollars without warrants then are surprised when the one responsible for AiG keep doing things the same old way. AiG wants you to believe they are “too big to let fail”. what arrogance, and idiocracy from our new government “boys” in command. Do you really think things will change if there are not consequences? We the american people are chumps, we should demand change, but don’t seem to have the guts to follow-through, reorganize AiG under chapter 11 – fire the fCEO, ire the whole aboard and all top executives. Insurance is funny money worked around statistics, that fails when you poison the well and give them free cash. Would have been cheaper to have the government back the insured than to reward the incompetent management. Keep drinking your cool-aid.

Posted by: californiagirl | March 15, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Are government workers on our dime ? Of course they are. Ok, let’s here what kinds of outrageous perks they get. Generous health plan, early retirement with double dipping…etc. Where’s all the outrage over that ?

Posted by: Carl | March 15, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

RETAIN THE BEST AND BRIGHTEST??? Where would they go? DO they think a resume showing AIG as the last employer is a GOOD thing?? All of these people have got to get it through their heads that you do not get a bonus for BAD work. Besides, who would they sue? AIG? Its broke. The US GOvernment? Yeah right. LOL

Posted by: kay | March 15, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

I just hope that the grandious plans for government-administered everything that the administration plans and participants will be scrutinized as thoroughly as corporations. Of course this means paperwork, bureaucracy, verfication and administration processes, and the associated costs and overhead to ensure that people are who they claim to be and are receiving benefits to which they are entitled – the same principle objections to government-adminstered plans like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security that are already in place. How, or how, will the President sneak this one past the people?

Posted by: Publius | March 15, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

AIG should change their name to ROA (Rape of America). Let them implode. There are other sources within the insurance world who can absorb there loss. The best way to stimulate the economy is to pass these billions of dollars out to the people.

Posted by: sgtyork111 | March 15, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Maybe these guys are pretty smart, they got Obama to give them billions and contiunue to get more………who is really the less intelligent one in this picture???

Posted by: david | March 15, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

And Attorney General Eric Holder is where?

Posted by: LongT | March 15, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

The current administration can go to the media and rant all they want. The fact is that there is no telling how much AIG gave in campaign monies to the very politicians who now are doing the venting, including Obama!!

Posted by: Steve | March 15, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Thank you, malfax. Wisdom is power. Your comment should be posted on the front page of every newspaper, entered onto every blog, every social networking site, handed out to every student in every high school in America.
Maybe, just maybe, real change will come.

Posted by: Dare2Dream | March 15, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

turn over the name and sddresses of those pukes that took their so called earned bonus and give them to people who have worked all their lives to have a home raise a family pnly to lose their homes to a bank that gives this kind of treatment to joe the average guy.i hope that some of these people mee some night on a dark alley.god bless the banker

Posted by: REDMAN70 | March 15, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Our Government is a joke.
They are bought and paid for by the banking industry and share holders.
Our Government does not work FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
We need to revolutionize THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and bring her back to the PEOPLE.

Posted by: Jim | March 15, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Time for the second American Revolution. We should not be giving money to anyone for this mess. We should be arresting those responsible and give them the same lack of due process they would give an average employee who they beleive did not do their job legally or appropriately. These companies rule with brute force and kangaroo courts and so should we.

Posted by: Roy | March 15, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

AIG executives should be on bended knee apologizing to the American people for the utter mess they created. Instead, they’ve got their grimey hands out looking for millions. AT THE VERY LEAST, the names and addresses of EVERY single person getting a bonus over half a million should be posted on whitehouse.gov. These clowns need to be outed.

Posted by: Despicable | March 15, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I’m pissed off at AIG too http://tinyurl.com/d3n38o

Posted by: Chris McCann | March 15, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

DOROTHY JOHNS wrote: “I voted Democrat, but agree with Republicans abou AIG. These bonuses should not be going forward. This should have been in the agreement when AIG got their first money.”
==========================
The Republicans and Dems. fought AGAINST restricting the bonuses.
Actually, both the GOP and the Dems. agreed in the first bailout bill that they “could not” interfere with bonuses, golden parachutes, etc. that had been legally agreed to prior to the bailout bill.
Then, they told Detroit they wouldn’t get bailed out unless the UAW renegotiated a prior legally binding agreement. Which means, of course, they could have done the same thing to the bankers but chose not to shoot the hand that feeds their campaign coffers.

Posted by: The_Mick | March 15, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Gee did the administartion do a great job researching how our tax money was going to be used…I applaud the AIG Pres for telling the government to go screw themselves…we need to keep these gems that took us down this road.

Posted by: Grant Bishop | March 15, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Of course the President has Presidential Powers to relate the bailout to his Presidential Powers in reserve. The contracts were signed before the bailout, the bailout was part of a special congressional and administration bailout, which makes any order by the President as an addendum to the bailout. The correct legal procedure is to order the bailout returned immediately while they sort it out, and re do it. Of course, Harvard genius over there can’t figure that out.

Posted by: shari74 | March 15, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

The President can freeze the AIG accounts and get an injunction citing “mistake” in the original terms of the bailout, that there was an “omission” of facts by AIG, that there was not full disclosure of their contractual obligations prior to the bailout – so that they could put in provisions to prevent this sort of thing. That’s basically just an injunction and relief issue.

Posted by: shari74 | March 15, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

AIG should get gutted. Boot out the bums. Put government officials and economists in there to get the job down on the cheap. Then break the company up into little tiny insignificant pieces so that if any one piece fails then we don’t need to pay for $0.5 billion is bonuses and $0.2 trillion in wasted money on a company too big to fail.

Posted by: BK | March 15, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

So here I am your basic hard working American. I live a conservative lifestyle even though banks “were” giving money away to all who were able to show they still breathed on a daily basis. I drive used cars that I own even though Detroit could put me in a new one no income needed. Now let me be a small business and run it like AIG and I would be in court. But no in this country the inability to be competitive is rewarded. Build second rate cars we will bail you out. Over state your business abilities we will bail you out. Lie about your credit worthiness we will bail you out. Unless your the average guy who has done the right things, then we will be in your pocket for the lairs, cheaters, and untrustworthy ilk standing in line waiting for my hard earned money. We should not be rewarding failure. Build a better business plan, a better automobile, a better credit system, don’t reward those who have demonstrated that could not do it right the first time, or the hundredth time.

Posted by: Paul | March 15, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

The claim that the government had to let AIG pay off its bonus contracts sounds bogus. Why not demand the execs renounce the contracts before giving AIG the bailout? If the execs say they’ll quit and go elsewhere: where would they go? Who would want them?

Posted by: shrinkrapper | March 15, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

NO ONE, absolutely no one should be doing ANY type of business with this company. The decision makers continue to operate using unethical practices and corrupt employees are not only still working there but are rewarded. Where is the incentive to change their practices? It is over. Let’s move on and support businesses that can operate in fair and equitable best practices. There is opportunity for good businesses to rise and replace these greed mongers. Let this company FAIL!

Posted by: Kathy | March 15, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

The taxpayers now own AIG and therefore this should render previous bonus contracts that were prior to bailout invalid.

Posted by: aray | March 15, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

This is CORRUPTION. The best and the brightest white collar criminals should be going to the slammer, not taking more millions of dollars from taxpayers who are losing their jobs, houses, life savings, health, EVERYTHING. And the lawyers who are getting a kick back to say “oh, it’s a contract, gotta pay” should be going to the slammer too. oh and btw, academia is culpable here as well ..what are they teaching these guys in business school? ..to drive the entire country off the cliff with their reckless insatiable greed? let the universities pay their graduates at bail-out companies their “bonuses”, else university admin can go to the slammer too! some serious accountability and consequences are required here to put an end to this out-of-control corruption.

Posted by: citizen | March 15, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

I see no fix for this problem through any conventional means. Our corrupt system will have to fall of it’s own decadent weight before there will be any opportunity for change. This is NOT going to be pretty!!!!!! If you are not preparing for some ugly consequences, you have may well live to regret it. Wake the heck up people. This is serious stuff!
Hope for the best and prepare for the worst.

Posted by: Glim Leaper | March 15, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Former AIG head Hank Greenberg should be sitting in the same cell next to Bernie Madoff!! It was good to see Larry Summers call out AIG for the bonuses but with how much sincerity it was from the former treasury secretary is questionable!! It is time to remove the “tax-exempt” status from institutions as Harvard, Yale etc.

Posted by: Rich | March 15, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

This AIG money is from the FIRST bailout- passed under Bush and the Republicans. they are the ones that wanted no oversight or control so get your fats straight. This is a Republican bail out for Republicans!!!

Posted by: glenda | March 15, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

I’m afraid the Obama administration is continuing to play us all for fools. First Obama is going to put a stop to these bonuses; then his Treasury Secretary, who cheated on his own taxes, is sent out almost child-like to ASK (not DEMAND) that AIG refrain in the future from paying such outrageous bonuses. Who us going to listen to him? He looks like a little boy in an over-sized chair.
Of course, the administration needs more tax dollars to cover the continuing drain of our dollars as they spend, spend, spend. I am very curious as to how many members of the Washington elite, earning at least $250,000, will actually be paying more taxes. I am convinced that they all–Democrats and Republicans– know how to avoid them while claiming it was “all an innocent mistake.” No wonder Nancy Pelosi keeps smiling; it won’t be her sacrifice or her money.
I voted for Obama because I believed he was speaking the truth. I’m very sorry I did. He has no idea how intelligent and perceptive the American people are. He also needs to understand that trust is hard earned and easily lost. I don’t trust him or his administration now,and I’m very disappointed.

Posted by: Donna | March 15, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Obama will voice his outrage and say no one in the FUTURE will get bonuses in the future. I am so sick of him trying to have it both ways, EMPTY WORDS.

Posted by: Tina | March 15, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

And they tell us now that most of the Fed money went to other banks including Goldman Sachs and several foreign banks. Now I guess we know what the crisis was that the former administration had to prevent – banks not being able to collect their insurance for bad investments. Should have let AIG go bankrupt and then spend 12-18 months picking up the pieces with Fed money – would have been cheaper and all those contracts for bonuses would have been negated!

Posted by: Don | March 15, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

I just read with outrage AIG has announced this weekend (ostensibly to avoid public scrutiny) payment of $165 million in bonuses to its executives, even though it has received over $170 billion in taxpayer bailouts.
How can AIG’s Chairman (Edward Liddy) and CEO (Robert Willumstad) allow for bonuses to be paid to its executives in light of the bailouts? How could the Compensation Committees of the Board of Directors of AIG (Compensation Committee: James F. Orr III, Chairman, Stephen F. Bollenbach, Dennis D. Dammerman, Suzanne Nora Johnson, Virginia M. Rometty) possibly approve these bonuses? What were they thinking? It is morally indefensible that bonuses to any executive of any company that has been bailed out to be paid – particularly AIG. Where’s the sense of moral outrage? Where are the values and sense of right and wrong of these people? Where’s the leadership?
Every executive bonus plan that I’ve read includes in small print deep in the Plan Document a phrase that reads something as follows: subject to approval by the Compensation Committee. The payment of bonuses and incentive compensation is discretionary. CEOs recommend to their Chairman and Compensation Committee the payment of bonuses. So where is the backbone of the CEOs, Chairmen and Directors to just say no? How can this happen?
The real villains are the CEOs and top teams of AIG and other bailed out companies and their gutless boards that fail to show leadership and just say no to the approval of these bonuses. These actions are self-serving, unconscionable, further erode the confidence of Americans in “the system” and only enrich the participants at the expense of us all.
Chuck Bolton
http://chuckbolton.wordpress.com/

Posted by: Chuck Bolton | March 15, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

BEST AND BRIGHTEST LEST TRY THE DUMB AND MORONIC, LIKE IT COULD GET ANY WORSE.
FINALY SOMETHING ALL PEOPLE CAN GET BEHIND LET AIG GO BANKRUPT, LET THOSE PEOPLE EAT DIRT. I GIVE THEM SPIT

Posted by: JAY GREENBERG | March 15, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

The true outrage is the ignorance of the middle-class in this country embracing inefficient laws that instituted these criminals. Today’s depression is a direct result of 20 years of deregulation and lobbying authorized by our Congress. Then there’s Oakley-Sarbanes – what a joke. The average American bought it lock stock and barrel, and many remain under the spells of these trickle-down theorists. Like addicted criminals, AIG’s empathies for their clients are numbed by greedy profit margins, and their twisted lifestyles are causing delusions that refuse to accept reality: Capitalism is now for those whom produce, rather than scheme.

Posted by: Ginny | March 15, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

I’ve been a full supporter of Obama since day one. I remain one, but in light of this AIG issue, I believe that many people like me around the world will be wondering just how committed Obama and his administration is in keeping to their promise of righting the wrongs of Wall Street. The plain truth is, Wall Street has not done anything beneficial for this country or the world for the last 20 years. All it has done is improved the net worth of a few already wealthy but morally bankrupt individuals while exploiting the American public, workers in the third world and ravaged its natural resources. I think Obama needs to stop rewarding, and start PUNISHING the fat cats that got us here. Like he PROMISED. Mr Obama, your still loyal supporter awaits your firm reply.

Posted by: Natt | March 16, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

BONUS PAYMENTS AT AIG
This is not just outrageous, it borders on criminal! The entire banking system has been corrupted. The managers have stolen our money and then fleed their companies. These bonus contracts should never have been allowed. The owners (US government) should now decide which employees are to retained and which to let go. Those workers who choose to accept their bonus should be at risk of losing their job.
WERE DID THE MONEY GO
The money that the government has given to AIG has just been used to buy some of the toxic assets from other banks at full price. AIG/Government now owns these assets. The money given to the banks have been used to fill the hole in capital reserves. The banks need these reserves to legally lend money.
Here is the problem in a nutshell. Toxic assets consist of Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) and Credit Default Swaps (CDS) that “insure” the MDS, The value of MBS has declined because the housing prices have declined. The method (math formula) of pricing the CDS falsely assumed that country wide average housing price would never decrease thus drastically inflating the CDS price. The result is that the old formula no longer works and no acceptable replacement formula has been developed. Any new pricing scheme will mean short term paper losses in the trillions of dollars.
HERE IS THE GOOD NEWS.
The actions of the federal reserve and the congress have bought us time to fix the banking problem. A new formula for pricing CDS will be developed shortly and used to price new MBS and CDS. that don’t include subprime loans. This formula will also allow the old CDS to be sold at a fair price and remove them from the banks assets. If there are fewer foreclosures the CDS losses will be minimal. These actions will solve the immediate problem and allow the banks to get back into the business of making sound loans. Business will then improve and the stock market will come roaring back.
THE FUTURE
More regulation of the entire world financial and banking system must be instituted to prevent such catastrophes from ever happening again. First, corporate entities anywhere in the world that are too big to fail should be reduced in size and new ones be prevented from being created. Second, the MBS rating system should be fixed to result in more realistic ratings (e.g. let the buyers instead of the sellers pay for the ratings). This will prevent a sub-prime MBS being falsely rated AAA and sold to pension funds. Third, CDS should be regulated as insurance products and require the setting aside reserves in case of defaults. Holders of the CDS should be require to have a stake in insured assets. (No more gambling with the world’s finances). And fourth, Corporate rules should be changed to prevent them from entering into these insane bonus contracts and golden parachutes that have no clear economic benefit to the share holders.
Well, I got that off my chest.

Posted by: GFreemanPHD | March 16, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Oakley-Sarbanes? Here you are calling people ignorant. LOL. Ginny, tell us why your socialist Messiah isn’t doing anything about this? Maybe this is the democrat idea of spreading the wealth

Posted by: Ginny is Dumb | March 16, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Do you understand what a CDS is? It is an asset for the holder and a liability for the seller. If the asset is worth $10 million to the buyer, the liability to AIG is $10 million. The problem is, the holder showed it as an asset, while AIG did not show it as a liability.

Posted by: Ron | March 16, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

The braindead Obama worshippers are still in denial. This is all happening under Obama-Pelosi-Reid. Yes it started under Bush, but wasn’t Obama supposed to be about change? Why is he doing the same thing as Bush?

Posted by: Bob | March 16, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

You braindead Obama worshippers keep defending him over this. If he can get away with it with your blind support, he will keep doing the same. You should be flooding the White House with phone calls, emails, and faxes demanding that the bailouts are stopped dead.

Posted by: Bob | March 16, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Contracts? We don’t need no stinking contracts and we’ll honor the contracts we damn well feel like honoring. Bonus money contracts, well… hey hey… these were smart Ivy league kids we had to pay (that hush money to) and besides, they were set BEFORE the crisis (hahahahah..). Now if we are talking toxic mortgages, we’ll break that contract like so fast.

Posted by: Deanfv | March 16, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Is anyone else sick of hearing the Democrats claim that it wasn’t their fault and they can’t do anything about it? They have been in charge of Congress since January 2007 and now have the White House. It’s time to step up or step down. The government owns 80% of AIG and there’s nothing that can be done? Let those cockroaches sue and we’ll see if any jury awards them the bonuses that they didn’t earn.

Posted by: Fred | March 16, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

This is the beginning of the END…I voted for the Libertarian in the Prez election…I AM PROUD TO SAY IT OUT LOUD!! Thomas Jefferson would be infuriated at this current situation…and would probably leave the country! We are in a downward spiral that will only end in stealing from the future of our children..that much is guaranteed.
in the movie “Traffic” By Steven Soderburg, there is a great scene when Michael Douglas takes over as “drug czar” and has to sit down and discuss his job with the man whom he is replacing. Look it up..it is what President Obama is doing now….blaming his predessor for the current problems.
when you take a new job and trouble befalls you…first blame your predessor….If trouble finds you a second time….write your resignation!
I suggest watching this scene to get the whole point….But, our President has fundamental beliefs that directly contradict those that our founding fathers and those that died for our freedom fought for.
AIG will go down as this largest financial blunder of this administration. To pay out bonuses is literally taking money out of each and every American’s bank accounts and giving it to people who deserve to loose their jobs.
At some point, we have to let these companies go under!

Posted by: susan | March 16, 2009, 1:53 am 1:53 am

If you’re not OUTRAGED about this AIG BS, you should be. AIG…”best and brightest”…now there’s an oxymoron if I ever saw one. I say let these bastards go down in flames…it’s called “consequences”. These companies should be held to the same standards the taxpayers are…we don’t get any bailouts…why should they?!? The administration should: 1) get the money back, 2) let them fall flat on their faces.
Those who make bad financial decisions need to learn to live with the consequences. Just where do these EXEC’s get off thinking it’s OK to get a bonus for driving the company into the ground?! Bonuses are for a job WELL DONE. Clue: This not one of them!

Posted by: John | March 16, 2009, 3:30 am 3:30 am

Movement 2:00:55 seems to be the only commentator who’s gotten beyond verbal outrage to the right place. If this isn’t resolved by the end of THIS week to our satisfaction (“our” meaning all of us complaining and threatening or calling each other names or defending our dead parties), it’s time to stop chatting and start heading for Washington. Most of us have already tried calling, writing, emailing, and faxing our reps there since before the first bailouts. Clearly, they don’t hear us from here. Let’s go there, any of us who can, and the rest be bombarding the phones and faxes at the same time. Name a date — end of March?

Posted by: carrier | March 16, 2009, 5:34 am 5:34 am

What Contracts ? Is is mentioned in the contract that in case the company goes bankrupt, they will bowwor tax payer money to pay bonus.
See, bonus means – sharing company’s profit with employees. So , if the compnay is in loss — how can they pay bonus and where from.
These are all hypocrites , they are criminasl and they are used to it , they dont care.
They may have degrees from Good Institute but definitely they dont have ethics.
Ethics is also very important.
These so called Well educated Executives should be kicked out.

Posted by: Kanchan | March 16, 2009, 6:13 am 6:13 am

AIG worries about not being able to attract and retain “the best and the brightest” yet their execs can’t be too damned good or bright, the company has failed, it has become a parasite, an albatross upon the backs of Americans. I want my quarterly dividend check since my tax dollars are tied up in that ass factory.

Posted by: Tom | March 16, 2009, 6:14 am 6:14 am

How can we say that AIG have the Best and the Brightest employees
If it is the case , how it screwed up itself.

Posted by: Kanchan | March 16, 2009, 6:32 am 6:32 am

Why are any of these people still alive? China owns most of the U.S. debt, when a Chinese businessman’s personal greed embarrasses China, they execute him. Why haven’t the AIG execs been executed? They deserve to die horrible, violent deaths. They deserve to be raped to death in prison. They deserve to have their houses burned down while they are trapped inside, nailed by the genitals to a heavy piece of furniture.

Posted by: schlockma | March 16, 2009, 6:37 am 6:37 am

You’re sick schlockma.

Posted by: FedUp | March 16, 2009, 8:14 am 8:14 am

Some of you need to get over the word “bonus.” They will be sued. If you wish for them to be sued? Well, it will cost the company more. And since your tax money now owns the company? Well, you’re making poor business decisions yourself. You stand to get paid back if you don’t run off their entire sales force here. It’s all about a word here. This was promised compensation if they hit a target. Evidently many did. It was others that made poor decisions to help risk the company. Anywho, if any of you had worked a year thinking if you performed as said you’d get paid such and such amount – only to have the public yell you needed to die and not get paid? Well, I’m going with you’d find it rather unfair. Your beefs are with deregulation and some upper CEO’s. Not some sales guy that was simply selling what he was told to sell. Your beefs should also be somewhat with congress. Because they are demonizing these people while they had a big hand in things as well.

Posted by: FedUp | March 16, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

AIG SHOULD HAVE NEVER GOTTEN THE BAILOUT MONEY IF THAT WAS IN THE CEO’S CONTRACT’S
WHY DIDNT THE FEDRAL GOVERNMENT CHECK IT OUT FIRST?
PRESIDENT OBAMA DO NOT GIVE ANYMORE OF MY TAX MONEY TO AIG LET IT FALL!
TOO THE AMERCIAN PEOPLE STOP YOUR PAYMENTS TOO YOUR AIG ACCOUNTS……LET YOU VOICE BE HEARD. WE THE PEOPLE CAN STOP THEM!!!!!!!!IF WE STAND TOGETHER WE CAN CHANGE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA……

Posted by: Brendett NC | March 16, 2009, 8:31 am 8:31 am

ah yes the republican fat cats arejust gonna take ever last drop of blood they can take out of american people….so sad they shoudl be hung until dead in public square

Posted by: T | March 16, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am

Ignorance of the law is no excuse accept for those who make the laws an excuse.
So why are our current lawmakers so upset by what they themselves created or conveniently forgot to establish? They created the bail-out…they created the criteria and voted for it…”We the People” had no rights, other then not being able to stop this. To say they were unaware of the consequence of their own demise is absolute insanity. They knew exactly the words to use and the words to exclude when releasing their bail-out plans. Out of a good mans heart comes good treasure…out of a greedy mans heart comes greed and deceipt..

Posted by: angela | March 16, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am

The Federal Government has lost there minds,Does anybody have any common since in Washington DC…
LET AIG FALL
WE the People are outraged by AIG action’s….
Libby didnt borher to tell the Federal Government this was in the AIG contract’s firing Libby would be the best thing you could for the people
United States
FIRING ALL THE GREEDY CEO’S WASHINGTON DC FOR THIS MESS, THE STOCKMARKET WOULD TURN AROUND..NOBODY WANTS TO DO BUSINESS WITH CRIMINAL’S AND
LIAR’S

Posted by: Brendett NC | March 16, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am

It amazes me that the stimulus money going to states and local governments appear to have miles of strings attached but these bozos hand over this money to private companies without any preconditions? Where the hell do we find these people we keep electing?

Posted by: Joe | March 16, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

I fear the bailouts are also affecting litigation. With AIG involved, for instance, a taxpayer is being pitted against himself in attempting to settle any lawsuit. The fees/costs are outrageous and what attorney wants to kill the goose laying the golden egg in the form of a taxpayer guarantee of payment? There is no reason to negotiate in good faith.

Posted by: Rodney Haworth | March 16, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Larry Sumers :
We are a country of law. There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts. Every legal step possible to limit those bonuses is being taken by Secretary Geithner and by the Federal Reserve system.
—————————————
The absurdity of the Obama administration demonstrated so very nicely!
“There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts.”
Oh, REALLY……
—-
Feb 18th – Obmaa revealed plans to aid home owners
Reforming bankruptcy rules to allow a judge to reduce the principal owed on the mortgage for a primary residence. Current bankruptcy laws exempt the mortgage on a person’s primary residence from rules allowing debts to be written down.

Posted by: Mike_C | March 16, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.