Mar 31, 2009 6:55pm

Tax Problems for Sebelius

ABC News’ Jon Karl Reports: Here we go again: tax problems for another cabinet nominee. In this case, HHS nominee Kathleen Sebelius has informed the Senate Finance Committee that an audit of her and her husband’s 2005, 2006, 2007 tax returns has revealed some "unintentional errors, which we immediately corrected." As a result, Sebelius and her husband have filed amended returns and paid $7,040 in back taxes and $878 in interest. Unlike the $128,000 dollar mistake that doomed Tom Daschle’s nomination for the same job, Sebelius’s errors appear minor. The tax issues were discovered after she hired certified public account to review her past tax returns. The problems fell into three categories: 1) She could not locate receipts on three charitable contributions (you need receipts for contributions over $250) 2) In July 2006, she sold her house for less than the amount of her mortgage (she was under water back in 2006!). As she kept paying off the loan balance, she improperly took a home mortgage interest deduction. 3) She could not locate receipts for some business expenses she claimed. The problems don’t appear likely to derail her nomination. In fact, shortly after he learned of the problems, Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) put out a statement strongly supporting her nomination. "Congress is going to need a strong partner at the Department of Health and Human Services to achieve comprehensive health reform this year, and we have that partner in Governor Sebelius," said Baucus. "There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Governor Sebelius has the political experience, determination, and bipartisan work ethic to get the job done with Congress this year. She’s the right person for the job and I look forward to hearing from her at the Finance Committee’s hearing on Thursday."

User Comments

This is unbelievable. Liberals do not pay taxes. Obama is completely out of control.
Boston Tea Parties guys……hit the hard and often. Let’s run this nut out of office before he destroys our nation.

Posted by: Doug | March 31, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Well if these mistakes are minor, why is this a front page story?

Posted by: Scotti | March 31, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

This happens so often now that we’re all sort of numb to it. Bottom line is that someone MUST BE FIRED over the vetting fiasco.
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | March 31, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Taxcheat: prerequisite to Obama adminstn

Posted by: plainsm | March 31, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

“We don’t know who the real Obama is”. well if you want him to be black, he will be black, if you want him to be white, he will be white, if you want him to be multiethnic, he will be multiethnic, if you want him to be christian, he will be christian, if you want him to be muslim, he will be muslim, because you see he don’t know who he is. And that is the real sad part, after winning a campaign on talking about nothing but Bush = now he has nothing to talk about. It is so sad that we voted for him -= never, never again. Four years we will all have had enough.

Posted by: Jane | March 31, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

OK guys i didn’t even vote for him, but seriously? She and her husband combined over 3 years probably make high six figures combined. You’re gonna protest about an almost certainly innocent mistake of 7 thousand? AND they paid the interest! Simmer down…

Posted by: um? | March 31, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Democrats are the most unethical, immoral, and uncaring souls on the face of the earth.
All they want is money, control, and power over everyone else.
It’s time to throw the Socialist dictator Obama out on his ear!

Posted by: One_American | March 31, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

The money may not be much (it really isn’t) but the pattern is well established now – if you want a place in BHO’s cabinet, you must be first be a tax cheat…
How do YOU spell double standard?

Posted by: Disgusted_1 | March 31, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Obama is totally out of control….. Do any Dem’s pay their taxes?

Posted by: Lumberman_63 | March 31, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

What is it with all of Obama’s cabinet choices? Geesh

Posted by: Chuck | March 31, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

This is insignificant. There’s got to be much more important news going on these days.

Posted by: tkindred | March 31, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

This isn’t funny anymore. Obama and his cronies are an absolute disgrace to the offices that they hold. I wouldn’t trust them to make me a g-d Big Mac, for Christ’s sake.
I hope those of you who voted for this loser are pleased with yourselves. And while you’re paying your tax bills this year, I hope you feel every penny of it. Idiots.

Posted by: Courtney | March 31, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Egads! Is that a picture of the Deadly duo or what?? Thanks. Now I’ll have nothing but nightmares for 4 years.

Posted by: O buster | March 31, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Has anyone vetted Barak Obama?

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Let’s just move to a single, universal, flat tax so that NOBODY can intentionally or unintentionally pay the wrong amount of tax. Hello? Anyone listening?

Posted by: Eric | March 31, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

It is simply amazing that so many of the nominees are paying back taxes after being nominated by Obama. At this rate maybe the deficit could get reduced if Obama does not appoint anyone to the position but keeps nominating new people after the taxes are recovered. Anyway, as Obama clearly stated he is not after getting perfect people but those who can get the job done. As long as the same criteria are used and no one who has made mistakes in the past is allowed in, I would say that may be okay, we can allow some slack.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | March 31, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Courtney, you go girl! I agree!!

Posted by: Carol in Alabama | March 31, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Eric hit the nail on the head. Now someone will have to figure out how to wrest control over the country from the special interests…..that is the Democrats and the Republicans.

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

I do my own taxes but most better paid folks pay someone else to do it. Once you get past a certain point it’s hard to figure out what you should or shouldn’t be paying. The tax law in this country is too complicated. This is showing up because everyone has put it under the spotlight.
You folks who think it’s deliberate cheating can think that if you want but most of these people are fine folks who are doing their best. If you can’t accept that don’t go to church next sunday because you are just unchristian,

Posted by: Watcher | March 31, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Good Lord… you Obama bashers should be ashamed…. He has a huge mess to clean up that YOU caused with your last two presidential votes! You guys are SO going to be the dorks in this chapter of the history book. Go volunteer at a food bank this weekend and do your part to help out…. GROW UP AMERICA.. no one can fix it but YOU… no man, no woman…. just YOU….

Posted by: Stacy | March 31, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

From the right –
the rich right complain non stop about high taxes but pay them.
From the left –
the rich left impose high taxes and never complain because they have no intentions of actually paying them.

Posted by: Jeff | March 31, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

If these people are not detail-oriented enough to pay all their taxes; then how in the world are they going to govern well.? This is not just one person now but too many for an administration.

Posted by: Mike in Chicago | March 31, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

GOOD LORD, Watcher. Please realize that it’s not one party that’s to blame for the debacle that is the USA situation. George Washington advised the population to not let political parties take control. We should have listened then, and we should take heed now!

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

I meant..Stacy!’

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Instead of blaming the Democrats and Republicans I BLAME the American voter who seems to be to disengaged from reality to make a wise vote and then stay intouch with their elected official’s moves.
Wake up America!

Posted by: John | March 31, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Everybody in this nation is being taxed to death and the rules are so hard to follow that even this high paid nominee needed help. What is the answer? Form a national sales tax! NO MORE IRS! This change in itself would stop these errors and make the tax code fair! It would also save us all a lot of money and headaches.

Posted by: john copeland | March 31, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Who cares, I want universal Health Care. All you crybabies can start up you own compound in Alaska and make Rush your leader.

Posted by: Mike | March 31, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

no wonder democrats like raising taxes, they don’t pay them anyhow

Posted by: Pioneer324 | March 31, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

I’m not blaming Dems and Repubs….but I am blaming the fact that they are all simply lobbyists, selling to the highest bidder. An independent revolution is looming; one that elects Public Servants, rather than Political Servants.

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

OMG…Make me angry..
I work so hard and pay all the tax by law.
These politicians don’t follow the law..huh!

Posted by: catleya | March 31, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Awwww…c’mon take her anyway…please

Posted by: samhiguchi | March 31, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

adfa

Posted by: frankcampos | March 31, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

What does adfa mean?????

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

someone needs to audit the IRS software. every corrected return I’ve sent in resulted in a refund. yet every refund I received was attributed to an incorrect year because the software wouldn’t let the agents attribute it to the year I was entitled to the refund. I can’t wait for their audit. We will all be gasping in explanation “oh — that’s how they did it!” Of course getting to the “oh” moment will cause great consternation amidst fellow IRS agents who will not know how to undo what damage will be caused when their new software won’t figure out first. If this sentence (the one you just read) makes no sense — then you are following the logic of the IRS toll free assistance number. Sooner or later you’ll get to the right conclusion. Don’t give up. FYI – what do you do when your employers fail to file W-2; victimize the tax payer who paid into the system in the way of excessive phone bills to get the W-2 filed in time by hounding the people who claim they paid into the local, state and federal government on your behalf. I’m deducting my phone bill unde the auspices of tax preparation. In conclusion, how much money do we need to use to track how much money we could use. What’s the owerhead figure for administrative costs in the united states? let’s cut to the chase — what if I told you I don’t need to tell you how much I make and I’m going to put all the money in my own health care account and manage the funds myself and attribute my health and well being to minimizing the tax-induced stress-related dis EASE caused by all of you people filing your returns too late for me to obtain my refund on time. $14 MILLION DOLLARS. That’s the future value of the present cost of your past mistakes. Still not making any sense. Well the next time I obtain a 1999 refund for a 2004 filing in 2008 I’ll explain it to you more succinctly. That’s how the IRS explained it to me: you’ll get it (your refund) faster that way….in 60 to 90 days. I suggested they keep petty cash on hand. They told me “we can’t do it that way.” I stated “Why not?” The IRS tax agent badge that day stated — “because whatever information I collect today has to be transmitted to Philadelphia to issue a check from California to be printed out of Cincinnati to be mailed to your former mailing address (2004) and marked return to sender in spite of the fact you performed a change of address in 2006 that expired in 2006 (what happened to forever after?) and was marked return to sender in 2008. Why, I want to know, was not the sender the guy in the IRS Agent suit, not willing to submit a receipt to petty cash for two twenty dollar bills? The cash on hand concept is not exceptionally new but it will do two things: (1) save time (2) save money. Now how’s that for an cornerstone in a new economic strategy? Recap: to save time and money cut out the middle man and straight away – -give the money directly to me in the way of something similar to the Boston Tea party’s approach to the tea tax. That’s right. Dump my hard earned money all over me. I’m not drowning now. But I will be when I see the P & I for those filling out my tax refund paperwork at T-14 days and counting. Still don’t get it? Why don’t you try to file on time some year “they’ll ask me that.” and I’ll say — because you didn’t prosecute the university which taught me 3 things: never say anything wrong, never admit anywrong doing, and never refund your student’s tuition on time — in spite of the fact they failed to attend 60 percent of classes to overcome a fatal mistake made by a physicians training inside their firewalls of blame-proof layering lawyers. Still don’t make any sense of this? Three PhDs will need to analyze substinative subtext. It’s why we C3P0s like to say a judge is only as good as the robot that got the program out of central dispatch and downloaded it into my mainframe. I’m not a robot you see. I just learned from the U.S. Department of Energy that “when do you really need it by” applies to me only when I do something wrong. This still doesn’t make any sense . Not wrong. That’s because the financial engineering community deals in negativity. I don’t mind you going on and droning on about this nonsensical stuff — but why make it so tough on the rest of us. Just use your last pay stub to file an early return and cut out the W-2s. completely. There, now you’ve saved all the time and money you can and cut out all of the middle people who want to know how you spent your time and money. Massive unemployment will teach them a lesson, LES is more . The less information you ask for the more likely the economy will get out of it’s Not Really Reduced Reduction in Paper Work 2003 Work Force Development Act misery status quo style pain in the tuchas modus operandi and we’ll lay them off and subject them to the 20 page questionaire administered by each state non-government agency? Then they’ll know how it feels to be real.
Anyone want to know why the Boston Big Dig didn’t succeed all by itself? Follow through!

Posted by: wisdom | March 31, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

If you want to publish, get a book deal….don’t use a blog.

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Unbelieveable…another one…gee what a surprise. This is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE. Why do we have to ACCEPT this individual? NOPE…NOT RIGHT!!!

Posted by: Darlene | March 31, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

unbelievable!!!!Can you believe this, is there any!!!!I mean ANYONE Obama can pick that has paid their taxes before being picked

Posted by: payupmidclass | March 31, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Uhm … excuse me … since so many of Obama’s cabinet appointees have had tax errors, I got to wondering … Is anyone working in IRS anymore and is their automated audit checking system working also? Just how many tax errors are in the IRS filings the past few years that weren’t caught in a manual or automated audit? I mean, if Treasury didn’t catch the other financial missteps, isn’t it pretty obvious their lack of competency was pandemic and spread to IRS too?

Posted by: Rob | March 31, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

first of all you bunch of retarted republicans the mess we are in is your fault over spening in the last 8 years on a war that was held IN THE WRONG PLACE!!!! so that we could protect oil…second ya bunch of tards how is this Obama’s fault yes i understand that the people he has picked in the past have had tax issue…but do you think that if the president was going to ask you to work for him that you are going to straight tell him..um Mr. President i dont pay or report taxes…NO…thats the point to hide the fact that you are not…but how is the president going to know that. i guess my point is, i know you dont like him but its not his fault that other people didnt pay their taxes…JUST think of all the sneeky crap that you people hide from employers…spouses..etc…chill out republicans your being real idiots

Posted by: frankcampos | March 31, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

IRS -Inquisition Reserve for public Servant…. Please don’t mess with ordinary folk

Posted by: Swiftlearner | March 31, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

When they do it it’s Turbo tax fault or “an honest mistake”. If it’s you or me, we get audited and the IRS raids our home office, employer and our homes, guns drawn on our spouses and children and God forbid, our pets shot for trying to warn us of the coming invasion by the criminals thugs with a badge. Yeah, Obama’s chosen people pay no taxes… Hey it’s NO biggie, “Go back to bed America, your government will save you…”

Posted by: hmn... | March 31, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

What do you suppose the liberals would be saying if this was The Bush administration

Posted by: payupmidclass | March 31, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Can Obama recruit anybody except tax cheats. This is beyond absurd. Obama is a complete idiot.

Posted by: brian | March 31, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

I wonder how many of YOU would have tax problems if they were examined with the kind of depth that these people submit to. Our tax code is so long, so complex, and so confusing that no person can understand it without extensive study. And still mistakes are made. Even tax pros can disagree on things. Lets get to a flat tax and get rid of all the gray areas.

Posted by: Bob | March 31, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Hey ‘Payupmidclass’…..virtually no-one can stand up to an audit without at least a minor correction being made. Even you! The tax codes which are probably perpetuated by the ‘Accountants Lobby’…are convoluted as to be confusing to everyone, even the Sec Treas.

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Stop being haters republican.. just cuz OBAMAS you new DADDY…..

Posted by: frankcampos | March 31, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

If she she failed to pay all of her 2005, 2006, 2007, then she should volunteer for an audit for all the other years. I know that after 3 years they cannot go after you, but if she wants to be 100% honest with the American people she would volunteer. How many other Presidents have had this problem with their nominees?

Posted by: Angel | March 31, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Let us be real here. What you cynical bashers of all things that come to your attention need to see is the fact that Obama is keeping his administration honest and open. If there is a problem they are not afraid to air it to even the likes of you. I.E. they care how “you” try to twist it because at least the are “trying” to do the right thing. What you fail to see or have blinded yourself to it and or it was hidden from your sight was how the last administration handled such things. They would either not investigate such possibilies, and if known, cover up that it happened or deny it or define it as trivial and unimportant. Of course those of you that can only support your own prejudices would not understand any of this. hmmm, should we support an open and honest administration or an administration that hides and lies and distorts everything and than uses it’s presidential powers to keep from you blinded instead of being “open” and “honest” with the people that elected them? Hmm, which one would I want? Hmmmm?

Posted by: dlboggan | March 31, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Wake up crooks run our country – DA – just look at who elected some one who never has done anything. Yes he is charming and we all love to hear him talk – our auto industry will lose because CONGRESS has made it easy for the foriegn companies to break our comapnies. The auto unions are worthless and we should dumped them now. But that will not happen – so more of the same,

Posted by: a citizen | March 31, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

I repeat….who vetted the President? Obviously, the Democratic Party. Have they asked the IRS to review his tax returns….or to have them independently audited? Let’s audit all the senators and the congressmen, too! Wholesale retirements would probably be in store. The problem is that the OWNERS of the store are these very people.

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Are we the only people who pay our taxes? This is turning into a joke. I’m starting to believe all politicians are cheats. This is criminal. Republican or Democrate….I’m pissed!

Posted by: kennedy | March 31, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Almost every year – some news programs run sure fire ratings getters – you take moderately complex, identical returns to 10 different tax prep outfits – and get 10 different taxes due amounts. We’ve all seen these stories.
So here we have people going through the equivalent of a the dreaded “compliance audit” – where you have to show every single receipt for every single dollar you claimed and giving it the most conservative possible approach. I would love to see the right wing dipsticks that have posted here get the same audits and see how they faire under similar scrutiny. Love to see some volunteers.

Posted by: nh bob | March 31, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

The only people I know that don’t owe taxes are tax cheats themselves. So she is one of us who made a mistake on taxes or owed. As long as they attempt to remedy it I don’t care. I love the way the Republicans are looking to see who owes now and probably they are the biggest cheaters of all. I say look at all their taxes and he who is without sin cast the first stone.

Posted by: Steve | March 31, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

The pattern of behavior has been established.
Democrat=I do not pay what is owed
Republican=we need to soak those rich bastards
Banker=don’t even think about earning a living
I believe I am ready to take to the streets, who is with me?

Posted by: ANON | March 31, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

New Hampshire Bob. Lets forget the right wing and left wing rhetoric. They are all Politicians! They are the enemy…perpetuating their positions by making us believe that no one else can do the job. The famous rant…”I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it any more”…should be on everyone’s lips.

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Hey all you tea party people. Wake up the Gov does not care what you think. They have the power and they will do whatever they want when they want and you cannot do anything about it. I am sure they are just laughing at you.

Posted by: Buella | March 31, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

There were errors. The taxes are PAID (with interest).
No cheating. No real story.
PS — I would bet the ranch that if Congress had been as exacting as they are now in the confirmation process of former cabinet appointments… we would have found just as many Republicans with imperfect tax returns from past years.
POINT: This kind of stuff is in no way a partisan issue.
Sheesh…

Posted by: dassis | March 31, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

This is ridicules! Are all our politicians tax cheats? They should all be audited.

Posted by: 3rdParty | March 31, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Hey Sheesh! Partisan issues and partisan thinking are the cause of our problems. Are there any Independent people out there?

Posted by: John Vacek | March 31, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

This is a test of sorts as I got into a bit of trouble the other night. I’m no particular fan of Kathleen and lean to conservatism, but I don’t see that big of a deal about it. She took the precautionary measure of squaring the business away with a CPA and the IRS. I guess my point is if you went over Republicans’ tax returns with the scrutiny applied to these cabinet appointees, you’d find similar. A big brouhaha was made about Sarah Palin’s taxes, and IIRC when it was first released to the media way back when, an accountant-type here said she had done nothing illegal. It turned out otherwise at least on her Alaska return. Here’s an example, the capital gains tax on selling your home rule has changed if I understand that right. I’ve had umpteen capital “improvements” and upgrades on my modest home, still nowhere near what it should be. Problem is where are all the receipts? I don’t have them. So if that rule were still in effect, I’d lose a lot of money I honestly paid but just can’t prove with receipts. Three new furnaces and two roofing jobs in 40 years, just for starters.

Posted by: BridgetoSomewhere | March 31, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Obama’s choices are worse than the mafia. Looking back, all the red flags were here about Obama in the beginning.

Posted by: jack | March 31, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

$878 in penalties? You have got to be kidding. They got a deal! I haven’t filed/paid taxes since 2001 and I have seen what the interest and penalties are – OUTRAGEOUS! Like I ssaid, if the only paid $878 in penalties they got a deal, but there’s no surprise in that preferential treatment either!

Posted by: Anon | March 31, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Shame on Gov SebeliusWhile all of us poor schmucks are working hard to keep food on the table and pay our bills – and pay our taxes – these politicians are fleecing our pockets and our country.
It’s absolutely disgraceful that Obama is trying to fill his cabinet with liars and cheaters. What a joke our political system has become.

Posted by: Grannysun | March 31, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

BridgetoSomewhere, If I recall even
Monsignor John McCain, “forgot” to pay
taxes on one of his several houses.
I also agree with you, the ones who
are complaining the most are known
to be cheaters themselves. “The pot
calls the kettle black!”

Posted by: spacerook1 | March 31, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

What is this!? Can’t nObama find SOMEONE on the left who can pay their friggen taxes CORRECTLY?
Just remember this -
OBAMA – One Big A** Mistake – America

Posted by: truthwillsetufree | March 31, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

How do you “unintentionally” claim the mortgage interest on a home that you have “sold?!?” Because it was NOT unintentional !!!! Sebelius is just another dishonest politician. Dime a dozen.

Posted by: Ben | March 31, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

John Vacek, our forefathers should
have NEVER let those clowns in Congress write
the tax code! They obviously wrote it for
the benefit to their own priorities and
interest. The loopholes were designed for
them ONLY, so they could use the back door
approach. Once the word got out and the
loophole became the norm instead of the
exception, they added new language,but
always left the backdoor open for escape.
This is one reason why this tax code is so
screwed up!

Posted by: spacerook1 | March 31, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Imagine if these folks were Republicans. They would call for impeachment by now.
So much for “change”. So much for Queen Nancy’s “most ethical congress”.
2010, here we come. That’s when REAL change will happen.

Posted by: BlameAmericaLast | March 31, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

This is sureal – this can’t be happening! How are we to think our President is capable of not handling his personal “helpers”. If my “personal helper” would not clean my house (after paying 15.00 per hour + all taxes) she’s gone. The amount is negligble – she’s a cheat!

Posted by: genels | March 31, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Ok.. Enough is enough! How many crooks is this guy going to hire? Tax cheats and tax evaders are all the same. This inept and incompetent leader of ours is just unbelievable. America, reap what we’ve sown. We’ve elected an idiot into office. His Chicago politics are and will continue to be a mistake. The mob has taken over. God save our country!

Posted by: Mike | March 31, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

From the article above (did you all read it?)…
“…unintentional errors, which we immediately corrected.” As a result, Sebelius and her husband have filed amended returns and paid $7,040 in back taxes and $878 in interest.”
An amended return is NOT cheating on taxes. Every person who files taxes is allowed to use this procedure. All kinds of American taxpayers use it when they discover errors. It is really NOT a big deal.
Anon… the $878 was not a penalty. It was the interest owed on the $7040 in back taxes owed, discovered and PAID!
***
John Vacek… my “partisan” comment referred to the fact that errors in paying taxes is not done by only Dems, or only Repubs, etc. — meaning people from every viewpoint (political or otherwise) have had these kinds of problems.

Posted by: dassis | March 31, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

“Let us be real here. What you cynical bashers of all things that come to your attention need to see is the fact that Obama is keeping his administration honest and open. If there is a problem they are not afraid to air it to even the likes of you.”
How long have you been crazy?

Posted by: ceeLeelee | March 31, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

What the heck is this? Obama wants to tax more on the rich while his own gang is cheating on taxes..

Posted by: miller | March 31, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Are all democrats cheating on their taxes?

Posted by: taxcheats | March 31, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

These are minor errors. It seems to me that she made a reasonable attempt to pay the taxes. Having been audited myself, the IRS incorrectly claimed I had underreported income. It turned out that I’d rolled over an IRA and it wasn’t reported. I also made a few errors in the past that were in the $50 to $500 range. This is news for a slow day.

Posted by: 63tango | March 31, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

I apologize, forgot to add – hey, you wonderful, incitefull (soo important) ladies of the VIEW – where are you? – hey, I forgot, President Bush caused all this – right?

Posted by: genels | March 31, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Oh, and lastly, who vetted Obama? What kind of background check was done? Believe it or not, people are still waiting for an answer. Is he or is he not a US citizen? Come clean Mr. President. Make fools out of the ones that are questioning your place of birth. Release your records, and put the question to rest!

Posted by: Mike | March 31, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

What about Chris Dodds? Has he paid his taxes???

Posted by: taxcheats | March 31, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Are all democrats tax cheats? They should be audited immediately.

Posted by: taxcheats | March 31, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

You can keep up your silly diatribes about “tax cheats” all you want, folks-of-the-right-wing.
But be very careful — yes, absolutely! 2010 is coming. And then 2012… let the fun begin!
If you really think Palin (for example… she had some serious tax problems herself, if you can fathom an honest memory) and the rest of the Republican hopefuls will be spared this kind of media scrutiny… you haven’t been paying attention.
The media just loves to stir it up.
PS — maybe we should have every media person tax-audited???
Now THAT… would be real fun!

Posted by: dassis | March 31, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

PLEASE stop the right vs. left nonsense; it’s just another manufactured line of division to keep people bickering while the true masters — international bankers and their cohorts — consolidate power. The Bush administration transferred unconstitutional powers to the executive, and now the Obama administration is moving to put the financial system under its hand. Different face on the same thing, folks.

Posted by: Burke Hamblin | March 31, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Why do the rest of us pay taxes and the Dems get by without until Obama offers them a big job?
What is the count now? Besides our SD Senator, Tom.

Posted by: Marilyn | March 31, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Forget the tax cheats. 5 out of 21 of Obama’s Cabinet members owns a non-US car.

Posted by: young_voter | March 31, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Burke…
Your opinion has merit, however — there really IS a difference of viewpoint POLITICALLY that is espoused on message boards.
People who look at issues from one perspective can be called “right/or right-wing” and those from another opposed mind set can be called “left/or left-wing”.
It is the nature of humans to hold to opinions.
Like I said — you have yours. It is the “different face” you speak of that identifies these divergent views.

Posted by: dassis | March 31, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Grannysun, and taking it a bit further, I think the keyword is “intent” whether the filer intended to cheat or not. That’s pretty hard to prove either way, so lots of black pots and kettles. I think a lot of people just didn’t save every single receipt and take the deduction anyway; I don’t know if that is dishonest or not if they know in their heart they paid. That is not how an auditor would see the situation, certainly. Yes, you can go back and try to get records of proof here and there and should definitely save receipts and statements. I just wish it could be simplified and more fair for all personal filers. Businesses would be in a different category, and I think a lot cheat on expenses and a lot don’t. They need to keep scrupulous records and receipts and hire a CPA. Average people can’t afford that nor should be expected to, a governor is not exactly average. If she hadn’t come forward herself, it would never have come to light unless she had been audited or had to release her returns so the whole world could quibble over them, so I see that as being honest more than cheating. She probably saw what went down with the others and got worried because with a demanding job, who has time to think of every little thing? Yes, details are important but so is being able to see the bigger picture and not micromanage every little aspect of your life. I’m not defending deliberate cheaters.

Posted by: BridgetoSomewhere | March 31, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

I love America.
And I also love my Honda Civic (mine, made in Canada, by the way)… if only our companies could make such reliable autos that keep their value.
A little thing called “planned obsolescence” is what has kept the greed alive and the American automaker has suffered instead of thrived due to the theory.
Look it up. Be informed.

Posted by: dassis | March 31, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

What’s WRONG with you, AMERICANS?!!! Do you run out of honest people? One after another, every single person Obama chose “unintentionally” (yeah, right! if you believe that, contact me, I have a pair of WTCs to sell to you) owe tax!!!

Posted by: asensibleone | March 31, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Plainsm…I agree with you. You said
“Taxcheat: prerequisite to Obama adminstn”.. It sure is. To many tax cheats to count.LOL

Posted by: CW | March 31, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

What is wrong with you Americans!!! Why aren’t all these Obama tax cheats being investigated? Do you have one set of rules for these democratic cheats and another for the ordinary folks.

Posted by: Taxcheats | March 31, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

ALEX JONES IS RIGHT! THESE PEOPLE ARE THIEVES!

Posted by: Bob | March 31, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

I pay my taxes.
I am from Kansas.
Do not approve her nomination.

Posted by: mindy | March 31, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

She’s either a liar or an incompetent. But in the end, what difference does it make? Either type of person shouldn’t be offered a position of power. What a farce this administration has become – and in only 90 days or so. Only about 3 years and 270 days to go…

Posted by: This_End_Up | March 31, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Go to prisonplanet.com and see what more crap is coming down. By the way we should do something to Gordon Brown.

Posted by: Steve | March 31, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Several Obama administration nominees have been derailed by tax issues, notably the president’s first nominee for HHS secretary, former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle. He withdrew from consideration while apologizing for failing to pay $140,000 in taxes and interest.
Timothy Geithner also faced questions about his failure to pay back taxes before the Senate confirmed him as Obama’s treasury secretary. Geithner apologized, saying it was an honest mistake.
And Hilda Solis was confirmed as Obama’s labor secretary only after the confirmation process was delayed by news reports that Solis’ husband recently had settled unpaid tax liens on his California auto repair business for about $6,400. White House officials said Solis and her husband were not aware of the liens.

Posted by: payupmidclass | March 31, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Gov Sebelius is a great and wise choice, much better choice than Palin was to GW.

Posted by: gman | March 31, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

These events make the projected tax hikes rather ironic.

Posted by: jol | March 31, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

John Vacek …Please tell us your kidding….LOL…that is funny…Bush didn’t have that problem, maybe you liberal are too stupid to figure out your own mess you created. Raise taxes on everyone, (middle class as well) but don’t pay your own and claim is was too confusing????? that is funny…

Posted by: payupmidclass | March 31, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Have none of these folks heard of H&R Block? Amazing when their feet are held to the fire and their past is held up to scrutiny…they suddenly see unintentional errors. In this case three years in a row???????? That is a stretch.

Posted by: ConservativeGal2 | March 31, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Whoop. They mistook a big $2000 per year. Out of gosh knows how much. Palin owed more than this republicans. It’s becoming clear to me they’re going over all the nominee’s returns or something. At least this one paid interest.

Posted by: FedUp | March 31, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

gman… much better choice than Palin was to GW.:you wrote….what?.. Palin was to GW?…first of all Palin was nothign to GW, Second she was VP running mate to McCain. Third, SHE PAID TAXES….WOW!!!!!!!

Posted by: payupmidclass | March 31, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

FedUp …it’s called Vetting….nothing new. your going work for the tax payers of America, let make sure your not a crook or tax cheat, that would leave Obama with no one

Posted by: payupmidclass | March 31, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

frankcampos | Excuse me…Ms Hillary voted for it as did many of the dems in the Senate..don’t rewrite history!

Posted by: ConservativeGal2 | March 31, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Obama voters think emotionally by and large so this, and other tax cheats who were appointed won’t matter.
Obama, a former cocaine addict who won’t release his college grades and who spent 20 years listening to a hate filled anti Semitic preacher, can do no wrong.
He is oh so smart.

Posted by: Constantine XIII | March 31, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Wonder if any of the people who are saying, No big deal, they paid so what, it ws just a mistake….would try to not pay their taxes.
I DOUBT IT!!! The IRS comes after you, etc. Gee if they try could we use “I voted for Obama” as an excuse.
I DOUBT IT…Let’s talk about some integrity…then again do they have any!!

Posted by: Sue | March 31, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Let’s leave this poor woman alone. Rather, why the President won’t release a copy of his original birth certificate on file in Hawaii? Why does he continue to send lawyers into court to block the release of this very basic document? What could he be hiding? Why no curiosity
on the part of the press?

Posted by: Terry | March 31, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

What amuses me about this is that if George Bush had this same experience with his cabinet, it would never, never leave the front pages or ABC, CBS or NBC news. But, since it’s the darling of the media with this problem, it’s just a minor thing that not a particularly big deal. The media has made Obama, they have a huge investment in seeing him succeed.

Posted by: Don | March 31, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

This is getting rather sickening.
How many is this now?
Somebody told be last summer to be weary of Obama, that he is from Chicago, the land of corruption. I thought, yeah right.
Well, I voted for the guy and now wished I hadn’t. This isn’t the sole reason, but the straw that broke the camel’s back.
Your poll, chalk me up for “disapprove” now.

Posted by: Becky T | March 31, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

I have been arguing with the IRS about my 06 return since 07. I don’t owe the money and they admit I don’t owe it but they say my preparer didn’t fill out the right form. So far two preparers and one attorney haven’t been able to figure out which form that is. They are threatening to seize assets for $4,500.
Our esteemed leader has been nominating people who intentionally don’t pay taxes they actually owe and we’re expected to accept it because it’s only a mere $7,918.
They’re threatening to “seize assets” over $4,500 I don’t owe but it’s okay for one of the elite to not pay $7,918 she actually owes.
Must be nice to be one of the elite instead of one of the proletariat.

Posted by: Oonogil | March 31, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

yyyyeeeaaahhhhhh keep it up! im lovin this change man. this is what the people wanted. now im just waitin for a revolution to break out. people are to stupid and blind anyway. fyi my fellow americans we lost our country to our currupt system thats been raping us for years. isnt it about time we get it back?

Posted by: matt | March 31, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Wow! I’m starting to think that either all of the nominee’s are corrupt or the tax code is too complicated. How about a flat tax (?) and then we won’t expose all of the corrupt politicians

Posted by: Scoartney | March 31, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

OMFG, “unintentional errors, which we immediately corrected” and “The problems don’t appear likely to derail her nomination.”
This is good to know because next year I plan to unintentionally make errors in my tax returns and hope that B.O. will nominate me for a cabinate office so I won’t be prosecuted under the tax law like Joe Sixpack but rather get a reprieve.

Posted by: don | March 31, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Don,
Don’t forget to file expense reports to collect your per diem while you sleep in your own bed.

Posted by: jiml1956 | April 1, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I keep hearing Palin’s name being brought up—I guess it’s true–the best defense is a good offense. Chris Dodd and Barney Franks both used that ploy. Both of those Demos took big contributions from Freddy and Fannie. Ol’ Barney had a male prostitute working out of his apartment a few years back. How come he didn’t come to the defense of Sen. Craig? Ted Kennedy is on the Ethics Committee—he drove Mary Jo Kopechne to her death and abandoned her. Hillary is one of the most corrupt people to hold office and Obama’s heroes were all Marxists. Pelosi’s husband owns million in stock in Del Monte who owns StarKist Tuna and Pelosi got an exemption for StarKist so they don’t have to pay their Samoan workers the new minimum wage–a savings of about 2 bucks an hour for StarKist, the largest employer in Samoa. The list goes on and on. I’m non-partisan but I didn’t vote for Obama if Chicago’s Al Capone was still alive he probably would be appointed FBI chief by Hussein
Obama. Biden met with leaders of S.A. countries today and because they are upset about all their criminal immigrants being returned and the loss of revenue being sent home, Biden told them there needs to be a program to allow all the illegal crooks in this country to become citizens even though the people paying that idits wages clearly stated they are against any form of amnesty. Maybe we need to organize some street protests. th arrogance of our elected officials is unbearable.

Posted by: Ron Powell | April 1, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Ron,
Where have you been the past 8 years?

Posted by: jiml1956 | April 1, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

What amuses me about this is that if George Bush had this same experience with his cabinet, it would never, never leave the front pages or ABC, CBS or NBC news. But, since it’s the darling of the media with this problem, it’s just a minor thing that not a particularly big deal. The media has made Obama, they have a huge investment in seeing him succeed.
Posted by: Don | Mar 31, 2009 10:57:16 PM
***************************
Hello. You found this on the front page of ABC. As well as the past ones.

Posted by: FedUp | April 1, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Some people believe the issue of the President’s birth certificate has been resolved, is it true? If so, then why would he send lawyers into court to block the release of his original birth certificate (not the abstract seen on the Internet)? What could he be hiding? Why won’t the press look into this? If you want to be informed, then check out this link
http://24ahead.com/s/obama-citizenship

Posted by: Terry | April 1, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

FedUp …it’s called Vetting….nothing new. your going work for the tax payers of America, let make sure your not a crook or tax cheat, that would leave Obama with no one
Posted by: payupmidclass | Mar 31, 2009 10:22:22 PM
**********************************
Sorry, not getting intentional “cheating” out of this one. Did Gaithner tho. I’d imagine if I got audited we’d end up being told we messed up something as well.

Posted by: FedUp | April 1, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am

The comments that are being made over 7 grand are beyond hysterical to me. Come on is that even going to make a dent in all the back taxes owed by americans. All you self righteous republicans making these comments, I am sure there are plenty of you out there that have not paid your taxes. Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

Posted by: Justin | April 1, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Justin, I’m with you man, why should we worry about the vetting of this woman when the President himself wasn’t properly vetted? Shouldn’t you check out this link?
http://24ahead.com/s/obama-citizenship

Posted by: Terry | April 1, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

So, cheating on taxes is ok. Fine. Count me in.

Posted by: tax cheater | April 1, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am

Incredible! Another Obama tax cheat!! More from the party of tax cheats and higher taxes. Do you think liberals pay the taxes they create for the common folks?

Posted by: Mihann | April 1, 2009, 3:41 am 3:41 am

The government must reap what it sows. America, the message is as follows: LIE ON YOUR 1040!!! I am certainly going to lie – I have a lot that requires honest reporting (like overseas bank accounts in my asian name and overseas income). HOW CAN THEY POSSIBLY FIND OUT?!! They are clearly telling me NOT to report this income. Without it, I am eligible for the earned income exclusion. WHERE’S MY CHECK, GEITHNER? I MADE OVER $140,000 in 2008 and will claim the earned income exclusion!! Thanks for the message, government. I have learned it well and got it loud and clear.

Posted by: tax cheater | April 1, 2009, 3:45 am 3:45 am

The problem is these guys are trying to build a system based on higher taxes and they themselves don’t comply. I mean if it’s really just a simple mistake, how come there’s never an accidental overpayment? It makes them look like absolute hypocrites. And will any of them see jail time for failing to pay their taxes? Somehow I doubt it. They probably won’t lose a wink of sleep about it.

Posted by: Yet another taxpayer | April 1, 2009, 4:39 am 4:39 am

Man!! Why are all these commenter and people here SO over this tax issue problem?!!! Before you call someone a tax cheat, you’ll need to see if the person HAS the INTENT to hide additional money from the government and IRS. I believe that it’s because the complexity of the tax code that many of these picks misrepresented their tax(those thick stacks of tax forms, gray fine prints on the last page, and those GAZILLIONS whatchamacallit rules.)
AT least, people, this is “TRANSPARENCY”; we know who missed their taxes and we’re not kept in the dark about it; we know every single cent they didn’t pay to the government.
As for Sebelius, she paid off the $7,000 she owed already, she just reported it just in case the Senate misunderstood her and scrutinize it. Calm Down, Guys!!!

Posted by: Jeffery09 | April 1, 2009, 4:51 am 4:51 am

obama is a great deal like bush. obama ignores or overlooks the misdeeds of people he selects for his administration. like bush, obama is not careful during the selection process. people are lying to obama just as they lied to bush. Kathleen Sebelius is just the latest of a list of idiots obama has hand picked. the buck stops with obama, it is his responsibility. there is no change, my fellow americans, there is no change.

Posted by: Lawrence | April 1, 2009, 5:34 am 5:34 am

“$7,040 in back taxes and $878 in interest” – That’s not small potatoes. I can’t believe there are so many of his nominees with Tax problems and everyone keeps brushing it off as “minor” mistakes. These are the people that are supposed to be smart enough to run our country. Maybe they’re showing us just how easy it is to cheat on your taxes.

Posted by: Willy | April 1, 2009, 5:57 am 5:57 am

Amoung the criteria used by Obama to evaluate possible nominees, honesty, integrity and competence don’t even make the list. Instead, Loyality to Obama, Loyality to The Party and Ideological Purity are primary.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | April 1, 2009, 6:11 am 6:11 am

The vetting process failed in the beginning with the “vetting” of Obama. Why shud we think it anymore capable now?

Posted by: Sam Deakins | April 1, 2009, 6:21 am 6:21 am

These kind of topics on nominees that have not paid all taxes, does not make me think less of President Obama nor does it make me think that Sebelius is a tax cheat.
However, it does make me think of my tax lady that prepares my taxes…I hope she is doing a better job than the tax preparers that are doing the taxes for these nominees..
This tax problem is not a Democrat problem, it is a symptom of the wealthy, as Leona Helmsley is quoted,
“We don’t pay taxes, Only the little people pay taxes”.
It is why Warren Buffet pays about 17% in taxes but, his secretary pays 35% in taxes…
While we the little people have our taxes yanked from our paychecks, many of the wealthy seek to pay as little in taxes as possible, even to putting their money away in banks accounts in other countries to avoid paying taxes…
yeah… but./
My ex husband wasn’t wealthy, but, as a self employed person, he would ask for cash whenever possible so he would not have to turn it in on his taxes…
So people everywhere, try hard not to pay taxes…
Which is a good reason to reform the way we pay taxes…

Posted by: theafalcon200 | April 1, 2009, 6:24 am 6:24 am

The Falcon,
The Problem is Blind Partisan Trust and too many taxes. Not the Wealthy.
If you want a Real reform of Taxes, how about a National Sales tax? Or a Flat Tax? Then those of us that work 2 jobs will get to take more home and it will be easier fo all of us to become Wealthy.
Instead of what is happening now which is we are all getting Poorer. This will only get worse with more irresponsible Spending by the Government.
Oh and according to the Rest of the World….even our Poor is Wealthy…

Posted by: Patch W Adams | April 1, 2009, 7:26 am 7:26 am

Look at the bright side. We found a Democrat that makes charitable contributions. Well, it was probably to another Democrat.

Posted by: shiggybop | April 1, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Willy wrote: “”$7,040 in back taxes and $878 in interest” – That’s not small potatoes.”
Actually it is when you consider that it was for 2 people (husband and wife) over a 3 year period. And I think it’s safe to say these 2 were earning a tad more than minimum wage during this time.

Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 1, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Pathetic

Posted by: Why are we in this handbasket? | April 1, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Oh, give us a break, One_American. A rabid democrat could write the very same thing about Republicans, only by changing the word socialist to fascist. This constant name calling, not to mention some of the vulgarity, doesn´t get us anywhere. The problem here is with the tax codes which encourages carelessness (as in the case of Sibelius,) confusion (perhaps for Daschle) and real shenanigans as in the case of Geithner and how many other rich people who find a lot of loopholes.
You think Bush appointees and other assorted Republicans never made m “mistakes” with their taxes? That´s good for a few laughs.

Posted by: BachisBest | April 1, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Some folks might think this is no big deal as indeed some of the comments show, and the obvious attempts to downplay this story of yet another Obama candidate nominee that has once again failed in paying taxes, “mistake” or not. It is ALWAYS an innocent mistake or “error”, but by golly they want to run our country in some very key positions! (And it is not the amount that should outrage us, but the fact it happened at all.) Most average taxpayers could never get away with what these folks do. King George cannot compare to the thugs in D.C. and our local governments.

Posted by: casey | April 1, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Um? you are an idiot. It doesn’t matter how much, it is the fact they know they would get caught and did it anyway. You have to be really stupid to let this go, or is it okay because they are Dems? The old hypocritical double standard that you liberals have. You would crucify Bush for this, so you are nothing more than a liar and hypocrite. Obama is proving he is not only a fraud but not qualified to hold the presidency. He’s running under 50% getting through Congress due to criminal acts.

Posted by: Former_Democrat | April 1, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Based on the comments here, there are no surprises about who thinks what. The Democrats think that it was an honest mistake, the Republicans think it was deliberate, possibly criminal behavior. Tolerance and ‘benefit of the doubt’ versus intolerance and rigidity. Left versus Right. The age-old battle rages on……..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 1, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

this is one way to increase government revenue, keep letting obama nominate democrates for jobs! by the way, does anyone know if obama has been audited himself? if not, we’re probably missing out on some more money there as well. we could get him to pay for fudging his and princess michelle’s taxes next.

Posted by: picklepants7 | April 1, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Each and everyone on the government’s payroll should have their tax returns audited, including potential candidates BEFORE the fact. I believe it would reveal an astonishing number who failed to pay year after year, for which there is no excuse. If our government officials and top level wannabes can’t manage their own finances, how on earth can they efficiently run our government? We seem to have a proliferation of tax evaders and cheats running amuck and dragging our country down the tubes, not to mention all those involved in corruption, embezzling and fraud. Whatever happened to integrity, character and morals?

Posted by: minuteman2 | April 1, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

This is truly change we can all believe in. What a bunch of bologna. How did so many Americans fall for this bumper sticker B.S.?
My guess is barry will take on washington’s corruption problems about as much as he did in chicago- which is never.

Posted by: Jill | April 1, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

So these gifted liberals who are today working to solve the planets economic problems are too stupid (or crooked) to accurately fill out a simple tax return. How comforting.
And I love the twisted logic by the tax cheat apologists on this blog; all these democrats getting caught cheating on their taxes is actually evidence of their honesty. Precious.

Posted by: Ken | April 1, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Seems to be a trend!

Posted by: LongT | April 1, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

If his cabinet nominees owe less than $50,000 it’s actually viewed as a positive now.

Posted by: Spread That Wealth | April 1, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Come on PEOPLE! This would only be news if it was Republican. If they are Democrat it is a minor oversight. Get back to the script!

Posted by: JChilman | April 2, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.