Mar 22, 2009 12:19pm
‘This Week’ Roundtable: Bonus Backlash
Today on the "This Week" Roundtable, former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, ABC’s George Will, Betsy Stark and Donna Brazile debated the furor in Washington, D.C. over the AIG bonuses and the legislation passed in the House, and drafted in the Senate, to tax back company bonuses.
Watch this:
–George Stephanopoulos
Email
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Re Ms Brazile’s comment that Americans are fearful of Wall St. Actually, Wall St. does not scare me.. this administration does.
Posted by: Norman C. Gilmore | March 22, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
If you monitor the comments on the Internet, there is a growing polarization growing between those that represent the wealthy and politically influential verses those who have lost their savings and livelihood. This has me concerned because the taxpayer outrage over the AIG bonuses is a prime example of how the current conditions match that of the causes of the French Revolution. Do to the similarities of the times, members of Congress should read the causes for the French Revolution of 1789-1799 on Wikipedia.
I am NOT calling for revolution, but simply comparing the similarities that led to events past and present. Such as hunger, homelessness, unmanageable national debt, greed, high unemployment, the financing of multiple wars while not funding social needs, high food prices, the El Niño effect, support of revolutionaries overseas (American Colonies vs. Iraq), social burdens at home caused by war, the leadership’s military failures and ineptitude, the lack of social services for war veterans, the burden of a grossly inequitable system of taxation and conflicts over financial advisers and reporting transparency.
In addition, there were/are social and political factors, many of which involve resentments and aspirations. For example, do today’s wealthy and politically influential (bourgeoisie) merchant class and banking interests project a similar image to that of the aristocratic ruling class of the French 1790′s?
While there are many differences between now and the French Revolution, how many similarities must there be before we begin to work together to prevent the prospect of another revolution? I fear that the AIG bonuses, and those to come at other banking institutions, have already started our next revolution and that the conflict between the banks and the taxpayers will widen and the hostilities begin.
Posted by: PragmaticStatistic | March 22, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
I just can’t imagine giving money to people who make bad decisions – - – whether it be bailouts or bonuses. How do people get that dumb? And why did Americans choose desperation and vote these people in instead of choosing toughness and bravery to fight hard. There sure is a difference in voters of the last 20+ years.
Posted by: TEX | March 22, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe says a high tax on bonuses paid to executives by companies receiving bailout funds could likely be structured in a way to avoid constitutional problems.
Some proposals are circulating to tax bonuses at rates varying from 70 percent to 100 percent as a way to recoup the $165 million paid to executives at AIG, the Wall Street Journal (sub. req.) reports.
One issue is whether such a bill violates the Constitution’s ban on Bills of Attainder that punish a person or group without a trial. Tribe told the Wall Street Journal that Congress could avoid that constitutional problem with a broad bill that doesn’t target “a closed class of named executives.” Also blunting any Bill of Attainder challenge would be the fact that the aim of the tax is fiscal rather than punitive, and it would apply in the future as well as retroactively, Tribe wrote in a summary posted at the Atlantic.
Another issue is whether retroactive taxes violate the ex post facto clause. Actually, it’s a nonissue, Tribe says. “The ex post facto clause applies exclusively to criminal punishment and poses no difficulty here,” Tribe told the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.
Tribe also addressed whether the law would violate the contracts clause, the takings clause and the due process clause in the Wall Street Journal Law Blog interview. He saw no problem. Many courts have ruled requirements for substantive due process are not violated if the legislation has a rational legislative purpose, “something nobody could deny in this instance,” according to Tribe.
The Wall Street Journal also points out that a tax rate approaching 100 percent is not unprecedented. The top federal income-tax rate was once 90 percent, and some excise taxes on specific transactions have hit 100 percent.
Posted by: cowgirl | March 22, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Why think about anarchy against the United States government now!!!!
Is it because we have a African American President???
No one seem to care when Bush & Cheney was in office!!!!
The American TAXPAYERS did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | March 22, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Former Secretary Robert B. Reich is absolutely correct. A crime has not only taken place here, it is ongoing.
The additional $30 billion line of credit from the U.S. Treasury that was made available to AIG needs to be appropriated to the U.S. Department of Justice for hiring investigators, auditors and prosecutors to pursue extortion and fraud claims against AIG and its directors, and unjust enrichment claims against any AIG counter-parties who were paid-off with money provided by the U.S. Treasury. All of this money, including the $165 million paid in employee bonuses can be recovered by having a U.S. federal court, in equity, impose a constructive trust over that money obtained by AIG through its extortion and fraud against the federal government.
Posted by: Pro Se | March 22, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
I did not “Even Know” I was “outraged” about AIG Bonuses until the President, Congress and the Media told me…
And since the same parties are not talking about the Federal Reserve buying back Government and Mortgage Debts to the tune of $1.2 Trillion… I guess there should be no concern on my part regarding this unprecedented move by the FED.
It’s also good to “know” that I am not outraged about the $13 Billion in AIG bailout funds that have gone to Goldman Sachs and another $35 Billion plus that have gone tor foreign banks.
Always good to be “know” what “outrages” me., Joe
Posted by: Joe Robertson | March 22, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
The fact is-most of these commentators know nothing of what the ordinary american thinks..nor do they care…george will is inbedded in republican dogma and can’t be expected to offer a solution that speaks to what americans feel, or their problems, he is neither accurate or articulate
Posted by: cowgirl | March 22, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Wall Street has run wild with our money..first as investors, then as taxpayers..they have fleeced americans of their savings and retirements and now their future earnings..You are heading down the wrong track suggesting they deserve to keep their high bonuses and incomes…George Will supports the kind of conduct and morals that got us here..I don’t think the americanpublic does..we don’t worship wall street the way he does…before i ever put a dime back on wall street..I want to know my money is being handled but sensible people who know the value of the dollar..not monetary potentates..
Posted by: cowgirl | March 22, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
I am angry at the Congress. We never hear about the damage they did to create this meltdown. Now they appear so innocent. They even did not take their raises this year. I am sure under protest. However they tripled their “expense accounts”. Like from $30,000 to 90,000. Is that any worse than AIG? Do you ever hear about this? I am now sure that Nancy Pelosi and Rom Emanuel are running the country. God save us!
Posted by: Jo | March 22, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Robert Reich blames market failure for the current economic woes. We have not had a pure market for decades. What is new is the huge amount of taxpayer money being transferred to banks to reimburse them for losses. Instead of a bailout, they should go to bankruptcy court. As it is very clear to everyone, trillions of dollars of bailouts have not improved the economy.
The government regulates banks and insurance companies, setting the rules and monitoring them. It was the government that permitted the investment banks to leverage up their capital 30 to 1. FDIC insured banks should not have been permitted to loan money to hedge funds without collateral like T bills. Banks should not have been permitted to have off balance sheet investments.
This is all failure of government. This is crony capitalism. If you have connections, the government will bail you out with taxpayer money. Bankrupt firms should go bankrupt. No company should be allowed to dominate an industry like AIG did. Break up AIG like the phone company. No company is too big to fail.
Finally, derivatives should not be owned nor financed by FDIC insured banks. Let rich people and hedge funds invest with their own money in them. They should not be able to borrow from an FDIC insured bank and turn around and speculate in derivatives.
Posted by: Bennet Cecil | March 22, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Cowgirl, I agree.
I am a former employee of BearStearns and can testify to the idea that markets unfettered by government regulations will do just fine. There is a new book out about BearStearns if anyone is interested that details the level of corruption and selfishness that motivates Wall St.
I walked away after working for most major Wall St. firms and can tell you in all honesty that the whole basket is nothing more that legallized theft, on the retail comsumer level or institutional level. Greed motivates and drives every decision. My former manager at Morgan Stanley put it well, “Frog, we are not here to investment money for the longterm. We are hear to generate commission sales. Regradless of an investment being up or down, sell or buy. Commissions bring bigger checks for all of us.”
George Will is the most simple minded man I have seen on TV given his position. He is clinging to ideas of his hero, Ronald Reagan, another very simple minded man (and I am holding back on my true thoughts about these two.)
Faced with all historical evidence to the contrary, George Will continues to warn us in his banal bag of brains “YOU JUST WAIT AND SEE. YOU JUST WAIT AND SEE.” How pathetic!
I do simpathize, however. It is a terrible thing to see every idea, concept and theory you have held to be true over so many years completely collapse in such a horrific and disastrous way as we see today. But it is unforgivable to continue to cling to them in face of all evidence showing them for what they are and refuse to be big enough, humble enough or intelligent enough to realize the error and work positively for a new approach. George Will (and, in general, all these republican demagogues)cannot give up and only offer the most consistent ridiculous rants: let the market take care of itself and all will be just fine, deregulate, cut taxes further, spend nothing (fine when democrats are in, but it’s a very different story when republicans are in office. In the latter case, spend all you can but only give the money to the rich and massively incompetent, overpaid executives.)
If the market were to take care of itself, all major US banks would fail, the auto industry would fail, companies would be collapsing on all sides, millions of people would be thrown into huge tent cities and complete poverty, and the $10 to $100 million a year CEOs would simple walk off saying “its not our fault, we didn’t do it, how could we have predicted that our business were operation on completely bogus business models?”
Posted by: basementfrog | March 22, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Cowgirl, I agree.
I am a former employee of BearStearns and can testify to the idea that “markets unfettered by government regulations will do just fine” is a misguided and factually untrue statement. There is a new book out about BearStearns if anyone is interested that details the level of corruption and selfishness that motivates Wall St.
I walked away after working for most major Wall St. firms and can tell you in all honesty that the whole basket is nothing more than legallized theft, on both the retail comsumer level and institutional level. Greed, pure selfish enrichment, motivates and drives every decision. My former manager at Morgan Stanley put it well, “Frog, we are not here to investment money for the longterm. We are hear to generate commission sales. Regradless of an investment being up or down, sell or buy. Commissions bring bigger checks for all of us. Make it happen.”
George Will is the most simple minded man I have seen on TV given his position. He is clinging to ideas of his hero, Ronald Reagan, another very simple minded man (and I am holding back on my true thoughts about these two.)
Faced with all historical evidence to the contrary, George Will continues to warn us in his banal bag of brains “YOU JUST WAIT AND SEE. YOU JUST WAIT AND SEE.” How pathetic!
I do simpathize, however. It is a terrible thing to see every idea, concept and theory you have held to be true over so many years completely collapse in such a horrific and disastrous way as we see today. But it is unforgivable to continue to cling to them in face of all evidence showing them for what they are and refuse to be big enough, humble enough or intelligent enough to realize the error and work positively for a new approach. George Will (and, in general, all these republican demagogues)cannot give up and only offer the most consistent ridiculous rants: let the market take care of itself and all will be just fine, deregulate, cut taxes further, spend nothing (fine when democrats are in, but it’s a very different story when republicans are in office. In the latter case, spend all you can but only give the money to the rich and massively incompetent, overpaid corporate executives.)
If the market were to take care of itself, all major US banks would fail, the auto industry would fail, companies would be collapsing on all sides, millions of people would be thrown into huge tent cities and complete poverty, and the $10 to $100 million a year CEOs would simple walk off saying “its not our fault, we didn’t do it, how could we have predicted that our businesses were operation on completely bogus business models?” And those ridiculous models are built on the generously stupid ideas of ‘Reagonomics.” Those simple-minded ideas George Will et al cling to.
Posted by: basementfrog | March 22, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Mr. Frog. There is a video clip circulating of Ma and Pa Kettle explaining how they conclude that 5 into 25 =14, which fits todays financial climate. That bear sterns and others used fuzzy math or simple thievery is an understatement but then so does the government that is joined at the hip with wallstreet.. There are plenty of medium sized banks, many large companies, all over this country that are honest, treat their customers honestly and operate with the utmost integrity.
To go and place a “special Tax” on one group is dangerous, reeks of a Soviet style government and makes me wonder who is next. If they are serious about seeking justice they should investigate who caused what, were there laws broken and if so punish the guilty. Having the Congress and press whip the public to a frenzy and sending mobs of people to the homes of the “guilty” is akin to the days of public lynchings.
This broo ha ha is nothing more than deflection of the ineptness of politicians to do their job.
Posted by: david | March 22, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Poster “Norman C. Gilmore” says he is not scared of Wall Street, but Obama Admin. In what way? Every aspect?
The Wall Street executives have impunity and they cannot go to jail even they lose your or my money. Congress also does this to some extent. With the exception of Madoff and a few, can you prove them they did this intentionally so that the impunity clause can be taken out?
I think we have to scared of the Wall Street and some in Congress — not so much Obama admin unless we talk partisan politics.
Posted by: Jason | March 22, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
You voted for Obama …
You got a socialist!
What did you expect anyway?
A free lunch?
Posted by: dl | March 22, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Isn’t it a bit sad that our Erstwhile Congress develops a MOB Attitude against retention bonuses THEY AUTHORIZED; then holds an kangaroo court to skewer a CEO for doing what the law permitted; the chief architect of the legislation first denies, but later remember his handy work; and by the end of the week, they want BILLIONS MORE TO THROW AT A PROBLEM THEY CREATED!!??
Geithner wants to at least appear as though he is in the dark and KNOWS NOTHING, but was hired for his ‘knowledge’ of being in charge of the NY Fed and the territory – including AIG!!
In the meantime, over at 1600 PA Ave, the President is filling out his brackets and calling the winners of the Final Four — before appearing on Leno and insulting special needs kids!!
What a week it was!! And they think we are going to trust them????? Watch businesses start moving out of the US. Who wants to put up with THIS?? How quickly we are becoming a laughing stock. Perhaps it is now time for Mrs. Obama to tell the government that she is again “ASHAMED”!!
Posted by: PappyHappy | March 22, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
I want RON Paul on. PLEASE these talk alike look alike people you have on are boring. THEY really are nothing but old 60′s radicals and people that are party over substance.
Posted by: ChicagBob | March 22, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
The Wall Street Journal also points out that a tax rate approaching 100 percent is not unprecedented. The top federal income-tax rate was once 90 percent, and some excise taxes on specific transactions have hit 100 percent.
Posted by: cowgirl>>>>>>>>>>
You forgot its probably unconstitutional.. THE only people I want 100 percent taxed is the Congressmen. YES they signed this bill into action that allowed this. SO I WANT THEIR Salaries to be taxed 100%. Hows that for fair?
Posted by: ChicagBob | March 22, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Some have been saying that Mr. Geithner got go go. I, however, after seeing a clear evidence, would rather have Mr. Geithner stayed and Mr. Obama gone.
Posted by: young_voter | March 22, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Fellow Republicans , I heard that the FBI and CIA were sending covert agents to all of the tea parties to gather information/names .
Patriotic Republicans , be warned !!
Posted by: loki | March 22, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Fellow Republicans , I heard that the FBI and CIA were sending covert agents to all of the tea parties to gather information/names .
Patriotic Republicans , be warned !!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The CIA are not allowed to act on American soil. They are not a national agency. BUT I am going to DC if I can on July 4th ENOUGH lets march!
Posted by: ChicagBob | March 22, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
I suggest you read Jesse Ventura’s book about when he was Governor. Read how he asked the CIA why they WERE operating in the US, and what they told him in response.
Posted by: hmn... | March 23, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am
AIG is only alive at this time because of the bailout cash, the PIGxecutives or any employee of a bailout corporation has NO business getting a bonus … period. The PIGS are stealing the bailout money, people should go to jail. Start with Bernie Maddoff, put him in a small cell with long-dong-silver, confiscate his everything, his fugly wife’s everything, his incompetent children’s everything, his close & distant relatives everything, his barber, his rabbi, his gold teeth, his colonostopy doctor, and even his gay lover.
WE THE PEOPLE approved a $700b bailout that is now 1.3 trillion, expected to reach 4 trillion in 4 years, projected to be at 8 trillion in 10 years. At a time when there is a baby boom production of which 42% are single mothers with no means to provide basic needs to the leaches being born. Good job parents of America! May the fleas of a thousand camels infest the c_r_o_t_c_h of every lazy freeloader, every incompetent larda$$, and every corporate PIGxecutive dead weigh on this awesome country of ours.
Posted by: We The People | March 23, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Sarah
http://www.lyricsdigs.com
Posted by: Sarah | March 23, 2009, 5:55 am 5:55 am
Chicago Bob,you might want to read my first entry about the consitutionality of taxing the bonuses, I went looking for some consitutional authority for this…since i am offended by people who have no standing on this issue speaking out–on that which they no nothing of…which includes reporters, politicians and bloggers.
Posted by: cowgirl | March 23, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
AIG bonuses have finally awakened the American people who sat up and screamed: THAT’S ENOUGH!!! Executives have felt for too long that they are indispensible. We’ve all known that their only interest has been the quick buck (for them) so why should anyone be shocked that AIG executives would TAKE the bonuses and THEN be surprised at everyone’s reaction. Madeoff has shown the world that even people in high position’s can do dumb things.
Posted by: JerryH | March 24, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Why do liberals keep chiding us fiscal, constitutional,and social conservatives that “we must work together” to save our country, when in actuality they mean we must shut up and concede to their un-American policies?
For those of you that thought GW Bush was a bad president, “you ain’t seen nuttin yet!”
Posted by: blacklabbob | March 25, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am
Why doesn’t anyone do a special about the TRAITORS IN MY COUNTRY! JUST BECAUSE THEY COME FROM HOLLYWOOD DOES THAT MEAN THAY GET A PASS? Associating with the enemy,what kind of nonsense is that?Remember Hanoi Jane? She got off the hook because of her father,Henry Fonda,another great actor,who was only what he read,just like our FEARLESS LEADER!
Posted by: amstaffbru | March 25, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Back away from all the heat about AIG, greed on Wall Street and look for the root causes of both our nation’s economic dilemma and the use of $165M for bonuses to losers paid from taxpayer money. Back away from the blame game and look for light on the problem. I suggest the systemic cause of all this is favoritism, or what I would characterize as corruption. That corruption rises from Washington having the power to take from one American by taxation and give to another by a wide range of programs fronm those designed to help the truly needy to those cynically paying off campaign contributors. McCain recognized the problem when he got sucked into the Keating Five mess and with a Democrat introduced McCain-Feingold reform. It is under attack as a violation of the freedom of speech Ammendent One, and probably should be. It was flawed by passing through the political process which it would disrupt. This reform should be revisited but in a much broader context. It is one part of the circuit from taxes to transfer payments to payoffs to more taxes or debt. It is the most amenable to reform, and thus the best place to start. I favor limiting campaign contributions to individuals so we can see who is laying out the money and draw our own conclusions as to their motivation. In a longer view I suggest we review the balance of the corrupt vicious circle and I ask whether government ought not be limited to setting rules assuring “Equal Justice Under Law” and eschewing the role of addressing every human need that fosters this corruption of congress. For millenia, since before the dawn of man, creatures banded together VOLUNTARILY to address their common problems, and it worked pretty well. Government, with the ability to tax, is not a VOLUNTARY association. I’m kinda revolutionary in these thoughts, and I welcome comment from YOU on them. Until then, stick a cork in all the invective in these blogs directed at one party, one President, or the other. In the final chapter of his book, “Parliament of Whores”, P. J. O’Rourk used a local town’s experience to show how everybody wants something done by them (government). His book up til then had described the ridiculous excesses of Washington. That final chapter showed, as Pogo said, “We have met the enemy and they is us”. In the name of freedom please consider what you get from the government, what you have wanted from the government, and how these things inevitably lead to the corruption against which we are all united.
Posted by: tom beebe | March 26, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
I JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND
I just don’t understand! People who couldn’t save 20% for a down payment were given a chance to buy their own home. They were able to make their monthly payments. Some of the people who had owned their homes for 20 years had built up equity, were able to re-mortgage to buy a new car and make some improvements on their home. They to were able to make their payments to the bank of $1,500.00 a month. All of a sudden their payment doubles or triples going to over $3000.00 and could no longer make their payment. The Bank foreclosed and they were evicted from their homes. The Bank now owns their house which is now vacant and being vandalized. The value is just decreasing every day. Wouldn’t the bank have been better off if the bank kept the people in their home at $1,500.00 a month, the bank was still making money.
We are now blaming the people who the Bank gave the mortgage to for the state of the economy and are giving big bonuses to the executives for putting these deals together.
If the Banks didn’t get us, the credit card companies will. The people who haven’t lost their homes have used their credit cards to stay a float, waiting for the economy to turn around. The credit card companies have increased their fees out of sight and nobody seems to care.
So why doesn’t the Government take action before credit card companies end up screwing us over like the Banks did. Or the credit card companies send more people into bankruptcy.
Posted by: Richard Jameson | March 26, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Richard: read my entry which precedes yours. If you want to “understand” start with a search for the cause (NOT the blame) of the screwups. As I suggested, they’re rooted in the government being able to force you to give up your money for whatever cause lines their pockets. Yet here you are saying “why doesn’t the take action….” Why don’t we take action to limit what the government does do? Look hard at your complaints; they originate with a government which lied to the people you describe, telling them they could have credit to buy what they couldn’t afford. As I said, there’s plenty of blame to go around; but are YOU blameless, or are those who over-borrowed blamelsee?
Posted by: Tom Beebe | March 26, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Reich wingers certainly know how to drive up the “negatives” of their opponents using tried and true tactics of lying about facts, slander and fear mongering. Here’s how they do it: In a rare display of candor, North Carolina Representative Patrick McHenry said:____ “Our goal is to bring down the approval numbers for [Speaker] Pelosi and for House Democrats. That will take repetition. This is a marathon, not a sprint.” ______He boasted about the GOP’s “strategy” going forward: “We will lose on legislation. But we will win the message war every day, and every week, until November 2010.” This Republican “communications” operation is already in full swing with the corporate media playing the usual enabler role. Even though we’re facing what Alan Greenspan called a “once in a century” economic cataclysm, the public airwaves are still filled with the familiar Republican boilerplate: cut taxes, cut spending, deregulate, let the market work its magic, and so on.
___In other words, the right will use a page out of the Third Reicn’s play book and use constant repetition of untruths to wear the public down and turn them against Obama. I hope Democrats will meet them at the door and fight GOP repetition with Republican repetition. Otherwise the GOP will push the big lie and the media will help them, since all major media outlets are right wing GOP enablers who repeat Republican mantras over and over again.
Posted by: JL | March 27, 2009, 3:54 am 3:54 am
I meant to say I hope the Democrats will fight Republican repetition of lies with Democratic repetition of refutation and put out the facts so the public won’t buy into GOP hogwash that the GOP repeats over and over with the press’s help to wear down the public and capitalize on the public not knowing the facts of any given situation. That is how the Third Reich propagated its lies also. Repetition in the press.
Posted by: JL | March 27, 2009, 3:58 am 3:58 am