This Week’s Podcast: House Minority Whip Eric Cantor
On the ABC News Shuffle Podcast this week we chatted with Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., the House Minority Whip.
You can listen to it on iTunes or HERE. The Podcast is produced by the wonderful Huma Khan.
Cantor pushed back on a new attack from Democrats. "Let me say something about the allegations that the Republicans are the party of ‘No,’" he said. "We’re the party of K-N-O-W, not N-O. It is that we know the path back to how to get the economy back on track."
Saying that "the country is tired of partisanship," Cantor said Republicans are "going to work on getting a bipartisan budget: We absolutely will. We were reaching out all the time during the stimulus process. The president continues to say he wanted to work with us, he had us at the White House. Speaker Pelosi did not reciprocate, did not at all invite Republicans in."
The result, he said, "is a stimulus bill that now people are already saying doesn’t work. We’ve got economists out there saying they’re going to fall short in terms of their goal of creating three and a half million new jobs."
That raised an interesting conundrum, I thought. How does Cantor walk the line between attacking ideas he disagrees with and talking down the stimulus?
"Our role now that it is passed is to ensure that the expenditure of taxpayer dollars is done in a prudent way," Cantor said, "and we’ve set up a stimulus watch program that can ensure that this money can be spent in the best way possible to produce jobs. President Obama himself has given warning to city and state officials that if he sees that money is being spent on pork barrel type projects, that he’ll put a stop to that. And so we join him in that effort.
"And look, just because we may disagree on the policy," he said, "doesn’t mean that we are rooting against this president or this economy. I mean we just have certain principles that we believe in — it’s free markets, it’s the belief in the free individual and small businesses and entrepreneurship. Many of those things are under attack right now in Washington."
We also talked about his being the only Jewish Republican in the House, his relationship with House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, and other issues. And if you’ve never heard "chag sameach" said with a Southern twang, you won’t want to miss it. Listen here.
- jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
It is waste of time listening to anyhing that comes out from this stupid guy. He does KNOW anything apart fro saying NO.
Posted by: vp | March 14, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Of course Cantor disagrees with himself over the stimulus.
If Obama fixes the economy with it, the 100% Repub rejection of it will BE THE END OF HIS JOB.
Posted by: R Mutt | March 14, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
When are reporters going to hold people like Cantor’s feet to the fire? Just because they’re in the minority doesn’t mean they’re free from the responsibility to put forth plans and explain how they would work. Cantor claims Obama’s stimulus is not working. Regardless of how you can tell such a thing after just a matter of weeks, most of the economists he cites who claim it won’t create enough jobs say that is because it may be TOO SMALL. Yet Cantor and his crew wanted an even smaller stimulus. How does he square that circle? And why won’t anyone in the media challenge him to try?
Posted by: Lisa | March 14, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Cantor: “It is that we know the path back to how to get the economy back on track.”
Wow, I’m getting flashbacks to the debates last year. (McCain: “I KNOW how to get bin Laden”… Really, Mac? Care to share with the rest of the class?)
Posted by: Lisa | March 14, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Cantor was your Party or was It not the One In Power all through out the Clinton Presidency? 6 Years of Bushes Presidency? I have YET TO SEE Any Plans, Ideas, Anthing other then the Same Policies that Brought us to this Mess.FACE IT YOUR PARTY IS BANKRUPT! NO NEW IDEAS, NO THINKING ANEW, NOTHING NADA, ZIPPO, ZILCH! Let the Democrats fix your Mess please. Were better off without your parties Input REPUBLICANS PARTY OF NO!
Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | March 14, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Well if the KNOW so much why did they lose this last election and Congress two years previous?
Posted by: Jwench | March 14, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Concerned in Ohio
If the American People thought that the Republicans Acutally Knew what they were Doing, And was Offering something Diffrent then the last 14 Years or so then please tell me why they got the Life Beat out of them In 2 Elections? and their Approval Ratings are Sinking Faster then the Dow?
Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | March 14, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
“If Obama fixes the economy”
He’ll fix it, all right. Just not the way you think.
Posted by: PD | March 14, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Do Republican’s believe they are running a shadow government?
K-N-O-W (Keep Negative Obama’s Washington)
I just don’t see bipartisanship. No whining makes up for effort. If you are in the minority, you just have to work a little harder with the majority. Stop this whining public forum and get down and dirty with your colleagues.
Posted by: Rodney, Minnesota | March 14, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
“Do Republican’s believe they are running a shadow government?
K-N-O-W (Keep Negative Obama’s Washington)”
Perhaps they believe that, as elected officials, they ARE part of the government.
Obama’s Washington? What is he, king?
Remember when Obama called in a group of Democrats and Republicans for a conference, and Cantor pressed him to use Republican ideas? Remember Obama’s response? “I won.”
That’s true, Obama won the presidential election. But as a member of Congress, it’s equally true that Cantor won *his* election.
Our system of government is not a single-person rule.
Posted by: PD | March 14, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
It’s clear that the global economy won’t be influenced too greatly by any one man or country — this whole control thing is ludicrous, we have a system of complexities that overwhelms human comprehension.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 14, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Well, the American people voted in November for a Democratic President, Democratic House and Democratic Senate. Rightly or wrongly, that’s what they voted for. So it shouldn’t be surprising that Obama and the Democrats in Congress believe that gives them a mandate to pursue Democratic ideals and policies.
Bipartisanship is fine and dandy and I see nothing wrong with incorporating some ideas from the minority party if it seems like those ideas will work. But, by the same token, Republicans like Cantor can’t expect that all or most of their policies and ideas will necessarily be adopted by the President or the Congress. That’s what being in the minority means. They can vote “no” against Democratic bills if they wish but they have no standing to throw temper tantrums and rant against “partisanship”.
Elections have consequences.
Posted by: Lisa | March 14, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
‘They can vote “no” against Democratic bills if they wish but they have no standing to throw temper tantrums and rant against “partisanship”.’
What an odd thing to say. Elected representatives can vote, but they cannot voice their views?
Did you hold this position and apply it to the Democrats in 2001-2006?
Posted by: PD | March 14, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
“Elected representatives can vote, but they cannot voice their views?”
Of course they can voice their views. We do still have a 1st amendment. I didn’t say they could not voice their views. I said they have no standing to rail against partisanship, especially when it seems their definition of “bipartisanship” is that Obama should adopt Republican policies. That’s not what the American people voted for and the minority party has no standing to throw temper tantrums about that fact.
Posted by: Lisa | March 14, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
“I didn’t say they could not voice their views. I said they have no standing to rail against partisanship …”
That is self-contradictory. You say they can voice their views, but you are going to decide under what circumstances they can do so. They can voice their views, except when you think they shouldn’t.
” … especially when it seems their definition of “bipartisanship” is that Obama should adopt Republican policies.”
Well, of course they will argue for their own policies. Is bipartisanship that you abandon your own policies, even when you believe they are better, and just roll over to adopt those of the other party? No, you advance your own policies and try to convince the other side to agree.
Obama is the one not being bipartisan, when he says “I won.” Pelosi and Reid are not being bipartisan, when they shut Republicans out of committee meetings.
Posted by: PD | March 14, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
PD You demonstrate the problem with Acronyms. The conversation of the subject gets subverted to the absurd. It doesn’t matter that I was the idiot perpetuating the ill advised Acronym. You took it far beyond the subject of bipartisanship. That is the problem, bipartisanship and how they come to that problem solving convergence.
Posted by: Rodney, Minnesota | March 14, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
PD, my statements were not in any way contradictory and you are either intentionally misunderstanding them or are incapable of understanding them. Either way, I’m tired of restating it but I will try one more time. After that, comprehension is up to you.
Read what I wrote again. There’s a difference between a right to say something and the standing to say something and expect to be taken seriously.
There’s also a difference between arguing for your viewpoint and railing against the other side for being “partisan” if they don’t adopt your viewpoint.
Posted by: Lisa | March 14, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
“It is that we know the path back to how to get the economy back on track.”
.
Why do I hear Pete Seeger’s “The Big Muddy” running through my head?
Posted by: Paul Dirks | March 14, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
If only Jon Stewart did this interview, we would know that Cantor was lying through his teeth, and that Pelosi did in fact ask the Reps to participate in drafting the stimulus, yet they declined.
Posted by: Flash Override | March 14, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
What do they mean get the economy back on track? It was some of the stupid GOP ideas that helped to create this mess in the first place.Why would we want them to have anything to do with straigtening out the economy when their failed policies over the years have never worked.
Posted by: Jwench | March 14, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
There’s a difference, Concerned. The Republicans are simply saying “no” to Obama’s budget plans while coming up with NO budget plan of their own. Do you know why? Because writing down a plan inspires scrutiny to its details, something the Republicans are unwilling to risk.
If you want Cantor, et al. to be taken seriously, tell them to write a comprehensive plan of their own and invite scrutiny of it.
Posted by: Lisa | March 14, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
“If only Jon Stewart did this interview…”
I’ve come to say that a lot while watching the media at work. Sad, isn’t it? A showman on Comedy Central gets to the crux of the matter and calls out hypocrisy and talking points better than any “journalist”.
Posted by: Lisa | March 14, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
The robotic one is totally out of touch, authenticity and wisdom!
Obama, Pelosi and Reid are Partisan Plus. Obama schmoozes for the camera but that is the end of it! :(
Posted by: aware2u | March 14, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Lisa,
You hit the nail on the head. They are criticizing Obama but what solutions have they presented? None. I agree about your Jon Stewart comment as well.
Posted by: Jwench | March 14, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
“The Republicans are simply saying “no” to Obama’s budget plans while coming up with NO budget plan of their own. Do you know why? Because writing down a plan inspires scrutiny to its details, something the Republicans are unwilling to risk.”
That’s patently false. Republicans came up with ideas for the stimulus. Pelosi, 0bama, Reid, shut them out. Republicans came up with ideas on the Omnibus, 0bama said Pelosi didn’t have time to be bipartisan.
The Republicans are offering plenty of ideas, the MSM refuses to report them, and the other partisan mouthpieces abjectly refuse their very existence.
Clearly it’s working perfectly, because low-information types like you have bought into their propaganda hook, line, and sinker.
Posted by: Concerned in OH | Mar 14, 2009 4:46:18 PM
Yes it’s one big conspiracy against the Republicans. Who told you that Rush? Hannitty?
Posted by: Jwench | March 14, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
A showman on Comedy Central parrots Obama’s talking points but Cramer has been positive and funny while Obama’s fear-mongering rhetoric downed the DJIA.
Now Obama is attempting a positive dialogue with strings attached! :(
What will Jon say now? :)
Obama is the dumbest so called “brilliant” guy ever! :)
Posted by: aware2u | March 14, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Concerned: Vague, random “ideas” are not the same thing as a plan. If they don’t like the way Obama’s 10 year budget approaches health care, taxes and deficits then they need to submit a comprehensive plan that addresses those things and works together as a whole. Then the country can compare the two. Attacking an entire plan with vague, disconnected ideas that give no clue as to how their ideas would affect the deficit and economy is useless. But that’s how they want it right now. If you don’t have a plan, it can’t be scrutinized.
Posted by: Lisa | March 14, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Jwench says: Yes it’s one big conspiracy against the Republicans. Who told you that Rush? Hannitty?
It isn’t necessary to listen to Rush or Hannity – just listen to the robotic, obfuscating, out of touch, arrogant Obama and figure it out for yourself! :)
Posted by: aware2u | March 14, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
What is it that the media are the only ones who care what teh republian has to say?
On a side note, why does the media ONLY care about what the Republicans have to say?
Posted by: Flash Override | March 14, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
aware2u,
OK, point me to the Republican plan. Remember, I’m not talking about vague, disconnected “ideas” thrown out. I’m talking about a comprehensive budget plan that addresses how each of those “ideas” would affect the deficit, etc.
Obama’s full 10-year budget is freely available online for download. Point me to the Republican plan.
Posted by: Lisa | March 14, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Aware2u
Republican plan is being held in an undisclosed location to be open only during emergency…..Mr Chaney?… and by the way …. its time to leave.
Posted by: Ps | March 14, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Goodness–now even the estimable David Broder appears to have become a right-winger:
“Meantime, on the main challenge — the economy — the criticism has begun to infect the mainstream media as well as the conservative wing. I was struck last week to read heartfelt pleas to Obama from my Post colleague David Ignatius and David Brooks of the New York Times to get his priorities straight and concentrate on the crucial task of rescuing banking, credit, housing and jobs.
“These are people who deeply admire and respect Obama and wish him nothing but success. But, like some thoughtful congressional Democrats with whom I have spoken, they worry that he has bitten off more than he can chew.”
The stench of flop-sweat is palpable in the nation’s capital.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 14, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
“Obama’s full 10-year budget is freely available online for download. Point me to the Republican plan.”
Over time, you’ll probably come to realize that it is the president who proposes the budget to the congress.
If the Democrats had not stonewalled the Republican proposals to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2003 and 2005, this financial crisis would never have occurred. We can thank Barney Frank and Chuck Schumer for that.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 14, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“If the Democrats had not stonewalled the Republican proposals to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2003 and 2005, this financial crisis would never have occurred. We can thank Barney Frank and Chuck Schumer for that.”
Yeah right. That would have stopped the Republicans from letting the SEC deregulate the banking industry so that Bear Sterns and Lehman Bros could leverage themselves right out of business and almost topple AIG -which is what really triggered this financial crisis.
Posted by: Skip | March 14, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
“Obama’s full 10-year budget is freely available online for download. Point me to the Republican plan.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Mar 14, 2009 7:13:14 PM
____________
Did Obama say that he was going to spend more money in one month than was spent in the history of the planet during his campaign.
Posted by: tr | March 14, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Cantor’s endless stream of platitudes was pretty hard to listen to.
Posted by: Danny | March 14, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
The heck with ‘bi-partisanship’…I think we’ve seen Nancy Pelosi and the other Marxists’ ideas of ‘bi-partisanship’. As the Socialists currently in power stumble, jump all over them and expose them for the incompetent losers they are.
This is a golden opportunity for the Republicans to put these extremists out of the political scene permanently. Cooperate with the Leftists and they will blame the GOP when it all goes downhill. Work against them and they will blame the GOP…
Sit back and let them hang themselves. Sure, they’re damaging our country now, but perhaps a majority of voters will soon wise up (one can dream I suppose) before the damage gets any worse.
As for solutions, why should the GOP have ‘solutions’? Allow badly run businesses to go under to be replaced by more successful ones. Propping up failing banks and businesses is only making the situation worse.
Government-based ‘solutions’ are for Socialists and RINOs. They think that government is the answer to our problems, where if you look carefully you’ll see that government is usually the cause.
Posted by: RR GOP | March 14, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Great podcast, Jake! Just one question, though: isn’t the newly-discovered (or would “unearthed” be the better word?) Repub position on fiscal responsibility much like the twelfth-hour conversion of a ne’er-do-well reprobate who’s just learned that he has incurable cirrhosis of the liver after eight years of bingeing?
Posted by: chuck | March 14, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
“They think that government is the answer to our problems, where if you look carefully you’ll see that government is usually the cause.”
Most Americans think that the cause of this current huge problem was the lack of government -at least government oversight. The Republicans let some really big firms get really really greedy and they imploded taking the economy with them.
Posted by: Skip | March 14, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Blame the Republicans, or blame the Democrats. It’s all the same. America has been spending money it doesn’t have since WW2. It seems the question is simple, and very basic. Are American’s willing to live within their means? Ever? – so far, the answer has been no, and it’s been that way regardless which party is in power. We have created an economy that is pure fiction, pushing the perceived value of everything so high that nobody can afford their own American dream – the bubble had to burst – and it did so independent of party politics.
Posted by: D. Sullivan | March 14, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Much, much easier to criticize, and complain than to actually do anything. Reminds me of John McCain’s successful ride into Washington during the campaign to solve this crisis.
No. it is the Party of NO.
Posted by: Thinking | March 15, 2009, 6:48 am 6:48 am
Political gibberish on the sacred Ipod…back in the day you could listen to your favorite tunes on one…oh, the good old days.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 15, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
This guy makes me sick. Sarah Palin in a suite.
Posted by: su35driver | March 15, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
I guess what you hear depends on the ears you listen with. I find Cantor a solid, intelligent, committed Republican leader. This whole “they just say NO” business quite tiresome. Cantor is, after all, in the out party. He is in the minority. So there are practical limits to the role he can play in shaping policy and I think he is doing an excellent job in trying to make an impact within those boundaries.
I keep seeing posts suggesting the Republicans must put up their own comprehensive budget, which makes no sense at all. Did the Democrats put together an alternative budget when Bush was in power, or Reagan? No. The budget comes from the administrative branch, and then is revised and reshaped by the legislature. The republicans can make proposals for how it should be shaped, and they will do that.
Cantor makes positive statements on how to move forward, but you do not listen because they reflect his own views rather than those of President Obama. When many of you say you want the Republicans to work in a bipartisan manner, you actually mean you want them to acquiesce to everything that the president wants, even if it goes against their own philosophy of government and their own principles.
And Flash, repeated a lie does not magically make it true. Pelosi did NOT offer to allow real Republican input into writing the stimulus bill, only to be rejected. I defy you to provide some proof for this statement you keep making, contrary to all evidence.
Posted by: moderate | March 15, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va talks like the Republicans are already running for the 2010 elections. The Republicans like Eric want to say no to the voters not knowing they will pay a price 2010 and 2012.
Posted by: Sue | March 15, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Look for the Republicans to dig themselves into a deeper hole by being a party of No! Cantor sounds clueless on the Sunday morning talk shows. Millions of Americans have lost homes and jobs and Republicans like Cantor with sound bites without solutions aren’t helping.
Posted by: Davis | March 15, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
I agree.
Neil
Posted by: neil Garrett | March 16, 2009, 5:18 am 5:18 am
We know what the Republican budget will be. More tax cuts for the rich and much less spending. No money for infrastructure. No money for unemployment benefits. No money for healthcare. No money for education. Oh – but more money for the Pentagon. Starve the government and increase the financial pressure on the middle class. Bust unions. More tax breaks for corporations who send jobs overseas and layoff Americans. No “Buy American” clauses. It’s so ironic how Republicans tout “Country First” but do the exact opposite.
Posted by: Bob | March 16, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am