Bush 43: I Want Obama to Succeed, Won’t Criticize Him
ABC News’ Karen Travers reports: Today in Calgary, Alberta, former President George W. Bush said he would refrain from criticizing the Obama administration and that he wants President Obama to succeed. “I’m not going to spend my time criticising him. There’s plenty of critics in the arena. I think it’s time for the ex-president to tap dance off the stage and let the current president have a go at solving the world’s problems,” the former president said in remarks to business executives. “He deserves my silence. And if he wants my help, he can pick up the phone.” Bush’s comments follow scathing remarks from his former vice president, Dick Cheney, in an interview on CNN Sunday. Cheney said President Obama is making critical national security choices that make the American people less safe. The speech today was Bush’s first since leaving office in January. The event was organized by the Calgary Chamber of Commerce and his remarks to business executives were closed to the press and the tickets were invitation only. The former president said he wants President Obama to succeed. “I love my country a lot more than I love politics. I think it is essential that he be helped in the office.” Radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh touched off a firestorm when he said earlier this year that he hoped Obama would fail, forcing Republicans on Capitol Hill to publicly say they did not share that view. ‘The Decider’ Tells All? Former President Bush, who in 2006 designated himself "The Decider," said his book on his presidency will focus on his 12 hardest decisions and his goal is to try to put the reader into the mindset of how those decisions were made. “I want to put people in my place on that, when the history of this administration is written at least there is an authoritative voice saying exactly what happened,” he said. Bush cited the capture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as an example. “I want people to understand what it was like to sit in the Oval Office and have them come in and say we have captured Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, this mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, the alleged killer of a guy named Danny Pearl because he was simply Jewish, and we think he has information on further attacks on the United States,” he said. “I want to draw people in to that environment and let them determine what they would have done if their most important job was to protect the country.” Former President Bush briefly mentioned AIG and said he agreed with the “angst” in Washington. “AIG, which is now in the news, granting big bonuses, in spite of the fact that they’ve taken a big chunk of taxpayer money, which I agree with the angst being expressed in Washington on this matter.” — Karen Travers
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
W won’t jump ugly. Never.
Posted by: vinman | March 17, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Too Bad the left won’t criticize JIMMAH and SLICK WILLY………but then again they have no CLASS and no guiding PRINCIPLES to judge former presidents. They are governed only by their own VITRIOLIC rhetoric.
Posted by: socialism101 | March 17, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Teamwork…
Posted by: Paul Dirks | March 17, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
oh yea, i almost forgot about dubya… what a loser he was
Posted by: earth_not_flat | March 17, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
BRAVO! (CLAP!) (CLAP!) (CLAP!) Mr. Bush!!!!
(standing ovation!)
Posted by: FS | March 17, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Say what you want about former President Bush, but he is a class act when it comes to wanting OUR COUNTRY to succeed no matter what party is in power. He stands by his decisions and he will flat out tell you that he is at peace with his decisions. I am a die hard Republican, but I want Obama to succeed in helping this country move forward. However, I am totally against socialized healthcare and socialist policies in general.
Posted by: Wade | March 17, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Mr Bush has a good heart. He may become the best after president since he is
Posted by: zorra | March 17, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Say what you want about former President Bush >>> Really is anything he says relevant? He has screwed up on so many levels. I tried to compliment him today and just could not. He did a few things right but messed up so many more.
I wished he had been the man we thought he was rather than the man he was.
Posted by: ChicagBob | March 17, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
W has shown a helluva lot more class than Jimmy Carter has in the past. He always was a class act, no matter how much the media and the George Soros stooges tried to disgrace him.
Posted by: Bill | March 17, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Former president Bush is his own man now and could do great work.
Posted by: zorra | March 17, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
from open secrets web site (PEOPLE ITS TIME FOR AN LEGIT 3rd PARTY OF MODERATION):
Before the Fall, AIG Payouts Went to Washington
Published by Massie Ritsch on March 16,
As long as everyone’s talking today about AIG’s payouts to its executives and foreign banks, let’s remember the payouts AIG has made over the years to politicians. In the last 20 years American International Group (AIG) has contributed more than $9 million to federal candidates and parties through PAC and individual contributions. That’s enough to rank AIG on OpenSecrets.org’s Heavy Hitters list, which profiles the top 100 contributors of all time.
Over time, AIG hasn’t shown an especially partisan streak, splitting evenly the $9.3 million it has contributed since 1989. In the last election cycle, though, 68 percent of contributions associated with the company went to Democrats. Two senators who chair committees charged with overseeing AIG and the insurance industry, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), are among the top recipients of AIG contributions. Baucus chairs the Senate Finance Committee and has collected more money from AIG in his congressional career than from any other company–$91,000. And with more than $280,000, AIG has been the fourth largest contributor to Dodd, who chairs the Senate’s banking committee. President Obama and his rival in last year’s election, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), are also high on the list of top recipients.
AIG has been a personal investment for lawmakers, too. Twenty-eight current members of Congress reported owning stock in AIG last year, worth between $2.5 million and $3.3 million. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), one of the richest members of Congress, was by far the biggest investor in AIG, with stock valued around $2 million.
Last year AIG and its subsidiaries spent about $9.7 million on federal lobbying, or about $53,000 for every day Congress was in session in 2008. The company’s spending on advocacy last year was down from an all-time high of $11.4 million spent on lobbying in 2007.
Posted by: schlock | March 17, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Now that is how an ex-president is supposed to act. Just like when he was in office …… nothing but class & respect. I would like to see a Democrat act this was some day! I will keep dreaming??
Posted by: JimOnTheRight | March 17, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Well I think that’s nice of W. Seems like time has humbled him a bit.
But one thing for sure, his book is going to be heavily ghostwritten.
Posted by: Danny | March 17, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
In a couple of years people are going to realize what Bush was, with his notions of not abandoning your chosen course because it was tough or unpopular, for willing to be reviled in service of a greater good. It’s call being a grownup. A couple of years of Hopey/Changey wishy washy rule via opinion poll will make people raise the voting age to fifty, so we never get another unqualified, inexperianced chief executive handed to us by twenty year olds. You could fight three Iraq Wars for the amount of debt the current administration has rung up in two months. And despite their laughable lack of plan (where’s that toxic asset plan Sec Geitner?) progress, competence, they continue to lay every problem at Bush’s feet. And still, after all the vitriol unleashed against him for the past eight years, he acts graciously. Obama can’t take criticism from a talk show host without taking time out to get bitch about it. Sheesh.
Posted by: Ray | March 17, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
No matter what you think about Bush’s politics, the war, the economy, etc., he is a class act for staying mum after the inauguation. Carter and Clinton did not. Indeed, the Clintons stole furniture and their staff trashed the White House as they left. Mrs. Bush left gifts for the Obama kids. Enough said.
Posted by: Ted | March 17, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Posted by Micheal – It is good to read an article on President Bush’s activities. One should remember that he kept the nation safe.
He kept the nation safe? Tell that to the 3000 people that died on 9/11.
Posted by: Truth lives | March 17, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
All You Hateful and Hate Filled People, wanting Obama to Fail…
Former Pres. Bush says…
This is Bigger than Politics and he wants President Obama to Suuceed…
Not Fail.
The former president said he wants…
“President Obama to Succeed”.
“I love my country a lot more than I love politics. I think it is essential that he be helped in the office.”
Posted by: O. | March 17, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
So he won’t criticize his successor. That’s more consideration that his democratic predecessors gave him.
Posted by: Chris | March 17, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Recall that Mr. Bush–to use the language favored by the current hapless crowd–”inherited” a vigorous, militant Al Qaeda, armed and trained and spread around the globe, all utterly unchecked by his predecessor. He never once complained about the grotesquely negligent lassitude of the Clinton fools. Instead, he took Al Qaeda on in the theater of its choice–Iraq, which bin Laden proclaimed the “central front” in the jihad against the West. He took them on, and he beat them. Beat them quite soundly, and beat them in spite of the opposition of the doomsayers in the Democratic party.
Recall Harry Reid, April 2007: “This war is lost.” Thank God we had a man with spine in the White House. We certainly have none now.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 17, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
does not matter what he said . he is losser
Posted by: mar | March 17, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
I wonder if Bush is emphasizing with Obama. Bush certainly knows what Obama must be feeling, or will soon be feeling, after standing in the worlds hottest kitchen long enough.
This is one of Bush’s best remarks.
Posted by: Pinetree | March 17, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
The right man was in charge when America was attacked by terrorists. Obama would have a love-in with the camel jockeys.
Posted by: Brent | March 17, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
I’m with Moderate on this. It’s been a long and very noble tradition for former presidents to refrain from criticizing their successors, and the glaring exception to this tradition is the petty, vindictive failure Carter.
Having been disgracefully routed from office while an incumbent, he has devoted the remainder of his life to demeaning his successors of both parties, all for the purpose of showing that the people were just not quite good enough for him.
It is a matter of breeding. Carter was, and is, ill-bred trash.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 17, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
“does not matter what he said . he is losser”
Try to work on your spelling and punctuation there, will you?
In any case you’re wrong: he won twice, and on the second occasion he did something Bill Clinton was never able to do: he won a majority of the votes cast. He’s an honorable man who served his country well.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 17, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
President Bush did everything he thought necessary to keep this country safe and I applaude him for that. He didn’t care if it made him popular or unpopular.
Posted by: Bill | March 18, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Oh No! Now Will Ferrell is going to run around the country as Bush for the next 8 years saying “I Want Obama to Succeed” :-D
Posted by: Cooday | March 18, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Thank you President Bush. Always a class act, never a whiner, never blamed anyone else, just does the job that needs to be done. And still is.
Posted by: Gary | March 18, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
George should call a ‘spade a spade’
Posted by: Sluggo | March 18, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am
President Bush, always a class act.
Gracious, not a whiner and doesn’t lay blame at any other person’s feet.
Posted by: Kary | March 18, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Nice thing about Jake’s job he gets to Bond with everyone, Bush, Obama, Gibbs and Will Ferrell :-D
Posted by: Will Ferrell Fan | March 18, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am
All the love is killin me
Posted by: arahaa | March 18, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am
I disagreed (vehemently) with almost every policy decision W made, but at least he has the decency to wish the next administration good luck, and hopes that they will succeed.
Posted by: vilhelm klink | March 18, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Bush is a CLASS ACT and those of us in MIDLAND, TEXAS, are PROUDER THAN EVER of his giving spirit and his true-blue HEART.
His book is going to be GREAT and what a fabulous thing to share with the American People.
MAKE JEB BUSH into BUSH 45!!!
Posted by: Proud in Midland | March 18, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Why is the picture of Mr. Tapper so very large?
Posted by: TheRappah | March 18, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
His comments show his class and his respect for the holder of the office,whomever is President.
W lost me though when he bailed out the banks but let Lehman Bros. fail.That was backwards and started the cascade.
We’re in alice in wonderland territory now.
Posted by: J House | March 18, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Typical Bush, take somebody else’s money, squander it and leave the mess for someone else to clean up, just like he has done all his career…hell, he even screwed over the Bi-Laden family who invested in his failed Texas oil company!
Posted by: CC | March 18, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am
Class and love out lives hate and anger any day. I don’t see how some of you people live with yourselves day after day. We love Obama, and we love Bush, and we love Clinton,you have not walked in their shoes. At least they are men who worked for the betterment of this nation. What have you done for your country lately?
Posted by: Ellis | March 18, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Incredible. All those liberals hoping that Bush would fail every day he was in office all of a sudden now find him graceful etc. Bullshiite. Please… Bush, you showed no backbone toward Republican principals when you are in office. You demonstrated that kissing Democratic arses got you nowhere while you were in office. The liberals hated your guts then, they do now, and they always will. The only thing you managed to accomplish was to alienate the Republicans too, while you were at it. And you’re still at it now!
Posted by: Eric | March 18, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am
Obama calling Bush for help, what a joke!!!! That would be Bush telling Obama how to shaft the taxpayers even more. Politicians + wall street = crooks.
Posted by: putytat15 | March 18, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Mr. Bush in my eyes is one of the greatest president ever. It’s all the leftists medias wich got all the leftists libbs to beleived that he lied. I don’t see Mr. Bush lied at all, he made a decision and he stuck with it even till after his term ends.
Posted by: vegas | March 18, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am
“Having been disgracefully routed from office while an incumbent, he has devoted the remainder of his life to demeaning his successors of both parties, all for the purpose of showing that the people were just not quite good enough for him.
No, he has devoted the remainder of his life to charity and freedom by building houses for the poor and monitoring elections in third world nations -good things that benefit humanity, things you seem to know nothing about.
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Bush will always be the WORST President ever, the only thing to keep him from being remembered FOREVER as the largest screw-up of American History, is if Barack Hussein Obama bails out his legacy of failures.
Posted by: able | March 18, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Two termer Bush knows that Obama will be a one termer, so he can be quite generous. ;-)
Posted by: Jo | March 18, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Remember, Bush did as Bush wanted….even when the American People needed him to change course. That’s the example of a Horrible President.
Posted by: able | March 18, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Obama is already a miserable failure. There is no hope and change.
There is only Carter’s 2nd term.
Adios Obama. Don’t get too attached to the oval office!!
Posted by: Jo | March 18, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Obama this week: AIG should not give out those bonuses! This is shocking.
Oops. Obama and team knew about them all along.
BUSTED Obama. Love it!
Posted by: Jo | March 18, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am
I read many times that eventually history would be kind to George W. Bush and redeem him. I think George Bush always had a good heart, but he made some bad choices in his cabinet. He lost Colin Powell when he should have shoved Cheney and Rumsfeld out the door.
Posted by: Sharonkatheen | March 18, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Cheney is lock step with Rush, Hannity and the rest of the GOP loudmouths but Bush just wants to tap dance away? You can tell who was really running the country the last 8 years.
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Hutchison Leads Perry in Texas Primary
A new UT Poll shows Sen. Kay Baily Hutchison (R-TX) leading Gov. Rick Perry (R) in a Republican gubernatorial primary, 37% to 29%.
Meanwhile, Roll Call reports Hutchison “now appears likely to stay in the Senate even as she runs for governor, counter to what was originally expected when she began preparing to seek her state’s top post last year.”
Posted by: O. | March 18, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Carter was the worst president, hands down. Remember the 70% tax bracket, getting gas on the day designated by your license plate, the failure to retrieve the US hostages, giving millions to No.Korea on the promise that they wouldn’t build atomic weapons. That’s just a start of his pathetic legacy as the POTUS. He now goes around bashing other presidents. Yup, Jimmy is a piece of work alright.
Posted by: Chuck | March 18, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Able,
You are absolutely right Obama will bail out Bush’s legacy just like he have spent billions of taxpayer’s money to bail out AIG and others. However Obama will bail Bush’s legacy out by being worst than Mr. Bush was. I mean this is a proven fact, when you are on stage and you want the light to shine on you then all lights around you should be darken correct? Well Bush does not critizises Obama because he takes on the bright lights around him and no need for them to be darken in order for him to be shine.
Posted by: vegas | March 18, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am
Listen whether you like him or not he does have a sense of humor which goes a long way in this life right into the 2010 and 2012 elections it may take that long to recover.
As that 11 trillion dollar deficit drops it becomes a sign of our recovery. This is the legacy Bush left Americans. The Democrats, Obamacans and Independent Obama supporters have a right to run against it in 2010 and 2012.
Posted by: Contemplative | March 18, 2009, 2:07 am 2:07 am
Obama is a disgrace. He’s simply a (slightly) smarter version of Carter. And that isn’t saying much.
Posted by: Ryan | March 18, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Bush was a complete failure and traitor to conservatives and America because of his fiscal policies. Obama is a marxist/socialist and is leading the US into a downward spiral of financial doom. I hope to God Obama fails. His goal is to create enough of a recovery in the US to subsidize the rest of the world, at the expense of US citizens. Get ready, you idiots who voted for him, I hope you enjoy the reaming.
Posted by: The Truth | March 18, 2009, 2:11 am 2:11 am
I bet Bush would not be saying that if Obama supports indictments of Bush and Cheney for War Crimes. Obama is a liar, and should be demanding not only the bonus money from AIG and other greedy executives, but repealing the 700 billion bank bailout, and freezing the banks until the money is sent back and located. Bush caused this mess, and this guy needs to be in Jail..
Posted by: Dominic | March 18, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am
The bottom line on President Obama:
He’s successful, articulate, highly educated, self-confident, not a token of the GOP and won the POTUS after everything that Rush and Hannity threw at him. He’s everything that bigots hate with every fiber of their being. His actions and policies have NOTHING to do with much of the opposition. He’s got them calling him names using words they can’t even define because it ain’t politically correct to call him what’s really in their hearts.
Posted by: Mike from Carolina | March 18, 2009, 2:37 am 2:37 am
I think liberals forget the top 3 people they rally against, 2 have never been elected to anything and the other cant be elected anymore. Why do liberals focus so much attention to Rush, Hannit and Bush? Its going to prove nothing and get them nothing.
Posted by: Dan | March 18, 2009, 2:43 am 2:43 am
Bush is good at basic personality decorum. Bush just wasn’t presidential; he could not challenge/compel congress with his poor speech. The sad thing is, Obama has this intellectual ability, but I’m thinking he lacks the will or has a lame agenda which the majority doesn’t support, so he’ll let the congressional dems run the country, and they’ll support his pet issues. He does have a chance at greatness. He’s smart enough to individually challenge/pressure/compel every member of congress.
Posted by: Ozarkess | March 18, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am
Truth lives,
You mean the same people who were over here under Clintons watch going to flight school and planning the thing? Bush had been president for 8 months when this happen and some how he was to blame? Are you liberals really that out of touch with reality or you jut have this much hate for one man?
Posted by: Dan | March 18, 2009, 2:50 am 2:50 am
We don’t have health care because
We Can’t Afford it….
where is my scripts?
oh, my oxycontin?
btw: got my girlfriend pregnant. Thank goodness to abortion.
Posted by: HH | March 18, 2009, 2:57 am 2:57 am
Eat and Such.
our reality today.
Posted by: HH | March 18, 2009, 3:01 am 3:01 am
Obama is already a miserable failure. There is no hope and change.
Posted by: Jo
There is only Carter’s 2nd term.
Adios Obama. Don’t get too attached to the oval office!!
Hey Jo. Wake up, your dreaming again. You better get use to the fact, Obama is here to stay for at least 8 years. Just makes your blood boil even more doesn’t it. Hahahahahahahahaha
Posted by: John | March 18, 2009, 3:04 am 3:04 am
Tape dance ? ‘ Mission accomplished after all.
Posted by: Swiftlearner | March 18, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am
Politics apart,Obama is a man of faith.He like most of us believe in loving your neighbour and enemy as you love yourself.
Hate and revenge for political reasons is unamaerican as purporting some filmsy war crimes or crimes against humanity by Bush.No US president will be dragged into slime of hate-mongers.Get over it.Bush should have hanged summarily the master-mind of 9/11 and Jesus would have forgiven him!!!.
Posted by: joe85 | March 18, 2009, 4:15 am 4:15 am
It is the mainstream news media. Former George W. Bush did such a good job as the President for 8 years. It is Obama that the American are having problem with. He lied and has broken promises to the voters. It was the Democratic Congress (Pelosi, and Reid, for example)wanted Bush to fail. They are the one that were not doing their job because they wanted to complain and whiny all the time. It is a waste of time. The Democratic Congress did lied to the America people. They deserved to lose the election in 2010. Hope that Mrs. Pelosi will not be the Speaker of the House anymore.
Posted by: anonymous | March 18, 2009, 4:47 am 4:47 am
You bloody Americans.9/11 was simply a drama. In order to occupy ones land you should make such thing. 9/11 was a plan make before by the Americans, but it was carried out by Bush Administration.
Keep this straight in your minds.
Posted by: Mick | March 18, 2009, 5:50 am 5:50 am
Translation:…..President Bush like the rest of us…want Obama to succeed….
To succeed in showing America what an inept, bumbling, decietful ‘pretender he is…..
He’s doing a magnificent job so far….
President Bush knows he can just sit back and let Obama ‘show’ the country who he really is…..Heh Heh Heh…..
Posted by: J Moore | March 18, 2009, 5:53 am 5:53 am
I want Obama to fail. If he succeeds, this country is doomed.
The AIG thing is a perfect example.
Obama and the Democrats GUARANTEED AIG could keep those bonuses and those stupid Democrats all signed it. They wrote it into the stimulus bill! And now they can’t run away from it fast enough.
And not one dimbulb morning show host can figure out to ask why they voted for this language.
Posted by: drjohn | March 18, 2009, 7:29 am 7:29 am
Bush has something Obama will never have: class.
Bush won’t criticize Obama and Obama cannot stop blaming Bush.
Obama is a dirtbag. It’s the Chicago way.
Posted by: drjohn | March 18, 2009, 7:32 am 7:32 am
Yes, President Bush is a class act. He says what he means and means what he says. Obama will fail because he is so arrogant. When he no longer has Bush to blame then he has nothing to say. I am so sick and tired of Obama. It is always the previous administration’s fault so I guess if something happens now it is still the previous administration’s fault. We love you Preident Bush – Thank you from the bottom of our hearts for keeping us safe and you never gave in to be popular like Obama has done. Obama does not have the experience to be President and now he never will. What a real shame. Thank you for not believing in abortion, thank you for having morals, thank you for never demeaning the White House. We have so much to be grateful to you for – time will prove us right. When the media’s love affair with Obama is over and we see the true man, people will be stunned.
Posted by: Jane | March 18, 2009, 7:54 am 7:54 am
To all 10 people paying your “respects” to Bush–add mine–so long…we are NOT missing you..imagine how much worse off we would be if the republicans were still in charge of the mess they made..
Posted by: cowgirl | March 18, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am
I think that finally President Obama will understand what the President Bush did is right. Understand why President Bush’s hair turn gray fast. The Financial Crisis and 911 is not President Bush’s fault, like the plane crash to river, bird hit the plane, the aircraft commander saved everyone. President Bush saved people from another terrorist attack . In Chinese culture, people always unite in bad situation and stop blame each other, So I hope US people like us, unite and fully support your President Obama’s policy, Even If President Obama did wrong, you can correct it after 4 years, If President Obama get success, it’s good for US and world.
Posted by: typ7777 | March 18, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am
George W Bush, while not perfect, has been a class act and still is. The clowns on Capitol Hill need to take some lessons.
Posted by: NPage | March 18, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am
“This is the Good Cop, Bad Cop” bull that this Administration has hoodwinked some of you for the past 8 years. Do you really, Really think that Bush and Cheney don’t discuss their agendas. It’s both of their legacy that they are trying to save. HAVING CLASS IS THAT NO PRESIDENT (EX) OR…………HIS VICE-PRESIDENT CRITICIZE ANOTHER PRESIDENT WITH LESS THAN 2 MONTHS IN OFFICE. NOT ONLY are they Classless, but dumb with a Bad Image that will be written into history books.
Posted by: sngeorgia | March 18, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Vindication for Bush.
Obama keeps most of Bush policies but changes the wording to fool his naive supporters.
Best vindication for Bush–Obama is making so many mistakes it’s hard to keep up with all of them.
Posted by: sammy | March 18, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Never thought anyone could be as arrogant as Bush.
But I was so so wrong.
Obama takes the prize for arrogance
and smugness(if that’s a word).
Posted by: tyler | March 18, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am
He outsourced (to Canada) his first public engagement since leaving DC. Figures.
The biggest irony will be Bush’s Presidential Library. This for a man who mangled the English language more than any president in history.
I wonder how much the economic crisis will hurt Bush and Cheney and Rush. Oh that’s right – not at all.
His policy and financial failures will live in infamy, and he will supplant Nixon as the worst president ever. History will be very, very hard on GW Bush. He can afford to show a little class now that he’s gone. There’s a first time for everything…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | March 18, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
I don’t know if it’s arrogance, incompetence or sheer genius! Now we learn that ACORN is going to have a roll in recruiting the 1.4 million workers needed to conduct next year’s census. This is an organization that has a long history of voter registration fraud. Now I guess we will see that a Mickey Mouse and a Donald Duck really are living on every street in America!!
Posted by: James Danley | March 18, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Senator Barack Obama received a $101,332 bonus from American International Group in the form of political contributions according to Opensecrets.org. The two biggest Congressional recipients of bonuses from the A.I.G. are – Senators Chris Dodd and Senator Barack Obama.
The A.I.G. Financial Products affiliate of A.I.G. gave out $136,928, the most of any AIG affiliate, in the 2008 cycle. I would note that A.I.G.’s financial products division is the unit that wrote trillions of dollars’ worth of credit-default swaps and “misjudged” the risk.
Posted by: Peace Train | March 18, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Bush has class, all right drjohn. All of it low.
Posted by: EdDoc80 | March 18, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
It is astonishing to see a couple of posters here claiming that Bush has “class.” CLASS????????? You can’t be serious. Of all the things you could say about Bush, “class” is not one of them. He mangled the English language, demonstrated disdain for understanding complex issues (don’t confuse him with the details), and treated anyone not on his side of things as enemies. CLASS????? NOT!
Posted by: Afton Girl | March 18, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Afton girl,
This is where you may have a failure of understanding. If you could let go of your rage long enough to understand this, class is an action, not a description of the picture. For him to say the things he did, and not be partisan, was an act of class. Unfortunately, you are so filled with rage prompted by endless attacks by partisan people over the years you refuse to see anything else but what feeds that rage. I actually feel for you. You’ve been manipulated to be what you are, to live with disgust and rage in your heart, all for politics.
Bush didn’t do everything right, but he didn’t do everything wrong either, but I’d bet you’ve been made to believe that.
Posted by: KR | March 18, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
“And not one dimbulb morning show host can figure out to ask why they voted for this language.”
Maybe because they’re alot brighter than you want to make them out to be. They know that the exempted bonuses are from before the stimulus bill was passed while these disputed bonuses, going to the Finance division, are to be awarded afterward.
Posted by: Skip | March 18, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
First rate class act…
Bush may have done many things wrong, but his class and character is on another league.
Obama keep blaming Bush for all his trouble and Bush supports Obama and wants him to succeed… you get the difference!
Posted by: Frieda | March 18, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Peace Train wrote: “Senator Barack Obama received a $101,332 bonus from American International Group in the form of political contributions according to Opensecrets.org. The two biggest Congressional recipients of bonuses from the A.I.G. are – Senators Chris Dodd and Senator Barack Obama.”
What’s your point? Is it your contention that, because Obama got a hundred grand in contributions from them, that he is somehow beholden to them? And that he will do…..what? How much did they give to everyone else? Why not post that info? How much did Obama raise for his campaign – over half a BILLION if I remember correctly. A hundred grand is a fraction of a percentage point of his total. I believe you’re just so anti-Obama that you’re stirring the pot for no reason and looking for issues that aren’t there…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | March 18, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Considering Bush’s complete failure in life…….whom exactly would he be in a position to criticize? George…..”It’s better to be silent and thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.”
Posted by: Sammy | March 18, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Hey Afton Girl, it’s your guy Obambi who is stuck to a teleprompter. His mangling of the English language is so bad his handlers have tied him to two teleprompters.
Yesterday Obambi thanked himself for inviting himself to the White House. He can’t even thank a head of state for visiting without reading the thank you off the teleprompter.
What a loser….
Posted by: JAZ | March 18, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Well, it does seem like Bush has been rather graceful during the transition and beyond!
However, he is still a war criminal.
Posted by: Hoover | March 18, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
JAZ: I am shocked, shocked to learn that Obama has used a teleprompter! Who knew? I’ll bet no other president ever had to use a lame teleprompter!
Posted by: Howard Beale | March 18, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
“Senator Barack Obama received a $101,332 bonus from American International Group in the form of political contributions according to Opensecrets.org. The two biggest Congressional recipients of bonuses from the A.I.G. are – Senators Chris Dodd and Senator Barack Obama.”
From 1989 to 2008, open secrets compiled this list.
Dodd, Chris (D-Conn) $280,238
Bush, George W (R-Texas) $200,560
Schumer, Charles E (D-NY) $111,875
Obama, Barack (D-Ill) $107,332
McCain, John (R-Ariz) $99,249
Baucus, Max (D-Mont) $90,000
Kerry, John (D-Mass) $85,000
Johnson, Nancy L (R-Conn) $75,400
Sununu, John E (R-NH) $69,049
Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) $59,515
Lieberman, Joe (I-Conn) $57,900
Rangel, Charles B (D-NY) $53,582
Giuliani, Rudolph W (R-NY) $50,250
Lazio, Rick A (R-NY) $48,600
Ensign, John (R-Nev) $44,569
Bayh, Evan (D-Ind) $43,700
Larson, John B (D-Conn) $43,000
Biden, Joseph R Jr (D-Del) $41,350
Baker, Richard (R-La) $41,032
Torricelli, Robert G (D-NJ) $39,000
Why do right wingers lie about something so stupid and easily verified?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 18, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Uh Ryan,
Obama was not in office for all those years. Proportionally he collect more than anyone except maybe Dodd.
But I bet you knew that.
Posted by: Plumber | March 18, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
It’s been a long and very noble tradition for former presidents to refrain from criticizing their successors, and the glaring exception to this tradition is the petty, vindictive failure Carter.
~~~
DOn’t forget Clinton. From what I can tell the noble tradition belongs only to the republicans.
Posted by: Plumber | March 18, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Why doesn’t Bush go on Stephen Colbert? He can promote his book. It would make make the front page of Drudge and Political Punch :-D
Posted by: Colbert Fan | March 18, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
“Obama was not in office for all those years. Proportionally he collect more than anyone except maybe Dodd.”
So “proportionally” and if you throw out Bush’s money then you can call Obama one of the two biggest recipients.
Hell you can even cite that for the last cycle (2008) Obama was in the top 2.
But what it boils down to is you guys have no idea because you don’t bother to investigate, you just parrot.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 18, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
I don’t know why Bush would criticize him.
Considering Obama is continuing Bush’s Bailoutonomics, massive expansion of govt., his WoT policies (expanding rendition, torture, FISA, air-raiding villages and killing civilians in sovereign lands) and his nation-building nonsense, why would he have a problem with Obama?
Posted by: Gone Gulchin' | March 18, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Why Would W Critize Obama W Knows the Huge Mess he Left him!
Posted by: Angie In Pa | March 18, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Ryan_C, I don’t have a dog in the campaign contribution hunt here, but I would caution you to read what people actually write before you criticize them as simply parroting and not knowing their facts. Plumber made the point that Obama made the list very high EVEN THOUGH he was not there for the whole decade as others were, so PROPORTIONATELY he was in the top two. And you gripped about ignoring the fact that Bush was on the list, when of course, the original post stated that, “The two biggest Congressional recipients of bonuses from the A.I.G. are – Senators Chris Dodd and Senator Barack Obama.” See, CONGRESSIONAL. Bush was not in Congress. Even with Bush factored in, Obama is number four on the list. Take out the former pres and he moves up to number three. Factor in the fact that the two men above him both were getting contributions for 10 years and he was getting them for a fraction of that time. So per year, he is by far in the top two. So folks did not misspeak as you accused them of.
Fair is fair.
Posted by: moderate | March 18, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
“Why Would W Critize Obama W Knows the Huge Mess he Left him!
Posted by: Angie In Pa | Mar 18, 2009 2:12:28 PM”
…………
Oh Angie, please. Bush was not a King issuing edicts.
Congress is far more important, and far more culpable, than whoever was, and is, in the White House.
Government on both sides of the aisle, along with the Federal Reserve and Treasury, caused this economic crisis.
This crash has been building for decades.
Posted by: Gone Gulchin' | March 18, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Plumber, play fair. I do not recall Clinton publicly second-guessing Bush, at least not until Mrs. Clinton was running for president and I would cut him slack for that. He did not forget the water’s edge tradition, which Carter completely ignored. Not that I’m a huge Clinton fan, but I don’t want to overstate the case. Both Republican and Democrat former presidents have, for the most part, resisted the temptation to undercut their successors, except for Jimmy. Which is a shame, because for the first few years after he left office, I thought he was going to be a much better ex-president than he was president.
Posted by: moderate | March 18, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
George should practice taking the Fifth Amendment. He will need it at his War Crimes Trial.
Posted by: Sammy | March 18, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Why Would W Critize Obama W Knows the Huge Mess he Left him!
Posted by: Angie In Pa | Mar 18, 2009 2:12:28 PM
=====================================
Anita In Pa: Spoken just like a left winger. Yeah, usually christians and people with class don’t critize. In this case, you have got to cut Bush some slack. You can’t say that oblabla doesn’t critize; that is all he has done of Bush and it is not very persidential.
Posted by: Mildred | March 18, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
“And you gripped about ignoring the fact that Bush was on the list, when of course, the original post stated that, “The two biggest Congressional recipients of bonuses from the A.I.G. are – Senators Chris Dodd and Senator Barack Obama.” See, CONGRESSIONAL. Bush was not in Congress.”
Which ignores the fact Obama garnered most of his AIG (like 90%) contributions while running for President just as Bush had.
The contortions one has to go to to make the talking point true make it worthless.
And that was the point.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 18, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
I do not recall Clinton publicly second-guessing Bush, at least not until Mrs. Clinton was running for president and I would cut him slack for that.
~~~
I rest my case.
Posted by: Plumber | March 18, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Ryan C, no contortions needed at all to make the point. Barack Obama, senator and candidate, was the recipient of more money from AIG personnel on an annual basis than almost any other member of congress. You perjoratively label this a “talking point,” although I’m not sure what you mean by this. I am not part of some organized effort to remind people of that fact. I am simply agreeing with others here who made the point and then bizarrely had to defend it as if it were in dispute.
And yes, I am fully cognizant that Bush and McCain (and Senator Clinton) got scads of money from the same company, too. That’s not great, either. That underscores the point that the vast sums of money given to politicians and particularly to candidates for the highest offices is a source of concern and should be scaled back.
Posted by: moderate | March 18, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
“You perjoratively label this a “talking point,” although I’m not sure what you mean by this”
Because the Obama got AIG money meme has been making the rounds on the right wing blogs and other medie.
It was not an accusation towards you.
“And yes, I am fully cognizant that Bush and McCain (and Senator Clinton) got scads of money from the same company, too. That’s not great, either. That underscores the point that the vast sums of money given to politicians and particularly to candidates for the highest offices is a source of concern and should be scaled back.”
Ohhh something we can debate.
Do you feel that contribution limits from individuals should go back to the smaller limits?
Do you think mandatory public financing is the way to go?
How do you propose to restrict the amount of money dumped into campaigns?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 18, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Ryan, ah, yes, campaign finance reform, quite a thorny issue. (I know, what issue isn’t thorny?) And one where I fear my “moderateness” takes over and I am much more comfortable identifying what I don’t like than taking a strong position on what I do want. That is to say, it will probably be a very one-sided debate, because I would be the first to admit I have no answers.
My inclination is to go with complete public financing. I know that has real limitations, but it’s still my preference. Every year, I check that box on my tax return.
I don’t think smaller donations are the answer– in fact, I find the 2300 personal limit sort of an odd number and not terribly useful. But setting an even lower limit and expecting folks to play by the rules seems like a recipe for failure to me. I am sure you will not agree, but I am very suspicious that many people manipulated the system during the last campaign hidden in the “small donors” to the Obama campaign (and doubtless to others, but his numbers were the most outsized and unscrutinized).
But of course you identified the hardest nut to crack– how to tackle the problem of money pouring in to advocacy groups, 529s, etc. Much of the money spent on modern campaigns is not spent directly by candidates’ campaigns. And I have no clue how to deal with that. YOu have any suggestions?
Posted by: moderate | March 18, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“My inclination is to go with complete public financing. I know that has real limitations, but it’s still my preference. Every year, I check that box on my tax return. ”
Yes pub financing (especially if mandatory) has its issues because of the inherent advantages for the incumbent in name recognition and free media.
But I also see that as the best solution to a complex problem.
“I don’t think smaller donations are the answer– in fact, I find the 2300 personal limit sort of an odd number and not terribly useful. But setting an even lower limit and expecting folks to play by the rules seems like a recipe for failure to me.”
The individual limits were raised a few years ago to what they are now.
“But of course you identified the hardest nut to crack– how to tackle the problem of money pouring in to advocacy groups, 529s, etc. Much of the money spent on modern campaigns is not spent directly by candidates’ campaigns. And I have no clue how to deal with that. YOu have any suggestions?”
Agreed that this is the toughest nut.
Perhaps a limit to political commercials (all commericals, radio, TV, internet) not from a candidate or party?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 18, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Why bother to criticize him – no one listens to you anyway!
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 18, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
“I’ll treat your President with the same respect you treated mine”.
Posted by: Gillian Smith | March 18, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Ryan_C,
“Yes pub financing (especially if mandatory) has its issues because of the inherent advantages for the incumbent in name recognition and free media.”
I mainly agree, but it is not just incumbents who have that sort of advantage and in fact, in house races in particular, they may not have much of a name recognition advantage for the first decade or so. *G* There is the rising problem of the American Idolization of the political process. Celebrities, talking heads on cable, and the super-wealthy are just some of those who also have a name recognition/free media advantage. Remember Jesse Ventura for governor? Who’d have thunk it? Both Larry Kudlow and Chris MAtthews have apparently flirted with the notion of running for the Senate. From Lynn Swann to Ah-nold, plenty of athletes have tried with various degrees of success to break into politics. And of course there are the actors…. So how do we neutralize celebrity and name recognition in a publicly financed system? I have no idea.
“But I also see that as the best solution to a complex problem.” See, we don’t disagree about everything, just about a lot of things. I like that.
Posted by: moderate | March 18, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
President Bush isn’t running for anything…he doesn’t have to be civil to those that attacked and bashed him for 8 years.
The Democrats, like Slick Willy and Hillary and God Incarnate however, always feel the need to attack those more competent than themselves in order to raise their stature and increase their political power.
Posted by: RR GOP | March 18, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Karen Travers: “‘I want to put people in my place on that, when the history of this administration is written at least there is an authoritative voice saying exactly what happened,’ he said.”
Excuse me, Ms. Travers, but George W. Bush actually said “authoritarian voice”, not “authoritative voice.”
Why are you amending his quote after-the-fact? And once you did, why did you not disclose such amendment by placing the amended in brackets, as is pro forma in all such literary or journalistic matters? Do you really hold your readers in such contempt that you’d think most of us wouldn’t know or understand the difference?
Posted by: Donald from Hawaii | March 19, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am