Treading Carefully, U.S. Hints It Wants to Engage Cuba, Venezuela
ABC News’ Kirit Radia reports:
It’s a debate as old as the Monroe Doctrine: how should the United States engage its neighbors in the Western hemisphere? More often than not, the answer has been with a heavy hand.
The Obama administration appears ready to buck the trend, hinting today it is looking to improve relations with countries like Cuba and Venezuela. During the campaign, Obama repeatedly said he would roll back Bush-era restrictions on family remittances and travel to Cuba.
The Brazilian president is expected to urge President Obama to re-engage with Cuba and Venezuela when the two leaders meet at the White House tomorrow.
"We are intent on engaging all countries constructively," Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Thomas Shannon told reporters today when asked about the prospects of deeper engagement with countries in the region at odds with the United States.
This will all be on display when President Obama attends the Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago in April.
"We will be going to the summit with an open and constructive attitude," Shannon said, though he noted it’s not only up to Washington.
"Ultimately, our willingness to engage constructively with countries around the region depends on a reciprocal willingness on their part to engage with us," he said.
For the past 50 years, U.S. policy in the region has led many countries to reject what they view as U.S. meddling in their internal affairs (think Bay of Pigs, banana republics, support for the Contras, etc). In recent years the relationship has soured as several countries, led by the so-called "Axis of Evo" (Bolivia, Venezuela, Ecuador and Cuba), have expelled American diplomats, ceased counter-narcotics cooperation with Washington and blamed the United States for domestic problems.
Shannon declined to denounce Bolivia’s recent decision to oust an American diplomat from the embassy in La Paz.
To see where the U.S. is headed in its relationship with Latin America, one need look no farther than Sunday’s election in El Salvador, which pits two groups that faced off in a bloody civil war in the 1980s, including the leftist FMLN.
Shannon called the Salvadoran election "an important aspect of how we’re going to be engaging in this hemisphere."
"We have made it very clear that this is a choice of the Salvadoran people that we will respect and that we look forward to, continuing our very positive relationship with El Salvador, and working with the next elected government," he said.
His remarks are indicative of the Obama administration’s goals for Latin America, a shift from heavy hands to hands-off.
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Shouldn’t we continue to condemn and threaten them. Surely that is the path towards peaceful coexistence.
Posted by: Huh | March 13, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
We should say No. It works every time!
Posted by: Thinking | March 13, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Oh, Sure…… after all, what harm have Stalinist thugs like Castro, Chavez, Ortega & friends caused around this world of ours – - – besides the murder of over ONE HUNDRED MILLION human beings?!?
Posted by: chiadi | March 14, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
chiadi—you left out Mao and we engaged with him. Castro, Ortega and Chavez have not murdered 100 million people. your figure is absurd. have they committed human rights abuses? yes. but so have most of the regimes the US has supported over the years—Pinochet, Mobutu, the Shah of Iran, South Africa, Israel, Marcos. i would rather be a political dissident in Cuba than enter a sports arena under Pinochet. Chavez, Castro and Ortega have been responsible for fewer than most of our friends. educate yourself!
Posted by: Paul Wall | March 14, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Shouldn’t we continue to condemn and threaten them. Surely that is the path towards peaceful coexistence.
Posted by: Huh
______________
Cuddling up to these nations is what created Fidel Castro who soon pointed nuclear weapons toward our country. Or did they not teach you that in the failed schools in the inner cities run destroyed by democrats.;
Posted by: tr | March 14, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
tr – Last I checked we were the only nation to actually drop nukes on people. Plus under Bush, we threatened Iran, ebmargoed Cuba, and condemned Venezuela. We also invade a new nation every other year or so, while Cuba, Iran, and Venezuela have observed other’s borders. If I were them I would try and get nukes ASAP. It is interesting they are now courting Russia for bomber bases on their soil. See tr, what goes around comes around. Remember the “Golden Rule”. If you forgot listen to Ron Paul. We are a nation that supports Israel while conveniently looking the other way when it comes to settlements. We are a nation that kills 1.5 million babies a year. We are a nation….well you get the picture. We no longer have moral superiorty on much of anything so condemning others makes us look foolish.
Posted by: Huh | March 14, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Engage…as in marry? Sounds about like these Leftist knuckleheads running the show nowadays. I suppose The One is just itching to take a ride on one of those Russian bombers they’re planning on basing in both countries? I guess Air Force One is a little monotonous after a while.
Posted by: RR GOP | March 14, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
17 March 2009
—President Dmitry Medvedev on Tuesday announced a “large-scale” rearmament and renewal of Russia’s nuclear arsenal, accusing NATO of pushing ahead with expansion near Russian borders
Meeting defence chiefs in Moscow, Medvedev said he was determined to implement reforms designed to streamline Russia’s bloated military.
Russia continued to face various security threats requiring robust defence capacity, he said.
“From 2011, a large-scale rearmament of the army and navy will begin,” Medvedev said at the meeting of the country’s top defence chiefs.
He called for a renewal of Russia’s nuclear weapons arsenal and added that NATO was pursuing a drive to expand the alliance’s physical presence near Russia’s borders.
“Analysis of the military-political situation in the world shows that a serious conflict potential remains in some regions,” Medvedev said.
He listed local crises and international terrorism as security threats and also stated: “Attempts to expand the military infrastructure of NATO near the borders of our country are continuing.—
Posted by: Hey, Obama, How's that "Smart Power" Working Out for You? | March 17, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am