Mar 16, 2009 5:03pm

Two Weeks Ago: White House Says It’s Confident It Knows What Happened to Previous AIG Billions

From White House press secretary Robert Gibbs’ briefing two weeks ago, when $30 billion in additional funds were announced for AIG. AIG had at this point designated $165 million in retention bonuses for officers of the Financial Products subsidiary, as well as an additional $121.5 million in executive bonuses.

TAPPER:  AIG, is the administration confident that it, that it knows what happened to the tens of billions of dollars previously given to AIG?
   
GIBBS:  Is it confident — I’m sorry?

TAPPER:  That they know — that you guys know what happened to the previous billions before you hand over this next $30 billion.
   
GIBBS:  Yes — yes, the — I mean, I don’t think it’s a — well, obviously, you’ve got a huge insurance company that is losing money, not the least of which because of its sheer size and sheer size and decrease in the growth in our economy.  It experiences a far bigger drop, largely because of its size. But, again, the steps that — that Treasury and — and others took were to ensure a larger systemic problem wasn’t one that we had to deal with here today in letting something just die.
   
TAPPER:  But in terms of specifically the — I guess it’s like $150 billion before, you guys are confident…
   
GIBBS:  Yes.

– jpt

User Comments

PB0 has been just a little be overwhelmed by his newfound power, or shall we say, he was in just a bit over his head.
He has a Treasury Sectary sitting in his office by himself just a few days ago. He cannot check everything, or knew what to check, can he?
Sorry, but experience matters.
Pity, it’s too late even for buyer’s remorse.

Posted by: two cats | March 16, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Its all Bushes fault.

Posted by: democrat | March 16, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Tap dance. Lie. Rinse. Repeat. Jake, you know and I know that the great majority of the MSM will cover for Obama on AIG, pulling punches and spinning pretty phrases to rationalize away yet more lies and prevarications. It’s what they always do vis a vis Obama. Thank you so much for being one of the very reporters out there asking serious questions and expecting straight answers. If we had more like you, we would never have ended up in this gigantic mess.

Posted by: Kat5 | March 16, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

They also said they vetted Geithner until they found out he didn’t pay all his taxes.
I smell a very bad trend in the Obama not really administrating so much as Overlooking White House.

Posted by: kravitz | March 16, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Kravitz,
Were you ever on the USS Enterprise?

Posted by: Do It Right | March 16, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

When I wake up and read the New York Times, I’m confidant I know as much about what’s going on as the Obama Administration. The difference is: I don’t stop with the New York Times.

Posted by: mesquito | March 16, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Oh Paleeezeee!! Give it a rest. And I suppose McCain would have done better? You’ve got to be kidding. No one would have done anything better with this mess Bush/Cheney left us in.

Posted by: Styx09 | March 16, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Oh Paleeezeee!! Give it a rest. And I suppose McCain would have done better?
Posted by: Styx09 | Mar 16, 2009 5:33:13 PM
===
HRC certainly, 100% sure, would have done better than this phony.

Posted by: two cats | March 16, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

we
Thank you for keeping this inexperienced White House on their toes!!

Posted by: James | March 16, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Jake,
Thanks for some increasingly rare pointed journalism. I’m afraid, however, that the next row of seats removed from Air Force One may include yours.
Thanks, too, for the Twitters.

Posted by: beeman | March 16, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

From Michael Goodwin:
“Not long ago, after a string of especially bad days for the Obama administration, a veteran Democratic pol approached me with a pained look on his face and asked, ‘Do you think they know what they’re doing?’
“The question caught me off guard because the man is a well-known Obama supporter. As we talked, I quickly realized his asking suggested his own considerable doubts.
“Yes, it’s early, but an eerily familiar feeling is spreading across party lines and seeping into the national conversation. It’s a nagging doubt about the competency of the White House.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 16, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Yes – ANYONE could have done a better job than obama. They warned you about on the job training and this is TERRIBLE. This is the worst job any new president has ever done. The obama administration and obama himself are embarrassing the American people with their incompetence. We are the laughing stock of the whole world because of this clown show in Washington. Please put us all out of our misery and step down, obama. Stop putting in frauds, tax cheats, and liars in OUR government. Do what you said you would do: LOWER OUR TAXES not just give us tax credits. QUIT LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE for God’s sake!!!

Posted by: Jenny | March 16, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Jake
I must say your a Good Reporter too Bad you wernt Like this with the Bush Administration!

Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | March 16, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

I assume that you are referencing the bonuses that haven’t been paid yet; correct?

Posted by: Thinking | March 16, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

“Confident”
Well, we are confident Obama is an utter failure and Hillary would have been fantastic. She tried to warn us.

Posted by: Tim | March 16, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Obama lies about leaving Iraq too. 50,000 troops remaining is not an end.
Obama lied about healthcare too. Now he wants to tax them. Which is what he accussed Hillary of doing.
Rush Limbaugh….smoke and mirrors of Jimmy Carter Obama II.

Posted by: Martin | March 16, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Time to sharpen my hunting and trapping skills. What a mess. The government should never have gotten involved with any kind of stimulus package. I am not a business person, but I have sense enough to know that on only business can create economic value. All the business community needs is for the gov to lower the corporate tax rate down to around eleven percent. That is the only kind of stimulus that this country needs. Sure, there will still be abusers, but that is basically small change when you consider all the thousands of businesses that will use that money for R&D, expansion and hiring. Obama doesn’t get it.

Posted by: manitu | March 16, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Looks to me like the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing in this administration. It would be comical if it wasnn’t costing us our country.

Posted by: jim 234 | March 16, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

All the business community needs is for the gov to lower the corporate tax rate down to around eleven percent
****************************************
MY MY who going to loan them the money?

Posted by: Thinking | March 16, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

This is shaping up to be the “lyingest” administration since Clinton, and that’s saying a lot!

Posted by: MissButterfly | March 16, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Jake, you didn’t parse his answer correctly.
Mr. Gibbs used the Politicianspeak definition of “Yes”, which is ‘until proven otherwise’.

Posted by: I'm With Stupid | March 16, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

This is shaping up to be the “lyingest” administration since Clinton, and that’s saying a lot!
_____________________________________
By all means, please give us specifics. Obama’s quotes with accompanying information to support your accusation.

Posted by: Sting like a Bee | March 16, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Jake, what about the hundreds of billions that AIG sent to overseas banks? ABC is not reporting on this HUGE issue. Jake, be a reporter, not a clone of Charlie and George.

Posted by: RunnHMCM | March 16, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Jake
You’re going to end up in the Santelli/Cramer/Limbaugh pool soon. Gibbs loves continuing the campaign.
Keep up the great work!

Posted by: drjohn | March 16, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Some of us were outraged months ago by this news, and it was news months ago.
Obama is headed to Leno to gird his loin..er……ratings. When the going gets tough, the tough go to Hollywood.

Posted by: drjohn | March 16, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

This is shaping up to be the “lyingest” administration since Clinton, and that’s saying a lot!
Posted by: MissButterfly | Mar 16, 2009 6:44:06 PM
==========
MissButterfly,
Let’s get this straight. Clinton never lied what his administration did, things that matter to the people. He brought about 8 years of unprecedented prosperity and peace in the history of this country. You should be grateful, and ought apologize for your unfamilarity of history.
His problem with the definition of sex is really none of your or anyone else’s business, except those involved.
0bama, on the other hand, is clueless, as clueless as G W Bush was.

Posted by: kat | March 16, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Obama is the JOKE that we’ve been waiting for!!
I feel sorry for our country, how we got hypnotizd by this guy!

Posted by: frieda | March 16, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

And this administration wants to do “HEALTH CARE”?
(singing) Happy days are here again…….

Posted by: American Infidel | March 16, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Kat, what about the Clinton Administration’s bill that “created 100,000″ new cops. The very moment that he signed the bill President Bill stated, “We now have 100,000 new cops.” The problem is the most that was ever created was 47,000 new officers.

Posted by: James Danley | March 16, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

And this administration wants to do “HEALTH CARE”?
(singing) Happy days are here again…….
****************************************
Too bad that our press could not point out that not 1 cent came from Tarp 1 or Tarp 2, or the Stimulus Bill. All the money that AIG has recieved so far came from a law made in something like 1932. This money was allocated last Sept-Oct time frame.
Tarp1 came with some authority to control this and Tarp two has greater Authority. Unfortunately tthey did not reciebve mone under these.

Posted by: Thinking | March 16, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Look beyond the problem too.
Republicans continue to argue less regulation is better. This is just more proof (like we needed any) that less regulation must just be a cover allowing willing business owners to lie, rob and cheat their way to a fat pay-check or bottom line.
We have watched corporate junkets, bonuses, planes, etc continue at tax-payers expense. Bring on the regulation Obama and do for these companies what they can not do for themselves. Find a brain and a conscience.

Posted by: Ranger | March 16, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

American Infidel, speaking of “healthcare,” The American Legion has expressed its disappointment in President Obama’s plans to force private insurance companies to pay for the treatment of military veterans who have suffered service-connected disabilities and injuries. This is an outrage! Some injuries could likely exhaust the maximum lifetime insurance coverage limits leaving the families without any insurance coverage. This will result in a drastic drop in re-ups and volunteers. This will force Congress to reinstate the Draft. But even more importantly, this is nothing more than an attempt to force private insurance companies out of business so President Obama and the Democrats can implement their goal of a fully government-run healthcare system.

Posted by: James Danley | March 16, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

James Danley,
In case you really forgot, that’s the bill that put cops on NYC streets, enabling what’s-his-name-running-for-prez to clean up NYC. If you have been to that city before and after Cliton’s presidency, you understand what I am talking about, just in case you are too old to remember or too young to appreciate it.
Incidentally, that was the bill written by VPJB.
As far as PB0 is concerned, he has no clue, just the way you were talking about.

Posted by: kat | March 16, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

James Danley – The American Legion has praised Obama on far more than it has disagreed with Obama. In addition, military recruits are exceeding quotas by a long shot. Some as much as 150%. You may have a valid point on healthcare, but it’s too early to tell so the fear tactic is a bit extreme. Obama has been one of the biggest champions for veterans benefits and he will do right by them.

Posted by: Ranger | March 16, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Kat, I wasn’t objecting to the bill. Just the fact that President Clinton lied about there being 100,000 new police officers.

Posted by: James Danley | March 16, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Ranger, fear tactic?? The following is a quote from Commander David K. Rehbein of The American Legion: “It became apparent during our discussion today that the President intends to move forward with this unreasonable plan. He says he is looking to generate $540-million by this method, but refused to hear arguments about the moral and government-avowed obligations that would be compromised by it.”

Posted by: James Danley | March 16, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Everything President Obama has done so far has shown him to be willing to waste a few hundred million here and there in order to spend more.
The $700billion + stimulus package and its “imperfections”. The omnibus spending bill and its $8 billion of “last years business”.
These bonuses were about .01% of the money we’ve thrown at AIG. If the $165 million were an earmark, President Obama wouldn’t have bothered to raise his veto pen to reject it.
But now- now- he is just outraged at the spending.

Posted by: MayBee | March 16, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

James – yes, fear tactic. VA Secretary, Eric Shinseki says the proposal is “under study”. You draw some pretty strong conclusion for a policy “under study”.
As for Rehbein, he can’t seem to say anything without it carrying a dramatic or catastrophic tone – Here’s another example on another topic:
“National Commander David K. Rehbein of the American Legion strongly responded by saying, “”There is nothing to discuss. Photographing the caskets containing the remains of men and women who have made the supreme sacrifice on behalf of our country and its freedoms is little short of sacrilege.”

Posted by: Ranger | March 16, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

I wish more journalist were like you Jake. We need the hard questions ask.

Posted by: ken | March 16, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

This only proves you are part of the problem not the solution. You took his yes answer at face value while a blogger exposed the aig bonus story…then the washington post quote broke the story. Thank you again bloggers for getting the truth

Posted by: jay schlock | March 17, 2009, 4:00 am 4:00 am

I was thinking that Obama is a mistake.

Posted by: Thinking | March 17, 2009, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Are We Taxpayers – Or Suckers?
If you voted for Obama your one of them Suckers that dragged the rest of America into the biggest mistake ever. YOU HAPPY NOW.

Posted by: omen | March 17, 2009, 7:06 am 7:06 am

Where’s Hillary? I voted for her, thankfully.

Posted by: angry democrat | March 17, 2009, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Are We Taxpayers – Or Suckers?
If you voted for Obama your one of them Suckers that dragged the rest of America into the biggest mistake ever. YOU HAPPY NOW.
Posted by: omen
+++++++++++++++++++++=
There is a sucker born every minute

Posted by: radical | March 17, 2009, 7:32 am 7:32 am

Definition of SUCKER from the dictionary.
suck·er a. One who is easily deceived; a dupe. 1. Slang a person who is easily deceived or swindled a: a person easily cheated or deceived.
Sounds like your a sucker if you donated money to Obama, believed in Obama or voted for Obama according to the dictionary.

Posted by: ugnada | March 17, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am

sucker
n 1: a person who is gullible and easy to take advantage of

Posted by: kenya | March 17, 2009, 7:36 am 7:36 am

David Gergen stated on CNN at 8:30 am est that AIG bonuses were paid out FRIDAY!! Makes Obama (and especially Gibbs!!) very disingenuous about AIG!! Why all the outrage on post Sunday and MOnday? Sounds like we are being sold a bill of goods by this new administration.

Posted by: Penny | March 17, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am

1. There was a contractual obligation for AIG to pay them. However, this is not contractual obligation for the AIG con-men to take them. Can’t we shame them into not taking them?
2. What is the journolist? Who is on it? Is it a secret left wing cabal? Why is the MSM silent?

Posted by: Joe | March 17, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

AIG monies was already alocated in September. Speaking about lying to the American people, oh how we forget so easily……torture, war, deficits, the recession, wiretaps and on and on.

Posted by: sngeorgia | March 17, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Also, It’s only a tenth of a percent. This in the context of a huge economic emergency of which these bonuses comprise a hundredth of a percent. Sure, I wish that AIG was more honorable and forthcoming, but the Obama people are humans. Not focusing on economic issues down to the tenth of a percent is not indication of idiocy or carelessness, but being really busy and understanding that there are a lot of really important things going on.

Posted by: TQ White II | March 17, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

How about we fine those in AIG that batched the job…..

Posted by: Timray | March 17, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

So, Gibbs really didn’t answer the question, did he? And the reason why is that he could not definitively answer “Yes” because he would be outright lying.

Posted by: AZ | March 17, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

So Obama knew two weeks ago where the AIG money was going but he only became outraged now?
Now that the rest of us found out and became outraged.
Obama must be in a panic–how will he get more of our money for another spending spree if we are outraged?

Posted by: sammy | March 17, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

I see the White House is lying to the American people…again!

Posted by: Cory | March 17, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Obama wants us to be outraged at private companies, but not outraged at the Government officials that are supposed to be regulating them.
The “H” in Barack H. Obama stands for “Hypocrite”.

Posted by: Sally J | March 17, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

If I worked for AIG I would quit my job after I received my bonus.
Let Obama come in and make AIG profitable.
LOL.

Posted by: Rhonda Bleems | March 17, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Obama became outraged when the polls showed that WE are outraged. How convenient.

Posted by: ctmom | March 17, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

The duplicitous behavior of the Obama Administration has only begun to be exposed, and we’re at the tip of the iceberg (imagine if all journalists, when not snarking on their private “JournoList” listservs with each other and with various Democrats in government, actually acted like Jake Tapper and did their jobs!)
From reversing campaign promises on an almost daily basis, to chiding economic rhetoric from McCain that Obama then uses as a talking point, to his desire to preserve the public funding of elections while not actually doing it himself as promised, to the horrible vetting and installation of serial liars and tax cheats in his administration, to the flurry of withdrawn nominees for various scandalous reasons, to the focus on a radio talk show host as the world burns, to the blatant fearmongering and down-talking of the economy until his approval numbers start ticking down with the stock market that elicit a 180 reversal on rhetoric (or at least until his bill gets passed), etc.
And we’re not even out of the first 100 days yet.
If you thought Clinton was bad, you ain’t seen nothing yet, America.

Posted by: Good Lt | March 17, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Pushing the stimulus, the administration snarked that the pork in the bill was a small percentage of the overall $787 billion. I’d like to have that small percentage in my pocket. Anyway, now they are faux outraged at the $167 million bonuses at AIG. His BS is so glaring,I can’t believe that the whole world can not see his BS for what it is. The stimulus contained $130 mil. for a salt marsh beach rat. How does that simulate the economy. That kind of crap should have been completely cut out of the “stimulus.” Now he accepts almost 9,000 earmarks in the latest budget, while railing against earmarks. He could have vetoed that bill, but BS’d that it was last year’s business. He’s a charlatan in my eyes. Now he wants to tax health benefits and force veterans to use pri vate insurance for service related injuries. He contradicts himself every time he speaks.

Posted by: Patricia | March 17, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

“While the Senate constructed the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd unexpectedly added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. That amendment provides an “exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009,” which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are seeking to tax. The amendment is in the final version and is law.
Also, Sen. Dodd was AIG’s largest single recipient of campaign donations during the 2008 election cycle with $103,100, according to opensecrets.org.
Dodd’s office did not immediately return a request for comment.”
—————————————
Lots of outrage over something most of DC already knew about for a long time.
Bipartisan…

Posted by: mad | March 17, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Thank you Jake Tapper for being just about the only main stream media person who will reveal the true Obama.

Posted by: ctmom | March 17, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

It was all so apparent to anybody wanting to look..
Obama:
“Unprepared to be the FIRST, Rushing to be the WORST!”

Posted by: LogicalSC | March 17, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

“AIG had at this point designated $165 million in retention bonuses for officers of the Financial Products subsidiary, as well as an additional $121.5 million in executive bonuses.”
It seems that The CHANGEling’s “outrage” at the AIG bonuses is many days late and a hundred million dollars short. That His over-acted “outrage” — watch for repeats of that nervous cough — didn’t extend to executive bonuses is curious.
Or it WOULD be curious if He hadn’t voted for the Bush bailout, and been installed by the corporados for whom He conveniently, for the moment, professes disdain …
Why is Geithner still there?

Posted by: Pants on Fire | March 17, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Obama became outraged when the polls showed that WE are outraged. How convenient.
————————————-
ctmom,
This was Al Gore’s M.O. It why he was always “re-introducing” himself to America. He was all about get a poll, then formulate a thought.

Posted by: Mike_C | March 17, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

“Lots of outrage over something most of DC already knew about for a long time.”
They didn’t even take the time to read the massive bill! Remember Obama\Pelosi were adamant that the bill was so urgent that they had to vote on the bill 10 hours after the final bill was posted.
And cover was ran for the Democrats by their friends in the MSM who belittled anybody who suggested that it should be postponed until the bill could be studied. It was approved by the Democrats but this bill was NOT signed till 5 days later because Nancy had to run off to Europe and Barry was taking another vacation to Chicago to conference with William Ayers.
For all the leftist here, this is what you get by having a swooning pack of “journalists” who just pass along the spin of Obama as “reality”.
Just remember that conservatives have been against this from the beginning!
It was passed entirely by Obama and the Democrats. So reap what you sowed idiots!

Posted by: LogicalSC | March 17, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

“Pity, it’s too late even for buyer’s remorse.”
It’s not too late — in fact, the time is ripe — to impeach The CHANGEling for looting the Treasury — all it takes is a new House, made up of party-free independents who aren’t beholden to the mob and the corporations.
Dis-electing a bunch of faux “Democratic” and “Republican” reps may finally be possible.

Posted by: Pants on Fire | March 17, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

“While the Senate constructed the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd unexpectedly added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. That amendment provides an “exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009,” which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are seeking to tax. The amendment is in the final version and is law.”
—————————————
Just say no to phony outrage.
The president signed this bill.

Posted by: mad | March 17, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

================================
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and White House economic aide Lawrence Summers failed to stop Senate banking committee chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., from adding to the stimulus bill stricter limits on bankers’ bonuses than the White House wanted.
Dodd argued that the restrictions were critical to gaining public support for more funding for the ailing financial sector, saying that the perception that executives were getting rich on bailout money would be an impediment.
Under the administration’s proposal, compensation restrictions applied only to banks that receive “exceptional assistance” from the government. Top executives could be paid no more than $500,000, with bonuses or other compensation coming as stock that could only be claimed after the federal money had been paid back.
The bill passed by Congress set executive bonus limits on all banks that receive bailout money. The amount of assistance will determine the number of executives affected, though top executives will be prohibited from getting bonuses or incentives except as restricted stock that vests only after bailout funds are repaid. Amounts also can be no greater than one-third of the executive’s annual compensation.
The prohibition would not apply to bonuses that are spelled out in an executive’s contract signed before Feb. 11, 2009.
===================================
So Dodd put MORE in there than Obama wanted, AIG found discovered they could honor those pre-2/11 contracts and did so! Hmm, As others have said, nice acting…..
“And the Oscar goes to Barrack Obama for his great performance of showing anger after the American people expressed theirs”
By the way, was there ever a definiton for “exceptional assistance” provided by the administration?

Posted by: Mike_C | March 17, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

It great to see Jake and Gibbs bonding this way. This may be the beginning of a great friendship that may last a life time :-D

Posted by: Yeil | March 17, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

How do you think this would have played out if the Republicans had supported this mess? Maybe, Obama will blame the three Republicans who voted for the bill now.

Posted by: djaymick | March 17, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

How do you think this would have played out if the Republicans had supported this mess?
We know how it would have played out. Exactly the same way that the entire subprime meltdown! Liberals from Chris Dodd to Harold Raines to Jamie Gorelick to Barney Frank to Barack Obama would have made billions of bucks then blamed it on Republicans and American’s greed.
All to the general hoorah of the MSM.
And Obama would once again lecture Americans about how WE were going have to change all the while he was shoveling billions to his friends like ACORN so they could have another go at lenders for some free loans.

Posted by: LogicalUS | March 17, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

I believe all thinking taxpayer citizens are getting totally fed up with Barack (from Chicago), the green horn president “who won”. This clears the field for anything he and Imanuel can think up, put through congress, and pay back the groups who pushed his election. Obama is running AIG since they took the money, the administration is calling the shots. The MSM is on the fix also and that is why no matter which outlet you listened to on 3/17, they were in lock step, “Obama, Congress,(put in your own politican name) and it was the same message no matter which station you listened to. Decoys, to hide the billions AIG funneled on into European banks, ala Presiden B.H. Obama.

Posted by: Teaparty one | March 17, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

I marvel that a few thousand individuals are responsible for this whole thing, in govt and international finance.
The ties that these people have to one another are frightening…the true history about this bank robbery of the national treasury is yet to be written.
It is a page right out of Henry Ford’s Dearborne Independent.

Posted by: J House | March 18, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Obama didn’t inherit anything that he didn’t help create. Sure, Bush spent a lot on the war effort, but Obama has already doubled the national debt. Neither party has the filberts to force banks to swallow their bad assets, so we take it up the back tunnel.
Banks and megacorporations pay off politicians on both sides of the aisle with massive campaign contributions, so congress takes care of their big contributors before they even think of the little guy.
If there was ever a time for a taxpayer revolution, that time is NOW!!!
Let the people not waste this crisis!! Throw the crooked bums out, and rewrite the rules so lobbyists NEVER AGAIN take this much power from the people!

Posted by: ruaqtpi2 | March 18, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am

I’m surprised Gibbs didn’t blame Rush Limbaugh this time

Posted by: O'Shaunessey | March 18, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Our government is acting like it is a Venture Capital firm with unlimited resources. Let’s print up some more money, increase tax revenue and try some things out. Let’s not do any TRUE due diligence as to whether investing OUR money in these companies is a good investment, because there are no consequences for them if it doesn’t work out. They’ve got no SKIN in the game so to speak, it’s all ours!
All this backpedaling on NOT knowing about the bonuses makes me so sick and angry that I’m embarrassed for America.
The amendment to the bill that enabled these retention bonuses to be paid was negotiated by our Congress (Dobb, Pelosi, Reed, etc…). Dobb and others giving AIG execs the exemption they needed to collect these massive multi-million dollar bonuses and then walking away. Obama signed off on it. Paying off those who contributed to them.
Tell me honestly, what has changed about politics in Washington since Obama has arrived. These disgusting practices are more rampant than ever!
To the people who are saying, well at least Obama and the Democrats are trying to find out how the money is being spent, wake up already! Are you really that stupid?
I believe all of them (Congress, Obama, AIG) should be brought up on charges of fraud because that’s exactly what this is. The people of this country have just been duped for the largest amount ever, makes Madoff’s scheme look like childs play.

Posted by: Frankie | March 18, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Jake, I know you will ready for obambi’s smoke and mirrors BS with Jay Leno. What we have now is a crisis in confidence with the markets, congress and the judgement of barack’s telepromter. He is a narcissist who has no clue how to lead. For all Bush haters and Hillary supporters, both could lead. After 9/11, Bush rationally got us back on track.

Posted by: Jose53 | March 18, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

As a conservative I’m not suprised at this mess they have now. Bush wasn’t the best pres we’ve had but this idiot BO is going down in history as one of the worst ever.

Posted by: CONSERVATIVESRRIGHT | March 19, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.