Mar 30, 2009 6:57am

Wagoner: Under the Bus

(Updated at noon with new data – see italics below.)

The Obama administration's move to set strict guidelines for further aid to U.S. automakers – and to throw G.M. chief Rick Wagoner under the bus – makes great sense in terms of public opinion. The loans are not popular; the auto industry's leaders, even less so.

The administration's tough line matches with public attitudes on corporate conduct overall: Eighty percent of Americans in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll blame large business corporations for a role in the country's economic crisis – with nearly six in 10 saying they deserve "a great deal" of blame for the situation. And it's gotten the public's dander up: Nearly seven in 10, 68 percent, say they're "angry" at the role major corporations have played in the recession.

Notably, the public's ire crosses partisan lines, in what’s otherwise a highly partisan time. Eight in 10 Democrats, Republicans and independents alike assign blame to large corporations. And resulting anger ranges from nearly two-thirds of Republicans (64 percent) to nearly three-quarters of Democrats (73 percent) – sizable majorities across the board. (More on our full poll to come…)

Specific to Detroit, in a question we asked in an ABC/Post poll in December, just 22 percent of Americans thought the automakers’ troubles were chiefly caused by the bad economy; 75 percent, instead, attributed them to poor management. That's a key reason majorities consistently have opposed government loans to keep G.M. and Chrysler afloat.

CBS asked a similar question last month, with a similar result – by 63-24 percent Americans faulted the automakers’ management, rather than economic factors beyond their control, as the main cause of their problems. In a CNN poll in February, just 26 percent were confident in auto industry executives to make the right decisions for the economy; 74 percent, not confident. And in a December CNN poll, 82 percent expressed a negative opinion of automaker executives overall.

The industry's workers, as opposed to its leadership, have been far better rated. That underscores the administration's challenge in dealing with corporate basket cases from Wall Street to Detroit: protecting the economy and preserving jobs without being seen as bailing out errant executives. Given that imperative – as well as G.M. and Chrysler's objective condition – the decision on Wagoner, and the tight conditions on further automaker loans, look like an easy call.

User Comments

Why didn’t Obama throw some bankers under the bus? Because bankers can enact effective blackmail, whereas auto companies cannot! Obama needs to get to work and realize this isn’t just about reelection.

Posted by: tina | March 30, 2009, 7:22 am 7:22 am

WOW. This is really scary having Obama who could not run a hot dog stand for a profit telling automakers how to operate.

Posted by: kool | March 30, 2009, 7:27 am 7:27 am

I think that the American taxpayer should demand that Congress resign for their terrible performance before we give them any more of OUR money to dole out to these companies and their various pet projects

Posted by: Trent | March 30, 2009, 7:28 am 7:28 am

If being a leader requires intelligence, personal dignity, high moral values and strong economic management skills, then we also have to call for resignations of a lot of congress and the administration.

Posted by: jamescbuilder | March 30, 2009, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Trent,
Every member of the House and one third of the Senate is thrown from office… unless they can convince the voters to vote for their retention.
Compare that to business leaders, many of whom we have seen stay on and are even paid ‘retention bonuses’ despite colossal failure that has lead to the near collapse of the U.S. economy.

Posted by: John | March 30, 2009, 8:04 am 8:04 am

WOAH!! Hang on one minute!
I voted for Obama to save these companies. My union told us he would save us and we had to vote for him.
What the heck is going on?

Posted by: Kell | March 30, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Why didn’t they talk about the OTHER American car companies today in the speech. All the replacement jobs are there with Bright, Fisker, Tesla and a boatload of others who have been waiting, and waiting, and waiting for the many DOE funds. Where is the simple “let’s go” for those guys, none of whom have screwed up like Detroit. Let’s Go!

Posted by: Paul Lewis | March 30, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

I think our government is out of control. We are quickly changing from a capitalistic society to socialistic. Why should our government dictate who should be CEO of any company. The Board of Directors still need to govern companies not Washington. Look out, soon it will be you the government will be dictating too. They’ll start telling you what job you’re qualify for. Big Government is bad for our country. These companies should be restructuring under our bankruptcy laws and if they can’t make it other companies will. Let the strong servive and thrive.

Posted by: Doug | March 30, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

did the teleprompter have obamas or trumps face on the screen when it said
YOUR FIRED!

Posted by: darknessesedge | March 31, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

As a lifetime Michigan resident and currently not employed I may be disappointed with the US auto companies. Be that as it may; it is a corporate issue. I am concerned when the Executive Branch of our government has the audacity to suggest a corporation remove a chief executive and they are succesful in this when there is no fraud or unlawful situation involved. If this is the policy of the new administration, I expect, as a tax payer, they will force each chief executive to resign from the banks and financial companies who have received my tax dollars. I also expect each of these banking and financial companies to provide a restructuring plan to be accepted by the executive branch within a set schedule. All companies receiving tax dollars should be held to the same standard. With the current attitude in the White House, I can only assume the executive branch believes the banks and financial corporations they gave billions of tax dollars to have excellent management.

Posted by: Patti | March 31, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Is the government retirement invested inAIG

Posted by: james | March 31, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.