White House: Obama vs. Limbaugh Debate “Unlikely”
ABC News’ David Chalian reports: If you were already preparing to set your DVR to record the big Obama vs. Limbaugh debate, you may want to put down the remote. To nobody’s surprise, we got our first official word from the White House this morning that it is unlikely President Obama will accept Mr. Limbaugh’s invitation. "Well, it’s an interesting invitation," said White House Domestic Policy Adviser Melody Barnes in an interview with NBC’s "Today" show. "I think that Rush Limbaugh does not represent the rest of the American people and the president. We have to succeed," Barnes added in response Limbaugh’s desire to see President Obama fail in enacting his policy proposals. When pressed again on whether President Obama — the leader of the free world with the biggest megaphone — will take up Limbaugh’s offer, Ms. Barnes let out a burst of laughter. "Well, I think it’s probably unlikely, but we look forward to hearing more from Mr. Limbaugh and from others as we continue to address these problems," she said. Republicans appear to be growing tired of the Obama administration and its allies’ efforts to keep Rush Limbaugh center stage. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) took to the op-ed page of the Washington Post today to urge an end to the diversionary tactic. However, if Democrats and Limbaugh both see a strategic advantage in keeping it up, the food fight may not relent anytime soon.
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Why Would President Obama want to Waste his time With a Pill Pooping coke Snorting Idiot Comedian? Who Dosent even Know the Constitution! The President has WAY MORE IMPORTANT Things to do.
Posted by: Angie in PA | March 5, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
I keep thinking we will have some adult dialog at some point from the GOP on just what they could be doing to make this mess better. So far all I hear is high drama and name calling. And then we do get the tax cut business again. I would love to know why middle America is so concerned with how much more money the rich can make and keep on our backs. Please the rich will be rich and keep most of everything they have unless they got greedier and went with Madoff, tax cuts are great if you already have made your first million not so much for the rest of us.
Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | March 5, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
What a ridiculous notion that any president would waste time and stoop so low as to debate an oxyconton’d-out pig! Now really!!
Posted by: hang | March 5, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
That’s because the wh knows that Rush would mop the floor with Obama.
Obama would be taken to the woodshed and whipped like a red headed stepchild. Beat like a mule. Then used as Rush’s pet monkey.
What Rush flush’s down the toilet has more credibility than all of Obama.
Posted by: Kate | March 5, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Healthcare needs to be reformed, plain and simple. If you are sick there should be help. If you cut your finger off, you should be able to go to the hospital to have reattached. You should not be questioned about your financial status while you are bleeding, nor should a person have to result to sewing it back on himself.(movie “Sicko”)Also why is Rush Dumbaugh challenging that man to a debate. He is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. He does not have to stoop to this mans childish banter, and like it or not, he has already debated the people that matter in his campaigning days. Rush does not matter. He should know his place which is on the radio and not in the Whitehouse. And where did this 100 days stuff come from. He is not on probation. He has 4 YEARS, and he has my vote in the re-elect.
Posted by: Stephanie in MD | March 5, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
The president has way more important things to do….like ruining the economy. Dow down again, good job Barry.
Posted by: Trace | March 5, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Why would a pill popper debate a coke snorting idiot?
Posted by: Angie | March 5, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Obama started the controversy early on by making light of Limbaugh. Then Rahm Emanuel got into the fray, as did Eric Holder. It seems like these guys want to divert attention away from the economy. Now that Limbaugh has issued a statement to debate Obama on policy, this whole affair has become very silly. I don’t believe for a minute that Obama would go on national radio without a teleprompter, or notes. He couldn’t hold a candle to Limbaugh. And as for the latter, I listen occasionly, but am far from being a fan. Anyone who let’s a public figure, or a politician sway their views are sheep in my book. So everyone get their heads out of where the sun don’t shine and think for yourselves. Okay?
Posted by: Steve | March 5, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
If he is above this, why does he keep going after Rush. Obama is a coward and would look foolish if he ever accepted this debate. He’d actually have to explain his plan- which could not happen because Pelosi would have to be by his side.
Posted by: David | March 5, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Rush is just after ratings to further line his pocketbook. If he actually had any conviction behind his performances, he would take office and make a difference. Even Al Franken eventually quit ranting on the radio and walked his talk. Limbaugh doesn’t think Steele is up to the RNC Chair task – well, why didn’t he offer to take the job?
Those who can, do. Those who can’t, criticize. There is little question what group Rush has chosen.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 5, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
“That’s because the wh knows that Rush would mop the floor with Obama. Obama would be taken to the woodshed and whipped like a red headed stepchild. Beat like a mule. Then used as Rush’s pet monkey. What Rush flush’s down the toilet has more credibility than all of Obama.”
..
Just like Mccain and Hillary did during the debates, right?
Posted by: reason | March 5, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Why would a pill popper debate a coke snorting idiot???
Posted by: Angie | March 5, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
David:”If he is above this, why does he keep going after Rush.”
Could you define what you mean by “keep going after Rush”? Rush and the media have been hyping it up like crazy, but it’s nothing like the legendary Bush Admin vs. the Traitorous NY Times battles.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 5, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
jhw539
Everyone knows, and the WH admitted that they were involved in trying to paint Rush as the face of the GOP. They are trying to demonize him to be the new Bush to energize the left. Obama has this thing about going after any talk show host who disagrees or criticizes him. ie- Seantelli, Cramer, hannity, Rush. He should be above this but he is so worried about the talk show circuit. This is not how a POTUS shopuld act. When Rush finally called him out on it, as anticipated he hid behind a staement for his staff.
Posted by: David | March 5, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
“Republicans appear to be growing tired of the Obama administration and its allies’ efforts to keep Rush Limbaugh center stage”…LOL!!! are they finally catching on???? Rush is in narcisitic heaven thinking he’s relevant while Obama is more than happy to have folks see that fat ugly hateful face seen as the ‘other’ option.
Posted by: frank | March 5, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
I am astonished at how stupid is the show that is going on because of an asinine, drug addict, uncouth Rush Limbaugh. The man rants and rants and is certainly not helping his party. To think that President Obama would debate him is quite a laughing matter. Does Rush forget what President Bush got this country into ? Perhaps Elizabeth from the View should keep her immature views to herself or leave the show and join that awful man that is Rush.
Posted by: marie renee | March 5, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
The moment that Rush has the courage to run for office – ANY office, City Council, dogcatcher, anything – Obama might consider a debate. As long as Rush cowardly hides behind a microphone, alone, in a soundproof room, hidden from all dissent, he’s not worth the time.
Hey dittoheads, at least Al Franken had the guts to run, to face the acceptance/regection of the people, to deal with dissent and disagreement in real time.
Rush’s narcissistic, self-indulgent cowardliness won’t allow that.
Hey Rush, quit hiding. Get in the game.
Posted by: godblessusa | March 5, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
“Those who can, do. Those who can’t, criticize”
Wonder which one of those the liberals did under Bush???????????????
Pot meet kettle!
Posted by: Gin | March 5, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
“Rush would mop the floor with Obama.”…Well, then, by all means, have your fat boy run for president! Do it! Start the campaign today,my friend! Put your money w here your mouth is, or, rather, have Rush put his money where the gallon of ice cream usually is! ALL OF IT! Why not put his hot air to the test. HE believes what he says so much, then bank on it. EVery last cent he has throw it into a campaign so if he failed, he has nothing left. Do it. LEt him learn his own insignificance. I can’t wait to see every little detail of every failure in his life brought to the forefront – three failed marriages, no kids, flunked out of college, fat as all hell, ex-junkie…oh yeah, baby, bring it on!
Posted by: marty | March 5, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
“at least Al Franken had the guts to run”..damn straight! Run Rush run!!! DO IT FAT BOY!!
Posted by: this is too freakn funny | March 5, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Obama has to have a boogey man to go after. He’s doing it with Rush now and he did it with Joe the plumber.
Poor Obama.
Hows the stock market today Obama?
Posted by: bear | March 5, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
“Rush would mop the floor with Obama”…Obama is a constitutional law scholar. Rush just got the declaration of independence and the constitution confused. Rush is ranting about something and quoting the DOI. Uhhhh, how exactly does us declaring we are no longer a British colony relevant to a stimulus discussion??? LOL!!! Oh yeah, it would be wonderfully entertaining. So have him run! What’s the matter? Chicken??? do it. What’s the problem? he wants a debate, come out of your little sound room and take a walk in the real world. We’d ALL enjoy it, i guarrentee.
Posted by: ah well | March 5, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
marty
Um does confusion and liberalism go hand in hand? Obama drew first blood. Obama is the one that went after Rush. Liberalism is a mental disorder, obviously.
Posted by: Kate | March 5, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
If the Republican leadership was really interested in getting Limbaugh off the media front pages, then they’d tell him to shut up instead of grovelling to him everytime they open their mouths.
And Angie…you seem to forget that Bush admited to snorting coke when he ran for office the first time, and it became public that he was an admitted alcoholic. The difference is Bush and Limbaugh blamed others for their problems. Obama, on the ohter hand, admitted his mistake and took a higher road.
Posted by: algwriter | March 5, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Newt Gingrich was on GMA this morning. He said that he and his institute look forward to working with Obama on the HealthCare issue, and he (Gingrich) sees a lot of opportunity for meaningful reform, especially as everyone agrees that the system is broken and needs fixing. He also said that Obama has a chance to work with him and many other conservatives and Republicans if he really means what he (Obama) says about bi-partisan solutions to important problems.
Seems like Gingrich is willing to work with the President, and Gingrich actually has concrete ideas.
Now, I ask you, and you especially Kate, doesn’t that sound a lot more production than your name calling? Rush Limbaugh is a bully, albeit an affable bully, and like all bullies he will always find a cadre of like minded bullies (Kate, you still listening?) that find joy in mocking the defenseless, enjoining in juvenile name-calling of those with whom they disagree, and generally denigrating and trying to humiliate anyone who threatens their pathetic and closed-minded points of view.
And yes, I do listen to Rush Limbaugh enough to know what I am talking about.
Posted by: Steve From NH | March 5, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
“the WH admitted that they were involved in trying to paint Rush as the face of the GOP. They are trying to demonize him “…LOL!! Do you people take NO responsibility for your own actions. WHO came out yesterday and said “debate me or I own AMerica” ?????? LOL!!!! Demonizing Rush consists of nothing more than suggesting someone listen to him. His own word hang him all the while he’s in egotistical heaven LOVING that he is the headlines. FOOL!!! If Bush was the evil king, Rush is certainly the court jester.
Posted by: frank | March 5, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
If the administration’s spokespeople give Limbaugh the time of day, it’s to allow that flatulence-inflated blowhard to continue to display his own ignorance and emphasize his own irrelevance. Limbaugh is hanging himself by his own petard while the American public laughs.
Posted by: nanameow | March 5, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Gin:”Wonder which one of those the liberals did under Bush???????????????
Pot meet kettle!”
The liberals ran a highly effective campaign under Bush, took back the Congress, and now took back the Whitehouse. That is called doing. What campaign is Rush running?
Posted by: jhw539 | March 5, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
on the drug issue. At our ages, apres 70′s, just about everybody tries drugs in their youth. Not the point. WHO are the WEAK ones who got addicted??? THAT is a show of weakness, character flaw. Neither bush nor Obama was addicted to coke. Though bush may be an alcoholic. But the difference between someone like clinton, or obama having tried some drugs, like i did, was the HUGE difference between me trying it once and how weak and deeply troubled were the poeple who turned it into their lifestyle and got addicted. That says something about someone. You can’t compare obama trying while doing very well in a hard hard college (so obviously he must have remained perfectly functional and on his game) to someone who got addicted to the point where he is spending enormous amounts of money for it and is losing functional ability to run their life. I hate to say, I don’t mean this to make fun of someone, but his being so enormously fat also is a very similar weakness to someone who is addicted to drugs. WHy is he is so fat? why does he have no control over himself? That lends to a certain weakness of character. he has no wife, no children, no repsonsibilities, he’s rich. Why does he STILL do such a lousy job managing his own body?
Posted by: mary | March 5, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
This reminds me when Ahmednajad insisted to debate Bush while he knew already, what the answer he will get!
Posted by: RS | March 5, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
David:”Everyone knows, and the WH admitted that they were involved in trying to paint Rush as the face of the GOP. They are trying to demonize him to be the new Bush to energize the left. ”
Amazing. Pointing out that he is the defacto head of the GOP, after he forced Congressmen and the actual Chair of the RNC to personally apologize and acknowledge his prestige, is “trying to demonize him.” Let me just savor that for a moment – calling someone a leader in the Republican party is demonizing him. Not comparing him to Bush, not mocking him personally (the WH has been careful to keep criticism professional, unlike blowhards on this board) – no, merely pointing out that he is the most powerful Republican voice out there is demonizing him.
That is frankly hilarious.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 5, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Then in four years we can see if the conservatives are running an effective campaign. Until then, I will call it being effective since that’s what you call what the liberals did for eight years.
Posted by: Gin | March 5, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
So we have Obama’s side to this.
Rush starts in 2 minutes…
I’ll tune in to hear his side and decide for myself.
Posted by: Kris | March 5, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
“Obama is the one that went after Rush”….are you delusional???? Rush had been ranting about Obama nonstop NONSTOP since he was first elected!!!! WEEKS went by before Obama said a word. Rush brought this on himself a nd I must say, hello?????? Rush is ENJOYING this!!!! Haven’t ya noticed??? he’s LOVING it! Rush is in narcistic heaven! Just yesterday Rush claims he will “own” america! LOL!! Well, do bring it on, fat boy! He wants to debate our president! Well then have him RUN!!! Put his money where his fat a$$ mouth is. Does that bother you??? Why???? DO IT! If you’re soooo sure he’s right, do it! Let’s see his life picked to pieces as he did to Obama! Good for the goose, good for the porky gander, eh???
Posted by: marty | March 5, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
This was just more buffoonery from the republicans, they have noth8ng concrete to offer so they give us distractions. GOP, your turning into a bigger joke than you were before.
Posted by: JR | March 5, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
First, if Limbaugh wants a debate, let hem run for office, where he will have to back up his big mouth with action and responsibility for his actions.
Second, I could believe that Limbaugh might win a debate, because I have seen his type in action when I was in college inthe 60′s, ironically on the part of left wing zealots. If he doesn’t have the facts, he will make them up, knowing his opponent cannot immediately answer his statements if he has the least respect for the truth. In other words, I have not the least respect for Limbaug’s honesty or honor,
Posted by: Jim | March 5, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
“That lends to a certain weakness of character”..well, yeah, Mary, the man just confused the DOI with the constitution. Slight difference. LOL! He should have looked it up before he went on and started ranting it. He’s lazy. google it. takes two seconds, nah, that’s too much for him. better to go on in front of millions of people (or whatever, i dont know how many listen to him) and make a bloody fool of yourself. LAzy. btw – your name made me do a double take. mary – marty, ya know? I thought “good post….I wrote it???? ” Ha!
Posted by: marty | March 5, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Can One of you Just one of you tell Me who Is Inspiring People in the Republican Party right Now? With an Approval Rating at 26% Seems Like Rush is the One since all the Republican Politicans Speak out about him then turn around And Apologize Like scared Sissys WHO IS THE TRUE LEADER OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
Posted by: Angie in PA | March 5, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Well – he couldn’t be any worse than any other Obama crooney – Blago, Ayers, etc.
Posted by: jamescbuilder | March 5, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
The Obama Daily Tracking Poll is down 212 points today.
Nice one Peeeeebo. Good job, right liberals?
Posted by: Justin | March 5, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Speaking of pot smoking, coke snorting windbags, that perfectly describes Obama.
Posted by: Sluggo | March 5, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Republicans/Conservatives, not even honest Abe could get you out of the hole that Bush/Cheney Inc. has dug for you.
Posted by: Mack | March 5, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Whew, marty | Mar 5, 2009 11:39:52 AM, that was quite a rant you displayed up there! Don’t let the vermins on this site get your blood pressure shot up.
Posted by: D. | March 5, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
This is a waste of time and space as you write this crap..There is no way in hell Obama would debate this numb nuts>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted by: NHvoter | March 5, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Gin:”Then in four years we can see if the conservatives are running an effective campaign. Until then, I will call it being effective since that’s what you call what the liberals did for eight years.”
For two (debatably 4) of those years the liberals – at least the ones in Congress – were lined up behind President Bush. You seem to forget that for a while Bush had the highest approval rating of any president since polling began – beating the likes of WWII FDR. Before his – I think we can all agree – unfortunate rating to the 90′s, he was still well over 50% and didn’t dip under 50% until the 2004 election was underway. The Democratic Congress accepted his mandate and gave him his signature tax cuts and the No Child Left Behind act.
It is documented fact that the Democratic party compromised, they did not stand on principle and obstruct until Bush’s failure was proven.
Posted by: jhw539 | March 5, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
“Speaking of pot smoking, coke snorting windbags, that perfectly describes Obama.”…well, he graduated from columbia university and Harvard Law school in constitutional law and passed the barr exam and was the president of the Harvard Law Review, so while he admitted TRYING something, obviously, he was extremely successful and on his game, literally, he is a very accomplished basketball player and athlete, so apparently this ‘drug use’ never got in the slightest way with performance eitherathletic or academic, so while i know you folks love to think he’s some God-man, I tend ot think he’s human, so obviously the ‘drug use’ must have been more like a few tries or he could not have kept up his performance he was whie it was happening. Unlike bush, who was the son of a famous politician and very rich alum, there would be no fixed grades for some nobody black kid who had no money. He had ot earn his grades andif he didn’t keep them up, he’d be kicked out like any other nobody. Unlike rush, who flunked out of college, and has failed at everything he done, literally, all he has ever done is talk, his wholelife zero accomplishments, failed marriages, no kids, he’s not a parent, he’s screwed up every relationship he’s had, he wasn’t on his game enough to learn anything or take a t est, and he’s fat as all hell, can’t even keep the brownies out of his face, I’m sorry, if you want weak character, Rush is a poster boy for it.
Posted by: mary | March 5, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Er, I think its more like Republicans keeping Limbaugh in the limelight by inviting him to speak at CPAC, (video of conservatives giving him a standing ovation), and the sight of moderate Republicans apologising for saying his talk show is rating driven, ugly and divisive. But, whatever, Rick. If you enjoy blaming Obama for the fact Limbaugh is the face of the Republican Party at this time, OK. Obama has wide shoulders, he’ll take the blame for Limbaugh’s existence.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | March 5, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
“Obama has wide shoulders, he’ll take the blame for Limbaugh’s existence.”..no, i’m sure it’s gotta be clinton’s fault, right???
Posted by: marty | March 5, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Just sad that the Republican party has fallen so low, and now basically represents the uneducated, prejudiced, followers of kook religion, and budding national socialists – i.e. Nazis, for those ‘publicans without a clue – about 95% of them, it would seem. We need a new copnservative party that stands for conseervative principles – stop needless foreign wars and expenditures, support education in science and technology, understand and adhere to our constitutional principles, and do whatever possible to support a meritocracy-based society. Dwight Eisenhower as a great Republican and great leader – perhaps the last one. He was also not stupid, uneducated, and simply a mouthpiece for idiot ideology.
Posted by: lrybrown | March 5, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
“it’s gotta be clinton’s fault”— come to think of it. 9/11 happened 9 months into Bush’s first term and while bush got a memo in August, 8 months after clinton was gone warning about it, still repugs blamed clinton. Then anything that went wrong for the next 8 years was all Clinton’s fault. Then Obama was elected and within one week everything was Obama’s fault. what happened over those 8 years of Bush’s rein??? Where we in some time machine or something???? Dont we blame everything on the old president for the next 8 years, isn’t that how it goes Republicans???
Posted by: too freakn funny | March 5, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
President Obama would be wrong to accept such an invitation at this stage in the game. However, if he plans to make his accusations that the Republican Party is in disarray, he should do precisely that and show up on Rush’s show as soon as he possibly can.
Posted by: NPage | March 5, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Obama Daily Tracking Poll is down 223 and falling.
Posted by: Justin | March 5, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
I hear a chicken clucking at the whitehouse. Too funny.
Posted by: Trace | March 5, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
“I hear a chicken clucking at the whitehouse. Too funny.”
All these chicken references…must be in today’s memo.
What you silly people don’t understand is that Obama is extremely bright. Nobody in their right mind who have a President debate somebody who is has NO SKIN IN THE GAME. They are not on equal footing. Rush can say whatever he wants and not have to back it up or try to get it through Congress or sell it to the people. He’s a blowhard. Plain and simple.
Posted by: silky | March 5, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
“Nobody in their right mind who have a President debate somebody who is has NO SKIN IN THE GAME.”
The mind goes one way, the fingers go another.
Posted by: silky | March 5, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Rush,
YOU HAVE DONE IT… Years of dedicated pill popping, boozing, over-eating and slandering have brought to the highest and most coveted seat in Republican Party Politics… ITS LEADER. You have FINALLY over come the disadvantages of being short, round and off-radar and entered the main stream to swim with what is left of the Republican Party. ENJOY.
It is my hope that you rally the people to continue with Republican Party Economic Policies; they have done so much, for so few, for so long. If its not broke, don’t fix it.
And with your “connections” you can now get those pain pills for free instead having to buy them from some 2 bit doctor in an alley. Its the standard deal for all high ranking Republican Party Members. A numb mind is the basis of all the parties great policies and ideas; so you will fit right in…
Posted by: BIG FAN | March 5, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
THE CORE REASONS FOR EXTREME REPUBLICAN STRATEGY !
1) EXTREME REPUBLICAN CORE IDIOLOGY STEMS FROM CORPORATION CULTURE OF DOMINANCE. THE 5% OF POPULATION GOLDEN RULE.
2) THEY ACHIEVE SEVERAL POSITIONS BY ENDORSING RUSH Limbaugh, SEGREGATION THROUGH
FLAMMABLE RHETORIC DIVIDE AND CONQUER THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, KEEP AMERICANS QUESTIONING A TRUE FORWARD DIRECTION. THEY DON’T WANT AMERICA TO PROGRESS
IN THE SAME WAY THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS DO. THEY DON’T MAKE SENSE OF THINGS LIKE HIGH SPEED RAIL, HEALTH CARE , EDUCATION AND GREEN ENERGY,
BASIC INSTINCTIVE PROGRESSIVE NEEDS WE SEE AS IMPARITIVE TO OUR SUCCESS.
THESE ARE CLEARLY ISSUES WE HAVE NOT MADE PROGRESS IN FOR DECADES AND THEY WANT TO KEEP IT THAT WAY.
3) PROGRESS IN THESE AREAS WOULD BRING AMERICAN PEOPLE TOGETHER IN A WAY NEVER SEEN BEFORE. UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ARE NOT SO DIFFERENT AND WE WANT THE SAME BASIC EVOLUTION IN LIFE.
4) THE REPUBLICANS CAN’T STAND HAVING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE COME TOGETHER UNDER OBAMA. COMING TOGETHER FOR THE GOOD OF ALL THAT WOULD BE CONTRADICTORY TO CORPORATE DOMINANCE AS WAS THE RULE UNDER BUSH, COMMON THREAD.
5) IT IS NOT SO HARD TO SEE WHAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL DO NEXT WHEN YOU UNDERSTAND ONE SIMPLE CONCEPT AT THERE CORE. THEY ARE STRATEGIST ON BEHALF OF SOME OF THE BIGGEST MOST POWERFUL CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD. GREED IS AT CORE ANSWERING THE QUESTION OF IDIOLOGY. MONEY FOR THE SAKE OF MONEY THIS IS WERE ALL THIS STOP MAKING SENSE RHETORIC COMES FROM.
6) ONCE WE UNDERSTAND THIS WE CAN CALL THE EXCENTRICT REPUBLICANS FOR WHAT THEY ARE CORPORATE NAZIS. NOT A GROUP THAT WANTS TO SEE THIS COUNTRY SUCCEED IN THE SAME WAY YOU AND I OR THE AVERAGE JOE WANT IT TO SUCCEED. THEY HIDE BEHIND SOME EXCENTRICT FLAVORED EXTREME CULTURAL IDEOLOGY WORKING TO INSITE HATE AND FEAR.
7) THE EVOLUTION OF THE INTERNET WAS AND IS CRUCIAL TO WHY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GOT THERE WAY AND ELECTED OBAMA. THE INTERNET IS THE ONE MEDIUM THAT CAN KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TOGETHER SO WE MAY TAKE CONTROL OF THIS COUNTRY FROM THE EXTREME RIGHT REPUBLICANS FROM THE GREEDY CORPORATIONS.
8) REPUBLICANS CAMPAIGN THROUGH FEAR, DIVIDE AND CONQUER AND A WEALTH OF MISS INFORMATION. LIKE GLOBAL WARMING IS NOT REAL. MINIMALLY CONFUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
9) WE NEED TO WAKE UP AND APPROACH THIS FOR WHAT IT IS OF COURSE IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE TO MOST AMERICANS . THAT IS THE HOLE POINT IT IS NOT SUPPOSED TO MAKE SENSE CONFUSION IS KING.
IF WE APPROACH THIS FROM ITS VERY CORE WE MAY MINIMIZE THIS CANCER IN OUR CULTURE
THAT HOLDS US BACK FROM BEING OUR VERY BEST.
10) RUSH Limbaugh IS THE EPITOME OF THE NEGATIVE CAMPAIGN. DISTRACTING OUR ATTENTION FROM WHATS IMPORTANT. CONFUSE DIVIDE PLANT FEAR ADD KAYOS, DON’T LET AMERICANS HAVE JOY IN EVOLVING AS A HEALTHY COUNTRY WOULD . THEN THEY WILL BUILD ON MORE COMPLEX FRAMEWORKS CAMPAIGNS STRATEGY’S THAT WILL BEST MUDDY THE PURSUIT OF HEALTHY AMERICANS VISION OF EVOLUTION .
11) SOME BODY NEEDS TO CALL THE EXTREME REPUBLICANS FOR WHAT THEY ARE. THEY NEED TO SAY THIS ON PUBLIC TV WAKE UP AMERICANS WE ARE FIGHTING FOR COMMON HORSE SENSE PROGESS AND VALUES IN THIS COUNTRY WE ARE NOT SOCIALIST WE ARE NOT COMMUNISTS WE ARE SMART LOVING AMERICANS THAT WANTS NOTHING MORE THAN OUR COUNTRY AND OUR PRESIDENT TO SUCCEED. THEY ARE CORPORATE NAZIS!!!!
Posted by: JOHN RAMIREZ | March 5, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Posted by: Kate
That’s because the wh knows that Rush would mop the floor with Obama.
Obama would be taken to the woodshed and whipped like a red headed stepchild. Beat like a mule. Then used as Rush’s pet monkey.
What Rush flush’s down the toilet has more credibility than all of Obama.
It’s too bad you feel that way Kate, but still doesn’t change the fact that OBAMA is POTUS and your POTUS
Posted by: fempharoh | March 5, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Al Franken as well as other liberal pundits on the radio had their collective posteriors handed back to them trying to compete with Limbaugh. Rush continues to laugh all the way to the bank and would be taking a cut in pay to assume any political office. He is however, modern day’s foremost proponent of Hayek and de Tocqueville. And yes, he knows the Constitution inside and out.
Posted by: somnolence | March 5, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
If Rush can’t figure out why he’s not a chick-magnet… why the “babes” aren’t attracted to him……..why on earth would anyone listen to him speak on any subject? Rush……….fat, drug addicts shouldn’t bounce in public. Believe me………it doesn’t look to the audience, apparently, the way it looks to you. If you insist on bouncing in public, you will never get a date!
Posted by: Sammy | March 5, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
So Obama (through his press secretary) take MULTIPLE opportunities to attack Rush. Rush calls him on it and offers a friendly debate on the issues. Obama (through his press secretary) laughs it off. What a COWARD!! First of all, for the President of the United States to spend his time demonizing a radio talk show host is pretty sad. Doesn’t Obama and the Democrats have bigger foes to worry about? Like the economy and terrorists? I suppose Rush is an easier target for someone like Obama.
Posted by: JoeSmoe | March 5, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
First the White House takes shots at Limbaugh, then the DNC runs anti-Limbaugh ads (even some in Spanish), then the press drills every GOP official about Limbaugh, then the left-leaning press takes the worst reactions and tries to create a false crisis out of it… wherever could such a strategy have sprung from?
-
Obama mentor Saul Alinsky’s handbook Rules for Radicals outlines the techniques used by this administration to try and break any link between Rush Limbaugh’s influence and the GOP- it’s basically a divide-and-conquer approach:
-
Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
-
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
-
According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”
-
Now that we all know what the underhanded control-freak Obama is up to, conservatives, Limbaugh, and the GOP would be well-advised to ignore these malicious hypocrites, and don’t take the bait. Note that Wall St. didn’t go for these diversionary stunts one bit, they’re focused like a hawk on his ongoing demolition of the country.
The narcissist Obama looks desperate and insecure going after Rush, so just let him go down with his ill-advised policies, shouldn’t take long now
-
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com
Posted by: Reaganite Republican | March 5, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
The devil is busy why in the world would President Obama have a debate with that clown who what to be in a position but no one wants him,not even his so call friends.This reminds me of the Jim Crow days when the more affluent whites would use the less educated of the group to causes problem this is what is going on right now.There has been a changing of the guard.Let’s except it and move forward are continue to waste valuable time.President Obama we the people of this country voted for you.Now Rush needs to just state what he is a hateful little white man.By the way I’ll take you on.The President doesn’t have time for you,he’s trying to put hope by in this country.But most of all we have to put God by in this country and it isn’t about President Obama.
I’m waiting Rush let’s do this.
Posted by: Barbara Biggs | March 5, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Obama has much better things to do with his time then wallowing in the slime with a wind bag like Limbaugh!
Posted by: ZakD | March 5, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
So- the Rushbots think that our President wakes up each morning wondering how to embarass old Rush today. Does anyone actually believe such nonsense? Or that, even if the President wanted to address the “concerns” of the gasbag of the century, that he could even find the time? Unlike Rush and his cheering section, the President has real work to do. Work that is important to democrats and republicans alike, even though the gravity of it all is probably over the heads of the whiners and complainers, and just plain hate-mongers who find their “voice” with Rush. Rather than contribute ideas and solutions, the squeaky peanut gallery contents itself with name-calling and bellyaching. We do have free speech, guys, so you can go on with your diatribes as long as there is a station that will carry you and a sponsor who will pay for it. But reasonable folks who actually want to get things done also enjoy that same freedom, and I will partake of it long enough to admonish the bums in the “NO!” corner that, although I cannot make you shut up, I can suggest you grow up. Rush is no different than any other demagogue that stalks the fringe from the shadows. He just pushes your buttons better and shouts a little louder. Most speakers who have little substance to offer do make lots of noise, and Rush is no exception. Get a real job, and get a life all you Rushbots! And Rush- the next time you lose count of the oxycontins, don’t wory. Us liberals will go easy on you, just like we did before. It’s funny how the conservative tune changes when the largess of the court goes their way, and check is made out to one of them.
Marianne Menter
Posted by: Marianne Menter | March 6, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am
I would watch pay per view to see that debate. I think that would be one of the biggest philisophical debates since Erasmus and Martin Luther.
Posted by: Richard Saggau | March 6, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
So lets see if I understand this:
Before the election those who would become the white house staff decide on a strategy of attacking Rush Limbaugh
The White house anoints Rush as the leader of the opposition.
The White house demands that republicans state if they support Limbaugh or no.
Limbaugh answers the White House and offers him 3 hours on the most popular radio program in history to debate the leader of the opposition that they have appointed.
And now the White House demurs and their defenders all say they have more important things to worry about and instead attack his former addiction. (Note that Rush in his challenges to the president didn’t bring up President own self admitted drug history) Their answers are only insults.
Apparently the president and his staff and his followers are not convinced they can stand up to Mr. Limbaugh and persuade this audience, particularly without a teleprompter to tell him what to say.
As Glenn Reynolds suggested time to break out the chicken suit and begin the countdown on the number of days since Rush issued his challenge and the White House demurered.
Of course this announcement doesn’t totally reject it. No solid decision either way. President Obama has apparently discovered a way to vote “present” as president.
Posted by: DaTechGuy | March 6, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I think a debate between Rush Limbaugh and the President would be quite beneficial. Since Mr. Limbaugh has an extremely large listening audience, the President would have an excellent chance to (try to) explain the programs he is forcing upon the United States.
Posted by: A bit of Thought | March 6, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
What a ridiculous notion that any president would waste time and stoop so low as to debate an oxyconton’d-out pig! Now really!!
Posted by: hang | Mar 5, 2009 11:10:04 AM
__________________________________________
You have to “love” the hatred that spews out of the foaming at the mouth “compassionate” Liberals.
and attackign Limbaugh on drugs? you can’t be this much of a hypocrite. Your President is a cocaine head.
Posted by: CJ from Illinois | March 6, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
THE CORE REASONS FOR EXTREME REPUBLICAN STRATEGY !
1) EXTREME REPUBLICAN CORE IDIOLOGY STEMS FROM CORPORATION CULTURE OF DOMINANCE. THE 5% OF POPULATION GOLDEN RULE.
2) THEY ACHIEVE SEVERAL POSITIONS BY ENDORSING RUSH Limbaugh, SEGREGATION THROUGH
FLAMMABLE RHETORIC DIVIDE AND CONQUER THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, KEEP AMERICANS QUESTIONING A TRUE FORWARD DIRECTION. THEY DON’T WANT AMERICA TO PROGRESS
IN THE SAME WAY THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS DO. THEY DON’T MAKE SENSE OF THINGS LIKE HIGH SPEED RAIL, HEALTH CARE , EDUCATION AND GREEN ENERGY,
BASIC INSTINCTIVE PROGRESSIVE NEEDS WE SEE AS IMPARITIVE TO OUR SUCCESS.
THESE ARE CLEARLY ISSUES WE HAVE NOT MADE PROGRESS IN FOR DECADES AND THEY WANT TO KEEP IT THAT WAY.
3) PROGRESS IN THESE AREAS WOULD BRING AMERICAN PEOPLE TOGETHER IN A WAY NEVER SEEN BEFORE. UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ARE NOT SO DIFFERENT AND WE WANT THE SAME BASIC EVOLUTION IN LIFE.
4) THE REPUBLICANS CAN’T STAND HAVING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE COME TOGETHER UNDER OBAMA. COMING TOGETHER FOR THE GOOD OF ALL THAT WOULD BE CONTRADICTORY TO CORPORATE DOMINANCE AS WAS THE RULE UNDER BUSH, COMMON THREAD.
5) IT IS NOT SO HARD TO SEE WHAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL DO NEXT WHEN YOU UNDERSTAND ONE SIMPLE CONCEPT AT THERE CORE. THEY ARE STRATEGIST ON BEHALF OF SOME OF THE BIGGEST MOST POWERFUL CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD. GREED IS AT CORE ANSWERING THE QUESTION OF IDIOLOGY. MONEY FOR THE SAKE OF MONEY THIS IS WERE ALL THIS STOP MAKING SENSE RHETORIC COMES FROM.
6) ONCE WE UNDERSTAND THIS WE CAN CALL THE EXCENTRICT REPUBLICANS FOR WHAT THEY ARE CORPORATE NAZIS. NOT A GROUP THAT WANTS TO SEE THIS COUNTRY SUCCEED IN THE SAME WAY YOU AND I OR THE AVERAGE JOE WANT IT TO SUCCEED. THEY HIDE BEHIND SOME EXCENTRICT FLAVORED EXTREME CULTURAL IDEOLOGY WORKING TO INSITE HATE AND FEAR.
7) THE EVOLUTION OF THE INTERNET WAS AND IS CRUCIAL TO WHY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GOT THERE WAY AND ELECTED OBAMA. THE INTERNET IS THE ONE MEDIUM THAT CAN KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TOGETHER SO WE MAY TAKE CONTROL OF THIS COUNTRY FROM THE EXTREME RIGHT REPUBLICANS FROM THE GREEDY CORPORATIONS.
8) REPUBLICANS CAMPAIGN THROUGH FEAR, DIVIDE AND CONQUER AND A WEALTH OF MISS INFORMATION. LIKE GLOBAL WARMING IS NOT REAL. MINIMALLY CONFUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
9) WE NEED TO WAKE UP AND APPROACH THIS FOR WHAT IT IS OF COURSE IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE TO MOST AMERICANS . THAT IS THE HOLE POINT IT IS NOT SUPPOSED TO MAKE SENSE CONFUSION IS KING.
IF WE APPROACH THIS FROM ITS VERY CORE WE MAY MINIMIZE THIS CANCER IN OUR CULTURE
THAT HOLDS US BACK FROM BEING OUR VERY BEST.
10) RUSH Limbaugh IS THE EPITOME OF THE NEGATIVE CAMPAIGN. DISTRACTING OUR ATTENTION FROM WHATS IMPORTANT. CONFUSE DIVIDE PLANT FEAR ADD KAYOS, DON’T LET AMERICANS HAVE JOY IN EVOLVING AS A HEALTHY COUNTRY WOULD . THEN THEY WILL BUILD ON MORE COMPLEX FRAMEWORKS CAMPAIGNS STRATEGY’S THAT WILL BEST MUDDY THE PURSUIT OF HEALTHY AMERICANS VISION OF EVOLUTION .
11) SOME BODY NEEDS TO CALL THE EXTREME REPUBLICANS FOR WHAT THEY ARE. THEY NEED TO SAY THIS ON PUBLIC TV WAKE UP AMERICANS WE ARE FIGHTING FOR COMMON HORSE SENSE PROGESS AND VALUES IN THIS COUNTRY WE ARE NOT SOCIALIST WE ARE NOT COMMUNISTS WE ARE SMART LOVING AMERICANS THAT WANTS NOTHING MORE THAN OUR COUNTRY AND OUR PRESIDENT TO SUCCEED. THEY ARE CORPORATE NAZIS!!!!
Posted by: JOHN RAMIREZ | Mar 5, 2009 3:58:45 PM
___________________________________________
John Ramirez, I love your number 8. Republicans campaign through fear and misinformation? HAHAHA!!
Your rant is EXACTLY what Democrats do, especially the camapainging through fear and misinformation. You gave the right example. Global Warming which Democrats have used fear and misinformation to try to convince people that it is man made.
Why are you liberals so full of hate? Your god won, be happy for the next four years. Enjoy life, stop the hatred and the foaming at the mouth.
Posted by: CJ from Illinois | March 6, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Obama has much better things to do with his time then wallowing in the slime with a wind bag like Limbaugh!
Posted by: ZakD | Mar 5, 2009 9:08:18 PM
_________________________________________________
Of course you are right ZakD. Obama needs to keep on destroying what is left of our once mighty economy.
Posted by: CJ from Illinois | March 6, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
“Why Would President Obama want to Waste his time With a Pill Pooping coke Snorting Idiot Comedian? Who Dosent even Know the Constitution! The President has WAY MORE IMPORTANT Things to do.”- Angie in PA
Angie, Obama will be debating Rush Limbaugh not Al Franken.
Posted by: Rich in Ghent | March 7, 2009, 7:20 am 7:20 am
I have to say, if our own President of United States, cannot take on a radio host in a debate, what hell are we going to do when he has to sit down a debate with the leader,or leaders, of other country’s. Obama has to be able to talk to anyone, about anything that will effect the people’s thoughts him. If he cannot do that, then all of us in the United States had better be ready to do it ourselves. In closing, Obama, as a citizen of this wonderful counrty, stand up to these people,network’s, radio commitators that are saying “you can’t, won’t, or are not going to lead this country into a better future for our us, our children, and their children. and if you cannot do that, then let your wife do it.
Posted by: Joseph Montana | March 7, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Yeah, if Obama can’t take out a radio host in debate, what makes him think he can take on enemy leaders? I suppose it’d be a hard date to make though, considering Obama is tethered to his teleprompter Biden-style nowadays.
Posted by: Doug | March 9, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
B Hussein Obama will be failed for sure, if he takes a debate w/ Rush . He in only a Community Organizer-in-chef
Posted by: du tan | March 9, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
B. Hussein Obama staffs
1- TurboTax cheat Tim Geithner
2- Pardon orders seller Eric Holder
3- Donating collector Hill Rodham
So how can he handle his job ?
Posted by: du tan | March 9, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
When Limbaugh is the Repubs Presidential candidate, I’m sure President Obama would be happy to debate Ol’ Missouri Fats. Ol’ Fats will not run for Prez because… 1. He would not want to be embarrassed by the scrutiny he would have to face. 2. All the money he would lose by not being able to spew the poison he spews on the radio. 3. The Repubs don’t want him to.
Posted by: Pat | March 15, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm