Candidate Obama, President Obama, and the Armenian Genocide
Armenian American activists today said that President Obama’s refusal to pushing Turkey to recognize its genocide against Armenians — or to even used the "g" word — fell “far short of the clear promise he made as a candidate that he would, as President, fully and unequivocally recognize this crime against humanity.” Behind the scenes, the White House says, the president was urging Turkish and Armenian leaders to resolve this issue as part of the normalization of relations the two countries are negotiating. This evening in Istanbul, President Obama met at a reception with the Foreign Ministers of Armenia, Turkey and Switzerland on the margins of the Alliance of Civilizations, which is meeting here. This photo of the meetings was provided by the White House: An administration source tells ABC News that in his meeting with Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian, Swiss Foreign Minister and mediator Micheline Calmy-Rey, Turkish undersecretary of the foreign ministry Ertugul Apakan, and Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan, President Obama took the opportunity to congratulate them on the progress on the normalization of relations between Turkey and Armenia, and also to press them to take this to the conclusion. The tentative agreement between the two countries includes a historical commission which would make a conclusion about just what happened in the early part of the last century, when hundreds of thousands of Armenians were killed by Turks. As a senator, and then as a presidential candidate, Barack Obama often talked about how bold he was to call the slaughter of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians at the hands of the Ottoman Empire just what it was: a genocide. “America deserves a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian Genocide and responds forcefully to all genocides,” he said. “I intend to be that President.” In a January 2008 letter to the Armenian Reporter, Mr. Obama said he shared “with Armenian Americans – so many of whom are descended from genocide survivors – a principled commitment to commemorating and ending genocide. That starts with acknowledging the tragic instances of genocide in world history.” In 2006, Mr. Obama noted, “I criticized the secretary of State for the firing of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, John Evans, after he properly used the term ‘genocide’ to describe Turkey’s slaughter of thousands of Armenians starting in 1915. I shared with secretary Rice my firmly held conviction that the Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion, or a point of view, but rather a widely documented fact supported by an overwhelming body of historical evidence.” Asserted Mr. Obama, back then: “The facts are undeniable. An official policy that calls on diplomats to distort the historical facts is an untenable policy.” Mr. Obama also stated unequivocally that “as President I will recognize the Armenian Genocide.” His position on the matter was so strong, the Armenian National Committee of America had its own Obama File on Armenian Genocide Recognition which included a Youtube clip of the President on the campaign trial saying, “there was a genocide that did take place against the Armenian people. It is one of these situations where we have seen a constant denial on the part of the Turkish government.” Last year, Aram Hamparian, executive director of the Armenian National Committee of America, said that “Armenian American voters welcome Senator Obama’s powerful call for real change in how our government addresses the core moral and foreign policy issues that hold such great meaning for our community. After decades of White House complicity in Turkey’s efforts to block American recognition of the Armenian Genocide, most recently in the form of President Bush’s personal efforts this past October to delay the Armenian Genocide Resolution, the time has clearly come for a President who will personally lead – not obstruct – the commemoration of this crime against all humanity.” But what a difference actually relying upon the US alliance with Turkey makes. Standing with Turkish president Abdullah Gul today, Mr. Obama was asked about his position that the Turks need to acknowledge the up to 1.5 million Armenians the Ottoman Empire slaughtered around the time of World War I. “My views are on the record and I have not changed views,” Mr. Obama said. “What I have been very encouraged by is news that under President Gul’s leadership, you are seeing a series of negotiations, a process, in place between Armenia and Turkey to resolve a whole host of longstanding issues, including this one.” Saying he wants to “be as encouraging as possible around those negotiations which are moving forward and could bear fruit very quickly very soon. And so as a consequence, what I want to do is not focus on my views right now but focus on the views of the Turkish and the Armenian people. If they can move forward and deal with a difficult and tragic history, then I think the entire world should encourage them.” (ABC News’ Lara Setrakian says in Turkey it is a crime to publicly discuss the Armenian Genocide, a ban mounted in 2000 as an add-on to Article 301, which prohibits by law any insult to Turkey or the Turkish nation. The "g" word has landed a handful of scholars in jail, among them famed journalist Hrant Dink before his 2007 assassination by an extreme nationalist.) Gul then said that during World War I the Ottoman Empire “was battling on four fronts. And unfortunately, some citizens of the empire then were provoked by some other countries and there were many internal clashes and many people lost their lives. And we share the sorrow of all those who lost their lives, but we have to remember that the Muslim population also suffered greatly at the same time.” Later today in front of the Turkish Parliament, President Obama alluded to the genocide but didn’t mention it, and certainly didn’t call it a "genocide." An issue “that confronts all democracies as they move to the future is how we deal with the past,” he said, noting how the U.S. “is still working through some of our own darker periods” such as slavery, and segregation, and the past treatment of Native Americans. “History is often tragic, but unresolved, can be a heavy weight,” he said. “Each country must work through its past. And reckoning with the past can help us seize a better future. I know there are strong views in this chamber about the terrible events of 1915. While there has been a good deal of commentary about my views, this is really about how the Turkish and Armenian people deal with the past.” ANCA’s Hamparian said the president today “missed a valuable opportunity to honor his public pledge to recognize the Armenian Genocide.” “We expect that the President will, during Genocide Prevention Month this April, stand by his word, signaling to the world that America’s commitment to the cause of genocide prevention will never again be held hostage to pressures from a foreign government,” Hamparian said. Gul today said he has “suggested that a joint history commission be established and that we would agree to the results or the conclusions of this commission. And Turkey opened — made its archives available for that purpose.” That said, ANCA’s Elizabeth S. Chouldjian expressed some skepticism of Gul’s willingness to call the genoicde what it was. “This is the same president (Gul) who said a few days ago, ‘What is there to talk about? There was nothing that happened in 1915 that could be called a genocide.’ “This was an opportunity for President Obama to speak as clearly as he did as a candidate,” she said. – jpt

Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Jake,
Great report.
Thank you for asking the questions and reporting on event most of your colleagues in the MSM aren’t willing to pursue. Enjoyed your interview with National Review. Keep up the good work.
Posted by: tjp612 | April 6, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
I just don’t know what to say anymore , I sit and listen in amazement. Today with all this new found love and understanding for the Muslim way of life, and the subtle am sorry for what was done, I just cant believe anything any more, just wake me up when this is all over.
Posted by: SJ | April 6, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
If I read Jake’s report correctly, its a crime to refer to the genocide in Turkey. So exactly what good would Obama be doing by breaking a law in his host country? Demonstrate how local laws don’t apply to the American presidents?
this comment is also for Jake, i hope he reads it: the only thing Obama could do as a candidate was talk about his stand on issues, which he did (way too much, imo). President Obama is in a position to actually get something done without talking about it. If the two countries are already negotiating like he said AND making progress on the subject, what does he accomplish by talking and causing a stir?? I really don’t get it. He clearly talks about the events in his speech without making it a controversial issue that could potentially hamper progress on the negotiations. He is not there to be a devil’s advocate. He is there to get something done and I personally believe he is doing that.
We really need to get rid of this habit of ours where we talk talk talk while something is in progress. Remember Mission Accomplished?
Thank you.
Posted by: Question | April 6, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Rustard,
Obama won. Get over yourselves.
Yes Obama has brains in his head. He thinks before he speaks.
Posted by: Norm | April 6, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Why does Obama think his experience as a child living in Indonesia for a short time has any importance or gives him some special insights? It seems odd to me that he would include that in a speech in the way he did in Turkey.
There are 12,000 mosques in the US and 5 million practicing Muslims. Has the US done something to Muslims that requires an apology?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
“Has the US done something to Muslims that requires an apology?”
I don’t know. Why not ask all those innocent Muslims torn away from their families and locked up at Gitmo for several long years. They may have some insight.
Posted by: TellinTruth | April 6, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
“Armenian American activists today said that President Obama’s refusal to pushing Turkey to recognize its genocide against Armenians — or to even used the “g” word — fell “far short of the clear promise he made as a candidate that he would, as President, fully and unequivocally recognize this crime against humanity.”
That’s because Obama doesn’t speak Austrian.
Posted by: drjohn | April 6, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Posted by: TellinTruth | Apr 6, 2009 7:39:53 PM
Conversely, 3000 Americans died at the hands of Muslims.
They were innocent too.
Posted by: drjohn | April 6, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
“Conversely, 3000 Americans died at the hands of Muslims.”
_________________________
Correctly said, and without seething prejudice, that would be:
“Conversely, 3000 Americans died at the hands of (a few radical, fringe) Muslims (likely no more radical than radical Americans like Tim McVeigh.)”
Posted by: Spencer | April 6, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Call Obama whatever you want. Teleprompter or not he floored the 28 year term congressman and senator McCain in all the 3 debates without a prompter.
Obama was the head of Havard law review. You don`t get to be stupid to get that post. That is something every senator and congressman wished they had on their resume.
Obama won and he is delivering on his promises. Its only 60 days. Take the chill pill and go to bed.
Posted by: Norm | April 6, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Are these items even news anymore? Obama pretended to be a lot of things to a lot of people to get elected. A slim majority of the country bought it. If they’re surprised now that he’s changed his tune, then they’re even more ignorant and sheep-like than their vote initially indicated. *shrugs*
Posted by: CH | April 6, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
“Are these items even news anymore? Obama pretended to be a lot of things to a lot of people to get elected. A slim majority of the country bought it.”
Slim majority? He won by a landslide.
Posted by: Larry | April 6, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Sounds like he said one thing to get elected and another after he was elected.Almost like being “stunned” on Leno about the AIG bonuses.
Posted by: jamescbuilder | April 6, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
The tentative agreement between the two countries includes a historical commission which would make a conclusion about just what happened in the early part of the last century, when hundreds of thousands of Armenians were killed by Turks.
****************************************
So they have a tentative agreement, and you expect Obama to interject on that agreement?
Posted by: Thinking | April 6, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
“Why not ask all those innocent Muslims torn away from their families”
Do you know the circumstances of why those “innocent” Muslims were detained?
Is that why Obama needs to say we are not at war with Islam?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
You mean to say that Tapper reporting what two different people said is somehow bias? Do you only want to hear things that only flatter Obama?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
The Ottoman Empire no longer exists and to censure Turkey for the actions of an country that no longer exists is futile. The US should look to it’s treatment of the Native Americans and deal with that before casting stones at Turkey over the actions of a country that no longer exists.
Posted by: kedi | April 6, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
“The Ottoman Empire no longer exists and to censure Turkey for the actions of an country that no longer exists is futile.”
It has more to do with religion and not the state, the claim that millions of Armenian and Greek Christians were murdered by the Turk Muslims.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Two sides, one mouth… get used to it.
The real shame here is that if our mainstream media had simply done its job throughout the election by reporting on the countless examples of just such dichotomies as this in Barack Obama’s actual record versus his pontifications, voters might have had the chance to vote on a real person rather than the illusion of bliss, put forth so obsequiously on his behalf by the veritable Barack Obama public relations team that is the American mainstream media.
These occasional little spurts of feigned objectively come way too little, and way too late. But, Obama idolaters, don’t fret, by the time you’ve read this I’m fairly certain there will be another post to quickly follow this on, perhaps yet another “objective” view of how every person who has come within a mile of Michelle Obama has practically fainted with delirium at having been merely exposed to the endless wonders of her being.
Posted by: Thank God for Karma | April 6, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
“every person who has come within a mile of Michelle Obama has practically fainted with delirium at having been merely exposed to the endless wonders of her being.’
It’s pretty funny isn’t it. lol.. I’m sure she is an OK person but to compare her to Jackie Kennedy, being a high fashionista, and so forth, is really over the top. It just shows you how mindless society has become….
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Meanwhile, a mob of right-wingers takes over a baseball stadium in Texas:
“ARLINGTON, Texas — Former President George W. Bush wound up his right arm with two windmill whirls, then fired a high strike to help the Texas Rangers start the season Monday.
“Former President George W. Bush, the Rangers’ managing general partner from 1989 until being elected governor of Texas in 1994, throws the first pitch.
In his first big appearance locally since moving to Dallas from the White House, Bush received a standing ovation and overwhelming cheers from a crowd of about 40,000 after the public address announcer said, ‘We welcome home the 43rd president.’”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 6, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Obama is a HYPOCRITE
Posted by: Indie | April 6, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
“then fired a high strike to help the Texas Rangers start the season Monday.
When is Obama throwing the first ball? Lot of pressure to throw a strike like Bush, huh? I will always remember the cheers when Bush threw that strike first time after 911?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
posted by: Fascist Hyena | Apr 6, 2009 8:46:18 PM
Do you ever critically think for yourself or just copy and paste portions of random news articles and polls that you deem worthy?
Most Texans (not all) are pretty polite and I would hope they would give any former President a warm welcome; especially one with a history with that team. Good Grief!
btw – Tapper’s post is regarding Turkey, not baseball.
Posted by: Just Curious | April 6, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
Are you surprised? IF you pay close attention to ODRAMA, he pays “lip service” to his audience. It is all about him and his agenda. Human rights, genocide, he goes with the flow. No character.
Posted by: bpower | April 6, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
I’m sure she is an OK person but to compare her to Jackie Kennedy, being a high fashionista, and so forth, is really over the top. It just shows you how mindless society has become….
****************************************
Mindless enough to have an opinion about it.
Posted by: Thinking | April 6, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
McCain only lost because the stock market tanked on him and then he got desparate and his gamble on Palin.
****************************************
Got desperate and gambled. Just what we need as a leader.
I hardly believe that you posted this as your argument.
Posted by: Thinking | April 6, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Bush received a standing ovation and overwhelming cheers from a crowd of about 40,000 after the public address announcer said, ‘We welcome home the 43rd president.’”
****************************************
Season opener with a former president throwing the first ball with a crowd of 40,000 with a capcity of over 49,000.
Posted by: Thinking | April 6, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
“btw – Tapper’s post is regarding Turkey, not baseball.”
Speaking of Turkey, VP Joe Biden threw out a baseball today also. No word if the crowd stood up and cheered or booed.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
As a presidential candidate Bush presented himself as a compassionate candidate for President.
Jake how many Iraq civilians died in Iraq because of Bush and his supporters?
According Iraq Body count online 91,367 – 99,754 documented.
No records have been kept by the US but with undocumented Iraq civilian deaths number ranges from over 200,000 or more.
Now the mainstream media fell in line when the drums of war were being played for the Iraq war by Bush and neoconservatives. I don’t blame the media because Bush and his Republican supporters played the fear card on all of us. What give us hope was this election cycle when the Republicans attempted to play the fear card again on us and our favorite mainstream pundits we all fought back. Many of our Democrat, Independent and Obamcan posters on the comment sections came to the mainstream media defense as well as Obamas.
Now the Republicans in the Senate want to hold up the Bush Torture memos by blocking President Obama’s nominees.
Jake we need the Mainstream Media to stay on top of this.
The world is watching and a fact finding commission for what Bush and his supporters did to us all with Iraq is important not just in the healing process for us all but to send a message to the world.
So when I read this article I think of
Candidate Bush, President Bush, and the Iraq Genocide (No WMD were ever found in Iraq)
Posted by: Rusty | April 6, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
“Season opener with a former president throwing the first ball with a crowd of 40,000 with a capcity of over 49,000.”
According to the Texas Rangers:
Standing room tickets only remain for Monday’s game and are expected to be available at the Rangers Ballpark in Arlington on Monday. All other reserved seats have been sold out.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Standing room tickets only remain for Monday’s game and are expected to be available at the Rangers Ballpark in Arlington on Monday. All other reserved seats have been sold out.
****************************************
I guess they didn’t show then
Posted by: Thinking | April 6, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Biden Ball Update:
Word is that VP Joe Biden took the mound at Baltimore and threw a high, fluttering looper as the first pitch of the game. No word if any patron in the upper deck was injured.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
So we shold have just let the Kurds be mass murdered and we should have let Sadaam do whatever he wanted after gassing them chemical weapons
***************************************
Hmmm. I think he did that after Gulf war 1, and we did nothing. No we went after WMDs but there wasn’t any.
They have been killing people by the millions in Africa, what are we doing about it?
Posted by: Thinking | April 6, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Oh, for goshsakes, why don’t you call it like it is…..Obama is a LIAR. How many things has he lied about now in just a matter of months? Transparency, lobbyists, not raising taxes, earmarks, now this? And he’s bowing before the Saudi king too?
Obama will say whatever he wants to get what he wants, then after that, it’s under the bus you go! I just feel contempt for all those Armenian-Americans who really rallied for this guy; will you still follow him now that he has betrayed you?
Of course, everywhere Obama goes, he has to be popular, he has to say just the right things. He is forever on a campaign, POTUS is not good enough, now he is running for EWWW (Emperor of the Whole Wide World).
Posted by: decentAmerican | April 6, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Norm
Your assertion re: the D’Oh debates is fantasy. The media (the same media that STILL refuses to report on the truth of this clearly unqualified fool) declared him so; it was never true. His cram sessions barely got him through. Then, as now, he knows NOT of what he speaks; his notes and teleprompter tell him what to say.
Obama was the head of Harvard Law review – the first year they created an affirmative action opening for the post. He never actually wrote or editted a single article in his entire tenure.
Obama won on empty rhetoric and he is delivering on his stealth agenda – voters bought the rhetoric; Republicans caught the agenda and tried to wake America up.
Posted by: gael | April 6, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
If it’s a case between keeping Turkey happy and in the U.S. ally camp or appeasing Armenian-Americans, I think Obama is wise in picking Turkey here…
Posted by: matt | April 6, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Posted by: Spencer | Apr 6, 2009 7:50:49 PM
Ah, Spencer, yours is the example of the argument made on half of the information.
You should have read the other post.
Posted by: drjohn | April 6, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Jake, I hope you keep on this and let us know what happens on April 24.
Posted by: arhooley | April 6, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Mark my words — Obama will issue an unequivocal statement recognizing the Armenian genocide on April 24. This was just preliminary pep talk.
Posted by: stevie | April 6, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
{Kedi wrote: “The Ottoman Empire no longer exists and to censure Turkey for the actions of an country that no longer exists is futile. “}
Kedi, it isn’t a censure of Turkey to simply recognize the Ottoman Genocide against Armenians, which is a historical fact.
It is modern Turkey that has made a simple issue into a quagmire for itself by spending millions in the US to lobby against a simple commemoration of a historic fact.
Posted by: David | April 7, 2009, 6:55 am 6:55 am
The tentative agreement between the two countries includes a historical commission which would make a conclusion about just what happened in the early part of the last century, when hundreds of thousands of Armenians were killed by Turks.
****************************************
So they have a tentative agreement, and you expect Obama to interject on that agreement?
Posted by: Thinking | Apr 6, 2009 8:00:05 PM
——————
Yes. We prefer cowboy diplomacy: shoot first then ask questions.
Posted by: D. | April 7, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am
I am the grandaughter of an Armenian Genocide survivor who marched through syrian desert as a young girl after TURKS killing her family, was sold to arabs and then bought by my grandfather who was 25 years her sinior.
I am deeply disappointed by president Obama’s actions. We should never let a THIRD WORLD COUNTRY DICTATE US!!!
Especially when their getting paid for their services!!!
Posted by: salpy | April 7, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am
After reading alot of junk here that has nothing to do with the story, I think it should be noted that not only Obama but Clinton and Bush promised to use the G word and didn’t. So, stop with pointing your political fingers at Obama. He’s not the first and won’t be the last.
I find it amusing that it’s the Turks who are saying that they are near an agreement with Armenia, just in time for April. Like the swallows to Capistrano, the Turks come out with something new every spring. Do you really believe that the Armenians would go for this? Listen, the Armenian rep said that until Turkey recognizes its actions, there will be no relations between the two countries. Why has no one noticed that? It’s the usual stall tactic by the Turks, Obama will do the same as the past presidents and it’ll be business as usual.
Posted by: MM | April 7, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Obama is on a forever campaign…This is getting ridicoulous already. He says anything at anytime apolgizing to Muslims for what!!!! They are the ones who hate us and hate all other people who are what they consider Infidels….I can promise you one thing if he doesn’t keep his promise to the Armenian American community he will lose their votes come next election…..he has already lost my vote for sure.
Posted by: Jack | April 7, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
The Armenian Genocide was as well planned and executed as Hitler’s Genocide during World War II. The Turkish government was not only responsible for the mass deportation and murder of an entire race, but also conveniently stole the property of its Armenian population. The biggest fear in Turkey today is reparation on a massive scale similar to the reparations Germany made to its victims and survivors of the WWII Holocaust. What price can you put on the real estate, bank accounts, businesses and valuables stolen from a million of Turkey’s middle and upper middle class? An admittal by the Turkish government that it committed the Genocide will surely follow in lawsuits on such a massive scale that it could bankrupt Turkey. One day my Armenian grandfather’s family owned a steel mill and a large vinyard, the next they were forced from their home carrying a suitcase on a death march. My grandfather and his older sister were the only survivors from a family of 9. They never saw their family home, business and vinyards again. Myth? No. Just another story of the few lucky enough to survive the Armenian Genocide.
Posted by: JJ | April 7, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
What concerns me is
(1)the fact that ‘the genocide question needs to be resolved between Turkey and Armenia’.
(2)1915-1923 is considered the only period that massacres of Armenians by the Turks took place
(3)it is implied that no other race was affected by Turkish behaviour
Let me just say that my Armenian grandfather left Istanbul with his family in 1896 due to massacres taking place there. Recently I have learned that these murders were part of the Hamidian Massacres in which more than 200000 persons died. There were also massacres in 1909 in Adana when 9000 are reported to have been killed.
There were also further Christian races affected by Turkish behaviour – Greeks and Assyrian Christians were targets of Turkish massacres.
Before the First World War the middle eastern country with the most Christians was Turkey maybe 3 or 4 million out of a total population of 20 million. What proportion of the country is Christian now. 100,000 out of a population of 70 million perhaps. Not bad progress for a secular state! Here in the ‘Christian’ UK our non-Christians (Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Buddist, Sikhs etc) hold a far healthier proportion than that.
Finally, why does the state of Armenia have to ‘negociate’ on the truth of the genocide. I would suggest that most Armenians affected by the genocide have never lived in Armenia but are scattered in countries like Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, France, Germany, United States, Canada, Brazil, Argentina and Australia (to name a few).
Posted by: halfarmenian | April 7, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
-Armenian Genocide Commission? – by Turkey?? LOL!
“Gul today said he has “suggested that a joint history commission be established and that we would agree to the results or the conclusions of this commission. And Turkey opened — made its archives available for that purpose.”
OH give me a break! What do you think this “joint history commission” is going to find, looking through Turkey’s “archives”
As a human being first, and Armenian American second, this is adding insult to injury. Maybe it’s because I’ve cried one too many tears over my murdered ancestors, – grandparents, and great-grandparents of people I grew up with, women and children raped, tortured and murdered for being Christian… I’ll spare you the details…. but the idea that someone needs to investigate – like it’s a charge that has not yet been proven, is just so infuriating!!
How would our Jewish friends feel if Germany suggested starting a commission to look into whether the events during WW2 were indeed a holocaust? They would scream Sacrilege! Well guess what – this is the same thing.
The annals of world history hold more than enough evidence proving that this was unequivocally Genocide, thank you very much without Turkey needing to rummage through its corrupted and doctored “archives”.
In what universe do we let the accused investigate their own crime??
What I want from my country and my president is for it/him to be a leader, to speak for what’s right and just in the world and not let another nation dictate its policy, effectively muzzling it. The fact that Turkey has been able to dictate policy in Washington insults me, and it should insult every other red blooded American.
Posted by: Elin | April 8, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
The posters that make comments like “America should be wise and pick Turkey over historical fact” should look to their own past of denouncing slavery. If indeed interest dominates politics then the Emancipation Proclamation was the biggest economic mistake of the 20th century.
Posted by: 04/24/2009 | April 10, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
THE COUNTRY NAMED TURKEY, TODAY, IS INDEED THE CONTINUATION OF THE ATTOMAN EMPIRE AND THE SAME COUNTRY WITH THE SAME PEOPLE, SAME RELIGION SAME ETHNICITY, ETC. THE HANDS OF EVERY TURKS IS STILL, THEN AND NOW, COVERED WITH THE BLOOD OF INNOCENT ARMENIANS, ELDERLY, OLD-YOUNG AND PREGNANT WOMEN, CHILDREN (BORN AND UNBORN), AND ADULT ARMY RECRUITS (FROM 15 TO 62 YEARS OLD). SLAUGHTERING 1.5 MILLIONS INNOCENT ARMENIANS UNDER THE THEN GOVERNMENT OF THE OTTOMAN, THE YOUNG TURKS OR THE GOVERNMENT OF TURKEY, ALL ARE THE SAME PEOPLE. ORGANIZED, PLANNED AND EXECUTED BY THE SAME PEOPLE OF TURKEY, TURKS OR ATTOMANS. CONFISCATING PROPERTIES, HOMES, LANDS PERSONAL BELONGINGS. BURNING, DESTROYING AND DESECRATING CHURCHES, MONASTERIES AND CEMETERIES BY THE SAME PEOPLE OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE OR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE YOUNG TURKS OR THE GOVERNMENT OF MODERN TURKEY ESTABLISHED BY MUSTAFA KEMAL ATTATURK, ALL ARE THE SAME TURKS LIVING IN THE SAME LAND CALLED TURKEY.
MR. PRESIDENT, MR. OBAMA IT IS TIME YOU AND US THE CITIZENS OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MUST AND SHOULD RECOGNIZE THE GREATEST GENOCIDE OF THE 20TH CENTURY, NAMELY THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE. ALREADY OVER TWO DOZENS COUNTRIES HAVE RECOGNIZED THE FIRST AND THE GREATEST GENOCIDE OF THE 20TH CENTURY. MR. OBAMA, WE MUST LEAD THIS MISSION OF RECOGNITION OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE AND WE MUST NOT BE A FOLLOWER.
THIS TINY COUNTRY NAMED ARMENIA TODAY, EXISTED OVER THOUSAND YEARS AND WILL EXIST FOR MANY YEARS TO COME. THIS HEROIC NATION IS OWED A LOT NOT BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUT BY THE ENTIRE HUMANITY. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE, THE GOVRNMENT OF THE YOUNG TURKS AND THE GOVERNMENT OF KEMAL ATTATURK ARE THE SAME. EVERY SINGLE TURK IS AND WILL BE LIABLE FOR THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE. TIME IS NOT RUNNING AGAINST THE HEROIC PEOPLE OF ARMENIA.
MR. PRESIDENT, MR. OBAMA, YOU DEFINITELY NEED TO DELIVER WHAT YOU HAVE PROMISED TO THE DYNAMIC AMERICAN-ARMENIAN COMMUNITY THE PROMISE YOU YOURSELF MADE WHILE RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THIS GREAT NATION.
Posted by: PIERRE ARZUMAN | April 11, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I do have faith in President Obama that he will keep his promise. I give credit that on the day of his visit to Turkey his homestate Hawaii becamse the 42nd state to recognize the genocide, so let’s not give up on him, he is still working on it, thank you!
Posted by: Ms. TT | April 17, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
This is a biased article. The propaganda has become so extensive, it is no surprise that most of the users here have very much bought into the reality of a genocide. The same goes for President Obama, who fell under the spell of an adviser, the fact-challenged genocide scholar, Samantha Power.
Note how the author of the above article, Jake Tapper, presents as the only counter-view Gul’s declaration regarding how Armenians were “provoked,” making it seem like this is just a Turk’s opinion. Armenian leaders of the period, such as Hovhannes Katchaznouni and Armen Garo are fully on record for acknowledging the same, that is, “ever since the beginning of the war the Armenians fought by the side of the Allies on all fronts.” (Boghos Nubar, The Timnes of London, Jan. 1919 letter).
In other words, this goes beyond simple provocation. The Armenians as a whole betrayed their nation and posed an extremely dangerous threat, aiding and abetting three super-powered enemies. Their fate was relocation, which is how nations sometimes deal with citizens who do not even display disloyalty, as with how the USA and Canada treated their Japanese during WWII. The 1948 U.N. Convention on Genocide excludes cases of political alliances. On this point alone, what happened to the Armenians cannot be called a genocide in the legal sense.
Shouldn’t Jake Tapper have looked into whether Gul’s statement was true? But as usual, on this topic, the tendency is to go with what the common crowd has come to believe. This does not say much about the credibility of those who just go along.
Mr. Tapper also tells us “hundreds of thousands of Armenians were killed by Turks,” and then offers another variation, “up to 1.5 million Armenians the Ottoman Empire slaughtered around the time of World War I.” Numerically, which is it?
We know it can’t be 1.5 million, because 1.5 million was the entire Armenian population figure, as documented by most Western accounts of the time, as with the Encyclopedia Britannica, and the 1912 Beitish Blue Book, estimating the figure at one million. Samantha Power and most of her genocide cronies tell us 1 million survived. Around five hundred thousand is the accurate figure for the Armenian dead.
Is it true most were “slaughtered”? Isn’t it terrible to say so without the evidence? The fact is, most Armenians died of famine and disease, the same for most of the nearly three million Ottoman Muslims who died, even the soldiers — in good part because of the British naval blockade. (About a quarter, 150,000 of these Armenians, died of starvation in Armenia, after having accompanied the retreats of their Russian and French allies. These are also designated as genocide victims, much as their supposed killers were not even in the neighborhood.)
The Armenians who were massacred most likely numbered in the low tens, and not the hundreds of thousands. Their killers acted independently, and the Ottoman government tried 1,600 for committing crimes against Armenians during the war, executing dozens. This in itself tells us what occurred cannot be a genocide.
In order to prove genocide, one must come up with evidence for “intent,” tying in the participation of the government. None exists. It is very immoral to conclude a crime, particularly a great crime, without the evidence.
The British tried desperately to find this evidence after the war, for their planned Nuremberg, the Malta Tribunal (1919-21). Nearly everything the propaganda machine presents today as evidence was rejected by the British themselves, including the 1919 mock trials by the postwar Ottoman government, and the U.S. archives. (The latter rejected for consisting of nothing but opinions, which is hearsay. Hearsay is not evidence.)
As for “ABC News’ Lara Setrakian says in Turkey it is a crime to publicly discuss the Armenian Genocide.” The Armenian genocide matter has been freely discussed in Turkey for a good many years. Why would Jake feel compelled to put in this highly inaccurate information by his colleague, an Armenian partisan? Aren’t journalists supposed to check the truth of their sources?
Why give ANCA so much credibility? Is this an organization that values the truth? One or two of their chairmen over the years were convicted terrorists, committing violence in the name of their beneficial genocide cause.
Let’s wind up with the last part of what comes across as the dishonest voice of this article, Gul’s declaration that “we have to remember that the Muslim population also suffered greatly at the same time.” As mentioned, nearly three million died, mainly of the same non-murderous reasons most of the Armenians died. However, what is never mentioned is that the Armenians conducted a massive systematic extermination campaign, following far more closely the rules of the 1948 U.N. Genocide Convention. In the U.S. Archives, a British colonel estimated the Armenians murdered 300,000-400,000 in Van and Bitlis alone. This means FAR MORE Turks and Muslims (and others, as Jews) were killed by Armenians than the other way around.
When Jake heard this, we can get the impression he simply did not care. Even if he didn’t know of the Armenians’ great crimes (backed up by their own friends, reports by Russian officers, serving as true firsthand witnesses, along with the U.S. team of Niles and Sutherland, as well as secret Ottoman reports), 700,000 Muslims were also relocated by the Ottoman government, about the same number as the Armenians who were relocated, suffering no less. Why doesn’t anyone care about these victims? The reason is clear: they are Turks, and they don’t count.
People should be ashamed for accepting this ugly and racist propaganda so unquestioningly, They think they are being “moral,” coming against “genocide,” but in fact, such irresponsible and dishonest parties are being highly immoral — making libelous accusations without caring for factual evidence. The validation of this propaganda only perpetuates hatred against Turks; the effect of the Armenian genocide cause is very, very harmful.
Posted by: Sick of Bias | April 23, 2009, 2:47 am 2:47 am
This is a biased article. The propaganda has become so extensive, it is no surprise that most of the users here have very much bought into the reality of a genocide. The same goes for President Obama, who fell under the spell of an adviser, the fact-challenged genocide scholar, Samantha Power.
Note how the author of the above article, Jake Tapper, presents as the only counter-view Gul’s declaration regarding how Armenians were “provoked,” making it seem like this is just a Turk’s opinion. Armenian leaders of the period, such as Hovhannes Katchaznouni and Armen Garo are fully on record for acknowledging the same, that is, “ever since the beginning of the war the Armenians fought by the side of the Allies on all fronts.” (Boghos Nubar, The Timnes of London, Jan. 1919 letter).
In other words, this goes beyond simple provocation. The Armenians as a whole betrayed their nation and posed an extremely dangerous threat, aiding and abetting three super-powered enemies. Their fate was relocation, which is how nations sometimes deal with citizens who do not even display disloyalty, as with how the USA and Canada treated their Japanese during WWII. The 1948 U.N. Convention on Genocide excludes cases of political alliances. On this point alone, what happened to the Armenians cannot be called a genocide in the legal sense.
Shouldn’t Jake Tapper have looked into whether Gul’s statement was true? But as usual, on this topic, the tendency is to go with what the common crowd has come to believe. This does not say much about the credibility of those who just go along.
Posted by: Sick of Bias | April 23, 2009, 2:49 am 2:49 am
Obama doesnt want to paint Turkey as villianous or as a country who may have made past mistakes. Those characterizations are reserved for us.
Posted by: zeke | April 25, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am
I just couldn’t understand why Turkey would condemn anyone using the GENOCIDE word if they’re not guilty. I think it will take an exceptional leader to accept mistakes done in the past no matter how degrading it may be.
Posted by: Vilma | April 25, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Well, on April 24, 2009, in his official statement, the President did actually state the words “Meds Yeghern” which translates into “The Grate Genocide.” Thus, for all those who understand (which included the Armenians and the Turks), the President still uses the word Genocide. I am disappointed with his reduced level of courage. However, he did have the courage to state in Turkey that his views have not changed. This is something his predecessors could not do.
So Mr. President, if you (or someone in the White House) are reading this comment, next time you plan to talk about the subject, eat a good meal, give yourself a little push, and say the forbidden word in English. The Middle East will not collapse. Turkey will not turn into a radical Islamic state. Nor, will the Turks retaliate against the United States. Turkey is a pragmatic state that wants to join the EU and desperately wants to be seen as a civilized nation.
By clearly recognizing the Armenian Genocide, you will not only go into the history books as one of the greatest presidents of the United States, but you will actually help the Turks to recognize that their current position makes absolutely no sense. You might even win the Nobel Peas Prize.
I, as an Armenian and a grandson of a Genocide survivor, actually care about the Turks becoming civilized and joining the EU more than America ever can or will. After all, Turkey’s lack of civilized culture has undermined Armenian progress for centuries.
Thus, while I understand your position, if you leave it up to the Turks and the Armenians, while borders might open, the issue of Genocide will never get resolved because on the bargaining table, these are two unequal partners.
Posted by: Vardan | April 30, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
I wish that one day any politician, especially the President of the USA will stand up to the Turks. We have let national interest take precedence over morality in this country. Obama was elected because he promised to be different. He not only betrayed the Hellenic American community, but our Armenian American brothers as well. Shame on you Mr. Obama. You lied to all of us!!
Posted by: Tom G | May 1, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm