Chavez Gifts Obama With Book That Assails U.S. for Exploiting Latin America
At President Obama’s meeting with the heads of South American countries this morning, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez stood, walked over to him, and presented him with a copy of "Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent" by Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano.
Obama politely posed for a photograph with Chavez, shook his hand, and accepted the gift.
The book, first published in Spanish in 1971, offers a critique of the consequences of 500 years of European and U.S. colonization of Latin America.
"The division of labor among nations is that some specialize in winning and others in losing," the book begins. "Our part of the world, known today as Latin America, was precocious: it has specialized in losing ever since those remote times when Renaissance Europeans ventured across the ocean and buried their teeth in the throats of the Indian civilizations. Centuries passed, and Latin America perfected its role."
Galeano writes that while the era of "lodes of gold" and "mountains of silver" has passed, "our region still works as a menial laborer. It continues to exist at the service of others’ needs, as a source of oil and iron, of copper and meat, of fruit and coffee, the raw materials and foods destined for rich countries which profit more from consuming them than Latin America does from producing them."
At another point in the book, Galeano writes: "Our defeat was always implicit in the victory of others; our wealth has always generated our poverty by nourishing the prosperity of others."
The book also criticizes the U.S. for "spreading and imposing family planning. … In Latin America it is more hygienic and effective to kill future guerillas in the womb that in the mountains or the streets."
Banned in Uruguay and Chile when it was first published, "Open Veins of Latin America" is considered a classic in Latin America.
In Isabel Allende’s foreword to later versions of the book, the Chilean-American writer says that Galeano "has more first-hand knowledge of Latin America than anybody else I can think of, and uses it to tell the world of the dreams and disillusions, the hopes and the failures of its people. … Galeano denounces exploitation with uncompromising ferocity, yet this book is almost poetic in its description of solidarity and human capacity for survival in the midst of the worst kind of despoliation."
The copy of the book Chavez gave Obama appears to be in Spanish, a language Obama does not speak.
At the start of the first plenary session at the Summit of the Americas later this morning, President Obama was asked what he thought of Chavez’s gift.
“You know, I thought it was one of Chavez’s books," Obama answered. "I was going to give him one of mine.”
- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
Email
President Obama Tops Mitt Romney in New Poll
Romney on a Roll
I’m sure its already in use in our colleges as a text book.
Posted by: Tommy knuckles Throop | April 18, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Should be required reading for all the Blame America First crowd…
Posted by: The Bear | April 18, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am
This isn’t shocking at all. Obama and Chavez have a lot in common. chavez hates America, Obama apologizes for it. Obama, though, is much more efficient at nationalizing the banks and other industries – he’s done most of it in 90 days.
I can see how they’ll become BFF in no time!
Posted by: PatF | April 18, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am
I’d read the book myself folks. Jake’s anti-Obama, so his book quotes are likely partial, taken out of context, and highly misleading. Just saying, read for yourself. Don’t take his word for it.
Posted by: Larry | April 18, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
While it wouldn’t be polite to refuse the book from Chavez in front of the world (but probably would have been the right thing to do!), Obama could have at LEAST whipped out the copy of the U.S. Constitution that he has in his coat pocket and presented it to Chavez. Would have been a civilized rebuke, but I guess he left it in his other jacket.
Posted by: Dobe | April 18, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Third world nations, like many in Latin America suffer NOT because of exploitation…but like the Continent of Africa, from poor foundational living principles…like a viable constitution (e.g., USA) and a moral/ethical culture (Protestant work/moral ethic)) that can defend/sustain that constitution. Instead, these pagan or Roman Catholic countries are run and ruined by despots and petty tyrants. The USA may not be a Christian nation…per se…but it’s founding principles and countless millions are indeed ‘Christian’.
Posted by: laz62 | April 18, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Congratulations President Obama, you are every bit the leader Chavez is, I’m so proud of you.
Posted by: David | April 18, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Chavez and Obama are really not that much different from one another. In the Venezuelan election of 1998, Chavez told all the Venezuelans what they wanted to hear. He presented himself as a moderate. The political center of the Venezuelan populace that was feed up with the status quo was wooed into voting for him. Over the last 11 years, however, he has revealed his true authoritarian colors. He has constantly maneuvered to centralize the powers of government into his hands, he has nationalized key industries and extended the largesse of the government to make an ever increasing number of Venezuelans dependent upon government hand outs, he has nationalized key industries and expanded the ranks of those employed by the government so that millions more depend upon government for their livelihoods. Additionally, he has polarized his country like never before. While the left and right bicker, he quietly steals the freedom of both sides. It is interesting that Obama’s old associate, Bill Ayers, was in Venezuela as recently as 2006 praising the Bolivarian educational (indoctrination) system that Chavez has instituted in Venezuelan schools. Also, Jody Evans, a key Obama fundraiser, was in Venezuela that same year expressing her admiration for the fine work that Hugo is doing. Believe me (all buffoonery) aside, these two aren’t all that different where ideology is considered.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
So Chavez is of Indian descent and not Spanish – sure. Chavez is a crooked joke to the civilized world, but a hero to left and Obama. Obama is truly on a roll in bringing America down – he is after all a world citizen first.
Posted by: IC Atlanta | April 18, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Wow! So long America, it was a nice ride while it lasted.
Posted by: Tabtwo | April 18, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Pardon my grammatical errors. It is still early in the morning where I am.
Posted by: steve | April 18, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Hey Larry,
How’s this review?
“Since its U.S. debut a quarter-century ago, this brilliant text has set a new standard for historical scholarship of Latin America. It is also an outstanding political economy, a social and cultural narrative of the highest quality, and perhaps the finest description of primitive capital accumulation since Marx.”
Posted by: Tabtwo | April 18, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Is it the rich foreigners that form the corrupt governments that continually rob the people of its Latin American countries? What about the drug cartels and their countless atrocities against the same people that you purport to protect, are they all ran by rich whites? No, my comrade, they are all a product of uniquely South American corruption, rivaled only by the likes of Mugabe and Pot. Only when you use emotion like Galeano can you stir up this kind of illogical nonsense. South America specializes in losing, only because its politicians specialize in fleecing its populace.
Posted by: Naz | April 18, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
He FINALLY got a gift WORSE than the ones he dishes out….GOTTA LOVE IT !!!
Posted by: Pobbo | April 18, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
laz62: You sound crazy. Colonialism destroyed Africa and Latin America. These countries had no problems until those ships started ariving. And still in South America where the aboriginals ware not touched, they live peacefully and prosperous in thier own rights. Same for Africans whose tribes were untounched by colonialism. African by far had a superior civilization, exemplified by the fact that even prehistoric animals were able to survive under thier watch. More animals were extinct under colonialism than even possible under any other civilization. Let’s also not the condition of the planet and the filth we continue to live with daily and then pretend it does not exist – like a matrix!!
Posted by: milesbrown49 | April 18, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Chavez wants $200 per barrel oil and Obama gets to read his views on why the U.S. is so bad. Sounds like a great campaign add for the Republicans in 2010 and 2012!! I’m sorry folks, but I’m losing faith in Obama fast!!!
Posted by: JimM | April 18, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Wow, you just can’t make this stuff up.
Yay ABC, MSM, and Liberals. Yes you did! You destroyed America in record time and not a single bullet was used.
Posted by: CessnaDriver | April 18, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
I have lived in several Latin American countries over the course of the last 30 years. Believe me they do a great job of screwing themselves up on their own. They play the usual “blame the US” game to either assuage their guilty consciences or to deflect the attention of their populations from their own corruption and ineptitude.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Furthermore, anyone that believes that Chavez is anything but a dictator is a fool. What kind of “President” threatens to jail its political opposition? He has already run out of other people’s money, oil is no longer $100+ per barrel, he cannot sustain his government expansion.
Posted by: Naz | April 18, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Mr. Obama does not need the book, he had already has a similar book. He blames America for everything.
Posted by: young_voter | April 18, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Obama’s response: Thanks but no thanks, I’v already read it
Posted by: Pedro | April 18, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am
this is true. the rich are rich becuase they they rubbed others off their wealth. The effects of today is as the result of the past face it. if were are to live in peace then we must be ready to comfront our fears and anger.
Posted by: kristk68 | April 18, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
If they cant use their own resources in their own back yard, then they are stupid
Posted by: Rocky | April 18, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
What should our President should have done….acted as a wingnut, whined, and REFUSED a book and a handshake? It seems that the behaviors of angry people are always the same, perhaps the same as Chavez.
Posted by: sngeorgia | April 18, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
This is a very good book regardless of ones political view. As one who grew up in Latin America,of American parents, I can tell you that this book is key to understanding why Latin Americans see the US the way they do.All of congress, state dept and whitehouse shld read it.
Posted by: HenTraRob | April 18, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Chavez sure likes our money enough. Perhaps he shouldn’t bite the hand that feeds him.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 18, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
He can put his new book in the spot Winston Churchill’s bust used to be.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
If Obama had any backbone, he would have told Chavez where to shove that book. Unfortunately, our president appears to share many of Chavez’s views, from our former president being “the devil” to the United States being responsible for the majority of problems in the world.
Posted by: Stacy McCorkle | April 18, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
“The copy of the book Chavez gave Obama appears to be in Spanish, a language Mr. Obama does not speak.”
But does he speak Venezuelan? (Maybe he can turn his attention to it after he masters Austrian.)
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 18, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
we all ove america but it like some are really advocate of evil.Obama is doing the right thing. america is great but also has very dark side even now.simpleWe always pointing fingers while we cover our own. if we are to live in love peace we have to face our fears
Posted by: kristk68 | April 18, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
What Obama needs to do, “is learn to speak spanish”… hahahaha, what a fraud
Posted by: JC | April 18, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Isn’t Chavez of Spanish decent? What does he think of the spanish that settled in latin america?
Posted by: Lynn | April 18, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Posted by: David | Apr 18, 2009 10:05:33 AM
” Nearly all of Venezuela’s best-known opposition leaders are under indictment or facing investigation by the administration”…
http://uk.reuters.com
For the love of all that’s holy, I was being sarcastic in my first post.
_______________________________________
David:
Thank you for restoring my faith (in at least a small part) in humanity. Did you see John Ziegler get handcuffed in front of the Annenberg School of Journalism. It was something of a Chavez like tactic to squelch opposition. I think that we are soon going to move a bit towards Chavez land in this country.
Look into how the Obama campaign dealt with WGN talk show host Milt Rosenberg’s interview with David Freddoso and Stanley Kurtz. If you investigate these two events, you see that at the time, during last summer, Obama was comporting him self in a kinder and gentler, Chavez like manner. He aroused his catatonic minions to try to squelch the interviews. Not many folks know about this. The Obama press was absent AGAIN.
Posted by: steve | April 18, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Dictators keep all the power and money for themselves. They keep their people in poverty deliberately so they can enjoy the spoils. Why wasn’t Obama insulted when he was given the book as a gift. People need to wake up that maybe he is more like Chavez than they realize. He seems really, really comfortable with him.
I heard a NAACP leader speak once. He talked about the democrats not wanting to really bring people out of their poverty, just make them more comfortable there.
Posted by: Fran | April 18, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Stacy McCorkle: You’ve got it completely correct.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Finally we have a president that doesn’t need pictures of farm animals in his books.
Posted by: cturple | April 18, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Once again Obama displayed grace and readiness to accept a gift of a book presenting a different perspective and view than is presented by the North American books. As Americans we are not proud of all the evil and the historical mistakes committed by us with regard to the native Americans, or Latin Americans, nor are the Germans or the British (with their respective histories). There is nothing wrong in understanding where we have erred and who we have hurt since our independence and to chart a new course such that we evolve as better human beings and build a more harmonious and compassionate nation and be better qualified to be not just the military leaders of the world but the moral leaders of the world.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | April 18, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
A BIG THANK YOU to President Obama,You just handed anyone who runs against you in 2012 the TAG LINE of the century for their campaign…I just lost ANY respect for your “smarts” with that handshake……
Posted by: Parallax View | April 18, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
The plan is to make more people dependent upon government. People who are dependent upon government are easier to control. Dependence on government creates permanent power for those that control the purse strings. That is where we are headed folks.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Incidentally, the US hasn’t been in existence for five centuries. I suspect the book is about the colonization of Meso and South America -first by Europeans, and then by North Americans. It’s history – Americans just don’t like to hear about our crappy past.
Posted by: cturple | April 18, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
All done in a minimum amount of time. Bankrupt the good ole US of A and deplete the democracy and the total constitution in less than 90 days. I certainly don’t think this is the change that everyone voted for????
Posted by: NVInd | April 18, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Those in Latin America have legitimate grievances. I choose to live in a capitalistic free-market (I wish) country. Those in South America can choose whatever path they want as long as it doesn’t interfere with the way we do things here. However on the flip side, we have been interfering in their affairs for a very long time for our own benefit. This book is probably another view of things. That is all…
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Those in Latin America have legitimate grievances. I choose to live in a capitalistic free-market (I wish) country. Those in South America can choose whatever path they want as long as it doesn’t interfere with the way we do things here. However on the flip side, we have been interfering in their affairs for a very long time for our own benefit. This book is probably another view of things. That is all…
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Those in Latin America have legitimate grievances. I choose to live in a capitalistic free-market (I wish) country. Those in South America can choose whatever path they want as long as it doesn’t interfere with the way we do things here. However on the flip side, we have been interfering in their affairs for a very long time for our own benefit. This book is probably another view of things. That is all…
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Notice how Obama points to the book and has the other hand on the book, both probably using the same publisher.
Posted by: CC | April 18, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Steve is correct in his assessment of Latin America and Chavez in particular. I lived in Venezuela and was there when Chavez tried his first coup (defeated by pesky video formats) and showed his competence. It is disturbing how much the US reminds me of Venezuela. Chavez kept saying I need more authority, more power, so I can fix the problems. Everyone can see what a wonderful job was done fixing things.
Posted by: Jones | April 18, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
The conservatives need only to look at one man to fire up their base…Obama. His apologetic stance tyo the entire world will surely set the stage for 1 term. Congress will be on the chopping block too. Let him do as he does. AFter all, he won, right?
Posted by: Alan Smith | April 18, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
You’d think people would be too embarrassed to defend the unmitigated disaster that was George Bush. But Stacy McCorkle rises to the challenge…And Steve gladly jumps on the bandwagon.
Posted by: I love the USA | April 18, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
IC Atlanta- We are ALL world citizens. There is nothing wrong with trying to gain a little bit of perspective.
Posted by: JIL | April 18, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Obama understands the saying:
“keep your friends close, your enemies closer”
of course the right wing nuts will yell and scream but that’s what they always do… especially when they LOSE.
Bush would have even spoken to Chavez..
and that would have gotten us no where.
Or Bush would have said something like;
“we know how hard it is to put food on your family.”
Posted by: Gus | April 18, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Jones:
There are different styles to be sure, but there are many ideological parallels between Obama and Latin American leaders such as Chavez, Evo Morales and Rafael Correa (who, by the way, got his doctorate from the University of Chicago. Additionally, Lopez Obrador in Mexico could be added to this group. Although the styles are very different, I have believed for the last two years that Obama is cut from the same ideological cloth.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
JIL – You are right. The problem is that we have a bunch of republican sillies that want to demonize Chavez when we should be demonizing ourselves. We do the drugs that creates the border violence, we drive drunk, we kill 1.5 million unborn babies a year, we bomb civilians daily, we show unfair favoritism towards Israel as they expand settlements and checkpoints, etc. Seriously, we have no right to condemn anybody. We have also bankrupted ourselves so we are a bunch of fiscal idiots to boot.
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Gus:
Some day you might wake up and see that ideologically, Obama is not very different from guys like Chavez. You probably don’t know much about Latin America, and might not want to explore the issues too deeply.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
JIL – You are right. The problem is that we have a bunch of republican sillies that want to demonize Chavez when we should be demonizing ourselves. We do the drugs that creates the border violence, we drive drunk, we kill 1.5 million unborn babies a year, we bomb civilians daily, we show unfair favoritism towards Israel as they expand settlements and checkpoints, etc. Seriously, we have no right to condemn anybody. We have also bankrupted ourselves so we are a bunch of fiscal idiots to boot.
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Chavez and Obama are alike radicals.
friends. they both think alike.
it shows how much obama thinks america is to blame.
go america………
Posted by: hohn sterz | April 18, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Steve – Last I checked, he was at least initially democratically elected. So these people can choose the way the are to be governed. I am working on my Spanish thanks. I think my last comment contains only truths. By the way we do mess with these people for our benefit.
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
First congress in 2010, then the community organizer. Never, ever, never again will we elect a democrat socialist with no management experience and a deep hate for this nations history and economic system. Never. Then, we CLEAN OUT THE SCHOOLS. We have been such fools.
Posted by: Phocus | April 18, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
hmmmm….sends away the Churchill bust, but accepts Chavez’s gift…yeah, sounds like change is upon us….and not for the better.
Posted by: samhiguchi | April 18, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Why can’t you people just leave Bush alone? He is no longer the President – Obama does not have the experience to be President. He doesn’t understand America since he was raised in Hawaii and Kenya. Is he a true American? Well, we will have more tea parties because he will not destroy America as he is trying to do.
Posted by: Jane | April 18, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
What made Chavez think that we don’t have copies here in the U S already?
Oh yeah, it was just to snub Obama in public. Surely, he knows we have a copy of this book in probably every university library in the U S.
Posted by: Debbie | April 18, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
For those that haven’t got a clue out there, I recommend that you do some serious reading about Venezuela. George Bush was an angel compared Chavez. No joke.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
“..we should be demonizing ourselves…”
Speak for yourself. And be my guest.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 18, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Cessna- what EXACTLY has been destroyed under Obama’s watch? Did you miss the last 8 years? I have many friends all of the world and travel often and I can assure you, America’s reputation has been restored under Obama. The world finally has faith in America again.
Posted by: Smith | April 18, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Okay, I’ll try again. this is a well-respected book in academic circles. It tells the ugly truth about the history of the Western Hemisphere without pulling any punches. I’ve just ordered my copy. I wish more Americans would educate themselves about our real history.
Posted by: cturple | April 18, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Civilizations evolve and adapt. Asia had been colonized by the Europeans…their resources of much less abundance than that of Latin America. They have moved forward and probably will surpass Europe and North America within the next 20-50 years economically. It is because their populace places rigorous value on education. Americans and Europeans have become complacent in that regard.
Posted by: phallon | April 18, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Steve – Interestingly enough both Bush and Clinton probably have more blood on their hands than Chavez, no joke. We need a kill count based on civilian deaths do to decisions made by all three. It would be very telling.
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
TWO PEAS IN A POD
Posted by: Casey | April 18, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
The rest of the world is doing a ‘happy dance’ watching America fall. And no one even stands up for her for freedom to pass the torch of freedom on to the coming generations, for sovereignty, for the Constitution. And you thought the Muslims dancing in the streets on 9-11 was something…you ain’t seen nothing yet.
Posted by: Fred | April 18, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
This is a very good book regardless of ones political view. As one who grew up in Latin America,of American parents, I can tell you that this book is key to understanding why Latin Americans see the US the way they do.All of congress, state dept and whitehouse shld read it.
==========
That may be so, but as President it is also his job to explain to others why the US sees the world the way we do.
Posted by: MayBee | April 18, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
It would have been rich to see President Obama offer – as his own gift – the red/brownshirt Hugo Chavez a copy of the “Guide to the Perfect Latin American Idiot” by Mendoza, Montaner and Vargas Llosa.
Posted by: Martin Edwin Andersen | April 18, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
IT’S PRETTY OBVIOUS THAT JOE McCARTHY…
was right. The internet has allowed all the communists in the U.S. to expose themselves. It’s amazing that our President is a Communist–but the American people are pretty dumb and have short memories.
Posted by: Joe McCarthy Was Right | April 18, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Fred – Only guy in government that defends the constitution as it is written is Ron Paul.
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Someone like Chavez would never have gained power had the US not raped their country through companies like Exxon-Mobli. Rather than give even the illusion of spreading the wealth, they only helped the upper class of Venezuela. Over time, we reaped the fruit of Exxon’s “lack of philanthropy”
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Jane wrote: “He doesn’t understand America since he was raised in Hawaii and Kenya. Is he a true American? Well, we will have more tea parties because he will not destroy America as he is trying to do.”
Umm, Hawaii IS part of the USA – didn’t you ever learn that in school? I Fear and ignorance is NOT a good thing, the previous administration notwithstanding…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Kelly Kinsel – The liberal scum will be in trouble because they don’t like guns. Oh well….
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
I know about Latin America more than these two idiots together (Obama-Chavez). I was born and grew up in Mexico. What I saw left sick and wanting to get out of there. Thanks God there was the U.S that adopted me as a citizen. It never crossed my mind to go to Cuba or Venezuela. The only country that offered me freedom was the U.S. Unfortunately, Obama is undoing this country as fast as possible.
Posted by: filologo | April 18, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
CommonSense – Thanks for some common sense. These neocon sillies really are silly.
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
the greed shown by US mult-nationals impoverished the mass of Venezuelans. It was only a matter of time before a Hugo Chavez rose to power by appealing to the poor majority of Venezuelans
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Since Obama said we needed the strength of the Mexican work force, I guess we are still exploiting Latin America to our own demise.
Posted by: common sense | April 18, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Yes, neo conservative, red state, republicans want to continue giving tax breaks to the wealthiest americans and corporations, under the “trickle down” illusion. They want to “de-regulate business” while “regulating our bedrooms”
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Phocus- I”m not sure who you are exactly speaking for at this point. I would suggest the Republican party wake up and kick out the right wing extremists if they want to have a legitimate chance of winning in 2010 or a shot at the Presidency in 2012. The majority of Americans approve of Obama’s job in office (63%). 71% of Americans trust Obama with the economy (Gallop). That’s a HUGE number. Patriotic Americans who understand history and the principles by which this country was founded on support Obama. Fortunately, that’s the majority.
Posted by: DU | April 18, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Some day you might wake up and see that ideologically, Obama is not very different from guys like Chavez. You probably don’t know much about Latin America, and might not want to explore the issues too deeply.
=====
Au contraire.. Obama is a patriotic American, but an American who realizes that our government has made huge mistakes over the course of the last 200+ years. We’ve supported dictators over and over again… when it suited our purpose. We’ve meddled where we should not have meddled.. when it suited our purpose. It’s time to realize that we are not guilt free and have in fact, elevated the hatred that so many foreign countries have for the USA. It does not hurt to talk to those who hate us.. it helps to understand why they hate us so much. We totally support Saudi Arabia, yet they are a cruel and inhumane dictatorship.
Don’t let Rush and the rest of the neocons brainwash you. Wrapping yourself in an American flag isn’t the answer.
Posted by: Gus | April 18, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
I guess 12 million illegal Latin Americans sucking the life out of the US taxpayer us ignored by Chavez. I don`t thing Chavez is a decendent of native Latin Americans. Apparently he is the decendant of Spanish that were the origninal pillagers,murderers and oppressers of Latin America.
Posted by: Cliff Summers | April 18, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Friendship cannot grow by slamming your friend. The US might have done mistakes in Latin America, so also Latinos in America by spreading gang violence. Hence it is time for forgetting the past and move forward and develop healthy relationship. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez presenting a book of `crimes of US’ is a very poor taste. Looks like Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez needs a psychatric help.
Posted by: Sri | April 18, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
More tired scolding and leveraging guilt on America. We can be certain that our Apologist-in-Chief will respond in a way that his Leftist buddies across the globe will aprove.
Posted by: Randal | April 18, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
This country is heading to a civil unrest. We are polarized like never before.I know that soon rather than later a spark is going to create a big fire and we will not able to stop the bloodshed. The clock in ticking….
Posted by: Frank | April 18, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
People who hate the president for being critical of his own country are not truly patriotic, just bull headed, arrogant and ignorant. A society that cannot examine its own shortfalls can never advance and improve in its relations with other countries or its enlightenment in dealing with its own challenges. To have that knee jerk superior attitude has painted our nation into a corner. We have constantly to swagger and dispay our might. A little humility goes a long way in the world of diplomacy. I think President Obama is a great ambassador; and despite the furious hate speak on the Right, I think he will be solidly re-elected for a second term.
Posted by: phoenix lady | April 18, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Chavez is a descendant of those European oppressors(mostly Spain and Portugal). He is on the planet because of what happened.If he wants to fix blame then he needs to blame his family.
Posted by: William | April 18, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
This is what happens when you deny the new world order.
Posted by: sugar cane | April 18, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
The stunning IGNORANCE of the GOP regarding world history and our place in it is further evidence of exactly why they are the party that is out of power, out of favor, and out of ideas. At the rate you’re losing constituents, I’ll bet your candidate garners less votes in 2012 than the Green Party…..or Ralph Nader!
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
SearamblerOne-I thought the exact same thing about that post. Doesn’t understand America because he grew up in Hawaii? Seriously?
Jane, thanks for telling 1.2 million people that they are apparently not Americans. I’m sure they’ll be glad to know. BTW, isn’t Pearl Harbor somewhere near there?
Posted by: IheartDuke | April 18, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
The last time Louisiana rejected stimulus money was when the highway system was built. Rather than accept the federal strings to “integrate”..Louisiana preferred to remain racist and segregated; hence, rejected the money.. hurt the state, and had the worst, pot-holed highways in the USA
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Bravo PhoenixLady- Great post!
Posted by: iheartDuke | April 18, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Yet, once again, republicans choose to hurt their states for individual political gain. Rejecting stimulus money so much needed by their states. Rebublicans are arrogantly silly!
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
under GW, while he was dumping billions into the sands of IRAQ for absolutely nothing, you never heard even a “peep” from the neocons about “fiscal responsibility”. And Lord have murcy, did they really think anyone would fall for that silly “Tax Tea Party” stunt?
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Blame America, make apologies for America on foreign soil. Did Obama apologize for the only land America asked for from Europe after WWII. Oh, but wait they would have to dig up our brave American soldiers who gave their life so Europeans could have freedom. Next time let the oppressed call Chavez, Castro, Ahmadinejah, and every other dictator to their rescue.
Posted by: suzanne | April 18, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Thoughtful moderates immediately knew Obama’s reaching out to our adversaries would spark attacks from the right. Science has determined politically right peoples’ brains are wired differently than the rest of us – I suspect “different” actually means mentally ill – not that there’s anything wrong with that…
Moderates are sick of the loud right and we’re not going to take it much longer!
Posted by: cwm | April 18, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
It is time to start the healing process, otherwise the world will go down the tubes. Peace and Love is the only way. War and hatred is the wrong way.
Posted by: cony007 | April 18, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Steve – Interestingly enough both Bush and Clinton probably have more blood on their hands than Chavez, no joke. We need a kill count based on civilian deaths do to decisions made by all three. It would be very telling. ————– so you count suicide bombers that blow themselves up and killed thousands of iraqis in iraq as our fault. I count that as islam’s fault.
Posted by: john | April 18, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
This will look nice in Obama’s personal library next to his signed hardback edition of “Rules for Radicals” by Saul Alinsky.
Posted by: Jenn | April 18, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
This is a perfect example when you give an inch to an idiot he wants more. Chavez thinks now that he got a handshake and a big smile, he can basically tutor Obama on everything.
Obama should have kept his distance from this idiot.
Obama is playing a dangerous game if he continue his “apology” tour.
So, on his next trip to Iran, Ahmadinejad is going to give him another book, this one in Farsi!
Posted by: frieda | April 18, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
The U.S. did not “colonize” Latin America.
Posted by: Eduardo | April 18, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I mean, they spent all that effort to give the fake, illusory appearance of a “ground roots upswell”… when everyone could see that Fox News merely propagandized the red state people. Fox News is nothing more than a neo-con propaganda machine.
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Hard to believe Americans are to blame again. As a Canadian I say, America is not perfect,but it has done more good than any country in the world.The media is slamming your country most of the time! Obama is apologetic to be an American.What a shame!!!
Posted by: liz scholten canada | April 18, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
SearamblerOne , 62 Americans voted for your hero and 60 millions voted for McCain. It was not an overwhelming take over. So were are pretty much divided in half. Sadly,the victory is so poor that your hero has some of his party leaders against him and he does not even have 4 months in office.
Posted by: Frank | April 18, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
amazing the author complains about spreading family planning .advocating for contraception NOT abortion is healthy for a region that cannot afford to feed its own
Posted by: daniel Harrigan | April 18, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Joe the plummer….the cable guy…. always a gimmick… or a stunt… like the tax tea parties…. why are the republicans always looking for the next quick gimmick to dupe the public?
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
CommonSense – yeah, the tea-baggers were definitely not grass roots, more like astroturf! I wonder what historical reenactment Fox News has next on their agenda for their sheep, er I mean viewers? Maybe they’ll try and re-do the Civil War, only this time with the South winning…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Rick Perry should be impeached for advocating that his state, Texas, secede from the USA. what kind of governor would even say such silly mess… oh yeah, another republican neo-con…
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
“Joe the plummer…”
He would probably call himself Joe the Plumber.
It’s delightful to see how uneasy the loony left is over the tea parties. Note that on that day Fox News’s ratings exceeded those of MSNBC and CNN combined–by a lot.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 18, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
lol searambler, you are so “on target” with your assessment of the republican shyster charlatan machine!
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Just think, these clowns would have put John McCain and Sarah Palin in the white house! Lawd have murcy on us all…
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
BTW, Mr Tapper, “gift” is a noun and not a verb. Thank you.
Posted by: chuck in austin | April 18, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
I am not a fan of Jake. But let me point out that he did not criticize Obama in this article which is a relief from his previous Fox News-like posts. Jake gave a good review of the book Chavas gave to Obama and said the president was polite to Chavas. End of story.
Posted by: Blue State Patriot | April 18, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Do Americans realize that their president is coming across to the world like a weak and push over president? Why are his advisors not reading newspaper commentaries or letters to the editor in the countries he visits? Stop the apology tour already, it is making the United States look very bad…do you see Putin or Chavez, or Castro go around the world apologyzing? Even if he says there will be a new course of action, Mr. Obama should speak also of the good things the USA has done.
Posted by: Maria | April 18, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Republicans hate america… they hate our US government… they are the most un-patriotic bunch ever…. yet, are the quickest to wrap themselves in the US and confederate flags…. THE CONFEDERACY LOST….GET OVER IT!!!
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Funny thing is that I see Obama as more Christ-like than any Republican or right wing extremist.
Posted by: JV | April 18, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
‘Open Veins’ is indeed a classic, but is woefully anachronistic. Both Chávez and Obama would be better advised to read, ‘Forgotten Continent’ by Michael Reid.
Posted by: Dave | April 18, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Eduardo-According to his book, Perkins’ function was to convince the political and financial leadership of underdeveloped countries to accept enormous development loans from institutions like the World Bank and USAID. Saddled with huge debts they could not hope to pay, these countries were forced to acquiesce to political pressure from the United States on a variety of issues. Perkins argues in his book that developing nations were effectively neutralized politically, had their wealth gaps driven wider and economies crippled in the long run.
Posted by: Huh | April 18, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Umm Frank, the election was only a few months ago, and already you’re trying to re-write the numbers? Obama got 69.5 million popular votes compared to 60 million for Mccain. He got 365 electoral votes compared to 173 for the other guy. He got 52% of the total votes compared to 45% for Mccain. It was a resounding defeat of the GOP by any measure. Deny it or decry it, it is what it is. The majority of the country wanted the GOP out of power, and we got it. Now we’re in the clean-up phase, undoing the damage of the last few years. Good for us!
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
The fact that Hugo Chavez is an attention seeking buffoon does not lessen the impact of having a president who takes the higher ground. Not just Americans are seeing images of this meeting, but many thousands of people in South and Central America, who will see the openness of an American president, willing to meet an adversary halfway. It is, after all, just a book. It never hurts to read the thoughts and ideas of our enemies. We all read Mein Kamph in high school. Many of us own copies. that does not make us Nazis.
Posted by: phoenix lady | April 18, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
YOU CAN BE AMERICAN AND PATRIOTIC AND STILL BE OBJECTIVE ABOUT YOUR OWN COUNTRY.
PAST AMERICAN GOVERNMENTS HAD DONE ENORMOUS GOOD AND BAD THINGS TO OTHER COUNTRIES. JUST BECAUSE ONE IS ACKNOWLEDGING THE SAD HISTORIES DOESN’T MAKE ONE UNPATRIOTIC AND MARXIST, LEFTIST, ETC. WHATEVER REPUBLICANS LIKE TO LABEL THEM.
OBAMA IS WHAT HE IS. HONEST AND OBJECTIVE ABOUT HIS COUNTRY.
Posted by: BQ | April 18, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
The Ugly American is not an imaginary character, it is very much alive as demonstrated by the majority of posts here. The conquistadores and the Spanish Catholic zealots who accompanied them ravaged South America, Central America, Mexico, and tried to do so in California, Arizona, New Mexico and Colorado but were turned back because the riches of North America were not the in-your-face gold, silver and emeralds found south of the Rio Grande but were of a more subtle nature. Europeans, during the age of colonization DID rape, pillage, torture and kill, decimating native populations, human and animal, with abandon throughout the continents of
the Western Hemisphere, and siphoning off natural resources. Keep in mind that the book Hugo Chavez presented to President Obama was written in 1971 by a man who not only talked the talk, he
walked the walk. The USA is envied by many other countries for the freedom of speech, the achievements we’ve made and the wealth we apparently enjoy and where envy exists hate is usually not far behind. But, keep in mind, what people see of us is the make-believe of TV. The last administration had an adversarial relationship with almost every other country in the world and when the negligence of that administration brought us to the brink of financial ruin, few stand with us now. President Obama’s term has begun having to do damage control trying to repair what 8 years of coddling the wealthy while being militarily engaged on two fronts has done. Bush started out with a balanced budget and a surplus; but Obama has had to begin his term with minus zilch.
Posted by: nanameow | April 18, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Why not . . . Obama likes anything that trashes the United States.
Posted by: rplat | April 18, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
SearamblerOne: “CommonSense – yeah, the tea-baggers were definitely not grass roots, more like astroturf!”
You guys sure seem to be experts on rallies YOU DIDN’T ATTEND. Our tea party had about 8,000 people, ONE THIRD of whom were Democrats. And for many people, it was their first rally EVER.
As more and more people come to their senses, the rallies will get bigger. MUCH bigger.
And I’m sure the whining from the left will only get more shrill and desperate, even though they won and have their utopia now. Further proof that liberalism is a mental disorder.
Posted by: Stacey | April 18, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Face it, Obama is taking all the correct steps to restore America’s standing in the world! He is a gifted communicator, is rational, fair, and understands transformational leadership extraordinarily well. Neocons wud prefer us be lookin at Sarah Palin and all her family’s drug, sex and baby mama drama to distract us from our economic concerns!
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
“It’s delightful to see how uneasy the loony left is over the tea parties. Note that on that day Fox News’s ratings exceeded those of MSNBC and CNN combined–by a lot”
Which tells you exactly why, in black and white, Fox sponsored and promoted these events – ratings and profit!
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
It’s the mentality exemplified by Frank that needs to change if the GOP is going to get back to being relevant. Newsflash to Frank: denying the facts is precisely what got the party. If it helps you sleep better at night, live in your cozy world of denial. You can listen to Sean Hannity as you fall asleep each night. But the cold, harsh, stark reality is that the party got CRUSHED in the past two elections. Period.
Posted by: Reality Check | April 18, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Chavez is preaching to the choir. I’m sure Obama has read and cherished that book, and many more like it.
Posted by: Drew | April 18, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Eduardo: Although the U.S. did not colonize Latin America, we did however, pillage its resources. We’re not a perfect nation and we try to atone for misdeeds and attempt not to repeat them. As with other regions of the world such as in Asia (India and China) who have been colonized by Europeans,have moved forward and are excelling. The book represents a reality and provides insight to their travesty of European conquest and ill begotten consequences bestowed upon the people of their continent.
Posted by: phallon | April 18, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Stacey, the tax tea parties were a mere gimmick on April 15th. No one likes to pay taxes, including the Obamas who paid more taxes than you will make in a lifetime; yet, to think you have a popular uprising only shows that you are a pawn of sean hannity and rush limbaugh!
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Trash America and apologize for how terrible we are. Blame Bush.
Compare notes on socialism.
That’s how Obama won Chavez over.
Move along to the next dictator.
Obama is patheic.
Posted by: millie | April 18, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
I think Obama and this thug leader
could be fast friends. Seems Obama
wants to know and understand people
who are like these tyrants than the
people who had a “tea party” this
week. Those are the people that his
administration want to write off as
a bunch of kooks. Go figure.
Posted by: wis134 | April 18, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Good for you Stacey, I hope you had fun tea-baggin’ the day away. So tell me, exactly what was accomplished that day? Have your taxes suddenly disappeared? Is government no longer wasteful, thanks to these rallies? Have you heard from your congressman, asking for your opinion on how to deal with the issues of the day?
No? How strange. BTW, just how many thousands or millions of tea bags were bought, destroyed and wasted that day to protest wasteful spending…..?
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
phallon, “Teaparties were a gimmick” tell that to the millions who came out!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Chavez is a good judge of character. Just a couple of weeks ago he called Obama an ignoramus.
Posted by: Boxcar | April 18, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Obama term: “ONE AND DONE”!!!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Republicans will be the eternal “minority party of obstructionists” as long as they continue to appear as grumpy old white men whose only concern in life is abortion!
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
That photo-op of Obama shaking hands with Chavez…
I bet Rev Wright and Bill Ayers have tears in their eyes.
How long they have waited for that.
Posted by: nick | April 18, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
nanameow: Great post!
Posted by: Phallon | April 18, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
It’s ironic that Chavez likes recommending books to our Presidents. When he befriends bookburners like those who rule Iran and Cuba How many political dissidents are in the gulags of Iran and Cuba? Let’s here a word from the lefties on Chavez’s hypocrisy.
Posted by: Nietzschean | April 18, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Do the Danes “hate America” too, Mr. Tapper?
Posted by: 4thestate | April 18, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
SearamblerOne: “CommonSense – yeah, the tea-baggers were definitely not grass roots, more like astroturf!”
You guys sure seem to be experts on rallies YOU DIDN’T ATTEND. Our tea party had about 8,000 people, ONE THIRD of whom were Democrats. And for many people, it was their first rally EVER.
As more and more people come to their senses, the rallies will get bigger. MUCH bigger.
And I’m sure the whining from the left will only get more shrill and desperate, even though they won and have their utopia now. Further proof that liberalism is a mental disorder.
Stacey
***************************************
Too bad the Repubicans can’t even grasp for
a level of competence, in their case they are
beyond the term dysfunctional.
Posted by: spacerook1 | April 18, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
The problem with kow towing to the socialist in latin America is that it lends credence to their exaggerated claims against the U.S. that then translate to the U.S. having to give them money and attention in some form or other. All while undermining well regulated capitalist values.
If Obama opens up even more to Cuba w/out getting anything in return he risks losing all of latin America to socialism, but since he comes from a liberation theology background that might be his very intention.
Posted by: frank | April 18, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
oh yeah, Sarah Palin wanted to “ban” certain books… Republicans are quick to “ban”…. use “sanctions”… kill… cuz, they represent the party of the uneducated, close minded people!
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Funny how the left gets upset over regular Americans having peaceful tea parties–but they are OK with Obama bowing to a tyrant that oppresses women.
And fine with him warmly shaking hands with a tyrant that hates gays and says “death to America”.
Something is terribly wrong.
Posted by: riley | April 18, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
I’m not surprised that a few people would be offended by Obama’s way of doing business.The parochial minds would have wished that we present the typical egocentric leader who’s in a hurry to deride and denigrate any an everyone who disagrees with American values.The fact of the matter is that America is not that island Auterky that a whole bunch of people imagine .We need others as much as they need us.This has become increasingly glaring now that we are in a global recession. A good leader gives others room to express themselves while he listens with rapt attention.There’s a new world order and cynics had better come to terms with it.Otherwise,they’ll remain out of touch.
Posted by: EyesWideOpen | April 18, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
“phallon, “Teaparties were a gimmick” tell that to the millions who came out!”
Millions?!?!? Hahahahaha, good one. Most estimates are that around 250,00 total, across the nation, showed up. Averages out to roughly 5000 per state. The high school I attended way back when had nearly that number of students. Hardly a resounding success – except for Fox News’ ratings and profits…
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
The republican party can revive itself by getting their constituency to stay in school beyond a 5th grade understanding of the world!
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Well put spacerook1!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Hey, Commonsense!! How about useing facts with the commonsense!! CHINA HAS NEVER BEEN COLONIZED as you claim!!
Posted by: Roger | April 18, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
You want to know what drives Obama’s words and his actions just listen to a few little clips of his pastor’s sermons.
Obama’s actions and his feelings about our country have Rev Wright written all over them.
I knew when voters bought Obama’s rediculous excuse about never hearing those sermons–America was in deep trouble.
Posted by: tyler | April 18, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
You wait, this book will be on Oprah’s book list! It’s author will be our next president! Even if he’s not US born, like this one!!
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
just more of the same, the left showing their true colors by calling the right names and insulting them. Just goes to show how much intelligence they have. Just like their leader and king, Obama. I would just like to see him defend the USA just once but when you hate America and are as ashamed of her as he is I guess thats asking for something “above his pay grade” I have an idea, why don’t all you America hating lefties move the Venezuela. I think you would be happier there.
Posted by: notanobamafan | April 18, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Face reality, everybody is tired of the republicans and their lies! Everybody now sees clearly through rebublican BULL. Exxon Mobil was kicked out of Venezuela over a profit sharing dispute. Rather than take less profits, they thought they could rally Bush to invade Venezuela, cuz, didn’t take much to make him invade somewhere. Rather than less profits from Venezuela, now EXXON makes ZERO profit there. That’s what “close-minded” arrogant greed gets ya, “ZERO”
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
“If Obama opens up even more to Cuba w/out getting anything in return he risks losing all of latin America to socialism, but since he comes from a liberation theology background that might be his very intention”
Frank, what is a “liberation theology background”?
And why do you feel it is the responsibility of the USA to interfere in South American politics? Your contention that if we thaw out relations with Cuba it will somehow cause all of Latin America to be “lost” to Socialism is puzzling. Please elaborate.
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
ZERO!
Posted by: CommonSense | April 18, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Why do the anti-liberal commentators on here always have so much disdain for compassion and understanding?
Posted by: Philo | April 18, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Although I only lived in one area of Latin America for less than 12-years it is easy to understand why nearly every country in this part of the hemisphere struggles with the democratic process. One might blame it on the centuries of living under colonial rule, others can trace it to the mixture of races (native Indian, European, Afro and even North American) which has resulted a people whose background is so convoluted that it begs to be controlled by a strong-arm leader, or are open to constant upheaval. Couple that with majority of the people who are uneducated and you have what is today’s Latin America. Does some of the blame fall onto our shoulders here in the US? It does if you are looking for a scapegoat. Let’s get real about the situation in the people in Latin America choose to live in today…it is of their own making, even if they were strong-armed at one time, they still control their own environment today, just as we do here in the States. Its like believing the woman who continually ends up in an abusive relationship is not to be blamed for the choices she makes.
Posted by: AlinNC | April 18, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
What’s all the worry about Obama cozying up to a two bit third rate dictator. All he is doing is exporting Gm to South America. With his Cap and Trade they can build cars in chavez’s Socialist paradise for 30 dollars a month instead of 30 dollars an hour. The new GM 2010 “Chavez” comes with a built in new Chinese AK 47 for the descerning leftist to defend the Messiah
Posted by: Arizonaman | April 18, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Obama’s “We Suck” tour.
Where is his next stop?
And which dictator will he validate next?
Posted by: ned | April 18, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
If Chavez is so anti-white/European, then why does he speak Spanish – the language of his “invaders?” Another blatant hypocrasy of the ignorant left.
Posted by: mm | April 18, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Obama and Chavez have much in common.They both like to bash America and its former US President.
Can the public take another 44 months of this? Next thing you know, he’ll be giving Texas, N Mexico and Arizona back to Mexico, just as soon as he runs all of the white framers off their land.
We’re officially the United Statee of Zimbabwe (and the value of the dollar is heading that way, too)
Posted by: J House | April 18, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Conveniently omitted from this article were some of B.O.’s quotes such as, “We have at times been disengaged, and at times we sought to dictate our terms,” Obama said to loud applause. “But I pledge to you that we seek an equal partnership. There is no senior partner and junior partner in our relations.”
That’s right, another apology to crooks, tyrannts, and criminals. His passionate hatred for America is only eclipsed by his love of dictators.
Posted by: Mike Jefferson | April 18, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
SearamblerOne, you (I) get pushed (by you) then (I) push back. Won’t take this creep without resistance!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Nobama will rush to read his book and agree with every word. He will gain lots of insight on how to direct this country towards socialism and ultimately communism. He will use his stimulus to publish the book and put it in all public schools and library’s. America, you asked for change…and you’re going to get it.
Posted by: AmericaDownThaTube | April 18, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
The miracle of Obama’s soft power, as reported by Newsweek:
“Over the past few months, North Korea’s behavior has grown unusually belligerent, even by Pyongyang’s prickly standards. The North has cut relations with Seoul, tested a new missile, and, after the U.N. condemned the launch last week, threatened to withdraw forever from further nuclear-disarmament talks and restart its weapons program.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 18, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
CommonSense wrote: “…you never heard even a ‘peep’ from the neocons about ‘fiscal responsibility.’”
That’s apparently because you don’t listen to Conservative Talk Radio. Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and others were all over President Bush and the Republican Congress for their fiscal irresponsibility and their expansion of the federal government.
Now then that “silence” from the grass roots was “deafening” in November of 2006 and November of 2008. Many Conservatives all across the country stayed home during those elections which resulted in the Democrats retaining control of Congress and then expanding on their majorities.
Posted by: James Danley | April 18, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
birds of a feather flock together
Posted by: dem mugged by reality | April 18, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
plainsm – LOL! Hey, it’s all good, we’re just a couple of Americans having a healthy debate. Yeah, sometimes we (you, me, and everyone else here) gets a little carried away, but in the end, we’re all in the same boat together. At least we live in a country where we CAN have debates like this…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Philo – Yeah. You’re right. You liberals are so compassionate and understanding – esp. when it comes to the right of the child in the womb, the man or woman breaking his or her back working to pay taxes for those who wish not to work, and for those who still feel that children in a public school should still be allowed to have a Valentine or Christmas party without fear of litigation. You and your people are sooooo compassionate.
Posted by: mm | April 18, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Oh, goody, this was for me:
“oh yeah, Sarah Palin wanted to “ban” certain books… Republicans are quick to “ban”…. use “sanctions”… kill… cuz, they represent the party of the uneducated, close minded people!”
For the sake of argument, I’ll accept your Olbermannesque comparison of Palin to the mullahs of Iran and Castro. But how is that a defense of a guy who endorses governments that throw people in prison and execute those who disagree with it? Should that guy be giving out lessons in morality?
Posted by: Nietzschean | April 18, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Obama and Chavez are hermanos. Soon, los Etados Unidos will be one with Cuba and Venezuela. One big paraiso.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Yesterday Chavez called BO an intelligent man.
A few weeks ago he called him a poor ignoramus.
Looks like Chavez also has an expiration date on his words.
Posted by: ned | April 18, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
So, please tell us what did POTUS 43 do to reign in Chavez during his 8 yrs in office!? Oh, the silence is deafening!!!!!
Posted by: DShirley
Yes, if one can’t “reign in” Chavez, one must join him. 43 could only reign in the Saddam guy.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
The common bond between Chavez and B0 is Karl’s classic Manifesto.
Besides, we were once colonies ourselves. Now, Pb0 will try to learn Spanish, too.
Posted by: kat5 | April 18, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
I WISH I COULD SAY THAT CHAVEZ’S GIFT WAS INAPPROPRIATE!
I wish I could say that His gift insulted the President…
I wish I had a President that would have thrown the damn book back at the self-righteous despot…
But alas; My PRESIDENT is Barack Obama; A Community Organizer that agrees with Chavez and joins with him in debasing My Country!
tragic…
Posted by: AMR1960 | April 18, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Who will ever know what this president says to countries that hate us behind closed doors.
The way this president has been acting I personally don’t trust the guy at all.
Scary time we live in.
Posted by: mike | April 18, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
I don’t know about you but it gives me great confidence in our “dear leader” when Obama gave Chavez a “soul brother” handshake! True brothers-in-arms! Viva Chavez! Viva Fidel! Viva Obama! Viva Mugabe! Viva! Viva! Viva! Si Se Puede!
Posted by: Al | April 18, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
“hey commonsense, Palin didn’t try to ban any books.”
No, she merely INQUIRED about whether or not it COULD be done, as reported by the head librarian, in the town where she was mayor. Gee, I wonder WHY she would want to know……
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Chavez gives Obama a book he can’t read and Obama gives Brown DVDs that he can’t watch. Our planet is in good hands…….
Posted by: Rick | April 18, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
A reminder that candidate Obama did not want the President to give the impression that America stands above the rest of the world:
=====
OBAMA: …
Because the problem is, if we think that meeting with the president is a privilege that has to be earned, I think that reinforces the sense that we stand above the rest of the world at this point in time. And I think that it’s important for us in undoing the damage that has been done over the last seven years, for the president to be willing to take that extra step.
====
So I think we are seeing him do his best to take this extra step of denying our exceptionalizm.
Posted by: MayBee | April 18, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Chavez gives Obama an America bashing book? I’m sure Obama will treasure it. The speech Obama gave while in South America was probably excerpted from it, considering that they both carried the same anti-American theme of how rotten we are as a country.
Posted by: OxyCon | April 18, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Obama has now commited treason. He should be immediately detained and tried and convicted as a traitor for his crimes against the people of this nation and for fraternizing with a known socialist/terrorist dictator like this pig Chavez.
Posted by: Ed | April 18, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
It seems the Obama cultists are more than willing to commune with the Chavez cultists. Come, amigos, join us.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
I don’t understand why half of the posters here bash their fellow Americans for having a different opinion on our politics yet openly embrace a dictator such as Chavez.
Posted by: Chuck | April 18, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Commonsense: Liberalism is a philosophy built on victimization and emotion. Any liberal argument can be dissected within seconds. Your posts represent the true ignorance of the political faction in which you are a part of. So let me break down your post indicating that neo-cons (another emotionally-based name which means nothing used to describe republicans ). Your claim is that republicans do not hold their politicans accountable when it comes to fiscal matters. GWB shot the economy. Most Americans agree with this. Bush won in 2004 with 51% of the vote. By the time he left office in January, his approval rating was 17%. This means that the majority of republican voters abandoned him during his second term because of his handling of the economy. A majority of republicans does not consititute 17% of the electorate. In addition, this 17% also included some independents and blue-dog democrats. I am not trying to put you down. You are a very smart person whose capabilities are much greater than you yourself think. The problem is that you’ve bought into a defunct political philosophy – liberalism – which preaches emotion and dependece.
Posted by: mm | April 18, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
William … I can tell you from experience that diplomacy is not about humility and partnership – it’s about reaching common ground on the struggle between our national interests and the national interests of the country that sits across the table. There isn’t a world leader out there that will denigrate their constituency just to appease and support the USA. Have you heard any head of state, other than Obama, fault their own country on the world stage? If a country cooperates with us it’s because they need something from us like money, protection, trade or resources – things that we have no obligation to give. That’s why other heads of state are salivating over Obama – they see him as easily manipulated to their benefit.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Obviously the conservatives here have never read the history of how the US treated others in the Americas. Instead of mouthing off they should do a little reading about the truth. When they read about the truth they will find that the US has not always been the nice guy.
Posted by: unshrub | April 18, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
“Chavez gives Obama a book he can’t read and Obama gives Brown DVDs that he can’t watch. Our planet is in good hands…….”
LOL!
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
OK, enough play time, I gotta get some work done…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | April 18, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Obviously the conservatives here have never read the history of how the US treated others in the Americas. Instead of mouthing off they should do a little reading about the truth. When they read about the truth they will find that the US has not always been the nice guy.
Posted by: unshrub
Obvious that some are unaware that much of the exploitation of the Americas was committed by the French, Spanish, Portuguese and British. Si?
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Obama will love this book, he is the only President that I know of who hates America and all it stands for. Obama is hard at work denigrating America its people and all that America stands for. Obama is a disgrace, I guess he will go to any lengths to make sure we are reduced to a third world country. Can you imagine consorting with a dictator like Chavez. Oh, wait Obama wants to be a dictator. I liken what Obama is doing to Zimbabwe, you think that is beyond the pale?? Wait and see how he will destroy us.
Posted by: jollypolly2 | April 18, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
A book he cannot read. Kind of like a DVD you cannot watch.
Posted by: Larsinkima | April 18, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Posted by: Lynn: Isn’t Chavez of Spanish decent? What does he think of the spanish that settled in latin america?
………………………
Chavez is an indigneous American. the book is about FIVE HUNDRED YEARS of exploitation. That includes the colonization by Spain. That is why he SPEAKS Spanish – because his country was invaded by Europeans in the 16th century.
Posted by: cturple | April 18, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Anyone who thinks last week’s tea party reflects the popular views of Americans surely lives in a fool’s paradise.How many latinos and blacks were involved? The Republican Party is find of deluding itself into thinking that the ‘real Americans’ are white supremacists.No wonder there’s a whole splatter very ‘intelligent’ sarcasm about Obama’s contact with Chavez.As floppez has suggested,someone should tell us how George Walker Bush reigned in Chavez or anyone else for that matter. A very small interest group can project all the hypocrisy and bigotry it wants but I’m sure Americans will put their vote where their mouth is from now on.We’ve all learnt a very bitter lesson and its engraved in our brains.
Posted by: EyesWideOpen | April 18, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
jollypolly2 : So move to Texas and secede with Perry.
Posted by: cturple | April 18, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
SearamblerOne … No kidding! What was with that handshake? A “hey you’re my bro” handshake and a big smile for Chavez? Thanks, Mr. President, for legitimizing a dictator that backed FARC attacks on Americans and Colombians. Obama is the ultimate narcissist – seeking adoration at the expense of the American people. You never, ever, legitimize tyranny.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
unshrub – No nation under the sun is completely innocent of its treatment towards others. A nation should not be judged on her sins of the past. Rather, she should be judged on how she strives to correct the effects of her past sins. And many of the sins that our nation has committed were done so by the party you represent. From Andrew Jackson’s ‘Trail of Tears’ to FDR’s detainment of Japanese-Americans to Harry Truman’s bombing of innocents in Nagasaki and Hiroshima to JFK’s and LBJ’s creation and advacement of the unjust Vietnam War to LBJ’s creation of ‘The Great Society ‘ which yielded the complete destruction of the black famility solely and specifically to keep them a dependant voting block. Be careful where you point your fingers.
Posted by: mm | April 18, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Were doomed…Here I come Panama!
Posted by: cjcanu01 | April 18, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
searamblerone–if you did this much writing in your 5000 person high school, you made have made it to college. The level of debate in this blog is jejune.
Chavez was overwhelmingly elected president of Venz. by an uneducated electorate. We appear to have the same problem in the US.
Posted by: Pat | April 18, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Wright, Ayers and now Chavez??
Our Pres seems very comfortable in company of these men.
Posted by: politicsIsdirty | April 18, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Obama has now commited treason. He should be immediately detained and tried..convicted as a traitor for his crimes against the people of this nation…
Sure! Just as soon as Bush and Co are arrested and tried for treason for subjugating the constitution and bill of rights to their own ends. Patriots don’t start wars to avenge their own personal issues or to make money. They don’t lie to their fellow Americans…
Posted by: NWg | April 18, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Chavez didn’t give this book to Bush because he knew W wouldn’t play his games. Chavez and other dictators obviously know a buffoon when they see one, and they see one running our country now. Great job, Obamabots!
Posted by: JustMe | April 18, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Ed,
The treason came up when Obama ordered the FBI investigate Veterans to see if they were joining certain groups. Not only is that a violation of the Constitution it is Obama’s attempt to keep tabs on anyone that may not agree with his policies. Last I checked Vets and anyone else are allowed to join any group they want, including the Black Panthers if they want.
Obama has labeled those people that don’t agree with him the enemy and that in itself is an act of war against his own America.
Posted by: Tabtwo | April 18, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Keith – Nice try pal. The greatest mass murderers in human history were from the left. Left-wing radicalism, which always yields socialism, which in turn always yields communism have claimed more lives throughout human history than any “conservative” head of state. You know this too. You’re just denying it. Liberalism breeds violence over time. And please spare me about how the left does not try to force their values on the populace. You cited gay marriage. So lets use that…37 out of 37 states voted not to have same-sex marriage. Even the liberal blue states. And in each case, leftist courts overruled the people and implimented gay marriage. And it will keep happening. So please spare me your phony outrage.
Posted by: mm | April 18, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
“Chavez was overwhelmingly elected president of Venz. by an uneducated electorate. We appear to have the same problem in the US.”
politicsIsdirty, Very well said … and sadly, very true.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
it’s funny to read how many of the ‘conservative right’ fear books, no matter who wrote them, history clearly shows that the ‘conservative right’ & ‘holier than thou’ folks like to burn books, restrict scientific advancement, oppress people for believing something different from them.
further reading of comments here by some display a hatred and burning wish to see violence in the streets of America,.. guess Tim McVeigh wasn’t a clear lesson for them.
better for us to have a well informed reliable individual like Pat Robertson, calling for Chavez’s murder to plan foreign policy, right?
Republicans/conservatives, at least the ones spewing the newest lines of filth are just another manifestation of groups like the xenophobic John Birch Society.
Posted by: Mr. Tony | April 18, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
tabtwo: You are very correct friend. I find it amazing how for eight years the left was screaming about unjust profiling and domestic spying, yet they are silent on the recent DHS report. Complete hypocrasy.
Posted by: mm | April 18, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
“Chavez was overwhelmingly elected president of Venz. by an uneducated electorate. We appear to have the same problem in the US.”
Sorry, Pat posted that … but politicsIsDirty has a good point too: ”
“Wright, Ayers and now Chavez??
Our Pres seems very comfortable in company of these men.?
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
I would venture to say that not one of these right wing nuts has not only not read this book but any other book about US actions in Latin and South America. I certainly haven’t read this one either but I have read enough to know that the US has spent much of its history screwing our neighbors to the south. Talking to adversaries is part of being civilized. What would you do–pull out your rifle and shoot the guy?
Such nonsense to equate diplomacy with capitulation.
Posted by: perumal11 | April 18, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
It is shameful the kind of things that some of these republicans spew out. I live in the Caribbean and used to think that the Repulican party stood for something noble. How mistaken I was. The kind of hatred that they are belching is as bad as that of the Al-queda terrorists. They cannot disagree with you in a civil way. I believe they are absolutely racist. Nothing Obama does will ever be good for them. Just imagine one stating that Obama was not US born. Isnt Hawaii a US state. Oh I forgot, they do not recognise Hawaiians as US citizens!! Racism at its ugliest.
Posted by: Matthew | April 18, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Obama is smooth as they come. His line about how he thought it was one of Chavez’s books so he wasgoing to give him of of Obama’s books was classic. However, if I was Axlerod, he would have said “It’s a real shame my kidsbook isn’t out yet”. To all the right wingers, and some of the extremist on your side. Please do tell how Europe and America has not obstructed Latin America over the decades?
Posted by: Seeryer | April 18, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
perumal11:
I used to believe the rubbish that you wrote. Until I spent 30 years living and doing business in several Latin American countries. They do a very good job at screwing things up on their own, and then pointing the finger at the U.S.
No seas tan pendejo.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
I just love ‘mm’s ‘absolute clarity’… LOL
Posted by: Mr. Tony | April 18, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Let me see if I have a grip on this;
“Dear Leader” throws over England, France, Germany, Poland, Israel, Et. Al.
But “Dear Leader” cuddles up with Russia, Iran, Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela and Hamas!!!
Folks, I think we all know where this is going…to a very bad, bad place.
Posted by: ichabod crane | April 18, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Matthew, because you vacationed for a month in Santo Domingo does not qualify you as an expert in Caribbean, South or Central American history. You’re certainly not Cuban or Dominican.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
I hope president Obama reads this magnificent book.
Posted by: Andrew | April 18, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
I really love the derogatory comments towards the people of the south… Being a true blooded Texan I can honestly say that I cannot wait for the day when we put our second amendment right into your pancy ass faces and pull the trigger! This country is divided and there is only one way to unite it. Do not care how you chumps try to re-write history, slaves were owned by Democrats who fought the Republicans while flying that confederate flag. Fools… Democrats ARE antiAmerican RDDB S.O.B.’s.
Posted by: Marc Cortez | April 18, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
1367 days and counting (if we make it) I love my country, why don’t you.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Steve, unfortunately, with Obama cultists, pendejos r us.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
i’m quite sure Obama already has a copy
Posted by: stormin1961 | April 18, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Matthew:
Are you serious? Al Qaeda terrorists? People disagree with Obama for purely racial reasons? Don’t be a disingenuous fool, please.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I hope president Obama reads this magnificent book.
Posted by: Andrew
He will, Andrew, because he too is magnificent.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
How long must we put up with clowns both American and foriegn. I just find it insulting that we have people (Obama, reid, pelosi, franks,etc.) that don’t take a stand for America. This South American fool and others can be eliminated so easy.
They take our money, jobs and bad mouth all the way to the bank. God em I alone
Posted by: a citizen | April 18, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Those of you who keep saying denigrating and obviously false things about our President sadden me greatly. Obama loves this country. He’s the living embodiment of the American dream. Just because he may not be your ideal old white guy president doesn’t mean you shouldn’t love your country and stop disparaging our president especially to a kook like Chavez. Chavez walked over gave the president a book that apparently he was dying to give, and Obama was merely being polite. End of story! WHAT NOW HATE OUR PRESIDENT FOR BEING POLITE? Maybe this is a good sign that the world is willing to talk to Obama, that some complaints are being heard instead of shunned. That’s a good thing. But in any case I think the President is awesome, people everywhere love him. But here in our own country there are people that speak so foul of him, I start to wonder what country they’re living in? This is our elected president, not some radio personality, he’s only just taken over, the far right doesn’t give him a chance just for the sake of giving him a chance, right out of the gate Limbaugh wants the president to fail. I think Limbaugh is an angry anti american government hard liner like Chavez, and Rush lives here and people on the far right love him and purchase and read his books, what’s thier excuse?
Posted by: Scotti | April 18, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
and did Obama make sure there were IHS signs in the camera shot?
Posted by: stormin1961 | April 18, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
“rich countries which profit more from consuming them than Latin America does from producing them.”
Yes, because Latin American tyrants steal the profits for themselves. The Castros are doing very, very well financially.
BTW maybe Obama can ask W for a translation. Bush does speak Spanish.
Posted by: PJ | April 18, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
DID HE ALSO BOW TO CHAVEZ?
THIS DUFUS HAS NO CLUE ABOUT GIFT GIVING ON THE WORLD RULER STAGE.
HE SENDS A BUST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL FROM THE WHITE HOUSE BACK TO THE BRITS..INSULT…GIVED THE BRIT PM A GIFT OF DVD AMERICAN MOVIES THAT WON’T PLAY ON BRIT MACHINES AND GIVES HIS KIDS A WHITE HOUSE GIFT SHOP MARINE ONE HELICOPTER TOY……HIS WIFE HUGS THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND, AND THEY GIVE HER A DARN IPHONE WITH OBAMA’S SPEECHES ON IT….AND HE JUST ACCEPTS A GIFT FROM A WORLD RENOWN HATER OF AMERICA….HE JUST DOES NOT HAVE A CLUE…THIS BLACK MAN FROM KENYA AND HIPPY PARENTAGE, NO SOCIAL CLASS OR UNDERSTANDING EXCEPT WHAT A LOW LEVEL LAWYER LEARNS AS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER….AND HE THINKS THE WORLD IS GOING TO ADORE AND RESPECT HIS IGNORANCE AND STUMBLE BUMBLING TELEPROMPTER SPEECHIFYING!!!!!
THE OBAMA WORSHIPERS ARE BLIND FOOLS.
Posted by: RUFUS | April 18, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
it’s also fun to see the rampant usage of ‘isms’ & ‘ists’ by people …….using those terms as if they really have a clue about what they are referring to.
Posted by: Mr. Tony | April 18, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Grow up, people. Obama doesn’t hate America, we’re not becoming socialist or communist, and neither Obama nor America are infallible. That’s reality. And why is it that every republican politician and supporter is automatically perfect in every way, simply because of their political affiliation? What childish thinking. It seems nobody in the GOP ever finds fault with anybody in their own party, no matter how inconsiderate and poorly suited to politics they may be (ahem, Palin). Instead of whining about the left all the time, lets find ways to progress and make our country and world a better place for everybody. Like it or not, we’re all human and we’re all interdependent. If that’s too socialist for you, then go find your own planet.
Posted by: truth has no affiliation | April 18, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Scotti, Sadly it was Obama’s new friend Chavez that called Obama an ignoramus just a few weeks ago.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Obama will lead to the downfall of the USA.
Posted by: Brent In Canada | April 18, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Obama didn’t really bow to the Saudi King, he was trying to steal his wallet. He didn’t really shake Chavez’s hand, he was trying to steal his watch.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
A masonic handshake obviously: he’s half white so the masons accepted him
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
This book was unilaterally recommended to me when I lived in Uruguay as an exchange student for a year, and I struggled through a spanish copy of it.
While some of the conclusions are clearly dated and/or biased, it is indeed a poetic, rich, and savage historical and social overview of a vast and complex region. I highly recommend anyone interested in Latin America to read it and make up their own mind.
I believe there was a passage about a European mining company using indigenous people to stir a pond of mercury + sludge for extraction of gold or silver… the poison ate their legs off, but it was cheaper than using mules.
Posted by: McCrazy | April 18, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
I have to agree with Chevez on one thing. He thinks Obama is an ignoramis too. Hanging with a dictator that would like nothing better than to see the United States destroyed is treason.
Posted by: Linda | April 18, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Tab Two wrote “The treason came up when Obama ordered the FBI investigate Veterans to see if they were joining certain groups. Not only is that a violation of the Constitution it is Obama’s attempt to keep tabs on anyone that may not agree with his policies.”
REALITY SAID:
On Studio B, Smith asked Herridge of the report, “Who and what are they talking about here? I mean, this isn’t about these — this isn’t about tea party folks.” Herridge replied:
No, essentially the driver in these intelligence assessments is the downturn in the economy. What they say essentially is that when people have less money, they’re out of work, they feel disenfranchised, this is fertile ground for groups on the left as well as groups on the right.
And you remember from reporting on this show, Shep, that even at the end of last year, prior to the inauguration, the Homeland Security Department under the Bush administration was sounding the alarm about the potential for right-wing groups to act, specifically because of the economy, and also because America was going to have its first African-American president.
Herridge also noted that the DHS report “does talk specifically about returning veterans as being sort of attractive targets for these groups, because they’ve got the weapons training and they may feel somewhat disenfranchised when they return for a variety of returns.” She later added, referring to the reports on left-wing and right-wing extremists, “I would point out that both of these assessments, Shep, were commissioned under the Bush administration. It takes some time to do them. They only came out after he had left office.” Interviewing former CIA covert operations officer Mike Baker later in the segment, Smith said of the reaction to the report on right-wing extremists, “[I]t sounds like just regular old, everyday people who are conservative just got, you know, got their dander up over something that is not applied to that.” Baker replied, “Yeah, it really is. It’s a little bit, unfortunately, it’s a little bit what the Republicans on the conservative side have been doing.”
WHAT DOES TAB TWOSAY NOW?
Posted by: Seeryer | April 18, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Does the book mention the sanction of the enslavement of indigenous peoples by the Roman Catholic Church?
For profit.
Posted by: katie2 | April 18, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Birds of a feather flock together huh, well, he bow’s to arabs and bonds with dictators….nuff said.
Posted by: bluestarmom | April 18, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Excuse me while I go and throw up…
Posted by: R Garcia | April 18, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
truth has no affiliation:
I suggest you go buy the world a Coke and sing kumbaya. By the way could you do something about the direct flight that goes from Caracas to Tehran that transports uranium mined in Venezuela for Iranian enrichment?
Or could you help to support my friend in immigration court in the fall who is asking for political asylum in the U.S because he spoke out against Chavez’s government. If he is sent back, he, and his family, will be put into a hole from which they never will emerge (or worse).
Kumbaya.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
It is interesting to see the anti-republican comments being put out here in response to a story about Chavez putting a book into President Obama’s hands. The fact is that if a Republican speaks, it is immediately assailed by the left and criticized as being over-the-top and anti-American.
The response to these people is that we view your right to disagree as all fine and dandy, but you might want to take lessons in diplomacy and also to stop with the hate-talk. It has driven a wedge between us that might take a generation now to repair. We want nothing to do with Democrats now. Our take is that they support socialism/communism and this bit with the artificial criticism is a means of sealing the fate of the U.S. with a society where no diversity of opinion will be allowed in the future so that the Democratic voice will be the ONLY voice to be heard or sanctioned. The U.S. is headed into the abyss that Russia and China entered long ago.
As for Hugo Chavez, he is a traitor to his people and this stunt of his is only that. Personally, I am driving less and less so that I can stick it to him and his country by keeping the price of oil low.
Posted by: Jon | April 18, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
“”Trash America and apologize for how terrible we are.”"
_____________________
President and Mrs Obama are so retro. I was hoping for a young family in the White House.
Posted by: katie2 | April 18, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
I could care less what books a punk like Chavez gives Obama. Obama didn’t ask for it, Chavez gave it to him. What I do care about is that everytime Obama leaves the country he apologizes for how much he believes America sucks. He either beieives this or he is pandering to get applause. Either way it’s disgusting and has never been done by any other president.
Posted by: robtr | April 18, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
I hope Obama uses the pages of the book for toilet paper. That’s what it is good for.
Posted by: Jon | April 18, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Such a great man who cares only for the poor and struggling…this Hugo Chavez. He is a Hero to the world.
Posted by: dave | April 18, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
How many of you saw the video of John Ziegler getting handcuffed outside of the Annenberg School of Journalism earlier this week? Be prepared to see more of this kind of thing. The “to protest is patriotic crowd” seems to have changed their tune now.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
It saddens me that President Obama crossed the room to shake hands with this little thug. What saddens me more is that the people who voted for him don’t understand how weak it makes our President look to the world.
Posted by: Thunder | April 18, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Awesome… I wonder if Obama gave him the same thing? How embarrassing!
Posted by: J.C. | April 18, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Bluestarmom,
What did you think of W kissing the king of Saudi Arabia and holding his hand and also seeing into the soul of his good buddy Vlad Putin? I am curious to know.
Posted by: Seeryer | April 18, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Seeryer:
you are correct with your analysis, but you assume that many here actually read the documents they rant about, which of course they do not. They get their info from Rush, Hannity etc,, the proof is that they recite the same lines of attack they hear, they are unable to think for themselves, which is why you see so much ‘us & them’ and violent imagery from them.
careful analysis and thought takes a much greater effort and education than simply believing in a manufactured mythology about America to feel better about one’s self…….
On the extremes of political discourse, and religious zealotry, rational thought is absent,
Posted by: Mr. Tony | April 18, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Obama will read the book and he will love it. Chaves gave it to him so that he could write a book report on it in a month when he is done reading it. You liberals should be proud that Chavez is trying to give him pointers on how to be a good dictator. If Chavez is successful then in a few months you will not see any posts like this on the internet. You will not see Drudge on the internet either.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
” And why is it that every republican politician and supporter is automatically perfect in every way, simply because of their political affiliation? What childish thinking.”
*************
Truth has no affiliation, You sound childish. I haven’t met anyone Republican, Democrat or Independent that believes they are perfect in every way. I’m sure there are some out there, but they are not limited to one party or any party for that matter. Keep viewing the world in your narrow minded way.
Posted by: robin | April 18, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
What did you think of W kissing the king of Saudi Arabia and holding his hand and also seeing into the soul of his good buddy Vlad Putin? I am curious to know.
Posted by: Seeryer
It was certainly better than kissing Putin and seeing the soul of the Saudi king. That point notwithstanding, Saddam is still dead.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
“It saddens me that President Obama crossed the room to shake hands with this little thug. What saddens me more is that the people who voted for him don’t understand how weak it makes our President look to the world.”
Thunder … worse, it legitimizes a dictator and puts him on par with the President of the United States.
Posted by: m | April 18, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
This is not a party thing, this is shaking hands with a man who just two weeks ago called OUR President and idiot! Now as an American, this is unacceptable! But the President has been on an Apology Tour right now hoping for better relationships. Well Europe has not given us any support, nor has the Middle East. South America wants more hand outs and we want Chavez’s oil. But he has already bowed to the Saudi King…
Posted by: R Garcia | April 18, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Steve, it’s a wonder that the same refuse gets repackaged and resold as profound thought. That it’s arrived in this country with such and impact, with these cultist, is very creepy.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
robin:
re: Truth has no affiliation….
‘truth’ for the Taliban
‘truth’ for Americans
‘truth’ for N. Koreans
‘truth’ for Iraqis
‘truth’ for Palestinians
I could go on, but to which ‘absolute truth’ are you referring to?
Posted by: Mr. Tony | April 18, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Marx observed that the southern hemisphere went to the more capable.
Posted by: Mary Jo | April 18, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Marx observed that the southern hemisphere went to the more capable.
Posted by: Mary Jo
Was that Harpo or Goucho?
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Did anyone on President Chavez check with President Obama’s to make he didn’t already had a copy and read this? :-)
Posted by: JeffinSac | April 18, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
“Seeryer:
you are correct with your analysis, but you assume that many here actually read the documents they rant about, which of course they do not. They get their info from Rush, Hannity etc,, the proof is that they recite the same lines of attack they hear, they are unable to think for themselves, which is why you see so much ‘us & them’ and violent imagery from them.
careful analysis and thought takes a much greater effort and education than simply believing in a manufactured mythology about America to feel better about one’s self…….
On the extremes of political discourse, and religious zealotry, rational thought is absent,”
Mr. Tony … I have read the document; every single page (I’ve also read every single page of the “torture memos”, which clearly indicate that Bush did NOT torture – but I digress). If you’re read them, take a look at the top and bottom of each page, and the letters in front of each paragraph: It says FOUO or FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (the “torture memos” are TOP SECRET, and intentionally declassified by Obama, something the ACLU suit could not have forced – but I digress). The point is, DHS should never have released those reports, regardless of who commissioned them or what they contained. Now, before you lamely attempt to attack me for being an ignorant conservative that only gets my info from Rush or Hannity (neither of which I’ve ever listened to), know that I work for DHS and I know what our protocols are for FOUO documents. It’s marked FOUO so that it doesn’t end up in the public domain, but rather that it ends up in the hands of the officials that need it in order to do their jobs. It’s not a Republican/Democrat thing … be careful getting off your high horse (or high jackass as the case may be).
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
I agree with HenTraRob; no matter how you view the consequences of European colonialism in Latin America, this book represents a dominant view of the U.S. in L.A. and is thus an essential read for our politicians in dealing with the region.
And while I am not a fan of Obama, I don’t think he had any other choice than to accept it. I would be far more embarrassed of my president if he made an ass of himself refusing a gift from a foreign leader or, of all things, returning one…oh wait, he already did the latter.
Posted by: Denise | April 18, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
When do you think the light will go on and Obama will realize he is being played like a 3 string Banjo?
Posted by: Kenneth Bauman, Sr. | April 18, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Steve, Obama and his little lambs.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Disgusting butt-kissing between the two. I loathe Chavez, he’s scum on the bottom of a smeared gum in the bottom of a barrel.
Posted by: Rob | April 18, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Oh, for pity´s sake. What was he supposed to do, give Chavez a sock to the jaw, or tell him to shut up like the King of Spain did? Being civil and polite is diplomacy. It is also a way to confuse Chavez a bit. The British press is reporting that both Raul Castro and Lula told Chavez to cool the anti-US rhetoric but I see nothing about this in the US media. So is it true or not?
Posted by: BachisBest | April 18, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Chavez should have given Obama an IPod containing the best of his (and of Fidel’s) speeches.
Posted by: flopez111 | April 18, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Judge not, that ye be not judged.
For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.
Matthew, Chapter 7
Posted by: tim | April 18, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
“Disgusting butt-kissing between the two. I loathe Chavez, he’s scum on the bottom of a smeared gum in the bottom of a barrel.”
A common sentiment in Latin America … except in Venezuela where that sort of thinking is not permissible.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Two peas in a pod :)…Power Hungry Buffoons. They both appease the poor for their vote.
Posted by: ambsie | April 18, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
We need Obama. He is just what we need after eight years of Texas. Thank you Mr. President for making foreign policy and relations a priority. I want to travel freely in South America and around the world without being subject to Bush hate.
Posted by: Jesus is who he said he is | April 18, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
It is sad that our great leader is now accepting gifts from a thug dictator like Chavez. This only elevates Chavez in the world’s eye and shows more clearly what Obama really stands for. Obama warms relations with every two-bit dictator and communist leader. This makes him no better than they are.
Posted by: Mihann | April 18, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
MrBatman
I am reluctant to assume that you are DHS, merely on your say so in a public blog.
re: “clearly indicate that Bush did NOT torture”
‘clearly’, there are a great many who disagree legally with your obviously slanted analysis.
re: designations of ‘classified’ or ‘top secret’:
anything can be tagged with those terms whether they are secret and necessary for national security or not.
your point seems to be that Bush is clear of any torture charge because a document is labeled ‘FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY’… exactly how do you know for sure that Bush had nothing to do with policies for ‘torture’?
Posted by: Mr. Tony | April 18, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Both Chavez and Obama are dreadful curs who want to implement socialism/communism (both failed systems) in Venezuela and the United States. If the US is lucky, it will turn Congress around in 2010, and run Obama off in 2012. Pray for that to happen. When the people fear the government, you have tyranny; when the government fears the people, you have liberty. I’ll take liberty.
Posted by: William | April 18, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Interesting. A book like that, from Chavez, to Obama, and Chavez was integral, in the mass exodus of rich, and middle class from Venezuela. Integral in the control over the once free press. Integral in the massive poverty that now enslaves the people of Venezuela, to the government. The government decides who gets what, and how much? Where have I heard this before???
Posted by: Jeanie | April 18, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
This has to be a bad dream. No one can be this obtuse.
Posted by: ThorsHammer | April 18, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
obama already read it.
Posted by: colin flaherty | April 18, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
I am also detecting a rather pronounced case of that recently discovered disease called ‘Republican 8 year memory loss’ here.
Posted by: Mr. Tony | April 18, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Mr. Tony … I thought conspiracy theories were the sole province of the right, LOL? As for whether or not your believe I’m DHS is of no relevance to me. I’m not going to educate you on the policies of classification, declassification and protection of documents either – you can look it up and read it for yourself. But, those “torture memos” were LEGAL INTERPRETATIONS FROM DOJ. Just because someone doesn’t agree with it does not change that fact. The Bush administration sought out the proper legal channels for making a determination on whether or not those interrogation techniques violated US law or international treaty – the LEGAL INTERPRETATION is that they did not. They make be offensive to your soft sensibilities, but that does not change the LEGAL INTERPRETATION from the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. I can type in all caps all day, but people with BDS will never open their eyes or minds to anything that isn’t anti-Bush, pro-Obama. But that’s OK, we have a Constitution and Bill of Rights that protect your right to your opinion – and I love that about this country.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Steve,
It’s probably the business you’ve been doing for 30 years that’s helped to screw them! Where do you think the term banana republics came from? But this is not about being able to speak Spanish or working in South America. It’s about how we refurbish the image of America after it’s been gutted by Bush for the last eight years. In Iran, in Cuba, in Europe itself. Even your old buddy Nixon went to China at the height of the cold war and spoke to Mao–imagine that! Because even Nixon could see that China was a country that we needed to have relations with. Did all of you then condemn him for being a communist? Bring some perspective to your thinking.
Posted by: perumal11 | April 18, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
President Obama did the right thing in reaching out to Latin American leaders and being prepared to work for a better relations. He is also right in not rebuffing Hugo Chavez. The important question for us is: why are so many Latin American countries going leftist? This is what we want to stop! However, we must try to understand why—not in a politically astute way, but objectively. If not, we will be making a wrong problem diagnosis. On that, I recommend to President Obama and his Latin American specialist team a New York Times bestseller written by John Perkins titled The Secret History of the American Empire (Penguin Books, 2007). Perkins knows intimately what he is writing about and has an insider’s knowledge. He knows these countries well, have met with their leaders and peoples and have been very involved with many aspects of the US foreign policy and multinational corporations throughout the world. He had also served as a peace corps volunteer, later business leader and Chief Economist. President Obama is saying in effect, there is a better way than the hard policies of the past! Think of COUNTRIES in Latin America that have gone or leaning (or leaned in the past) leftist. They include Bolivia, Ecuador, Brazil, Cuba, Guatemala, Venezuela, Chile, Panama (under Gen. Torrijos), and most recently El Salvador. There is a better way to approach Latin America—one that will be a win-win for all–and that is what Obama is doing. Dwight Eisenhower, in his final address to the nation (Jan. 17/1961), spoke about the “military-industrial complex” and the use of American power to defend and foster America’s corporatocracy (often expoitative) abroad. It continues today as evidenced by massive arms dealings that fuel conflicts and crisis throughout the world, including “big gun” battles in Mexico. Military contractors and arm dealers work in concert with the NRA. Eisenhower had warned us, saying that “Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.” Why did he say that? This we must try to understand especially with respect to its impact on the American foreign policy. Are there lessons for Latin America? Plenty! I say all these not as a socialist, but a capitalist who fiercely believes in the American system as well peace and prosperity in all corners of the earth.
Posted by: Dr. Sam | April 18, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Sam, the problem with your analysis is that it ignores the fact that Obama is going there and dealing with Chavez not to try to curb his socialist appetite but to encourage it. Perhaps Obama is even learning from him and taking notes.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Mr. Tony … and just so you know: Nobody classifies a document without a very good reason. For example, go read the report about us right-wing loonies – notice that every paragraph starts with U/FOUO or some other combination of letters. When you classify a document, you must determine the classification level of each and every paragraph. It’s this level of effort and the security requirements that preclude an arbitrary classification of a document.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
R Garcia, it’s called having a man who is justifiably confident enough in himself that he doesn’t act like a 5-year-old on the playground when somebody calls him a name. All you clowns criticizing Obama, here’s a suggestion: spend the time looking at the mess you helped create through your support of Bush. Your fellow Americans will go to work cleaning up the mess you made. Thank you. That is all.
Posted by: Reality Check | April 18, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
your point seems to be that Bush is clear of any torture charge because a document is labeled ‘FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY’… exactly how do you know for sure that Bush had nothing to do with policies for ‘torture’?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Per a story on the Washington Times…
“President Obama’s executive order closing CIA “black sites” contains a little-noticed exception that allows the spy agency to continue to operate temporary detention facilities abroad. ”
Can we be so certain that interrogations aren’t still going on, under Obama?
I find it irresponsible of Obama to have made public the memos. It puts our military, and CIA in a very vulnerable position. Which begs the question…just whose side is Obama on? He did say he’d stand with the Muslims if it came to that, in his book.
Posted by: Jeanie | April 18, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Dr. Sam … Just think of the countries in North America that are leaning leftist: The United States of America.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Sacramento Conservative, ah yes, of course…Obama wants to turn the whole world into a socialist banana republic. Pretty soon we’ll all be working in a gulag. Good Lord, what is wrong with the school system in Sacramento? I know there are budget cuts across the state now but that can’t excuse your education. And don’t forget, better go buy 100 guns today because Obama’s gonna change the law tomorrow.
Posted by: REality Check | April 18, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Reality Check, time for a reality check. Look at the mess that Barny’s Frank and Chris “Countrywide” Dodd made. Look up the hearings on Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac that go all the way back to 1999 and look who is opposed to investigating and re-regulating them. My guess is you haven’t and you won’t. You will continue to blame Bush for the housing crash and the banks mess when in fact Bush made statements about FM & FM being a potential disaster as early as 2000.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
good day to all
Posted by: Mr. Tony | April 18, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
I have never heard of that book by Chavez, but I’m sure it must deal with the imperialism and genocide of the Spanish of the Inca’s, Aztec’s and the Mayan’s. I wish they were our neighbors to the south rather than what we now have.
Posted by: MaryAnne B. Phillips | April 18, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
“I find it irresponsible of Obama to have made public the memos. It puts our military, and CIA in a very vulnerable position. Which begs the question…just whose side is Obama on? He did say he’d stand with the Muslims if it came to that, in his book.”
Jeanie … Very good point. It also begs the question: when America is involved in 2 wars (sorry, OCOs), and the ACLU lawsuit could not have forced the declassification of those memos, why did Obama release them? It only limits our options in dealing with an enemy that has no limits.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Bachisisbest, an enlightening resolution:
“What is he supposed to do: give him a sock in the jaw?” If any two deserved a sock in the jaw, both of them do!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Perhaps Sarkozy will give him a sock in the jaw? It is sad when we need to rely on France for distributing international justice.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Why would Obama need a copy of the book? He’s already the lead actor in the movie.
The fact that Obama legitimizes communism this way is discouraging. But the fact that socialist Dems in our country defend and support this behavior is revealing about their intent.
There is no Democratic party any longer. All that is left is the extreme socialist ideology you have been indoctrinated with.
The one that labels Americans as terrorist and real terrorists strikes as “man made disasters”.
All while you cheer them on.
What tools you are.
Foolish.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Sacramento Conservative, pas de tout, they helped us out in the Revolutionary War with LaFayette
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Yes, waiting 200 years for them to come around again is a bit much though.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Reality Check … What mess? Please put some “Reality” in your statements. What mess did Bush create that Obama has to correct by shaking hands and taking a book from a dictator that is despised around the world? Or is it something else? I seriously doubt that you will be doing any “cleaning up” of Bush’s mess (whatever that is). I blame Bush for being at the helm when the economic crisis hit (a real leader shoulders all responsibility, and does not blame others for failings), but he didn’t cause it (I’m sure you’ll disagree, so prove it). Really, I’m just trying to understand reality as you see it … so please, some examples based in reality?
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I am sure that B.O. had read it back in junior high.
Posted by: Alton | April 18, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Mr. Batman:
Thanks for your note. Just try to think outside of the box for a minute.
Again, thanks.
Posted by: Dr. Sam | April 18, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Sacramento Conservative, what is a long time in our eyes, is nothing in Our Lord’s
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Research people: BO(acronym pun intended)
coauthored this book
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Dr. Sam … Thanks for the condescension, it’s fun … it doesn’t make you right, but it’s fun.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Sac Conservative: you can’t possibly believe that had Bush wanted to regulate the housing markets (and more importantly the derivatives markets), that little Barney Frank and Chris Dodd would have stood in the way. Come on. What you’re saying is that little Barney and silly Chris had Bush in check? Oh my sides are hurting from the laughter. The Oakland school system couldn’t have failed you that badly. You do realize that (1) Republicans controlled Congress until the beginning of 2007 and that (2) even at the beginning of 2007 and beyond, the margin was so slim in the Senate that nothing could happen w/out Bush’s approval. Further, you have got to be engaging in some fantastical trip of creativity to forget that Bush got through Congress whatever he wanted to get through Congress until 2006. I know Sean and Rush tell you to blame Frank and Dodd, but come on. Think for yourself. Have more pride than that.
Posted by: REality Check | April 18, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
A liberal’s idea of diplomacy: “shut up, I’m talking!”
A liberal’s idea of dealing with Iran’s nuke policy: “leave them alone, they’re busy”
A liberal’s idea of action: “not now, I’m watching American Idol”
A liberal’s idea of peace: “Terrorist should have US rights, the unborn has no rights.”
A liberal’s idea of stimulus: “I have a tingly feeling running up my leg”
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Dr. Sam … Just out of curiosity, do you have any actual experience working with the Governments in Latin America? Have you been to all those countries you mentioned and seen their histories first-hand? Or, are you just quoting your Perkin’s book? (consider this a loaded question)
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Batman, it’s quite simple. The Executive Branch in our system of government is responsible for enforcing our laws and regulating financial markets. When the Executive Branch detests all oversight and regulation, none occurs. And an utter mess develops. I am a huge proponent of capitalism, and have worked in business (and the financial markets) most of my life. But capitalism ONLY works when those getting the reward take the risk. What we had the past eight years was privatization of reward and nationalization of risk. You’ve got to be just as hot about it as I am, aren’t you? After all, it’s OUR tax dollars that are cleaning up the mess while those who created it are counting their money. And the only way that situation developed was with an Executive Branch who looked the other way while banks leveraged 40:1 and massive systemic cancers such as AIG developed. It’s amazing to think but in the long view of history, Bush’s blunder in Iraq may look mild compared to his utter negligence regarding the domestic economy.
Posted by: Reality Check | April 18, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Correction: But they can’t, because their very currency in the market of ideas..
Posted by: José A. Amorós | April 18, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Danny Vice … one edit to your post:
“A liberal’s idea of action: “not now, I’m watching American Idol: The Presidential Edition”
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Enough is enough, let’stop the hate and become real brothers.
Posted by: efren montes | April 18, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
sorry about all the typos…it was a moment of passion. God bless America!
Posted by: mister may | April 18, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Is everyone kidding me right now? What do you mean “if they don’t use what they have in their backyard they are stupid”???? It’s not that simple. Educate yourself. I’m in a hurry right now so I don’t want to get into details. This deserves more attention indeed. But come on…! I repeat, educate yourself. Yuck.
Posted by: Patricia | April 18, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
montes….It is not hate, just a disagreement. It happens in every family. Get off your soppy high horse…please!
Posted by: mister may | April 18, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Well, I thought the Demi-Dems said that Hillary or Barrack (as prez or sos) were just going to be SO Good as international politicians & diplomats that all our problems would just ‘melt away’ as soon as they were on the scene. President Bush was just such an ‘Evil Doer’ that none of his approaches or assessments could possibly be correct. You know, Bush was just ‘SO Mean & Hateful’ and that was why there were Bad People in the world…………..You mean to tell me that some Bad Guys are just So Bad that they will not listen to kind words, Liberalistic Humanitarianism, and behind the scenes Political Niceties…………..
You mean to tell me that these Bad Guy World Leaders just could not feel the ‘Warm Glow’ coming off of Obama as he spoke……….. The world just loved Obum SO much (prior to the election), and now they just seem to be turning on him — Well Imagine That.
You don’t think that some of those countries Favored him because they thought that he was so Inexperienced and Nice (Nice in his Naiveté) that he would just be too Slow and Nice in his approach that the situation would be over before he knew what hit him. You don’t think that some of those countries wanted a US Prez that promoted diplomacy so much that he would be easily Run Over, as Iran’ plays’ with him and Russia & China are up to their usual tricks (including toying with our ships at sea); and now Chavez talks behind his back, makes faces at him and ‘hand delivers’ pieces of propaganda right under his nose.
(welcome to the ‘real world’ libbies)
Posted by: Mr Reality | April 18, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Reality Check … From the Constitution of the United States:
“The CONGRESS shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and
Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general
Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be
uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;”
Note that it’s the Legislative Branch (Congress), not the Executive Branch (President) that deals in monetary policy. If you want to see what the President is responsible for, please read Article 2 of the Constitution.
Now, considering that the financial meltdown started about a year ago, and the Democrats were in control of the Congress for 3 years now, blaming Bush seems to be lacking in Reality.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
It is also the presidents duty to ensure the hiring and firing of corporate executives and ensure that they carry out the responsibilities of the corporation in a “Green” way.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
You guys are missing the point. Obama is changing the face of the nation.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Do all the Challenges to the US (at the moment – & now Chavez’s attitude toward Obama and more from N. Korea) mean that the world does not respect Obama. They didn’t challenge Bush to this degree ever, and when they did challenge him he let them know he would not put up with it – Showing what it means to have a strong leader.
At least so far (and maybe in reality) Obum is a weakling. Will he let the world run over us (is that why the world favored him SO much)………………… You see you Infantile Liberals; Bush was rising to the occasion (and McCain would have also) more than you would have ever known, ‘Otherwise’. Now we have a wimp (giving in to the world on so many different fronts).
Lets see if he can develop a backbone???????????
So far the answer is basically NO.
Posted by: Mr Reality | April 18, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Reality Check … What blunder in Iraq? Are you referring to the 12 UN Resolutions that threated military action (and we were signatory to), Saddam ignored? Or the Kurds who are safe now that Saddam can’t kill them anymore? Or the fact that there’s a Democracy in Iraq now? Or was the blunder when Clinton (the Secretary of State) and Biden (Vice President), when faced with the same evidence that Bush had, voted “YEA” on the war in Iraq? Or, maybe the blunder was in paying for oil from Iraq, even though we could have taken as much as we wanted. Yeah, that Bush was one evil dude.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Hey Stormin1961, I wonder if you were so kindhearted to our former president? I wonder if you railed against all your liberal buddies when they were calling President Bush a Nazi and equating him to Hitler? Somehow, I doubt it!
I can tell that your understanding of International Politics is as strong as your hypocrisy. As a leader of a nation, from WHOM you accept gifts is just as important as the gifts themselves. The message Chaves was giving Obama with the gift of that book was that he (as well as Americans in general) were ignorant of Latin American History. AND the fact that he gave him an edition printed entirely in Spanish was another little slap that he should learn more.
International Politics are full of subtext and innuendos.
Posted by: stormin1963 | April 18, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
stormin1963 … You’re spot-on.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
I’m guessing Chavez just wants the anointed one’s autograph on the book.
Posted by: Independent | April 18, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
“We have at times been disengaged, and at times we sought to dictate our terms,” Obama said to loud applause. “But I pledge to you that we seek an equal partnership. There is no senior partner and junior partner in our relations.”
Our leader … blaming his predecessors and pledging to diminish America’s standing in the world. Successful diplomacy is about delicate negotiating from a position of strength – Obama just leveled the playing field. So much for American Exceptionalism … we’re the equal of El Salvador, or Bolivia, or Venezuela now.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
If Brazil doesn’t want to produce Orange Juice concentrate and Argentina doesn’t want to produce beef then they are free not to. Who is forcing them to supply us with a thing?
Posted by: Dennis D | April 18, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Hugo Chavez hates America. He is our enemy. No he just didn’t hate Bush. His inflamatory general Anti American statements are well documented. Instead of shaking his hand Obama should have SPAT in his FACE.
Posted by: Dennis D | April 18, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Mr Reality,
I wouldn’t equate world leaders challenging of Obama with a lack of respect for him. Perhaps they never engaged Bush in such dialogue because a relevant and organized response requires intelligence, critical and complex thinking ability.
Posted by: Lori | April 18, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Batman, 3 points: First, go back and read your own copy/paste from the Constitution. It addresses NOTHING of what I said. The Executive Branch is responsible for regulating the markets. Taxes have nothing to do with it. Second, I’m going to give you credit for being brighter than your post would suggest. If you don’t understand that the current meltdown was created NOT 8 months ago but over the past 8 years, I’m afraid you’re beyond help. Third, that line about “everybody read the intelligence” is so idiotic, it’s laughable. WHO WROTE THE Powerpoint that everyone based their decision on? Of course everyone came to the same conclusion. It was based on ginned up evidence. Come on, don’t make yourself for a fool.
Posted by: Reality Check | April 18, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
If everyone was honest… They’d have to admit that Republicans who had congress and the white house locked up made some serious mistakes.
Now that the Dems have everything locked up, they are skyrocketing into socialism.
This is why our founding fathers worked so hard to create a balance of power. Our government was never meant to be enrun by any one political party.
It doesn’t work that way… it falls apart.
It’s vital that we get back to balance, let the discourse calm down and then undo the spending legislation that hasn’t taken place yet.
We need to reset things and get back to gridlock in 2012..
Do things get done in congress as quickly? Absolutely not.
But this forces congress to have a full and complete debate on a subject before rushing into legislation on ANY matter.
.
Posted by: Dancnkc | April 18, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Did Barak give him a copy of his America bashing book in exchange for Chavez’s America bashing book? Perhaps he can give the copy to Jerimiah Wright and he preach this Sunday”s sermon out of it. Black church’s have become democratic party voting booths, I am sure God is proud of their progress.
Posted by: George | April 18, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Lori, it also requires an “inhalator”.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Dear President Obama, please read this book and start GUIDE the US govt’s to a morally and etically correct direction. Your work on Cuba is very promising.
You consider all humans equal. This book expounds forced unequality among nations in the eye of US govt.- Dead WRONG.
Posted by: Tariq Ahmed | April 18, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Reality Check wrote:”The Executive Branch is responsible for regulating the markets.”
In a fascist nation, yes. In the socialist dream world of Obama and the Democrat buffoons in Congress, potentially. But not in the Constitutional Republic described by our Constitution.
Posted by: JonT | April 18, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
The only liberal I knew that hated “Taxes” was dyslexic.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
MrBatman
-your faith in the term ‘LEGAL INTERPRETATION’ as a defacto ‘get out of jail free’ card for Bush with regard to ordering torture is somewhat disheartening, one only needs to review recent and past American history to see that ‘LEGAL INTERPRETATION’ as you put it makes slavery, segregation and repression of other minorities possible… indeed, one can examine history and find ‘LEGAL INTERPRETATION’ used for much of the carnage throughout history.
But, Bush is your guy so he has to be right.
BTW: your knowledge of the minutiae of classification terminology is almost overwhelming..
..I’m certainly glad that all those WMD’s were found by Bush & Rumsfeld, and that after 3 1/2 years into the Iraq war and sacrificing thousands of Americans, Bush changed his faith/oil oriented war to a more tactical military campaign run by the military.
and now.. good day once again…..
Posted by: Mr. Tony | April 18, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Obama and Chavez have a lot in common. They both hate America, were happy when the economy colapsed and blame america for the world’s problems.
Posted by: Judy | April 18, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
The difference between Obama and Chavez is: Obama thins he rode a donkey into town (Biblical reference) and Chavez just thinks he owns everyones donkey.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Obammy and Chavez be lookin like blood bros.
Posted by: WorldclaZZ | April 18, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
America definitely has a dark side that needs to be exposed:
Nancy, Harry, Barney, Chris, Barry, Hillary & Waxman. Their political intentions are truly nefarious.
Posted by: IC Atlanta | April 18, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Reality Check = Olberman/ “Madcow” Maddow. Hmmm… who is using buzzwords?
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Mr. Tony -Constantly looking back at what Bush did, to justify Obama’s destructive behavior is unproductive.
Bush gave us Tarp 1. It was the first installment in the disrobing of our constitution and government.
Obama, unhappy with disrobing a little, went into a full burlesque of our country’s constitution – Blasting our country into socialism and attacking Americans instead of the enemy.
No need to sing the song, dude. We know how the song is sung.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Do a search on profile of a sociopath and see who fits the bill.
Posted by: Landry | April 18, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Made me nauseous to see Obama shaking Chavez’ hand.
Are we going to put money into these America-hating countries to use against us?
I’m worried.
Posted by: Tex | April 18, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
The new three stooges “Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Obama”
Posted by: unscrupulousmedia | April 18, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Danny Vice, you do remember that Obamessiah gallantly strode into the white house and brokered the bail-out agreement? He is as much to blame for the first as he is for all the rest. Seeing as how Turbo Tax Cheat Tiny-Tim Gerbals help him negotiate it and was installed by Obama, Obama gets all the blame.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Mr Reality,
My statement wasn’t about Hitler or propaganda. But since YOU brought him up, to the millions of innocent Iraqis who were managing to live a decent or even semi-decent life before the unwarranted invasion, BUSH MAY HAVE WELL HAS BEEN HITLER!
Posted by: Lori | April 18, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
How do you rob a country? You do it with the assistance of 68 million people. Gratz ACORN!
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
It just amazes me how much republicans hate , simply hate obama , I wonder if it is because of race or simply because he is a democrat, for the most of you seems to simply think that there is no chance of a good democrat president to ever exist. You complaint about Obama being polite. How about Bush not reading the CIA reports to got us to 9-11, then again you might say that we have not been attacked since then but what about our allies remember??? Madrid , London ??? and not to mention Irak, remember irak is our responsibility now. The world doesn,t respect Obama , Chavez called Bush the Devil here in American soil remember.
Commmon accept it you guys just whant a republican president no matter if its ronald mc donald .
Posted by: ozwizard | April 18, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
It’s kinda funny. One minute my comments were on the board, now they are missing. I truly do not understand how the supposedly open minded people in this country, especially a supposed objective press.
Posted by: barackem | April 18, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
We already have Ronald McDonald as president.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
are ready to shut down free speech.
Posted by: barackem | April 18, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
I can’t believe I sit here and read these comments. Does anyone get their news from any other source than Fix News?
Posted by: morethanfixnewsoutthere | April 18, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
It is just because of race that republicans hate Obama. It has nothing to do with him wanting to socialize our country, shut down the coal industry, fire CEOs of private corporations, criminalize conservatism and shake hands with terrorists and dictators.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Sure is nice of BO to give Chavez a nice propaganda picture that he can use in his own country to legitimize his shutting down the opposition news press and taking over private businesses
Posted by: unscrupulousmedia | April 18, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Republicans are marginalizing themselves. I know you can see it Jake Tapper. Did you see all those racist signs at those Tea Parties…it was more like an anti-Obama movement sponsored by Fox news or more like a KKK rally. The republican party is destroying itself. I see Chavez and Obama’s meeting as good for America. All those individuals who were at the Tea Parties would have rather have Bush be President…now what does that say about them?? Jake Tapper….I know you know what I’m talking about!!
Posted by: Shelley | April 18, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Lori … people like you are truly scary! Do you know ANY history of the Iraq War, or of Iraq before the War?
Consider this: FORMER Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein has admitted ordering the attack that killed more than 180,000 Kurds, an official of the Iraqi Special Tribunal said yesterday.
Not only did he admit ordering the attack against Kurds in the north of the country, but he boasted that the killings were legal and justified.
Today, there’s a functioning democracy in Iraq and people are free – something that never existed under Saddam Hussein. And you think Bush may as well have been Hitler – are you deranged?
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Shelley … Please explain why you think the Obama-Chavez relationship is good for America.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Batman, agree w/ you about the causes, although I’d add the bill snuck in by Phil Gramm at the 23rd hour of Clinton’s Administration that allowed hedge funds and derivatives to largely escape oversight (just as much Clinton’s fault as Gramm’s). Bottom line is probably that the whole lot is to blame in DC. It may be just as fallacious to pin all the blame on Bush as it is to say it was Barney Frank and Chris Dodd’s fault (which is a ridiculously silly argument, no matter what you think of those two –> I’m no fan either). We still disagree about the Executive Branch’s role in regulating markets but I’ll leave that be for now.
Posted by: Reality Check | April 18, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
JAKE TAPPER:: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS JEALOUS OF OBAMA…PLAIN AND SIMPLE!!! I CALL IT HOW I SEE IT! OBAMA HAS DONE MORE IN EIGHTY SOMETHING DAYS THAT BUSH HAS 8 YEARS….THEY ARE SOO AFRAID THAT OBAMA WILL BECOME ONE OF THE GREATEST U.S. PRESIDENTS AND THEY ARE IRATE ABOUT IT B/C HE IS BLACK. I AM A WHITE WORKING CLASS INDIVIDUAL AND CAN SEE RIGHT THROUGH THESE STUPID REPUBLICANS WHO HATE OBAMA B/C HE IS BLACK….PLAIN AND FRIKKIN SIMPLE.
Posted by: KEVIN | April 18, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Obama doesn’t care who he buddies up to including America haters like Chavez. Now I’m beginning to understand his like of Wright, Ayres, etc. He’ll visit Iran next bringing lots of toys and goodies.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
For me personally, race has nothing to do with why I dislike obamamessiah so much, it is his agenda that I can’t take. I wonder if we are looking at the antichrist?
Posted by: Hillary C | April 18, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Yeah, Obama has done more than Bush did… 5 trillion more than Bush did.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
BTW Batman, I was a lifelong Republican until the past few years when I could no longer blindly salute while Bush went off the rails. My disgust of Bush has just as much to do with what he’s done to the Republican Party as to what he’s done to the country.
Posted by: Reality Check | April 18, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Now you are talking sense reality check.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
“Republicans are marginalizing themselves. I know you can see it Jake Tapper. Did you see all those racist signs at those Tea Parties…it was more like an anti-Obama movement sponsored by Fox news or more like a KKK rally. The republican party is destroying itself. I see Chavez and Obama’s meeting as good for America. All those individuals who were at the Tea Parties would have rather have Bush be President…now what does that say about them?? Jake Tapper….I know you know what I’m talking about!!”
I totally agree. “Fixed Noise” refused to show the racists sign but thanks to other news outlets I seen exactly what those tea partiers were…RACIST!! The ones Sarah Palin calls “Real Americans.” Jake I know you seen it too!!
Posted by: J | April 18, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Fact. liberals have been heard by more viewers via the F@x News Network, than by any other cable news source.
Now which one of you libs want to challenge me on this?
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Reality Check … It’s just crazy for anyone to blame the economic crisis on any one individual … except that Bush is accountable because it started on his watch. But that means that Obama is accountable now that he’s responsible … and any decent leader doesn’t blame others (as he’s doing) for what their accountable for. Can you name one time when Bush blamed Clinton for anything, or denigrated the United States on the world stage? I pose the same challenge about the regulation of the markets – I’d be happy to admit that I’m wrong if you can show me a passage in the Constitution that delegates the direct regulation of the markets to the President. If it doesn’t, he doesn’t have that authority and shouldn’t be exercising it (firing the CEO of GM?).
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
ozwizard, I voted for Obama but find his embrace of socialist and communist leaders troubling. I find his embrace of Lula’s comments about white people with blue eyes being the cause of the world’s economic meltdown despicable. You might be surprised how many Republicans disliked Bush and his deficit spending. This is not party politics.
Obama has been a major disappointment to those of us who crossed the aisle to vote for a man we thought would help end racial division rather than yucking it up. A man who promised money for infrastructure but largely gave more to upside down government reward systems. A man who embraced capitalism but has done nothing but apologize for it since becoming president. A man who wants to be equal partners with socialists and communists instead recognizing that leadership came from free people and capitalist ideals, not oppression or Latin American style, Che inspired, “people’s” movements.
Posted by: barackem | April 18, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
That was full of typos!
Reality Check … It’s just crazy for anyone to blame the economic crisis on any one individual, except that Bush is accountable because it started on his watch. But that means that Obama is accountable now that he’s the President. A decent leader never blames others (as he’s doing) for what they’re accountable for. Can you name one time when Bush blamed Clinton for anything, or denigrated the United States on the world stage?
I pose the same challenge about the regulation of the markets – I’d be happy to admit that I’m wrong if you can show me a passage in the Constitution that delegates the direct regulation of the markets to the President. If it doesn’t, he doesn’t have that authority and shouldn’t be exercising it (firing the CEO of GM?).
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Obama continues his apology tour of the world: “We have been too easily distracted by other priorities and failed to see that our own progress is tied directly to progress through the Americas.” So who’s Obama apologizing on behalf of this time? Could it be those who are delaying signing free trade treaties with our friendly allies, Panama and Columbia? And who would those foot-draggers be? None other than Obama, his hit-woman Pelosi, and their union constituents.
Posted by: judithod | April 18, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
republicans are destroying the party b/c now all that independents see from them are racist (see tea party) and un-american remarks (see, gov perry from TX). they wont control the white house or congress for a while. the only republican i hear who makes sense is not even a public official…megan mccain. its true!
Posted by: Peter | April 18, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Here is a prime example of liberal truth. “global warming” disproven. “climate change” inserted as new lib buzz word. Need anyone say more?
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Peter. point to news article showing unaltered, unfaked picture of anything racist that went on at said tea party. Prove it or step down.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
It’s so “wonderful” to see our President has such an affinity for sociopaths, tyrants, and despots like Hugo Chavez.
Posted by: Joe C | April 18, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
I feel we can have a great country with Obama’s leadership. The paranoid, uneducated clowns can move out of the U.S. if they don’t like it. Sound familiar?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
joe bobos, think that the aforesaid was that intelligent? then why didn’t you move during Bush’s term?
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
“The paranoid, uneducated clowns can move out of the U.S. if they don’t like it.”
Well sure. But since that’s your base, it will adversely effect your winning future elections. Not to mention most other countries want their emigrants to be productive, tax paying citizens.
Posted by: buzz | April 18, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
On the other hand, consider the Nations of Southern Europe that founded modern Latin America. They have not performed well in adapting to modern industrial society either. At least not as much as the nations of northern Europe. There might simply be a much deeper cultural ineptitude at play here than overt racism or colonialism. Their culture simply does not compete well against others. Are we anglo-Americans to hobble our own civilization to accmoodate that of others?
Posted by: Stan | April 18, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
The magic will come in about 3 years, 3 months when we vote this dolt out of office.
Posted by: rplat | April 18, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
MrBatman. Yes. I can. When Bush “went it alone” in Iraq he denigrated America in front of the world. When Bush refused to sign the Kyoto protocol, banned federal funding for stem cell research, and altered scientific studies to meet his own agenda he denigrated America in front of the world. Bush spent 8 years denigrating America in front of the world. Finally we have a president who is intelligent and understands that we are a part of the global community. It is not un-American to recognize that every country can be better, including our own. Those were the principles America was founded on- to constantly strive to lead the world in ethics, science, medicine, technology, education, and so on. We are sorely lacking and if we want to continue to be a global leader, then we will need to continue to reflect on our mistakes and discover new ways to improve upon our weaknesses. Being arrogant and stubborn and continuing in this belief that the status quo is acceptable as the right wing of the Republican party so desires will get us no where. Thankfully, the majority of Americans agree.
Posted by: Dukie | April 18, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
THIS MESSAGE IS FOR—>Danny Vice. YOU WANTED TO SEE THE RACISTS SIGNS…go to huffpost b/c i tried posting the exact link here but it wouldn’t let me…when you get on the sight look to the right under “most popular on huff post” the subject is “ten most offensive signs” <–click on that. THEN YOU'LL SEE THE HATRED AND THE RIGHT WING RADICALS!
THIS MESSAGE IS ALSO FOR ALL THOSE FOLKS WHO WATCHED FIXED NOISE AND WEREN'T SHOWN THE RACIST SIGNS…
Posted by: J | April 18, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
It’s funny how the conservative sheep always use the term “drinking the kool-aid,” when in fact it is them who get all of their paranoid, world is coming to an end, government is against you garbage from talk radio and fox news. They all think alike. It reminds me of the Peoples Temple under Jim Jones, THE PEOPLE WHO DRANK THE KOOL-AID. Their leader got them to drink Kool-aid by using fear tactics, just like the fox news sheep.
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Reality Check … It may surprise you to know that I’ve always been, and will always be, an Independent. I don’t allow myself to become polarized over party lines. I will take a side on each issue, but I don’t side with a party.
I’m not a Bush loyalist, but I can’t justify the thrashing that he’s taken from the Left. What’s ironic is that now Obama is taking the same thrashing from the Right, and the Left thinks it’s unfair!
This country was united after 9/11, but look where we are now. The war in Iraq is polarizing to be sure, but that’s truly another case of shared responsibility between the Left and the Right – but Bush shoulders the accountability (rightfully). I just don’t think he should shoulders all the blame.
I truly dislike Obama’s policies, not only the excessive spending, but also his foreign policy of appeasement (which it truly is). I’m not a racist (I’m in a mixed marriage), or unpatriotic (I’ve served and defended this country for over 20 years now), because I dislike his policies – I’m simply exercising my freedom to have my own thoughts (which I wish so many Obamatrons would do too).
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
“The magic will come in about 3 years, 3 months when we vote this dolt out of office.”
One and done: quick bread prez!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
There was nothing “Unamerican” about what Governor Perry said. In fact, though I’m a Republican and support the War in Iraq, I believe that those opposing the war had every right to openly do so. The labeling of our fellow Americans as “Unamerican” unless they are someone like Bill Ayers who actively sought to murder police men or the unibomber. Political views are ideas and the openness of ideas from the beginning of the renaissance in England through the enlightenment brought us the blessings of our God-given rights to self-government and freedom of religion that we enjoy today.
If in fact our government were to behave like that of Hugo Chavez or were to continue or intensify illegitimate actions of both the Bush and the Obama Administrations with Congress failing to rein the Executive in and the Executive trampling over our political rights, than the government is acting illegitimately and must be brought down.
Our framers crafted our Constitution to have a diffesed – not a Unitary – central government with much left open to the states and the people themselves. We as Americans reject true “Unamerican” concepts like central economic planning and divine right of kings. Our God-given or “natural rights” are under attack by people who believe our Constitutional and Federal Republic is “antiquated” to govern effectively in the modern world. This is a lie and we should reject it.
Posted by: Joe C. | April 18, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
My super-liberal inlaws basically achieved a sexual high over Obama. On Easter all I heard from them was that they were disappointed in his job so far. Sorry guys, I think your average non-blogging working schmoe that voted for this dood is not happy now. They could give two shats what Bushco did. They care about what can be done now. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Ya can’t fix inflation with inflation.
As for the tea parties, you are fooling yourself if you think that they were a purely right wing phenomenon. I met some really nice Dems at the party in Sacramento. There were blacks,asians, whites and latinos there. All concerned about spending.
Let’s follow the govt lead and borrow all the money you can from anyone who will lend it to you, friends family bookies whatever. Pack on debt to outragous levels. See if that helps your individual plight.
Posted by: Ryan | April 18, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
” When Bush refused to sign the Kyoto protocol, banned federal funding for stem cell research, and altered scientific studies to meet his own agenda he denigrated America in front of the world. Bush spent 8 years denigrating America in front of the world.”
Oh give me a freaking break. Clinton also refused to present Kyoto to the Congress (never got to the not-signing point for either president), Bush never banned federal funding for stem cell research, in fact there was zero funding for stem cell research previous to Bush. You really need to read those talking points a bit better. Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about on anything.
Posted by: buzz | April 18, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Most of you only have an argument because fox news and conservative media told you how to think.
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
joe bobos … Just for your information, the reason that “Drink the Kook-Aid” reminds you of Jim Jones is because that’s where the expression came from. Perhaps you should drink less of it learn more about it.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Obama doesn’t need this book. He has an entire library full of similar screeds and he has read every one of them.
Posted by: Annie | April 18, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Most of you only have an argument because fox news and conservative media told you how to think.
Posted by: joe bobos | Apr 18, 2009 3:52:40 PM
bobos the clown telling us how to think!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
joe bobos—-and who told you how to think?
Posted by: Hillary C | April 18, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
I like Annie. And I have to say, the media commented often during the RNC/DNC conventions how much classier and prettier the conservative women were. That’s because they respect and care for themselves. Libs – enjoy your Rosie O’Donnell and Rosanne Barr
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Mr. batman, duh. That is what I’m saying. Conservatives use that phrase to refer to patriotic people who support the president when in fact, they are the ones “drinking the Kool-Aid by buying into false hysteria and propaganda initiated by the NRA and fox news.
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
“I feel we can have a great country with Obama’s leadership. ” — Sir, are you serious. Some, unlike Michlle Obama and yourself, apparently, have always seen our country — and especially its ideals of limited government — as great. I guess it depends on what you mean by “great”.
Posted by: Joe C. | April 18, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
J – I saw your malattempt to lure me to that cess pool you call the Huffington Post. That’s like me using sesame street as an example of a hard news item. Please reference a real news source, not an idiotic hit blog.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
bobos the clown, ever heard of:”Caviat emptor”??? No, didn’t think so
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Obama is looking for some pointers from Chavez on how to abolish term limits and how to destroy the free press.
Posted by: Right Wing Extremist | April 18, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
This photo of Presidents Obama and Chavez can be viewed as a new beginning, rather than with derision or fear. President Obama hinted during his campaign that the USA needs new and different perspectives in dealing with the world from those who did not have the advantages of wealth and privilege as those did before him.
What strongly works in our favor as Americans and as a Nation is we have a person of color as our President. Accordingly, an African American (or a woman had Hillary Clinton won) would set entirely new dynamics for discourse and diplomacy with other nations. I strongly feel that the people of many countries will relate and feel far more kinship in dealing with President Obama than not. In essence, a person of color as the leader of the free world can take us to new unexplored heights if we allow the concepts to flourish.
Remember, the majority of the world”s people are either racially or ethnically black, brown, red or yellow. As such, people of color far outnumber Caucasians worldwide. Wouldn’t it be in our best interests to have a person of color as our leader with the intellect, personality, political finesse, financial reach and military strength to justly deal with other nations? To accomplish what President Obama has says so much about Americans and gives hope to those who had no reason. Can we not see this for what it is and use it effectively to better our country and the world? someone gave this too me I thought it ws very good and thought I would share
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
J … What’s not racist about 96% of blacks voting for Obama? All of the other demographics voted fairly close to overall election results, but blacks were skewed hard left. That implies that race was a significant factor in their vote. Why is it OK to support someone because of their skin color, but it’s not OK to oppose someone because of their skin color? I’m suggesting that neither should happen and that a person should be judged and voted for on their merits alone.
I wanted to be at the tea parties for the simply reason that I don’t believe in what this administration is doing to our country. They are spending obscene amounts of money without due deliberation or consideration of the impact their actions will have on the future.
Simple fact: Obama’s (and Bush’s) debt will have to be paid back, and since every penny of government money comes from taxpayers – the taxpayers are going to shoulder the burden. That’s worth protesting about.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Danny Vice, elementary school, high school, college, graduate school, my parents, my own observations have all formed my thinking. Not fake news channels.
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
BTW, Ariana Huffington is Greek, her real last name is: Stassinopoulos
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Dang, those were some good pictures… it is funny how none of them were racist.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Maybe they thought that this Black man was a better candidate that McCain and Palin!
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
How can any intelligent American defend Obama palling around with Chavez?
If your love for Obama, or kneejerk hatred of anyone who criticizes him, blinds you to the point where you can’t acknowledge an error in judgement like this, then it shows you are just a liberal tool – and a bigot.
Posted by: I must be hallucinating | April 18, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Right wing extremist, are you referring to all of the sheriff auction homes left over from the Bush era?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Ariana Stassinopoulos, not Ariana Huffington. That’s why she has that funny accent. Import
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
L. Moore. How very “Carter” of you. He spouted the same blather over and over and over while Americans were being held hostage.
The UN spouted the same blather for two years before the Rwanda genocide happened.
Clinton followed the same ideology before Somali… Do you have anything more you’d like to ad before we discount your liberal blather?
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Peter, the GOP were ready to elect Colin Powell president as far back as 1996. This type of name calling from the Democrats has done nothing but encourage minorities to stay in their own segregated communities since the civil rights movement 40 years ago. It has been encouraged by community leaders who have used inflamed rhetoric to fester mistrust and division between races in this country.
It was understandable at a time when segregation was an accepted practice in this country. It never did make sense for many of us who demonstrated for civil rights back in the 60s to see the movement continue as a segregated, self interested movement, separating us into our own communities, continuing to blame whites for oppression rather than recognizing that the problem was as much about mistrust and segregation as it was about oppression.
If Democrats do not get past this name calling soon, this nation is finished. We are coming closer and closer to Latin American style populist movements based on the same type of mischaracterizations.
We are not a class based or race based nation. At one time blacks were slaves in this country. They had their birthright stolen a second time when deed restrictions and business restrictions kept them from buying land or starting a business or even shopping freely. Those impediments are gone, rightfully.
Unfortunately, it has opened the door for the kind of reverse racism that you now shout, the kind of reverse racism that people like Lula and Obama embrace with a belief that white people with blue eyes are the world’s problem. It is that mentality that has fueled the socialism and communism in Latin America.
Obama seems clueless, continually apologizing for capitalism instead of defending it as the system that will finally rid the world of poverty and despair, equalizing people according to hard work, perseverance, and ability rather than class, race, and ethnicity.
Posted by: barackem | April 18, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
what was Obama suppose to do, smack him or act like an adult, What would you do if you were Obama? I would like to hear what you have to say. It would give great insight into the mind of a genius.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I looked at all the pictures, I am sure you haven’t. I especially loved the one with a black teenager holding a sign that says, “Blacks against Obama” HOW RACIST!!!
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
The venezulean people deserve much much than a book from Obama. Their country is in a mess, with Chavez to blame. Obama can’t deliver. Time to start anew.
Posted by: Heavenislikethis | April 18, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
“Let’s follow the govt lead and borrow all the money you can from anyone who will lend it to you, friends family bookies whatever. Pack on debt to outragous levels. See if that helps your individual plight.”
Ryan … you’re on to something here! But you’re missing the true meaning of your own statement. Obama’s policies encourage this – lead by example right? If we all pile on debt that we can’t repay, it will actually help us because Obama will pass some “Bookie Relief Act” that relieves us of responsibility for our personal stupidity and passes it on to some other American that plays by the rules and is accountable for their actions. I mean, if I knew that I could’ve bought a huge home at an outrageous price with a stupid interest-only loan, and then Obama would have come along and given me a government-backed ultra-low interest loan at taxpayer expense … I would have bought 2 houses! Surely he’ll “stimulate” my gambling debt away! I like this welfare stuff – I get everything I want, and YOU have to work for it!
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
J – Haven’t you ever heard of photoshop? Seriously? It’s hard to believe you actually swallow what they shovel as fact. Go to a REAL news source. I’ll even let you use CNN as a source if you like – and they are FIRMLY on your side.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
MrBatman…blacks always voted in high numbers for democrats so how is that racists?? if hillary would have won…i gurantee you she would have gotten the same percentage. a lot of white voters voted for mccain…does that make them racist??
Posted by: Hannity the Manatee | April 18, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Larry Moore smacking him would be a great idea!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Mr Batman,
Do you know the history of the U.S. invasion of Iraq? It began with a lie!
Posted by: Lori | April 18, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Can a tea party attendee please explain why a mass tea party was not held when Bush was in office? Why did you have to wait until the new President, who inherited 8 years worth of deficit, took office? Seems a bit late to me. If you were so worried about future generations inheriting debt, you should’ve been out sooner.
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
L. Moore … I’ve been to events like this and nobody approaches a head of state (much less the President of the United States) unless it’s allowed. If Obama didn’t want to have this encounter, he didn’t have to.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Mr Batman,
Do you know the history of the U.S, invasion of Iraq? It began with a lie!
Posted by: Lori | April 18, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
bobos the clown, “he inherited the debt” who compelled BO to run for office?
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
L. Moore. You don’t put yourself in a position to where a thug like Chavez feels welcomed to hand you the book in the first place. How many years do you think it will take before Obama has the common sense to realize he is being a used like a bafoon?
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Lori … Feel free to enlighten me.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
J….I seen the pics on huff post. Republicans have fell to an all new low. My mom is next to me in shock right now…WOW!!
Posted by: Catherine loves VA!! | April 18, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
attention liberals; I saw a bunch of signs at the “tea parties” using the term fascist for Obama. So what on earth are you talking about?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Well.. it wasn’t a loaded Ipod.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 18, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Now come on the president of the US running from someone because of a insult, Grown men do not avoid each other no matter their like or dislikes. Men face each other and hold civil discourse
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
J…. Didn’t you know ALL those pictures were fake. FOX news says so! Trying to reason with the neocons is useless.I’m enjoying watching their heads explode everytime Obama takes down another wall Bush built with his cowboy diplomacy.Priceless!!
Posted by: linda n carolina | April 18, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Hey J | Apr 18, 2009 3:55:36 PM. The one sign about Jewels was a little much, but nothing compared to what you hear on CNN. Those signs were great. It is funny that you can not handle Conservatives who actually stand up and protest. Those signs are childsplay compared to what the Left throws out there. You are just frightened because liberals are not used to people actually doing what is right and standing up :-)
Posted by: Red 77 | April 18, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
plainsm; BO was probably compelled to run to fix the mess this county was put into. Do you really think another Republican was capable of running this country?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Lori, this history of the Iraq war began with 12 broken resolutions in the UN. It also began with democrats signing off on intelligence. It also began with Clinton declaring Saddam had WMD….and dozens of other Democrat politicians…. and they were right, because Saddam did have them at one time… and we had no evidence to prove he destroyed them.
So what’s your point?
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Liberals… THERE WERE TEA PARTIES WHILE BUSH WAS IN OFFICE!!! Get your facts straight, they were held by Ron Paul supporters who happen to be mostly libertarian/conservative.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Mr Batman,
Do you know the history of the U.S. invasion of Iraq? It began with a lie!
IT SURE DID…WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!!!!
Posted by: Peter | April 18, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
We have a President who bows to Saudi royalty…happily accepts a book trashing American from a two-bit socialists who also trashes America…tries to apologize to the Russians by giving them a symbolic button to “reset” our relationship with them (but embarrasses us further by having the button really say “overcharge”)…
And how does he treat our most steadfast allies in England? By giving them thoughtless, cheap gifts of no historical or political significance in spite of the wonderous gifts that were presented to him.
Posted by: ynot4tony2 | April 18, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Well, if tea parties were being held when Bush was in office, why didn’t Fox News, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh etc. promote them? Why show huge support for it now when Obama is in office? Most of the people who attended these “tea parties” obviously had no clue about them before. Also, why wasn’t Rick Perry talking succession when Bush was in office?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
i seen the pics at the tea party…bad taste. i’m not impressed with them at all
Posted by: Independent Voter | April 18, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
I remember The inspectors leaving Iraq because we assail them for not finding WMD’s, Just before we invaded, I also remember how we knew that these alleged WMD’s were be transported around and this is the reason the inspectors could not find the at all the regular sight you would look. And after we invaded it became a joke around the world when no WMD’s existed and we invaded on a LIE.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Sigh, Peter…Don’t leave Clinton and his thug cohorts in congress who also repeatedly vowed that Saddam had WMD. It’s funny how you socialists always forget all about that. Selective memory I suppose. And it’s interesting how you forget all about the WMD Saddam DID use to gas his own people. More selective memory.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Hannity the Manatee … You’re correct, blacks traditionally do vote in larger numbers for Democrats – but not at 96% (Bill Clinton won 82%). That implies some racial bias (for both of them) because the other demographic groups did not fall out at those extremes. I’d just like us to get away from selective racism – the idea that if we don’t agree, or do agree with something, then it must be because of race.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Oh Hello ~
Given all the serious problems facing the World, some of the comments posted here are funny to say the least!!
As Americans, you guys ought to feel such pride, that you picked a person to be your President, who, is so well liked & respected – that he may just be able to get the co-operation necessary, to make a better World, for all of us. But mostly for his fellow citizens in the U.S.
Get on board. Or – Give it a rest.
We all, need all the help we can get to resolve Centuries of man made problems with Money, Equality. Etc., etc.
:)
Posted by: HelloFunnyWorld | April 18, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Chavez has nothing to brag about. If it weren’t for oil to export, his government would be in the gutter.
Posted by: John | April 18, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Well, there you have it. Naive Obama making nice with the mouth, Hugo Chavez. And Obama accepting a book blaming America for all of Latin America’s troubles. Until Latin America start accepting responsibility for it’s own failures, it will be forever condemned to keep repeating the same mistakes. How long will it take for the people of that continent to take responsibility for their own actions and quit blaming others for all their troubles? They have no one to blame but themselves. If we didn’t buy their bananas, iron, and oil, they would be worse far worse off than they are not. How about figuring out a way to develop iPods, software applications that the rest of the world could use, fuel efficient engines, consumer electronics that the rest of the world wants. That is what the U.S. has done. We’re just not going to pay $5.00 a piece for a banana. I’ll quit eating them first! Grow up Latin America.
Posted by: Chris | April 18, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Well, if tea parties were being held when Bush was in office, why didn’t Fox News, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh etc. promote them? Why show huge support for it now when Obama is in office? Most of the people who attended these “tea parties” obviously had no clue about them before. Also, why wasn’t Rick Perry talking succession when Bush was in office?
THIS IS PROOF FOX NEWS PROMOTED THE TEA PARTY EVENTS LAST WEEK!!
Posted by: Peter | April 18, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Danny: You couldn’t define socialism if you had too….perhaps you don’t plan on drawing Social Security/Medicare when you can. How about unemployment? Like your clean water,schools,4 lane highways? By the way, being rude and calling names won’t get you very far in your arguments!
Posted by: linda n carolina | April 18, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
I would hope our president is not afraid of the truth. The book tells of our way of treating latin american countries like vampires at a blood bank.The truth will set you free!!
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
I’m sure Barry will be quoting from the book in no time. Especially if it’s put on the teleprompter for him. I’m sure he is already drafting an apology to Venezuela and the rest of Latin America.
Posted by: Sleggo | April 18, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
“Well, if tea parties were being held when Bush was in office, why didn’t Fox News, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh etc. promote them? Why show huge support for it now when Obama is in office? Most of the people who attended these “tea parties” obviously had no clue about them before. Also, why wasn’t Rick Perry talking succession when Bush was in office?
THIS IS PROOF FOX NEWS PROMOTED THE TEA PARTY EVENTS LAST WEEK!!”
OMG YOU GOT THE PROOF!!! STOP THE PRESSES!!!
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Sacramento Conservative; You have no logical argument. End of story. These “tea parties” are nothing more than a bunch of sour grapes, crybabies who didn’t get what they wanted in our democratic election.
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Send ‘em both out in a speed boat off the shores of Somalia.
Posted by: Hillary C | April 18, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Boy, this guy is superman.
In a few months has blessed us with the following:
insane debt, released terrorists, bowed to a saudi king, cover up a religious symbol, asked veterans to pay their own medical bills, released classified files related to terrorist interrogations to the world, sent a apology letter the iran, north korea kicks inspectors out and does nothing, kisses the *** of every country that wishes our destruction.
Well,we are off to a good start.
Posted by: Mike | April 18, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
“Also, why wasn’t Rick Perry talking succession when Bush was in office?”
Succession comes one person at a time… LOL!
YOU = FAIL
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
I,m hoping for reparations to the Black Americans , This nation has so many sins they are immeasurable and I for one don’t care to be someone who would cosign the any of the evil we have done
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
So then, this is what Conservatives do. Screw up the economy, then blame the next President (if he’s Democrat).
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Regarding the weapons of mass destruction…the UN believed it and
had sactions against Iraq because of it.
Clinton believed it, there was a whole
village of people killed as a result of
chemical agents and Hussien told the
world he had them and would use them.
So why would we not believe they were
there???
Posted by: wis134 | April 18, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
No one has done more damage to South and Central America than the citizens of those countries. Blaming others for your own problems solves nothing, it actually makes it worse.
Posted by: Robert | April 18, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
What a fool he is. A slap in the face and he thanks him for it. I’m really getting tired of saying “I told you so” but what else is there to say.
Posted by: Spread That Wealth | April 18, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
The lefties sure are good at repeating the Democratic talking points….
Posted by: unscrupulousmedia | April 18, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Joe The Plumber was right!,Oh and Media? you’re next,with no opposition on the right,you better watch what you say about His Majesty,you may end up like the the Media in Cuba Or Venezuela,whats that you say? they have no Media..I rest my case!
Now that he has the Navy Seals blackmailed for not charging them for murder,he’ll probably use them on Talk Radio first,followed by FOX News,and by that time he wont need a press secretary anymore!
Posted by: Kelly | April 18, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Again, Sacrament “Conservative.” You have no argument. WHY WOULD THE GOVERNOR OF TEXAS WAIT UNTIL NOW TO TALK OF SECEDING.” Was he not angry before fox news decided to sponsor a “tea party.”
Posted by: Joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
You cannot rewrite history, we done so much to foster those terrible thing that has happen in those countries. We should offer an apology, we should acknowledge what we have done, how else do we restart a dialog with those nations. Make no mistake they know all about what we have done in the past. Let us act like the greatest nation of the world. A nation of men not cowards.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
We Conservatives cling to our Guns & Religion,but according to the Nazi in Homeland Security…NOT FOR LONG!
Posted by: Kelly | April 18, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
WOW, O EVEN ACCEPTING THIS BOOK AGAINST THE U.S. IS OFFENSIVE. THIS FROM THE MAN WHO IS ACTIVELY SEEKING THE DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA. ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFUL. DOES O NOT HAVE ANY LOVE FOR AMERICA? NO, I THINK NOT. HE HAS CRITICISED AMERICA ON EVERY TRIP.
DOES THIS NOT ALARM ANY REASONABLE
AMERICAN?????????????
Posted by: migtex1234 | April 18, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Bobo, do you know what a sponsor is or what a sponsor does?
The tea parties were being formed in late January and were in full swing in Feb. Long before Fox ever announced where one would be, you dolt.
No tea party anywhere accepted sponsorship by any news outlet. Political leaders who asked to speak were refused – for good reason. Now can we have a fact based conversation or do you wish to keep spewing unsubstantiated nonsense?
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Kelly: Soon as you said “Joe the Plumber” you lost all credibility!
Posted by: linda n carolina | April 18, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
i wonder if the libertarian party is gearing up for 2012?? republicans should have never endorsed the tea party events. their party is gonna split. a 3rd party in 2012 will take their votes away….
Posted by: Independent Voter | April 18, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Go get em Kelly. =)
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Peter … Get real, are you really suggesting that because something wasn’t found it could not possibly have existed? Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons (which are WMD’s) to kill the Kurds. And how about the fact that the US armed Iraq with WMDs? Also, there were 18 UN Resolutions (under Clinton and Bush) that threatened military action against Iraq. So you are suggesting that Bush told ONE lie SO convincingly that a large majority of Congress voted to go to war? Simplistic world views are effective for sustaining paranoia, but they aren’t always accurate. I’d suggest you try and find the positives – like a democracy in Iraq instead of an oppressive and murdering dictator.
And by the way, as of 2005 they had found over 500 chemical weapons (sarin and mustard gas) in Iraq. Sure the nuclear bomb intelligence turned out to be faulty, but we get a lot of faulty intelligence – and inaction can kill.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
FACT…Texas could break up into 5 different states..NOT secede! Hey don’t let a real fact get in the way of an argument!
Posted by: linda n carolina | April 18, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Joe Bobos, read his books. Read his mentor Saul Alinsky. Follow the data and the logic to a conclusion.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Yes linda, as soon as kelly brought up a person who successfully exposed Obama for the socialist that he was, she lost credibility with you. You aren’t interested in hearing a view from a real person… Just your talking head lackies on MSNBC and CNN, who feel a tingly sensation running up their leg.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Again, Danny Vice. Why were they not in full swing when Bush was in office, before January? Aren’t you a bit late? I didn’t any conservatives crying about socialism when Bush was pushing for bailouts.
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Threats! Have we not settle the question before about seceding and arm rebellion. We can settle that question again if you like.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
I am surprised, as I would have thought that a book blasting America would have been the President’s gift to Chavez. And, from the photos, I wouldn’t say your assessment that the President “posed politely with Chavez”, they looked very friendly. Do you think Chavez, giving Obama a book that was in Spanish, which the President doesn’t speak, was a snide take off on the DVD’s Obama gave Brown….or a suggestion that Obama, and the rest of us had better learn Spanish?
Posted by: Joanne | April 18, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Linda, I have a quiz for you.
Which US state announced it’s intentions to succeed from the Union within the last 5 years? And is that state a red state or a blue state?
tic toc tic toc…..
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Obama. worst. president. ever.
2012
Posted by: oriana | April 18, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Bobos… opposition to the bail outs WAS in full swing before Obama took office. Let’s get back to facts here Bobos.
When Bush tried to ram TARP 1 down our throats, what happened to the phone lines in both houses of congress? Can you answer that question for me? Just because Bush began the insanity, doesn’t mean we needed to put that insanity on steroids.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
EVERYBODY IN HERE THAT IS COMPLAINING THAT FOX NEWS SPONSORED THE TEA PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE SURPRISED… FOX NEWS VICE PRESIDENT SAID IT HIMSELF THAT FOX NEWS IS THE “VOICE AND OPPOSITION TO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.” BUT YET THOSE BUSH LOVERS CLAIM THAT JOURNALISM HAS DIED. THE IRONY I TELL YA….REPUBLICANS GET THEIR TALKING POINTS FROM FIXED NOISE. RIGHT WING RADICALS WHO HATE AMERICA!!
Posted by: POTUS...the People's Choice! | April 18, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
POTUS… do you talk in all caps because you are a teleprompter?
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
I know enough that many if not all Latin Americans distrust the US. You know nothing and yet say so much. How many people do you know from Latin America, and do you eat with them,Know their culture have them as family members? What do you know of Latin American History, If you don’t acknowledge , OurGreed, Murder, Land and resource grabbing. How we rape there land and people. what do you know, Nothing! do some research open your mind be some one who know what the are saying , not someone the spouts off ans sound as if saying something makes it so.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Oh Linda, did you find the answer to my question yet? It wasn’t Texas. I hope you didn’t run away yet… come back.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Danny Vice,
The difference with Clinton was he didn’t invade Iraq without evidence of WMDs? He didn’t manufacture intelligence for the purposes of going to war.
Posted by: Lori | April 18, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Mr Batman,
“Do you know the history of the U.S. invasion of Iraq? It began with a lie!
IT SURE DID…WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!!!!”
– Above comment by Lori-Peter
WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS – in Saddam Hussein’s Lies !!!!!!!
(respond if you have the capacity)
Posted by: Mr Reality | April 18, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
you all can say what you want about Obama…JUST DON’T TOUCH HIM….YOU WILL SEE RIOTS AND REVOLUTIONS THAT YOU’VE NEVER SEEN BEFORE….TRUST ME!!
Posted by: Jaimeson | April 18, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Lori,
Do you always ‘Run’ from the Tough Questions !!!
Posted by: Mr Reality | April 18, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
While I agree that European and American abortionists have done Latin America a disservice, the buying of raw materials has hardly been one of exploitation by the West as much as it is exploitation by Latin American rulers. Latin American rulers have a long & tarnished history of neglect and corruption. They could have invested in higher education but did not. They could have invested in infrastructure and free market economics but largely did not. Chavez own moronic mismanagement and greed for power have effectively guaranteed the ignorant and poor masses more ignorance and a lower standard of living beyond his own lifespan.
Posted by: SDDuude | April 18, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
POTUS… do you talk in all caps because you are a teleprompter?
AND BUSH COULDN’T EVEN READ WITH A TELEPROMPTER…HAHAHA. YOU GUYS LOVED THAT INCOMPETENT PRESIDENT BUSH HUH?? WOW!!
Posted by: Jaimeson | April 18, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Worst President ever! How did you come to that conclusion? Please explain with spout fox news verbatim. show your grasp of current events and you economic knowledge. overwhelm us with your best rendition of you knowledge. I know that you don’t like knowledge or education. So Obama must be stupid and you are the bright one.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Lori, No he didn’t. He was busy with invading another country at the time, if you remember. But, Lori, let me ask you this. Since Saddam did use WMD on his own people…. but the hundreds of thousands… how would ignoring that jive with your politically correct stance of human rights? Human rights are only important to talk about – not take action on, right?
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
“WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS – in Saddam Hussein’s Lies !!!!!!!
(respond if you have the capacity)”
Mr Reality … are you suggesting I don’t have the capacity to respond, or Lori and Peter don’t?
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Sacramento “Conservative.” Your acronyms are cute, but you still have no real argument. I support the President regardless of what he does, so I’m patriotic, right? Wasn’t that the mantra of the Republicans for the last 8 years? Why can’t you do that now? Is it because Fox News is telling you not to?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
What happens when Obama doesn’t have a teleprompter? Uhhh… uhh… breathalizer… uhh… hold on… uhhh… inhalator… uhh…
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Republicans vs. Tea Party 2010 and 2012
Posted by: Jaimeson | April 18, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Be nice to Lori. She’s the first person who’s offered a legitimate debate without relying on DNC talking points.
I don’t agree with her. But at least she’s thinking for herself, and I can respect that.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Wait a minute, Chavez is hugely popular in his country, and is ruling by referendum, as the laws in his country states, Where do you get your info? How do you exist just saying anything someone tells you and don’t know for yourself.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Joe, whatever you do, don’t use the word “cute” if you point a statement at me. I am NOT shaving my legs for anyone.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
When you gun loving idiots say violent things and show your racism proudly and will and have killed for your hate. Why in the hell would anyone turn a blind eye on you. your got history partner and it glaring obvious that you that you should be watched.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
If something is said in a forum and a liberal refuses to acknowledge it, was it ever really typed?
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Why didn’t he bow???? Get on his knees and (WELL YOU KNOW WHERE THAT WAS GOING) Will he apoligize to this tin horn dictator? Did he thank him for the blame america first book.It will probably be on his deck, right beside the communist manafesto.
Posted by: kevin | April 18, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
“When you gun loving idiots say violent things and show your racism proudly and will and have killed for your hate. Why in the hell would anyone turn a blind eye on you. your got history partner and it glaring obvious that you that you should be watched. ”
Spoken like a true genius.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
L. Moore, Hitler was popular with his people too. Stalin was popular with his people for a time. Where do you plan to take THIS line of reasoning? He’s a thug.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
My argument is that so called “Conservatives” are now bashing Obama when they were silent the whole time the “Conservative” Bush was making poor fiscal decisions. Now they are speaking out against a President who hasn’t even been in office for 4 months and can’t even rationally explain why his “future” policies will affect them. Most of the people throwing around the terms “fascist” and “socialist” have no idea what they mean.
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Mr Reality … thought so. But really, why bother? They won’t let a little thing like facts get in the way of their worship of Obama.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Chavez has no class. Too much cocaine maybe. What an insult gift to give to any leader of a country. Almost as insulting as giving DVD’s,an IPOD loaded with videos of yourself. Always the US fault for everything in the world. I am so sick of it. If you don’t blame the US, then it is Europe’s fault. Always, the white race is at fault. Seems more like jealousy to me than anything else.
Posted by: Joan | April 18, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Yes he ith look in his library and see he has the book as a man who is not scare of thought and knowledge and history. A man who does not disparage knowledge is a wise man, beware of those who despise wisdom, Knowledge, words, and thought. for him discourse is a dirty word, Courteous interaction is beyond him,Diplomacy is a alien concepts. Bring it On! He understand that, American Cowboys never existed in life, only in fiction but only a wise man would know that.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Also, why is it that anyone who now supports the President is “worshiping him” or has to refer to him as the “savior.” You people are really showing your immaturity by saying this all the time. Do any of you remember when Bush was in office and anyone who dare speak out against his policy was labeled un-patriotic? How hypocritical can you be? Remember, this was a democratic election, and Obama won. Not Mcain.
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
What cracks me up the most is all the liberal pundits blaming Fox News for its bias coverage, yet I have read three independent studies (for the less than 25 crowd, that means no media conglomerate paid for the study) that all say Fox News is right down the center.
But one of the symptoms of liberalism is a complete lack of fact-finding capabilities, so its not really their fault.
Posted by: Rachel | April 18, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Also Bobos… if you need someone to explain why his irresponsible printing of a trillion dollars and spending 12 trillion and counting is bad for our future, then perhaps you should stop discussing this and pick up a book called “Economics for Dummies”.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
I read an earlier comment from a Democrat explaining how they are in the clean up phase, undoing what the Republicans did to us. When the Democrates took over Congress in early 2007, I told my wife “you watch and see…the stock market’s history.” My highest 401k balance was in July of 2007. It began it’s decline in August of 2007 and currently has only half of the balance realized in July of 07′ remaining. Thank you Democrates for undoing what the Republicans had done. Nice job!!!!
Posted by: Joe | April 18, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Danny Vice,
There are other ways of addressing human rights violations without going to war. I would NOT however rule it out, but the issues (of whether to go to war or not) have to be weighed carefully. I am not convinced that war necessarily makes things better. Look at history, including the Iraq debacle. The U.S. cannot invade every country with human rights violations. If it did, we wouldn’t have a country.
Posted by: Lori | April 18, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Steve, that is true.. and the socialist in our country are using that same power grab model here in the US.
Break down the people, make them need you, get them dependent on you… and then begin buying businesses. Start firing CEOs, Raise taxes, expand welfare.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
“But one of the symptoms of liberalism is a complete lack of fact-finding capabilities, so its not really their fault.”
One of the symptoms of conservatism is a complete lack repetition of facts without distortion.
Posted by: Skip | April 18, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Sorry, I must have missed the “huge conservative movements” against Bush’s policies. You win. Bush was a knucklehead. But, in fairness, it was not only MSNBC who missed reporting on these, it was also Fox News. Fox News was too busy reporting that the Dixie Chicks were unpatriotic for speaking out against Bush. Why do Conservatives insist that every counter-argument is a liberal talking point. Aren’t your arguments Conservative talking points?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
You know nothing about Chavez or his country or you would nor portray him as a dictator, because he’s not, and because he did not play ball will Dubya and the oil Company they made a bad man in the press in the American press. You neeed to enlighten your self read something other the news. or the FOX
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
The “worshiping” comments came from the fact that you liberals were worshiping him. Like the “He’s gonna change the world” song which pretty much declared that Obama will be able to do anything he wants to and the whole world will be subject to his remaking. It was a democrat in congress who first refered to him as a Jesus like character… “Jesus was a community organizer”, “Obama could be considered a political savior” and other such blasphemous comments.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
The book was a nice present…
I hope CT school curriculum planners miss this article…
Obama and Chavez are both seen in the same place. I was sure Chavez had an Obama mask and was doing double duty.
Posted by: Gar Rigg | April 18, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Your point, was not Bush popular with you ? what are you saying the some you equate Obama with Stalin? And you guy wonder why Home Land security watches you!!!!
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
That’s true Lori. We can’t invade every country. But if action isn’t taken at some point, you end up with a Rwanda on your hands – and Saddam had conducted a few Rwanda’s of his own. 12 UN resolutions later, it was pretty apparent that he wouldn’t bend. Libya, on the other hand was an example of a success story (as far as we know). But I think Saddam proved that he wasn’t about to follow Libya’s example.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
L. Moore… you know absolutely nothing about the cowardice dictator Chavez. You know nothing about the people who were once rich in his country and are now broke because he felt they had “too much”. I’d like to see you work an 80+ work week and then have the government say that is too much for you to use all on your own. You are so blind!
Posted by: Rachel | April 18, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Well, Fox reported on the shutting down of the phone system in congress due to CONSERVATIVES who opposed Bush’s amnesty bill. Conservatives didn’t have rallies on education and Bush’s socialist medicare bill but they were outraged none the less… Bush pissed us off a lot and even called Conservatives names. Fox isn’t perfect but they are a far cry from being a propaganda machine like MSNBC and CNN.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
joe bobos … Ok, two concepts you should become aware of:
1) The deficits (both Bush’s and Obama’s) will have to be paid back. Since the government doesn’t have any money, it will come from us. There are a substantial number of Americans that don’t want their children to have to pay back loans (with interest) that funded bank and auto company bailouts, pig odor research or high-speed rail for Pennsylvania and California. These people (and I am one) have every right to protest the reckless spending that this administration is engaged in.
2) There’s another large group of Americans that don’t approve of Obama’s policy of foreign appeasement and apology. This groups understands that there isn’t a single country in this world that doesn’t put its own interests ahead of our own. In that context, appeasement is weakness and a sign of Obama’s apparent desire to diminish our role in the world. Fact is, not everyone agrees with us, or will ever agree with us. The ideological divides between the US and the rest of world are huge. All of Obama’s actions to date have moved the US closer to the ideologies of other countries without requiring them to do the same. That’s not diplomacy, that’s appeasement. His interaction with Chavez is an embarrassment to this country and to the people that have been fighting for human rights and against dictatorships around the world. You never, ever legitimize a tyrant (like we’re done with N. Korea, Iran, Cuba, and now Venezuela).
I suggest that you actually evaluate Obama’s actions and more importantly, their outcomes, before you fall in line so easily.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
L. Moore. When Bush started spending money like a drunken sailor, no, he wasn’t popular with me. The way Bush initially went into Iraq did NOT make him popular with me. Rumsfeld was a bad advisor. The war took an immediate turn for the better when he stepped aside. When Bush pushed TARP 1, no, he was not popular with me.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Danny Vice … Good point, but it 18 United Nations Resolutions.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Just don’t be mean :) Use big, nice-sounding words to gently remind the crazy libs how lost they are. It’s a technique I learned from Obama ;)
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
America deserves Obama and the Dems. They voted for these folks even after they said they were going to do all of these things. I was shocked in 2006 when you folks voted for dems while they were crying to open up borders. I was shocked in 2008 when you voted for Obama after he told everyone exactly what he was going to do. There’s no surprises here folks. But what is most surprising to me is that all of these politicians campaigned and promised to do what they are doing. And you voted for it. Everything Obama and the Dems have done to this country was on their platforms. The fact all you folks are acting so surprised now makes me laugh and cry. Where have you been? Why was your head in the sand when it really mattered? The repubes had every chance to shape up their party, but they coward to McCain– The same guy who tried to sneak amnesty and open borders through midnight legislation sessions without any public knowledge.
They all said they would be doing this if they got elected. You people voted for them. They’re fulfilling their promises, and now we all have to take your medicine. America’s own ignorance will be its own demise.
Posted by: Joe the Filmmaker | April 18, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Wa t a minute wasn’t Bush the president? how does bad adviser s?ave him, and get Hundred of thousand of people killed and Obama a Terrible President in Lest than a Hundred days? when you just disagree with his policy!1 Something wrong with this picture ya THINK!
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
“Fact is, not everyone agrees with us, or will ever agree with us. The ideological divides between the US and the rest of world are huge.”
How are we ever going to reach agreements with the rest of the world if we are never willing to make concessions? It’s time to start focusing on our ideological similarities and work from there toward settling differences.
Posted by: Skip | April 18, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
How do you go 8 years under Bush and never say a word and the Black is the worst President ever. Now you know why you are 20 per cent of the electorate?
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Yeah, but Joe, there are a lot of people who don’t spend a lot of time listening to politics. They catch a few sound bites and then go back to their lives.
Also, Americans vote largely on personality, not polities. They voted for Bush over Kerry because Kerry came off as a stuffed shirt. And I’m so sure that will ever change.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
No one laughing, you people have a problem, and what terrible about it you will never see it, hate is a bad thing it rots you perception and your soul
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Joe the Filmmaker … Only 53% voted for Obama. I for one proudly voted for McCain. I’m an Independent, but McCain had me when he finished the last debate and said something to effect of “it’s been my greatest privilege to have been allowed to serve you as a Senator, and I hope you’ll give me the opportunity to serve you as President.” Obama said something like “we can’t continue the failed policies of Bush, and I am the only one that can bring the change America needs to be decent again.” McCain understands service to his country, Obama only understands our service to him. Easy choice really…
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Just saying you voted for McCain Knowing Palin would be the Vice President speaks volumes of your judgment. Go ahead tell me how she’s and Mac are geniuses!
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Joe,
At least he got the popular vote!
Posted by: Joe the truth teller | April 18, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
L. Moore, Obama won 54% of the vote, not 80%. And that was BEFORE he began his socialist regime.
As far as the last 8 years go. I’ve stated many things I didn’t agree with. You have stated nothing you disagree with.
Why is that? Why would anyone embrace an ideology without questioning any of it’s components?
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Danny Vice. It seems like you are rational. I’m not here trying to say Obama is “savior.” That is a Conservative talking point. I’m merely saying that Conservatives are acting a bit hypocritical with their new found outrage over taxes and socialism under Obama. I’m still trying to figure out why anyone who dared speak out against Bush’s policies was labeled “un-patriotic” whereas now it is patriotic to speak out against the President?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Its wonderful to be everyones friend but sadly that is not the world in which we live in. Has everyone forgotten that 19 muslim men killed themselves on 9/11/01 with the express purpose of killing as many American Citizens as they could. How do you counter an enemy that would do that, does not recognize peace and only wants you dead? These muslims extremists born of the same blame America and hate America crowd as the author of that book that Chavez gave Obama. The correct response would have been to burn the book right in front of Chavez or he could have politely refused it but no, no, no, not God bless America as his old Reverend would say.
Posted by: Tom | April 18, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Christopher, You live in North Korea?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
This president is friendlier with America’s enemies than he is with half the country (Republicans, Conservatives, 3rd party voters etc etc). This is frightening.
I dont think you people have any idea who you voted for. And PS – the issue isnt Bush – it is Obama.
Posted by: spoc158 | April 18, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Moore: Let’s get one thing right out in the open. Disagreeing with a method of government has nothing to do with hating people. Time and time again, it’s noted that conservatives give substantially more to charities. Time after time conservatives stop talking and put their words into action by serving in 3rd world countries across the globe. Hate is when you try to convince everyone that a thug dictator is really your friend and other Americans are the true enemy.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Who cares what the rest of the world thinks about the USA? I mean didn’t we claim our independence from the world in 1776? Aren’t we a unique Republic in all the world? What good does it do for us to conform to what the World wants?
Being an American used to mean something, lets keep it that way.
Posted by: Tom | April 18, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
When I hear the Blame America first Crowd statement, I know I’ve got a non intellectual speaking. never rear books huh? don’t know any history? white anglo saxon or one who SKI from their name. Senseless jabbering no substance a person who follows not lead, does not play well with others of a different race. Low self esteem, watches fox, needs to be accepted in his community of bigots. America ain’t perfect, Yes I love America, but I am not Blind nor stupid, and I want the best for this land. Both here and abroad.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Skip … I’ll agree with you to a point, but it’s the differences that separate Americans from say, the French or the Thais or Australians. We have a cultural identity that comes from those differences that frankly I don’t want to concede. The problem is, the differences which define us also separate us – often with anger and hate. Focusing on the similarities is a fine idea, and every President has done that (some more than others). But some differences should not be resolved. I don’t think that the President of the United States should be conceding to, and legitimizing, the dictators of this world without a concession on their part. That’s what Obama is doing – lowering our guard under the premise of shared ideologies, when in fact their are few.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
“Hate is when you try to convince everyone that a thug dictator is really your friend and other Americans are the true enemy.”
And who is ‘you’? Obama has certainly never said that any law abiding American is an enemy.
Posted by: Skip | April 18, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Anyone else wonder what “pearls” are in Mr. Obama’s library? Probably ‘See Spot Run.’ Perhaps Marx’ Manifesto? Too funny. I am confident their taste in literature will be similar.
Posted by: Jay K | April 18, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Here are your statements, read them does hate come to mind? irrational hate, small minded hate!, Herein lies your own words, deny them as hate is a symptom of delusion.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Chavez keeps getting re-elected, so he must be doing something correctly. He was dead right about Bush too, whom he called a ‘devil.’ There can be absolutely no denial that both Europeans long ago, rapidly followed by the US exploited Latin America, so what’s the beef?
Posted by: Mister Jimmy | April 18, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
I like the concept in the book OB was given. It is that the United States has been taking all of the resources out of Latin America and by purchasing these resources we have made these countries poor. Instant solution. Let us band together and never ever again purchase any resources from Latin America. That way they can keep them for themselves and will be very rich. Sounds like a plan to me.
Posted by: joe, farmington,NH | April 18, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Bobo, it’s because Congress is passing legislation right now that will require a substantial tax increase later. Also, taxes are high on businesses which drives jobs overseas. My home’s property tax just went up even though it’s value dropped.
Obama has vowed to repeal Bush tax cuts. Right now I get two big child tax credits that will be cut in half once Obama allows it to expire.
This spending is going to have very real consequences for my family’s future. Consequences I didn’t sign up for.
The last election is proof that no one party Democrat or Republican should EVER lock up the entire government. When they do, we run into serious problems and legislation is passed without carefully weighing out the risks that come with it.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Mister Jimmy … So by virtue of getting re-elected, he’s shown his virtue, honor and integrity – so we should all just shake his hand and be friends?
George W. Bush was re-elected.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Nocommonsense said <> LOL..did your mother tell you that? OMG get in the 21st century.
Posted by: susan | April 18, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Mister Jimmy … Also, and I’m asking this in all seriousness, what did Bush do that makes him the Devil? Specifically, what did he do?
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Socialism: A political movement advocating public ownership of means of production,distribution, and exchange.
mmmmmmmm-does that sound familiar? Does the public of the USof A (me and you) now own a few banks? How about the some of the other Financial institutions? Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet? This is going to be a long road and the government is in charge, until we vote them out of office and take our country back. We might own the banks, but we have no voice in how the money is distributed anymore because the government owns us. We voted them in, now lets just vote them out.
Posted by: sally | April 18, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Obama is either a evil genius or the dumbest black man you ever known. and how did all you limited people find him out. I mean the majority of the nation put him in office, But you woke up sooo smart and you can see everthing so clearly. with your degree in economic’s political science, world affairs, Why did all you people not run for office?you know the past and future, when your 6 year old become twenty-six your know what the state of the world will be. How astute of you.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
To bad Obama did not accept the book, look at it and hand it back saying “already read it unfortunately not very accurate”. From the reviews I have read of it the praise it heaps on Cuba alone discredits it.
However he did the gracious thing. A word that has never been used to describe Hugo Chavez.
Maybe it’s just me but I find it incredibly arrogant of Chavez to present any head of state a history book in public on the eve of telling the same leader 2 weeks ago…”go read a book” and “I do not think he is intelligent”
But you need to understand these Latin American’s….last week Brazil’s Lula claimed the financial crisis was a result “of whites with blue eye’s”.
They have a law in Brazil against this type of speech but of course it is not enforced when the prez does it.
Posted by: Mark | April 18, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Danny Vice. Isn’t the fact that your property tax increased due to the school district and county and not Federal government?
Posted by: joe bobos | April 18, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Couldn’t agree with Danny Vice more. Why does Obama apologize for everything the US do to the world and try to be friendly with dictators like Chavez? What he has done just make the US stand weaken nothing more?
Posted by: rose2009 | April 18, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
“Wouldn’t it be in our best interests to have a person of color as our leader with the intellect, personality, political finesse, financial reach and military strength to justly deal with other nations?”
L. Moore … So you’re suggesting that race should be a determining factor in who should be President, not simply the capabilities of the individual and the will of the people? So race is an indicator of an ability to ‘justly deal with other nations’? Wow.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Couldn’t agree with Danny Vice more. Why does Obama apologize for everything the US do to the world and try to be friendly with dictators like Chavez? What he has done just makes the US stand weaken nothing more?
Posted by: rose2009 | April 18, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
“What should our President should have done….acted as a wingnut, whined, and REFUSED a book and a handshake?”
Would FDR have ever shook Hitler’s hand? Chavez isn’t someone we just have disagreements with. He is a sworn enemy of the U.S.
Posted by: Larry | April 18, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
It seems to me that right-wingers are always more focused on peoples differences than on their similarities. Even George Will was saying last weekend that the people of the world just don’t get along. While I would agree to a healthy amount of caution when dealing with other countries who we have marked differences with, we cannot allow the hard-liners of the world to hold us all hostage in a perpetual state of diametric opposition. I would bet, and this is opinion only, that if you polled the people of the world you would find that a substantial majority of them have the very same values; To get married, have a home and raise children in peace and safety. That is a very solid foundation to build on.
Posted by: Skip | April 18, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Voting for McCain because of Palin would be like voting for Biden because of Obama. “Oh, but Obama wrote a couple of books! Obama led a “community organizing” effort! Obama went to an Ivy League school.”
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
It seems to me that whenever a liberal says, “It seems to me that conservatives…” it is usually followed with a big fat lie or something completely stupid.
Posted by: Sacramento Conservative | April 18, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
I am really “touched” by Chavez gift to President Obama. Alas! The games that “leaders” play. Chavez must learn to be a little bit more gracious and refined, the audacity of his poor manners never cease to amaze me. I am sure that it is an exercise in futility to attempt to explain the meaning of diplomacy.
Posted by: Mora R. Solano | April 18, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Being an American used to mean something, lets keep it that way.
hmm.. what does it mean ?? care to answer?
Posted by: ricardinho | April 18, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Skip … I’ll agree about a common set of desires for the majority of humans. But, that’s not shared by the leaders of their countries. Leadership in many countries, especially Latin America, is about power and influence. When a head of state abuses power, we can’t solve the problem by validating their leadership and then asking them to stop abusing it! To recognize that their abuse of power is legitimate negates the argument that they have to stop it. That’s why Chavez is trying so hard to buddy up to Obama, he can then go back to abusing this citizens with the full “support” of the USA (“hey, Obama acknowledge me as an equal”). Maybe it will work, but I’d like to know of a similar historical example where it did.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
build a more harmonious and compassionate nation and be better qualified to be not just the military leaders of the world but the moral leaders of the world.
This position is totally contradictory, you can be eiher one or the other but not both.
Posted by: ricardinho | April 18, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Yes Chavez !
Big man !
Posted by: Parallax | April 18, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Bobo, Taxes come by way of both the Fed and the state.
That is why I don’t agree with the Fed pushing the stimulus on the states. What do you suppose the states will have to do to balance it’s budget down the road? Raise tax. There is no free lunch. There is no guy behind the curtain that has to pay these trillions of dollars. It’s just you and me, neighbor.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Another thing Mr. Jimmy: if you had a clue and were at least minimally informed about what has happened in Venezuela over the last 10 years, you would know that, in comparison to Chavez, Bush was an angel. Get a clue.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
President Obama conducted himself with dignity abroad. What did you right wingers expect? For Obama to spit in the face of Chavez? Obama conducted himself as a statesman. It should be obvious to even the dimmest of wit that 8 years of mad cowboy disease got the U.S. nowhere.
Posted by: Mark | April 18, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Ricardo, being an American used to mean being free and being an individual with inaliable rights. Socialism directly opposes that ideology by meshing people together into the “collective good”.
Socialism is like the Borg. Obama has taken the stance of “resistance is futile…you will be assimilated”…
Well, I don’t want to be assimilated, I want to be a person. I’ll pay a reasonable tax, but I don’t want to be owned by the government. I don’t want to be born, live and die being cradled by the government. That to me is directly the opposite of what America stands for.
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Mark, since when was groveling, pacifying and degrading your solidarity before a dictator thug the definition of dignity?
If a woman lets herself be raped, and doesn’t put up a fight… how is THAT dignity?
Dignity is when you DO stand up and fight for what’s right. Pacifying dictators has nothing to do with dignity
Posted by: Danny Vice | April 18, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Mark … Statesmen don’t use the “brothers” handshake with a Dictator. They have their handlers keep them separated until such time as they are formally recognized by our Government. And you are incorrect about where 8 years of Bush got us … insulting and childish, but still incorrect.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
What I’m disgusted with is the look on Obama’s face as he gives a palm-up (a sign of subservience) “brothers” handshake to Chavez – just look at Obama’s face. His body language is easy to read – and terrifying.
Posted by: MrBatman | April 18, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
I am an american first. But, if you take the time to study Latin American History you will find that the United States has not been very friendly nor benevolent toward the peoples to the south.
United Fruit, the Vanderbilts, William Walker are among the legancies that the people of latin america remember.
Panama of Panama Canal fame did not even exist untill Teddy Roosevelt did a little gun boat diplomacy with Columbia and formed Panama.
The Revolutions and sometime dictators the U.S. has supported was for the benefit of the American Businesses rather than the people of the country.
People can not be exploited for their own good.
I agree with most of the fellow bloggers Chevez and Obama are from the same ideology and deserve each other.
Posted by: ben_there | April 18, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Steve saidK “you would know that, in comparison to Chavez, Bush was an angel.”
————
You are so right.
If Bush were like Chavez, he would have suspended term limits and he’d still be the president!!!
I think Chavez and Obama got a hot bro-mance going.
Posted by: Right Wing Extremist | April 18, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
How could we have some national interrest with respect to Cuba and Venezuela that supercedes the grievances of the refugees who have lost their homes to rapacous communists and their families to the dictators’ gulags? Democrats make common cause with the maffia, though, so it is no surprise they want to be seen with international pariahs, too.
Posted by: ClaireSolt | April 18, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
This book also exists in an English language translation. Obama needs to read it.
Posted by: Joe | April 18, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
There are strikes going on against Hugo Chavez right now. Maybe if some of you idoits listened to fox news instead of condeming it you might know about the strikes. If you are stupid enough to think that Obama’s US bashing is going to be good for this country you are sadly mistaken.
Posted by: Linda | April 18, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Larry: “Chavez isn’t someone we just have disagreements with. He is a sworn enemy of the U.S.”
Could somebody please tell me what Chavez has done to our country? If I’m not mistaken doesn’t he supply heating oil to poor Americans? And I could be wrong here, but wasn’t he elected?
He has oil that Dubya and the Texas crime syndicate couldn’t manage to steal, and I think that’s why they tell us he’s bad.
If I’m wrong then somebody please provide some evidence to the contrary.
Posted by: boogienights1 | April 18, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Chavez says one evening, according to the predominant press account (another press account differs) “I want to be your friend”, after saying within the last month that Obama “is an ignoramus at best”. The morning after the blowfish, whose head looks as though it may explode if he eats one more thing or says one more thing to puff himself up, says “I want to be your friend”, he offers a gift full of insults to our country – which, most presidents might be offended by, but ours most likely already owned at least two editions of the book, one most likely signed by the author, no doubt a personal friend. The saddest part is, Chavez probably knew the book wouldn’t offend, because he knew the recipient holds much antipathy toward America, and toward “white Europeans”. Of course, such antipathy toward a race of people is only considered racism if the holder of the antipathy has white skin. I was still struggling with whether it was worse that President Obama bowed before an Islamic prince, or the fact that his administration then blatantly lied about it, insulting the intelligence of the general public – but maybe PT Barnum was right after all.. I’ve just about decided that the lying about it was even worse then the bow – but I go back and forth. Change I Don’t Believe In.
Posted by: greggy | April 18, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
boogienights1:
You seem not to have a clue about Venezuela and how Chavez has worked over the last 10 years to erode his country’s democratic institutions. I recommend you learn to read and understand Spanish. Yes, he get’s elected, but the PRI in Mexico won every “election” in Mexico over a period of 70 years. Winning elections is a shoe in when you’ve got control of all of the levers of government.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
I lived and worked in various Latin American countries for thirty years. Sure there have been some historical injustices committed over the years, but I know, from direct experience, that the governments there are the best equipped and the most qualified at screwing their own people. Subsequent to doing that, they are quite expert at pointing the finger at the US. I used to believe the liberal blame the US crap, until I saw and experienced with my own eyes what happens on the ground in these places.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Just to give you a quick idea of what you are dealing with in Hugo Chavez: he is one of Robert Mugabe’s biggest supporters among international leaders.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
It would be ironic if Obama gave Chavez his personal copy of “Rules for Radicals” by Saul Alinsky
Posted by: Red Stater | April 18, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Why doesn’t Obama speak Spanish ? He stood before a LaRaza conference when he was pandering–I mean campaigning–and talked about embarrassing and illiterate Americans were for not speaking the languages of other countries. Of course, he began by saying “not speaking Spanish” but caught himself before quite completing the word.
So, why isn’t the person who says it’s wrong for Americans not to learn Spanish when he doesn’t bother to nor any of his family.
I know. It’s “do as I say, not as I do”.
WTG, Obama. You just gave Chavez an opportunity make a fool out of you. Your “overtures” of peace are perceived as weakness. Don’t you have a diplomat with experience who could advise you ?
Posted by: TGood | April 18, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
It would be ironic if Obama gave Chavez his personal copy of “Rules for Radicals” by Saul Alinsky
Posted by: Red Stater
_______________________________________
I would bet that he’s already read it.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Hard to tell who is lying or who is just plan ignorant. Chavez is not a dictator, Obama is not a socialist. President Chavez was just heard loudest in his critism of Bush, most people in Latin America thought worse, the evil duo of Bush & Cheney are gone, time to move on. Obama gets it.
Posted by: Carlos | April 18, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Disclaimer: I am not a fan of Chavez and very few liberals are. Most liberals are pragmatists. Chavez is an ideologue. Like Bush, but a different ideology. Ideologues are unresponsive to facts and for that reason tend to make bad policy.
Nevertheless, Europe and the US have exploited South America. I didn’t think that was really even in doubt. What’s next from the rightwing revisionists? Slavery a myth? North America was uninhabited? Please. One way to stop demagogic ideologues and have pragmatism move forward is to acknowledge history so that we can move on.
Posted by: jrshipley | April 18, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
OBAMA ALREADY READ IT.
Posted by: jamie | April 18, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
obama and chavez are both radicals.
That’s why they like each other.
Posted by: joe peters | April 18, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Re: “Subsequent to doing that, they are quite expert at pointing the finger at the US. I used to believe the liberal blame the US crap, until I saw and experienced with my own eyes what happens on the ground in these places.”
Our government funds the dictators and governments in Latin America that exploit their people for corporate gain. We fund the Mexican ruling class. (The Merida Plan/Plan Mexico) When Latin American countries elect somebody who will not exploit their people or give away their resources, we demonize them, as in the case of Bolivia’s Morales. When Mexico almost elected a liberal (Obrador) the global elite freaked out. Now their boy President Calderon is rewriting Mexico’s constitution and turning it into a police state. Look up The School of the Americas.
Read some books because you will never see this on TV or learn it in school. Latin America is ignored. Our country’s wealth comes in part through exploitation of Mexico and the rest of Latin America.
Don’t freak out just because somebody told the truth.
Posted by: sunnyday | April 18, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
When Hugo Chavez tried to push through a constitutional “reform” in 2008, one of the provisions that he sought to include in that countries national charter was that parents and “the state” would have joint custody of all minors under 18 years of age. That is frightening, and, yeah, Chavez is a great guy.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Puleez. I have lived in Brazil for 11 years and if there has been vast exploitation it has been done by 500 years of Portuguese corruption.
Posted by: Tenney Naumer | April 18, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
sunnyday:
I would imagine that you are not aware of the fact that George Soros was key to Evo Morales’ coming to power in Bolivia. After putting Evo in place, George Soros (a big Obama backer) cut a sweetheart deal with Morales that would enable him to profit handsomely in deals having to do with Bolivia’s natural gas.
By the way, what Latin American dictator has the U.S. “propped up” in the last twenty years?
Your rhetoric is dated.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
sunnyday:
I did my master’s degree at the Getulio Vargas Foundation in Brazil. I work for a Mexican company now. I know the history, and I know, as I said in an earlier post, your rhetoric is dated. Raul Prebisch’s Dependency Theory was formulated in the 50s. You need to update your knowledge.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
BHO should be relieved that he is no longer the worst gift-giver in the world.
Posted by: Doug Piranha | April 18, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Obama already read the book Chavez gave him? Hellz bellz. Obama already wrote two books just like it.
Posted by: Doug Piranha | April 18, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
From comments Obama is making on his world tour, he’s already read the book and is touting its ideals.
Posted by: Jack | April 18, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
president Obama speaks spanish
Posted by: pmoffa08 | April 18, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
jrshipley:
At some point you will realize (if you haven’t done so already), we have elected another ideologue. This one, however, is on the left end of the spectrum.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
I think the book that Chavez gave Obama is a good look at why South America is such a failure. They play the blame game victim probably better than any leftist in the world. I would counter the book with Fabricantes de Miseria written by 3 one time leftist journalist from south of our borders. South America should be a continent of wealth, instead it is a disaster, and it’s leaders are just plain interested in power.
Posted by: lions | April 18, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Chavez is right.. we are only rich because of what we found in South America. For example, Henry Fords celebrated ‘assembly line’? It was a Rube Goldberg contraption designed to look impressive; it actually didn’t do anything! Ford found all those Model-T’s growing wild in a deserted part of the Argentinean steppes and had them shipped under cover of night into the U.S. one by one, at bargain basement prices. Only then could he offer a wage to his so-called ‘workers’ (who were really just keeping the fake assembly line running) large enough to create the middle class and years of prosperity. Boy, those ‘natural resources’ from South America sure kick ***!
And how about that time this fellow found a strange, square, intricately formed object growing from a tree in the Amazon and discovered that if attached to something called a ‘circuit’ through which flowed something called ‘electricity’ it could perform an abstract notion called a ‘calculation’. Well, let me tell you, he returned to the U.S. with a crazy notion– what if I could harvest these by the millions, and sell them to people who also wanted to calculate things? He didn’t know it at the time but he was on his way to becoming a billionaire– and the founder of Intel, the worlds leading harvester of computer chips! Once again, South America is enriching the U.S.! It’s so unfair.
Posted by: bill | April 18, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Re: “Raul Prebisch’s Dependency Theory was formulated in the 50s. You need to update your knowledge.”
I don’t know what that theory is. But NAFTA, CAFTA and all of those “free trade” agreements keep the people of those countries poor and exploited.
Butlet me ask you this: What happened when it looked like Obrador was going to be the next president of Mexico? The op-ed pages in all the major newspapers went nuts. You see, a liberal like Obrador would change the system and not let Mexicans be exploited by the ruling class and the global elite. Can’t have that!
So the Mexican Supreme court selected Calderon, who is the current conservative president of Mexico. Since he took office, violence has increased and Mexico is on the way to becoming a police state, under the guise of the War on Drugs. Drugs don’t even come from Mexico. They come through Mexico, from among other places, Afghanistan. Our government supports Calderon and just gave his government billions of dollars. (Plan Mexico/ The Merida Plan)
So please don’t tell me that our government has no control, or influence in Latin America. Give me a break.
Posted by: sunnyday | April 18, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Look how freaked out conservatives are over a BOOK. They fear knowledge. Education to a conservative is like garlic to a vampire.
Posted by: Joan | April 18, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Oh Chavez is so great he doesn’t exploit his people only those big bad oil companies do.
/sarc
Posted by: lions | April 18, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
ROFL @ Joan! Joan, tomorrow is Divine Mercy Sunday and I pray that the Lord has mercy on your hateful words
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
“president Obama speaks spanish”
Posted by: pmoffa08 | Apr 18, 2009 9:31:13 PM
Really, his Spanish is so bad I wish he wouldn’t
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
When Pavlov rang a bell, a dog salivated. When Chavez’s name is mentioned, right winger lemmings are conditioned to attack.
Chavez’s crime? Putting his own country and the rest of Latin America ahead of the IMF.
Funny how when Chavez nationalized a bank about a year ago, the American media went ape about the “socialist.” Now, the American financial system has to be saved by the government.
Posted by: Will Fletcher | April 18, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Will Fletcher, so you want to move to Bravil?
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
To refuse to consider anything because you might disagree with it ruins credibility and gives the other side ammunition to say “see, they don’t care about anyone but themselves.”
But if you read (or listen) to what’s being said and THEN say “These are the reasons that is wrong”, then the other side doesn’t have an excuse to whine.
Thank god the “Nyah Nyah I Can’t HEAR You!” administration is gone. Listening and THEN speaking is what gives us credibility, and takes it away from those who rant against us.
Posted by: Fran | April 18, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
plainsm :
Genius, Chavez is in Venezuela, not “Bravil”.
Moron.
Posted by: Fran | April 18, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Fran, 6 of one half a dozen of the other with those countries
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Re: “Boy, those ‘natural resources’ from South America sure kick ***!”
Yeah, like gold, silver and oil from Mexico. Silver from Argentina (argent means silver). Oil from Venezuela, natural gas from Bolivia, and copper from Chile.
And what about food? Corn, chocolate, vanilla, squash, chile, pumpkin, tomatoes and domesticated turkey were all first cultivated/domesticated in Mexico thousands of years ago. When you eat your turkey, corn and pumpkin pie on Thanksgiving, you are eating indigenous Mexican food. Potatoes originally come from Peru. Peanuts originally come from Brazil.
Some of the comments here are incredibly ill informed. Latin America is rich in natural resources.
Posted by: sunshine | April 18, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
plainsm: does that actually mean something?
Such a statement indicates you can’t tell one country from another so they’re all the same to you.
ROFLMAO. Maybe you should stick to the entertainment blogs.
Posted by: Fran | April 18, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Problem is the world thinks Obama is a joke an appeaser. I agree education is good, and listening to both sides not just your own is important. Though most importantly Obama doesn’t have any credibility yet, nothing was accomplished in the G20. I do think if he doesn’t just back his words with action our safety is at stake. So next test, how about getting that American journalist out of Iran. When Carter was pres. and the hostages were taken and held for years their was a reason they let them go when Reagan became president and it wasn’t because they agreed with him or liked him.
Posted by: lions | April 18, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Facts a conservative, Never shall the two meet, Being told what to think is so much easier, give a sound bite and a slogan I can repeat, a Phrase to say,facts be damn. Knowledge hell we don’t need any knowledge, thats for them liberal elitist. You can go to Harvard, receive a law degree, become president, But we are smarter, Fox news tells me everything I need to say or do. eight years late, and a president short but what I care. I’m like a person who can spout any lie I heard and believe it. don’t need any definitions, Fascist,Socialist,Communist all the same to me. Give a flag and a cause, I’ll tell my kids what to think, they don’t need the schools actually telling them the universe is not my God domain.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
This book really got the right panties in a bunch it’s a book you read them they don’t brainwash you unless you’re a poorly educated person easily influence by anything you read. books are not scary, they contain thoughts, not kyptonite, get a grip. read everything you can get your hands on, From James Joyce to jesus, LEARN !!!
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
plainsm:
I can tell you a lot about what Chavez has done in Venezuela over the last 10 years. I have a friend that is here seeking political asylum from Venezuela, because he dared to speak his mind there on the radio. You have no clue as regards of what you speak.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Steve, huh? I’m on your side!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
The problem with Latin America is the fact they always think of themselfs as victims Just like some people in the United States they always blame someone else for their problems instead of looking in the mirror they have free will to choose what to do. They need to quit whining about what happened hundred of years ago and get on with it.
Posted by: Ron | April 18, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Here here Ron! Well put!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
L.Moore:
Problem is Liberals only think they have the knowledge.
So go read Fabricantes de Miseria for an education Reading both sides is important right?
Again I think Open Veins.. is a good book and is a important to understanding the psychology of Latin America. Though the reason they fail is in their own hands and once in a while you do have to look in the mirror. South America as said below is rich in resources and should be and it’s people well off. Actually if you really get into the history of South America or Latin America you will see the close ties the Democratic Party has to many of the leaders past and present.
Posted by: lions | April 18, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
lions, well said! bravo!
Posted by: plainsm | April 18, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Recent history tell so much more about our political affairs, what short attention spans you must have to gripe about this president, each word you utter speak volumes about your mind set, When you be a critic with no solution, how nice. know everything that wrong yet say nothing of whats right. For a man to achieve what Obama has achieve when all odds were against him is beyond comparable to anything you will do in two lifetimes. yet you are critic! blog all you like but ask yourself Am I wrong? Could you be? Do I know all the answers, Am I a president of the most powerful nation in history, What do I really know that I can judge a man that is. I did not like bush but I would never denigrate him as you have Obama. And I don’t extrapolate, I deal in facts not assumptions, If a man says he makes a decision that affects 300 millions people I would hope he would use his minds instead of his gut feelings.
Posted by: L. Moore | April 18, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Conservatives don’t like to admit it when there is exploitation. Latin Americans aren’t “whining.” Our foreign policy considers Latin America “our backyard” where we can do whatever we want. NAFTA, CAFTA are harmful to American workers and Latin American workers.
Wake up conservatives. Your policies have FAILED.
I am going to buy this book. I hope it goes to number one.
hehehheh
Posted by: sunshine | April 18, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Or, on second thought, might you be referring to the idiot hoard that inundated WGN Chicago, on a command from the Obama, campaign when Milt Rosenberg interviewed Stanley Kurtz and David Freddoso during the summer. Rosenberg offered the Obama campaign a place at the table to contest any points on which the participants differed, but the opted to give the order to the idiot hoard that you are referring to to attempt to shut down the discussion by disrupting the radio station.
You can listen to the podcasts. I would imagine that you are not even aware of this. We knew how much money the RNC paid for Sarah Palin’s wardrobe, but there wasn’t much reporting on the fact that the Obama campaign deactivated the anti-fraud protection on the donor page of their website. If you never have heard of this before, its because the Washington Post buried it in a paragraph on page 23.
Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
attn sunshine you act as if copper/gold/tin/corn/peanuts etc…
are “given to us” by these latin american countries. if i eat a turkey it was purchased in a store the same with the copper untensils ! you said these products were indigenous to mexico thousands of years ago. i didnt think “mexico” as a country has been around that long… lol
latin america has also given us millions of poor, retards and gangbangers and a pain in the butt for the past 50 years in havana. btw hey fidel if your system is so superior why do you need the embargo lifted?? what if communism had won and there no longer existed a usa what would your excuse be then??
Posted by: patagonianproud | April 18, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Perhaps the obama gave him an ipod with recorded messages of how he loathes America too. They are two of a kind and both will one day give an account for their deceptive evil ways.
Posted by: i-live-2-ride | April 18, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
“I am going to buy this book.”
I guess the economy’s not that bad after all.
“Look how freaked out conservatives are over a BOOK. They fear knowledge. Education to a conservative is like garlic to a vampire.”
No, it’s just the idiots that pretend that 1. they’re actually going to read it and 2. actually understand it.
“As Americans we are not proud of all the evil and the historical mistakes committed by us with regard to the native Americans, or Latin Americans…”
Once again the arrogant Leftist attitude that dozens of other countries with hundreds of millions of people are somehow too stupid or weak to solve their own problems, or treat them as children who can’t be blamed for them.
Posted by: RR GOP | April 18, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
re: ill informed comments–no one ever said South America doesn’t have resources. The point is that all the resources in the world won’t make you wealthy. The problem with the books that Chavez reads is they don’t know where wealth comes from either. Really he’s doing a tremendous disservice to poor people everywhere by perpetuating the fallacy that resources and wealth are the same thing. Unfortunately for him he’s not hurting us one bit, but he is harming the very people he claims to stand for.
Posted by: bill | April 18, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Typical socialist reading. The message of the book is to trust a dictator to care and provide for the people. Nothing new or even insightful. This template of disillusionment can be applied to any group of people in the world. Most of the socialist dictators in Latin America are clueless in economics and recite Marxist lines in their speeches. What’s sad is that many liberal Americans buy this crap as being “educated”. This sick indoctrination occurs daily in the halls of our colleges with little questioning. It creates a group of ignorant, disillusioned youths with the arrogance of the educated elite each year.
Posted by: Malcom Z. | April 18, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
The book was “Socialism for Dummies”. What a nice gift.
Posted by: El Guapo | April 18, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
YES, I’M A MAD AMERICAN
I Am the Liberal-Progressives Worst Nightmare.
I am an American.
I am a Master Mason and believe in God.
I ride Harley Davidson Motorcycles and believe in American products.
I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some Liberal governmental functionary be it Democratic or Republican!
I’m in touch with my feelings and I like it that way!
I think owning a gun doesn’t make you a killer, it makes you a smart American.
Think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized,
and does not entitle you to anything. Get over it!
I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, do it in English.
I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God
when and where they want to..
My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and Willie G. Davidson that makes the Awesome Harley Davidson Motorcycles.
I don’t hate the rich. I don’t pity the poor.
I know wrestling is fake and I don’t waste my time watching or arguing about it.
I’ve never owned a slave, or was a slave, I haven’t burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you!
So, shut up already.
I believe if you don’t like the way things are here,
go back to where you came from and change your own country!
This is AMERICA …We like it the way it is!
If you were born here and don’t like it you are free to move to any Socialist country that will have you.
I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson preaches, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution.
Can I get an AMEN on that one?
I also think the cops have the right to pull you over if you’re breaking the law, regardless of what color you are.
And, no, I don’t mind having my face shown on my drivers license.
I think it’s good…. And I’m proud that ‘God’ is written on my money.
I think if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, I don’t want you deciding who should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.
I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me stuff or trying to guilt me into making ‘donations’ to their cause.
Get a Job and do your part!
I believe that it doesn’t take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents.
I believe ‘illegal’ is illegal no matter what the lawyers think.
I believe the American flag should be the only one allowed in AMERICA !
If this makes me a BAD American, then yes, I’m a BAD American.
If you are a BAD American too, please forward this to everyone you know.
We want our country back!
image 1109928554-0
Posted by: R. Brown | April 18, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Malcolm Z: “The message of the book is to trust a dictator to care and provide for the people.”
Did Rush tell you that? You obviously haven’t read the book yourself. You should read 1984 by George Orwell. You would see yourself reflected among the masses who cannot think for themselves.
Posted by: bodacious | April 18, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
“The point is that all the resources in the world won’t make you wealthy.”
Well, not if somebody invades your country and steals them, which is what has happened to Latin America. Gold and silver from Mexico and the rest of Latin America funded the Industrial Revolution. Part of the Heasrt Family fortune came from Mexican silver from the San Potosi mine.
We are still intervening in Latin America through the War on Drugs and through “free trade” agreements that nobody got to vote on. Some of those countries are barely sovereign.
You need to get an education because you are very ignorant of what our government does in Latin America. It’s never in the media, as the liberal media tends to ignore Latin America.
I am glad that people will be reading Galeano’s book.
Posted by: sunshine | April 19, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Why is that “Good Americans” like the one at top of the post not realize that “Good Americans” got free land and free labor for several generations. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton do not speak for African Americans they speak for your benefit financed by the Media to justify your rants about black folks wanting something for slavery and how wrong it is and how you have not gained any benefit from slavery line. In the 400 years African Americans have been in this country we have helped to build the American Dream through education, politics, the arts, and in the military where we have served with distinction in every single war from the War of Independence to our fights in Iraq today. In the short period of 50 years that there has been full integration in American society we have reached the highest levels in all areas of our society based on talent and dedication not family ties.
Posted by: krijnirnveiuhuch | April 19, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
The book “Socialism for Dummies” already exists. It is called “From the Good Savage to the Good Revolutionary” and it was written by a close friend to Eduardo Galeano. However, there is a parody of BOTH books written by 3 Latin American authors, including the son of famed Peruvian writer Vargas Llosa. The book basically discredits Galeano’s statements for being mostly false or imprecise, and is a tirade of Latin America’s love affair with a halucinating Left.
Posted by: Roberto Diaz | April 19, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
people here are saying we should read this book so we can be educated. I’m sure NAMBLA has books, and literature available for one to read. But I don’t need to read it to know it’s garbage, I don’t need to read Mein Kampf to know it’s trash. I understand the nature of the authors to know it’s not worth my time. Communism, and Facism are crazy ideologies given to us by the European elite… the same people Liberals love to emulate. I know this… Millions have been oppressed by these doctrines, and cancers of the mind. I know the US has liberated countless millions from the chains of these doctrines. There is nothing to be gained from reading their filth. You liberals can have all this valuable knowledge for yourselves.
Posted by: Scott K | April 19, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am
Well said, RR GOP/MAD AMERICAN!
Posted by: Brian in Texas | April 19, 2009, 1:44 am 1:44 am
“No thanks, Hugo, I already have it!”
Posted by: Chris | April 19, 2009, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Americans, WAKE UP! Can’t you all see we’re slowly turning into a socialistic society. Chaves just openly suggested to this pres. O that our country is a total loser and we are not to be trusted. AND this pres. accepted this book? WOW!!! Think about your children and their future, America. Read between the lines, please!
Posted by: eva | April 19, 2009, 2:15 am 2:15 am
Welcome Back Carter!
Chevez just turned Obama into a doormat, the rest of the world will be walking all over him.
Posted by: addie | April 19, 2009, 2:26 am 2:26 am
Why is this newsworthy at all? Is Mr. Tapper going to spend the next four years detailing all of the gifts that President Obama is given by foreign heads of state?
I guess it’s just food for the rabble who are going to hate Obama no matter what he does.
And really, there sure are a lot of them here, aren’t there?
Posted by: RickD | April 19, 2009, 2:57 am 2:57 am
Fear no books! All you have to lose is your opinion. Educate yourselves!!! BTW, we’ve had socialism a long time in this country; it’s called police departments, fire departments, education, mental health etc.
Posted by: Susan Pease Banitt | April 19, 2009, 3:00 am 3:00 am
Brilliant. Say what you will about Chavez but his gift to Obama of “Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent” by Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano will ensure that it will be one of the most read books of all time around the world.
Posted by: bink | April 19, 2009, 3:02 am 3:02 am
dear friends from america ,
Please remember america was no different than hitler or communism when they delt with latin american countries or countries like phillipines or palestine
i do not suport chavez or his anti american feelings , no one should support ideologies of war and oppression, either its america or russia or cuba , be friendly with every one that will help america to become most trusted partner again
Posted by: vinod | April 19, 2009, 3:03 am 3:03 am
The majority of Latin America’s problems are their own. Period. Corrupt governments and corrupt dictators do not typically create prosperous nations.
If you think about it, there is absolutely no reason for Mexico to be less economically powerful than the United States since it has an abundance of resources, rich soil, beautiful coastlines, and a temperate climate. The fact that it is practically a third-world country is a testament to its corrupt government and mobsters. It is such a tragedy. But it will rise in the next 50 years or so once the fat, disgusting, mobsters and their families are eliminated as its children increasingly grow up in a “connected” world that teaches them how disgusting and cowardly the drug/narco-trafficking world is.
Chavez continues to be a thug and literally a pig-faced dictator. Obama played it smooth. At least that’s what I’m hoping he did.
Posted by: EAS | April 19, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am
I’m sure Obama already had a copy. He also loves Frantz Fanon. Ortega, Chavez, and Morales aren’t the only commies at this meeting.
Posted by: Cambyses | April 19, 2009, 3:59 am 3:59 am
Everyone saying “the unstable and corrupt governments are Latin America’s problem”, or “the Latin American countries don’t have a base to build on”, you’re right. Now look at the source of that instability.
In Mexico, the United States continually put its own economic interests above the stability or well being of the country. We supported whoever would help us earn a quick buck, which usually meant decreasing the rights of Mexican’s citizens and weakening Mexico’s own economy and infrastructure.
The Banana Republics are another great example of this; the toppling of governments for the profit of United Fruit. US intervention in Panama was similar, landing troops a dozen times to ensure the canal was built, and instituting a favorable government.
The United States overthrew the government of Ecuador in 1961.
The United States overthrew elected social democrat Juan Bosch in the Dominican Republic in 1963.
The obvious case of Nicaragua and the Contras starting in 1983.
We put mines in the Honduran Harbors, a clearly illegal act, and were found guilty of that in international court.
Further reading on the topic, if anyone cares to learn:
The Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations: The American Search for Opportunity, 1865-1913, vol. 2
Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America
Posted by: Read up on History | April 19, 2009, 4:41 am 4:41 am
Oh no! It’s the conservatives coming out of the woodworks with the belief that the only books in the world is the Bible and Harry Potter. One to worship, one to burn.
What’s the difference between say, the Pope handing Obama a book and Chavez? I can’t think of much difference.
If most of you right-wing tea-baggers actually opened the Bible once in awhile, you’d realize that Jesus Christ was anti-American socialist.
Who cares what book somebody hands Obama to read? For all we know he’ll stick it on a shelf and not think of it again OR he can be open-minded and give it a read. Who will it hurt?
Posted by: Kelly | April 19, 2009, 4:55 am 4:55 am
Chavez has just suceeded in sending a message to USA through its #1 citizen OBAMA. “You people have long exploited us and now we are letting you know that we know” that is chjavez’s message so USA beware
Posted by: edwin | April 19, 2009, 5:05 am 5:05 am
From edwin:
Chavez has just suceeded in sending a message to USA through its #1 citizen OBAMA. “You people have long exploited us and now we are letting you know that we know” that is chjavez’s message so USA beware
_________________________________________
Osama bin Laden beat Chavez to the punch 8 years ago with the same message when Bush was the sitting President.
But it seems like things are on the up. At least Chavez didn’t call the current President the Devil. LOL!
Posted by: Kelly | April 19, 2009, 5:13 am 5:13 am
some peoples win, some lose.
be a winner, not a whiner.
Posted by: Peter in Laurel | April 19, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
While you people rag on about a book and what America may or may not have done in the past, Congress is about to pass a bill that completely violates the First Amendment. Not only does it violate Free Speech but it also prohibits the Free Exercise of Religion for individuals who participate in the Serve America Act–H.R.1388.
Sec. 1310. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES AND INELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.
Subtitle C of title I (42 U.S.C. 12571 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 132 the following:
SEC. 132A. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES AND INELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.
(7) “Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of proselytization, consistent with section 132.”
_____________
Wake up America!
Posted by: James Danley | April 19, 2009, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Dictators have to have a boogy man to demonize and help them get away with what they do to their own people. When they say it’s all for the revolution what they really mean is I have to have an excuse for completely controlling you in all that you think and do so I can have complete power. I know better what is best for you, now and forever. I know what’s fair and you don’t really care as much as I do. Wait, that sounds like the Progressive,Liberals in OUR country.
Posted by: E. Hutchison | April 19, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Jo
James Danley
Isn’t the clue the word “mandatory” ? Which means that mandatory religious instruction is prohibited – but not when it’s voluntary. So what’s the big deal ? It’s basically saying that you cannot be obliged to follow religious instruction if you don’t want to. Thus it is entirely in keeping with the First Amendment – so why the fuss ? Are you defending the idea that religious instruction should be mandatory ? Surely not !
Posted by: jo | April 19, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am
E.Hutchinson
No it sounds like Bush and Osama Ben laden. He was Bush’s bogey man, right ? Very much like Emmanuel Goldstein in 1984.
An excellent excuse to keep those military industries churning out expensive junk, thus fattening the wallets of the Bush family and their cronies with bumper dividends, at the expense of the US taxpayer, who is today footing the bill.
No wonder Osama’s so elusive – catching him would have put an end to the “War on Terror” – and then how would we keep those lucrative Raytheon, Boeing and General Dynamics assembly lines turning ?
Posted by: jo | April 19, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Barack already has a copy of that book. Barack used it’s text as a guideline for his “stimulus” plan.
Posted by: Matt | April 19, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am
This book is remarkable! Powerful yet poetic. We have to take into consideration years before colonialism took place in these once rich, presently undevelop places such as ‘Latin America’ and ‘Africa’- until we face our truths, we can keep avoiding all the questions. With great honor this gift is truly an enlighten one.
Posted by: Bigs | April 19, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Reading many of the comments left concerning this subject certainly proves one important point; political divisiveness among citizens draws their attention away from what is really going on. Divide and conquor is one of the oldest and most effective strategies used by “leaders” since the beginning of time. James Danley posted a good point that went ignored in responses. What he posted is a fact that transcends political differences and parties, but was missed because there is so much finger pointing nd name calling going on. Don’t you see that this is exactly what leaders of both parties want? As long as the American public argues and the cultural gap widens in society, political leaders (of the two major parties) can exploit that fact and remain in power. Conservative and Liberal talk show hosts and media personalities just fan the flames of this destructive inferno, and make damn good livings as a result. CNN, FOX, Washington Post etc. should not make your minds up for you. More people need to step back, look at the nation’s situation from a distance safely away from contaminating political commentary and media distraction, and you will see how easily our attention is drawn away from what is really happening in our country. Divide the races and cultures, pit the haves against the have nots, set young against old, men against women, throw in personal sexual preferences to widen the gap further, and good old religious differences to really stir the pot of separation soup. As long as the focus is on “American Idol” and not on American Law Makers, then our society is doomed to the fate of every other failed society throughout history. Please stop this political fighting over what path Republicans or Democrats will lead us. They are both leading us down the same path as long as they keep us separate and misinformed. If there is one thing both parties agree on, it is that our government, no matter which of the two parties is in power, will not allow a third party to take power, or afford the citizens an opportunity to remove them from power by any means, simply by keeping citizens fighting among themselves over which party is right, and saying the things necessary to keep people fired up and pointing fingers at one another. As long as attention is paid to other distractions, lawmakers can do whatever they want to us, and we will never even realize it until it is too late. Gotta run now, “Idol” is coming on…
Posted by: John F. Kane | April 19, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Jo:
“Mandatory” is a subtext. The bill states, “…that includes mandatory…” Thus the bill ALSO prohibits voluntary religious expression as well. Read the entire portion on prohibited activities. It also prohibits the right of the those serving under this act “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Jo:
“Mandatory” is a subtext. The bill states, “…that includes mandatory…” Thus the bill ALSO prohibits voluntary religious expression as well. Read the entire portion on prohibited activities. It also prohibits the right of the those serving under this act “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Anyone serving under this bill will have to surrender ALL of their First Amendment Rights.
Posted by: James Danley | April 19, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Sorry, I thought I had just added the last sentence to my comment before posting. But obviously in adding the last sentence I also copied my first paragraph again.
Posted by: James Danley | April 19, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
I am sure that the appeaser in chief is in full agreement with how bad our great country is. He has not once stood up to our enemies, his friends, who are condemning our country. He most probably hates America and its values more than our enemies, his friends. I hope the obambtons are happy now that he daemons our country and is hopping into bed with all our enemies while condemning our friends, his enemies.
Posted by: 7papa7 | April 19, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
They both hate America -
They are both Socialists -
They both are dictators -
No wonder they hit it off so well.
Posted by: Kenny West | April 19, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
What I find so infuriating is that liberals keep prefacing their comments with the words “you right wingers”. Hey wake up! I’m no right winger! I just can’t stand to see my president go to foriegn shores and constantly apologize for the USA. You “left wingers” love Barry Co. I don’t! I don’t like the spending that he is inflicting upon future generations of Americans. He gets along alittle too well with far left dictators for my tastes, yet you “left wingers” find a way of excusing this. You people make me sick, frankly.
Posted by: Riffy | April 19, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Read Jared Diamond’s Guns Germs and Steel, a great book that covers why the very root causes Latin America, as well as Africa, ended up getting the short end of history thus far. Blame politics all you want, that’s just proximate causes. It’s all geography and the luck of where aboriginals ended up.
Posted by: Ernie Oporto | April 19, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Strange that in the title of this book that “five centuries” is in there…the only problem is, the United States has been around only 200 years…so, what about the preceding 300 years?
No mention of that from the Marxists…just more bashing of the U.S.
For maybe just the last 100 years the U.S. has had anything like the power to ‘exploit’ LA?
Obviously, they have not read it despite their claims.
Posted by: RR GOP | April 19, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
In order to maintain power dictators need to demonize someone. Being the most ideaologically opposite and most abundant just happens to make the USA the easiest target. The “woe is me” act is wearing thin and is disgusting. We are not perfect, have plenty of warts but try to find a better example of goodness and opportunity in terms of a nation.
Posted by: Joe B | April 19, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
“Chavez keeps getting re-elected, so he must be doing something correctly.”
But, that logic, of course, does not apply to President Bush now does it?
Posted by: RR GOP | April 19, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Dr. Sam: “The important question for us is: why are so many Latin American countries going leftist? This is what we want to stop!”
Why? Scandanavia (Sweden, Finland, Denmark) is socialist. Why is it OK there, but not in Latin America?
I’ll tell you why. Because we install leaders in Latin America who will let the corporations take all of their natural resources without paying for them, and I include labor as a natural resource. (Think of Mexico. Their current President was selected by their Supreme Court.) Any leader who won’t go along with the plan of the global elite is demonized as an “enemy” even if that leader has done nothing bad to our country.
Posted by: Susan | April 19, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I doubt that few of you have actually visited South America, much less lived there. I lived in Guadalajara for 5 years and saw first hand the corruption that stops their economy from growing. Property rights don’t exist, just ask the folks in Puerto de Hierro, one of the richest and most exclusive enclaves. Out of nowhere somebody decides to build a high rise condos right in the middle of their nice residential development. Traffic was already a nightmare and now it’s worth. The governments of South America are open to the highest bidder, much like the US. But at least we respect property rights and the people has some say in local planning.
Have traveled to Brazil 2x on business and they are very different than Mexico. Much more European influence with a well developed economy. Spent 2 weeks in Chile and Argentina on honeymoon and Chile is also very advanced compared to the rest of Central and South America.
If you really want to know the root cause of Latin America’s problems, just check the Swiss bank accounts of their leaders. How much money do you think Chavez, Castro and others are stealing from their own people? Follow the money, just like here in the good old USA.
Posted by: Jon Barecky | April 19, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
“Because we install leaders in Latin America who will let the corporations take all of their natural resources without paying for them,…”
Yeah, and as governor of Alaska Sarah Palin has made the oil companies pay the state for its resources.
It’s not the actions, obviously, but rather the ideology that counts, eh?
Posted by: RR GOP | April 19, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Great culture and book.
For whiners, failures and cowards, that is.
In essence, it simply does its best to blame others for its own
failures, while using anti-white racism in the process, to boot.
And THAT is the similarity to “Hitler,” not anything America did or
tried to do in so-called ‘Latin America.’
Shove it, Chavez, you utterly miserable failure.
Posted by: Zeb | April 19, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
I’m still chewing on this idea that bad Latin American leaders are ‘installed’ (by the U.S. of course) but the good Communist ones are fairly elected.
So, exactly what have we gotten from Latin America that has made the U.S. so wealthy and successful as a nation?
Of course, it couldn’t be the system our Forefathers worked and fought for, nor the hard work/ingenuity of our people, nor the great wealth of natural resources AND the efficient management of them.
Mexico is just south of the U.S. separated by (barely) a ‘river’…same continent, lots of oil and other resources…they had control of the same resources of all of the western U.S. states combined for a very long time, a modern army-but yet easily lost the Mexican-American War…what’s their excuse?
Posted by: RR GOP | April 19, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
“It’s not the actions, obviously, but rather the ideology that counts, eh?”
How’s Iran-contra for action?
-Illegally selling arms to fund terrorists who indiscriminately kill whole villages of men, women and children so argi-conlomerates can maintain control of the the economy of small nations.
Posted by: Skip | April 19, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
I am shocked by the ignorance of so many comments on this site. How quickly people forget. Ronald Regan felt he was above the law of the United States people. Congress told him not to sell arms to Iran to fund the contras, yet he went ahead and did it anyway. The result being many mass graves all over Central America. I don´t see it as anti-USA to admit where we were wrong. The United States has meddled in Latin American politics for a long time with some horrible results. What is anti-USA in admitting that?
Posted by: Vecino | April 19, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
“How’s Iran-contra for action?
-Illegally selling arms to fund terrorists who indiscriminately kill whole villages of men, women and children so argi-conlomerates can maintain control of the the economy of small nations.”
Sure, but if Iran-Contra had been for supporting the likes of the Shining Path or FARC, then that would be A-OK, huh?
Posted by: RR GOP | April 19, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
maybe everybody should just buy this book and read it so they knows what they’re on about before they go a’ spoutin’ off at the mouth again?
Posted by: david clark | April 19, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
I love the way Chavez and Ortega dwell in the past. Now with the Bush administration gone they have no one to rail against.
Posted by: Paulo | April 19, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
“Sure, but if Iran-Contra had been for supporting the likes of the Shining Path or FARC, then that would be A-OK, huh?”
Certainly not! I don’t think the Iran arms sales should have been made to fund anything let alone violent groups of any kind, anywhere.
I meant to say ‘agri-conglomerates before; the guys who think it’s OK to grow coffee instead of food when the people are starving, so we can have a cheap cup of coffee every morning.
Posted by: Skip | April 19, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
“maybe everybody should just buy this book and read it so they knows what they’re on about before they go a’ spoutin’ off at the mouth again?”
Yes, and The Communist Manifesto, everything written by Dear Leader and Jimmy Carter, too.
That’s along the same lines of ‘well, don’t criticize LSD unless you drop some acid’, or ‘don’t criticize prostitution until you’ve paid for sex.’
That is, one must submerse themselves in trash so that they can no longer criticize it themselves thus removing opposition (‘Well, YOU read/did it!’)
I’m sure you have Mein Kampf, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the Turner Diaries sitting on your bookshelf?
And if you aren’t, by the same ‘logic’ Liberals use in their arguments, you are not being open-minded.
Posted by: RR GOP | April 19, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
European and American interests killed millions of natives in the Americas. Why is it so difficult to admit to the truth? We know it happened.
We know that the U.S. was convicted of war crimes, namely a war of agression in Nicaragua and ordered by the World Court to pay restitution for the slaughter of tens of thousands of innocent people (and this is within the last 40 years).
We should acknowledge and apologize for our sins and try to make amends where its possible.
Posted by: AJ Simkatu | April 19, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
“European and American interests killed millions of natives in the Americas. Why is it so difficult to admit to the truth? We know it happened.”
Sure, and how many natives were themselves killed by the Incas, Mayans, and Aztecs in their pursuit of empire? Add to that the many other tribal wars and what do you have?
Simply Man’s inhumanity to Man. Not the White Man as the chief target of all Humankind’s woes.
Posted by: RR GOP | April 19, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Latino like all dictators create an enemy for the people they wouldn’t otherwise have to get their support while holding them in almost bondage and slavery. All those nations should turn to democratic governance and capitalism even while we ae turning away from what made this country the greatest ever.
Posted by: Jack Kinch(1uncle) | April 19, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Re: “Sure, and how many natives were themselves killed by the Incas, Mayans, and Aztecs in their pursuit of empire? Add to that the many other tribal wars and what do you have?”
We have right wing BS. There were millions of indigenous people in the Americas in 1492. Both the Spanish and the English decided to commit genocide and take the land and its resources for themselves. They bragged about it in their own writings. Read “American Holocaust” by David E. Stannard.
Human sacrifice was also a myth created by the Spaniards to justify the Conquest. They took some Indians to Spain and tortured them in The Inquisition until they “admitted” that they committed human scarifice. That is the only “evidence” of it. Yet it is repeated as though it were historical fact.
Posted by: Joey | April 19, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Obama probably gave him a hula hoop and a Duncan yo-yo.
Posted by: Ben | April 19, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
RR GOP: “I meant to say ‘agri-conglomerates before; the guys who think it’s OK to grow coffee instead of food when the people are starving, so we can have a cheap cup of coffee every morning.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dear RR,
Coffe is food… and medicine. I’ve been drinking coffee every morning for 25 years which is why my last colonoscopy shows that I have the ‘healthiest colon” my doctor has ever seen. Also, coffee cheap? Where? Do I need a coupon for the discount?
Posted by: charles | April 19, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
It is quite the tragedy to see that people are as close minded and limited by their ignorance to reject centuries of an objective analysis of history and simply denounce people that offer a different perspective and critique of history as “Blame America First crowd.”
This type of approach to critiques of history are what keep people limited to their rigid perspectives which result in a stagnation of intellectual and character growth. [I've probably already lost the authors of these comments by now, but that's ok.]
If we are to learn from our history, which any intelligent and well educated person strives to do, then we must be open to intelligent and academic critiques of history in order to both learn from different perspectives and also develop valid counter-arguments.
For the record, I am a “Conservative” as would be considered in the U.S. I study at one of the most conservative universities in the U.S.–Liberty University. I see this limited and ignorant attitude all the time at Liberty. There are infinitely valuable ideals within the Conservative movement that could be intelligently advanced if approached correctly.
In regards to Latin America, the leaders of these countries have more than valid arguments, they argue from experience as well. Just go to Wikipedia and you’ll see a list of U.S. interventions in Latin America throughout the 20th century. These interventions were both illegal and immoral. This presents a problem for someone claiming to take the higher moral ground.
Hopefully, the continuing efforts to educate Americans will result in a more shrewd people, and will result in valuing and appreciating other cultures as much as we appreciate ours.
Posted by: A. Cervantes | April 19, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Sorry, RR GOP. My last post was for Skip.
Posted by: charles | April 19, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
This president needs a serious training session in how to handle himself around foriegn leaders. First it’s tacky gifts and hands-on with the Queen of England, bowing in front of the Saudi King and how hamming it up with Chavez, a man who wants to see our destruction. Of course he may well be serious here and not care that he’s befriending a basic declared ememy. I just wonder if he actually cares. And when the press, yes, you ABC, tries to dance around it and say it’s just diplomacy I tell you, it drives me right back to FOX news. This is pathetic in every way. I just hope this Obama realizes that with every wink and giggle with a foriegn dictator that hates us, more and more votes are lost for him in 3 years, and also next year in the mid-terms.
Posted by: Dale Mack | April 19, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
To Dale Mack: Obama was not “hamming it up” with Chavez. He shook his hand. Big deal.
People make too big a deal over Chavez. He’s not China or the Soviet Union. He doesn’t have WMDs. He has oil that he won’t give away to the multi-national oil companies that that’s why he’s demonized.
What did he give us? A BOOK. That’s a thoughtful and intelligent gift, but in right-wing wacko land , a book that has not been pre-approved by Rush and Fox News is dangerous.
Posted by: susan | April 19, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Susan, you’re misinformed…Chavez isn’t “demonized” because he won’t be ruled by big oil (nice liberal talking point: blame the ills of the world on greedy American corporations). He’s demonized because he’s a thug. Why? Because he uses his power in order to rewrite constitutions in order to retain his power and stay in office as dictator. Seems to me that your liberal heart would bleed for the Venezuelan people who are ruled in tyranny…but somehow, we are to blame for that, too. Is that not the actions of a thug?
And what’s this about books being approved by Fox News or Rush? Do you smell what you’re shoveling? It’s leftists who try to silence people and ban books that don’t agree with their agenda…conservatism is about keeping your liberal “committees” away from banning this or that. It’s ironic that the base word of ‘liberalism’ is ‘liberty’…yet liberals try to silence anyone they disagree with…be it the fairness doctrine (because they can’t compete in a free market)…and your protesters at colleges around the US throwing pies and forcing speakers out of classrooms and off stages…the ACLU circumventing the people’s will by going through sleezy liberal court circuits to get your way…you people preach tolerance, open-mindedness, kindness, & letting everyone have a part of the discussion…yet you try to silence anyone who disagrees with you. In your own mind, you’re the “nice” people…yet any liberal I’ve known is vindictive, envious, angry, and thinks this country owes them something. Conservative college kids don’t even act like that…so when Obama speaks at Notre Dame, you won’t see any conservatives trying to disrupt him the way liberals would if it were Bush, for example. Your entire philosophy is based on emotional decisions, what Aristotle called “irrational”. I love my liberal friends…it’s not that they’re ignorant, it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so. M’out.
Posted by: shawn | April 19, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Obama’s book is #2 on Amazon and a very good gift for a Dictator…see all Presidantial gifts at http://leevandenbrink.blogspot.com
Posted by: Lee Vanden Brink | April 19, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
What a thoughtful gift!! And all Obama got for him was a Spanish-dubbed set of DVDs of Chico and the Man.
Posted by: BabyObama | April 19, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Obama’s Presidential book hits # 2 on Amazon…See all the great gifts ideas for Queens or Dictators at
Posted by: Lee Vanden Brink | April 19, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
And of course it was awkward because Obama had planned on giving Chavez the same book.
Posted by: Nigel Tufnel | April 19, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
It seems no one has anything to say to the truth I posted below:
Everyone saying “the unstable and corrupt governments are Latin America’s problem”, or “the Latin American countries don’t have a base to build on”, you’re right. Now look at the source of that instability.
In Mexico, the United States continually put its own economic interests above the stability or well being of the country. We supported whoever would help us earn a quick buck, which usually meant decreasing the rights of Mexican’s citizens and weakening Mexico’s own economy and infrastructure.
The Banana Republics are another great example of this; the toppling of governments for the profit of United Fruit. US intervention in Panama was similar, landing troops a dozen times to ensure the canal was built, and instituting a favorable government.
The United States overthrew the government of Ecuador in 1961.
The United States overthrew elected social democrat Juan Bosch in the Dominican Republic in 1963.
The obvious case of Nicaragua and the Contras starting in 1983.
We put mines in the Honduran Harbors, a clearly illegal act, and were found guilty of that in international court.
Further reading on the topic, if anyone cares to learn:
The Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations: The American Search for Opportunity, 1865-1913, vol. 2
Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America
Posted by: Learn Some History | April 19, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Please, we givetens of billions of dollars a year in remittances to latin america. OUR TAX DOLLARS!!! The Panama Canal is extremely important to international trade. Do you think it should not have been built???
Posted by: chochy | April 19, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Shawn: “He’s demonized because he’s a thug. Why? Because he uses his power in order to rewrite constitutions in order to retain his power and stay in office as dictator.”
Shawn: America does business with dictators all the time, as long as those dictators are open to giving multi-national corporations access to cheap labor and resources.
If Chavez gave away his country’s oil, labor and resources, our government would have no problem with him, no matter what he did to his people.
Pinochet of Chile is a perfect example. He was installed by the US on Sept. 11, 1973, because the elected President, Allende, wanted to keep Chile’s resources for Chile. So the US put in a right-wing dictator who let multi-national corporations have copper and other natural resources.
Those are the facts, my friend. Why do you think the media never reports on Latin America? Not even the liberal stations? They don’t want this stuff coming up.
Posted by: susan | April 19, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Chairman Oh and Red Hugo have a lot in common- both are arrogant narcissists with a racial victimhood complex… and are habitual liars.
-
Both displayed contempt for democracy/opposition once elected- and are absolutely clueless re. economic manners. And both are out to serve a far-left agenda while dragging a bountiful nation into the abyss.
-
So these two have plenty to chat about-
-
Actually, I think I respect Chavez more than our guy- he might be a misguided socialist yahoo, but at least he admits it.
-
Posted by: Reaganite Republican Resistance | April 19, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
There’s no irony in a guy named Chavez giving a book about European exploitation of South America. I mean, for God’s sake, it’s called Latin America because of the exploitation.
He’s a thug. Obama should be embarrassed for giving the thug the time of day and legitimizing him.
Posted by: John | April 19, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Oh, gee, and here I thought these idiots hated America because of Bush. Oops. My bad.
Posted by: Pete Vino | April 19, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
The eggplant meets the potato.
Posted by: People for the Ethical Treatment of Vegetables | April 19, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
There is not a dimes worth of difference between Obama’s ideology and the ideology of Chavez. The only difference is that Chavez can state it openly while Obama acts it out but has to dissemble like mad with ambiguous or misleading language.
Posted by: student1776 | April 19, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
He should have given Obama “Confessions
Of A Economic Hit Man”. That way he could have heard it direct from an agent of the
Federal Govt. You might want to read it.
Because, after all…we are next.
Posted by: quinny | April 19, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Chavez is a great leader who has extreme courage to stand up against the U.S. A previous reader stated to read, Confessions Of A Economic Hit Man by John Perkins. This book reveals how the U.S. and our allies force and/or decieve (bribe) leaders allowing for the exploitation of their people and resources.
Posted by: Isaac | April 19, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Why don’t all you A,erica Haters pack your bags and find some other country you like better. Some other place that will allow you to make a living. Have a home, and most of all spout all of this hatred for the country that is the best in the world. Maybe Hugo will allow you to come to his house. I am sick and tired of seeing all these hateful comments. You all act like you have read some many books and have all the answers. One idiot tells us to go to Wikipedia to get the right answer. What a dolt. So>>>find another country and get yourself out of here, and don’t let the Flag hit you in the behind on the way out. and I do read the Bible and Jesus Christ was about love, but he was also about doing for yourself, not having others do for you. Give a man a fish and you will feed him for the day. Teach a man to fish and he will take care of himself.
Goodby all you Anti-Americans. I wish I could wish you all out of this country.
Posted by: Ru | April 19, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
it is important to split off latin america from Iran and china. Even if we have to swallow crap. Chavez and fellow lefties ties to Iran and china is more dangerous than accepting a book even a book in latin or spinglish.
believing too muchus propaganda is bad for your health.
Posted by: rh | April 19, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Someone wrote a book about a whole continent stupid enough to grab their ankles for the world for 500 years. Do you think this whiner is part of the problem or the solution? Obviously a whole lot of slow learners in that neighborhood!
Posted by: civilnomore | April 19, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
“Sure, and how many natives were themselves killed by the Incas, Mayans, and Aztecs in their pursuit of empire? Add to that the many other tribal wars and what do you have?”
There is no question that the natives were also brutal to themselves and others, but the moral argument that “he did it first” is not that effective on reasoning adults past the third grade.
The vast majority of atrocities were commited by European and American business interests.
Posted by: AJ Simkatu | April 19, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Oh, really…so if the United States had ignored Latin America and refused to do business with them, that would be OK?
There wouldn’t BE any businesses in Latin America if it weren’t for the Americans and the Europeans, just as there’s no way that the Arabs could have figured out how to drill oil on their own…much less figure out a use for it.
People in many parts of Latin America are exploiting THEMSELVES, and without America’s help-crime, corruption, kidnappings, murder, assassinations, bombings, armed thugs, private armies.
It is not the United States’ fault that they chose to stick with semi-feudalism and failed to adopt Jeffersonian Democracy.
I still point to the past and the inane argument that the Communists always make that it is better for the natives to exploit and butcher each other because then it’s ‘revolution’, ‘social evolution’ and ‘self-determination’, and if outsiders do it, it’s ‘exploitation’ and ‘imperialism’.
There is no way on Earth that one can (without lying) say that the United States has done ANYTHING (sorry, no italics here) like the Europeans did originally in the way of imperialism in Latin America…or Africa or Asia for that matter.
Posted by: RR GOP | April 20, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Chavez gave Obama the book because Obama already has a black velvet painting of Elvis. :)
Posted by: charles | April 20, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Ahhh, how fascinating to see all these armchair experts in world politics! The internet is a breading ground for morons to post comments to fire each other up, 700 some odd comments, nearly all a waste of time…. Seems like Americans sure like to hear themselves talk and have opinions on things they know nothing about.. would not expect anything else.
Posted by: Armchairian Commenter | April 20, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
How would you react if a person like Hugo Chavez walks up to you in front of the media and presents you with a book? Be rude and tell him to go away?President Obama did the best thing he could of done and that was be cordial and accept the gift amongst the public eye. Anything less than cordial would of resulted in more political conflict not needed.
Posted by: Hello | April 20, 2009, 3:04 am 3:04 am
A gift is a gift, given in good spirit that makes us one – the receiver and the giver. The TAO says we should never question a giver’s purpose, but the gift giver should also never ask us if we ripped the pages from such a book to clean our behind. So says Lao Tsu.
Posted by: Ronald Reagan | April 20, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am
I don’t think Chavez can teach Obama anything about bashing America.
He seems to be doing just fine himself every opportunity he gets overseas.
I am sure he will love the book from his new friend. Maybe Michelle will invite the warm & fuzzy Chavez in for a stay in the Lincoln Bedroom.
Be just like the good ole Clinton days…
Posted by: Freudor | April 20, 2009, 4:22 am 4:22 am
Anybody notice that in South America, they speak Spanish and not English as we do in the United States? If the people of South America want to be mad at anyone, be mad at Spain for taking all the gold not the United States. The fact of the matter is, it doesn’t matter who you are, where you are from, how much you make for a living or how much you already have, and might I mention this is also the reason why socialism may never work. Almost nobody in this world ever wakes up in the morning and says to themselves, I think I have to much or make to much so I think I’m going to give away part of my income or tell the boss at work that I think I’m being payed more than I am worth so I’ll be glad to take a pay cut.
It is human nature to always want more than we already have. This does not only pertain to the monetary system but also knowledge, this is why most of us are not still swinging in trees and eating each other. We always want the simplest least expensive answer that we can find, this will most likely never change, or at least we may never live to see it. When will it change? It will change when we all place more value on others than we do ourselves. We all need to learn that our friends, family coworkers and, everyone in our lives and around us are just as important as we are to ourselves. Everything that we do affects everyone and everything around us, until we all learn that the world will never change. This is why I fear for our future as a whole.
Posted by: The Mad American | April 20, 2009, 5:10 am 5:10 am
The copy of the book Chavez gave Obama appears to be in Spanish, a language Obama does not speak.
“when Europeans come over here, they all speak English, they speak French, they speak German, but when we go over there, all we can say is ‘merci beaucoup.’”
“Instead of worrying about whether immigrants will learn English, you need to make sure your child can speak Spanish.”
So Obama doesn’t speak Spanish, but expects our kids to? More of his do as I say, not as I do policy.
This guy is an embarrassment to the American people. He is consistently showing his inexperience and lack of skills. Someone get him an earpiece and talk for him before he does something even more stupid. -If that is possible.
The book, first published in Spanish in 1971, offers a critique of the consequences of 500 years of European and U.S. colonization of Latin America.
The last I knew, the US was only 233 years old. I must ask, how many Latin American countries has the US colonized in the past 233 years? I know we were instrumental in Panama and the resultant canal (we don’t own or operate it anymore and look at how that country is thriving).
Wake up America! I must agree with IC Atlanta
| Apr 18, 2009 9:50:28 AM
Chavez and Obama are really not that much different from one another. In the Venezuelan election of 1998, Chavez told all the Venezuelans what they wanted to hear. He presented himself as a moderate. The political center of the Venezuelan populace that was feed up with the status quo was wooed into voting for him. Over the last 11 years, however, he has revealed his true authoritarian colors. He has constantly maneuvered to centralize the powers of government into his hands, he has nationalized key industries and extended the largesse of the government to make an ever increasing number of Venezuelans dependent upon government hand outs, he has nationalized key industries and expanded the ranks of those employed by the government so that millions more depend upon government for their livelihoods. Additionally, he has polarized his country like never before. While the left and right bicker, he quietly steals the freedom of both sides.
Obama is turning this once great nation into a nation that will be mocked and taken advantage of. When we show weakness, the dictators use that to increase their power and influence. The one thing that this has shown is that we shouldn’t elect someone to high office without looking at their background first.
Posted by: Bill | April 20, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am
They don’t complain to Spain, France, or England because the U.S. is the country with the checkbook and liberal white guilt. This was nothing more than the guilt trip that preludes the begging se$$ion. They should be focusing on population control from Mexico to Argentina to stabilize their economy.
Posted by: yell | April 20, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
In return for the book Obama gave Chavez a boxed set of John Wayne movie DVD’s.
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspirator | April 20, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
I don’t get it. The Latins complain about the U.S. exploiting them, all but Cuba that complains about our staying away.
Posted by: murphy stone | April 20, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Obama will come home, Chavez will call him an idiot as he has done before and that will be that!
Posted by: PC | April 20, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
After an expensive and lengthy trip to Europe,Turkey,Saudi Arabia and Latin Amemerica our President came back with “a book”.The only cunning one was Castro, who will be laughing his way to the bank smoking his cuban cigar.
Posted by: MFB | April 20, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Has the U.S. meddled in Latin America? Sure it has but let’s put things in perspective – the major source of trouble in Latin America is its consistent losers parade of leaders and constant flirtation with socialism.
Argentina was the 6th largest world economy in the 1930s (larger than Canada) and was poised to be a world economic power. Alas, it will never be thanks to Peronists, socialists and others who have controlled it’s economy for the last 80 years. Oh, and the the government just confiscated all private pensions and 401K type assets from individuals to help meet its massive spending obligations. Nice!
Contrast that experience with Chile, which adopted free market principles in the mid-1970s and today is, without a doubt, the most healty economy in the region. Where did they get the expertise to pull this off? Why, from Milton Freedman and economists from the University of Chicago (the “Chicago Boys”), that’s where!
Posted by: Marty | April 20, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
I’m a little confused. I sent Senator Obama a criminal indictment, in the form of a book, and it was returned with a letter stating “Senator Obama wants to lead by example. Instituting a clear cut, no-gift policy should eliminate any appearance of an individual or organization attempting to influence him.” Then I resent the indictment to President Obama this year and it was returned again. How is it I can’t get the highest Executive officer in my country to accept a criminal indictment of a number of officials posing as law-enforcement and he can accept a GIFT, in the form of a book, from a foreign dignitary?
Brian Kilcullen ~ Enemies in War
Posted by: Brian Kilcullen | April 20, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Tell me again how allowing a commander to give the orders to kill three pirates is supposed to redeem this President when it comes to foreign policy. Seriously is there any dictator, tyrant, human-rights abuser or mass murderer that he will actually castigate instead of blaimg the US for their actions? This is beoming a cavalcade of appeasement for some of the most brutal thugs in the world. The
handshake he gave Chavez was an absolute disgrace, as he was all smiles and laughter, like he had just met a childhood hero or something.
And please, don’t tell me “well Bush did this, or Bush did that”, because the man is no longer president and he no longer formulates American foreign policy. Obama may actually be worse than Carter. At least Carter boycotted the Olympics, instead of giving tin pot dictators propaganda-rich photo-ops. This president is an absolute embarrassment, and he offers no solace at all to those who have to suffer under the tyranny of the men he is busy patting on the back.
Posted by: Jim | April 20, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
The US has meddled in Latin America. Whooo, that’s good. For a second, I thought Chavez might not have a reason to make all dissent and criticism of him illegal. I thought he mignt not be justified in seizing private property by force, jailing his opponents and rigging elections. I thought there might not be a rationale behind funding a terrorist organization, FARC, and becoming pals with a state, Iran, that funds Hamas and Hezbollah. But since we have meddled in Latin American affairs, all this is reasonable, and Obama looks great palling around with this paragon of virtue. And for a second I thought it might look like he was chummy with a brutal totalitarian thug. Boy am I relieved.
Posted by: Jim | April 20, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
What Hugo Chavez reads or recommends is his business. What President Obama reads is his business, also. But when an America-hating dictator uses a naive politician to advance his destructive agenda and in so doing elevates obscure, leftist political propaganda to the top of Amazon.com….that is the business of the American people. And we are paying rapt attention. Here’s the kicker. Make no assumptions about where I’m coming from. I’ve been a Democrat my entire life and I’m appalled by President Obama’s lack of awareness.
Posted by: Carole | April 20, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
The only reason for the problems some of these Latin American countries have, is that their politicians there are thiefs, and these countries have a history of economis rip-off at the hands of the politicians they elected.
Another problem after that one is that some of them keep blaming other countries for what happened 600 years ago, instead of assuming responsibility,and stop whining.
On top of that, many of these countries have been penetrated by the ideology of the government of Castro, now Chavez, etc., which use opportunism to exacerbate the situation described above.
It’s like a psychologically disturbed person: cannot let go, and focus on the present, blame others for their problems, and keep electing the wrong people, like an abused woman keeps chosing abusive men.
That’s what’s really happening in Latin Ametica in a nutshell.
Posted by: Richard | April 21, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Impressive. It is a given that L.A. corrupt governments have much to do with its present economic state but do not deny the US role as an important factor as well. Most US lack information of their own history let alone other countries and so base their opinions on heartless, free market ideas, and so called democracy. It is amazing how even after being affected (loss of homes, IRA’s, etc)US people still take the blame for their losses, instead of seeing how the system creates avariciousness and an amoral system where health is a commodity and not a basic human right, where somebody can billions at the expense of cheap labor somewhere else and that is conisdered savvy business practices.
Posted by: GregRdz | April 21, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
The past is the past. America has made its mistakes, but also has had its share of triumphs and has given alot to the world. Hugo Chavez is an ass clown. Obama is not a fool for accepting the book. Anyone would have done that including both the bushs reagan carter and clinton. Obama is a fool for thinking that Hugo Chavaz, Kim Jong Il and others just hated George Bush. They hate America and guess what Pres Obama you are America. Stand up to these idiots, because they are our greatest threat, and will be for a long time.
Posted by: joe | April 23, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am
As a latinamerican I have to say that we don’t have to blame anything to the US, actually, we have to bless it. America has been home to millions of latinamerican people that had to run from their countries because of people like Chavez, Correa or Morales, who are there to get rich at the cost of making their people poor.
Posted by: toy | April 30, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
After reading several coments it seems like here in the usa the word america is specific to only united states. after so many decades you all fail to realize that the people of canada central and south america are americans we are still educated in the rest of the contenent that we are americans and by the way spanish is a european language.
Posted by: Rudy O Pineda | May 29, 2009, 2:25 am 2:25 am
I wonder how many of u people posting comments here have acually lived in 3rd world contries, or maybe u have just gone there to visit. which is not the same, have u acually been there long enough to see the effect american companies have on them, how they pay them a poverty rate enough to live on hunger. When u live hungry every day and you have children you cant feed, or a bed to put them to bed in. Thats when people start joing revolutions wanting to become socialists, prehaps under false promises of a better life. Who cares about the book its history. Our history, it does not lie. I read this book 10 years ago, it didnt make me hate anyone as has any other history book. It just made me relize how after all we are all human come from one. How possibly we are all american,arab,hispanic,,euorpean, maybe even human..: )
Posted by: diana | June 2, 2009, 2:13 am 2:13 am
After an expensive and lengthy trip to Europe,Turkey,Saudi Arabia and Latin Amemerica our President came back with “a book”.The only cunning one was Castro, who will be laughing his way to the bank smoking his cuban cigar.
Posted by: Rankers | August 25, 2009, 4:01 am 4:01 am
The people (assumedly all U.S. citizens) who wrote the caustic responses all buy into the “America is superior”, America is the great good Samaritan to these lowly “third world countries”… (The US invented that phrase you know.).
Every one of them should READ the BOOK before they lambaste the contents or Hugo Chavez’s stance.
But they won’t… which is why the rest of the world calls the people of America “ignorant” and worse.
All those who refuse to READ or LEARN what is contained in the pages of HISTORY are doomed to repeat it, and that is coming to pass today … America is no more.. replaced by “The United States”… the people have already fallen into the status of “lowly third world country”..biggest debtor in the entire world whose currency is going down the black hole of economics…..
But they haven’t “felt” the full impact yet.. and since they judge by “feelings” and not well read intelect, they are for the most part “still happy”.
They would do well to read the book and learn what their own future looks like.
Posted by: Nancy | April 13, 2010, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
To say that the president is being ‘buddies’ with this US antagonist is ridiculous. He is a respectful statesman, and snubbing Chavez would have accomplished nothing. Chavez can do little to the US and he knows it. We’re still one of their largest trading partners if you can believe that. He’s using us a boogeyman to keep the people on his side.
He knows full well that as much as we dislike him, military action against Venezuela is out of the question, so he likes to pretend when he speaks to the people that a US invasion is right around the corner.
Posted by: Duncan | May 14, 2010, 1:01 am 1:01 am
I cannot believe all the America haters here. But I do have a question. If America is so terrible why is it that everyone wants to come here? Well you all need not worry as Obama is doing his best to make us a third world county too. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!
Posted by: ChicagoJim | July 25, 2010, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
This is why we all need to adopt the Quaker lifestyle.
Posted by: Jed Myre | April 6, 2011, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
The only thing we can do is believe in President Obama and hope he does the right thing: read the book and then listen. The past is the past, and it cannot be changed, so we must work hard to type enough kind words down the page so we no longer have to see the horrible things that have been done.
Posted by: brandon | April 8, 2011, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm