By Caitlin Taylor

Apr 15, 2009 9:45am

Conservatives Decry Homeland Security Report on “Rightwing” Extremism

Yesterday, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich tweeted that "The person who drafted the outrageous homeland security memo smearing veterans and conservatives should be fired."

Gingrich was referring to this report prepared by the Department of Homeland Security’s Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division, and coordinated with the FBI.

As Fox News has reported, DHS also issued a study of the threat of leftwing extremists (read it HERE.) But the report on the rightwing extremists is the one attracting heat in the conservative bloggosphere, from Gingrich, Michelle Malkin, Powerline, and elsewhere.

The report states that while DHS "has no specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence…rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues."

DHS defines "rightwing" as "broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."

The "emergent issues," the DHS report states, include both "the election of the first African American president" and "a prolonged economic downturn—including real estate foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability to obtain credit," which DHS says "present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment."

"A recent example of the potential violence associated with a rise in rightwing extremism may be found in the shooting deaths of three police officers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on 4 April 2009," the report states. "The alleged gunman’s reaction reportedly was influenced by his racist ideology and belief in antigovernment conspiracy theories related to gun confiscations, citizen detention camps, and a Jewish-controlled ‘one world government.’"

Other potential dynamics that could help these groups’ recruitment, the report states, included proposed "imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans" and the debate over illegal immigration.

"Over the past five years, various rightwing extremists, including militias and white supremacists, have adopted the immigration issue as a call to action, rallying point, and recruiting tool," the report states. "Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent."

The report states concern that returning "veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists," who may attempt to recruit and radicalize the veterans "in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat. These skills and knowledge have the potential to boost the capabilities of extremists—including lone wolves or small terrorist cells—to carry out violence. The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today."

"After Operation Desert Shield/Storm in 1990-1991, some returning military veterans—including Timothy McVeigh—joined or associated with rightwing extremist groups," the report states. "A prominent civil rights organization reported in 2006 that ‘large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other white supremacists are now learning the art of warfare in the [U.S.] armed forces. The FBI noted in a 2008 report on the white supremacist movement that some returning military veterans from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have joined extremist groups."

Sean Hannity and Dr. James Dobson chatted about this report on Fox News last night, which Hannity interpreted as targeting "people who think maybe we’re not controlling our borders" and "people who have pro-life bumper stickers."

“What do you think of that interpretation, especially coming from a guy that started his political career in the home of an unrepentant terrorist who bombed our Pentagon and Capitol and sat in Reverend Wright’s church for 20 years?” Hannity asked.

Dobson said "there are no Timothy McVeighs out there right now. They’re making a big deal out of something that hasn’t happened and may not happen."

- jpt

User Comments

“The alleged gunman’s reaction reportedly was influenced by his racist ideology and belief in antigovernment conspiracy theories”
Sounds like a typical show for Hannity or Limbaugh.

Posted by: JAD | April 15, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

There was a left-wing extremist report released by DHS on January 26th. I don’t see liberals freaking out about it.
Conservatives know that they have been stroking rhetoric that could one day get someone killed.
Remember Timothy McVeigh!

Posted by: nancy | April 15, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

WTH planet is this guy on? Of course those people are out there. Dobson, google
Aryan Nation, KKK, etc. Talk about burying your head in the sand.
Dobson said “there are no Timothy McVeighs out there right now. They’re making a big deal out of something that hasn’t happened and may not happen.”

Posted by: thorfinn | April 15, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Hello.?.? Que the video from the Palin rallies..

Posted by: JAD | April 15, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

I am very pro-life; it is simply wrong to tear a living person apart. Does this belief that EVERYONE should have the right to life an extreme idea?
I hope God has mercy on our nation.
Peace be with you!

Posted by: Eric | April 15, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

I’m in need of some clarification. Were Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, John Hancock and Samuel Adams right wing extremists or left wing extremists?

Posted by: Winter Patriot | April 15, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

I agree with Newt.
Just because my husband is well trained and in the special forces and happens to be a conservative does’t mean he’s some radical extremist.
Is this some sick joke to smear our country’s best? So it happens that almost all of my husbands unit are conservatives, and they say that is the case with all the special forces so now they are radical extremists.
They are our country’s heros, not enemies.

Posted by: haley t | April 15, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

It’s a report. What’s wrong with it? Seems like extremism is on the rise. What, should we ignore it? Todd Harrison of minyanville has been saying the same thing, kinda… Recessions/Depressions cause social unrest. It’s a fact that gun sales are through the roof. Who thinks that we shouldn’t be paying attention? This report is saying we should be paying attention.
Gingrich is trying to politicise everything these days, because he’s running for President.
Hannity is just ridiculous, and wrong. Obama didn’t “pal around with terrorists”, and I’m pretty sure he didn’t write this report. Why does Hannity say “this coming from a guy (Obama) who started his political…”? What’s he trying to say, that Obama personally writes these reports, and that as a known terrorist he shouldn’t? Doesn’t make any sense.
What is he stupid? Or does he just think we are. If Hannity were really a patriot, or interested in helping in any way, he’d do a little research and try to enlighten us on things that really are happening – there’s plenty of factual stuff to disagree with Obama without making it up. Then again, the made up stuff makes for much more inflammatory TV.
So, in essence, Hannity is the one inciting and enticing right wing extremists to be more extreme.

Posted by: Steve From NH | April 15, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Wow, conservatives are now self-identifying with extremists. The right wing has jumped the shark.

Posted by: Amused | April 15, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

I’m glad DHS finally released this report. The far right wing of the Republican party has gone freaking insane and Hannity, Beck, and the rest of the conservative pundits are the driving force. Case in point, Hannity stating people who have pro-life stickers are targeted. REALLY? Hannity knows that is a lie. People who threaten violence will be targeted as they should be. Most of these people are uneducated and don’t have a clue how to form an independent, intelligent thought for themselves. Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh are going to have a lot to answer for and btw, they are doing nothing but driving more and more Independents and moderate Republicans away from the party. The Republican party is going to be a fringe minority. It will be interesting to see which party takes its place in the future.

Posted by: Dream a Dream | April 15, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Don’t blame Hannity and Limbaugh for that hideous act of violence that killed both white and black officers. Just because H & L. disagree with some of what the far left spin-meisters promote – and aren’t afraid to say so – doesn’t make them racists. They both have their faults – racism isn’t one of them.

Posted by: leeannabelle | April 15, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Look at haley and eric’s comments. Perfect examples of people actually believing conservatives are the target. THE REPORT IS TALKING ABOUT EXTREMISTS. The Timothy McVeighs of the country…not some soccer mom running around preaching about the right to life. Geeez.

Posted by: chapelbells | April 15, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

I’m a vet. I served and got an honorable discharge. I went to war and fought so morons could call me and my fellow soldiers names. I understand the nutty remarks. They are simply the ranting of someone that has no idea what it’s like to actually love your country enough to stand up and fight, kill, and in some cases die for the freedoms that those nutty people takes for granted.
I can only say “Thank you moron for thinking of me once again. Perhaps next time you can thank me for making sure you have those freedoms.

Posted by: Former Vet | April 15, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

When you have daily right wing threats against the president and gun-loving kooks killing cops, this is legit.

Posted by: Matt | April 15, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

I just read the two reports, and the main difference appears to be the peceived threat from the leftwing extremists is CYBER RELATED, while the perceived threat from the rightwing extremists is PHYSICAL DEASTRUCTION RELATED. The reality is that both sides can attack both ways, and to differentiate these extremes only serves to set up “blame games” based on method of attack, not on evidence of who actually diod the attacking.

Posted by: MNResident | April 15, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am

If I remember right; history shows that the Republican Party was formed to stop slavery………..The Democrat Party supported it…? Am I wrong?

Posted by: Eric | April 15, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

liberals think they can vote their way out of a confrontation….lol

Posted by: beau | April 15, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Translation of “conservative” response-
“Please, Mr. DHS Man, don’t look into that dark scary corner of our electorate where we keep the true believers of all the nonsense spewed by our mouthpieces like Limbaugh and our collection Fox News toadies. Yeah, we know that they’re a bunch of loose cannon, but we can’t have an official government report actually pointing out that fact. I mean, come on. We really, really need their votes and now we’re going to have to find some Republican with at least a shred of credibility to distance us from that report. You know, another tired exploitation of our armed forces personnel, a crass appeal to “patriotism”, that old schtick. Damned if we aren’t going to have to throw in the blathering of some washed-up evangelical about abortion, just to make sure we reach all of them. This is a fine mess you’ve made for us. Thanks for nothing.”

Posted by: John Nelson | April 15, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

To the person that is extremely pro-life…are you pro-life to the point where you kill others? That is the extremism the report talks about. There are other groups out there, draped in the flag and carrying the Cross that would kill in order to get their way. This is not to say that everyone that is conservative is in these groups, just as not every liberal is associated with ACORN or the demonstrators at the G8 summits. It is mentioning that there is a growth of such groups. For those like the woman who has a husband in the special ops….just because he is conservative, doesn’t make him a potential terrorist. However, others like him have come home and joined groups like the Montana Freeman.
An anecdote…one of my friends was a sniper in the army and was honorably discharched. When the snipers were hitting random people in the DC area, he told us he was contacted. The government knew his file, knew he had the skills to pull it off, so the investigation started with those types of people.
Point being, the government is being RATIONAL in trying to defend against ALL threats, foreign or DOMESTIC. Note that DOMESTIC doesn’t only mean left wing ideology.

Posted by: chris | April 15, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

I am a right-wing extremist-
I support the Constitution of the United States of America and carry a copy of it wherever I go.
I am a right-wing extremist-
I served six years active duty with the United States Army and did not return bitter or disillusioned
I am a right-wing extremist-
I have the right to disagree with MY government on any matter what-so-ever and to so state my disagreements.
I am a right-wing extremist-
I support a regime change in the United States of America by using the Ballot Box
I am a right-wing extremist-
I support the separate Rights of the States as specified in the Constitution
I am a right-wing extremist-
I support taxation ONLY with representation
I am a right-wing extremist-
I strenuously object to the Government of the United States of America having the temerity to classify me as a potentially violent danger to my Country.

Posted by: T.L. Eddy | April 15, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

The main reason the corporate media is freaking out about this is that it totally destroys their meme of “left wing fascist”.
The pertinent question is really – Why hasn’t the “conservative” right disavowed the racist, seperatist and fascist right?

Posted by: Flash Override | April 15, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Liberals are the problem here.
Look at their posts.
They think Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh “spew hate” and inspire racists.
That PROVES they have never listened to any of these guys. Their spoonfed talking points is all the proof they need to hate these successful conservative talkshow hosts.

Posted by: Liberals have always been haters | April 15, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

I believe it is time for the average citizen to understand that these lefties in power are trying to smother your voice and rob your children.

Posted by: Larry Clifton | April 15, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Health clinics are bombed and doctors are shot there by right-wing activists.
The ATF has several encounters each year, often involving violence, with extremists who refuse to register their weapons and deliberately hoard reloading equipment and modified firearms for the armageddon that they believe is coming.
I served in the military for 8 years, and can honestly say that part of the reason I got out was because of isolated pockets of extreme beliefs and behaviors that were so sexually and racially biased (and ignored in “good ol’ boy” networks) that friends of mine were forced into relocation or retraining to remove them from the situation.
I’ve not encountered a pro-choice group bombing a pro-life rally.
I’ve never heard of people with legally owned, registered guns getting gunned down in ATF raids.
The majority of our armed forces adhere to the tenets of fairness and equality, and serve with honor and distinction.
But there are extremists, and they do exist within our borders, and they are motivated by fervent beliefs that are much more closely tied to immigration, religion, firearms, and government oversight than they are related to free speech, secularism, and movements to expand social programs.
The full report lists off threats from every sector and their likelihood; I’m personally more reassured that people are doing their jobs and planning for our security now than I have been for the past 8 years.

Posted by: Liam | April 15, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Yes, Eric you are wrong. There is no such party.

Posted by: Flash Override | April 15, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

the framers were revolting against king george. I think that might be different.

Posted by: the dude | April 15, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Why do Republicans whine and complain so much?
It’s unbecoming.
If they were at school, they would be expelled by now.

Posted by: America | April 15, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

This is so funny I can barely stop laughing – the right wing nuts are upset because the FBI and Homeland Security might be watching their activities and creating secret files on them just like the Republicans have done with non-violent, liberals and progressives who dared to speak their minds. How does it feel Limbaugh and Hannity?

Posted by: Kate1149 | April 15, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

This is proof positive that the Obama administration HATES the military, mirroring the left wing movement
Emails are now coming out that the Iraq visit with the troops was a staged event

Posted by: The government OWES me | April 15, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

I quit spending money. This gets both parties attention. If enough people quit spending money then both parties will get back to the economy problem …. Both parties and media are spinning news stories which is all about divide the american public and conquer their objections.
Quit spending money.

Posted by: dkm466 | April 15, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I remember when Ridge was DHS. Every other week there was hue and cry about Islamist radicals about to blow up the country, and it always turned out to be nothing. Then, they find a huge cache of weapons and chemicals owned by radical Christianists and said nothing about it.

Posted by: Flash Override | April 15, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I am a conservative Associate Pastor of a Evangelical Church (no surprise there right) I beleive that Abortion is Murder and that our borders should be controlled very strictly as the true extreamists has proven that they intend to do us harm. With that said, I am shocked that any God fearing person regardless of their political views would associate themselves with Timothy McVeigh, the neo-nazzis, Arians… They are extreamist, and by definition that means that they are the exception not the rule. And no I am not talking about Republicans, Democrats, or any other political group. Ignorance has one to lump a group of people into the image of Evil just because they don’t beleive exactly the same as we do. This is real extreamism.

Posted by: Jeffrey | April 15, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Comments such as Gingrich’s tweet show exactly why most are now disgusted by his brand of slash and burn conservatism. Who in their right minds are for extremists, of any variety? As indicated in the article, left wing extremists are also a concern. But when Gingrich reads the following “Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists. DHS/I&A is concerned that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to
boost their violent capabilities.” as a smear against all vets, that’s nothing more that an attempt to mislead and energize the gullible. If anything, it is that kind of muckraking that will speak to the McVeighs of the future. How self-serving. How disgraceful.

Posted by: Biff | April 15, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Where is the coverage of all the Tea parties by the main stream media? This is a non partisan event showing the outrage at the out of control spending by our government. Will be interesting to see how the MSM portrays these events when/if they do decide to cover it.

Posted by: Shonoff | April 15, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

If it walks like a right wing extremist,
and talks like a right wing extremist,
it must be a right wing extremist.

Posted by: The truth | April 15, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

What I find frightening is the obvious demonizing of the other side in this report. It reads more like a political preemptive strike than a response to real problems. There are kooks in every demographic. So what? Should we then shut down free speech? And, as to Chris’ comment about people “draped in the flag and carrying the cross that would kill in order to get their way”–give some evidence.
I only hope President Obama doesn’t prove to be “Hugo Chavez light.”

Posted by: mm | April 15, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Please people-read the report. Really-it’s only 9 pages and linked in the article-it’s not that difficult.
It does not say that because you served in the military, or support the constitution, or free speech that you are an extremist-really. Stop believing everything Hannity tells you and look for yourself. Please.

Posted by: Biff | April 15, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Two words: Timothy McVeigh

Posted by: Frances | April 15, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Good Joke: So, I asked my spouse, “Where are the left-wing extremists?” He replied, “In the Whitehouse.”
Disclaimer: Lest the left-wing extremists come and get me the above conversation was JUST A JOKE! Or are we still allowed to tell those :[

Posted by: wehavemainstreammedia? | April 15, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

The report does not in any way single out veterans. It simply states that radical groups COULD and WOULD be targeting returning vets, and that hate groups are represented in the armed forces by people that make it through the gang affiliation screening.
It’s not it any way an indictment against vets in general. I’m a vet, and I’m not offended because I realize that there is truth to the report, and I’m not an extremist.
How many of you have actually read the original report?

Posted by: RGherman | April 15, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

They had a very similar report a couple months ago about left-wing extremists…I didn’t hear anyone complaining about it…Everyone knows there are extremists on both sides. There are crazy fascist right wing people out there and there are crazy left wing anarchists out there. Fortunately, we have free speech in this country so you can say whatever you want. It’s just that many of these extremists groups promote illegal behavior, often violent crime.

Posted by: Scott | April 15, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

. . . and the black guy in San Francisco who killed two cops and then also killed two SWAT members who were called in. I don’t think he was a Hannity, Beck or Limbaugh listener.
Nuts are nuts, regardless of their politics.

Posted by: Larry G | April 15, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Hahahahahaha… all I can do is laugh, Obama has a 70% approval rating, right wing folks are doing tea parties about taxes that are from the Bush administration. They pretend to be surprised that the KKK and other racist hate groups identify with ‘conservative’ ideals. The worst domestic terrorists (Oklahoma city bombing) was an extreme right-winger, ruby ridge, waco, etc. There are 100M more registered democrats than republicans (look it up on wikipedia). Contrived indignation is the funniest. Conservatives are the minority, you had your chance, you messed it up .. get over yourselves.

Posted by: joeldg | April 15, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Jake, thanks for highlighting the Leftwing report. If you compare the 2 reports, it seems like the Leftwing report cites more specific examples, names specific groups.
I wonder if DHS was asked to prepare reports on both groups, and had a harder time finding concrete evidence on the rightwingers? Both reports are the same length, maybe some bureaucrat was just tossing in speculation to make the report long enough.

Posted by: WSLS-Webguy | April 15, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

To the person who said that Obama hates the military -
If that were true, why is this administration the one that is fixing the disconnect between the medical care that an injured active duty soldier receives and gets all screwed up between discharge and transfer of care to the VA? There were a couple of representatives from the military and the VA on the News Hour last week, and they were all over themselves with excitement over the idea that this problem is finally going to be addressed.
And then there’s Michelle Obama and her work with military families.
Seems like this administration is more concerned with the military than the last ones, and that soldiers be put in harms way for a good reason, with thought and planning, with an exit strategy, and then not thoughtlessly discarded when the service is done with ‘em.
And of course the trip to Iraq was staged – they all are. What did you want, Obama getting in a taxi and going shopping in downtown Baghdad?

Posted by: Steve From NH | April 15, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

The part about the military is pretty offensive.
And yes, it is that much more offensive coming from the administraion of a President who lied about his relationship (or rather, Axelrod lied for him) with a man who would have been Timothy McVeigh but for the early detonation of the bomb his girlfriend was making.
I think between this and Panetta saying the global recession is the number 1 destabilizing factor in the world *could* look like the Obama administration is using their position to politicize information to suit their agenda.

Posted by: MayBee | April 15, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

It’s so great to watch Right Wingers whine. Please…more of these reports asap.

Posted by: China | April 15, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” –Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Words to live by | April 15, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

What about the epidemic of black on white crime in the U.S. By radical hate groups like the UHURU in St Petersburg/Tampa, Florida, they run eveything in St Pete. But The FBI and FDLE let them kill and rape at will.The local police are afraid of them.
Ex Republican

Posted by: RGeier | April 15, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

How would Dobson know that “there are no Timothy McVeighs out there right now”? Equally befuddling is his contention that “they’re making a big deal out of something that has not happened and may not happen.”
1) It has happened…in Oklahoma City. and 2) It “may not happen” is supposed to be reassuring? It’s Homeland Security’s job to ensure that it does not happen. Keep up the good work, Madam Secretary.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | April 15, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

“And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms…. The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Words to live by | April 15, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Liam,
There is no place in the constitution that requires gun registration and hand loading is something I have done since being a teenager.
I was raised in the Western US and have a completely different view of todays hysteria about firearms than you.
I believe is self sufficiency, independence and personal freedom all issues defined in our constitution and I take offence when liberals with a utopian view of society as they would like it, try to make their value system
mine. It is not constitutional and does not apply here.
CLW

Posted by: Charles L. Wood | April 15, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

“Where is the coverage of all the Tea parties by the main stream media? This is a non partisan event…”
Non-partisan? Really?
“Emails are now coming out that the Iraq visit with the troops was a staged event.”
A single email. From an anonymous source. As for the claim that all of the cameras the troops had were provided by the WH – ie, one of the primary claims in that anonymous email – photos don’t lie. Go to the WH site and search for the “Troops in Iraq” slideshow of Obama’s visit. Check out photo 6 of 11. I count at least 20 different types of cameras in that single shot…maybe more.

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Lou Dobbs bloviates continually about the border issue… illegal aliens etc. And he’s being doing so for oh.. about 5 years. people just can’t think for themselves anymore it seems.

Posted by: Natalie | April 15, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Steve From NH: about veterans care:
Obama has tried to get a proposal thru that would make DISBLED veterans PAY for their own insurance to cover their war injuries.. The american legion and vets groups SLAMMED this piece of crap legislation and Obama had to back down.. but he told the american Legion that he thinks it still a good idea.

Posted by: The Media is the problem | April 15, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”
That is the oath of enlistment in the armed forces of the United States of America. Please note that it does not say “for the duration of my enlistment”.
There are literally millions of Americans out there who have taken this oath. You may be one of them. You certainly know someone who has. Some of them took that oath more seriously than others.
The government and the media want us to think of Timothy McVeigh as some evil right wing wacko skinhead. But suppose he was just some confused kid trying to fulfill his oath to the best of his ability? Are there more of him out there? Are they right? Is the Constitution of The United States in danger?
What part of the constitution gives the President the right to fire the head of General Motors? Is that act any more lawful that President Vladimir Putin’s firing and imprisonment of the head of GAZPROM?
Has our government become an unlawful government like that of King George III? Some members of congress and the various state legislatures evidently think so. Are we witnessing the beginning of another American Revolution?

Posted by: Winter Patriot | April 15, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

it is claimed that a similar report was issued about “left wing” threats? Anybody see it? Where can we find it?
It is also interesting to note that in the past (30′s through 70′s) and the government was concerned about “left wing” threats and often used the same illegal tactics to fight those people as the “right wing” threats.
So this is nothing new “right wingers”. The only difference is that the former “left wing” agitators are now think they are in charge. But, don’t worry, that is only appearance. The bankers are still in total control…..

Posted by: Ed | April 15, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Oh joy here we go again. The point of the report against the conservatives pretty much included anyone that belives the constitution should be followed. This includes the 10th amendmant which strictly limits the Federal Governments power. Please attack conservatives some more, at least we base our postion on factual evidence and not some made up scare tatic. There will always be extremist on both sides of the political spectrum, but lumping us all under that title just shows the immature positions taken by those that want to gain as much power as they can in one fell swoop.
To put it simply both reports are more scare tactics to further the power grab in progress.

Posted by: conservative not republican | April 15, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

I thought the idea of states having defined powers unless the consitution specifically gives that power to the federal government was in the constitution?
So how does beleiving this make you an extremist?
Why were there seperate documents for right and left wing extremist? Why not one document? Could this be so that Obama could release a document about right wing extremist without “offending” his liberal voter base?
Otherwise, why wouldn’t this have been a document on “extremist groups” and not one based on right wing or left wing?
Today there are tea party protests, legal protesting, which is a right we have as people. But ACORN has promised to disrupt these protests. So who is the problem here? A group of people practicing their right to protest or another group whose goal is to disrupt a legal protest?
But of course, ACORN is good and the tea party protesters are “extremist”.

Posted by: Heather | April 15, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

“The government and the media want us to think of Timothy McVeigh as some evil right wing wacko skinhead. But suppose he was just some confused kid trying to fulfill his oath to the best of his ability?”
-Winter Patriot
Are you going to try and tell us that Osama Bin Laden was just some confused person trying to fulfill his oath to the best of his ability??

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

To joeldg,
Last I saw, Obama’s approval rating was more like 60%, not 70%. And I wouldn’t trust everything you read on Wikipedia as factually accurate, especially something as politicized as counts of registered voters. Minor quibbles, mind you. I’m just going for accuracy.
Cheers,
SinisterMatt

Posted by: SinisterMatt | April 15, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Winter patriot: You ask what gives the president the right to fire one man.
You might do well to remember that Reagan fired over 11,000 members of the PATCO union in 1981. The whole union.
But of course, a dem firing one person who mismanged huge company (at the peril of many labor jobs) suddenly becomes important?

Posted by: joeldg | April 15, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

“But ACORN has promised to disrupt these protests. So who is the problem here? A group of people practicing their right to protest or another group whose goal is to disrupt a legal protest?”
OK, first of all, that’s a rumor. Do you have facts to back up that claim? Second, is the teabaggers right to protest any different from ACORN’s – or any other group’s – right to counterprotest? Isn’t the fact that both of these groups can get together in public and scream insults and slurs at each other what makes this country great?

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Vet here as well. No combat, but son of war vet, grandson of war vet, nephew of war vet. Friend of several war vets.
Two things. 1. To ignore a threat is silly. We must trust our fellows, but we must also identify every threat. If you are unable to objectively do so, get the hell out of the way so those who are able can protect us.
2. Being a soldier gives no one a pass. It does not give one a right to judge others, nor does it put one above judgement. Any who suggest otherwise, again, need to remove themselves so that objective professionals can do their jobs.
My uncle, a decorated and honored vet of 3 or 4 tours, pointed a loaded weapon at my grandmother and likely would have used it had there not been intervention. We are all humans. To think doing this or that makes one super-human is silly and again, anyone who thinks it does has every right to speak their mind, but should get out of the way and let the professionals do their job.
Oh, and I read both reports. There is nothing in there to get nearly this upset about if you are literate and objective and honest with yourself.

Posted by: Another Serviceman | April 15, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

“The government and the media want us to think of Timothy McVeigh as some evil right wing wacko skinhead. But suppose he was just some confused kid trying to fulfill his oath to the best of his ability?”
Holy cow. Somebody actually wrote the above as a response to this DHS report? The DHS thanks you for backing up their analysis with real life examples.
As for whether or not McVeigh was a right wing wacko, you may want to argue that with the families of the folks who were killed in the Murrah Building bombing, including the parents of the 19 kids who were murdered that day.

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

to Haley T. and all the others agreeing with Hannity and Gingrich:
1.) The report does not say that all trained veterans with conservative beliefs are dangerous extremists, it says that some are, which is true.
2.) The report also states that there are dangerous left wing extremists, it does not say that the rigth wing is more dangerous than the left.
3.) Providing you husband is not psychotic, not killing innocent people and not invlolved with gorups that do; then your absolutely right he is a hero, as are all our veterans, disillusioned or not.
I am a registered Republican, my fiscal views are very conservative, my social views lean more towards the left.
Understand this, extremists on both ends of the spectrum are dangerous to the safety and stability of our country. They undermine bipartisan efforts to heal a divide this country has been dealing with since people started following the party lines, and not following their true beliefs on each individual issue. They undermine the ability of our country to defend itself and gather information because those responsible to protecing us are more concerened with keeping their senate seats, white house offices, or the kickbacks from their lobbyists.
The politicians spend more time explaining and defending the decisions they make, then they spend making decisions.
Jesus preached tolerance and moderation, he preached that only GOD may judge humanity, he preached forgiveness. Unfortunately many who call themselves Christians, seem to have forgotten this and so have appointed themselves the guardian of our moral character. Guess what? Abrotion is murder? true it does end a life, or at least the potential for life. but so does that steak you eat every night, and the salad and potato you eat with it. all those things were alive, and they are now dead because of you.
who are we to judge the value of one life over another?
before all of continue to sling slurs around and call this or that person, anti-american, dangerous, or idiotic.
stop and think, have i made mistakes? am i perfect? if the answer is no, which it is\
then shut the hell up

Posted by: Jball | April 15, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

The Obama Administration has once again insulted our military with this so-called report. I say we abolish the Department of Homeland Security – and repeal the Patriot Act. The powers created by these unconstitutional acts and agencies are dangerous in the hands of this Administration – perhaps even moreso than the last.

Posted by: JJC | April 15, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

READ THE MEMO. For every “scare” or warning in the thing they state “although they are not planning yet, although nothing has been done yet”. So what’s the alert for?
“Right” wing extremists? How about you “left” wing extremists who were actually standing at polling places with weapons in hand ON TV intimidating voters in the last election.
I don’t recall Pres. Bush’s administration putting out trash like this on “left” wing extremists.
Unbelievable, this administration tries to make Veterans pay for their own service related healthcare expenses then says “Vets” deserve our support. Cuts the defense budget, which directly affects their ability to fight, and says they support them in their mission. Now they put out this garbage labeling them as “potential” domestic terrorist candidates simply b/c they served their country and don’t believe in unfair taxation or 2nd amendment infringements.
All the while the media downplays the Presidents friendship with a known, proven domestic terrorist who, with his own spouse, are directly implicated for domestic bombings, attempeted murders and actual death of a LEO in San Francisco.
Libs got the country now, but what do you have? They tear it down then wonder why it’s not what they wanted. It’s like a fat, gluttonous tick sucking the blood out of fat cow until it dies then slowly starves to death itself. If you fundementally “change” America then it’s not America now is it?

Posted by: med | April 15, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

“The Obama Administration has once again insulted our military with this so-called report.”
How so? By saying that right wing extremists may try to recruit returning veterans with combat skills? Now I know this has never (Tim McVeigh) ever (Oklahoma City bombing) happened but if I were a right wing extremist group, vets with combat experience would certainly be a group I’d target. And just like there are all kinds of different people in our society as a whole, there are all kinds of different people in the military, including a very small number of homicidal wackos who may be open the lurings of a right-wing extremist group.

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

joeldg:
Your comparison does not hold up. When Reagan fired the air trafic controllers of PATCO they were employees of the FAA paricipating in an illegal work stopage. As head of the executive branch the president had every legal right to terminate their employment as a result of their illegal strike.
But last time I checked, General Motors was still not quite part of the federal government. Again, what part of the constitution gives the president the power to fire the CEO of a corporation?

Posted by: Winter Patriot | April 15, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

This is just the WH continuing it’s smear campaign against Republicans and Conservatives – first Rush, then Sean Hannidy, and on and on…. and now this – what about folks like Wm Ayers and his band of merry terrorists along with other leftist groups that no one seems concerned about – America is in real trouble and it’s not from the Right – it’s sitting in the WH and his administration – Wake up people -

Posted by: seph | April 15, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

“I don’t recall Pres. Bush’s administration putting out trash like this on “left” wing extremists.”
The Department of Energy under Bush in April 2001 (there was no DHS at that time) released a report on the threat of left-wing extremists. That was the first April of Bush’s first terms. This is the first April of Obama’s first term.
“Unbelievable, this administration tries to make Veterans pay for their own service related healthcare expenses..”
Did that actually come to pass? Didn’t think so.
“Cuts the defense budget..”
In what world is a 4% defense budget increase a “cut”?

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

the republicans are quickly becoming the most hated political party of all time right up there next to the taliban.

Posted by: Democrats 4 Ever | April 15, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

I really enjoy reading the righteous indignation of conservatives on here.
As a veteran of the the first gulf war and registered non-partisan I think your faux-concern is cute.
War should always be the last resort, it is expensive and has a tendency to just cause more wars.
Anyway, we need more of these reports to show you radical-repubs what your willful-ignorance has been busy suppressing for years.

Posted by: joeldg | April 15, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

In fact, the Obama administration in January issued a similar warning about left-wing extremists. Important to note is that both reports were initiated during the administration of former President George W. Bush… not during the current Obama administration.

Posted by: Dave | April 15, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

I read many of the post here, Obama hate him or love him he is the President of the United States and Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces,
I did not vote for him or McShame,
Tim was motivated by the carnage he whitnessed at Mt Carmel, But still people believe he had was the ring leader in the operation against the Mura bld. He was nothing more than a lookout, Why would he pull over for a local police man for a traffic stop? Why would he not shoot said officer with the handgun he was armed with? If one of you ragbag’s had just blown up a b bld. and killed children by mistake, instead of the intended target, Wouldn’t you shoot it out with a traffic cop, rather than go peacebly? People you have to get your facts straight about Tim, and the Operation against the Mura bld. Radical Right? should the government be concerned? Well it only common sense to be aware.
Why doesnt the Government address the imagration problem, or it’s UnConsitutional behavior, Maybe some of these groups would find it harder to
gather new memebers, Most of these groups are already inflitrated by lawenforcement any way, Remeber the only way to keep a secret is to not tell anyone. Grow up Obama haters get over it, Obama lover’s read the Constitution and Understand why American’s are upset

Posted by: RaferJanders | April 15, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

“Wow, conservatives are now self-identifying with extremists. The right wing has jumped the shark.”
Excellent point.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Newt must be in a mental fog, it’s been widely publicized that gun stores have had a huge uptick in sales fed by right wing rants that President Obama intends to take away everyone’s guns.
The hate filled letters to the editor and blog posts about this president often include thinly veiled allusions and insults targeting a specific race.
Republican right wing folks are continually trumpeting socialism when any steps are taken to help ordinary citizens but are noticeably silent on all the bene’s their wealthy and business benefactors receive.
I long for the return of useful republicans who perform the role of loyal opposition with seriousness and gravity instead of an eye turned toward the National Enquirer for foolish incendiary rants.

Posted by: TrueBlue | April 15, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

“what about folks like Wm Ayers and his band of merry terrorists along with other leftist groups that no one seems concerned about”
Yes, we should all be scared of aging hippies from an organization that hasn’t existed in over 25 years.
Of course, we should be vigilants in watching out for threats from extremists on both sides of the ideological spectrum. And that’s why the DHS produced two reports – one covering left-wing extremists, one covering right-wing extremist.
“it’s sitting in the WH and his administration”
You mean the guy who won a national election just a little over 5 months ago, beating the other guy by about 7 percentage points? The guy who enjoys and approval rating average of about 60%, getting majority approval from both Democrats and independents…and from about a quarter of self-identified Republicans? I know you’re upset that your side lost but that’s the way our government works – we have elections and somebody loses and somebody wins. In November 2008, the voters of this country may a clear choice regarding who they want to lead our nation for the next 4-8 years. If a large number of people now regret that choice, why are Obama’s approval ratings actually higher than the percentage of votes he won in the election?

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

As A veteran who served during Vietnam, this is an outrage. I’m sure that there was a line item budget amount for some high level lackey to write this garbage who the only enemy they ever faced was a restroom attendant.
By the way fire the president of the UAW whose member legacy health care costs add more than $ 20.00 per hour to every car.

Posted by: Frank | April 15, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Does President Obama remind anyone else of Richard Nixon?

Posted by: Plumber | April 15, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

I don’t know much about the report but it would not surprise me a bit that exremism is on the rise. It is always on the rise during economic uncertainty just like crime. And you have cheerleaders in the conservative movement such as Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, etc…who have for years railed against government and treated it as an enemy of the people….so, the report doesn’t surprise me a bit…..
I believe Conservatives greatest fear, as Limbaugh says, is that Obama will be successful and this country will once again become economically strong and live up to its Consitution. If that happens conservatives will become marginalized and no longer a force in politics. In fact, they are almost there today….which is raising fear within their ranks….They fear losing influence and power…

Posted by: indy_voter | April 15, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

To all the vets commenting on this story: If you’re not one of these right-wing radical nutjobs, why are you so offended?
The report states very clearly that involvement of vets is very very small. So why do you assume they’re talking about you?

Posted by: Catherine | April 15, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

i just knew the GOP would take this personally… instead of agreeing with the facts that far right groups are a threat to civility and democracy, they are coming to their rescue and aligning themselves with their comrades… more proof of how desparate they are and that their ‘base’ is so far right it’s laughable

Posted by: earth_not_flat | April 15, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am

ACORN members are more prone to violence than a member or former member of the Military, just look at their past history, and now we have the man that represented that group out of Chicago. Also watch how he salutes the military members on Marine One, he wouldn’t do it if it wasn’t for the fact that it would be picked up on the news !!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: NavyRet | April 15, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Terrorists are terrorists– whether they are right wing or left. Poor republicans can dish it out but can’t take it.
Quite frankly, republicans have been whipping up the lather of this “base” ever since they realized they were losing in electoral politics. Arm yourselves!! they encourage, defend yourself against your “socialist” government. Talk about sore losers.
Oh and they are always under attack. Obama’s going to take away your guns! He’s going to take Rush Limbaugh off the air! Now this report is just more fodder for the wounded me complex.
I’m not crazy about the democrats either, but at least they are trying to work within the system and solve some problems.

Posted by: mo | April 15, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

first the right wing republicans created terrorists in iraq by lying to start a war in the mideast… now that they have been stopped (or are on target to be stopped) they are creating domestic terrorists at home using fox news and rush limbaugh

Posted by: earth_not_flat | April 15, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

“And that’s why the DHS produced two reports – one covering left-wing extremists, one covering right-wing extremist.”
Please point to where in the DHS report that labels believers in an all powerful central government or those who want to control CEO pay or regulate someones private property or favor gun control as left-wing extremists. Not there because DHS and leftist consider those who believe that as moderates and not extremists. I wonder had the British produced such a report 200 years ago if Thomas Jefferson would be considered as a right-wing extremists.

Posted by: PapaJim | April 15, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

haley t wrote: “Just because my husband is well trained and in the special forces and happens to be a conservative does’t mean he’s some radical extremist”.
Of course it doesn’t and that is NOT what the report was about. Good grief, if your husband is truly who and what you say, he isn’t concerned. I’m a veteran and have no ties to any radical right wing group so I’m not concerned. This knee jerk from jerks like Newt are meant to stir up the radicals, not honest people.

Posted by: Larry | April 15, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

“ACORN members are more prone to violence than a member or former member of the Military, just look at their past history…”
I’m not saying that former members of the military are any more prone to violence than anybody else in this country…as I noted in an earlier post, just like our population as a whole, the military is filled with all different kinds of people, mostly good but some bad and some very bad. But where is this evidence of ACORN’s violent past of which you speak? Please provide examples.

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Powerline Blog (a conservative blog–written by Ivy League lawyers) pretty much took this report apart. For example, in researching the observation that “some” US soldiers were involved in right-wing extremist groups, they determined that the actual numbers, based on the data and source used by DHS, was less than 20.

Posted by: John Smith | April 15, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

“Just because my husband is well trained and in the special forces and happens to be a conservative does’t mean he’s some radical extremist”
but, he sure would make a damn good one!

Posted by: joeldg | April 15, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

I love all these knee-jerk neocons coming on here and hysterically crying: “The government’s saying that soldiers are our enemies!” or “Now I’m an enemy because I have a pro-life sticker!”
READ THE REPORT! They talk about how our soldiers are being TARGETED for recruitment.
It’s well-known that the Bush administration lowered the requirements (past criminal history, high school diploma) for being soldiers in order to keep up enlistment numbers.
Is it shocking to think that these less educated soldiers, possibly with a criminal history, might be susceptible to recruitment attempts by extremist groups?
Those extremist groups are DOCUMENTED. They’re not fabrications consisting of people with Palin stickers or Pro-life stickers. Just like the KKK/etc is documented.
How about, instead of making a knee-jerk reaction based on Sean Hannity’s mindless talking points, you–FOR ONCE–do the actual READING FOR YOURSELF!

Posted by: Concerned Citizen | April 15, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

JJC writes
“The Obama Administration has once again insulted our military with this so-called report. I say we abolish the Department of Homeland Security – and repeal the Patriot Act. The powers created by these unconstitutional acts and agencies are dangerous in the hands of this Administration – perhaps even moreso than the last.”
Hahahahahahaha been waiting for someone to call for this. It was okay to give YOUR president unprecedented powers and erode our constitution, but now you have a new president and he’s well, dangerous, because well, you’ve been told so.
I’m with you buddy. I’ve been against the homeland security crap since the beginning– but where oh where were you these past eight years?
May I suggest we all try thinking for ourselves for awhile and stop listening to the claptrap idealogues. We might find we have shared interests.

Posted by: mo | April 15, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Does anyone know what the political preferences were of the murderer of the four Oakland cops a couple months back? Or the politics of the people in the community who came out to memorialize that cop killer? I think I know.

Posted by: John Smith | April 15, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

“I wonder had the British produced such a report 200 years ago if Thomas Jefferson would be considered as a right-wing extremists.”
The DHS report refers to right-wing extremists – ie, the folks like Tim McVeigh and Eric Rudolph who kill innocent people, including children. I don’t recall that being the strategy of our founding fathers. In fact, our founding fathers would have told loony birds like McVeigh and Rudolph to hit the highway.

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

“For example, in researching the observation that “some” US soldiers were involved in right-wing extremist groups, they determined that the actual numbers, based on the data and source used by DHS, was less than 20.”
OKC bombing – 2 guys
9/11 attacks – 19 guys
A very small number of extremists, given the motivation and the tools, can be very, very dangerous. And if they have been trained by the best military in the world, they can be even more dangerous.

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Between BLACK and WHITE thinking is a vast area of GREY – I’ll meet you there.

Posted by: NancyR1 | April 15, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Everyone posting…. Please read the 11:27am post by JBall. Tell the truth brother…(or sister).

Posted by: cfjohn | April 15, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Red Fred,
Albany? Basic Fred?

Posted by: cfjohn | April 15, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Republicans , politicians and constituents are as nutty as a fruit cake.
I guess there might be a few moderate Republicans who aren’t gone completely rabid yet , they are either very rare or ar keeping silent because I sure have yet to see/hear them…but if they DO exist they had better get control of their lunatic fringe brethren asap ,or else.
There are laws/police/jails/graves ready for the people who incite violence against this flag ,for any reason . Republicans think ,incorrectly ,that they own this nation .
Evidently absolute control of government for that long (8 yrs) is a very empowering effect but unfortunately it virtually blinds the supportive constituent to the truth or reasonable alternatives
It’s like a disease, passed down like a virus from the rabidly partisan politicians who rant/glorify/demonize with manchurian candidate-like effect.
How did such people ever get in power in the first place? Easy. You voted for them.
Americans ,wake up. Democrats aren’t perfect but they are much preferred to Republicans . Give a Republican enough rope ,and they’ll steal all they can ,while they can . Bill Clinton might not have been an angel but at least he didn’t let the country fall into ruin for the sake of big business and profits for the already disgustingly wealthy.
And those who attempt to paint(,quite simplistically and unfairly as well )the 2 parties as somehow being equally to blame for the current messes/fiascos this nation is embroiled in at present ,are just patent revisionists (for whatever inane reason) who probably voted Republican to begin with and are trying to pass blame where none is really deserved ,mostly because they know somewhere down deep THEY voted for all this last 8 years of Republican fueled/bred b/s and were accomplices,witting or unwitting.
I am sick and tired of this revisionist b/s when EVERYONE KNOWS WHO HAD THE VETO PEN AND HOUSE/SENATE MAJORITY FOR 8 YEARS , WHO LIED ABOUT WMDS TO START A FOR-PROFIT WAR , WHO GAVE OUT NO-BID CONTRACTS THAT MADE A FEW CRONIES FILTHY RICH , WHO ADVOCATED AND LEGALIZED (BY FIRING FEDERAL JUSTICES) STATE TORTURE IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION , ALLOWED BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO STEAL AMERICANS BLIND WHILE THEY WERE GETTING RICH OFF OF $5 GASOLINE …ETC..ETC.
You people really need to just not vote if you can’t do better, honestly…

Posted by: Darnut | April 15, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

The difference between the two reports lie in the specifics. How many specific groups are called out in the right wing report? None from what I remember. The right wing report mentions 2 PEOPLE, but never names groups. The left wing one mentions groups such as: Hactivist, Animal liberation front, Earth liberation front, Animal defense league, etc, etc. it also mentions the anarchist cookbook
Thats the problem. When you use such broad characterizations (one of which for right wing “extremism” is railing against federal authority in preference for state authority, which of course defines most libertarians) without giving examples of what exactly you’re talking about people cant help but get a little worried. They worry because they realize that such broad labeling includes them even if the most violent thing they do is attend a tea party protest.
The report has also sparked the head of the American Legion to demand an apology. Also the left wing version worried that groups with violent histories would only rely on cyber attacks, where as the un-named broadly defined so that 90 year old grandfathers who fought in world war 2 are included groups are only committed to violent attacks.

Posted by: Zaggs | April 15, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Mr. Dobson…do you KNOW that there are no Timothy McVeighs out there today? Do you really? I wonder how you have felt if you said that the day before the Oklahoma City bombing. Or how about the idea of flying planes into the World Trade Center? Crazy! Never going to happen! Yeah..well what do you think now? You can never be too sure about anything and I hear ALOT of ranting and raving from The Right these days…and not all of it is peaceful objections.

Posted by: Silence DoGood | April 15, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

“I wonder had the British produced such a report 200 years ago if Thomas Jefferson would be considered as a right-wing extremists.”
So you are comparing our US government with the British, in other words, you think our government is the enemy and that maybe right wing people who want to blow it up are not extremists? What is the point, please?

Posted by: mo | April 15, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

“The DHS report refers to right-wing extremists”
Did or did not the DHS report include individuals who believe in state rights? Where does the report say anything about killing children (please disregrad partial birth abortion) and extremists? In fact, does the report not include a belief system and not specific actions by individuals?

Posted by: PapaJim | April 15, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

This report is as big of a sham as they come. If such a small portion of our returning veterens are deemed “at risk” for involvement with fringe groups that promote violence, why even mention this demographic by name? Furthermore, instead of ideology, law enforcement should be focused on violent acts or blatent promotions of violence. We are wasting resources if we try to rein in ideologies we don’t like – right or left wing. We can prevent violence as citizens by stepping in and bringing in the authorities when we see violent acts. We can also help our fellow man by simply talking and taking interest.
This country is severely lacking in basic morality. For those who think that greater federal involvement in our lives will end social or economic injustice or prejudice, you are taking a dangerous risk with the God-given freedoms that the framers spelled out for us that no power has any legitimate authority to ever take away.
I did not like much of what President Bush did – with the exception of his pro-life policies as he increased federal spending and federal power over every person and entity in this country. But I also don’t like President Obama’s radical expansion of federal power, pro-abortion policies, and even even worse deficits than Bush.
I just think we need to wise up and stop giving Washington DC and the Executive Branch in particular more power than it legitimately has under the Constitution.

Posted by: Fix Things Up | April 15, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

“What is the point, please?”
I just asked a question. Can you answer the question? By the way, how did you feel about the government for the past 8 years?

Posted by: PapaJim | April 15, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Hey and don’t forget the bang up job Bush (and his appointed nincompoops) did with Katrina.
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!
(whacko!!)

Posted by: haha | April 15, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

“However, from their ashes will rise another party (perhaps with the same name) that is more middle of the road with a mantra of fiscal conservatism and Libertarian values.”
I sure hope so. I’m a Democrat and a liberal but I also think that our nation would be much healthier and our political debate much more intelligent if my party was countered by a serious opposition party that is in touch with the concerns of a large number of Americans. Today’s GOP isn’t serious or in touch, nor is really even relevant any longer.

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

“What I dont like is the direction in which our Country Is headed and thats (SOCIALISM) the very thing our country fought against in WWII.”
Actually, we fought against countries (Germany, Italy, Japan) headed by right-wing, xenophobic, nationalist, fascist governments. The commies (the Soviet Union) and the socialists (England, France) were on our side.

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

This report can have the effect of labeling you an extremist because of some heart felt and mostly American views
This report also has the effect of demonizing many good people simply for serving or believing abortion is wrong. Our biggest terrorist threat is not from Americans that love America, but rather from those that hate America and every thing she stands for.

Posted by: Ronny Wayne | April 15, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

“I just asked a question. Can you answer the question? By the way, how did you feel about the government for the past 8 years?”
Your question was would the British have considered Jefferson a right wing extremist and I have to say NO, he wasn’t a right wing extremist. His politics were not based on lies and paranoia, manipulated by B grade talk show hosts.
There’s no comparison between McVeigh and his ilk and Jefferson. Whackos blowing up abortion clinics are just whackos blowing up abortion clinics. Religious extremism is not “revolutionary.” If US right wing extremists have any brethen at all it is the Taliban. They also want to control women’s bodies and destroy the government by force so they can impose their beliefs on others.

Posted by: mo | April 15, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

“This report can have the effect of labeling you an extremist because of some heart felt and mostly American views.”
Kind of like how folks who used the American tradition of dissent to protest the Iraq invasion/war (a war of choice – not exactly an American tradition) were branded as traitors? Or how those people who opposed the Bush adminstration’s expansion of the power of the executive branch and its policies of torture and covert surveillance of American citizens were called anti-American? Or how those people who now support the Obama administration are labeled as socialists/communists hell-bent on destroying our nation?

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

My dear OGLiberal:
Yes we did fight with an illegitimate Communist government during World War II against illegitimate Fascist governments. Their ideologies were very different on paper, but the actions of both the Nazis and the Soviets were murderous and genocidal. Just because the Soviets were “on our side” out of convenience does not forgive any of their suppressive and godless acts.
“Right WIng” and “Left Wing” elements within the United States cannot even begin to be compared to the evil done by the Nazis or the Soviets. Our framers created a government that couldn’t legitimately get too powerful to prevent any group from pursuing an overly radical agenda – they also simultaneously gave the flexibility for incremental change when change was needed.
Our country has lasted so long under the greatest Constitution ever precisely because of how the framers structured it. If we continue to allow the government to pursue illegitimate acts or to promote rapid radical increases in the federal government’s power, we would have problems too.

Posted by: Fix Things Up | April 15, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

joeldg wrote: “You might do well to remember that Reagan fired over 11,000 members of the PATCO union in 1981. The whole union.”
The difference is, the Air Traffic Controllers are GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES who have a no-strike clause in their employment contracts. They violated the terms of their employment contracts when they went on strike. Any employee who violates the terms of his or her employment contracts is subject to firing.
The CEO of any private company is held accountable ONLY by the Board of Directors or stockholders of that company. The President of the United States has no Constitutional authority to force ANY employee of a private company out of office.

Posted by: James Danley | April 15, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

So,let me get this straight…
It’s either blatant capitalism ,where a few are rich and get the favors and personal attention of the government and everybody else works like slaves for them .
or
It’s some kind of socialism , where all law abiding citizens have equal access to the nation wealth , it’s government and it’s services and each citizen is treated equally ; that is big business or the wealthy don’t get preferential treatment because of who they are/what they have.
Well , I pick door#2 . We don’t need an elite rich country club ruling class and I don’t care what anyone does for this nation or for a living be it a Dr. Lawyer ,Indian Chief ,Astronaut, Football Player whatever …it is not worth such a division among us.
Every kid in america deserves to grow in such a country club setting or go to a private school with the best teachers ,and if all kids can’t ,then none should. That is the fair way that assures each person gets what they themselves deserve ,not what their (often connived/stolen ) money or influence can buy. Without fairness and sharing ,America will diverge even further from truth/honesty.
There cannot be a separate elite class anymore in this nation, that confused egocentric capitalistic notion is what is promoting and continuing the overt and covert class warfare that is tearing America apart.
Just like bringing candy to kindergarten ,you either share or it gets taken away.
No one is forcing anyone to work hard to get rich or whatever , but we ARE going to force those who themselves choose to be rich (by whatever means) to pay their fair share of taxes and run their business in a legal and fair way. Being fair means just that and you will do that or you will be legally penalized for your selfishness. That’s the new way ,get used to it.
Btw ,no one is forcing anything on anyone. This country doesn’t BELONG to any one ideology ,and this agenda is clearly voter mandated ,so if you don’t like the way this country is going ,either :
A) elect your own representatives (good luck on that…)
B) move
C) SHUT UP!!!

Posted by: Bobby | April 15, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

“Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.==========
=====
During the campaign, candidate Obama pushed the (now familiar) line that people like Lou Dobbs and Rush Limbaugh were ginning up fears that had led to the “doubling” of hate crimes against Hispanics.
Hate crimes against hispanics had not in fact increased.
It is fascinating to see his Homeland Security department trying to make roughly the same argument, although they were smart enough not to blame Limbaugh and Dobbs.
It is fascinating, though, how much this poorly written and ill-sourced report feeds into Obama’s preferred narrative, that those who don’t agree with him on immigration issues are stoking hate.
It is similarly fascinating to see how well this dovetails with the current Democratic talking points (on blogs and cable shows) that administration critics are stoking violence. I guess they saw that criticism work well in the primaries, and they are going to continue to use it until someone calls the administration on it.

Posted by: MayBee | April 15, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

The problem is that extremists like Hannity and Limbaugh try to confuse the issue in order to get themselves heard.
Hannity’s interview last night is garbage. It’s not news – it’s just hate mongering which FOX does all the time.

Posted by: Mike | April 15, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

indy_voter wrote: “I believe Conservatives greatest fear, as Limbaugh says, is that Obama will be successful and this country will once again become economically strong and live up to its Consitution.”
You have totally misrepresented Rush Limbaugh’s comments. Rush actually wants President Obama to SUCCEED IF he governs like President Reagan. BUT if President Obama wants to abandon Capitalism and the Free Market in favor of a Socialist government THEN Rush wants President Obama’s policies to fail.

Posted by: James Danley | April 15, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Winter Patriot posted the oath of a serviceman:
“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”
With Obama in office they can choose to defend the constitution or obey the president. I wonder which they will choose.

Posted by: Jeff | April 15, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Um why is there only an outcry by the Republicans about right wing extremists? It even states that there is a paper on left wing extremism, but no hue and cry over it. Could it be they are just doing anything and everything possible to keep their names in the paper?

Posted by: kay | April 15, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

“the supreme law of the land is the constitution, not the president”
Agree 100%. Now tell us exactly what it is that this president is doing that is unconstitutional. Be specific.
“last time the democrats got out of line, during the civil war, the republicans had to bitch slap you guys back into reality.”
Today’s GOP is nothing like the party Lincoln led. And all of the calls for secession that I’m hearing today are coming from the right. Secession (and slavery) was the reason that Lincoln/the Republican Party/the USA had to bitch slap the Southern Democrats (now extinct…actually, they’re Republicans today) and the Confederacy, right?

Posted by: OGLiberal | April 15, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

If I recall, weren’t the states supposed to have most of the control and the feds very little. IMO the rapid acceleration of the federal takeover of states sovereignty is the root cause of all the problems. Try sticking to the Constitution for a change (10th Amendment ring a bell).
DHS is another group of federal gov’t blowhards trying to justify their existence. In the process more of our constitutional rights get usurped. Why wonder when firearm sales spike. Its not the radicals, it’s everyday people petrified that they will not have the ability to protect themselves. Have you called 911 lately? Oddly, the same group that screams “keep the gov’t out of my womb” are the very ones that want them in my gun safe. Go figure!
If both sides would spend more time treating this country with UNDIVIDED respect, then this kind of crap would be laughable. But no, as long as each side whips its own into a frenzy we’ll die in a high g tailspin. Rush etal, proclaim the socialist coming, Rachael Madcow tags a conservative as a neo nazi. Meanwhile normal AMERICANS are worried sick about what kind of bs their kids will inherit. Yes people are scared and scared people do things stupid things. I’m not republican or democrat. Neither speaks for me and both have left me hanging. I see this DHS brief in the same context as the supermax FEMA camps. It’s just another federal sleight of hand parlor trick to misdirect us. Wake up and be an AMERICAN first!

Posted by: skunkwerx | April 15, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Dr. Dobson is a NUT!!! The accusations they make about Obama is a joke. Hannity is still trying to tie him to terrorists.
The idea that somehow Obama doesn’t understand our (US) Judea-Christian roots? What a joke of a statement.
FOX News is a perfect example of right wing extremism in America.

Posted by: Mike | April 15, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

So after persecuting average Democratic americans, tapping phone calls, etc (The Patriot Act)for 8 years,right wingers don’t like it so much when the shoe is on the other foot?

Posted by: CaitlynBee | April 15, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Jeff,
Limbaugh doesn’t know what he’s talking about. We have a Capitalistic system in the US. The reason why we are bailing out the banks is because the system FAILED! So, I don’t exactly understand why he wants Obama to FAIL. Obama is trying to get Capitalism going again in this country.

Posted by: Mike | April 15, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

I never thought I’d see the day where Pat Buchannon seems like a centrist.

Posted by: cfjohn | April 15, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

The Presidents have been taking more and more power for over seventy years. It is not so much that Mr. Obama is doing anything that is blatently unconstitutional [though TARP and some items in his budget arguably are - as are the continuation of certain elements of the Patriot Act], it is that he is continuing our country along – and even acelerating an extremely dangerous trend. Our framers created a government that derives its powers from the people and leaves much open to the people and the states to decide on their own.
The increase in federal power over the people and particularly the ever-elevating status of the Executive branch should be something that all good Americans should be concerned about. There is a reason we did not create a king or a unitary system of government when this country was founded.
It is insulting to our intelligence that some sing such praises to a mere man – a politician. We should respect the president, but some are taking this toward homage and some sort of perversion of reverence – which is strange and foreign in the American experience. I’ll be damned before I praise any man the way some have praised Obama. I don’t want to go back to the dark ages – and by placing so much power with one man, that is exactly what we are trending towards.

Posted by: Fix Things Up | April 15, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

I read the entire report on left wing extremists and it is not until the last page that they mention that some of these “animal rights” groups have used violent tactics, but no mention of what they have done in the past. The whole report is focused on non-violent cyber-attacks, whereas the report on right wing extremists is very much focused on violence and how returning Vets will swell the ranks of these groups and help them to perpetrate violent acts. This is not a standard report that has been worked on for over a year as some at DHS have claimed, the opening lines speak of the rise in recruitment due to the poor economy and the election of a black president. There is a very extreme difference in the tone and accusations of the reports.

Posted by: Jason | April 15, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Unfortunately the extremism is on both sides…squeezing in upon the moderates of America.
They are the loudest and most aggressive, and they swing the country from the useless Bush to the charlatan Obama and who can even imagine what’s next?
Then these same people have the gall to warn of third parties as the problem?
A solid third party built out of the middle would be the best thing that could happen to this country.

Posted by: paul | April 15, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

bailouts are unconstitutional. only the states under the 10th amendment have that power. obama railed Bush for wiretaps that he now all of a sudden deems constitutional. he spreads flat out lies such as shutting down gitmo, troops out of iraq in 18 months, saying all economists believe the government must spend in a recession (read the greatest economic minds like Milton Friedman or Friedrich von Hayek who would disagree if still alive), lying about the AIG bonus money that they knew about and protected in the stimulus bill, not keeping bills online for Americans to view for at least 5 days before signing, not going line by line taking out all ear marks… i could go on for days man.
obama is just fear mongering and doing anything to take peoples eye off the real problem which is the fact hes lying about the economy getting better.
but hey, what would i know… im just a radical right wing war veteran crazy guy right?

Posted by: nic | April 15, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

This report can have the effect of labeling you an extremist because of some heart felt and mostly American views.”
Yes that is exactly what I am talking about we should be very careful how and who we demonize
No one person or group has all the answers. More now than ever we should listen to deferent views
We need to go slow and be very careful because we have seen mistakes in both wars by moving too fast. I see congress delegating too much power to the courts or to the president they did it with Bush they are doing it now with Obama.
With Bush, congress gave Bush the authority to go into Iraq, and Afghanistan. They should have declared war. However, they did not want to make a decision so they let Bush make it so if it goes bad well we know what happened. (No one wants to lose power)

Posted by: Ronny Wayne | April 15, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Limbaugh doesn’t know what he’s talking about. We have a Capitalistic system in the US. The reason why we are bailing out the banks is because the system FAILED! So, I don’t exactly understand why he wants Obama to FAIL. Obama is trying to get Capitalism going again in this country.
Posted by: Mike | Apr 15, 2009 1:32:29 PM
let me get this straight… you say capitalism failed, but obama wants to get it going again? if it failed why wouldnt he want to try something completely different? but i have to correct you, with government intervention over the last 70+ years we have strayed from capitalism and are more a hybrid of a socialist democracy.
you need to read Friedrich von Hayek’s ‘theory of money’ and ‘economic fluctuations’ that won him the nobel prize back in 1974, when the nobel prize still actually meant something.
or Milton Friedman that challenged the basic keynesian model that obama is using as his economic plan.
both these men are known as two of the greatest economic minds ever. youll learn a thing or two.

Posted by: nic | April 15, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

“last time the democrats got out of line, during the civil war, the republicans had to bitch slap you guys back into reality.”
The Republican party of this time had more in common with the ACLU than today’s republican party.

Posted by: cfjohn | April 15, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

“if it failed why wouldnt he want to try something completely different? but i have to correct you, with government intervention over the last 70+ years we have strayed from capitalism and are more a hybrid of a socialist democracy.”
So what was the golden era of capitalism then?
The age of the robberbarons?

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

ABC News is censoring comments.
Typical of Corporate owned TV stations and newspapers.
And they wonder why they are going Bankrupt ? Who needs Censorship in the Internet Age ?
See ya…

Posted by: Sandy | April 15, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

There was a left-wing extremist report released by DHS on January 26th. I don’t see liberals freaking out about it.” Why not? You ought to be worried when your legal, constitutional protected, political beliefs are painted by a government agency as potential terrorist activities. Oh, I forgot, we only protect those that we agree with

Posted by: Vera | April 15, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

So after persecuting average Democratic americans, tapping phone calls, etc (The Patriot Act)for 8 years,right wingers don’t like it so much when the shoe is on the other foot?
Posted by: CaitlynBee | Apr 15, 2009 1:32:12 PM
———————————-
That would be called a “hypocrite” Caitlyn.
Right Wingers (aka the “Moral Majority” lol!)
are known for this trait,I think it is genetic personally , some kind of brain function defect or maybe they just got kicked in the head by a mule or something.
They also were loving it when their egocentric ultra partisan party had majority control and instilled lots of other crazy elitist agenda as law; now the party’s over ,and it’s crying/whining time for the Republicans.
I personally am beginning to like those “homeland security ” laws much more lately ,I think we maybe should keep them on the books for awhile so we liberals can keep an watchful adult eye on the gun loving whacko Republicans.
(wink wink!)

Posted by: Dale In co | April 15, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

“The difference is, the Air Traffic Controllers are GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES who have a no-strike clause in their employment contracts. They violated the terms of their employment contracts when they went on strike. Any employee who violates the terms of his or her employment contracts is subject to firing.
The CEO of any private company is held accountable ONLY by the Board of Directors or stockholders of that company. The President of the United States has no Constitutional authority to force ANY employee of a private company out of office. ”
So, when GM “asks” the government to bail them out and the condition is that there needs to be a change in management (do you *really* trust that guys discretion with your tax dollars), then I see that more as a business transaction.
Reagan on the other hand, fired those government union workers outright, whereas previously government unions had gone on strike with nothing, he then set the new standard for what the private sector uses in dealing with unions as well. Effectively it screwed unions from that point forward.

Posted by: joeldg | April 15, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

I bet those “tea parties” were a treasure trove for the fbi and the dhs.
LOL!!

Posted by: dillian | April 15, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Teaparties may be met with cops in riot gear. LOL! Just bought my “Proud member of DHS right-wing hit list” bumper sticker

Posted by: Liz Moore | April 15, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Dale in co
Why does everything devolve into ” the gun loving whacko”? Why does the fact that I prefer to maintain a a well stocked safe automatically classify me as a whacko? Does the ability for you to air you beliefs paint you as a kook? Why are you afraid of my of my right to carry?
Lets pretend that every effort to resolve the current economic disaster fails. There is panic and pandemonium raging in the streets. The criminal element preys upon your grandmother and political factions scramble to fill the vacuum. It is absolute anarchy. What would you do? Exactly what they are teaching my kids in school. “If approached or attacked, hide under you desk”. In effect become a target. Excuse me for wanting to fight my way out.
Before you fly off the handle and discount my absurdity with your absurdity, consider the underlying point. I do not want to rely on or place my safety with the same right and left leaning idiots that are running this country. The very ones that tap our comm’s system (bush/cheney), force banks to loan money with no verifiable income (barney frank), cheat on their taxes (geitner), insist on a private 737 because the gulfstream g3 was beneath her(pelosi, the unmitigated gall to shame gm execs)and every other imbecile in DC that will lie cheat and steal to obtain power and wealth.
People are pissed because the occupants are corrupt not the system. There is no honor or duty, only graft and greed. We are fed lies and mistruths to keep us fighting with each other and not paying attention to them. Were you asked, by the people that supposedly work for you, to authorize themselves a pay raise? I must have missed the email.
The DHS memo accomplished this tasked not my right to carry.

Posted by: skunkwerx | April 15, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

They are our country’s heros, not enemies.
Posted by: haley t | Apr 15, 2009 10:07:33 AM
——————————
Only if they abide by the laws of the land ,otherwise they are common criminals , and if they rally with violence( or advocate such treasonous actions) against the Union , they are criminal terrorists/traitors.
Opinions kept to ones self are one thing , overt actions are completely different. Actions (by “heroes” or whoever ) that break the law will result in jail time ,or a fine ,or some sort of penalty . It’s that simple haley.
The only legal way to effect change in this nation is by electing representatives who agree with your opinion and will fight WITHIN THE LAW to make new laws ,or changes to existing laws ,in your behalf.
If you or anyone else can’t find an agreeable consensus amongst a political party to do just that ,well too bad,toough luck etc…
Maybe your opinions are just too far off of center for public acceptance ,or whatever…in any event this country is big enough for lots of differing opinions ,but those who would attempt to use violence in any way ,will not be tolerated for 1 nanosecond ,nor should they be.
This is a nation of laws, by laws. No other pronouncement is needed. Live by the laws ,or get them changed …legally with facts and logic but absolutely no violence or incitement of violence.
I applaud all military services and the people who keep us all safe ,but their opinions , political and otherwise , are not gold plated by any means and are often tainted with overtly right wing indoctrinations and leanings , from boot camp onwards and so many in the military are more or less brainwashed, in my experience anyway.

Posted by: Frx | April 15, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Posted by: Liz Moore | Apr 15, 2009 3:32:06 PM
——————————–
We will be watching for you.
Be sure to put those stickers on all your vehicles ,and one or two in your yard as well.
Thanks.

Posted by: Mr. T. | April 15, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

It’s not out-of-the-question that the 2009 TEA party participants could someday be regarded by history as patriots who made a difference- same as 1773. This sort of public outrage might be just what’s needed to break through the media’s manufactured reality.
And you can believe that Obama and the left are plenty scared of the TEA party movement- how else to explain the dubious timing of his “everything is under control” speech on the economy, and (on the same day before the protests) the wierd DHS report warning of “right-wing” radicals and their propensity to violence? Now ACORN is deploying thugs to confront these protests at the street-level? What’s next, bring-in the Crips? Or the next year, the mandatory Obama youth corps or his new, private militia?
Barack Obama is rapidly liquidating everything that made this country great… and needs to be put back-on-his-heels with a major embarrassment that puts an end to the myth that everybody just loves Barack and his wacked-out agenda… because millions of us DON’T.

Posted by: Reaganite Republican Resistance | April 15, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

“It’s not out-of-the-question that the 2009 TEA party participants could someday be regarded by history as patriots who made a difference- same as 1773.”
Well at least you harbor no delusions of grandeur.
“This sort of public outrage might be just what’s needed to break through the media’s manufactured reality.”
Oh the irony considering the tea parties are a manufactured media event brought to you by FoxNews.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

I don’t see a problem with Republicans wanting to advance their notions with tea parties (how quaint) and such .
The problem I DO see is how they attempt to do that ideological advancing,i.e. mainly by lying and conniving to try to revise their past obvious and abject failures and pass the buck/blame for those failures to anyone/anywhere/anything but those who rightfully deserve it…themselves.

Posted by: Ned | April 15, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

You all are silly for thinking that just because you see more “right wing extremists” on the news that they are the majority out there. You never hear about the couple homosexuals (and no, i’m not saying homosexual to segment a group and make a generalize statement about them) beat up an old lady who was peacefully holding a sign of her opinion in support of Prop 8.
It’s these “Pro-life extremists” like me that are also holding out a hand to help people, volunteering, and trying to God’s love. In my experience of voicing what i hold and have found in my life to be true, it’s the more left orientated people who act out with violance, immaturity, and hate.
Never believe the media, it’s controlled by left wing people, that’s why there’s so much anti-right wing. Do some research and you’ll see it’s the people on the right that are being picked on and bullied. Students are being threatened to be expelled from college for talking about Jesus, high schoolers who want to even mention their faith in their well earned valedictorian speech were threatened to have their graduation withheld.
There are ‘extremists’ on both sides, but the majority are not extremists as much as anyone wants to think.
Come on people, think for yourselves, do some research, see both sides of the picture. Am I the only one here who is not a mindless media-zombie?

Posted by: Trevor | April 15, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

“insist on a private 737 because the gulfstream g3 was beneath her(pelosi, the unmitigated gall to shame gm execss”
More right wingers parroting the lies they were told.
Even the Bush White House thought this was stupid
“This is a silly story, and I think it’s been unfair to the speaker,” White House spokesman Tony Snow said.
Rep. Adam Putnam of Florida, the No. 3 Republican leader, called the push for a large transport plane “an extravagance of power that the taxpayers won’t swallow.”
“It’s important we see what the specific request was,” Putnam said.
But Snow on Thursday said the negotiations over Pelosi’s transport have been conducted solely by the House sergeant-at-arms and the Pentagon, with no direct involvement by the speaker or her office — or the White House.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

“Jeff,
Limbaugh doesn’t know what he’s talking about. We have a Capitalistic system in the US. The reason why we are bailing out the banks is because the system FAILED! So, I don’t exactly understand why he wants Obama to FAIL. Obama is trying to get Capitalism going again in this country.”
Where else would a government takeover be considered capitalism except in a left-wing produced show called “fast and furious”? :[

Posted by: wehavemainstreammedia? | April 15, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

The only extremist terrorists I know are ELF.
I was told that PETA has done some stuff to consider them to be extremist.

Posted by: tammie g | April 15, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

One person shooting three cops in a stand-off over a urinating dog and we have the DHS issuing a report about right-wing extremism. It’s intersting to note that 4 cops were killed in the week prior by an Oakland ex-con and there was a parade by locals to celebrate the fugitive’s glorious stand-off against the police. Where is the DHS report on that? Everything is politically movitated these days – whether it’s Newt or the DHS. People need to think for themselves outside of their party affiliations.

Posted by: t961585 | April 15, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Bill Gwatney LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) – Bill Gwatney, who served stints as an Arkansas state senator, chairman of the state’s Democratic Party and as a party superdelegate, died Wednesday after a gunman burst into his office at the state party headquarters and shot him several times. He was 48.
Mr. Gwatney was killed by a disgruntled radical extremist person. You can deny it. OK. That is what right wing talk shows do.
This is what my friend recently said to me about the right wing, “They don’t like you, and they don’t care.” I think that sums things up nicely. The DHS report is necessary and right on!

Posted by: bll | April 15, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

When the government that makes the laws you decry crumbles into ruination (and once your bullets/food run out) you wont be so worried about your constitutional “rights” ,I’m sure.
This is a nation of laws and codes ,each of them making certain guarantees in our daily lives.
Without the nation , you are nothing and you have no guarantees on anything ,not even living.
Move to Somalia for a while if you want to get a first hand feel for that kind of go-it-alone rambo lifestyle ,see if it appeals to you … And don’t forget your weapons and ammo because you’re gonna need ‘em!
(Btw, have you ever simply thought about which/what entity GUARANTEES your rights as a us citizen ?)
Think hard now…

Posted by: Federal Marshall | April 15, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Remember – Civil Disobedience is reserved for the Left — Extremism is reserved for the Right.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 15, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Bll,
Mr. Gwatney was killed on August 13, 2008. The DHS report is “right on” if you think 8 months after the fact is a timely way to warn law enforcement of potential threats. Releasing the DHS report today accomplishes its politically motivated agenda against TEA parties which some want to paint as a crazy right wing movement. I do not doubt that right wing ideas form a nucleus to TEA party protests but they have a right to demonstrate and be heard as much as anti-war protesters did about Iraq before it became fashionable.

Posted by: t961585 | April 15, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Dale in co
Why does everything devolve into ” the gun loving whacko”? Why does the fact that I prefer to maintain a a well stocked safe automatically classify me as a whacko? Does the ability for you to air you beliefs paint you as a kook? Why are you afraid of my of my right to carry?
———————————–
Sorry ,but whenever I hear folks like you talk about their guns the scene from “Tremors” comes to mind ,you remember,Michael Gross and Reba McEntire ?
Made me giggle a little.
So anyway , I am sure you have an argument that supports ownership of assault weapons ,silencers, machine guns ,grenades ,tanks ,battleships,wmds etc and other paramilitary weaponry by the public that pertains to the 2nd Amendment?
As I recall , all guns at that time ,military and hunting types both , were black power/single shot ,and required about 15-30 seconds to reload. How does a law written then apply to a Phalanx turret gun now? I suppose you think you need one of those too ? And it is GUARANTEED under the 2nd Amendment too ,right?
I don’t think the gun argument has
a reasonable argument to support paramilitary weapons/options for public use weapons in any way. They are not needed for hunting , and there are many other firearms that are suitable for home or personal self-defense.
Also ,the firearms regulations that ARE in place are rag-tag , differing wildly from state to state ,and need careful overhaul from the top-down ,along with consistent persistent hard handed FEDERAL enforcement.
I am tired of the overtly biased simplistic arguments for such blatant man killing weaponry that clearly have no basis in any part of the constitution ,that was itself genuinely but naively written when such weapons were unimaginable .
I own guns myself, but I see no need for assault weapons to do some target shooting or get a quail or two ,or even guard my house. The guns I have will do those jobs SUFFICIENTLY ,and that is the nexus of the debate…i.e. what is sufficient for the purpose and more-or-less safe for public use vs what is clearly overkill and too dangerous for public use.
Paramilitary weaponry ,hi-cap magazines ,collapsible stocks ,flash hiders to name a few , are not legitimate items any law abiding citizen needs ,and to allow them for public sale with no/few/lax restrictions is just not a good idea , it never was ,and it needs to be changed soon.
And it will. Change…I’m lovin’ it.
You?

Posted by: Brain? | April 15, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

If they’re unhappy with Government interference here, they should move to Somalia where there is no Government. They can set up their businesses tax free over there or become pirates. Labor is cheap, although they may have a tough time finding consumers to buy their goods.

Posted by: Mack | April 15, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

The bad guys always try to justify their actions – the ends justify the means – SOUND FAMILIAR. THE NIGHTMARE DID INDEED START ON JAN. 20

Posted by: manitu | April 15, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

“we have the DHS issuing a report about right-wing extremism.”
updated 7:41 p.m. PT, Mon., July 28, 2008
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. – An out-of-work truck driver accused of opening fire at a Unitarian church, killing two people, left behind a note suggesting that he targeted the congregation out of hatred for its liberal policies, including its acceptance of gays, authorities said Monday.
A four-page letter found in Jim D. Adkisson’s small SUV indicated he intentionally targeted the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church because, the police chief said, “he hated the liberal movement” and was upset with “liberals in general as well as gays.”

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

The powerplayers in the Beltway are
playing a game of “Let’s you and him
fight.” How long will it be until the
grassroots of both parties figure out
that they’re being played for chumps by
their own government?
Remember the outrage from the left when
the same DHS was profiling and
collecting information on left-wing
groups and anti-war protesters? The
right-wingers sneered right on cue from
the Beltway powerplayers. Now, the
left-wingers wear a smug sneer on their
own faces….on cue from the exact same players in the Beltway.
Do you think the DHS has suddenly cleared and deleted their files on left-wingers and focused solely on Veterans, conservatives and libertarians??
We’re all being played for the chumps that we are. Yeah. “Let’s you and him fight.” …chumps…
Whether you are left or right of the aisle, whether you consider yourself to be ‘red’ or ‘black’ or ‘brown’ or ‘white,’ or even green with purple polka-dots, this is no longer about political or religious affiliations or about social or fiscal ideologies.
It is about freedom.

Posted by: Warren Bonesteel | April 15, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Free speech does not involve insighting others to riot against the legally elected government of the United States of America using incentives like Hilter, socialism, threats that guns will be taken away, and the demise of the country. The political right takes no responsibility for the words that threaten lives. This Obama administration has been in office since January 20th, 2009. The trashing of the economy happened on the political rights watch. The motives of the political right appear to be nefarious. No matter what the president does, the political right has no good thing to say. There is a right wing radio station in my home town with negative, demeaning talk, attacking the president from 6am until 10pm at night. They have listeners leaning on every word. I listen when I can stand it, to try to understand the world view of people who are so angry. The political right appeals to fear, racism, and hate to attrack listeners. The DHS is necessary and right on! No responsibility, the right wing takes no responsibility for their speech.

Posted by: bll | April 15, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

All those idiots at Homeland Security have done is to AROUSE A SLEEPING GIANT!!! DUMB, DUMB, DUMB!!

Posted by: Jimbo | April 15, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

“rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority,” Wow. I guess anyone who believes in the Constitution is a right-wing extremist.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Might have something to do with the recent phenominal increase in the sale of fire arms and ammunition – something mostly associated with the lunatic fringe on the far right.

Posted by: Jil | April 15, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Ellesbelles:
Could you explain what you mean by that? I think we’d all like to know.

Posted by: bll | April 15, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Jil:
The Civil War was fought over states rights. The Union won.

Posted by: bll | April 15, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

The current administration is a bunch of armchair theorists with NO EXPERIENCE IN THE REAL WORLD – WHAT DO YOU ALL EXPECT??? DA!!

Posted by: Jimbo | April 15, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

“rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority,” Wow. I guess anyone who believes in the Constitution is a right-wing extremist.”
So do you ignore the 14th amendment?

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

How ironic, and sad that so many people still listen to these hypocrites.
They still, continually espouse that theirs is the only philosophy that works and after coming very close to bankrupting our great county with there myopic views that tax cuts will solve any and every problem.
Then to complain about the second of two studies relating to the two parties is equally sad.

Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | April 15, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

bll: Article the twelfth [Amendment X]
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Ryan C – I’m not sure how believing in states rights (as guaranteed by the constitution under ), means ignoring Amendment XIV. It doesn’t negate equal protection.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

“Ryan C – I’m not sure how believing in states rights (as guaranteed by the constitution under ), means ignoring Amendment XIV. It doesn’t negate equal protection.”
Believing that states have rights does not reject equal protection.
However believing in “rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority”
Is not a belief in states rights but a rejection of federal authority.
But then again for the most part believers in states right on the right side of the aisle tend to do so because they are still miffed at integration.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

the tea party tonight was incredible and filled with bus loads of right-wing extremists. banners were flying, flags were waving, pledges were made and the ground swell against socialistic takeover is in swing :)

Posted by: wehavemainstreammedia? | April 15, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

From Thomas Jefferson -
“A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.”
That’s what Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are aiming for.
Oh – I forgot — Thomas Jefferson was a right wing extremist.

Posted by: susie | April 15, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Ryan C said “But then again for the most part believers in states right on the right side of the aisle tend to do so because they are still miffed at integration. ” You have got to be kidding me! I can’t believe you even stated that. I believe in state & local rights because 1) the Federal government can’t do anything as efficiently as a smaller authority – the bigger the entity, the more bureaucracy & the more money it takes to function 2) I know better what I need than the Federal government does and by extension, my commmunity knows its needs better than the Federal government & my State knows its needs better than the Federal government. None of which matters, because the Constitution guarantees that the Federal government not usurp state & local authorities. (But they do it all the time – it needs to stop.)
Posted by: Ryan C

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 16, 2009, 6:25 am 6:25 am

State’s Rights: A mythical term from a bygone era.. now being perpetuated by the newly disgruntled.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 16, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Dale in co
“I am sure you have an argument that supports ownership of assault weapons .,silencers, machine guns (need a class3 lic),grenades ,tanks ,battleships,wmds etc and other paramilitary weaponry by the public (Can’t recall seeing any of these for public sale) that pertains to the 2nd Amendment?”
nope can say that i do! I do not have a class 3 license nor do I want one. As far as paramilitary (your definition) rifles are concerned, an assault rifle is a rifle designed for combat, with selective fire capable of shooting in both fully automatic and semi automatic modes. All civilian versions are semi only thus are not, contrary to the chronic attempts to do so by the brady bunch. There is no functional difference between my Browning BPS trap shotgun and my Mossberg 500 with a collapsible stock. They are functionally identical all else is ergonomic.
If you read HB1022 it clearly states that the AG has the sole discretion to define what a sporting purpose firearm is regardless of it design. It also gives him the authority to blanket ban at will. My 22 rifle and my semi auto benelli sporting clay shotty are on the proposed ban list as it is written now. What does this tell you? They do not want any firearms at all. No wonder people are spooked.
I do agree that there are whack jobs that have no business possessing anything more than a butter knife. It all goes to intent. Aryan Nation, Stormfront and the Black Panthers have an intent that is different than mine or yours. It’s criminal. Prosecute criminal activity not the average enthusiast. If the AG waved his magic wand today and confiscated all powder charged weapons, do you think that these groups would not or could not get them from underground sources?
“What is clearly overkill and too dangerous for public use”? I do not publicly use anything in my safe. I know of no one that walks down the street with an AK strapped to his chest. Whats more dangerous to society, me or the hordes of teen drivers with cars sporting more horsepower than a formula racer of the 60′s? If you really want to talk overkill and a public threat look there. Am I on the House floor and on the network media claiming moral high ground and restricting anyone’s choice?
In a nutshell, my choices and intentions come with a thorough background check and a proper registration, all within the legal limits. Everything I own is LEGAL. (until…)

Posted by: skunkwerx | April 16, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

ryanc,dale in co
gotcha!
“More right wingers parroting the lies they were told.” Do you think that lies are exclusive to the right?
Surely Rachael Madcow or Olbermann would never spread lies or slant or spin. They are as guilty as Rush etal. Instead of being our watchdogs, all of them driving wedges between us.
I am a registered democrat (not a liberal) and am ###### off at what we are becoming. I can’t stand what the dem/gop parties have migrated toward and it makes me ill. It’s nothing but a power grab.

Posted by: skunkwerx | April 16, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

A Hit Dog will holler!!!!!

Posted by: T | April 16, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Posted by: skunkwerx | Apr 16, 2009 10:07:44 AM
—————————–
Sorry ,but most of your argument is as holey as swiss cheese. And honestly I don’t care to illuminate you on this matter because democratic lawmakers will do what is needed whether people like you or the other gun nuts agree or not ,which is good. Your opinions are just that , and are not based on facts or reality but are based on things you have heard or read or whatever on some right wing leaning gun loving media outlet (like Fox ,or the plethora of more crude ,vicious ones ,that peddle hate and intolerance ,the very nexus of this article in fact) .
Far too many Americans ,especially conservatives it seems , think their opinions are golden The problem is that they largely are undereducated but at the same time they are rabidly opinionated to the point of being impossible to reason with ,as is your case/predicament. Not unusual today at all , just rather perplexing to the rest of the non-whackos ,who can’t figure out why anyone would say or do such sophomoric and occasionally illegal things.
No one is coming for your .22 or target clay , that is just hyperbolic alarmist fear mongering ,the likes of which got 3 policemen killed just lately.
Just like screaming out “FIRE!” in a crowded theater ,you really DON’T have the right to say whatever you think ,and when you (or an entity) incites others to illegal civil disobedience (or worse) YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE!!
Why don’t you write letters to their widows and kids explaining your viewpoint that “THE GOVERNMENT IS COMING FOR ALL OUR GUNS!!”
People like you are very responsible for the rabble you rouse with your strident affirmations of what you THINK.
When/if you can get a consensus of INTELLIGENT people to agree with your deluded/simplistic/ misinformed opinions , then you might have something worthwhile .
As long as your main affirmations come from groups/individuals with deep pro-gun leanings your opinion is just a glad hand for what they say ,you are just parroting what they tell you to think ,with no real thought or reasoning behind your opinions.
That would be ok ,if you didn’t spout out such drivel for the world to hear , just like the rest of the gun crazies who go on and on about the 2nd amendment ,then in the same sentence start in on the “wheres his birth certificate ?” or ” he is not a christian ,he is a muslim terrorist!” or ” look look , he got his kids a swingset ,he wasted taxpayer $$$ ,or worse …Such commentary is quite obviously overtly pre-biased towards one political party ,ridiculous and unworthy of much attention ,like your pro-gun rant/ silliness.
I am a gun owner, with several firearms and I am not worried about my guns getting taken away at all, and neither are most sane rational Americans as well.

Posted by: Brain? | April 16, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I find it ironic that the republicans, who endorsed and promoted spying on the citizens of the US, manipulated the threat alert levels to elect their choice in president and wasted a trillion dollars and thousands of American lives fighting a threat that didn’t exist, decry a DHS report which highlights a valid potential threat which needs to be addressed.
Apparently, in their utter lack of valid stand on any current political, social or economic issue, they grandstand with irrelevancies and settle for twisting the words of a serious report to instigate an atmosphere of contrived outrage.
Given the fact that most of the US right-wing “patriotic” organizations have a much higher percentage of vets in them than in the general public, they would be better served by saying, “Look, we put in place the mechanisms that let you monitor these misguided men and women. So if you catch anyone doing something bad in the US, you have us to thank.”
Instead, they shoot themselves in the foot. I’d not want to be a Republican for the next decade or two. Their abdication of the GOP leadership to the likes of Limbaugh has amply demonstrated their lack of insight into what America needs and wants. Their retreat toward their ‘core’ ideals has left them even further from the heart of the average American as well. They call for political unity when the winds blow their way and call for secession (The Texas Governor has floated the idea) when the winds blow against them.
It’s obvious that political power means more to them than standing by their country in good times and bad. The heart of the Republican is a coward’s heart, full of fear and hatred and lust for power. They wave the flag to promote their power when it suits them, and then dump it on the ground and stomp on it when they don’t get their way.
Fortunately, much like the dinosaur, the old-school Republican is rapidly going extinct and what we hear of them today is just the death rattle of the GOP. The ‘liberal’ thing to do would be pull the plug. But Karma says otherwise. Like their intervention in the Terry Schaivo euthanasia case, let’s employ their right to life philosophy and watch them struggle to the last in their painful and mindless attempts to retain some slim measure of political life before pulling the shroud over the party forever.

Posted by: Fatesrider | April 16, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

I am a conservative. That is NOT a political position as much as it is a way of life. I believe in The Constitution, minimal government, the rule of law, demonstrably provable scientific facts, The Golden Rule, the value of reasoned cynicism and SELF-RESPONSIBILITY. If that is sufficient to brand me a “Right Wing Extremist”, then I stand proudly accused. I believe the TRUELY dangerous among us are those who would modify the above principals for self centered reasons. People who would encourage a “Fairness Doctrine” on COMMERCIAL enterprise such as talk radio. (do it on PBS stations, thats fine) Those same folks would faint if it was carried over into T. V. or newsprint, the “Liberals” would be out of jobs. Or folks whom legalized killing their own young under the guise of personal “Right to manage their own body.” No such “Right” exists, so they persuaded The Supreme Court to create one just for them. They care not a whit for pregnant women whom have been incarcerated for NOT properly careing for their pre-birth children. So much for true concern. We have a legal system that will convict one person of murder for taking the life of a fetus prior to birth, yet PAY a Doctor for doing the exact same thing. We have a social culture that attempts to DEMAND all of us to treat members of a minority, cul-de-sac, micro society as “normal”, when in fact they are ABNORMAL by ANY measurement or definition of nature. If you have friends, relatives or neighbors whom think like that, then you know some REALLY dangerous extremists operating under color of “Liberal” ideals.

Posted by: AlchyDave25 | April 16, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

This is simply a ploy by right wing media to pump up their ratings.
If there weren’t any non-issues for Hannity to whine about, why would anybody watch him?

Posted by: xmarks | April 16, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

If you can point me to the line in the report that says all soldiers are unhinged nutjobs, or all pro-lifers are dangerous fanatics, or that everybody concerned about illegal immigration is a murderous fanatic, I promise to try to work up some outrage.
Otherwise… looks like another tempest in a teapot, hmm?

Posted by: Yukon Sam | April 16, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

XMARKS: Again, I am a Conservative, I’ve no political axe to grind, so lets review your comments in light of logic and reason. You mentioned “Right wing Media.” Although not 100% so, that statement is an elegant oxymoron.
If the so called “Right Wing Media” needed to “pump up” their ratings, why are the Leftist and Liberals so adament to get “equal time” on the talk radio shows? It’s the “Air America” type buffonery that can’t stay afloat. Mssrs. Hannity, Limbaugh, Et Al are doing just fine. Someone is LISTENING to THEM. Is that what scares you?
The D.H.S. is a Governmental agency. You and your ilk, have, for whatever inane reason, installed a Left leaning, Liberal Democratic Government.
THEY have defined “Right Wing Radical” as, among other things, groups “dedicated to a single issue, SUCH AS opposition to Abortion or immigration.” Now, lots of folks, of all political stripes, oppose abortion, since its premise flies in the face of proven science AND nature. Better look askance at your neighbors! Few folks take real exception to immigration, it’s ILLEGAL ENTRY INTO OUR COUNTRY we dislike. That, by definition, makes the enterees criminals. Thus the DHS is labeling people who oppose crime as “Radical”. Nice peice of work there!
The DHS further states that the “Right Wing Radicals” play on fears about “emergent issues”. The issues being, Foreclosures, Unemployment and Tight Credit. So now we have the DHS saying that people whom oppose those issues and are attempting to rectify them are “Recruiting Radicals”.
What a swell bunch, our leaders, and what a rum crew, us humans. The DHS would not seem to fit easily into either group.

Posted by: AlchyDave25 | April 16, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Just out of curiosity, does this report tell us anything about the radical right that we don’t already know? They have guns and will kill every last one of us to keep them. I get it! I get it!

Posted by: cicclinton | April 16, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

@AlchyDave25:
Did you actually read the report yourself?
(1) The scope of the report is on radical and VIOLENT groups/individuals, not all people opposed to abortion or immigration. The report in NO way characterizes all people who hold those views to be radical or violent.
(2) It is also not about people who are against immigration or illegal immigration, just the ones that are radical or violent. The entire report is pretty much centered around hate groups…glad to see you are lumping yourself in with these nut jobs.
(3) “Thus the DHS is labeling people who oppose crime as “Radical”. Nice peice of work there!”
It does no such thing, if you read it with the scope of the report in mind and read it objectively you can see that is clearly not the case.
(4) “The issues being, Foreclosures, Unemployment and Tight Credit. So now we have the DHS saying that people whom oppose those issues and are attempting to rectify them are “Recruiting Radicals”.
Again, you are making incorrect assumptions about the report. It is not saying that people who “oppose” those issues are radical, it is saying a combination of those issues (current economic, credit, housing, and employment issues, among other things) can make people who already have radical leanings even more so. In other words the stress of those issues can make people more likely to either be influenced by radical groups or become live out their already radical tendencies.

Posted by: BJC | April 17, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Dear Leader won because of a slick campaign/lots and lots of money, the fawning of the mainstream media, the suppression of anything negative about Him by the mainstream media, the idea that going Democrat would automatically solve everything, and McCain’s mistakes.
I wouldn’t take too much heart in His win because the Liberal Socialism many of you espouse here is not what folks voted for…handouts, maybe, but not to start singing the Internationale in ACORN-run communes. In short, you guys are quite alone apart from the Hollywood/MSM elitists, college professors and illegal immigrants.
The Present really needs to get a hold of this situation. But, I suspect that the Left is actually trying to goad people into trying something so that they can be dealt with once and for all, and allow the Marxists even greater, more permanent powers. And if they don’t try something, the Marxists will get what they want anyway…pretty much a win-win for them and a royal screwing for the country as a whole.
We can sit around and imagine such things happening ‘over there somewhere’, but it will be where we all live. Everything will be shut down.
We’d rather keep it strictly political of course, but my take on it is that the extremely vile talk over the last 8 years from the Left has made it seem OK to those on the Right. What makes you Libs think that it’s only the Black Panther/Weather Underground types that are capable of going ape? Paradoxically, accusing people of being terrorists who really aren’t might set them off.
Also, who’s to say that some Communist group won’t start something? They’ve tried before.
Despite you Liberals going off about George Bush, -he’s at home in Texas looking at blueprints of his library. He’s outta there. He was not an extremist. But the People’s Choice is. Hopefully, future generations will learn what a real extremist looks like and not vote for them. But television would have to become extinct first I suppose.
I hope that all this is worth it so that a few people can feel good about themselves being ‘progressive’ and ‘citizens of the world’.

Posted by: RR GOP | April 17, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Where can we get or read a copy of this report of 4/16 ?

Posted by: Dan | April 17, 2009, 5:09 am 5:09 am

Some one the left obviously think there’s a right wing extremist neocon behind every bush. Why would they even put out a memo like this? I think it shows a lack of real acumen.

Posted by: LongT | April 17, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

“Some one the left obviously think there’s a right wing extremist neocon behind every bush.”—-Hahaha. Not every Bush…just one big texas Bush.

Posted by: cicclinton | April 18, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

How is quoting the story grounds to be removed? How is stating a fact from the story/report and agreeing that it could be true grounds to be removed. Yes, we vets are trained by the gov’t. Yes, we were privy to methods and tactics and can execute those same tactics better than civies can. Yes, we can do more damage than your average civie. What in there is wrong or disrespectful?

Posted by: rayhagermanniraqvet | April 19, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

I used to have considerable respect for Jim Dobson – used to listen to him every day, in fact. That all ended when he left off preaching the Gospel and Christian living principles, and got into political meddling in violation of scripture. Dobson has become yet another right-wing hate monger, little different actually than Limbaugh.

Posted by: Jordan | April 23, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

DHS needs to consider all threats, from all extremist groups whatever belief they hold, it bothers me that conservatives and military veterans would be a target of this report. Their are no facts to back this up, There are facts about so called immigration groups who are so extreme that they have beaten people who oppose them, and it has been caught on video. Reports and proof on suspious activity of groups accepting money from governments outside this country, who are considered not frendly to the United States. Such groups have discussed immigration policies of the United States with officals of such governments. And DHS is focus on groups, because they are white, as a threat, their are just as many Hispanic extremist groups who are opposing laws that the DHS is suppose to uphold. It needs, to stop and consider all angles of threats. when you do a threat report all threats must ne considered and it should have been labeled as a developing threat, along with other extreme groups activites. (White or not) who are conducting activties they come close to violating laws. DHS has a biased report, and continues to use the old Sterotype of Klan members, being a threat, while they still are, there are other threats to be considered, not all will resort to violent acts as DHS wants to think, most want to use the political process as a means to place leaders who want open borders, and replace exsisting laws, that would threaten National secuirty because of their ties with governments that want this country be a open place.

Posted by: Brandon | April 23, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

The insane, out-of-control polarized partisanship in America will bring America to an end if it continues in the direction it’s going. THAT is preciesely what the DHS reports are acknowledging – right or left – it doesn’t matter – tthey meet at the extremes.
One Amrica, or no America? It’s your choice.

Posted by: Prophet | April 26, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

I shed blood and took blood for this country and would willingly do it all over again. I will be damned if I wont fight when my country turns its back on me and my brothers/sisters who have and will give and take life for our commander in chief, no matter how idiotic he or she may be. Through the years, all the leaders of the united states have turned a blind eye and their back on all veterans and only take care of them when someone finally decides that enough is enough and speaks up. I learned that my country cares for nothing but power and money.

Posted by: wolf | August 25, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.