Did Obama Break a Pledge to Adopt a Rescue Dog?
"We’re going to adopt a dog, I think," Michelle Obama told Entertainment Tonight on September 30, 2008.
"A rescue dog," said then-Sen. Obama.
But something happened to that idea.
In his first post-election press conference on November 7, 2008, then President-elect was asked what kind of dog he was planning on buying for his girls.
"We have two criteria that have to be reconciled," the president said. "One is that Malia is allergic, so it has to be hypo-allergenic. There are a number of breeds that are hypo-allergenic. On the other hand, our preference would be to get a shelter dog. But obviously, a lot of shelter dogs are mutts, like me. So the — so, whether we’re going to be able to balance those two things, I think, is a pressing issue on the Obama household."
Over the weekend we learned that the Obama girls would be gifted with a pure-bred Portuguese Water Dog named Bo, a gift from Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass.
It would seem that the president didn’t ever make a "promise" or "pledge" to adopt a shelter dog.
But it’s also true that as a candidate for the presidency he indicated that he was going to do so.
Animal rights activists are chagrined with his decision.
Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO Humane Society of the United States, issued a statement congratulating the Obamas for "taking in a second-chance dog. Bo is a Portuguese water dog who was apparently returned by the family that originally purchased him."
But Pacelle was clearly disappointed, noting that families "like the Obamas, who are interested in a particular breed of animal or have special circumstances such as allergies in their household, can turn to their local animal shelter or breed rescue group. About one-quarter of all dogs in shelters are purebreds, many surrendered by their owners like the new First Dog."
The Humane Society press release also pointed out that three million "healthy and treatable dogs and cats are put down every year in shelters across America. These animals are loving, happy and loyal dogs and cats who ended up in shelters through no fault of their own. Yet, at the same time, there are more than 10,000 puppy mills churning out dogs for the pet trade to be sold to unsuspecting buyers."
"We see faddism when it comes to pet-keeping in the movies, and we may see that scenario play out in the case with the First Family’s selection of a Portuguese water dog," added Pacelle. "There are reputable breeders of these dogs, yet sadly we expect disreputable puppy mill operators to start producing them as well, intent on cashing in on the heightened awareness of this breed."
The Obamas have said they intend to give a charitable contribution to the Washington DC chapter of the Humane Society. Bo arrives tomorrow.
– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Okay, I voted for McCain, but am hopeful Obama’s presidency will be successful, and begrudgingly now believe maybe McCain wasn’t the best choice for the time.
This is a big-time nontroversy.
If there is a thread of hotheads complaining about Obama about this one, it will be a good example of ODS.
Bye!
Posted by: Wade | April 13, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
“Did Obama Break a Pledge to Adopt a Rescue Dog?”
Of course!
For those of you who haven’t figured it out, it’s pretty easy to tell when “O” is being dishonest and pandering…
(hint: it involves his lips moving)
Posted by: tjp612 | April 13, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
“Okay, I voted for McCain, but am hopeful Obama’s presidency will be successful”
This is a matter of perspective, isn’t it? From what I’ve seen of what Obama wants to do to “succeed” (and thus be “successful” from his point of view), I do NOT hope Obama’s presidency will be successful.
Posted by: tjp612 | April 13, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Good Lord, another day of “the presidents dog” WHO CARES? You guys are turning into a tabloid freak show.
Posted by: pwhited | April 13, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Oh pitiful wingnut haters, has it come to this?? LMAO! This is what you’ve reduced too? Complaining about a darn dog?? LOL
Posted by: Lynne | April 13, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Are you kidding me?
Really?
You’re all worried about whether or not the dog is “technically” a rescue dog?
This truly goes to show that Obama is doing such a good job that he can’t be faulted for anything but trying to protect his daughter’s allergies.
Shame on you all!
Posted by: Chantal | April 13, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
tjp612
Thanks for illustrating my point so succinctly and effectively.
Posted by: Wade | April 13, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Yup, that’s what Obama do.
Posted by: ceeLeelee | April 13, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Are we still the land of the free? Well, I think so and the Obama’s have the freedom to change their mind. Besides they are making a contribution to Washington DC chapter of the Humane Society. This is so petty and juvenile and has nothing to do with politics!
Posted by: ladyrain | April 13, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Really, this is a big deal to people? Would they rather obama went to the pound and purchased a dog that would make his daughter sick? That’s dumb, Most shelters encourage people to NOT purchase a dog if there are allergies. All day long people gripe about how people buy pets as fashion items, it seems our pres has taken time to think it through, not just jump into something that is not good for him or his family.
Posted by: Tatjanna | April 13, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Anyone who really gives a darn about what kind of DOG the family picks should have their voting rights stripped. They are clearly too immature and have their minds tied up worring with nonsense to have access to the power of voting.
Posted by: Disinterested in pap | April 13, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
how desperate are you to come up with anything negative? You stood by eight years of psychosis like nothing was wrong. Now, the other guy, who by the way in this short amount of time is doing one hell of a job thank you, gets jumped over a dog he receives as a gift? How ridiculous.
Posted by: Thomasi | April 13, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
The right wing screaming crowd needs to understand that the media’s unprecedented attention given to Obama gives and takes. It’s not necessarily a consistent plus. The dog adoption “controversy,” for instance.
Posted by: matt | April 13, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Some are missing the larger point…
This isn’t about the dog as much as (yet again) Obama cannot be believed as he is fundamentally dishonest. I could care less what kind of dog he gets and from where he gets it. I’m tired of hearing about it (and all other trivial things Obama). It just illustrates (again) his incessant desire to pander and to be liked (which are fundamental to his narcissistic personality).
Posted by: tjp612 | April 13, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“Now, the other guy, who by the way in this short amount of time is doing one hell of a job thank you”
I’d be curious to hear your definition of “one hell of a job”….
Posted by: tjp612 | April 13, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
you guys need to get a freaking life
Posted by: dj | April 13, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Rich folks, get rich folks dog. After all they are both lawyers aren’t they
Posted by: Ray | April 13, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
People have a right to be disappointed…and then they can move on. I find it very heartening that so much concern has been expressed over shelter dogs. Wayne, as always, strikes the right note. But for anyone to deny the passionate feelings of animal activists (or very caring people in general) is absurd, judgmental and indeed un-American. Too many animals suffer horrible lives and deaths because too many people don’t like discussing it.
Posted by: Marie | April 13, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
He rescued it from the Kennedys.
Posted by: Sally J | April 13, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
tjp612 do you really want to talk about dishonestly? Take a look at the last eight years and then you can talk about dishonestly!!!
Posted by: ladyrain | April 13, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
“I’d be curious to hear your definition of “one hell of a job”"
I’ll give mine.
Under Obama the stim bill passed, as well as the budget.
Obama has made clear that we will not torture, that we will close so called black detentions sites around the world as well as Gitmo.
He has shifted the central front in the war on terror back to its rightful place of Afghanistan.
He has just rescinded the stupid Cuba travel ban that Bush put in place.
And apparently I am not the only one who thinks he’s doing a good job.
He job approval numbers are in the low 60′s.
The percentage of people who think the country is moving in the right direction has doubled since he took office and is higher than its been since 2007 (though still low).
Economic optimism is at a 20 month high though that is still low as well.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 13, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
What absolute lunacy! This is about a family’s personal choice. It is neither up to you or I to decide on what type of dog they are going to get or where the dog comes from. Personally, I don’t care and have ill regard for anyone who makes it their mission to destroy the joy and happiness that the first pet will bring to this young family.
Shame on all of you who want to make this all about themselves and their own political leanings. It is time to stop trying to control other people’s lives and concentrate on your own miserable life!
Posted by: Frank Arellano | April 13, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Just one more campaign promise/pander by Obama, who said anything to get elected — about much more than a puppy dog.
We told you so.
Posted by: Gee | April 13, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
But of course the dog was a rescue. He was rescued from Ted Kennedy.
Posted by: Asylum Aleikum | April 13, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
How can anyone believe a word this guy says? And, to defend him as well. Mind-blowing! How mindless some are.
Posted by: Porkey | April 13, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Campaign promise? Where’s the promise that was broken? This is a headline in search of an article. What a waste of space this whole conversation is… and the idiots who “blame” or “accuse” Obama should read a damn book and educate themselves because they are stupid.
Posted by: Rose | April 13, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Choosing a new canine member of the family is a complicated process and it involves the desires and opinions of everyone in the family. They will be the one’s living and caring for the animal. It’s a personal decision and really it’s none of our business. Give the guy a break!
Posted by: Johnny Thomas | April 13, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Shame on you Jake Tapper for starting some crap like this! He can do what ever he wants to do with regard to his family. I feel sorry for you, because I know you have to make a living, and this is what it has come to. Leave this man alone! Leave hsI family alone. This just gives people who hide behind these blogs to the chance to say hateful things, but I bet not one of them would say any of this to our POTUS face, I bet they will PUNK OUT!!!
ENOUGH!!!
Posted by: fempharoh | April 13, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
The Obamas made a wise decision. They took a dog that was destined for either rehoming or a breed rescue where it would then be rehomed. They also put the best interests of their family above the animal rights folks’ interests. I own, breed, and handle in shows AKC-registered dogs. Portugese Water Dogs are not a common breed and very difficult to find. The chances of finding a purebred PWD in a shelter are almost nil. This family had many considerations, including the health of their children, in choosing a dog. The best way to get a dog with predictable traits is to get a REAL purebred dog from a reputable breeder who knows his/her dogs genetic lines.
Wayne Pacelle, who wants to eliminate all pet ownership and whose organization collects lots of money to help animals but spend very little on the projects they say they are collecting for, is making statements that he knows will keep him in the good graces of the AR folks and also make him look good politically. Notice that PETA, the group that kills as many as 90% of the animals they “rescue”, has no statement.
The Obamas did the right thing for their family. Mr. Kennedy knew a breeder from whom he had gotten high-quality dogs and worked with them to get the dog they wanted. THAT is how one should go about getting a purebred dog.
BTW, I’ve owned over 20 mixed breed dogs rescued from shelters in my lifetime. Those dogs are wonderful pets, but I’ve spent more on their health issues than on those of purebred dogs. Still, if you want a good pet and don’t care about whether you can predict its traits then a shelter dog is a great choice.
Posted by: SDM | April 13, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
I couldn’t care less. He did pledge to close Guantanmo, and he hasn’t. He’s shipping all new unlawful combatants to Bagram, and if someone can explain the difference to me, I’d love to hear it. He promised not to invoke the state secrets doctrine, and he’s doing so vigorously. Mind you, I supported all of these actions when Bush did them, and I support them now. I just think if the man had any class or grace, having discovered what reality is as commander-in-chief he might offer a word of apology to his predecessor.
Meantime, the far left is discovering gradually what I have always known:
“It’s not just Paul Krugman anymore. A growing chorus on the legal left is cooling toward President Barack Obama as a result of recent actions by the Justice Department vigorously defending the Bush administration in what it termed the war on terror.”
He’s changed the name, but that’s about it. (Quick, somebody–tell me what the new name for the War on Terror is. And what’s the new name for the age-old unlawful combatant?)
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 13, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
If you people are so concerned about rescue dogs, go out and adopt one..two..three..or more. That will show everyone what a wonderful upstanding person you are. Don’t consider The President Of The United States is doing a bang up job, just worry he didn’t go to a shelter to adopt a dog! Grow up! This country is in trouble, thanks to our last president. President Obama is trying to do what he can about that. Forget the dog and do something to help the country!
Posted by: kathy winslow | April 13, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Jake…down to doing dog stories….HAHAHA….
Posted by: linda n carolina | April 13, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Just like everything else, he talks out of both sides of his mouth. Has a “spin” for everything. So Dem’s how is that CHANGE working for ya????
Posted by: HH | April 13, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Shame on you Barack Obama. Shame on you.
- Hillary Clinton, Former First Lady, Current Secretary of State, Future President.
Posted by: young_voter | April 13, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Jake – First of all Humane Society of United States is not connected in any way to our local humane societies. Wayne Pacelle has gotten himself into confrontation problems many times before. FBI has been watching them for awhile. Be careful.
Humane society attempts tp make blanket statement labeling all breeders into same category. Each local human society funded by each state is responsible for providing good educational programs, lease laws, etc in area they live. Our county humane society has good programs, and we do not have huge problem. If these societies are ineffective they need to take a good look at themselves and their programs. Each locality has it’s own set of unique problems that must be dealt with, but a can do attitude can do wonders.
FACT – Bo is neutered
FACT – Bo is a a six month old second chance dog. His first owner could not keep him. Because he was bred by well respected PWD breeder he did not have to go to a shelter. This breeder requires all dogs she/he/they breed must be returned if owner can not keep during dog’s lifetime. I totally respect and congratulate this breeder for conducting such an honorable breeding program. This breeder belongs to a dog breed club. And does have a breed rescue program within that club. When this breeder gets a dog back, if she has no one waiting for an animal she can contact breed club rescue for possible interested new dog owners. AKC dog breed clubs watch all club members closely to make sure they are taking their own dogs back. Peer pressue within club and breeder reputation is high. Screening process for dog ownership is lengthy and detailed. Very careful.
FACT – Obama’s daughter has dog allergies. Medically they could only get a dog of certain non-allergenic dog breeds that has AKC certified pedigree. Getting from a shelter would have been great, but dogs do not come with proven lineage, or AKC certified pedigree. Chances would be too high for incorrect information or shelter guarantees regarding dog lineage. This is a medical no-no. Welfare of Obama’s daughter and dog were of paramount importance. Obama’s had done all correctly and researched well for their own particular unique situation.
FACT – Obama did keep his promise, but had to consider his daughters dog allergies. Bo is a second chance dog. By some is a rescue dog.
FACT – Obama’s are giving to local DC Humane Society. Thank goodness for this decision. I would never, ever support Humane Society of the United States. Lately they have become more of a radical animal activist group with some highly questionable associations. I could go on and on, but won’t. Also some purported connections to despicable PETA, and animal terrorist groups suspected but not proven to date. Jake, I would be quite leery of this organization. Wayne appears to look great, handsome, well dressed and well spoken, and play the the public relation role well – but-but-but!
Go Bo!! Congratulations Obamas!! How exciting!!
Posted by: Sharon | April 13, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
I don’t care about Distraction Dog. I care about the deficit, the national debt and the strength of the dollar. Those are the issues I will vote on in 2010 and 2012.
Posted by: Janet | April 13, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Having given credit to Obama his role in the safe return of Capt. Philips, I hope I will be allowed to speak on this issue without being branded a right-wing ranter who hates the president. (But then, I’m insanely optimistic. *G*)
SDM makes a good point– it is perfectly okay to get a purebred dog from a reputable breeder, as the Obamas did, if that is your desire. And SDM makes an even better point by slamming the PETA folks and others rightly labelled Humaniacs who ride these hobbyhorses for the publicity and benefit themselves more than the animals.
However, I take strong exception to your suggestion, SDM, that one needs to adopt a purebred from a breeder when allergies are involved. Tatjanna writes dismissively that it is wrong to suggest the president should have chosen a shelter animal that “would make his daughter sick” and goes on to suggest that “Most shelters encourage people to NOT purchase a dog if there are allergies.” See, this is the sort of misinformation that limits adoptions. I have volunteered at a shelter for over a decade now and I can tell you that you are as likely to be able to find a hypoallergenic dog at a shelter as elsewhere. No dog can be considered immune from triggering allergic reactions, but it is true that some breeds and breed mixes, including the PWD, are generally far less likely to trigger problems.
The point is that Obama himself raised the issue and raised expectations. The point is not that we should be able to tell his family what to do but that we should be able to express disappointment when we suspect there is pandering involved. Perhaps he felt pressured by rescue groups– some of those folks can indeed be intense and persistent. But the time to say, “enough. My family will make a decision in our girls’ best interests and it’s not anyone else’s business” was when the matter first came up, when he kept talking on the campaign trail about getting the girls a dog. That promise to his daughters was a private matter that he did not have to share with all of us. But he made it public, he repeatedly mentioned it, people went, “aw, what a sweet daddy” and the interest in the dog to come grew.
Then, as Tapper points out, when asked about the dog after the election, he waxed eloquent about shelter dogs and “mutts like me” and didn’t simply say, “as nice as that would be, we’ll be going the certified purebred route out of an abundance of caution.” He was, as politicians are wont to do, trying to have it both ways. This is just a reminder that Obama is, in the end, an ordinary politician– not markedly different from other politicians. (that’s not a slam or a compliment, just an observation)
Posted by: moderate | April 13, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
In reply to : Sharon | Apr 13, 2009 8:41:02 PM
FACT: “A quick search of the Petfinder website Monday revealed 14 Portuguese water dogs at shelters across the country, including a female named Pepper being kept at a foster home in the District. “She is an adorable and sweet 2-3 yr old Portuguese Water dog that we found in a high kill shelter!” writes the rescue group K-9 Lifesavers on the ad. “She loves kids and other dogs.”
Posted by: sarainitaly | April 13, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
He didn’t break a promise. He never made a promise. He said it was possible they would get one, not that they would definitely get one. Besides, the dog is a second chance dog. Good Lord, let it go. The US is falling into crisis, and this you consider to be important?
Posted by: lisa | April 13, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
There is no such thing as a non-allergenic dog. Just because a dog doesn’t shed there’s no way to prevent it from having allergens in its dander. Malia is probably allergic to other things if she’s allergic to dogs. She’s probably allergic to dust and pollen too, and there’s no way to avoid all dust and pollen, etc., which is why we have marvelous drugs to treat allergy symptoms. Malia will need allergy medicine to go with their new purebred, store-bought dog. Buying dogs from a breeder is wrong as long as there are shelters full of wonderful animals waiting to be gassed to death. Forcing dogs reproduce for the purpose of selling their offspring is wrong and it should be illegal. I adore Obama but I am VERY disappointed that the Obamas chose this dog. They were offered the same breed from shelters for months. Bad move!
Posted by: Schmoopsy | April 13, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
” I do NOT hope Obama’s presidency will be successful.” You want America to fail? Why do you hate America?
Posted by: Mike | April 13, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
I didn’t need to even click on the headline to know that Jake Tapper wrote this…
You are really reaching, man… like last week, when you tried to attack Obama for talking to Hillary at the picnic table?
Lame!
Will you ever write something positive about the president?
Posted by: Mike | April 13, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
What do you expect from a lying lowlife thug? but a least he rescued the dog from a drunk
Posted by: The government OWES me | April 13, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Who cares!!!!!!!! It’s just a DOG. WHO CARES if Obama broke a promise about a DOG. There are more important things than that. I can’t believe there are over 1,000 articles about this subject. People are so DUMB, and have NO LIFE, and posess ONE brain cell if all they can think about is Obama getting or not getting a “Rescue dog”.. please…cover things that ACTUALLY matter to the human race. THANKS!
Posted by: Ann | April 13, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
I do not trust anyone who is pushing 50 and has never had a pet…especially when that person does have the desire for a full time makeup artist…and only got the dog because of lame public pressure.
Posted by: paul | April 13, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
I don’t agree with any of Obama’s policies, but this is ridiculous to slam him for a non-promise not kept. The important thing here is that he kept his promise to his kids and that they love the dog. That is the only thing that is important in this story.
Posted by: ellsbell930 | April 13, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
You Utopians are so short-sighted, limit-minded. What a difference does it make to break a freeking dog promise??? It hurts nobody, creates no federal deficits, spied on no citizen privacy, and kept no state secrets.
Leave BO alone, which ever it is.
Posted by: skinny dog | April 13, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Still on the dog story Jake? Never thought you’d be writing about stupid stuff like this when you got that big White house job eh? Your mum must be so proud.
Posted by: linda n carolina | April 13, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
There is no such thing as the “DC chapter” of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS).
HSUS runs no pet shelters. It has no affiliated shelters. Why does anyone listen to it?
Posted by: David | April 13, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Anyone with children suffering from serious allergies would not post a negative comment on this topic. So the naysayers here do NOT know what the are talking about.
Schmoopsy – you could not be any more uneducated on this topic.
Posted by: Paige | April 13, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
There was no “pledge,” there was no “promise.” The Obamas said that they hoped to adopt a shelter or rescue dog, they said that they would try to do so, but they also pointed out the complications presented by their daughter’s allergies. That was made clear from the beginning.
This is a non-issue. The Obama girls were presented with a gift, and that’s that. End of story.
Posted by: Eleonora27 | April 13, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
“But it’s also true that as a candidate for the presidency he indicated that he was going to do so.”….huh???? what part of “We’d LIKE to” do people not understand? It didn’t work out. So shut up already.
Posted by: r u kidding me | April 13, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Maybe I’m a little more savy than Jake, but I’ve always understood what the word “maybe” means, or “I’d like to” ever since I was five and wanted an atari and my Dad said, “I’d like to….We’ll see.” Sometimes “we’ll see” would turn into a positive, sometimes it didn’t. Isn’t this something you’re supposed to learn in grammar school?
Posted by: Liv'n the Dream | April 13, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Get used to it.
He has been breaking promises all over the place. So much so that I want out, or atleast my money back.
Posted by: Buyer's Remorse | April 13, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
skinny dog–You Utopians are so short-sighted, limit-minded. What a difference does it make to break a freeking dog promise??? It hurts nobody, creates no federal deficits, spied on no citizen privacy, and kept no state secrets.
Leave BO alone, which ever it is.
***************************************
So apparently this is another lame dig at Bush. Obama is currently at war, hurting people on both sides, he’s single-handedly created the largest deficit in history (dwarfing Bush), can spy on anyone he pleases(FBI,CIA), and will take a million state secrets to the grave. GET A CLUE!!!
Posted by: umm... | April 13, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Ted Kennedy is dying of a brain tumor, and wanted to give the Obama girls a dog. Maybe he wanted to know that people would remember him when he was gone, and this was one of his ways of doing that. Who knows?
There was no “public pressure” to get a dog. It was something the Obama girls had wanted for some time, and their father told them, on election night, that they would get a puppy when they were settled in the White House. If you’ve ever been a parent, you know what it is like to have a child with their heart set on a pet. The girls have waited long enough.
Malia and Sasha met the dog, and Malia did not have any allergic symptoms to Bo. I suspect that, if you are a parent, that’s probably the most important consideration in deciding on a pet.
A whole lot of presidents have had dogs in the White House, most of them purebreds, and — as far as I know — President Obama was the first and only one to even talk about the possibility of getting a shelter dog.
While Bo is considered a “rescue dog” because he previous owners couldn’t, for some reason keep him, the Obamas have signaled their intent to give a donation to a shelter in addition to taking Bo.
Stop and think about this people. These young girls have, pretty much, had their father taken away from them for at least the next four years. Possibly eight. That means that they are going to “go without” a father a lot more than most kids do, and they’ll do it at a very tender age.
Whatever I feel about President Obamas policies, I have to respect both his wife and his children for being willing to sacrifice having him in their lives enough for him to be our President.
Pick on his policies all you want (even I don’t think I fully agree with all of them), but leave the damn dog and his daughters out of this. His kids wanted a dog. He got them a dog. He’s making a donation to an animal shelter since this particular dog came as a gift.
Get over it.
Posted by: Jaylah | April 13, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Obama doesn’t keep his word when it matters, so why expect him to on this?
Besides, how could anyone think that a pound puppy is good enough for royalty?
Posted by: fish | April 13, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
“Obama is currently at war, hurting people on both sides…”
Umm, who started both wars?
“[He]can spy on anyone he pleases(FBI,CIA)…”
Umm, who tossed out our US Constitution and decided the president had those abilities?
Posted by: Jaylah | April 13, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Why did animal rescue groups want the first family to go the shelter dog route? Because, for some ridiculous reason, many people are sheep and will do things in imitation of what they see public figures do. Michelle Obama wears what seems to me to be an unattractive, too small cardigan sweater from J Crew and the same sweater sells out. She wears a great little dress on the View and they can’t keep it in stock suddenly. Paris Hilton carries her chihuahua around in her purse and there’s a jump in interest in chihuahuas. If the Obamas had adopted a shelter dog, it would have increased adoptions of shelter dogs. Maybe that’s not a good thing, because people would not have been adopting for the right reason. But a lot of little dogs would have been saved.
Posted by: GetReal | April 13, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
How is it possible that all of you people think it is not important that Obama got a dog from a breeder when millions are being killed in shelters every day. He had a responsebility above all other mortals to set an example as President of doing the ethical thing here. There was only a right or wrong thing to do here. It is a black and white issue. I for one will never have any respect of the Obama’s or Biden’s again. Saying it is a non-issue??? Have you all lost your heads, not to mention your hearts??? This is a problem that could have easily been solved in our lifetime, now it has pro. been set back eight years. Get a clue people of the gravity of what has happened!!!!!
Posted by: Sarah | April 13, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
There he goes again- another promise broken- and obviously this was the most important one.
Posted by: jschmidt | April 13, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Regarding a family pet, President Obama MAY have had a pledge to no one in the world other than to his two daughters. The Obama’s choice of a family pet is no more our business than their favorite flavor of pizza.
Posted by: RSC | April 13, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Sarah, goodness, calm down girl! Go look at the home page here. The Obamas dog, or animal shelters in general, are (by far) NOT the biggest issue this country needs to be dealing with.
And, frankly, nobody cares if you “never have any respect of the Obama’s or Biden’s again.” If this is what you base your opinions on, it just goes to show how shallow and superficial your mind is.
Posted by: Jaylah | April 13, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
bHo MADE it a public issue! He put it in his acceptence speech!
Posted by: Denisea213 | April 13, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
FACT– the circumstances of that first owner are kinda of mysterious. The breeder is in Texas. The first owner was in Washington, DC. Then the first owner wants to return the kind of dog the first family has expressed interest in at the same time that the first family is ready to get a dog. Ted Kennedy knows about the dog, reportedly having adopted a dog from the same litter. So instead of going back to Texas the dog goes to Ted’s trainer and on to the White House. Do we know that the Kennedys still have Bo’s sibling? Or were they the original owners?
Posted by: GetReal | April 13, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Oh please. This dog is for his kids. Move on to a more important story.
Posted by: Steve | April 13, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Denisea213, do you have any idea how stupid your “bHo” makes you look?
I guess YOUR parents asked you what you wanted your middle name to be as you came out of your mother’s womb?
Posted by: Jaylah | April 13, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Well there it is….at the top of the page…Obama lied.
Posted by: trint | April 13, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Yep, it’s just another President FlipFlop moment here. Nothing new about that!
Posted by: JustMe | April 13, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
RSC, I would agree that Obama’s promise to his daughters was none of our business but the problem with that argument is that he made it our business, in that way politicians do. He didn’t just promise the girls a dog. He told audiences along the campaign trail over and over that he had promised the girls a dog “win or lose.” It was a humanizing move, a warm and fuzzy applause line. He talked about the dog in his acceptance speech. He was the one who let the world in on the fact that Sasha and Malia would finally get a dog. So forgive us for acting as if this were a public act.
I am thrilled that these sweet little girls will get a wonderful pet. But we are not intruding on a family situation any more than we have been invited to intrude, to a large degree.
Posted by: moderate | April 13, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Denisea213, Obama said absolutely nothing about a shelter or rescue dog in his acceptance speech. What he said was that his daughters had earned a new puppy; he and his wife had previously said, in an interview, that they’d promised their daughters a dog, whether or not he won the presidency. However, he made NO promise or pledge about where the dog was to come from.
In other words, saying that you’d LIKE to adopt a dog from a shelter, if possible, is not equivalent to a promise or pledge that you will do so. Surely you’re adult and intelligent enough to grasp that?
Posted by: Eleonora27 | April 13, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
So if Ted Kennedy offered YOU a dog, would you turn him down? And, how is it that adopting a secondhand dog is any different from adopting at a shelter?? All my pets are secondhand: I got them from shelters or from people who didn’t want them anymore. It’s the same thing. If you can rescue a pet before it goes to the shelter, that’s a lot less traumatic for the pet. One of my cats was having a full nervous breakdown due to going to the shelter: it took a year for him to get over it and I’m amazed that both of us survived that year, but now he’s adorable and charming and we can’t believe how much he must have suffered from going there. Just because it’s a purebred doesn’t make a difference. So it the one that had a nervous breakdown. To try to make President Obama into a flip-flopper because of this is ridiculous. He didn’t buy a puppy from a puppymill, he got a grown pet as a secondhand dog and I think he kept the spirit of his intentions intact. And it’s nobody’s business anyway. It’s the children’s business, which should be a private matter for them.
Posted by: Anniemee | April 13, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
I have 15+ years in rescue. A rescue dog is wonderful. Its not the right choice for everyone though. A responsibly, ethically bred purebred is also a fine choice. I have both, and frankly, so do many of my rescue comrades. My bigger concern is the myth of the “hypo-allergenic” dog. They do not exist. What will happen if the children are allergic to Bo? A mutt would have been a wonderful and powerful choice for the Obamas, but please don’t dismiss a responsible bred pedigreed dog as an irresponsible choice.
Posted by: CMCK | April 13, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
As the owner of 2 humane society adopted pets – a dog and a cat – I am disappointed. But how do you turn down a gift from Ed Kennedy. That, I’m sure, would be a huge political faux pas.
Posted by: Anna in EP | April 13, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
“Umm, who started both wars?”
Umm, if Obama doesn’t like them, why does he continue to wage them?
“Umm, who tossed out our US Constitution and decided the president had those abilities?”
Umm, if the constitution was “tossed out” by Bush, why is Obama pursuing each and every such unconstitutional measure himself?
And what is with this adolescent “Umm” stuff? If you’re going to use it for God’s sake don’t lead with your chin.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 13, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
To be honest, I have to wonder if all the Obama-haters posting here even have the slightest idea what damage they are doing to “their party” with all of their spewage.
People of even moderate intelligence and powers of discernment look at your verbal vomit and think to themselves that they most certainly don’t want to be seen as agreeing with your twisted logic.
So you keep spewing your poison, and you’re too busy hating to see that you’re way outnumbered. And even people that once might have agreed with you that they didn’t think Obama was the best candidate are now in a big hurry to distance themselves from you and your delusions.
Sorta like Sarah Palin, ya know? I, personally, hope that she continues to run loose, because that is the very best way I can imagine to making sure that the Democrats remain in control of the White House until at least 2016. You haters just keep typing out your vitriol. You’re the Democrats best hope!
If you bothered to read the whole story that Jake Tapper wrote, you will see exactly what President Obama said about shelter dogs. He said that he “hoped” they could get a shelter dog. That he would “prefer” to get a shelter dog. He never said, “I promise we’ll get a shelter dog.”
So all your inane drivel about his “broken promises” is nothing more than your own little delusion.
Posted by: Jaylah | April 13, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
I sure hope that all the interest in the First Dog will inspire people to consider shelter animals. As I’ve mentioned numerous times, I volunteer each week at my local animal shelter. And those adorable, doomed dogs I meet there can tear your heart out. When I found out that more than a dozen puppies– yes, little fuzzy baby puppies– were euthanized last week because of lack of space at the shelter, I was heartsick. Even more, however, I get particularly attached to older dogs who have little chance of getting adopted. Of the animals brought into our shelter, 95% do not get adopted. That means they die. Yes, a large number come in sick or injured, but the majority of those who come in are healthy, normal dogs who just need good homes.
When will people learn to be responsible owners, to spay and neuter, to take it upon themselves to find new homes for animals they cannot keep? Nothing makes me madder than to watch someone come into the shelter, as I have witnesses dozens of times, to turn in a female dog with a whole litter of puppies. Dogs cannot practice birth control– it is their owners’ responsibility. I remember one sweet six year old dog named Coco who got turned in to our shelter this winter. The owner said, “She keeps having puppies and I am just sick of it.” So this poor homely older dog was doomed. The four puppies that were turned in with her did get adopted quickly, but once all her babies were gone, the dear thing was depressed and lonely and stopped eating. She spent all her time in the back of her pen, not even venturing to the front when potential adopters came by. Her plight really moved some of the volunteers and we really beat the bushes to find her a home. We managed to get her into a foster home and hopefully they can get her in good shape and find her a permanent home. But we can’t do that every animal, and I can’t bring them all home. (I wanted to adopt her but I already had 3 dogs and 4 cats, including an older cat with health problems who would not have tolerated a new addition to the family very well.) There’s a new Coco every day and most of them get euthanized.
The high number of animals that wind up in shelters is largely preventable. There are some areas where strict enforcement of leash laws and licensing and strong spay/neuter movements are effective and the number of animals in shelters is relatively low. In fact, our shelter has arranged on occasion to send a load of dogs to shelters in the northeast that actually wind up with waiting lists for adoptable dogs.
If all this talk about shelter and rescue dogs raises awareness to the point that adoptions shoot up, I will be very pleased. If you need a pet, please consider a shelter animal. And if you visit a shelter, please consider the older animals.
Posted by: moderate | April 13, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
“You want America to fail? Why do you hate America?”
Did you want Bush to fail? Did you hate America?
I pray that Mr. Obama is as successful as Bush was in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I fear that he will not be.
Why did Mr. Obama launch a war against those Somalian kids? Or did he inherit it?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 13, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Posted by: Fascist Hyena: Umm, if Obama doesn’t like them, why does he continue to wage them?
Please go directly back to your 7th grade history class. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200.
That response actually made me laugh out loud.
Posted by: Jaylah | April 13, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
“So you outspoken nut-jobs keep spewing your poison…”
I pray for the soul of the poor woman who wrote that. She is obviously so consumed with hatred that she resorts to name-calling. For shame…imagine calling someon a “nut-job” just because he disagrees with you.
Is Mr. Obama a nut-job? No, he is simply an attractive, well-intentioned man who is ill-equipped for his current job, and is engaged in imposing terrible costs on this country and its citizens. I hope he leaves office after four years and leads a happy and contented life with his lovely family and their dog.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 13, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Jaylah, what on earth makes you assume that every single person who complains about the president is a Republican? Or that every single person who has anything negative to say is a “hater”? You seem pretty quick to spew some less than kind remarks yourself, by the way.
Posted by: moderate | April 13, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
“That response actually made me laugh out loud.”
You laughed so hard that you were utterly unable to answer the question.
And while you’re at it, you might want to tell us why he has sent 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan instead of withdrwaing them.
We await your answers. Laughter won’t quite do.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 13, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
I have responsibly taken in & spayed neutured over 20+ abandoned dogs/cats over the years!! Many LEFT @ the vet my daughter worked! I only once PAID for a pet–$100 for a dalmation 3-month old puppy who had his metal collar so badly imbedded in his neck that the vet struggled to cut it loose!! So JAHLAH 11:12–what have you done?? Eleonora27-I only stated that bHo started the interest & even sat for an interview with Michelle about getting a mutt like him!
Posted by: Denisea213 | April 13, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Their daughter Sasha seems doesn’t like the puppy.
She seemed to be scared of Bo and stood back.
Poor Bo with his pity cute face was waiting to be pet.
Posted by: catleya | April 14, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Moderate: Yes, older dogs are soooo appreciative of a loving home & family!One year we had a winter stray & he just loved to curl up with my 3-yr.old while she read books to him! Later, he was the best buddy to my young son, the 2 were unseperable!2-other older strays become my granddaughters “cuddle buddies”.
Posted by: Denisea213 | April 14, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
There was obviously some compromise within the Obama family concerning the selection of the family pet. Recall that Mr. Obama had several other very specific qualifications for the selection of the family dog – for example, no little yipping “girlie dogs”. I think Mr. Obama honestly envisioned (and hoped for) a mixed-breed puppy that would grow into a rugged sporting dog. How many of you have had firm ideas/expectations about a family purchase and found that you later had to compromise on some of those ideas because your family members had different expectations? We all have. The difference is we don’t have the public waiting around to weigh and scrutinize every word and decision.
It’s not like the Obamas need my approval, but I think they did a fine job selecting their family pet; and like any loving parents, they placed their daughters’ needs and desires above their own, and above the desires of the public.
Posted by: Anemone | April 14, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Well, it’s been fun but I’m turning in the for the night. But before I go– Hyena, you are my hero. Keep up the good work. And Denisea, God bless you. What you have done for animals is awe-inspiring. And Sarah, your passion is a good thing. Don’t let the grumpy ones get you down.
Posted by: moderate | April 14, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Making an issue out of a dog is just another pathetic bite at Obama’s heals by the Neo-Con radio lemmings.
Posted by: dan | April 14, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am
@Moderate 11:41:41 pm,
Thanks for posting this great comment.
To Denisea 213 too.
I’m glad we have some animal lovers like you .
I rescues many animals also.
If not us who else.
Posted by: catleya | April 14, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
This is the animal rights nutjobs trying to make a story out of nothing.
PETA and the HSUS have been on a campaign to vilify anyone who chooses to purchase a purebred puppy rather than adopting from a shelter. This is their issue.
The HSUS and PETA have been sponsoring legislation in nearly every state in the nation trying to ban the breeding of dogs and cats. They do not believe citizens have the right to breed their own animals, nor do they believe in purebred show dogs. PETA protested Westminster this year comparing the AKC to the KKK. This is the mentality of these people.
So imagine their dismay when their Messiah, Obama chooses to get a well-bred PWD bred by respected breeder, with a champion sire and dam.
Obama should be speaking out for the rights of all Americans to get a well bred dog, not ducking behind some lame excuse of it being a ‘rescue’, there are no PWD rescues from respectable PWD breeders. The breed club requires breeders to take back dogs they’ve bred.
Posted by: nathan | April 14, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
All the right-wingers are constantly preaching family values this and family values that while trying to often legislate morality. Obama did what was in the best interest of his daughter – for that, he should be applauded yet you chose to denigrate him.
You can’t see that through your hate colored glasses. I have a child with severe allergies so knowing the exact line of the dog is important to minimize allergic reactions. Give the man a break and grow the hell up.
Posted by: Paige | April 14, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am
He said he wanted a mutt like himself. You talk about people who can’t see anything good in Obama. Look at yourself, when he breaks a promise or keeps Bush policies that he criticized on the campaign trail you think nothing is wrong. Hypocrites!
Posted by: 3rd party | April 14, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am
He chose this Portuguese water dog in order to minimize the allergic reaction to his daughter.
You meant, you can’t find any kind of dog at any shelter to minimize the allergic reaction?
None???
Posted by: cilla | April 14, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am
Denisea213 (dOh) asked “JAHLAH –what have you done??
Over the course of my 54 years on earth, I have adopted 4 dogs and 26 cats, either from animal shelters or from people just dropping off their cats near our country home.
I have had each of those animals either spayed or neutered and given all their immunizations. None of them were “outdoor” pets. They have all lived in my home with me.
I currently have a lab/setter/chow (who sheds horribly, no matter how often he’s brushed) sharing my home. As a result, when I divorced, I specifically bought a home with a LARGE fenced yard.
I have never owned a purebred dog or cat in my life.
I volunteer 20 hours per week at my local animal shelter.
Is that enough for you dOh, or you think I should be doing more?
Posted by: Jaylah | April 14, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am
THANK YOU moderate & catleya!!You lifted my spirits!! If only SOME people could live peacefully together as my cats & dogs do! Animals face a daily struggle, made worse by economy,loss of interest, abuse & by PEOPLE breeding for money!
Posted by: Denisea213 | April 14, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Jaylah–Hope you have a better attitude around the pets than you do typing words!!Don’t know what caused such upset by bHo that causes personal attacks!
Posted by: Denisea213 | April 14, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am
“You meant, you can’t find any kind of dog at any shelter to minimize the allergic reaction?
None???”
______________________________
Unfortunately, dogs at a shelter don’t have a history that comes with them. You are assuming they are purebred, but have no idea what part of the country the dog was bred in and with what type of environmental situation that could exacerbate allergy symptoms.
Unless you are and Allergist, I suggest staying away from this.
Posted by: Paige | April 14, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am
really? people are losing their homes, and jobs… livlihoods are at stake and children are fearful of what will become of their families and their future. Education is failing our kids, two wars are being fought and we’re still talking about the dog?
really? we’re angry about this?
Posted by: disappointed | April 14, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am
really? we’re angry about this?
Posted by: disappointed | Apr 14, 2009 1:08:14 AM
_______________________________
Apparently, some people are totally bent out of shape while conveniently forgetting the adorable purebred Scottish Terriers Barney and Miss Beasley from the previous administration.
Posted by: Paige | April 14, 2009, 1:15 am 1:15 am
I don’t like Obama’s politics, but he and his family can pick the dog that they want from whoever they want. So let’s give the Obama family a break on their choice of dog. And the dog’s cute, by the way.
Posted by: Sandy | April 14, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am
@Moderate 11:41:41 pm,
Thanks for posting this great comment.
To Denisea 213 too.
I’m glad we have some animal lovers like you .
I rescues many animals also.
If not us who else.
=====================
Me too!! 4 dogs total, German Shep from the pound, Aussie from a Humane Society, Pitbull a stray and a Rottie acquired from a friend.
All great dogs, very obedient and loyal. Good dogs are a blessing.
Posted by: jester13 | April 14, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am
THANKS to you too Jester 13!! My son had brought an unwanted Pit Bull puppy home 2 Christmas’ ago & I was a little wary. But, she is the most loving faithful companion!! Great with all the grandkids & EVERYONE comments on how great she is!!Glad you have a “loved” one too!!
Posted by: Denisea213 | April 14, 2009, 2:20 am 2:20 am
Public interest in this story occured since he announced it in Nov.2008 & it is now April 2009!! Some people are adament about a breed & only “their” breed & I guess his “dragging” out getting a dog caused this!If they had just surprised the girls with a dog,it would have been a done deal & THEN after the fact people would have discussed it!
Posted by: Denisea213 | April 14, 2009, 2:27 am 2:27 am
I’d get a Dobe….
Posted by: Suzannaquanashawn | April 14, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am
A dog is a dog, shelter or not. why do we always have to find something nagative to say about any actions taken by this family. it all started with finding the right schools for the girls. private or public? who cares!
They never promised to get a shelter dog. i think they suggested it was a possibility but maintained it had to be compartable with their girls.
Posted by: kandi | April 14, 2009, 5:57 am 5:57 am
Obama probably did broke a pledge.
Posted by: anonymous | April 14, 2009, 5:59 am 5:59 am
Dear Jack,
Who cares?
Sincerely, Angie
Posted by: Angie | April 14, 2009, 6:04 am 6:04 am
Sorry.. Dear.Jake!
Posted by: Angie | April 14, 2009, 6:06 am 6:06 am
Yes: There are more important stories out there then the “dog story” like Obama thinking about dropping the USA demand that Iran shut down it’s nuclear program. Yes: It’s their dog and they should be the ones who decide where they get their dog. Yes: it wasn’t a clear cut promise to get a shelter dog. But on the other hand, the other elements of the media and Obama himself has made this a major story. Although it’s Obama’s decision, he should be setting an example by taking a dog from the shelters. The part in this story about breeding mills is real and many dogs are killed because they don’t meet the standards of these illegal mills. All that said, I don’t think it’s the end of the world because Obama didn’t get a sheltered dog, it just makes him more like a typical politician.
Posted by: Willy | April 14, 2009, 6:25 am 6:25 am
Quite frankly, I see no reason for anyone being out of joint, so to speak about what kind of pet, the 1st. family chooses, because they are the ones who must consider one of their children is allergic, then their choices is their business and not that of rescue shelters.
This is america, land of free choices, and none of anyone’s business.
Move on to the important issues in USA.
Posted by: bettys | April 14, 2009, 6:48 am 6:48 am
He indicated that he would prefer to get a shelter/rescue dog. At the time of that statement, I saw quite a few logistical problems with that statement.For one thing, the Obamas would have to open up their personal lives to a great deal of scrutiny. No aspect of your life is too small a detail for a rescue/shelter group to examine. Obama’s wife and children have already had their lives turned upside down (no matter what the side benefits), and they would be relying on the discretion of the group’s volunteers, who are not trained in security issues. Not an appetizing prospect. The odds are that in going through a shelter/rescue organization, the Obamas would have had to give up even more of their control over their personal details to people they don’t know (not appetizing for parents of famous tweens) or the organization would have to relax some of its rules, resulting in accusations of special treatment or the expectation from all would-be adopters that the group’s rules can be bent.
Plus, they needed a very specific kind of dog. Hypo-allergenic, and not too many issues. This dog will be in the media spotlight, and it has to be of the temperament that it can withstand the crowds, camera flashes, noise and whatnot. That’s a lot to ask of an animal, and to demand it of a dog that may have come from an abusive or poorly socialized situation would frankly be cruel. Moreover if this dog could not withstand these things and bit someone or didn’t play along, it could damage the rescue/shelter movement irreparably. If this dog doesn’t work out in this highly specific and potentially stressful situation, it just will be a poor match and go back to the breeder. A shelter dog that didn’t work out would have caused an uproar.
The Obamas got a dog from a reputable breeder via a trusted friend. One can ask no more of them then that.
Posted by: JrzWrld | April 14, 2009, 6:57 am 6:57 am
Normally it wouldn’t be such an issue but in the current economic downturn there are so many pets being abandoned. Maybe the first family could make some sort of effort to help the shelters by promoting adoptions.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 14, 2009, 7:22 am 7:22 am
Oooooo, Obama broke a “promise”!
He didn’t want a dog. It was all a campaign trick that backfired on him.
Everyone steps right up to the trough the master filled for them. Feeding on this garbage keeps attention off what’s really going on, deeper even than the endless wars and the economy.
Try something spicier…like HR 1444 or the free cellphone program for welfare recipients. Social engineering and our tax dollars at play.
Never mind, you just keep up the partisan babbling like the master wants you to. It’s easier than thinking.
Posted by: Eyes Open | April 14, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am
I was also annoyed that he did not adopt. People stuck in bubbles of ignorance don’t understand that for every dog that is purposely brought into this world through a breeder, puppymill, or because the woman down the street decides that her dog “should experience the joy of birth” – there are dogs and puppies that are forced into gas chambers or who take needles into their legs and are put to death. Healthy, happy, fun creatures who have to be killed because there aren’t enough homes. It’s sickening. When Obama says he will adopt, he should adopt. It makes sense for the President to stick to his word, so that his word actually has meaning. Anyway, now that millions of people will be scurrying out to “buy” this breed of dog, it’s a sad day for dogs everywhere. You would think Obama could figure out that there are breed rescues that focus on dogs who have been given up, abandoned, etc – and I am sure Obama could have found this same breed within a rescue.
Posted by: Amy | April 14, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Amy: are you aware that this dog had been previously adopted out, and then returned to the shelter by the owner? In my mind the Obama girls received an unwanted dog. In my mind this consitutes “rescue.”
Posted by: Carl Spackler | April 14, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Carl, This is not a rescue. People wanting to let the president have his cake and eat it to (hint broadly he’s going the shelter route, express a desire to go the shelter route, then have a friend give him a purebred from a breeder) are trying to spin this as a rescue but it is not.
The breeder in Texas sold Bo to an owner in Washington, DC. This is a good breeder with a solid reputation. The breeder’s policy is to insist that if the dog is not a good fit, you must return it to the breeder rather than resell it or something. The owner supposedly decided not to keep Bo, but then Ted Kennedy intervened and persuaded the breeder to let Bo remain in the DC area (with his trainer in Va) while he arranged to give the puppy as a gift to the Obamas.
Think of the timeline. Bo is six months old, and we’re told that he’s been at the trainer’s place for a month, while he was being trained and was wisely brought to the White House to make sure he was a good fit with the family and that Malia had no allergic reactions. So he was not at this first owner’s for very long– at five months, he was already out of that home. A good breeder, and by all reports this Texas breeder is top-notch, will not sell a puppy until it is at least twelve weeks old (that is, 3 months). So the original owner had this puppy, tops, for two months.
If Kennedy had not conveniently stepped in, the pup would have been returned to its breeder, Martha Stern. A quality purebred dog from a sterling breeder who already has a high-profile clientele (for example, Kennedy purchased one of Bo’s siblings) would have had no problem at all quickly settling the puppy in a new home. This is not an animal who had been rejected, who may not get adopted, who is in need of rescue. To say that the ‘rehoming’ of Bo is some sort of rescue is silly spin.
Posted by: moderate | April 14, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
I know we all wanted the Pres to adopt, but given that we are talking about the White House, that is all but impossible.
The key is hypoallergenic and good with kids. Super, super, super hard to find.
My wife and I had two criteria: Non-allergenic (she teaches music in our home) and good with kids. Same as the president. We settled on Wheaten, Standard Poodle or Standard Schnauzer, all because we did not want a small dog around kids. I was completely committed to rescuing – I had rescued my previous dog. We searched nationally for any of the three breeds for six months. Zero, zippo, nada.
After nine months, we gave up and bought a Wheaten puppy from a breeder.
BTW, my sister’s small rescue terrier later bit my daughter in the face while she was crawling.
Rescue advocates, I hear your pain. But your expectations are unreasonable.
Posted by: dollared | April 14, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
moderate: who cares? The bottom line is this–an unwanted dog got a home.
Posted by: Carl Spackler | April 14, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Carl, the point I was making was that this was NOT an unwanted dog. PWD are trendy (even before the First Family got one) and relatively rare. This dog would have been snapped up by someone else from the breeder– it was not rescued.
Not selecting a rescued dog is one issue and I have no problem with the Obamas getting a dog from a breeder. I’m not an anti-breeder activist type, not at all. (My beef has been on the political nature of pandering to the rescue/shelter crowd and then not carrying through). But trying to label Bo a rescue dog to satisfy those who wanted to see a shelter adoption is a different issue. Don’t buy the spin. Bo seems to be a lovely, adorable animal who will bring much love to the First Family. But he is not a rescue
Posted by: moderate | April 14, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
@Jester13,
Thanks for joining us animal lovers.
I also do not believe Pit Bulls are fierce, bad dogs.
I think it depends on the owner how they treat their pets.
I feel sorry for them because some states ban Pit Bull.
God bless you all.
Posted by: catleya | April 14, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
BTW my sister’s small rescue terrier later bit my daughter in the face while she was crawling. Posted by Dollared 12:11:59 PM.
Dollared,
When you have a pet either cat, dog or whatever never let your baby alone with your pet.
It doesn’t matter they come from a shelter or any breeder.
You have to introduce your pet to your baby and show your pets that they are not forgotten.
Some pets will get jealous of a new born baby or new family member.
My sister’s cocker spaniel used to play with my niece when she was 1 year old and this dog came from a shelter.
Posted by: catleya | April 14, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Facist Hyena: “He did pledge to close Guantanmo, and he hasn’t. He’s shipping all new unlawful combatants to Bagram..”
=======================================
I hoped he would do exactly this, and am very pleased he is.
Posted by: mad | April 14, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
The dog probably has a chip. I think it needs to be put on a diet already. Yikes! Hello Secret Service, see your new duty..walk the dog, feed the dog, groom the dog, scan the dog.
Posted by: Joan | April 15, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am
If they said they wanted a rescue or shelter pet, I think they should had kept their word. Many citizens look up to the president’s office and what they each say at all times.
We have a shelter here that is closing down. They say it is due to not enough families coming to adopt pets. These little ones need all the help they can get. Too many are put down. With all the waste of $$$, can’t see how people can end the pets lives like that. Maybe, if they could speak, it would be different.
Hope their dog has a good life but would be nice if they did follow up as they said. It could had brought attention to many pet centers who are feeling the crunch of keeping the shelters going.
Posted by: Joan | April 15, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Perfect designer dog for the family that has designer pizza delivered from St. Louis, an entourage of 500 for their Grand Tour of Europe and a full-time make-up artist for mom when she travels.
Elites get an elite dog. Mutts are for the working joe.
Posted by: MaryR | April 15, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
The Obama family lied…they betrayed the public!
They betrayed the homeless animals in the shelters.
Just like Michelle Obama said “Everything we do in the White House will be symbolic like adopting a dog from a shelter.” Thank you.
Posted by: Martin Zimmer | April 26, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Iam sadden to see what dog he got .I wish he could watch a video of puppy-mills. I am hoping he will do something to end this .And all the cruelty to poultry industry the beef industry .This country needs to clean up its act on the way animals are treated in england germany they dont treat them like that .Its become against the law to dock tails and crop ears. wake -up peolpe animals feel to.
Posted by: M.PARKS | May 14, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Everyone, please get a grip. The dog was given to him by Ed. Kennedy because he had been in four homes and did not make it. If that is not an adopted dog, what is? Kennedy had been pressuring him for months to get one of these dogs. There were only two types of dogs for his girl who is allergenic. Both were fancy dogs from everyday perspective. Give him a break and take a breath yourself. This is not what is important although I am an animal lover myself and have two rescue dogs. If I had a child who was allergenic, I would do the same. Let’s have some peace on this issue.
Posted by: talmag | May 28, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm