Guantanamo Detainees to US
Hill sources tell me that Congressional leaders were told today that Guantanamo detainees from China – the Uighurs – are likely to soon be released into the United States, most likely to the Virginia suburbs. These notifications follow this front page story today in the Los Angeles Times. It is already clear that Republicans are prepared to pounce on this decision. Without referencing today’s notifications, Republican Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., released a statement this afternoon arguing that the release of the Guantanamo detainees will not make America safer. No word yet from Hill Democrats. Pentagon sources tell ABC’s Luis Martinez that the decision is "a toe in the water, not a done deal."
–George Stephanopoulos

Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
The best way to eliminate terrorism is to downsize poverty. If people are happy with their lives, devoid of want and scarcity, then they’re less likely to feel oppressed, and the vocal minority that advocates violent tactics will fall out of favor.
The Borgen Project (www.borgenproject.org) has some interesting insight into addressing the issues of global poverty, something we can remedy easily and sustainably.
Some interesting figures to ponder:
$30 billion USD: The annual shortfall to end global poverty.
$550 billion USD: The annual US defense budget.
Posted by: Jon Lilly | April 24, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
sorry, but Islamic terorism has nothing to do with poverty. Islamists want to take over countries and then the world and make everyone under their rule submit to Islam and Sharia Law. Americans who don’t understand the fundamental goals and ambitions of these Islamic fascists will soon live the regret it.
Posted by: Sandy | April 24, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
If they are terrorists why they will be released without a proper trial and if they are not why they are detained?
Posted by: Lobotomized citizen | April 24, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Is there anything intelligent that could be preserved
instead of changed, because it belonged to the past
administration ?!
Apparently the hate for Bush is rivaled only by the hate for this country. The swearing on the Bible was
easy to do, if you do not consider the Bible a Holy Book. Plus I remember something had been left out
on the first oath, and was added separately. Really an
oversight?
Posted by: arlene moriarty | April 24, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
arlene, if you think the missing language in the first oath of office might not have been an “oversight” why don’t you contact the the head justice of the Supreme Court? After all, he was the one who administered the oath and left out part of the oath since he didin’t want to read it.
Posted by: sunny in tulsa | April 24, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
if the dems are so eager to prosecute reps from the bush admin, then just wait until reps back in charge and start prosecuting barack’s admin for his treasonous actions!
bring it on!!
Posted by: sunoverla | April 24, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
i hope every single memo on the okay for the release of gitmo detainees into the united states are preserved because i’m sure the next administration is going to want to prosecute the lawyers and politicians who okayed this cockamamie idea!
Posted by: sunoverla | April 24, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
This is insane! send them back to China!
Posted by: Alex | April 24, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Hey John Lilly,
If poverty can be eradicated easily, then why does it still persist? Is it your contention that there has been no effort to combat poverty? Give me a break, and keep the blood pouring from your heart away from me.
The continent of Africa has been given aid and money to the tune of billions of dollars for three decades, and it’s still a hell hole.
Read a book entitled ‘Dead Aid’. We could give $30 Billion every year towards poverty, which would make up the ‘shortfall’, and global poverty would persist.
The defense of the United States is more important than giving money to countries who should learn to feed them damn selves anyway.
Poverty is a condition which US money can only do so much about. How much money has been pumped into Africa over the last three decades, and yet poverty, disease and corruption are at an alltime high.
So when i see your ‘statistics to ponder’, I can only say… Thank God those ratios are the way they are.
Plus, your comment that terrorism can be stopped if you take people out of poverty is a joke. Osama Bin Laden has millions of dollars, but that didn’t seem to stop him, did it? You show a fundamental misunderstanding of the threat we face. Terrorists can’t be bought, for they are on a jihad for their Lord. How come you don’t get that? Maybe you should pull your head from the President’s ass so you can see more clearly.
You comments are pathetic and moronic, and that is me being nice.
Posted by: Chris | April 24, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
“Plus, your comment that terrorism can be stopped if you take people out of poverty is a joke. Osama Bin Laden has millions of dollars, but that didn’t seem to stop him, did it?”—-Osama didn’t fly the planes himself. He got a bunch of guys with no jobs and no cash and a grudge to do it for him. Who do you think has the time to sit around and listen to these militants except the unemployed and desperate?
Posted by: cicclinton | April 24, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Poverty causes terrorism? Naive.
Posted by: LongT | April 24, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Chris you are completely wrong AND a tool.
Posted by: Chris is dumb | April 24, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Chris, Your comments are pathetic and moronic, and that is me being nice.
Posted by: Jim Bob | April 24, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
They are terrorists when Bush/Cheney said so. They are not terrorists when Obama said so. The bounty hunters got their rewards and the military guys got their promotion. Now, who is going to pay these detainees the 7 years they lost?
Posted by: k | April 24, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
I thought that most of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were fairly well educated and came from middle class families?
Posted by: Jenny Dee | April 24, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Thank goodness they were released in the D.C. area. When they let the other 250 innocents go I hope they dump them on Pennsylvania Aveneue. It is only fitting that they should be close to those who most love them, albeit a few in Hollywood would seem equally appropriate. There won’t be many other choices since NONE of our friends in Europe or Asia want anything to do with them. Oh I gorgot France said they would take ’1′. That sure was swell of them. Sidebar: I’m betting a few thousand devalued dollars that a nuke goes off somewhere in the West within 3 years, I just hope Garafollo (sp) is nearby and throw in Bill Maher and Pelosi/Barnie and Reid, and the usual suspects, etc. What fun we will have. Thanks
Posted by: Svend | April 24, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
These two creeps are Chinese? SEND THEM BACK TO CHINA!!!!! We don’t need more of their crap here!
This administration is incredible. I become more and more nauseated with each news story I read. It’s too bad we can’t rerun the election, knowing what we know now. More of the Dems would have been kicked out.
Posted by: FedUpAmerican | April 24, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Sunny in tulsa: I smiled at your comment because I
totally agree with you.
I just do not want to end up in Gitmo and spend the rest of my life there, while the real criminals will be walking the streets of the US , F-R-E-E
Posted by: arlene moriarty | April 24, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Reading these comments makes me wonder about my fellow Americans. None of you seem to understand who these Uighurs are. Nor do you read very well. The haven’t been released anywhere yet. Considering the Pentagon determined that all except 1 should have been released in 2003, it is amazing they are still there. In one case the person was just looking for his brother in Afghanistan. I would hate to think that they just sat there for 7 years because the Bush administration didn’t want to admit they made mistakes.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | April 24, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
If they release them in the US then the perfect address to release them to is 1600 Pennselvayia Ave.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | April 24, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
This is change you voted for.
You voted for Napalitano as homeland security director.
Napalitano cancelled an immigration raid where hundreds of illegals are working at a plant that supplies the military.
You voted for releasing old photos to please the ACLU and Obama would have released tapes if they hadn’t been destroyed.
You voted for the most liberal senator ever.
And democracy is over in this country.
With the media and illegal immigration we are now a one party system.
Democrats are guaranteed to win forever because of the demographic changes because of illegal immigration.
Obama and Napalitano have refused to send national guard to the border.
You voted for change alright. You voted to make american policies to the far left.
Posted by: Dan | April 24, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
You’ve got a spare bedroom, don’t you, George?
Posted by: Jim Treacher | April 24, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
GEORGE – how can you CALL yourself a honest reporter and an AMERICAN?. HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT BO AND ALL FOR WHAT HE STANDS for and say you are an AMERICAN? MR. BO is an illegal alien BUT that you DO NOT report. He’s never shown a legal long vault birth certificate to prove he was born in the US…’cause he was born in Kenya! Why don’t you tell both sides of the story? The truth!!!!! once and for all. The world and the USA should know the real Obama. He is not eligible to be our prez. Tell that to the world! Why don’t you report that?!
Posted by: Linda | April 24, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
100 days in Obama’s America and you the bitter, gun toting, bible thumping, working class bigots are about to get some new neighbors courtesy of Obama. Straight from Guantanamo your own next door Islamic Terrorist! You get them because nobody else will take them. And heck lucky Virginia it looks like you’ve won the Obama lotto…you’ll get the first terrorists. Aren’t you excited, I thought he would send them to Chicago his home town, but he must like you best! Got any really tall high rises where you can room them? I hope he saves two, one to room with Nancy Pelosi, and One for Harry Reid! Anywone suppose our brave House and Senate leaders, who want to close Guantanamo, will volunteer to take a terrorist in to live with their families? Somehow I think they’ll save that priviledge for the working poor!
Posted by: valwayne | April 25, 2009, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Linda, i guess the birth certificate that President Obama has provided to numerous news outlets and internet fact check sites (factcheck.org for example) is a fake?
Posted by: Dillon | April 25, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Good Lord Obama is more concerned about placating some radical left loons on the web and of the media (Stephenapolus?) than protecting our national security.
Wait, sorry, I made a mistake. It’s not because he’s pressured from the socialist left, it’s that he is one himself.
Well, at least he’ll soon end the income gaps — because we’ll all be poor in the new Gov’t controlled socialist nation of America. But as if that wasn’t enough, he’s inviting terrorists over for a vacation!?
Goodbye America, it was nice knowing you!
Posted by: netster007x | April 25, 2009, 2:37 am 2:37 am
Good Lord Obama is more concerned about placating some radical left loons on the web and of the media (Stephenapolus?) than protecting our national security.
Wait, sorry, I made a mistake. It’s not because he’s pressured from the socialist left, it’s that he is one himself.
Well, at least he’ll soon end the income gaps — because we’ll all be poor in the new Gov’t controlled socialist nation of America. But as if that wasn’t enough, he’s inviting terrorists over for a vacation!?
Goodbye America, it was nice knowing you!
Posted by: netster007x | April 25, 2009, 2:37 am 2:37 am
I watch it all! CSPAN to FOX Let the truth be known! If they broke the law (former administration) Prosecute! NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW
America is pissed off! We sat back and watched Bush destroy our country! I myself got thrown in jail for being $1500 behind in child support. Where is the justice? These bastards broke the law. Prosecute! Look at the mess… lets clean it up! We have the patience.
Posted by: Duke Kelly | April 25, 2009, 5:07 am 5:07 am
Republicans are ready to pounce. These poor Uighars have done nothing. They’re not members of Al Quaeda, they’re not planning attacks on the US, a mass of courts have ordered their release, so why are they being held. The Republican party that never stops talking about freedom and human right. The Republican party in reality the party of torture and secret prisons.
Posted by: john | April 25, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Hey John….if these Uighurs did nothing wrong how did they end up in Gitmo….just fishing in the area and got lossed & ran out of fuel?
Posted by: Dave | April 25, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
There are 97 Yemenis in Gitmo that Yemen may not take back. Most of the detainees left in Gitmo are dangerous criminals who would slit the throats of 100 American school children a day if they could. The countries where they previously lived do not want them.
I would think that a smart community organizer would look into where these people are going to go before giving in to Moveon and George Soros and proudly announcing that he was going to close Gitmo.
Isn’t Sidwell Friends School in the suburbs of Washington DC? Lets put the detainees in there as teachers if they are qualified. The poor innocent downtrodden detainees probably won’t be any more anti-American than the Sunday School teachers Obama’s daughters had for most of their lives.
Where can we bet on whether Gitmo is still open next year?
Posted by: MadJayhawk | April 25, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Dan whined “Obama and Napalitano have refused to send national guard to the border.
You voted for change alright. You voted to make american policies to the far left.”
Your hero Bush had 8 years to send the national guard to the border, but didn’t.
And you are correct, we voted your pathetic far right government out after they did more harm than Bin Laden to this country. Cry some more for me, I love it.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | April 25, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Why the hell are we letting them loose in Virginia?! At least, send them back to their own country, and they can be China’s problem. This is why people still want the right to bear arms.
Posted by: MarieG | April 25, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
I don’t think they would last long there…Hell Obama should just turn them all lose and he will be happy them …This is what he really wants anyways…..God Help Us Obama will not stop until they are all released….God Bless America…
Posted by: Pcc | April 25, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
John Lilly, I really hope that was satire but I’m not so sure.
$30 billion a year to end global poverty! Of course, it’s all so obvious now! Let’s see, 6 billion people on earth, for the sake of argument we’ll say 3 billion of them are living on under 2 dollars a day. So sure, if we give each one of those 3 billion an extra 10 bucks a year, that should do it.
The terms leftist and mathematician will never be confused.
Posted by: b | April 26, 2009, 6:27 am 6:27 am
At least this will get it over,bring them on. I am sorry for the community they are released in but…..
Hussein has wanted this from day one,he and his merry band of America Haters can be proud of his 100 days. He has done more to damage this country in 100 days than any other elected moron ever!!
Posted by: Bamajim | April 26, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Hello Chris,
> Hey John Lilly,
> If poverty can be eradicated easily,
> then why does it still persist?
Because many powerful people and corporations consider it in their interest to preserve poverty to take advantage of lower wages, extract resources for low prices, and then be given government contracts for aid to poor countries on top of it.
So, the veracity of John Lilly’s claims aside, I believe your assumption that everybody actually WANTS to eliminate poverty is a fallacy.
Posted by: Jill | April 26, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
b,
John Lilly, I really hope that was satire but I’m not so sure.
> $30 billion a year to end global
> poverty! Of course, it’s all so
> obvious now! Let’s see, 6 billion
> people on earth, for the sake of
> argument we’ll say 3 billion of them
> are living on under 2 dollars a day.
> So sure, if we give each one of those
> 3 billion an extra 10 bucks a year,
> that should do it.
That’s right, that would be a silly strategy indeed. But since your apparently anti-leftist, shouldn’t St. Regan’s trickle-down economics do it? Just give $30 million each to 1000 leaders in the developing world. Oh, wait…
Posted by: Jill | April 27, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Are they being given special US citizenships?
Posted by: anony | April 27, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Well, the person does have a point when he says that poverty does lead to terrorism. When you have people who due to poverty, have a lack of education, they tend to be herded in like sheep by extremists. You are currently seeing that in various countries around the world. Most of the suicide bombers or people planning these elaborate people usually are poorly educated or they have access to no education and are led to believe that their greater role in the world is to spread fundamentalism or to blow themselves up. Usually the people who are doing this aren’t the elite. As for African debt, you need sustainable development in these countries to help fight against poverty. Giving money isn’t doing anything because of rampant corruption. The best thing is to have sustainable development. You are currently seeing this take place in countries such as Ghana, South Africa, Botswana and a few others. Now that democracy is spreading to many of these countries, you are seeing foreign and local investment and sustainable development. It may take a few years, but as you can see, several countries are moving in the direction of being economic powerhouses in the next fifty years. The Chinese see the value of foreign investment and commerce with these countries. You saw the same trend with the Japanese and Brazil and now you see that Brazil has lost its developing world status. You still have problems of course but it has become one of the global economic leaders in biofuel exports and in several other industries. Just my assertion as someone who works on developing markets.
Posted by: Jenn | May 7, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm