Legislature, Not Court, Brings Gay Marriage to Vt.
ABC News’ Teddy Davis reports: Vermont’s legislature voted Tuesday to legalize same-sex marriage by overriding the veto of Republican Gov. Jim Douglas. The vote was 23-5 to override in the state Senate and 100-49 to override in the House. Under Vermont law, two-thirds of each legislative body had to vote for the override. Vermont is not the first state to adopt same-sex marriage. But it is the first state to adopt same-sex marriage through non-judicial means. While Vermont is more liberal than many other states, Tuesday’s vote is significant nationally because of the way in which it changes the contours of the debate. Up until now, opponents of same-sex marriage have been able to buttress religious- and tradition-based arguments with attacks on judicial over-reaching. For example, when Iowa’s Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage last week, Tony Perkins, the president of the conservative Family Research Council, issued a statement saying that same-sex marriage "continues to be a movement driven by a liberal judicial elite determined to destroy not only the institution of marriage, but democracy as well." This sweeping indictment of the "liberal judicial elite" was based, in part, on the fact that the three states which currently recognize same-sex marriage — Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Iowa — all got there through court decree. A fourth state — California — also adopted same-sex marriage after a decision of the state’s Supreme Court. On two occasions, in 2005 and 2007, California’s legislature passed a same-sex marriage bill but the legislation was vetoed by Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the bill’s proponents did not have the two-thirds vote necessary to override the veto. In Vermont, same-sex marriage is now law through a vote of the people’s representatives.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
This is exactly how a republican naysayer should be treated.
VETO THIS MR GOVERNOR , YOU ARE OVERRULED!
Posted by: TTER | April 7, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Too bad that the representives don’t listen to the people that put them into power.
Now it is time to take their power away.
Posted by: Dave | April 7, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
The closest thing to a poll I’ve seen on this issue in Vermont is the Doyle Poll, and it showed a 53% to 38% majority in favor of same sex marriage in Vermont. They’ve already had civil unions for almost a decade, so anyone thinking this is going to result in a voter revolt is delusional.
Personally, I think the government should approve same-sex marriage – it’s just paperwork and it is good for societal structures overall. I view real marriage as a sacrament recognized by my church, and it is under no threat whatsoever from this.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 7, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Does anyone realize or care that these people,gays and the lawmakers that rule in their favor, are going straight to hell.
Posted by: Mac | April 7, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
“Does anyone realize or care that these people, gays and the lawmakers that rule in their favor, are going straight to hell.”
I don’t know, but I guess they’ll see haters like you there.
Posted by: Alex | April 7, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Wrong Alex, I don’t hate anyone. I don’t agree with that lifestyle. Where did you read “hate” into anything I said?
Posted by: Mac | April 7, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
It will be interesting to watch and see if the conservatives try anything to override the peoples will. Are they going to use the federal courts to overturn the legislatures? Conservatives usually preach about state rights until those states disagree with conservative views.
Posted by: unshrub | April 7, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Mac:
I forgot, I am not scared of going to hell for supporting gay marriages. I would, however, be worried about going to hell if I don’t let gays have free will. Anything that happens afterwards will be God’s decision because it’s not my place to judge who goes to hell.
Posted by: unshrub | April 7, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Last time I checked hell was a city in Michigan.
Posted by: bhciapol | April 7, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
I’m gay and I went to Hell. And when I went it was cold and frozen in some places. Hell is in the north of Poland, and I’ve been there twice and back! Gays are not asking for special priviledges, they are simply asking to have the same laws and protections applied equally not just to them but to everyone!
Posted by: Ernest van DerDyke | April 7, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
GO VERMONT! WAY TO GO VERMONT LEGISLATURE!
Posted by: Nancy | April 7, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Same sex marriage is not the same as a marriage between a male and a female. It is an abomination and it produces death. It actually ends the human race because it cannot reproduce. Marriage is something that is living and can continue the human race not kill it.
Posted by: lowes4321 | April 7, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
American marriage is chiefly regulated by the states, not by a church or a specific religious belief. The Supreme Court has held that states are permitted to reasonably regulate the institution of marriage by prescribing WHO is allowed to marry, and how the marriage can be dissolved.
Nowhere is “Marriage” defined in the US Constitution; our laws are not based on the Bible or a specific denomination’s interpretation of the Bible.
Two centuries ago marriage was a contract based upon a voluntary private agreement by a man and a woman. Originally, the husband’s duty was to provide a safe house and pay for necessities such as food and clothing. It was also presumed a wife’s obligations were to maintain the home, have sex with her husband, and to raise the children.
Today the underlying concept that marriage is a legal contract still remains. But the assumptions about “marriage obligations” have changed: Women are in the workforce. Couples share housework and raising children. Vermont is simply adapting to more changes in our society.
Posted by: LetUsLeaf | April 7, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
good for vermont. as one of those left-coast “breeders,” i applaud my wooded friends in VT for taking a stand for basic human rights. gays/lesbians are not asking for special rights. they are asking for, gasp! shock! dismay!, the same rights as everyone else. where i’d like to show respect for those who disagree on religious bounds, their opinion flies in the face of 1. the separation of church and state, 2. the concept that i think makes the US so special, “equal protection under the law.” i am no legal authority, but those concepts get at the base of what it means to be free, of free choice and key to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
again, my best to all those in VT!
now, if we can only get prop 8 over-turned in CA, my girlfriend and i will be a happy couple indeed!
Posted by: alan | April 7, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
“Wrong Alex, I don’t hate anyone. I don’t agree with that lifestyle. Where did you read “hate” into anything I said?”
Oh, I don’t know, it might have had something to do with the whole “these people…are going straight to hell” piece. But I could be wrong.
Posted by: Schu | April 7, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
It’s great day for freedom and equality in the USA!
And by the way: Why is there so much hatred being expressed on this issue – when most news sites, TV broadcasts and Internet commentary blanket our senses with “normal” news such as the Palin-Johnston dysfunctional parenthood story.
Enough, let a nice, committed gay couple move in next door!
Posted by: Tom | April 7, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
lowes4321 that was funny. I say that because I really hope you aren’t seriously suggesting that same sex marriage will end the human race. Sure, same sex couples can’t reproduce, but there are plenty of us out there having 2,3,4 or more children. That’s more enough to make up for them, I think.
Posted by: Brian | April 7, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Lowes4321–With record birthrates in this nation and others across the globe, I really don’t think you need to worry about the death of the human race.
Posted by: Doug | April 7, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Lowes4321–With record birthrates in this nation and others across the globe, I really don’t think you need to worry about the death of the human race.
Posted by: Doug | April 7, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Posted by: lowes4321 | Apr 7, 2009 2:28:29 PM
How does a married homosexual couple who adopts a child in need of a loving home “produce death”? Where do you find so much fear and hate?
Posted by: Church Lady | April 7, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Please. I am SO sick to death of people using that LAME “gay marriage will end the human race because it cannot reproduce.” Hmm, what about straight couples that can’t reproduce because of health issues? Should they be allowed to marry? What’s the deal with you wackos, you think that if gay marriage is passed, everyone will suddenly turn gay and no more children will be produced? Give me a break. Straight marriages will merrily continue forth, right along with gay marriages, and children will continue to be popped out, and the human population will continue to thrive. PS – there are WAY too many humans on earth right now as it is. Population overgrowth. Maybe we could use a break? What do you think?
Stop using that ignorant “loss of reproduction” excuse on us. It’s lame, makes no sense, and is just another way for you to not have to actually think through what you’re saying, or actually care about anyone but yourself and your extremely close minded views. I’m just DONE with it.
rant over.
Posted by: Nathan | April 7, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Was always under the impression that marriage was instituted for the purpose of LEGALLY procreation of children. So who in the hell can tell me how gays can procreate ? I’d luv to know.
Posted by: slobbo | April 7, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
When I was growing up it was in insult to be called gay/queer. How can anyone be proud to admit it? Qu e er…..sums it up I guess.
Posted by: IntuitiveOne | April 7, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
What a bunch of sick, twisted people….
Further moral decline in America….
Posted by: Lumberman_63 | April 7, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Lowes4321 – The way I look at it, same sex marriage is saving the human race. We’re not going to be able to sustain this planet if we keep reproducing like rabbits… not to mention, gays are adopting – meaning they are putting love and energy into all those kids the straights are dumping into orphanages where the public system that can’t afford to raise them properly. As far as I’m concerned, it’s a win win.
Posted by: D | April 7, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Congratulations to Vermont for both supporting the will of the people (polls show Vermont citizens are in favor of marriage equality) but more importantly standing up for justice. We don’t discriminate against people in the United States of America. Every law that singles out and mistreats a certain race, a certain sexual orientation or a certain religion will fester like a burr under our skin until we root it out and get rid of it.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Today Vermont bravely joined the march toward equal treatment under the law for the millions of gay and lesbian families in this country.
Posted by: Marine Vet | April 7, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
@Mac:
How do you know who is going to Hell and who isn’t? Did God tell you that personally? Doesn’t your Bible say, “Judge not, that ye be not judged” and
“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.”
Now let those people alone!
Posted by: Ellem | April 7, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
This reminds me of the town of Brattleboro, VT, whose “forward thinking” citizens legalized public nudity because the human form was “beautiful” and “natural” and they wouldn’t give in to hateful ideas from those opposed to public nudity because we are all “equal” when we are naked. They were forced to make an abrupt turn-around and outlaw public nudity amidst great outcries because children and undeserving decent people were subjected to new and more depraved levels of obscenity and provocation. The tourists all found other places to go. The extremists all made pilgrimages to the town and made unwelcome spectacles of themselves. After the nudity enablers had exhausted their rationalizations, the people of this town had to eat crow and learn that normal, kind, decent people can be offended by public nudity. The same thing will happen in Vermont with gay marriage. The courts and the citizens are going to be so mixed up as to what constitutes marriage and relationships that they are going to exhaust every rationalization imaginable. Get ready for polygamy in Vermont. Canada is already choking on polygamy in British Columbia, something the gay marriage advocates said would never happen. Of course, Canada has now experienced a conservative revolution, almost directly tied to the legalization of gay marriage. Perhaps Governor Jim Douglas should take courage from Canada’s example.
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | April 7, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
I am a straight Vermonter who could care less about gays having the right to marry, and I find it a shameful waste of time and money to even debate the issue. All people should have the same rights regardless of sexual orientation. And to all the Bible-thumpers out there, you preach love and acceptance to all but then pick and choose who should receive ‘salvation’ based on a person’s so-called lifestyle. Meanwhile, some of your evangelist leaders are closeted homosexuals caught with male escorts using Meth. Hypocrites!
Posted by: Chris | April 7, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
The whole religious angle to this debate gets so old. What about what non-religious folks beleive? But I guess by religious freedom the right-wingers on here mean their religious freedom and not other people’s. Blah. If people want to get married let them. Seems simple but I guess its just not simple enough for people who chock their heads full of mythical rubbish.
Posted by: JD | April 7, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Sean,
Massachusetts has had marriage equality for gays and lesbians now for over 6 years and nothing bad has happened. This civil rights issue has nothing to do with some town legalizing nudity. Your bigotry is showing.
Posted by: James | April 7, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
The “sick, twisted people” in moral decline are the folks who belong to the Religious Right……….Christo-Fascists trying to ram their religious ideology and doctrine down the throats of those w/ whom they disagree.
To quote bishop Demond Tutu: “Religion is like a knife. If you use it to slice bread, that is good. If you use it to slice off your neighbor’s arm, that’s bad.” The Holier-than-Thou Christo-Fascists need to learn their quaint, personal religions are just that………theirs.
Posted by: Sammy | April 7, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Ok. First off everyone stop telling everyone else who’s going to hell and who isn’t. None of us know and none of us have the right to decide.
Second. Straight people stop calling gays/lesbians Queers. Gays/Lesbians please stop calling straight people breeders.
Third. Marriage is a legal binding contract. If you chose for it to be a binding contract between you, your love, and the state of vermont that’s fine. If you chose for it to be a binding contract between you, your love, and God that’s fine to but stop telling other people what to do with their marriage be it straight or gay.
Posted by: Katie | April 7, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
What evolved purpose does buttsex have? What’s that, none you say?
I thought liberals believed in evolution and man has been gay since the beginning of man. Then why hasn’t a purpose in nature come from buttsex?
Last I heard, it doesn’t even self lubricate like the woman’s vag. Does sperm in the butt serve a purpose?
Posted by: Not even in nature | April 7, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Not even in nature–Does everything YOU do serve a purpose? Doubtful.
Posted by: Doug | April 7, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Majority rule has nothing to do with equality in this matter. It’s justice! I don’t care if every resident of a state dosen’t agree, you can’t legislate your so called ‘morality’.
Posted by: gdguynbalt | April 7, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
“There is no power greater than an idea whose time has come.” – Victor Hugo
Along with the Vermont decision, the D.C. Council voted today to recognize same-sex marriages performed in states where they are legal in D.C.
“Faith, Hope and Love, and the greatest of these is Love” … Love is triumphant today!
Posted by: Rev Hank Bates | April 7, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
I am the furthest thing from gay, but I ask, what affect does someone else having ‘buttsex’ with another man (or woman) have on you ‘Not even in nature’? How is that adversely affecting your morally correct life?
Oh yeah, and next time some little dog begins humping your leg, ask the dog what purpose that serves in nature. Oh I know, because IT FEELS GOOD to the dog. That’s the primary purpose of sex (straight or homo), to feel pleasure. Over population of the planet is secondary.
Posted by: Chris | April 7, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Marriage is a state-sanctioned construct to save-guard the orderly transfer of property rights. The notiion of marriage for “love” is a relatively new development from the Victorian era.
Posted by: Tom | April 7, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
How can you even take someone who says “buttsex” seriously? What are you, five? Also, Not Even in Nature, what purpose does fellatio serve? Oh and don’t forget that straight couples can have anal sex too…so it’s not exclusively a “gay phenomenon.”
In conclusion, don’t knock anal sex until you give it a try. You just might like it! ; )
Posted by: Sean | April 7, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
All I can say is……..I sure am glad I live far away from Vermont.
Posted by: IntuitiveOne | April 7, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
IntuitiveOne – What is it that you’re so afraid of? Are gays and lesbians going to hunt you down, sodomize you, and make you gay too? I’m sure where you live there are no gay people, right?
Funny, I’m straight, I’ve lived in VT for 20+ years and have never been accosted by a gay or lesbian. Go figure…
The issue is about equal rights. Not religious values.
Let us not forget that VT was also the first state in the Union to abolish slavery. This ‘liberal’ state has a long history of doing the right thing when others choose to remain ignorant.
Posted by: Chris | April 7, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
IntuitiveOne? … your moniker does not reveal your narrow-minded-ness! Gay marriage is legal throughout Canada, Mexico City and countries abroad .. and it will be legal in your neighborhood soon!
Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | April 7, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Chris-I don’t care who is queer as long as they stay in the closet. They should be ashamed.
Posted by: IntuitiveOne | April 7, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Francisco, it shows how sick the world has become.
Posted by: IntuitiveOne | April 7, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
I find stupidity to be more of a disease than homosexuality. If only there were a cure…
Posted by: Doug | April 7, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Stay in the closet. Right. Just like black people had to stay in the back of the bus. Makes perfect sense.
You should be ashamed for being so ignorant and intolerant of others who don’t abide by YOUR chosen lifestyle.
To each their own, my friend. Live and let live.
Posted by: Chris | April 7, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
This makes me so sick! Marriage is between MAN & WOMAN and no one else! This should have never been allowed to happen in any state!!!
Posted by: ShouthernGal | April 7, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
…and the South shall rise again. Yeeee-haw!!
Posted by: Chris | April 7, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Not even in nature -
Does everything need an evolved purpose? Most people have sex not for pushing out babies, but for pleasure.
What does any of this have to do with equal rights under the law??
Don’t know if you heard, ‘Buttsex’ doesn’t = gay. It’s one form of sex that is used by straights and gays, but not all.
Posted by: otter4771 | April 7, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
I find stupidity to be more of a disease than homosexuality. If only there were a cure…
Posted by: Doug | April 7, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
5-10 years from now, when this issue has resolved and NO BIG DEAL, you will see just how many friends, preachers, coaches, teachers, law enforcement officers, lawyers, construction, white collar and blue collar alike, yes, even some of your neighbors, and relatives are actually gay…and you didn’t even know it! Once the negative stigma is gone, those who are gay will live without fear. And all the fear that has been spread for years, will subside.. we will look back and laugh at our ignorance as a society.
Posted by: gdguynbalt | April 7, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Chris, what a ridiculous comparison. Black people did not choose to be black. People choose to be gay. It is mental.
Posted by: IntuitiveOne | April 7, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I find stupidity to be more of a disease than homosexuality. If only there were a cure…
Posted by: Doug | April 7, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Hey, I got it! This is what’s wrong with all those right wing Christians! They keep talking about buttsex, and don’t realize it’s NOT about sex, it’s about LOVING another human being with all your heart! That’s it! They forgot that marriage wasn’t ONLY about populating the earth, but also loving another person. NO wonder they’re so bitter.
Posted by: Nathan | April 7, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
SouthernGal has it right!!
Posted by: IntuitiveOne | April 7, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
People like Mac on these sites always make me laugh as they inject the threat of eternal damnation to HELL as a means of justifying their prejuidice and using religion as a means to deny taxpaying citizens Constitutional rights. If it were up to citizens and “good Christians” like Mac interracial marriage wouldn’t exist either.
Posted by: addict42 | April 7, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
If anal intercourse is the big problem here, most straight people are engaging in the practice as much as or even more than a lot of gays.
Posted by: addict42 | April 7, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
IntuitiveOne your moniker is ironic…why would anyone choose to be marginalized and subjected to the likes of people such as yourself.
Posted by: addict42 | April 7, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Okay now I’m in stitches reading IntuitiveOne’s ridculous views and I’m sure the people of Vermont and San Francisco, CA are very happy you live in some backward rural Southern state far, far from them.
Posted by: addict42 | April 7, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
i know alot of married couples that have but sex why is it that gays cant have the same rights in a free nation to live free from religions blind narrow out of date view…you religous people always talk about your freedoms but just love takeing them away from others that dont believe liek you…if you love religous ruled nations so much move to iran or or some other muslim nation and you cant kill and torure thsoe taht dont belive in god.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
You can defend yourselves with everything you’ve got till the day you die. You can have all the rights you want but being gay is totally unatural, unhealthy, nasty and gross. Look at the picture of two men holding hands. You’ve got to admit, something wrong with that picture. Well I guess I’m a bigot and a hater now because I don’t agree. I don’t hate you fellas, I just think you’re gross.
Posted by: jack | April 7, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
If anal intercourse is the big problem here, most straight people are engaging in the practice as much as or even more than a lot of gays.
But you’re inside a man with a hairy bun dude. What’s wrong with you, like you said, a woman will let you do that.
Posted by: jack | April 7, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I have no problem with gays and I don’t understand why some people get so worked up about what happens in other people’s bedrooms.
Is it really true that those who attack gays are gay themselves and just looking for some way to have a dialogue on it? That is the only thing that could explain all the time and effort some on this board are expending on this topic.
My marriage to my wife is not threatened one tiny bit by gays being treated equally under the law and if allowing them marriage brings more love and joy into the world, I’m all for it.
Oh, and anyone who says that gay is a “choice” is quite obviously gay and thinks they are “choosing” to be straight even though they know they’re gay deep down. How sad. Everyone should be free to by themselves without discriminatory laws treating them unequally.
Massachusetts 6 years ago, Connecticut a year ago, Iowa last week, Vermont today, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Maine and New York later this year, California next year and then the rest. Thank God we’re headed toward having equality all over the country so we can stop talking about this issue all the time and move on to other things like, say, the economy.
Posted by: Chuck | April 7, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Jack – THANK YOU. WELL PUT.
Posted by: IntuitiveOne | April 7, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Our “representatives” didn’t listen to us here in VT. They are much smarter than we are. Saying that homosexuality is a civil right is like saying slavery is a civil right. It is wrong to own another person. Homosexuality is wrong,(According to the rule maker–God himself) there are no aspects of it that are healthy. I would daresay that most aspects of it are downright harmful to the individual themselves. To say it is a civil right is to do even those trapped in the homosexual lifestyle.
Posted by: Travis | April 7, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
I think that gay marriage is a mistake. I think that years from now people will wonder why we even considered it. I don’t feel that banning gay marriage does any harm to society. Gays and lesbians who never believed in marriage before, suddenly want it now. Even the Goodridges from MA couldn’t stay married after being together for decades. It was never really about marriage. It was about being gay or lesbian. Congratulations to all the gay marriage advocates in Vermont. You have done real harm to marriages in Vermont. I don’t know why on earth someone would celebrate that. However, if you think that people who believe in marriage are going to resign themselves to defeat, you will be sadly mistaken. There are more enduring values than political grandstanding. You will learn that equality doesn’t raise the desire of a few over the deeply held beliefs of the many. There is a reason that marriage between one man and one woman has endured for ages, and it is not because of the efforts of bigots. It is because of the love of the men and women who married each other and saw how it was good. For ages, others have tried all kinds of arrangements. Those other arrangements haven’t endured, and it wasn’t for lack of effort or enthusiasm. Most people love and honor marriage between one man and one woman. They are not bigots. They just understand the value of something you can’t seem to grasp.
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | April 7, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Addict42. What are you addicted to?
Posted by: IntuitiveOne | April 7, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
This opens the doors for underage marriages, multiple partners and arranges marriages with the dead. Are we ready fro that?
Posted by: James | April 7, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
jack—and i think haters like you are gross.. and when i see all the blind shepp christains walking into church on sunday morning i get almost sick thinking how they waste there lives on old tired out lies and myths.but i willnot tell you that you cant go to church why do you think you can tell people how to live. let them be gay and marry how does it affect your religion or salvation.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Sean,
How does allowing gay marriage hurt anyone?
Posted by: Andy | April 7, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
travis—but alot of us sane reasoning people dont believe in a big bad boogey man in the sky. so why should we follow your oldout dated ideals..thi snation was formed on freedom of religion we are free of haveing religion rule us.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
It’s pretty simple–if you think gays are gross, that’s your own problem. White people used to think that blacks were gross and stopped inter-racial couples from getting married because they found their love to be gross and nasty. That bigotry is thankfully nearly behind us, but the anti-gay bigotry is certainly thriving on this board.
Do you angry people even notice the rest of the country and world moving on and passing you by? In the last 10 years, the number of Americans who support marriage equality for gays and lesbians has doubled. 5 years from now, we will be a majority. Voters under age 25 are for gay marriage by 75%, voters over 65 are against gay marriage by 75%.
You do the math.
Posted by: James | April 7, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Okay, all you opponents of gay marriage: give me a valid reason why preventing two members of the same sex from marrying is just, fair, and equal.
“God/the Bible says it is wrong.” NOT VALID. That’s one religious standpoint. If you believe they’re going to hell, that’s your belief. It should not create a law.
“It’s not natural.” INVALID AGAIN. For starters, who are you to say what is natural and what isn’t? And since I am quite sure that some of you will say that isn’t proof of your argument’s invalidity, how about this: you see that computer you’re using? That’s not natural. What about airplanes? Plastic? Many of the drugs that people use on a daily basis? Not natural, yet not illegal.
“Marriage is only between a man and a woman.” NOPE. That’s purely a religious standpoint. Ever hear of “separation of church and state”? That’s kind of a biggie about how our country is run.
All of you who keep putting down the GBLT community are the reason there is so much fear and hatred in the world. You preach to “love thy neighbor as thyself” yet turn and deny basic rights to people who don’t share your lifestyle. Even if you don’t agree with it, even if you think they’re going to hell, that’s NOT your problem! God gave us all free will – the ability to choose for ourselves how to live our lives – and you have no right to try to take that away from others.
Posted by: Schu | April 7, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
sean obrien—and back when they gave bl;acks voteing rights and women voteing rights and said it was legal for a black and white to marry people like you shouted that it would be bad…guess what it wasnt…we are all equal in this nation our founding fathers made that very clear..so why should someone that pays taxes works hard isnt a criminal not be able to get married…no matter what sex they are they have same rights as you do in as much they can get married..they were born gay or chose to be gay doesnt even matter.. just listen to our founding fathers words all people are have the same rights.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
NotEvenInNature:
Does sperm in the mouth serve an “evolved” purpose, as you put it? And yet, most straight men whom I know LOVE getting head, and it has no more procreative function than does “butt-sex,” as you called it.
Posted by: bob | April 7, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
I’m addicted to the comedy you give with your hilarious postings Intuitive
One and your ironic monkier makes me laugh and laugh. And Jack I know a lot of “gross” staight people as well. Obese men, women with facial hair, people who smell bad, people who are slamming others for the sake of their insecurties and to try to rationalize their irrational thoughts.
Posted by: addict42 | April 7, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
james–how true we are slowly eliminateing the blind fools of the past..soon the christain faith as it is seen by most today will be part of a scary wicked history lesson.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
I don’t get the logic of the “gay marriage leads to death” people — how exactly does letting gay people getting married lead to that? If they are not married does it NOT lead to death? What does them getting married or not make any difference?
Posted by: Eric | April 7, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Marriage is a social institution that forms the foundation of the family. I oppose this not just on religious grounds but for three reasons: 1. This opens the doorway for any and all redefinitions of marriage such as polygamy, incest, and underage marriage. The arguments for each can be couched in terms of individual choice, love, and cultural/social minority rights that serves the foundation of gay marriage advocate arguments. 2. This means that homosexuality must be taught in schools as a valid lifestyle. We’re already moving in that direction but this gives legal justification for not tolerance but acceptance of a lifestyle that many people find abhorrent since it is based on a sexual deviation much like bestiality. 3. Churches will become the legal target of gay/lesbian groups for refusing to conduct these marriages. This is already happening in Europe in countries where gay marriage is legal. They will be accused of promoting “hate”, a common rhetorical argument used by gay/lesbian advocates who want to silence all opposition. Churches actually love homosexuals, they just hate the practice of homosexuality which is sinful (and yes there are numerous Biblical references for this). Likewise, I oppose this argument not out of hate, but out of love and concern for my fellow sinners.
Posted by: ekoja22 | April 7, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
I can’t believe the names and excuses you gay people come up with to justify your being with another man. The new thing with you people is calling anyone who doesn’t agree with you a hater or bigot. I’m not religious but if you are, is god a hater and bigot? He doesn’t agree with you. You’re the ones with the deseases that resuled from being with the same sex. Admit it, sexual deseases are way higher among gays than anyone. Why? because your body rejects it. So call us what you want. You’re the ones that have the sexual identification problem.
Posted by: jack | April 7, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Just as an addendum, I meant that “I oppose gay marriage not out of hate….”. I just realized that last sentence was unclear.
Posted by: ekoja22 | April 7, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
It’s obvious from posts on here that it’s lack of education killing this country (and mankind as a whole).
Posted by: Doug | April 7, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Sean, either you forget or don’t realize that Christians were once a highly persecuted minority. Now that you think you own the world, you’re turning on other minorities and persecuting them. Do you really think your God would approve of that?
Posted by: Schu | April 7, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
“Chris, what a ridiculous comparison. Black people did not choose to be black. People choose to be gay. It is mental.” — Why are only homophobic idiots experts on what being gay is? Do you know how many gays commit suicide because they want so badly to be straight? They have their preachers, their family, their friends all telling them that what they are is evil and sinful. And no matter what they do they are simply not attracted to the opposite sex. Does that sound like a choice to you?
Posted by: Eric | April 7, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
jack—wow what a ignorant rant…so all the gay and lesibian just because people like you dont agree with them they shoudl change there lives to make you happy..is taht how america works.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
ekoja22—Extremely well said..
Posted by: arkie vet | April 7, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
ekoja22: You are just upset because we no longer live in a society where it is considered acceptable to treat gays as second class citizens. 50 years ago, the EXACT same things were being said about granting black people equal rights. We have to protect “our cultural heritage”, schools will have to teach that black people are equal to white, etc. And just like in the past, people who think like you will be grouped into an ever shrinking demographic segment of the population. Gay marriage does not lead to incest, polygamy, underage, etc. marriage — any more than allowing the marriage of 2 straight people leads to the marriage of 3 straight people.
Posted by: Eric | April 7, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
to the gays choose to be gay why woul dthey choose to be something that fools like you will torment and discriminate against. why would they choos eto be something that only results in them being outsiders…doesnt sound liek something i would choose…think about the gays that even though they know they will be killed still are gay in iraq and iran and other muslim nations…why is it they woudl choose that… they dont they are born taht way…it happens i grew up on a fram we had a steer that woudlnever no matter what mount a cow but would try mounting other steers.. ask most farmers and tehy will tell you same thing.it happens
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
If God didn’t want people to have “buttsex”, then there would be no sexual pleasure in it. Therefor, God wants you to have “buttsex”. It’s part of His creation plan.
Posted by: waysie | April 7, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Jack—–Respectfully,your post reveals a basic lack of understanding regarding human sexuality on the one hand and a jump to a conclusion as to god’s view of homosexuality on the other.
Firstly—-All professional organizations that study homosexuality agree that it is normal and not a matter of choice.(apa,ama,other two apa’s etc.)
Secondly—-Not all religions view homosexuality negatively.There is broad disagreement even within the christian faith on this.
Posted by: mensarino | April 7, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
o
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
i
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Jack, MAC, Sean and intuitive one, your words are priceless. Thank god we have people like you in this world to make me laugh out loud. It’s healthy and fun. You are like the Marx brothers of stupidity. Thanks for that!
Posted by: USMC | April 7, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Churches will become the legal target of gay/lesbian groups for refusing to conduct these marriages. This is already happening in Europe in countries where gay marriage is legal. They will be accused of promoting “hate”, a common rhetorical argument used by gay/lesbian advocates who want to silence all opposition.
=======================================
never happened. But hardly the point, we’re not europe, and we have something called separation of church and state, which actually protects the church. Many churches did not want to perform interracial marriages and to this day not a one of them has ever been forced to.
Posted by: USMC | April 7, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
usmc—how true..the ignorance and hatered of them kind of people is sad.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
This is the Law of God regarding homosexuality-please read on:
21st Century King James Version: “Be fruitful and multiply”
American Standard Version: “Be fruitful, and multiply”
Amplified Bible: “Be fruitful, multiply”
Contemporary English Version: “Have a lot of children!”
Darby Translation: “Be fruitful and multiply”
English Standard Version: “Be fruitful and multiply”
Holman Christian Standard Bible: “Be fruitful, multiply”
The Message: “Prosper! Reproduce”
New American Standard Bible: “Be fruitful and multiply”
New International Reader’s Version: “Have children and increase your numbers”
New International Version: “Be fruitful and increase in number”
New King James Version: “Be fruitful and multiply”
New Life Version: “Give birth to many; grow in number”
New Living Translation: “Multiply”
King James Version: “Be fruitful and multiply”
Young’s Literal Translation: “Be fruitful, and multiply”
“The meaning is quite clear, and needs little elaboration. God created two humans of different sexes so that they could reproduce. He ordered them to have children and start to populate the world with more humans. There is obviously a limit to the number of children that Eve could give birth to. One might safely assume that God’s instruction to Adam and Eve were also binding to their children, grandchildren, even down to the present generation.
The only family/marriage structure that allows procreation by the spouses is made up of one or more men and one or more women. Two women cannot procreate together. Two men cannot have children. God’s intent therefore is for marriage to be limited to opposite sexes. God did not initially create one man and multiple women, or one women and multiple men, or multiple men and women. God’s intent therefore was to have opposite-sex pairs of humans marry and create families consisting of one man and one woman. There is no room in God’s plan for same-sex marriage (SSM). SSM should therefore not be legalized as they have been by rogue courts and legislatures in the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada and the state of Massachusetts.”
Homosexuality is against God’s plan for His Kingdom…this new law just accelerated Armagedon and many will be “cast in the pit of fire”. I wish I could have a magic wand and touch each one of you and save you from yourselves as I don’t really believe that you know God…I could cry for you…but I’ll pray for your soul that you change your ways and come to God..
Posted by: susiegal | April 7, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
christains dont want government or anybody in there church business,but the christains sure do love being in everybody and the governments business..
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
susiegal—even if all us sane people are wrong and soem big boogey man god in the sky is real. it is still our choice and this is a free nation were all can live as they want..keep your beliefs just that your beliefs they are not mine.. our founding fathers made sure we all had equal rights all of us even the gays and lesbians..
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
if we didnt have any christains in this world can you imagine how peacefull and happy and prosperous we would all be…man what a utopia with hateful war like christains here.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
The real issue here is societal acceptance of biologically deviant behavior. There is a real correlation between the level of societal acceptability granted any given behavior and the increased manifestation of that behavior in the society. As we as a nation abandon any real semblance of an absolute moral code we will continue to digress. It’s not rocket science folks, look at the increase across this nation of promiscuity and its unfortunate byproduct (single parent households). If society (via mass media) suddenly decided to advocate for any behavior, incest (for example) and successfully turned public opinion to be in favor of or even just tolerant of such behavior don’t you think that you would see an increase in that behavior within the society? Of course you would. You could do the same with any behavior (murder, spouse abuse, stealing music on Napster etc.) Just because society deems a behavior to be okay does not make it so. Think slavery. It remains to be seen whether a court will rule governmental irresponsibility and culpability in an inevitable eventual case alleging psychological scarring of an adopted child of a homosexual household. I guess we will see….
Posted by: Bubby | April 7, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
ShouthernGal … did you mean “SouthernGal?” … grow up sister, it’s a new world, a new time, and time to put the HATE behind us and move forward .. “live and let live” it is so simple … don’t like gay marriage … neither did Ted Haggard’s wife … let gays marry gays and straights marry straights and the world will be a better place for all of us!
Posted by: Cassandra Washington | April 7, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Jack, MAC, Sean and intuitive one, your words are priceless. Thank god we have people like you in this world to make me laugh out loud. It’s healthy and fun. You are like the Marx brothers of stupidity. Thanks for that!
Posted by: USMC | Apr 7, 2009 5:48:28 PM
What’s even funnier is how you try to make it sound like we’re the ones with the problem. You’re the ones laying with the same sex. Your excuse that all these gays were born that way is dead wrong. it’s a perversion of what was intended with sex. You can’t tell me that so many were just born in the wrong body and nature made so many mistakes. Just a bunch of excuses to justify your perversion. i do believe a few were born that way, but lets get real, it’s a vey few percentage wise. Plus i didn’t hear a response to the high rate of deseases among the homosexual community.
Posted by: jack | April 7, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
If everybody turned gay there would be no more babys. Way to go
Posted by: harley guy | April 7, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Firstly—-All professional organizations that study homosexuality agree that it is normal and not a matter of choice.(apa,ama,other two apa’s etc.)
Secondly—-Not all religions view homosexuality negatively.There is broad disagreement even within the christian faith on this.
Posted by: mensarino
Also, where do you get that ALL professional organizations agree that gays are born that way? Did you just make that up, it sounds like it. because you’re wrong. So if a guy says, hey, I think I’ll try that, I’m hearing so much about it, I’m curious. then he tries it and thinks, I kinda like that, I’m going to do it again. Doe’s that mean he was born that way? That means he just likes the sex and maybe the perversion of it.
Posted by: jack | April 7, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
ekoja22:
The 3 things you mention actually ARE religious grounds.
1. Incest and underage obviously harms.
Polygamy is usually formed due to religious reasons. Many times it involves a power marriage involving under age. Tons of problem with it legally. There is no slippery slope.
Allowing 2 people to marry never slipped to 7 being married.
2. Since when is heterosexuality taught as a ‘valid’ lifestyle? There is never any talk of if it’s good or bad. Any teaching about homosexuality, it would be the same – not tolerated or accepted, just exists. Why is it a bad thing to accept anyway? That screams irrationality or religious reasons.
3. Churches are not legally required to marry all heterosexual marriages. Many churches in fact deny certain str8 couples. There is no big legal target and there wouldn’t be with gays either.
Posted by: otter4771 | April 7, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
susiegal:
1. there are over 6 BILLION people on this planet! If we keep multiplying we are going to destroy the environment and ourselves. Duh!
2. your book also says that wearing clothing made of more than one kind of fiber is an abomination (in Leviticus), why aren’t you worried about that?
3. there are many ways to know God and Goddess — don’t assume that anyone who doesn’t follow your path is lost or will be punished. there are many of us who are just as spiritual as you are, who fully support gay rights.
Posted by: syrinx | April 7, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
jack—have you had sex with more then one women and did you have any sex out of wedlock?
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Susiegal, “go forth and multiply” has nothing to do with homosexuality, and those are some of the few words in the Bible that should be taken literally. There are PLENTY of people already multiplying like mad. Are you going to condemn straight couples who, for some reason or another, cannot have a child? And there’s this wonderful new system: it’s called adoption. There are so many unwanted children in the world, so maybe we should back off on the whole “multiplying” thing for a bit. Gay couples can raise children just as well as straight couples. You say, “Wait – those poor children will become gay! We must stop this abomination!” 1. I’m not seeing the issue here…isn’t the Gospel’s message all about love, tolerance, and acceptance? Let’s not forget salvation for EVERYONE. 2. Not necessarily. One of my friends was raised by two gay men, and he’s about as straight as you can get.
Posted by: Schu | April 7, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
explain how what someone does in there own personnel life that doesnt have anything to do with anybody else but themselves bother you christains… why not just let people alone.. if we tryed telling you how to live yoru christains lives you would be haveing a fit saying how the constitution this or that.. but when the gays or lesbians want ther rights you say fine break the constitution to stop them.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Susiegal, do you support banning marriages to those who infertile? With your logic, you should…
Yay Fellow Vermonters!
Posted by: Lambofgoth | April 7, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
schu—i have one friend that is gay he was raised by a minister of a christain church…the other is str8 and he was raised by a gay single man.. and he is amrried to a women now with three great kids.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
susiegal, you sound so pompous and self-righteous.
Posted by: QuackDebbie | April 7, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
lambofgoth—she is just a bigot that hates all that are not white skinned blue eyed pure aryan nation christains..like most christains they hate all not like them..
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Posted by: susiegal | Apr 7, 2009 5:58:58 PM: “God’s intent therefore is for marriage to be limited to opposite sexes”.
Nowhere is “Marriage” defined in the US Constitution; also, American laws are not based on the King James Bible or a specific denomination’s interpretation “God’s intent”. The legal marriage contract is just that. A contract regulated by the states.
On the other hand, your definition of marriage is defined by specific church doctrines. You may think homosexuality is “sinful”, other Christian churches don’t agree. That’s why the United States provides freedom for people to worship in their own way, and CLEARLY separates religion from our government.
Regardless of my religious beliefs or yours, the US Supreme Court has held that states are permitted to reasonably regulate the institution of marriage by prescribing WHO is allowed to marry, and how the marriage can be dissolved. It is a legal contract that has nothing to do with our interpretation of the Bible.
Posted by: LetUsLeaf | April 7, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
letusleaf—so good great now if the christains posting hate on here just open there mind and read it and learn.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
To the best of my knowledge, people of “gay” currently enjoy the same rights as any other single individuals in this country. If said rights are violated, they have the same remedies. If the majority of the population feels that gays should get a better deal on their taxes, hospital visitation rights, et al, fine, I don’t mind. But give their union another name. Marriage is already taken and its meaning well understood for ages. Why not call the gay union marriage? Well for the same reason you do not call a red head a blonde. However, now what do you do about two friends of the same sex whom live together but do not have sex together. Are our tax codes now going to be structured according to who’s having sex with who ? There are many other reasons why, in this case, the “squeaky wheel” should not be greased and the minority should not rule. But, I truely believe the whole thing is a big power play by the gay community. They are desperate to have the rest of the world accept them as completely “normal” in every way. Kind of like saying you’re a red head if you say you are, regardless of the color of your hair. If you have black hair, you are not a red head. If you are gay, you are not normal. If you are 8’6″ tall, you are not normal. May not be a thing in the world wrong with you, but you are NOT normal. The gays will get over it, or they’ll pitch hissy fits, or they’ll die of old age, but they will never be normal. Should “normality” ever equate with “homosexuality”, our species will soon become extinct.
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | April 7, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
funny when you talk about rights facts and the constitution christain haters shut up and go away..because they know if stomp on gay peoples rights to marry we could stomp on there rights to practice religion freely.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Real T: (I hope I was clear haha sometimes I’m not) Thank you. My point exactly.
Posted by: Schu | April 7, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
alchydave25—how owuld you feel if a group of zealots wanted to take away a freedom of yours…oh and yes they are haveing there freedom to marry who they want infringed upon..what if before you got married the cops came and said no you cnat marry your wife.. this is same thing..gays just want what by righst and constitution is theres to have.
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
schu—very i am with you…
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
oh well cant tell ignorant and hateful anything..
Posted by: real T here | April 7, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
REAL T HERE: Well, I can’t marry my sister, my daughter, my mother, my aunt or a host of other people. If my I.Q. falls within a certain range, I can’t marry anyone. What IS your point ? ?
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | April 7, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
“This opens the doors for underage marriages, multiple partners and arranges marriages with the dead. Are we ready fro that?
Posted by: James | Apr 7, 2009 4:56:49 PM”
This is why I don’t understand what you people that don’t want gay marriage are talking about.!.! How exactly does any of this lead towards this stuff? Also, wasn’t this allowed at one point or another?? I believe that most marriages up until a couple of hundred years ago were arranged by the family to keep certain property in the family, to stop the spread of wars and so on. How does my wanting to marry the one person that I love, ONE PERSON, lead to plural marriages exactly? And your red state of Texas seems not to mind having plural marriages in their back yards considering the FLDS is allowed to flourish!
No one can ever explain how gay marriage adversly affects this country. People point to their bibles and say “see it says it here” but then there are people that read the same bible and believe that being gay is not a sin. Therefore, you can’t use the Bible as your book of reference to decide for me how to live my life. Also, this country has the seperation of church and state, meaning one can not rule over the other. Therefore, if you and your church don’t believe in gay marriage then don’t have one. As for me and my church, it is okay!! God said his greatest commandment is love, so how about it! Stop telling people how to live their lives and live your own!! Stay out of my bedroom, I didn’t invite you in! And lastly, why do I hear religious people decry all types of sex, yet when then you hear of a scandal like Ted Haggard, the head of the Christian Right at one time. Preaching one thing and doing another….
Posted by: James N Philly | April 7, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Susiegal posted, “this new law just accelerated Armageddon”.
According to whom? Sister Amiee Semple McPherson? Your interpretation of the Old Testament? What about all those other American Christian churches that teach the Old Testament is not the word of God written in stone, but a parable or an ancient story copied, edited, and translated over centuries?
Because we live in the United States of America, we are all free to worship in our own way, including Muslim, Hindu, Mormon, and Jew. That is why one specific faith’s dogma is separated from the rule of law.
Posted by: LetUsLeaf | April 7, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Apparently some here don’t read too well…
The real issue here is societal acceptance of biologically deviant behavior. There is a real correlation between the level of societal acceptability granted any given behavior and the increased manifestation of that behavior in the society. As we as a nation abandon any real semblance of an absolute moral code we will continue to digress. It’s not rocket science folks, look at the increase across this nation of promiscuity and its unfortunate byproduct (single parent households). If society (via mass media) suddenly decided to advocate for any behavior, incest (for example) and successfully turned public opinion to be in favor of or even just tolerant of such behavior don’t you think that you would see an increase in that behavior within the society? Of course you would. You could do the same with any behavior (murder, spouse abuse, stealing music on Napster etc.) Just because society deems a behavior to be okay does not make it so. Think slavery. It remains to be seen whether a court will rule governmental irresponsibility and culpability in an inevitable eventual case alleging psychological scarring of an adopted child of a homosexual household. I guess we will see….
Posted by: Bubby | April 7, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Like many gay and lesbians across the country, I was excited and happy to hear the news from Vermont today. One step closer to true equality in my lifetime.
Imagine my shock and disappointment when I listened for and didn’t hear ONE WORD from ABC World News Tonight with Charlie Gibson about same. I guess the roll-out of the new Segway prototype was a more relevant human interest story.
Even NBC managed a 10 second blurb.
Bravo to the brave Vermont lawmakers. Shame on ABC.
I’ll be changing my Tivo to NBC News. Sorry, Charlie.
Posted by: Steve G. | April 7, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Philly James – sometimes those who really love you feel it necessary to tell you what you NEED to hear not what you WANT to hear… that is… if they are true friends….
Posted by: Bubby | April 7, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
I was born in VT and now I’m just finishing up my 15th year here.
I can remember watching the news when same-sex marriage rights were passed in M.A. right after I came out as queer. I cried because I was so proud of our almost-neighbooring state for recognizing my rights as a human being. I was sure then that I would never be able to marry in my home town in VT, at the church my parents AND grandparents married in. Now, I can. Now I can be proud of my state, of my legislators, of my people.
I love VT.
I love my church and christian faith.
I love that I can be myself in both places.
Posted by: Emmy Lou | April 7, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Bubby, umm, you have me confused right now..?? My true friends love and respect me for me, not because they are told what to believe. When I go to church, my pastor and the other church members love me and celebrate my relationship. In fact, at our 5 year anniversary we we asked to stand up as a testament to how love does endure. What I don’t need is someone else who looks at their religion and decides that I am an abomination to tell me I’m going to hell. Sorry, my church and “true” friends love me and care for me just as any other person. The God that I worship does not seem to be the same god that many others bow to.
Maybe if people started worrying about things that Jesus actually spoke out against, poverty, obscene wealth, sickness and disease, then this world would be a better place.
Once again, I never invited anyone into my bedroom with me, therefore, get the he.ll out! If you don’t want or don’t believe in gay marriage, there is only one simple solution….. DON’T GET GAY MARRIED!!
Posted by: James N Philly | April 7, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Bubby—I let your comment slide once,but not twice.Your post is devoid of any scientific validity.It is full of hypotheticals and scare tactics.Your attempts to sound educated do not ring true to the truly educated.
Study up a bit more,my boy, and educate yourself about human sexuality.You,too,Jack.I base my comments on 40 years as a psychologist.If you were familiar with the official stances of the American Psychiatric,Psychological andPediatric Associations, as well as the American Medical Association, you would know that ALL regard homosexuality as normal and not a choice.One can only choose behavior but not orientation.
You would think that people would want to post with knowledge to support them…..guess not.
Posted by: mensarino | April 7, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Posted by: Bubby | Apr 7, 2009 7:29:18 PM “Apparently some here don’t read too well…”
No Bubby, we read just fine. Not all of us agree that “the real issue is societal acceptance of biologically deviant behavior.” Where did you dig up the idea that societal acceptability will somehow “increase” homosexuality?
Yah, it’s not “rocket science”, because it’s not SCIENCE AT ALL. Sure, single parent households are caused by the decline of American families, but for a wide range of reasons beyond morality, including poverty and lack of education.
It is delusional to say “of course” people would embrace something like incest if mass media promoted it. And, just because YOU deem a behavior to be “sinful” or “deviant” does not make it so.
Posted by: LetUsLeaf | April 7, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Welcome to the moral decline of America. Instead of dumbing marriage down, we should be making it stronger and something to be respected; legalizing gay “marriage” makes it a haphazard, worthless thing open to anyone who claims to be “in love”. Wake up, people. Marriage is serious business, meant only for one man and one woman. It should NEVER, EVER be treated as a social experiment.
Posted by: Mimma | April 7, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
there is nothing wrong with gay marriage, eccept there wouldn’t be children, unless they adopt, or if its lesbian they get one of those things where the docs put sperm in them and that gets them pregnant. but there is nothing wrong with it. all u haters can jus go somewhere. i wish all the states would let there be gaymarriage cuz its jus a person bein who they are, there is nothin bad about it.
Posted by: annaboo | April 7, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Bravo Emmy Lou ! Your post brought tears to my eyes.
Posted by: Idahogirl | April 7, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Posted by: Mimma | Apr 7, 2009 8:14:18 PM
“Legalizing gay “marriage” makes it a haphazard, worthless thing open to anyone who claims to be “in love”.
According to whom? Where do people dredge up this nonsense? Gay marriage does not make marriage “worthless” to heterosexuals. Ask anyone who is both married and a heterosexual – this does not somehow make rational people view marriage as any less “serious business”.
Posted by: LetUsLeaf | April 7, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
I was moved to tears today to watch my legislators override a veto (for the first time in about 20 years in Vermont) to send a message to my neighbors that “we accept you”. Now my next-door neighbors can be accepted just like my wife and I, as full citizens of Vermont. The scene at the capital today was unlike anything I’d ever seen. An massive coming together of all types of people, to affirm our acceptance of a long disenfranchised group of people that are in ALL walks of life.
Posted by: Joe | April 7, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
LetUsLeaf, I am sure you would be one of the first to cite “No Fault” in the dissolution of your own marriage. You clearly do not understand my argument, or the essential importance of a union between one man and one woman only.
Posted by: mimma | April 7, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Mimma, plenty of straight people claim to be in love and get married. Heck, there are plenty of “straight” celebriteis that get married only to divorce days, months later. Does this not have an effect on marriages?? Or is just gay people that are going to have an affect on marriages?? How exactly do gay marriages affect straight marriages? I’ve never understood your argument and probally never will! If you don’t want to marry a person of the same gender, don’t, but how does letting them marry have any effect on you.?.?.?
Posted by: James N Philly | April 7, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Well, James N Philly, I’ve never been mugged, so really, muggings do not effect me. The act does effect society in general, however. I am not basing my arguments on religion, but a common sense approach to what is best for the community at large and marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Posted by: mimma | April 7, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Mimma, I don’t get your logic at all. How does gay marriage affect society in general? How is it best for the community to not allow gay people to get married? Are you saying it better for kids???? Then by your logic, allowing two people who choose not to have children or are sterile has an adverse affect on society and thus should be barred from getting married, that is if you follow your logic…. Just because you believe something does not make it so….
Posted by: James N Philly | April 7, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
James N Philly, please read my previous post.
Posted by: mimma | April 7, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Bigotry took a big hit today!!!
Our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters deserve this equality and we must keep fighting discrimination until we overcome.
I’m very proud of Vermont today.
Posted by: Jasper | April 7, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Mimma,
How would gay marriage hurt anyone? I’m proud to invite the millions of gay families in this nation into the right, responsibilities and dignity of marriage. This is about equal civil rights and churches can do whatever they want.
Posted by: Jasper | April 7, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Mimma, read it, still no answer to my questions. You’re equating getting beat up to gay, loving couples being denied the right to a marriage?!?!?! In what ways is it bad for a community if a person who is gay gets married? I read your previous post, now, if you were so kind, please answer my questions…..
Posted by: James N Philly | April 7, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
mensarino ……..my post is completely valid and scientific… where did you get your bougus psych degree?
Posted by: bubby | April 7, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Live your life as a gay, loving couple. You can live as you like, and do what you feel is best and right for you. By all means (and I mean this most sincerely)your life is your own and you make of it what you will. I am in no way disputing this. HOWEVER, THIS IS NOT MARRIAGE. Marriage is meant for one man, and one woman. There are no exceptions or substitutions.
Posted by: mimma | April 7, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Oh really,Bubby.Please submit your post to any Psych. Dept and let them give you the bad news.You won’t believe me,maybe you will believe them.
Do you have an advanced degree in anything,much less psychology?
Easy for you to condemn the messenger rather than look to yourself——Psych.101….no charge.
Posted by: mensarino | April 8, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
By the way,Bubby,grown men don’t go by “Bubby” and you might want to learn how to spell”bogus” if you’re going to throw it out there.
Posted by: mensarino | April 8, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am
For those of you who want to pull out the judge not verse in the Bible please read and understand what thou readest. God doesn’t say don’t judge, He says that whatever judgement you judge by, you will also be judged by that same judgement.(Matthew 7:1&2). God talks about homosexuality in Romans chapter 1 and He says those who commit such things are worthy of death. He goes on to say that even those people who say it is ok are worthy of death. You can’t just pick out one verse in the Bible and ok it, you have to read the whole thing. Being gay is a sin just as telling a lie is a sin God sees it all as sin. WE all commit sin but we all don’t give in to our sins like gays are doing. Gays aren’t born that way, they are tempted to do those things and give into it. God teaches us to love everybody and to search the scriptures daily. If we all would search for truth and not our agenda’s we would all be a happier people.
Posted by: ACTS238 | April 8, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Psychology 101 – Denial is one of the stages of death… Denying that homosexuality is biologically abnormal is merely evidence that you and many of your colleagues are already brain dead… there is no question that it occurs but the value of the behavior to the survival of the species is highly suspect… Truth is that you are all just soothe sayers feeding into the delusional dysfunction of these poor biologically short-circuited individuals to avoid conflict and remain politically correct. Disgusting lot – those Psychologists…
Posted by: Bubby Sr. | April 8, 2009, 2:48 am 2:48 am
IntuitiveOne: “Black people did not choose to be black. People choose to be gay. It is mental.”
It may be mental, but for most of us it is still hard-wired. I never chose to be heterosexual, I just am. Many of friends never chose to be homosexual, they just are.
Just because you are bisexual and can choose does not mean everyone can.
Posted by: James | April 8, 2009, 4:48 am 4:48 am
Gay marriage will destroy the gay lifestyle. Marriage, being a conservative force on people and society,will make it hards for gays to remain single and live like they will forever be single. The rampant annonymnous sex of the gaya lifestyle will be curtailed by the married gays. Being single and gay will become the mark of an outcast. How dare gays get married and ruin a free and easy lifestyle?
Posted by: Waysie | April 8, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am
This is a step in the right direction where the law of the land sees and treats everyone as equal. I also think that the people who voted in favor of equality should be commended and honored for upholding the ideals our founders and that those who tarnished those ideals should be looked down upon due to their actions.
Posted by: Nathan | April 8, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
ACTS238 | Apr 8, 2009 1:01:31 AM posted
“You can’t just pick out one verse in the Bible and ok it, you have to read the whole thing.”
OK ! So, according to Deut 21:18 “If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son…all the men of his town shall stone him to death.” Should we follow this advice, or just pick and choose which verses to follow, like Leviticus 20:13 recommending gays “must be put to death”?
Not every Christian denomination believes the Bible is the carved in stone word of god – other Christians believe the Old Testament is comprised of ancient stories and parables, edited and translated over centuries.
And where did you learn “gays aren’t born that way”? I’m curious – have you vever met anyone who is homosexual?
Posted by: LetUsLeaf | April 8, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
mimma | Apr 7, 2009 8:47:46 PM posted “I am sure you would be one of the first to cite “No Fault” in the dissolution of your own marriage.”
See, this is the mystery with conservatives – I simply do not understand their thinking processes.
In this case, how in heavens name are you “sure” I would be the first to cite “No Fault” in dissolution of my marriage? You don’t know me, or my extremely committed, very happy and very long marriage.
And because I disagrees with your perspective that marriage should be a “union between one man and one woman only”, does not mean I do not understand your argument. It means I adamantly disagree that the Old Testament is somehow the template that should be used to guide how our society views gay marriage.
Posted by: LetUsLeaf | April 8, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Bubby Sr. | Apr 8, 2009 2:48:16 AM posted “Denying that homosexuality is biologically abnormal is merely evidence that you and many of your colleagues are already brain dead.”
Let’s see…should rational Americans take advice from the American Psychiatric, Psychological and Pediatric Associations and the American Medical Association that homosexuality is not “abnormal”, or should we dismiss these “politically correct soothe sayers” as “a disgusting lot”.
Sorry Bubby, I’m going with modern data, the doctors and professionals, not Old Testament fire and brimstone fear mongering.
Posted by: LetUsLeaf | April 8, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
So far not one legal or constitutional argument as to why same sex marriage should be prevented. The fact is that the 14th amendment of the US Constitution guarantees equal protection and denying same sex marriage violates that. No state can legally pass laws denying same sex marriage nor can they legally amend their constitution to deny it.
Posted by: morethanpolite | April 8, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I’m just waiting for the it’s cool to be gay fad to fade away and see what the next perversion fad will be.
Posted by: justwaiting | April 8, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
No ‘justwaiting’ you’re just flaunting your own small and narrow minded self adsorbed self centered meaningless opinion that in 20 years people will simply shake their head at in amazement that anyone had such backward ideas. So were you around in 1967 so that you could say the same about interracial marriage when the Supreme Court finally shot down people like you?
Posted by: morethanpolite | April 8, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
if gay men want to join us suffering sad married str8 men and get married fien atleast they will marry someone sane us str8 guys have to marry wicked twisted insane women..almost makes you want to be gay when you listen to women rant and talk crazy as always.
Posted by: real T here | April 8, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
I am a straight person that has no problem with the gay/lesbian community of people… Yeah I get a little uncomfortable at the thought of two guys engaging intimately… But, that’s my problem not theirs…
I think gays/lesbians are people, people who contribute to the best and worst in society like everyone else…
I think we get all caught up in the flesh that we are in and have forgotten that we are first and foremost, Spiritual beings…
I am a Pagan, so I am not trying to bring religion into this place.
I have two children, one grown up and one almost grown that appear to be straight… I would have loved them no matter, straight or gay and would want for them, all rights that I have.
Posted by: theafalcon200 | April 9, 2009, 5:42 am 5:42 am
After reading all of the negative comments, I’m both amused and saddened by them. The basic fact is that most of those who are opposed to gay marriage are using religion as a cover for their own prejudices. There was an NPR news story awhile back about male exchange students from Afghanistan who were warned NOT to hug or hold hands when in the USA as it could be misinterpreted. In their world, simple non-romantic displays of affection between males were not uncommon — even in that macho, fundamentalist Muslim culture. Remember the quote “Almighty God created the races: White, Black, Yellow, Malay, and Red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix…” ? It’s the same thing. You can hide behind religion to justify almost anything. It might not be easy for you at first to explain to your child why someone has two mothers, or two fathers, or why two boys are kissing each other, but not so long ago the same people asked my father why he was with mother or why she had mixed race children.
Posted by: Inga Svensdottiir | April 9, 2009, 8:49 am 8:49 am
theafalcon200 —– well gee how noble… a parent who would love their child… and would want their child to be happy first and foremost… even at their genetic demise… what did you feed your kids for dinner? candy?
Posted by: Bubby | April 9, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
theafalcon200 —-
P.S. to speak of how humans are “spiritual beings” in the context of attempting to justify hedonistic practices is just downright hilarious !
Posted by: Bubby | April 9, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Thank You! Vermont! For standing against religious bigotry and ignorance; the like’s of The Dobsonites (Focus On the Family), The Mormons (Latter Day Saints), Baptist Convention, Catholic League, American Family Association, Chrisitan Coalition, Family Research Council et. al.! I wish I had all of the hundreds of millions of dollars these organizations have been able to raise to fight against giving ALL Americans equal rights so as to feed the AMERICAN homeless, feed the children, help the poor, help the elderly, provide medical assistance to children and the needy. Again, Thank You Vermont!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: john copeland | April 9, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Thanks vermont for bringing the US farther down in it’s morals. It’s only a matter of time. All civilizations went this route before they disappeared off the earth.
Posted by: goingdown | April 28, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Love for all!!
Posted by: Gabriel | June 11, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am
I dont understand why there is so much negativity towards gay/lesbian marriage. My parents barely stayed married 5 years, any kids they had were made while they were not married., so claiming marriage as a legal way to have kids is bs. Ever heard of orphans??? Yea the by product of straight people there, so be proud that you had a fun night then abandon your child because you dont want to be bothered with it. Heck straight marraiges have been failling at an all time rate, should we stop letting striaght people marry? no we dont, so let the people who want to get married, regaurdless of genders involved just do it.
Posted by: Shana | November 4, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm