McCain Offering Budget Alternative — But Don’t Call It Leadership’s Proposal
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: The will-they-or-won’t-they saga over a Senate GOP budget alternative is producing a concrete proposal after all. Sort of. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., has been working with several of his colleagues to formulate a full-on alternative to the Democratic budget — and has it ready to introduce on the Senate floor this afternoon, according to Senate aides. The move is being made despite Senate leaders’ stated desire that there not be a complete Senate Republican budget alternative; instead, they support making line-by-line changes to the Democrats’ proposal. The McCain budget, which comes on the same day GOP House leaders introduced their own version of the budget, would spend $229 billion less than President Obama’s budget over five years, primarily by freezing all discretionary spending with the exception of defense and veterans’ services. It would reduce deficits by an estimated $977 billion more than Obama’s proposal over five years, and would contribute some $2 trillion less to the national debt, according to a fact sheet describing the proposal provided to ABC News. McCain’s budget would also make permanent the Bush tax cuts, provide a permanent fix to the alternative minimum tax, and set up a special commission on entitlements that would seek to “reduce mandatory spending by at least 4 percent over the next five years, and 7 percent over the next decade,” according to the fact sheet. McCain has been working with a small circle of allies on the proposal, including Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas. Noticeably absent from that list are Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and the Senate Budget Committee’s top Republican, Judd Gregg, R-N.H. McConnell and Gregg have opposed the idea of offering a complete Republican alternative budget. Instead — as Democrats generally did regarding the budget process when Republicans last controlled the Senate — they are offering individual amendments on the Senate floor this week. “We have offered alternatives all along the way and we will offer numerous alternatives on the budget when it comes up,” McConnell told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos last month. The political end of the leadership argument often is this: Budget votes put all senators in tough spots, and they’d rather keep the scrutiny on the Democrats’ budget instead of forcing moderate GOP members into politically perilous votes on a GOP alternative. Still, McCain and his allies feel it’s important for members of the Senate Republican caucus to enunciate their ideals in budgetary form. Democrats have mocked Republicans in recent weeks for just saying “no” to Obama’s ideas without offering a complete budget of their own. If this dance isn’t complicated enough, GOP aides expect most Republican members — including, most likely, McConnell and Gregg — to vote for McCain’s alternative budget Just don’t call it a “leadership proposal.”

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
McCain with an economic plan? He’s making progress! At least he realizes there is an economic problem now. Of course, his usual cohorts are in tow….except for one…..where’s Joe??
Neocon’s can come up with an “alternative” budget that is meant to take a good portion on the president’s stimulus plan, but from what I hear, The president’s budget will pass with or without Republican backing.
Posted by: js45601 | April 1, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
The Republican party is dieing slowly but surely.
They will fall below the 40 mark in the senate come 2010.
Posted by: Steve_NJ | April 1, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Good, I keep hearing about how people are calling the GOP the party of “No” (with good reason at time). Well, here is the alternative, something more than just saying no. Not that anybody will listen…
Posted by: zzzzzzz | April 1, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
McCain was terrible on economics during the presidential debates. Ron Paul schooled him on several occasions.
Posted by: Huh | April 1, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
First, from the libs nut jobs, we get “All the repubs do is complain. They have no plan. They are the party of NO”. Then we get “Neocon’s can come up with an alternative budget that is meant to take a good portion on the president’s stimulus plan, but from what I hear, The president’s budget will pass with or without Republican backing.” The repubs have been handed control of this country come next election. It’s in the bag.
Posted by: mojo | April 1, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
McCain’s budget would also make permanent the Bush tax cuts,
Posted by: Hownice | April 1, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
It took them THIS long to come up with one!
WOW, what an april fools day this is turning
out to be. Lets see where the corporate welfare
and greed is taking us now.
Posted by: spacerook1 | April 1, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Sure Mojo….keep drinking that cool-aid LMAO….too funny !
Posted by: Hownice | April 1, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Every time the GOP has something to say you already know what it is. The same garbage that has almost destroyed this Great Nation. Tax Breaks for the wealthy and reduced spending if the democrats are in charge. You can change their name but as soon as they open their mouths you know who they are. 19 more republican senate seats on the ballot in 2010. Arlen Specter is the only one worth saving in that round. GOP could be replaced by a broken record.
Posted by: rightbehind | April 1, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Steve_NJ said
“The Republican party is dieing slowly but surely.
They will fall below the 40 mark in the senate come 2010.”
The same was said about the Democrats not too long ago. Public opinion is a sliding scale and a good amount of the weight lies in the middle. The only way either party can truly hope to retain power is by playing more to the middle and less to the far left or right. The Dems learned that lesson a few years ago and the Reps will learn it as well.
When that happens, if the Dems are trying to strong arm a far left agenda they will fall. Just like they did in the 90′s and just like the Reps did in the most recent elections.
Posted by: dadelus | April 1, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
lookout 2036, that is the year I predict the GOP will have a fighting chance!
Posted by: jasime sweetness | April 1, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Well at least some in here can’t keep saying “the repubs have no ideas and are part of the problem”
Posted by: boxcar | April 1, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Mojo…you say The repubs will be handed control of this country come next election? That it’s in the bag??
LOL!!! In your dreams.
Posted by: Sara | April 1, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
dadelus | Apr 1, 2009 5:54:37 PM
Good point.
Posted by: boxcar | April 1, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
7 months after since he said ‘the economy is sound’ he suddenly realizes maybe it isnt. great job maccain! maybe Palin helped him realize…
Posted by: jasime sweetness | April 1, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
April Fools, my friends.
Posted by: Mack | April 1, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
wow, what an ineffective, unimaginative party. They just don’t get it.
Posted by: Eric | April 1, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
The GOP leadership doesn’t want an alternative because they know it would end up like the laughable proposal from the House GOP.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | April 1, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Hey there MR. McCain where did that great inspiring concession speech after your presidential loss go. The spirit of serving my president, time to work together, bipartanship. Do you remember Silverado Savings and Loan. Or is this about rich folks like you and your wife losing the handle on the wealth and power you Republican folks so enjoy. You remind me of a phrase my Grandma used to use. John your like a fart on hot skillet. You know jumping here there and everywhere invisible like the deficit in your lack of substance sincerety
Posted by: Subdude8 | April 1, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
If anyone (regardless of party) has a proposal that would supposedly save us $2 trillion, it’s worth at least looking in to it before making judgment. Of course, most of you, who care more about your party than the country, will only look at which party created the budget (whether Obama’s or McCain’s) and THAT, my friend, is part of the problem with this country. Ignorance at it’s finest (and priciest!)
Posted by: AL | April 1, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
I am beginning to dislike that man more and more all of the time.
Posted by: unshrub | April 1, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
The most innovative proposal in McCain’s budget is a new federally-funded program to KEEP THOSE DAMN KIDS OFF MY LAWN!
Posted by: Jeebus | April 1, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Is this a joke?
Posted by: Kim | April 1, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
its the same old story – more tax breaks for the already stupendously wealthy -and more for big corporations – heck those poor folks are HURTING. lol.
Posted by: trueblue | April 1, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
There will be one heavy theme to the GOP “alternative”; TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY AND THE CORPORATIONS. It will be exactly the same trickle down failed policies the Neo-Cons swear by that were invented by their Messiah Ronald Reagan. It didn’t work when Reagan did it and it didn’t work for GWB but they seem to think that their way is the only way even when it fails miserably. They will surly send it to their unregulated free political campaign wing of Limbaugh, Hannity and FOX News to promote the plan.
Posted by: dan | April 1, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
I’m tired of Harry “The Body Oder” Reid saying that it was because of the last 8 years that the economy collapsed.
Has Reid ever heard of the “Housing Bubble?” Which a lot of people in his party help to cause.
Posted by: Tired of Excuses | April 1, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
I’m sure Obama will put aside politics and accept McCain’s better plan.
Posted by: Mike from Chicago | April 1, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
McCain you didn’t WIN – so keep your ideas to yourself (especially if nut job Phil Gramm wrote them for you!!! You know the creep from TX that keep deviatives, credit-swaps and hedgefunds UNREGULATED in December 2000.) McCain why don’t you do something POSITIVE for the State of Arizona and help stop illegal immigration (by enforcing the EXISTING laws AGAINST businesses that hire them!!!) and do something about the drug wars that have spilled over into Phoenix and Tucson??? DO SOMETHING FOR YOUR OWN STATE FOR A CHANGE!!!!!!
Posted by: Melanie | April 1, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
We’ve already done the tax cuts/cut spending for 20 years out of the last 28. Enough! We need a real budget for real people.
Posted by: jan | April 1, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Hey tired – read this…
Look at the speech President Bush made on June 17, 2002:
“Now, we’ve got a problem here in America that we have to address. Too many American families, too many minorities do not own a home. There is a home ownership gap in America. The difference between Anglo America and African American and Hispanic home ownership is too big. (Applause.)
And we’ve got to focus the attention on this nation to address this.
And it starts with setting a goal. And so by the year 2010, we must increase minority home owners by at least 5.5 million. In order to close the homeownership gap, we’ve got to set a big goal for America, and focus our attention and resources on that goal. (Applause.)
…I want to thank Franklin Raines, of Fannie Mae and Leland Brendsel of Freddie Mac. Thank you all for coming. (Applause.)
…Three-quarters of white America owns their homes. Less than 50 percent of African Americans are part of the homeownership in America. And less than 50 percent of the Hispanics who live here in this country own their home. And that has got to change for the good of the country. It just does. (Applause.)
And so here are some of the ways to address the issue. First, the single greatest barrier to first time homeownership is a high down payment.
It is really hard for many, many, low income families to make the high down payment. … And let me talk about some of the progress which we have made to date, as an example for others to follow. First of all, government sponsored corporations that help create our mortgage system – I introduced two of the leaders here today – they call those people Fannie May and Freddie Mac, as well as the federal home loan banks, will increase their commitment to minority markets by more than $440 billion. (Applause.)
I want to thank Leland and Franklin for that commitment. It’s a commitment that conforms to their charters, as well, and also conforms to their hearts.
This means they will purchase more loans made by banks after Americans, Hispanics and other minorities, which will encourage homeownership. Freddie Mac will launch 25 initiatives to eliminate homeownership barriers. Under one of these, consumers with poor credit will be able to get a mortgage with an interest rate that automatically goes down after a period of consistent payments. (Applause.)”
By 2005, of course, people with bad credit of all races were going nuts with easy credit as this approach became close to the norm.
Put the blame on the right people – FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH ORDERED FRANNIE AND FREDDIE TO GIVE LOANS TO PEOPLE WHO COULD NOT QUALIFY FOR TRADITIONAL BANK HOME LOANS!!!!
Posted by: Melanie | April 1, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
What a laugh this is. Not only do I not believe this, I don’t believe they would know a plan if it hit them in the face! All the repukes know how to do is say “no” but nothing comes out of their mouths after it. What a joke the repukelican party has become. McCain needs to slither off to Arizona and stay there with the rest of the old folks – and take the others with him!
Posted by: durrs | April 1, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Why is it that the Republicans is so willing to sacrifice all else in favor of defence ? Defence spending should be reduced over the long term and this will have a bigger impact on the deficit than anything else. Obama is right to pursue a strategy of beefing up Afghanistan and Iraq’s own defence capabilities so we do not bleed for their security. The notion that the US should be the sole protector and policeman is now outdated. It does not win us any friends and it does not earn us any revenue and we also cannot forcibly impose ourselves on others simply because it will fly in our face everything we stand for. Given the piggy bank, it renders it even more irrelevant the conservative’s argument of the efficacy of the use of force to advance America’s interests.
Posted by: sinical | April 1, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
I am very sick of the sore loser McCain. He didn’t even think the enomcy was bad and now he have a plan. McCain we didn’t elected you so please please go away and shut the F UP! I am very tried of all you Republicans trying to undermind President Obama with your tax cuts.
Posted by: gl | April 1, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
There sure don’t seem to be many republican supporters posting on this thread defending this so-called “plan”.
“Republicans………HELLOOOOOOOOO…………WHERE ARE YOUUUUUUUUUU ?!?!?!?
Posted by: Sandra | April 1, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
McCain has been working with a small circle of allies on the proposal, including Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas.
There are some of the same people that said the economy is fine. The will be programs for the poor. No health plan becasue they have a very good health plan.
Posted by: gl | April 1, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
This is April fools day so I guest the Republicans just wanted to play April fools joke on the American people with their weak budget.
Posted by: gl | April 1, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
THE BUSH TAX CUTS DID NOT WORK!!!! Is he the LAST human being on the planet to not know this????? do you know WHO those tax cuts affect??? The CEO’s republicans are so upset with! LOL! Joe the Plumber was a myth. Literally. A guy named Sam who made $40K a year who wasn’t even a licenced plumber and didn’t have anywhere near enough money to buy a business!!! no. The folks that tax cut affects are the very CEO’s who get thier multibillion dollar bonuses for nothing. Dont worry – THEY’RE FINE! And they’re investing that money in CHINA for a better rate of return! Ok- remember this “The fundamentals of the economy are sound”…..
Posted by: matt | April 1, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
So many critics are on this site. To me, the plan sounds great — sounds a lot more realistic than either the democrat’s budget or the one introduced by House leaders.
Posted by: mommamia | April 1, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
screw mccain… after the BS he spewed during the election campaign i wouldn’t trust a thing he says… the Dems are being way to nice and need to just move on and let these republican losers alone
Posted by: earth_not_flat | April 1, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Posted by: mommamia | Apr 1, 2009 6:50:12 PM
So you think McCain’s plan is great… you must be rich and use tax loopholes to avoid many your fair of American taxes too… like Cindy McCain does…
Posted by: Melanie | April 1, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
I’s like opposite world. Let’s introduce a budget that is the opposite of what we need. We’re in a recession, so we need to spend. After 8 years of spending unabandoned, let’s stop spending now. The tax cuts ot the wealth did not work – for 8 years. The collective buying power of the middle class is MUCH stronger and dearly what the economy needs- so….let’s give tax cuts to the wealthy again! Yeah, that’s it. I suppose given the republicans say they want Obama to fail, this is just the vehicle to make sure it happens. YOu know , these people have made it publicly known they want the US to fail, the economy to tank – write them off. Dont listen to a word they say, dont bother trying to please them. Forget them. Come midterms we’ll kick even more out. They are not to be trusted. This ‘budget’ is the biggest joke since bush himself. More proof they hope we sink. Thanks for letting us know. NOw go sit down. We dont trust you anymore!!!
Posted by: frank | April 1, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
js45601: I agree – and let the Libertarians take over in place of the Republicans to both fight against the big spending Democrats and get us out of policing the world.
Posted by: luvnrockets | April 1, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
“stay the course” huh??? LOL!! You got that right -this plan is a JOKE! Ya know, we didn’t get to where we are by being a little bit wrong! Ok??? bush was 100% completely wrong in his economic policy and this perpetuates it. First republicans cannot be trusted because they are too stupid. Second- they WANT the economy to tank. Ok. Do we need anymore reason to nOT listen to a word they say????
Posted by: john | April 1, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
I’d agree with this except for keeping the bush tax cuts. I think that taxes need to be raised. The extra money could be used to pay down our debts. We can then invest the money that we save from the interest payments back into productive projects.
Posted by: jol | April 1, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Do you konw why they are having “capitalism” riots i n London instead of “antiAmerican” riots?? Did you notice that???? NO AntiAmerican riots a world meeting. Did you not notice???? The FIRST time in 7 years that a meeting of the world leaders did not result in HUGE ANTIAMERICAN marches! No longer are we the Devil Spawn to the world. No thanks, McCain. Dont trust a word Mr. “The Fundamentals of the economy are sound” says. I like it right where we are, t hank you. WE almost had 6 of the biggest largest banks fail along with their insurance company. The economic free fall has stopped. Obama did that. I trust him to start it up again, thank you very much. You were so stupid you didn’t even know we were in free fall.
Posted by: are u kidding me | April 1, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Like so many failed businesses, they should file bankruptcy, change their name, and start anew. They remind of that old nursery story of the ant and the grasshopper, Republicans being the grasshopper. So appropo.
Posted by: tendergroins | April 1, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
I dont trust republicans. That’s all. I Just dont trust them. They dont want anything good to happen. I trust Obama. I Think he’s done a good job so far. banks have steadied. No more bank failure surprises. I think he caught up with the runaway wagon and has caught up thereins. Let’s let the president drive the wagon back home. ) see zero to give the reins to the folks who had the horses in a suicide sprint for the cliff.
Posted by: mary in the heartland | April 1, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
I dont trust republicans. That’s all. I Just dont trust them. They dont want anything good to happen. I trust Obama. I Think he’s done a good job so far. banks have steadied. No more bank failure surprises. I think he caught up with the runaway wagon and has caught up thereins. Let’s let the president drive the wagon back home. ) see zero to give the reins to the folks who had the horses in a suicide sprint for the cliff.
Posted by: mary in the heartland | April 1, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
The market has been trending upward the last three weeks or so and the GOP is desperately looking for a way to put a stop to it.
Posted by: dan | April 1, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Cannot believe media will not splash McCain all over hell’s back yard with the Abramoff connection to him, the Gramm connection with him regarding UBS, housing deregulation, paid lobbying artists for pandering legislation and his own connection with AIG and the investments he has with many of these same companies. Why is he untouchable, or Gramm, Paulson, many Repub’s with a hand in the cookie jar. Please take this serious guys, the outrage should not end with Bush. Cheney also had his fingers in, this is not over by far. The World does know Wall Street along with Conservative politics and politicians have collapsed the World economy. Following this for years it’s easy to see what their behavior says and their words mean. Corruption and greed…..GOP, Greedy Old Party.
Posted by: whitehawk | April 1, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
“The FIRST time in 7 years that a meeting of the world leaders did not result in HUGE ANTIAMERICAN marches”…I heard that on the BBC!! Reporters noted that! No burning the US flag! No burning an effigy of our president! That IS the first time in decades, they noted, that a US president traveling overseas did not result in burning US flags!!! NONE that their reporter couldsee and they went out looking! Wow. That is nice to see.
Posted by: john | April 1, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
i think it the right plan. the dems choice is just to give money away to campaign donors and reward those who do not take risk and employ people. you get what you reward.moreover there should be strings attached…if you get govt handout/ bailout you should be drug tested and sign personal guarantees to pay the money back like small business people have to.
Posted by: catman | April 1, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
The GOP budget = Huge tax cuts for the rich = Massive executive bonuses in another guise.
Posted by: JAB | April 1, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
so now johnny is wanting to permanently cement in place the bush tax cuts HE RAN ON VOTING AGAINST? what a prototypical republican chump/loser he is….
it is pretty clear he voted against the tax cuts back then purely as a political stunt/move/ploy ; he knew the tax cuts would pass with republican majority support , without his vote .leaving him free to do what politicians do best …attempt to paint themselves as something they are not.
HES A MAVERICK , HE DIDN’T VOTE WITH REPUBLICANS ON THE TAX CUTS SO YOU CAN TRUST HIM JOE SIXPACK!
yeah right….
now we see the REAL john mccain , a backstabbing hypocrite who is all about getting more
$$ and keeping $$ more at any cost ,even at the peril of the nations health ,the republican oath !!
TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE JOHNNY ,WE SAW THROUGH YOUR B/S AND THATS WHY YOU LOST YOU B/S ING REPUBLICAN LIAR!!!
Posted by: Bobby L | April 1, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
The economic situation the world finds itself in was not caused by ONE thing or ONE political party. The national debate about this–on blogs like this–always gets bogged down with partisan noise, instead of honest fact-finding and soul searching. Part of the problem is the duanting reality of just how incredibly complicated this all is.
Face it, most of us don’t really have much substantive knowledge about economics works, let alone comlicated financial instruments created by guys with PhD’s in Business. This crisis is the result a terrible confluence of several different factors. So let’s stop this over-simplistic finger pointing.
Posted by: WeDecide | April 1, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
whitehawk – It’s time to set aside your dislike for a particular party and look at each plan or idea on its merits. Party loyalty is dividing this country and standing in the way of progress. The truth is, there are corrupt and greedy people in both the democratic and republican parties.
It’s time to stop dredging up the past and start looking for solutions so that our country can thrive again.
Posted by: Get over it | April 1, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
McCain also offered us Palin. So thanks but no thanks.
Posted by: CAW | April 1, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
What?…More tax cuts??? When are these dummies going to learn you have to pay for it? Taxes have to go up sooner or later. It isn’t pleasant but it is the truth. I seem to see a lot of Europeans touring here and I know their tax rates are higher than here. Maybe socialism isn’t so bad???
Posted by: Dunlike | April 1, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
All the calls saying the Republicans are finished are premature… And given the slide of the country to socialism, a lot of Americans are rediscovering their love of Capitalism and our true values… not the ones being foisted on us by a pack of chicago mobsters and their union backers.
Posted by: Jon | April 1, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
“Budget Alternative?” Why not do something for the people’s pocketbook? If congress wants to help the auto industry sell cars, why don’t they have the tax code reflect what it did up until 1987. When itemizing your federal income taxes, before 1987,(Schedule A), you could deduct all “personal” interest you paid. On the Schedule A (Itemized Deductions) form, under “Interest Paid, Block 12 read: “Total credit card and charge account interest you paid”. This was added to the interest you paid for your home mortgage, for a total of the interest you paid for the tax year.
People knew, when buying a new car, that the Government would at least let them deduct the interest they pay for the car, or the washer, dryer, etc. It might not have been much but it was a few dollars you could deduct when filing your tax returns.
But, before anyone realized it, the Schedule A (Itemized Deduction) form, under “Interest Paid” read: “Note: Personal interest is no longer deductible.”
So, if you go out and purchase, on credit, a car or any big-ticket item, you will not get one dime worth of a tax break. You cannot deduct one dollar of the interest. And, the current administration is floating a proposal to get rid of the deduction for home mortgage interest.
Posted by: Percy | April 1, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
So you think McCain’s plan is great… you must be rich and use tax loopholes to avoid many your fair of American taxes too… like Cindy McCain does…
Posted by: Melanie
What a lovely, mature response and typical of so many people these days who simply lack the critical thinking skills to formulate a mature response to a comment.
This plan is cheaper than Obama’s, spends less, reduces the deficit by billions and the federal debt by trillions (just think about what happens when China gets tired of buying our debt). It’s a solid plan that protects rich and poor, present and future taxpayers. You don’t need to be rich to see that and to me, seems a heck of a lot better than begging China for more money, or worse, turning on the printing presses and printing more dollars (get ready for inflation!).
Posted by: mommamia | April 1, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
John McCain is an old fool and he needs to shut his mouth and go away!!! You lost. John. You and Cheney should SHUT UP!!!!!
Posted by: Christine | April 1, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
More tax cuts for the rich.
Posted by: Jim Bob | April 1, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
JUst print them money. If they dont work anymore just use it to heat the house in the Winter
Posted by: Swiftlearner | April 1, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Jeez, give the guy a break. It’s just an alternative
Posted by: me | April 1, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Happy April Fools Day everyone! We all
needed a good laugh.
Posted by: spacerook1 | April 1, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
McCain lost, IN A BIG WAY! He chose Palin for VP — Palin! Now we are supposed to trust his judgment on a budget??? Go away you old insane fool!
Posted by: robby10001 | April 1, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Posted by: catman | Apr 1, 2009 7:18:57 PM
You listen to FIXNews don’t you…
Do you think that Rush Limbaugh went to rehab for his addiction to Oxycontin???
Did he pay for it or did taxpayers as he was arrested for possession of a controlled substance???
You do know it costs between $30K to $40K a year to house ONE convict in the U.S. Should we let them out because there is no money to house them anymore as most states are on the verge of financial collapse too or should taxes go up a bit???
Did you know that the bank bailouts are LOANS and have to be paid back first – even if they are taken over.
But like most good Republicans you believe whatever b/s line they feed you on FIXNEWS… Did you ever think that a 4% taxrate hike on the top 5% earners in this country who made most of their money in the financial or service industry in the last few years(unless they are a celebrity or inherit it from good old dad/mom)would kill them??? These are the same people who wouldn’t allow regulation on the hedgefund/ deviatives market in the first place.
So either you are in the 35% tax rate bracket (if you don’t use the existing loopholes not to pay even that much) and YOU think a 4% rise to a 39% tax rate is too much!!!!
Somebody has to start paying for ALL this national debt that has run up over the last 30 years – 22 of them under REPUBLICANS!!!! But YOU think it should be the middle and working class – don’t you??!!??
Posted by: Melanie | April 1, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Get over it – That’s EXACTLY what the GOP wants. They want everyone to FORGET the last eight years as if they didn’t happen. Hannity was calling it the “Obama Recession” in DECEMBER! The GOP propaganda machine was in full force the instant Obama won the election. McShame and the GOP tossed the very same person they chanted “four more years” “four more years” about during the GOP convention. He tried a failed attempt to call himself “change” when in fact his policies were EXACTLY the SAME. American’s saw through him like a ghost in the sunlight. I’m betting you’re one of the GOP faithful that is calling for calm and bipartisanship now that your party is not in power but likely the same person that when in power was shouting screw the Dems we run the show.
Posted by: dan | April 1, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
You so called outstanding citizens of the USA(liberal extremest) are as scary as any group which calls our country home. One political party would be no different than a dictatorship and bring our country to its knees. Do you hold secret meetings and have special handshakes?
Why are you so opposed to alternative views by either party while our President is away in Europe giving away out future. You should vent elsewhere with you freedoms disappearing as fast under this administration as every in our. By the way my family voted for President Obama.
Posted by: William | April 1, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
So, if you go out and purchase, on credit, a car or any big-ticket item, you will not get one dime worth of a tax break. You cannot deduct one dollar of the interest. And, the current administration is floating a proposal to get rid of the deduction for home mortgage interest.
Posted by: Percy | Apr 1, 2009 7:40:03 PM
—————————–
percy ,you sound like a welfare child.
where does it say anywhere in the constitution you get to write off interest on certain loans?
tsk tsk , you elitist republicans and your elitist “entitlements”…
GUESS WHAT ? THAT TRAIN LEFT TOWN LAST NOVEMBER…GET WITH THE PROGRAM OR GET CRUSHED UNDERFOOT.
this nation has had ENOUGH republican b/s for 100 years ,and now is PAYBACK TIME!
Posted by: Today! | April 1, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
McCains Plan:
1-More tax cuts for the rich and wealthy ceo’s
2-Ship more jobs overseas where they utilize child labor.(more return for wealthy investors)
3-Cut jobs,social security, and medicare for average middle class Americans .
4-More bonus’s and aid for wealthy ceo’s
Posted by: con me not | April 1, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Posted by: Percy | Apr 1, 2009 7:40:03 PM
Why should taxpayer’s subsidize your credit card debt by allowing YOU or anyone to deduct their interest??? No one put a gun to your head and told you to charge for things that you did not have to cash to pay for – outright!
Likewise – with a mortgage – it is a choice to own a home and hopefully one that you can afford. Again, why should the interest that the bank charges you to have that house and payoff overtime be tax deductable??? Again, you are asking the US taxpayers to subsidize your home!!! It is time we all start paying for things we WANT on our own dime going forward!!!!
Posted by: Melanie | April 1, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Yes, I absolutely agree — McCain and Cheney should shut up. Can you imagine what would have been said if Clinton or Gore weighed in on everything the Bush Administration said and did?
McCain still thinks he’s running for election! Cheney is lonely, left-out control freak who can’t move on with his life.
Posted by: Agree | April 1, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
John, the anti war, anti US participation is yet to occur. Maybe you might want to get beyond the spokesperson of the govt across the pond for your news. How about that so call positive meeting between us and Iran? Did you believe in that one yesterday. Plenty of time with our movement in Afghanistan for the President to get attacked around the world for his position.
Posted by: William | April 1, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
John, the anti war, anti US participation is yet to occur. Maybe you might want to get beyond the spokesperson of the govt across the pond for your news. How about that so call positive meeting between us and Iran? Did you believe in that one yesterday. Plenty of time with our movement in Afghanistan for the President to get attacked around the world for his position.
Posted by: William | April 1, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
“They just don’t get it” comes right back into play. This is more of the same and unbelievable. McCain, you lost. Move on.
Posted by: Megan | April 1, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
So you think McCain’s plan is great… you must be rich and use tax loopholes to avoid PAYING your fair of American taxes too… like Cindy McCain does…
Posted by: Melanie
What a lovely, mature response and typical of so many people these days who simply lack the critical thinking skills to formulate a mature response to a comment.
This plan is cheaper than Obama’s, spends less, reduces the deficit by billions and the federal debt by trillions (just think about what happens when China gets tired of buying our debt). It’s a solid plan that protects rich and poor, present and future taxpayers. You don’t need to be rich to see that and to me, seems a heck of a lot better than begging China for more money, or worse, turning on the printing presses and printing more dollars (get ready for inflation!).
Posted by: mommamia | Apr 1, 2009 7:41:39 PM
FIRST of all ‘Mommamia’ there was a typo in my original comment… and as far as my original comment and your typical Republican attack when it was NOT directed at you – is well typical and childish like your ‘username’…
So you think that McCain has the right plan… Really, the same McCain that had Phil Gramm write his pre-presidential campaign economic plan for our country… The same rich, ex-Senator from TX – Gramm that called American whiners when years of DEREGULATION pushed by the Republicans caused our financial banking system collapse. You do mean that McCain!!!!????!!!!
Here is something that maybe you should learn…”A few days after the Supreme Court made George W. Bush president in 2000, Gramm stuck something called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act into the budget bill. Nobody knew that the Texas senator was slipping America a 262 page poison pill. The Act was designed to keep regulators from controlling new financial tools described as credit “swaps.” These are instruments like sub-prime mortgages bundled up and sold as securities. Under the Gramm law, neither the SEC nor the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were able to examine financial institutions like hedge funds or investment banks to guarantee they had the assets necessary to cover losses they were guaranteeing.” And a $40 TRILLION dollar unregulated market!!!!
So keep believing that having the rich p-i-s-s down on us with their Republican Mantra works!!! I take Obama over that Republican b/s anyday because like Obama – I care about this country’s ability to thrive globally through better education, our independence on foreign and polluting oil (as a national security issue as well as environmental issue) and doing something to get people to STOP using our emergency rooms as their personal and non-paying medical clinics!!!
So mommamia – we know where you can take your so-called critical REPUBLICAN thinking and PLEASE place it where it never shines!!!!
Posted by: Melanie | April 1, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
I get pretty sick and tired of the black is white crowd. For the ten millionth time learn what the fundamentals of the economy means, it has NOTHING to do with how much money is in your pocket. Also the majority of the Bush tax cuts went to the middle and lower class.
In 2001 and 2003, President George W Bush signed into law various tax cuts. I’d like to quote the following from a May 2008 Kiplinger magazine article by Knight Kiplinger entitled “Fuzzy Tax Talk:”
Those laws slashed tax bills of low- and middle-income families, sometimes down to zero for those with several children (each of whom is now worth a $1,000 tax credit). The percentage declines for upper-income people were much smaller; but in terms of actual dollar amounts, the wealthy received the bulk of the savings because they pay the most income taxes.
Specifically, with regard to the wealthy, Bush lowered the marginal tax rates for those with incomes over $350,000 (the top tax rate, admittedly on the rich) from 40% to 35%. He also approved the lowering of the capital gains tax from 20% to 15% (which helps everyone who owns stock, real estate, or any other sell-able asset, but admittedly most benefits the wealthiest members of society since they own more of those assets).
That’s what he did for the “rich.” But he also lowered every OTHER tax bracket (from 15, 28, 31, 36, and 39.6 percent to 10, 15, 25, 28, 33, and 35 percent) and added other of tax credits and breaks for the “poor” such as the child care tax credit, AMT, and earned income tax credit. The following data is taken from the articleBush’s Tax Cuts Are Unfair…:
If you and your spouse have a taxable income of $60,000 a year, you’ve had almost a 24 percent income tax cut since President Bush took office. (And ditto if your income was just $20,000.) Meanwhile, the folks who make $350,000 a year got a cut of only about 12.5 percent; those who make $1 million a year got an even smaller cut. Pre-Bush, the $1 million a year couple paid 33 times as much as the $60,000 couple; today they pay more than 38 times as much.
Overall, the biggest percentage cuts went to the poorest of the poor (those with incomes in the $10,000 range) and the next biggest to those making about $60,000. Surprised? I bet not; you’re wondering about the other cuts – the ones on dividends, capital gains, and inheritance taxes that allegedly skew gains to the rich. Well lets add all those changes in, along with all the other Bush tax breaks such as the child-care tax credit, the earned income tax credit, the AMT, etc.:
The biggest percentage tax cut—about 17.6 percent—went to taxpayers in the second-lowest quintile, that is to taxpayers with below-average incomes. After that, the size of the tax cut falls off as you move from the lower middle to the middle middle (12.6 percent) to the upper middle class (9.9 percent). It rises again slightly for the top quintile, but only to a little over 11 percent.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 1, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
McConnell needs to be replaced by someone with some backbone who isn’t afraid to stand up and defend the American people against the destructive Democratic liberal agenda. Good for McCain , Graham, Coburn and Hutchinson.
Posted by: Isabella | April 1, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Why are people on the left so hostile? Honestly! The man IS doing his job. He is a senator. He is not paid to just shut up and go away after a lost election. Even if he did that you loons would be the first to criticize hiim for doing nothing. Your guy won the election! Do you really expect that no one should question or challenge him? That’s very un-American to me.
Posted by: independentlady22 | April 1, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Just a short time ago McCain thought that Palin was the best that the republican party had to offer, I am sure he is still consulting her on economics.
Posted by: vissionquest | April 1, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
McCain. You old coot. Talk to an economist would you. Decades of spending and debt buried us. Even more debt and more spending will lift us out!
Posted by: terry | April 1, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Breaking news alert! The GOP has new ideas to fix the economy. Tax breaks for the wealthy and blocking spending so long as the democrats are in charge. 19 more republican senate seats on the ballot in 2010.
Posted by: rightbehind | April 1, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
McCain would do better to get ahold of his border with Mexico and clean the streets and desert areas of his filthy State. Anyone been to Arizona lately? It’s a literal trash can and I believe the Arizona flag to be the plastic bags that hang of the cacti in the deserts. CLEAN UP YOUR STATE before you try to give advice on a Country!!!!!
Posted by: Hickory1 | April 1, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Sandra We are watching the rest of you froth at the mouth!
Posted by: CC | April 1, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
There’s an old adage……”If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem”. This country needs to stop bickering with each other and work together to solve our problems. I assume that if President Obama succeeds then all the republicans will crawl back under their rocks.
Posted by: rchnpdx | April 1, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | Apr 1, 2009 8:23:39 PM—Excellent post! Unfortunately I don’t think many in here can understand it, or if they do…would never admit it. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: CC | April 1, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Man-O-man, this republican party really is that dumb. I truly believe that we are actually seeing the end of this political party. They are a joke and nobody takes these clowns seriously.
Posted by: TommyTwoTimes | April 1, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
rchnpdx===does that mean that there can be no dialog with the conservatives? Even a moderately intelligent person has to see that we cannot continue on this rampant spending spree.
Posted by: CC | April 1, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Anyone notice the name-calling here? Is it necessary or does that show super intelligence?
Posted by: CC | April 1, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Melanie posted “Put the blame on the right people – FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH ORDERED FRANNIE AND FREDDIE TO GIVE LOANS TO PEOPLE WHO COULD NOT QUALIFY FOR TRADITIONAL BANK HOME LOANS!!!!” As much as I dislike Bush, he really doesn’t deserve as much of the blame as some of the other people. Top of that list is Phil Gramm, McCain’s economic adviser. Between getting rid of Glass-Steagall and not regulating derivatives (both bills bear his name), he caused most of our problem. The house problem is a small part of the mess, the 35 to 1 derivatives market is what really killed us.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | April 1, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
TommyTwoTimes posted “Man-O-man, this republican party really is that dumb. I truly believe that we are actually seeing the end of this political party.” I hope the Republican party collapses and is replaced with a new, truly conservative party led by Dr. Ron Paul.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | April 1, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
There sure don’t seem to be many republican supporters posting on this thread defending this so-called “plan”.
“Republicans………HELLOOOOOOOOO…………WHERE ARE YOUUUUUUUUUU ?!?!?!?
Posted by: Sandra
==========================
LOL. Good one Sandra.
They are waiting for ABC to start a thread about Michelle’s arms and how much fuel the President is using in Air Force One.
Posted by: Hollie | April 1, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Terry—More debt is definitely the answer. McCain is too old to see that.
Posted by: sarah | April 1, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
“It will be exactly the same trickle down failed policies the Neo-Cons swear by that were invented by their Messiah Ronald Reagan.”
Trickle-down economics are always in effect, in good times and in bad. What do you think is happening right now?!?!
Posted by: Chuck | April 1, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
TommyTwoTimes posted “Man-O-man, this republican party really is that dumb. I truly believe that we are actually seeing the end of this political party.” I hope the Republican party collapses and is replaced with a new, truly conservative party led by Dr. Ron Paul.
Posted by: SamTyler1973
()()()()()()()()()()
Well they need to do something because the GOP has gotten really pathetic.
I mean, come on……running around complaining about the Obama’s gift to the Queen, crying about how much the girl’s new swing set cost, and on top of all of that nonsense, coming out with a weak and stupid budget plan that we have been using for the past 8 years?!?!?!
The GOP has gotten ridiculous.
Posted by: TommyTwoTimes | April 1, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
melanie darling how are you? i was at dinner so i did not have time to address your rant. i support tax cuts for everyone period. i dont want obama giving any more of my money to gietner or acorn. i ve done well over the past 22 years coming from a dirt poor family.being poor i learned to NEVER depend on anyone and especially someone from the government. i didnt overspend and i built businesses and employed and employ people. my point is if you are going to get a government handout/ bailout i want strings attached. i have nothing against drugs other than i dont want my money buying someone elses drugs. so i would like to see drug testing for bailout/ handout recipients including the president and especially geitner. if you borrow money PERSONNALLY guarantee it like i have too. i have paid many peoples way and owe you nada.
Posted by: catman | April 1, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
More of the same old failed Republican policies of the past 12 or so years. Just remember whenever someone talks about cutting spending, they are really taking about cutting someone else’s spending. And cutting “entitlements” means reducing Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid. If you want to have your elderly parents living with you and you paying for their medical costs while you try to save for your retirement and put your kids through college, keep voting for people like McCain.
I think offering alternatives is a good idea. But these alternatives need to be grounded in reality; not the Republican fantasy land where everyone is independently wealthy and doesn’t need a government social safety net.
Posted by: GaLiberal | April 1, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Breaking news alert! The GOP has new ideas to fix the economy. Tax breaks for the wealthy and blocking spending so long as the democrats are in charge. 19 more republican senate seats on the ballot in 2010.
I was thinking the same thing. Just free the budget as long as the domocrats are in charge. This Republicans are very evil. They hate American people. If you ain’t white and rich then you are not in! WHITE OLD MEN AT THEIR BEST!
Posted by: McCain who! | April 1, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Chuck—Bailouts are “trickle-down” on steroids. Steroids make men feel strong, but steroids shrivel their “boys”.
Posted by: carrie | April 1, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Posted by: CC
Thanks, I just get really tired of the lies passed off as truth by some people, I guess the more something is repeated the more people think it is true even if it isn’t.
George Bush spent a lot of money it is true but he was NOT a fiscal conservative and a hell of a lot of his spending went toward social programs like education (he spent the most on education since Johnson) and medicare (the prescription drug plans) and to the poor through his tax cuts. So this MYTH that all of the money he spent went to the rich really is a lie.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 1, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
I have been reading about a tipping point in Democracy where if there is less than 50% of the people paying taxes there is no more Democracy. Are we there yet?
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 1, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
TommyTwoTimes posted “I mean, come on……running around complaining about the Obama’s gift to the Queen, crying about how much the girl’s new swing set cost…” Yep. Also in the article it sounds like the GOP is more interested in positioning themselves for the next election than actually helping out to fix our problems. I really can’t stand the partisanship of both parties. This country needs fixing and it is their job to pitch in and help, not sit back and hope the other party fails.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | April 1, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
mc cain who! wow! they hate america? if you aint white your this and that? if you are represenative of the obama clan i cant wait for 2010. try working hard sometime and look in the mirror you find find your staring at someone who is holding you back.dont be a government lackie.
Posted by: catman | April 1, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Who cares? This should not even be news.
Note to McCain: I know you are old and slow, but you lost the election. Get over it.
Posted by: Guido | April 1, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
NoMoreMr.NiceGuy – I’ll bet you voted for GWB twice and only now after the fact, your like the rest of the Neo-Cons throwing him under the bus in hindsight.
Amazing how the Neo-Cons turn tail and run from the person that they touted as a great President not more than 6 months ago.
Posted by: dan | April 1, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Spending less money? The Dems want to spend as much as possible so everyone can be poor. Obamas budget if that is the correct word will ruin the dollar, depress jobs because of raisin corporate taxes and general cost the consumers a ton more of money. What a disaster.
Posted by: jschmidt | April 1, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
GaLiberal posted “I think offering alternatives is a good idea. But these alternatives need to be grounded in reality…” I agree. The GOP members should be trying their best to come up with ideas to get this country back on track. And the Democrats need to really sit down and listen and to give the GOP’s ideas serious consideration. Sadly, as I said earlier, too many of them seem content to sit back and hope the Democrats fail so that their party can gain seats in the next elections. Anybody for term limits.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | April 1, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
What the Republicans say or do now doesn’t really matter, because the federal government is under total Democratic control. Therefore everything that happens is to their credit or blame. On Friday, I hope all of the newly unemployed people — which will number in the hundreds of thousands — will take some comfort in the fact that our President is listening to show tunes with the Queen of England. You have him to thank for your situation. He promised 4 million new jobs. He’s already negative 1.5 million.
Posted by: Ken P. | April 1, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Hearing these leftwingnuts just makes me realize something concerning Der Fuh…..uh I mean President Obama: Coming Soon!! The Final Solution to the Conservative Question!!!
Posted by: SChaos1701 | April 1, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
The reason McCain is a little late getting this plan formulated with the other Republicans, is because he still thinks the economy is wonderful, he said so during the campaign. When you play Left Back instead of Quarterback, you will always be behind in your judgemant. The others he is working with, are still recovering from the shock of their failed policies they were in control of so long, before the axe fell, and they woke up, somewhat, to reality. Then they whined, then they blamed someone else, then they cried after the election, then they still held to their failed balogna, then they took shots at Obama, and would not cooperated with his ideas, and now, all of a sudden someone figured out that none of that was making any sense to the public, DA. I am anxious to see their belated bull, and see if it is anything other than the same old, conservative constipation they have practised for too long.
Posted by: 73toms | April 1, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
What would you call spending by the govt. as a stimulus hoping it trickles down into the economy but trickle down economics? If the govt. really wanted to stimulate the economy they would give you the money instead of giving it to the banks and these companies which are deemed to big to fail but in essence they are spending money on the big boys hoping that it trickles down to you and if it failed under Reagan according to you why on earth is it possible going to work under Obama, is it because the names have changed but the face stays the same.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 1, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | Apr 1, 2009 9:33:45 PM
Bush never paid for the “No child left behind program”… He forced the state’s to pay for it through higher local taxes… So much for education. Bush also refused to sign the bill that would allow for medical coverage to the poorest of all American children – so much for healthcare for the little ones. Though he did get Medicaid to cover prescriptions on the backs of taxpayers…
And regarding your tax rates analysis – having a poor person who makes $10K or less pay federal taxes is stupid… Having a hedgefund manager who averaged around $180M a year in salary two years ago pay a max. tax rate of 34% but most likely used off shore accounts to avoid paying even that much if any at all AND compare that person to a family earning $60K a year is also silly… Something akin to voodoo economic that Republicans are famous for… Also, keeping both WARS out of the national annual budget and using Congress to increase those ‘line items’ separately -and off the books so to write – was Bush’s FRAUD on the American people!!!!
As was Bush’s ordering Frannie/Freddie and the banking industry to lower their mortgage loans standards in 2002 so more people with bad credit and no money for downpayment could get loans. These are the very loans wrapped up as Mortgage Back Securities that are now deemed toxic and bought down the banking industry and AIG because AIG insured those very same toxic (aka subprime mortgages) assets in the first place and called it credit-swaps.
Posted by: Melanie | April 1, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Ken P posted “He promised 4 million new jobs. He’s already negative 1.5 million.” Yes, Ken. Any he’s been in power a little over 2 months now! Should he have already solved all of our problems by now? Heck, by 6 months in he should have fixed all the problems in the world and be working on interplanetary issues.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | April 1, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
WHITE OLD MEN AT THEIR BES! ALL THEIR GREED HAVE DESTROYED THIS COUNTRY. YES, ALL THE CEO ARE WHITE MEN AND NOW THEY WANT TO HELP OUT THE BLACK PRESIDENT! NOT!
Posted by: McCain who! | April 1, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Posted by: dan
You are quite wrong. I have voted Democrat all of my life until their disgusting display this year. I campaigned for Hillary but when she didn’t have the balls to stand up for herself by letting that disgusting display of Democracy ensue during the primaries I figured she didn’t have the balls to stand up for me either and I switched sides.
I am big enough to admit that a lie is a lie no matter what side perpetuates it and if you cared one wit about Democracy you would never let someone steal an election like Obama did with the help of the sorry media.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 1, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
melanie…bush lost your guy won. this mess is on your mans lap, he chose to take it …he is now responsible. the 48% who didnt vote for him are merely just giving him the same welcome as you, sean penn, susan sarrrandon, the dixie chicks and the rest of the left gave to the last president. ITS SOO MUCH MUCH EASIER TO BE IN THE MINORITY PARTY >>ISNT IT?
Posted by: catman | April 1, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
I repeat Bush spent the most money on education since Johnson. As for cooking the books, having four separate books goes back to Clinton or even before. We haven’t had an honest budget assessment since God knows when.
“Though he did get Medicaid to cover prescriptions on the backs of taxpayers…”
Everything in this country is funded on the backs of the taxpayers so what is your point. That it is terrible when Bush does it but it is ok when Obama does it or it’s ok to fund things that you deem necessary but not what your neighbor thinks is necessary.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 1, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
WOW he is coming up in this world ,we are in trouble??????He didn’t have a clue when running for President and he still has NO CLUE
I sure hope he is not running again for anything……Pain in the rear…..Sick of his silly face ..
Posted by: NHvoter | April 1, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
73toms posted “The reason McCain is a little late getting this plan formulated with the other Republicans, is because he still thinks the economy is wonderful, he said so during the campaign.” This isn’t true. The reason McCain is late is because, as he himself admits, he doesn’t know much about the economy. He has to rely upon his top economic adviser Phil “I screwed America” Gramm who told McCain that our economic problems were all in our heads and that America is a nation of whiners.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | April 1, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
rightbehind said “… The same garbage that has almost destroyed this Great Nation. Tax Breaks for the wealthy and reduced spending …” Stop spewing this myth. The Bush tax cuts were for EVERYONE, not just the wealthy.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 1, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Melanie said “McCain you didn’t WIN – so keep your ideas to yourself ” Perhaps you need a civics lesson. McCain is a Senator & has every right to bring his ideas to Congress, as does every other Senator & Congressman/woman. Just because he lost the Presidential race, doesn’t mean he lost his freedom of speech.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 1, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
sinical – the word is “defense”, not “defence”.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 1, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Catman: The point you’re missing is that Bush earned the distrust of America whereas Obama has hardly gotten his seat warm and many GOP supporters are ready to draw negative conclusions, very little of which is based on reasonable thinking; just bias for the sake of bias and controversy.
Posted by: Mike from Carolina | April 1, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
matt – The Bush tax cuts DID work. The current recession has nothing to do with the Bush tax cuts. The Bush tax cuts allowed my family to become a one-income household when I got laid off at the end of 2001. When I saw what was happening during the Presidential campaign, I got a job – thank goodness I did – because we already are barely making it with 2 incomes.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 1, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
dan said “The market has been trending upward the last three weeks or so ..” That’s because Obama was keeping his mouth shut. He opened it one day this week & the market tanked 300 points.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 1, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Once again these Republicans insist on giving America’s most wealthy permanent tax cuts. HA HA HA. Are they nuts? Seriously, are they freaking nuts?
Posted by: ronnierayjenkins | April 1, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Jim Bob said “More tax cuts for the rich.” Did you actually read the article? It says a continuation of the Bush tax cuts – which benefitted EVERYONE. It is a myth, spread by liberals, that the Bush tax cuts only helped the wealthy.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 1, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
McCain is a hypocrite. The Republicans are so concerned about spending and they got us into the unnecessary Iraq war. That fiasco is going to cost us over a trillion dollars and thousands of lives.
Posted by: V | April 1, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
GaLiberal said “More of the same old failed Republican policies of the past 12 or so years. Just remember whenever someone talks about cutting spending, they are really taking about cutting someone else’s spending. And cutting “entitlements” means reducing Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid. If you want to have your elderly parents living with you and you paying for their medical costs while you try to save for your retirement and put your kids through college, keep voting for people like McCain.”
You had no good years in the past 12 years? OH- you did? Then I guess the Republican policies weren’t that bad, were they? As for the rest of your rant – it IS my responsibility to take care of my family – NOT yours. I would be just as happy if they would do away with Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid. (Especially since Medicare is the reason healthcare is a mess – but that is another rant for another day).
Who, exactly, do you think pays for those things? They have to come out of someone’s hard earned money. Why should someone who works hard for their money pay for something that I need? We all need to be responsible for ourselves & our families.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 1, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Strange how Americans saw no problem in spending 11 Trillion dollars in 8 years with nothing to show for it but debt. Now McCain said he knew nothing about Economic but would select a VP who did. Now he has a plan on a Budget that he knows nothing about Econmics. Well Hank Paulson had no knowledge of Economics and became US Treasury Secretary. We see how well he did so McCain could most likely do the same and put us deeper in debt. The Republican Economic Plan is the same as George W. Bush. If Americans choose to follow the Republican Budget the US will have 2 per cent rich and 98 per cent poor with no Middle Class. Isn’t that the reason the United States was founded in the first place?
Posted by: Jackie | April 1, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Posted by: ellsbells930
I agree, I would gladly do away with Social Security, Medicare, all of it. Nothing has ruined America like these programs.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 1, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
If the Bush tax cuts worked so well, we would be swimming in prosperity.
Posted by: repubswrong | April 1, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
“The Bush tax cuts DID work”..ZERO GROWTH!!! Those tax cuts were invested ….IN CHINA! NOBODY was investing in new job development the past 8 years! Job creation was related to increasing DEBT!!!! The tax cuts were a TOTAL BUST. We did not get to where we are by being a little bit wrong! Those subprime mortages – they were NOT made by FAnnie andFreddie. Did you know that??? They were made in the PRIVATE sector. The ‘growth’ was VERY small compared to china and india (Where teh bulk of US capital investments were made) and they were the result of buying crap ‘securities’ and folks taking second mortages on their homes to hire carpenters and buy crap. No no. Read up your financial sections, get a copy of the Wallstreet Journal or Business Week – if you take into account the exponential increase in debt to account for hte spending the past 8 years, there was NO GROWTH and what ‘growth’ there was, sweaked along at less than 1% while China nad INdia were growing at 8%!!! NOBODY Invests in a global economy, in a company that has an 80% failure rate as US companies did, while if you invest overseas, you get a nearly 6 fold increase on your investment and greater than 80% SUCCESS rate. grow up.
Posted by: Matt | April 1, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
who would ever trust a republican with anything? They WANT Obama to fail They WANT the economy to fail. ANd from the looks of “Morethe same” i’d say either that is exactly what they’re working toward, or they’re the stupidiest humans on the planet. Yeah yeah, just let those tax credits a little while longer!!! 8years wasn’t long enough!!! We have just had 6 of the largest major banks and their insurer nearly go under, sucking with them the entire economy and world economy, and this guy is talkingabout tax breaks for the rich. A one pony show. Either way, enough of ‘reaching across the isle” the guys on the other are traitors and not trust worthy with our economy, they will sabotage it, and even IF they want to help, uhhh, look where their “ideas” get you! ahhh, no thanks “the fundamentals of the economy are sound” johnny boy. Ever learn what a derivative is yet?
Posted by: r u kidding me | April 1, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Yeah, this was basically his campaign rally, and it lost. ALong with his “let the bad banks fail” brain child. If he were president the electricity would have gone out by now, there would be NO economy. Our money would be used for kindling. Not impressed with his economic fog thus far. He is honestly too oldfor his job. He doesn’t know what the heck he’s talking about. It’s an embarressment.
Posted by: anoher one bites the dust | April 1, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
I dont trust republicans anymore. IT’s a chilling thing to hear them say they hope Obama fails. I know what they’re saying – If the economy does fall into a Depression, they will get power back. I get it. I think we all do. How do you trust these people with even the slightest bit of power or influence? They want a DEpression and make no bones that is what they will actively work towards. Obama needs to write them off. Dont trust them. They will sabotage anything you try to do to help this country.
Posted by: Mary | April 1, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
ellsbells930…r u serious..
Posted by: us citizen | April 1, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Did he suspend his senate duties until this was done…
Wasn’t he the one that stated back in Oct. that the “Fundamentals of the Economy are sound” ?
Is he trying to run for POTUS again?
EWWWW, that means we have to see and hear from Wailin Palin again…. I am hibernating…
Posted by: lm | April 1, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Here’s a prediction for ya. Old John boy will not have a heart attack this year because he’s too stupid to have hypertension. Proved that when he elected read my lips, Sayanara Sarah, the Failin Palin to be his VP. Limbaugh, Hannity will probably have heart attacks before the end of President Obama’s second term, or commit suicide. One way or another, the Republicans won’t be a concern anymore(as if they are now), because like sheep, they always follow Rush and Hannity’s lead. As a consequent, the Democrats will gain enough seats to completely control all legislation without a peep from the Republicans, because there won’t be a Republican Party anymore. Their party’s being lead around with a nose ring by the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity? LOL! Reminds me of the Jim Jones’s party in Guiana. Here, drink some of this says Rush and Hannity, and they all died.
Posted by: abaloneca1 | April 1, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
The election is over..
Posted by: agtrpkr | April 1, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
When did any Republican say that they hope Obama fails, stop repeating these lies. Obama has played the fear card ever since he has been on the national stage, and it was Emanuel who said ‘never let a crisis go to waste.’ The majority of Americans would like to see a true bipartisan effort to solving our problems and a moderate approach, not a lurch to either the right or left and I guarantee you the hard left will learn some lessons in the next election just like the hard right did.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 1, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
It doesn’t matter who the author is, any Republican budget has three components: Tax reductions for the weathiest among us, control spending for the poorest among us, and never do a thing about our energy future, our out of date educational system or our out of control “healthcare” system which even the Chamber of Commerce agrees needs changing.
Posted by: Herb Gray | April 1, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
I should have added that any GOP budget will spend as many trillions as needed for uneeded and unasked for military equipment, to later throw on the junk heap.
Posted by: Herb Gray | April 1, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
McCain: Thanks but no thanks. Go away. You had your chance to be a leader and you failed your country miserably. You enabled Bush and Cheney for eight years. You paved the way for Gonzales, Wolfowitz and all the others. good bye.
Posted by: Steve from Danville | April 1, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
With MCcain in the senate, it’s kinda like Bush never left the national stage. Bush policies over and over again. Why cant the good citizens of Arizona retire this old fogy and elect someone to the senate that is not tied to GWB. Some people call him a Vietnam war hero. What did he do in Vietnam except get himself shot down and captured. If that’s all it takes to be called a hero, i was in Vietnam in 1970 and i should have gotten myself captured so that i to could be called a hero.
Posted by: johnnylee | April 1, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
NoMoreMr.NiceGuy—When did any Republican say that they hope Obama fails
I’m so sorry, must have been a serious accident. Head injury? How long were you in the coma?
Posted by: abaloneca1 | April 2, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am
John – with a plan? No problem…he’ll change things up by tomorrow morning. He’s a man whose time is up, actually…and he should just walk away quietly.
I agree with John – he,himself, admitted that he knows nothing about the economy. And I, myself believed him; maybe he should go back and read his own statements/admissions.
Posted by: F. Goodwin | April 2, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Do you konw why they are having “capitalism” riots i n London instead of “antiAmerican” riots?? Did you notice that???? NO AntiAmerican riots a world meeting. Did you not notice???? The FIRST time in 7 years that a meeting of the world leaders did not result in HUGE ANTIAMERICAN marches! No longer are we the Devil Spawn to the world. No thanks, McCain. Dont trust a word Mr. “The Fundamentals of the economy are sound” says. I like it right where we are, t hank you. WE almost had 6 of the biggest largest banks fail along with their insurance company. The economic free fall has stopped. Obama did that. I trust him to start it up again, thank you very much. You were so stupid you didn’t even know we were in free fall.
Posted by: are u kidding me
look we are capitalists were america its what made her great HAVE YOU TURNED SOCIALIST ALREADY?
Posted by: david reyes | April 2, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
NoMoreMr.NiceGuy — Excuse me but it seems that it was the Hillary team that was trying to “steal” the election. You know the little thing about agreeing not to count votes until she was behind and then wanting to change the rules but only if they benefit her. You know THAT little thing.
The American people elected President Obama fair and square even through all the dirty politics, lies and innuendo’s that was being tossed at him so you really need to not let your ego guide your ability to think rational.
Posted by: dan | April 2, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Obama wrote the book on dirty politics (the only book he actually did write) so I guess that would pretty much make him an expert and the rules were bent quite nicely in favor of Obama in Mich. not Hillary. When the ACORN convictions start to make news and some brave investigator starts to put two and two together we’ll see just what comes out in the wash.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 2, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am
McCain should have offer his budget proposal years ago before the economy tanked. Republicans had their chances but failed badly. For now please let the Democrats a chance to fix the economy.
Posted by: ctla567 | April 2, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Posted by: abaloneca1
Rush Limbaugh said ‘if his version of success is turning America into a socialist society, I want him to fail! Why would I want socialism to succeed?!?” Notice the word IF and the speaker of the quote Rush Limbaugh, not an American senator to my knowledge.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 2, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am
I hate to say it folks but most of the people out here can’t handle the truth. You want to rewrite history. The truth is, the rest of the world is happy not to see another white male as POTUS. Brazil’s president said last week, this global financial crisis was caused by white, blue eyed men.
Posted by: Ms Priss | April 2, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am
I tell you what. The Republicans shouldn’t be allowed near anything resembling a budget. Since the beginning of Reagans term, they have put in place the tools that have allowed the the largest theft of wealth in the history of this nation. Now they want more. And especially from McCain. While our President tries to save American corporations, and close the loopholes that have allowed this to happen, the idiot who has done more as a United States Senator to help American business move off shore, or to be taken over by foreign ownership, want’s Americans to adopt his budget. Give me a break. McCain who has put millions of acres of his own state in the hands of foreign ownership (Rio Tinto), backed the sale of American icon Budweiser to foreigners, almost succeeded in turning over a large part of American defense to the French, (Airbus), then had the audacity to run for President and probably would have been successful had it not been for Barack Obama; he’s really got to be joking to think any one with sense and knows the facts would back anything he would propose.
Posted by: devilkev | April 2, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Posted by: Ms Priss
People are people, and white blue eyed men are no different than black, brown eyed ones, that is just a racist statement.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 2, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am
1. The Bush tax cuts benefitted, as no more mr. nice guy posted, the lower class and middle class more, in percentage of income saved. Dollar wise, the wealthy will always benefit more from tax cuts – that’s basic math.
2. Someone said “Fannie and Freddie did not originate the mortgages, they were in the PRIVATE sector.” Couple problems with that statement; first, Fannie and Freddie were private companies chartered by the government. You’re right – Fannie and Freddie didn’t originate the mortgages, but they bought them, tranched them, and sold them to Wall St as AAA rated securities insured by AIG. AIG insured them because they were tranched by Fannie and Freddie, which held nearly 50% of the mortgages in the US.
3. Nearly 50% of American did not vote for Obama. They voted for either Republicans or Independents or refused t vote. Therefore, if those people did not vote for Democrats, then the non-democrats in Congress represent 50% of the population. The numbers are probably off, however, the point remains: to say that repblican and independent views (ie bashing Lieberman) don’t matter is to disenfranchise half of the nation.
4. There are a few things you never do in a recession: increase spending, raise taxes, and meddle with the natural forces of the market. Recessions are natural – they are very much Darwin in nature; the good companies stick around, the bad companies are bought up or outright fail. The difference with this is the interconnectedness of everything; Wall St. bought the securities of bad mortgages from Fannie and Freddie (mostly countrywide and now defunct brokers), AIG insured them, and when those assets turned bad, everything went to hell. Throw in Mark to Market, which penalizes balances sheets for unrealized losses (meaning: the losses haven’t actually happened), and the financials are destroyed, the credit markets freeze, and big companies like GM, states, and municipalities can’t operate because of high costs and lack of financing; no one buys bonds, because they’re junk, there’s no good commercial paper (which insurance companies live off of), and so on and so on.
The point of the previous point (3) is that while som socialistic steps needed to be taken to help the needs of company’s short term financing, the root problems (mark to market, mortgage laws, not reseting ARMS to 30 or 40 year fixed loans) aren’t even being discussed. Instead, the democrats are using the poor economy to shove through a very expensive budget that is essentially a 6 year old’s Christmas list of Liberal wants from the last 20 years.
I’m not a Republican – I’m a conservative who is dismayed at the total and utter refusal to educate oneselves in this country. I see it on all the boards – nothing but partisanship and bile towards those with different views. The majority of you only regurgitate everything you hear on CNN and the New York Times.
Posted by: WallStPeon | April 2, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am
Oh yeah McCain, no investment in Education, Healthcare and Alternative Energy. Do you think by ignoring funding for all of those crucial investments that they’ll just work themselves out?
Or is this an underhanded attempt to try to block any work from getting done for the next 5 years?
Everyone knows you guys are just gonna whine that “you tried but Obama just won’t work across party lines” when Obama rejects your ridiculous budget.
Maybe you should try offering constructive ideas instead of destructive or obstructive ideas. Then you might have something worth listening to.
Posted by: Topher | April 2, 2009, 1:52 am 1:52 am
I forgot one other thing:
People bring up the trillions Bush spent over 8 years. At this rate, Obama will spend that in one year.
What’s that you say? He has to in order to fix the “failed Bush policies?” Ohh, I see…you mean the policies that he’s continuing and expanding on? You mean the strategy that he condemned for Iraq and is using for Afghanistan? You mean the fact that the bailout plan was expanded with no accountability, much like Bush and Paulson’s? You mean the fact that he set a terrible precedent by strong arming a company the government gave LOANS to (with no ownership stake in the company, mind you, so technically, no right whatsoever as they own NONE of the company) to remove a CEO? Yup, he’s doing a bang up job.
What, may I ask, is Obama spending trillions on that will actually stimulate the economy immediately? I’m not talking about anything with bank bailouts or anything of that nature, I’m talking about what from the 800 billion + spent will directly stimulate the economy in a way that we will see in the short term?
I’m guessing the responses will be like Gibbs – “you can read that in the newspaper.”
Posted by: WallStPeon | April 2, 2009, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Topher wrote: “Everyone knows you guys are just gonna whine that “you tried but Obama just won’t work across party lines” when Obama rejects your ridiculous budget.”
Um…how has Obama crossed party lines? He has closed door meetings with democrats ONLY aout the budgets, no Republicans invited. He let Nancy Pelosi, who flat out said “we won’t listen to Republicans, their views were rejected” write the stimulus bill. Republicans have no say whatsoever in this “changed” government.
Obama is no different than any other President whose party controlled congress. Yup, no better than Bush so far…probably worse, actually. I don’t recall the Republicans from 2000-2006 PUBLICALLY saying “Democrat views don’t matter” – do you?
There is no bipartisanship in the government. Any time a democrat or liberal says that “Republicans won’t work with the democrats” – would you work with someone who says “shut up…your views don’t matter?”
Posted by: WallStPeon | April 2, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am
WallStPeon,
That’s the problem with the thinking in this country. Everyone, apparently including you, think in the short term.
The problem is, you fail to build a foundation for long term success like Obama is doing by investing in vital national resources like education and alternative energy.
If you fail to invest in long term strategies, when we reach the end of short term strategies, our economy takes quite a hit.
Evidently these short term strategies aren’t a great idea because they are not sustainable.
Like Obama said, we can’t keep going boom and bust, boom and bust.
This country has got to stop living in a culture where we expect instant gratification.
Posted by: Topher | April 2, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Also, the Republican’s budget proposal seems like a lazy couch potato did it.
They probably sat down, ready to go line by line through it, then just said “screw it” and cut out everything but defense and veteran’s spending.
I could write that budget in two minutes.
At least show some effort when you write a budget.
It’s sad it took them so long to come up with it. McConnell and Gregg actually have the right idea.
Posted by: Topher | April 2, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am
I heard Rep Ryan presenting the alternative this morning. Sounds like a sane solution to the Dem hogwild spending. The Dems seem like children wanting toys and candy and the Repubs are the only adults in the room.
Posted by: Angela P | April 2, 2009, 3:02 am 3:02 am
The Republican Party is completely and utterly dead with no hope of resurrection. The old people that sustained it will be gone in four years and the new voters wil NEVER allow them to regain any power. You that cling to the hope that the Republican party of hate, discrimination and greed will come back are fooling yourselves . ITS OVER. McCain’s budget won’t go anywhere. NO one trusts him. He’s a rich idiot that left his wife and family to marry a beer heiress for political gain. He’s an angry old man with nothing to say that matters. And his Party is as old and angry as he is. Johnny El.
Posted by: Johnny El | April 2, 2009, 3:54 am 3:54 am
The problem is that if you dont give the execs tax breaks and huge incentives to take away jobs to overseas cheap labor then they will simply run there companies into the ground giving themselves huge bonuses so they can stay rich and then cry that they need to get the taxpayers that accually work for there money to give them money or they will have to lay off thousands to make up the difference that they put there companies in the hole to make themselves rich in the first place and that not to mention all the money they spent buying our congressmen in order to allow them to do all this in the first place. After they get the blank check from the tay payers that the congressmen that they own give them they lay off the workers anyways to shore up there profit margin and then use the money to run other companies into the ground so they can buy them up for penneys and then give themselves more huge bonuses from your tax money. get rid of all the representitives in office and stop purchacing anyhing from companies that take your money and move overseas to work where the govrnment and take your hard earned money and give it to these criminals anymore. By the way 90% of the government big buisness wellfare ripoffs of the taxpayer dollars has been thought up by republicans.
Posted by: Mike | April 2, 2009, 5:05 am 5:05 am
NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | Apr 1, 2009 11:40:39 PM
Well unless you have been under a rock your grand OLD party the spokesman for the repulican movement Rush Lim-idiot said and I quote “I hope Obama fails” this is the equivilant to saying I hope america fails. The reason behind is hopes is so that his party can posibily return to power in four years. The same gos for the GOP goveners that are will not take any stimlus money. They know that this money will help the economy and they dont want the the economy to get better during with a democrat in office because again they want the GOP to return to power in four years and they have no chance of that happening if the economy gets better with Obama in the white house. Its sad that these GOP member would put there Power ahead of whats right for america but as we saw under the Bush regime thats buiness as usual for the GOP.
Posted by: Mike | April 2, 2009, 5:26 am 5:26 am
Matt – There is no need to get personal.
The Bush tax cuts worked for individuals. My family had more money to spend – and we are definitely NOT rich. We currently don’t come close to Obama’s arbitrary cutoff of what he considers rich.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 2, 2009, 6:22 am 6:22 am
us citizen – I am completely serious. (And I can also post in complete sentences with real words).
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 2, 2009, 6:23 am 6:23 am
abaloneca1 – You only listen to liberal sound bites, don’t you? Otherwise you would know that what you are attributing to all Republicans was never said. First, you have to know that I think Rush Limbaugh is an idiot. However, what he actually said was that he hoped that Obama failed at passing his policies, which he CLARIFIED to mean anything that would take us deeper into Socialism. As someone who straddles conservatism/libertarianism, while I want to see the country prosper, I do not want any growth in government – I’d prefer to see LESS government interference into my life. There is no way some bureaucrat knows what is better for me than I do myself. (And the only reason Rush Limbaugh has been declared the face of the Republican party is because the liberal media has declared it so – if you talked to most conservative, you would find that they would not agree with that).
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 2, 2009, 6:32 am 6:32 am
Johnny said “The Republican Party is completely and utterly dead with no hope of resurrection. ” I seem to remember reports about 3 – 4 years ago declaring the same about the Democratic party. These things go in cycles, after people in the middle get tired of too much liberalism, the pendulum will swing back the other way. Then people will think we’ve gone too conservative & it will swing back..and so on and so on and so on….
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 2, 2009, 6:35 am 6:35 am
Topher said”Oh yeah McCain, no investment in Education, Healthcare and Alternative Energy. ” It’s not the Federal government’s job to invest in these things. Education should be left to local control, healthcare left to the individual (scrap Medicare & Medicaid and all insurance companies) & alternative energy left to the private sector & the consumer.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 2, 2009, 6:39 am 6:39 am
ctla567 said “McCain should have offer his budget proposal years ago before the economy tanked. ” This is a budget proposal, NOT a special bill to do anything to the economy. It’s the same thing that congress & the president do every year.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 2, 2009, 6:43 am 6:43 am
Ha, Ha, Ha,,,Republican Budget???more tax cuts for the wealthiest, more subsides for the oil and gas industries…on top of the Bush tax cuts!!! Basically undoing the Recovery Plan…
OMGosh, this is laughable…we don’t really need medicare and medicaid anyway right???
Hey GOP, how is this not more of the same Cheney/Bush tactics…???
Seriously…
And Ryan, speaking about using fear as a tool to move the American people, that was too funny cuz that has to be a trademark of the GOP.
Just freakin Hilarious, I love it.
Great stuff guys, keep it up, all they way to through the 2010 and 2012 elections…Please, keep it going…
They are not called the Grand Obstructionist Party for not.
Still no new or better ideas, just more of the same old stuff…
lovin it
Posted by: theafalcon200 | April 2, 2009, 6:47 am 6:47 am
Every time the GOP has something to say you already know what it is. The same garbage that has almost destroyed this Great Nation. Tax Breaks for the wealthy and reduced spending if the democrats are in charge. You can change their name but as soon as they open their mouths you know who they are. 19 more republican senate seats on the ballot in 2010. Arlen Specter is the only one worth saving in that round. GOP could be replaced by a broken record.
Posted by: rightbehind | Apr 1,
—————————————
Speaking of reduced spending, all we heard from the left loonies was about GW’s spending. And look what the current administration has done in just two months: billions of dollars for those that bankrolled Barry’s campaign (AIG and ACORN), not to mention all of the billions approved in earmarks that have nothing to do with fixing the economy. Wasn’t one of his main campaign slogans “no more earmarks”? Then billios more for GM, just to tell them to file for bankruptcy! And while giving billions of way to the already rich and greedy CEOs that the left claim to despise, all while the Messiah continues to bankroll them with tax payer money. The middle class got a whopping $8.00 a week tax break (which will last for only 9 or 10 months before the Dems stick it to the middle class to finance the billions going to the corporations. So to the left, it was deplorable what GW spent, yet this administration has already outspent the previous administration, and in only 2 months time. Get a clue!!!!
Posted by: Global Fraud! | April 2, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Ha, Ha, Ha,,,Republican Budget???more tax cuts for the wealthiest, more subsides for the oil and gas industries…on top of the Bush tax cuts!!! Basically undoing the Recovery Plan…
Posted by: theafalcon200
—————————————
Only the left would consider bankrupting American a recovery plan. The Dem party should be renamed the BAM (Bankrputing of America) party.
Posted by: Global Fraud! | April 2, 2009, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Bush bailed out AIG, not Obama.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122156561931242905.html
The Bush Admin wrote TARP and Bush it into law, not Obama.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13609.html
Bush gave money to GM and Chrysler, not Obama.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/19/news/companies/auto_crisis/index.htm
Posted by: gary | April 2, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am
Guess we could have already figured that the GOP would want to make the Bush tax cuts permanent. They would want to do this in a time where hundreds of thousands of Americans are losing their jobs? What are the rich or small business doing to employ Americans today?
Posted by: Bob | April 2, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am
What I loved about the article is when it talks about how, for the years the Republicans were in power, the Democrats respected the budget by changing line by line and not proposing an alternative plan. NOW the Republicans are out and they cannot show the same respect? No, their loser has to try and keep the Bush years alive with a plan that makes those tax cuts permanent! {SHUDDER}
Posted by: kay | April 2, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am
I guess he can’t stand behind a GOP sinking ship. Problem is McCain advisers also promoted deregulation and now promotes it along with privatizing Medicare. There type of health care reform is to get rid of it and let it run out of control. It helps “their kind” to make profits.
So sad some people don’t see it.
Posted by: JerryZ | April 2, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am
I just want to know is McCain going to help us get Bin Laden? He said he could catch him while he was running for office. If he doesn’t offer his help, then that means that it was just a ploy to get elected. I mean, we are talking about the security of the United States. Doesn’t that take precedence over your specific party? As far as the budget goes, the tax cuts did not work. I mean, they never reduced the deficit, and when the economy hit a little bump, they did absolutely nothing to smooth it out. Now we have exposed to a bunch of people that received those tax breaks and we are finding out how they screwed other Americans instead of helping them like they were suppose to.
Posted by: dcell0410 | April 2, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
McCain also backed the Bush/Rove fix for health care, tax the money people pay for health insurance. The taxpayers and insured people are already packing the load with higher premiums. I never saw the logic there!
Posted by: rickyt1234 | April 2, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Yes, and I expect the next republican idea to be: Giving the CEOs of the big banking institutes…The Medal of Freedom…Giving them huge tax breaks on top of their thievery..is VINTAGE republican nonsense
Posted by: cowgirl | April 2, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Of course McCain wants the Bush tax cuts permanent, he’s rich and benefits from it! He is the party of the have mores who Bush called his base. Now they are worried about deficits??? Under Bush they borrowed and spent like drunken sailors, Cheney said “deficits don’t matter” hahahahah
“spend $229 billion less than President Obama’s budget over five years, primarily by freezing all discretionary spending with the exception of defense and veterans’ services.”__So no increase to Social Security for the elderly, healthcare, education or food programs? Republicans are all for the war machine (defense contractors their biggest donors) but nothing for the average person. Take a good look at the Republican “plan” all full of tax cuts from eliminating estate taxes to lowering capital gains for rich. Again McCain and his ilk personally benefit from this.
Then they want to tax everyone making less than 100k 10%. Here’s news for you that will tax some people, the working poor, who now aren’t taxed because they can least afford it. The ones making over 100k will actually get a cut as now they’ll only pay 25% but even then if there’s no allowance for deductions may pay more depending how much over 100k they make…the more you make if you were in the 35% bracket under the Republicans will pay A LOT less while the middle class pays A LOT more.
Their “plan” for healthcare is here’s a voucher good luck. Those vouchers are to used at private insurance companies who will also get rich off of the poor and middle class. Try giving those vouchers to those in Congress, military and government employees and see how that goes over.
Thank you Repigs this is why average Joe Blow Americans cannot be fooled by your lies anymore. Many were once rich are now humbled. Those that put money ahead of all else and have it will vote Repig but since that’s only 5% of the population as long as most of the rest see you for what you are…greedy, corrupt, and only for rich Americans as opposed to all Americans you’ll remain the minority and hopefully someday die out.
Posted by: Hege! | April 2, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Your kidding? They finaly come up with something and all it turns out to be was what they touted during the election. “Stop spending, make permanent the (lopsided) bush tax cuts.” We voted against that by electing Obama, what makes them think we will like it now? They dont get it. I am waiting for someone in that party to take charge and refocus them. All they are doing is copying the last 8 years which failed them.
Posted by: Brendan | April 2, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Besides, there’s no chance this budget will be implemented, so the GOP can take creative and political license to propose what they want, and with the evidence they want. In at least one instance, the party’s comparative projections approach the fantastical. The best example of that is one graph included in both the alternative budget and a Wall Street Journal op-ed penned by Ryan. Either Ryan and his staffers have achieved omniscience or they’re getting just a little too creative, as the graph projects spending under Obama’s proposal out until the year 2060 or so, allowing the GOP to draw a graph that shows a much greater discrepancy between the two proposals than what actually exists.
A number of the plan’s strategies also raise questions in themselves. It’s not clear how much the GOP’s proposal for a “simplified” tax code that will take only 25 percent, as opposed to 35 percent, of any income higher than $100,000 ($50,000 for single filers) would impact government revenue….So does anyone but me..think this republican budget..which cuts revenue to the government…Quadruples the National Debt???? republican math anyone???
Posted by: cowgirl | April 2, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm