Meghan McCain: ‘Old School Republicans’ Are ‘Scared S**tless’ of the Future

Meghan who? Her only claim to fame is who her father is, which is not saying much since he picked some nobody from Alaska as his running mate. No one would ever have heard of Palin in the lower 48 if he hadn’t been dumb enough to pick her.

Who are the old school republicans? Libertarian types or people that like to threaten and bomb other countries? Ron Paul is the answer as far as I am concerned.

Ron Paul indeed. I wonder what Meghan’s take is on the one man with ultimate credibility in DC.

Republicans are the most frustrated Americans right now because all of the polls suggest that a majority of Americans support president Obama on most of his policies. Obama is doing a great job and the Republicans don’t know which way to turn..I AM LOVING IT! Ha Ha..after the Republicans have destroyed our country for eight years..Obama is a breath of fresh air

Angela-Medical care for all IS socialized medicine by definition. RGeier-yea you really stuck it to Mcain by voting for A SOCIALIST. you also screwwed the country just to feel good. That means you are just as responsible for everything he does that hurts this country. When your kids and grandkids are paying 80 percent taxes thanks to Obama you can proudly say “I helped him do this to you” way to go.

Boo!!!!!
hahahahahaha

Chris Nie- You are the definition of what Meghan McCain said when she referred to “Old School Republicans”, scared sh**l**s of the future.
Meghan McCain- you are the change that the Republican party needs, why can’t they all think like you? You can still be Republican yet favor small gov., gay marriage, etc.!

I see a bright political career ahead for meg. honesty gets my vote.

We Republicans lost an election, not our minds and not our core values!
A marriage is between a man and a woman!
It is evil to kill an unborn child!
Capitalism is still the best economic system!
You earn a day’s pay for a day’s work!
Without a strong military, everything else is moot!
The Republican Party stands for these values.

Once again this proves that the quickest way for a republican to gain attention in the media is to criticize the republican party. Many have found this before including Colin Powell. Meghan don’t be deceived, they love for the moment and drop you like a hot potato later. Surely the must be something you agree on which you agree with the republicans… just try to trot that out and see the reception you get from your new friends.

I love the smell of burning republicans in the morning….it smells like…victory. Please GOP, thrash around some more…it’s hilarious. …………..Michelle, Everett Wa

only those who hate America and Jesus Christ are against gay marriage, which is a legal commitment based on love -

I still haven’t figured out how Gay’s are “discriminated against” and how does two gay men getting married actually benefit society? There is 0% chance of them EVER having a kid together so it’s all for show and liberals making themselves feel better about themselves into tricking themselves that they are better than everyone because they are so “open minded” about a lack of morals. Gays can marry too they just choose not to. Also, why is it alright to hate bash and hate Catholics but it’s not alright to hate and bash homosexuality? Also, McCain wasn’t a leader and should of never got the presidential nomination and this shows why, also notice how the media loves Meghan like they used to love her dad……..hmmm I wonder why???? Couldn’t be because she’s a liberal posing as a republican and the media loves it!

I’m totally fine with the Republican Party brushing Meghan McCain off as just a daughter of a politician. She sees something most Republicans don’t, and that’s that times are changing whether they’re on board or not.
So, Republicans, ignore Meghan McCain and you will go the way of the dinosaurs.
Just listen to Bob Dylan sing “Times They Are A Changin’.” Hopefully for you, you’ll figure out what you need to do to stay relevant and survive. If not, bye-bye!! And good riddance.
I guess a good analogy would be that the Democrats are the Internet and Republicans are daily metro newspapers. Know what I mean?

just what credentials, of any kind, does meghan have to offer? wasn’t she an aspiring fashion designer? doesn’t she have a college degree in Art? if she is some kind of republican leader, the GOP is getting deeper in trouble. as for wearing black, doesn’t black hide a woman’s thick, or fat, body? hey, i’m entitled to comments, questions, too!!

Meghan, I hope the Repukes never listen to you because it is so much fun to watch the party of no ideas crash and burn.

The party that adopts the 30% of Americans who were thrown away after outsourcing can win. The party that can empty the prisons of drug crimes, and replace them with murderers, rapist, and violent scum, will win. The throw-away Americans are looking for a viable party, and the Party that adopts them can possibly end the spiral of this countries death, if that is still possible at this late date. Legalize drugs, and shut down the gulags.

Legalize drugs, and shut down the gulags.
Posted by: Mr. Sampson | Apr 19, 2009 6:56:45 AM
*****************************************
You’re a pig and need to be incarcerated until you learn to “play well with others”.

The republicans should lead all government in getting out of the marriage business. Marriage, as far as the government is concerned, should be an incorporation, with fees for incorporating, and fees for ending the corporation. The only thing government should regulate, is that a blood test or DNA test should prevent inbreeding. You can’t incorporate incest. After that, marriage is a simple religious ceremony. If your religion allows homosexuality, or beastiality, than you can marry any human or animal you want, as long as you pay the incorporation fees.

If you legalize drugs, we can move the product to the liquor stores, and the same people who are buying drugs on the street will be the same people buying drugs at the store. Alcohol and tobacco kill more people every month, but none of them go to prison because they are not part of the throw-away Americans.

This is just a little girl, with a potty mouth, who will do and say anything for attention! I have not heard anything she has said, that makes her a core republican! Do you notice that she only goes on Liberal news shows! She bashes American’s who believe Marriage is between a man and a woman. She believes in the killing of American babies!! Like most liberals, she will say anything to sell a book, just like Obama! And do you think she is a closet homosexual! Nancy Pelosi has a office right beside her for you Meghan, you, are no republican!

huh!

Keep it up republicans. Keep rejecting a more centrist republican and see where it gets you. The part you just can not seem to process is how your extreme killed your party there. This kid represents your future, and she appears to have the ability to get what is currently wrong with things. Do you want to fix it or do you want to be right?

Standley, what planet do you live on? OBama is doing a great job??? yea, of putting us into so much MORE (after Bush) debt that we will NEVER get out. Proposing NEW debt that will make going to the doctor for medical care a nightmare, chumming up to our sworn (by their choice) enemies, telling the world we are no longer a Christian nation, etc.etc.etc. The Republican party would be fine if they would go back to being THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. They have moved so far to the left that the greedy Washingtonians look like the Dems! Small government, free enterprise, God and country, that is the Republican party. Until we return to that, no one will recognize us as Reagonites.

Megan thinks if you have a tatoo, dark clothing and like punk rock that it makes you what? More caring, more accepting of others? Who the old guard she refers to; I don’t have a clue but she could take a stand and be clear in whatever it is she believes in. In other words, don’t beat around the bush, quit talking in riddles.
As for tea parties. Those who participated did so at their own expense and time. Most of us see how bailouts have added a burden onto generations of Americans well into the future. Taking money from the earners, giving it to poorly run companies for them to loan it back to us somehow doesn’t make sense.
Don’t try to make the protest seem to be leveled at one person, Tony. We have a Congress that is suppose to look out for our interest, this means being prudent in what they spend, how they spend it and more importantly read the bills before they approve them. If you will take off the blinders, look at the key players in this mess you’ll find some interesting names….they ain’t all republicans.

The GOP fell in love with Fascism and were stomped down. Let’s hope their error was fatal.

You go Megan, rock and fire on those old
(!)’s.

Define smaller government. Does that include downsizing the Department of Defense? Does it include cutting the budgets of CIA, NSA, FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Commerce? These are the big costs in the budget (ok much of the CIA and NSA are not published in the budget). They are necessary, but they are huge contributors to government spending.
The truth is that we need bigger government to protect us from Big Corporations (so long as we do not repeat the mistake of electing a corporate tool like Bush). Note also that conservatives are not so big on getting off the backs of sexters, nudists, gays, and others whose life style does not match theirs own.

She’s hot. I think she’s really a liberal, but can’t admit it due to her daddy.

About time they saw the light….we are all Americans and all for the best for this country Not the rich not the gays not the poor …..For everyone.

To Herbert Hoover (the one posting a view of marriage above); why should marriage of any type have a standing in law? If all are to be equal under law, than why should this religious ceremony confer better tax status, for example? To those who want to preserve the “sanctity of marriage” I say, get government out of marriage. Let there be no “authority in me vested by the state”. Your church can then determine what is marriage, not the politicians. Let not rights to estates, division of assets, and all the laws based on marriage be denied to any who have not entered into this state recognized religous institution. Simply put, separate church and state.

Go Meghan Go!
This IS just what is needed within the GOP
Move away from the Neo-Con’s darkness and bring the party into this century.
Finally, a breath of fresh air from the right.
With this kind of real world “realism” recognizing the world as it is and not from a myopic perspective she really has a chance to pick up the mantle everyone else within the GOP is stumbling, tripping over.
Go Meghan Go!

Tim… what I should have said was I don’t give her comments any credence.

The republicans are trying to cling to something they never had.
MORALS
Meg… I think your dad call that “Straight Talk”
kudos

The only reason homosexuals want marriage rights, is because they want the legal protections. They don’t really care about the religious ceremony, which they can do now. My suggestion earlier was to redefine marriage laws. To get the states out of the marriage business. If a couple or group marriage wants some legal protection, they can form a corporation. That way, if the union fails, they can disolve the corporation and split any profits. We can get the states out of the divorce business, alimony, and child support business, and the corporate law shall prevail.
Marriage is just a religious ceremony at that point. Legal protections become something you invest in.

Tom Bebe
”
Wayne T; who was it among the founding fathers that spoke of “citizen” (not professional) leaders?
By the way, kid, stick around til you’re my age. And stay involved in my fight for equality for all under law.
So where is it written that government should be more that a set of rules and the enforcement of same, equally, upon us all?”
I don’t know that any Founding Father spoke out on the issue of citizens vs professional politicians but then I wouldn’t have expected them to since most were somewhat wealthy and many were slave owners.
However, just because they didn’t address the issue does not mean it is not a better idea. Even the Catholic religion and it’s “governing body” has changed and evolved over the years as new information and new ideas have clashed with it so why should our form of government not change to address the problems and the times?
The Founding Fathers did address equality of all men but then they only paid lip service to that “equality” just as our present government does. You can easily see how “equal” people are when you look at the laws and the tax codes. Money and other perks to the professional politicians will get you the laws and tax codes that oppress the majority and enrich the strong and wealthy.

Ron Paul is the only republican worth anything. Additionally, no democrats are worth much either.

“how does two gay men getting married actually benefit society?”
Why does it need to benefit society, or ANYONE else for that matter? Fortunately for most of us, we don’t live in a Communist state in which all of our personal choices must have some kind of broad, utilitarian effect on society. The nice thing about a country like ours is that we value personal liberty, and we value the right to do what we want so long as it doesn’t directly and tangibly harm others.
Social “conservative” Republicans are a very odd bunch. They subscribe to this libertarian ideology when it comes to gun rights and economic freedom (at least in theory. Some are a bit confused here too). Yet they completely abandon the concept of personal liberty when it comes to one’s personal decision to form romantic relationships with someone of his or her same sex. Conveniently, marriage manages to be an issue where social benefits trump personal choice. God forbid someone marry without the intention or ability to procreate with their partner. According to the social conservative, they should only choose to marry someone with whom they can reproduce and subsequently create more future tax payers to feed our hungry socialist, nanny state.

“If you legalize drugs, and empty the prisons of drug crimes (which should be a traffic fine at most) participants, then you will cut taxes. Cutting taxes is a Republican agenda. Without drug crimes, detectives will have to solve real crimes like murder and rape. We won’t need private Armies (swat people) with machine guns and grenade launchers, and armored vehicles). We will cut taxes, and police departments will go after violent murderes, violent robbers, and violent rapists. See the pluses already?”
The “War on Drugs” has been a back-burner issue for a long time now. It’s a joke. People are going to use drugs, legal or not. There is a TON of money going out of the country because of drug laws. And not just out of the country, but to wicked, vicious cartels. Legalize and tax. Start with pot and see how that shakes out. I’m not sure I’m on board with the legalization of narcotics yet, but it should at least be on the table for discussion.

Wow, she’ll do just about anything to get a date! I’m an Independent and wouldn’t vote for anyone who supports gay marriage or any further protection for gays. There are plenty of laws on the books already that protect us all equally. There might be 2 politicians left who are worthy of any vote and they are not in the Democratic Party! The problem is, we really only have one party, they all look the same anymore! As for Meghan, go find something really worthwhile to do! Make your spoiled self useful!

Anyone who thinks this clown is not a good american or new repub as she says is a complete moron.I wish I could round all of you up send you in the shuttle into the sun.Pukes!