By Danny

Apr 15, 2009 10:39am

Obama Aide Outlines Health Reform Strategy

ABC News’ Teddy Davis reports: The Obama White House thinks it can win congressional approval of a government insurance option, a major element of the president’s health-care plan, by assuring lawmakers that it does not have to operate the same way as Medicare,  the government insurance program for Americans over 65. "There are policy ways of getting around the objections people have," said Nancy Ann DeParle, the director of the White House Office of Health Care Reform. "You don’t have to use Medicare prices, you can use something else," she added. DeParle, who ran Medicare in the Clinton administration, floated the possibility of using something other than Medicare reimbursement rates while participating in a roundtable with reporters sponsored by the Kaiser Family Foundation in Washington, DC. DeParle conceded that a public plan will not be able to win over people who have a "philosophical" objection to government involvement in health insurance. She expressed optimism, however, that a public insurance option could be crafted in such a way that it overcomes the objections of those who worry about the cost shifting which comes when the government underpays health-care providers. Creating a government insurance option that would operate alongside private insurers has emerged as a major flashpoint in the nascent health-care battle. Obama endorsed a public option during his presidential campaign and leading Democrats want to make sure that it survives. "The thing that’s worth going to the mat over is the public entity because that is what the bill lives or dies on," former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean told ABC News in an interview last month. "If the health insurance industry gets to write the bill, it will not be in there, and if that happens, we will not have done health reform."  Because Medicare pays less than private insurance companies for some treatments in some places, conservatives worry that letting Americans enroll in a government insurance option would drive private insurers out of business and make it more difficult for Americans to find a doctor. As recently reported by National Journal magazine, a Medical Group Management Association survey found that 24 percent of physicians’ group practices already limit the number of Medicare patients they accept. While some progressives want Obama to make a  government insurance option a non-negotiable element of health-care reform, DeParle reiterated the Obama view that the lack of a government insurance option would not automatically trigger a veto. "I would never get into talking about vetoes," said DeParle. "I wouldn’t do that." After being peppered with a series of questions about the government insurance option, DeParle quipped: "You guys are really interested in the public plan, aren’t you?" UPDATE: The Insurance Industry Weighs In An insurance industry spokesman, Rob Zirkelbach of America’s Health Insurance Plans, reacted to DeParle’s roundtable with reporters by saying that he appreciates that "there is a growing recognition of the significant impact that cost shifting has on consumers and employers." He added, however, that Obama’s openness to paying providers more than Medicare does currently will not protect providers and consumers in a budget crunch. He also expressed concerns about the market power that a government insurance provider would exercise. "There’s always a concern when someone can be both a player and the referee," said Zirkelbach. 

User Comments

I NO THIS IS DIFFERENT SUBJECT MATTER BUT I MUST SAY BUSH MUST BE TRYED ON TORTURE CHARGES FOR US TO RETAIN OUR HUMANITY HE AUTHORIZED WATER BOARDING AS WELL AS OTHER MEANS OF TORTURE ON INNOCENT DETAINEES SOME OF THEM ALSO WHY DONT INDIVIDUALS TALK ABOUT HOW BUSH TURNED THE LAND OF THE FREE INTO THE LAND OF BIG BROTHER BY TAKING AWAY ONE OF OUR GOD GIVEN FREEDOMS PRIVACY WHICH WAS A VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION WITHIN ITSELF BUT HE MUST BE TRYED FOR TORTURE BECAUSE HE VIOLATED THE GENEVA CONVENTION AND WE MADE A CONTRACT WITH OTHER COUNTRIES THAT WE SHOULD HONOR PLUS NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW IN THIS COUNTRY? ALSO LOOK INTO THE ESTELL RICHARDSON MURDER CASE AS WELL AS THE BOOT CAMP DEATH TRIAL AND SEE WHAT BUSH AND THE GOP REALLY STAND FOR RACISM THE G IS FOR GENOCIDE

Posted by: william robinson | April 15, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

OBAMA IS GOING TO DO HIS JOB LETS DONT WORRY ABOUT HIM UNLESS HE NEEDS OUR SUPPORT BUT WE CAN AS AMERICANS ATLEAST CLEAN UP THE GARBAGE SO HE DOESNT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT BUSH AND HIS AFFILIATES MUST PAY FOR THERE RECKLESS BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH ABSOLUTE POWER AND PUT BUSH ON YOUR COMPUTER AND SEE WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT ALSO LOOK UP ENRON AND SEE WHY OUR ECONOMY IS REALLY IN THE HOLE

Posted by: william robinson | April 15, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Senate moderates – Dems and Republicans – will never stand for anything that smacks o government-run health care, let alone the real deal.
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | April 15, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

THE FIRST STEP in any “health reform” is getting illegal aliens out of the system. I invite Mr. O’Babble out here to Southern Cal. to get a close-up look at the problem: Just walk into any E.R.at any hospital.

Posted by: Ron | April 15, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

The U.S. has a higher infant mortality rate than any other highly industrialized nation. All the other highly industrialized nations have national health plans. The bottom line is that we need a national plan – our children are dying.

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | April 15, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

tough task. difficult to tackle.
We’re in good hands with Nancy Ann DeParle. Let’s give it a chance & see what the administration proposes.

Posted by: gus amaral | April 15, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Health care reform will succeed only when we focus on costs of care and forget insurance. When costs approach those of other countries like France, insurance will be there to cover the much reduced risks. A CAT scan in France is about $100. A PET scan is $1200 not the $3k-6k it costs here. Obama is leading us to a point where we will all be forced to pay for everyone’s far too costly care & drugs.

Posted by: Terence Conklin | April 15, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

“Health care reform will succeed only when we focus on costs of care and forget insurance.”
Forget insurance? Okay. And how do we get there?

Posted by: Silky | April 15, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

And are you talking about patient insurance or doctor/hospital liability insurance? Or both? Because liability insurance is really at the root of much of the problem with health care costs.

Posted by: Silky | April 15, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

I can’t believe what I’m hearing! To persuade members of Congress not to create the government insurance option, insurers are offering to accept a series of new consumer protections that they contend would achieve universal coverage. The latest olive branch, to end the practice of charging women more than men for the same health-care coverage. Other concessions from the insurance industry include a November offer to stop denying coverage to sick people, and a March offer to end the practice of charging higher premiums to those with a history of health problems. Pahleez…

Posted by: Jeanie Embry | May 6, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.