Obama Talks Turkey
ANKARA, TURKEY — President Obama told members of the Turkish Parliament today that his presence here is a signal that he sees Turkey as a key part of the European alliance and the economic and strategic decisions made on this trip. But given that this was the president’s first speech in a Muslim country he made sure to address not only this country but the Muslim world in general.
"Some people have asked me if I chose to continue my travels to Ankara and Istanbul to send a message," he said. "My answer is simple: Evet. Yes."
The president’s day began at the Atatürk Mausoleum where he lay a wreath at the grave of the Turkish Republic’s founder and first president, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and signed the guest book invoking Atatürk’s motto "’peace at home, peace in the world."
In his speech, the president pushed for the European Union to accept Turkey as a member despite its underdeveloped economy and urged the country to continue pushing for human rights for minority groups such as the Kurds.
"Democracies cannot be static – they must move forward," he said. "Freedom of religion and expression lead to a strong and vibrant civil society that only strengthens the state, which is why steps like reopening the Halki Seminary will send such an important signal inside Turkey and beyond."
Turkish authorities closed the Seminary, the primary theological school of the Eastern Orthodox Church’s Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople — in 1971.
Invoking American historical ugliness such as slavery and segregation, the president gently suggested the Turks need to acknowledge their slaughter of Armenians during and after World War I. Though Mr. Obama did not today use the word "genocide" — which he did as a senator, urging Turkey to acknowledge its past barbarism.
"History is often tragic, but unresolved, can be a heavy weight," he said. "Each country must work through its past. And reckoning with the past can help us seize a better future."
As he has been repeatedly doing throughout this trip, President Obama apologize for their tense relationship during the Bush administration, which resented Turk officials’ refusal to allow US troops to enter Iraq through their country.
"I know there have been difficulties these last few years," he said. "I know that the trust that binds us has been strained, and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. Let me say this as clearly as I can: the United States is not at war with Islam.
With viewers of Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya watching live, the president alluded to his Muslim father and his childhood in Indonesia, saying the "United States has been enriched by Muslim Americans. Many other Americans have Muslims in their family, or have lived in a Muslim-majority country – I know, because I am one of them."
The president also made a nod to his belief that his predecessor too narrowly defined the relationship with Turkey and other Muslim-majority allies in terms of counter-terrorism.
"America’s relationship with the Muslim world cannot and will not be based on opposition to al Qaeda," he said. "Far from it. We seek broad engagement based upon mutual interests and mutual respect."
The president praised Turkey as not the country "where East and West divide" but rather "where they come together."
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
“Invoking American historical ugliness such as slavery and segregation, the president gently suggested the Turks need to acknowledge their slaughter of Armenians during and after World War I. Though Mr. Obama did not today use the word “genocide” — which he did as a senator, urging Turkey to acknowledge its past barbarism.”
3.5 million Greek and Armenian Christians were slaughtered by the Turks from 1914 to 1923.
So, he suggests that the ugliness of American slavery and segregation in our history is comparable to genocide?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
The US is not a member of the European Union and Obama needs to butt out.
Most people I know in the UK do not want Turkey to join. It’s not in Europe, what’s next? Israel has to join too? Is this the magical resolution to all the middle east problems-get all those countries to join the EU?
Posted by: Keith | April 6, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Big Guy thought they were going to lunch for turkey sandwiches before ‘prompter totus told him that Turkey is acually a country.
Posted by: rustard | April 6, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
While seemingly redundant, it is important to state this directly.
Too many around the globe still hear and feel and to some extent, see the “either your with us or against us” or the ever popular “dead or alive” branding of what the brain surgeons of the Bush administration laughingly called “foreign policy”.
Finally, we have grown ups in the executive branch!
Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | April 6, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
There are 4.5 million American Indians and Alaska Natives left representing conservatively 10 percent of the survivors. If the Genocide wasn’t committed against American Indians and Alaska Natives their population would be over 45 million conservatively today.
Posted by: Cooday | April 6, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
“Many other Americans have Muslims in their family, or have lived in a Muslim-majority country – I know, because I am one of them.”
Now, Obama is now becoming a religious leader? That he lived in a Muslim country as a child gives him some special quality to understand and resolve the historic religious fever of Muslim hatred towards Chrisianity?
Where are the world leaders of Islam denouncing the Islamic fundamentalists and that Islam is not at war with the US, Christianity, or the western world?
I wonder what the clerics in Turkey have to say about Christians and Jews.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Was Big Guy speaking Austrian in Turkey?
Posted by: al | April 6, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
jpt:As he has been repeatedly doing throughout this trip, President Obama apologize for their tense relationship during the Bush administration, which resented Turk officials’ refusal to allow US troops to enter Iraq through their country.
=============
There is nothing wrong with Bush resenting Turkey for that refusal. It was a very tense negotiation. Overall, however, Bush did not treat Turkey badly and has been an outspoken defender of Islam.
Bush was an advocate for Turkey’s entry into the EU. It’s one of the things, I suppose, that European leaders considered arrogant.
Muslim extremists have bombed Istanbul and Ankara, killing Turks as well as the British Consul-General in 2003.
Yet Obama instinctively apologizes for Bush, and whatever imagined crimes he committed against Turkey. Of course we aren’t at war with Islam, and Bush made that same statement. It was Islamic extremists that took that fight to Turkey.
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Keith:”It’s not in Europe, what’s next? Israel has to join too? Is this the magical resolution to all the middle east problems-get all those countries to join the EU? ”
While unlikely, that may just be the best suggestion I’ve heard for bringing peace in the Middle East. Remember the EU already contains a number of once quite bitter enemies (including the literal Nazis).
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
MayBee:”Overall, however, Bush did not treat Turkey badly…Yet Obama instinctively apologizes for Bush, and whatever imagined crimes he committed against Turkey.”
Bush is HATED in Turkey – over 80% of Turks thought him bad for global security in 2005, and it has only gotten worse since then. Obama wasn’t apologizing to you, he was apologizing to Turks. I suspect his apology works better than your proposal that he simply explain to them how they are just foolishly IMAGINING that they hate Bush.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Obama in Austria:
“It was also interesting to see that political interaction in Europe is not that different from the United States Senate. There’s a lot of — I don’t know what the term is in Austrian — wheeling and dealing — and, you know, people are pursuing their interests, and everybody has their own particular issues and their own particular politics.”
=====
This perhaps ties in with his constant apologizing for the Bush administration- especially in Turkey.
Obama clearly is surprised that nations look out for their own interests and policies. Including the US.
Now, Bush may have been unpopular for the things he did- but much of that is because he wanted other countries to do what they didn’t want to do. It’s easier to blame him than admit compromises can’t always been reached- and in fact aren’t always the desired result.
In the US, Obama tried for approximately 5 weeks to listen to his opposition, then labeled them the party of “no” and started ignoring them.
Yet he is surprised and appalled when leaders do this on the world stage?
Eventually, he’s going to have to do something in America’s interest that other countries don’t want to do. Will he be able to? Will he want the next President to tour Europe, apologizing for him?
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
“Bush is HATED in Turkey – over 80% of Turks thought him bad for global security in 2005′
Then why did the government cooperate with Bush in Afghanistan if he was so hated.? Why would their hatred be any different than the leftists like you in the US who hated Bush even before the Iraq war?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
“Eventually, he’s going to have to do something in America’s interest that other countries don’t want to do.”
Excellent point.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Bush is HATED in Turkey – over 80% of Turks thought him bad for global security in 2005, and it has only gotten worse since then.
=========
Bush being hated in Turkey doesn’t equate to Bush treating Turkey badly. He didn’t. Obama shouldn’t apologize to Turks because they hate Bush. He shouldn’t pretend Bush treated Muslims badly, or acted against them.
It was alQaeda that killed other Turks and the British consul General. Obama should not for one minute feed into the notion that was Bush’s fault.
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Sigmond:”Then why did the government cooperate with Bush in Afghanistan if he was so hated.? Why would their hatred be any different than the leftists like you in the US who hated Bush even before the Iraq war?”
Don’t be foolish – IRAN cooperated with us in Afghanistan and we have talks with them regarding Iraq (where they are helping murder our servicemen), are they now our best buds? I did not hate Bush before the Iraq war, up until the bumbling of the rebuilding he merely appeared to be another big government Republican. And as I leftist, I don’t mind that too much – I voted happily for his father, Bush Sr (who is an under rated president in my opinion, the first Gulf War was a masterpiece of diplomacy and war).
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Maybee: Obama said:
“I know there have been difficulties these last few years, I know that the trust that binds us has been strained, and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. Let me say this as clearly as I can: the United States is not at war with Islam.”
What are you talking about him saying? Clearly the strong anti-American sentiment in Turkey and their refusal to allow passage during the Iraq war indicates some strain doesn’t it?
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
jhw539 ..I agree that Bush, Sr. doesn’t get the credit he deserves.
Wata did George Bush do to Turkey that Obama needs to apologize for?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Wow. Duncan Black, aka Atrios and darling of the intellectual left, likes to say that “we are ruled by children” when recognizing noting* how stupid and irresponsible our leaders are, but he’s WRONG.
We. Are. Ruled. By. Criminals.
* As we all know, parsing the nuance of the difference between the words terms “recognize” and “note” is a job task requiring a deep profound reserve well of political skills and a dauntless will to lead international negotiations until they reach a successful productive outcome. A person individual who can use draw on utilize those skills in a tense high-stakes meeting confrontation without flinching is probably a once-in-a-generation once in a lifetime leader who probably likely deserves will win oh hell just give him the damn Nobel Peace Prize.
Posted by: I need a lifeboat! | April 6, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Bush in Instanbul, June 2004:
“Your country, with 150 years of democratic and social reform, stands as a model to others, and as Europe’s bridge to the wider world. Your success is vital to a future of progress and peace in Europe and in the broader Middle East — and the Republic of Turkey can depend on the support and friendship of the United States of America.
For decades, my country has supported greater unity in Europe — to secure liberty, to build prosperity, and to remove sources of conflict on this continent. Now the European Union is considering the admission of Turkey, and you are moving rapidly to meet the criteria for membership. Mustafa Kemal Ataturk had a vision of Turkey as a strong nation among other European nations. That dream can be realized by this generation of Turks.
America believes that as a European power, Turkey belongs in the European Union. Your membership would also be a crucial advance in relations between the Muslim world and the West, because you are part of both. Including Turkey in the EU would prove that Europe is not the exclusive club of a single religion; it would expose the “clash of civilizations” as a passing myth of history. Fifteen years ago, an artificial line that divided Europe — drawn at Yalta — was erased. And now this continent has the opportunity to erase another artificial division — by including Turkey in the future of Europe. ”
Soooo arrogant.
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Sigmond:”Wata did George Bush do to Turkey that Obama needs to apologize for?”
First, bear in mind Obama’s actual words – it was hardly a blanket apology for wrongdoing.
As for Bush, “You’re either with us or against us” was taken to mean that Turkey, who did not support the invasion of Iraq at all, was being thrown into the same enemy group as terrorists (which, due to Bush’s sloppy rhetoric, they were). This completely poisoned the VERY sensitive issue of how Bush empowered the Kurds in Northern Iraq (a national security issue to Turkey) and the ongoing military squabbles on that border. As Mehmet Dulger (chief of Turkey’s parliamentary foreign-affairs committee at the time): “we don’t understand why the U.S. is giving preference to a group of Kurds ahead of an ally of 50 years.”
Bush Jr was an utter disaster diplomatically. He spoke loudly, clumsily and then flailed around with a big (but rapidly tiring) stick.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Sigmond,
Almost half of the 30 million Turks had lost their lives between 1912 and 1922 by … I will not get into the ‘who slaughtered the Turks” business since a gang of nations had attacked Turks from all sides, which happen to be our neighbors today and we cannot afford to live hating our neighbors.
Posted by: nyoped | April 6, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
This is how the very non-arrogant Jacques Chirac discussed the arrogant George Bush’s support for Turkey entering the EU:
==========
French President Jacques Chirac bluntly criticised President Bush for supporting Turkey’s bid to join the European Union, saying the US President had ‘gone too far’, a foreign news agency reported on Monday.
Bush publicly endorsed Turkey’s bid, telling Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara.
Chirac told a news conference on the sidelines on the NATO summit here Monday: ‘Not only did he go too far, he ventured into territory which is not his concern’.
The French president, who is among the EU leaders most firmly opposed to Turkish membership of the EU, added: ‘It would be like me telling the United States how to run its affairs with Mexico.’
===========
Obama is lucky he has Sarkozy and Merkel to deal with.
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
What is Obama implying when he says this:
“There is a simple truth to this story: Turkey’s democracy is your own achievement. It was not forced upon you by any outside power,”
hmmmm…..
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
“Bush Jr was an utter disaster diplomatically. He spoke loudly, clumsily and then flailed around with a big (but rapidly tiring) stick. ”
Turkey is still our ally. Iraq is free and Turkey has a new democracy on it’s border. Doesn’t sound like a disaster to me.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
“You’re either with us or against us
=========
Bush said that about fighting back after 9/11 in 2001. It was not about Iraq. Hillary Clinton said the exact same thing.
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Sigmond:”Turkey is still our ally. Iraq is free and Turkey has a new democracy on it’s border. Doesn’t sound like a disaster to me.”
Turkey is an ally who refused passage to our troops during active war. Such great help there. And Iraq cost WAY more in money and lives than it had to – not in retrospec, but if Bush had merely listened to his own state department instead of Cheney.
This isn’t flag football – all our men and women who died in that desert aren’t made whole by Bush finally hitting (by process of elimination and our kid’s deaths) on a strategy that works (as well as can be hoped in that wretched area). One that he (or to be fair, Rumsfeld) pushed out a General very early on merely for suggesting (need more boots on the ground from day one, take more than a handful of months).
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
“we cannot afford to live hating our neighbors. ‘
Good point. If you live in Turkey and are Muslim, how do you feel about Christians and Jews?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Would things be better for Turkey now if we had followed Barack Obama’s urgings and pulled our troops out of Iraq at the bloodiest part of the war?
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
“This isn’t flag football”
Look, war is chaos. There has never been a perfectly managed war in history. Total chaos – mistakes are made, innocents killed, atrocities, and so forth. I’m as good a Monday morning quarterback as the best of them, too.
Why blame Bush for Turkey, anyway for not allowing passage of troops? We found another way and are still friends with Turkey, no.?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
obama calling Turkey a model for the rest of the world. My eye it is!. I take this very personal. I have some dear friends who are Christians that live in Turkey. If they are caught spreading the gospel, they are thrown in jail. in the house churches that exist, they are not allowed to worship out load or sing songs since they are always on edge that the police are nearby. And obama wants Turkey to be the model!!! get real!
Posted by: DJ | April 6, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
MayBee:”Would things be better for Turkey now if we had followed Barack Obama’s urgings and pulled our troops out of Iraq at the bloodiest part of the war?”
When was that? If we had not started the war in 2001, there is absolutely NO question that more Iraqis would be alive now (albeit still under Saddam’s thumb).
Here’s a question for you, would more of our troops be alive if Bush had listened to Shinseki and started the surge in Feb 2003, when he recommended it: “I would say that what’s been mobilized to this point — something on the order of several hundred thousand soldiers are probably, you know, a figure that would be required. We’re talking about posthostilities control over a piece of geography that’s fairly significant, with the kinds of ethnic tensions that could lead to other problems. And so it takes a significant ground-force presence.”
(Remember that Rumsfeld and Wolfiwitz slapped down General Shinseki’s comments calling them “wildly off the mark” and “hard to believe”.)
You really are in a small fringe if you are defending Bush’s political conduct of the war and ignoring generals for years as anything like competence.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
“We have a rock star president who for the first time in American history fired the President of a private corporation, General Motors, then immediately flew to Europe with an entourage of 500 courtiers and a worshipful media, bowed waist-deep to the King of Saudi Arabia, and proceeded to accuse his own country of arrogance.
In France, of all places.”
Posted by: Get a grip! | April 6, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Obama has rightly repudiated the last eight years of Bush-era policies towards the Muslim world. I have no problem with Obama specifically mentioning a break with the past as a priority for his foreign policy vision. Any Republicans whining about “no respect” for Dubya need to look at the election results from 2008…
Posted by: matt | April 6, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
ummm, it’s not obama’s call to have turkey join the EU. This arrogance and inexperience is just the latest string of embarrassments from this clown.
Posted by: chad | April 6, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
“You really are in a small fringe if you are defending Bush’s political conduct of the war and ignoring generals for years as anything like competence. ”
How many generals and other flag officers were consulting the President and that had a different point of view about what to do than Shineski or others? And why would Bush deliberately make a decision he or they thought would be bad? You and I weren’t there to know. You and I are like everybody else – Monday quarterbacks defending our partisan positions, no?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
“Obama has rightly repudiated the last eight years of Bush-era policies towards the Muslim world.”
What were Bush’s policies towards the Muslim world? Please tell us what they were and why they needed to be repudiated. Thanks.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
When was that? If we had not started the war in 2001, there is absolutely NO question that more Iraqis would be alive now (albeit still under Saddam’s thumb).
=========
We went to war with Iraq in 2003.
Look, I’ve already said I’m not going to debate the entire Iraq war. My point is Obama keeps wanting to blame Bush for the mistakes he made, when Obama, as a Senator, advocated some policies that also would have had some pretty devastating effects. If he wants to play the ‘what if’ blame game, he’s got a lot of fingers pointing back at himself.
As for “more” Iraqis being alive if we hadn’t gone to war, I will remind you of the devastating humanitarian consequences of the Iraq sanctions we were imposing. There were several paths we could have taken with Iraq, none of them especially good.
Anyway, it’s just a very immature Presidency. As I said, he will learn soon enough that people won’t do what he wants just because he wants it, and he will get people in other countries disliking him for it, and blaming him for their problems.
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Sigmond:”How many generals and other flag officers were consulting the President and that had a different point of view about what to do than Shineski or others? ”
At that time, Shineski was the chief of staff. Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz clearly did not agree with him. The fact remains that it clear that Shineski’s position was likely correct, and the alternative council Bush chose (up until embracing more boots on the ground in the form of the surge) was wrong.
A bunch of decisions like that kinda define a poor leader. And in the US, the general population is empowered to comment and past judgment (they serve at our pleasure) upon their leadership and military.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
“How many generals and other flag officers were consulting the President and that had a different point of view about what to do than Shineski or others? And why would Bush deliberately make a decision he or they thought would be bad?”
The problem was that the Bush administration prosecuted the war politically instead of purely militarily. From the lead-up to the invasion right through to the surge, they accepted advice from the military leaders that fitted the image that they wanted to portray as really happening and dismissed those that did not.
Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
“A bunch of decisions like that kinda define a poor leader.”
Nobody is perfect, are they? It is easy to criticize after the fact, especially if you already have partisan bias. Tell me about Bush’s good decisions.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
“The problem was that the Bush administration prosecuted the war politically..”
Welcome to the Monday Morning QB club. I’m sure you have no partisan bias, either, huh? Tell us about the good decisions Bush made. Thanks.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Get a Grip:
“bowed waist-deep to the King of Saudi Arabia”
There’s been a significant lack of mention of that in the media.
Posted by: Keith | April 6, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
“…to appointing inexperienced political cronies to key rebuilding positions”
Who are you speaking of?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Sigmond:”Tell me about Bush’s good decisions.”
He was slow and deliberate in assigning blame after 9/11 and rallied full world support for the justified action against Afghanistan.
His administration oversaw the implementation of some practical, business and environment friendly emissions regulations on diesel off road vehicles.
The No Child Left Behind Act put some appropriate pressure on the educational system to focus on results.
But he is judged by his performance overall and his conduct of the Iraq war was horribly inept and showed very bad leadership. Rumsfeld was a good choice to cut back on the size of a bloated cold war Pentagon but a disaster for nation building. His economic leadership was somewhere between absent and atrocious, and his political tactics were a perfection of polarization that will take decades to repair.
Now you – What did Bush do right?
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
“bowed waist-deep to the King of Saudi Arabia”
I was worried that he would get a bloody nose when it looked like his nose hit the floor in that bow. That could have been even more embarrassing.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Sigmond:”
“…to appointing inexperienced political cronies to key rebuilding positions”
Who are you speaking of?”
You cannot be this ignorant of basic facts – I am starting to suspect you are deliberately wasting my time.
Jay Hallen, aged 24, was assigned to reopen the Iraqi stock exchange. He had no background in finance. The stock market opening was delayed until he gave up his grandiose visions and let them go back to the format that it last operated in.
James Haveman, a 60-year-old social worker, was called upon to restructure Iraq’s health care system. Haveman launched an anti-smoking campaign rather than using the CPA’s limited resources to prevent childhood diarrhea or other fatal diseases.
Some have also attacked Kerik, but while he was inept and only one man when thousands were needed, he at least had creds to suggest he may have been a good choice.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 6, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
“I was worried that he would get a bloody nose when it looked like his nose hit the floor in that bow.”
Interesting since all the video I have seen has been a quick bend forward at the waist.
But hey you’re a right winger, lying is first nature, not second.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 6, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
“Look, war is chaos. There has never been a perfectly managed war in history. Total chaos – mistakes are made, innocents killed, atrocities, and so forth.”
Which is why the decision to go to war must be carefully weighed because the consequences are very real.
As opposed to a war based on cook up intelligence and a giant middle finger to the world.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 6, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I may have said it before, but Donald Rumsfeld did the absolute best impersonation of Chicken Little that I’ve ever seen done by a Secretary of Defense. It engendered so much confidence in our leadership and was so endearing to our kids.
Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
“You cannot be this ignorant of basic facts”
Asking you a question to clarify something does not mean I am ignorant. I don’t know anything about those you mentioned but I’m sure there were many mistakes in conducting the war by Bush and others – political appointees, decisions, etc.. As i said before, war is chaos and there are no well managed wars I can think of in history.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
CBS News reports:
The Saudi Arabian newspaper al-Watan reported today that Turkish security services have arrested a man of Syrian origins Friday in connection with a plot to assassinate President Barack Obama during his current visit to Turkey.
The man, who was carrying an Al-Jazeera TV ID card in the name of M.G., confessed after his arrest that he was planning on stabbing the U.S. president with a knife during the Alliance of Civilizations summit held in Istanbul, adding that he had three other accomplices to help him execute his plan.
According to the paper, Turkish investigators were trying to verify whether the Qatari-based Arab TV channel has truly issued the ID card produced by the man, or if it’s a forged copy.
The suspect, a permanent resident of Istanbul, has been regularly attending all conferences and events relating to the Middle East held in the city.
======================
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
I am trying my best to like the new President..I am really trying.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 6, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
“Let me say this as clearly as I can: the United States is not at war with Islam.”
Can someone tell me when BHO’s predecessor EVER said we were at war with Islam. My recollection is that he said exactly what BHO did, in fact even going so far to say that Islam was a religion of peace….
Posted by: jb | April 6, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
jb,
That’s what I remember too.
Posted by: Keith | April 6, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
More from Bush’s 2004 speech in Istanbul:
=========
“The Turkish writer Orhan Pamuk has said that the finest view of İstanbul is not from the shores of Europe, or from the shores of Asia, but from a bridge that unites them, and lets you see both. His work has been a bridge between cultures, and so is the Republic of Turkey. The people of this land understand, as that great writer has observed, that ‘What is important is not [a] clash of parties, civilizations, cultures, East and West.’ What is important, he says, is to realize ‘that other people in other continents and civilizations’ are ‘exactly like you’.”
=============
“Many Americans trace their heritage to Turkey, and Turks have contributed greatly to our national life — including, most recently, a lot of baskets for the Detroit Pistons from Mehmet Okur. I know you’re proud of this son of your country, and there’s a lot of people in Detroit really grateful for his talents. ”
============
Obama hit both of these themes.
Posted by: MayBee | April 6, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
“Let me say this as clearly as I can: the United States is not at war with Islam.”
Can someone tell me when BHO’s predecessor EVER said we were at war with Islam. My recollection is that he said exactly what BHO did, in fact even going so far to say that Islam was a religion of peace….
****************************************
Why do you ask? Obama was not saying that the US said we were. Many Muslims and certainly Al-Qaeda either believe we are or are trying to say we are.
You realy need to get a grip
Posted by: Thinking | April 6, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
“Many Muslims and certainly Al-Qaeda either believe we are or are trying to say we are.”
Shouldn’t it be the Muslim leaders of the world telling Muslims that Muslims are not at war with the United States?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Why are you deleting my comments? Obama said in Turkey that he is muslim..
This is what he claimed while a candidate for Presidency:
“I think it ’s very important for people not to buy into the kinds of dirty tricks that we’ve become so accustomed to in our politics, and people need to understand I’m not and never have been of the Muslim faith.“
Posted by: mjl | April 6, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
After bowing subserviently to the king of Saudi Arabia, who is the next Muslim potentate that he will grovel to?
Remember the “tolerant” treatment of the Armenians in the genocide of 1915-17 and the Greeks in pogrom of 1955? T
he Kurds are currently receiving their own form of “benevolence” from the Turks.
The E.U. is right to be cautious about letting T
quo warranto, B.O.?
Posted by: Solid Citizen | April 7, 2009, 6:19 am 6:19 am
Sigmond, have you ever heard of a group of people sometimes referred to as Native Americans? I know I’m not the first in this thread to pose this to you– I wonder what you’ll say to change the subject this time.
Keith, where was the capital of the Roman Empire beginning in the 4th Century? And what year did the UK abandon the pound for the euro?
MayBee, in which language does the word “interesting” mean the same thing as “shocked and appalled”?
mjl, can you think of any Americans in political life who profess a different religious tradition than at least one member of their family? It’s okay– think about it as long as you need to. (HINT: GWB is a Methodist.)
Posted by: Your Mom | April 7, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Jake, I confess, I didn’t vote for Obama though it was a hard and last minute decision. (I’m not Rep. or Dem.) One of the reasons I was drawing near during the election was, or what I understood was that, he is a Christian and whether a Christian or not, I do put a lot of instances on a person with Christian values (real ones that is). I have even started to really warm up to him, even to the point of thinking a vote for him would not had been a wrong vote. I must admit it was a big disappointment to find out he is a smoker however, in light of resent info, I must say, it is beginning to look like he, being a Christian, may have been for political gain. Now let me Qualify that statement. In a story I read yesterday, in News Week (May), about Obama’s trip to Turkey, Hadia Mubarak, an American born Muslim stated Obama as saying: “yes, he (Obama) told the world, Muslims Americans exist and our existence has enriched, not impoverished American culture”. So, what was he stating by using “our”, he is a Muslims? She went on to say about his election: “the mere hint that Obama practiced Islam was the surest way for he to lose”. Is she saying he hide his practice of Islam for political gain. Then in your 4/6 story you stated Obama as saying: “United States has been enriched by Muslim Americans. Many other Americans have Muslims in their family, or have lived in a Muslim-majority country – I know, because I am one of them.” Again, what was he stating by using “I am one”? He is a Muslims or an American whom has Muslims in his family? It’s not that I have a lot against Muslims, unless their over ther in nut land, with some of the “christians” but lies and deceit I do.
Posted by: LD | May 1, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm