Apr 6, 2009 8:38pm

Obama: ‘We Are Not at War With Islam’

The President reaches out to Muslims of the world while speaking in Turkey. Our World News story:

- jpt

User Comments

“We are not at war with Islam” – That’s what Mr. Bush 2 also said. I don’t know why this made news.

Posted by: young_voter | April 6, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

War with my brothers? NEVER!!!!

Posted by: Obama circus of clowns | April 6, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

I never thought we were, just radical extremist who happen to be mostly Muslins.

Posted by: david | April 6, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

I’d like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony……All together now!!!

Posted by: figureditout | April 6, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Good of President Obama to apologize to the rest of the world for America’s many sins. He just forgot to mention that if it wasn’t for the United States, all of Europe would be speaking German right about now.
I’m glad they liked him. Too bad they told him to go blow when he wanted troops in Afghanistan and a commitment to stimulus money. I’m surprised he didn’t brand them all racists.

Posted by: Janet | April 6, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Well we certainly weren’t attacked by the Knights Templar. Maybe BHO should check with some of the guys serving in the Army and Marines and find out who they are trying to kill.

Posted by: ChainsUCanBelieveIn | April 6, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

“We are not at war with Islam” – That’s what Mr. Bush 2 also said…”
But after invading Iraq to destroy WMDs that it turned out they didn’t have and throwing a lot of Muslims into prison camps with no charges and torturing some of them etc. etc., they just started not to believe him.

Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

“He just forgot to mention that if it wasn’t for the United States, all of Europe would be speaking German right about now.”
I think it’s more likely that they’d be speaking Russian, but anyways they are grateful.

Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

He just forgot to mention that if it wasn’t for the United States, all of Europe would be speaking German right about now.
I’m glad they liked him. Too bad they told him to go blow when he wanted troops in Afghanistan and a commitment to stimulus money. I’m surprised he didn’t brand them all racists.
***************************************
Hmmmm……. the GIFT they must keep paying for?
Let’s not exchange gifts ok?

Posted by: Thinking | April 6, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Janet,
We’re so tired of that pitiful argument. Don’t you think the Russians have something to say about that? If it wasn’t for the biggest battles on the Eastern front we wouldn’t have made any progress.
Read some history books please.

Posted by: JV | April 6, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

“lot of Muslims into prison camps with no charges ”
It is not a crime to be an enemy combatant. Enemy combatants are not arrested, they are captured as combatants when they are acting as combatants and no charges need to be made. They are detained in prison or prison camps.
This is why there are “no charges” on some of those combatants heing held at Guantanamo. At end of wars, POW’s are released but not charges.
These guys being released that you think are innocent may be innocent of crimes but are not innocent of beiong enemy combatants.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Bush never did capture Osama Bin Laden or completely take out Al-Qaeda.
Somewhere in Pakistan in a cave is Osama while in Texas George Bush is on a rehab tour throwing around a baseball. Over 4200 Americans will never seen baseball again.
Our war was with Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda.
My question is this – If our troops kill Osama is the war over? Or is this a war that keeps on going?
Also We need to listen to our allies like the British and Egypt. Bush and many of the Republican Senators and Republican congressman in Washington DC today never did.

Posted by: Texas Ranger Fan | April 6, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

It is not a crime to be an enemy combatant.
These guys being released that you think are innocent may be innocent of crimes but are not innocent of beiong enemy combatants.
***************************************
Out of your mouth in the same post.
Read it and think about it.

Posted by: Thinking | April 6, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

The prison camp at Guantanamo was specifically set up to create a legal black hole where these militant undesirables could be held indefinitely without either being charged with a crime as civilians or being protected by the Geneva Convention as POWs. It has turned out to be a recruitment bonanza for militant extremists.

Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Those darn radical islamist extremist terrrrist comittin tyrrrany. Where is George Bush when we need him.
We need his strategerie in smokin these radical islamist extremist out of their holes.

Posted by: Omentum | April 6, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

“Also We need to listen to our allies like the British and Egypt. Bush and many of the Republican Senators and Republican congressman in Washington DC today never did.’
We listened to their intelligence before going in to Iraq, and their intelligence along with others coincided with US intelligence. Are you saying that their intelligence was good?
You don’t mention Democrat Senators or congressman. How many of them even read the intelligence? Hillary didn’t, did she. You’re not a partisan, are you – you know, a Bush hater?

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

“being protected by the Geneva Convention as POWs.”
What are POWs charged with under Geneva Convention?

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

How about saying that we’re at war with evil. Think that would get anyone’s attention ?

Posted by: Ron | April 6, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

“What are POWs charged with under Geneva Convention?”
They are charged with being bad guys and locked up.
They are protected from being tortured.

Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

thinking………being an enemy combatant is not a crime.
Those being released are not innocent of being enemy combatants.
Was I not clear enough for you?

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

“They are protected from being tortured.”
I’ll agree to that.
So, you do see that this fuss about “innocent” people being detained as POW does not necessarily require they be charged?
If not, what charges is a POW charged with under Geneva Convention?

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

I am not aware that the detainees at Gitmo have ever been referred to as POWs.

Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

“It has turned out to be a recruitment bonanza for militant extremists. ”
You mean like : Join Al Queda, kill people and if you’re caught by the US alive, you get to live in glorious Cuba, three nutritious meals a day, private quarters, cable TV and free laundry service and Bonus: Free toilet paper.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Bush said this same thing repeatedly and pointedly.
But Obama can’t speak Austrian.

Posted by: drjohn | April 6, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

“I am not aware that the detainees at Gitmo have ever been referred to as POWs.’
What did you think they were called? Dancing Bears?

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

“What exactly is this British and Egyptian intel you’re referring to?
Ask poster Texas Ranger Fan or use google.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

“What did you think they were called? Dancing Bears?”
OK let me reverse the question: Do you think all the detainees at Gitmo were treated properly according to the Geneva Convention?

Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Obama: “Ich bin ein Musliner”

Posted by: drjohn | April 6, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

“OK let me reverse the question: Do you think all the detainees at Gitmo were treated properly according to the Geneva Convention? ”
I don’t have any way of knowing that. If you are asking if I support torture, that would depend on you mean by torture. I would not want our policy to be procedure that would physically injure or cause permanent damage. Water boarding iom is debatable – we use it on our own agents and military personnel as a training procedure.
No need to debate that – if you disagree, that’s OK, that’s your opinion.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

“What did you think they were called? Dancing Bears?”
Detainees at Gitmo are ‘Enemy Combatants” – not POW’s.
The United States does not recognize the Taliban as a legitimate Afghani government. President Bush determined that the Taliban members are covered under the Geneva Convention because Afghanistan is a party to the Convention. Under Article 4 of the Geneva Convention, however, Taliban detainees are not entitled to POW status which would be covered under Article 3.

Posted by: Ranger | April 6, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

How to tell that we are now living in Dreamland:
“ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. – Windmills off the East Coast could generate enough electricity to replace most, if not all, the coal-fired power plants in the United States, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Monday. But those numbers were challenged as ‘overly optimistic’ by a coal industry group, which noted that half the nation’s electricity currently comes from coal-fired power plants.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 6, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

It’s just that if the detainees are obviously POWs as you seem to be asserting, and we did torture any of them which many claim that we did, then we’re guilty of war crimes aren’t we?

Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

“It’s just that if the detainees are obviously POWs as you seem to be asserting, and we did torture any of them which many claim that we did, then we’re guilty of war crimes aren’t we?”
Well, they were “enemy combatants”, now they’re detainees (like POW).
If there is a complaint, there will be a charge, there will be a trial. If it is found that an illegal torture procedure was applied in the trial, there would be a verdict, most likely a guilty verdict.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Obama is nuclear weapons grade stupid and foolish.

Posted by: Sparky | April 6, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

I just think that there is no way to properly explain to the rest of the world, especially the Muslim world, how we can continue to operate that prison with honor. We need to either treat the detainees as POWs or charge them with crimes and bring them to trial. I agree with those who think that Muslim extremists exploit its existence to gain followers who then attack our forces. If Americans really want to support our troops in the field by actually reducing the numbers of enemy fighters facing them, they’ll reach deep down inside themselves and try and find the guts to close that disgraceful prison.

Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

“Look on the bright side, at least he’s not nucular weapons grade stupid.’
If we took a poll of all 57 states, there might be some disagreement with that.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

“I agree with those who think that Muslim extremists exploit its existence to gain followers who then attack our forces.”
Do you think these terrorists don’t torture? Or that if they are caught they won’t be thrown into some prison? If we had a policy of cutting their heads off if caught, do you think this would recruit more terrorists?
So if we close Guantanamo, terrorism goes away? I think it’s an absurd argument.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

“It is asinine to paint the entire Arab world because of the actions of relatively VERY few.”
Who has painted the entire Arab world as the enemy? And why are the leaders of Islam not telling the world and their fellow Muslims that Muslims are not at war against the western society, US, Europe, Israel, etc.?

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

The military has even said that there is no way to kill all of the terrorists. The only way to win is to prevent the extremists from recruiting more fighters. We must make peace with the Muslim world to cut off and isolate terrorist organizations.

Posted by: Skip | April 6, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

“If there is a complaint, there will be a charge, there will be a trial. If it is found that an illegal torture procedure was applied in the trial, there would be a verdict, most likely a guilty verdict.”
Not necessarily which is why the Obama administration is moving cautiously. There are several torture and unlawful detainee cases before the courts, including the Supreme Court.
The Bush administration did acknowledged publicly that water-boarding was used by U.S. government questioners on 3 detainees. CIA Director Michael Hayden, testified before Congress and said Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubayda and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri were waterboarded in 2002 and 2003.
Water-boarding is outlawed under the UN’s Convention against torture and Japanese Soldiers were convicted of war crimes for water-boarding allied soldiers. Water-boarding as torture is vague in the US Army handbook, but the fact the CIA destroyed hundreds of hours of interrogation tapes prior to going in “discovery” for court is problematic.
Now you get into convicting a person with fruit from a poisonous tree…

Posted by: Ranger | April 6, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

“If you are asking if I support torture, that would depend on you mean by torture. I would not want our policy to be procedure that would physically injure or cause permanent damage. Water boarding iom is debatable – we use it on our own agents and military personnel as a training procedure.”
Sigmond – Christopher Hitchens, journalist, had similar feelings about water-boarding. He decided to have it done to himself to see for himself. Go read his article on the subject in Vanity Fair (available on-line) I’ll just say, he ended the piece with this:
” Well, then, if waterboarding does not constitute torture, then there is no such thing as torture.”

Posted by: Ranger | April 6, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

“The Bush administration did acknowledged publicly that water-boarding was used by U.S. government questioners on 3 detainees.”
leading Democrats were also aware of these water boarding procedures before they happened. I realize you want to see Buah hang but that’s not going to happen. If you think Obama will not waterboard if a critical emergency arises, then you are naive. Obama is no fool.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

“Christopher Hitchens,”
So, was it his waterboarding experience that made him brain dead?
I have seen the video of that as well as videos of our special teams that have had it applied. It is very effective, as it should be. Obama will use it if a critical emergency arises. As I’ve said. He’s no fool.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

“I realize you want to see Buah hang but that’s not going to happen.”
Where did I write or imply such a thing?

Posted by: Ranger | April 6, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

“Japanese Soldiers were convicted of war crimes for water-boarding allied soldiers.”
They also water boarded them to death. Chopped fingers off as they water boarded. And much more. Nasty business. No wonder they were convicted of war crimes

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

“”Christopher Hitchens,”
So, was it his waterboarding experience that made him brain dead?”
I’m not a big fan either, but you have to give credit where credit is due. Why don’t you volunteer to get tied down and water-boarded like he did and report back to us?

Posted by: Ranger | April 6, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Silky Johnson,
“Christians have been bombing clinics and wearing sheets and torturing and killing blacks for years, yet, oddly, we are not at war with Christians.”
Your point is valid.
How does a simple listing of facts equate to an indictment of the entire Arab world? Was your statement an attack against all Christens? I didn’t take it that way,
The real point is that the President’s statement that we are not at war with Islam will not will not advance anything. No one ever claimed to be at war with Islam, especially the former president who went out of his way to state otherwise. It seems that President Obama’s policy is much the same as President Bush’s policy. Let us hope he is as successful in preventing attacks at home, and even more so at preventing attacks abroad (e.g Spain, London, Bali, Mumbai).

Posted by: Terry | April 6, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

“I’m not a big fan either, but you have to give credit where credit is due. ”
Credit for what? That he subjected himself to water boarding? I watched him being water boarded. He was waterboarded and “talked” within 10 seconds. Nothing happened to him physically except he wet his pants.
The purpose of water board is to make someone give up information. They talked, those three that underwent it and by all accounts, gave up info that saved hundreds if not thousands of lives. They are all normal after this, no? No body parts missing, still alive, well fed. So are the hundreds or thousands that were in jeopardy. Obama is no fool – he will use it if he has to.
Comparing the water boarding of the Japanese to what we do is a pathetic argument.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 6, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Sigmond -
The United States knows quite a bit about waterboarding. The U.S. government — whether acting alone before domestic courts, commissions and courts-martial or as part of the world community — has not only condemned the use of water torture but has severely punished those who applied it.
After World War II, we convicted several Japanese soldiers for waterboarding American and Allied prisoners of war. At the trial of his captors, then-Lt. Chase J. Nielsen, one of the 1942 Army Air Forces officers who flew in the Doolittle Raid and was captured by the Japanese, testified: “I was given several types of torture. . . . I was given what they call the water cure.” He was asked what he felt when the Japanese soldiers poured the water. “Well, I felt more or less like I was drowning,” he replied, “just gasping between life and death.”
Nielsen’s experience was not unique. Nor was the prosecution of his captors. After Japan surrendered, the United States organized and participated in the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, generally called the Tokyo War Crimes Trials. Leading members of Japan’s military and government elite were charged, among their many other crimes, with torturing Allied military personnel and civilians. The principal proof upon which their torture convictions were based was conduct that we would now call waterboarding.
(Wallach – Washington Post)

Posted by: Ranger | April 7, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am

“Comparing the water boarding of the Japanese to what we do is a pathetic argument.”
Ah Yes, because when we do it, it is moral and necessary, but when anyone else does it, it is a crime and should be punished.

Posted by: Ranger | April 7, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

“The principal proof upon which their torture convictions were based was conduct that we would now call water boarding. ”
Show me the case files and not cut and paste articles from a journalist. You will find it is not so cut and dry. But thanks for responding. As I said earlier, I don’t want to debate whether it’s torture or not. I believe it is not and if you disagree, that’s OK with me..

Posted by: Sigmond | April 7, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

From a German rag:
“Obama has reduced America’s exaggerated sense of self-importance while, at the same time, opening up the possibility for his country to attain a new greatness.”
Right. Let somebody else become self-important. Let them begin by committin fighting forces to Afghanistan. And let’s hear a little bit about what this “new greatness” will entail.
Oh, brother–why don’t we just join the EU, and adopt the Euro as our currency? Think how they’d love us then!

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 7, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

cilla- good reminder on Bali. Too many people forget that bombing.
Bali itself is mostly Hindu, although you are correct that Indonesia is the most populous Muslim nation. The bombings there killed mostly Balinese people, and they almost destroyed their tourism-based economy. They *hate* terrorism, and they dare to say so.
People also forget the terrorism that wracked the Philippines well before the Iraq war. Remember Martin Burnham?
What I would like from President Obama is a tiny defense of America, every so often, and praise of this country from a time in the past 25 years, but before he was President.

Posted by: MayBee | April 7, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

“Ah Yes, because when we do it, it is moral and necessary, but when anyone else does it, it is a crime and should be punished. ”
A lot has changed in 65 years. Laws have changed. Laws have been overturned. Society has changed, etc.
While you may think Bush et al are already guilty, I prefer to wait and see if there is a trial, the evidence, the jury, the case, and the determination if water boarding is torture or not, before judging anyone.
IMO, the concept of innocent until proven guilty, trumps whether or not water boarding is torture or not. You are free to think otherwise.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 7, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

skip said:I just think that there is no way to properly explain to the rest of the world, especially the Muslim world, how we can continue to operate that prison with honor.
====================
Tell me which of these countries you would dare to spend time in prion in, or trust their judicial systems:
Turkey, Indonesia, Iran, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan…..?

Posted by: MayBee | April 7, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

“Tell me which of these countries you would dare to spend time in prion in, or trust their judicial systems:
Turkey, Indonesia, Iran, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan…..?”
Just being in prison in any Muslim country would be torture. I think the Turkish prison in the film Midnight Express is still operating.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 7, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

While you may think Bush et al are already guilty, I prefer to wait and see if there is a trial, the evidence, the jury, the case, and the determination if water boarding is torture or not, before judging anyone.’
Tom Ridge, Bush’s first Homeland Security Secretary and his Director of National Intelligence among others from his administration have come out and said that water boarding is torture.
Waterboarding is considered torture by
This is not a referendum on Bush, but the US can not sit on the UN council against torture while publicly admitting we have done so and will continue to do so ourselves.
Conveniently, we have hundreds of hours of missing interrogation tapes related to this topic – if it’s not torture, why are we hiding them?
If it’s not torture – why can’t they be POW’s and go under Article 3 of the Geneva Convention?

Posted by: Ranger | April 7, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Tom Ridge is entitled to his opinion. You are entitled to have yours. Me, too.
Let me ask you: What is it about water boarding that you object to? (please don’t just say it’s torture)

Posted by: Sigmond | April 7, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Why do we not hear complaints about the terrorists torturing people. We water board three terrorists and the terrorists keep torturing and killing innocents worldwide. They cut heads off, kill children, women. But, we water board three terrorists and we’re the bad guys.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 7, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

How many of you would run a red light to get your wife or child to the hospital if your wife or child was about die from a gunshot wound?

Posted by: Sigmond | April 7, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

We make some pretty big claims in this country about being the greatest nation on earth, the guardians of democracy and the protectors of freedom. Are we willing to do the hard work and have the courage to make the sacrifices and take the risks to live up to it?

Posted by: Skip | April 7, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am

“Are we willing to do the hard work and have the courage to make the sacrifices and take the risks to live up to it?’
Americans have been doing that for a long time. Why do you think that is something new or something we should be doing?

Posted by: Sigmond | April 7, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

“Americans have been doing that for a long time. Why do you think that is something new or something we should be doing?”
Because many many Americans including myself feel that the prison camp at Gitmo that we’ve been arguing about all night is a clear departure from those principles regardless of the whole waterboarding controversy.

Posted by: Skip | April 7, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

God bless president Barack Hussein Obama and God bless America! I’ll be praying for you president Obama and for my country. You are a good man with a good heart and America will be better because of your heart. Thank you Mr president you are on the right track..The Republicans are confused and they don’t know what to do because your brilliance seem to confound them. I understand that they are looking for an Obama clone vis a vis a conservative one..but has not been able to find one as yet. I am proud of the way that you and Mrs Obama have handled yourselves abroad..you have represented us well. Thank you Mr president!

Posted by: Stanley | April 7, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am

We make some pretty big claims in this country about being the greatest nation on earth, the guardians of democracy and the protectors of freedom. Are we willing to do the hard work and have the courage to make the sacrifices and take the risks to live up to it?
==============
Do we make any claims about being perfect?
I can’t think of a time in our history- especially during war but not only- that we haven’t done somethings outside the box. Some a sin of commission (like FDR’s internment camps) and some omission (Jimmy Carter letting Iran hold the American hostages for so long).
No President has perfectly upheld the ideals.
Our allies have a habit of benefiting from the things we do, then chastising us for doing them. There were multiple nation’s forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, but you notice nobody else offered to hold combatants. You notice they don’t know what to do with the Gitmo guys either.

Posted by: MayBee | April 7, 2009, 4:09 am 4:09 am

Something about your style of reporting just depresses me. Everything has a negative slant or at the very least is expressed in a way that feels negative.
It’s difficult to watch the news as reported by you. The words and tone with which you frame the story affects a kinda hopeless and downcast reaction, even when the event in itself is neutral.

Posted by: A Comment | April 7, 2009, 4:47 am 4:47 am

WHAT A SLIMY SELF PROMOTING PIECE OF GARBAGE OBAMA IS.
Bush frequently praised Islam and was very determined to make the point that we were in a war against terrorism.
Perhaps it is Obama who believes all believers in Islam are terrorists, or perhaps he stupidly took that leap.
His lying implication that we ever declared war on Islam is a reflection of what a scumbag Obama is.
DId Obama remember to mention that members of Islam declared war against the US (Infitada), 2 years prior to 9/11 while Clinton was still in office.
I thought not, then he would have to admit it is not the US or Bush who is at fault for this conflict but radical Islamists who are raised to kill, literally, Americans and Jews.
I have no doubt Obama shares and approves of those values.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.