By Teddy Davis

Apr 3, 2009 7:59am

Palin Wants Senate Race Do-Over in Alaska

ABC News’ Teddy Davis reports: Republican Gov. Sarah Palin wants a Senate race do-over in Alaska now that the U.S. Department of Justice has decided to drop corruption charges against former Sen. Ted Stevens, a long-time Republican senator who was narrowly defeated in 2008 by Democrat Mark Begich. "It’s fair to say that the governor hopes Begich steps aside so that a special election can be held," Palin political spokeswoman Meghan Stapleton told ABC News. Palin’s push for a special election began when a reporter at the Fairbanks News Miner e-mailed her a copy of a statement from the head of the Alaska Republican Party calling for Begich to step down.    Asked to weigh in on the Alaska GOP’s position, Palin replied: "I absolutely agree." When the Alaska reporter wrote back to confirm that John McCain’s former running mate meant she would like Begich to resign in order to hold a special election, the governor responded: "Yes." During last year’s campaign, Palin called on Stevens to step aside after it was announced that he had been convicted of seven felonies. But after Attorney General Eric Holder asked a federal judge to drop the case on Wednesday, citing prosecutors’ improper behavior during the trial, Palin joined the chorus of Alaska Republicans hoping that Begich would step aside so that a special election could be held. "Now that we know the election was tained based upon a flawed judicial process and an unjust conviction just days before the election, it is absolutely appropriate to hold a special election," said Palin in a written statement. "Alaskans deserve this." Even though Palin is explicitly seeking a special election that would only be triggered by Begich stepping aside, the Alaska governor does not want to be seen as demanding the resignation of a sitting senator. "I am not splitting hairs," said Palin in her statement. "It is not about Senator Begich resigning or not; it’s about providing Alaskans with a fair opportunity to choose." While Palin is hoping that Begich will resign so that a special election can be held, she is powerless to force him to do so and he indicated Thursday that he has every intention of remaining in his seat despite calls from some Alaska Republicans for him to step aside. "Today, with our country in a severe recession, it’s more important than ever that we have a sentor focused on fixing our economy so Alaska have the jobs they need to support their families," said Begich in a statement. "That is my job in the Senate, and I’m honored to serve Alaskans for the next six years." ABC News’ Ferdous Al-Faruque contributed to this report.   

User Comments

Of course Palin wants to gerrymander a way for the GOP to regain a Senate seat. It’s what she does…
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | April 3, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am

She’s right.
The citizens of Alaska didn’t fairly vote in Begich. How could it be with the media and of course the commercials the democrats were running about Stevens prior to the elections be fair. It wasn’t. It formulated opinion thereby effecting the outcome of a vote.
Make every voter aware that Stevens is not guilty and have another election. If Begich wins, atleast then he can have the honor of winning in a fair election.

Posted by: Kate | April 3, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

The Republicans want a do over at the expense of a Democrat. It will not happen. I think that they should also be thinking about the cost of redo. The dropping of the case while vacating the conviction of Stevens does not say he did not do anything wrong. It says that the prosecutors did unethical things.

Posted by: VoterinFl | April 3, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am

The people of Alaska spoke…why would Begich resign the seat he was elected to? Unfairness happens every day…some lose and some win……..we don’t whine about it…we move forward. Stevens just happened to be one of us. Afterall, it was his party that acted criminally at the Justice Depart., and I would say, after sitting in his seat for decades, why in the world didn’t he challenge the Justice Department that wiretapped Americans illegally and forfeited the rights of others by detaining them illegal. Live with it, Stevens……….it is of your making. Sarah Palin is being led around on a leash by her party again.

Posted by: sngeorgia | April 3, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Kate: Lets be clear . . . No one has said Stevens is innocent. They said he was treated unfairly by the Prosecution. There is a big difference between a crook who is not in jail and a man who is “not guilty” because he is truly innocent! All I know is Steven’s is not in jail.

Posted by: scott_mich | April 3, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Many of us outside Alaska who had heard of Stevens considered him a dubious character long before the charges, which just matched what we suspected he was doing. Palin is not much better, just a different set of cronies from her predecessors.

Posted by: Jim H | April 3, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am

“Make every voter aware that Stevens is not guilty . . .”
Wait a moment . . . nobody has said that he isn’t guilty. The problem here is that the Bush Justice Department failed to do their job correctly. Oh, he is guilty alright. No doubt about it. Remember, he who lies will perish!
It now appears to me that anytime a Republican doesn’t like the outcome of an election they automatically blame this so-called LIBERAL media and call for a do-over. Hmmm. I guess that means we should have a do over of the 2006 Virginia US Senate race because the media unfairly covered George Allen’s “Macaca” moment.
Who is going to pay for all of these new elections the Republicans want? The taxpayer of course! It will cost millions for a new election in Alaska. Why not make Palin’ pay for it? Furthermore, the Republicans talk about tort reform, but they are the first to file lawsuits – just look at Minnesota where Al Franken will not be able to take his Senate seat because the GOP is planning on tying Franken up in legal hurdles possibly “for years.”

Posted by: Tom | April 3, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am

I heard McCain wants a do over with different running mate.

Posted by: Martz | April 3, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Good example Tom, let’s look at Minnesota.
Coleman won on election night by a margin bigger than what Franken is winning now. How can that be???
Election night, they counted EVERY vote. After Franken whined, they recounted. They are not counting 4000 ballets. Franken is now ahead.
I don’t care what side of the aisle you are on. That is a prime case of fraud, not counting them all. Of course the outcome would be the same as election night and the Franken camp can’t have that. Cheat to win.

Posted by: Angie | April 3, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Big difference between not guilty and improper conduct by the prosecution. Stevens is still a slimy politician that is guilty of all the charges brought against him and probably many more. Nothing has changed in that aspect, he just won’t be spending the rest of his life behind bars because the prosecutor wasn’t ethical.

Posted by: Kevin | April 3, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

No Angie, on election night in Minnesota they did not count every vote. None of the absentee ballots had been counted. The first time every legal vote in the state had been counted was during the mandatory hand recount that was completed with Franken ahead by more than 200 votes. Try getting your facts straight before posting your ignorance.

Posted by: Kevin | April 3, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Good for Gov. Palin!
As predicted…Sarah Palin is able to run everything like the PRO that she is!
Palin 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: kpchulo | April 3, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Kevin
Get your facts straight. You make it sound like they are counting all of them now. They are NOT. So, YOU are WRONG!!

Posted by: Dave S | April 3, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

The right wingers are going to jump at any chance they can that would possibly alter the balance of power in the U.S. Senate. Why, other than the obvious? Moves such as the appointment of individuals such as Dawn E. Johnsen, the Obama appointee and Yale law professor, to head the OLC (Office of Legal Council) could be a reason. Johnsen, a strict constitutionalist, is on record in favor of revisiting things such as just why the Bush prosecutors made 103 deferred and nonprosecution agreements with U.S. companies between 2002 and 2009. One such agreement being the agreement reached in Nov. of 2004 between the Bush Justice Dept. and the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding an agreement to NOT prosecute officials of AIG. The Clinton Administration made 11 such agreements. She also wants to revisit many of the Bush signing agreements used to usurp Constitutional law. Many people that are left over or were involved in these actions want every chance they can to block her appointment.

Posted by: devilkev | April 3, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

So, should we have a presidential re-election too? Surely many voters were even more turned off by yet another Republican scandal and voted democrat because of it. Is it a technicality that Stevens is getting off on? Is anyone saying there’s proof he is innocent?

Posted by: genhrules | April 3, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Dave S-
No, they are not counting every cast ballot, only the ones that are deemed legal under the standards set by the state of Minnesota. For some reason, they’ve decided not to count the illegal ones. Maybe you want the illegal ballots to be counted? Before you try pointing out erroneous facts, maybe you should educate yourself a little bit more.

Posted by: Kevin | April 3, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

So Sarah Palin believes that if one doesn’t like the results of an election, one can simply call for a redo?? Sounds like a CRYBABY WHINER to me. Following HER logic, the 2004 Presidential campaign should be redone too…the Swiftboaters told lies about John Kerry in their commercials. Let’s redo THAT election too, shall we??

Posted by: raflin10 | April 3, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Eric Holder and the Obama administration believe that America is a nation of laws and those laws must be obeyed whether you are a Republican, a Democrat, friend or foe. The posecution in the Stevens trial did not obey the law and Holder did the right and ethical thing in dismissing the charges against Stevens. But these kinds of mistakes and injustices happen in the justice sysem all the time, but there is no legal basis to undo a legally held election. Stevens should be thankful to the honesty of Eric Holder that he is not going to serve the rest of his life in jail and that he has some of his good name back. There is no proof that Stevens would have won the election under any circumstances after the “Bridge to No-where” debacle that he was involved in.

Posted by: Kate1149 | April 3, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Why didn’t Republicans in Alaska go ahead and vote for Stevens despite the news of his conviction? The governor would have been in the position to APPOINT a Republican replacement if Stevens was unable to finish his term! No do-overs are neccessary …. the people have spoken. Remember when a DEAD man won an election a few years ago? Enough said.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | April 3, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

The do-over is already scheduled for 2014.

Posted by: Arvid | April 3, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Yeah. Only democrats would elect someone who drives drunk, murders a woman, and gets a free pass by the voters, the law and the press.

Posted by: grace | April 3, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Sure Sarah, in a recession like no other let’s be sure to hold a special election that would cost millions upon millions of dollars.

Posted by: FedUp | April 3, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

And the tax increaseS have begun. Tax on a pound of tobacco went from $1.09 to over $24 per pound on Wednesday. ‘No tax increases if you make less than $250K’. Yeah, right! Another LIE.

Posted by: deanbob | April 3, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

FedUp | Apr 3, 2009 11:29:58 AM….Who would pay for the ‘do over’?

Posted by: deanbob | April 3, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

deanbob: This isn’t a tax on YOU. Tobacco is a drug and we all have the freedom to not use it. You may not have heard yet, but it’s bad for you and raises health care costs for all the rest of us.

Posted by: treetop | April 3, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

As hard hit as Alaska is over the loss of gas revenue, i can’t imagine spending millions on another election….Ted Stevens was not proclaimed innocent, the prosecution withheld evidence…He didn’t have to go to jail..why not retry him and see if he could be judged innocent in a court of law with that evidence…at this point he is in no way shape or form…innocent..Sarah Palin shows again her ignorance and lack of regard for the law…Thank god and greyhound shes gone…

Posted by: cowgirl | April 3, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Sarah, Honey…………ya’ don’t get “do overs.” If so, we could have had two Bush “do overs.” Next you’ll be asking for a “do over” for last November.
But, then, what can ya’ expect from Moose Barbie…aka Bible Spice? And this is the “best and brightest” the Republican Party has too offer.
Hey, Sarah………can ya’ still see Russia from your front porch?

Posted by: Sammy | April 3, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

I want a do-over for the Bush-Kerry election, now that we know all the private “swift boat” ads were false. Get real, Palin. You must live in some fairy land if you think think this is how the world really works. There aren’t “do overs”. Guarantee she wouldn’t be making statements like this if a democrat lost the seat due to convictions that were subsequently turned over. what a partisan f-head.

Posted by: Devin | April 3, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Begich won the election by a few thousand votes over someone who the media and most all had deemed convicted. Now that it turns out that the charges have been dropped due to perjury and prosecutorial misconduct, the civil right of all Alaskans were violated under because the election was won based on lies and perjuries. Stevens was given a shoddy deal, and it would be good if Begich would resign due to stuff that has now come to light but it will not happen and we Alaskans will al remember that when he is up for reelection

Posted by: DJ | April 3, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

How enlightening, not that much was needed.
When the outcome of a race is favorable – ie 2000 presidential supreme court decision, the GOP is all for calling it a done deal. But when they are less than on the winning side, like Minnesota/Alaska they take it to the hilt and demand recounts, lawsuits and do-overs.
Do they really not see the hypocrisy in this?

Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | April 3, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

The only election in Alaska that should be a do-over is the one for governor. I’m sure most Alaskans are fed up with this clown (palin) by now.

Posted by: pt | April 3, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

when the Republicans don’t get their way, regardless of legalities – there’s claiming of unfairness?
dumb is out, smart is in.
sorry, Palin.

Posted by: That Girl | April 3, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Speaking of “do overs”, Sarah……….wanna a “do over” on the Turkey-Slaughtering Backdrop you used during a T.V. interview last year…..just in time for Thanksgiving? That baby is going to follow you for the rest of your life.
Sarah, Honey………pay more attention to your surroundings in the future, particularly when the cameras are rolling. You, silly goose, you.

Posted by: Sammy | April 3, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Once again the republicans show just how out of touch they are. Senator Stevens was the beneficiary of a new DOJ that follows the rule of law and had no choice but to overturn his conviction. The evidence in this matter is still overwhelmingly against Senator Stevens and if he wasn’t so old he would be tried again. I think thoust look a gift horse in the mouth and Governor Palin is just too stupid to figure it out.

Posted by: Lou-NH | April 3, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

pt–”The only election in Alaska that should be a do-over is the one for governor. I’m sure most Alaskans are fed up with this clown (palin) by now.”– actaully she has one of the highest approval ratings of any sitting govenor.

Posted by: arkie vet | April 3, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Devin–”I want a do-over for the Bush-Kerry election, now that we know all the private “swift boat” ads were false.”— Gee Devin, are you privy to some information that the rest of us don’t have?? Where are you getting that the swift boat ads were false?? – from Kerry??

Posted by: arkie vet | April 3, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Stevens was unfairly prosecuted, but he was clearly behaving improperly. It has not been determined if he is guilty, but the facts of his receiving gifts is on the table.

Posted by: muffler | April 3, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

i sure hope those prosecutors are fired over this mess…
how could they try to manipulate things in such a way that could cost the state all this money because they were unethical?
bad, bad prosecutors!!

Posted by: hemnebob | April 3, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Someone needs to explain to the Republicans that “party” may not mean what they think it does. This is not a party like a frat party – they need to stop thinking of themselves as a fraternity and start thinking of themselves as part of a greater whole, whose job is to represent the people, not just their platform. Every step they take lately fails to address the needs of the American people – they’re just looking to extend their own power.

Posted by: Geoff | April 3, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Geoff–”they need to stop thinking of themselves as a fraternity and start thinking of themselves as part of a greater whole, whose job is to represent the people, not just their platform. Every step they take lately fails to address the needs of the American people – they’re just looking to extend their own power.”– there si a flaw in your logic there.. Republicans ( and dems for that matter) run on a particular set of principles and those who elect them share their views. That means, its the job of the politician to argue for and defend the views of the people who elected him or her. I am a republican, and if I had wanted a representative to blend into the “greater whole” i would have voted for someone else.. I want my beliefs to be defended not sacrificed…

Posted by: arkie vet | April 3, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Sorry to ruin your party arkie vet, but an independent organization not affiliated with either the Democrats or Republicans says so. Try reading the truth here: http://www.factcheck.org/republican-funded_group_attacks_kerrys_war_record.html
And, unless you’re trying to change history, the Republican candidate for President in 2008 (John McCain in case you’ve forgotten) slammed the ads in 2004 by responding “McCain : I think the ad is dishonest and dishonorable. As it is none of these individuals served on the boat (Kerry) commanded. Many of his crew-mates have testified to his courage under fire. I think John Kerry served honorably in Vietnam.”

Posted by: Kevin | April 3, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Sure she wants a “do over”. It would keep her in the public eye and give the GOP another chance to pick up a seat. I wonder if she would want the do over if Stevens were a Democrat and the Repubs won the seat. LIKELY NOT.

Posted by: dan | April 3, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

@arkie vet:
“It’s the job of the politician to argue for and defend the views of the people who elected him or her.” – no argument about that particular approach, but that isn’t what the Republican party is doing in Congress. If they were presenting alternatives, if they were actually debating the issues rather than simply disagreeing with the Democrats and with the White House, then they would be better fulfilling that expectation. Since the election, and the loss of so many seats, the Republicans have offered almost nothing in the way of alternatives – their purpose has been very superficial and obvious, and it is to take back the power. When prominent party members band together behind Rush Limbaugh and state that they want the president’s policies – and let’s not mince words, they want the *president* – to fail, that’s not representing their constituents or presenting an alternative; in order for the president’s policies to fail, they have to be implemented – to follow their implications, they are offering no alternatives, leaving the country to twist in the wind while they gloat and place the blame, in hopes they can swoop in afterward and take back the power they once had. This is not representing anyone but themselves; instead of offering alternatives, they are abstaining from government, from the responsibilities for which they were elected, and hoping they can simply avoid being connected to anything that they disagreed with, despite the fact that they did nothing to fix it before it went wrong. It’s like saying you knew the other guy’s parachute was packed wrong, but you let him jump anyway, and once he dies, you’ll talk to the folks who packed the chute.
I agree that you may have voted for them because you believed in your party’s principles, but as has been plainly obvious, the RNC doesn’t even know what it represents any more, other than its opposition to the DNC, and its desire for power. Surely THAT is not what you voted for, is it?

Posted by: Geoff | April 3, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Geoff- you say it well when you point out that the republican party is abstaining from participation so they can later blame whatever doesn’t work. I mean let’s be real, not everything the president puts forward will work, even he admits that. The sad part is that the republicans can stay true to their principals and constituents but instead they are just being obstructionists.

Posted by: Lou-NH | April 3, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Ms. Looney has spoken again. Didn’t she call for Stevens resignation while she was campaigning, uhn…being used by the “old white head men in the Republican Party”. No….he won’t resign his seat.

Posted by: sngeorgia | April 3, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Republicans? Principles? The two are mutually exclusive.

Posted by: Sammy | April 3, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

seems to me the only reason she is calling for his resignation is becaue she cant actually do anything about his legitimate term as a senator. This way all the team Red guys at FIXED News “Fair and Balanced” can continue to rant about injustic. meanwhile the its not going our way Members of Congress who never met a photo opp they didnot like spew rhetoric to confuse and distract. Pretty shameful..But whats new? as for the people of Alaska doing away with Palin.. get real these peple like Sexual deviants and Bimbos.. I mean didn’t they just get cable tv last year ..She’s the best thing to promote attention to the Forgotten state since the Valdez incedent .’” Dontcha know”

Posted by: Big bri's House | April 3, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

My advice for Palin….get a life and focus on your family idiot and then…before you think about politics, actually learn what makes our government and how the wheels turn. This is a dumb woman to the core.

Posted by: Bobby Smacks the dumb | April 3, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Despite all the rude things said about Gov Palin, I think her wisdom has shone forth yet again, lighting the way for Republicans in this dark time. When the going gets tough, the tough do not give up! They sue for a recount, lose, appeal the loss, and lose again! They demand that the winner of an election resign and prove that the voters really REALLY wanted to elect him. They refuse to swallow the silly Democratic idea that majority rule means that Republicans can actually lose an election, or that a majority of Democratic Senators can pass a bill. When the times get tough, the true leaders of our party stand up to those pesky elected Democrats and warn them that if they do not govern like Republicans, we will expose them to the voters— as… as the DEMOCRATS they are!! And if those lucky Democrats are so uppity as to think that the voters chose them precisely because they were not Republicans, well, then our tough guys know how to pull off the gloves, eh? They skip anger management class, get all red in the face, start calling Democrats “socialists,” and declare that they want the elected government of their country to fail while America fights two wars and faces the worst economic crisis in two generations. In other words– sorry friends, my admiration leads me to excess– our leaders have set the tone and example we need. We Republicans are tough enough to know that true democracy is never having elections that the other side can actually win, that America’s leaders are not necessarily our leaders, and that true patriotism is never letting the well-being of the American people matter more than the well-being of the Grand Old Party. Truly there is no better spokesperson for our point of view than the Governor of Alaska, our next nominee for President of the United States! My brothers on this page share her victorious spirit, and I am honored to be among them.

Posted by: Flubster Jones | April 3, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

The Republicans have definitely become the party of NO…for the next 8 years. Yep – the party of NO brains, NO hearts, NO courage, NO vision. Palin fits right in with with the party of NO!

Posted by: sandy | April 3, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Bobby, just wondering which one of the members of the Palin household you were referring to as the family idiot that is supposed to be focused upon? I have my guess, but there are so many possibilities.

Posted by: Kevin | April 3, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

It’s no different than how obama made it to Wa. Begich could become president. It’s how new comers get their foot in the door.

Posted by: yabba | April 3, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Begich has more brains and savy than Palin does. Palin is a Barbie doll – all fluff, no brains! President Obama made it to Washington with intelligence and hard work. The community organization skills Palin so made fun of, really came in handy in Europe. Too bad the Republican Party has no leadership, ideas, no vision. All they can do is say “NO!” You have no leaders in your party so you rely on Rush, Billo, Hannity, and Beck to lead you futher down the slippery slope. So sad, so pathetic.

Posted by: sandy | April 4, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am

cant wait to send my check to palin to run in 2012, i hope i get a chance to work on her campaign she has an army in tow we love her

Posted by: david reyes | April 4, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Why wait to send her money, she could probably use your help now to begin to pay off the more then half a million dollars she owes lawyers for their work on her various abuse of office charges. Ought to be interesting since Newt Gingrech is threatening to divide the party and he has significantly more following and clout in the republican party then Gov. Palin will ever command.

Posted by: Kevin | April 4, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Kevin,
You are so right! Palin, McCain, Boehner, and McConnell have tipped to far so far to the right of the political spectrum they have fallen off the end. When the Republicans have no leadership other than Rush, Hanitty, Billo, and Beck, you have to take pity on them. They are so engulfed in their Republican ideology, they have deserted any ideals that will help this country recover. I am not a Gingrich supporter, but he has more brains in his little finger than Barbie doll has in her whole body. Gingrich realizes the Republicans will never be back in power until they abandon the radical right wing. There is no room for the radical right in this country – the world has changed, this country has changed, and people like david reyes will never understand that. They follow the radical right like a pack of sheep – not realizing they are being led to the edge of a cliff and the slightest wind will sweep them over the edge.

Posted by: sandy | April 4, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Sarah is RIGHT! There should be a special election! Let the people speak once and for all! You liberal democrats are just afraid that you might lose a senate seat!

Posted by: DM | April 4, 2009, 1:36 am 1:36 am

sandy: There is one thing that has not changed and will never change. That is the living word of God, the HOLY BIBLE! There might be many translations of it but the basic message is the same and will always be the same. Heaven and earth may pass away but God’s word will never pass away! The day that this country turns against God and the Holy Bible will be the day that this country fails and goes down in destruction! I pray that day never happens and I will do every thing that I can to prevent it from happening! I refuse to let Satan and the godless atheists take over this country that my ancestors fought to build and protect!

Posted by: DM | April 4, 2009, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Prosecutorial misconduct does not mean that Stevens did not break many laws. Setting aside the verdict does not mean he is innocent, just not found guilty…YET! Why would republicans want to put a lawbreaker up for election even when they know he did wrong? Everyone knows what Stevens did. He does not get a free pass just because a prosecutor didn’t follow the rules. Punish the prosecutor and retry Stevens. The republicans just continue to make fools of themselves. When people finally get tired of the Republicans obstructing every Obama move to fix the problems, the congress will have a bunch of democratic replacements to help our president do the work that is needed. My message to Republican senators, “You are there to support your constituents, not your buddies. Support your president or you will be watching from the sidelines very soon!”

Posted by: Michael Hall | April 4, 2009, 3:36 am 3:36 am

One version or another of an unseen, unknown beings’ word has been the basis for most of the major wars fought around the world and the cause of deaths of untold millions. It’s this attitude of religious superiority that leads to hatred and people attempt to base it on the writings in holy books. No, people interpret what they want out of the bible and ignore what doesn’t meet their (or what they’re told their) beliefs should be. Having faith in a higher being is not the problem, the problem is following blindly behind people telling you what that faith should mean. You, DM, are not and never will be a superior individual based on the religion that you follow. That is something you have to earn by living life, and it doesn’t matter whether you follow the Bible, the Koran, the Talmud, the Veda, or no organized religion. The same ancestors that built this nation also took part in blind religious intolerance and genocide towards the people that lived here long before anyone from Europe stepped foot on Plymouth Rock.

Posted by: Kevin | April 4, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

The prosecutors should be investigated. If they acted unethically, illegally or politically motivated they should be fired and the people of Alaska should decide if they want a new election.

Posted by: Fran | April 4, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Again, you’re acting as if Stevens is innocent of the charges. He is not, the evidence against him was overwhelming enough to be convicted of all charges by the courts within essentially minutes of deliberation. If the prosecutors decided to open the case again, the outcome would be exactly the same. Just because the former prosecutor didn’t follow protocol doesn’t mean he’s innocent and doesn’t mean that a validly held election can be nullified. The people of Alaska had a choice between a sitting senator under indictment for massive corruption and Mark Begich, they chose not to elect the crook.

Posted by: Kevin | April 4, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

A “do-over”? John McCain would like a “do-over” so he could pick a different Vice President running mate. Every day there seems to be another story confirming why Sarah Palin should never be allowed anywhere near Washington DC.

Posted by: Rick_VT | April 4, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

After it was proved the the SwiftBoater attack ads were lies funded by GOP supporters, I don’t recall if the GOP offered for Bush to resign and to hold a “fair” vote. Can anyone here refresh my memory on that one?

Posted by: MissouriDad | April 4, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Levy Johnston did a few do overs according to his interview on Tara Banks. Perhaps Ms. Palin should focus on raising her children because they are out of control.

Posted by: Chuck | April 4, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

it is really sad to me that there can be so much disinformation out there that people can still believe the Swift boat ads against kerry. not only do they believe it, but they tell us leftists liberal commies that we need to get informed.
oh the irony. the sad, sad, irony.

Posted by: chris | April 4, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Al Gore didn’t get a do over why should Stevens get one. His charges were drop based on a technicality. That like saying the police didn’t read Ted Bundy his rights therefore he is innocent. It is because Eric Holder is a attorney general who adheres to the constitution.

Posted by: Tonya | April 4, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

elections are elections. the people of Alaska spoke on November 4. Sen. Stevens’ name was on the ticket. Attorney General Holder asked a judge to dismiss the case because of prosecutorial defiance and misconduct not because the government didn’t have a case.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 4, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

deanbob—Obama was talking about income tax and unless you are utterly clueless you know this very well. sorry tobacco taxes are going up for you. hopefully you can quit smoking which will not only leave you untaxed but healthy as well.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 4, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

First Governor Palin (while running for VP)wanted Senator Stevens to resign.
Now she wants another duly elected Senator to resign.
It doesn’t work that way. No matter how anyone, including Mrs. Palin wants to declare “What would have happened, if…”; the fact is that Mark Begich was legally elected, sworn in and now serves in the the US Senate.
It is simply, not her call.
Ted Stevens has not been exonerated of criminal charges by any means — the prosecutors conduct is the issue here, not Steven’s guilt or innocence.
Mark Begich has done nothing to warrant removal, recall or resignation from office.
Period.

Posted by: dassis | April 4, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

hey chris…
If we who voted for Barack Obama (and a majority of Democrat lawmakers on local, state and federal levels)…
are to be called “leftist liberal commies”…
cool.
There is nothing in a name but a bunch of letters.
It must be very tough for the fading members of the opposing viewpoint to face a very BIG fact: the majority of people under 30 are with us.

Posted by: dassis | April 4, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Let’s see, if Begich was a Republican, the Democrats all over the country, including Queen Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid would be asking him to step down. In the name of “fairness”.
Sure…hypicrites

Posted by: BlameAmericaLast | April 4, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Is there no commonsense left in this country? Stevens is still guilty of every charge against him and he knows it. He WAS found guilty. This means that had the prosecution not been stupid in their proceedings and the EXACT same evidence was presented correctly..he would STILL have been convicted. Get it?

Posted by: commonsense | April 4, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Who says that Stevens is innocent. All articles I have read alluded to he accepted less money than originally reported as supposedly was hidden by the prosecutor’s office. They made a mistake by supposedly withholding evidence that supports “LESS” money transfered hands, not that they were dropping charges because he was innocent.

Posted by: Chuck | April 4, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

BlameAmericaLast…
So, YOU are speaking for ALL Democrats?
Regardless… your comment is not only wrong, it’s nutty. Having the current senator step down is not any kind of sure fire way to get the guy-you-want into office. There would be a little thing called an election…… which could go either way. Dang — do you even have a secondary, much less an original thought in your head?
All this predicting that those who didn’t get their way in the last national (and a LOT of local and state) election is so ridiculous.
We have what we have, we are where we are… no wishing and hoping and predicting otherwise will change that.
Be a SupportAmericaFirst person and get behind the government the majority of the people elected (as per the CONSTITUTION)….
thanks, good night

Posted by: dassis | April 4, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Interesting how Palin can throw Stevens under the bus one moment and then call for him to get his seat back the next. What a hypocrite. These are here words when asked about Stevens:
“This is a sad day for Alaska and a sad day for Senator Stevens and his family,” she said on the tarmac at Richmond International Airport. “The verdict shines a light on the corrupting influence of the big oil service company up there in Alaska that was allowed to control too much of our state. And that control was part of the culture of corruption that I was elected to fight, and that fight must always move forward regardless of party affiliation or seniority or even past service.
“As Governor of the State of Alaska, I will carefully now monitor the situation and I’ll take any appropriate action as needed. In the meantime, I ask the people of Alaska to join me in respecting the workings of our judicial system and I’m confident that Senator Stevens from this point on will do the right thing for the people of Alaska,”

Posted by: J Johnson | April 5, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Kevin: If believing that there is only one God and that there is no other incites hatred then so be it, hate me! There is only one God! He is the Lord God Jehovah, the creator of this universe! I don’t blindly follow what people tell me what faith should mean either! I read the Bible, the King James Version only, and base my faith on what I read myself and my Bible tells me that there is only one God! It also tells me very plainly how I should live my life and how I should not live it. The Bible is very plain about what sin is and what is not sin.
I do attend church regularly and I do have a pastor whom I respect as a friend and the leader of my church and mostly I do agree with what he teaches. However, there are times when I do disagree with him but not often. I know the Bible well enough that I know when he is teaching something that doesn’t agree with my interpretation of the Bible. I then pray and search the Bible. If I find that he is right then I change my interpretation. If not, then I pray that God will change my pastor’s interpretation. I don’t, though, dispute my pastor. I simply accept what he teaches or I don’t.
I also don’t aspire to be a superior individual, just a blessed one. It matters very little to me what others think of me. It matters more to me what God thinks of me. I know that if I live according to the principles and rules set for us in the Bible and put God first in all things then I will be blessed by God. That is what matters most to me.
And about my ancestors, if by religious intolerance you mean preaching the word of God to the native Americans, then yes, according to you, they were intolerant! However, Jesus told his disciples to go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. My ancestors would not have been doing their job as Christians if they hadn’t preached the gospel to the native Americans.
However I deny that my ancestors took part in any genocide. After they arrived in the New World (now America) they sometimes had to defend themselves from attacks from the indians but they never took part in any genocide. In fact at least two of my ancestors are thought to have married indians but it’s never been proven. Several of my ancestors were Revolutionary war and War of 1812 veterans and killed more British on the battlefield than indians!

Posted by: DM | April 5, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

If anything is tainted in AK it’s Sarah Palin’s shameless attempt to have a “re-do” election after Sen. Begich beat Stephens in the election. That Senator Stevens was let off so lightly was due to his age and longevity as a senator. He should be grateful for the kind treatment he received after the convictions and ‘Gov. Palin should be ashamed to try to twist it as if Stevens was maligned. What part of “Convicted” did you not understand Gov. Palin? Your sheer nerve and audacity never cease to amaze. Go keep an eye on the Russians for us would ya?

Posted by: lkm | April 5, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Rick_VT: You are wrong! It is Sarah Palin who needed a better running mate! I am a republican and I voted for McCain because I thought, (and still do), that he was best of the two candidates. However, I wasn’t too happy with either of the candidates. I didn’t like any part of Obama’s platform and, although I agreed with most of what McCain stood for, he ran what I call a half-hearted campaign. He didn’t want the presidency badly enough to fight for it and he refused to use all of the tools that were available to him to win. He also should have been much more decisive and forceful in the debates. Instead his answers were very vague and no one really knew what his platform was. He also seemed like a sick old man in the debates. People looked at him and then looked at the younger, healthier Obama and they chose the younger, healthier man. Also McCain’s campaign was failing until the conventions. He needed a running mate who would bolster his campaign. Sarah Palin did do that! Some people think she hurt his campaign. I disagree! She worked tirelessly for over two months to get him elected and John McCain wouldn’t have received nearly as many votes as he did if it had not been for Sarah Palin. John McCain lost because of one person – John McCain!

Posted by: DM | April 5, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am

“It’s fair to say that the governor hopes Begich steps aside so that a special election can be held,” Palin political spokeswoman Meghan Stapleton told ABC News.
It’s also fair to say I’d like to redo my 401K allocations from last year.
Neither is going to happen.

Posted by: James | April 5, 2009, 5:12 am 5:12 am

Well, DM, then you are not only egotistical in your belief that only your higher being can be the correct one, but you’re also delusional in your attempt to rewrite the history of the nation. The actions of the people landing on the shores of the US from Europe are written in the history books, and the slaughter of the native people for their lands is a well-documented event. Whether your relatives actually pulled the trigger isn’t the debate. It’s the actions as a whole of the people “spreading their faith to the savages” that exterminated entire tribes of people. Having a closed mind towards the beliefs of others will continue to cause bloodshed and death around the world, it’s time to wake up and realize that just because you have an opinion doesn’t mean it’s the correct or only one. It’s the same blindness of surroundings that led to people believing the earth was flat, evolution doesn’t exist, or that we’re the only intelligent beings in the universe. More than two thirds of the six billion people on the planet follow a different spiritual being (or none at all) than your choice, but I’m sure in your opinion they just haven’t been enlightened to your one and only correct choice yet.

Posted by: Kevin | April 5, 2009, 5:29 am 5:29 am

Kevin: I am not the one who needs to wake up, you are! You are the one who is blind and can’t see that my God IS God! You can call me egotistical or whatever you want to call me but there is one thing that I am not and that is delusional! I am not the one who is being deceived by Satan and I am not the one who will take the soon coming mark of the beast, the 666, on your forehead or the palm of your right hand and will damn your soul for eternity if you don’t change!

Posted by: DM | April 6, 2009, 4:58 am 4:58 am

Same old tired rhetoric, only my beliefs can be the correct ones. The more than 4 billion people that think differently must be enlightened to my way of thinking at all costs. There’s a word for a group of people that band together and refuse to acknowledge the existence of reality, it’s a cult. Do you really think your maniacal rants have any impact other than people wondering which asylum may be getting a new resident soon? When the time comes for your so-called eternal reckoning, prove that it won’t be Mara and his forces instead of your adversary Satan. Or it could be one of the dozens of religious demonic forces from beliefs around the world. Or, it could be that when a person dies nothing beyond decomposing in the ground occurs. You be sure to enjoy tithing your 15% every week to make sure that the churches have enough money in the kitty to continue paying off the frequent multi-million dollar child molestation charges and I’ll make sure to keep enjoying the spectacle of the sheep following these “spiritual leaders”.

Posted by: Kevin | April 6, 2009, 5:28 am 5:28 am

Kevin: If we are a cult we have the best leader in the world! His name is Jesus Christ! He is the son of the one and only living God! Christianity has been in existance for over 2000 years! We also have millions of members in our churches and, in spite of what you might think or what you might have heard, we are growing every day! That, for your information is the impact that we are having! That is SOME CULT!
And another thing, you don’t even know how much the traditional tithe is! It’s ten per cent not fifteen! Whatever we give more than ten per cent is an offerring to the Lord and is voluntary!
Also in spite of what you say not every church or minister has been involved in child molestation. Mine has not! My church is pentecostal and is not an organized church in the sense that Catholic, Presbyterian, etc are organized churches. The tithes that are paid to my church stay in my community and in my church. They are spent for the utility bills and the upkeep of my church building and to help the needy in my community. My pastor is paid a set salary every month. Our church treasurer writes him a check every month. I know this to be a fact because once a year my church has a business meeting and all of the members are invited to attend. The treasurer then gives an account of all of the church expenses during the past year.
That all said, there is one more thing that I want to ask you. When you are on your death bed and dying are you sure you want to die thinking that there is no life beyond death? And another thing there is no guarantee that you will even have a “death bed”. It is possible that you might die suddenly in an accident or with a heart attack. Wouldn’t you rather know where you are going?
I know where I’m going after death. I will be living in the holy city New Jerusalem that John saw in Revelation chapter 21 and I will be living in one of the places that Jesus promised to those who love him in John chapter 14 verse 3. I will also be with the Lord and my parents and loved ones who have gone before me. Can you say that about yourself?

Posted by: DM | April 6, 2009, 7:18 am 7:18 am

So now you have that gall to assume that everyone that believes differently than you do is going to regret that choice and change their mind at the last minute. Oh, my beliefs in either a unseen being or the lack of an unseen being have been wrong all these years, if only I’d listened to DM on the internet blog all would be right with the world. Get over yourself, reality says that somewhere in the neighborhood of 70% of the worlds’ population disagrees with you, and you don’t have the facts or the right to call their choice incorrect. Each and every year the percentage of people claiming Christianity as their faith decreases as a part of the world’s total population and that trend will continue. Increasing numbers doesn’t equal increasing influence.
The one thing that you are right on, I have no clue how much the standard tithe is because I believe that any amount over 0% is a waste of money. I have 100% knowledge of what will happen after my death. Doctors will harvest whatever organs are usable, and then the carcass will be thrown in an oven and turned to broil. End of story.
You might as well try spreading your message in a supermarket parking lot, you’d have better luck there than your feeble attempts to convince me that your beliefs are the only ones that have a right to exist. The various cultures of the world have every right to their own beliefs, many of which are much older with greater numbers of followers than the 2000 years of your faith.

Posted by: Kevin | April 6, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Kevin: I do have the facts! All the facts I need! They are all in the Holy Bible! That, along with the United States constitution, is what gives me the right to disagree with all of the other so-called religions in the world! If they don’t believe that there is just one God, the Lord God Jehovah, they are wrong! They are a false religion and I don’t care how long they’ve been in existance! I am also going to tell you that I feel sorry for you because when you are facing death you are going to be absolutely terrified because you will know that you are not ready to die! One thing that I know is that when I die I won’t be afraid because, although my body will go back to dust, my soul and spirit will go back to God who gave them and I will live on forever in Heaven (the holy city New Jerusalem that I told you about). You don’t have that assurance and you are so spiritually blind that you don’t realize what a horrible fate that you are facing! I know that you don’t believe it but after death your spirit will live on in one of two places, heaven or hell. Since heaven is reserved for the saints of God and for those who love Him and you don’t love Him and don’t believe in Him, you know the only alternative if you don’t change! I want you to know that God loves you even though you don’t believe in Him. I know you don’t want it but I will be praying for you anyway!

Posted by: DM | April 7, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am

hey sarah
how about a redo of the
2000 presidential election?
d m r

Posted by: dennis m r | April 17, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Since you’re referencing the constitution, let’s look what the document actually says. The wording of the constitution gives YOU the right to YOUR own beliefs and freedoms, nowhere in the wording does it give you the right to deny the rights and beliefs of other people. And, if you remember your third grade history, the constitution only applies to people that are United States citizens. That leaves 95% of the remainder of the world to their own accord.
You can attempt feebly to deny the existence of other religions, but it’s leading you down a path of ignorance and insanity. You’re in the minority of the world population and no matter how loudly you attempt to scream that “I must be the only one that’s correct”, you’re not. Everyone has their own belief system, whether it’s in the belief of a higher power or the lack of such, and no one is absolutely correct in their beliefs.
Go ahead and stick with your insistence on a dwindling belief system if it’s what enables you to make it through another day. That is 100% your choice and unlike you, I believe that everyone is entitled to their own choice. However, to infer that other people can’t be comfortable or educated about the choice that they’ve made frankly makes you just another of the idiots of the world. Don’t waste your time “praying for” me to a fictional character I have no belief in and I won’t inconvenience you with actual scientific principles supported by facts rather than myths.

Posted by: Kevin | April 30, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.